Form 6-K
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 6-K
Report of Foreign Private Issuer
Pursuant to Rule 13a-16 or 15d-16 of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2009
Commission file number 1- 32479
TEEKAY LNG PARTNERS L.P.
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
4th Floor, Belvedere Building
69 Pitts Bay Road
Hamilton, HM 08 Bermuda
(Address of principal executive office)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant files or will file annual reports under cover
Form 20-F or Form 40-F.
Form 20-F
þ Form 40- F o
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in paper as permitted by
Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(1).
Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in paper as permitted by
Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(7).
Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant by furnishing the information contained in this
Form is also thereby furnishing the information to the Commission pursuant to Rule 12g3-2(b) under
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
Yes o No þ
If Yes is marked, indicate below the file number assigned to the registrant in connection
with Rule 12g3-2(b): 82- _____
TEEKAY LNG PARTNERS L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES
REPORT ON FORM 6-K FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31, 2009
INDEX
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PAGE |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 1. Financial Statements (Unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
TEEKAY LNG PARTNERS L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES (Note 1)
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME (LOSS)
(in thousands of U.S. dollars, except unit and per unit data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
VOYAGE REVENUES (note 10) |
|
|
75,673 |
|
|
|
76,305 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OPERATING EXPENSES (note 10) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Voyage expenses |
|
|
518 |
|
|
|
408 |
|
Vessel operating expenses |
|
|
18,741 |
|
|
|
18,407 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
19,326 |
|
|
|
18,790 |
|
General and administrative |
|
|
3,555 |
|
|
|
4,455 |
|
Restructuring charge (note 16) |
|
|
1,951 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
44,091 |
|
|
|
42,060 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from vessel operations |
|
|
31,582 |
|
|
|
34,245 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OTHER ITEMS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense (notes 5 and 8) |
|
|
(17,119 |
) |
|
|
(37,215 |
) |
Interest income |
|
|
3,975 |
|
|
|
16,072 |
|
Realized and unrealized loss on derivative instruments (note 11) |
|
|
(16,236 |
) |
|
|
(44,296 |
) |
Foreign currency exchange gain (loss) (note 8) |
|
|
20,428 |
|
|
|
(33,891 |
) |
Equity income (loss) |
|
|
3,873 |
|
|
|
(64 |
) |
Other income (loss) net (note 9) |
|
|
169 |
|
|
|
(81 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other items |
|
|
(4,910 |
) |
|
|
(99,475 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
|
26,672 |
|
|
|
(65,230 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-controlling interest in net income (loss) |
|
|
4,691 |
|
|
|
(23,006 |
) |
Dropdown Predecessors interest in net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
894 |
|
General Partners interest in net income (loss) |
|
|
1,477 |
|
|
|
(862 |
) |
Limited partners interest: (note 14) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
|
20,504 |
|
|
|
(42,256 |
) |
Net income (loss) per: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common unit (basic and diluted) |
|
|
0.48 |
|
|
|
(1.08 |
) |
Subordinated unit (basic and diluted) |
|
|
0.41 |
|
|
|
(1.25 |
) |
Total unit (basic and diluted) |
|
|
0.46 |
|
|
|
(1.15 |
) |
Weighted-average number of units outstanding: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common units (basic and diluted) |
|
|
33,382,764 |
|
|
|
22,540,547 |
|
Subordinated units (basic and diluted) |
|
|
11,050,929 |
|
|
|
14,734,572 |
|
Total units (basic and diluted) |
|
|
44,433,693 |
|
|
|
37,275,119 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the unaudited consolidated financial statements.
3
TEEKAY LNG PARTNERS L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES (Note 1)
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(in thousands of U.S. dollars)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As at |
|
|
As at |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
200,960 |
|
|
|
117,641 |
|
Restricted cash current (note 5) |
|
|
28,671 |
|
|
|
28,384 |
|
Accounts receivable |
|
|
8,411 |
|
|
|
5,793 |
|
Prepaid expenses |
|
|
6,304 |
|
|
|
5,329 |
|
Other current assets |
|
|
1,633 |
|
|
|
7,266 |
|
Current portion of derivative assets (notes 2 and 11) |
|
|
13,962 |
|
|
|
13,078 |
|
Current portion of net investment in direct financing lease (note 5) |
|
|
5,547 |
|
|
|
|
|
Advances to affiliates (note 10h) |
|
|
9,980 |
|
|
|
9,583 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
275,468 |
|
|
|
187,074 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted cash long-term (note 5) |
|
|
603,544 |
|
|
|
614,565 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vessels and equipment (note 8) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At cost, less accumulated depreciation of $129,646 (2008 $121,233) |
|
|
1,068,661 |
|
|
|
1,078,526 |
|
Vessels under capital leases, at cost, less accumulated depreciation of $114,980
(2008 $106,975) (note 5) |
|
|
920,875 |
|
|
|
928,795 |
|
Advances on newbuilding contracts (note 12) |
|
|
54,871 |
|
|
|
200,557 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total vessels and equipment |
|
|
2,044,407 |
|
|
|
2,207,878 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment in and advances to joint venture (note 10f) |
|
|
68,167 |
|
|
|
64,382 |
|
Net investment in direct financing lease (note 5) |
|
|
198,745 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets |
|
|
26,300 |
|
|
|
27,266 |
|
Derivative assets (notes 2 and 11) |
|
|
107,356 |
|
|
|
154,248 |
|
Intangible assets net (note 6) |
|
|
139,522 |
|
|
|
141,805 |
|
Goodwill (note 6) |
|
|
35,631 |
|
|
|
35,631 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
|
3,499,140 |
|
|
|
3,432,849 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable (note 10a) |
|
|
12,311 |
|
|
|
10,838 |
|
Accrued liabilities (note 10a) |
|
|
24,578 |
|
|
|
24,071 |
|
Unearned revenue |
|
|
9,704 |
|
|
|
9,705 |
|
Current portion of long-term debt (note 8) |
|
|
56,276 |
|
|
|
76,801 |
|
Current obligations under capital lease (note 5) |
|
|
145,890 |
|
|
|
147,616 |
|
Current portion of derivative liabilities (notes 2 and 11) |
|
|
41,898 |
|
|
|
35,182 |
|
Advances from joint venture partners (note 7) |
|
|
1,236 |
|
|
|
1,236 |
|
Advances from affiliates (note 10h) |
|
|
92,668 |
|
|
|
73,064 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
384,561 |
|
|
|
378,513 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt (note 8) |
|
|
1,333,865 |
|
|
|
1,305,810 |
|
Long-term obligations under capital lease (note 5) |
|
|
663,872 |
|
|
|
669,725 |
|
Other long-term liabilities (note 5) |
|
|
56,591 |
|
|
|
44,668 |
|
Derivative liabilities (notes 2 and 11) |
|
|
183,031 |
|
|
|
225,420 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
2,621,920 |
|
|
|
2,624,136 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies (notes 5, 11 and 12) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-controlling interest |
|
|
7,553 |
|
|
|
2,862 |
|
Partners equity |
|
|
869,667 |
|
|
|
805,851 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total equity |
|
|
877,220 |
|
|
|
808,713 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and total equity |
|
|
3,499,140 |
|
|
|
3,432,849 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the unaudited consolidated financial statements.
4
TEEKAY LNG PARTNERS L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES (Note 1)
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(in thousands of U.S. dollars)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
Cash and cash equivalents provided by (used for) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OPERATING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
|
26,672 |
|
|
|
(65,230 |
) |
Non-cash items: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized loss on derivative instruments (note 11) |
|
|
10,336 |
|
|
|
43,792 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
19,326 |
|
|
|
18,790 |
|
Foreign currency exchange (gain) loss |
|
|
(20,620 |
) |
|
|
33,781 |
|
Equity based compensation |
|
|
92 |
|
|
|
88 |
|
Equity (income) loss |
|
|
(3,873 |
) |
|
|
64 |
|
Accrued interest and other net |
|
|
2,515 |
|
|
|
1,880 |
|
Change in non-cash working capital items related to operating activities |
|
|
17,481 |
|
|
|
2,363 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net operating cash flow |
|
|
51,929 |
|
|
|
35,528 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FINANCING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt |
|
|
85,695 |
|
|
|
78,642 |
|
Debt issuance costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,083 |
) |
Scheduled repayments of long-term debt |
|
|
(31,897 |
) |
|
|
(9,154 |
) |
Prepayments of long-term debt |
|
|
(25,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Scheduled repayments of capital lease obligations and other long term liabilities |
|
|
(2,347 |
) |
|
|
(2,241 |
) |
Proceeds from follow-on public offering |
|
|
68,532 |
|
|
|
|
|
Advances to and from affiliates |
|
|
21,339 |
|
|
|
(2,069 |
) |
Repayment of advances from affiliates |
|
|
|
|
|
|
578 |
|
Decrease in restricted cash |
|
|
628 |
|
|
|
942 |
|
Cash distributions paid |
|
|
(26,789 |
) |
|
|
(20,552 |
) |
Equity distribution from Teekay Corporation (note 13) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,281 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net financing cash flow |
|
|
90,161 |
|
|
|
48,344 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INVESTING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Receipts from direct financing lease |
|
|
1,341 |
|
|
|
|
|
Advances to joint venture |
|
|
(1,210 |
) |
|
|
(3,085 |
) |
Expenditures for vessels and equipment |
|
|
(58,902 |
) |
|
|
(78,085 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investing cash flow |
|
|
(58,771 |
) |
|
|
(81,170 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
83,319 |
|
|
|
2,702 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of the period |
|
|
117,641 |
|
|
|
91,891 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of the period |
|
|
200,960 |
|
|
|
94,593 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental cash flow information (note 13)
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the unaudited consolidated financial statements.
5
TEEKAY LNG PARTNERS L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES (Note 1)
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN TOTAL EQUITY
(in thousands of U.S. dollars and units)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL EQUITY |
|
|
|
Partners Equity |
|
|
Non- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General |
|
|
controlling |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common |
|
|
Subordinated |
|
|
Partner |
|
|
Interest |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
Units |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Units |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
Balance as at December 31, 2008 |
|
|
33,338 |
|
|
|
634,212 |
|
|
|
11,051 |
|
|
|
134,291 |
|
|
|
37,348 |
|
|
|
2,862 |
|
|
|
808,713 |
|
Net income and comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,965 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,539 |
|
|
|
1,477 |
|
|
|
4,691 |
|
|
|
26,672 |
|
Cash distributions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(19,003 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,299 |
) |
|
|
(1,487 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(26,789 |
) |
Proceeds from follow-on public offering of
units, net of offering costs of $3.3 million
(note 3) |
|
|
4,000 |
|
|
|
67,095 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,437 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
68,532 |
|
Equity based compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
63 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
92 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as at March 31, 2009 |
|
|
37,338 |
|
|
|
698,332 |
|
|
|
11,051 |
|
|
|
132,558 |
|
|
|
38,777 |
|
|
|
7,553 |
|
|
|
877,220 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the unaudited consolidated financial statements.
6
TEEKAY LNG PARTNERS L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(all tabular amounts stated in thousands of U.S. dollars, except unit and per unit data or unless otherwise indicated)
The unaudited interim consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with
United States generally accepted accounting principles (or GAAP). These financial statements
include the accounts of Teekay LNG Partners L.P., which is a limited partnership organized under
the laws of the Republic of The Marshall Islands, its wholly owned or controlled subsidiaries,
the Dropdown Predecessor, as described below, and variable interest entities for which the
Partnership is the primary beneficiary (see Note 12) (collectively, the Partnership). The
preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make
estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and
accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Certain information and footnote disclosures required by GAAP for complete annual financial
statements have been omitted and, therefore, these interim financial statements should be read
in conjunction with the Partnerships audited consolidated financial statements for the year
ended December 31, 2008. In the opinion of management of Teekay GP L.L.C., the general partner
of Teekay LNG Partners L.P. (or the General Partner), these interim consolidated financial
statements reflect all adjustments, of a normal recurring nature, necessary to present fairly,
in all material respects, the Partnerships consolidated financial position, results of
operations, and changes in total equity and cash flows for the interim periods presented. The
results of operations for the interim periods presented are not necessarily indicative of those
for a full fiscal year. Significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated
upon consolidation. Certain of the comparative figures have been reclassified to conform to the
presentation adopted in the current period.
As required by Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (or SFAS) No. 141, the Partnership
accounted for the acquisition of interests in vessels from Teekay Corporation as a transfer of a
business between entities under common control. The method of accounting prescribed by SFAS No.
141, Business Combinations, for such transfers is similar to the pooling of interests method of
accounting. Under this method, the carrying amount of net assets recognized in the balance
sheets of each combining entity are carried forward to the balance sheet of the combined entity,
and no other assets or liabilities are recognized as a result of the combination. The excess of
the proceeds paid, if any, by the Partnership over Teekay Corporations historical cost is
accounted for as an equity distribution to Teekay Corporation. In addition, transfers of net
assets between entities under common control are accounted for as if the transfer occurred from
the date that the Partnership and the acquired vessels were both under the common control of
Teekay Corporation and had begun operations. As a result, the Partnerships financial statements
prior to the date the interests in these vessels were actually acquired by the Partnership are
retroactively adjusted to include the results of these vessels during the periods they were
under common control of Teekay Corporation.
On April 1, 2008, the Partnership acquired interests in two liquefied natural gas (or LNG)
vessels (the Kenai LNG Carriers) from Teekay Corporation and immediately chartered the vessels
back to Teekay Corporation. These transactions were deemed to be business acquisitions between
entities under common control. As a result, the Partnerships statement of income and cash flows
for the three months ended March 31, 2008 reflect these two vessels, referred to herein as the
Dropdown Predecessor, as if the Partnership had acquired them when each respective vessel began
operations under the ownership of Teekay Corporation. The Kenai LNG Carriers began operations
under the ownership of Teekay Corporation on December 13 and 14, 2007. The effect of adjusting
the Partnerships financial statements to account for this common control exchange increased the
Partnerships net income by $0.9 million for the three months ended March 31, 2008.
The Partnerships consolidated financial statements include the financial position, results of
operations and cash flows of the Dropdown Predecessor. In the preparation of these consolidated
financial statements, general and administrative expenses and interest expense were not
identifiable as relating solely to the vessels. General and administrative expenses (consisting
primarily of salaries and other employee related costs, office rent, legal and professional
fees, and travel and entertainment) were allocated based on the Dropdown Predecessors
proportionate share of Teekay Corporations total ship-operating (calendar) days for the period
presented. In addition, if the Dropdown Predecessor was capitalized in part with non-interest
bearing loans from Teekay Corporation and its subsidiaries, these intercompany loans were
generally used to finance the acquisition of the vessels. Interest expense includes the
allocation of interest to the Dropdown Predecessor from Teekay Corporation and its subsidiaries
based upon the weighted-average outstanding balance of these intercompany loans and the
weighted-average interest rate outstanding on Teekay Corporations loan facilities that were
used to finance these intercompany loans. Management believes these allocations reasonably
present the general and administrative expenses and interest expense of the Dropdown
Predecessor.
Adoption of New Accounting Pronouncements
In December 2007, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (or FASB) issued SFAS No. 141
(revised 2007), Business Combinations (SFAS No. 141 (R)). SFAS No. 141 (R) requires an acquirer
to recognize the assets acquired, the liabilities assumed, and any
non-controlling interest in
the acquiree at the acquisition date, measured at their fair values as of that date. This
Statement also requires that the acquirer in a business combination achieved in stages to
recognize the identifiable assets and liabilities, as well as the non-controlling interest in the
acquiree, at the full fair values of the assets and liabilities as if they had occurred on the
acquisition date. In addition, SFAS No. 141 (R) requires that all acquisition related costs be
expensed as incurred, rather than capitalized as part of the purchase price and those
restructuring costs that an acquirer expected, but was not obligated to incur, to be recognized
separately from the business combination. SFAS No. 141 (R) applies prospectively to business
combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after the beginning of the first annual
reporting period beginning on or after December 15, 2008. The Partnerships adoption of SFAS
No. 141(R) prospectively in January 2009 did not have a
material impact on the Partnerships consolidated
financial statements.
7
TEEKAY LNG PARTNERS L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Contd)
(all tabular amounts stated in thousands of U.S. dollars, except unit and per unit data or unless otherwise indicated)
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160, Non-controlling Interests in Consolidated
Financial Statements an amendment of ARB No. 51 (SFAS No. 160). SFAS No. 160 amends
Accounting Research Bulletin (or ARB) 51 to establish accounting and reporting standards for the
non-controlling (minority) interest in a subsidiary and for the deconsolidation of a subsidiary.
This statement provides that non-controlling interests in subsidiaries held by parties other
than the partners be identified, labeled and presented in the statement of financial position
within equity, but separate from the partners equity. SFAS No. 160 states that the amount of
consolidated net income (loss) attributable to the partners and to the non-controlling interest
be clearly identified on the consolidated statements of income (loss). The statement provides
for consistency regarding changes in partners ownership including when a subsidiary is
deconsolidated. Any retained non-controlling equity investment in the former subsidiary will be
initially measured at fair value. On January 1, 2009, the Partnership adopted SFAS No. 160
prospectively. The Partnership has applied the presentation and disclosure provisions of SFAS
No. 160 to its consolidated financial statements retrospectively.
