Unassociated Document
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-KSB/A No. 1

x
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 
For the fiscal year ended October 31, 2005

o
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 
 
For the transition period from _____________ to _____________

Commission file number: 000-27667

Metalline Mining Company
(Name of small business issuer in its charter)

Nevada
91-1766677
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
(IRS Employer Identification No.)
   
1330 E. Margaret Ave.
Coeur d'Alene, ID 83815
(Address of principal executive offices, Zip Code)

Issuer's telephone number: (208) 665-2002

Securities registered under Section 12 (b) of the Exchange Act: None

Securities registered under Section 12 (g) of the Exchange Act:

Common Stock
(Title of class)

Check whether the issuer is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act. o
 
Check whether the issuer (1) filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act during the past 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes x  No o 

Check if there is no disclosure of delinquent filers in response to Item 405 of Regulation S-B contained in this form, and no disclosure will be contained, to the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-KSB or any amendment to this Form 10-KSB. x
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yes o  No x
State issuer's revenues for its most recent fiscal year. None.
The aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates computed by reference to the price at which the common equity was sold, as of May 17, 2006 was $133,012,323.

The number of shares of common stock outstanding as of May 17, 2006 was 34,105,724.
Transitional Small Business Disclosure Format (Check one): Yes o  No x
 
METALLINE MINING COMPANY ANNUAL REPORT
ON FORM 10-KSB FOR THE FISCAL YEAR
ENDED OCTOBER 31, 2005

Page
   
i
   
 
1
7
9
9
   
 
10
11
11
12
12
12
   
 
12
14
15
17
17
17
   
18
   
F/S-i
   
E-1




METALLINE MINING COMPANY ANNUAL REPORT
ON FORM 10-KSB FOR THE FISCAL YEAR
ENDED OCTOBER 31, 2005


FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This annual report on Form 10-KSB contains forward-looking statements regarding future events and Metalline Mining Company's (the "Company's") future results that are subject to the safe harbors created under the Securities Act of 1933 (the "Securities Act") and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act"). These statements are based on current expectations, estimates, forecasts, and projections about the industry in which the Company operates and the beliefs and assumptions of the Company's management. Words such as "expects," "anticipates," "targets," "goals," "projects," "intends," "plans," "believes," "seeks," "estimates," "continues," "may," variations of such words, and similar expressions are intended to identify such forward-looking statements. In addition, any statements that refer to projections of the Company's future financial performance, the Company's anticipated growth and potentials in its business, and other characterizations of future events or circumstances are forward-looking statements. Readers are cautioned that these forward-looking statements are only predictions and are subject to risks, uncertainties, and assumptions that are difficult to predict, including those identified elsewhere herein, including under "Risk Factors." Therefore, actual results may differ materially and adversely from those expressed in any forward-looking statements. The Company undertakes no obligation to revise or update any forward-looking statements for any reason.
 
-i-
METALLINE MINING COMPANY ANNUAL REPORT
ON FORM 10-KSB FOR THE FISCAL YEAR
ENDED OCTOBER 31, 2005

PART I

ITEM 1. DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS.

Overview

Metalline Mining Company (the "Company") is an exploration stage enterprise, formed under the laws of the state of Nevada on August 20, 1993, to engage in the business of mining. The Company currently owns eight concessions, which are located in the municipality of Sierra Mojada, Coahuila, Mexico. The Company's objective is to define sufficient mineral reserves on the Property to justify the development of a mechanized mining operation (the "Project"). The Company conducts its operations in Mexico through its wholly owned Mexican subsidiary, Minera Metalin S.A. de C.V. The Company currently has a total of five employees, including four full-time employees.

Mining operations are typically developed in phases. These phases include: 1) exploring to identify available mineral deposits and define a resource; 2) conducting a feasibility study to determine whether deposits may be profitably extracted; and 3) eventually developing mining operations. The Company has already conducted extensive exploration and identification of the mineralization located on the concessions that it possesses in the Sierra Mojada mining district, or the District. The Company has also initiated a feasibility study. If the results of the feasibility study are positive and the Company is able to secure sufficient financing, then the Company would proceed to the development stage, leading eventually to the operation of a mine on the concessions.

Thus far, the Company has spent a total of approximately $13 million during the exploration phase and continues to maintain a sampling and drilling program that is budgeted at approximately $50,000 per month, not including analytical costs, which can vary from $20,000 to $40,000 per month. The Company estimates that completion of a feasibility study will cost approximately $5 million and the Company expects that it will take approximately 12 months to complete. Following the completion of a successful feasibility study, the Company would then proceed to the construction phase, which would entail construction of a mine and related infrastructure pursuant to a mine plan developed specifically for the Company's concessions, and construction of an extraction plant to extract metal from the ore that would be mined.

Much of the infrastructure required for a mine, including access to roads, electricity and rail lines, is already in place due to the historical mining operations conducted in the District. Results from mapping, sampling, drilling and inspection of existing workings indicate that large mineralized resources can be developed within and adjacent to the existing workings and in unexplored stratigraphic units outside of and below the existing mine workings. The Company anticipates that it would also build additional infrastructure, including mine access, a tailings pond and an extraction plant. The Company would also enter into agreements with the landowners of the concessions' surface rights upon completion of a feasibility study and finalization of a mine plan for the Project. The Company estimates that construction of a mine and extraction plant would cost approximately $400 million and take approximately two to three years to complete.

A description of work completed in the exploration phase and initiated in the feasibility phase follows:

In 1997 the Company initiated exploration of the concessions by collecting and analyzing historical data from previous mining operations, surveying the locations of the mines, geological mapping, and sampling of the surface and some of the existing mines. Based on the information gained from this work, the Company has been exploring the tabular, nearly horizontal bodies of mineralized material located on the concessions that are known as mantos.
 
-1-
Exploration from 1997 to 1999 concentrated on the polymetallic copper, silver, zinc, lead mineralization north of the Sierra Mojada Fault. The Veta Rica, Once, San Jose and other mines located in the western part of the district were mapped and channel sampled. In the eastern part of the District in the Encantada and Fronteriza mines, copper, silver, zinc, lead mineralization has been mapped, channel sampled and drilled and is known as the Polymetallic Manto. Work on the polymetallic mineralization was put on standby in 1999 when the Company recognized the potential of the oxide zinc mineralization as a result of a positive feasibility study conducted on the Skorpion Mine located in Namibia, Africa, that demonstrated that the use of the solvent extraction electrowinning ("SXEW) process could make it profitable to mine oxide zinc deposits that would otherwise be unfeasible. Now that the Company's work on the oxide zinc mineralization is in the feasibility study stage, the Company anticipates continued exploration of the polymetallic mineral system north of the Sierra Mojada Fault. However, the Company has not yet allocated financial resources nor established a timeline for when it expects to initiate such additional exploration.

In September 1999, the Company entered into a joint venture agreement with North Ltd. of Australia. North Ltd. conducted a surface reverse circulation drill program that drilled 26 holes to explore the oxide zinc mineralization south of the Sierra Mojada Fault. North Ltd. was purchased by Rio Tinto for its iron ore holdings and in October 2000 Rio Tinto terminated the joint venture with the Company. Rio Tinto did not retain an interest in the Sierra Mojada concessions.

In November 2001, the Company entered into a joint venture agreement with Servios Industriales Penoles ("Penoles"), Mexico's second largest mining company. Penoles conducted exploration of the oxide zinc mineralization that included: channel sampling; driving raises vertically through the mineralized mantos; and surface and underground drilling. In November 2003, Penoles and the Company terminated their joint venture agreement by mutual consent. Penoles did not retain an interest in the concessions.

The Company initiated a diamond drill program in January 2004, and drilled over 30,000 meters in 2004 and 2005. In addition, over 9,000 meters of percussion drill and over 12,000 meters of channel samples of the oxide zinc mineralization in the San Salvador, Encantada and Fronteriza mines has been completed by the Company and its joint venture partners. This work has defined a body of oxide zinc mineralization extending 1,500 meters in an east-west direction, 100 to 200 meters in a north-south direction, and 20 to 100 meters vertically. The Company intends to continue the drill program into the Esmeralda mine, the next mine to the west of the San Salvador, to further define the extent of the Iron Oxide Manto and the Smithsonite Manto.

Prior mining of oxide zinc mineralization has occurred intermittently over a distance in excess of 5 kilometers from the Oriental Mine located in the east end of the District to the Vasquez Tres Mine located in the west end of the District. Holes drilled 2,000 meters west of the San Salvador Mine intersected oxide zinc mineralization that is up to 140 meters (460 feet) thick and 10 meters (33 feet) below the surface. Drilling has also intersected oxide zinc mineralization intermittently over the 2,000 meters between the Fronteriza mine and the Oriental mine.

In 2004, the Company retained Reserva International, LLC, an independent contractor specializing in resource evaluation, to generate a block model evaluation based upon the data compiled from the Company's and its joint venture partner's accumulated database to determine the size and grade of the mineralization of the Iron Oxide Manto and the Smithsonite Manto. Based on the estimates generated from the block model evaluation, the Company has determined that the estimated mineralization justifies a feasibility study of the Iron Oxide Manto.

Although the Company is of the opinion that sufficient mineralized material has been defined to justify construction of a mine, extraction plant and refinery, the Company still must complete a feasibility study to determine whether a mining operation may be profitably conducted. This study will consist of a detailed engineering and economic valuation of the Iron Oxide Manto mineralized material to determine the viability and profitability of the potential operation.

The Company initiated the feasibility study in 2004, retaining Green Team Consultants Internation cc ("GTI"), of Johannesburg, South Africa. GTI was selected, in part, due to GTI's experience conducting the feasibility study for the Skorpion Mine in Namibia, Africa. GTI supervised the design, construction and training of the Skorpion Zinc personnel, and operated the mine and extraction plant through initial production and until the mine and plant were 90% of capacity, at which point operation of the mine and plant was turned over to Skorpion Zinc, a subsidiary of Anglo American Corporation PLC.
 
-2-
The Skorpion Mine is the first, and to date only, mine in the world using the SXEW process for extracting zinc from oxide zinc ore and produces a refined product, Super High Grade zinc which is 99.995% zinc. SXEW is a hydrometallurgical process that has about a 30% lower cost for extracting zinc than the pyrometallurgical process used at smelters by essentially all other mining operations around the world. The Company anticipates that using the SXEW process will enable the Company to extract zinc more efficiently and economically than its competitors.

GTI, as general contractor for the feasibility study, has retained TWP Consulting (pty) Ltd. ("TWP") to prepare the mine plan as part of the feasibility study for the Project. TWP is a large South African mining consulting company that has worked on large mining projects in South Africa and internationally, including the mine plan at the Skorpion Mine.

GTI has also retained Min-Tek, a South African consulting company specializing in mineral and metallurgical research and development, to complete the metallurgical work for the Project. Min-Tek performed the metallurgical work for the Skorpion feasibility studies.

GTI has also retained SRK Consulting ("SRK") as the auditing engineering firm for the feasibility study. SRK is a world-wide engineering consulting company that was the auditing engineering firm for the feasibility study of the Skorpion Mine.

Principals of GTI, TWP and SRK have completed a tour and examination of the Sierra Mojada Property, reviewed the project data, conducted underground examination of the Iron Oxide, Smithsonite and Polymetallic Mantos, and selected surface locations for the mine and extraction plant facilities.

On July 12, 2005, the Company released the results of Mint-Tek's metallurgical test work. The test work focused on demonstrating the viability of using a combination of dense media separation ("DMS") and flotation processes to successfully produce a zinc oxide concentrate from a variety of samples taken from the Sierra Mojada mineralization. The report included a conceptual block flow diagram showing the key DMS and flotation steps followed by conventional zinc refining using leach, solvent extraction and electrowinning. The Company believes that the ability to produce a concentrate which can be shipped economically would be a major contributing factor to the potential success of the Project because it would allow the Company to choose the best site for a refinery based upon the tax regime, cost of power and other capital and operating cost inputs available at various locations. In addition, the report noted that acid-consuming mineral such as limestone and dolomite would be discarded in the concentration process, which would reduce sulphuric acid consumption in the refinery process.

Min-Tek's test work of the Sierra Mojada samples indicated that a zinc oxide concentrate with a zinc content of 30% can be produced at an overall concentrator zinc recovery of 75%-80%. The concentrate produced responded well to atmospheric leaching with dilute sulphuric acid, and refinery leach extraction efficiency was above 98%. The concentrator operating cost is expected to be approximately $5-$8 per ton of ore treated, which is offset by the fact that the sulphuric acid consumption in the refinery leach step is expected to be 70% less than that achievable with direct leaching of the ore.

The Company expects to continue to optimize the concentrating process route by conducting further test work to confirm key aspects of the flowsheet and to enhance overall recovery and concentrate grade. In particular, the incorporation of cleaner and scavenger steps in the flotation circuit and the potential to recover zinc from slimes produced in the process (currently considered to be discarded) provides further upside potential.

Feasibility study work continues to determine the mining method and its related costs and to determine the production rate. Drilling continues to explore the Iron Oxide Manto mineralization to the west in the San Salvador and La Esmeralda mines. In addition, surveying, mapping and channel sampling is being conducted in the La Esmeralda mine to determine the location of historic workings. No historic data is available for the La Esmeralda mine, which produced ore from the Lead Manto south of the Sierra Mojada Fault and the copper, silver, polymetallic mineralization north of the Sierra Mojada Fault. The Company expects that the decline to access the Iron Oxide Manto mineralization will enter through ground upon which La Esmeralda is located, and the location of the existing workings must be determined as part of the mine plan for the feasibility study. Channel samples in these workings have been collected and have produced a few thousand samples of mineralized material, which consist of north side copper-silver mineralization and south side oxide zinc mineralization. These samples have been prepared for assay and results will be announced when available.
 
-3-
The Company has had a mining operation in the Smithsonite Manto that has been shipping zinc carbonate ore to Cameron Chemical Company, for use as a micronutrient for the fertilizer industry. During the period ended October 31, 2005, the Company realized other income from the sale of the zinc carbonate ore. The Company has ceased mining zinc carbonate ore, but anticipates continued sales from the existing inventory of mined ore until the inventory is depleted.

Cautionary Note

The Company is an exploration stage company and does not currently have any known reserves and cannot be expected to have reserves unless and until a feasibility study is completed for the Sierra Mojada concessions that shows proven and probable reserves. There can be no assurance that the Company's concessions contain proven and probable reserves and investors may lose their entire investment in the Company.

Set forth below and elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB and in other documents we file with the Securities and Exchange Commission are risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from the results contemplated by the forward-looking statements contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB.

Risk Factors

Exploration stage mining company with no history of operation.

