e10vq
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the Quarterly Period Ended September 30, 2009
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission File Number 001-11462
DELPHI FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
|
|
Delaware (302)
|
|
478-5142
|
|
13-3427277 |
|
|
|
|
|
(State or other jurisdiction of
|
|
(Registrants telephone number,
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification |
incorporation or organization)
|
|
including area code)
|
|
Number) |
|
|
|
1105 North Market Street, Suite 1230, P.O. Box 8985, Wilmington, Delaware
|
|
19899 |
|
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
(Zip Code) |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject
to filing requirements for the past 90 days:
Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files):
Yes o No o
Indicate by check mark whether the
registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated
filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large accelerated
filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer þ |
|
Accelerated filer o |
|
Non-accelerated filer o
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
|
Smaller reporting company o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of
the Exchange Act).
Yes
o No þ
As of November 2, 2009, the Registrant had 48,161,591 shares of Class A Common Stock
and 5,753,833 shares of Class B Common Stock outstanding.
DELPHI FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.
FORM 10-Q
INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
AND OTHER INFORMATION
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page |
|
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION (UNAUDITED) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 1. Financial Statements |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Income for the Three and
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2009 and 2008 |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Balance Sheets at September 30, 2009 and
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Equity for the
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2009 and 2008 |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2009 and 2008 |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations |
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk |
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 4. Controls and Procedures |
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 1A. Risk Factors |
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 6. Exhibits |
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Signatures |
|
|
31 |
|
-2-
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements
DELPHI FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(Dollars in Thousands, Except Per Share Data)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Revenue: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Premium and fee income |
|
$ |
342,610 |
|
|
$ |
345,028 |
|
|
$ |
1,052,776 |
|
|
$ |
1,028,092 |
|
Net investment income |
|
|
88,682 |
|
|
|
19,407 |
|
|
|
243,560 |
|
|
|
112,494 |
|
Net realized investment losses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other than temporary impairment losses |
|
|
(73,771 |
) |
|
|
(28,173 |
) |
|
|
(137,007 |
) |
|
|
(52,479 |
) |
Less: Portion of other than temporary impairment
losses recognized in other comprehensive income |
|
|
21,748 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42,467 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net impairment losses recognized in earnings |
|
|
(52,023 |
) |
|
|
(28,173 |
) |
|
|
(94,540 |
) |
|
|
(52,479 |
) |
Other net realized investment gains (losses) |
|
|
1,564 |
|
|
|
(5,567 |
) |
|
|
(5,389 |
) |
|
|
(7,196 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(50,459 |
) |
|
|
(33,740 |
) |
|
|
(99,929 |
) |
|
|
(59,675 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss on redemption of junior subordinated deferrable
interest debentures underlying company-obligated
mandatorily redeemable capital securities issued
by unconsolidated subsidiaries |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(598 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(598 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
|
380,833 |
|
|
|
330,097 |
|
|
|
1,196,407 |
|
|
|
1,080,313 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefits and expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefits, claims and interest credited to policyholders |
|
|
240,956 |
|
|
|
244,042 |
|
|
|
748,361 |
|
|
|
730,709 |
|
Commissions |
|
|
21,886 |
|
|
|
22,254 |
|
|
|
67,046 |
|
|
|
64,374 |
|
Amortization of cost of business acquired |
|
|
26,740 |
|
|
|
21,814 |
|
|
|
76,217 |
|
|
|
58,459 |
|
Other operating expenses |
|
|
61,054 |
|
|
|
55,756 |
|
|
|
181,813 |
|
|
|
161,567 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
350,636 |
|
|
|
343,866 |
|
|
|
1,073,437 |
|
|
|
1,015,109 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss) |
|
|
30,197 |
|
|
|
(13,769 |
) |
|
|
122,970 |
|
|
|
65,204 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate debt |
|
|
3,806 |
|
|
|
4,427 |
|
|
|
11,667 |
|
|
|
12,940 |
|
Junior subordinated debentures |
|
|
3,247 |
|
|
|
3,240 |
|
|
|
9,728 |
|
|
|
9,726 |
|
Junior subordinated deferrable interest debentures
underlying company-obligated redeemable capital
securities issued by unconsolidated subsidiaries |
|
|
|
|
|
|
177 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
934 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,053 |
|
|
|
7,844 |
|
|
|
21,395 |
|
|
|
23,600 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income tax expense (benefit) |
|
|
23,144 |
|
|
|
(21,613 |
) |
|
|
101,575 |
|
|
|
41,604 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax expense (benefit) |
|
|
2,321 |
|
|
|
(11,803 |
) |
|
|
19,261 |
|
|
|
3,395 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
20,823 |
|
|
$ |
(9,810 |
) |
|
$ |
82,314 |
|
|
$ |
38,209 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic results per share of common stock: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
0.39 |
|
|
$ |
(0.20 |
) |
|
$ |
1.63 |
|
|
$ |
0.79 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted results per share of common stock: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
0.39 |
|
|
$ |
(0.20 |
) |
|
$ |
1.63 |
|
|
$ |
0.78 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends paid per share of common stock |
|
$ |
0.10 |
|
|
$ |
0.10 |
|
|
$ |
0.30 |
|
|
$ |
0.29 |
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
-3-
DELPHI FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Dollars in Thousands, Except Per Share Data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed maturity securities, available for sale |
|
$ |
4,608,184 |
|
|
$ |
3,773,382 |
|
Short-term investments |
|
|
572,802 |
|
|
|
401,620 |
|
Other investments |
|
|
542,047 |
|
|
|
479,921 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,723,033 |
|
|
|
4,654,923 |
|
Cash |
|
|
82,269 |
|
|
|
63,837 |
|
Cost of business acquired |
|
|
244,930 |
|
|
|
264,777 |
|
Reinsurance receivables |
|
|
378,277 |
|
|
|
376,731 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
93,929 |
|
|
|
93,929 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
320,428 |
|
|
|
409,103 |
|
Assets held in separate account |
|
|
109,016 |
|
|
|
90,573 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
6,951,882 |
|
|
$ |
5,953,873 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and Equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Future policy benefits: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Life |
|
$ |
346,716 |
|
|
$ |
300,567 |
|
Disability and accident |
|
|
775,320 |
|
|
|
743,690 |
|
Unpaid claims and claim expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Life |
|
|
64,110 |
|
|
|
70,076 |
|
Disability and accident |
|
|
426,802 |
|
|
|
398,671 |
|
Casualty |
|
|
1,158,937 |
|
|
|
1,061,046 |
|
Policyholder account balances |
|
|
1,452,332 |
|
|
|
1,356,932 |
|
Corporate debt |
|
|
365,750 |
|
|
|
350,750 |
|
Junior subordinated debentures |
|
|
175,000 |
|
|
|
175,000 |
|
Other liabilities and policyholder funds |
|
|
740,539 |
|
|
|
581,954 |
|
Liabilities related to separate account |
|
|
109,016 |
|
|
|
90,573 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
5,614,522 |
|
|
|
5,129,259 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred Stock, $.01 par; 50,000,000 shares authorized, none issued |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class A Common Stock, $.01 par; 150,000,000 shares authorized;
55,922,807 and 48,946,432 shares issued, respectively |
|
|
559 |
|
|
|
489 |
|
Class B Common Stock, $.01 par; 20,000,000 shares authorized;
5,981,049 shares issued |
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
60 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
659,683 |
|
|
|
522,596 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
|
|
(46,303 |
) |
|
|
(351,710 |
) |
Retained earnings |
|
|
916,309 |
|
|
|
846,390 |
|
Treasury stock, at cost; 7,761,216 shares of Class A Common Stock and
227,216 shares of Class B Common Stock |
|
|
(197,246 |
) |
|
|
(197,246 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity |
|
|
1,333,062 |
|
|
|
820,579 |
|
Noncontrolling interest |
|
|
4,298 |
|
|
|
4,035 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total equity |
|
|
1,337,360 |
|
|
|
824,614 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and equity |
|
$ |
6,951,882 |
|
|
$ |
5,953,873 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
-4-
DELPHI FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EQUITY
(Dollars in Thousands)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class A |
|
|
Class B |
|
|
Additional |
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
Non- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common |
|
|
Common |
|
|
Paid in |
|
|
Comprehensive |
|
|
Retained |
|
|
Treasury |
|
|
Shareholders |
|
|
controlling |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
Stock |
|
|
Stock |
|
|
Capital |
|
|
Income (Loss) |
|
|
Earnings |
|
|
Stock |
|
|
Equity |
|
|
Interest |
|
|
Equity |
|
Balance, January 1, 2008 |
|
$ |
487 |
|
|
$ |
59 |
|
|
$ |
509,742 |
|
|
$ |
(42,497 |
) |
|
$ |
828,116 |
|
|
$ |
(154,517 |
) |
|
$ |
1,141,390 |
|
|
$ |
30,181 |
|
|
$ |
1,171,571 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38,209 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38,209 |
|
|
|
1,697 |
|
|
|
39,906 |
|
Other comprehensive loss: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in net unrealized
depreciation on
investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(246,781 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(246,781 |
) |
|
|
(1,032 |
) |
|
|
(247,813 |
) |
Decrease in net loss on
cash flow hedge |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
589 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
589 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
589 |
|
Change in net periodic
pension cost |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(207,948 |
) |
|
|
665 |
|
|
|
(207,283 |
) |
Change in noncontrolling
interest ownership |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(491 |
) |
|
|
(491 |
) |
Exercise of stock options |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
7,197 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,200 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,200 |
