Edgar Filing: SYNNEX CORP

Form 10-Q

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

x	QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended February 28, 2007

¨	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from to

Commission File Number: 001-31892

SYNNEX CORPORATION

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware

94-2703333

(State or other jurisdiction of

incorporation or organization)

(I.R.S. Employer

Identification No.)

44201 Nobel Drive

Fremont, California

94538

(Address of principal executive offices)

(Zip Code)

(510) 656-3333

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer or a non accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer ¨ Accelerated filer x Non-accelerated filer ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company ( as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act): Yes ¨ No x

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.


Class		Outstanding at April 2, 2007
Common Stock, $0.001 par value		31,088,735

SYNNEX CORPORATION

FORM 10-Q

INDEX


		Page
PART I.	FINANCIAL INFORMATION	3
Item 1.	Financial Statements	3
	Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets (unaudited) as of February 28, 2007 and November 30, 2006	3
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations (unaudited) for the Three Months Ended February 28, 2007 and 2006	4
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (unaudited) for the Three Months Ended February 28, 2007 and 2006	5
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (unaudited) for the Three Months Ended February 28, 2007 and 2006	6
	Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)	7
Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	20
Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk	28
Item 4.	Controls and Procedures	29

PART II.	OTHER INFORMATION	30
Item 1A	Risk Factors	30
Item 6.	Exhibits	43
Signatures
Exhibit Index

PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1. Financial Statements

SYNNEX CORPORATION

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(in thousands, except for par values)

(unaudited)


	February 28, 2007		November 30, 2006
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	22,473	$	27,881
Short-term investments		14,986		13,271
Accounts receivable, net		589,512		363,437
Receivable from vendors, net		88,880		95,080
Receivable from affiliates		5,210		1,855
Inventories		524,300		594,642
Deferred income taxes		16,897		17,994
Current deferred assets		13,713		13,990
Other current assets		11,755		9,887

Total current assets		1,287,726		1,138,037
Property and equipment, net		40,182		36,698
Goodwill and intangible assets, net		73,410		48,588
Deferred income taxes		6,722		6,716
Long-term deferred assets		126,244		139,111
Other assets		15,993		13,584

Total assets	$	1,550,277	$	1,382,734


LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Borrowings under securitization, term loans and lines of credit	$	243,973	$	50,834
Accounts payable		461,657		462,480
Payable to affiliates		70,025		89,831
Accrued liabilities		74,196		81,818
Current deferred liabilities		28,389		29,516
Income taxes payable		10,048		6,693

Total current liabilities		888,288		721,172
Long-term borrowings		41,715		47,967
Long-term liabilities		11,048		10,131
Long-term deferred liabilities		81,432		90,686
Deferred income taxes		1,205		1,232

Total liabilities		1,023,688		871,188

Commitments and contingencies (Note 12)		—		—

Stockholders’ equity:
Preferred stock, $0.001 par value, 5,000 shares authorized, no shares issued or outstanding		—		—
Common stock, $0.001 par value, 100,000 shares authorized, 30,642 and 30,477 shares issued and outstanding		31		30
Additional paid-in capital		184,172		181,188
Accumulated other comprehensive income		12,182		13,999
Retained earnings		330,204		316,329

Total stockholders’ equity		526,589		511,546

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	1,550,277	$	1,382,734

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements (unaudited).

SYNNEX CORPORATION

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(in thousands, except for per share amounts)

(unaudited)


	Three Months Ended
	February 28, 2007			February 28, 2006
Revenue	$	1,588,276		$	1,501,735
Cost of revenue		(1,513,852	)		(1,436,725	)

Gross profit		74,424			65,010

Selling, general and administrative expenses		(49,481	)		(42,763	)

Income from operations before non-operating items and income taxes		24,943			22,247

Interest expense and finance charges, net		(3,058	)		(5,853	)
Other income (expense), net		158			273

Income before income taxes		22,043			16,667

Provision for income taxes		(8,168	)		(5,984	)

Net income	$	13,875		$	10,683

Earnings per share:
Basic	$	0.45		$	0.37

Diluted	$	0.43		$	0.34

Weighted-average common shares outstanding—basic		30,548			29,055

Weighted-average common shares outstanding—diluted		32,372			31,204

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements (unaudited).

SYNNEX CORPORATION

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(in thousands)

(unaudited)


	Three Months Ended
	February 28, 2007			February 28, 2006
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income	$	13,875		$	10,683

Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:
Depreciation expense		1,634			1,239
Amortization of intangible assets		1,198			1,000
Share-based compensation		1,004			735
Provision for doubtful accounts		2,043			1,641
Unrealized gain on trading securities		(220	)		(141	)
Realized gain on investment		(58	)		(36	)
Unrealized loss on short-term investments		—			8,933
Others		(8	)		9
Changes in assets and liabilities, net of acquisition of businesses:
Accounts receivable		(224,568	)		41,228
Receivable from vendors		6,216			6,373
Receivable from affiliates		(3,355	)		2,178
Inventories		67,906			(27,993	)
Other assets		8,535			(73,854	)
Payable to affiliates		(19,806	)		(19,111	)
Accounts payable		7,725			6,566
Accrued liabilities		(3,263	)		45,748
Deferred liabilities		(8,620	)		—

Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities		(149,762	)		5,198

Cash flows from investing activities:
Purchases of short-term investments		(2,206	)		(2,851	)
Proceeds from sale of short-term investments		802			278
Acquisition of businesses, net of cash acquired		(33,213	)		—
Purchase of property and equipment		(1,884	)		(1,814	)
Increase in restricted cash		(947	)		—

Net cash used in investing activities		(37,448	)		(4,387	)

Cash flows from financing activities:
Cash overdraft		(7,515	)		(7,867	)
Proceeds from revolving line of credit and securitization		324,380			129,163
Payment of revolving line of credit and securitization		(130,182	)		(128,392	)
Payment of bank loan		(7,343	)		—
Net proceeds under other lines of credit		73			1,129
Net proceeds from issuance of common stock		1,980			2,791
Others		—			8

Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities		181,393			(3,168	)

Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents		409			(133	)

Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents		(5,408	)		(2,490	)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period		27,881			13,636

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	22,473		$	11,146

Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information:
Interest paid	$	2,384		$	471

Income taxes paid	$	3,632		$	3,085

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements (unaudited).

SYNNEX CORPORATION

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

(in thousands)

(unaudited)


	Three Months Ended
	February 28, 2007			February 28, 2006
Net income	$	13,875		$	10,683
Other comprehensive income:
Changes in unrealized gains on available-for-sale securities		4			93
Foreign currency translation adjustment		(1,821	)		2,052

Total comprehensive income	$	12,058		$	12,828

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements (unaudited).

SYNNEX CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

For the three months ended February 28, 2007 and 2006

(amounts in thousands, except for per share amounts)

(unaudited)

NOTE 1 – ORGANIZATION AND BASIS OF PRESENTATION:

SYNNEX Corporation (together with its subsidiaries, herein referred to as “SYNNEX” or the “Company”) is an information technology products supply chain services company. The Company’s supply chain services include distribution, contract assembly, logistics and business process outsourcing. SYNNEX is headquartered in Fremont, California and has operations in the United States, Canada, China, Mexico, Philippines and the United Kingdom.

The accompanying interim unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements as of February 28, 2007 and 2006 and for the three months then ended have been prepared by the Company in accordance with the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). The amounts as of November 30, 2006 have been derived from the Company’s annual audited financial statements. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States have been condensed or omitted in accordance with such rules and regulations. In the opinion of management, the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements reflect all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments, necessary to state fairly the financial position of the Company and its results of operations and cash flows as of and for the periods presented. These financial statements should be read in conjunction with the annual audited financial statements and notes thereto as of and for the year ended November 30, 2006, included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year then ended.

The results of operations for the three months ended February 28, 2007 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending November 30, 2007, or any future period and the Company makes no representations related thereto.

NOTE 2 – SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES:

Use of estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expense during the reporting period. The Company evaluates these estimates on a regular basis and bases them on historical experience and on various assumptions that the Company believes are reasonable. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Principles of consolidation

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiaries and majority-owned subsidiaries in which no substantive participating rights are held by minority stockholders. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated.

The consolidated financial statements include 100% of the assets and liabilities of these majority-owned subsidiaries and the ownership interest of minority investors are recorded as minority interest. Investments in 20% through 50% owned affiliated companies are included under the equity method of accounting where the Company exercises significant influence over operating and financial affairs of the investee. Investments in less than 20% owned companies or investments in 20% through 50% owned companies where the Company does not exercise significant influence over operating and financial affairs of the investee are recorded under the cost method.

Cash and cash equivalents

The Company considers all highly liquid debt instruments purchased with an original maturity or remaining maturity at date of purchase of three months or less to be cash equivalents. Cash equivalents consist principally of money market deposit accounts that are stated at cost, which approximates fair value. The Company is exposed to credit risk in the event of default by financial institutions to the extent that cash balances with financial institutions are in excess of amounts that are insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.

SYNNEX CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

For the three months ended February 28, 2007 and 2006

(amounts in thousands, except for per share amounts)

(unaudited)

Restricted cash

As of February 28, 2007 and November 30, 2006, the Company had restricted cash in the amount of $9,110 and $8,141, respectively, for future payments to one of its vendors relating to a long-term project at the Company’s Mexico operation.

Investments

The Company classifies its investments in marketable securities as trading and available-for-sale. All securities related to its deferred compensation plan are classified as trading and are recorded at fair value, based on quoted market prices, and unrealized gains and losses are included in “Other income (expense), net” in the Company’s financial statements. All other securities are classified as available-for-sale and are recorded at fair market value, based on quoted market prices, and unrealized gains and losses are included in “Accumulated other comprehensive income,” a component of stockholders’ equity. Realized gains and losses, which are calculated based on the specific identification method, and declines in value judged to be other-than-temporary, if any, are recorded in “Other income (expense), net” as incurred.

To determine whether a decline in value is other-than-temporary, the Company evaluates several factors, including current economic environment, market conditions, operational and financial performance of the investee, and other specific factors relating to the business underlying the investment, including business outlook of the investee, future trends in the investee’s industry and the Company’s intent to carry the investment for a sufficient period of time for any recovery in fair value. If a decline in value is deemed as other-than-temporary, the Company records reductions in carrying values to estimated fair values, which are determined based on quoted market prices if available or on one or more of the valuation methods such as pricing models using historical and projected financial information, liquidation values, and values of other comparable public companies.

Long-term investments include instruments that the Company has the ability and intent to hold for more than twelve months. The Company classifies its long-term investments as available-for-sale if a readily determinable fair value is available.

Allowance for doubtful accounts

The allowance for doubtful accounts is estimated to cover the losses resulting from the inability of customers to make payments for outstanding balances. In estimating the required allowance, the Company takes into consideration the overall quality and aging of the receivables, credit evaluations of customers’ financial condition and existence of credit insurance. The Company also evaluates the collectability of accounts receivable based on specific customer circumstances, current economic trends, historical experience with collections and any value and adequacy of collateral received from customers.

Inventories

Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market. Cost is computed based on the weighted-average method. Inventories consist of finished goods purchased from various manufacturers for distribution resale and components used for contract assembly. The Company records estimated inventory reserves for quantities in excess of demand, cost in excess of market value and product obsolescence.

Property and equipment

Property and equipment are stated at cost, less accumulated depreciation and amortization. Depreciation and amortization are computed using the straight-line method based upon the shorter of the estimated useful lives of the assets, or the lease term of the respective assets, if applicable. Maintenance and repairs are charged to expense as incurred, and improvements are capitalized. When assets are retired or otherwise disposed of, the cost and accumulated depreciation and amortization are removed from the accounts and any resulting gain or loss is reflected in operations in the period realized. The ranges of estimated useful lives for property and equipment categories are as follows:


Equipment and furniture		3 - 7 years
Software		3 - 7 years
Leasehold improvements		3 -10 years
Buildings		39 years

SYNNEX CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

For the three months ended February 28, 2007 and 2006

(amounts in thousands, except for per share amounts)

(unaudited)

Goodwill

The Company has adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets” (“SFAS No. 142”), which revised the standards of accounting for goodwill, by replacing the amortization of these assets with the requirement that they are reviewed annually for impairment, or more frequently if impairment indicators exist. The values assigned to goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets are usually based on estimates and judgments regarding expectations for the success and life cycle of products and technologies acquired. No goodwill impairment was recorded for the periods presented.

Impairment of long-lived assets

The Company reviews the recoverability of its long-lived assets, such as property and equipment, when events or changes in circumstances occur that indicate the carrying value of the asset or asset group may not be recoverable. The assessment of possible impairment is based on the Company’s ability to recover the carrying value of the asset or asset group from the expected future pre-tax cash flows, undiscounted and without interest charges, of the related operations. If these cash flows are less than the carrying value of such assets, an impairment loss is recognized for the difference between estimated fair value and carrying value. The measurement of impairment requires management to estimate future cash flows and the fair value of long-lived assets.

Intangible assets

Intangible assets consist of vendor lists, customer lists and trade names, which are amortized on a straight-line basis over their estimated lives. Intangible assets are amortized as follows:


Vendor lists		4 - 10 years
Customer lists		4 - 8 years
Trademarks		4 - 10 years
Other intangible assets		3 - 5 years

Software costs

The Company develops software for internal use only. The payroll and other costs related to the development of software have been expensed as incurred. Excluding the costs of support, maintenance and training functions that are not subject to capitalization, the costs of the software department were not material for the periods presented. If the internal software development costs become material, the Company will capitalize the costs based on the defined criteria for capitalization in accordance with Statement of Position 98-1, “Accounting for the Costs of Computer Software Developed or Obtained for Internal Use.”