The Company is in its exploration stage, has no operating history, and is subject to all the risks inherent in a new business enterprise. The likelihood of success of the Company must be considered in light of the problems, expenses, difficulties, complication, and delays frequently encountered in connection with a new business, and the competitive and regulatory environment in which the Company will operate.

No commercially mineable ore body.
No commercially mineable ore body has been delineated on the properties, nor have any reserves been identified. The Company is an exploration stage company and does not currently have any known reserves and cannot be expected to have reserves unless and until a feasibility study is completed for the Sierra Mojada concessions that shows proven and probable reserves. There can be no assurance that the Company's concessions will ever contain reserves and investors may lose their entire investment in the Company.
Risks inherent in the mining industry.
The Company is subject to all of the risks inherent in the mining industry including, without limitation, the following:

·  
competition from a large number of companies, many of which are significantly larger than the Company, in the acquisition, exploration, and development of mining properties;
·  
the concession holder must pay fees and perform labor on the concessions to maintain the concessions title;
·  
exploration for minerals is highly speculative and involves substantial risks, even when conducted on properties known to contain significant quantities of mineralization, and most exploration projects do not result in the discovery of commercially mineable deposits of ore;
·  
the probability of an individual prospect ever having reserves that meet the requirements of Securities Act Industry Guide 7 is extremely remote, and in all probability the properties do not contain any reserves, and any funds spent on exploration will probably be lost;
·  
operations are subject to a variety of existing laws and regulations relating to exploration and development, permitting procedures, safety precautions, property reclamation, employee health and safety, air quality standards, pollution and other environmental protection controls;
·  
a large number of factors beyond the control of the Company, including fluctuations in metal prices, inflation, and other economic conditions, will affect the economic feasibility of mining;
·  
mining activities are subject to substantial operating hazards some of which are not insurable or may not be insured due to economic considerations; and
·  
the availability of water, which is essential to milling operations.
-4-
Nature of the industry.

Exploration, development, and mining of mineral properties is highly speculative and involves unique and greater risks than are generally associated with other businesses. The Company's operations will be subject to all the operating hazards and risks normally incident to the exploration, development, and mining of mineral properties, including risks enumerated above and below.

Fluctuating price for metals.

The Company's operations will be greatly influenced by the prices of silver, copper, lead, zinc, and other metals. These prices fluctuate widely and are affected by numerous factors beyond the Company's control, including expectations for inflation, the strength of the United States dollar, global and regional demand and political and economic conditions and production costs in major metal producing regions of the world.

Mining concessions.

The Company holds mining concessions in Mexico. The Company holds title to the concessions that it owns subject to its obligation to maintain the concessions by conducting work on the concessions, recording evidence of the work with the Mexican Ministry of Mines and paying a semi-annual fee to the Mexican government. Ownership of the concessions provides the Company with exclusive exploration and exploitation rights of all minerals located on the concessions, but does not include the surface rights to the real property. Therefore, the Company will need to negotiate the necessary agreements, as needed, with the appropriate surface landowners if the Company determines that a mining operation is feasible for the concessions. The Company currently anticipates that it will build mining infrastructure needed on land owned by the local municipality. Initial communications with the municipality officials indicate that they will be willing to negotiate the necessary agreements, but there can be no assurance that an agreement that is satisfactory to the Company will be reached.

Environmental controls.

Compliance with statutory environmental quality requirements may necessitate significant capital outlays, may materially affect the earning power of the Company, or may cause material changes in the Company's intended activities. No assurance can be given that environmental standards imposed by either federal or state governments will not be changed or become more stringent, thereby possibly materially adversely affecting the proposed activities of the Company.

Governmental regulation and environmental controls.

The Company's activities are subject to extensive Mexican laws and regulations controlling not only the exploration for and development of mineral properties, but also the possible effect of such activities upon the environment. In its mining operations, the Company will use certain equipment, which will subject the Company to Mexican safety and health regulations. While the Company intends to act in compliance with all such regulations, any adverse ruling under any regulations, any imposition of a fine, or any imposition of more stringent regulations could require the Company to make additional capital expenditures that could impair its operations.

Availability of water; shortages of supplies and materials.

Water is essential in all phases of the exploration and development of mineral properties. It is used in such processes as exploration, drilling, leaching, placer mining, dredging, testing, and hydraulic mining. Any water that may be found will be subject to acquisition pursuant to appropriate governing laws. The Company has not determined the availability of water at Sierra Mojada, except to note that adequate water supplies are generally developed by drilling, but has not determined the cost of acquisition. Both the lack of available water and the cost of acquisition may make an otherwise viable project economically impossible to complete. The mineral industry has experienced from time to time shortages of certain supplies and materials necessary in the exploration for and evaluation of mineral deposits. The prices at which such supplies and materials are available have also greatly increased. There is a possibility that planned operations may be subject to delays due to such shortages and that further price escalations will increase the costs of the Company.
 
-5-
Uninsured risks.

The Company may not be insured against all losses or liabilities, which may arise from operations, either because such insurance is unavailable or because the Company has elected not to purchase such insurance due to high premium costs or other reasons.

Need for subsequent funding.

The Company has an immediate need for additional funds in order to finance its proposed business operations. The Company's continued operations therefore will depend upon the availability of cash flow, if any, from its operations or its ability to raise additional funds through equity or debt financing. There is no assurance that the Company will be able to obtain additional funding when needed, or that such funding, if available, can be obtained on terms acceptable to the Company. If the Company cannot obtain needed funds, it may be forced to curtail or cease its activities.

Need for additional key personnel.

At the present, the Company employs four full-time and one part-time employee. The success of the Company's proposed business will depend, in part, upon the ability to attract and retain qualified employees. The Company believes that it will be able to attract competent employees, but no assurance can be given that the Company will be successful in this regard. If the Company is unable to engage and retain the necessary personnel, its business would be materially and adversely affected.

Reliance upon directors and officers.

The Company is wholly dependent, at the present, upon the personal efforts and abilities of its officers and directors who will exercise control over the day to day affairs of the Company. While the Company may solicit business through its officers, there can be no assurance as to the volume of business, if any, which the Company may succeed in obtaining, nor that its proposed operations will prove to be profitable. As of the date hereof, the Company does not have any commitments regarding its proposed operations and there can be no assurance that any commitments will be forthcoming.

Non-arms' length transaction.

The number of shares of common stock issued to certain shareholders of the Company for cash was arbitrarily determined and may not be considered the product of arm's length transactions.

Indemnification of officers and directors for securities liabilities.

The Bylaws of the Company provide that the Company may indemnify any director, officer, agent, and/or employee as to those liabilities and on those terms and conditions as are specified in the Nevada Business Corporation Act. Further, the Company may purchase and maintain insurance on behalf of any such persons whether or not the corporation would have the power to indemnify such person against the liability insured against. The foregoing could result in substantial expenditures by the Company and prevent any recovery from such officers, directors, agents, and employees for losses incurred by the Company as a result of their actions. Further, the Company has been advised that in the opinion of the Securities and Exchange Commission, indemnification is against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and is, therefore, unenforceable.
 
-6-
Competition.

The Company believes that it will have competitors and potential competitors, many of whom may have considerably greater financial and other resources than the Company.

Public market for securities.

At present, the Company's common stock is traded under the symbol MMGG on the OTC Bulletin Board operated by the National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc. This market is a thinly traded market and lacks the liquidity of other public markets with which some investors may have more experience.

Cumulative voting, preemptive rights and control.

There are no preemptive rights in connection with the Company's common stock. The Company's shareholders may be further diluted in their percentage ownership of the Company in the event additional shares are issued by the Company in the future. Cumulative voting in the election of directors is not provided for. Accordingly, the holders of a majority of the shares of common stock, present in person or by proxy, will be able to elect all of the Company's Board of Directors.

Sales of Unregistered Securities

The Company has financed its obligations to date by selling shares of its common stock in transactions that have not been registered under the Securities Act or registered or qualified under any applicable state or foreign securities laws. The Company has attempted to limit its sales to accredited investors in compliance with the exemptions from registration provided by the Securities Act and various state securities laws for private placement transactions. There can be no assurance, however, that the Company's sales will be deemed to be exempt by securities regulators. The Company is currently reviewing its sales of unregistered securities to determine whether these sales have complied with the appropriate exemptions for the states in which the Company has sold securities. A finding that the Company is liable for damages for past securities sales could have a material adverse effect on the Company.

Lack of Formal Market Study

The Company has not requisitioned a formal marketing study by an independent marketing organization to evaluate the demand for mineral resources that the Company intends to develop. The Company has conducted in-house evaluation of market factors to support its assessment of the mining industry and the demand for zinc, but there can be no assurance that there is sufficient demand to support the development of the Project and the sale of zinc or other metals that the Company may mine as part of the Project.
 
No dividends anticipated.

At the present time the Company does not anticipate paying dividends, cash or otherwise, on its common stock in the foreseeable future. Future dividends will depend on earnings, if any, of the Company, its financial requirements and other factors. There can be no assurance that the Company will pay dividends.

ITEM 2.  DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY.

The Company owns the following eight mining concessions, including the buildings and equipment located thereon:

Concession
  
Title No.
  
Hectares
  
           
Sierra Mojada
    
198513
    
4,767.3154
  
Mojada 3
    
199246
    
1,689.2173
  
Esmeralda
   
188765
    
117.5025
  
Esmeralda 1
    
187776
    
97.6839
  
Unificación Mineros Nortenos
    
169343
    
336.7905
  
La Blanca
    
188326
    
33.5044
  
Fortuna
    
160461
    
13.9582
  
Vulcano
    
83507
    
4.4904
  
Total
          
7,060.4626
  

The eight concessions total 7,060 hectares (17,445 acres). The Company owns 100% of the eight concessions pursuant to purchase agreements with the previous owners. A number of prior established concessions that are not owned by the Company are located within the largest concession, the Sierra Mojada concession. The Company holds title to the concessions that it owns subject to its obligation to maintain the concessions by conducting work on the concessions, recording evidence of the work with the Mexican Ministry of Mines and paying a semi-annual fee to the Mexican government.

Ownership of a concession provides the owner with exclusive exploration and exploitation rights of all minerals located on the concessions, but does not include the surface rights to the real property. Therefore, the Company will need to negotiate the necessary agreements, as needed, with the appropriate surface landowners if the Company determines that a mining operation is feasible for the concessions. The Company currently anticipates that it will build mining infrastructure needed on land owned by the local municipality. Initial communications with the municipality officials indicate that they will be willing to negotiate the necessary agreements.
 
-7-
The concessions are located within a mining district known as the Sierra Mojada District (the "District"). The District is located in the west central part of the state of Coahuila, Mexico, near the Coahuila-Chihuahua state border approximately 200 kilometers south of the Big Bend of the Rio Grande River. See Exhibit 99.1 attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference for a map showing the location of the mine. The principal mining area extends for some 5 kilometers in an east-west direction along the base of the precipitous, 1,000 meter high, Sierra Mojada Range. The District has high voltage electric power supplied by the national power company, Comision Federal de Electricidad, C.F.E. and is supplied water by the municipality of Sierra Mojada. The District is accessible from Torreon by vehicle via 250 kilometers of paved road. There is a well maintained, 1,100 meter, gravel airstrip in the District as well as a railroad connecting with the National Railway at Escalon and Monclova.

Over 45 mines have produced ore from underground workings throughout the approximately five kilometer by two kilometer area that comprises the District. The Company estimates that since its discovery in 1879, the District has produced about 10 million tons of high grade ore that was shipped directly to smelters. The District has never had a mill to concentrate ore and all mining conducted thus far has been limited to selectively mined ore of sufficient grade to direct ship to smelters. The Company believes that mill grade mineralization that was not mined remains available for extraction. The Company anticipates exploring and potentially developing the mill grade mineralization and the unexplored portions of the concessions.

The concessions contain two distinct mineral systems separated by the Sierra Mojada Fault which trends east-west along the base of the range. North of the fault mineralization composed of silver, copper, zinc, lead sulfide and oxide minerals. South of the fault the mineralization is oxide zinc and oxide lead minerals.

The sediments in the District are predominantly limestone and dolomite with some conglomerate, sandstone and shale and the bedding attitudes are near horizontal. The mines are dry and the rocks are competent. The thickness and attitude of the mineralized material is amenable to high volume mechanized mining methods and low cost production.

Much of the infrastructure required for a mine, including access to roads, electricity and rail lines, is already in place due to the historical mining operations conducted in the District. Results from mapping, sampling, drilling and inspection of existing workings indicate that large mineralized resources can be developed within and adjacent to the existing workings and in unexplored stratigraphic units outside of and below the existing mine workings. The Company anticipates that it would also build additional infrastructure, including mine access, a tailings pond and an extraction plant. The Company would also enter into agreements with the landowners of the concessions' surface rights upon completion of a feasibility study and finalization of a mine plan for the Project. The Company estimates that construction of a mine and extraction plant would cost approximately $400 million and take approximately two to three years to complete. The Company intends to finance this cost with a combination of equity and debt. In addition the Company may seek joint venture partners or other alternative financing sources as necessary to complete development of the Project.

The Company's corporate offices are located at 1330 East Margaret Avenue, Coeur d'Alene, Idaho 83815, and its telephone number is (208) 665-2002 and FAX is (208) 665-0041. The Company's facilities in Mexico include offices, residences, shops, warehouse buildings and mining equipment located at Calle Maria #1, La Esmeralda, Coahuila, Mexico. The Company's telephone and FAX number in Mexico is 52 872 761 5129. Electric power has been upgraded to 13,200 volts and lines run to the compound, the shops and the San Salvador and Encantada mines. The San Salvador and the Encantada mines have been electrified and the main levels are wired. San Salvador and Encantada head frames and hoists have been rebuilt and upgraded. In management's opinion, the Company's properties may not be adequately covered by insurance. The Company has chosen not to obtain such insurance for the Company's properties in Mexico because it would be difficult to obtain and the cost of such insurance would outweigh its value. In management's opinion, the Company's plant and equipment are in good condition and well maintained.
 
-8-
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS.

The Company is not currently a party to any legal proceedings.

ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS.

There were no matters submitted to a vote of security holders during the fourth quarter of the fiscal year covered by this report.
 
-9-
PART II

ITEM 5. MARKET FOR COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS.

