Edgar Filing: AMPEX CORP /DE/

Amendment No. 1 to Form 10-Q for the Period Ended September 30, 2004

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q/A

(Amendment No. 1)

(Mark One)

x	QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2004

¨	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from to

Commission File No. 0-20292

AMPEX CORPORATION

(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)


Delaware		13-3667696
(State of Incorporation)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification Number)

1228 Douglas Avenue

Redwood City, California 94063-3199

(Address of principal executive offices, including zip code)

(650) 367-2011

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports); and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No x

As of September 30, 2004, the aggregate number of outstanding shares of our Class A Common Stock, $.01 par value, was 3,642,517. There were no outstanding shares of our Class C Common Stock, $0.01 par value.

Explanatory Note

Restatement of Financial Statements for Correction of Error in Accounting for the Media Pension Plan

This Amendment No. 1 to Ampex Corporation’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2004 includes restated unaudited consolidated financial statements as of September 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003 and for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2004 and 2003 to correct the accounting for our obligations under a pension plan of our former magnetic tape manufacturing subsidiary (“Media”) which we disposed of in 1995.

The agreement for the sale of Media required the buyer, Quantegy Corporation, to pay directly or to reimburse Ampex for required contributions to the Media pension plan. However, we remained the Plan Sponsor of the Media pension plan and remained obligated to make pension contributions to that Plan.

In connection with the restatement of the Company’s consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2003, the Company and the Audit Committee determined that its pension accounting constitutes a “material weakness.”

As a result of the foregoing, the Company has restated its consolidated balance sheets at December 31, 2003 and 2002, and consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss), cash flows, and stockholders’ deficit for the three years within the period ending December 31, 2003, including the corresponding 2003 and 2002 unaudited interim periods, and the unaudited quarterly periods ended March 31, 2004, June 30, 2004 and September 30, 2004. The restatement affects periods prior to 2001. The impact of the restatement on such prior periods is reflected as an adjustment to accumulated deficit, other accrued liabilities, other liabilities and minimum pension liability adjustment within Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income as of January 1, 2001. The effect of the restatement on net income (loss) and diluted earnings (loss) per share is set forth in Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations in Part I of this Form 10-Q/A

Note 1, Restatement of Previously Issued Financial Statements, discloses the nature of the restatement adjustments and shows the impact of the restatement adjustments on income (loss) from continuing operations and net income (loss) applicable to common stockholders and related diluted income (loss) per share amounts for each of the periods ended September 30, 2004 and 2003. In addition, Note 1 to the restated unaudited consolidated financial statements shows the effects of the adjustment on total liabilities, the accumulated deficit and total stockholders’ deficit as of September 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003. The impact of the restatement adjustments affecting periods prior to 2001 has been reflected in adjusted stockholders’ deficit as of January 1, 2001. For information on the impact of the restatement on the years 2000 and 1999, reference is made to Item 6, Selected Financial Data, in Part II of the 2003 Form 10-K/A.

For a discussion of the Company’s accounting for its obligations under SFAS No. 87, “Employers’ Accounting for Pensions,” see Note 16 to the restated consolidated financial statements accompanying the 2003 Form 10K/A. Other notes to the unaudited consolidated financial statements of this Form 10-Q/A affected by the restatement have also been revised.

This Form 10-Q/A amends and restates Item 1, 2 and 4 of Part I of the original Form 10-Q, and no other information included in the original Form 10-Q is amended hereby. The explanatory caption at the beginning of each of these revised items of this Form 10-Q/A sets forth the nature of the revisions to that item.

The Company did not amend its Annual Reports on Form 10-K or Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q for periods affected by the restatement that ended prior to December 31, 2002, and the financial statements and related financial information contained in such reports should no longer be relied upon and are superceded by the information in this Form 10-Q/A. The Company did not amend its Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q for periods affected by the restatement for the year ended December 31, 2003, and the financial statements and related financial information contained in such reports should no longer be relied upon and are superceded by the information in this Form 10-Q/A.

This Amendment does not reflect events that have occurred after the November 22, 2004 filing date of the Form 10-Q that was originally filed, or modify or update the disclosures presented in the original Form 10-Q, except to reflect the corrections described above. Information with respect to those events has been or will be set forth, as appropriate, in the Company’s subsequent periodic filings, including its Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q and Current Reports on Form 8-K. Any reference to facts and circumstances at a “current” date refer to such facts and circumstances as of such original filing date.

AMPEX CORPORATION

FORM 10-Q/A

Quarter Ended September 30, 2004

INDEX


		Page
PART I — FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1.	Financial Statements

	Consolidated Restated Balance Sheets (unaudited) at September 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003	3

	Consolidated Restated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss) (unaudited) for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2004 and 2003	4

	Consolidated Restated Statements of Cash Flows (unaudited) for the nine months ended September 30, 2004 and 2003	5

	Notes to Unaudited Restated Consolidated Financial Statements	6

Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	22

Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure about Market Risk	41

Item 4.	Controls and Procedures	41

PART II — OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1.	Legal Proceedings	43

Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	45

Item 3.	Defaults Upon Senior Securities	45

Item 4.	Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders	45

Item 5.	Other Information	45

Item 6	Exhibits	45

Signatures		46

AMPEX CORPORATION

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(in thousands, except share and per share data)

(unaudited)


	September 30, 2004			December 31, 2003
	Restated			Restated
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	5,451		$	14,023
Short-term investments		9,160			—
Accounts receivable (net of allowances of $88 in 2004 and $137 in 2003)		2,892			4,513
Inventories		6,184			6,343
Other current assets		4,052			4,366

Total current assets		27,739			29,245

Property, plant and equipment		4,333			4,825
Other assets		598			1,127

Total assets	$	32,670		$	35,197

LIABILITIES, REDEEMABLE PREFERRED STOCK AND STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIT
Current liabilities:
Notes payable	$	132		$	146
Accounts payable		2,579			1,511
Net liabilities of discontinued operations		807			1,076
Accrued restructuring costs		631			1,300
Other accrued liabilities		12,731			24,844

Total current liabilities		16,880			28,877
Long-term debt		89,560			74,022
Other liabilities		73,758			74,561
Accrued restructuring costs		1,794			3,450
Net liabilities of discontinued operations		1,354			2,071

Total liabilities		183,346			182,981

Commitments and contingencies (Note 10)

Mandatorily redeemable nonconvertible preferred stock, $1,000 liquidation value:
Authorized: 69,970 shares in 2004 and in 2003
Issued and outstanding - none in 2004 and in 2003		—			—

Mandatorily redeemable preferred stock, $2,000 liquidation value:
Authorized: 21,859 shares in 2004 and in 2003
Issued and outstanding - none in 2004 and in 2003		—			—

Convertible preferred stock, $2,000 liquidation value:
Authorized: 10,000 shares in 2004 and in 2003
Issued and outstanding - none in 2004 and in 2003		—			—

Stockholders’ deficit:
Preferred stock, $1.00 par value:
Authorized: 898,171 shares in 2004 and in 2003
Issued and outstanding - none in 2004 and in 2003		—			—
Common stock, $.01 par value:
Class A:
Authorized: 175,000,000 shares in 2004 and in 2003
Issued and outstanding - 3,642,517 shares in 2004; 3,728,017 in 2003		36			37
Class C:
Authorized: 50,000,000 shares in 2004 and in 2003
Issued and outstanding - none in 2004 and in 2003		—			—
Other additional capital		454,468			454,394
Accumulated deficit		(516,010	)		(510,042	)
Accumulated other comprehensive loss		(89,170	)		(92,173	)

Total stockholders’ deficit		(150,676	)		(147,784	)

Total liabilities, redeemable preferred stock and stockholders’ deficit	$	32,670		$	35,197

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited consolidated financial statements.

AMPEX CORPORATION

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)

(in thousands, except share and per share data)


	For the Three Months Ended						For the Nine Months Ended
	September 30,						September 30,
	2004			2003			2004			2003
	Restated			Restated			Restated			Restated
	(unaudited)
Licensing revenue	$	1,759		$	1,744		$	4,861		$	7,702
Product revenue		4,390			6,367			15,767			17,950
Service revenue		2,173			2,065			6,496			7,049

Total revenue		8,322			10,176			27,124			32,701

Intellectual property costs		1,653			205			4,595			796
Cost of product sales		3,069			3,848			9,955			10,712
Cost of service		688			747			2,342			2,375
Research, development and engineering		1,022			696			2,853			2,326
Selling and administrative		3,326			2,848			9,160			9,095
Restructuring charges (credits)		(1,410	)		—			(1,410	)		—

Total costs and operating expenses		8,348			8,344			27,495			25,304

Operating income (loss)		(26	)		1,832			(371	)		7,397

Media pension costs		322			328			965			982
Interest expense		2,534			2,215			7,312			6,716
Amortization of debt financing costs		14			15			42			43
Interest income		(30	)		(57	)		(88	)		(86	)
Other (income) expense, net		(385	)		2			(381	)		35

Loss from continuing operations before income taxes and equity in income of limited partnership, including sale of investment		(2,481	)		(671	)		(8,221	)		(293	)

Provision for (benefit of) income taxes		—			(3,981	)		248			(3,306	)
Equity in income of limited partnership, including sale of investment		(591	)		—			(2,149	)		—

Net income (loss) from continuing operations (Note 5)		(1,890	)		3,310			(6,320	)		3,013

Income from discontinued operations (net of taxes of nil in 2004)		352			—			352			—

Net income (loss)		(1,538	)		3,310			(5,968	)		3,013

Benefit from extinguishment of mandatorily redeemable preferred stock		—			974			—			3,041
Preferred dividends ascribed, but not declared		—			(451	)		—			(1,416	)

Undistributed net income (loss) applicable to common stockholders		(1,538	)		3,833			(5,968	)		4,638

Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax:
Foreign currency translation adjustments		2			(67	)		46			(54	)

Comprehensive income (loss)	$	(1,536	)	$	3,766		$	(5,922	)	$	4,584

Basic and diluted undistributed income (loss) per share (Note 5) :
Undistributed income (loss) per share from continuing operations	$	(0.52	)	$	0.88		$	(1.72	)	$	0.50
Income per share from discontinued operations	$	0.10		$	0.00		$	0.10		$	0.00
Undistributed income (loss) per share applicable to common stockholders	$	(0.42	)	$	1.18		$	(1.63	)	$	1.45

Weighted average number of basic and diluted common shares outstanding		3,642,517			3,260,733			3,667,572			3,207,382

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited consolidated financial statements.

AMPEX CORPORATION

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(in thousands)


	For the Nine Months Ended
	September 30, 2004			September 30, 2003
	Restated			Restated
	(unaudited)
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income (loss)	$	(5,968	)	$	3,013
Income from discontinued operations		(352	)		—
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:
Depreciation, amortization and warrant accretion		596			809
Accretion of interest expense		7,168			6,577
Reversal of prior years’ tax reserves		—			(4,164	)
Equity in income of limited partnership, including sale of investment		(2,149	)		—
Periodic pension cost		2,383			1,333
Stock option compensation expense		60			—
Net loss on disposal of assets		26			—
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable		1,587			1,555
Inventories		159			370
Other assets		2,949			(615	)
Accounts payable		1,077			(103	)
Other accrued liabilities and income taxes payable		(2,139	)		(154	)
Ampex and Media pension contributions		(9,895	)		—
Accrued restructuring costs		(2,325	)		(1,001	)
Other liabilities		(174	)		60

Net cash provided by (used in) continuing operations		(6,997	)		7,680
Net cash used in discontinued operations		(634	)		(726	)

Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities		(7,631	)		6,954

Cash flows from investing activities:
Proceeds on maturity of short-term investments		—			1,483
Purchases of short-term investments		(9,160	)		(1,000	)
Deferred gain on sale of assets		(38	)		(38	)
Additions to property, plant and equipment		(91	)		(16	)

Net cash provided by (used in) continuing operations		(9,289	)		429

Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities		(9,289	)		429

Cash flows from financing activities:
Borrowings under debt agreements		9,895			—
Repayments under debt agreements		(1,539	)		(3,311	)
Proceeds from foreclosure of shareholders notes		13			—
Proceeds from issuance of common stock		—			145

Net cash provided by (used in) continuing operations		8,369			(3,166	)

Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities		8,369			(3,166	)

Effects of exchange rates on cash		(21	)		32

Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents		(8,572	)		4,249
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period		14,023			7,579

Cash and cash equivalents, end of period	$	5,451		$	11,828

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited consolidated financial statements.

AMPEX CORPORATION

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Note 1 - Ampex Corporation

Ampex Corporation (“Ampex” or the “Company”) is a leading innovator and licensor of visual information technology. During its 59-year history, the Company has developed substantial proprietary technology relating to the electronic storage, processing and retrieval of data, particularly images. The Company currently holds approximately 600 patents and patent applications covering digital image-processing, data compression and recording technologies. The Company, through its wholly-owned subsidiary, Ampex Data Systems Corporation (“Data Systems”), designs, manufactures and services storage products that have very large capacities and fast data transfer rates. These products are used principally in digital recording, archiving and rapid restore/backup applications. Through its corporate licensing division, the Company licenses its patents to manufacturers of popular consumer electronics products.

Restatement of Previously Issued Financial Statements

The Company has restated its financial statements in this Form 10-Q as of September 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003 and for the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2004 and 2003 to correct the accounting for its obligations under a pension plan of its former magnetic tape manufacturing subsidiary (“Media”) which it disposed of in 1995.

The agreement for the sale of Media required the buyer, Quantegy Corporation, to pay directly or to reimburse Ampex for required contributions to the Media pension plan. However, Ampex remained the Plan Sponsor of the Media pension plan and remained obligated to make pension contributions to that Plan.

The Company had accounted for its obligations under the Media pension plan under SFAS No. 5, “Accounting for Contingencies” since the sale of Media in 1995. However, as a result of communications with the Office of the Chief Accountant of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”), the Company now believes that it should have accounted for these obligations under the provisions of SFAS No. 87, “Employers’ Accounting for Pensions.” In connection with the restatement of the Company’s consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2003, the Company and the Audit Committee determined that its pension accounting constitutes a “material weakness.” The effects of the restatement are shown below:

Effect on Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss)


	Three Months Ended					Nine Months Ended
	Sept. 30, 2004			Sept. 30, 2003		Sept. 30, 2004			Sept. 30, 2003
	(in thousands, except per share amounts)
Net income (loss) from continuing operations:
As reported	$	(1,568	)	$	3,638	$	(5,355	)	$	3,995
As restated	$	(1,890	)	$	3,310	$	(6,320	)	$	3,013

Net income (loss) applicable to common stockholders:
As reported	$	(1,216	)	$	4,161	$	(5,003	)	$	5,620
As restated	$	(1,538	)	$	3,833	$	(5,968	)	$	4,638

Diluted income (loss) per share:
Income (loss) per share from continuing operations
As reported	$	(0.43	)	$	0.98	$	(1.46	)	$	0.80

As restated	$	(0.52	)	$	0.88	$	(1.72	)	$	0.50

Income (loss) per share applicable to common stockholders
As reported	$	(0.33	)	$	1.28	$	(1.36	)	$	1.75

As restated	$	(0.42	)	$	1.18	$	(1.63	)	$	1.45

AMPEX CORPORATION

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)

Effect on Consolidated Balance Sheets


	September 30, 2004			December 31, 2003
	(in thousands)
Total liabilities:
As reported	$	172,365		$	171,334
As restated	$	183,346		$	182,981

Accumulated deficit:
As reported	$	(523,581	)	$	(518,578	)
As restated	$	(516,010	)	$	(510,042	)

Stockholders’ deficit:
As reported	$	(139,695	)	$	(136,137	)
As restated	$	(150,676	)	$	(147,784	)

Common Stock

On June 12, 2003, the Company effected a one-for-twenty reverse stock split of its Class A Common Stock. The number of outstanding shares was reduced from approximately 63.4 million to 3.2 million shares. Common share data and per share calculations for all prior periods included in the unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements and the Notes thereto have been restated to reflect the impact of the one-for-twenty reverse stock split.