Long-term deferred assets and long-term deferred liabilities

The Company’s Mexico operation has entered into a multi-year contract to sell equipment to an independent third-party contractor that provides equipment and services to the Mexican government. The payments by the Mexican government are generally due on a monthly basis and are contingent upon the contractor continuing to provide services to the Mexican government. The Company recognizes product revenue and cost of revenue on a straight-line basis over the term of the contract. All long-term accounts receivable and deferred cost of revenue associated with this contract are included in the consolidated balance sheet under the caption “Long-term deferred assets.” According to contract terms, the Company will also hold back a certain amount of accounts payable for a certain period of time. All long-term accounts payable and long-term deferred revenues associated with this contract are included in the consolidated balance sheet under the caption “Long-term deferred liabilities.”

SYNNEX CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

For the three months ended February 28, 2007 and 2006

(amounts in thousands, except for per share amounts)

(unaudited)

Concentration of credit risk

Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to significant concentration of credit risk consist principally of cash and cash equivalents and accounts receivable. The Company’s cash and cash equivalents are maintained with high quality institutions, the compositions and maturities of which are regularly monitored by management. Through February 28, 2007, the Company had not experienced any losses on such deposits.

Accounts receivable include amounts due from customers primarily in the technology industry. The Company performs ongoing credit evaluations of its customers’ financial condition and limits the amount of credit extended when deemed necessary, but generally requires no collateral. The Company also maintains allowances for potential credit losses. In estimating the required allowances, the Company takes into consideration the overall quality and aging of the receivable portfolio, the existence of a limited amount of credit insurance and specifically identified customer risks. Through February 28, 2007, such losses have been within management’s expectations.

In the three months ended February 28, 2007 and 2006, no single customer exceeded 10% of the Company’s total revenue. At February 28, 2007 and November 30, 2006, no single customer comprised more than 10% of the total consolidated accounts receivable balance.

Revenue recognition

The Company recognizes revenue generally as products are shipped, if a purchase order exists, the sale price is fixed or determinable, collection of resulting receivables is reasonably assured, risk of loss and title have transferred and product returns are reasonably estimable. Shipping terms are typically F.O.B. the Company’s warehouse. Provisions for sales returns are estimated based on historical data and are recorded concurrently with the recognition of revenue. These provisions are reviewed and adjusted periodically by the Company. Revenue is reduced for early payment discounts and volume incentive rebates offered to customers.

The Company purchases licensed software products from original equipment manufacturer (“OEM”) vendors and distributes them to customers. Revenue is recognized upon shipment of software products when a purchase order exists, the sales price is fixed or determinable and collection is determined to be probable. Subsequent to the sale of software products, the Company generally has no obligation to provide any modification, customization, upgrades, enhancements, or any other post-contract customer support.

The Company’s Mexico operation has entered into a multi-year contract to sell equipment to a contractor that provides equipment and services to the Mexican government. Under the agreement, the Mexican government makes payments into the Company’s account. The payments on this contract by the Mexican government are generally due on a monthly basis and are contingent upon the contractor continuing to provide services to the government. The Company recognizes product revenue and cost of revenue on a straight-line basis over the term of the contract.

Original Equipment Manufacturer supplier programs

Funds received from OEM suppliers for inventory volume promotion programs, price protection and product rebates are recorded as adjustments to cost of revenue. The Company tracks vendor promotional programs for volume discounts on a program-by-program basis. The Company monitors the balances of receivables from vendors on a quarterly basis and adjusts the balance due for differences between expected and actual volume sales. Vendor receivables are generally collected through reductions authorized by the vendor, to accounts payable. Funds received for specific marketing and infrastructure reimbursements, net of direct costs, are recorded as adjustments to selling, general and administrative expenses, and any excess reimbursement amount is recorded as an adjustment to cost of revenue.

Royalties

The Company purchases licensed software products from OEM vendors, which it subsequently distributes to resellers. Royalties to OEM vendors are accrued for and recorded in cost of revenue when software products are shipped and revenue is recognized.

Warranties

The Company’s OEM suppliers generally warrant the products distributed by the Company and allow returns of defective products. The Company generally does not independently warrant the products it distributes; however, the Company does warrant the following: (1) its services with regard to products that it assembles for its customers, and (2) products that it builds to order from components purchased from other sources. To date neither warranty expense, nor the accrual for warranty costs has been material to the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

SYNNEX CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

For the three months ended February 28, 2007 and 2006

(amounts in thousands, except for per share amounts)

(unaudited)

Advertising

Costs related to advertising and promotion expenditures of products are charged to selling, general and administrative expense as incurred. To date, costs related to advertising and promotion expenditures have not been material.

Income taxes

The asset and liability method is used in accounting for income taxes. Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the expected tax consequences of temporary differences between the tax basis of assets and liabilities and their reported amounts in the financial statements using enacted tax rates and laws that will be in effect when the difference is expected to reverse. Valuation allowances are provided against assets that are not likely to be realized.

Fair value of financial instruments

For certain of the Company’s financial instruments, including cash, short-term investments, forward contracts, accounts receivable and accounts payable, the carrying amounts approximate fair value due to the short maturities. The amount shown for borrowings also approximates fair value since current interest rates offered to the Company for debt of similar maturities are approximately the same. The estimated fair values of foreign exchange forward contracts are based on market prices or current rates offered for contracts with similar terms and maturities. The ultimate amounts paid or received under these foreign exchange contracts, however, depend on future exchange rates. These gains or losses are based on changes in the fair value of the contracts, which generally occur as a result of changes in foreign currency exchange rates and are recorded in “Other income (expense), net.”

Foreign currency translations

The functional currencies of the Company’s foreign subsidiaries are their respective local currencies, with the exception of the Company’s operations in the UK and the Philippines, for which the functional currencies are the U.S. dollar. The financial statements of the foreign subsidiaries, other than the operations in the UK and the Philippines, are translated into U.S. dollars for consolidation as follows: assets and liabilities at the exchange rate as of the balance sheet date, stockholders’ equity at the historical rates of exchange, and income and expense amounts at the average exchange rate for the quarter. Translation adjustments resulting from the translation of the subsidiaries’ accounts are included in “Accumulated other comprehensive income.” Gains and losses resulting from foreign currency transactions are included within “Other income (expense), net.” Such amounts are not significant to any of the periods presented.

Comprehensive income

Comprehensive income is defined as the change in equity of a business enterprise during a period from transactions and other events and circumstances from non-owner sources. The primary components of comprehensive income for the Company include net income, foreign currency translation adjustments arising from the consolidation of the Company’s foreign subsidiaries and unrealized gains and losses on the Company’s available-for-sale securities.

Share-based compensation

Effective December 1, 2005, the Company began accounting for share-based compensation under the provision of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 123(R), “Share-Based Payment” (“SFAS No. 123(R)”) which requires the recognition of the fair value of share-based compensation. Under the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS No. 123(R), share-based compensation is estimated at the grant date based on the fair value of the awards expected to vest and recognized as expense ratably over the requisite service period of the award. The Company has used the Black-Scholes valuation model to estimate fair value of share-based awards, which requires various assumptions including estimating stock price volatility, forfeiture rates and expected life.

Net income per common share

Net income per common share-basic is computed by dividing the net income for the period by the weighted-average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period. Diluted weighted-average shares primarily consist of stock options, restricted shares and restricted stock units. The calculation of net income per common share is presented in Note 8.

SYNNEX CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

For the three months ended February 28, 2007 and 2006

(amounts in thousands, except for per share amounts)

(unaudited)

SFAS No. 128, “Earnings Per Share” requires that employee stock options, non-vested restricted shares and similar equity instruments granted by the Company be treated as potential common shares outstanding in computing diluted earnings per share. Diluted shares outstanding include the dilutive effect of in-the-money options. Under the treasury stock method, the amount the employee must pay for exercising stock options, the amount of compensation cost for future services that the Company has not yet recognized and the amount of tax benefits that would be recorded in additional paid-in-capital when the award becomes deductible are assumed to be used to repurchase shares.

Recently issued accounting pronouncements

In June 2006, the Emerging Issues Task Force (“EITF”) issued consensus on Issue No. 06-03, “How Taxes Collected from Customers and Remitted to Governmental Authorities Should Be Presented in the Income Statement (That Is, Gross versus Net Presentation)” (“EITF No. 06-03”). The Company adopted the provisions of EITF No. 06-03 effective December 1, 2006. The Company has consistently reported taxes collected from customers on a net presentation basis; therefore, the adoption of EITF No. 06-03 did not have any effect on the Company’s financial position or results of operations.

In June 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued FASB Interpretation No. 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes—an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109” (“FIN 48”). FIN 48 clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in an enterprise’s financial statements in accordance with FASB Statement No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes,” and prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement process for financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. FIN 48 also provides guidance on derecognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure and transition. FIN 48 is effective for the fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006 and will be applicable to the Company in the first quarter of fiscal 2008. The Company is currently evaluating the effect of FIN 48 on its consolidated financial position and results of operations.

In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements” (“SFAS No. 157”). SFAS No. 157 provides guidance for using fair value to measure assets and liabilities. It also responds to investors’ requests for expanded information about the extent to which companies measure assets and liabilities at fair value, the information used to measure fair value, and the effect of fair value measurements on earnings. SFAS No. 157 applies whenever other standards require (or permit) assets or liabilities to be measured at fair value, and does not expand the use of fair value in any new circumstances. SFAS No. 157 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007 and is required to be adopted by the Company in the first quarter of fiscal 2008. The Company is currently evaluating the effect that the adoption of SFAS No. 157 will have on its consolidated financial position and results of operations.

In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, “The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities” (“SFAS No. 159”), which permits entities to elect to measure many financial instruments and certain other items at fair value that are not currently required to be measured at fair value. This election is irrevocable. SFAS No. 159 will be effective in the first quarter of fiscal 2008. The Company is currently assessing the potential impact that the adoption of SFAS No. 159 will have on its financial statements.

NOTE 3 – SHARE-BASED COMPENSATION:

The Company recognizes share-based compensation expense under the provisions of SFAS No. 123(R), which requires the measurement and recognition of compensation expense for all share-based payment awards made to employees and directors, including employee stock options and employee stock purchases based on estimated fair values. The Company has also applied the provisions of Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 107 relating to SFAS 123(R).

The Company uses the Black-Scholes valuation model to estimate fair value of share-based awards, which requires various assumptions including estimating stock price volatility, forfeiture rates and expected life. Under the fair value recognition provisions for SFAS No. 123(R), share-based compensation is estimated at the grant date based on the fair value of the awards expected to vest and recognized as expense ratably over the requisite service period of the award. In addition, option-pricing models require the input of highly subjective assumptions, including the option’s expected life and the price volatility of the underlying stock. The expected stock price volatility assumption was determined using historical volatility of the Company’s common stock.

SYNNEX CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

For the three months ended February 28, 2007 and 2006

(amounts in thousands, except for per share amounts)

(unaudited)

No options were granted during the three months ended February 28, 2007 and five thousand restricted stock awards were granted in the three months ended February 28, 2007. During the three months ended February 28, 2007 and 2006, the Company recorded share-based compensation cost of $1,004 and $ 735 respectively.

NOTE 4 – BALANCE SHEET COMPONENTS:

Accounts receivable, net:


	February 28, 2007			November 30, 2006
	February 28, 2007			November 30, 2006
Trade accounts receivable	$	620,785		$	394,986
Less: Allowance for doubtful accounts		(15,406	)		(14,433	)
Less: Allowance for sales returns		(15,867	)		(17,116	)

	$	589,512		$	363,437

The increase in accounts receivable as of February 28, 2007 was primarily due to a change in terms during the quarter in the Company’s U.S. securitization arrangement which resulted in all accounts receivable transacted in Company’s securitization arrangement being classified as an on-balance sheet transaction versus the prior quarter when it was classified as off-balance sheet (see Note 5).

Inventories:


	February 28, 2007		November 30, 2006
	February 28, 2007		November 30, 2006
Components	$	55,424	$	66,775
Finished goods		468,876		527,867

	$	524,300	$	594,642

Goodwill and Intangible assets, net:


	February 28, 2007							November 30, 2006
	Gross Amount		Accumulated Amortization			Net Amount		Gross Amount		Accumulated Amortization			Net Amount
Goodwill	$	56,373	$	—		$	56,373	$	30,144	$	—		$	30,144
Vendor lists		22,062		(16,845	)		5,217		22,062		(16,307	)		5,755
Customer lists		14,934		(5,226	)		9,708		15,141		(4,738	)		10,403
Other intangible assets		3,217		(1,105	)		2,112		3,259		(973	)		2,286

	$	96,586	$	(23,176	)	$	73,410	$	70,606	$	(22,018	)	$	48,588

Amortization expense was $1,198 and $1,000 for the three months ended February 28, 2007 and 2006, respectively. The increase in goodwill as of February 28, 2007 was due to the acquisitions of Link2Support and PC Wholesale (see Note 11).

NOTE 5 – ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE ARRANGEMENTS:

The Company primarily finances its North America operations through two accounts receivable securitization programs, a U.S. facility (the “U.S. Arrangement”) and a Canadian facility (the “Canadian Arrangement”).

The Company amended its U.S. Arrangement on February 12, 2007, to increase the Company’s availability to sell a maximum of $350,000 U.S. trade accounts receivables from the previous level of $275,000 based upon eligible trade receivables (“U.S. Receivables”). The Company also extended the maturity date of the U.S.

SYNNEX CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

For the three months ended February 28, 2007 and 2006

(amounts in thousands, except for per share amounts)

(unaudited)

Arrangement from August 2008 to February 2011. The Company’s effective borrowing cost under the U.S. Arrangement is a blend of the prevailing dealer commercial paper rate and LIBOR plus 0.55% per annum. Prior to amending the U.S. Arrangement in February 2007, the Company recorded the previous U.S. Arrangement as an off-balance sheet transaction because the Company funded its advances by selling undivided ownership interests in the U.S. Receivables. The amended U.S. Arrangement requires the Company to account for this transaction as an on-balance sheet transaction because the Company funds its borrowings by pledging all of its rights, title and interest in and to the U.S. Receivables as security.