|
Stock-based compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,880 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,880 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,880 |
|
Acquisition of treasury stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(42,729 |
) |
|
|
(42,729 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(42,729 |
) |
Cash dividends |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13,716 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13,716 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13,716 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, September 30, 2008 |
|
$ |
489 |
|
|
$ |
60 |
|
|
$ |
521,819 |
|
|
$ |
(288,654 |
) |
|
$ |
852,609 |
|
|
$ |
(197,246 |
) |
|
$ |
889,077` |
|
|
$ |
30,355 |
|
|
$ |
919,432 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, January 1, 2009 |
|
$ |
489 |
|
|
$ |
60 |
|
|
$ |
522,596 |
|
|
$ |
(351,710 |
) |
|
$ |
846,390 |
|
|
$ |
(197,246 |
) |
|
$ |
820,579 |
|
|
$ |
4,035 |
|
|
$ |
824,614 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative effect
adjustment, April 1, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,372 |
) |
|
|
2,372 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
82,314 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
82,314 |
|
|
|
226 |
|
|
|
82,540 |
|
Other comprehensive income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Decrease in net unrealized
depreciation on
investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
325,660 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
325,660 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
325,660 |
|
Increase in other than
temporary impairment
losses recognized in other
comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(19,343 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(19,343 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(19,343 |
) |
Decrease in net loss on
cash flow hedge |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
589 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
589 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
589 |
|
Change in net periodic
pension cost |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
873 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
873 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
873 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
390,093 |
|
|
|
226 |
|
|
|
390,319 |
|
Net contribution from
noncontrolling interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
37 |
|
Issuance of common stock |
|
|
65 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
121,056 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
121,121 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
121,121 |
|
Exercise of stock options |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,189 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,194 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,194 |
|
Stock-based compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,842 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,842 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,842 |
|
Cash dividends |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14,767 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14,767 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14,767 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, September 30, 2009 |
|
$ |
559 |
|
|
$ |
60 |
|
|
$ |
659,683 |
|
|
$ |
(46,303 |
) |
|
$ |
916,309 |
|
|
$ |
(197,246 |
) |
|
$ |
1,333,062 |
|
|
$ |
4,298 |
|
|
$ |
1,337,360 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
-5-
DELPHI FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Dollars in Thousands)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
82,314 |
|
|
$ |
38,209 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided
by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in policy liabilities and policyholder accounts |
|
|
225,538 |
|
|
|
194,967 |
|
Net change in reinsurance receivables and payables |
|
|
(4,613 |
) |
|
|
18,901 |
|
Amortization, principally the cost of business acquired and investments |
|
|
38,295 |
|
|
|
46,601 |
|
Deferred costs of business acquired |
|
|
(97,936 |
) |
|
|
(94,043 |
) |
Net realized losses on investments |
|
|
99,929 |
|
|
|
59,675 |
|
Net change in federal income tax liability |
|
|
6,632 |
|
|
|
(53,654 |
) |
Other |
|
|
(14,101 |
) |
|
|
(56,828 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
336,058 |
|
|
|
267,484 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of investments and loans made |
|
|
(1,206,214 |
) |
|
|
(1,012,307 |
) |
Sales of investments and receipts from repayment of loans |
|
|
177,957 |
|
|
|
348,569 |
|
Maturities of investments |
|
|
637,166 |
|
|
|
311,840 |
|
Net change in short-term investments |
|
|
(171,162 |
) |
|
|
(158,961 |
) |
Change in deposit in separate account |
|
|
4,845 |
|
|
|
10,547 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used by investing activities |
|
|
(557,408 |
) |
|
|
(500,312 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits to policyholder accounts |
|
|
242,614 |
|
|
|
335,082 |
|
Withdrawals from policyholder accounts |
|
|
(131,337 |
) |
|
|
(83,382 |
) |
Borrowings under revolving credit facility |
|
|
17,000 |
|
|
|
79,000 |
|
Principal payments under revolving credit facility |
|
|
(2,000 |
) |
|
|
(6,000 |
) |
Redemption of junior subordinated deferrable interest debentures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(20,619 |
) |
Proceeds from the issuance of common stock |
|
|
121,121 |
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition of treasury stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(42,729 |
) |
Cash dividends paid on common stock |
|
|
(14,767 |
) |
|
|
(13,715 |
) |
Other financing activities |
|
|
7,151 |
|
|
|
3,200 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by financing activities |
|
|
239,782 |
|
|
|
250,837 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in cash |
|
|
18,432 |
|
|
|
18,009 |
|
Cash at beginning of period |
|
|
63,837 |
|
|
|
51,240 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash at end of period |
|
$ |
82,269 |
|
|
$ |
69,249 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
-6-
DELPHI FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
Note A Significant Accounting Policies
The financial statements of Delphi Financial Group, Inc. (the Company, which term includes the
Company and its consolidated subsidiaries unless the context indicates otherwise) included herein
were prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States
(GAAP) for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of
Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by
GAAP for complete financial statements. The information furnished includes all adjustments and
accruals of a normal recurring nature, which, in the opinion of management, are necessary for a
fair presentation of results for the interim periods. Certain reclassifications have been made in
the September 30, 2008 consolidated financial statements to conform to the September 30, 2009
presentation. Operating results for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009 are not
necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ended December 31, 2009.
For further information, refer to the consolidated financial statements and footnotes thereto
included in the Companys annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, as
amended by Amendment No. 1 thereto on Form 10-K/A (the 2008 Form 10-K). Capitalized terms used
herein without definition have the meanings ascribed to them in the 2008 Form 10-K.
Accounting Changes
Basis of Accounting. In June 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) adopted the
FASB Accounting Standards Codification (the Codification) as the source of authoritative GAAP
recognized by the FASB for application by nongovernmental entities. Rules and interpretive releases
of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) under federal securities laws are also sources of
authoritative GAAP for the SEC registrants. All guidance contained in the Codification carries an
equal level of authority. The Codification is effective for financial statements issued for
interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009, with certain exceptions for nonpublic
nongovernmental entities. Since the Codification primarily identifies the sources of authoritative
accounting principles that are generally accepted and does not modify any accounting principles,
its adoption did not have a material effect on the Companys consolidated financial position or
results of operations.
Business Combinations. As of January 1, 2009, the Company adopted new guidance issued by the FASB
on business combinations. This new guidance establishes principles and requirements for how the
acquirer in a business combination: (a) recognizes and measures in its financial statements the
identifiable assets acquired, the liabilities assumed, and any noncontrolling interest in the
acquiree, (b) recognizes and measures the goodwill acquired in the business combination or a gain
from a bargain purchase and (c) determines what information to disclose to enable users of the
financial statements to evaluate the nature and financial effects of the business combination.
This new guidance requires an acquirer to recognize the assets acquired, the liabilities assumed,
and any noncontrolling interest in the acquiree at the acquisition date, measured at their fair
values as of that date, with specified limited exceptions. The new guidance is effective for
business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after the beginning of the first
annual reporting period beginning on or after December 15, 2008. Assets and liabilities arising
from a business combination having an earlier acquisition date are not to be adjusted upon the
effectiveness of this statement. The adoption of the new guidance did not have any effect on the
Companys consolidated financial position or results of operations.
In April 2009, the FASB issued new guidance for accounting for assets acquired and liabilities
assumed in a business combination that arise from contingencies. This new guidance addresses
application issues relating to initial recognition and measurement, subsequent measurement and
accounting, and disclosure of assets and liabilities arising from contingencies in a business
combination. Acquirers are now required to recognize at fair value an asset acquired or liability
assumed in a business combination that arises from a contingency if the acquisition date fair value
of that asset or liability can be determined during the measurement period. If the acquisition
date fair value cannot be determined during the measurement period, a contingency shall be
recognized if information available before the end of the measurement period indicates that it is
probable that an asset existed or liability had been incurred at the acquisition date and the
amount thereof can be reasonably estimated. The new guidance is effective for assets or
liabilities arising from contingencies in business combinations for which the acquisition date is
on or after January 1, 2009. The adoption of the new guidance did not have any effect on the
Companys consolidated financial position or results of operations.