The consolidated net income attributable to the partners would be different in the three months
ended March 31, 2009 had the previous requirements in paragraph
15 of ARB 51 continued to have
been applied rather than SFAS 160. Under paragraph 15, losses attributable to the
non-controlling interest that exceed its equity capital are charged against the majority
interest, as there is no obligation of the non-controlling interest
to cover such losses.
However, if future earnings do materialize, the majority interest should be credited to the
extent of such losses previously absorbed. Pro forma consolidated net income attributed to
non-controlling interest and to the partners and pro forma earnings per unit had ARB 51 been
applied are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
26,672 |
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma non-controlling interest in net income |
|
|
(2,862 |
) |
Pro forma partners interest in net income |
|
|
29,534 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma
net income per unit: |
|
|
|
|
Common unit (basic and diluted) |
|
|
0.64 |
|
Subordinated unit (basic and diluted) |
|
|
0.58 |
|
Total unit (basic and diluted) |
|
|
0.63 |
|
In February 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position (FSP 157-2) which delayed the effective
date of SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements, for
non-financial assets and non-financial
liabilities, except for items that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial
statements on a recurring basis (at least annually). For purposes of applying this FSP,
non-financial assets and non-financial liabilities would include all assets and liabilities other
than those meeting the definition of a financial asset or financial liability as defined in
paragraph 6 of SFAS No. 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial
Liabilities. This FSP defers the effective date of SFAS No. 157 to fiscal years beginning after
November 15, 2008, and the interim periods within those fiscal years for items within the scope
of this FSP. The Partnerships adoption of the provisions of SFAS No. 157 related to those
items covered by FSP 157-2 from January 1, 2009 did not have a material impact on the
Partnerships consolidated financial statements.
In March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161, Disclosures About Derivative Instruments and
Hedging Activities-an amendment of FASB Statement No. 133 (SFAS No. 161), which amends SFAS No.
133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, by requiring expanded
disclosures about a companys derivative instruments and hedging activities, including increased
qualitative, and credit-risk disclosures, but does not change the scope or accounting of SFAS
No. 133. SFAS No. 161 also amends SFAS No. 107, Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial
Instruments, to clarify that derivative instruments are subject to the
concentration-of-credit-risk disclosures of SFAS No. 107. SFAS No. 161 is effective for
financial statements issued for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after November 15,
2008, with early adoption permitted. On January 1, 2009, the Partnership adopted the provisions
of SFAS No. 161. See Note 11 of the notes to the unaudited consolidated financial statements.
In March 2008, the FASB issued its final consensus on the Emerging Issues Task Force (or EITF)
Issue 07-4, Application of the Two-Class Method under FASB Statement No. 128, Earnings per
Share, to Master Limited Partnerships. This issue may impact a publicly traded master limited
partnership (or MLP) that distributes available cash, as defined in the respective partnership
agreements, to limited partners, the general partner, and the holders of incentive distribution
rights (or IDRs). This issue addresses earnings-per-unit (or EPU) computations for all MLPs
with IDR interests. MLPs will need to determine the amount of available cash at the end of
the reporting period when calculating the periods EPU. This guidance in Issue 07-4 is
effective for the Partnership for the fiscal year beginning January 1, 2009 and is applied
retrospectively to all periods presented. On January 1, 2009, the Partnership adopted the
provisions of Issue 07-4. See Note 14 of the notes to the unaudited consolidated financial
statements.
In April 2008, FASB issued FASB Staff Position No. 142-3 (FSP No. 142-3), Determination of the
Useful Life of Intangible Assets. This FSP amends the factors that should be considered in
developing renewal or extension of assumptions used to determine the useful life of a recognized
intangible asset under SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets. This FSP is effective
for the Partnership for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008, and interim periods
within those fiscal years. The Partnerships adoption of FSP 142-3 in January 2009 did not have
a material impact on the Partnerships consolidated financial statements.
The Partnership also adopted EITF Issue 08-06 (EITF 08-06), Equity Method Investment Accounting
Considerations. This Issue addresses the impact that SFAS 141 (R) and SFAS 160 might have on
the accounting for equity method investments, including accounting for changes in value and
changes in ownership levels. The adoption of EITF 08-06 did not have a material impact on the
Partnerships consolidated financial statements.
8
TEEKAY LNG PARTNERS L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Contd)
(all tabular amounts stated in thousands of U.S. dollars, except unit and per unit data or
unless otherwise indicated)
2. |
|
Fair Value Measurements |
Effective January 1, 2008, the Partnership adopted SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements. In
accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board Staff Position No. FAS 157-2, Effective
Date of FASB Statement No. 157, the Partnership deferred the adoption of SFAS No. 157 for its
nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities, except those items recognized or disclosed at
fair value on an annual or more frequently recurring basis, until January 1, 2009. The adoption
of SFAS No. 157 did not have a material impact on the Partnerships fair value measurements.
SFAS No. 157 clarifies the definition of fair value, prescribes methods for measuring fair
value, establishes a fair value hierarchy based on the inputs used to measure fair value and
expands disclosure about the use of fair value measurements. The fair value hierarchy has three
levels based on the reliability of the inputs used to determine fair value as follows:
Level 1. Observable inputs such as quoted prices in active markets;
Level 2. Inputs, other than the quoted prices in active markets, that are observable either
directly or indirectly; and
Level 3. Unobservable inputs in which there is little or no market data, which require the
reporting entity to develop its own assumptions.
The following table presents the Partnerships assets and liabilities that are measured at fair
value on a recurring basis and are categorized using the fair value hierarchy.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value at |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset / (Liability) |
|
|
Level 1 |
|
|
Level 2 |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Interest rate swap agreements assets (1) |
|
|
125,030 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
125,030 |
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swap agreements liabilities (1) |
|
|
(219,249 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(219,249 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Other derivatives (2) |
|
|
(12,877 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12,877 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(107,096 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(94,219 |
) |
|
|
(12,877 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The fair value of the Partnerships interest rate swap agreements is the estimated amount
that the Partnership would receive or pay to terminate the agreements at the reporting date,
taking into account current interest rates and the current credit worthiness of both the
Partnership and the swap counterparties. The estimated amount is the present value of future
cash flows. Given the current volatility in the credit markets, it is reasonably possible that
the amount recorded as derivative assets and liabilities could vary by a material amount in the
near term. The Partnerships interest rate swap agreement includes $3.5 million of accrued
interest which is recorded in accrued liabilities on the consolidated balance sheets. |
|
(2) |
|
The Partnerships other derivative agreement is between Teekay Corporation and the
Partnership and relates to hire payments under the time-charter contract for the Toledo Spirit
(see Note 10j). The fair value of this derivative agreement is the estimated amount that the
Partnership would receive or pay to terminate the agreement at the reporting date, based on the
present value of Partnerships projection of future spot market rates, which has been derived
from current spot market rates and long-term historical average rates. |
Changes in fair value during the three months ended March 31, 2009 for assets and liabilities
that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis using significant unobservable inputs
(Level 3) are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset/(Liability) |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value at December 31, 2008 |
|
|
(17,955 |
) |
Total unrealized gains |
|
|
5,078 |
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value at March 31, 2009 |
|
|
(12,877 |
) |
|
|
|
|
The Partnership has determined that there are no non-financial assets or non-financial
liabilities carried at fair value at March 31, 2009.
On March 30, 2009, the Partnership completed a follow-on public offering of 4.0 million common
units at a price of $17.60 per unit, for gross proceeds of approximately $70.4 million. As a
result of the offering, the Partnership raised gross equity proceeds of $71.8 million (including
the General Partners 2% proportionate capital contribution). Subsequent to March 31, 2009, the
Partnership used the total net proceeds from the equity offerings of approximately $68.5 million
to prepay amounts outstanding on two of its revolving credit facilities.
9
TEEKAY LNG PARTNERS L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Contd)
(all tabular amounts stated in thousands of U.S. dollars, except unit and per unit data or unless otherwise indicated)
The Partnership has two reportable segments: its liquefied gas segment and its Suezmax tanker
segment. The Partnerships liquefied gas segment consists of LNG carriers and a LPG carrier
subject to long-term, fixed-rate time charters to international energy companies. As at March
31, 2009, the Partnerships liquefied gas segment consisted of fifteen LNG carriers (including
the four LNG carriers which are accounted for under the equity method and two LNG carriers held
by a variable interest entity in which the partnership is the primary beneficiary) and one LPG
carrier. The Partnerships Suezmax tanker segment consists of eight 100%-owned Suezmax-class
crude oil tankers operating on long-term, fixed-rate time-charter contracts to international
energy companies. Segment results are evaluated based on income from vessel operations. The
accounting policies applied to the reportable segments are the same as those used in the
preparation of the Partnerships audited consolidated financial statements for the year ended
December 31, 2008. On April 2, 2009 the Partnership acquired an additional LPG carrier (see Note
12b).
The following tables include results for these segments for the years presented in these
financial statements.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
Liquefied |
|
|
Suezmax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liquefied |
|
|
Suezmax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gas |
|
|
Tanker |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gas |
|
|
Tanker |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment |
|
|
Segment |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Segment |
|
|
Segment |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Voyage revenues |
|
|
57,582 |
|
|
|
18,091 |
|
|
|
75,673 |
|
|
|
56,132 |
|
|
|
20,173 |
|
|
|
76,305 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Voyage expenses |
|
|
292 |
|
|
|
226 |
|
|
|
518 |
|
|
|
150 |
|
|
|
258 |
|
|
|
408 |
|
Vessel operating expenses |
|
|
12,589 |
|
|
|
6,152 |
|
|
|
18,741 |
|
|
|
11,769 |
|
|
|
6,638 |
|
|
|
18,407 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
14,478 |
|
|
|
4,848 |
|
|
|
19,326 |
|
|
|
14,196 |
|
|
|
4,594 |
|
|
|
18,790 |
|
General and administrative (1) |
|
|
2,134 |
|
|
|
1,421 |
|
|
|
3,555 |
|
|
|
2,462 |
|
|
|
1,993 |
|
|
|
4,455 |
|
Restructuring charge |
|
|
867 |
|
|
|
1,084 |
|
|
|
1,951 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from vessel
operations |
|
|
27,222 |
|
|
|
4,360 |
|
|
|
31,582 |
|
|
|
27,555 |
|
|
|
6,690 |
|
|
|
34,245 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes direct general and administrative expenses and indirect general and
administrative expenses (allocated to each segment based on estimated use of corporate
resources). |
A reconciliation of total segment assets to total assets presented in the consolidated balance
sheets is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets of the liquefied gas segment |
|
|
2,890,616 |
|
|
|
2,900,689 |
|
Total assets of the Suezmax tanker segment |
|
|
391,216 |
|
|
|
396,131 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
200,960 |
|
|
|
117,641 |
|
Accounts receivable, prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
|
16,348 |
|
|
|
18,388 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated total assets |
|
|
3,499,140 |
|
|
|
3,432,849 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5. |
|
Leases and Restricted Cash |
Capital Lease Obligations
RasGas II LNG Carriers. As at March 31, 2009, the Partnership owned a 70% interest in Teekay
Nakilat Corporation (or Teekay Nakilat), which is the lessee under 30-year capital lease
arrangements relating to three LNG carriers (or the RasGas II LNG Carriers) that operate under
time-charter contracts with Ras Laffan Liquefied Natural Gas Co. Limited (II), a joint venture
between Qatar Petroleum and ExxonMobil RasGas Inc., a subsidiary of ExxonMobil Corporation. All
amounts below relating to the RasGas II LNG Carriers capital leases include the Partnerships
joint venture partners 30% share.
Under the terms of the RasGas II LNG Carriers capital lease arrangements, the lessor claims tax
depreciation on the capital expenditures it incurred to acquire these vessels. As is typical in
these leasing arrangements, tax and change of law risks are assumed by the lessee. Lease
payments under the lease arrangements are based on certain tax and financial assumptions at the
commencement of the leases. If an assumption proves to be incorrect, the lessor is entitled to
increase the lease payments to maintain its agreed after-tax margin. During 2008 the Partnership
has agreed under the terms of its tax lease indemnification guarantee to increase its capital
lease payments for its three LNG carriers to compensate the lessor for losses suffered as a
result of changes in tax rates. The estimated increase in lease payments is approximately $8.1
million over the term of the lease with a carrying value of $8.0 million as at March 31, 2009.
The Partnerships carrying amount of the remaining tax indemnification guarantee is $9.4
million. Both amounts are included as part of other long-term liabilities in the Partnerships
consolidated balance sheets. The tax indemnification would be for a total 36 years, which is the
duration of the lease contract with the third party plus the years it would take for the lease
payments to be statute barred. There is no maximum potential amount of future payments however,
Teekay Nakilat may terminate the lease arrangements on a voluntary basis at any time. If the lease arrangements terminate, Teekay Nakilat will be required to pay termination
sums to the lessor sufficient to repay the lessors investment in the vessels and to compensate
it for the tax effect of the terminations, including recapture of any tax depreciation.
10
TEEKAY LNG PARTNERS L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Contd)
(all tabular amounts stated in thousands of U.S. dollars, except unit and per unit data or unless otherwise indicated)
At their inception, the weighted-average interest rate implicit in these leases was 5.2%. These
capital leases are variable-rate capital leases. As at March 31, 2009, the commitments under
these capital leases approximated $1,067.1 million, including imputed interest of $597.5
million, repayable as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Year |
|
Commitment |
|
2009 |
|
$ |
18.0 million |
|
2010 |
|
$ |
24.0 million |
|
2011 |
|
$ |
24.0 million |
|
2012 |
|
$ |
24.0 million |
|
2013 |
|
$ |
24.0 million |
|
Thereafter |
|
$ |
953.1 million |
|
Spanish-Flagged LNG Carrier. As at March 31, 2009, the Partnership was a party to a capital
lease on one LNG carrier (the Madrid Spirit) which is structured as a Spanish tax lease. Under
the terms of the Spanish tax lease for the Madrid Spirit, which includes the Partnerships
contractual right to full operation of the vessel pursuant to a bareboat charter, the
Partnership will purchase the vessel at the end of the lease term in 2011. The purchase
obligation has been fully funded with restricted cash deposits described below. At its
inception, the interest rate implicit in the Spanish tax lease was 5.8%. As at March 31, 2009,
the commitments under this capital lease, including the purchase obligation, approximated 117.4
million Euros ($155.6 million), including imputed interest of 13.2 million Euros ($17.5
million), repayable as follows:
|
|
|
Year |
|
Commitment |
2009 |
|
25.7 million Euros ($34.0 million) |
2010 |
|
26.9 million Euros ($35.7 million) |
2011 |
|
64.8 million Euros ($85.9 million) |
Suezmax Tankers. As at March 31, 2009, the Partnership was a party to capital leases on five
Suezmax tankers. Under the terms of the lease arrangements, which include the Partnerships
contractual right to full operation of the vessels pursuant to bareboat charters, the
Partnership is required to purchase these vessels after the end of their respective lease terms
for a fixed price. At the inception of these leases, the weighted-average interest rate implicit
in these leases was 7.4%. These capital leases are variable-rate capital leases; however, any
change in our lease payments resulting from changes in interest rates is offset by a
corresponding change in the charter hire payments received by the Partnership. As at March 31,
2009, the remaining commitments under these capital leases, including the purchase obligations,
approximated $220.7 million, including imputed interest of $18.6 million, repayable as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Year |
|
Commitment |
|
2009 |
|
$ |
128.3 million |
|
2010 |
|
$ |
8.4 million |
|
2011 |
|
$ |
84.0 million |
|
The Partnerships capital leases do not contain financial or restrictive covenants other than
those relating to operation and maintenance of the vessels.
Operating
Lease Obligations
Teekay Tangguh Joint Venture. Teekay Tangguh Holdings Corporation (or Teekay Tangguh) owns a 70%
interest in Teekay BLT Corporation (or the Teekay Tangguh Joint Venture) and is considered a
variable interest entity for the Partnership (see Notes 8 and 10e).
As at March 31, 2009, the Teekay Tangguh Joint Venture was a party to an operating lease whereby
it is the lessor and is leasing its LNG carriers (or the Tangguh LNG Carriers) upon delivery to
a third party company (or Head Lease). The Teekay Tangguh Joint Venture is then leasing back the
LNG carriers from the same third party company upon delivery to the charterers (or Sublease).