The amount of U.S. Receivables sold to the financial institutions under the prior U.S. Arrangement before the amendment, at February 12, 2007 and November 30, 2006 was $249,469 and $273,028 respectively. The total outstanding balance as of February 12, 2007 under the prior U.S. Arrangement was repaid under the new amended U.S. Arrangement. The gross proceeds resulting from the sale of U.S. Receivables totaled approximately $148,703 and $242,640 for the period from December 1, 2006 to February 12, 2007 and December 1, 2005 to February 28, 2006, respectively. The gross payments to the financial institutions under the U.S. Arrangement totaled approximately $172,262 and $241,800 for the period from December 1, 2006 to February 12, 2007 and December 1, 2005 to February 28, 2006, respectively.

The Company’s Canadian Arrangement is a one-year revolving accounts receivable arrangement which allows SYNNEX Canada Limited (“SYNNEX Canada”) to sell up to C$100,000 of U.S. and Canadian trade receivables (the “Canadian Receivables”) to a financial institution. In connection with the Canadian Arrangement, SYNNEX Canada sells its Canadian Receivables to the financial institution on a fully-serviced basis. The effective discount rate of the Canadian Arrangement is the prevailing Bankers’ Acceptance rate of return or prime rate in Canada plus 0.45% per annum. To the extent that cash was received in exchange, the amount of Canadian Receivables sold to the financial institution has been recorded as a true sale, in accordance with SFAS No. 140, “Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities.”

The amount of Canadian Receivables sold to the financial institution and not yet collected from customers at February 28, 2007 and November 30, 2006 was $64,119 and $70,810, respectively. The gross proceeds resulting from the sale of Canadian Receivables totaled approximately $50,858 and $56,761 for the three months ended February 28, 2007 and 2006, respectively. The gross payments to the financial institution resulting from the sale of Canadian Receivables totaled approximately $57,549 and $68,899 for the three months ended February 28, 2007 and 2006, respectively.

Under the U.S. and Canadian Arrangements the Company is required to maintain certain financial covenants to maintain its eligibility to sell additional U.S. and Canadian Receivables under the facilities. These covenants include minimum net worth, minimum fixed charge coverage ratio, and net worth percentage. The Company was in compliance with the material covenants at February 28, 2007 and November 30, 2006.

As is customary in trade accounts receivable securitization arrangements, a credit rating agency’s downgrade of the third-party issuer of commercial paper or of a back-up liquidity provider (which provides a source of funding if the commercial paper market cannot be accessed) could result in an adverse change or loss of our financing capacity under these programs if the commercial paper issuer or liquidity back-up provider is not replaced. Loss of such financing capacity could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition and results of operations.

The Company has also entered into financing agreements with various financial institutions (“Flooring Companies”) to allow certain customers of the Company to finance their purchases directly with the Flooring Companies. Under these agreements, the Flooring Companies pay to the Company the selling price of products sold to various customers, less a discount, within approximately 15 to 30 days from the date of sale. The Company is contingently liable to repurchase inventory sold under flooring agreements in the event of any default by its customers under the agreement and such inventory being repossessed by the Flooring Companies (see Note 12, “Commitments and Contingencies” for additional information). Approximately $204,849 and $245,497 of the Company’s net sales were financed under these programs in the three months ended February 28, 2007 and 2006, respectively. Approximately $31,796 and $44,394 of accounts receivable at February 28, 2007 and November 30, 2006, respectively, were subject to flooring agreements. Flooring fees were approximately $1,212 and $1,476 in the three months ended February 28, 2007 and 2006, respectively, and are included within “Interest expense and finance charges, net.”

SYNNEX CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

For the three months ended February 28, 2007 and 2006

(amounts in thousands, except for per share amounts)

(unaudited)

NOTE 6 – RESTRUCTURING CHARGES:

In the first quarter of fiscal 2005, the Company announced a restructuring program in its distribution segment, which impacted approximately 35 employees across multiple business functions in SYNNEX Canada and closed its facilities in Richmond, British Columbia, Calgary, Alberta and Saint-Laurent, Quebec. All terminations were completed by May 31, 2005. In the third quarter of fiscal 2005, the Company closed its facility in Markham, Ontario. This restructuring resulted in a total expense of $2,513, which consisted of employee termination benefits of $711, estimated facilities exit expenses of $1,681 and other expenses in the amount of $121. All charges were recorded in accordance with SFAS No. 146, “Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities.” The following table summarizes the activity related to the liability for restructuring charges through February 28, 2007:


	Facility and Exit Costs			Other		Total
Balance accrued at November 30, 2006	$	113		$	—	$	113
Cash payments		—			—		—
Non-cash charges		(50	)		—		(50	)

Balance accrued at February 28, 2007	$	63		$	—	$	63

The unpaid portion of the restructuring charges is included in the condensed consolidated balance sheets under the caption “Accrued liabilities.”

NOTE 7 – BORROWINGS:

Borrowings consist of the following:


	February 28, 2007			November 30, 2006
SYNNEX US revolving line of credit and securitization	$	215,269		$	27,070
SYNNEX Canada term loan		882			1,178
SYNNEX Canada revolving line		5,984			—
SYNNEX Mexico term loan		62,370			70,436
SYNNEX UK line of credit		154			81
Others		1,029			36

		285,688			98,801
Less: Current portion		(243,973	)		(50,834	)

Non-current portion	$	41,715		$	47,967

The increase in U.S. revolving line of credit and securitization as of February 28, 2007 was primarily due to a change in terms during the quarter in the Company’s U.S. Arrangement, which resulted in accounts receivable transacted in the Company’s securitization arrangement being classified as an on-balance transaction versus the prior quarter when it was classified as off-balance sheet (see Note 5).

NOTE 8 – NET INCOME PER COMMON SHARE:

The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted net income per common share for the periods indicated (in thousands, except per share data):


	Three Months Ended
	February 28, 2007		February 28, 2006
Net income	$	13,875	$	10,683

Weighted-average common shares—basic		30,548		29,055
Effect of dilutive securities:
Stock options and restricted stock		1,824		2,149

Weighted average common shares—diluted		32,372		31,204


Earnings per share:
Basic	$	0.45	$	0.37
Diluted	$	0.43	$	0.34

SYNNEX CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

For the three months ended February 28, 2007 and 2006

(amounts in thousands, except for per share amounts)

(unaudited)

Options to purchase 621 and 1,606 shares of common stock as of February 28, 2007 and 2006, respectively, have not been included in the computation of diluted net income per share as their effect would have been anti-dilutive.

NOTE 9 – RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS:

Purchases of inventories from MiTAC International Corporation and its affiliates (principally motherboards and other peripherals) were approximately $79,646 and $107,911 during the three months ended February 28, 2007 and 2006, respectively.

Sales to MiTAC International Corporation and its affiliates during the three months ended February 28, 2007 and 2006 were approximately $1,089 and $560, respectively. The Company’s relationship with MiTAC International Corporation has been informal and is not governed by long-term commitments or arrangements with respect to pricing terms, revenue, or capacity commitments. Accordingly, the Company negotiates manufacturing and pricing terms, including allocating customer revenue, on a case-by-case basis with MiTAC International Corporation.

NOTE 10 – SEGMENT INFORMATION:

Segments were determined based on products and services provided by each segment. Accounting policies of the segments are the same as those described in the summary of significant accounting policies. The Company has identified the following two reportable business segments:

The Distribution segment distributes computer systems and complementary products, as well as related logistics and support services and business process outsourcing, to a variety of customers, including value-added resellers, system integrators, retailers and direct resellers.

The Contract Assembly segment provides electronics assembly services to OEMs, including integrated supply chain management, build-to-order and configure-to-order system configurations, materials management and logistics.

Summarized financial information related to the Company’s reportable business segments at February 28, 2007 and 2006, and for each of the periods then ended, is shown below:


	Distribution		Contract Assembly		Consolidated
Three Months Ended February 28, 2007:
Revenue	$	1,476,831	$	111,445	$	1,588,276
Income from operations before non-operating items and income taxes		23,548		1,395		24,943
Total assets		1,305,831		244,446		1,550,277
Three Months Ended February 28, 2006:
Revenue	$	1,390,811	$	110,924	$	1,501,735
Income from operations before non-operating items and income taxes		20,257		1,990		22,247
Total assets		906,987		224,226		1,131,213

SYNNEX CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

For the three months ended February 28, 2007 and 2006

(amounts in thousands, except for per share amounts)

(unaudited)

Summarized financial information related to the geographic areas in which the Company operated at February 28, 2007 and 2006 and for each of the periods then ended is shown below:


	North America		Other		Consolidation Adjustments		Consolidated
Three Months Ended February 28, 2007:
Revenue	$	1,536,462	$	57,048	$ (5,234	)	$	1,588,276
Income from operations		11,244		2,494	137			13,875
Other long-lived assets		35,822		20,359	—			56,181
Three Months Ended February 28, 2006:
Revenue	$	1,451,813	$	60,984	$(11,062	)	$	1,501,735
Income from operations		9,991		672	20			10,683
Other long-lived assets		19,572		21,207	—			40,779

Revenue in the U.S. was approximately 78% of total revenue for each of the three months ended February 28, 2007 and 2006.

NOTE 11 – ACQUISITIONS:

On February 20, 2007, the Company acquired all of the outstanding capital stock of Link2Support, Inc. (“Link2Support”) based in Manila, Philippines for approximately $25,000 in cash. The acquisition agreement allows for an earnout payment of $5,000 to be paid if certain milestones are met in the first year after the acquisition. Link2Support is a technical support and contact center that delivers voice, e-mail and technical chat support as well as other value-added services. The Link2Support acquisition is consistent with the Company’s strategy to broaden its supply chain offerings and increases its contact center expertise. The aggregate purchase price was allocated to tangible and identifiable intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on estimates of fair value. The fair value of identifiable net assets acquired was $8,359 and the remainder of the purchase price of $16,641 has been recognized as goodwill. The allocation of purchase price is preliminary and the estimates and assumptions used are subject to change. The Company currently is evaluating the allocation of purchase price to net tangible and identifiable intangible assets and does not expect the final allocation of purchase price to have a material impact on the Company’s financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.

On February 27, 2007, the Company entered into definitive agreements to acquire the assets of PC Wholesale, a division of Insight Direct USA, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of Insight Enterprises, Inc. The Company paid a purchase price of $29,444 in cash. PC Wholesale is an IT distributor with specialized focus on end-of-life and refurbished equipment that is complementary to the Company’s core distribution business. An initial payment for $10,000 was made on February 27, 2007 and the remaining payment was made on March 1, 2007. The Company recorded $10,000 as goodwill in its financial statement for the quarter ended February 28, 2007. The allocation of purchase price is preliminary and the estimates and assumptions used are subject to change. The Company currently is evaluating the allocation of purchase price to net tangible and identifiable intangible assets and does not expect the final allocation of purchase price to have a material impact on the Company’s financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.

The above acquisitions, individually and in the aggregate, did not meet the conditions of a material business combination as defined by the Securities and Exchange Commission. As such, they were not subject to the disclosure requirements of SFAS No. 141, “Business Combinations.” However, the Company believes that disclosures provided herein are useful to the understanding of the goodwill and intangible assets activities through February 28, 2007.

SYNNEX CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

For the three months ended February 28, 2007 and 2006

(amounts in thousands, except for per share amounts)

(unaudited)

NOTE 12 – COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES:

The Company was contingently liable at February 28, 2007, under agreements to repurchase repossessed inventory acquired by Flooring Companies as a result of default on floor plan financing arrangements by the Company’s customers. These arrangements are described in Note 5. Losses, if any, would be the difference between repossession cost and the resale value of the inventory. There have been no repurchases through February 28, 2007, under these agreements, nor is the Company aware of any pending customer defaults or repossession obligations.

The Company is from time to time involved in legal proceedings, including the following:

In May 2002, Seanix Technology Inc. filed a trademark infringement action in the Federal Court of Canada against the Company and SYNNEX Canada. The suit claims that the Company has infringed on Seanix’s exclusive rights to its Canadian trademark registration and caused confusion between the two companies resulting from, among other things, the Company’s use of trademarks confusingly similar to the Seanix trademarks. The complaint seeks injunctive relief and monetary damages in an amount to be determined. Substantial discovery has taken place and no trial date has been set.

In May 2002, Acropolis Systems, Inc. and Tony Yeh filed a civil suit in Santa Clara County California Superior Court against the Company, Robert Huang, C. Kevin Chuang and Stephen R. Bowling. The suit alleges violation of California securities laws, fraud and concealment and breach of contract resulting from, among other things, failure to disclose the existence of a lien in favor of the Company on the assets of eManage.com, Inc. prior to entering into stock purchase agreements for shares of eManage.com stock. At the time of this stock purchase, the Company was the majority stockholder of eManage.com. The complaint seeks monetary damages in the amount of approximately $2,000. Substantial discovery has taken place and a trial date has been set for October 2007.

In addition, the Company has been involved in various bankruptcy preference actions where the Company was a supplier to the companies now in bankruptcy. These preference actions are filed by the bankruptcy trustee on behalf of the bankrupt estate and generally seek to have payments made by the debtor within 90 days prior to the bankruptcy returned to the bankruptcy estate for allocation among all of the bankrupt estate’s creditors. The Company is not aware of any currently pending preference actions.

The Company does not believe that these proceedings will have a material adverse effect on the Company’s results of operations, financial position or cash flow.

NOTE 13 – SUBSEQUENT EVENTS:

On March 9, 2007, SYNNEX Canada completed the purchase of a new logistics facility in Guelph, Ontario. The facility is approximately six hundred thousand square feet. The total purchase price for this facility was approximately $12,000. SYNNEX Canada will be consolidating its two existing Ontario Canada area facilities into this new facility.