The Company's shares are traded on the Over-the-Counter Bulletin Board operated by the National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc. under the trading symbol "MMGG." The Company's shares began trading on November 19, 1996. A summary of trading by quarter for 2005, 2004, and 2003 follows:

Fiscal Quarter
  
High Bid(1)
  
Low Bid(1)
  
           
2005
          
Fourth Quarter
    
1.25
    
0.84
  
Third Quarter
    
1.45
    
0.90
  
Second Quarter
    
2.09
    
1.35
  
First Quarter
    
2.31
    
1.55
  
               
2004
              
Fourth Quarter
    
2.10
    
1.57
  
Third Quarter
    
3.25
    
1.64
  
Second Quarter
    
2.45
    
1.75
  
First Quarter
    
3.21
    
1.60
  
               
2003
              
Fourth Quarter
    
2.00
    
1.18
  
Third Quarter
    
1.35
    
1.10
  
Second Quarter
    
1.40
    
1.01
  
First Quarter
    
1.45
    
1.20
  
               
(1)
These quotations reflect inter-dealer prices, without retail markup, markdown, or commissions, and may not represent actual transactions.

As of October 31, 2005, the Company had approximately 300 holders of record of its common stock.

The Company has not paid any dividends since its inception and does not anticipate paying any dividends on its common stock in the foreseeable future.

During the year ended October 31, 2003, the Company sold 7,000 common stock units with an ascribed cash value of $10,500. The Company also sold 849,000 shares (without warrants) at an average price of $0.98 per share. The Company also issued 100,000 shares of common stock under the Penoles agreement for cash, at $2.00 per share (see Note 12). Additionally, 373,925 shares of common stock valued at $468,771 were issued as compensation for officers. These shares were issued in private placement transactions without registration under the Securities Act in reliance upon the exemptions from the registration requirements provided by Section 4(2) and Rule 506 of Regulation D under the Securities Act.

During the year ended October 31, 2004, the Company issued a total of 7,580,150 shares of common stock to accredited investors for cash at $1.00 per share, realizing $6,881,287 after private placement costs of $698,863. Additionally, 141,286 shares of common stock valued at an aggregate of $155,214 were issued for services and 120,655 shares of common stock valued at an aggregate of $152,271 were issued as compensation to officers. These shares were issued in private placement transactions without registration under the Securities Act in reliance upon the exemptions from the registration requirements provided by Section 4(2) and Rule 506 of Regulation D under the Securities Act.

During the year ended October 31, 2005, the Company issued 476,404 shares of common stock for cash at an average of $0.98 per share, for a total received of $466,729. In connection with the sale of these shares, for each share sold the Company also issued a warrant to purchase one additional share of common stock at an exercise price of $1.25 per share. In addition, 176,772 shares of common stock valued at an aggregate of $176,772 were issued as compensation to officers and employees. These securities were issued in private placement transactions without registration under the Securities Act in reliance upon the exemptions from the registration requirements provided by Section 4(2) and Rule 506 of Regulation D under the Securities Act.
 
-10-
ITEM 6. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OR PLAN OF OPERATION.

Plan of Operation

We are in the exploration stage and do not currently have any income from operating activities. The Company currently owns eight concessions that are located in the municipality of Sierra Mojada, Coahuila, Mexico. Our objective is to define sufficient mineral reserves on these concessions to justify the development of a mechanized mining operation (the "Project"). The Company conducts its operations in Mexico through its wholly owned Mexican subsidiary, Minera Metalin S.A. de C.V. At October 31, 2005, we had a working capital deficit of $35,526, minimal other capital resources available to meet obligations which normally can be expected to be incurred by similar companies. At October 31, 2005, we had a accumulated stockholder's equity of $4,782,760. At October 31, 2004 we had a working capital of $2,551,383, and a stockholder's equity of $7,441,419. Management must obtain additional financing to finance operations and invest in other business opportunities, however, no assurance can be given that we will be successful in obtaining additional financing or that other business opportunities will be found.

The Company’s primary focus for the years ended October 31, 2004 and 2005 was to explore the Sierra Mojada concession to identify available mineral deposits and define a resource. The Company’s plan of operation for the next 12 months is to conduct a feasibility study for the Company's Sierra Mojada Project to determine whether a mining operation may be profitably conducted on the Company's concessions. The study is expected to include a detailed engineering and economic valuation of the Iron Oxide Manto mineralized material with continued geologic mapping of the surface and underground workings, sampling and drilling to explore for additional mineralization, and compilation of the data into a computer data base for reserve calculation to determine whether a mining operation can be economically conducted on the Company's Sierra Mojada concessions. See "Description of Business."

In addition to the feasibility study, the Company’s commitments include the general overhead of business operations, such as salaries, travel expenses, property maintenance and the sampling and drilling program.  Thus far, the Company has spent a total of approximately $13.2 million during the exploration phase and continues to maintain the sampling and drilling program that is budgeted at approximately $50,000 per month, not including analytical costs which can vary from $20,000 to $40,000 per month. The Company estimates that completion of a feasibility study will cost approximately $5 million and the Company expects that it will take approximately 12 months to complete. Following the completion of a successful feasibility study, the Company would then proceed to the construction phase, which would entail construction of a mine and related infrastructure pursuant to a mine plan developed specifically for the Company's concessions, and construction of an extraction plant to extract metal from the ore that would be mined.  The Company estimates that construction of a mine and extraction plant would cost approximately $400 million and take approximately 2 to 3 years to complete. The Company intends to finance this cost with a combination of equity and debt. In addition the Company may seek joint venture partners or other alternative financing sources as necessary to complete development of the Project.

In order to finance the feasibility study and the business operations described above, the Company has raised capital by selling unregistered shares of its common stock as described below in “Liquidity and Capital Resources.”

Cautionary Note to Investors

The Company is an exploration stage company and does not currently have any known reserves and cannot be expected to have reserves unless and until a feasibility study is completed for the Sierra Mojada concessions that shows proven and probable reserves. There can be no assurance that the Company's concessions contain proven and probable reserves and investors may lose their entire investment in the Company. See “Risk Factors.”

Liquidity and Capital Resources. 

The Company financed its obligations during the fiscal year ended October 31, 2005 by the sale of 7,580,150 shares of its common stock during the previous fiscal year at an average price of $1.00 per share, less issuance costs of $698,863, and the sale of 476,404 shares of common stock during the year ended October 31, 2005 at an average price of $0.98 per share. During the three months ended January 31, 2006 the Company closed a private placement, which began during the fiscal year end October 31, 2005 on March 31, 2005. The Company issued a total of 13,945,636 shares of common stock at a price of $0.80 per share resulting in aggregate proceeds of $11,156,508.80. In connection with the sale of these shares, for each share sold, the Company also issued a warrant to purchase one additional share of common stock at an exercise price of $1.25 per share. The warrants are exercisable for a period of five years from their issuance.  

The Company anticipates that the funds that it has raised will be sufficient to maintain operations for the next twelve months through the year ending October 31, 2006. However, as of the year ended October 31, 2005 there can be no assurance that the Company has sufficient funds to complete the feasibility study. If the Company is unable to raise additional capital, it may have to cease operations. Due to the Company's lack of revenues, the Company's independent certified public accountants included a paragraph in the Company's 2005 financial statements relative to a going concern uncertainty.

Critical Accounting Policies

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make a variety of estimates and assumptions that affect (i) the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities as of the date of the financial statements and (ii) the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods covered by the financial statements.
 
Our management routinely makes judgments and estimates about the effect of matters that are inherently uncertain. As the number of variables and assumptions affecting the future resolution of the uncertainties increase, these judgments become even more subjective and complex. Although we believe that our estimates and assumptions are reasonable, actual results may differ significantly from these estimates. Changes in estimates and assumptions based upon actual results may have a material impact on our results of operation and/or financial condition. We have identified certain accounting policies that we believe are most important to the portrayal of our current financial condition and results of operations. Our significant accounting policies are disclosed in Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The Company's financial instruments as defined by Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 107, "Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments," include cash and cash equivalents, marketable securities, receivables, advances to employees, accounts payable and accrued expenses. All instruments are accounted for on a historical cost basis, which, due to the short maturity of these financial instruments, approximates fair value at October 31, 2005 and 2004.

Property Concessions
Costs of acquiring property concessions are capitalized by project area upon purchase or staking of the associated claims. Costs to maintain the property concessions and leases are expensed as incurred. When a property concession reaches the production stage, the related capitalized costs will be amortized, using the units of production method on the basis of periodic estimates of ore reserves. To date no concessions have reached production stage.
 
Property concessions are periodically assessed for impairment of value and any diminution in value is charged to operations at the time of impairment. Should a property concession be abandoned, its capitalized costs are charged to operations. The Company charges to operations the allocable portion of capitalized costs attributable to property concessions sold. Capitalized costs are allocated to property concessions abandoned or sold based on the proportion of claims abandoned or sold to the claims remaining within the project area.

Deferred tax assets and liabilities
The Company recognizes the expected future tax benefit from deferred tax assets when the tax benefit is considered to be more likely than not of being realized. Assessing the recoverability of deferred tax assets requires management to make significant estimates related to expectations of future taxable income. Estimates of future taxable income are based on forecasted cash flows and the application of existing tax laws in each jurisdiction. To the extent that future cash flows and taxable income differ significantly from estimates, the ability of the Company to realize deferred tax assets could be impacted. Additionally, future changes in tax laws in the jurisdictions in which the Company operates could limit the Company’s ability to obtain the future tax benefits.

Property and equipment
Property and equipment are stated at cost. Depreciation is provided using the straight-line or accelerated methods over the estimated useful lives of the assets. The useful lives of property, plant and equipment for purposes of computing depreciation are five to seven years for equipment, and 39 years for buildings.

The Company evaluates the recoverability of property and equipment when events and circumstances indicate that such assets might be impaired. The Company determines impairment by comparing the undiscounted future cash flows estimated to be generated by these assets to their respective carrying amounts. Maintenance and repairs are expensed as incurred. Replacements and betterments are capitalized. The cost and related reserves of assets sold or retired are removed from the accounts, and any resulting gain or loss is reflected in results of operations.

Accounting for Stock Options and Warrants Granted to Employees and Nonemployees
The Company currently reports stock issued to employees under the rules of SFAS No. 123 and therefore, the Company’s accounting for stock options and warrants are not effected by the issuance of SFAS No. 123R.

In December 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board revised SFAS No. 123 and issued SFAS No. 123R.

The warrants were valued using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. The assumptions used were as follows: volatility of 58%, a risk-free interest rate of 3% and an exercise term of five years.

The fair value of options was determined using the Black-Scholes option pricing model using a risk free interest rate of 3.25% and a volatility of 42.49%.

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets
We review the net carrying value of all facilities, including idle facilities, on a periodic basis. We estimate the net realizable value of each property based on the estimated undiscounted future cash flows that will be generated from operations at each property, the estimated salvage value of the surface plant and equipment and the value associated with property interests. These estimates of undiscounted future cash flows are dependent upon the estimates of metal to be recovered from proven and probable ore reserves and mineral resources expected to be converted into mineral reserves, future production cost estimates and future metals price estimates over the estimated remaining mine life. If undiscounted cash flows are less than the carrying value of a property, an impairment loss is recognized based upon the estimated expected future cash flows from the property discounted at an interest rate commensurate with the risk involved.
 
Environmental Matters
When it is probable that costs associated with environmental remediation obligations will be incurred and they are reasonably estimable, we accrue such costs at the most likely estimate. Accruals for estimated losses from environmental remediation obligations generally are recognized no later than completion of the remedial feasibility study for such facility and are charged to provisions for closed operations and environmental matters. We periodically review our accrued liabilities for such remediation costs as evidence becomes available indicating that our remediation liability has potentially changed. Costs of future expenditures for environmental remediation are not discounted to their present value unless subject to a contractually obligated fixed payment schedule. Such costs are based on our current estimate of amounts that are expected to be incurred when the remediation work is performed within current laws and regulations. Recoveries of environmental remediation costs from other parties are recorded as assets when their receipt is deemed probable.

Future remediation costs for inactive mines are accrued based on management’s best estimate at the end of each period of the undiscounted costs expected to be incurred. Such costs estimates include, where applicable, ongoing care, maintenance and monitoring costs. Changes in estimates are reflected in earnings in the period an estimate is revised.

 
Accounting for reclamation and remediation obligations requires management to make estimates unique to each mining operation of the future costs the Company will incur to complete the reclamation and remediation work required to comply with existing laws and regulations. Actual costs incurred in future periods could differ from amounts estimated. Additionally, future changes to environmental laws and regulations could increase the extent of reclamation and remediation work required. Any such increases in future costs could materially impact the amounts charged to earnings. At October 31, 2005 the Company has no accrual for reclamation and remediation obligations because management cannot make a reasonable estimate. Any reclamation or remediation costs related to abandoned concessions has been previously expensed.
 
Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In May 2005, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 154 ("SFAS No. 154"), "Accounting Changes and Error Corrections." This statement requires entities that voluntarily make a change in accounting principle to apply that change retrospectively to prior periods' financial statements, unless this would be impracticable. SFAS No. 154 supersedes APB Opinion No. 20, "Accounting Changes," which previously required that most voluntary changes in accounting principle be recognized by including in the current period's net income the cumulative effect of changing to the new accounting principle. SFAS No. 154 also makes a distinction between "retrospective application" of an accounting principle and the "restatement" of financial statements to reflect the correction of an error. SFAS No. 154 applies to accounting changes and error corrections that are made in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2005. Management believes the adoption of this statement will not have an immediate material impact on the financial statements of the Company.

In March 2005, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued FASB Interpretation No. 47 ("FIN 47"), "Accounting for Conditional Asset Retirement Obligations." FIN 47 clarifies that the term "conditional asset retirement obligation," which as used in SFAS No. 143, "Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations," refers to a legal obligation to perform an asset retirement activity in which the timing and (or) method of settlement are conditional on a future event that may or may not be within the control of the entity. The entity must record a liability for a "conditional" asset retirement obligation if the fair value of the obligation can be reasonably estimated. FIN 47 also clarifies when an entity would have sufficient information to reasonably estimate the fair value of an asset retirement obligation. FIN 47 is effective no later than the end of fiscal years ending after December 15, 2005. Management believes the adoption of this statement will not have an immediate material impact on the financial statements of the Company.

In December 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 153. This Statement addresses the measurement of exchanges of nonmonetary assets. The guidance in APB Opinion No. 29, "Accounting for Nonmonetary Transactions," is based on the principle that exchanges of nonmonetary assets should be measured based on the fair value of the assets exchanged. The guidance in that Opinion, however, included certain exceptions to that principle. This statement amends Opinion 29 to eliminate the exception for nonmonetary exchanges of similar productive assets and replaces it with a general exception for exchanges of nonmonetary assets that do not have commercial substance. A nonmonetary exchange has commercial substance if the future cash flows of the entity are expected to change significantly as a result of the exchange. This statement is effective for financial statements for fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2005. Earlier application is permitted for nonmonetary asset exchanges incurred during fiscal years beginning after the date of this statement is issued. Management believes the adoption of this statement will not impact the financial statements of the Company.
 