Under the terms of these leases, the third party company claims tax depreciation on the capital
expenditures it incurred to lease the vessels. As is typical in these leasing arrangements, tax
and change of law risks are assumed by the Teekay Tangguh Joint Venture. Lease payments under
the Sublease are based on certain tax and financial assumptions at the commencement of the
leases. If an assumption proves to be incorrect, the third party company is entitled to increase
the lease payments under the Sublease to maintain its agreed after-tax margin. The Teekay
Tangguh Joint Ventures carrying amount of this tax indemnification is $11.1 million and is
included as part of other long-term liabilities in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets
of the Partnership. The tax indemnification would be for a total of 26 years, which is the
duration of the lease contract with the third party plus the years it would take for the lease
payments to be statute barred. There is no maximum potential amount of future payments however,
the Teekay Tangguh Joint Venture may terminate the lease arrangements on a voluntary basis at
any time. If the lease arrangements terminate, the Teekay Tangguh Joint Venture will be required
to pay termination sums to the third party company sufficient to repay the third party companys
investment in the vessels and to compensate it for the tax effect of the terminations, including
recapture of any tax depreciation. Both the Head Lease and the Sublease have 20 year terms and
are classified as operating leases. The Tangguh LNG Carriers delivered in November 2008 and
March 2009, respectively and were delivered to the charterers in December 2008 and May 2009,
respectively.
11
TEEKAY LNG PARTNERS L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Contd)
(all tabular amounts stated in thousands of U.S. dollars, except unit and per unit data or unless otherwise indicated)
As at March 31, 2009, the total future minimum rental payments to be received and paid under the
lease contracts are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year |
|
Rental Receipts |
|
|
Rental Payments |
|
2009 |
|
$ |
18,143 |
|
|
$ |
16,657 |
|
2010 |
|
$ |
28,892 |
|
|
$ |
25,076 |
|
2011 |
|
$ |
28,875 |
|
|
$ |
25,076 |
|
2012 |
|
$ |
28,860 |
|
|
$ |
25,076 |
|
2013 |
|
$ |
28,843 |
|
|
$ |
25,076 |
|
Thereafter |
|
$ |
332,563 |
|
|
$ |
382,531 |
|
Restricted Cash
Under the terms of the capital leases for the RasGas II LNG Carriers and Spanish-flagged LNG
carrier described above, the Partnership is required to have on deposit with financial
institutions an amount of cash that, together with interest earned on the deposits, will equal
the remaining amounts owing under the leases, including the obligations to purchase the
Spanish-flagged LNG carrier at the end of the lease period. These cash deposits are restricted
to being used for capital lease payments and have been fully funded primarily with term loans
(see Note 8). The interest rates earned on the deposits approximate the interest rates implicit
in the leases.
As at March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, the amount of restricted cash on deposit for the
three RasGas II LNG Carriers was $482.7 million and $487.4 million, respectively. As at March
31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, the weighted-average interest rates earned on the deposits were
1.2% and 4.8%, respectively.
As at March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, the amount of restricted cash on deposit for the
Spanish-Flagged LNG carrier was 106.0 million Euros ($140.4 million) and 104.7 million Euros
($146.2 million), respectively. As at March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, the
weighted-average interest rates earned on these deposits were 5.0%.
The Partnership also maintains restricted cash deposits relating to certain term loans, which
cash totaled $9.1 million and $9.3 million as at March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008,
respectively.
Net Investment in Direct Financing Lease
The first of the two Tangguh LNG Carriers commenced its time-charter with The Tangguh Production
Sharing Contractors in January 2009. This time charter is accounted for as a direct financing
lease with a 20 year term and the following lists the components of the net investment in direct
financing lease:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total minimum lease payments to be received |
|
|
380,645 |
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated residual value of leased property (unguaranteed) |
|
|
94,373 |
|
|
|
|
|
Initial direct costs |
|
|
317 |
|
|
|
|
|
Less: Unearned income |
|
|
(271,043 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment in direct financing lease |
|
|
204,292 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As at March 31, 2009, minimum lease payments to be received by the Partnership in each of the
next five succeeding fiscal years are approximately $14.4 million (2009), $19.3 million (2010),
$19.3 million (2011), $19.3 million (2012) and $19.3 million (2013). The lease will
end in 2029.
6. |
|
Intangible Assets and Goodwill |
As at March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, intangible assets consisted of time-charter
contracts with a weighted-average amortization period of 19.2 years.
The carrying amount of intangible assets as at March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008 for the
Partnerships reportable segments is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross carrying amount |
|
|
182,552 |
|
|
|
182,552 |
|
Accumulated amortization |
|
|
(43,030 |
) |
|
|
(40,747 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net carrying amount |
|
|
139,522 |
|
|
|
141,805 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12
TEEKAY LNG PARTNERS L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Contd)
(all tabular amounts stated in thousands of U.S. dollars, except unit and per unit data or unless otherwise indicated)
Amortization expense of intangible assets for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008 was
$2.3 million.
The carrying amount of goodwill as at March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008 for the Partnerships
liquefied gas segment is $35.6 million.
7. |
|
Advances from Joint Venture Partners |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Advances from BLT LNG Tangguh Corporation (See Note 10e) |
|
|
1,179 |
|
|
|
1,179 |
|
Advances from Qatar Gas Transport Company Ltd. (Nakilat) |
|
|
57 |
|
|
|
57 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,236 |
|
|
|
1,236 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Advances from joint venture partners are non-interest bearing and unsecured. The Partnership did
not incur interest expense from the advances during the three months ended March 31, 2009 and
2008.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Dollar-denominated Revolving Credit Facilities due through 2018 |
|
|
218,000 |
|
|
|
215,000 |
|
U.S. Dollar-denominated Term Loans due through 2019 |
|
|
415,289 |
|
|
|
421,517 |
|
U.S. Dollar-denominated Term Loans due through 2021 (1) |
|
|
349,287 |
|
|
|
314,606 |
|
U.S. Dollar-denominated Unsecured Loan (1) |
|
|
1,144 |
|
|
|
1,144 |
|
U.S. Dollar-denominated Unsecured Demand Loan |
|
|
16,387 |
|
|
|
16,200 |
|
Euro-denominated Term Loans due through 2023 |
|
|
390,034 |
|
|
|
414,144 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
1,390,141 |
|
|
|
1,382,611 |
|
Less current portion |
|
|
37,133 |
|
|
|
37,355 |
|
Less current portion (variable interest entity) (1) |
|
|
19,143 |
|
|
|
39,446 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
1,333,865 |
|
|
|
1,305,810 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
As at March 31, 2009, long-term debt related to the Teekay Tangguh Joint Venture was $350.4
million (December 31, 2008 $315.6 million). Teekay Tangguh Holdings Corporation, a variable
interest entity whereby the Partnership is the primary beneficiary, owns 70% of the Teekay
Tangguh Joint Venture. |
As at March 31, 2009, the Partnership had three long-term revolving credit facilities (or the
Revolvers) available, which, as at such date, provided for borrowings of up to $584.3 million,
of which $366.3 million was undrawn. Interest payments are based on LIBOR plus margins. The
amount available under the revolving credit facilities reduces by $26.1 million (2009), $31.6
million (2010), $32.2 million (2011), $32.9 million (2012), $33.7 million (2013) and $427.8
million (thereafter). All the revolving credit facilities may be used by the Partnership to fund
general partnership purposes and to fund cash distributions. The Partnership is required to
reduce all borrowings used to fund cash distributions to zero for a period of at least 15
consecutive days during any 12-month period. The revolving credit facilities are collateralized
by first-priority mortgages granted on seven of the Partnerships vessels, together with other
related security, and include a guarantee from the Partnership or its subsidiaries of all
outstanding amounts.
The Partnership has a U.S. Dollar-denominated term loan outstanding, which, as at March 31,
2009, totaled $415.3 million, of which $247.1 million bears interest at a fixed rate of 5.39%
and requires quarterly payments. The remaining $168.2 million bears interest based on LIBOR plus
a margin and will require bullet repayments of approximately $56.0 million per vessel due at
maturity in 2018 and 2019. The term loan is collateralized by first-priority mortgages on three
vessels, together with certain other related security and certain guarantees from the
Partnership.
Teekay Tangguh owns a 70% interest in the Teekay Tangguh Joint Venture. The Teekay Tangguh Joint
Venture owns the Tangguh LNG Carriers and the related 20-year fixed-rate, time-charter
contracts. On November 1, 2006, the Partnership agreed to purchase Teekay Corporations 100%
interest in Teekay Tangguh, which caused the Partnership to become the primary beneficiary of
this variable interest entity (see Notes 10e and 12a). Interest payments on the loan are based on
LIBOR plus margins. At March 31, 2009, the loan totalled
$349.3 million and the margins ranged between 0.30% and 0.625%. Following
delivery of the vessels, interest payments on one tranche under the loan facility are based on
LIBOR plus 0.30%, while interest payments on the second tranche are based on LIBOR plus 0.625%.
Commencing three months after delivery of each vessel, one tranche (total value of $324.5
million) reduces in quarterly payments while the other tranche (total value of up to $190.0
million) correspondingly is drawn up with a final $95.0 million bullet payment per vessel due
twelve years and three months from each vessel delivery date. This loan facility is
collateralized by first-priority mortgages on the vessels to which the loan relates, together
with certain other security and is guaranteed by Teekay Corporation. When the Partnership
acquires Teekay Corporations ownership interest in the Teekay Tangguh Joint Venture, the rights
and obligations of Teekay Corporation under the guarantee may, upon the fulfillment of certain
conditions, be transferred to the Partnership (see Note 12c).
13
TEEKAY LNG PARTNERS L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Contd)
(all tabular amounts stated in thousands of U.S. dollars, except unit and per unit data or unless otherwise indicated)
The Partnership has a U.S. Dollar-denominated demand loan outstanding owing to Teekay Nakilats
joint venture partner, which, as at March 31, 2009, totaled $16.4 million, including accrued
interest. Interest payments on this loan, which are based on a fixed interest rate of 4.84%,
commenced in February 2008. The loan is repayable on demand no earlier than February 27, 2027.
The Partnership has two Euro-denominated term loans outstanding, which, as at March 31, 2009
totaled 294.4 million Euros ($390.0 million). These loans were used to make restricted cash
deposits that fully fund payments under capital leases for the LNG carriers the Madrid Spirit
and the Catalunya Spirit (see Note 5). Interest payments are based on EURIBOR plus a margin. The
term loans have varying maturities through 2023 and monthly payments that reduce over time. The
term loans are collateralized by first-priority mortgages on the vessels to which the loans
relate, together with certain other related security and guarantees from one of the
Partnerships subsidiaries.
The weighted-average effective interest rate for the Partnerships long-term debt
outstanding at March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008 was 2.4% and 3.6%, respectively. These rates
do not reflect the effect of related interest rate swaps that the Partnership has used to
economically hedge certain of its floating-rate debt (see Note 11). At March 31, 2009, the
margins on the Partnerships long-term debt ranged from 0.3% to 0.8%.
All Euro-denominated term loans are revalued at the end of each period using the then-prevailing
Euro/U.S. Dollar exchange rate. Due primarily to this revaluation, the Partnership recognized
foreign exchange gains (losses) of $20.4 million and ($33.9) million for the three months ended
March 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
The aggregate annual long-term debt principal repayments required for periods subsequent to
March 31, 2009 are $47.1 million (2009), $70.8 million (2010), $271.2 million (2011), $67.6
million (2012), $68.1 million (2013) and $865.3 million (thereafter).
Certain loan agreements require that minimum levels of tangible net worth and aggregate
liquidity be maintained, provide for a maximum level of leverage, and require one of the
Partnerships subsidiaries to maintain restricted cash deposits. The Partnerships ship-owning
subsidiaries may not, among other things, pay dividends or distributions if the Partnership is
in default under its term loans or revolving credit facilities.
9. |
|
Other Income (Loss) Net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
Income tax recovery (expense) |
|
|
250 |
|
|
|
(80 |
) |
Miscellaneous |
|
|
(81 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income (loss) net |
|
|
169 |
|
|
|
(81 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10. |
|
Related Party Transactions |
a) The Partnership and certain of its operating subsidiaries have entered into services
agreements with certain subsidiaries of Teekay Corporation pursuant to which the Teekay
Corporation subsidiaries provide the Partnership with administrative, crew training, advisory,
technical and strategic consulting services. During the three months ended March 31, 2009 and
2008, the Partnership incurred $2.5 million and
$2.1 million, respectively, of these costs for
these services. In addition, as a component of the services agreement, the Teekay Corporation
subsidiaries provide us with all usual and customary crew management services in respect of our
vessels. For the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008 we incurred $6.2 million and $3.2
million, respectively, for crewing and manning costs, of which $4.1 million is payable to the
subsidiaries of Teekay Corporation as at March 31, 2009 and is included as part of accounts
payable and accrued liabilities in the Partnerships consolidated balance sheets.
On March 31, 2009, a subsidiary of Teekay Corporation paid $3.0 million to the Partnership for
the right to provide certain ship management services to certain of the Partnerships vessels.
During the three months ended March 31, 2008, $0.5 million of general and administrative
expenses attributable to the operations of the Kenai LNG Carriers was incurred by Teekay
Corporation and has been allocated to the Partnership as part of the results of the Dropdown
Predecessor.
During the three months ended March 31, 2008, $3.1 million of interest expense attributable to
the operations of the Kenai LNG Carriers was incurred by Teekay Corporation and has been
allocated to the Partnership as part of the results of the Dropdown Predecessor.
b) The Partnership reimburses the General Partner for all expenses incurred by the General
Partner or its affiliates that are necessary or appropriate for the conduct of the Partnerships
business. During the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, the Partnership incurred
$0.1 million and $0.2 million, respectively, of these costs.
c)
The Partnership is a party to an agreement with certain of Teekay Corporation pursuant to which Teekay
Corporation provides the Partnership with off-hire insurance for
certain of its LNG carriers. During the
three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, the Partnership incurred $0.5 million and $0.4
million of these costs. The Partnership did not renew its off-hire insurance with Teekay
Corporation that was expiring during the second quarter of 2009.
14
TEEKAY LNG PARTNERS L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Contd)
(all tabular amounts stated in thousands of U.S. dollars, except unit and per unit data or unless otherwise indicated)
d) In connection with the Partnerships initial public offering in May 2005, the Partnership
entered into an omnibus agreement with Teekay Corporation, the General Partner and other related
parties governing, among other things, when the Partnership and Teekay Corporation may compete
with each other and certain rights of first offer on LNG carriers and Suezmax tankers. In
December 2006, the omnibus agreement was amended in connection with the initial public offering
of Teekay Offshore Partners L.P. (or Teekay Offshore). As amended, the agreement governs, among
other things, when the Partnership, Teekay Corporation and Teekay Offshore may compete with each
other and certain rights of first offer on LNG carriers, oil tankers, shuttle tankers, floating
storage and offtake units and floating production, storage and offloading units.
e) On November 1, 2006, the Partnership agreed to acquire from Teekay Corporation its 70%
interest in the Teekay Tangguh Joint Venture, which owns the two newbuilding Tangguh LNG
Carriers and the related 20-year, fixed-rate time charters to service the Tangguh LNG project in
Indonesia. The purchase originally was to be completed on or before the deliveries of both
newbuildings to the charterers, which occurred in November 2008 and March 2009, respectively.
However, the purchase has been delayed in order to determine a
satisfactory ownership structure for
the transaction (see Note 12c). The estimated purchase price (net of assumed debt) for Teekay
Corporations 70% interest in the Teekay Tangguh Joint Venture would be approximately $70
million. The customer under the charters for the Tangguh LNG Carriers will be The Tangguh
Production Sharing Contractors, a consortium led by BP Berau Ltd., a subsidiary of BP plc.
Teekay Corporation contracted to construct the two double-hull Tangguh LNG Carriers of 155,000
cubic meters each at a total estimated delivered cost of approximately $404.3 million, excluding
capitalized interest, of which the Partnership is responsible for 70%. When the Partnership
acquires Teekay Corporations interest in this project, the Partnership will have operational
responsibility for the vessels. The remaining 30% interest in the Teekay Tangguh Joint Venture
is held by BLT LNG Tangguh Corporation, a subsidiary of PT Berlian Laju Tanker Tbk.
During 2008, the Teekay Tangguh Joint Venture repaid $28.0 million of its contributed capital to
its joint venture partners, Teekay Corporation and BLT LNG Tangguh Corporation.
f) On November 1, 2006, the Partnership agreed to acquire from Teekay Corporation its 100%
interest in Teekay Nakilat III Holdings Corporation (or Teekay Nakilat (III)) which in turn owns
40% of the RasGas 3 Joint Venture. RasGas 3 Joint Venture owns the four RasGas 3 LNG carriers
and related 25-year, fixed-rate time charters (with options to extend up to an additional 10
years) to service the expansion of a LNG project in Qatar. The customer is Ras Laffan Liquefied
Natural Gas Co. Limited (3), a joint venture company between Qatar Petroleum and a subsidiary of
ExxonMobil Corporation. The delivered cost of the four double-hulled RasGas 3 LNG Carriers of
217,000 cubic meters each was approximately $1.0 billion, excluding capitalized interest, of
which the Partnership was responsible for 40% upon its acquisition of Teekay Corporations
interest in the joint venture. The four vessels delivered between May and July 2008.