Liquidity

The Company has incurred significant losses in recent years, primarily with respect to operations discontinued in 2000 and 2001. The Company also has incurred substantial interest expense and pension charges. The Company has limited liquidity with which to conduct its operations. Substantially all cash generated by the Company’s licensing activities in excess of operating expenses and certain other expenses, including patent litigation costs, is required to be applied to reduce debt. Cash and short-term investments totaled $14.6 million at September 30, 2004, substantially all of which was generated by Data Systems and is excluded from the calculation of Available Cash Flow, as defined in the Senior Note indenture, and is available to be reinvested in the Company’s businesses.

As previously reported, the Company has instituted litigation with the International Trade Commission (“ITC”) and in the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware against certain manufacturers of digital still cameras and cellular phones equipped with digital image storage and retrieval capabilities for unauthorized use of the Company’s intellectual property. The Company has incurred substantial litigation costs during the last nine months totaling $3.5 million in connection with these suits, and it will be required to spend substantial additional funds if these suits ultimately go to trial and are not resolved through negotiations. Furthermore, the Company may decide to institute additional litigation against other manufacturers of digital still cameras and/or other products where its technology is being used if licensing agreements are not completed in the near future. See Note 10.

The Company has recently restructured its senior debt to extend maturities and modify certain covenants that have improved the Company’s near-term liquidity. In March 2004, the Company received consent from the holders of its senior debt securities (i) to extend the maturity date of its Senior Discount Notes from January 5, 2005 to January 5, 2006, (ii) to extend the measurement date from December 31, 2004 to December 31, 2006, by which the Company is required to generate at least $30 million of Available Cash Flow and (iii) to defer scheduled principal repayments on its pension notes through December 31, 2006.

AMPEX CORPORATION

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)

In addition, the Company has substantial pension contributions due in future periods under the Ampex pension plan and pension funding due in future periods under the pension plan of Media, a former subsidiary that was sold in 1995 (“Media”). If the Company does not have the resources to make these payments, which in recent years it has not, the Company will seek to borrow additional funds from a former affiliated party, Hillside Capital Incorporated (“Hillside”), to meet these obligations. See Note 9.

Our Management believes that the Company’s liquidity, coupled with its ability to borrow pension contributions from Hillside, and our expectation that Hillside has the intent and ability to fund such pension contributions on our behalf, should be sufficient to satisfy the projected cash obligations through September 2005, but there can be no assurance in this regard. In order to satisfy its debt covenants, meet its debt service obligations and to make estimated future pension contributions, Ampex will be required to broadly license its patents to manufacturers of digital still cameras, camera equipped cellular phones, digital camcorders, DVD and Hard Disk recorders. The Company has recently entered into several new license agreements with manufacturers of certain of these products. Additional licensing discussions are in progress with other manufacturers. If we are successful in negotiating one or more licenses we would expect to receive substantial royalty payments in the fourth quarter of 2004 or thereafter, although we can not predict exact timing or amount of any such payments. There can be no assurance that the Company will be able to conclude new license agreements or if concluded whether they will generate sufficient licensing revenue to satisfy all of its existing and future commitments. See Notes 9 and 10 and 16.

Note 2 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Basis of Presentation

The consolidated financial statements included herein have been prepared by the Company, without audit, pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission for reporting on Form 10-Q. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles have been condensed or omitted pursuant to such rules and regulations. In addition, certain reclassifications have been made to the prior year financial statements to conform to the current year’s presentation. The statements should be read in conjunction with the Company’s report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2003 and the Audited Consolidated Financial Statements included therein.

In the opinion of Management, the financial statements reflect all adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring adjustments) necessary for a fair statement of financial position, results of operations and cash flows for the interim periods presented. The results of operations for the three and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2004 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year.

Note 3 – Stock-Based Compensation, as restated

The Company accounts for stock-based awards to employees in accordance with APB No. 25 (“APB 25”), “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees,” and has adopted the disclosure-only alternative of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123 (“SFAS 123”), “Accounting for Stock Based Compensation.”

AMPEX CORPORATION

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)

The Company has elected to account for employee stock options using the intrinsic value method prescribed by APB 25, and therefore compensation cost for stock options is measured as the excess, if any, of the quoted market price of the Company’s stock at the date of the grant over the amount an employee must pay to acquire the stock. Had compensation cost for the Company’s stock-based compensation plan been determined based on the fair value on the grant dates for awards under those plans consistent with the method of SFAS 123, the Company’s undistributed net income (loss) applicable to common stockholders and basic and diluted undistributed income (loss) per share would have been adjusted to the pro forma amounts indicated below:


	Three Months Ended						Nine Months Ended
	Sept. 30, 2004			Sept. 30, 2003			Sept. 30, 2004			Sept. 30, 2003
	(in thousands, except per share amounts)
Undistributed net income (loss) applicable to common stockholders:
As restated	$	(1,538	)	$	3,833		$	(5,968	)	$	4,638
Compensation expense, net of tax		(64	)		(3	)		(116	)		(16	)

Pro forma	$	(1,602	)	$	3,830		$	(6,084	)	$	4,622

Basic and diluted undistributed income (loss) per share:
Undistributed income (loss) per share applicable to common stockholders, as restated	$	(0.42	)	$	1.18		$	(1.63	)	$	1.45

Undistributed income (loss) per share applicable to common stockholders, pro forma	$	(0.44	)	$	1.17		$	(1.66	)	$	1.44

These pro forma disclosures are not necessarily representative of the effects on reported net income (loss) from continuing operations and undistributed net income (loss) applicable to common stockholders for future years.

The fair value of options at the date of grant was estimated using the Black-Scholes model with the following weighted average assumptions:


	Three Months Ended				Nine Months Ended
	Sept. 30, 2004		Sept. 30, 2003		Sept. 30, 2004		Sept. 30, 2003
Expected life (years)	1.0		1.0		1.0		1.0
Risk-free interest rate	— 2.00	%	— 1.27	%	— 2.00	%	— 1.27	%
Expected volatility	158	%	319	%	158 - 247	%	319	%
Expected dividend yield	—		—		—		—

Note 4 – Recent Pronouncements

In March 2004, the FASB approved EITF Issue 03-6, “Participating Securities and the Two-Class Method under FAS 128.” EITF Issue 03-6 supersedes the guidance in Topic No. D-95, “Effect of Participating Convertible Securities on the Computation of Basic Earnings per Share” and requires the use of the two-class method of participating securities. The two-class method is an earnings allocation formula that determines earnings per share for each class of common stock and participating security according to dividends declared (or accumulated) and participation rights in undistributed earnings. In addition, EITF Issue 03-6 addresses other forms of participating securities, including options, warrants, forwards and other contracts to issue an entity’s common stock, with the exception of stock-based compensation (unvested options and restricted stock) subject to the provisions of APB 25 and SFAS 123. EITF Issue 03-6 is effective for reporting periods beginning after March 31, 2004 and should be applied by restating previously reported earnings per share. The Company has adopted EITF Issue 03-6 and has restated previously reported earnings per share for the effect of this pronouncement.

AMPEX CORPORATION

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)

At its March 2004 meeting, the EITF reached a consensus on recognition and measurement guidance previously discussed under EITF 03-01. The consensus clarifies the meaning of other-than-temporary impairment and its application to investments classified as either available-for-sale or held-to-maturity under SFAS No. 115 and investments accounted for under the cost method or the equity method. The recognition and measurement guidance for which the consensus was reached in the March 2004 meeting is to be applied to other-than-temporary impairment evaluations in reporting periods beginning after June 15, 2004. The Company does not believe that this consensus on the recognition and measurement guidance will have an impact on its consolidated results of operations.

In November 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued SFAS No. 151, “Inventory Costs - an amendment of ARB No. 43, Chapter 4.” This statement amends the guidance in ARB No. 43, Chapter 4, “Inventory Pricing,” to clarify the accounting for abnormal amounts of idle facility expense, freight, handling costs, and wasted material (spoilage). This statement requires that the above items be recognized as current-period charges, regardless of whether they meet the criterion of abnormal. Additionally, SFAS No. 151 requires that the allocation of fixed production overheads to the costs of conversion be based on the normal capacity of the production facilities. SFAS No. 151 is effective for fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2005. The Company does not expect SFAS No. 151 to have a material impact on its financial condition or results of operations.

In December 2004, the FASB issued Statement No. 123R, “Share-Based Payment,” which requires companies to measure and recognize compensation expense for all stock-based payments at fair value. SFAS No. 123R is effective for all interim periods beginning after June 15, 2005. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of SFAS No. 123R on its financial position and results of operations as well as alternative transition methods under SFAS No. 123R. In addition, the Company has not determined whether the adoption of SFAS No. 123R will result in amounts that are similar to the current pro forma disclosures under SFAS 123. See “Stock-Based Compensation” in Note 2 to Consolidated Financial Statements for information related to the pro forma effects on its net income (loss) and basic and diluted income (loss) per share if the Company had applied the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation,” to stock-based employee compensation.

In December 2004, the FASB issued two Staff Positions (“FSPs”) that provide accounting guidance on how companies should account for the effects of the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004 (the Act) that was signed into law on October 22, 2004. The Act could affect how companies report their deferred income tax balances. The first FSP is FSP FAS 109-1 (“FSP 109-1”); the second is FSP FAS 109-2 (“FSP 109-2”). In FSP 109-1, the FASB concludes that the tax relief (special tax deduction for domestic manufacturing) from the Act should be accounted for as a “special deduction” instead of a tax rate reduction. FSP 109-2 gives a company additional time to evaluate the effects of the Act on any plan for reinvestment of repatriation of foreign earnings for purposes of applying SFAS No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes.” However, a company must provide certain disclosures if it chooses to utilize the additional time granted by the FASB. The Company is evaluating the impact, if any, these FSPs may have on its consolidated financial statements.

AMPEX CORPORATION

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)

Note 5 - Computation of Basic and Diluted Undistributed Income (Loss) per Share, as restated

In accordance with the disclosure requirements of SFAS 128, a reconciliation of the numerator and denominator of basic and diluted undistributed income (loss) per common share is provided as follows:


	Three Months Ended						Nine Months Ended
	Sept. 30, 2004			Sept. 30, 2003			Sept. 30, 2004			Sept. 30, 2003
	(in thousands, except per share amounts)
Numerator

Net income (loss) from continuing operations, as restated	$	(1,890	)	$	3,310		$	(6,320	)	$	3,013
Less preferred dividends ascribed, but not declared		—			(451	)		—			(1,416	)

Undistributed net income (loss) from continuing operations, as restated	$	(1,890	)	$	2,859		$	(6,320	)	$	1,597

Undistributed net income (loss) applicable to common stockholders, as restated	$	(1,538	)	$	3,833		$	(5,968	)	$	4,638

Denominator
Weighted average common stock outstanding		3,643			3,256			3,668			3,207
Stock options		—			5			—			—

Total		3,643			3,261			3,668			3,207

Basic and diluted undistributed income (loss) per share from continuing operations, as restated	$	(0.52	)	$	0.88		$	(1.72	)	$	0.50

Basic and diluted undistributed income (loss) per share applicable to common stockholders, as restated	$	(0.42	)	$	1.18		$	(1.63	)	$	1.45

The basic undistributed income (loss) per share and basic undistributed income (loss) per share applicable to common stockholders are calculated in accordance with the two-class method described in EITF Issue 03-6. Under this method, dividends of 8% per annum are ascribed to preferred stockholders, in periods when Preferred Stock was outstanding, to the extent that sufficient income was available, even though preferred stock dividends had not been declared. Diluted undistributed income (loss) per share and diluted undistributed income (loss) per share applicable to common stockholders is computed using the “as if” converted method if such method results in additional dilution.

In the nine months ended September 30, 2003, the Company issued 64,440 shares of Common Stock to redeem 1,611 shares of Redeemable Preferred Stock. Such shares of common stock are included in the weighted average common stock outstanding from the dates of exchange. As of October 30, 2003, the Company redeemed all of its outstanding shares of 8% Noncumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock by issuing shares of its Class A Common Stock. Accordingly, the Company issued 450,600 shares of Class A Common Stock. Such shares of common stock are included in the weighted average common stock outstanding from the dates of exchange.

Stock options to purchase 289,803 shares of Common Stock at prices ranging from $1.15 to $32.50 per share were outstanding at September 30, 2004, but were not included in the computation of diluted undistributed income (loss) per share because they are anti-dilutive.

Stock options to purchase 73,516 shares of Common Stock at prices ranging from $2.40 to $97.50 per share were outstanding at September 30, 2003, but were not included in the computation of diluted undistributed income (loss) per share because they are anti-dilutive.

AMPEX CORPORATION

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)

Note 6 - Supplemental Schedule of Cash Flow Information


	Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2004		2003
	(in thousands)
Interest paid	$	497	$	471
Income taxes paid		1,031		874
Preferred stock (redemptions)		—		(1,611	)

Income taxes paid in the nine months ended September 30, 2004 includes $0.8 million representing payment to the California Franchise Tax Board to settle income tax and interest assessed for the period 1983 to 1985.