On March 9, 2007, the Company amended its U.S. revolving line of credit to accommodate SYNNEX Canada’s purchase of the new logistics facility in Guelph, Ontario and the Company’s investment in China Civilink (Cayman).

On March 27, 2007, SYNNEX Canada, signed a definitive agreement to acquire substantially all of the assets of Redmond Group of Companies (“RGC”), including AVS Technologies, an independent distributor of consumer electronics. Total consideration for the purchased net assets is approximately C$45,000, including approximately C$10,000 of debt assumption. The acquisition of RGC will allow SYNNEX Canada to expand its consumer electronics distribution focus and market share. The transaction is subject to regulatory and other approvals and satisfaction of other customary closing conditions. Once the acquisition is complete, RGC will operate under the SYNNEX Canada name.

On April 5, 2007, the Company purchased a controlling interest in China Civilink (Cayman) for $30,000. China Civilink (Cayman) operates in China as HiChina Web Solutions. HiChina Web Solutions provides internet

SYNNEX CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

For the three months ended February 28, 2007 and 2006

(amounts in thousands, except for per share amounts)

(unaudited)

services such as domain name registration and is headquartered in Beijing, China. This company will continue to operate as a stand-alone entity under the HiChina Web Solutions name. The acquisition of HiChina Web Solutions further supports the Company’s strategy to grow its supply chain offerings by providing access to an established customer base in China.

ITEM 2.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Forward-Looking Statements

When used in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (the “Report”), the words “believes,” “plans,” “estimates,” “anticipates,” “expects,” “intends,” “allows,” “can,” “will” and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. These are statements that relate to future periods and include statements relating to our services, our relationships with and the value we provide to our OEM suppliers and reseller customers, our relationship with MiTAC International and Sun Microsystems, the anticipated benefits and closing of our recent acquisitions, the consolidation of our Canadian facility, our strategy with respect to international operations, gross margin, selling, general and administrative expenses, fluctuations in future revenues and operating results and future expenses, fluctuations in inventory, our estimates regarding our capital requirements and our needs for additional financing, our infrastructure needs and growth, strategic acquisitions or investments, use of our working capital, expansion of our operations and related costs, impact of accounting pronouncements, impact of new rules and regulations affecting public companies, the adequacy of our cash resources to meet our capital needs, statements regarding our securitization programs, sources of revenue and the adequacy of our disclosure controls and procedures. Forward-looking statements are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those projected. These risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to, those risks discussed below in Part II, Item 1A “Risk Factors,” as well as the seasonality of the buying patterns of our customers, the concentration of sales to large customers, dependence upon and trends in capital spending budgets in the IT industry, fluctuations in general economic conditions, increased competition and costs related to expansion of our operations. These forward-looking statements speak only as of the date hereof. We expressly disclaim any obligation or undertaking to release publicly any updates or revisions to any forward-looking statements contained herein to reflect any change in our expectations with regard thereto or any change in events, conditions or circumstances on which any such statement is based.

Overview

We are a global information technology, or IT, supply chain services company. We offer a comprehensive range of services to IT original equipment manufacturers and software publishers, collectively OEMs, and reseller customers worldwide. The supply chain services that we offer include product distribution, related logistics and support services, contract assembly and business process outsourcing.

We have been in the IT distribution business since 1980 and are one of the largest IT product distributors based on 2006 reported revenue. We focus our core wholesale distribution business on a limited number of leading IT OEMs, which allows us to enhance and increase the value we provide to our OEM suppliers and reseller customers. In the three months ended February 28, 2007, our largest OEM supplier, HP, accounted for approximately 26% of our total revenue.

Because we offer distribution, related logistics and support services, contract assembly and business process outsourcing, OEM suppliers and resellers can outsource to us multiple areas of their business outside of their core competencies. This model allows us to provide services at several points along the IT product supply chain. We believe that the combination of our broad range of supply chain capabilities, our focus on serving the leading IT OEMs and our efficient operations enables us to realize strong relationships with our OEM suppliers and reseller customers. We are headquartered in Fremont, California and have distribution, sales and assembly and contact center facilities in the United States, Canada, China, Mexico, Philippines and the United Kingdom.

We manage our business in two segments – distribution and contract assembly. Our revenue is currently approximately 93% from distribution and 7% from contract assembly. In addition, from a geographic segment perspective, approximately 96% of our total revenue is from North America and the remaining 4% is from outside North America.

The IT product distribution and contract assembly industries in which we operate are characterized by low gross profit as a percentage of revenue, or gross margin, and low income from operations as a percentage of revenue, or operating margin. As well, the market for IT products is generally characterized by declining unit prices and short product life cycles. Our distribution business is also highly competitive on the basis of price. We set our sales price based on the market supply and demand characteristics for each particular product or bundle of products we distribute.

Our revenue is highly dependent on the end-market demand for the IT products that we distribute and assemble. This end-market demand is influenced by many factors including the introduction of new IT products and software by OEMs, replacement cycles for existing IT products and overall economic growth and general business activity. A difficult and challenging economic environment may also lead to consolidation or decline in the IT distribution industry and increased price-based competition.

Recent Acquisitions and Divestitures

We seek to augment our organic growth with strategic acquisitions of businesses and assets that complement and expand our supply chain service capabilities. We also divest businesses that we deem not strategic to our ongoing operations. Our historical acquisitions have brought us new reseller customers and OEM suppliers, extended the geographic reach of our operations, particularly in international markets, and expanded the services we provide to our OEM suppliers and customers. We account for acquisitions using the purchase method of accounting and include acquired entities within our consolidated financial statements from the closing date of the acquisition.

During fiscal 2007, we made the following acquisitions:

On February 20, 2007, we acquired all of the outstanding capital stock of Link2Support, Inc., or Link2Support, based in Manila, Philippines for approximately $25.0 million in cash. The acquisition agreement allows for an earnout payment of $5.0 million to be paid if certain milestones are met in the first year after the acquisition. Link2Support is a technical support and contact center that delivers voice, e-mail and technical chat support as well as other value-added services. The Link2Support acquisition is consistent with our strategy to broaden our supply chain services offerings and increases our contact center expertise. The aggregate purchase price was allocated to tangible and identifiable intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on estimates of fair value. The fair value of identifiable net assets acquired was $8.4 million and the remainder of the purchase price of $16.6 million has been recognized as goodwill. The allocation of purchase price is preliminary and the estimates and assumptions used are subject to change. We are currently evaluating the allocation of purchase price to net tangible and identifiable intangible assets and do not expect the final allocation of purchase price to have a material impact on our financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.

On February 27, 2007, we entered into definitive agreements to acquire the assets of PC Wholesale, a division of Insight Direct USA, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of Insight Enterprises, Inc. We paid a purchase price of $29.4 million in cash. PC Wholesale is an IT distributor with specialized focus on end-of-life and refurbished equipment that is complementary to our core distribution business. An initial payment for $10.0 million was made on February 27, 2007 and the remaining payment was made on March 1, 2007. We recorded $10.0 million as goodwill in our financial statement for the quarter ended February 28, 2007. The allocation of purchase price is preliminary and the estimates and assumptions used are subject to change. We are currently evaluating the allocation of purchase price to net tangible and identifiable intangible assets and do not expect the final allocation of purchase price to have a material impact on our financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.

On March 27, 2007, our Canadian subsidiary, SYNNEX Canada Limited, or SYNNEX Canada signed a definitive agreement to acquire substantially all of the assets of Redmond Group of Companies or RGC, including AVS Technologies, an independent distributor of consumer electronics. Total consideration for the purchased net assets is approximately C$45.0 million, including approximately C$10.0 million of debt assumption. We expect that the RGC acquisition will expand SYNNEX Canada’s consumer electronics distribution focus and market share. The transaction, which is subject to regulatory and other approvals and satisfaction of other customary closing conditions. Once the acquisition is complete, RGC will operate under the SYNNEX Canada name.

On April 5, 2007, we purchased controlling interest in China Civilink (Cayman) for $30.0 million. China Civilink (Cayman) operates in China as HiChina Web Solutions. HiChina Web Solutions provides internet services such as domain name registration and is headquartered in Beijing, China. This company will continue to operate as a stand-alone entity under the HiChina Web Solutions name. The acquisition of HiChina Web Solutions further supports our strategy to grow our supply chain offerings by providing access to an established customer base in China.

Building Acquisition

On March 9, 2007, SYNNEX Canada completed the purchase of a new logistics facility in Guelph, Canada. The facility is approximately six hundred thousand square feet. The total purchase price for this facility was approximately $12.0 million. SYNNEX Canada will be consolidating two existing Ontario Canada area facilities into this new facility.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

There have been no material changes in our critical accounting policies and estimates for the three-month period ended February 28, 2007 from our disclosure in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended November 30, 2006. For a discussion of the critical accounting policies, please see the discussion in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended November 30, 2006.

Results of Operations

The following table sets forth, for the indicated periods, data as percentages of revenue:


	Three Months Ended
	February 28, 2007		February 28, 2006
Statements of Operations Data:
Revenue	100.00	%	100.00	%
Cost of revenue	(95.31	)	(95.67	)

Gross profit	4.69		4.33
Selling, general and administrative expenses	(3.12	)	(2.85	)

Income from operations before non-operating items and income taxes	1.57		1.48
Interest expense and finance charges, net	(0.19	)	(0.39	)
Other income (expense), net	0.01		0.02

Income from operations before income taxes	1.39		1.11
Provision for income taxes	(0.51	)	(0.40	)

Net income	0.87	%	0.71	%

Three Months Ended February 28, 2007 and 2006

Revenue:


	Three Months Ended February 28, 2007		Three Months Ended February 28, 2006		% Change
	(in thousands)		(in thousands)
Revenue	$	1,588,276	$	1,501,735	5.8	%
Distribution revenue	$	1,476,831	$	1,390,811	6.2	%
Contract assembly revenue	$	111,445	$	110,924	0.5	%

The increase in our distribution revenue was primarily attributable to continued growth in our business in the United States and Canada, increased demand for products through the IT distribution channel and increased selling and marketing efforts. Our distribution revenue also increased due to our focus on our new enterprise solutions and consumer electronics divisions and contributions from our 2006 acquisitions of the Azerty United Canada ink and toner distribution business from United Stationers Supply Company, the Telpar distribution business

of Peak Technologies, Inc. and Concentrix Corporation. There was no significant movement in contract assembly revenue during the three months ended February 28, 2007 versus the three months ended February 28, 2006, as demand was stable from our primary customer.

The increase in our revenue was somewhat mitigated by continued significant competition in the IT distribution marketplace, vendor direct sales models, our desire to focus on operating income growth before revenue growth and gradual declines in the average selling price of the products we sell.

Gross Profit:


	Three Months Ended February 28, 2007			Three Months Ended February 28, 2006			% Change
	(in thousands)			(in thousands)
Gross profit	$	74,424		$	65,010		14.5	%
Percentage of revenue		4.69	%		4.33	%	8.3	%

Our gross profit is affected by a variety of factors, including competition, the mix and average selling prices of products we sell and the mix of customers to whom we sell, rebate and discount programs from our suppliers, freight costs and reserves for inventory losses.

The increase in gross margin percentage was a result of higher margins in our distribution segment, mainly due to ongoing improvements in our pricing initiatives and increased value added service offerings.

While we currently expect that our total gross margin percentage will be relatively stable from first quarter 2007 levels, our gross margins may decrease in future periods as a result of the relative mix of our distribution and contract assembly revenue, distribution customer mix, as well as due to potential increased competition, softness in the overall economy or changes to the terms and conditions in which we do business with our OEMs.

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses:


	Three Months Ended February 28, 2007			Three Months Ended February 28, 2006			% Change
	(in thousands)			(in thousands)
Selling, general and administrative expenses	$	49,481		$	42,763		15.7	%
Percentage of revenue		3.12	%		2.85	%	9.5	%

Our selling, general and administrative expenses consist primarily of salaries, commissions, bonuses, and related expenses for personnel engaged in sales, product marketing, distribution and contract assembly operations and administration. Selling, general and administrative expenses also include share-based compensation expense, deferred compensation expense or income, temporary personnel fees, the costs of our facilities, utility expense, professional fees, depreciation expense on our capital equipment and amortization expense on our intangible assets, offset by reimbursements from OEM suppliers.

Selling, general and administrative expenses increased both on a dollar basis as well as percentage of revenue in the first quarter of fiscal 2007 from the prior year due to our recent acquisitions, continued investments in our business, the incremental costs associated with increased revenues and costs of generating high margin revenue.

While we continually strive to maintain the lowest possible cost structure in running our operations, without sacrificing customer and vendor service and satisfaction, we do expect that our selling, general and administrative expense will increase in future periods as we invest in our infrastructure to improve processes and productivity and to grow our valued-added business.

Income from Operations before Non-Operating Items and Income Taxes:


	Three Months Ended February 28, 2007		Three Months Ended February 28, 2006		% Change
	(in thousands)		(in thousands)
Income from operations before non-operating items and income taxes	$	24,943	$	22,247	12.1	%
Distribution income from operations before non-operating items and income taxes	$	23,548	$	20,257	16.2	%
Contract assembly income from operations before non-operating items and income taxes	$	1,395	$	1,990	(29.9	)%

Income from operations before non-operating items and income taxes as a percentage of revenue for the three months ended February 28, 2007 increased to 1.57% from 1.48% in the prior year primarily due to the aforementioned improvements in sales and gross profit.

By segment, our distribution margin increased to 1.59% of distribution revenue from 1.46% in the prior year primarily for the same reasons noted above regarding our overall increase in income from operations. Our contract assembly margin decreased to 1.25% in the three months ended February 28, 2007 from 1.79% in the prior year primarily due to the product and pricing changes with our main customer.