On May 6, 2008, the Partnership acquired Teekay Corporations 100% ownership interest in Teekay
Nakilat (III) in exchange for a non-interest bearing and unsecured promissory note. The purchase
price (net of assumed debt) of $110.2 million has been paid by the Partnership. This transaction
was concluded between two entities under common control and, thus, the assets acquired were
recorded at historical book value. The excess of the purchase price over the book value of the
assets was accounted for as an equity distribution to Teekay Corporation. The remaining 60%
interest in the RasGas 3 Joint Venture is held by QGTC Nakilat (1643-6) Holdings Corporation (or
QGTC 3). The Partnership has operational responsibility for the vessels in this project,
although QGTC 3 may assume operational responsibility beginning 10 years following delivery of
the vessels.
On December 31, 2008 Teekay Nakilat (III) and QGTC 3 novated the RasGas 3 term loan along with
the related accrued interest of $871.3 million and deferred debt issuance costs of $4.1 million
to the RasGas 3 Joint Venture. As a result of this transaction the Partnerships long-term debt
and accrued liabilities have decreased by $871.3 million and other assets decreased by $4.1
million. This transaction was offset by a decrease in the Partnerships advances to the RasGas 3
Joint Venture. Also on December 31, 2008, Teekay Nakilat (III) and QGTC 3 novated their interest
rate swap agreements to the RasGas 3 Joint Venture for no consideration. As a result, the
RasGas 3 Joint Venture assumed all the rights, liabilities and obligations of Teekay Nakilat
(III) and QGTC 3 under the terms of the RasGas 3 term loan and the interest rate swap
agreements.
g) In April 2008, the Partnership acquired the two 1993-built Kenai LNG Carriers from Teekay
Corporation for $230.0 million. The Partnership financed the acquisition with borrowings under
one of its revolving credit facilities. The Partnership chartered the vessels back to Teekay
Corporation at a fixed rate for a period of ten years (plus options exercisable by Teekay
Corporation to extend up to an additional fifteen years). During the three months ended March
31, 2009, the Partnership recognized revenues of $10.0 million from these charters.
h) As at March 31, 2009, non-interest bearing advances to affiliates totaled $10.0 million
(December 31, 2008 $9.6 million) and non-interest bearing advances from affiliates totaled
$92.7 million (December 31, 2008 $73.1 million). These advances are unsecured and have no
fixed repayment terms.
i) In July 28, 2008, Teekay Corporation signed contracts for the purchase of two technically
advanced 12,000-cubic meter newbuilding Multigas ships (or the Skaugen Multigas Carriers)
capable of carrying LNG, LPG or ethylene from subsidiaries of I.M. Skaugen ASA (or
Skaugen). The Partnership agreed to acquire these vessels from Teekay Corporation upon delivery.
The vessels are expected to deliver in the second half of 2010 for a total cost of approximately
$94 million. Each vessel will then commence service under 15-year fixed-rate charters to
Skaugen.
15
TEEKAY LNG PARTNERS L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Contd)
(all tabular amounts stated in thousands of U.S. dollars, except unit and per unit data or unless otherwise indicated)
j) The Partnerships Suezmax tanker, the Toledo Spirit, which was delivered in July 2005,
operates pursuant to a time-charter contract that increases or decreases the otherwise fixed
hire rate established in the charter depending on the spot charter rates that the Partnership
would have earned had it traded the vessel in the spot tanker market. The remaining term of the
time-charter contract is 17 years, although the charterer has the right to terminate the time
charter in July 2018. The Partnership has entered into an agreement with Teekay Corporation
under which Teekay Corporation pays the Partnership any amounts payable to the charterer as a
result of spot rates being below the fixed rate, and the Partnership pays Teekay Corporation any
amounts payable to the Partnership as a result of spot rates being in excess of the fixed rate.
The amounts payable to or receivable from Teekay Corporation is incurred or recognized at the
end of the year.
11. |
|
Derivative Instruments |
The Partnership uses derivative instruments in accordance with its overall risk management
policy. The Partnership has not designated these derivative instruments as hedges for accounting
purposes.
At March 31, 2009, the fair value of the derivative liability relating to the agreement between
the Partnership and Teekay Corporation for the Toledo Spirit time charter contract was $12.9
million. Realized and unrealized gains (losses) relating to this agreement have been reflected
in realized and unrealized loss on derivative instruments in the Partnerships statements of
income (loss). Unrealized mark-to-market gains (losses) related to this agreement were $5.1
million and ($2.7) million for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. The
unrealized loss of $2.7 million relating to this agreement for the three months ended March 31,
2008 was reclassified from voyage revenues to realized and unrealized loss on derivative
instruments for comparative purposes.
The Partnership enters into interest rate swaps which either exchange a receipt of floating
interest for a payment of fixed interest or a payment of floating interest for a receipt of
fixed interest to reduce the Partnerships exposure to interest rate variability on its
outstanding floating-rate debt and floating-rate restricted cash deposits. The Partnership has
not, for accounting purposes, designated its interest rate swaps as cash flow hedges of its USD
LIBOR denominated borrowings or restricted cash deposits. The unrealized net gain or loss on the
Partnerships interest rate swaps has been reported as realized and unrealized loss on
derivative instruments in the consolidated statements of income (loss). Realized losses related
to interest rate swaps were $5.9 million and $0.5 million for the three months ended March 31,
2009 and 2008, respectively. Unrealized losses related to interest rate swaps were $15.4 million
and $41.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. The realized
and unrealized gain (loss) of ($41.6) million relating to interest rate swaps for the three
months ended March 31, 2008 was reclassified from interest expense ($68.3) million and
interest income $26.7 million to realized and unrealized loss on derivative instruments for
comparative purposes.
As at March 31, 2009, the Partnership was committed to the following interest rate swap
agreements:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value / |
|
|
Weighted- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying Amount |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Fixed |
|
|
|
Interest |
|
Principal |
|
|
of Asset |
|
|
Remaining |
|
|
Interest |
|
|
|
Rate |
|
Amount |
|
|
(Liability)(5) |
|
|
Term |
|
|
Rate |
|
|
|
Index |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
(years) |
|
|
(%)(1) |
|
LIBOR-Based Debt: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Dollar-denominated interest rate swaps(2) |
|
LIBOR |
|
|
472,179 |
|
|
|
(90,318 |
) |
|
|
27.8 |
|
|
|
4.9 |
|
U.S. Dollar-denominated interest rate swaps(2) |
|
LIBOR |
|
|
224,906 |
|
|
|
(55,531 |
) |
|
|
10.0 |
|
|
|
6.2 |
|
U.S. Dollar-denominated interest rate swaps(3) |
|
LIBOR |
|
|
350,000 |
|
|
|
(61,022 |
) |
|
|
16.3 |
|
|
|
5.2 |
|
LIBOR-Based Restricted Cash Deposit: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Dollar-denominated interest rate swaps(2) |
|
LIBOR |
|
|
476,192 |
|
|
|
125,030 |
|
|
|
27.8 |
|
|
|
4.8 |
|
EURIBOR-Based Debt: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Euro-denominated interest rate swaps(4) |
|
EURIBOR |
|
|
390,033 |
|
|
|
(12,378 |
) |
|
|
15.2 |
|
|
|
3.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,913,310 |
|
|
|
(94,219 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Excludes the margins the Partnership pays on its floating-rate debt, which, at March 31,
2009, ranged from 0.3% to 0.8% (see Note 8). |
|
(2) |
|
Principal amount reduces quarterly. |
|
(3) |
|
Interest rate swaps held in Teekay Tangguh, a variable interest entity of which the
Partnership is the primary beneficiary (see Note 10e). |
|
(4) |
|
Principal amount reduces monthly to 70.1 million Euros ($92.9 million) by the maturity dates
of the swap agreements. |
|
(5) |
|
The fair value of the Partnerships interest rate swap agreements includes $3.5 million of
accrued interest which is recorded in accrued liabilities on the consolidated balance sheets. |
The Partnership is exposed to credit loss in the event of non-performance by the counterparties
to the interest rate swap agreements. In order to minimize counterparty risk, the Partnership
only enters into derivative transactions with counterparties that are rated A or better by
Standard & Poors or Aa3 by Moodys at the time of the transactions. In addition, to the extent
practical, interest rate swaps are entered into with different counterparties to reduce
concentration risk.
16
TEEKAY LNG PARTNERS L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Contd)
(all tabular amounts stated in thousands of U.S. dollars, except unit and per unit data or unless otherwise indicated)
12. |
|
Commitments and Contingencies |
a) In December 2003, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 46(R), Consolidation of Variable
Interest Entities, an Interpretation of ARB No. 51 (or FIN 46(R)). In general, a variable
interest entity (or VIE) is a corporation, partnership, limited-liability company, trust or any
other legal structure used to conduct activities or hold assets that either (1) has an
insufficient amount of equity to carry out its principal activities without additional
subordinated financial support, (2) has a group of equity owners that are unable to make
significant decisions about its activities, or (3) has a group of equity owners that do not have
the obligation to absorb losses or the right to receive returns generated by its operations. If
a party with an ownership, contractual or other financial interest in the VIE (a variable
interest holder) is obligated to absorb a majority of the risk of loss from the VIEs
activities, is entitled to receive a majority of the VIEs residual returns (if no party absorbs
a majority of the VIEs losses), or both, then FIN 46(R) requires that this party consolidate
the VIE.
The Partnership consolidated Teekay Tangguh and Teekay Nakilat (III) in its consolidated
financial statements effective November 1, 2006, as both entities became VIEs and the
Partnership became their primary beneficiary on that date upon the Partnerships agreement to
acquire all of Teekay Corporations interests in these entities (see Notes 10e and 10f). The
Partnership has also consolidated the Skaugen Multigas Carriers that it has agreed to acquire
from Teekay Corporation as the Skaugen Multigas Carriers became VIEs and the Partnership became
a primary beneficiary when Teekay Corporation purchased the newbuildings on July 28, 2008 (see
Note 10i). Upon the Partnerships acquisition of Teekay Nakilat (III) on May 6, 2008, Teekay
Nakilat (III) is no longer a VIE. The assets and liabilities of Teekay Tangguh and the Skaugen
Multigas Carriers are reflected in the Partnerships financial statements at historical cost as
the Partnership and the VIE are under common control.
The following table summarizes the combined balance sheets of Teekay Tangguh and the Skaugen
Multigas Carriers as at March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
44,739 |
|
|
|
22,939 |
|
Other current assets |
|
|
2,705 |
|
|
|
6,140 |
|
Current portion of net investment in direct financing lease |
|
|
5,547 |
|
|
|
|
|
Vessels and equipment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At cost, less accumulated depreciation of $270 (2008 $620) |
|
|
207,749 |
|
|
|
208,841 |
|
Advances on newbuilding contracts |
|
|
54,871 |
|
|
|
200,557 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total vessels and equipment |
|
|
262,620 |
|
|
|
409,398 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment in direct financing lease |
|
|
198,745 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets |
|
|
7,013 |
|
|
|
7,449 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
|
521,369 |
|
|
|
445,926 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
910 |
|
|
|
60 |
|
Accrued liabilities and other current liabilities (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,495 |
|
Accrued liabilities and other current liabilities |
|
|
38,033 |
|
|
|
24,135 |
|
Advances from affiliates and joint venture partner |
|
|
71,730 |
|
|
|
50,391 |
|
Long-term debt (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
113,611 |
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
331,288 |
|
|
|
162,693 |
|
Other long-term liabilities |
|
|
87,310 |
|
|
|
85,551 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
529,271 |
|
|
|
462,936 |
|
Total equity |
|
|
(7,902 |
) |
|
|
(17,010 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and total equity |
|
|
521,369 |
|
|
|
445,926 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
As at March 31, 2009, long-term debt related to newbuilding vessels to be delivered was $nil
(December 31, 2008 $140.1 million). |
The Partnerships maximum exposure to loss at March 31, 2009, as a result of its commitment to
purchase Teekay Corporations interests in Teekay Tangguh and Skaugen Multigas Carriers, is
limited to the purchase price of its interest in both entities, which is expected to be
approximately $164 million.
b) In December 2006, the Partnership announced that it has agreed to acquire three LPG carriers
from Skaugen, which engages in the marine transportation of petrochemical gases and LPG and the
lightering of crude oil, for approximately $33 million per vessel. The first vessel delivered in
April 2009 and the remaining two are expected to deliver between 2009 and 2010. The Partnership
will acquire the vessels upon their deliveries and will finance their acquisition through
existing or incremental debt, surplus cash balances, proceeds from the issuance of additional
common units or combinations thereof. Upon delivery, the vessels will be chartered to Skaugen at
fixed rates for a period of 15 years.
c) The Partnership is seeking to purchase Teekay Corporations interest in the Teekay Tangguh
Joint Venture in 2009 using a tax efficient structure and subsequent to March 31, 2009, the
Partnership received a favorable ruling from the Internal Revenue Service related to the type of
structure the Partnership would use to hold its interest in this project. The Partnership
expects to complete the purchase during the third quarter of 2009.
17
TEEKAY LNG PARTNERS L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Contd)
(all tabular amounts stated in thousands of U.S. dollars, except unit and per unit data or unless otherwise indicated)
13. |
|
Supplemental Cash Flow Information |
a) On January 4, 2009 one of the Tangguh LNG Carriers commenced its external time charter contract
under a direct financing lease. During the three months ended March 31, 2009, the recognition of
the net investment in direct financing lease for this vessel of $205.6 million was treated as a
non-cash transaction in the Partnerships consolidated statements of cash flows.
b) Net change in parents equity in the Dropdown Predecessor includes the equity of the Dropdown
Predecessor when initially pooled for accounting purposes and any subsequent non-cash equity
transactions of the Dropdown Predecessor.
14. |
|
Total Capital and Net Income (Loss) Per Unit |
At March 31, 2009, of the Partnerships total number of units outstanding, 47% were held by the
public and the remaining units were held by a subsidiary of Teekay Corporation.
On March 30, 2009 the Partnership completed a follow-on public offering of 4.0 million common
units (see Note 3).
Limited Total Rights
Significant rights of the Partnerships limited partners include the following:
|
|
|
Right to receive distribution of available cash within approximately 45 days after the
end of each quarter. |
|
|
|
No limited partner shall have any management power over the Partnerships business and
affairs; the General Partner shall conduct, direct and manage Partnerships activities. |
|
|
|
The General Partner may be removed if such removal is approved by unitholders holding
at least 66-2/3% of the outstanding units voting as a single class, including units held
by our General Partner and its affiliates. |
Subordinated Units
All of the Partnerships subordinated units are held by a subsidiary of Teekay Corporation. Under
the partnership agreement, during the subordination period applicable to the Partnerships
subordinated units, the common units have the right to receive distributions of available cash
from operating surplus in an amount equal to the minimum quarterly distribution of $0.4125 per
quarter, plus any arrearages in the payment of the minimum quarterly distribution on the common
units from prior quarters, before any distributions of available cash from operating surplus may
be made on the subordinated units. Distribution arrearages do not accrue on the subordinated
units. The purpose of the subordinated units is to increase the likelihood that during the
subordination period there will be available cash to be distributed on the common units.
Subsequent to March 31, 2009, if the Partnership meets the applicable financial tests in its
partnership agreement, 3.7 million subordinated units will convert into an equal number of common
units.
Incentive Distribution Rights
The General Partner is entitled to incentive distributions if the amount the Partnership
distributes to unitholders with respect to any quarter exceeds specified target levels shown
below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarterly Distribution Target Amount (per unit) |
|
Unitholders |
|
|
General Partner |
|
Minimum quarterly distribution of $0.4125 |
|
|
98 |
% |
|
|
2 |
% |
Up to $0.4625 |
|
|
98 |
% |
|
|
2 |
% |
Above $0.4625 up to $0.5375 |
|
|
85 |
% |
|
|
15 |
% |
Above $0.5375 up to $0.65 |
|
|
75 |
% |
|
|
25 |
% |
Above $0.65 |
|
|
50 |
% |
|
|
50 |
% |
During the three months ended March 31, 2009 and March 31, 2008, cash available for distribution
exceeded $0.4625 per unit and, consequently, the assumed distribution of net income (loss)
resulted in the use of the increasing percentages to calculate the General Partners interest in
net income (loss) for the purposes of the net income (loss) per unit calculation.
In the event of a liquidation, all property and cash in excess of that required to discharge all
liabilities will be distributed to the unitholders and our General Partner in proportion to their
capital account balances, as adjusted to reflect any gain or loss upon the sale or other
disposition of the Partnerships assets in liquidation in accordance with the partnership
agreement.
18
TEEKAY LNG PARTNERS L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Contd)
(all tabular amounts stated in thousands of U.S. dollars, except unit and per unit data or unless otherwise indicated)
Net Income (Loss) Per Unit
Net income (loss) per unit is determined by dividing net income (loss), after deducting the amount
of net income (loss) attributable to the Dropdown Predecessor,
the non-controlling interest and the General Partners interest, by the weighted-average number of units outstanding
during the period.