In December 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 152, which amends SFAS Statement No. 66, "Accounting for Sales of Real Estate," to reference the financial accounting and reporting guidance for real estate time-sharing transactions that is provided in AICPA Statement of Position (SOP) 04-2, "Accounting for Real Estate Time-Sharing Transactions." This statement also amends SFAS No. 67, "Accounting for Costs and Initial Rental Operations of Real Estate Projects," to state that the guidance for (a) incidental operations and (b) costs incurred to sell real estate projects, does not apply to real estate time-sharing transactions. The accounting for those operations and costs is subject to the guidance in SOP 04-2. This statement is effective for financial statements for fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2005. Management believes the adoption of this Statement will not impact the financial statements of the Company.
 
ITEM 7. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.

The selected financial data set forth below has been derived from, and should be read in conjunction with the Company's financial statements and the notes thereto, and Item 6 of this report entitled "Management's Discussion and Analysis or Plan of Operation. The selected financial data for the two years ended October 31, 2005 have been derived from the Company's audited consolidated financial statements beginning on page F/A-1, and incorporated by reference herein.

The selected financial data should be read in conjunction with and is qualified by such financial statements and the notes thereto.

Selected Financial Data

   
2005
  
2004
  
Summary of Balance Sheets:
          
           
Working capital
  
$
(35,526
)
$
2,551,383
  
Current assets
    
259,791
    
2,758,268
  
Total assets
    
5,085,442
    
7,659,878
  
Current liabilities
    
295,317
    
206,885
  
Long-term obligation
    
7,365
    
11,574
  
Total liabilities
    
302,682
    
218,459
  
Stockholder's equity
    
4,782,760
    
7,441,419
  
               
Summary of Statements of Operations:
              
               
Revenues
    
0
    
0
  
Net loss (1)
    
(3,302,161
)
  
(5,036,805
)
Net loss per share
    
(0.16
)
  
(0.30
)
               
(1)
Cumulative losses for period from inception (Nov. 8, 1993) through October 31, 2005 were $16,611,799.
 
 
-11-
ITEM 8. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE.

There have been no disagreements on accounting and financial disclosures through the date of this 10-KSB.
 
ITEM 8A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES.

Disclosure Controls and Procedures.
The Company's principal executive officer and principal financial officer have evaluated the effectiveness of the Company's disclosure controls and procedures (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act) as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on such evaluation, the Company's principal executive officer and principal financial officer have concluded that, as of the end of such period, the Company's disclosure control and procedures are effective.
 
 Disclosure controls and procedures are controls and other procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our reports filed or submitted under the Securities Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission's rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our reports filed under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to management, including our principal executive officer and our principal financial officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting.
 
There was no change in the Company's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the fiscal period to which this report relates that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company's internal control over financial reporting.

ITEM 8B. OTHER INFORMATION.

Not Applicable.

PART III

ITEM 9. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS, PROMOTERS AND CONTROL PERSONS; COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 16(a) OF THE EXCHANGE ACT.

The officers and directors of the Company are as follows:

Name
  
Age
  
Position
         
Merlin Bingham
  
72
  
President and Chairman of the Board of Directors
         
Roger Kolvoord
  
65
  
Vice President-Business and Member of the Board of Directors
         
Wesley A. Pomeroy
  
51
  
Member of the Board of Directors
         
Terry J. Brown
  
46
  
Vice President-Operations
         
Wayne Schoonmaker
  
68
  
Secretary & Treasurer

All directors hold office until the next annual meeting of shareholders or until their successors have been elected and qualified. The Company's officers are elected by the Board of Directors at the annual meeting and hold office until their death, or until they resign.

The Company's Board of Directors is responsible for the oversight and management of the Company. The Board does not have a separately-designated standing audit committee because the entire Board of Directors acts as the Company's audit committee. The Board has not designated an audit committee financial expert, as that term is defined in the Exchange Act rules promulgated by the SEC, because of the size of the Board and because the Company is still an exploration stage company.
 
-12-
Officer and Director Biographies:

Merlin Bingham, President, and Chairman of the Board of Directors

Since October 1996, Mr. Bingham has been the President and Chairman of the Board of Directors of the Company. From 1963 to 1983 Mr. Bingham worked in exploration for mining and oil companies in the western U.S. and Alaska, Zambia, the United Arab Emirates, Ecuador and Mexico. Since 1983, Mr. Bingham has been a consulting geologist. Mr. Bingham received a B.S. degree in Mineralogy from the University of Utah in 1963.

Roger Kolvoord - Vice President-Business and Director

Dr. Kolvoord has been a director of the Company since August 2002 and was appointed Vice President, Business in April 2003. Dr. Kolvoord has a B.S. degree in geology from the University of Michigan, a M.S. in Mineralogy form the University of Utah, and a Ph.D. in geochemistry from the University of Texas at Austin. He worked in exploration and exploration research for Kennecott Copper Company, Ranchers Exploration and Development Corporation, and ARCO, and operated a services company providing field services to oil and gas and mining companies. He has extensive mining and energy exploration experience. He was a manager with the Boeing Company for 14 years, working mainly in program management and new business development capacities in information systems and in remote sensing and geospatial information (mapping) ventures. An Associate Technical
Fellow of the Boeing Company, he returned to private consulting practice in 2000. An active member of the American Association of Petroleum Geologists, he served two terms as the Pacific Section Councilor of the Energy Minerals Division and is currently Chair of the Geospatial Information Committee. He resides in the Puget Sound region of Washington.

Wesley A. Pomeroy - Director

Mr. Pomeroy was appointed to the Board of Directors in September 2005 to fill an existing vacancy. Mr. Pomeroy is currently President of The Joe Dandy Mining Company, with gold properties in Cripple Creek, Colorado, and is a member of the Front Range Oil and Gas LLC and the POMOCO LLC (Pomeroy Oil Company). He is also currently a consulting geologist with Vortex Petroleum Inc. and has been associated since 1977 with various exploration and oil and gas companies. Mr. Pomeroy received a Bachelor of Science degree in geology from Colorado State University in 1977 and an MBA from the University of Colorado in 1990.
He resides in the Denver, Colorado area.

Terry J. Brown - Vice President-Operations

Mr. Brown was appointed Vice President-Operations in September 2005. Mr. Brown has 22 years experience in the mining industry in the United States, Mexico and Chile and has most recently been active as a consulting geologist in Mexico. His background is in exploration and project management, mine development and feasibility studies, and mining operations. Mr. Brown is a Certified Professional Geologist and is a member of the American Institute of Professional Geologists and the Society of Economic Geologists. He received a Bachelor of Science degree in geology from the New Mexico Institute of Mining & Technology in 1983. Mr. Brown resides in Chihuahua, Mexico.

Wayne Schoonmaker - Secretary & Treasurer

Mr. Schoonmaker was appointed Secretary & Treasurer of the Company in August 1997 and has held that position since that time. He is also currently Secretary & Treasurer of Hanover Gold Company, Inc. of Spokane, Washington and Secretary & Treasurer and Director of Independence Lead Mines Company of Wallace, Idaho. During the period of 1979 through 1993, Mr. Schoonmaker was employed at Asarco Incorporated as Chief Accountant of the Troy Mine and as Financial Manager of Asarco's Northwest Mining Department. From July 1978 to December 1978, Mr. Schoonmaker was Assistant Treasurer of the Bunker Hill Mining Company, and from 1964 to 1978, he was Assistant Secretary of Hecla Mining Company. Mr. Schoonmaker received a Bachelor of Science degree in Accounting from the University of Montana in 1962 and an MBA from the University of Idaho in 1987. Mr. Schoonmaker is a Certified Public Accountant in the states of Idaho and Montana.
 
-13-
Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

Under Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder, the Company's directors, executive officers and beneficial owners of more than 10% of any registered class of the Company's equity securities are required to file reports of their ownership of the Company's securities and any changes in that ownership with the SEC. Based solely on its review of copies of these reports and on written representations from such reporting persons, the Company believes that during 2005 such filing requirements were complied with.

Code of Ethics

The Company has not yet adopted a code of ethics that applies to the Company's principal executive officer, and principal financial officer because of the limited size of the Company and its management team, and because the Company is still an exploration stage company.

ITEM 10. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION.

Summary Compensation Table

The following table sets forth information concerning compensation received from the Company by each of the executive officers for services in all capacities to the Company and its subsidiaries for the last four years. This information includes the dollar value of base salaries, bonus awards and number of stock options granted, and certain other compensation, if any.
 
                   
Long-Term Compensation
      
       
Annual Compensation
  
Awards
      
   
Fiscal
          
Other Annual
  
Securities
  
All Other
  
   
Year
  
Salary
 
Bonus
 
Compensation
  
Underlying
  
Compensation
  
Name and Principal Position
  
ended
  
(US$)
  
(US$)
  
(US$)
  
Options (#)
  
(US$)
  
                           
Merlin Bingham
    
2005
    
201,563
    
0
    
0
    
0
    
0
  
President
    
2004
    
101,563
    
0
    
60,938(1
)
  
0
    
0
  
     
2003
    
33,854
    
0
    
135,417(1
)
  
0
    
0
  
     
2002
    
48,000
    
0
    
40,625(1
)
  
0
    
0
  
                                       
Roger Kolvoord
    
2005
    
81,250
    
0
    
0
    
0
    
0
  
Vice President
    
2004
    
118,750
    
0
    
74,479(1
)
  
0
    
0
  
     
2003
    
33,854
    
0
    
155,729(1
)
  
0
    
0
  
     
2002
    
0
          
0
    
100,000
    
0
  
                                       
Wayne Schoonmaker
   
2005
    
20,250
    
0
    
0
              
Secretary, Treasurer
    
2004
    
20,250
    
0
    
18,563(1
)
  
0
    
0
  
     
2003
    
8,438
    
0
    
35,438(1
)
  
0
    
0
  
     
2002
    
12,000
    
0
    
10,125(1
)
  
0
    
0
  
                                       
Terry Brown
   
2005
    
56,160
    
0
    
0
    
0
    
0
  
Vice President
    
2004
    
0
    
0
    
0
    
0
    
0
  
     
2003
    
0
    
0
    
0
    
0
    
0
  
     
2002
    
0
    
0
    
0
    
0
    
0
  
                                       
(1)
Represents the value of shares of the Company's common stock issued as compensation for services rendered, based on the fair market value of such shares on the date of issuance.
 
 
-14-
There are no other stock option plans, retirement, pension, or profit sharing plans for the benefit of the Company's officers and directors.

Option Grants in 2005.

During the fiscal year ended October 31, 2005, the Company did not grant common stock options.

Aggregated Year-End Option Values

The following table sets forth information on unexercised options at October 31, 2005. None of the executive officers exercised any stock option during fiscal 2005.

   
Number of Unexercised Securities Underlying Options (#)
  
Value of Unexercised In-the-Money Options(US$)(1)
  
Name
  
Exercisable
  
Unexercisable
  
Exercisable
  
Unexercisable
  
Merlin Bingham
    
100,000
    
0
    
0
    
0
  
Roger Kolvoord
    
100,000
    
0
    
0
    
0
  
Wayne Schoonmaker
    
50,000
    
0
    
0
    
0
  
                           
(1)
Because there was no positive spread between the respective exercise prices of outstanding stock options and the closing price of the Company's common stock on October 31, 2005 ($0.83), none of the options were in-the-money.

Long-Term Incentive Plan Awards.

The Company's shareholders approved a Qualified Stock Option Plan at the annual meeting of shareholders held March 1, 2001. During the years ended October 31, 2001 and 2002, options for 350,000 shares and 100,000 shares, respectively, were granted to officers and directors of the Company. There were no options granted during the years ended October 31, 2003, 2004 and 2005. Options for 100,000 shares granted to Daniel E. Gorski expired upon his resignation in September 2004.

Compensation of Directors.

In general, the directors do not receive any compensation for serving as members of the Board of Directors. There are no contractual arrangements with any member of the Board of Directors.

ITEM 11. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS.

The following table sets forth the common stock ownership of each person known by the Company to be the beneficial owner of five percent or more of the Company's common stock, each director individually, and all officers and directors of the Company as a group. Each person has sole voting and investment power with respect to the shares of common stock shown, unless otherwise noted, and all ownership is of record and beneficial.

 
  
Amount and
      
 
  
nature of
  
 
  
 
  
beneficial
  
% of Outstanding
  
Name and Address of Beneficial owner                               
  
ownership
  
Shares
  
           
Merlin Bingham
    
1,296,285
    
6.35
%
1330 E. Margaret Ave.
              
Coeur d'Alene, ID 83815
              
               
Roger Kolvoord
    
356,891
    
1.75
%
1330 E. Margaret Ave.
              
Coeur d'Alene, ID 83815
              
               
Wayne Schoonmaker
    
73,116
    
*
  
1330 E. Margaret Ave.
              
Coeur d'Alene, ID 83815
              
               
Wesley Pomeroy
    
50,000
    
*
  
1330 E. Margaret Ave.
              
Coeur d'Alene, ID 83815
              
               
Terry Brown
    
0
    
*
  
1330 E. Margaret Ave.
              
Coeur d'Alene, ID 83815
              
               
All officers and directors as a group (5 persons)
    
1,549,520
    
8.46
%
               
Britannia Holdings
    
3,190,500
    
15.64
%
King's House The Grange
             
St. Peter Port Guernsey Channel Islands
              
               
*
Less than 1%.
 
 
-15-
EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION

The following table provides information about the Company's common stock that may be issued upon the exercise of options, warrants and rights under the Company's equity compensation plans as of October 31, 2005.

Plan Category
  
(a) Number of Securities to be Issued Upon Exercise of Outstanding Options, Warrants and Rights
  
(b) Weighted Average Exercise Price of Outstanding Options, Warrants and Rights
  
Securities Remaining Available for Future Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans (Excluding Securities Reflected in Column (a))
  
Equity compensation plans approved by shareholders:
    
670,000
  
$
1.56
    
0
  
Equity compensation plans not approved by shareholders:
    
1,163,887
  
$
2.02
    
0
  
Total:
    
2,008,053
  
$
1.87
    
0
  

Equity Compensation Plans Not Approved by Security Holders

Warrants

Thirty-three warrants to non-employees remained outstanding as of October 31, 2005. Such warrants were granted pursuant to the terms of a form warrant agreement, with each such grant authorized by the Board. These warrants have not been approved by the shareholders of the Company. The warrants have exercise prices ranging from $0.75 per share to $5.00 per share and have expiration dates ranging from June 2006 to January 2011.
 
-16-
ITEM 12. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS.