Note 7 - Inventories


	September 30, 2004		December 31, 2003
	(in thousands)
Raw materials	$	2,490	$	1,785
Work in process		2,105		3,327
Finished goods		1,589		1,231

Total	$	6,184	$	6,343

Note 8 - Other Accrued Liabilities and Other Liabilities, as restated


	September 30, 2004		December 31, 2003
	Restated		Restated
	(in thousands)
Compensation and employee benefit	$	2,493	$	2,087
Pension		4,574		10,841
Accrued pension costs for Media pension plan		841		3,841
Deferred revenue and customer deposits		3,340		5,236
Taxes		151		1,136
Warranty and other product costs		493		641
Interest payable		183		259
Other		641		703
Environmental		15		100

Total Other Accrued Liabilities	$	12,731	$	24,844


	September 30, 2004		December 31, 2003
	Restated		Restated
	(in thousands)
Pension	$	56,140	$	57,281
Accrued pension costs for Media pension plan		15,575		15,302
Reserve for tax liabilities		1,150		1,150
Other postemployment benefits		215		226
Environmental		262		295
Other		416		307

Total Other Liabilities	$	73,758	$	74,561

AMPEX CORPORATION

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)

A reconciliation of the changes in the warranty and other product costs liability account for the nine months ended September 30, 2004 is as follows (in thousands):


Balance at January 1	$	641
Accruals for warranties issued during the period		4
Settlements made during the period in cash or in kind		(153	)

Balance at September 30	$	492

During the nine months ended September 30, 2004, Hillside advanced funds to the Company in order for it to make scheduled pension contributions to the Ampex pension plan and Media pension plan in the amount of $7.2 million and $2.7 million, respectively. Pursuant to the Retirement Plan Funding and Settlement Agreement between the Company and Media, Media is obligated to make payments of $74,000 per month to Ampex for as long as required to reimburse Ampex for pension contributions made on behalf of Media. Media has made payments to Ampex totaling $0.7 million for both the nine months ended September 30, 2004 and September 30, 2003. Payments received from Media are netted against the liability account, “Accrued pension contributions for Media pension plan.” See Note 9.

Pension liabilities have been actuarially determined pursuant to Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 87 (“SFAS 87”), “Employers’ Accounting for Pensions” and are based on different assumptions, principally the discount rate, used to determine estimated pension contributions. See Note 9.

Note 9 - Debt


	September 30, 2004		December 31, 2003
	(in thousands)
*Notes Payable*
Note payable - other	$	132	$	146

Total	$	132	$	146

*Long-term Debt*

Senior discount notes	$	9,828	$	9,757
Hillside notes payable		13,154		3,259
Senior notes		66,578		61,006

Total	$	89,560	$	74,022

Note Payable – Other

The note is a non-interest-bearing demand promissory note held by NH Holding Incorporated. The outstanding balance at September 30, 2004 of $0.1 million is expected to be paid or converted into shares of Common Stock.

Hillside Notes

In 1994, the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation (“the PBGC”) asserted that Hillside was a member of a “Controlled Group” together with Ampex, NH Holding Incorporated (“NHI”), the Company’s parent company at the time, and Media, a wholly-owned subsidiary at the time. Companies that are members of a “Controlled Group” under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”) regulations are jointly and severally liable to fund termination liabilities that the PBGC could trigger upon termination of underfunded pension plans. The Ampex and Media defined benefit plans were both underfunded at that time and have remained so. In connection with the reorganization of NHI, Hillside would have been excluded from the “Controlled Group.” Accordingly, the PBGC threatened to terminate the Ampex pension plan and Media pension plan, subjecting Hillside to immediate repayment of the termination liability.

AMPEX CORPORATION

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)

The PBGC, Hillside and Ampex entered into the Joint Settlement Agreement in 1994 that provided that Hillside would retain plan termination liability to the PBGC under the Ampex pension plan and Media pension plan after the reorganization of NHI. In addition, Hillside was required to advance pension contributions for the Ampex pension plan and Media pension plan in the event that Ampex was unable to make the pension contributions. Failure by Hillside to advance funds in subsequent periods would enable the PBGC to terminate the plans and seek recovery of termination benefits from Hillside.

The following schedule lists the annual estimated contributions as computed by the plans’ actuary for the Ampex pension plan and Media pension plan as well as the estimated Media Reimbursement through 2010.


	Estimated Contributions
	Ampex Pension Plan		Media Pension Plan		Media Reimbursement
	(in thousands)
2004 *	$	10,033	$	3,841	$	(888	)
2005		8,505		3,072		(888	)
2006		7,298		2,559		(888	)
2007		6,935		2,457		(888	)
2008		4,127		895		(888	)
2009		917		—		(888	)

Total	$	37,815	$	12,824	$	(5,328	)

*	Through September 30, 2004, payments of $7.2 million and $2.7 million pertaining to the Ampex pension plan and Media pension plan, respectively, have been made. In 2004, Media has made reimbursement payments to Ampex totaling $740,000 through September 30, 2004.

In prior years, Hillside made contributions totaling $4.0 million pertaining to the Ampex pension plan. The Company anticipates that, due to our senior debt agreements, Hillside may be required to fund future contributions.

If Hillside is required to make all or a portion of the above pension contributions, the Company will issue additional notes to Hillside (“Hillside Notes”). Under the terms of the Notes, $150,000 is due on the first anniversary of the Notes with the remainder due on the fourth anniversary of the Notes. Pursuant to amendments to the senior debt agreements, all principal payments on the Hillside Notes will be deferred until after December 31, 2006 with earlier repayment in the event that the Senior Discount Notes and Senior Notes have been repaid in full. The Hillside Notes provide for interest paid quarterly at 1 percent plus 175% of the applicable mid-term Federal rate (effective rate of 7.60% at September 30, 2004). The Company granted to Hillside a security interest in Data Systems’ inventory and other assets as collateral for advances, which it is required to make pursuant to the agreement. The agreement contains certain restrictive covenants which, among other things, restrict the Company’s ability to declare dividends, sell all or substantially all of its assets or commence liquidation, or engage in specified transactions with certain related parties, breach of which could result in acceleration of the Company’s potential termination liabilities.

While Hillside is legally obligated to comply with the terms of the Joint Settlement Agreement, and they have represented that they have sufficient assets to fund pension contributions that are scheduled in future years, Ampex has no direct or indirect financial ownership interest in Hillside and accordingly, has no ability to control Hillside or mandate its compliance with the terms of the Joint Settlement Agreement. Accordingly, Ampex’s ability to borrow pension contributions from Hillside is beyond its control.

AMPEX CORPORATION

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)

Senior Notes and Senior Discount Notes

In the first quarter of 2004, the Company restructured its outstanding 12% Senior Notes and Data Systems’ 20% Senior Discount Notes. The Senior Notes were exchanged for new 12% Senior Notes due 2008 and the due date of the Senior Discount Notes was extended from January 5, 2005 to January 5, 2006. The restructured Notes are secured by liens on the Company’s royalty stream that may be generated from existing and future patent licenses and, in addition, the Senior Discount Notes are secured by a deed of trust on Data Systems’ manufacturing facility in Colorado Springs, CO and are guaranteed by the Company. The new securities provide for the payment of accrued interest and principal out of Available Cash Flow of the Company, which includes all future royalty proceeds received by the Company, net of withholding taxes, and proceeds of certain potential asset sales less certain debt and specified operating expenses and a working capital reserve of up to $2.5 million. The Company is required to generate a minimum of $30 million of Available Cash Flow during the three years ending December 31, 2006 or an event of default will occur under the Senior Note Indenture. Prior to maturity, the new Notes are payable as to accrued interest and principal solely to the extent of Available Cash Flow received by the Company, and unpaid accrued interest is payable through the issuance of additional Notes or capitalized. From March 2002 to September 2004, Available Cash Flow totaled $5.5 million.

Accrued interest, interest expense and principal transactions for the Senior Notes and Senior Discount Notes are as follows:


	Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2004			2003
	(in thousands)
Senior Notes

Accrued interest, beginning of the period	$	2,627		$	2,338
Interest expense		5,572			4,960
Cash payments applied to interest		—			—
Issuance of Notes in lieu of cash payment of interest		(7,215	)		(6,422	)

Accrued interest, end of period	$	984		$	876

Cash payments applied to principal	$	—		$	—

Senior Discount Notes

Accrued interest, beginning of the period	$	244		$	267
Interest expense		1,461			1,583
Cash payments applied to interest		(278	)		(307	)
Capitalized interest added to principal		(1,318	)		(1,311	)

Accrued interest, end of period	$	109		$	232

Cash payments applied to principal	$	(1,247	)	$	(2,693	)

The security interest in royalty payments granted to the new 12% Senior Noteholders is subordinated to the security interest held by the Senior Discount Noteholders and no cash payments on the Senior Notes may be made until all payments of interest and principal have been made on the Senior Discount Notes. All payments due at maturity on the Notes must be made in cash.

The Indentures under which the new securities were issued contain customary affirmative and negative restrictive covenants that limit the payment of dividends, the incurrence of additional indebtedness or liens, certain sales of assets and other actions by the Company and its restricted subsidiaries. In the event of default, the holders of the Notes would be entitled to enforce the liens granted by the Company on its future patent royalty stream and the Colorado Springs facility and to apply amounts collected to repayment of the Notes.

AMPEX CORPORATION

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)

Note 10 - Commitments and Contingencies, as restated

Legal Proceedings

The Company has instituted litigation with the ITC and in the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware against Sanyo Electric Co. Ltd. (“Sanyo”) in May 2004 and separately against Sony Corporation in July 2004 and Eastman Kodak Company (“Kodak”) in October 2004 for unauthorized use of its patents in digital still cameras and cellular phones equipped with digital image storage and retrieval capabilities. The Company has withdrawn its suits against Sanyo having concluded a license agreement covering its digital still camera patents. If granted, an ITC order would prohibit the importation and sale of infringing products in the United States throughout the duration of the life of the patent. The U.S. District Court case seeks payment of damages. If the court determines that our patents are invalid or not infringed, the Company would not receive payment for any damages and existing licensees would discontinue payments to Ampex.

Also, the Company is currently a defendant in lawsuits that have arisen in the ordinary course of its business. Certain subsidiaries have been assessed income and value-added taxes together with penalties and interest. Exclusive of possible consequences of patent litigation, Management does not believe that any such lawsuits or unasserted claims will have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

Environmental Matters

Ampex’s facilities are subject to numerous federal, state and local laws and regulations designed to protect the environment from waste emissions and hazardous substances. Owners and occupiers of sites containing hazardous substances, as well as generators and transporters of hazardous substances, are subject to broad liability under various federal and state environmental laws and regulations, including liability for investigative and cleanup costs and damages arising out of past disposal activities. Ampex has been named from time to time as a potentially responsible party by the United States Environmental Protection Agency with respect to contaminated sites that have been designated as “Superfund” sites, and are currently engaged in various environmental investigation, remediation and/or monitoring activities at several sites located off Company facilities. Management has provided reserves, which have not been discounted, related to investigation and cleanup costs and believes that the final disposition of these matters will not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

The Company has not accrued any liability for costs that might be assessed against it by federal or state environmental agencies involving sites owned by the Company’s former subsidiary Media. Media is primarily responsible for the cleanup at its facilities and at off site locations. The Company believes that it has no material contingent liability in connection with the Media properties.

Guarantees

The Company, as permitted under Delaware law and in accordance with its Bylaws, indemnifies its officers and directors for certain events or occurrences, subject to certain limits, while they were serving at its request in such capacity. The maximum amount of potential future indemnification is unlimited; however, the Company has a Director and Officer Insurance Policy that enables the Company to recover a portion of any future amounts paid. As a result of the insurance policy coverage, the Company believes the fair value of these indemnification agreements is minimal.

The Company’s sales agreements indemnify its customers for any expenses or liability resulting from claimed infringements of patents, trademarks or copyrights of third parties. The terms of these indemnification agreements are generally perpetual any time after execution of the agreement. The maximum amount of potential future indemnification is unlimited. However, to date, the Company has not paid any claims or been required to defend any lawsuits with respect to any claim.

AMPEX CORPORATION

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)

The Company has guaranteed certain lease payments with respect to equipment and real estate of subsidiaries. The Company has recorded a liability for substantially the full amount of its guarantee, net of the anticipated sublease income expected to be realized. If no sublease income is realized, the Company’s additional unreserved exposure would be $0.5 million.

Products sold are generally covered by a warranty for periods ranging from 90 days to one year. The Company accrues a warranty reserve for estimated costs to provide warranty services. The estimate of costs to service the Company’s warranty obligations is based on historical experience and expectation of future conditions. To the extent that the Company’s experience increases warranty claim activity or increases costs associated with servicing those claims, the warranty accrual will increase resulting in decreased gross profit.

Plan Sponsor of Media Pension Plan

The Company is the plan sponsor and is liable to provide funding for plan benefits under a pension plan of a former affiliate, Media, which was sold in 1995. Presently the unfunded accumulated benefit liability is $19.1 million and such amount has been reflected in total liabilities on the balance sheet at December 31, 2003. During 2003, the Company and Media entered into the Retirement Plan Funding and Settlement Agreement, which provides for monthly payments of $74,000 by Media to Ampex in settlement of future pension contributions that may be required under the Media Plan that would be funded by Ampex. Direct pension contributions or reimbursements to Ampex by Media are recognized as an offset to pension cost in the period received.

The actuarial computation of pension contributions required over future years is based on our selection of certain assumptions such as the discount rate, expected long-term rate of return on plan assets and mortality assumptions for the plan participants. The Company uses the same actuarial assumptions for the Ampex pension plan and the Media pension plan. While Management believes that the assumptions are appropriate, significant differences in our actual experience or significant changes in our assumptions may materially affect our pension expense under the Ampex pension plan or our contingent obligation to make pension payments under the Media pension plan.

Note 11 - Preferred Stock

Beginning in June 1999, the Company became obligated to redeem the Redeemable Preferred Stock in quarterly installments. For the nine months ended September 30, 2003, the Company issued 64,440 shares of its Common Stock to satisfy the quarterly redemption requirements. On October 2, 2003, the Company redeemed all remaining Redeemable Preferred Stock. The Company recognized a benefit from extinguishment of preferred stock to the extent that the face amount of the preferred stock redeemed exceeded the market price of the common stock issued.

Note 12 – Related Party Transactions

Equity Investment:

In the third quarter of 2003, the Company’s unrestricted investment subsidiary invested $1 million to acquire a 21.6% interest in a limited partnership that was formed to purchase shares of 4imprint Group plc, a publicly-held British promotional products company. The partnership acquired 5,141,499 shares of the products company. Ampex’s CEO, Edward Bramson, controls HIP-IV Incorporated, the general partner of the partnership which owns a 0.2% interest, and he owns a 0.7% limited partnership interest in the partnership. Mr. Bramson also directly acquired 2,500,000 shares of the products company with his personal funds in concert with the limited partnership. Ampex’s CFO, Craig McKibben, is an officer of the general partner and he purchased a 7.5% limited partnership interest in the partnership with his personal funds. The Company’s effective cost of acquiring its pro rata share of the products company ($0.82 per share) was the same average price paid by Mr. Bramson. The Board of Directors of the Company determined that the terms of the Company’s investment in the partnership were at least as favorable as the terms afforded to Messrs. Bramson and McKibben and other unrelated investors. Mr. Bramson had served as the temporary, non-executive Chairman of the Board of the products company until July 2004 at which time the Board elected a new executive chairman. Mr. Bramson has assigned to Ampex all compensation he may receive as a non-executive board member. In addition, the general partner may receive certain management fees from the partnership, but has assigned those fees to Ampex. Neither Messrs. Bramson nor McKibben received any compensation from the partnership.