As required by EITF Issue No. 03-6, Participating Securities and Two-Class Method under FASB
Statement No. 128, Earnings Per Share, the General Partners, common unitholders and subordinated
unitholders interests in net income (loss) are calculated as if all net income (loss) was
distributed according to the terms of the Partnerships partnership agreement, regardless of
whether those earnings would or could be distributed. The partnership agreement does not provide
for the distribution of net income (loss); rather, it provides for the distribution of available
cash, which is a contractually defined term that generally means all cash on hand at the end of
each quarter after establishment of cash reserves determined by the Partnerships board of
directors to provide for the proper conduct of the Partnerships business including reserves for
maintenance and replacement capital expenditure and anticipated credit needs. Unlike available
cash, net income (loss) is affected by non-cash items, such as depreciation and amortization,
unrealized gains or losses on non-designated derivative instruments, and foreign currency
translation gains (losses).
The General Partners interest in net income (loss) is calculated as if all net income (loss) for
the period was distributed according to the terms of the partnership agreement, regardless of
whether those earnings would or could be distributed.
The calculations of the basic and diluted earnings per unit are presented below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
Net income (loss) attributable to the Partnership |
|
|
21,981 |
|
|
|
(43,118 |
) |
Net income (loss) attributable to: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common unit holders |
|
|
15,965 |
|
|
|
(24,339 |
) |
Subordinated unit holders |
|
|
4,539 |
|
|
|
(18,375 |
) |
General partner interests |
|
|
1,477 |
|
|
|
(404 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average units outstanding (basic and diluted) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common unit holders |
|
|
33,382,764 |
|
|
|
22,540,547 |
|
Subordinated unit holders |
|
|
11,050,929 |
|
|
|
14,734,572 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per unit (basic and diluted) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common unit holders |
|
|
0.48 |
|
|
|
(1.08 |
) |
Subordinated unit holders |
|
|
0.41 |
|
|
|
(1.25 |
) |
Pursuant to the partnership agreement, allocations to partners are made on a quarterly basis.
a) In December 2007, a consortium in which Teekay Corporation has a 33% ownership interest agreed
to charter four newbuilding 160,400-cubic meter LNG carriers for a period of 20 years to the
Angola LNG Project, which is being developed by subsidiaries of Chevron Corporation, Sociedade
Nacional de Combustiveis de Angola EP, BP Plc, Total S.A. and Eni SpA. The vessels will be
chartered at fixed rates, with inflation adjustments, commencing in 2011 upon deliveries of the
vessels. Mitsui & Co., Ltd. and NYK Bulkship (Europe) have 34% and 33% ownership interests in the
consortium, respectively. In accordance with an existing agreement, Teekay Corporation is required
to offer to the Partnership its 33% ownership interest in these vessels and related charter
contracts not later than 180 days before delivery of the vessels.
b) Teekay Corporation currently charters the Kenai LNG Carriers from the Partnership and then
charters them out to a joint venture between Marathon Oil Corporation and ConocoPhillips. When
this joint venture ceases to charter the Kenai LNG Carriers, Teekay Corporation will have the
right to cause the conversion of the carriers to LNG floating
production, storage and offload units (or FLNG). If converted, Teekay Corporation
would initially pay conversion costs and continue to pay the time charter rate, adjusted to
reflect the lack of vessel operating expense. Upon delivery of a converted carrier, the
Partnership would reimburse Teekay Corporation for the conversion cost, but would receive an
increase in the charter rate to account for the capital expenditure to convert the vessel. In
addition, because Teekay Corporation is providing at least ten years of stable cash flow to the
Partnership, the Partnership has agreed that it will not be required to offer to the Partnership
under other existing agreements any re-charter opportunity for the carriers and the Partnership
will share in the profits of any future charter or FLNG project in excess of a specified
rate of return for the project. The Partnership has granted Teekay Corporation a right of refusal
on any sale of the Kenai LNG Carriers to a third party.
19
TEEKAY LNG PARTNERS L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Contd)
(all tabular amounts stated in thousands of U.S. dollars, except unit and per unit data or unless otherwise indicated)
One of the Kenai LNG Carriers, the Arctic Spirit, came off charter from Teekay Corporation to the
Marathon Oil Corporation/ConocoPhilips joint venture in March 2009, and the Partnerships
subsidiary, Arctic Spirit LLC and Teekay Corporation entered into a joint development and option
agreement with Merrill Lynch Commodities, Inc. (or MLCI), giving MLCI the option to purchase one
of the Kenai LNG Carriers, the Arctic Spirit, for conversion to a FLNG. Because the Partnership charters the Arctic Spirit to Teekay
Corporation, Teekay Corporation will continue to pay the Partnership the charter rate while the
Arctic Spirit is subject to the option. If MLCI exercises the option and purchases the vessel from
the Partnership, the Partnership and Teekay Corporation have the right to participate up to 50% in
the conversion and charter project on terms that will be determined as the project progresses. If
the option is not exercised, the Partnership will continue to charter the Arctic Spirit to Teekay
Corporation on the current terms, and Teekay Corporations FLNG conversion rights
described above will continue. The agreement with MLCI also provides that if the conversion of the
Arctic Spirit to a FLNG proceeds, the Partnership and Teekay Corporation will negotiate, along
with an equity investment, a similar option for a designee of MLCI to purchase the second Kenai
LNG Carrier, the Polar Spirit, for a specified amount when it comes off charter.
During the three months ended March 31, 2009, the Partnership restructured certain ship management
functions from the Partnerships office in Spain to a subsidiary of Teekay Corporation. The total
estimated cost to be incurred in connection with this restructuring plan is approximately $3
million of which $2.0 million was incurred for the three months ended March 31, 2009. This
restructuring plan is expected to be completed by the end of the year and the carrying amount of
the liability as at March 31, 2009 is $0.4 million which is included as part of accrued
liabilities in the Partnerships consolidated balance sheets.
17. |
|
Recent Accounting Pronouncements |
In June 2009, FASB issued SFAS No. 168, The FASB Accounting Standards Codification and the
Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles a replacement of FASB Statement No. 162.
SFAS No. 168 identifies the source of GAAP recognized by the FASB to be applied by nongovernmental
entities. Rules and interpretive releases of the Securities and Exchange Commission (or SEC) under
authority of federal securities laws are also sources of authoritative GAAP for SEC registrants.
On the effective date of this Statement, the Codification will supersede all then-existing non-SEC
accounting and reporting standards. All other non-grandfathered non-SEC accounting literature not
included in the Codification will become non-authoritative. This statement is effective for
financial statements issued for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. The
Partnership is currently assessing the potential impacts, if any, on its consolidated financial
statements.
In June 2009, FASB issued SFAS No. 167, Amendments to FASB Interpretation No. 46(R) (SFAS No.
167). SFAS No. 167 eliminates FASB Interpretation 46(R)s exceptions to consolidating qualifying
special-purpose entities, contains new criteria for determining the primary beneficiary, and
increases the frequency of required reassessments to determine whether a company is the primary
beneficiary of a variable interest entity. SFAS No. 167 also contains a new requirement that any
term, transaction, or arrangement that does not have a substantive effect on an entitys status as
a variable interest entity, a companys power over a variable interest entity, or a companys
obligation to absorb losses or its right to receive benefits of an entity must be disregarded in
applying FASB Interpretation 46(R)s provisions. The elimination of the qualifying special-purpose
entity concept and its consolidation exceptions means more entities will be subject to
consolidation assessments and reassessments. SFAS No. 167 is effective for fiscal years beginning
after November 15, 2009, and for interim periods within that first period, with earlier adoption
prohibited. The Partnership is currently assessing the potential impacts, if any, on its
consolidated financial statements.
In June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 166, Accounting for Transfers of Financial Assets an
amendment of FASB Statement No. 140 (SFAS No. 166). SFAS No. 166 eliminates the concept of a
qualifying special-purpose entity, creates more stringent conditions for reporting a transfer of a
portion of a financial asset as a sale, clarifies other sale-accounting criteria, and changes the
initial measurement of a transferors interest in transferred financial assets. SFAS No. 166 will
be effective for transfers of financial assets in fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2009
and in interim periods within those fiscal years with earlier adoption prohibited. The Partnership
is currently assessing the potential impacts, if any, on its consolidated financial statements.
In May 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 165, Subsequent Events (SFAS No. 165). SFAS No. 165 is
intended to establish general standards of accounting for and disclosure of events that occur
after the balance sheet date but before financial statements are issued or are available to be
issued. It requires the disclosure of the date through which an entity has evaluated subsequent
events and the basis for selecting that date, that is, whether that date represents the date the
financial statements were issued or were available to be issued. SFAS No. 165 is for interim and
annual reporting periods ending after June 15, 2009. The Partnership is evaluating the impact, if
any, SFAS No. 165 will have on its consolidated financial statements.
In April 2009, the FASB issued FSP No. 107-1 and APB 28-1, which extends the requirements of SFAS
No. 107, Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments (SFAS No. 107) to interim financial
statements of publicly-traded companies. Prior to FSP No. FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1, fair values for
these assets and liabilities were only disclosed once a year. FSP No. FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1
requires that disclosures provide qualitative and quantitative information on fair value estimates
for all financial instruments not measured on the balance sheet at fair value, when practicable,
with the exception of certain financial instruments listed in SFAS No. 107. FSP No. FAS 107-1 and
APB 28-1 is effective prospectively for interim reporting periods ending after June 15, 2009. The
Partnership is evaluating the impact, if any, FSP No. FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1 will have on its
consolidated financial statements.
20
TEEKAY LNG PARTNERS L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Contd)
(all tabular amounts stated in thousands of U.S. dollars, except unit and per unit data or unless otherwise indicated)
a) In May 2009, the Partnership declared a cash distribution of $0.57 per unit for the quarter
ended March 31, 2009. The cash distribution was paid on May 15, 2009 to all unitholders of
record on May 14, 2009.
b) In July 2009, the Partnership declared a cash distribution of $0.57 per unit for the quarter
ended June 30, 2009. The cash distribution will be paid on August 14, 2009 to all unitholders
of record on July 29, 2009.
21
TEEKAY LNG PARTNERS L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES
MARCH 31, 2009
PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 2 MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
OVERVIEW
Teekay LNG Partners L.P. is an international provider of marine transportation services for
liquefied natural gas (or LNG), liquefied petroleum gas (or LPG) and crude oil. We were formed in
2004 by Teekay Corporation, the worlds largest owner and operator of medium sized crude oil
tankers, to expand its operations in the LNG shipping sector. Our primary growth strategy focuses
on expanding our fleet of LNG and LPG carriers under long-term, fixed-rate time charters. We intend
to continue our practice of acquiring LNG and LPG carriers as needed for approved projects only
after the long-term charters for the projects have been awarded to us, rather than ordering vessels
on a speculative basis. In executing our growth strategy, we may engage in vessel or business
acquisitions or enter into joint ventures and partnerships with companies that may provide
increased access to emerging opportunities from global expansion of the LNG and LPG sectors. We
seek to leverage the expertise, relationships and reputation of Teekay Corporation and its
affiliates to pursue these opportunities in the LNG and LPG sectors and may consider other
opportunities to which our competitive strengths are well suited. We view our Suezmax tanker fleet
primarily as a source of stable cash flow as we seek to expand our LNG and LPG operations.
Our
primary goal is to increase our quarterly distributions to unitholders. During 2008, we
increased distributions from $0.53 per unit for the first quarter of 2008 to $0.55 per unit
effective for the second quarter of 2008 and to $0.57 per unit effective for the third quarter of
2008.
SIGNIFICANT DEVELOPMENTS IN 2009
Equity Offerings
On March 30, 2009, we completed a follow-on public offering of 4.0 million common units at a price
of $17.60 per unit, for gross proceeds of approximately $70.4 million. As a result of this
transaction, we raised gross equity proceeds of $71.8 million (including the General Partners
proportionate capital contribution), and Teekay Corporations ownership of us was reduced from
57.7% to 53.0% (including its 2% percent General Partner interest). We used the total net proceeds
from the offering of approximately $68.5 million to prepay amounts outstanding on two of our
revolving credit facilities.
Purchase of Kenai LNG Carriers
In December 2007, Teekay Corporation acquired two 1993-built LNG carriers (or the Kenai LNG Carriers)
from a joint venture between Marathon Oil Corporation and ConocoPhillips for a total cost of $230
million. The specialized ice-strengthened vessels were purpose-built to carry LNG from Alaskas
Kenai LNG plant to Japan.
Teekay Corporation offered these vessels to us in accordance with existing agreements. On April 1,
2008, we acquired these two vessels from Teekay Corporation for a total cost of $230 million and
immediately chartered the vessels back to Teekay Corporation for a period of ten years (plus
options exercisable by Teekay Corporation to extend up to an additional fifteen years). The charter
rate is fixed, and does not provide Teekay Corporation with a profit over the net charter rate
Teekay Corporation receives from the Marathon Oil Corporation/ConocoPhillips joint venture unless
the joint venture exercises its option to extend the term in which case Teekay Corporation will
recognize a profit. The charter rate also adjusts to account for changes in vessel operating
expenses and drydocking costs.
Teekay Corporation and the Marathon Oil Corporation/ConocoPhillips joint venture have agreed that
when the joint venture ceases to charter the Kenai LNG Carriers, Teekay Corporation will have the
right to cause the conversion of the carriers to LNG floating
production storage and offload units (or FLNG). If converted, Teekay Corporation
would initially pay conversion costs and continue to pay the time charter rate, adjusted to reflect
the lack of vessel operating expense. Upon delivery of a converted carrier, we would reimburse
Teekay Corporation for the conversion cost, but would receive an increase in the charter rate to
account for the capital expenditure to convert the vessel. In addition, because Teekay Corporation
is providing at least ten years of stable cash flow to us, we have agreed that it will not be
required to offer to us under other existing agreements any re-charter opportunity for the carriers
and we will share in the profits of any future charter or FLNG project in excess of a
specified rate of return for the project. We have granted Teekay Corporation a right of refusal on
any sale of the Kenai LNG Carriers to a third party.
One of the Kenai LNG Carriers, the Arctic Spirit, came off charter from Teekay Corporation to the
Marathon Oil Corporation/ConocoPhillips joint venture on March 31, 2009, and our subsidiary Arctic
Spirit LLC and Teekay Corporation have entered into a joint development and option agreement with
Merrill Lynch Commodities, Inc. (or MLCI), which gives MLCI the option to purchase the vessel for
conversion to a FLNG. The agreement provides
for a purchase price of $105 million if Teekay Corporation exercises its option to participate in
the project, or $110 million if Teekay Corporation chooses not to participate. Under the option
agreement, the Arctic Spirit is reserved for MLCI until December 31, 2009 and MLCI may extend the
option quarterly through 2010. Because we charter the Arctic Spirit to Teekay Corporation, Teekay
Corporation will continue to pay us the charter rate while the Arctic Spirit is subject to the
option. If MLCI exercises the option and purchases the vessel from us, we expect MLCI to convert
the vessel to a FLNG (although it is not required to do so) and charter it under a long-term
charter contract to a third party. We and Teekay Corporation have the right to participate up to
50% in the conversion and charter project on terms that will be determined as the project
progresses. If the option is not exercised, we will continue to charter the Arctic Spirit to
Teekay Corporation on the current terms, and Teekay Corporations floating unit conversion rights
described above will continue. In June 2009, Teekay Corporation entered into a short-term time
charter contract for the Arctic Spirit with Malaysia LNG Tiga Sdn Bhd.
Teekay Corporation will to continue to charter the other Kenai LNG Carrier, the Polar Spirit, to
the joint venture until April 2010 and the joint venture has options to renew the charter for up to
six more years. The agreement with MLCI also provides that if the conversion of the Arctic Spirit
to an FLNG proceeds, we and Teekay Corporation will negotiate, along with an equity investment, a
similar option for a designee of MLCI to purchase the Polar Spirit for $125 million when it comes
off charter.
22
Commencement of the Skaugen LPG Project
In December 2006, we agreed to acquire upon delivery three LPG carriers from subsidiaries of I.M.
Skaugen ASA (or Skaugen), each of which has a purchase price of approximately $33 million. The
first vessel delivered in April 2009 and the remaining two vessels are expected to be delivered by
late 2009 and mid-2010. Upon delivery, the vessels will be chartered at fixed rates for 15 years to
Skaugen.
Tangguh LNG Project
In November 2006, we agreed to acquire from Teekay Corporation its 70% interest in a joint venture
owning two 155,000 cubic meter LNG carriers and the related 20-year, fixed-rate time charters to
service the Tangguh LNG project in Indonesia. The remaining 30% interest in the joint venture
relating to this project (or the Teekay Tangguh Joint Venture) is held by BLT LNG Tangguh
Corporation, a subsidiary of PT Berlian Laju Tanker Tbk. The customer will be The Tangguh
Production Sharing Contractors, a consortium led by BP Berau Ltd., a subsidiary of BP plc.