Interest Expense and Finance Charges, net:


	Three Months Ended February 28, 2007		Three Months Ended February 28, 2006		% Change
	(in thousands)		(in thousands)
Interest expense and finance charges, net	$	3,058	$	5,853	(47.8	)%

Amounts recorded in interest expense and finance charges, net, are primarily interest expense paid on our lines of credit, long-term debt and deferred compensation liability, fees associated with third-party accounts receivable flooring arrangements and the sale of accounts receivable through our securitization facilities, offset by income earned on our excess cash investments and financing income earned from a long-term project at our Mexico operation.

The decrease in interest expense and finance charges, net was primarily due to an increase in net financing income at our Mexico operation from our long-term project business, partially offset by higher interest expense as a result of higher interest rates, as compared to those in fiscal 2006.

Other Income (Expense), net:


	Three Months Ended February 28, 2007		Three Months Ended February 28, 2006		% Change
	(in thousands)		(in thousands)
Other income (expense), net	$	158	$	273	(42.1	)%

Amounts recorded in other income (expense), net, include investment gains and losses related to deferred compensation, foreign currency transaction gains and losses, investment gains and losses, and other non-operating gains and losses

The decrease in other income (expense), net was primarily due to a comparative decrease in foreign exchange gains in the first quarter of 2007.

Provision for Income Taxes:

Income taxes consist of our current and deferred tax expense resulting from our income earned in domestic and foreign jurisdictions. Our effective tax rate was 37.1% in the three months ended February 28, 2007 as compared with an effective tax rate of 35.9% in the prior year. The fiscal 2007 tax rate is higher than the fiscal 2006 tax rate due to higher foreign taxes. In fiscal 2006 certain foreign operations obtained tax benefit from net operating losses being carried forward that had been subject to a valuation allowance.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Cash Flows

Our business is working capital intensive. Our working capital needs are primarily to finance accounts receivable and inventory. We rely heavily on debt, accounts receivable flooring programs and the sale of our accounts receivable under our securitization programs for our working capital needs.

We have financed our growth and cash needs to date primarily through working capital financing facilities, bank credit lines and cash generated from operations. The primary uses of cash have been to fund increases in inventory and accounts receivable resulting from increased sales, and for acquisitions.

To increase our market share and better serve our customers, we may further expand our operations through investments or acquisitions. We expect that such expansion would require an initial investment in personnel, facilities and operations, which may be more costly than similar investments in current operations. As a result of these investments, we may experience an increase in cost of sales and operating expenses that is disproportionate to revenue from those operations. These investments or acquisitions would likely be funded primarily by incurring additional debt or issuing common stock.

Net cash used in operating activities was $149.8 million in the three months ended February 28, 2007. Cash used in operating activities in the three months ended February 28, 2007 was primarily attributable to the net increase in accounts receivable of $224.6 million and a decrease in payable to affiliates of $19.8 million offset by a decrease in inventory of $67.9 million, net income of $13.9 million and depreciation and amortization of $2.8 million.

The increase in accounts receivable of $224.6 is primarily due to a change in terms during the quarter in our U.S. securitization arrangement which resulted in accounts receivable transacted in our securitization arrangement being classified as an on-balance sheet transaction versus the prior quarter when it was classified as off-balance sheet.

Net cash used in investing activities was $37.4 million in the three months ended February 28, 2007. The use of cash was the result of acquisitions of Link2Support and PC Wholesale for $33.2 million, the purchase of investments of $2.2 million and capital expenditures of $1.9 million.

Net cash provided by financing activities was $181.4 million in the three months ended February 28, 2007 and was primarily related to proceeds from U.S. securitization arrangement of $324.4 million, offset by cash overdraft of $7.5 million and payment of revolving line of credit of $130.2 million.

Capital Resources

Our cash and cash equivalents totaled $22.5 million and $27.9 million at February 28, 2007 and November 30, 2006, respectively.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We have a one-year revolving accounts receivable securitization program in Canada through SYNNEX Canada, or Canadian Arrangement, which provides for the sale of up to C$100.0 million of U.S. and Canadian trade accounts receivable to a financial institution. The arrangement expires in November 2007. In connection with this program all of SYNNEX Canada’s U.S. and Canadian trade accounts receivable are sold to the financial institution on a fully-serviced basis. Sales of the accounts receivable to the financial institution under our Canadian Arrangement result in a reduction of total accounts receivable in our consolidated balance sheet. Our effective discount rate under the program is the prevailing Bankers’ Acceptance rate of return or prime rate in Canada plus 0.45% per annum. At February 28, 2007 and November 30, 2006 the amount of our accounts receivable sold to and held by the financial institutions under our Canadian Arrangement totaled $64.1 and $70.8 million, respectively.

In connection with this Canadian Arrangement, we issued a guarantee of SYNNEX Canada’s performance under the Canadian Arrangement.

We have also issued guarantees to certain vendors and lenders of our subsidiaries for the total amount of $148.0 million as of February 28, 2007 and $148.1 million as of November 30, 2006. We are obligated under these guarantees to pay amounts due should our subsidiaries not pay valid amounts owed to their vendors or lenders. The vendor guarantees are typically less than one-year arrangements, with 30-day cancellation clauses and the lender guarantees are typically for the term of the loan agreement.

On-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We primarily finance our U.S. operations with an accounts receivable securitization program or the U.S. Arrangement. We amended our original U.S. Arrangement on February 12, 2007, to increase our ability to sell up to a maximum of $350.0 million in U.S. trade account receivables, or U.S. Receivables, from the previous level of $275.0 million, based upon eligible trade receivables. We extended the maturity date of the U.S. Arrangement from August 2008 to February 2011. The effective borrowing cost under the U.S. Arrangement is a blend of the prevailing dealer commercial paper rate and LIBOR plus 0.55% per annum. Prior to amending the U.S. Arrangement in February 2007, we recorded the previous U.S. Arrangement as an off-balance sheet transaction because we funded our advances by selling undivided ownership interests in the accounts receivable. The amended U.S. Arrangement requires us to account for this transaction as an on-balance sheet transaction because we fund our borrowings by pledging all of our rights, title and interest in and to the U.S. Receivables as security. The balance outstanding as of February 28, 2007 was $215.3 million.

We are also obligated to provide periodic financial statements and investment reports, notices of material litigation and any other information relating to our U.S. Arrangement as requested by the financial institutions.

We amended our original senior secured revolving line of credit arrangement, or the Revolver, with a group of financial institutions, in February 2007. The Revolver is secured by our inventory and other assets and expires in 2011. The Revolver’s maximum commitment was amended from $45.0 million to $100.0 million. Interest on borrowings under the Revolver is based on the financial institution’s prime rate or LIBOR plus 1.50% at our option. There was no balance outstanding as of February 28, 2007 and the balance outstanding as of November 30, 2006 was $27.1 million.

In March 2007, we amended the Revolver again to accommodate SYNNEX Canada’s purchase of a new logistics facility in Guelph, Ontario and our investment in China Civilink (Cayman).

SYNNEX Canada established a revolving line of credit arrangement with a credit limit of C$20.0 million in December 2006. The revolving credit facility expires in January 2010. Interest on this facility is based on the Canadian adjusted prime rate. In connection with this revolving credit facility, we issued a guarantee of SYNNEX Canada’s obligations. The balance outstanding as of February 28, 2007 was $6.0 million.

Our Mexico subsidiary, SYNNEX Mexico S.A. de C.V., or SYNNEX Mexico, established a secured term loan agreement, or Term Loan, with a group of financial institutions in May 2006. The interest rate for any unpaid principal amount is the Equilibrium Interbank Interest Rate, plus 2.00% per annum. The final maturity date for repayment of all unpaid principal is November 24, 2009. The amount outstanding, under the Term Loan as of February 28, 2007 and November 30, 2006 was $62.4 million and $70.4 million, respectively. The Term Loan contains customary financial covenants. In connection with this Term Loan, we issued a guarantee of SYNNEX Mexico’s obligations.

We have other lines of credit and revolving facilities with financial institutions, which provide for borrowing capacity aggregating approximately $10.8 million at February 28, 2007 and November 30, 2006. At February 28, 2007 and November 30, 2006, we had borrowings of $0.2 million and $0.1 million, respectively, outstanding under these facilities. We also have various term loans, short-term borrowings and mortgages with financial institutions totaling approximately $1.9 million and $1.2 million at February 28, 2007 and November 30, 2006, respectively. The expiration dates of these facilities range from 2006 to 2013.

We are in compliance with all material covenants or other requirements set forth in our accounts receivable financing programs and credit agreements discussed above.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In June 2006, the Emerging Issues Task Force or EITF issued consensus on Issue No. 06-03, “How Taxes Collected from Customers and Remitted to Governmental Authorities Should Be Presented in the Income Statement (That Is, Gross versus Net Presentation)” or EITF No. 06-03. We adopted the provisions of EITF No. 06-03 effective December 1, 2006. We have consistently reported taxes collected from customers on a net presentation basis. Therefore, the adoption of EITF No. 06-03 did not have any effect on our financial position or results of operations.

In June 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board or FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes—an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109” or FIN 48. FIN 48 clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in an enterprise’s financial statements in accordance with FASB Statement No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes,” and prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement process for financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. FIN 48 also provides guidance on derecognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure and transition. FIN 48 is effective for the fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006 and will be applicable to us in the first quarter of fiscal 2008. We are currently evaluating the effect of FIN 48 on our consolidated financial position and results of operations.

In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements” or SFAS No. 157. SFAS No. 157 provides guidance for using fair value to measure assets and liabilities. It also responds to investors’ requests for expanded information about the extent to which companies measure assets and liabilities at fair value, the information used to measure fair value, and the effect of fair value measurements on earnings. SFAS No. 157 applies whenever other standards require (or permit) assets or liabilities to be measured at fair value, and does not expand the use of fair value in any new circumstances. SFAS No. 157 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007 and is required to be adopted by us in the first quarter of fiscal 2008. We are currently evaluating the effect that the adoption of SFAS No. 157 will have on our consolidated financial position and results of operations.

In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, “The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities” or SFAS No. 159, which permits entities to elect to measure many financial instruments and certain other items at fair value that are not currently required to be measured at fair value. This election is irrevocable. SFAS No. 159 will be effective in the first quarter of fiscal 2008. We are currently assessing the potential impact that the adoption of SFAS No. 159 will have on our financial statements.

ITEM 3.

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

There have been no material changes in our quantitative and qualitative disclosures about market risk for the three-month period ended February 28, 2007 from our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended November 30, 2006. For further discussion of quantitative and qualitative disclosures about market risk, reference is made to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year then ended.

ITEM 4.

Controls and Procedures

(a) Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures. We maintain “disclosure controls and procedures,” as such term is defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”), that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in Securities and Exchange Commission rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. In designing and evaluating our disclosure controls and procedures, management recognized that disclosure controls and procedures, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the disclosure controls and procedures are met. Our disclosure controls and procedures have been designed to meet reasonable assurance standards. Additionally, in designing disclosure controls and procedures, our management necessarily was required to apply its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible disclosure controls and procedures. The design of any disclosure controls and procedures also is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions.

Based on their evaluation as of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that, as of that date, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective at the reasonable assurance level.

(b) Changes in internal control over financial reporting. There was no change in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act) identified in connection with management’s evaluation during our last fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

PART II - OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1A

Risk Factors

Risks Related to Our Business

We anticipate that our revenue and operating results will fluctuate, which could adversely affect the price of our common stock.

Our operating results have fluctuated and will fluctuate in the future as a result of many factors, including:

•

general economic conditions and level of IT spending;

•

the loss or consolidation of one or more of our significant OEM suppliers or customers;

•

market acceptance, product mix and life of the products we assemble and distribute;

•

competitive conditions in our industry that impact our margins;

•

pricing, margin and other terms with our OEM suppliers;

•

variations in our levels of excess inventory and doubtful accounts, and changes in the terms of OEM supplier-sponsored programs, such as price protection and return rights; and

•

the impact of acquisitions we make.

Although we attempt to control our expense levels, these levels are based, in part, on anticipated revenue. Therefore, we may not be able to control spending in a timely manner to compensate for any unexpected revenue shortfall.

Our operating results also are affected by the seasonality of the IT products industry. We have historically experienced higher sales in our fourth fiscal quarter due to patterns in the capital budgeting, federal government spending and purchasing cycles of end-users. These patterns may not be repeated in subsequent periods.

You should not rely on period-to-period comparisons of our operating results as an indication of future performance. The results of any quarterly period are not indicative of results to be expected for a full fiscal year. In future quarters, our operating results may be below our expectations or those of our public market analysts or investors, which would likely cause our share price to decline. For example, in March 2005, we announced that our revenue and net income for the three months ended February 28, 2005 would be lower than our previously released guidance and, as a result, our share price subsequently declined substantially.

We depend on a small number of OEMs to supply the IT products that we sell and the loss of, or a material change in, our business relationship with a major OEM supplier could adversely affect our business, financial position and operating results.

Our future success is highly dependent on our relationships with a small number of OEM suppliers. Sales of HP products represented approximately 26% and 25% of our total revenue in the three months ended February 28, 2007 and 2006, respectively. Our OEM supplier agreements typically are short-term and may be terminated without cause upon short notice. For example, our agreement with HP will expire on May 31, 2007. The loss or deterioration of our relationships with a major OEM supplier, the authorization by OEM suppliers of additional distributors, the sale of products by OEM suppliers directly to our reseller customers and end-users, or our failure to establish relationships with new OEM suppliers or to expand the distribution and supply chain services that we provide OEM suppliers could adversely affect our business, financial position and operating results. In addition, OEM suppliers may face liquidity or solvency issues that in turn could negatively affect our business and operating results.