The Company receives rent-free office space in Coeur d'Alene, Idaho from its president. The value of the space is not considered materially significant for financial reporting purposes. The Company also has given $9,560 in cash advances for travel to two of its officers at October 31, 2005 under an accountable plan per IRS Regulation Section 1.62.

ITEM 13. EXHIBITS.

The exhibits filed as part of this report and the exhibits incorporated herein by reference are listed
in the Exhibit Index at page E-1.

ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES.

Audit Fees: The aggregate fees and expenses billed by Williams & Webster, P.S. for professional services rendered for the audit of the Company's annual financial statements and the review of the financial statements included in the Company's periodic reports filed with the SEC on Forms 10-Q, were $18,409 and $21,647 for the fiscal years ended October 31, 2004 and 2005, respectively.
 
Audit Related Fees: There were no fees billed by Williams & Webster, P.S. for audit related services rendered during fiscal 2004 and 2005.
 
Tax Fees: There were no fees billed by Williams & Webster, P.S. for tax services rendered during fiscal 2004 and 2005.
 
All Other Fees: There were no other services provided by Williams & Webster, P.S. during fiscal 2004 and 2005.
 
-17-
METALLINE MINING COMPANY
An Exploration Stage Company
October 31, 2005



SIGNATURES

In accordance with Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

 
METALLINE MINING COMPANY
 
By:   /s/ Merlin Bingham
Merlin Bingham, its
President
Date: May 30, 2006
 
By:  /s/ Wayne Schoonmaker
Wayne Schoonmaker, its
Principal Accounting Officer
Date: May 30, 2006



In accordance with the Exchange Act, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
 
By: /s/ Merlin Bingham   By: /s/ Roger Kolvoord
  Merlin Bingham     Roger Kolvoord
  President/Director     Vice President-Business/Director
  Date: May 30, 2006   Date: May 30, 2006
         
By: /s/ Wayne Schoonmaker   By: /s/ Wesley Pomeroy
  Wayne Schoonmaker     Wesley Pomeroy
  Secretary/Treasurer     Director
  Date: May 30, 2006     Date: May 30, 2006
 
 
-18-
METALLINE MINING COMPANY

INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 
PAGE
   
F/S-1
   
Financial Statements:
  
   
F/S-2
   
F/S-3
   
F/S-4
   
F/S-7
   
F/S-8


[The balance of this page has been intentionally left blank.]
 
F/S-i
The Board of Directors
Metalline Mining Company
Coeur d'Alene, Idaho

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Metalline Mining Company (a Nevada corporation and an exploration stage company) as of October 31, 2005 and 2004, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' equity and cash flows for the years then ended, and for the period from November 8, 1993 (inception) to October 31, 2005. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Metalline Mining Company as of October 31, 2005 and 2004, and the results of its operations, stockholders' equity and its cash flows for the years then ended, and for the period from November 8, 1993 (inception) to October 31, 2005 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 2 to the financial statements, the Company's significant operating losses raise substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. Management's plans regarding those matters also are described in Note 2. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

/s/ Williams & Webster, P.S.

Williams & Webster, P.S.
Certified Public Accountants
Spokane, Washington
January 27, 2006
 
F/S-1
 
METALLINE MINING COMPANY
           
(AN EXPLORATION STAGE COMPANY)
           
                    
            
   
October 31,
  
October 31,
  
   
2005
  
2004
  
ASSETS
           
            
CURRENT ASSETS           
Cash and cash equivalents
 
$
213,369
  
$
1,384,030
  
Marketable securities
    
—
    
1,250,000
 
Accounts receivable
    
23,620
   
88,164
 
Prepaid expenses
    
13,242
   
2,052
 
Employee advances
    
9,560
   
34,022
 
 Total Current Assets
    
259,791
   
2,758,268
 
               
PROPERTY CONCESSIONS
              
Sierra Mojada, Mojada 3
    
15,875
   
15,875
 
Fortuna
    
76,725
   
76,725
 
Esmeralda
   
255,647
   
255,647
 
Esmeralda I
   
180,988
   
180,988
 
U.M. Nortenos, Vulcano
   
3,682,772
   
3,682,772
 
La Blanca
   
122,760
   
122,760
 
 Total Property Concessions
    
4,334,767
   
4,334,767
 
               
EQUIPMENT
              
Office and mining equipment, net
    
490,884
   
566,843
 
 Total Equipment
    
490,884
   
566,843
 
TOTAL ASSETS
  
$
5,085,442
  
$
7,659,878
  
               
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
              
               
CURRENT LIABILITIES
              
Accounts payable
  
$
86,189
  
$
57,231
  
Accrued liabilities and expenses
    
189,046
   
145,445
 
Other liabilities
    
15,873
   
—
  
Note payable, current portion
   
4,209
   
4,209
 
 Total Current Liabilities
    
295,317
   
206,885
 
               
LONG-TERM LIABILITIES
              
Note payable, net of current portion
    
7,365
   
11,574
 
               
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
    
—
    
—
  
STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
              
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value; 1,000,000 shares authorized, no shares outstanding
    
—
    
—
  
Common stock, $0.01 par value; 50,000,000 shares authorized, 20,404,585 and 19,751,409 shares issued and outstanding, respectively 
    
204,047
   
197,515
 
Additional paid-in capital
    
19,852,673
   
19,064,992
 
Stock options and warrants
    
1,347,839
   
1,498,550
 
Deficit accumulated during exploration stage
    
(16,621,799
)
  
(13,319,638
)
 Total Stockholders' Equity
    
4,782,760
   
7,441,419
 
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
  
$
5,085,442
  
$
7,659,878
  
               
               
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
 
F/S-2
 
METALLINE MINING COMPANY
             
(AN EXPLORATION STAGE COMPANY)
              
 
               
           
November 8,
  
           
1993
  
           
(Inception)
  
   
Years Ended
  
to
  
   
October 31,
  
October 31,
  
October 31,
  
   
2005
  
2004
  
2005
  
               
               
REVENUES
  
$
—
  
$
—
  
$
—
  
                     
GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES
                    
Salaries and payroll expenses
    
797,104
   
633,019
   
3,237,617
 
Office and administrative expenses
    
309,483
   
299,172
   
988,946
 
Taxes and fees
    
95,353
   
108,220
   
489,441
 
Professional services
    
328,954
   
516,015
   
4,367,642
 
Property expenses
    
186,057
   
233,148
   
1,944,103
 
Depreciation
    
83,557
   
63,045
   
341,920
 
Exploration and research
    
1,666,884
   
3,374,049
   
5,334,086
 
TOTAL GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES
    
3,467,392
   
5,226,667
   
16,703,754
 
                     
LOSS FROM OPERATIONS
    
(3,467,392
)
  
(5,226,667
)
  
(16,703,754
)
                     
OTHER INCOME (EXPENSES)
                    
Miscellaneous ore sales, net of expenses
    
7,964
   
170,217
   
165,138
 
VAT tax refunds
    
119,615
   
—
    
119,615
 
Miscellaneous income
    
8,500
   
—
    
8,500
 
Interest and investment income
    
29,758
   
20,251
   
75,473
 
Interest and financing expense
    
(606
)
  
(606
)
  
(286,771
)
TOTAL OTHER INCOME
    
165,231
   
189,861
   
81,954
 
                     
LOSS BEFORE INCOME TAXES
    
(3,302,161
)
  
(5,036,805
)
  
(16,621,799
)
INCOME TAXES
    
—
    
—
    
—
  
NET LOSS
  
$
(3,302,161
)
$
(5,036,805
)
$
(16,621,799
)
                     
BASIC AND DILUTED NET LOSS PER COMMON SHARE
  
$
(0.16
)
$
(0.30
)
      
                     
BASIC AND DILUTED WEIGHTED AVERAGE NUMBER OF COMMON SHARES OUTSTANDING
    
20,014,313
   
17,025,631
       
                     
                     
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
 
 
F/S-3
 
METALLINE MINING COMPANY
                              
(AN EXPLORATION STAGE COMPANY)
                              
 
                               
                       
Accumulated
      
   
Common Stock
  
Additional
  
Stock
  
Stock
  
Deficit During
      
   
Number of
     
Paid-in
  
Subscriptions
  
Options and
  
Exploration
     
   
Shares
  
Amount
  
Capital
  
Receivable
  
Warrants
  
Stage
  
Total
  
                               
Common stock issuance prior to inception
(no value)
   
960,800
 
$
9,608
  
$
(9,608
)
$
—
  
$
—
  
$
—
  
$
—
  
1:5 reverse common stock split
   
(768,640
)
  
(7,686
)
  
7,686
   
—
    
—
    
—
    
—
  
Net loss for the year ended October 31, 1994
   
—
    
—
    
—
    
—
    
—
    
(8,831
)
  
(8,831
)
Balances, October 31, 1994
   
192,160
   
1,922
   
(1,922
)
  
—
    
—
    
(8,831
)
  
(8,831
)
                                             
3:1 common stock split
   
384,320
   
3,843
   
(3,843
)
  
—
    
—
    
—
    
—
  
Net loss for the year ended October 31, 1995
   
—
    
—
    
—
    
—
    
—
    
(7,761
)
  
(7,761
)
Balances, October 31, 1995
   
576,480
   
5,765
   
(5,765
)
  
—
    
—
    
(16,592
)
  
(16,592
)
                                             
Issuances of common stock as follows:
                                           
- for par value at transfer of ownership
   
2,000
   
20
   
—
    
—
    
—
    
—
    
20
 
- for cash at an average of $0.11 per share
   
1,320,859
   
13,209
   
133,150
   
—
    
—
    
—
    
146,359
 
- for services at an average of $0.08 per share
   
185,000
   
1,850
   
12,600
   
—
    
—
    
—
    
14,450
 
- for computer equipment at $0.01 per share
   
150,000
   
1,500
   
13,500
   
—
    
—
    
—
    
15,000
 
- for mineral property at $0.01 per share
   
900,000
   
9,000
   
—
    
—
    
—
    
—
    
9,000
 
Net loss for the year ended October 31, 1996
   
—
    
—
    
—
    
—
    
—
    
(40,670
)
  
(40,670
)
Balances, October 31, 1996
   
3,134,339
   
31,344
   
153,485
   
—
    
—
    
(57,262
)
  
127,567
 
                                             
Issuances of common stock as follows:
                                           
- for cash at an average of $0.61 per share
   
926,600
   
9,266
   
594,794
   
—
    
—
    
—
    
604,060
 
- for services at an average of $0.74 per share
   
291,300
   
2,913
   
159,545
   
—
    
—
    
—
    
162,458
 
- for payment of a loan at $0.32 per share
   
100,200
   
1,002
   
30,528
   
—
    
—
    
—
    
31,530
 
                                             
Options issued as follows:
                                           
- 300,000 options for cash
   
—
    
—
    
3,000
   
—
    
—
    
—
    
3,000
 
Net loss for the year ended October 31, 1997
   
—
    
—
    
—
    
—
    
—
    
(582,919
)
  
(582,919
)
Balances, October 31, 1997
   
4,452,439
   
44,525
   
941,352
   
—
    
—
    
(640,181
)
  
345,696
 
                                             
Issuances of common stock as follows:
                                           
- for cash at an average of $1.00 per share
   
843,500
   
8,435
   
832,010
   
—
    
—
    
—
    
840,445
 
- for cash and receivables at $1.00 per share
   
555,000
   
5,550
   
519,450
   
(300,000
)
  
—
    
—
    
225,000
 
- for services at an average of $0.53 per share
   
41,800
   
418
   
21,882
   
—
    
—
    
—
    
22,300
 
- for mine data base at $1.63 per share
   
200,000
   
2,000
   
323,000
   
—
    
—
    
—
    
325,000
 
                                             
Options issued or granted as follows:
                                           
- 1,200,000 options for cash
   
—
    
—
    
120,000
   
—
    
—
    
—
    
120,000
 
- for financing fees
   
—
    
—
    
—
    
—
    
60,000
   
—
    
60,000
 
- for consulting fees
   
—
    
—
    
—
    
—
    
117,000
   
—
    
117,000
 
Warrants issued for services
   
—
    
—
    
—
    
—
    
488,980
   
(488,980
)
  
—
  
Net loss for the year ended October 31, 1998
   
—
    
—
    
—
    
—
    
—
    
(906,036
)
  
(906,036
)
Balance, October 31, 1998
   
6,092,739
 
$
60,928
  
$
2,757,694
  
$
(300,000
)
$
665,980
  
$
(2,035,197
)
$
1,149,405
  
                                             
                                             
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F/S-4
 
METALLINE MINING COMPANY
                             
(AN EXPLORATION STAGE COMPANY)
                             
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (CONTINUED)
  
                               
                       
Accumulated
      
   
Common Stock
  
Additional
  
Stock
  
Stock
  
Deficit During
      
   
Number of
      
Paid-in
  
Subscriptions
  
Options and
  
Exploration
      
   
Shares
  
Amount
  
Capital
  
Receivable
  
Warrants
  
Stage
  
Total
  
                               
Balance, October 31, 1998
   
6,092,739
 
$
60,928
  
$
2,757,694
  
$
(300,000
)
$
665,980
  
$
(2,035,197
)
$
1,149,405
  
                                             
Issuances of common stock as follows:
                                           
- for cash at an average of $1.04 per share
   
818,800
   
8,188
   
842,712
   
—
    
—
    
—
    
850,900
 
- for drilling fees at $0.90 per share
   
55,556
   
556
   
49,444
   
—
    
—
    
—
    
50,000
 
                                             
Stock option and warrant activity as follows:
                                           
- exercise of options at $0.90 per share
   
250,000
   
2,500
   
267,500
   
—
    
(45,000
)
  
—
    
225,000
 
- issuance of options for financing fees
   
—
    
—
    
—
    
—
    
216,000
   
—
    
216,000
 
- expiration of options
   
—
    
—
    
60,000
   
—
    
(60,000
)
  
—
    
—
  
Stock subscription received
   
—
    
—
    
—
    
300,000
   
—
    
—
    
300,000
 
                                             
Net loss for the year ended October 31, 1999
   
—
    
—
    
—
    
—
    
—
    
(1,423,045
)
  
(1,423,045
)
Balance, October 31, 1999
   
7,217,095
   
72,172
   
3,977,350
   
—
    
776,980
   
(3,458,242
)
  
1,368,260
 
                                             
Stock option and warrant activity as follows:
                                           
Exercise of options at $0.86 per share
   
950,000
   
9,500
   
1,090,750
   
—
    
(288,000
)
  
—
    
812,250
 
Warrants issued for services
   
—
    
—
    
—
    
—
    
55,000
   
—
    
55,000
 
                                             
Issuances of common stock as follows:
                                           