-7-
DELPHI FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
Note A Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)
Noncontrolling Interests. As of January 1, 2009, the Company adopted new guidance issued by the
FASB on noncontrolling interests. This new guidance prescribes the accounting for and the
financial reporting of a noncontrolling interest in a companys subsidiary, which is the portion of
the equity (residual interest) in the subsidiary attributable to owners thereof other than the
parent and the parents affiliates. The new guidance requires that a noncontrolling interest in a
consolidated subsidiary be presented in a consolidated statement of financial position as a
separate component of equity and that changes in ownership interests in a consolidated subsidiary
that does not result in a loss of control be recorded as an equity transaction with no gain or loss
recognized. For a change in the ownership interests in a consolidated subsidiary that results in a
loss of control or a deconsolidation, a gain or loss is recognized in the amount of the difference
between the proceeds of that sale and the carrying amount of the interest sold. In the case of a
deconsolidation, the new guidance requires the establishment of a new fair value basis for the
remaining noncontrolling ownership interest, with a gain or loss recognized for the difference
between that new basis and the historical cost basis of the remaining ownership interest. Upon
adoption, the amounts of consolidated net income and consolidated comprehensive income attributable
to the parent and the noncontrolling interest must be presented separately on the face of the
consolidated financial statements. A detailed reconciliation of the changes in the equity of a
noncontrolling interest during the period is also required. The adoption of the new guidance did
not have a material effect on the Companys consolidated financial position or results of
operations.
Derivative Instruments. As of January 1, 2009, the Company adopted new guidance issued by the FASB
concerning disclosures about derivative instruments and hedging activities. This new guidance
requires entities to provide enhanced disclosures about (a) how and why an entity uses derivative
instruments, (b) how derivative instruments and related hedged items are accounted for and (c) how
derivative instruments and related hedged items affect an entitys financial position, results of
operations and cash flows. The new guidance requires qualitative disclosures about objectives and
strategies for using derivatives, quantitative disclosures about fair value amounts of gains and
losses on derivative instruments and credit-risk-related contingent features in derivative
instruments. The adoption of the new guidance did not have any effect on the Companys
consolidated financial position or results of operations.
The Company, at times, enters into futures and option contracts and interest rate and credit
default swap agreements in connection with its investment strategy and indexed annuity program.
These agreements are primarily utilized to reduce the risk associated with changes in the value of
the Companys fixed maturity portfolio and to fund the interest crediting obligations associated
with the Companys indexed annuity contracts. These positions are carried at fair value with gains
and losses included in income. The Company recognized net investment income of $1.6 million during
the nine months ended September 30, 2009 related to these instruments. The Company had no material
outstanding futures and option contracts or interest rate and credit default swap agreements at
September 30, 2009. The Company, at times, may also invest in non-dollar denominated fixed
maturity securities that expose it to fluctuations in foreign currency rates, and, therefore, may
hedge such exposure by using currency forward contracts. The Company had no material currency
forward contracts outstanding at September 30, 2009.
To mitigate the risk of interest rates rising before the issuance of the 2033 Senior Notes could be
completed, the Company entered into a treasury rate lock agreement in September 2002, with a
notional amount of $150.0 million and an anticipated debt term of 10 years. The Company paid $13.8
million upon the issuance of the 2033 Senior Notes in May 2003 to settle the treasury rate lock
agreement, of which $12.1 million was recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income and the
remaining loss was deemed ineffective and recognized as a reduction of net investment income. This
transaction was accounted for as a cash flow hedge; accordingly, $12.1 million of the loss on the
treasury rate lock agreement is being amortized into interest expense ratably over 10 years. The
Company will amortize $1.2 million of such loss into interest expense over the next twelve months.
The Company recognized $0.9 million of such loss into interest expense during the first nine months
of 2009 and 2008. The net loss on the treasury rate lock agreement included in accumulated other
comprehensive loss was $2.9 million (net of an income tax benefit of $1.6 million) at September 30,
2009.
Earnings Per Share. As of January 1, 2009, the Company adopted new guidance issued by the FASB on
determining whether instruments granted in share-based payment transactions are participating
securities. This new guidance addresses whether unvested instruments granted in share-based
payment transactions are participating
-8-
DELPHI FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
Note A Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)
securities which must be included in the earnings allocation in computing earnings per share. The
new guidance provides guidance for the calculation of earnings per share for share-based payment
awards with rights to dividends or dividend equivalents. The adoption of the new guidance did not
have a material effect on the Companys consolidated financial position or results of operations.
Fair Value Measurements. Effective April 1, 2009, the Company adopted new guidance issued by the
FASB on interim disclosures about fair value of financial instruments. This new guidance requires
disclosures about fair value of financial instruments for interim reporting periods as well as in
annual financial statements. The adoption of the new guidance did not have a material effect on
the Companys consolidated financial position or results of operations.
Effective April 1, 2009, the Company adopted new guidance issued by the FASB on determining fair
value which provides additional guidance for estimating fair value of financial instruments when
the volume and level of activity for the asset or liability have significantly decreased. It also
provides guidance on identifying circumstances indicating that a transaction is not orderly, and
indicates that significant decreases in the volume and level of activity of an asset or liability
in relation to normal market activity for the asset or liability require a company to further
evaluate transactions or quoted prices and exercise significant judgment in arriving at the fair
value. The adoption of the new guidance did not have a material effect on the Companys
consolidated financial position or results of operations
Other Than Temporary Impairments. Effective April 1, 2009, the Company adopted new guidance on the
recognition and presentation of other than temporary impairments. Under this new guidance, which
applies only to debt securities, companies are required to recognize in earnings only the credit
component of an other than temporary impairment. The remainder of the impairment will continue to
be recognized in other comprehensive income. The new guidance also modifies the existing
requirement for a company to assert that it has both the intent and the ability to hold a security
for a period of time sufficient to allow for an anticipated recovery in its fair value to its
amortized cost basis. In lieu of this requirement, a company is only required to assert that it
does not have the intent to sell the debt security and that it is more likely than not that it will
not be required to sell the debt security before its anticipated recovery. Upon its adoption of
the new guidance, the Company recorded an after-tax increase of $2.4 million in retained earnings
and a decrease in the same amount in other comprehensive income to reclassify the non-credit
related portion of previously recognized other than temporary impairments on fixed maturity
securities held as of April 1, 2009.
Subsequent events. In May 2009, the FASB issued new guidance on subsequent events. This new
guidance establishes principles for accounting and disclosure of events or transactions that occur
after the balance sheet date but before financial statements are issued or are available to be
issued. The new guidance requires an entity to (a) recognize in the financial statements the
effects of all subsequent events that provide additional evidence about conditions that existed at
the date of the balance sheet, including the estimates inherent in the process of preparing
financial statements, (b) disclose the nature and financial effect of subsequent events that
provide evidence about conditions that did not exist at the date of the balance sheet but must be
disclosed to keep the financial statements from being misleading, and (c) evaluate subsequent
events for recognition and disclosure through the date the financial statements are issued or are
available to be issued. The new guidance also requires entities to disclose the date through which
subsequent events have been evaluated. The new guidance is effective for financial statements for
interim and annual periods ending after June 15, 2009. Accordingly, the Company evaluated
subsequent events for recognition and disclosure through the filing date of this Form 10-Q. The
adoption of this new guidance did not have any effect on the Companys consolidated financial
position or results of operations.
-9-
DELPHI FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
Note A Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)
Recently Issued Accounting Standards
In June 2009, the FASB issued new guidance on the accounting for the transfers of financial assets.
This new guidance aims to improve the relevance, representational faithfulness and comparability
of the information that a reporting entity provides in its financial reports about transfers of
financial assets, the effects of a transfer of financial assets on its financial position,
financial performance, and cash flows and a transferors continuing involvement in transferred
financial assets. This new guidance removes the concept of a qualifying special-purpose entity from
the existing guidance and removes the exception from applying applicable consolidation guidance to
variable interest entities that were considered qualifying special-purpose entities. The new
guidance is effective for financial statements for interim and annual periods ending after November
15, 2009 and the transfers occurring on or after the effective date. The Company has not yet
determined the impact, if any, that the adoption of SFAS No. 166 will have on its consolidated
financial position and results of operations.
In June 2009, the FASB issued new guidance on the accounting for variable interest entities
(VIEs). This new guidance requires ongoing assessments of whether an enterprise is a primary
beneficiary of a VIE and replaces the quantitative approach to identifying variable interest
entities and determining a variable interest entitys primary beneficiary with a qualitative
method. The qualitative method is based on an enterprises (a) power to direct the activities of a
VIE that most significantly impact the entitys economic performance and (b) obligation to absorb
losses or right to receive benefits that could be potentially material to the VIE. The new
guidance also requires enhanced disclosures that will provide users of financial statements with
more transparent information about an enterprises involvement in a VIE. The new guidance is
effective for financial statements for interim and annual periods ending after November 15, 2009.