Our business is also highly dependent on the terms provided by our OEM suppliers. Generally, each OEM supplier has the ability to change the terms and conditions of its sales agreements, such as reducing the amount of price protection and return rights or reducing the level of purchase discounts, rebates and marketing programs available to us. From time to time we may conduct business with a supplier without a formal agreement because the agreement has expired or otherwise. In such case, we are subject to additional risk with respect to products, warranties and returns, and other terms and conditions. If we are unable to pass the impact of these changes through to our reseller customers, our business, financial position and operating results could be adversely affected.

Our gross margins are low, which magnifies the impact of variations in revenue, operating costs and bad debt on our operating results.

As a result of significant price competition in the IT products industry, our gross margins are low, and we expect them to continue to be low in the future. Increased competition arising from industry consolidation and low demand for certain IT products may hinder our ability to maintain or improve our gross margins. These low gross margins magnify the impact of variations in revenue, operating costs and bad debt on our operating results. A portion of our operating expenses is relatively fixed, and planned expenditures are based in part on anticipated orders that are forecasted with limited visibility of future demand. As a result, we may not be able to reduce our operating expenses as a percentage of revenue to mitigate any further reductions in gross margins in the future. If we cannot proportionately decrease our cost structure in response to competitive price pressures, our business and operating results could suffer.

We also receive purchase discounts and rebates from OEM suppliers based on various factors, including sales or purchase volume and breadth of customers. A decrease in net sales could negatively affect the level of volume rebates received from our OEM suppliers and thus, our gross margins. Because some rebates from OEM suppliers are based on percentage increases in sales of products, it may become more difficult for us to achieve the percentage growth in sales required for larger discounts due to the current size of our revenue base. A decrease or elimination of purchase discounts and rebates from our OEM suppliers would adversely affect our business and operating results.

Because we sell on a purchase order basis, we are subject to uncertainties and variability in demand by our reseller and contract assembly customers, which could decrease revenue and adversely affect our operating results.

We sell to our reseller and contract assembly customers on a purchase order basis rather than pursuant to long-term contracts or contracts with minimum purchase requirements. Consequently, our sales are subject to demand variability by our reseller and contract assembly customers. The level and timing of orders placed by our reseller and contract assembly customers vary for a variety of reasons, including seasonal buying by end-users, the introduction of new hardware and software technologies and general economic conditions. Customers submitting a purchase order may cancel, reduce or delay their orders. If we are unable to anticipate and respond to the demands of our reseller and contract assembly customers, we may lose customers because we have an inadequate supply of products, or we may have excess inventory, either of which may harm our business, financial position and operating results.

We are subject to the risk that our inventory value may decline, and protective terms under our OEM supplier agreements may not adequately cover the decline in value, which in turn may harm our business, financial position and operating results.

The IT products industry is subject to rapid technological change, new and enhanced product specification requirements, and evolving industry standards. These changes may cause inventory on hand to decline substantially in value or to rapidly become obsolete. Most of our OEM suppliers offer limited protection from the loss in value of inventory. For example, we can receive a credit from many OEM suppliers for products held in inventory in the event of a supplier price reduction. In addition, we have a limited right to return a certain percentage of purchases to most OEM suppliers. These policies are subject to time restrictions and do not protect us in all cases from declines in inventory value. In addition, our OEM suppliers may become unable or unwilling to fulfill their protection obligations to us. The decrease or elimination of price protection or the inability of our OEM suppliers to fulfill their protection obligations could lower our gross margins and cause us to record inventory write-downs. If we are unable to manage our inventory with our OEM suppliers with a high degree of precision, we may have insufficient product supplies or we may have excess inventory, resulting in inventory write downs, either of which may harm our business, financial position and operating results.

We depend on OEM suppliers to maintain an adequate supply of products to fulfill customer orders on a timely basis, and any supply shortages or delays could cause us to be unable to timely fulfill orders, which in turn could harm our business, financial position and operating results.

Our ability to obtain particular products in the required quantities and to fulfill reseller customer orders on a timely basis is critical to our success. In most cases, we have no guaranteed price or delivery agreements with our OEM suppliers. We occasionally experience a supply shortage of certain products as a result of strong demand or

problems experienced by our OEM suppliers. If shortages or delays persist, the price of those products may increase, or the products may not be available at all. In addition, our OEM suppliers may decide to distribute, or to substantially increase their existing distribution business, through other distributors, their own dealer networks, or directly to resellers. Accordingly, if we are not able to secure and maintain an adequate supply of products to fulfill our reseller customer orders on a timely basis, our business, financial position and operating results may be adversely affected.

We may suffer adverse consequences from changing interest rates.

Our borrowings and securitization arrangements are variable rate obligations that could expose us to interest rate risks. At February 28, 2007, we had approximately $350.0 million in such variable rate obligations. If interest rates increase, our interest expense would increase, which would negatively affect our net income. Additionally, increasing interest rates may increase our future borrowing costs and restrict our access to capital.

A portion of our revenue is financed by floor plan financing companies and any termination or reduction in these financing arrangements could increase our financing costs and harm our business and operating results.

A portion of our distribution revenue is financed by floor plan financing companies. Floor plan financing companies are engaged by our customers to finance, or “floor,” the purchase of products from us. In exchange for a fee, we transfer the risk of loss on the sale of our products to the floor plan companies. We currently receive payment from these financing companies within approximately 15 to 30 business days from the date of the sale, which allows our business to operate at much lower relative working capital levels than if such programs were not available. If these floor plan arrangements are terminated or substantially reduced, the need for more working capital and the increased financing cost could harm our business and operating results. We have not experienced any termination or significant reduction in floor plan arrangements in the past.

We have significant credit exposure to our reseller customers, and negative trends in their businesses could cause us significant credit loss and negatively impact our cash flow and liquidity position.

We extend credit to our reseller customers for a significant portion of our sales to them. Resellers have a period of time, generally 30 days after the date of invoice, to make payment. As a result, we are subject to the risk that our reseller customers will not pay for the products they purchase. In addition, our Mexico subsidiary has entered into a contract with a Mexico reseller customer, which involves extended payment terms and could expose us to additional collection risks. Our credit exposure risk may increase due to liquidity or solvency issues experienced by our resellers as a result of an economic downturn or a decrease in IT spending by end-users. If we are unable to collect payment for products we ship to our reseller customers or if our reseller customers are unable to timely pay for the products we ship to them, it will be more difficult or costly to utilize receivable-based financing, which could negatively impact our cash flow and liquidity position.

We experienced theft of product from our warehouses and future thefts could harm our operating results.

From time to time we have experienced incidents of theft at various facilities. In fiscal 2003 and fiscal 2005 we experienced theft as a result of break-ins at four of our warehouses in which approximately $12.9 million of inventory was stolen. Based on our investigation, discussions with local law enforcement and meetings with federal authorities, we believe the thefts at our warehouses were part of an organized crime effort that targeted a number of technology equipment warehouses throughout the United States.

We filed a claim with our insurance providers for the amount of the losses, less a small deductible. We have received substantially all of the claimed amounts.

These types of incidents may make it more difficult or expensive for us to obtain theft coverage in the future. In the future, incidents of theft may re-occur for which we may not be fully insured.

A significant portion of our contract assembly revenue comes from a single customer, and any decrease in sales from this customer could adversely affect our revenue.

As a result of product transitions, product life cycle, product acceptance and pricing pressure, our business with Sun Microsystems, our primary contract assembly customer, has decreased. Sun Microsystems accounted for approximately $96.1 million or 86% of our contract assembly revenue in the three months ended February 28, 2007

and approximately $105 million or 95% in the three months ended February 28, 2006. Our contract assembly business will remain dependent on our relationship with Sun Microsystems in the foreseeable future, subjecting us to risks with respect to the success and life cycle of Sun Microsystems products we assemble and the pricing terms we negotiate with Sun Microsystems and our suppliers. Accordingly, if we are unable to assemble new and successful products for Sun Microsystems on appropriate pricing terms, our business and operating results would be adversely affected.

The future success of our relationship with Sun Microsystems also depends on MiTAC International continuing to work with us to service Sun Microsystems’ requirements at an appropriate cost. We rely on MiTAC International to manufacture and supply subassemblies and components for the computer systems we assemble for Sun Microsystems. As MiTAC International’s ownership interest in us decreases, MiTAC International’s interest in the success of our business and operations may decrease as well. If we are unable to maintain our relationship and appropriate pricing terms with MiTAC International, our relationship with Sun Microsystems could suffer, which in turn could harm our business, financial position and operating results. In addition, if we were unable to obtain assembly contracts for new and successful products our business and operating results would suffer.

We have pursued and intend to continue to pursue strategic acquisitions or investments in new markets and may encounter risks associated with these activities, which could harm our business and operating results.

We have in the past pursued and in the future expect to pursue acquisitions of, or investments in, businesses and assets in new markets, either within or outside the IT products industry, that complement or expand our existing business. Our acquisition strategy involves a number of risks, including:

•

difficulty in successfully integrating acquired operations, IT systems, customers, OEM supplier and partner relationships, products and businesses with our operations;

•

loss of key employees of acquired operations or inability to hire key employees necessary for our expansion;

•

diversion of our capital and management attention away from other business issues;

•

an increase in our expenses and working capital requirements;

•

in the case of acquisitions that we may make outside of the United States, difficulty in operating in foreign countries and over significant geographical distances; and

•

other financial risks, such as potential liabilities of the businesses we acquire.

Our growth may be limited and our competitive position may be harmed if we are unable to identify, finance and complete future acquisitions. We believe that further expansion may be a prerequisite to our long-term success as some of our competitors in the IT product distribution industry have larger international operations, higher revenues and greater financial resources than us. We have incurred costs and encountered difficulties in the past in connection with our acquisitions and investments. For example, our operating margins were initially adversely affected as a result of our acquisition of Merisel Canada Inc. and we have written off substantial investments in the past, one of which was eManage.com, Inc. Also, our acquisition of EMJ Data Systems Limited or EMJ, caused an initial negative effect on our operating margins as we integrated EMJ’s systems, operations and personnel. Future acquisitions may result in dilutive issuances of equity securities, the incurrence of additional debt, large write-offs, a decrease in future profitability, or future losses. The incurrence of debt in connection with any future acquisitions could restrict our ability to obtain working capital or other financing necessary to operate our business. Our recent and future acquisitions or investments may not be successful, and if we fail to realize the anticipated benefits of these acquisitions or investments, our business and operating results could be harmed.

We are dependent on a variety of IT and telecommunications systems, and any failure of these systems could adversely impact our business and operating results.

We depend on IT and telecommunications systems for our operations. These systems support a variety of functions, including inventory management, order processing, shipping, shipment tracking and billing.

Failures or significant downtime of our IT or telecommunications systems could prevent us from taking customer orders, printing product pick-lists, shipping products or billing customers. Sales also may be affected if our reseller customers are unable to access our price and product availability information. We also rely on the Internet, and in particular electronic data interchange, or EDI, for a large portion of our orders and information exchanges

with our OEM suppliers and reseller customers. The Internet and individual web sites have experienced a number of disruptions and slowdowns, some of which were caused by organized attacks. In addition, some web sites have experienced security breakdowns. If we were to experience a security breakdown, disruption or breach that compromised sensitive information, it could harm our relationship with our OEM suppliers or reseller customers. Disruption of our web site or the Internet in general could impair our order processing or more generally prevent our OEM suppliers or reseller customers from accessing information. The occurrence of any of these events could have an adverse effect on our business and operating results.

We rely on independent shipping companies for delivery of products, and price increases or service interruptions from these carriers could adversely affect our business and operating results.

We rely almost entirely on arrangements with independent shipping companies, such as FedEx and UPS, for the delivery of our products from OEM suppliers and delivery of products to reseller customers. Freight and shipping charges can have a significant impact on our gross margin. As a result, an increase in freight surcharges due to rising fuel cost or general price increases will have an immediate adverse effect on our margins, unless we are able to pass the increased charges to our reseller customers or renegotiate terms with our OEM suppliers. In addition, in the past, UPS has experienced work stoppages due to labor negotiations with management. The termination of our arrangements with one or more of these independent shipping companies, the failure or inability of one or more of these independent shipping companies to deliver products, or the unavailability of their shipping services, even temporarily, could have an adverse effect on our business and operating results.

Because we conduct substantial operations in China, risks associated with economic, political and social events in China could negatively affect our business and operating results.

A substantial portion of our IT systems operations, including our IT systems support and software development operations, is located in China. In addition, we also conduct general and administrative activities from our facility in China. As of February 28, 2007, we had 650 personnel located in China. We expect to increase our operations in China in the future. Our operations in China are subject to a number of risks relating to China’s economic and political systems, including:

•

a government controlled foreign exchange rate and limitations on the convertibility of the Chinese renminbi;

•

extensive government regulation;

•

changing governmental policies relating to tax benefits available to foreign-owned businesses;

•

the telecommunications infrastructure;

•

a relatively uncertain legal system; and

•

uncertainties related to continued economic and social reform.

Our IT systems are an important part of our global operations. Any significant interruption in service, whether resulting from any of the above uncertainties, natural disasters or otherwise, could result in delays in our inventory purchasing, errors in order fulfillment, reduced levels of customer service and other disruptions in operations, any of which could cause our business and operating results to suffer.

Changes in foreign exchange rates and limitations on the convertibility of foreign currencies could adversely affect our business and operating results.