The two LNG carriers were delivered to the Teekay Tangguh Joint Venture in November 2008 and March
2009, respectively and the related charter commenced in January 2009 and May 2009, respectively. We
are seeking to purchase Teekay Corporations interest in the Teekay Tangguh Joint Venture in 2009
using a tax efficient structure and recently received a favorable ruling from the Internal Revenue
Service (or IRS) related to the type of structure we would use to hold our interest in this
project. We expect to complete the purchase during the third quarter of 2009.
OTHER SIGNIFICANT PROJECTS
Agreement to Purchase Skaugen Multigas Carriers
On July 28, 2008, Teekay Corporation signed contracts for the purchase of two technically advanced
12,000-cubic meter newbuilding Multigas vessels (or the Skaugen Multigas Carriers) capable of
carrying LNG, LPG or ethylene from Skaugen. We, in turn, agreed to acquire the vessels from Teekay
upon delivery for a total cost of approximately $94 million. Both vessels are scheduled to be
delivered in the second half of 2010. Upon delivery, each vessel will commence service under
15-year fixed-rate charters to Skaugen.
Angola LNG Project
In December 2007, a consortium in which Teekay Corporation has a 33% ownership interest agreed to
charter four newbuilding 160,400-cubic meter LNG carriers for a period of 20 years to the Angola
LNG Project. The Angola LNG Project is being developed by subsidiaries of Chevron Corporation,
Sociedade Nacional de Combustiveis de Angola EP, BP Plc, Total S.A., and Eni SpA. The vessels will
be chartered at fixed rates, subject to inflation adjustments, commencing in 2011. Mitsui & Co.,
Ltd. and NYK Bulkship (Europe) have 34% and 33% ownership interests in the consortium,
respectively. Teekay Corporation is required to offer to us its 33% ownership interest in these
vessels and related charter contracts not later than 180 days before delivery of the vessels.
Deliveries of the vessels are scheduled between August 2011 and January 2012.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
We use a variety of financial and operational terms and concepts when analyzing our results of
operations. Descriptions of key terms and concepts are included in Item 5. Operating and Financial
Review and Prospects in our Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2008, filed
with the SEC on June 29, 2009.
Items You Should Consider When Evaluating Our Results of Operations
Some factors that have affected our historical financial performance or will affect our future
performance are listed below:
|
|
|
Our financial results reflect the results of the interests in vessels acquired from
Teekay Corporation for all periods the vessels were under common control. In April 2008,
we acquired interests in the two Kenai LNG Carriers, the Arctic Spirit and the Polar
Spirit, from Teekay Corporation. This transaction was deemed to be a business acquisition
between entities under common control. Accordingly, we have accounted for this transaction
in a manner similar to the pooling of interest method whereby our financial statements
prior to the date these vessels were acquired by us are retroactively adjusted to include
the results of these acquired vessels. The periods retroactively adjusted include all
periods that we and the acquired vessels were both under the common control of Teekay
Corporation and had begun operations. As a result, our financial statements reflect these
vessels and their results of operations of these two vessels, referred to herein as the
Dropdown Predecessor, as if we had acquired them when each respective vessel began
operations under the ownership of Teekay Corporation, which were December 13 and 14, 2007. |
|
|
|
Our financial results reflect the consolidation of Teekay Tangguh, Teekay Nakilat (III),
and the Skaugen Multigas Carriers prior to our purchase of interests in those entities. On
November 1, 2006, we entered into an agreement with Teekay Corporation to purchase (a) its
100% interest in Teekay Tangguh Holdings Corporation (or Teekay Tangguh), which owns a 70%
interest in the Teekay Tangguh Joint Venture, and (b) its 100% interest in Teekay Nakilat
(III) Holdings Corporation (or Teekay Nakilat (III)), which owns a 40% interest in Teekay
Nakilat (III) Corporation (or the RasGas 3 Joint Venture). The Teekay Tangguh Joint Venture
owns two LNG carriers (or the Tangguh LNG Carriers) and related 20-year time charters. The
RasGas 3 Joint Venture owns four LNG carriers (or the RasGas 3 LNG Carriers) and the
related 25-year time charters. We have been required to consolidate Teekay Tangguh in our
consolidated financial statements since November 1, 2006, as this entity is a variable
interest entity and we are its primary beneficiary; we likewise consolidated in our
financial statements Teekay Nakilat (III) as a variable interest entity of which we were
the primary beneficiary from November 1, 2006 until we purchased it on May 6, 2008. After
this purchase, Teekay Nakilat (III) was no longer a variable interest entity and we now
equity account for Teekay Nakilat (III)s investment in the RasGas 3 Joint Venture in our
consolidated financial statements. As described above, we expect to complete the
acquisition of the Teekay Tangguh Joint Venture during the third quarter of 2009. On July
28, 2008, Teekay Corporation signed contracts for the purchase of two Skaugen Multigas
Carriers from subsidiaries of Skaugen. We have agreed to acquire the companies that own the
Skaugen Multigas Carriers from Teekay Corporation upon delivery of the vessels. We have
consolidated these ship-owning companies in our financial statements as variable interest
entities as we are the primary beneficiary. Please read Item 1 Financial Statements:
Notes 10(e), 10(f), and 10(i) Related Party Transactions and Note 12(a) Commitments
and Contingencies. |
23
Subsidiaries of the Teekay Tangguh Joint Venture entered into a U.K. tax lease in December
2007. Upon delivery of the vessels, subsidiaries of the Teekay Tangguh Joint Venture will
lease the vessels to Everest Leasing Company Limited (or Everest) for a period of 20 years
under a tax lease arrangement. Simultaneously, Everest will lease the vessels back to other
subsidiaries of the Teekay Tangguh Joint Venture for a period of 20 years.
|
|
|
Our financial results are affected by fluctuations in the fair value of our derivative
instruments. The change in fair value of our derivative instruments is included in our
results of operations. These changes may fluctuate significantly as interest rates and spot
tanker rates fluctuate relating to our interest rate swaps and to the agreement we have
with Teekay Corporation for the Toledo Spirit time-charter
contract, respectively. The unrealized gains or losses relating to the
change in fair value of our derivative instruments do not impact our
cash flows. |
|
|
|
Our financial results are affected by fluctuations in currency exchange rates. Under
GAAP, all foreign currency-denominated monetary assets and liabilities, such as cash and
cash equivalents, restricted cash, accounts receivable, accounts payable, advances from
affiliates and long-term debt are revalued and reported based on the prevailing exchange
rate at the end of the period. These foreign currency translations fluctuate based on the
strength of the U.S. dollar relative mainly to the Euro and are included in our results of
operations. The translation of all foreign currency-denominated
monetary assets and liabilities are unrealized foreign currency
exchange gains or losses and do not impact our cash flows. |
|
|
|
The size of our fleet will change. Our historical results of operations reflect changes
in the size and composition of our fleet due to certain vessel deliveries. Please read
Liquefied Gas Segment below for further details about certain prior and future vessel
deliveries. |
|
|
|
One of our Suezmax tankers earns revenues based partly on spot market rates. The time
charter for one Suezmax tanker, the Teide Spirit, contains a component providing for
additional revenues to us beyond the fixed hire rate when spot market rates exceed certain
threshold amounts. Accordingly, even though declining spot market rates will not result in
our receiving less than the fixed hire rate, our results at the end of each fiscal year may
continue to be influenced, in part, by the variable component of the Teide Spirit charter. |
|
|
|
Our vessel operating costs are facing industry-wide cost pressures. The oil shipping
industry is experiencing a global manpower shortage due to significant growth in the world
fleet. This shortage resulted in crew wage increases during 2007 and 2008. We expect the
trend of increasing crew compensation to continue during 2009,
however to a lesser extent than has been experienced in recent years. |
|
|
|
The amount and timing of drydockings of our vessels can significantly affect our
revenues between periods. During 2008 to 2009, our vessels were off-hire at various points
of time due to scheduled and unscheduled maintenance. No vessels are scheduled for
drydocking in 2009. |
Liquefied Gas Segment
Our fleet includes fifteen LNG carriers (including the four RasGas 3 LNG Carriers, which are
accounted for under the equity method, and the two Tangguh LNG
Carriers which are held by Teekay Tangguh, a variable interest
entity that we have not yet acquired from Teekay Corporation please read Item 2 Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations: Significant Developments
in 2009) and two LPG carriers (including one LPG carrier acquired from Skaugen in April 2009). All
of our LNG and LPG carriers operate under long-term, fixed-rate time charters. We expect our
liquefied gas segment to increase due to the following:
|
|
|
We have agreed to acquire upon delivery two additional LPG carriers (or the Skaugen LPG
Carriers) from Skaugen for approximately $33 million per vessel. The two vessels are
currently under construction are scheduled to be delivered between by late 2009 and
mid-2010. Please read Item 1 Financial Statements: Note 12(b) Commitments and
Contingencies. |
|
|
|
As discussed above, we agreed to acquire upon delivery the Skaugen Multigas Carriers
from Teekay Corporation for a total cost of approximately $94 million. Both vessels are
scheduled to deliver during the second half of 2010. Please read item 1 Financial
Statements: Note 10(i) Related Party Transactions. |
|
|
|
As discussed above, Teekay Corporation is required to offer to us its 33% ownership
interest in the consortium relating to the Angola LNG Project not later than 180 days
before delivery of the related four newbuilding LNG carriers. Please read Item 1
Financial Statements: Note 15 Other Information. |
24
The following table compares our liquefied gas segments operating results for the three months
ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, and compares its net voyage revenues (which is a non-GAAP financial
measure) for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008 to voyage revenues, the most directly
comparable GAAP financial measure. The following table also provides a summary of the changes in
calendar-ship-days and revenue days for our liquefied gas segment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands of U.S. dollars, except revenue days, |
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
|
calendar-ship-days and percentages) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
% Change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Voyage revenues |
|
|
57,582 |
|
|
|
56,132 |
|
|
|
2.6 |
|
Voyage expenses |
|
|
292 |
|
|
|
150 |
|
|
|
94.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net voyage revenues |
|
|
57,290 |
|
|
|
55,982 |
|
|
|
2.3 |
|
Vessel operating expenses |
|
|
12,589 |
|
|
|
11,769 |
|
|
|
7.0 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
14,478 |
|
|
|
14,196 |
|
|
|
2.0 |
|
General and administrative (1) |
|
|
2,134 |
|
|
|
2,462 |
|
|
|
(13.3 |
) |
Restructuring charge |
|
|
867 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from vessel operations |
|
|
27,222 |
|
|
|
27,555 |
|
|
|
(1.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Data: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue Days (A) |
|
|
972 |
|
|
|
904 |
|
|
|
7.5 |
|
Calendar-Ship-Days (B) |
|
|
1,005 |
|
|
|
910 |
|
|
|
10.4 |
|
Utilization (A)/(B) |
|
|
96.7 |
% |
|
|
99.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes direct general and administrative expenses and indirect general and administrative
expenses (allocated to each segment based on estimated use of resources). |
Our liquefied gas segments operating results include twelve LNG/LPG carriers (not including the
four RasGas 3 LNG Carriers delivered in 2008, which are accounted for under the equity method
following their deliveries between May and July of 2008) and ten LNG/LPG carriers during the
three-month periods ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. On April 1, 2008, we purchased
from Teekay Corporation the two Kenai LNG Carriers, the Arctic Spirit and the Polar Spirit;
however, as they are included as a Dropdown Predecessor, they have been included in our results as
if they were acquired on December 13 and 14, 2007, respectively, when they began operations under
the ownership of Teekay Corporation. During the first quarter of 2009, both Tangguh LNG Carriers
were in operations. The Tangguh Hiri was delivered in November 2008 and its charter commend in
January 2009. The Tangguh Sago delivered in March 2009 and its charter commenced in May 2009. As a
result, our total calendar-ship-days increased by 10.4% to
1,005 days in the first quarter of 2009 from 910 days in
the first quarter of 2008. Teekay Tangguh is a variable interest entity in which we are the primary
beneficiary and therefore, the results of the Tannguh LNG Carriers are included in our results.
Net Voyage Revenues. Net voyage revenues increased for the three months ended March 31, 2009, from
the same period last year, primarily as a result of:
|
|
|
an increase of $3.6 million for the three months ended March 31, 2009, due to the
commencement of the time charter for the Tangguh Hiri in
January 2009; and |
|
|
|
an increase of $0.5 million for the three months ended March 31, 2009, due to the
Catalunya Spirit being off-hire for 5.5 days during the
first quarter of 2008 for repairs; |
partially offset by
|
|
|
a decrease of $2.4 million for the three months ended March 31, 2009, due to the
effect on our Euro-denominated revenues from the weakening of the Euro against the U.S.
Dollar compared to the same period last year; and |
|
|
|
a decrease of $0.2 million for the three months ended March 31, 2009, due to the
Dania Spirit being off-hire for 14.7 days during 2009 for repairs of its generator. |
Vessel Operating Expenses. Vessel operating expenses increased for the three months ended March 31,
2009, from the same period last year, primarily as a result of:
|
|
|
an increase of $1.5 million for the three months ended March 31, 2009, from the
delivery of the Tangguh Hiri in November 2008 and the Tangguh Sago in March 2009; |
partially offset by
|
|
|
a decrease of $0.7 million for the three months ended March 31, 2009, due to the
effect on our Euro-denominated vessel operating expenses from the weakening of the Euro
against the U.S. Dollar compared to the same period last year (a majority of our vessel
operating expenses are denominated in Euros, which is primarily a function of the
nationality of our crew; our Euro-denominated revenues currently generally approximate
our Euro-denominated expenses and Euro-denominated loan and interest payments). |
Depreciation and Amortization. Depreciation and amortization increased for the three months ended
March 31, 2009, from the same period last year, primarily as a result of an increase of $0.3
million for the three months ended March 31, 2009, from the delivery of the Tangguh Sago in March
2009.
25
Suezmax Tanker Segment
During 2009 and 2008, we operated eight Suezmax-class double-hulled conventional crude oil tankers.
All of our Suezmax tankers operate under long-term, fixed-rate time charters.
The following table compares our Suezmax tanker segments operating results for the three months
ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, and compares its net voyage revenues (which is a non-GAAP financial
measure) for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008 to voyage revenues, the most directly
comparable GAAP financial measure. The following table also provides a summary of the changes in
calendar-ship-days and revenue days for our Suezmax tanker segment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands of U.S. dollars, except revenue days, |
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
|
calendar-ship-days and percentages) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
% Change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Voyage revenues |
|
|
18,091 |
|
|
|
20,173 |
|
|
|
(10.3 |
) |
Voyage expenses |
|
|
226 |
|
|
|
258 |
|
|
|
(12.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net voyage revenues |
|
|
17,865 |
|
|
|
19,915 |
|
|
|
(10.3 |
) |
Vessel operating expenses |
|
|
6,152 |
|
|
|
6,638 |
|
|
|
(7.3 |
) |
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
4,848 |
|
|
|
4,594 |
|
|
|
5.5 |
|
General and administrative (1) |
|
|
1,421 |
|
|
|
1,993 |
|
|
|
(28.7 |
) |
Restructuring charge |
|
|
1,084 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from vessel operations |
|
|
4,360 |
|
|
|
6,690 |
|
|
|
(34.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Data: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue Days (A) |
|
|
720 |
|
|
|
728 |
|
|
|
(1.1 |
) |
Calendar-Ship-Days (B) |
|
|
720 |
|
|
|
728 |
|
|
|
(1.1 |
) |
Utilization (A)/(B) |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes direct general and administrative expenses and indirect general and administrative
expenses (allocated to each segment based on estimated use of corporate resources). |
Net Voyage Revenues. Net voyage revenues decreased during the three months ended March 31, 2009,
from the same period last year. This is primarily a result of a decrease of $2.0 million for the
three months ended March 31, 2009, due to interest-rate adjustments to the daily charter rates
under the time charter contracts for five Suezmax tankers (however, under the terms of these
capital leases, we had corresponding decreases in our lease payments, which are reflected as
decreases to interest expense; therefore, these and future interest rate adjustments do not and
will not affect our cash flow or net income (loss)).
Vessel Operating Expenses. Vessel operating expenses decreased during the three months ended March
31, 2009, from the same period last year primarily as a result of:
|
|
|
a decrease of $0.9 million for the three months ended March 31, 2009, due to the
effect on our Euro-denominated vessel operating expenses from the weakening of the Euro
against the U.S. Dollar during such period compared to the same periods last year (a
majority of our vessel operating expenses are denominated in Euros, which is primarily
a function of the nationality of our crew; our Euro-denominated revenues currently
generally approximate our Euro-denominated expenses and Euro-denominated loan and
interest payments); |
partially offset by
|
|
|
an increase of $0.3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2009, relating to
higher crew manning, insurance, and repairs and maintenance costs. |
Depreciation and Amortization. Depreciation and amortization increased during the three months
ended March 31, 2009, from the same period last year, primarily as a result of an increase of $0.3
million due to the amortization of the costs associated with the scheduled drydockings during 2008
relating to the European Spirit, the Asian Spirit and the African Spirit.