The Company has not yet determined the impact, if any, that the adoption of the new guidance will
have on its consolidated financial position and results of operations.
In August 2009, the FASB issued guidance clarifying that in circumstances in which a quoted price
in an active market for the identical liability is not available, a reporting entity is required to
measure fair value of a liability using techniques such as referring to the quoted price of the
identical liability when traded as an asset, the quoted prices for similar liabilities, the quoted
price of similar liabilities when traded as assets or a present value technique. The fair value of
a liability is not adjusted to reflect the impact of contractual restrictions that prevent its
transfer. The new guidance is effective for financial statements for interim and annual periods
beginning after August 26, 2009, with early adoption permitted under certain conditions. The
Company has not yet determined the impact, if any, that the adoption of the new guidance will have
on its consolidated financial position and results of operations.
In September 2009, the FASB issued guidance on determining fair value for investments in certain
entities that calculate net asset value per share or its equivalent. This new guidance permits the
fair value of an investment in such an entity to be measured on the basis of the entitys reported
net asset value per share if the net asset value is calculated in a manner consistent with the
measurement principles of GAAP for investment companies and requires enhanced disclosures about the
nature and risks of investments in such entities. The standard is effective for interim and
annual periods ending after December 15, 2009. The Company has not yet determined the impact, if
any, that the adoption of the new guidance will have on its consolidated financial position and
results of operations.
Note B Investments
At September 30, 2009, the Company had fixed maturity securities available for sale with a carrying
value and a fair value of $4,608.2 million and an amortized cost of $4,666.8 million. At December
31, 2008, the Company had fixed maturity securities available for sale with a carrying value and a
fair value of $3,773.4 million and an amortized cost of $4,322.0 million. Declines in market value
relative to such securities amortized cost determined to be other than temporary pursuant to the
Companys methodology for such determinations, as further discussed below, are reflected as
reductions in the amortized cost of such securities.
-10-
DELPHI FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
Note B Investments (Continued)
The amortized cost and fair value of investments in fixed maturity securities
available for sale are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross Unrealized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Than |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Temporary |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Gains |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Impairments |
|
|
Value |
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands) |
|
Residential mortgage-backed securities |
|
$ |
1,493,735 |
|
|
$ |
88,050 |
|
|
$ |
(86,710 |
) |
|
$ |
(31,048 |
) |
|
$ |
1,464,027 |
|
Commercial mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
34,962 |
|
|
|
164 |
|
|
|
(6,656 |
) |
|
|
(785 |
) |
|
|
27,685 |
|
Corporate securities |
|
|
1,244,356 |
|
|
|
49,595 |
|
|
|
(40,421 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,253,530 |
|
Collateralized debt obligations |
|
|
220,587 |
|
|
|
384 |
|
|
|
(100,130 |
) |
|
|
(1,573 |
) |
|
|
119,268 |
|
U.S. Treasury and other U.S. Government
guaranteed securities |
|
|
100,107 |
|
|
|
5,875 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
105,982 |
|
U.S. Government-sponsored enterprise securities |
|
|
6,752 |
|
|
|
599 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,351 |
|
Obligations of U.S. states, municipalities and
political subdivisions |
|
|
1,566,295 |
|
|
|
75,085 |
|
|
|
(11,039 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,630,341 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total fixed maturity securities |
|
$ |
4,666,794 |
|
|
$ |
219,752 |
|
|
$ |
(244,956 |
) |
|
$ |
(33,406 |
) |
|
$ |
4,608,184 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross Unrealized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Than |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Temporary |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Gains |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Impairments |
|
|
Value |
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands) |
|
Residential mortgage-backed securities |
|
$ |
1,367,041 |
|
|
$ |
40,489 |
|
|
$ |
(207,905 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,199,625 |
|
Commercial mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
44,190 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(18,891 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,299 |
|
Corporate securities |
|
|
1,339,519 |
|
|
|
9,688 |
|
|
|
(183,995 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,165,212 |
|
Collateralized debt obligations |
|
|
227,229 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(116,268 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
110,961 |
|
U.S. Treasury and other U.S. Government
guaranteed securities |
|
|
51,826 |
|
|
|
5,905 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
57,731 |
|
U.S. Government-sponsored enterprise securities |
|
|
22,031 |
|
|
|
3,147 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,178 |
|
Obligations of U.S. states, municipalities and
political subdivisions |
|
|
1,270,166 |
|
|
|
19,230 |
|
|
|
(100,020 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,189,376 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total fixed maturity securities |
|
$ |
4,322,002 |
|
|
$ |
78,459 |
|
|
$ |
(627,079 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
3,773,382 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The amortized cost and fair value of fixed maturity securities available for sale at September 30,
2009, by contractual maturity, are shown below. Expected maturities will differ from contractual
maturities because issuers may have the right to call or prepay obligations, with or without
prepayment penalties.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Value |
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands) |
|
Residential mortgage-backed securities |
|
$ |
1,493,735 |
|
|
$ |
1,464,027 |
|
Commercial mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
34,962 |
|
|
|
27,685 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other fixed maturity securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One year or less |
|
|
57,017 |
|
|
|
57,097 |
|
Greater than 1, up to 5 years |
|
|
493,228 |
|
|
|
495,930 |
|
Greater than 5, up to 10 years |
|
|
851,477 |
|
|
|
830,221 |
|
Greater than 10 years |
|
|
1,736,375 |
|
|
|
1,733,224 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
4,666,794 |
|
|
$ |
4,608,184 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-11-
DELPHI FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
Note B Investments (Continued)
The gross unrealized losses and fair value of fixed maturity securities available for sale,
aggregated by investment category and length of time that individual securities have been in a
continuous unrealized loss position, are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
Less Than 12 Months |
|
|
12 Months or More |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
Value |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands) |
|
Residential mortgage-backed securities |
|
$ |
36,605 |
|
|
$ |
(139 |
) |
|
$ |
446,865 |
|
|
$ |
(117,619 |
) |
|
$ |
483,470 |
|
|
$ |
(117,758 |
) |
Commercial mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,111 |
|
|
|
(7,441 |
) |
|
|
24,111 |
|
|
|
(7,441 |
) |
Corporate securities |
|
|
20,419 |
|
|
|
(180 |
) |
|
|
313,002 |
|
|
|
(40,241 |
) |
|
|
333,421 |
|
|
|
(40,421 |
) |
Collateralized debt obligations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
112,854 |
|
|
|
(101,703 |
) |
|
|
112,854 |
|
|
|
(101,703 |
) |
U.S. Treasury and other U.S. Government
guaranteed securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Government-sponsored enterprise
securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Obligations of U.S. states, municipalities
& political subdivisions |
|
|
37,128 |
|
|
|
(196 |
) |
|
|
142,204 |
|
|
|
(10,843 |
) |
|
|
179,332 |
|
|
|
(11,039 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total fixed maturity securities |
|
$ |
94,152 |
|
|
$ |
(515 |
) |
|
$ |
1,039,036 |
|
|
$ |
(277,847 |
) |
|
$ |
1,133,188 |
|
|
$ |
(278,362 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
Less Than 12 Months |
|
|
12 Months or More |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
Value |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands) |
|
Residential mortgage-backed securities |
|
$ |
415,738 |
|
|
$ |
(140,542 |
) |
|
$ |
151,971 |
|
|
$ |
(67,363 |
) |
|
$ |
567,709 |
|
|
$ |
(207,905 |
) |
Commercial mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
22,089 |
|
|
|
(9,819 |
) |
|
|
3,211 |
|
|
|
(9,072 |
) |
|
|
25,300 |
|
|
|
(18,891 |
) |
Corporate securities |
|
|
505,595 |
|
|
|
(67,205 |
) |
|
|
256,980 |
|
|
|
(116,790 |
) |
|
|
762,575 |
|
|
|
(183,995 |
) |
Collateralized debt obligations |
|
|
76,003 |
|
|
|
(62,854 |
) |
|
|
34,958 |
|
|
|
(53,414 |
) |
|
|
110,961 |
|
|
|
(116,268 |
) |
U.S. Treasury and other U.S. Government
guaranteed securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Government-sponsored enterprise
securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Obligations of U.S. states, municipalities
& political subdivisions |
|
|
520,492 |
|
|
|
(61,106 |
) |
|
|
164,817 |
|
|
|
(38,914 |
) |
|
|
685,309 |
|
|
|
(100,020 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total fixed maturity securities |
|
$ |
1,539,917 |
|
|
$ |
(341,526 |
) |
|
$ |
611,937 |
|
|
$ |
(285,553 |
) |
|
$ |
2,151,854 |
|
|
$ |
(627,079 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net realized investment losses arose from the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands) |
|
Fixed maturity securities, available
for sale |
|
$ |
(41,918 |
) |
|
$ |
(31,444 |
) |
|
$ |
(85,929 |
) |
|
$ |
(48,639 |
) |
Other investments |
|
|
(8,541 |
) |
|
|
(2,296 |
) |
|
|
(14,000 |
) |
|
|
(11,036 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(50,459 |
) |
|
$ |
(33,740 |
) |
|
$ |
(99,929 |
) |
|
$ |
(59,675 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-12-
DELPHI FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
Note B Investments (Continued)
Proceeds from sales of fixed maturity securities during the first nine months of 2009 and 2008 were
$394.2 million and $196.8 million, respectively. Gross gains of $17.4 million and gross losses of
$(25.6) million were realized on the 2009 sales and gross gains of $2.6 million and gross losses of
$(9.9) million were realized on the 2008 sales. Proceeds from sales of fixed maturity securities
during the third quarters of 2009 and 2008 were $76.2 million and $90.7 million, respectively.