In each of the three months ended February 28, 2007 and 2006, approximately 22% of our total revenue was generated outside the United States. Most of our international revenue, cost of revenue and operating expenses are denominated in foreign currencies. We presently have currency exposure arising from both sales and purchases denominated in foreign currencies. Changes in exchange rates between foreign currencies and the U.S. dollar may adversely affect our operating margins. For example, if these foreign currencies appreciate against the U.S. dollar, it will make it more expensive in terms of U.S. dollars to purchase inventory or pay expenses with foreign currencies. This could have a negative impact to us if revenue related to these purchases are transacted in U.S. dollars. In addition, currency devaluation can result in a loss to us if we hold deposits of that currency as well as make our products, which are usually purchased by us with U.S. dollars, relatively more expensive than products manufactured locally. We currently conduct only limited hedging activities, which involve the use of currency

forward contracts. Hedging foreign currencies can be risky. For example, in fiscal 2003 we incurred $3.7 million of foreign currency transaction losses as a result of purchases of forward contracts not conducted within our normal hedging practices and procedures, combined with a weakening U.S. dollar. There is also additional risk if the currency is not freely or actively traded. Some currencies, such as the Chinese Renminbi, are subject to limitations on conversion into other currencies, which can limit our ability to hedge or to otherwise react to rapid foreign currency devaluations. We cannot predict the impact of future exchange rate fluctuations on our business and operating results.

Because of the experience of our key personnel in the IT products industry and their technological expertise, if we were to lose any of our key personnel, it could inhibit our ability to operate and grow our business successfully.

We operate in the highly competitive IT products industry. We are dependent in large part on our ability to retain the services of our key senior executives and other technical experts and personnel. Except for Robert Huang, our President and Chief Executive Officer, and James Estill, SYNNEX Canada’s President and Chief Executive Officer, our employees and executives do not have employment agreements. Furthermore, we do not carry “key person” insurance coverage for any of our key executives. We compete for qualified senior management and technical personnel. The loss of, or inability to hire, key executives or qualified employees could inhibit our ability to operate and grow our business successfully.

We may become involved in intellectual property or other disputes that could cause us to incur substantial costs, divert the efforts of our management, and require us to pay substantial damages or require us to obtain a license, which may not be available on commercially reasonable terms, if at all.

We may from time to time receive notifications alleging infringements of intellectual property rights allegedly held by others relating to our business or the products we sell or assemble for our OEM suppliers and others. Litigation with respect to patents or other intellectual property matters could result in substantial costs and diversion of management and other resources and could have an adverse effect on our business. Although we generally have various levels of indemnification protection from our OEM suppliers and contract assembly customers, in many cases any indemnification to which we may be entitled is subject to maximum limits or other restrictions. In addition, we have developed proprietary IT systems that play an important role in our business. If any infringement claim is successful against us and if indemnification is not available or sufficient, we may be required to pay substantial damages or we may need to seek and obtain a license of the other party’s intellectual property rights. We may be unable to obtain such a license on commercially reasonable terms, if at all.

We are from time to time involved in other litigation in the ordinary course of business. For example, we are currently defending a trademark infringement action and a civil matter involving third-party investors in eManage.com, Inc. We may not be successful in defending these or other claims. Regardless of the outcome, litigation could result in substantial expense and could divert the efforts of our management.

Because of the capital-intensive nature of our business, we need continued access to capital, which, if not available to us or if not available on favorable terms, could harm our ability to operate or expand our business.

Our business requires significant levels of capital to finance accounts receivable and product inventory that is not financed by trade creditors. If cash from available sources is insufficient, proceeds from our accounts receivable securitization programs are limited or cash is used for unanticipated needs, we may require additional capital sooner than anticipated. In the event we are required, or elect, to raise additional funds, we may be unable to do so on favorable terms, or at all. Our current and future indebtedness could adversely affect our operating results and severely limit our ability to plan for, or react to, changes in our business or industry. We could also be limited by financial and other restrictive covenants in any credit arrangements, including limitations on our borrowing of additional funds and issuing dividends. Furthermore, the cost of debt financing has increased recently and could significantly increase in the future, making it cost prohibitive to borrow, which could force us to issue new equity securities.

If we issue new equity securities, existing stockholders may experience additional dilution, or the new equity securities may have rights, preferences or privileges senior to those of existing holders of common stock. If we cannot raise funds on acceptable terms, we may not be able to take advantage of future opportunities or respond to competitive pressures or unanticipated requirements. Any inability to raise additional capital when required could have an adverse effect on our business and operating results.

The terms of our indebtedness agreements impose significant restrictions on our ability to operate which in turn may negatively affect our ability to respond to business and market conditions and therefore have an adverse effect on our business and operating results.

As of February 28, 2007, we had approximately $350.0 million in outstanding short and long-term borrowings under term loans, securitizations and lines of credit, excluding trade payables. The terms of our current indebtedness agreements restrict, among other things, our ability to:

•

incur additional indebtedness;

•

pay dividends or make certain other restricted payments;

•

consummate certain asset sales or acquisitions;

•

enter into certain transactions with affiliates; and

•

merge, consolidate or sell, assign, transfer, lease, convey or otherwise dispose of all or substantially all of our assets.

We are also required to maintain specified financial ratios and satisfy certain financial condition tests, including minimum net worth and fixed charge coverage ratio as outlined in our senior secured revolving line of credit arrangement. We may be unable to meet these ratios and tests, which could result in the acceleration of the repayment of the related debt, the termination of the facility or the increase in our effective cost of funds. As a result, our ability to operate may be restricted and our ability to respond to business and market conditions limited, which could have an adverse effect on our business and operating results.

We have significant operations concentrated in Northern California, South Carolina, Toronto and Beijing and any disruption in the operations of our facilities could harm our business and operating results.

Our worldwide operations could be subject to natural disasters and other business disruptions, which could seriously harm our revenue and financial condition and increase our costs and expenses. We have significant operations in our facilities located in Fremont, California, Greenville, South Carolina, Toronto, Canada and Beijing, China. As a result, any prolonged disruption in the operations of our facilities, whether due to technical difficulties, power failures, break-ins, destruction or damage to the facilities as a result of a natural disaster, fire or any other reason, could harm our operating results. We currently do not have a formal disaster recovery plan and may not have sufficient business interruption insurance to compensate for losses that could occur.

Global health, economic, political and social conditions may harm our ability to do business, increase our costs and negatively affect our stock price.

External factors such as potential terrorist attacks, acts of war, geopolitical and social turmoil or epidemics such as SARS and other similar outbreaks, in many parts of the world could prevent or hinder our ability to do business, increase our costs and negatively affect our stock price. For example, increased instability may adversely impact the desire of employees and customers to travel, the reliability and cost of transportation, our ability to obtain adequate insurance at reasonable rates or require us to incur increased costs for security measures for our domestic and international operations. These uncertainties make it difficult for us and our customers to accurately plan future business activities. More generally, these geopolitical social and economic conditions could result in increased volatility in the United States and worldwide financial markets and economy. We are predominantly uninsured for losses and interruptions caused by terrorist acts and acts of war.

Part of our business is conducted outside of the United States, exposing us to additional risks that may not exist in the United States, which in turn could cause our business and operating results to suffer.

We have international operations in Canada, China, Mexico, Philippines and the United Kingdom. In each of the three months ended February 28, 2007 and 2006, approximately 22% of our total revenue was generated outside the United States. In the three months ended February 28, 2007 and 2006, approximately 19% and 18%, respectively, of our total revenue was generated in Canada. No other country or region accounted for more than 10% of our total revenue. Our international operations are subject to risks, including:

•

political or economic instability;

•

changes in governmental regulation;

•

changes in import/export duties;

•

trade restrictions;

•

difficulties and costs of staffing and managing operations in certain foreign countries;

•

work stoppages or other changes in labor conditions;

•

difficulties in collecting of accounts receivables on a timely basis or at all;

•

taxes; and

•

seasonal reductions in business activity in some parts of the world.

We may continue to expand internationally to respond to competitive pressure and customer and market requirements. Establishing operations in any other foreign country or region presents risks such as those described above as well as risks specific to the particular country or region. In addition, until a payment history is established over time with customers in a new geography or region, the likelihood of collecting receivables generated by such operations could be less than our expectations. As a result, there is a greater risk that reserves set with respect to the collection of such receivables may be inadequate. In addition, our Mexico subsidiary has entered into a contract with a Mexico reseller customer, which involves extended payment terms and could expose us to additional collection risks. Further, if our international expansion efforts in any foreign country are unsuccessful, we may decide to cease operations, which would likely cause us to incur similar additional expenses and loss.

In addition, changes in policies or laws of the United States or foreign governments resulting in, among other things, higher taxation, currency conversion limitations, restrictions on fund transfers or the expropriation of private enterprises, could reduce the anticipated benefits of our international expansion. Furthermore, any actions by countries in which we conduct business to reverse policies that encourage foreign trade or investment could adversely affect our business. If we fail to realize the anticipated revenue growth of our future international operations, our business and operating results could suffer.

Our recent investments in contact center business could adversely affect our operating results as a result of operation execution risks related to managing and communicating with remote resources, technologies, customer satisfaction and employee turnover.

Our new contact center business in the Philippines may be adversely impacted if we are unable to manage and communicate with these remote resources. Service quality may be placed at risk and our ability to optimize our resources may be more complicated if we are unable to manage our resources remotely. Contact centers use a wide variety of different technologies to allow them to manage a large volume of work. These technologies ensure that employees are kept productive. Any failure in technology may impact the business adversely. The success of our contact center primarily depends on performance of our employees and resulting customer satisfaction. Any increase in average waiting time or handling time or lack of promptness or technical expertise of our employees will impact directly on customer satisfaction. Any adverse customer satisfaction may impact the overall business. Generally, the employee turnover rate in the contact center business and the risk of losing experienced employees to competitors are high. If we are unable to successfully manage our new contact center, our results of operations could be adversely affected and we may not realize the benefits of our recent acquisitions.

Risks Related to Our Relationship with MiTAC International

We rely on MiTAC International for certain manufacturing and assembly services and the loss of these services would require us to seek alternate providers that may charge us more for their services.

We rely on MiTAC International to manufacture and supply subassemblies and components for some of our contract assembly customers, including Sun Microsystems, our primary contract assembly customer, and our reliance on MiTAC International may increase in the future. Our relationship with MiTAC International has been informal and is not governed by long-term commitments or arrangements with respect to pricing terms, revenue or capacity commitments. Accordingly, we negotiate manufacturing and pricing terms on a project-by-project basis,

based on manufacturing services rendered by MiTAC International or us. As MiTAC’s ownership interest in us decreases, MiTAC’s interest in the success of our business and operations may decrease as well. In the event MiTAC International no longer provides such services and components to us, we would need to find an alternative source for these services and components. We may be unable to obtain alternative services and components on similar terms, which may in turn increase our manufacturing costs. In addition, we may not find manufacturers with sufficient capacity, which may in turn lead to shortages in our product supplies. Increased costs and products shortages could harm our business and operating results.

Our business relationship with MiTAC International has been and will continue to be negotiated as related parties and therefore may not be the result of arms’-length negotiations between independent parties. Our relationship, including pricing and other material terms with our shared customers or with MiTAC International, may or may not be as advantageous to us as the terms we could have negotiated with unaffiliated third parties. We have a joint sales and marketing agreement with MiTAC International, pursuant to which both parties agree to use their commercially reasonable efforts to promote the other party’s service offerings to their respective customers who are interested in such product offerings. To date, there has not been a significant amount of sales attributable to the joint marketing agreement. This agreement does not provide for the terms upon which we negotiate manufacturing and pricing terms. These negotiations have been on a case-by-case basis. The agreement had an initial term of one year and will automatically renew for subsequent one-year terms unless either party provides written notice of non-renewal within 90 days of the end of any renewal term. The agreement may also be terminated without cause either by the mutual written agreement of both parties or by either party without cause upon 90 days prior written notice of termination to the other party. Either party may immediately terminate the agreement by providing written notice (a) of the other party’s material breach of any provision of the agreement and failure to cure within 30 days, or (b) if the other party becomes bankrupt or insolvent. In addition, we are party to a general agreement with MiTAC International and Sun Microsystems under which we work with MiTAC International to provide contract assembly services to Sun Microsystems.

Some of our customer relationships evolved from relationships between such customers and MiTAC International and the loss of such relationships could harm our business and operating results.

Our relationship with Sun Microsystems and some of our other customers evolved from relationships that were initiated by MiTAC International. Our relationship with Sun Microsystems is a joint relationship with MiTAC International and us, and the future success of our relationship with Sun Microsystems depends on MiTAC International continuing to work with us to service Sun Microsystems’ requirements. The original agreement between Sun Microsystems and MiTAC International was signed on August 28, 1999 and we became a party to the agreement on February 12, 2002. Substantially all of our contract assembly services to Sun Microsystems are covered by this general agreement. The agreement continues indefinitely until terminated in accordance with its terms. Sun Microsystems may terminate this agreement for any reason on 60 days written notice. Any party may terminate the agreement with written notice if one of the other parties materially breaches any provision of the agreement and the breach is incapable of being cured or is not cured within 30 days. The agreement may also be terminated on written notice if one of the other parties becomes bankrupt or insolvent. If we are unable to maintain our relationship with MiTAC International, our relationship with Sun Microsystems could suffer and we could lose other customer relationships or referrals, which in turn could harm our business, financial position and operating results.

There could be potential conflicts of interest between us and affiliates of MiTAC International, which could impact our business and operating results.

MiTAC International’s and its affiliates’ continuing beneficial ownership of our common stock could create conflicts of interest with respect to a variety of matters, such as potential acquisitions, competition, issuance or disposition of securities, election of directors, payment of dividends and other business matters. Similar risks could exist as a result of Matthew Miau’s positions as our Chairman, the Chairman of MiTAC International and as a director or officer of MiTAC International’s affiliated companies. For fiscal year 2006, Mr. Miau received a retainer of $225,000 from us. Compensation payable to Mr. Miau is based upon the recommendation of the Compensation Committee and subject to the approval of the Board of Directors. We also have adopted a policy requiring material transactions in which any of our directors has a potential conflict of interest to be approved by our Audit Committee, which is composed of disinterested members of the Board.