- for cash at an average of $2.77 per share
   
1,440,500
   
14,405
   
3,972,220
   
—
    
—
    
—
    
3,986,625
 
- for services at $1.28 per share
   
120,000
   
1,200
   
152,160
   
—
    
—
    
—
    
153,360
 
- for equipment at $1.67 per share
   
15,000
   
150
   
24,850
   
—
    
—
    
—
    
25,000
 
                                             
Net loss for the year ended October 31, 2000
   
—
    
—
    
—
    
—
    
—
    
(882,208
)
  
(882,208
)
Balances, October 31, 2000
   
9,742,595
   
97,427
   
9,217,330
   
—
    
543,980
   
(4,340,450
)
  
5,518,287
 
                                             
Stock option and warrant activity as follows:
                                           
- Warrants exercised at $0.75 per share
   
20,000
   
200
   
25,560
   
—
    
(10,760
)
  
—
    
15,000
 
- Options issued for consulting fees
   
—
    
—
    
—
    
—
    
740,892
   
—
    
740,892
 
- Warrants issued for consulting fees
   
—
    
—
    
—
    
—
    
144,791
   
—
    
144,791
 
                                             
Issuances of common stock as follows:
                                           
- for cash at $2.00 per share
   
250,000
   
2,500
   
494,076
   
—
    
3,424
   
—
    
500,000
 
- for cash of $210 and services at $2.07 per share
   
21,000
   
210
   
43,260
   
—
    
—
    
—
    
43,470
 
- for cash of $180 and services at $2.05 per share
   
18,000
   
180
   
36,720
   
—
    
—
    
—
    
36,900
 
- for services at $2.45 per share
   
6,000
   
60
   
14,640
   
—
    
—
    
—
    
14,700
 
- for services at $1.50 per share
   
12,000
   
120
   
17,880
   
—
    
—
    
—
    
18,000
 
                                             
Net loss for the year ended October 31, 2001
   
—
    
—
    
—
    
—
    
—
    
(2,069,390
)
  
(2,069,390
)
Balance, October 31, 2001
   
10,069,595
   
100,697
   
9,849,466
   
—
    
1,422,327
   
(6,409,840
)
  
4,962,650
 
                                             
Issuances of common stock as follows:
                                           
- for cash at $2.00 per share
   
50,000
   
500
   
99,500
   
—
    
—
    
—
    
100,000
 
- for cash and warrants at $1.50 per share
   
96,000
   
960
   
134,400
   
—
    
8,640
   
—
    
144,000
 
- for cash and warrants at $1.50 per share
   
66,667
   
667
   
93,333
   
—
    
6,000
   
—
    
100,000
 
- for compensation at an average of $1.23 per share
   
86,078
   
861
   
104,014
   
—
    
—
    
—
    
104,875
 
                                             
Stock option activity as follows:
                                           
- for compensation at $0.61 per share
   
—
    
—
    
—
    
—
    
61,000
   
—
    
61,000
 
                                             
Net loss for the year ended October 31, 2002
   
—
    
—
    
—
    
—
    
—
    
(765,765
)
  
(765,765
)
Balance, October 31, 2002
   
10,368,340
 
$
103,685
  
$
10,280,713
  
$
—
  
$
1,497,967
  
$
(7,175,605
)
$
4,706,760
  
                                             
                                             
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
 
 
F/S-5
 
METALLINE MINING COMPANY
                              
(AN EXPLORATION STAGE COMPANY)
                              
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (CONTINUED)
  
                               
                       
Accumulated
      
           
Additional
  
Stock
  
Stock
  
Deficit During
      
   
Common Stock
  
Paid-in
  
Subscriptions
  
Options and
  
Exploration
      
   
Shares
  
Amount
  
Capital
  
Receivable
  
Warrants
  
Stage
  
Total
  
                               
Balance, October 31, 2002
   
10,368,340
 
$
103,685
  
$
10,280,713
  
$
—
  
$
1,497,967
  
$
(7,175,605
)
$
4,706,760
  
                                             
Issuances of common stock as follows:
                                           
- for cash at $2.00 per share
   
100,000
   
1,000
   
199,000
   
—
    
—
    
—
    
200,000
 
- for cash at an average of $0.98 per share
   
849,000
   
8,489
   
821,510
   
—
    
—
    
—
    
829,999
 
- for cash and warrants at $1.50 per share
   
7,000
   
70
   
9,847
   
—
    
583
   
—
    
10,500
 
- for compensation at an average of $1.25 per share
   
391,332
   
3,913
   
487,275
   
—
    
—
    
—
    
491,188
 
- for services at an average of $1.23 per share
   
91,383
   
914
   
119,320
   
—
    
—
    
—
    
120,234
 
- for subscriptions receivable at $1.00 per share
   
38,000
   
380
   
37,620
   
(38,000
)
  
—
    
—
    
—
  
                                             
Net loss for the year ended October 31, 2003
   
—
    
—
    
—
    
—
    
—
    
(1,107,228
)
  
(1,107,228
)
Balance, October 31, 2003
   
11,845,055
   
118,451
   
11,955,285
   
(38,000
)
  
1,498,550
   
(8,282,833
)
  
5,251,453
 
                                             
Issuances of common stock as follows:
                                           
- for cash at $1.00 per share, less issuance costs of $698,863
   
7,580,150
   
75,802
   
6,805,485
   
—
    
—
    
—
    
6,881,287
 
- for compensation at an average of $1.26 per share
   
120,655
   
1,207
   
151,064
   
—
    
—
    
—
    
152,271
 
- for services at various prices
   
141,286
   
1,413
   
153,801
   
—
    
—
    
—
    
155,214
 
                                             
Stock subscription received
   
—
    
—
    
—
    
38,000
   
—
    
—
    
38,000
 
Miscellaneous corrections and adjustments
   
64,263
   
643
   
(643
)
  
—
    
—
    
—
    
—
  
Net loss for the year ended October 31, 2004
   
—
    
—
    
—
    
—
    
—
    
(5,036,805
)
  
(5,036,805
)
Balance, October 31, 2004
   
19,751,409
   
197,515
   
19,064,992
   
—
    
1,498,550
   
(13,319,638
)
  
7,441,419
 
                                             
Common stock issued for cash at an average of $0.98 per share with attached warrants valued at an average of $0.28 per share
   
476,404
   
4,764
   
329,806
   
—
    
132,159
   
—
    
466,729
 
                                             
Common stock issued for compensation at an average of $1.00 per share
   
176,772
   
1,768
   
175,005
   
—
    
—
    
—
    
176,773
 
                                             
Expiration of stock warrants
    
—
    
—
    
282,870
   
—
    
(282,870
)
  
—
    
—
  
                                             
Net loss for the year ended October 31, 2005
    
—
    
—
    
—
    
—
    
—
    
(3,302,161
)
  
(3,302,161
)
Balance, October 31, 2005
    
20,404,585
 
$
204,047
  
$
19,852,673
  
$
—
  
$
1,347,839
  
$
(16,621,799
)
$
4,782,760
  
                                             
                                             
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
 
 
F/S-6
 
METALLINE MINING COMPANY
              
(AN EXPLORATION STAGE COMPANY)
              
 
               
           
Period from
  
           
November 8, 1993
  
           
(Inception)
  
   
Years Ended
  
to
  
   
October 31,
  
October 31,
  
October 31,
  
   
2005
  
2004
  
2005
  
               
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
              
Net loss 
  
$
(3,302,161
)
$
(5,036,805
)
$
(16,621,799
)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used by operating activities: 
                    
 Depreciation
    
83,557
   
63,045
   
341,920
 
 Noncash expenses
    
—
    
—
    
126,864
 
 Common stock issued for services
    
—
    
155,214
   
966,538
 
 Common stock issued for compensation
    
176,772
   
152,271
   
820,231
 
 Stock options issued for services
   
—
    
—
    
801,892
 
 Stock options issued for financing fees
    
—
    
—
    
276,000
 
 Common stock issued for payment of expenses
    
—
    
—
    
326,527
 
 Stock warrants issued for services
   
—
    
—
    
688,771
 
(Increase) decrease in: 
                
—
  
 Foreign property tax refund receivable
    
—
    
—
    
—
  
 Marketable securities
    
1,250,000
   
(1,250,000
)
  
—
  
 Accounts receivable
    
64,544
   
(88,164
)
  
(23,620
)
 Prepaid expenses
    
(11,190
)
  
(1,926
)
  
(13,242
)
 Employee advances
    
24,462
   
(13,122
)
  
(9,560
)
Increase (decrease) in: 
                
 
  
 Accounts payable
    
28,959
   
(53,667
)
  
86,189
 
 Contracts payable
    
—
    
—
    
4,209
 
 Accrued liabilities and expenses
    
59,474
   
137,484
   
220,703
 
 Net cash used by operating activities
    
(1,625,583
)
  
(5,935,671
)
  
(12,008,378
)
                     
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
                    
Purchase of investments 
    
—
    
—
    
(484,447
)
Proceeds from investments 
    
—
    
—
    
484,447
 
Equipment purchases 
    
(7,598
)
  
(328,746
)
  
(792,781
)
Mining property acquisitions 
    
—
    
—
    
(4,452,631
)
 Net cash used by investing activities
    
(7,598
)
  
(328,746
)
  
(5,245,412
)
                     
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
                    
Proceeds from sales of common stock 
    
466,729
   
6,881,287
   
16,370,187
 
Proceeds from sales of options and warrants 
    
—
    
—
    
949,890
 
Deposits for sale of stock 
    
—
    
38,000
   
125,500
 
Proceeds from shareholder loans 
    
—
    
—
    
30,000
 
Payment of note payable  
    
(4,209
)
  
(4,209
)
  
(8,418
)
 Net cash provided by financing activities:
    
462,520
   
6,915,078
   
17,467,159
 
                     
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents 
    
(1,170,661
)
  
650,661
   
213,369
 
Cash and cash equivalents beginning of period 
    
1,384,030
   
733,369
   
—
  
Cash and cash equivalents end of period 
  
$
213,369
  
$
1,384,030
  
$
213,369
  
                     
                     
SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW DISCLOSURES:
                    
Income taxes paid 
  
$
—
  
$
—
  
$
—
  
Interest paid 
  
$
606
  
$
606
  
$
286,771
  
                     
NON-CASH INVESTING AND FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
                    
Common stock issued for services 
   $  
$
155,214
  
$
966,538
  
Common stock issued for compensation 
  
$
176,772
  
$
152,271
  
$
820,231
  
Common stock issued for payment of expenses 
  
$
—
  
$
—
  
$
326,527
  
Common stock issued for equipment 
  
$
—
  
$
—
  
$
25,000
  
Common stock options issued for financing fees 
  
$
—
  
$
—
  
$
276,000
  
Options issued for services 
  
$
—
  
$
—
  
$
801,892
  
Warrants issued for services 
  
$
—
  
$
—
  
$
688,771
  
Noncash expenses 
  
$
—
  
$
—
  
$
126,864
  
                     
                     
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements


F/S-7

METALLINE MINING COMPANY
              
(AN EXPLORATION STAGE COMPANY)
              
 
               
NOTE 1 - ORGANIZATION AND DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS

Metalline Mining Company ("the Company") was incorporated in the State of Nevada on November 8, 1993 as the Cadgie Company for the purpose of acquiring and developing mineral properties. The Cadgie Company was a spin-off from its predecessor, Precious Metal Mines, Inc. On June 28, 1996, at a special directors meeting, the Company's name was changed to Metalline Mining Company. The Company's fiscal year-end is October 31.

The Company expects to engage in the business of mining. The Company currently owns concessions located in Sierra Mojada, Coahuila, Mexico. The Company conducts its operations in Mexico through its wholly owned subsidiary corporation, Minera Metalin S.A. de C.V. ("Minera Metalin").

The Company's efforts have been concentrated in expenditures related to exploration properties, principally in the Sierra Mojada project located in Coahuila, Mexico. The Company has not determined whether the exploration properties contain ore reserves that are economically recoverable. The ultimate realization of the Company's investment in exploration properties is dependent upon the success of future property sales, the existence of economically recoverable reserves, the ability of the Company to obtain financing or make other arrangements for development, and upon future profitable production. The ultimate realization of the Company's investment in exploration properties cannot be determined at this time, and accordingly, no provision for any asset impairment that may result, in the event the Company is not successful in developing or selling these properties, has been made in the accompanying financial statements.

The Company is actively seeking additional capital and management believes its properties can ultimately be sold or developed to enable the Company to continue its operations. However, there are inherent uncertainties in mining operations and management cannot provide assurances that it will be successful in this endeavor. Furthermore, the Company is in the exploration stage, as it has not realized any revenues from its planned operations.

NOTE 2 - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

This summary of significant accounting policies is presented to assist in understanding the financial statements. The financial statements and notes are representations of the Company's management, which is responsible for their integrity and objectivity. These accounting policies conform to accounting principles generally accepted in the U.S. and have been consistently applied in the preparation of the financial statements.

Accounting Method
The Company's financial statements are prepared using the accrual method of accounting.

Accounts Receivable
The Company carries its accounts receivable at cost. On a periodic basis, the Company evaluates its accounts receivable and determines if an allowance for doubtful accounts is necessary, based on a history of past write-offs and collections and current credit conditions.

The Company has not yet established a policy regarding accruing interest on trade receivables. Accounts will be written off as uncollectible when it is determined that collection will be unlikely.

Cash and Cash Equivalents
For purposes of the statement of cash flows, the Company considers all bank accounts, certificates of deposit, money market accounts and short-term debt securities purchased with a maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents.
 
F/S-8
 
METALLINE MINING COMPANY
              
(AN EXPLORATION STAGE COMPANY)
              
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OCTOBER 31, 2005
  
               
Compensated Absences
The Company's policy is to recognize the cost of compensated absences when actually paid to employees. If the amount were estimatible, it would not be currently recognized as the amount would be deemed immaterial.

Concentration of Risk
The Company maintains its domestic cash in two commercial depository accounts. One of these accounts is insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) for up to $100,000. The other account consists of money market funds, certificates of deposit and preferred securities, all of which are not insured. The Company also maintains cash in banks in Mexico. These accounts, which had U.S. dollar balances of $30,110 and $61,616 at October 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively, are denominated in pesos and are considered uninsured. Additionally, the Company maintained Mexican petty cash balances of $428 and $4,864 at October 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively. At October 31, 2005, the Company's cash balances included $114,965 which was not federally insured.

Derivative Instruments
The Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 133, "Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities," (hereinafter "SFAS No. 133") as amended by SFAS No. 137, "Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities - Deferral of the Effective Date of FASB No. 133", and SFAS No. 138, "Accounting for Certain Derivative Instruments and Certain Hedging Activities" and SFAS No. 149, "Amendment of Statement 133 on Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities." These statements establish accounting and reporting standards for derivative instruments, including certain derivative instruments embedded in other contracts, and for hedging activities. They require that an entity recognize all derivatives as either assets or liabilities in the consolidated balance sheet and measure those instruments at fair value.