Gross gains of $3.7 million and gross losses of $(3.1) million were realized on sales during the
third quarter of 2009 and gross gains of $0.4 million and gross losses of $(5.6) million were
realized on sales during the third quarter of 2008. Net realized investment gains and losses on
investment sales are determined under the specific identification method and are included in
income. In the first nine months of 2009 and 2008 the net losses realized on fixed maturity
securities also include provisions for the other than temporary declines in the values of certain
fixed maturity securities of $(77.7) million and $(41.4) million, respectively. The change in
unrealized appreciation and depreciation on investments, primarily relating to fixed maturity
securities, is included as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income or loss.
The Company regularly evaluates its investment portfolio utilizing its established methodology to
determine whether declines in the fair values of its investments are other than temporary. Under
this methodology, management evaluates, among other things, the financial position and prospects of
the issuer, conditions in the issuers industry and geographic area, liquidity of the investment,
changes in the amount or timing of expected future cash flows from the investment and recent
changes in credit ratings of the issuer by nationally recognized rating agencies to determine if
and when a decline in the fair value of an investment below amortized cost is other than temporary.
Management also considers the length of time and extent to which the fair value of the investment
is lower than its amortized cost and evaluates whether the Company intends to, or will more likely
than not be required to, sell the investment before the anticipated recovery in the investments
fair value. In addition, the Company evaluates loan to collateral value ratios, current levels of
subordination and vintages of its residential and commercial mortgage-backed securities.
If the fair value of a fixed maturity security declines in value below the Companys amortized cost
and the Company intends to sell or determines that it will more likely than not be required to sell
the security before recovery of its amortized cost basis, management considers the security to be
other than temporarily impaired and reports its decline in fair value as a realized investment
loss. If, however, the Company does not intend to sell the security and determines that it is not
more likely than not that it will not be required to do so, declines in the fair value that are
considered in the judgment of management to be other than temporary are separated into the amounts
representing credit losses and the amounts related to other factors. Amounts representing credit
losses are reported as realized investment losses in the income statement and amounts related to
other factors are included as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income or loss, net of
the related income tax benefit and the related adjustment to cost of business acquired. The amount
of credit loss is determined by discounting the securitys expected cash flows at its effective
interest rate, taking into account the securitys purchase price. Declines in the fair value of
all other investments that are considered in the judgment of management to be other than temporary
are reported as realized investment losses.
During the first nine months of 2009, the Company recognized $89.1 million of after-tax other than
temporary impairment losses, of which $61.5 million was recognized as after-tax realized investment
losses in the income statement related to credit losses and $27.6 million was recognized, net of
the related income tax benefit, as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income on the
balance sheet related to noncredit losses.
-13-
DELPHI FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
Note B Investments (Continued)
The following table provides a reconciliation of the beginning and ending balances of other than
temporary impairments on fixed maturity securities held by the Company for which a portion of the
other than temporary impairment was recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income or loss
(dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
Nine months ended |
|
|
|
September 30, 2009 |
|
|
September 30, 2009 |
|
Balance at the beginning of period |
|
$ |
59,420 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Increases attributable to credit losses on securities for which
an other than temporary impairment was not previously recognized |
|
|
17,775 |
|
|
|
77,384 |
|
Increases attributable to credit losses on securities for which
an other than temporary impairment was previously recognized |
|
|
2,332 |
|
|
|
2,143 |
|
Reductions due to sales, maturities, pay downs or prepayments of
securities
for which an other than temporary impairment was previously
recognized |
|
|
(9,454 |
) |
|
|
(9,454 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at the end of the period |
|
$ |
70,073 |
|
|
$ |
70,073 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The gross unrealized losses at September 30, 2009 are attributable to over eight hundred fixed
maturity security positions, with the largest unrealized loss associated with any one security
equal to $6.1 million. Unrealized losses attributable to fixed maturity securities having
investment grade ratings by a nationally recognized statistical rating organization comprised 51%
of the aggregate gross unrealized losses at September 30, 2009, with the remainder of such losses
being attributable to non-investment grade fixed maturity securities.
At September 30, 2009, the Company held approximately $1,145.6 million of insured municipal fixed
maturity securities, which represented approximately 20% of the Companys total invested assets.
These securities had a weighted average credit rating of AA by nationally recognized statistical
rating organizations at September 30, 2009. For the portion of these securities having ratings by
nationally recognized statistical rating organizations without giving effect to the credit
enhancement provided by the insurance, which totaled $817.2 million at September 30, 2009, the
weighted average credit rating at such date by such organizations was also AA. Insurers of
significant portions of the municipal fixed maturity securities held by the Company at September
30, 2009 included National Public Finance Guarantee Corp. ($322.9 million), Financial Security
Assurance Inc. ($171.2 million), Ambac Financial Group, Inc. ($146.1 million), and Financial
Guaranty Insurance Company ($40.9 million). At September 30, 2009, the Company did not have
significant holdings of credit enhanced asset-backed or mortgage-backed securities, nor did it have
any significant direct investments in the guarantors of the municipal fixed maturity securities
held by the Company.
Net investment income was attributable to the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands) |
|
Gross investment income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed maturity securities, available for sale |
|
$ |
77,648 |
|
|
$ |
35,476 |
|
|
$ |
225,354 |
|
|
$ |
142,526 |
|
Mortgage loans |
|
|
1,121 |
|
|
|
3,072 |
|
|
|
2,527 |
|
|
|
10,274 |
|
Short-term investments |
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
1,953 |
|
|
|
348 |
|
|
|
7,114 |
|
Other |
|
|
16,510 |
|
|
|
(14,042 |
) |
|
|
38,586 |
|
|
|
(24,877 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
95,305 |
|
|
|
26,459 |
|
|
|
266,815 |
|
|
|
135,037 |
|
Less: Investment expenses |
|
|
(6,623 |
) |
|
|
(7,052 |
) |
|
|
(23,255 |
) |
|
|
(22,543 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
88,682 |
|
|
$ |
19,407 |
|
|
$ |
243,560 |
|
|
$ |
112,494 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-14-
DELPHI FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
Note C Fair Value Measurements
The Company measures its assets and liabilities recorded at fair value in the consolidated balance
sheet based on the framework set forth in the GAAP fair value accounting guidance. This framework
establishes a fair value hierarchy of three levels based upon the transparency and availability of
information used in measuring the fair value of assets or liabilities as of the measurement date.
The levels are categorized as follows:
Level 1- Valuation is based upon quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in active
markets. Level 1 fair value is not subject to valuation adjustments or block discounts.
Level 2 Valuation is based upon quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets
or quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active. In addition,
a company may use various valuation techniques or pricing models that use observable inputs to
measure fair value.
Level 3 Valuation is generated from techniques in which one or more of the significant inputs for
valuing such assets or liabilities are not observable. These inputs may reflect the Companys best
estimates of the various assumptions that market participants would use in valuing the financial
assets and financial liabilities.
For these purposes, the Company determines the existence of an active market for an asset or
liability based on its judgment as to whether transactions for the asset or liability occur in such
market with sufficient frequency and volume to provide reliable pricing information. If the
Company concludes that there has been a significant decrease in the volume and level of activity
for an investment in relation to normal market activity for such investment, adjustments to
transactions and quoted prices are made to estimate fair value.
The Companys investments in fixed maturity securities available for sale, equity securities
available for sale, trading account securities, assets held in the separate account and securities
sold, not yet purchased are carried at fair value. The methodologies and valuation techniques used
by the Company to value its assets and liabilities measured at fair value are described below.