Synnex Technology International Corp. or Synnex Technology International, a publicly-traded company based in Taiwan and affiliated with MiTAC International, currently provides distribution and fulfillment services to various markets in Asia and Australia, and is also a potential competitor of ours. Mitac Incorporated, a privately-

held company based in Taiwan and a separate entity from MiTAC International, directly and indirectly owns approximately 15.2% of Synnex Technology International and approximately 8.5% of MiTAC International. MiTAC International directly and indirectly owns 0.3% of Synnex Technology International and Synnex Technology International directly and indirectly owns approximately 0.4% of MiTAC International. In addition, MiTAC International directly and indirectly owns approximately 8.8% of Mitac Incorporated and Synnex Technology International directly and indirectly owns approximately 14.2% of Mitac Incorporated. Synnex Technology International indirectly through its ownership of Peer Developments Limited owns approximately 17.1% of our outstanding common stock. Neither MiTAC International nor Synnex Technology International is restricted from competing with us. In the future, we may increasingly compete with Synnex Technology International, particularly if our business in Asia expands or Synnex Technology International expands its business into geographies we serve. Although Synnex Technology International is a separate entity from us, it is possible that there will be confusion as a result of the similarity of our names. Moreover, we cannot limit or control the use of the Synnex name by Synnex Technology International or MiTAC International, and our use of the Synnex name may be restricted as a result of registration of the name by Synnex Technology International or the prior use in jurisdictions where they currently operate.

As of February 28, 2007, our executive officers, directors and principal stockholders owned approximately 48% of our common stock and this concentration of ownership could allow them to control all matters requiring stockholder approval and could delay or prevent a change in control of SYNNEX.

As of February 28, 2007, our executive officers, directors and principal stockholders owned approximately 48% of our outstanding common stock. In particular, MiTAC International and its affiliates, owned approximately 47% of our common stock.

In addition, MiTAC International’s interest and ours may increasingly conflict. For example, we rely on MiTAC International for certain manufacturing and supply services and for relationships with certain key customers. As a result of a decrease in their ownership in us, we may lose these services and relationships, which may lead to increased costs to replace the lost services and the loss of certain key customers. We cannot predict the likelihood that we may incur increased costs or lose customers if MiTAC International’s ownership percentage of us decreases in the future.

Risks Related to Our Industry

Volatility in the IT industry could have a material adverse effect on our business and operating results.

The IT industry in which we operate has experienced decreases in demand. Softening demand for our products and services caused by an ongoing economic downturn and over-capacity was responsible, as well as problems with the salability of inventory and collection of reseller customer receivables.

While in the past we may have benefited from the consolidation in our industry resulting from delays or reductions in IT spending in particular, and economic weakness general, any such volatility in the IT industry could have adverse effect on our business and operating results.

Our distribution business may be adversely affected by some OEM suppliers’ strategies to increase their direct sales, which in turn could cause our business and operating results to suffer.

Consolidation of OEM suppliers has resulted in fewer sources for some of the products that we distribute. This consolidation has also resulted in larger OEM suppliers that have significant operating and financial resources. Some OEM suppliers, including some of the leading OEM suppliers that we service, have been selling a greater volume of products directly to end-users, thereby limiting our business opportunities. If large OEM suppliers continue the trend to sell directly to our resellers, rather than use us as the distributor of their products, our business and operating results will suffer.

OEMs are limiting the number of supply chain service providers with which they do business, which in turn could negatively impact our business and operating results.

Currently, there is a trend towards reducing the number of authorized distributors used by OEM suppliers. As a smaller market participant in the IT product distribution and contract assembly industries, than some of our competitors, we may be more susceptible to loss of business from further reductions of authorized distributors or contract assemblers by IT product OEMs. For example, the termination of Sun Microsystems’ contract assembly

business with us would have a significant negative effect on our revenue and operating results. A determination by any of our primary OEMs to consolidate their business with other distributors or contract assemblers would negatively affect our business and operating results.

The IT industry is subject to rapidly changing technologies and process developments, and we may not be able to adequately adjust our business to these changes, which in turn would harm our business and operating results.

Dynamic changes in the IT industry, including the consolidation of OEM suppliers and reductions in the number of authorized distributors used by OEM suppliers, have resulted in new and increased responsibilities for management personnel and have placed, and continue to place, a significant strain upon our management, operating and financial systems and other resources. We may be unable to successfully respond to and manage our business in light of industry developments and trends. Also crucial to our success in managing our operations will be our ability to achieve additional economies of scale. Our failure to achieve these additional economies of scale or to respond to changes in the IT industry could adversely affect our business and operating results.

We are subject to intense competition in the IT industry, both in the United States and internationally, and if we fail to compete successfully, we will be unable to gain or retain market share.

We operate in a highly competitive environment, both in the United States and internationally. The IT product distribution and contract assembly industries are characterized by intense competition, based primarily on product availability, credit availability, price, speed of delivery, ability to tailor specific solutions to customer needs, quality and depth of product lines, pre-sale and post-sale technical support, flexibility and timely response to design changes, technological capabilities, service and support. We compete with a variety of regional, national and international IT product distributors and contract manufacturers and assemblers. In some instances, we also compete with our own customers, our own OEM suppliers and MiTAC International.

Our primary competitors are substantially larger and have greater financial, operating, manufacturing and marketing resources than us. Some of our competitors may have broader geographic breadth and range of services than us and may have more developed relationships with their existing customers. We may lose market share in the United States or in international markets, or may be forced in the future to reduce our prices in response to the actions of our competitors and thereby experience a reduction in our gross margins.

We may initiate other business activities, including the broadening of our supply chain capabilities, and may face competition from companies with more experience in those new areas. In addition, as we enter new areas of business, we may also encounter increased competition from current competitors or from new competitors, including some who may once have been our OEM suppliers or reseller customers. Increased competition and negative reaction from our OEM suppliers or reseller customers resulting from our expansion into new business areas may harm our business and operating results.

Compliance with changing regulation of corporate governance and public disclosure may result in additional expenses.

Changing laws, regulations and standards relating to corporate governance and public disclosure, including the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, new Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC, regulations and New York Stock Exchange rules, are creating uncertainty for companies such as ours. These new or changed laws, regulations and standards are subject to varying interpretations in many cases due to their lack of specificity, and as a result, their application in practice may evolve over time as new guidance is provided by regulatory and governing bodies, which could result in continuing uncertainty regarding compliance matters and higher costs necessitated by ongoing revisions to disclosure and corporate governance practices. As a result, our efforts to comply with evolving laws, regulations and standards have resulted in, and are likely to continue to result in, increased general and administrative expenses and a diversion of management time and attention from revenue-generating activities to compliance activities. In particular, our ongoing efforts to comply with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and the related regulations regarding our management’s required assessment of our internal control over financial reporting and our independent registered public accounting firm’s attestation of that assessment have required the commitment of significant financial and managerial resources. We expect these efforts to require the continued commitment of significant resources. If our efforts to comply with new or changed laws, regulations and standards differ from the activities intended by regulatory or governing bodies due to ambiguities related to practice, our reputation may be harmed.

While we believe that we currently have adequate internal control over financial reporting, we are exposed to risks from legislation requiring companies to evaluate those internal controls.

Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 requires our management to report on, and our independent registered public accounting firm to attest to, the effectiveness of our internal control structure and procedures for financial reporting. We completed an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting for the fiscal year ended November 30, 2006, and we have an ongoing program to perform the system and process evaluation and testing necessary to continue to comply with these requirements. We expect to continue to incur increased expense and to devote additional management resources to Section 404 compliance. In the event that our chief executive officer, chief financial officer or independent registered public accounting firm determines that our internal control over financial reporting is not effective as defined under Section 404, investor perceptions and our reputation may be adversely affected and the market price of our stock could decline.

Changes to financial accounting standards may affect our results of operations and cause us to change our business practices.

We prepare our financial statements to conform to generally accepted accounting principles, or GAAP. These accounting principles are subject to interpretation by the Financial Accounting Standards Board or FASB, American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, the SEC and various bodies formed to interpret and create appropriate accounting policies. A change in those policies can have a significant effect on our reported results and may affect our reporting of transactions completed before a change is announced. Changes to those rules or the questioning of current practices may adversely affect our reported financial results or the way we conduct our business. We will have significant and ongoing accounting charges resulting from option grant and other equity incentive expensing due to adoption of SFAS 123(R) – “Share-Based Payment” that will reduce our overall net income. In addition, since we historically have used equity-related compensation as a component of our total employee compensation program, the accounting change could make the use of equity-related compensation less attractive to us and therefore make it more difficult to attract and retain employees.

Risks Related to Our Common Stock

Our common stock has been subject to substantial price and volume fluctuations due to a number of factors, some of which are beyond our control.

Share prices and trading volumes for many distribution and contract assembly service related companies fluctuate widely for a number of reasons, including some reasons which may be unrelated to their businesses or results of operations. This market volatility, as well as general domestic or international economic, market and political conditions, could materially adversely affect the price of our common stock without regard to our operating performance. In addition, our operating results may be below the expectations of public market analysts and investors. If this were to occur, the market price of our common stock would likely decrease.

Significant fluctuations in the market price of our common stock could result in securities class action claims against us, which could seriously harm our operating results.

Securities class action claims have been brought against companies in the past where volatility in the market price of that company’s securities has taken place. This kind of litigation could be very costly and divert our management’s attention and resources, and any adverse determination in this litigation could also subject us to significant liabilities, any or all of which could adversely affect our business and operating results.

Anti-takeover provisions in our certificate of incorporation may make it more difficult for someone to acquire us in a hostile takeover.

Our Board of Directors has the authority to issue up to 5,000,000 shares of preferred stock and to determine the price, rights, preferences, privileges and restrictions, including voting rights, of those shares without any further vote or action by our stockholders. The rights of the holders of our common stock will be subject to, and may be adversely affected by, the rights of the holders of any preferred stock that we may issue in the future. The issuance of preferred stock, while providing flexibility in connection with possible acquisitions and other corporate purposes, could have the effect of making it more difficult for a third-party to acquire a majority of our outstanding voting shares.

In addition, our certificate of incorporation contains certain provisions that, together with the ownership position of our officers, directors and their affiliates, could discourage potential takeover attempts and make attempts by stockholders to change management more difficult, which could adversely affect the market price of our common stock.

If securities or industry analysts do not publish research or reports about our business, our stock price and trading volume could decline.

The trading market for our common stock will depend on the research and reports that industry or securities analysts publish about us or our business. We do not have any control over these analysts. If one or more of the analysts who cover us downgrade our stock, our stock price would likely decline. If one or more of these analysts cease coverage of our company or fail to regularly publish reports on us, we could lose visibility in the financial markets, which in turn could cause our stock price or trading volume to decline.

We are subject to additional rules and regulations as a public company, which will increase our administration costs which, in turn, could harm our operating results.

As a public company, we incur significant legal, accounting and other expenses. In addition, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, as well as rules subsequently implemented by the SEC, have required changes in corporate governance practices of public companies. In addition to final rules and rule proposals already made by the SEC, the New York Stock Exchange, has adopted revisions to its requirements for companies that are NYSE-listed. These rules and regulations have increased our legal and financial compliance costs, and made some activities more time consuming or costly. These rules and regulations could make it more difficult and more expensive for us to obtain director and officer liability insurance, and we may be required to accept reduced coverage or incur substantially higher costs to obtain coverage. These rules and regulations could also make it more difficult for us to attract and retain qualified members of our Board of Directors, particularly to serve on our audit committee, and qualified executive officers.

ITEM 6.

Exhibits


10.1#		Amended and Restated 2003 Stock Incentive Plan and form of agreements thereunder (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended November 30, 2006).

10.2		Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated as of February 12, 2007 by and among the Registrant, the lenders signatory thereto from time to time, and General Electric Capital Corporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.15 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended November 30, 2006).

10.3		Second Amended and Restated Receivables Sale and Servicing Agreement, dated as of February 12, 2007, among the Originator, the Servicer and SIT Funding Corporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.16 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended November 30, 2006).

10.4		Second Amended and Restated Receivables Funding and Administration Agreement, dated as February 12, 2007, among SIT Funding Corporation, the lenders party thereto and General Electric Capital Corporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.17 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended November 30, 2006).

31.1		Certification by Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

31.2		Certification by Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

32.1 *		Statement of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer under Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350).

#	Indicates management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.

In accordance with Item 601(b)(32)(ii) of Regulation S-K and SEC Release Nos. 33-8238 and 34-47986, Final Rule: Management’s Reports on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting and Certification of Disclosure in Exchange Act Periodic Reports, the certifications furnished in Exhibit 32.1 hereto are deemed to accompany this Form 10-Q and will not be deemed “filed” for purpose of Section 18 of the Exchange Act. Such certifications will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the registrant specifically incorporates it by reference.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

Date: April 6, 2007


SYNNEX Corporation

By:		/s/ ROBERT T. HUANG
		Robert T. Huang
		Chief Executive Officer

By:		/s/ THOMAS C. ALSBORG
		Thomas C. Alsborg
		Chief Financial Officer

EXHIBIT INDEX


Exhibit Number		Description of Document
10.1#		Amended and Restated 2003 Stock Incentive Plan and form of agreements thereunder (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended November 30, 2006).

10.2		Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated as of February 12, 2007 by and among the Registrant, the lenders signatory thereto from time to time, and General Electric Capital Corporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.15 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended November 30, 2006).

10.3		Second Amended and Restated Receivables Sale and Servicing Agreement, dated as of February 12, 2007, among the Originator, the Servicer and SIT Funding Corporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.16 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended November 30, 2006).

10.4		Second Amended and Restated Receivables Funding and Administration Agreement, dated as February 12, 2007, among SIT Funding Corporation, the lenders party thereto and General Electric Capital Corporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.17 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended November 30, 2006).

31.1		Certification by Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

31.2		Certification by Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

32.1*		Statement of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer under Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350).

#	Indicates management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.