AMPEX CORPORATION

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)

The Company used the equity method of accounting for its interest in the limited partnership through September 30, 2004, the effective date when the partnership distributed all remaining assets and began to wind up its affairs. At September 30, 2004, “Other current assets” on the Consolidated Balance Sheets included $1.3 million representing the Company’s pro rata share of Sterling deposits in transit to the Company from the sale of its remaining shares of 4imprint Group plc.

The limited partnership had accounted for its interest in the products company using the equity method of accounting through June 30, 2004 when the partnership made a final distribution of all beneficial interest in remaining shares in the products company to its limited partners. As an accommodation to its partners, the partnership maintained such shares in its brokerage account until September 2004 when they were sold or physically delivered to its partners. In the nine months ended September 30, 2004, the partnership reported a net gain of $8.8 million, which included a net gain of $5.8 million from the March 2004 sale of 3,209,442 shares of the products company and a net gain of $2.8 million from the September sale or distribution of shares of the products company. Proceeds from the sale of such shares were received by the partnership and distributed to its partners, including Ampex and Messrs. Bramson and McKibben, in April 2004 and October 2004.

The following table provides summarized financial information on a 100% basis for the limited partnership accounted for under the equity method as of September 30, 2004 and for the nine months then ended (in thousands):

Earnings Data:


Income from operations	$	71
Equity in net income of products company	$	213
Gain on sale of stock of products company	$	8,597

Net gain	$	8,881

The Company’s pro rata share of the results of operations of the limited partnership are reported as “Equity in income of limited partnership, including sale of investment” in the Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss). Ampex has received total distributions of $3.3 million on its original $1 million investment, which includes incentive fees assigned by the general partner to the Company of $0.6 million, which have been netted against “Selling and administrative” expenses in the Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss).

Capital Transaction:

In 1995, 1996 and 1997, the Company sold shares of its Class A Common Stock to First Jeffson Corporation (“FJC”) and to Second Jeffson Corporation (“SJC”), affiliated corporations controlled by Edward Bramson, the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Ampex Corporation. The purchase price was paid partly in cash and partly with promissory notes. The notes were collateralized by a pledge of shares of Class A Common Stock that were purchased. For several years, the market value of the pledged shares was substantially less than the principal amount of the notes. In 2002, FJC advised the Company that there could be no assurance that it would be able to obtain additional funds from Mr. Bramson or others to make future payments of interest or principal on the notes. The Company offset the “Notes receivable from stockholders” against “Other additional capital” in the Consolidated Balance Sheets, effectively negating the original transaction. During 2003, FJC failed to make scheduled interest payments amounting to $205,953 on outstanding notes aggregating $2,794,050 that were to mature in January 2005 and October 2007. Accordingly, in March 2004, after reviewing the matter with legal advisors, Ampex foreclosed on these notes and caused the 85,000 pledged shares, which had a fair market value of $153,000, to be registered in the Company’s name. In connection with the foreclosure transaction, FJC also transferred to the Company 500 additional shares of Class A Common Stock and $12,600 in cash, which represented substantially all of FJC’s other assets. The foreclosure action did not affect the Company’s net assets or results of operations, exclusive of tax benefits that may be realized in future years. The Company has cancelled the shares received from FJC and has excluded them from shares outstanding at September 30, 2004. Interest and principal paid by FJC on the notes in prior years totaling $2.4 million will be retained by Ampex.

AMPEX CORPORATION

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)

Note 13 - Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss, as restated

The balances of each classification within accumulated other comprehensive loss are as follows:


	Minimum Pension Liability			Foreign Currency Items			Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss
	Restated						Restated
	(in thousands)
December 31, 2003, as restated	$	(92,899	)	$	726		$	(92,173	)
Current period change		3,049			(46	)		3,003

September 30, 2004	$	(89,850	)	$	680		$	(89,170	)

The net periodic pension cost for the Ampex and Media pension plan for the nine months ended September 30, 2004 is reflected as the current period change in minimum pension liability. The net periodic pension cost for 2004, which is charged to the Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss) ratably over the year to “Selling and administrative” expenses for the Ampex pension plan and to “Media pension expense” for the Media pension plan, was determined by the Company’s actuary.

Note 14 – Restructuring Charges (Credits)

A reconciliation of the changes in the restructuring accounts for the nine months ended September 30, 2004 is as follows (in thousands):


Balance at January 1	$	4,750
Recovery during the period		(1,410	)
Payments made during the period		(915	)

Balance at September 30	$	2,425

At December 31, 2003, the Company had a $4.8 million remaining liability entirely related to the future lease obligations, net of estimated sublease rental income, on facilities in Redwood City. In the nine months ended September 30, 2004, the Company recognized a restructuring credit of $1.4 million as a result of the relocation of some manufacturing operations from Colorado Springs to Redwood City, reutilizing leased facilities that were charged to restructuring in prior period. Future lease costs associated with these manufacturing activities will be charged to “Cost of product sales” as incurred. The Company remeasured the restructuring accrual at September 30, 2004 pursuant to Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 146 (“SFAS 146”), “Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities.” The lease obligations associated with the Redwood City facilities restructuring have been discounted to present value.

Note 15 - Income Taxes

As at December 31, 2003, the Company had net operating loss carryforwards for income tax purposes of approximately $200 million expiring in the years 2005 through 2023. Accordingly, the Company has the ability to shelter a substantial amount of future taxable income, including future licensing revenue, if any is ultimately realized. Effective July 1, 2004 a new U.S./Japanese tax treaty eliminated withholding tax on royalty payments. Prior to July 1, 2004, the Company’s Japanese licensing revenue was subject to foreign tax withholding of up to 10% of licensing revenue.

AMPEX CORPORATION

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)

Note 16 - Segment Reporting, as restated

The Company has two operating segments referred to as the Recorders segment and the Licensing segment. The Recorders segment includes the sale and service of data storage systems, instrumentation recorders and professional video products, all of which are made by the manufacturing subsidiary Data Systems. The Licensing segment involves the licensing of Ampex intellectual property through the corporate licensing division. The accounting policies of the segments are the same as those described in the summary of significant accounting policies.

The Company evaluates segment performance based on return on operating assets employed. Profitability is measured as income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes and equity in income of limited partnership, including sale of investment excluding restructuring charges, corporate administrative costs and elimination entries.

There were no intersegment sales or transfers.


	Nine Months Ended September 30, 2004
		(in thousands)
	Recorders		Licensing		Corporate and Eliminations			Totals
					Restated			Restated
Revenues from external customers	$	22,263	$	4,861	$	-		$	27,124
Interest income		66		—		22			88
Interest expense		1,462		—		5,850			7,312
Depreciation, amortization and accretion		311		—		285			596
Segment income (loss), as restated		1,490		265		(11,386	)		(9,631	)
Segment assets		28,671		—		3,999			32,670
Expenditures for segment assets		64		—		27			91

	Nine Months Ended September 30, 2003
		(in thousands)
	Recorders		Licensing		Corporate and Eliminations			Totals
					Restated			Restated
Revenues from external customers	$	24,999	$	7,702	$	—		$	32,701
Interest income		39		—		47			86
Interest expense		1,695		—		5,020			6,715
Depreciation, amortization and accretion		378		—		431			809
Segment income (loss), as restated		3,269		6,906		(10,468	)		(293	)
Segment assets		24,635		—		6,472			31,107
Expenditures for segment assets		8		—		8			16

AMPEX CORPORATION

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)

A reconciliation of “Segment income (loss)” to “Net income (loss)” as reported on the Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss) is as follows:


	Nine Months Ended Sept. 30,
	2004			2003
	(in thousands)
Segment income (loss) reported above, as restated	$	(9,631	)	$	(293	)
Restructuring charges (credits)		1,410			—
Provision for income taxes		(248	)		3,306
Equity in income of limited partnership, including sale of investment		2,149			—
Income from discontinued operations		352			—

Net income (loss), as restated	$	(5,968	)	$	3,013

Note 17 – Subsequent Event

In October 2004, Canon Inc. and Sanyo entered into separate license agreements with the Company for use of its patents in the manufacture and sale of digital still cameras. The Sanyo agreement also permits use of the Company’s patents in cellular telephones that incorporate digital image capture and retrieval features.

Pursuant to the two licenses, Ampex will receive payment of approximately $11.6 million representing royalties on shipments made prior to July 1, 2004 and will receive running royalties in future periods based on sales of products that utilize its digital still camera patents. The Company will also receive a negotiated prepayment of $13.5 million from one of the licensees with respect to royalties due on sales in the period from July 2004 through March 2006. Accordingly, Ampex will record at least $25.1 million of receipts from these two licenses in its fourth quarter 2004 financial statements.

In October 2004, the Company instituted litigation against Kodak. See Note 10.

Forward-Looking Statements

This Form 10-Q/A contains predictions, projections and other statements about the future that are intended to be “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Such forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other important factors that could cause our actual results, performance or achievements or industry results to differ materially from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Such risks, uncertainties and other important factors include, among others, those described under “Risk Factors, “ below. These forward-looking statements speak only as of the date of this Report. We disclaim any obligation or undertaking to disseminate updates or revisions of any expectations with regard thereto or regarding any change in events, conditions or circumstances on which any such statements are based. IN ASSESSING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS CONTAINED IN THIS FORM 10-Q/A, YOU ARE URGED TO READ CAREFULLY ALL SUCH CAUTIONARY STATEMENTS.

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

This item 2 has been restated to correct the accounting for our obligations under the Media pension plan in accordance with SFAS No. 87, “Employers’ Accounting for Pensions.”

The following discussion and analysis of the financial condition and results of operations of Ampex Corporation and our subsidiaries should be read in conjunction with the Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements and the Notes thereto, included elsewhere in this Report, and the Consolidated Financial Statements and the Notes thereto, and Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “2003 Form 10-K/A”).

Restatement of Previously Issued Financial Statements

We have restated our financial statements in this Form 10-Q/A as of September 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003 and for the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2004 and 2003 to correct our accounting for the our obligations under a pension plan of our former magnetic tape manufacturing subsidiary (“Media”) which we disposed of in 1995.

We had accounted for our obligations under the Media pension plan under SFAS No. 5, “Accounting for Contingencies” since the sale of Media in 1995. However, as a result of communications with the Office of the Chief Accountant of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”), we now believe that we should have accounted for these obligations under the provisions of SFAS No. 87, “Employers’ Accounting for Pensions.” In connection with the restatement of the Company’s consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2003, the Company and the Audit Committee determined that its pension accounting constitutes a “material weakness.” The effects of the restatement are shown below:

Effect on Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss)


	Three Months Ended					Nine Months Ended
	Sept. 30, 2004			Sept. 30, 2003		Sept. 30, 2004			Sept. 30, 2003
	(in thousands, except per share amounts)
Net income (loss) from continuing operations:
As reported	$	(1,568	)	$	3,638	$	(5,355	)	$	3,995
As restated	$	(1,890	)	$	3,310	$	(6,320	)	$	3,013

Net income (loss) applicable to common stockholders:
As reported	$	(1,216	)	$	4,161	$	(5,003	)	$	5,620
As restated	$	(1,538	)	$	3,833	$	(5,968	)	$	4,638

Diluted income (loss) per share:
Income (loss) per share from continuing operations
As reported	$	(0.43	)	$	0.98	$	(1.46	)	$	0.80

As restated	$	(0.52	)	$	0.88	$	(1.72	)	$	0.50

Income (loss) per share applicable to common stockholders
As reported	$	(0.33	)	$	1.28	$	(1.36	)	$	1.75

As restated	$	(0.42	)	$	1.18	$	(1.63	)	$	1.45

Effect on Consolidated Balance Sheets


	September 30, 2004			December 31, 2003
	(in thousands)
Total liabilities:
As reported	$	172,365		$	171,334
As restated	$	183,346		$	182,981

Accumulated deficit:
As reported	$	(523,581	)	$	(518,578	)
As restated	$	(516,010	)	$	(510,042	)

Stockholders’ deficit:
As reported	$	(139,695	)	$	(136,137	)
As restated	$	(150,676	)	$	(147,784	)

Business Segments

We have two business segments, which we refer to as our Recorders segment and our Licensing segment. Our Recorders segment includes the sale and service of data storage systems, instrumentation recorders (which record data, rather than visual information) and professional video products, all of which are made by our manufacturing subsidiary, Ampex Data Systems Corporation (“Data Systems”). Our Licensing segment involves the licensing of our intellectual property through our corporate licensing division. For information regarding revenues, income or loss, assets and other financial data for each business segment, see Note 16 of Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements.

Our Recorders segment includes Data Systems’ three principal product groups and its service revenue, which are described more fully below. Data Systems also conducts an “aftermarket” operation consisting primarily of the supply of spare parts for certain products.

•

Mass data storage systems, including Data Systems’ 19-millimeter scanning recorders and library systems (DST and DIS products) and related tape and aftermarket parts;

•

Instrumentation recorders, including Data Systems’ data acquisition and instrumentation products (including tape-based DCRsi instrumentation recorders, disk-based DDRs instrumentation recorders and solid-state memory-based DSRs instrumentation recorders) and related tape and aftermarket parts;

•

Professional video products, consisting principally of television aftermarket products that Data Systems continues to support but no longer manufactures; and

•

Service revenue, consisting principally of maintenance contracts on Data Systems’ products.

DST, DIS, DCRsi, DDRs and DSRs are trademarks of Ampex Corporation.

Our Licensing segment generates revenue from licenses granted to companies that manufacture consumer video products (such as VCRs, camcorders and recently digital still cameras, camera-equipped cellular phones, and DVD and Hard Disk recorders). We also license our patents to certain manufacturers of professional video tape recorders and image processing devices such as digital special effects processors.

The following table shows (i) licensing revenue generated by our Licensing segment, (ii) revenue generated by our Recorders segment through sales of Data Systems’ products by product group and (iii) service revenue for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2004 and 2003.


	For the Three Months Ended September 30,				For the Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2004		2003		2004		2003
	(in millions)
*Licensing Segment*
Licensing revenue	$	1.8	$	1.7	$	4.9	$	7.7

*Recorders Segment*
Mass data storage tape drives and library systems	$	1.7	$	2.5	$	5.2	$	8.2
Data acquisition and instrumentation recorders		2.1		2.9		8.5		7.4
Service revenue		2.2		2.1		6.5		7.0
Other (including professional video products)		0.6		0.9		2.1		2.4

Total net product and service revenue	$	6.6	$	8.4	$	22.3	$	25.0

Results of Operations for the Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2004 and 2003, as restated

Licensing Revenue. Licensing revenue was $1.8 million in the three months ended September 30, 2004 compared to $1.7 million in the three months ended September 30, 2003 and $4.9 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2004 compared to $7.7 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2003, and is derived from royalties that we receive from licensing our patents.