Instruments included in fixed maturity securities available for sale include mortgage-backed and
corporate securities, U.S. Treasury and other U.S. government guaranteed securities, securities
issued by U.S. government-sponsored enterprises, and obligations of U.S. states, municipalities and
political subdivisions. The market liquidity of each security is taken into consideration in the
valuation technique used to value such security. For securities where market transactions
involving identical or comparable assets generate sufficient relevant information, the Company
employs a market approach to valuation. If sufficient information is not generated from market
transactions involving identical or comparable assets, the Company uses an income approach to
valuation. The majority of the instruments included in fixed maturity securities available for sale
are valued utilizing observable inputs; accordingly, they are categorized in either Level 1 or
Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy described above. However, in instances where significant
inputs utilized are unobservable, the securities are categorized in Level 3 of the fair value
hierarchy.
The inputs used in the valuation techniques employed by the Company are provided by nationally
recognized pricing services, external investment managers and internal resources. To assess these
inputs, the Companys review process includes, but is not limited to, quantitative analysis
including benchmarking, initial and ongoing evaluations of methodologies used by external parties
to calculate fair value, and ongoing evaluations of fair value estimates based on the Companys
knowledge and monitoring of market conditions.
Residential mortgage-backed securities and commercial mortgage-backed securities include U.S.
agency securities and collateralized mortgage obligations. The Company uses various valuation
techniques and pricing models to measure the fair value of these instruments, including
option-adjusted spread models, volatility-driven multi-dimensional single cash flow stream models
and matrix correlation to comparable securities. A portion of the Companys investments in
mortgage-backed securities are valued using observable inputs and therefore categorized in Level 2
of the fair value hierarchy. The remaining mortgage-backed securities are valued using varying
numbers of non-binding broker quotes or a discount rate adjustment technique based on internal
assumptions for expected cash flows and appropriately risk-adjusted discount rates. These
methodologies rely on unobservable inputs and thus these securities are categorized in Level 3 of
the fair value hierarchy.
-15-
DELPHI FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
Note C Fair Value Measurements (Continued)
Corporate securities primarily include fixed rate corporate bonds, floating and variable rate notes
and securities acquired through private placements. The Company uses recently executed
transactions, market price quotations, benchmark yields and issuer spreads to arrive at the fair
value of its investments in corporate securities and collateralized debt obligations. The majority
of the corporate securities, other than securities acquired through private placements, are
categorized in Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy. Collateralized debt obligations and private
placement corporate securities are valued with cash flow models using yield curves, issuer-provided
information and material events as key inputs. As these inputs are generally unobservable,
collateralized debt obligations and private placement securities are categorized in Level 3 of the
fair value hierarchy.
U.S. Treasury and other U.S. government guaranteed securities include U.S. Treasury bonds and
notes, Treasury Inflation Protected Securities (TIPS) and other U.S. government guaranteed
securities. The fair values of the U.S. Treasury securities and TIPS are based on quoted prices in
active markets and are generally categorized in Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy.
Other U.S. government guaranteed securities are valued based on observable inputs including
interest rate yield curves, maturity dates, and credit spreads relating to similar instruments.
Accordingly, these securities are generally categorized in Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.
U.S. government-sponsored enterprise securities include issues of medium term notes by U.S.
government-sponsored enterprises. The Company uses recently executed transactions, market price
quotations, benchmark yields and issuer spreads to arrive at the fair value of these instruments.
These inputs are generally observable and these securities are generally categorized in Level 2 of
the fair value hierarchy.
Obligations of U.S. states, municipalities and political subdivisions primarily include bonds or
notes issued by U.S municipalities. The Company values these securities using recently executed
transactions, spreads, benchmark curves including treasury benchmarks, and trustee reports. These
inputs are generally observable and these securities are generally categorized in Level 2 of the
fair value hierarchy.
Other investments held at fair value primarily consist of equity securities available for sale and
trading account securities. These investments are primarily valued at quoted active market prices
and are therefore categorized in Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy. For private equity
investments, since quoted market prices are not available, the transaction price is used as the
best estimate of fair value at inception. When evidence is believed to support a change to the
carrying value from the transaction price, adjustments are made to reflect expected exit values.
Ongoing reviews by Company management are based on assessments of each underlying investment,
incorporating, among other things, the evaluation of financing and sale transactions with third
parties, expected cash flows, material events and market-based information. These investments are
included in Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy.
Assets held in the separate account represent funds invested in a separately administered variable
life insurance product for which the policyholder, rather than the Company, bears the investment
risk. These assets are invested in a limited liability company that invests in entities which
trade in various financial instruments. The Company concluded that the value calculated using the
equity method of accounting was reflective of the fair market value of such investments. The
investment portfolios of the funds in which the fund investments are maintained vary from fund to
fund, but are generally comprised of liquid, publicly traded securities that have readily
determinable market values and which are carried at fair value on the financial statements of such
funds, substantially all of which are audited annually. The amount that an investor is entitled to
receive upon the redemption of its investment from the applicable fund is determined by reference
to such security values. The Company utilizes the financial statements furnished by the funds to
determine the values of its investments in such funds and the carrying value of each such
investment, which is based on its proportionate interest in the relevant fund as of the balance
sheet date. These investments are included in Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy.
Other liabilities measured at fair value include securities sold, not yet purchased. These
securities are valued using the quoted active market prices of the securities sold and are
categorized in Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy.
-16-
DELPHI FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
Note C Fair Value Measurements (Continued)
Assets and liabilities measured at fair value in the consolidated balance sheet on a recurring
basis are summarized below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
Level 1 |
|
|
Level 2 |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed maturity securities, available for sale: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential mortgage-backed securities |
|
$ |
1,464,027 |
|
|
$ |
761 |
|
|
$ |
1,303,745 |
|
|
$ |
159,521 |
|
Commercial mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
27,685 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,685 |
|
Corporate securities |
|
|
1,253,530 |
|
|
|
2,958 |
|
|
|
1,131,255 |
|
|
|
119,317 |
|
Collateralized debt obligations |
|
|
119,268 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
119,268 |
|
U.S. Treasury and other U.S. Government
guaranteed securities |
|
|
105,982 |
|
|
|
74,135 |
|
|
|
29,110 |
|
|
|
2,737 |
|
U.S. Government-sponsored enterprise
securities |
|
|
7,351 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,351 |
|
|
|
|
|
Obligations of U.S. states, municipalities
and political subdivisions |
|
|
1,630,341 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,630,341 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other investments |
|
|
128,041 |
|
|
|
111,574 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,467 |
|
Assets held in separate account |
|
|
109,016 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
109,016 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
4,845,241 |
|
|
$ |
189,428 |
|
|
$ |
4,101,802 |
|
|
$ |
554,011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other liabilities |
|
$ |
58,695 |
|
|
$ |
58,695 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table provides reconciliations for Level 3 assets measured at fair value on a
recurring basis.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Treasury and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential |
|
|
Commercial |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other U.S. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage- |
|
|
Mortgage- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collateralized |
|
|
Govt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
held in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
backed |
|
|
backed |
|
|
Corporate |
|
|
Debt |
|
|
Guaranteed |
|
|
Other |
|
|
Separate |
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
Securities |
|
|
Securities |
|
|
Securities |
|
|
Obligations |
|
|
Securities |
|
|
Investments |
|
|
Account |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of quarter |
|
$ |
554,020 |
|
|
$ |
180,356 |
|
|
$ |
18,736 |
|
|
$ |
131,745 |
|
|
$ |
103,499 |
|
|
$ |
2,185 |
|
|
$ |
17,310 |
|
|
$ |
100,189 |
|
Total (losses) gains |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Included in earnings |
|
|
(29,829 |
) |
|
|
(1,077 |
) |
|
|
(4,794 |
) |
|
|
(19,917 |
) |
|
|
(3,095 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(946 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Included in other comprehensive income |
|
|
37,839 |
|
|
|
1,764 |
|
|
|
13,868 |
|
|
|
2,740 |
|
|
|
19,273 |
|
|
|
59 |
|
|
|
135 |