If certain conditions are met, a derivative may be specifically designated as a hedge, the objective of which is to match the timing of gain or loss recognition on the hedging derivative with the recognition of (i) the changes in the fair value of the hedged asset or liability that are attributable to the hedged risk or (ii) the earnings effect of the hedged forecasted transaction. For a derivative not designated as a hedging instrument, the gain or loss is recognized in income in the period of change.

Historically, the Company has not entered into derivatives contracts to hedge existing risks or for speculative purposes.

During the years ended October 31, 2005 and 2004, the Company has not engaged in any transactions that would be considered derivative instruments or hedging activities.

Earnings Per Share
The Company has adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 128, which provides for calculation of "basic" and "diluted" earnings per share. Basic earnings per share includes no dilution and is computed by dividing net income available to common shareholders by the weighted average common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted earnings per share reflect the potential dilution of securities that could share in the earnings of an entity similar to fully diluted earnings per share. Although there were common stock equivalents outstanding October 31, 2005 and 2004, they were not included in the calculation of earnings per share because they would have been considered anti-dilutive. Common stock equivalents outstanding were 1,833,887 and 1,647,665 at October 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively.
 
F/S-9
 
METALLINE MINING COMPANY
              
(AN EXPLORATION STAGE COMPANY)
              
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OCTOBER 31, 2005
  
               
Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Exploration Costs
In accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, the Company expenses exploration costs as incurred. Exploration costs expensed during the year ended October 31, 2005 and 2004 were $1,666,884 and $3,374,049, respectively. The exploration costs expensed during the Company's exploration stage amount to $5,334,086.

Exploration Stage Activities
The Company has been in the exploration stage since November 8, 1993 and has no revenues from operations. The Company is primarily engaged in the acquisition and exploration of property concessions. Should the Company locate a commercially minable reserve, the Company would expect to actively prepare the site for extraction.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The Company's financial instruments as defined by Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 107, "Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments," include cash and cash equivalents, marketable securities, receivables, advances to employees, accounts payable and accrued expenses. All instruments are accounted for on a historical cost basis, which, due to the short maturity of these financial instruments, approximates fair value at October 31, 2005 and 2004.

Foreign Currency Translation
Assets and liabilities of the Company's foreign operations are translated into U.S. dollars at the year-end exchange rates, and revenue and expenses are translated at the average exchange rates during the period. Exchange differences arising on translation are disclosed as a separate component of shareholders' equity. Realized gains and losses from foreign currency transactions are reflected in the results of operations.

Foreign Operations
The accompanying balance sheet at October 31, 2005 contains Company assets in Mexico, including: $4,334,767 in property concessions; $514,855 (before accumulated depreciation) of mining equipment; and $30,538 of cash. Although this country is considered economically stable, it is always possible that unanticipated events in foreign countries could disrupt the Company's operations. The Mexican government does not require foreign entities to maintain cash reserves in Mexico.

Going Concern
As shown in the accompanying financial statements, the Company has no revenues, has incurred a net loss of $3,302,161 for the year ended October 31, 2005 and has an accumulated deficit of $16,621,799. These factors indicate that the Company may be unable to continue in existence. The financial statements do not include any adjustments related to the recoverability and classification of recorded assets, or the amounts and classification of liabilities that might be necessary in the event the Company cannot continue in existence.

The Company's management believes that significant and imminent private placements of stock and continuing contracted agreements will generate sufficient cash for the Company to continue to operate based on current expense projections. The Company is currently operating on the cash proceeds of a private placement offering currently in progress.
 
 
F/S-10
 
METALLINE MINING COMPANY
              
(AN EXPLORATION STAGE COMPANY)
              
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OCTOBER 31, 2005
  
               
Marketable Securities
Pursuant to Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 115, the Company classifies marketable securities as trading, available-for-sale, or held-to-maturity. During the year ended October 31, 2004, the Company invested $1,250,000 in total-return mutual funds consisting of equities, convertible debt and high-yield securities, and classified them as trading. During the year ended October 31, 2005, these securities were sold and the proceeds were used in the operations of the Company. The Company did not hold marketable securities at October 31, 2005.

Principles of Consolidation
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly owned subsidiary, after elimination of intercompany accounts and transactions. The wholly owned subsidiary of the Company is listed in Note 1.

Property Concessions
Costs of acquiring property concessions are capitalized by project area upon purchase or staking of the associated claims. Costs to maintain the property concessions and leases are expensed as incurred. When a property concession reaches the production stage, the related capitalized costs will be amortized, using the units of production method on the basis of periodic estimates of ore reserves.

Property concessions are periodically assessed for impairment of value and any diminution in value is charged to operations at the time of impairment. Should a property concession be abandoned, its capitalized costs are charged to operations. The Company charges to operations the allocable portion of capitalized costs attributable to property concessions sold. Capitalized costs are allocated to property concessions abandoned or sold based on the proportion of claims abandoned or sold to the claims remaining within the project area.

Property and Equipment
Property and equipment are recorded at cost. Major additions and improvements are capitalized. Minor replacements, maintenance and repairs that do not increase the useful life of the assets are expensed as incurred. Depreciation of property and equipment is determined using the straight-line or accelerated methods over the expected useful lives of the assets. See Note 3.

Provision for Taxes
Income taxes are provided based upon the liability method of accounting pursuant to Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 109, "Accounting for Income Taxes" (hereinafter "SFAS No. 109"). Under this approach, deferred income taxes are recorded to reflect the tax consequences in future years of differences between the tax basis of assets and liabilities and their financial reporting amounts at each year-end. A valuation allowance is recorded against deferred tax assets if management does not believe the Company has met the "more likely than not" standard imposed by SFAS No. 109 to allow recognition of such an asset.

At October 31, 2005, the Company had net deferred tax assets calculated at an expected rate of 34% of approximately $4,618,000, principally arising from net operating loss carryforwards for income tax purposes. As management of the Company cannot determine that it is more likely than not that the Company will realize the benefit of the net deferred tax asset, there is a valuation allowance equal to the net deferred tax asset.
 
F/S-11

METALLINE MINING COMPANY
              
(AN EXPLORATION STAGE COMPANY)
              
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OCTOBER 31, 2005
  
               
The significant components of the deferred tax assets at October 31, 2005 and 2004 were as follows:

   
October 31,
 
October 31,
 
   
2005
 
2004
 
Net operating loss carryforward
  
$
13,582,000
  
$
10,456,000
  
Deferred tax asset
  
$
4,618,000
  
$
3,555,000
  
Deferred tax asset valuation allowance
  
$
(4,618,000
)
$
(3,555,000
)
 
At October 31, 2005, the Company has net operating loss carryforwards of approximately $13,582,000, which expire in the years 2008 through 2025. The Company has recognized approximately $1,491,000 of losses from the issuance of stock options and warrants for services through fiscal 2005, which were not deductible for tax purposes. The change in the allowance account from October 31, 2004 to 2005 was $1,063,000. The Company has immaterial temporary differences resulting from differences in tax depreciation of equipment.

During 2005, the Company received value added tax refunds from the Mexican government in the amount of $119,615.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In May 2005, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 154 ("SFAS No. 154"), "Accounting Changes and Error Corrections." This statement requires entities that voluntarily make a change in accounting principle to apply that change retrospectively to prior periods' financial statements, unless this would be impracticable. SFAS No. 154 supersedes APB Opinion No. 20, "Accounting Changes," which previously required that most voluntary changes in accounting principle be recognized by including in the current period's net income the cumulative effect of changing to the new accounting principle. SFAS No. 154 also makes a distinction between "retrospective application" of an accounting principle and the "restatement" of financial statements to reflect the correction of an error. SFAS No. 154 applies to accounting changes and error corrections that are made in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2005. Management believes the adoption of this statement will not have an immediate material impact on the financial statements of the Company.

In March 2005, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued FASB Interpretation No. 47 ("FIN 47"), "Accounting for Conditional Asset Retirement Obligations." FIN 47 clarifies that the term "conditional asset retirement obligation," which as used in SFAS No. 143, "Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations," refers to a legal obligation to perform an asset retirement activity in which the timing and (or) method of settlement are conditional on a future event that may or may not be within the control of the entity. The entity must record a liability for a "conditional" asset retirement obligation if the fair value of the obligation can be reasonably estimated. FIN 47 also clarifies when an entity would have sufficient information to reasonably estimate the fair value of an asset retirement obligation. FIN 47 is effective no later than the end of fiscal years ending after December 15, 2005. Management believes the adoption of this statement will not have an immediate material impact on the financial statements of the Company.

In December 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 153. This Statement addresses the measurement of exchanges of nonmonetary assets. The guidance in APB Opinion No. 29, "Accounting for Nonmonetary Transactions," is based on the principle that exchanges of nonmonetary assets should be measured based on the fair value of the assets exchanged. The guidance in that Opinion, however, included certain exceptions to that principle. This statement amends Opinion 29 to eliminate the exception for nonmonetary exchanges of similar productive assets and replaces it with a general exception for exchanges of nonmonetary assets that do not have commercial substance. A nonmonetary exchange has commercial substance if the future cash flows of the entity are expected to change significantly as a result of the exchange. This statement is effective for financial statements for fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2005. Earlier application is permitted for nonmonetary asset exchanges incurred during fiscal years beginning after the date of this statement is issued. Management believes the adoption of this statement will not impact the financial statements of the Company.
 
F/S-12
 
METALLINE MINING COMPANY
              
(AN EXPLORATION STAGE COMPANY)
              
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OCTOBER 31, 2005
  
               
In December 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 152, which amends SFAS Statement No. 66, "Accounting for Sales of Real Estate," to reference the financial accounting and reporting guidance for real estate time-sharing transactions that is provided in AICPA Statement of Position (SOP) 04-2, "Accounting for Real Estate Time-Sharing Transactions." This statement also amends SFAS No. 67, "Accounting for Costs and Initial Rental Operations of Real Estate Projects," to state that the guidance for (a) incidental operations and (b) costs incurred to sell real estate projects, does not apply to real estate time-sharing transactions. The accounting for those operations and costs is subject to the guidance in SOP 04-2. This statement is effective for financial statements for fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2005. Management believes the adoption of this Statement will not impact the financial statements of the Company.

Revenue Recognition Policy
The Company recognizes revenue when there is a mutually executed contract, the contract price is fixed and determinable, delivery of the product has occurred, and collectibility of the contract price is considered probable. As of October 31, 2005, the Company has not recognized revenues.

Stock-Based Compensation
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123, "Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation" (hereinafter "SFAS No. 123"), defines a fair value-based method of accounting for stock options and other equity instruments. The Company has adopted this method, which measures compensation costs based on the estimated fair value of the award and recognizes that cost over the service period.
 
NOTE 3 - PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT

Property and equipment are stated at cost. Depreciation is provided using the straight-line or accelerated methods over the estimated useful lives of the assets. The useful lives of property, plant and equipment for purposes of computing depreciation are five to seven years for equipment, and 39 years for buildings.
 
F/S-13
 
METALLINE MINING COMPANY
              
(AN EXPLORATION STAGE COMPANY)
              
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OCTOBER 31, 2005
  
               
The following is a summary of property, equipment, and accumulated depreciation at October 31, 2005 and 2004:

   
2005
  
2004
  
Mining equipment
 
$
514,855
  
$
507,257
  
Buildings and structures
    
141,061
   
141,061
 
Land - non mineral
   
15,839
   
15,839
 
Vehicles
    
42,068
   
42,068
 
Computer equipment
   
88,787
   
88,787
 
Office equipment
   
4,183
   
4,183
 
Furniture and fixtures
   
8,185
   
8,185
 
     
814,978
   
807,380
 
Less: Accumulated depreciation
   
(324,094
)
  
(240,537
)
   
$
490,884
  
$
566,843
  
               
Depreciation expense for the years ended October 31, 2005 and 2004 was $83,557 and $63,045, respectively. The Company evaluates the recoverability of property and equipment when events and circumstances indicate that such assets might be impaired. The Company determines impairment by comparing the undiscounted future cash flows estimated to be generated by these assets to their respective carrying amounts. Maintenance and repairs are expensed as incurred. Replacements and betterments are capitalized. The cost and related reserves of assets sold or retired are removed from the accounts, and any resulting gain or loss is reflected in results of operations.

NOTE 4 - CONCESSIONS IN THE SIERRA MOJADA DISTRICT

Sierra Mojada Mining Concessions
During the period of August 23, 1996 to July 18, 2000, the Company executed six separate agreements for the acquisition of eight concessions in the mining region known as the Sierra Mojada District located in Sierra Mojada, Coahuila, Mexico. Each agreement enabled the Company to explore the underlying concession in consideration for the payment of stipulated annual payments. Each of the concession agreements included an option to purchase the concession and the annual payments, which were applied in full toward the contracted purchase price of the related concession.

The Company subsequently completed the purchase of the eight concessions, as follows: Esmeralda, consisting of approximately 118 hectares, on March 20, 1997; Fortuna, consisting of approximately 14 hectares, on December 8, 1999; Sierra Mojada and Mojada 3, consisting of approximately 4,767 and 1,689 hectares, respectively, on May 30, 2000; Unificacion Mineros Nortenos and Vulcano, consisting of approximately 337 and 4 hectares, respectively, on August 30, 2000; Esmeralda I, consisting of approximately 98 hectares, on August 20, 2001; and La Blanca, consisting of approximately 34 hectares, on August 20, 2001. The Company has recorded the concessions at acquisition cost.

All of the concessions were acquired by purchase agreements with Mexican entities and/or Mexican individuals and all of the concessions were paid for in cash. In the acquisition of Sierra Mojada and Mojada 3 there was one purchase agreement for both concessions. Also, in the acquisition of Unificacion Mineros Nortenos and Vulcano, there was one purchase agreement for both concessions.
 
F/S-14

METALLINE MINING COMPANY
              
(AN EXPLORATION STAGE COMPANY)
              
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OCTOBER 31, 2005
  
               
Because all eight concessions are located in the Sierra Mojada Mining District and in close proximity to one another, the concessions are routinely treated as one major prospect area and are collectively referred to as the Sierra Mojada Project. The primary work performed on the Company's concessions has consisted of geologic mapping, sampling, and drilling. This work has resulted in establishing the presence of mineralized material (zinc) of sufficient quantity and grade to justify in the Company's opinion a feasibility study, which commenced during 2005.