In October 2004, we entered into separate licensing agreements with Canon Inc. (“Canon”) and Sanyo Electric Co. Ltd. (“Sanyo”), two major Japanese manufacturers of digital still cameras. The agreements permit the use of various U.S. and foreign patents owned by us in the manufacture and sale of

digital still cameras. The Sanyo agreement also permits use of our patents in cellular telephones that incorporate digital image capture and retrieval features. We will receive payment of approximately $11.6 million representing royalties on shipments made prior to July 1, 2004. Also, we will receive running royalties in future periods based on sales of products that utilize our digital still camera patents. We will also receive a negotiated prepayment from one of the licensees of $13.5 million with respect to royalties due on sales of products through April 11, 2006, the expiration date of our U.S. patent 4,821,121. Thereafter, running royalties will be calculated as a percentage of the selling price of products that utilize our other digital still camera patents, which expire at various dates through 2014. There can be no assurance that the above licensees will be selling products in future years that utilize these other patents. We expect to receive $25.1 million from these agreements in the fourth quarter of 2004, substantially all of which will be used to repay debt.

In May 2004, we entered into our first license with a major manufacturer of DVD recorders and, in the third quarter of 2004, we received our first royalty report from this licensee. Presently, royalties from this licensee are not material to total license revenues, but we expect that license fees from this licensee will increase. We are in discussions with additional manufacturers who may license our patents for use in DVD and Hard Disk recorders which would lead to further increases in royalties from these products.

In June 2003, we entered into license agreements with Matsushita Electric Industrial Co. Ltd. and Victor Company of Japan, Ltd. authorizing their use of our patents in the manufacture of video tape recorders, including digital camcorders. The agreements collectively provided for a one-time royalty payment of $5.4 million as settlement of royalties due on products sold in periods prior to the execution of the licenses. This payment was recognized as revenue in the second quarter of 2003. We also continue to receive ongoing licensing revenue from these companies calculated as a percentage of the sales price on that periods’ product sales. Licensing revenue received from these companies exceeded 10% of consolidated revenue in each of the nine-month periods ended September 30, 2004 and 2003. Sales of licensees’ products are beyond our control and, accordingly, we cannot predict the amount of licensing revenue that will be realized in future periods.

We continue to have active licensing negotiations with manufacturers of digital still cameras, camera equipped cellular phones, DVD recorders, digital video camcorders and other consumer products, which we believe use our intellectual property. We have offered to license our intellectual property at, what we believe are, commercially reasonable rates which provide for lump sum royalty payments on shipments made in periods prior to the execution of the license and running royalty payments computed as a percentage of the selling price of products shipped in future periods. We believe that we may be successful in negotiating one or more such licenses in the near term. If we are able to do so, we would expect to receive substantial royalty payments in the fourth quarter of 2004 or thereafter, although we can’t predict the exact timing or amount of any such payments. Furthermore, because the success of our negotiations is not solely controlled by us, we cannot assure you that any such licensing agreements will be successfully concluded. Our relevant digital patents were developed when we manufactured still stores, video special effects products and digital video tape recorders, which we marketed to the professional broadcast and post production industry in prior years. These patents have expiration dates from 2006 through 2014, which could cause our future licensing revenues to decline. See “Our Licensing Revenue is Subject to Material Fluctuations and Must be Applied to Reduce Our Debt.”

Product Revenue. Total product revenue decreased by 31.1% to $4.4 million in the three months ended September 30, 2004 compared to $6.4 million in the three months ended September 30, 2003, and decreased by 12.2% to $15.8 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2004 compared to $18.0 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2003. Government agencies and defense contractors are currently the largest market for Data Systems’ mass data storage and instrumentation recorders. In 2004, sales in this market have declined slightly. During the second and third quarter of 2004, we billed and have been paid an additional $1.2 million that will not be recognized as revenue until the products are shipped to the customer, which we expect to occur in the fourth quarter of 2004 or early in 2005. Government agencies and defense contractors have historically experienced significant pressure to reduce spending and

we expect them to experience such pressure in the future, which may lead to further sales declines. In recent years, our sales of mass data storage tape drives and library systems to the professional broadcast market has continued to decline as we have reduced our sales efforts in these market sectors. We have recently introduced our DDRs and DSRs instrumentation recorders, which are disk-based and solid-state memory-based data acquisition recorders used in intelligence gathering activities. These products are intended to replace, over several years, a large installed base of our DCRsi tape-based data acquisition recorders which, if successful, could lead to increased product revenues over current levels. There can be no assurance that these new products will attain the same level of market penetration that our earlier products achieved.

Our backlog of firm orders was $5.1 million at September 30, 2004 compared to $9.4 million at September 30, 2003. We typically operate with low levels of backlog, requiring us to obtain the vast majority of each period’s orders in the same period that they must be shipped to the customer. Historically, a small number of large orders have significantly impacted sales levels, and often orders are received late in the quarter, making it difficult to predict sales levels in future periods. The backlog at September 30, 2003 was larger than in recent periods with the increases represented by U.S. and foreign defense orders across all of our product lines.

Service Revenue. Total service revenue in the three months ended September 30, 2004 was comparable to levels realized in the three months ended September 30, 2003. The decline in service revenue in the nine months ended September 30, 2004 compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2003 resulted from the non-renewal of older service contracts offset, in part, by new customer activity.

Gross Profit on Licensing Revenue. Gross profit on licensing revenue represents licensing revenue less intellectual property costs. Intellectual property costs consist of outside legal costs and expenditures incurred by our in-house patent department in procuring licensing revenue. Gross profit as a percentage of licensing revenue was 6.0% in the three months ended September 30, 2004 compared to 88.2% in the three months ended September 30, 2003 and 5.5% in the nine months ended September 30, 2004 compared to 90.0% in the nine months ended September 30, 2003.

Gross profit on licensing revenue fluctuates widely between periods based on the timing of when new license agreements are executed and the cost of patent litigation incurred during the period. During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2004, we incurred significant legal costs in preparing for patent enforcement litigation of $1.1 million and $3.5 million, respectively. During comparable periods in 2003, we did not incur significant patent legal costs. We instituted litigation with the International Trade Commission (“ITC”) and in the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware against Sanyo in May 2004 and separately against Sony Corporation (“Sony”) in July 2004 and Eastman Kodak Company (“Kodak”) in October 2004 for their unauthorized use of our patents in digital still cameras and cellular phones equipped with digital image storage and retrieval capabilities. If granted, an ITC exclusion order would prohibit the importation and sale of such products in the United States throughout the duration of the life of each patent. The U.S. District Court suits seek payment of damages. Subsequently, we have withdrawn our complaints against Sanyo based on having concluded a license agreement with them. However, our litigation against Sony and Kodak continues, and we may seek to enforce our patents by instituting additional litigation against other manufacturers of digital still cameras and other products where our technology is being used, if licensing agreements are not completed on satisfactory terms.

Gross Profit on Product Revenue. Gross profit as a percentage of product revenue was 30.1% in the three months ended September 30, 2004 compared to 39.6% in the three months ended September 30, 2003 and 36.9% in the nine months ended September 30, 2004 compared to 40.3% in the nine months ended September 30, 2003. Our gross profit percentage on product revenue fluctuates based on a number of factors, including the volume and mix of product shipped in the period. The decrease in the gross profit percentage in 2004 when compared to 2003 was due to the decline in sales volume which resulted in lower absorption of fixed manufacturing costs.

Gross Profit on Service Revenue. Gross profit as a percentage of service revenue was 68.3% in the three months ended September 30, 2004 compared to 63.8% in the three months ended September 30, 2003, and 63.9% in the nine months ended September 30, 2004 compared to 66.3% in the nine months ended September 30, 2003. Our gross profit percentage on service revenue fluctuates from period to period based largely on the cost of materials used to repair or replace equipment in a particular period.

Research, Development and Engineering Expenses. All of our research, development and engineering expenses relate to our Recorders segment. Research, development and engineering expenses represented 12.3% and 6.8% of total revenue in the three months ended September 30, 2004 and 2003, respectively, and 10.5% and 7.1% of total revenue in the nine months ended September 30, 2004 and 2003, respectively. We have not capitalized any research, development and engineering expenditures. The increase in research, development and engineering expenditures during 2004 is due primarily to costs incurred to produce prototypes of the DDRs new ruggedized disk and DSRs solid-state memory-based data acquisition recorders. Such costs are expected to continue as we develop product enhancements and functionality. We may be required to lower RD&E spending if Data Systems’ sales decline significantly from current levels.

Selling and Administrative Expenses. Selling and administrative expenses increased to $3.3 million (40% of total revenue) in the three months ended September 30, 2004 from $2.8 million (28.0% of total revenue) in the three months ended September 30, 2003 and increased to $9.2 million (33.8% of total revenue) in the nine months ended September 30, 2004 from $9.1 million (27.8% of total revenue) in the nine months ended September 30, 2003. The Selling and administrative expenses for the Recorders segment and the unallocated corporate administrative expenses (no administrative expenses are allocated to the Licensing segment) are shown in the following table:


	For the Three Months Ended September 30,				For the Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2004		2003		2004		2003
	(in millions)
Recorders segment	$	2.1	$	1.6	$	4.6	$	4.7
Corporate		1.2		1.2		4.6		4.4

Total	$	3.3	$	2.8	$	9.2	$	9.1

In the third quarter of 2004 we relocated our Colorado Springs manufacturing operations to two separate, more cost-efficient facilities in Colorado Springs, Colorado and Redwood City, California. The vacated facility, which we still own, is currently being marketed for sale. Expenses related to the move and relocation costs in the amount of $0.2 million in the three months ended September 30, 2004 have been charged to Recorders’ selling and administrative expenses. Selling and administrative expenses for the three months ended September 30, 2004 also included a management performance award accrual of $0.5 million. Corporate selling and administrative expenses were reduced due to incentive fees earned by the general partner of the investment limited partnership in which we invested that were assigned to us totaling $0.4 million during the quarter ended September 30, 2004.

Restructuring Charges (Credits). During the three months ended September 30, 2004, we recognized a restructuring credit of $1.4 million as a result of the relocation of some manufacturing operations from Colorado Springs to Redwood City, reutilizing leased facilities that were charged to restructuring in prior periods. Future lease costs associated with manufacturing activities will be charged to “Cost of product sales” as incurred.

Operating Income (Loss). We reported an operating loss of $26 thousand in the three months ended September 30, 2004 and an operating loss of $0.4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2004, compared to operating income of $1.8 million and $7.4 million in the three and nine months ended

September 30, 2003, respectively. The operating income (loss) for the Licensing segment, Recorders segment, corporate administrative expenses and restructuring charges (credits) is shown in the following table:


	For the Three Months Ended September 30,						For the Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2004			2003			2004			2003
	(in millions)
Licensing segment	$	0.1		$	1.5		$	0.3		$	6.9
Recorders segment		(0.3	)		1.5			2.5			4.9
Corporate and restructuring charges (credits)		0.2			(1.2	)		(3.2	)		(4.4	)

Operating income (loss)	$	—		$	1.8		$	(0.4	)	$	7.4

The decrease in operating income in 2004 was primarily a result of the factors discussed above under “Licensing Revenue”, “Product Revenue” and “Gross Profit on Licensing Revenue.”

Media Pension Expense. We remain the plan sponsor of the pension plan of Media, a former subsidiary that was sold in 1995, and remain obligated to make pension contributions to that Plan. Pension costs (credits) are recognized under SFAS No. 87, “Employers’ Accounting for Pensions.” Payments made by Quantegy either as direct pension contributions or as reimbursement of amounts paid by Ampex on behalf of Media are recognized as an offset to actuarially computed pension costs. Contributions and reimbursements paid by Quantegy totaled $0.7 million in both nine month periods ended September 30, 2004 and 2003.

Interest Expense. Interest expense increased in the three months ended September 30, 2004 to $2.5 million compared to $2.2 million in the three months ended September 30, 2003. In the three months ended September 30, 2004, we made a $0.5 million cash debt service payment. There were no cash payments made in the three months ended September 30, 2003. Interest expense increased in the nine months ended September 30, 2004 to $7.3 million compared to $6.7 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2003. In the nine months ended September 30, 2004, we made a $1.5 million cash debt service payment. In the nine months ended September 30, 2003, we made a $3.0 million cash debt service payment. The balance of interest expense not paid in cash was capitalized and added to the principal balance of the Senior Discount Notes or the Senior Notes as applicable. Interest expense in future years may increase due to the capitalization of interest on our indebtedness not paid in cash from Available Cash Flow, as well as from additional notes issued to our former affiliate, Hillside Capital Incorporated (“Hillside”) in the event they make future years’ pension contributions, as more fully described below under “Liquidity and Capital Resources.”

Amortization of Debt Financing Costs. Financing costs associated with the original issuance of the 12% Senior Notes are being charged to expense through the maturity date in 2008.

Interest Income. Interest income is earned on cash balances and short and long-term investments.

Other (Income) Expense, Net. Other income (expense), net for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2004 includes a net gain of $0.4 million on the sale of assets, which were substantially fully amortized and disposed of in connection with the relocation of our Colorado Springs manufacturing operations to more cost-efficient facilities in Colorado Springs, Colorado and Redwood City, California. Otherwise, other income (expense), net consists primarily of foreign currency translation gains and losses resulting from our foreign operations.

Provision for (Benefit of) Income Taxes. The provisions for income taxes in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2004 and 2003 consisted primarily of foreign income taxes and withholding taxes on licensing revenue. We were not required to include any material provision for U.S. Federal

income tax in periods when we reported income due to the utilization of net operating loss carry forwards and timing differences. At December 31, 2003, we had net operating loss carry forwards for income tax purposes of approximately $200 million, expiring in the years 2005 through 2023. Accordingly, we have the ability to shelter a substantial amount of future taxable income, including future licensing revenue, if any is ultimately realized. Effective July 1, 2004 a new U.S./Japanese tax treaty eliminated withholding taxes on royalty payments. Prior to July 1, 2004, our Japanese licensing revenue was subject to foreign tax withholding of up to 10% of licensing revenue.

Equity in Income of Limited Partnership, Including Sale of Investment. We account for our interest in an investment limited partnership under the equity method of accounting. During the nine months ended September 30, 2004, the partnership sold or distributed to its partners all of the shares of common stock that it had purchased in a publicly-held British promotional products company. No further investment activities are envisioned and the partnership is in the process of winding up its affairs. We have received total distributions of $3.3 million on our $1 million investment, which includes incentive fees earned of $0.6 million from the carried interest assigned from the general partner.

Income from Discontinued Operations. In the three and nine months ended September 30, 2004, we recognized income of $0.4 million on previously discontinued operations, largely due to favorably concluding our obligations with respect to leased facilities previously occupied by these discontinued operations.

Net Income (Loss). We reported a net loss of $1.5 million and $6.0 million in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2004, respectively, compared to net income of $3.3 million and $3.0 million in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2003, respectively, as a result of the factors discussed above.