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases, issuances and settlements |
|
|
26,326 |
|
|
|
10,307 |
|
|
|
(125 |
) |
|
|
7,265 |
|
|
|
(409 |
) |
|
|
493 |
|
|
|
(32 |
) |
|
|
8,827 |
|
Net transfer (out of) in to Level 3 |
|
|
(34,345 |
) |
|
|
(31,829 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,516 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of the period |
|
$ |
554,011 |
|
|
$ |
159,521 |
|
|
$ |
27,685 |
|
|
$ |
119,317 |
|
|
$ |
119,268 |
|
|
$ |
2,737 |
|
|
$ |
16,467 |
|
|
$ |
109,016 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net losses for the period included in
earnings
attributable to the net change in
unrealized
gains and losses of assets measured
at fair
value using unobservable inputs and held
at September 30, 2009 (1) |
|
$ |
(38,893 |
) |
|
$ |
(8,826 |
) |
|
$ |
(4,887 |
) |
|
$ |
(19,933 |
) |
|
$ |
(4,295 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(952 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
In the third quarter of 2009, net losses of $0.5 million and
$38.4 million were reported in the
consolidated statements of income under the captions net investment income and net
realized investment losses, respectively. |
-17-
DELPHI FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
Note C Fair Value Measurements (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months Ended September 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Treasury and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential |
|
|
Commercial |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other U.S. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage- |
|
|
Mortgage- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collateralized |
|
|
Govt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
held in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
backed |
|
|
backed |
|
|
Corporate |
|
|
Debt |
|
|
Guaranteed |
|
|
Other |
|
|
Separate |
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
Securities |
|
|
Securities |
|
|
Securities |
|
|
Obligations |
|
|
Securities |
|
|
Investments |
|
|
Account |
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands) |
|
Balance at beginning of period |
|
$ |
735,379 |
|
|
$ |
163,004 |
|
|
$ |
25,299 |
|
|
$ |
323,043 |
|
|
$ |
109,358 |
|
|
$ |
2,608 |
|
|
$ |
21,494 |
|
|
$ |
90,573 |
|
Total (losses) gains |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Included in earnings |
|
|
(61,614 |
) |
|
|
(23,395 |
) |
|
|
(4,305 |
) |
|
|
(30,428 |
) |
|
|
(3,993 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
507 |
|
|
|
|
|
Included in other
comprehensive income |
|
|
43,499 |
|
|
|
15,791 |
|
|
|
11,614 |
|
|
|
3,245 |
|
|
|
14,185 |
|
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
(1,383 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Purchases, issuances and settlements |
|
|
(117,633 |
) |
|
|
19,444 |
|
|
|
(4,923 |
) |
|
|
(146,246 |
) |
|
|
(282 |
) |
|
|
82 |
|
|
|
(4,151 |
) |
|
|
18,443 |
|
Net transfer (out of) in to Level 3 |
|
|
(45,620 |
) |
|
|
(15,323 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(30,297 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of the period |
|
$ |
554,011 |
|
|
$ |
159,521 |
|
|
$ |
27,685 |
|
|
$ |
119,317 |
|
|
$ |
119,268 |
|
|
$ |
2,737 |
|
|
$ |
16,467 |
|
|
$ |
109,016 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net losses for the period included
in earnings
attributable to the
net change in unrealized
gains and losses of assets
measured at fair
value using unobservable
inputs and held
at September 30, 2009 (1) |
|
$ |
(68,480 |
) |
|
$ |
(32,057 |
) |
|
$ |
(4,887 |
) |
|
$ |
(21,530 |
) |
|
$ |
(7,471 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(2,535 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
In the first nine months of 2009, net losses of $1.1 million and $67.4 million were
reported in the consolidated statements of income under the captions net investment
income and net realized investment losses, respectively. |
The carrying value and estimated fair value of certain of the Companys financial instruments
which are not recorded at fair value on the consolidated balance sheets are shown below, excluding
financial instruments measured at fair value in the consolidated balance sheets on a recurring
basis. Because fair values for all balance sheet items are not included, the aggregate fair value
amounts presented below are not reflective of the underlying value of the Company.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2009 |
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
Carrying |
|
Fair |
|
Carrying |
|
Fair |
|
|
Value |
|
Value |
|
Value |
|
Value |
|
|
(dollars in thousands) |
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term investments |
|
|
572,802 |
|
|
|
572,802 |
|
|
|
401,620 |
|
|
|
401,620 |
|
Other investments |
|
|
414,006 |
|
|
|
414,006 |
|
|
|
336,411 |
|
|
|
336,411 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Policyholder account balances |
|
|
1,348,748 |
|
|
|
1,504,396 |
|
|
|
1,214,024 |
|
|
|
1,160,047 |
|
Corporate debt |
|
|
365,750 |
|
|
|
351,375 |
|
|
|
350,750 |
|
|
|
289,168 |
|
Junior subordinated debentures |
|
|
175,000 |
|
|
|
119,000 |
|
|
|
175,000 |
|
|
|
85,400 |
|
Advances from Federal Home Loan Bank |
|
|
55,342 |
|
|
|
72,378 |
|
|
|
55,342 |
|
|
|
75,861 |
|
Liabilities related to separate account |
|
|
109,016 |
|
|
|
109,016 |
|
|
|
90,573 |
|
|
|
90,573 |
|
The carrying values for short-term investments approximate fair values based on the nature of the
investments. Other invested assets include investment funds organized as limited partnerships and
limited liability companies which are reflected in the Companys financial statements under the
equity method of accounting. In determining the fair value of such investments for purposes of
this footnote disclosure, the Company concluded that the value calculated using the equity method
of accounting was reflective of the fair market value of such investments. The investment
portfolios of the funds in which the fund investments are maintained vary from fund to fund, but
are generally comprised of liquid, publicly traded securities that have readily determinable market
values and which are carried at fair value on the financial statements of such funds, substantially
all of which are audited annually. The amount that an investor is entitled to receive upon the
redemption of its investment from the applicable fund is determined by reference to such security
values. The Company utilizes the financial statements furnished by the funds to determine the
values of its investments in such funds and the carrying value of each such investment, which is
based on its proportionate interest in the relevant fund as of the balance sheet date. The
carrying values of all other invested assets and separate account liabilities approximate their
fair value.
-18-
DELPHI FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
Note C Fair Value Measurements (Continued)
Policyholder account balances are net of reinsurance receivables and the carrying values have been
decreased for related acquisition costs of $90.5 million and $125.1 million at September 30, 2009
and December 31, 2008, respectively. Fair values for policyholder account balances were determined
by estimating future cash flows discounted at a current market rate.
The Company believes the fair value of its variable rate long-term debt is equal to its carrying
value. The Company pays variable rates of interest on this debt, which are reflective of market
conditions in effect from time to time. The fair values of the 8.00% Senior Notes due 2033 (2033
Senior Notes) and the junior subordinated debentures are based on the expected cash flows
discounted to net present value. The fair values for fixed rate advances from the FHLB were
calculated using discounted cash flow analyses based on the interest rates for the advances at the
balance sheet date.
Note D Segment Information
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Group employee benefit products |
|
$ |
385,809 |
|
|
$ |
341,978 |
|
|
$ |
1,163,866 |
|
|
$ |
1,057,008 |
|
Asset accumulation products |
|
|
32,775 |
|
|
|
10,518 |
|
|
|
95,740 |
|
|
|
50,418 |
|
Other (1) |
|
|
12,708 |
|
|
|
11,939 |
|
|
|
36,730 |
|
|
|
33,160 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
431,292 |
|
|
|
364,435 |
|
|
|
1,296,336 |
|
|
|
1,140,586 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net realized investment losses |
|
|
(50,459 |
) |
|
|
(33,740 |
) |
|
|
(99,929 |
) |
|
|
(59,675 |
) |
Loss on redemption of junior subordinated deferrable
interest debentures underlying the Company-obligated
mandatorily redeemable capital securities issued
by unconsolidated subsidiaries |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(598 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(598 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
380,833 |
|
|
$ |
330,097 |
|
|
$ |
1,196,407 |
|
|
$ |
1,080,313 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Group employee benefit products |
|
$ |
74,678 |
|
|
$ |
32,979 |
|
|
$ |
212,284 |
|
|
$ |
140,771 |
|
Asset accumulation products |
|
|
13,792 |
|
|
|
(6,246 |
) |
|
|
35,497 |
|
|
|
4,504 |
|
Other (1) |
|
|
(7,814 |
) |
|
|
(6,164 |
) |
|
|
(24,882 |
) |
|
|
(19,798 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
80,656 |
|
|
|
20,569 |
|
|
|
222,899 |
|
|
|
125,477 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net realized investment losses |
|
|
(50,459 |
) |
|
|
(33,740 |
) |
|
|
(99,929 |
) |
|
|
(59,675 |
) |
Loss on redemption of junior subordinated deferrable
interest debentures underlying the Company-obligated
mandatorily redeemable capital securities issued
by unconsolidated subsidiaries |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(598 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(598 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
30,197 |
|
|
$ |
(13,769 |
) |
|
$ |
122,970 |
|
|
$ |
65,204 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Primarily consists of operations from integrated disability and absence management
services and certain corporate activities. |
Note E Comprehensive Income (Loss)
Total comprehensive income (loss) attributable to common shareholders is comprised of net
income and other comprehensive income (loss), which includes the change in unrealized gains and
losses on securities available for sale, the change in other than temporary impairments recognized
in other comprehensive income, the change in net periodic pension cost and the change in the loss
on the cash flow hedge described in Note A. Total comprehensive income (loss) attributable to
common shareholders was $390.1 million and $(207.9) million for the first nine months of 2009 and
2008, respectively, and $207.3 million and $(142.5) million for the third quarters of 2009 and
2008, respectively. Net unrealized losses on securities available for sale decreased $303.9
million in the first nine months of 2009 and $186.0 million in the third quarter of 2009.