NOTE 5 - LONG-TERM LIABILITIES

The Company's long-term liabilities at October 31, 2005 and 2004 are as follows:

   
 2005
  
 2004
  
Note payable to bank, due July of 2008, monthly principal and interest payments at 4.94%, collateralized by a vehicle
  
$
11,574
  
$
15,783
  
Less: Current portion
   
(4,209
)
  
(4,209
)
   
$
7,365
  
$
11,574
  
 
Loan maturities for each of the five years following October 31, 2005 are as follows:
         
2006
  
$
4,209
  
2007
    
4,537
 
2008
    
2,828
 
2009
    
—
  
2010
    
—
  
   
$
11,574
  


NOTE 6 - RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

The Company receives rent-free office space in Coeur d'Alene, Idaho from its president. The value of the space is not considered materially significant for financial reporting purposes. The Company also has given $9,560 in cash advances for travel to two of its officers at October 31, 2005 under an accountable plan per IRS Regulation Section 1.62.

NOTE 7 - PREFERRED STOCK

At its March 1, 2001 annual shareholders meeting, the Company approved a change to its articles of incorporation whereby the Company is authorized to issue 1,000,000 shares of $0.01 par value preferred stock. The specific features of the preferred stock are to be determined by the Company's board of directors. At October 31, 2005, there were no shares of preferred stock issued or outstanding.
 
F/S-15
 
METALLINE MINING COMPANY
              
(AN EXPLORATION STAGE COMPANY)
              
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OCTOBER 31, 2005
  
               
NOTE 8 - COMMON STOCK

In March 2005, the Company's board of directors authorized a private placement of up to 5,333,334 shares of the Company's restricted common stock at a price of $1.125 per share for total proceeds of $6,000,000. Purchasers of these shares will also receive a warrant to purchase one share of the Company's common stock at an exercise price of $2.00 per share with an exercise period of five years. In September 2005, a modification of the private placement terms was authorized. The modified terms allow for the issuance of 7,500,000 shares of common stock at a price of $0.80 per share, a warrant exercise price of $1.25 per share and an exercise period of five years.

During the year ended October 31, 2005, the Company issued 476,404 shares of common stock, under the aforementioned private placement, for cash consideration at an average of $0.98 per share with attached warrants valued at an average of $0.28 per share (see Note 10). In addition, 176,772 shares of common stock were issued to officers and employees of the Company at an average of $1.00 per share in consideration for accrued wages.

During the year ended October 31, 2004, the Company issued 7,580,150 shares of common stock for cash consideration at $1.00 per share less issuance costs of $698,863. Officers of the Company were issued 120,655 shares at an average of $1.26 per share in payment of accrued wages. The Company also issued 141,286 shares in exchange for services received. See Note 13.

During the year ended October 31, 2003, the Company sold 7,000 common stock units with an ascribed cash value of $10,500. The Company also sold 849,000 shares at an average price of $0.98 per share. The Company also issued 100,000 shares of common stock under the Penoles agreement for cash, at $2.00 per share. Additionally, 373,925 shares of common stock valued at $468,771 were issued as compensation to officers.

During the year ended October 31, 2002, the Company sold 162,667 common stock units with an ascribed cash value of $229,360 for common stock, and $14,640 for warrants. The Company also issued 50,000 shares of common stock under the Penoles agreement for cash at $2.00 a share. (See Note 12.) Additionally, 86,078 shares of common stock valued at $104,875 were issued as compensation to officers. On May 20, 2002, the Company authorized the offering of 1,000,000 common stock units, with each unit consisting of one share of common stock and one warrant equal to 1/3 of a share of common stock.

During the year ended October 31, 2001, the Company issued 20,000 shares of common stock for the exercise of warrants valued at $10,760 and for cash of $15,000. Additionally, 57,000 shares of common stock were issued for services valued at $112,680 and for cash of $390, and 250,000 shares of common stock with 125,000 warrants attached were issued for $500,000 in cash.

During the year ended October 31, 2000, the Company sold 1,440,500 shares of its common stock for $3,968,625 cash, issued 120,000 shares of common stock for services valued $153,360, issued 15,000 shares of common stock for equipment valued at $25,000 and issued 950,000 shares of common stock for options exercised at $0.86 per share.

During the year ended October 31, 1999, the Company sold 1,068,800 shares of common stock for $1,075,900 cash. In addition the Company received $37,500 as a deposit toward the purchase of 50,000 shares (this stock was issued in December 1999) and $300,000 for payment of subscriptions receivable. The Company also issued 55,556 shares for payment of drilling expenses valued at $50,000.

In February 1998, 200,000 shares of common stock were issued for a mine database. The shares were valued at $1.625 per share, resulting in a transaction valued at $325,000. Services valued at $22,300 were paid with 41,800 shares of common stock. An additional 1,398,500 shares of common stock were issued for $1,065,445 cash and receivables, and a subscription receivable of $300,000, between February and October 1998.
 
F/S-16
 
METALLINE MINING COMPANY
              
(AN EXPLORATION STAGE COMPANY)
              
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OCTOBER 31, 2005
  
               
In April 1997, 250,000 common stock shares were issued for cash of $87,500 and 133,800 shares of common stock were issued for services valued at $45,583. In May and June 1997, 181,600 shares of common stock were issued for $63,560 cash and 62,500 shares of common stock were issued for services valued at $21,875. In August and October 1997, 420,000 and 75,000 shares of common stock were issued for cash of $378,000 and $75,000, respectively. Additionally, during August 1997, 100,200 shares of common stock were issued for debt of $31,530 and 95,000 shares of common stock were issued for services valued at $95,000.

During November 1995, the Company's directors approved the issuance of 45,000 shares of common stock for services rendered at $0.01 per share. During June 1996, the Company issued 900,000 shares of common stock for the assignment of mineral rights in the Sierra Mojada Project in Coahuila, Mexico valued at $0.01 per share to Messrs. John Ryan, Merlin Bingham, and Daniel Gorski, who had formed a partnership to advance development of the mining concession located in Coahuila, Mexico. The partnership had an informal joint venture agreement with USMX, Inc. covering the mining concessions. By acquiring the partnership interest, the Company was able to negotiate and sign a formal joint venture agreement with USMX in July 1996.

During the year ended October 31, 1996, Metalline Mining Company issued 1,320,859 shares of common stock for $146,359 in cash. During October 1996, the Company issued 150,000 shares of common stock for computer equipment valued at $15,000. Also during October 1996, the Company issued 120,000 shares of common stock to Mr. Gorski and an additional 20,000 shares of common stock to Mr. Ryan for services rendered valued at $14,000.

In January 1996, Mr. Carmen Ridland, in a private sale, sold a controlling interest in the corporation to Mr. Howard Crosby. On January 12, 1996, Mr. Ridland transferred control of Cadgie Co. to Mr. Crosby and Mr. Robert Jorgensen.

On August 4, 1995 the directors of Cadgie Co. declared a 3:1 forward stock split of the outstanding Cadgie Co. shares, thus increasing the number of outstanding shares from 192,160 to 576,480.

On August 31, 1994, the directors of Cadgie Co. declared a 1:5 reverse stock split of the outstanding Cadgie Co. shares, thus reducing the number of outstanding shares from 960,800 to 192,160 shares.

The Company (Cadgie Co.) was formed in August of 1993 and incorporated in November 1993 by Mr. Carman Ridland of Las Vegas, Nevada as a spin-off from its predecessor, Precious Metal Mines, Inc. The Company issued 960,800 of its $0.01 par value shares to Precious Metal Mines, Inc. for 16 unpatented mining claims located near Philipsburg, Montana comprising the Kadex property group. Precious Metal Mines, Inc. distributed the 960,800 shares of Cadgie Company to its shareholders. One share of Cadgie Co. was exchanged for each share of Precious Metal Mines, Inc. held by holders of record as of August 31, 1993.

NOTE 9 - STOCK OPTIONS

During the years ended October 31, 2005 and 2004, the Company did not grant common stock options.

In 2002, the Company granted 100,000 options with an exercise price of $1.25 and an expiration of seven years. The fair value of these options was determined using the Black-Scholes option pricing model using a risk free interest rate of 3.25% and a volatility of 42.49%. The total value was calculated at $61,000.
 
F/S-17
 
METALLINE MINING COMPANY
              
(AN EXPLORATION STAGE COMPANY)
              
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OCTOBER 31, 2005
  
               
Following is a summary of the Company's stock option activity during the years ending October 31, 2005 and 2004:

   
Shares
 
 Weighted Average Exercise Price
 
            
Options outstanding at November 1, 2003
    
770,000
 
$
1.67
  
Granted
    
—
    
—
  
Canceled
    
(100,000
)
  
2.15
 
Exercised
    
—
    
—
  
Options outstanding at October 31, 2004
    
670,000
   
1.56
 
Granted
    
—
    
—
  
Canceled
    
—
    
—
  
Exercised
    
—
    
—
  
Options outstanding at October 31, 2005
    
670,000
 
$
1.56
  
 
On March 1, 2001, the Company's shareholders approved a qualified stock option plan (the "Plan"), which provides for non-statutory and incentive stock options for employees, directors and consultants, and has reserved a total of 1,000,000 shares of common stock for issuance pursuant to the Plan.
 
Summarized information about stock options outstanding and exercisable at October 31, 2005 is as follows:

Options Outstanding
 
Options Exercisable
 
Exercise Price
  
Number
Outstanding
  
Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life (Years)
  
Weighted Average
Exercise Price
  
Number
Exercisable
 
Weighted Average
Exercise Price
 
$1.25
    
100,000
    
3.77
  
$
1.25
    
100,000
  
$
1.25
  
1.32
    
370,000
    
0.93
    
1.32
    
370,000
    
1.32
  
2.15
    
200,000
    
4.33
    
2.15
    
200,000
    
2.15
  
$1.25-2.15
    
670,000
    
2.37
  
$
1.56
    
670,000
  
$
1.56
  


NOTE 10 - STOCK WARRANTS

During the year ended October 31, 2005, the Company issued 476,404 common stock units that consisted of 476,404 shares of common stock and warrants to purchase an additional 476,404 shares of common stock. As part of the total cash purchase, the warrants were valued at $132,159. The warrants were valued using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. The assumptions used were as follows: volatility of 58%, a risk-free interest rate of 3% and an exercise term of five years. During 2005, 290,182 stock warrants expired. As of October 31, 2005, 1,163,887 stock warrants were outstanding and exercisable.

During 2004, the Company did not issue stock warrants. At October 31, 2004, 977,665 stock warrants were outstanding and exercisable.
 
F/S-18
 
METALLINE MINING COMPANY
              
(AN EXPLORATION STAGE COMPANY)
              
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OCTOBER 31, 2005
  
               
During the year ended October 31, 2003, the Company issued 7,000 common stock units that consisted of 7,000 shares of common stock and warrants to purchase an additional 2,333 shares of common stock. As part of the total cash purchase, the warrants were valued at $583.

During the year ended October 31, 2002, the Company issued 162,667 common stock units that were made up of 162,667 shares of common stock and warrants to purchase an additional 54,222 shares of common stock. As part of the total cash purchase, the warrants were valued at $14,640.

During the year ended October 31, 2001, the Company issued 250,000 shares of stock with 125,000 warrants attached. These warrants were valued at $3,424. Additionally 20,000 warrants were exercised for $15,000 in cash and services valued at $10,760. The Company also issued 80,000 warrants for services, which were valued at $144,791.

NOTE 11 - COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

Compliance with Environmental Regulations
The Company's mining activities are subject to laws and regulations controlling not only the exploration and mining of property concessions, but also the effect of such activities on the environment. Compliance with such laws and regulations may necessitate additional capital outlays, affect the economics of a project, and cause changes or delays in the Company's activities.

NOTE 12 - JOINT VENTURE AGREEMENTS

Penoles Agreement
On November 15, 2001, the Company entered into an agreement with Compania Minera La Parrena S.A. de C.V. ("Penoles") whereby Penoles may earn the right to acquire a 60% interest in certain mining concessions located in the Sierra Mojada region of Coahuila, Mexico. The earn-in right was contingent upon the following: delivery by Penoles within four years of a pre-feasibility study, completion by Penoles of $1,000,000 of qualified expenditures on the aforementioned mining concessions, and Penoles purchase of up to 250,000 shares of Metalline's common stock $2.00 per share. As of October 31, 2003, Penoles had purchased 150,000 shares of common stock under this agreement. See Note 8.

During the year ended October 31, 2003, the Company received reimbursement of $151,536 from Penoles for expenses incurred by Metalline, which were applied toward an aggregate $85,712 of qualified expenditures incurred by Penoles. In November 2003, the agreement between the Company and Minas Penoles was terminated by the Company.

Northern Limited
On October 7, 1999, the Company announced that it entered into a five-year "earn-in" type of a joint venture agreement with North Limited. The agreement gives North Limited the right to earn into 60% of the Company's Sierra Mojada Project by providing all funds necessary to complete a feasibility study delivered in no more than five years that is acceptable to international banking institutions for lending development capital. North Limited is a large Australian mining company based in Melbourne, Australia and was known as North Broken Hill Peko before a name change in 1994. In August 2000, Rio Tinto Limited purchased North Limited for its iron ore holdings and subsequently terminated North Limited's agreement with the Company.
 
F/S-19
EXHIBIT INDEX

EXHIBIT NO.
  
EXHIBIT
     
3.1
  
Articles of Incorporation of Metalline Mining Company. Filed as an exhibit to the registrant's registration statement on Form 10-SB (Commission File No. 000-27667) and incorporated by reference herein.
     
3.2
  
Amended and Restated Bylaws of Metalline Mining Company. Filed as an exhibit to the registrant's current report on Form 8-K filed on September 14, 2005 and incorporated by reference herein.
     
3.3
  
Articles of Amendment to the Articles of Incorporation. Filed as an exhibit to the registrant's registration statement on Form 10-SB and incorporated by reference herein.
     
4.1
  
Reference is made to Exhibits 3.1, 3.2 and 3.3.
     
21.1
Subsidiaries of Metalline Mining Company. Filed as an exhibit to the registrant's Form 10-KSB filed on Jaunary 31, 2006 and incorporated by reference herein.
     
23.1
  
Consent of Williams & Webster, P.S. Filed as an exhibit to the registrant's Form 10-KSB filed on Jaunary 31, 2006 and incorporated by reference herein.
     
31.1
Certification of Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Exchange Act. Filed herewith.
     
31.2
Certification of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Exchange Act. Filed herewith.
     
32.1
Certification of Principal Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. Furnished herewith.
     
32.2
Certification of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. Furnished herewith.
     
99.1
Sierra Mojada location map. Filed as an exhibit to the registrant's Form 10-KSB filed on Jaunary 31, 2006 and incorporated by reference herein.


E-1