Benefit from Extinguishment of Mandatorily Redeemable Preferred Stock. In October 2003, we redeemed all remaining Redeemable Preferred Stock. In the final redemption, as in prior periods, we issued shares of Common Stock to satisfy our redemption obligations on our Redeemable and Convertible Preferred Stock. By agreement, such shares were valued at $50.00 each ($2.50 per share pre-reverse stock split), which was higher than the market value per share at the time of each redemption. As a result, we recorded a benefit available to common stockholders in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2003 of $1.0 million and $3.0 million, respectively.

Other Comprehensive Income (Loss). In the three and nine months ended September 30, 2004 and 2003, other comprehensive income (loss) consists of minimum pension liability, as restated, and foreign currency transaction adjustments resulting from our foreign operations.

Inflation and Changing Prices. We do not believe that inflation or changing prices have had any material impact on our product and service revenue, licensing income or income from continuing operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2004 and 2003.

Liquidity and Capital Resources, as restated

General. We have incurred significant losses in recent years, primarily with respect to operations we discontinued in prior years. In addition, we continue to incur significant interest expense on our debt securities and pension costs. We have limited liquidity with which to conduct our operations. Substantially all cash generated by our Licensing segment in excess of related operating expenses and certain other expenses, including patent litigation costs, is required to be applied to reduce debt. Cash and marketable securities totaled $14.6 million at September 30, 2004, substantially all of which was generated by the Recorders segment, is excluded from the calculation of Available Cash Flow and is available to be reinvested in our businesses.

We have instituted litigation with the ITC and in the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware against certain manufacturers of digital still cameras and cellular phones equipped with digital image storage and retrieval capabilities for unauthorized use of our intellectual property. We have spent substantial funds totaling $3.5 million during the last nine months in connection with these suits, and we will be required to spend substantial additional funds if these suits ultimately go to trial and are not resolved through negotiations. Furthermore, we may decide to enforce our patents by instituting additional litigation against other manufacturers of digital still cameras and/or other products where our technology is being used if licensing agreements are not completed in the near future, which would utilize still additional funds.

We have restructured our long-term senior debt to extend maturities and modify certain covenants that have improved our near-term liquidity. As recently amended, the Senior Notes require that we generate a minimum of $30 million of Available Cash Flow (as defined) during the five-year period ending December 31, 2006. From March 2002 to September 2004, we have generated $5.5 million of Available Cash Flow. We believe that the receipt of royalties from Canon and Sanyo in the fourth quarter of 2004 will enable us to make substantial progress in meeting this covenant. Accordingly, we currently expect that we will satisfy this covenant within the permitted time frame. We intend to apply these royalties to repay the Senior Discount Notes in full and to reduce the outstanding amount of our Senior Notes.

In addition, we have substantial pension contributions and pension related funding due in future periods. If we do not have the resources to make these payments, which in recent years we have not, we will seek to borrow additional funds from a former affiliate, Hillside, to meet these obligations.

Management believes that our liquidity, coupled with our ability to borrow pension contributions from Hillside, and our expectation that Hillside has the intent and the ability to fund such pension contributions on our behalf, should be sufficient to satisfy all projected cash obligations through September 2005, but there can be no assurance in this regard. In order to satisfy our debt covenants, meet our debt service obligations and to make estimated future pension contributions, we will be required to broadly license our patents to manufacturers of digital still cameras, digital camcorders, DVD and Hard Disk recorders. We have recently entered into several new license agreements with manufacturers of digital still cameras, digital camcorders and DVD recorders. Additional licensing discussions are in progress with other manufacturers. There can be no assurance that we will be able to conclude new license agreements or, if concluded, whether they will generate sufficient licensing revenue to satisfy all of our existing and future commitments.

Cash Flow. We used cash from continuing operating activities totaling $7.0 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2004 and generated cash from continuing operating activities totaling $7.7 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2003. The net change in 2004 resulted from lower licensing revenue, increased patent litigation costs and pension contributions that were offset in part by income from an investment partnership. Cash used by discontinued operations totaled $0.6 million and $0.7 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2004 and 2003, respectively.

Senior Debt. As of September 30, 2004 we had outstanding approximately $89.6 million of total borrowings, which includes approximately $66.6 million under our 12% Senior Notes due 2008, $9.8 million under our 20% Senior Discount Notes due 2006 and $13.2 million of notes payable to Hillside (“Hillside Notes”). Such indebtedness is secured by liens on a substantial portion of our assets, including for certain securities our future royalty receipts. We may incur additional indebtedness from time to time in the future, subject to certain restrictions imposed by our debt agreements, which would increase our debt service obligations in the future. In March 2004, we received consent from the holders of our senior debt securities (i) to extend the maturity date of our Senior Discount Notes from January 5, 2005 to January 5, 2006, (ii) to extend the measurement date from December 31, 2004 to December 31, 2006, by which we are required to generate at least $30 million of Available Cash Flow, as defined in the Senior Note indenture, and (iii) to defer scheduled principal repayments on our pension notes through December 31, 2006. The indentures under which the Senior Notes and the Senior Discount Notes were issued contain customary

affirmative and negative restrictive covenants that limit the payment of dividends, the incurrence of additional indebtedness or liens, certain sales of assets and other actions by us and our restricted subsidiaries. In the event of default, the holders of the Notes would be entitled to enforce the liens granted by us on our future patent royalty stream and the Colorado Springs facility and to apply amounts collected to repayment of the Notes.

Pension Contributions and Pension Related Funding Obligations. We are the Plan Sponsor of the Ampex pension plan and of the pension plan of Media, a former subsidiary that was sold in 1995 (“Media”). We amended these plans in early 1994 to terminate benefit service and compensation accruals as of February 1, 1994 in order to reduce payments that would otherwise be required. These pension plans remain underfunded and actuaries have forecasted that substantial pension contributions will be required beginning in 2004 through 2010 in order to fully fund benefits payable to plan participants.

In connection with the sale, Media assumed the obligation to reimburse us for pension contributions that we may be required to make in future years as Plan Sponsor of the Media pension plan. This agreement was intended to make us whole from any expense or cash outlay as it pertains to the Media pension plan. However, if Media becomes financially unable to honor its contractual reimbursement obligation, we would still be required to fund Media’s future pension contributions.

In July 2003, Ampex and Media entered into the Retirement Plan Funding and Settlement Agreement whereby Media agreed to make payments of $74,000 per month to us for as long as required to reimburse us for pension contributions made on behalf of Media.


	Estimated Contributions
	Ampex Pension Plan		Media Pension Plan		Media Reimbursement
	(in thousands)
2004 *	$	10,033	$	3,841	$	(888	)
2005		8,505		3,072		(888	)
2006		7,298		2,559		(888	)
2007		6,935		2,457		(888	)
2008		4,127		895		(888	)
2009		917		—		(888	)

Total	$	37,815	$	12,824	$	(5,328	)

*	Through September 30, 2004, payments of $7.2 million and $2.7 million pertaining to the Ampex pension plan and Media pension plan have been made. In 2004, Media has made reimbursement payments totaling $740,000 through September 30, 2004.

The Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation (“PBGC”), Hillside and Ampex entered into the Joint Settlement Agreement in 1994, whereby Hillside agreed to retain plan termination liability to the PBGC under the Ampex pension plan and Media pension plan after the reorganization of NH Holdings Incorporated, our former parent. Pursuant to this agreement, Hillside was also required to advance pension contributions for the Ampex pension plan and Media pension plan in the event that we were unable to make the pension contributions. Failure by Hillside to advance funds in subsequent periods would enable the PBGC to terminate the plans and seek recovery of termination benefits from Hillside.

At our request, Hillside has made the 2004 pension contributions which totaled $7.2 million and $2.7 million pertaining to the Ampex pension plan and the Media pension plan, respectively. We have issued Notes to Hillside in the amount of the pension contributions. We anticipate that, due to our senior debt agreements, Hillside may be required to fund future contributions.

If Hillside is required to make all or portions of the Ampex and/or Media pension contributions, we will issue additional Hillside Notes. Under the terms of the Hillside Notes, $150,000 is due on the first anniversary of the notes with the remainder due on the fourth anniversary of the notes. Pursuant to amendments to the senior debt agreements, all principal payments on the Hillside Notes will be deferred until after December 31, 2006 with earlier repayment in the event that the Senior Discount Notes and Senior Notes have been repaid in full. The Hillside Notes provide for interest paid quarterly at 1 percent plus 175% of the applicable mid-term Federal rate (effective rate of 7.60% at September 30, 2004). We granted to Hillside a security interest in Data Systems’ inventory and other assets as collateral for advances, which it is required to make pursuant to the agreement. The agreement contains certain restrictive covenants which, among other things, restrict our ability to declare dividends, sell all or substantially all of our assets or commence liquidation, or engage in specified transactions with certain related parties, breach of which could result in acceleration of our potential termination liabilities.

Hillside is legally obligated to comply with the terms of the Joint Settlement Agreement, and they have represented that they have sufficient assets to fund pension contributions that are scheduled in future years. We have no direct or indirect financial ownership interest in Hillside and, accordingly, have no ability to control Hillside or to mandate its compliance with the terms of the Joint Settlement Agreement. Accordingly, our ability to borrow pension contributions from Hillside is beyond our control.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements. During the nine months ended September 30, 2004 and 2003, we did not have any off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources that our Management believes is material to investors.

Disclosure of Contractual Obligations. During the nine months ended September 30, 2004, there were no material changes outside the ordinary course of our business in the contractual obligations and commercial commitments set forth in the 2003 Form 10-K/A, except for the change in debt obligations discussed in Note 9 of the Unaudited Consolidated Notes to the Financial Statements and a reduction, based on an actuarial computation, in required current year pension contributions from $13.9 million estimated at December 31, 2003 to $11.5 million estimated at September 30, 2004. The reduction in the current year pension liability has been added to long-term pension liability.

Recent Pronouncements

In March 2004, the FASB approved EITF Issue 03-6, “Participating Securities and the Two-Class Method under SFAS 128.” EITF Issue 03-6 supersedes the guidance in Topic No. D-95, “Effect of Participating Convertible Securities on the Computation of Basic Earnings per Share” and requires the use of the two-class method of participating securities. The two-class method is an earnings allocation formula that determines earnings per share for each class of common stock and participating security according to dividends declared (or accumulated) and participation rights in undistributed earnings. In addition, EITF Issue 03-6 addresses other forms of participating securities, including options, warrants, forwards and other contracts to issue an entity’s common stock, with the exception of stock-based compensation (unvested options and restricted stock) subject to the provisions of APB 25 and SFAS 123. EITF Issue 03-6 is effective for reporting periods beginning after March 31, 2004 and should be applied by restating previously reported earnings per share. We have adopted EITF Issue 03-6 and have restated previously reported earnings per share for the effect of this pronouncement.

under SFAS No. 115 and investments accounted for under the cost method or the equity method. The recognition and measurement guidance for which the consensus was reached in the March 2004 meeting is to be applied to other-than-temporary impairment evaluations in reporting periods beginning after June 15, 2004. We do not believe that this consensus on the recognition and measurement guidance will have an impact on our consolidated results of operations.

In November 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued SFAS No. 151, “Inventory Costs - an amendment of ARB No. 43, Chapter 4.” This statement amends the guidance in ARB No. 43, Chapter 4, “Inventory Pricing,” to clarify the accounting for abnormal amounts of idle facility expense, freight, handling costs, and wasted material (spoilage). This statement requires that the above items be recognized as current-period charges, regardless of whether they meet the criterion of abnormal. Additionally, SFAS No. 151 requires that the allocation of fixed production overheads to the costs of conversion be based on the normal capacity of the production facilities. SFAS No. 151 is effective for fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2005. We do not expect SFAS No. 151 to have a material impact on our financial condition or results of operations.

In December 2004, the FASB issued Statement No. 123R, “Share-Based Payment,” which requires companies to measure and recognize compensation expense for all stock-based payments at fair value. SFAS No. 123R is effective for all interim periods beginning after June 15, 2005. We are currently evaluating the impact of SFAS No. 123R on our financial position and results of operations as well as alternative transition methods under SFAS No. 123R. In addition, we have not determined whether the adoption of SFAS No. 123R will result in amounts that are similar to the current pro forma disclosures under SFAS 123. See “Stock-Based Compensation” in Note 2 to Consolidated Financial Statements for information related to the pro forma effects on our net income (loss) and basic and diluted income (loss) per share if we had applied the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation,” to stock-based employee compensation.

In December 2004, the FASB issued two Staff Positions (“FSPs”) that provide accounting guidance on how companies should account for the effects of the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004 (the Act) that was signed into law on October 22, 2004. The Act could affect how companies report their deferred income tax balances. The first FSP is FSP FAS 109-1 (“FSP 109-1”); the second is FSP FAS 109-2 (“FSP 109-2”). In FSP 109-1, the FASB concludes that the tax relief (special tax deduction for domestic manufacturing) from the Act should be accounted for as a “special deduction” instead of a tax rate reduction. FSP 109-2 gives a company additional time to evaluate the effects of the Act on any plan for reinvestment of repatriation of foreign earnings for purposes of applying SFAS No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes.” However, a company must provide certain disclosures if it chooses to utilize the additional time granted by the FASB. We are evaluating the impact, if any, these FSPs may have on our consolidated financial statements.

Risk Factors

We Have Experienced Significant Losses and Our Losses May Continue

We have incurred significant net losses. These losses were primarily attributable to certain businesses which we discontinued in 2001 and 2000. In addition, we continue to incur significant charges for interest expense and pension funding obligations.

Our continuing operations include the results of our Recorder and Licensing business segments. In the nine months ended September 30, 2004 and for the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001, we reported a net loss. Although we have restructured much of our senior debt to limit the amount of interest that we need to pay in cash through 2006 to Available Cash Flow, as defined, we continue to incur substantial interest expense on our indebtedness and this interest, if not paid in cash, is added to the outstanding debt balance, which will increase our interest expense in future periods.

Data Systems reported operating income and net income in the nine months ended September 30, 2004 and in 2003 and 2002. However, its business is dependent on the funding of government defense programs, which we believe will come under increased pressure in the future, and which may lead to declining sales in our Recorders segment. We are targeting our new disk-based and solid-state memory-based data acquisition recorders to replace a large installed base of Ampex tape-based data acquisition recorders, but there can be no assurance that these products will achieve the same level of market penetration.

In 2004 and 2003, we entered into licensing agreements which provide for substantial royalty payments to us for past and future use of our patents. We continue to attempt to negotiate new license agreements with manufacturers of digital camcorders, digital still cameras, camera equipped cellular phones, DVD recorders and other consumer products for use of our patents.

Our license agreements generally provide for a negotiated one-time payment of royalties due on products sold by the licensee in periods prior to the effective date of the license, as well as ongoing payments over the remaining lives of the patents based on future product sales by the licensee. We are required to apply substantially all our licensing revenue, net of operating expenses, to reduce our debt. At times, we have negotiated a lump sum prepayment in lieu of running royalties, for use of our patents through a specified future date, which enables us to more rapidly pay down our debt.