Other Operating Results
General and Administrative Expenses. General and administrative expenses decreased 20.2% to $3.6
million for three months ended March 31, 2009, from $4.5 million for the same period last year,
primarily the result of:
|
|
|
a decrease of $0.7 million for the three months ended March 31, 2009, relating to lower
long-term incentive plan accruals; and |
|
|
|
a decrease of $0.3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2009, associated with a
decrease in ship management fees relating to the Kenai LNG Carriers; |
partially offset by
|
|
|
an increase of $0.3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2009, associated with
corporate services provided to us by Teekay Corporation subsidiaries. |
26
Restructuring Charge. During the three months ended March 31, 2009, we restructured certain ship
management functions from our office in Spain to a subsidiary of Teekay Corporation. The total
estimated cost to be incurred in connection with this restructuring plan is approximately $3
million of which $2.0 million was incurred for the three months ended March 31, 2009. The
restructuring plan is expected to be completed by the end of the year.
Interest Expense. Interest expense decreased 54.0% to $17.1 million for the three months ended
March 31, 2009, from $37.2 million for the same period last year. Interest expense primarily
reflects interest incurred on our capital lease obligations and long-term debt. These changes were
primarily the result of:
|
|
|
a decrease of $7.8 million for the three months ended March 31, 2009, as the debt
relating to Teekay Nakilat (III) was novated to the RasGas 3 Joint Venture on December
31, 2008. The interest expense on this debt is not reflected in our
2009 consolidated interest expense as
the RasGas 3 Joint Venture is accounted for using the equity method; |
|
|
|
a decrease of
$5.0 million for the three months ended March 31, 2009, due
to a decrease of LIBOR rates relating to the long-term debt in
Teekay Nakilat; |
|
|
|
a decrease of $2.9 million for the three months ended March 31, 2009, relating to
the interest expense attributable to the operations of the Kenai LNG Carriers that was
incurred by Teekay Corporation and allocated to us as part of the results of the
Dropdown Predecessor; |
|
|
|
a decrease of $2.6 million for the three months ended March 31, 2009, from the
scheduled loan payments on the Catalunya Spirit, and scheduled capital lease
repayments on the Madrid Spirit (the Madrid Spirit is financed pursuant to a Spanish
tax lease arrangement, under which we borrowed under a term loan and deposited the
proceeds into a restricted cash account and entered into a capital lease for the
vessel; as a result, this decrease in interest expense from the capital lease is
offset by a corresponding decrease in the interest income from restricted cash); |
|
|
|
a decrease of $1.7 million for the three months ended March 31, 2009, from
declining interest rates on our five Suezmax tanker capital lease obligations
(however, as described above, under the terms of the time charter contracts for these
vessels, we received corresponding decreases in charter payments, which are reflected
as a decrease to voyage revenues); and |
|
|
|
a decrease of $1.0 million for the three months ended March 31, 2009, due to the
effect on our Euro-denominated debt from the weakening of the Euro against the U.S.
Dollar during such period compared to the same period last year; |
partially offset by
|
|
|
an increase of $0.6 million for the three months ended March 31, 2009, relating to
debt to finance the purchase of the Tangguh LNG Carriers. |
Interest Income. Interest income decreased 75.3% to $4.0 million for the three months ended March
31, 2009, from $16.1 million for the same period last year. Interest income primarily reflects
interest earned on restricted cash deposits that approximate the present value of the remaining
amounts we owe under lease arrangements on four of our LNG carriers. These changes were primarily
the result of:
|
|
|
a decrease of $7.7 million relating to interest-bearing advances made by us to the
RasGas 3 Joint Venture for shipyard construction installment payments as the loan was
repaid on December 31, 2008 when the external debt was novated to the RasGas 3 Joint
Venture; |
|
|
|
a decrease of
$3.9 million relating to the restricted cash in Teekay
Nakilat that is used to fund
capital lease payments for the RasGas II LNG Carriers; |
|
|
|
a decrease of $0.4 million due to the effect on our Euro-denominated deposits from
the weakening of the Euro against the U.S. Dollar during such period compared to the
same period last year; |
|
|
|
a decrease of $0.2 million, primarily from scheduled capital lease repayments on
one of our LNG carriers which was funded from restricted cash deposits; and |
|
|
|
a decrease of $0.2 million relating to lower interest rates on our bank accounts
compared to the same period last year. |
27
Realized and Unrealized Loss on Derivative Instruments. Net realized and unrealized loss on
derivative instruments decreased 63.3% to $16.2 million for the three months ended March 31, 2009,
from $44.3 million for the same period last year as detailed in the table below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
(in thousands of U.S. dollars) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Realized (losses) relating to: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swaps |
|
|
(5,900 |
) |
|
|
(504 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gains (losses) relating to: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swaps |
|
|
(15,414 |
) |
|
|
(41,101 |
) |
Toledo Spirit time-charter derivative contract |
|
|
5,078 |
|
|
|
(2,691 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10,336 |
) |
|
|
(43,792 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total realized and unrealized (losses) on derivative instruments |
|
|
(16,236 |
) |
|
|
(44,296 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign Currency Exchange Gain (Loss). Foreign currency exchange gains were $20.4 million for the
three months ended March 31, 2009, compared to foreign currency exchange losses of $33.9 million
for the three months ended March 31, 2008. These foreign currency exchange gains and losses,
substantially all of which were unrealized, are due substantially to the relevant period-end
revaluation of Euro-denominated term loans and restricted cash for financial reporting purposes.
Losses reflect a weaker U.S. Dollar against the Euro on the date of revaluation. Gains reflect a
stronger U.S. Dollar against the Euro on the date of revaluation.
Equity Income (Loss). Equity income was $3.9 million for the three months ended March 31, 2009,
compared to equity loss of $0.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2008. This change
primarily reflects the operation of the four RasGas 3 LNG Carriers in the period ended March 31,
2009, which were delivered between May and July 2008 and RasGas
3 Joint Ventures realized and unrealized gain on its interest rate
swaps.
Liquidity and Cash Needs
As at March 31, 2009, our cash and cash equivalents was $201.0 million (of which $44.7 million is
only available to the Teekay Tangguh Joint Venture), compared to $117.6 million at December 31,
2008 (of which $22.9 million was only available to the Teekay Tangguh Joint Venture). Our total
liquidity, including cash equivalents and undrawn long-term borrowings, was $567.2 million as at
March 31, 2009, compared to $491.8 million as at December 31, 2008. The increase in liquidity was
primarily the result of the equity offering in March 2009 which generated gross proceeds of
approximately $71.8 million.
Our primary short-term liquidity needs are to pay quarterly distributions on our outstanding units
and to fund general working capital requirements and drydocking expenditures, while our long-term
liquidity needs primarily relate to expansion and maintenance capital expenditures and debt
repayment. Expansion capital expenditures primarily represent the purchase or construction of
vessels to the extent the expenditures increase the operating capacity or revenue generated by our
fleet, while maintenance capital expenditures primarily consist of drydocking expenditures and
expenditures to replace vessels in order to maintain the operating capacity or revenue generated by
our fleet. We anticipate that our primary sources of funds for our short-term liquidity needs will
be cash flows from operations, while our long-term sources of funds will be from cash from
operations, long-term bank borrowings and other debt or equity financings, or a combination
thereof.
We will need to use certain of our available liquidity or we may need to raise additional capital
to finance existing capital commitments. We are required to purchase five of our Suezmax tankers,
currently on capital lease arrangements, at various times from late-2009 to 2011. We anticipate
that we will purchase these tankers by assuming the outstanding financing obligations that relate
to them. However, we may be required to obtain separate debt or equity financing to complete the
purchases if the lenders do not consent to our assuming the financing obligations. In addition, we
are committed to acquiring the two remaining Skaugen LPG Carriers, the two Skaugen Multigas
Carriers and Teekay Corporations 70% interest in the Teekay Tangguh Joint Venture. These
additional purchase commitments, which are scheduled to occur in 2009 and 2010 total approximately
$230 million. We intend to finance these purchases with one of our existing revolving credit
facilities, incremental debt, surplus cash balances, proceeds from the issuance of additional
common units, or combinations thereof. Please read Item 1 Financial Statements: Note 12 -
Commitments and Contingencies.
Cash Flows. The following table summarizes our cash flow for the periods presented:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
(in thousands of U.S. dollars) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash flow from operating activities |
|
|
51,929 |
|
|
|
35,528 |
|
Net cash flow from financing activities |
|
|
90,161 |
|
|
|
48,344 |
|
Net cash flow from investing activities |
|
|
(58,771 |
) |
|
|
(81,170 |
) |
Operating Cash Flows. Net cash flow from operating activities increased to $51.9 million for three
months ended March 31, 2009, from $35.5 million for the same period in 2008, primarily reflecting
the increase in operating cash flows from the two Kenai LNG Carriers delivered in
April 2008 and one Tangguh LNG Carrier having commenced its charter in January 2009 and the timing
of our cash receipts and payments. Net cash flow from operating activities depends upon the timing
and amount of drydocking expenditures, repairs and maintenance activity, vessel additions and
dispositions, foreign currency rates and changes in interest rates. The number of vessel
drydockings tends to be uneven between years.
28
Financing Cash Flows. Our investments in vessels and equipment have been financed primarily with
term loans and capital lease arrangements. Proceeds from long-term debt were $85.7 million and
$78.6 million, respectively, for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008. From time to time
we refinance our loans and revolving credit facilities. During the first quarter of 2009, we used
these funds primarily to fund LNG newbuilding construction payments in the Teekay Tangguh Joint
Venture.
During the three months ended March 31, 2009, the Teekay Tangguh Joint Venture received net
proceeds of $57.7 million from long-term debt borrowings which were used to fund LNG newbuilding
construction payments. Please read Item 1 Financial Statements: Note 12(a) Commitments and
Contingencies.
On March 30, 2009, the Partnership completed a follow-on public offering of 4.0 million common
units at a price of $17.60 per unit, for gross proceeds of approximately $71.8 million. Please read
Item 1 Financial Statements: Note 3 Public Offering.
Cash distributions paid during the three months ended March 31, 2009 increased to $26.8 million
from $20.6 million for the three months ended March 31, 2008. This increase was the result of:
|
|
|
a change in our quarterly distribution from $0.53 per unit in for the first quarter of
2008 compared to $0.57 per unit for the first quarter of 2009; and |
|
|
|
an increase in the number of units eligible to receive the cash distribution as a result
of the public offering and private placement of common units subsequent to March 31, 2008. |
Subsequent to March 31, 2009, cash distributions totaling $29.2 million were declared with respect
to the first quarter of 2009, which was paid in May 2009.
Investing Cash Flows. During the three months ended March 31, 2009, we incurred $58.9 million in
expenditures for vessels and equipment. These expenditures represent construction payments for the
two Skaugen Multigas newbuildings and one of the Tangguh LNG Carriers. The second Tangguh LNG
Carrier delivered in March 2009.
Credit Facilities
As at March 31, 2009, we had three long-term revolving credit facilities available which provided
for borrowings of up to $584.3 million, of which $366.3 million was undrawn. The amount available
under the credit facilities reduces by $26.1 million (remainder of 2009), $31.6 million (2010),
$32.2 million (2011), $32.9 million (2012), $33.7 million (2013) and $427.8 million (thereafter).
Interest payments are based on LIBOR plus a margin. All revolving credit facilities may be used by
us to fund general partnership purposes and to fund cash distributions. We are required to reduce
all borrowings used to fund cash distributions to zero for a period of at least 15 consecutive days
during any 12-month period. The revolving credit facilities are collateralized by first-priority
mortgages granted on seven of our vessels, together with other related security, and include a
guarantee from us or our subsidiaries of all outstanding amounts.
We have a U.S. Dollar-denominated term loan outstanding which, as at March 31, 2009, totaled $415.3
million, of which $247.1 million of the term loan bears interest at a fixed rate of 5.39% and has
quarterly payments. The remaining $168.2 million bears interest based on LIBOR plus a margin and
will require bullet repayments of approximately $56.0 million for each of three vessels due at
maturity in 2018 and 2019. The term loan is collateralized by first-priority mortgages on the
vessels together with certain other related security and certain guarantees from us.
The Teekay Tangguh Joint Venture has a loan facility, which, as at March 31, 2009, totaled $349.3
million. The Tangguh LNG Carriers delivered in November 2008 and March 2009. Interest payments on
the loan are based on LIBOR plus margins. At March 31, 2009, the margins ranged between 0.30% and
0.625%. Following delivery of the Tangguh LNG Carriers in November 2008 and March 2009, interest
payments on one tranche under the loan facility are based on LIBOR plus 0.30%, while interest
payments on the second tranche are based on LIBOR plus 0.625%. Commencing three months after
delivery of each vessel, one tranche (total value of $324.5 million) reduces in quarterly payments
while the other tranche (total value of up to $190.0 million) correspondingly is drawn up with a
final $95.0 million bullet payment per vessel due twelve years and three months from each vessel
delivery date. This loan facility is collateralized by first-priority mortgages on the vessels to
which the loan relates, together with certain other security and is guaranteed by Teekay
Corporation. If we acquire Teekay Corporations ownership of interest in the Teekay Tangguh Joint
Venture, the rights and obligations of Teekay Corporation under the guarantee may, upon the
fulfillment of certain conditions, be transferred to us.
We have a U.S. Dollar-denominated demand loan outstanding owing to Teekay Nakilats joint venture
partner, which, as at March 31, 2009, totaled $16.4 million, including accrued interest. Interest
payments on this loan, which are based on a fixed interest rate of 4.84%, commenced in February
2008. The loan is repayable on demand no earlier than February 27, 2027.
We have two Euro-denominated term loans outstanding which, as at March 31, 2009 totaled 294.4
million Euros ($390.0 million). These loans were used to make restricted cash deposits that fully
fund payments under capital leases. Interest payments are based on EURIBOR plus margins. The term
loans have varying maturities through 2023 and monthly payments that reduce over time. These loans
are collateralized by first-priority mortgages on the vessels to which the loans relate, together
with certain other related security and guarantees from one of our subsidiaries.
The weighted-average effective interest rates for our long-term debt outstanding at March 31, 2009
and December 31, 2008 were 2.4% and 3.6%, respectively. These rates do not reflect the effect of
related interest rate swaps that we have used to hedge certain of our floating-rate debt. At March
31, 2009, the margins on our long-term debt ranged from 0.3% to 0.8%.
29
Our term loans and revolving credit facilities contain covenants and other restrictions typical of
debt financing secured by vessels, including, but not limited to, one or more of the following that
restrict the ship-owning subsidiaries from:
|
|
|
incurring or guaranteeing indebtedness; |
|
|
|
changing ownership or structure, including mergers, consolidations, liquidations and
dissolutions; |
|
|
|
making dividends or distributions if we are in default; |
|
|
|
making capital expenditures in excess of specified levels; |
|
|
|
making certain negative pledges and granting certain liens; |
|
|
|
selling, transferring, assigning or conveying assets; |
|
|
|
making certain loans and investments; and |
|
|
|
entering into a new line of business. |
Certain loan agreements require that minimum levels of tangible net worth and aggregate liquidity
be maintained; provide for a maximum level of leverage and require one of our subsidiaries to
maintain restricted cash deposits. Our ship-owning subsidiaries may not, among other things, pay
dividends or distributions if we are in default under our loan agreements and revolving credit
facilities. Our capital leases do not contain financial or restrictive covenants other than those
relating to operation and maintenance of the vessels. As at March 31, 2009, we were in compliance
with all covenants in our credit facilities and capital leases.