We have also recently brought litigation against various companies where we believe our patents have been infringed. We have incurred significant litigation expenses of $3.5 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2004 in connection with these suits, and we forecast having to incur significant additional costs if these suits are not resolved through negotiations. Even if we are successful in negotiating new licensing agreements, there can be no assurance that future licensing revenues will attain levels sufficient to repay our debts and other obligations.

Accordingly, there is a material risk that we may not be profitable in future periods.

Risks of Limited Liquidity

We have limited liquidity with which to conduct our operations. Substantially all cash generated by our Licensing segment in excess of related operating expenses and certain other expenses, including patent litigation costs, is required to be applied to reduce debt. Cash and marketable securities totaled $14.6 million at September 30, 2004, substantially all of which was generated by our Recorders segment, is excluded from the calculation of Available Cash Flow and is available to be reinvested in our businesses.

While we have recently restructured our senior debt to extend maturities and modify certain covenants that have improved our near-term liquidity, we are incurring substantial litigation costs to enforce our patents as more fully described above, and we may decide to institute additional litigation against other manufacturers of digital still cameras and other products where our technology is being used if licensing agreements are not completed on satisfactory terms. We also have substantial pension contribution requirements. Our Management believes that our liquidity, coupled with our ability to borrow pension contributions from Hillside, and our expectation that Hillside has the intent and ability to fund such pension contributions on our behalf, should be sufficient to satisfy our projected cash obligations through September 2005, but there can be no assurance in this regard. If Hillside is unable to fund future pension contributions our financial position could be materially and adversely affected.

We Have Significant Indebtedness, Which May Affect Our Financial Condition, as restated

As of September 30, 2004 we had outstanding approximately $89.6 million of total borrowings, which includes approximately $66.6 million under our 12% Senior Notes due 2008, $9.8 million under our 20% Senior Discount Notes due 2006 and $13.2 million of Hillside Notes incurred in connection with pension

contributions advanced by Hillside (as more fully described below under the caption “We Have Substantial Unfunded Pension Liabilities”). Such indebtedness is secured by liens on a substantial portion of our assets, including for certain securities our future royalty receipts. We may incur additional indebtedness from time to time in the future, subject to certain restrictions imposed by our debt agreements, which would increase our interest expense in future periods. In March 2004, we received consent from the holders of our senior debt securities (i) to extend the maturity date of our Senior Discount Notes from January 5, 2005 to January 5, 2006, (ii) to extend the measurement date from December 31, 2004 to December 31, 2006, by which we are required to generate at least $30 million of Available Cash Flow, as defined in the Senior Note indenture, and (iii) to defer scheduled principal repayments on our pension notes through December 31, 2006. We believe that the receipt of royalties in the fourth quarter of 2004 will enable us to make substantial progress in meeting this covenant and we currently expect that it will be met within the time permitted.

In order to meet our debt service obligations and to make estimated future pension contributions, we will be required to broadly license our patents to manufacturers of digital still cameras, camera equipped cellular phones, digital camcorders and DVD recorders. We have recently entered into several new license agreements with manufacturers of certain of these products. Additional licensing discussions are in progress with other manufacturers. There can be no assurance that we will be able to conclude new license agreements or, if concluded, whether they will generate sufficient licensing revenue to satisfy all of our existing and future commitments. If we fail to generate the required revenues or if we default in our other obligations under the relevant loan agreements, the Noteholders would have the right to accelerate the indebtedness and foreclose on their liens, which would materially and adversely affect our financial condition.

The degree to which we are leveraged could have other important consequences to investors, including the following:

•

a substantial portion of our cash flow from licensing operations must be dedicated to the payment of principal of and interest on our outstanding indebtedness, and therefore will not be available for other purposes;

•

our ability to obtain additional financing in the future for working capital needs, capital expenditures, acquisitions and general corporate purposes may be materially limited or impaired by the terms of our existing debt agreements, and even if existing lenders consent to the issuance of new debt, such financing may not be available on terms favorable to us;

•

we may be more highly leveraged than our competitors, which may place us at a competitive disadvantage;

•

our leverage may make us more vulnerable to a downturn in our business or the economy in general; and

•

the financial covenants and other restrictions contained in our indentures and other agreements relating to our indebtedness also restrict our ability to make new investments, dispose of assets or to pay dividends on or repurchase common stock.

We expect that our cash balances and expected cash flow from operations as well as our ability to borrow pension contributions from Hillside, and our expectation that Hillside has the intent and ability to fund such pension contributions on our behalf, as discussed below, will be sufficient to fund anticipated operating expenses, capital expenditures and our debt service requirements as they become due, at least through September 2005. However, we cannot assure you that the amounts available from these sources will be sufficient for such purposes in future periods. Also, we cannot assure you that additional sources of funding will be available if we need them or, if available, will be obtained on satisfactory terms. If we cannot service our indebtedness, we will be forced to adopt alternative strategies. These strategies may include reducing or

delaying capital expenditures, selling assets, restructuring or refinancing our indebtedness, or seeking additional equity capital. We cannot give any assurance that any of these strategies will be successful or that they will be permitted under our debt indentures.

We Have Substantial Unfunded Pension Liabilities, as restated

The defined benefit pension plans of Ampex and Media are substantially underfunded. We are required to make substantial projected pension contributions under those pension plans beginning in 2004 and thereafter. Based on the most recent actuarial valuation, at December 31, 2003, estimated pension contributions under the Ampex pension plan over the next six years will total $37.8 million, of which $7.2 million has been paid in 2004. We are also the Plan Sponsor and are liable to provide funding for plan benefits under the pension plan of Media, our subsidiary which was sold in 1995. Estimated pension contributions under the Media pension plan over the next six years will total $12.8 million, of which $2.7 million has been paid in 2004.

During 2003, Ampex and Media entered into the Retirement Plan Funding and Settlement Agreement, which provides for monthly payments of $74,000 by Media to us in settlement of future pension contributions that we may be required to fund under the Media pension plan.

Under a Joint Settlement Agreement with Hillside, Ampex and the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation, Hillside is required to advance pension contributions for the Ampex pension plan and Media pension plan in the event that we cannot make them. When Hillside advances pension contributions, we become indebted to Hillside and issue an equivalent amount of Hillside Notes. At our request, Hillside has made pension contributions during 2004 totaling $7.2 million and $2.7 million pertaining to the Ampex pension plan and the Media pension plan, respectively. We have issued notes to Hillside in the amount of the pension contributions. We anticipate that, due to our senior debt agreements, Hillside may be required to fund future contributions. We believe that Hillside has sufficient assets to fund future pension contributions under the Joint Settlement Agreement, but we do not own or control Hillside, and except for the provisions of the Joint Settlement Agreement, our ability to borrow pension contributions from Hillside is beyond our control.

Risks Associated With a Decline in U.S. Government Spending

Data Systems’ business depends materially on continued U.S. government expenditures on intelligence and defense programs. We have recently introduced our new DDRs disk-based instrumentation recorder and our new DSRs solid-state memory-based instrumentation recorder for use in intelligence gathering activities. These products are intended to replace over several years a large installed base of DCRsi tape-based data acquisition recorders. There can be no assurance that these new products will achieve the same level of market acceptance as their tape-based counterparts.

The loss or significant decline in spending on various imaging and intelligence gathering programs where we are subcontractors to prime government contractors or lack of acceptance of our new products could have a material adverse effect on our business. U.S. intelligence and defense budgets have experienced declines from time to time in recent years, resulting in program delays, program cancellations and deferral of funding for approved programs. If sales of new systems decline in the future, we may be increasingly dependent upon revenues from the sale of spare parts, service and tape.

Our Licensing Revenue is Subject to Material Fluctuations and Must be Applied to Repay Debt

Licensing revenue has historically fluctuated widely due to a number of factors that we cannot predict, such as the extent to which third parties use our patented technology, the extent to which we must pursue litigation in order to enforce our patents, and the ultimate success of our licensing and litigation activities. Licensing revenue depends in part on fluctuating sales volumes and prices of licensees’ products

that incorporate our technology. Sales by licensees are beyond our ability to control or predict in advance. In addition, the cost of patent litigation can be material. In recent periods we have incurred significant expenses in connection with litigation that we have initiated against certain manufacturers of digital still cameras and related products for unauthorized use of our intellectual property. We also face the risk that a court could rule that our patents are invalid or not infringed, causing existing licensees to discontinue payments to us.

As discussed above, we recently entered into new license agreements covering digital camcorders, digital still cameras and DVD recorders, and we are in active negotiations with other manufacturers of these products. Under the terms of our debt agreements, we must use the proceeds from licensing, after deducting certain expenses and other costs, to repay debt service costs.

Certain of our digital still camera patents expire in 2006. We cannot assure you that licensees will continue to sell products that use our other digital still camera patents which expire at various dates through 2014. Also, we cannot assure you that we will be able to develop patentable technology that will generate significant licensing revenues in future years to replace patents as they expire. Our expenditures for research and development are less than what we spent in prior years, which are likely to have a long-term adverse effect on our ability to maintain a significant portfolio of patented technologies.

Accordingly, our licensing revenue fluctuates significantly from quarter to quarter and from year to year, and we cannot give any assurance as to the level of licensing revenue that will be realized in future periods. We also cannot assure you that future licensing revenues will be sufficient to repay our debts and other obligations.

Our Stock Price May be Subject to Continued Volatility

The trading price of our Common Stock has been and can be expected to be subject to significant volatility, reflecting a variety of factors, including:

•

fluctuations in patent licensing revenues, developments in our patent licensing program and the success or failure of litigation that we initiate to defend our patents;

•

quarterly fluctuations in operating results;

•

modifications to our senior debt agreements and other events that affect our liquidity;

•

announcements of the introduction of new products, technologies or services by us or our competitors;

•

announcements by us of acquisitions of, or investments in, new businesses or other events;

•

reports and predictions concerning us by analysts and other members of the media; and

•

general economic or market conditions.

The stock market in general, and technology companies in particular, have experienced a high degree of price volatility, which has had a substantial effect on the market prices of many such companies for reasons that often are unrelated or disproportionate to operating performance. These broad market and industry fluctuations may adversely affect the price of the Class A Common Stock, regardless of our operating performance.

Risks Associated With Acquisition Strategy

We are not currently seeking to make any acquisitions of a controlling interest in new businesses. At present, the terms of our principal debt instruments substantially restrict our ability to make acquisitions or investments in new businesses. However, we have made, and may under certain circumstances in the future make, acquisitions of, and/or investments in, other businesses. These entities may be involved in new businesses in which we have not historically been involved. In 2003, our unrestricted subsidiary invested $1 million to acquire a minority interest in a private investment limited partnership that has purchased common shares of a British promotional products company. The limited partnership has sold all of the shares of the products company and distributed the sale proceeds to its partners. We have received total distributions of $3.3 million on our investment, which includes incentive fees earned of $0.6 million from the carried interest assigned from the general partner. Our CEO, Edward Bramson, acquired shares in this company in concert with the limited partnership, and he controls the corporate general partner of the limited partnership. Mr. Bramson served as the temporary, non-executive Chairman of the Board of the British company until July 2004, at which time the Board elected a new executive chairman. Mr. Bramson has assigned to us all compensation he may receive as a non-executive board member. We may not be able to identify or acquire additional acquisition candidates in the future, or complete any further acquisitions or investments on satisfactory terms.

Acquisitions and investments involve numerous additional risks, including difficulties in the management of operations, services and personnel of the acquired companies, and of integrating acquired companies with us and/or each other’s operations. We may also encounter problems in entering markets and businesses in which we have limited or no experience. Acquisitions can also divert Management’s attention from other business concerns. We have made and may make additional investments in companies in which we own less than a 100% interest. Such investments involve additional risks, including the risk that we may not be in a position to control the management or policies of such entities, and the risk of potential conflicts with other investors.

All of our acquisitions of Internet companies have been written off during 2000 and 2001. In addition, we elected to discontinue the operations of MicroNet, which we acquired in 1998. It is possible that we could lose all or a substantial portion of any future investments.

Our Operating Results Are Subject to Quarterly Fluctuations

Our sales and results of operations are generally subject to quarterly and annual fluctuations. Various factors affect our operating results, some of which are not within our control, including:

•

receipt of licensing revenue;

•

customer ordering patterns;

•

availability and market acceptance of new products and services;

•

timing of significant orders and new product announcements;

•

order cancellations;

•

the amount and timing of capital expenditures and other costs relating to our operations and licensing activities;

•

the availability of critical raw materials and inventory subassembly components from our suppliers; and

•

general economic and industry conditions.

Results of a given quarter or year may not necessarily be indicative of results to be expected for future periods. In addition, fluctuations in operating results may negatively affect our debt service coverage, or our ability to issue debt or equity securities should we wish to do so, in any given fiscal period. Material fluctuations in our operating results in future periods could have a material adverse effect on the price of the Class A Common Stock.

Seasonal Customer Ordering Patterns May Affect Our Business

A substantial portion of our backlog at a given time is normally shipped within one or two quarters thereafter. Therefore, sales in any quarter are heavily dependent on orders received in that quarter and the immediately preceding quarter.

We May be Unable to Respond to Rapid Technological Change and the Need to Develop New Products

All the industries and markets from which we derive or expect to derive revenues, directly or through our licensing program, are characterized by continual technological change and the need to introduce new products, product upgrades and patentable technology. This has required, and will continue to require, that we spend substantial amounts for the research, development and engineering of new products and advances to existing products. We cannot assure you that our existing products, technologies and services will not become obsolete or that any new products, technologies or services will win commercial acceptance. Obsolescence of existing product lines, or inability to develop and introduce new products and services, could have a material adverse effect on our sales and results of operations in the future. The development and introduction of new technologies, products and services are subject to inherent technical and market risks, and there can be no assurance that we will be successful in this regard. In addition, reductions in our research and development programs could adversely affect our ability to remain competitive.

We Encounter Significant Competition in Our Recorders Segment

Data Systems encounters significant competition in all the markets for its products and services. Many of its competitors have greater resources and access to capital than us. In the mass data storage market, Data Systems competes with a number of well-established competitors such as IBM Corporation, Storage Technology Corporation, Sony and ADIC, as well as smaller companies. In addition, other manufacturers of scanning video recorders may seek to enter the mass data storage market in competition with us. Price declines in competitive storage systems, such as magnetic or optical disk drives, can negatively impact sales of Data Systems’ tape-based DST products.

In the instrumentation market, Data Systems competes primarily with companies that depend on government contracts for a major portion of their sales in this market, including Calculex, L-3 Communications Corporation and Sypris Solutions, Inc. The number of competitors in this market has decreased in recent years as the level of government spending in many areas has declined.