Contractual Obligations and Contingencies
The following table summarizes our long-term contractual obligations as at March 31, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2012 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of |
|
|
and |
|
|
and |
|
|
Beyond |
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2013 |
|
|
2013 |
|
|
|
(in millions of U.S. Dollars) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Dollar-Denominated Obligations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt (1) |
|
|
1,000.1 |
|
|
|
38.6 |
|
|
|
119.6 |
|
|
|
121.8 |
|
|
|
720.1 |
|
Commitments under capital leases (2) |
|
|
220.7 |
|
|
|
128.3 |
|
|
|
92.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments under capital leases (3) |
|
|
1,067.1 |
|
|
|
18.0 |
|
|
|
48.0 |
|
|
|
48.0 |
|
|
|
953.1 |
|
Commitments under operating leases (4) |
|
|
499.5 |
|
|
|
16.7 |
|
|
|
50.1 |
|
|
|
50.2 |
|
|
|
382.5 |
|
Purchase obligations (5) |
|
|
263.0 |
|
|
|
136.0 |
|
|
|
127.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total U.S. Dollar-denominated obligations |
|
|
3,050.4 |
|
|
|
337.6 |
|
|
|
437.1 |
|
|
|
220.0 |
|
|
|
2,055.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Euro-Denominated Obligations: (6) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt (7) |
|
|
390.0 |
|
|
|
8.5 |
|
|
|
222.4 |
|
|
|
13.9 |
|
|
|
145.2 |
|
Commitments under capital leases (2) (8) |
|
|
155.6 |
|
|
|
34.0 |
|
|
|
121.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Euro-denominated obligations |
|
|
545.6 |
|
|
|
42.5 |
|
|
|
344.0 |
|
|
|
13.9 |
|
|
|
145.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Totals |
|
|
3,596.0 |
|
|
|
380.1 |
|
|
|
781.1 |
|
|
|
233.9 |
|
|
|
2,200.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Excludes expected interest payments of $12.2 million (remainder of 2009), $44.9 million (2010
and 2011), $37.1 million (2012 and 2013) and $57.4 million (beyond 2013). Expected interest
payments are based on the existing interest rates (fixed-rate loans) and LIBOR at March 31,
2009, plus margins that ranged up to 0.8% (variable-rate loans). The expected interest
payments do not reflect the effect of related interest rate swaps that we have used as an
economic hedge of certain of our floating-rate debt. |
|
(2) |
|
Includes, in addition to lease payments, amounts we are required to pay to purchase certain
leased vessels at the end of the lease terms. We are obligated to purchase five of our
existing Suezmax tankers upon the termination of the related capital leases, which will occur
at various times from late-2009 to 2011. The purchase price will be based on the unamortized
portion of the vessel construction financing costs for the vessels, which we expect to range
from $35.6 million to $39.2 million per vessel. We expect to satisfy the purchase price by
assuming the existing vessel financing, although we may be required to obtain separate debt or
equity financing to complete the purchases if the lenders do not consent to our assuming the
financing obligations. We are also obligated to purchase one of our existing LNG carriers upon
the termination of the related capital leases on December 31, 2011. The purchase obligation
has been fully funded with restricted cash deposits. Please read Item 1 Financial
Statements: Note 5 Leases and Restricted Cash. |
|
(3) |
|
Existing restricted cash deposits of $482.7 million, together with the interest earned on the
deposits, will be sufficient to repay the remaining amounts we currently owe under the lease
arrangements. |
|
(4) |
|
We have corresponding leases whereby we are the lessor and expect to receive approximately
$466 million for these leases from the remainder of 2009 to 2029. |
30
|
|
|
(5) |
|
We expect to acquire Teekay Corporations 70% interest in the Teekay Tangguh Joint Venture
during the third quarter of 2009. The Tangguh LNG Carriers would provide transportation
services to The Tangguh Production Sharing Contractors, a consortium led by a subsidiary of BP
plc, to service the Tangguh LNG project in Indonesia at fixed rates, with inflation
adjustments, for a period of 20 years. An Indonesian joint venture partner owns the remaining
30% interest in the joint venture. The estimated purchase price is approximately $70 million. |
|
|
|
In December 2006, we entered into an agreement to acquire the three Skaugen LPG Carriers from
Skaugen, for approximately $33 million per vessel upon their deliveries scheduled between late
2009 and mid-2010. The first vessel was delivered in April 2009 and the other two vessels are
scheduled for delivery by late-2009 and mid-2010. In July 2008, Teekay Corporation signed
contracts for the purchase of two newbuilding Multigas carriers from Skaugen and we have agreed
to purchase these vessels from Teekay Corporation for a total cost of approximately $94 million
upon their delivery. Both vessels are scheduled to be delivered in the second half of 2010.
Please read Item 1 Financial Statements: Note 12 Commitments and Contingencies. |
|
(6) |
|
Euro-denominated obligations are presented in U.S. Dollars and have been converted using the
prevailing exchange rate as of March 31, 2009. |
|
(7) |
|
Excludes expected interest payments of $3.4 million (balance of 2009), $11.3 million (2010
and 2011), $5.4 million (2012 and 2013) and $16.8 million (beyond 2013). Expected interest
payments are based on EURIBOR at March 31, 2009, plus margins that ranged up to 0.66%, as well
as the prevailing U.S. Dollar/Euro exchange rate as of March 31, 2009. The expected interest
payments do not reflect the effect of related interest rate swaps that we have used as an
economic hedge of certain of our floating-rate debt. |
|
(8) |
|
Existing restricted cash deposits of $140.4 million, together with the interest earned on the
deposits, will be expected to equal the remaining amounts we owe under the lease arrangement,
including our obligation to purchase the vessel at the end of the lease term. |
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We have no off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have, a current or
future material effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or
expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources.
Critical Accounting Estimates
We prepare our consolidated financial statements in accordance with GAAP, which require us to make
estimates in the application of our accounting policies based on our best assumptions, judgments
and opinions. On a regular basis, management reviews the accounting policies, assumptions,
estimates and judgments to ensure that our consolidated financial statements are presented fairly
and in accordance with GAAP. However, because future events and their effects cannot be determined
with certainty, actual results could differ from our assumptions and estimates, and such
differences could be material. Accounting estimates and assumptions discussed in this section are
those that we consider to be the most critical to an understanding of our financial statements,
because they inherently involve significant judgments and uncertainties can be found in Item 5.
Operating and Financial Review and Prospects in our Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended
December 31, 2008.
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This Report on Form 6-K for the three months ended March 31, 2009 contains certain forward-looking
statements (as such term is defined in Section 27A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1933 as
amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) concerning future
events and our operations, performance and financial condition, including, in particular,
statements regarding:
|
|
|
our future financial condition; |
|
|
|
results of operations and revenues and expenses, including performance of our
liquefied gas segment; |
|
|
|
our ability to make cash distributions on our units or any increases in quarterly
distributions; |
|
|
|
LNG, LPG and tanker market fundamentals, including the balance of supply and demand
in the LNG, LPG and tanker markets; |
|
|
|
future capital expenditures and availability of capital resources to fund capital
expenditures; |
|
|
|
offers of vessels and associated contracts to us from Teekay Corporation; |
|
|
|
delivery dates of newbuildings; |
|
|
|
the commencement of service of newbuildings under long-term contracts; |
|
|
|
the expected timing, amount and method of financing for the purchase of joint
venture interests and vessels, including our five Suezmax tankers operated pursuant to
capital leases; and |
|
|
|
the timing of the acquisition of the Tangguh LNG project and the Skaugen projects. |
31
Forward-looking statements include, without limitation, any statement that may predict, forecast,
indicate or imply future results, performance or achievements, and may contain the words
believe, anticipate, expect, estimate, project, will be, will continue, will likely
result, plan, intend or words or phrases of similar meanings. These statements involve known
and unknown risks and are based upon a number of assumptions and estimates that are inherently
subject to significant uncertainties and contingencies, many of which are beyond our control.
Actual results may differ materially from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking
statements. Important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially include, but
are not limited to: changes in production of LNG, LPG or oil; greater or less than anticipated
levels of vessel newbuilding orders or greater or less than anticipated rates of vessel scrapping;
changes in trading patterns; changes in the Partnerships expenses; changes in applicable industry
laws and regulations and the timing of implementation of new laws and regulations; LNG or LPG
infrastructure constraints and community and environmental group resistance to new LNG or LPG
infrastructure; potential development of active short-term or spot LNG or LPG shipping markets;
potential inability to implement our growth strategy; competitive factors in the markets in which
we operate; potential for early termination of long-term contracts and our potential inability to
renew or replace long-term contracts; loss of any customer, time charter or vessel; shipyard
production or vessel delivery delays; changes in tax regulations; our potential inability to raise
financing to purchase additional vessels; our exposure to currency exchange rate fluctuations;
conditions in the public equity markets; LNG or LPG project delays or abandonment; and other
factors detailed from time to time in our periodic reports filed with the SEC, including our
Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2008. We do not intend to release
publicly any updates or revisions to any forward-looking statements contained herein to reflect
any change in our expectations with respect thereto or any change in events, conditions or
circumstances on which any such statement is based.
32
TEEKAY LNG PARTNERS L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES
MARCH 31, 2009
PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 3 QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
Interest Rate Risk
We are exposed to the impact of interest rate changes primarily through our borrowings that
require us to make interest payments based on LIBOR or EURIBOR. Significant increases in interest
rates could adversely affect our operating margins, results of operations and our ability to
service our debt. We use interest rate swaps to reduce our exposure to market risk from changes in
interest rates. The principal objective of these contracts is to minimize the risks and costs
associated with our floating-rate debt.
In order to minimize counterparty risk, we only enter into derivative transactions with
counterparties that are rated A or better by Standard & Poors or Aa3 by Moodys at the time of
the transactions. In addition, to the extent possible and practical, interest rate swaps are
entered into with different counterparties to reduce concentration risk.
The table below provides information about our financial instruments at March 31, 2009, that are
sensitive to changes in interest rates. For long-term debt and capital lease obligations, the
table presents principal payments and related weighted-average interest rates by expected maturity
dates. For interest rate swaps, the table presents notional amounts and weighted-average interest
rates by expected contractual maturity dates.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expected Maturity Date |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset/ |
|
|
Rate |
|
|
|
of 2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2012 |
|
|
2013 |
|
|
after |
|
|
Total |
|
|
(Liability) |
|
|
(1) |
|
|
|
(in millions of U.S. dollars, except percentages) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-Term Debt: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Variable Rate ($U.S.) (2) |
|
|
17.9 |
|
|
|
33.9 |
|
|
|
35.9 |
|
|
|
36.0 |
|
|
|
36.0 |
|
|
|
575.8 |
|
|
|
735.5 |
|
|
|
(646.8 |
) |
|
|
1.7 |
% |
Variable Rate (Euro) (3) (4) |
|
|
8.5 |
|
|
|
12.0 |
|
|
|
210.4 |
|
|
|
6.7 |
|
|
|
7.2 |
|
|
|
145.2 |
|
|
|
390.0 |
|
|
|
(338.8 |
) |
|
|
1.8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed-Rate Debt ($U.S.) |
|
|
20.7 |
|
|
|
24.9 |
|
|
|
24.9 |
|
|
|
24.9 |
|
|
|
24.9 |
|
|
|
144.3 |
|
|
|
264.6 |
|
|
|
(257.8 |
) |
|
|
5.4 |
% |
Average Interest Rate |
|
|
5.4 |
% |
|
|
5.4 |
% |
|
|
5.4 |
% |
|
|
5.4 |
% |
|
|
5.4 |
% |
|
|
5.3 |
% |
|
|
5.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital Lease Obligations (5) (6)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed-Rate ($U.S.) (7) |
|
|
118.1 |
|
|
|
3.9 |
|
|
|
80.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
202.1 |
|
|
|
(202.1 |
) |
|
|
7.4 |
% |
Average Interest Rate (8) |
|
|
8.8 |
% |
|
|
5.4 |
% |
|
|
5.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Rate Swaps: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contract Amount ($U.S.) (6) (9) |
|
|
10.0 |
|
|
|
17.9 |
|
|
|
18.4 |
|
|
|
18.9 |
|
|
|
19.4 |
|
|
|
490.3 |
|
|
|
574.9 |
|
|
|
(116.6 |
) |
|
|
5.6 |
% |
Average Fixed Pay Rate (2) |
|
|
5.6 |
% |
|
|
5.5 |
% |
|
|
5.5 |
% |
|
|
5.5 |
% |
|
|
5.6 |
% |
|
|
5.5 |
% |
|
|
5.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contract Amount (Euro) (4) (10) |
|
|
8.5 |
|
|
|
12.0 |
|
|
|
210.4 |
|
|
|
6.7 |
|
|
|
7.2 |
|
|
|
145.2 |
|
|
|
390.0 |
|
|
|
(12.4 |
) |
|
|
3.8 |
% |
Average Fixed Pay Rate (3) |
|
|
3.8 |
% |
|
|
3.8 |
% |
|
|
3.8 |
% |
|
|
3.7 |
% |
|
|
3.7 |
% |
|
|
3.8 |
% |
|
|
3.8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Rate refers to the weighted-average effective interest rate for our long-term debt and
capital lease obligations, including the margin we pay on our floating-rate debt and the
average fixed pay rate for our interest rate swap agreements. The average interest rate for
our capital lease obligations is the weighted-average interest rate implicit in our lease
obligations at the inception of the leases. The average fixed pay rate for our interest rate
swaps excludes the margin we pay on our floating-rate debt, which as of March 31, 2009 ranged
from 0.3% to 0.8%. Please read Item 1 Financial Statements: Note 8 Long-Term Debt. |
|
(2) |
|
Interest payments on U.S. Dollar-denominated debt and interest rate swaps are based on
LIBOR. |
|
(3) |
|
Interest payments on Euro-denominated debt and interest rate swaps are based on EURIBOR. |
|
(4) |
|
Euro-denominated amounts have been converted to U.S. Dollars using the prevailing exchange
rate as of March 31, 2009. |
33
|
|
|
(5) |
|
Excludes capital lease obligations (present value of minimum lease payments) of 104.2
million Euros ($138.1 million) on one of our existing LNG carriers with a weighted-average
fixed interest rate of 5.8%. Under the terms of this fixed-rate lease obligation, we are
required to have on deposit, subject to a weighted-average fixed interest rate of 5.0%, an
amount of cash that, together with the interest earned thereon, will fully fund the amount
owing under the capital lease obligation, including a vessel purchase obligation. As at March
31, 2009, this amount was 106.0 million Euros ($140.4 million). Consequently, we are not
subject to interest rate risk from these obligations or deposits. |
|
(6) |
|
Under the terms of the capital leases for the RasGas II LNG Carriers (see Item 1
Financial Statements: Note 5 Leases and Restricted Cash), we are required to have on
deposit, subject to a variable rate of interest, an amount of cash that, together with
interest earned on the deposit, will equal the remaining amounts owing under the
variable-rate leases. The deposits, which as at March 31, 2009 totaled $482.7 million, and
the lease obligations, which as at March 31, 2009 totaled $469.6 million, have been swapped
for fixed-rate deposits and fixed-rate obligations. Consequently, Teekay Nakilat is not
subject to interest rate risk from these obligations and deposits and, therefore, the lease
obligations, cash deposits and related interest rate swaps have been excluded from the table
above. As at March 31, 2009, the contract amount, fair value and fixed interest rates of
these interest rate swaps related to Teekay Nakilats capital lease obligations and
restricted cash deposits were $472.2 million and $476.2 million, ($90.3) million and $125.0
million, and 4.9% and 4.8%, respectively. |
|
(7) |
|
The amount of capital lease obligations represents the present value of minimum lease
payments together with our purchase obligation, as applicable. |
|
(8) |
|
The average interest rate is the weighted-average interest rate implicit in the capital
lease obligations at the inception of the leases. |
|
(9) |
|
The average variable receive rate for our U.S. Dollar-denominated interest rate swaps is
set quarterly at 3-month LIBOR. |
|
(10) |
|
The average variable receive rate for our Euro-denominated interest rate swaps is set
monthly at 1-month EURIBOR. |
Spot Market Rate Risk
One of our Suezmax tankers, the Toledo Spirit operates pursuant to a time-charter contract that
increases or decreases the fixed rate established in the charter, depending on the spot charter
rates that we would have earned had we traded the vessel in the spot tanker market. The remaining
term of the time-charter contract is 16 years, although the charterer has the right to terminate
the time charter in July 2018. We have entered into an agreement with Teekay Corporation under
which Teekay Corporation pays us any amounts payable to the charterer as a result of spot rates
being below the fixed rate, and we pay Teekay Corporation any amounts payable to us from the
charterer as a result of spot rates being in excess of the fixed rate. At March 31, 2009, the fair
value of this derivative liability was $12.9 million and the change from reporting period to
period has been reflected in realized and unrealized loss on derivative instruments.
34
TEEKAY LNG PARTNERS L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES
MARCH 31, 2009
PART II OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1 Legal Proceedings
None
Item 1A Risk Factors
In addition to the other information set forth in this Report on Form 6-K, you should
carefully consider the risk factors discussed in Part I, Item 3. Key Information-Risk
Factors in our Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2008, which could
materially affect our business, financial condition or results of operations.
Item 2 Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
None
Item 3 Defaults Upon Senior Securities
None
Item 4 Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
None
Item 5 Other Information
None
Item 6 Exhibits
None
THIS REPORT ON FORM 6-K IS HEREBY INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE INTO THE FOLLOWING REGISTRATION
STATEMENTS OF THE PARTNERSHIP:
|
|
REGISTRATION STATEMENT ON FORM S-8 (NO. 333-124647) FILED WITH THE SEC ON MAY 5, 2005 |
|
|
REGISTRATION STATEMENT ON FORM F-3 (NO. 333-137697) FILED WITH THE SEC ON SEPTEMBER 29,
2006 |
35
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
Date: July 31, 2009 |
TEEKAY LNG PARTNERS L.P.
|
|
|
By: |
Teekay GP L.L.C., its General Partner
|
|
|
|
|
|
By: |
/s/ Peter Evensen
|
|
|
|
Peter Evensen |
|
|
|
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) |
|
36