We Are Dependent on Certain Suppliers

Data Systems purchases certain components from a single domestic or foreign manufacturer. Significant delays in deliveries or defects in such components could adversely affect our manufacturing operations, pending qualification of an alternative supplier. In addition, we produce highly engineered products in relatively small quantities. As a result, our ability to cause suppliers to continue production of certain products on which we depend may be limited. We do not generally enter into long-term raw materials or components supply contracts.

We Are Subject to Certain Risks Related to Our International Operations

Although we significantly curtailed Data Systems’ international operations in prior years, sales to foreign customers (including U.S. export sales) continue to be significant to our results of operations. International operations are subject to a number of special risks, including limitations on repatriation of earnings, restrictive actions by local governments, and nationalization. Additionally, export sales are subject to export regulation and restrictions imposed by U.S. government agencies. Fluctuations in the value of foreign currencies can affect our results of operations. We do not normally seek to mitigate our exposure to exchange rate fluctuations by hedging our foreign currency positions.

We Are Dependent on Certain Key Personnel

We are highly dependent on our Management. Our success depends upon the availability and performance of our executive officers and directors. We have not entered into employment agreements with any of our key employees, and the loss of their services could have a material adverse effect on us. We do not maintain key man life insurance on any of these individuals.

Our Charter Documents and Certain of Our Governing Instruments May Prevent a Takeover

Our Certificate of Incorporation provides for a classified Board of Directors, with members of each class elected for a three-year term. It also provides for nullification of voting rights of certain foreign stockholders in certain circumstances involving possible violations of security regulations of the United States Department of Defense.

The indenture governing our outstanding Senior Notes requires us to offer to repurchase the Senior Notes at a purchase price equal to 101% of the outstanding principal amount thereof together with accrued and unpaid interest in the event of a change of control. Under the indenture, a change of control includes the following events: a person or group of people acting together acquires 50% or more of our outstanding voting stock; or the transfer of substantially all of our assets to any such person or group, other than to certain of our subsidiaries and affiliates.

The Note Purchase Agreement governing our outstanding Senior Discount Notes requires us to repay such notes in full upon the occurrence of a change of control. Under the agreement, a change of control includes, among other things: any person or group becomes the beneficial owner of more than 50% of our outstanding voting stock, or any merger or consolidation of Ampex with or into any other entity. The agreement also requires us to apply the proceeds from the sale of Data Systems or the sale of its Colorado Springs, CO manufacturing facility against the outstanding Notes.

These provisions could have anti-takeover effects by making an acquisition of us by a third party more difficult or expensive in certain circumstances.

We do not Expect to Pay Dividends on Our Common Stock

We have not declared dividends on our Common Stock since our incorporation in 1992 and we have no present intention of paying dividends on our Common Stock. We are also restricted by the terms of certain debt and other agreements as to the declaration of dividends.

We Are Dependent on Licensed Patents and Proprietary Technology

Our success depends, in part, upon our ability to establish and maintain the proprietary nature of our technology through the patent process. There can be no assurance that one or more of our patents will not be successfully challenged, invalidated or circumvented or that we will otherwise be able to rely on such patents

for any reason. In addition, our competitors, many of whom have substantial resources and have made substantial investments in competing technologies, may seek to apply for and obtain patents that restrict our ability to make, use and sell our products either in the United States or in foreign markets. If any of our patents are successfully challenged, invalidated or circumvented or our right or ability to manufacture our products becomes restricted, our ability to continue to manufacture and market our products could be adversely affected, which would likely have a material adverse effect upon our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We have recently initiated litigation to enforce our digital still camera patents and we may decide to initiate additional litigation against other manufacturers of digital still cameras and other products to enforce our patents, to protect trade secrets or know-how owned by us or to determine the enforceability, scope and validity of the proprietary rights of others. Any litigation or interference proceedings brought against, initiated by, or otherwise involving us, may require us to incur substantial legal and other fees and expenses and may require some of our employees to devote all or a substantial portion of their time to the prosecution or defense of such litigation or proceedings.

We Are Subject to Environmental Regulation and Our Business Could be Negatively Affected by the Costs of Compliance

Our facilities are subject to numerous federal, state and local laws and regulations designed to protect the environment from waste emissions and hazardous substances. Owners and occupiers of sites containing hazardous substances, as well as generators and transporters of hazardous substances, are subject to broad liability under various federal and state environmental laws and regulations, including liability for investigative and cleanup costs and damages arising out of past disposal activities. We have been named from time to time as a potentially responsible party by the United States Environmental Protection Agency with respect to contaminated sites that have been designated as “Superfund” sites, and are currently engaged in various environmental investigation, remediation and/or monitoring activities at several sites located off our facilities. There can be no assurance we will not ultimately incur a liability in excess of amounts currently reserved for pending environmental matters, or that additional liabilities with respect to environmental matters will not be asserted. In addition, changes in environmental regulations could impose the need for additional capital equipment or other requirements. Such liabilities or regulations could have a material adverse effect on us in the future.

ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

We have an investment in a limited partnership that holds shares in a publicly-held British promotional products company. We accounted for our investment in the partnership under the equity method through September 30, 2004, when the partnership sold or distributed all remaining shares held of the products company, made its final distribution and began to wind up its affairs. We have received total distributions of $3.3 million on our investment of $1 million, which includes incentive fees earned of $0.6 million from the carried interest assigned from the general partner. There were no other material changes during the third quarter of 2004 to the disclosure made under this Item in our 2003 Form 10-K/A.

ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

This item 4 has been restated to correct the accounting for our obligations under the Media pension plan in accordance with SFAS No. 87, “Employers’ Accounting for Pensions.”

Management’s Report on Assessment of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting for the Company, as such term is defined under Rule 13a-15(f) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over

financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

A material weakness is a control deficiency (within the meaning of PCAOB Auditing Standard No. 2), or combination of control deficiencies, that results in there being more than a remote likelihood that a material misstatement of the annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis by employees in the normal course of their assigned functions. As of September 30, 2004 we did not maintain effective controls over the application of generally accepted accounting principles related to the complex non-routine pension obligations of a disposed subsidiary sold in 1995.

This control deficiency resulted in the following adjustments of our financial statements.

On February 18, 2005, the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors of Ampex Corporation concluded that the previously issued financial statements contained in our Annual Report on Form 10-K as of December 31, 2003 and December 31, 2002 and for each of the years in the three year period ended December 31, 2003, as well as our interim financial statements contained on Form 10-Q as of and for the periods ending March 31, 2004, June 30, 2004 and September 30, 2004, should no longer be relied upon because of errors in those financial statements. These errors relate to how we accounted for our obligations with respect to a pension plan of our former magnetic tape manufacturing subsidiary (“Media”), which we sold in 1995. These errors are the subject of recent communications with the Office of the Chief Accountant of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”), after which we revised our views with respect to the appropriate accounting for the Media pension plan.

We have restated our financial statements in this Form 10-Q/A as of September 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003 and for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2004 and 2003 to correct the accounting for our obligations under a pension plan of Media which we disposed of in 1995.

The agreement for the sale of Media required the buyer, Quantegy Corporation, to pay directly or to reimburse us for required contributions to the Media pension plan. However, we remained the Plan Sponsor of the Media pension plan and we are obligated to make pension contributions to that Plan.

The ineffective control over the application of generally accepted accounting principles in relation to complex, non-routine transactions in the financial reporting process could result in a material misstatement to the annual or interim financial statements that would not be prevented or detected. As a result, management has determined that this control deficiency constituted a material weakness, as defined by the PCAOB as of September 30, 2004. Management communicated its conclusions to the Audit Committee of the Company’s Board of Directors.

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

Our management has identified the steps necessary to address the material weakness described above, as follows:

•

Engaging outside contractors with technical accounting expertise, as needed, and reorganizing the accounting and finance department to ensure that accounting personnel with adequate experience, skills and knowledge relating to complex, non-routine transactions are directly involved in the review and accounting evaluation of our complex, non-routine transactions;

•

Involving both internal accounting personnel and outside contractors with technical accounting expertise, as needed, early in the evaluation of complex, non-routine transactions to obtain additional guidance as to the application of generally accepted accounting principles to such transactions;

•

Documenting to standards established by senior accounting personnel and the principal accounting officer the review, analysis and related conclusions with respect to complex, non-routine transactions; and

•

Requiring senior accounting personnel and the principal accounting officer to review complex, non-routine transactions to evaluate and approve the accounting treatment for such transactions.

We began to execute the remediation plans identified above in the first quarter of 2005.

We have also implemented policies and procedures to assure adequate and timely involvement of outside accounting contractors, as needed; to obtain guidance as to the application of generally accepted accounting principles to complex, non-routine transactions. We believe that these corrective actions, taken as a whole, have mitigated the control deficiencies with respect to our preparation of our 2004 Annual Report on Form 10-K and that these measures have been effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the 2004 Form 10-K has been recorded, processed, summarized and reported correctly. We are in the process of developing procedures for the testing of these controls to determine if the material weakness has been remediated and expect that testing of these controls will be substantially completed by the end of our fiscal second quarter of 2005. We will continue the implementation of policies, processes and procedures regarding the review of complex, non-routine transactions. Management believes that our controls and procedures will continue to improve as a result of the further implementation of these measures.

In designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, Management recognized that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives, and Management necessarily was required to apply its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures.

There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting identified in the evaluation described above that occurred during our last fiscal quarter that have during the nine months ended September 30, 2004 materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

Evaluation of Effectiveness of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer, we evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures, as such term is defined under Rule 13a-15(e) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Based on that evaluation, our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were ineffective as of September 30, 2004 because of the material weakness identified above.

PART II – OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

We instituted litigation with the ITC and in the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware against Sanyo in May 2004 and separately against Sony in July 2004 and Kodak in October 2004 for their unauthorized use of our patents in digital still cameras and cell phones equipped with digital image storage and retrieval capabilities. If granted, an ITC exclusion order would prohibit the importation and sale of such products in the United States throughout the duration of the life of each patent. The U.S. District Court suits seek payment of damages.

We have subsequently withdrawn our complaint against Sanyo both in the ITC and in the U.S. District Court as a result of having concluded a license agreement with them. However, litigation with

Sony and Kodak continues and we may seek to enforce our patents by instituting additional litigation against other manufacturers of digital still cameras and other products where our technology is being used if licensing agreements are not completed on satisfactory terms.

We are a party to other routine litigation incidental to our business. In the opinion of Management, no such current or pending lawsuits, either individually or in the aggregate, are likely to have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

Our facilities are subject to numerous federal, state and local laws and regulations designed to protect the environment from waste emissions and hazardous substances. We are also subject to the federal Occupational Safety and Health Act and other laws and regulations affecting the safety and health of employees in our facilities. Management believes that we are generally in compliance in all material respects with all applicable environmental and occupational safety laws and regulations or have plans to bring operations into compliance. Management does not anticipate that capital expenditures for pollution control equipment for fiscal 2004 or 2005 will be material.

Owners and occupiers of sites containing hazardous substances, as well as generators and transporters of hazardous substances, are subject to broad liability under various federal and state environmental laws and regulations, including liability for investigative and cleanup costs and damages arising out of past disposal activities. We are engaged in a total of seven environmental investigations, remediation and/or monitoring activities at sites located off our facilities, including the removal of solvent contamination from subsurface aquifers at a site in Sunnyvale, California. Some of these activities involve the participation of state and local government agencies. We have been named as a potentially responsible party by the United States Environmental Protection Agency with respect to five contaminated sites that have been designated as “Superfund” sites on the National Priorities List under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act of 1980. Five sites (including four Superfund sites) are associated with the operations of the Media subsidiaries formerly owned by us. Although we sold Media in November 1995, we may have continuing liability with respect to environmental contamination at these sites if Media fails to discharge its responsibilities with respect to such sites. In October 2003, the California Regional Water Quality Control Board issued us a letter, which rescinds continued cleanup requirements for the Sunnyvale, California site, allowing us to shut down and remove all remediation equipment and substantially reduce any further obligation. During 2003, we spent a total of approximately $0.1 million in connection with environmental investigation, remediation and monitoring activities and we expect to spend a similar amount in fiscal 2004 for such activities.

Because of the inherent uncertainty as to various aspects of environmental matters, including the extent of environmental damage, the most desirable remediation techniques and the time period during which cleanup costs may be incurred, it is not possible for us to estimate with any degree of certainty the ultimate costs that we may incur with respect to the currently pending environmental matters referred to above. Nevertheless, at September 30, 2004, we had an accrued liability of $0.3 million for pending environmental liabilities associated with the Sunnyvale site and certain other sites currently owned or leased by us. We have not accrued any liability for contingent liabilities we may incur with respect to former Media sites discussed above. Based on facts currently known to Management, they believe we have no contingent liability in connection with such pending matters, either individually, or in the aggregate, that are material to our financial condition or cash flow or results of operations or material to investors.

While we believe that we are generally in compliance with all applicable environmental laws and regulations or have plans to bring operations into compliance, it is possible that we will be named as a potentially responsible party in the future with respect to additional Superfund or other sites. Furthermore, because we conduct our business in foreign countries as well as in the U.S., it is not possible to predict the effect that future domestic or foreign regulation could have on our business, operating results, financial condition or cash flow. There can be no assurance that we will not ultimately incur liability in excess of amounts currently reserved for pending environmental matters, or that additional liabilities with respect to environmental matters will not be asserted. In addition, changes in environmental regulations could impose the need for additional capital equipment or other requirements. Such liabilities or regulations could have a material adverse effect on us in the future.

ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS

We did not sell any equity securities during the third fiscal quarter of 2004 that were not registered under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.

There were no purchases of any shares of our common stock made by or on behalf of Ampex or any of our “affiliated purchasers” (as defined in Rule 10b-18(a)(3) of the Exchange Act) during the third quarter of 2004.

ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES

Not applicable.

ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS

Not applicable.

ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION

There were no matters required to be disclosed in a current report on Form 8-K during the fiscal quarter covered by this report that were not so disclosed.

There were no material changes to the procedures by which security holders may recommend nominees to our Board of Directors that were implemented since we last provided such disclosure in our 2004 Proxy Statement, dated April 29, 2004.

ITEM 6. EXHIBITS

The Exhibits filed with this Report are listed in the Exhibit Index included elsewhere herein and which is hereby incorporated by reference in this Item 6.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, Ampex has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.


		AMPEX CORPORATION

Date: April 15, 2005		/s/ EDWARD J. BRAMSON
		Edward J. Bramson
		Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

Date: April 15, 2005		/s/ CRAIG L. McKIBBEN
		Craig L. McKibben
		Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer

AMPEX CORPORATION

FORM 10-Q/A FOR THE QUARTER ENDED

September 30, 2004

EXHIBIT INDEX


Exhibit No.		Exhibit Description
31.1		Chief Executive Officer certification pursuant to Rules 13a – 14(a) and 15d – 14(a) of the Exchange Act.

31.2		Chief Financial Officer certification pursuant to Rules 13a – 14(a) and 15d – 14(a) of the Exchange Act.

32.1		Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.