-19-
DELPHI FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
Note F Stock-Based Compensation
The Company recognized stock-based compensation expenses of $7.7 million and $7.4 million in the
first nine months of 2009 and 2008, respectively, of which $2.8 million and $2.1 million was
recognized in the third quarters of 2009 and 2008, respectively. The remaining unrecognized
compensation expense related to unvested awards at September 30, 2009 was $27.6 million and the
weighted average period of time over which this expense will be recognized is 3.6 years.
The fair values of options were estimated at the grant date using the Black-Scholes option pricing
model with the following weighted average assumptions for the first nine months of 2009: expected
volatility 39.4%, expected dividends 1.82%, expected lives of the options 7.3 years, and the
risk free rate 3.0%. The following weighted average assumptions were used for the first nine
months of 2008: expected volatility 19.2%, expected dividends 1.31%, expected lives of the
options 6.8 years, and the risk free rate 3.2%.
The expected volatility reflects the Companys past monthly stock price volatility. The dividend
yield is based on the Companys historical dividend payments. The Company used the historical
average period from the Companys issuance of an option to its exercise or cancellation and the
average remaining years until expiration for the Companys outstanding options to estimate the
expected life of options granted in 2009 and 2008 for which the Company had sufficient historical
exercise data. The Company used the simplified method for options granted in 2009 and 2008, for
which sufficient historical data was not available due to significant differences in the vesting
periods of these grants compared to previously issued grants. The risk-free rate is derived from
public data sources at the time of each option grant. Compensation cost is recognized over the
requisite service period of the option using the straight-line method.
Option activity with respect to the Companys plans, excluding the performance-contingent incentive
options referenced further below, was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
Average |
|
Aggregate |
|
|
Number |
|
Average |
|
Remaining |
|
Intrinsic |
|
|
of |
|
Exercise |
|
Contractual |
|
Value |
Options |
|
Options |
|
Price |
|
Term |
|
($000) |
Outstanding at January 1, 2009 |
|
|
4,092,954 |
|
|
$ |
28.71 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted |
|
|
315,170 |
|
|
|
15.27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised |
|
|
(317,363 |
) |
|
|
13.36 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited |
|
|
(65,014 |
) |
|
|
32.36 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at September 30, 2009 |
|
|
4,025,747 |
|
|
|
28.81 |
|
|
|
6.9 |
|
|
$ |
6,204 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable at September 30, 2009 |
|
|
1,834,937 |
|
|
$ |
27.54 |
|
|
|
5.2 |
|
|
$ |
3,927 |
|
The weighted average grant date fair value of options granted during the first nine months of 2009
and 2008 was $8.89 and $6.27, respectively and during the third quarter of 2009 and 2008 was $9.81
and $4.07, respectively. The cash proceeds from stock options exercised in the first nine months
of 2009 and 2008 were $4.2 million and $0.5 million, respectively, and $2.0 million and $0.1
million for the third quarter of 2009 and 2008, respectively. The total intrinsic value of options
exercised during the first nine months of 2009 and 2008 was $2.8 million and $6.2 million,
respectively.
At September 30, 2009, 5,808,250 performance-contingent incentive options were outstanding with a
weighted average exercise price of $25.76, a weighted average contractual term of 6.6 years and an
intrinsic value of $4.5 million. Of such options, 3,208,250 options with a weighted average
exercise price of $24.84, a weighted average contractual term of 4.5 years and an intrinsic value
of $4.5 million were exercisable at September 30, 2009.
At the Companys 2009 Annual Meeting of Stockholders held on May 5, 2009, a proposal to approve an
employee option exchange program and related amendments to the Companys employee stock plans was
approved; however, the Company has not taken action to implement the option exchange program.
-20-
DELPHI FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
Note G - Computation of Results per Share
The following table sets forth the calculation of basic and diluted results per share (amounts in
thousands, except per share data):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(amounts in thousands, except per share data) |
|
Numerator: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
20,823 |
|
|
$ |
(9,810 |
) |
|
$ |
82,314 |
|
|
$ |
38,209 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding |
|
|
52,947 |
|
|
|
47,936 |
|
|
|
50,376 |
|
|
|
48,379 |
|
Effect of dilutive securities |
|
|
438 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
241 |
|
|
|
880 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding,
assuming dilution |
|
|
53,385 |
|
|
|
47,936 |
|
|
|
50,617 |
|
|
|
49,259 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic results per share of common stock: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
0.39 |
|
|
$ |
(0.20 |
) |
|
$ |
1.63 |
|
|
$ |
0.79 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted results per share of common stock: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
0.39 |
|
|
$ |
(0.20 |
) |
|
$ |
1.63 |
|
|
$ |
0.78 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-21-
DELPHI FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Introduction
The Company, through its subsidiaries, underwrites a diverse portfolio of group employee benefit
products, primarily disability, group life and excess workers compensation insurance. Revenues
from this group of products are primarily comprised of earned premiums and investment income. The
profitability of group employee benefit products is affected by, among other things, differences
between actual and projected claims experience, the retention of existing customers, product mix
and the Companys ability to attract new customers, change premium rates and contract terms for
existing customers and control administrative expenses. The Company transfers its exposure to a
portion of its group employee benefit risks through reinsurance ceded arrangements with other
insurance and reinsurance companies. Accordingly, the profitability of the Companys group
employee benefit products is affected by the amount, cost and terms of reinsurance it obtains. The
profitability of those group employee benefit products for which reserves are discounted, in
particular, the Companys disability and primary and excess workers compensation products, is also
significantly affected by the difference between the yield achieved on invested assets and the
discount rate used to calculate the related reserves.
The Company continues to benefit from the favorable market conditions which have in recent years
prevailed for its excess workers compensation products as to pricing and other contract terms for
these products. However, due primarily to improvements in the primary workers compensation market
resulting in lower premium rates in that market, conditions relating to new business production and
growth in premiums for the Companys excess workers compensation products have been less favorable
in recent years. In response to these conditions, the Company has enhanced its focus on its sales
and marketing function for these products and has achieved significantly improved levels of new
business production for these products in the current year. In addition, based on the growth and
development of the Companys assumed workers compensation and casualty reinsurance product, the
Company is including this product in its core products beginning with the third quarter of 2009.
For its other group employee benefit products, the Company is presently experiencing more
competitive market conditions, particularly as to pricing. These conditions, in addition to the
downward pressure on employment and wage levels exerted by the current recession, are adversely
impacting the Companys ability to achieve levels of new business production and growth in premiums
for these products commensurate with those achieved in prior years. For these products, the
Company is continuing to enhance its focus on the small case niche (insured groups of 10 to 500
individuals), including employers which are first-time providers of these employee benefits, which
the Company believes to offer opportunities for superior profitability. The Company is also
emphasizing its suite of voluntary group insurance products, which includes, among others, its
group limited benefit health insurance product. The Company markets its other group employee
benefit products on an unbundled basis and as part of an integrated employee benefit program that
combines employee benefit insurance coverages and absence management services. The integrated
employee benefit program, which the Company believes helps to differentiate itself from competitors
by offering clients improved productivity from reduced employee absence, has enhanced the Companys
ability to market its other group employee benefit products to large employers.
The Company also operates an asset accumulation business that focuses primarily on offering fixed
annuities to individuals. In addition, during the first quarter of 2006, the Company issued $100.0
million in aggregate principal amount of fixed and floating rate funding agreements with maturities
of three to five years in connection with the issuance by an unconsolidated special purpose vehicle
of funding agreement-backed notes in a corresponding principal amount. In March 2009, the Company
repaid $35.0 million in aggregate principal amount of the floating rate funding agreements at their
maturity, resulting in a corresponding repayment of the funding agreement-backed notes. Also,
during the third quarter of 2008, the Company acquired a block of existing SPDA and FPA policies
from another insurer through an indemnity assumed reinsurance transaction with such insurer that
resulted in the assumption by the Company of policyholder account balances in the amount of $135.0
million. The Company believes that its funding agreement program and annuity reinsurance
arrangements enhance the Companys asset accumulation business by providing alternative sources of
funds for this business. The Companys liabilities for its funding agreements and annuity
reinsurance arrangements are recorded in policyholder account balances. Deposits from the
Companys asset accumulation business are recorded as liabilities rather than as premiums.
Revenues from the Companys asset accumulation business are primarily comprised of investment
income earned on the funds under management. The profitability of asset accumulation products is
primarily dependent on the spread achieved between the return on investments and the interest
credited with respect to these products. The Company sets the crediting rates offered on its asset
accumulation products in
an effort to achieve its targeted interest rate spreads on these products, and is willing to accept
lower levels of sales on these products when market conditions make these targeted spreads more
difficult to achieve.
-22-
The management of the Companys investment portfolio is an important component of its
profitability. Over the second half of 2007 and continuing through 2008 and into 2009, due
primarily to the extraordinary stresses affecting the banking system, the housing market and the
financial markets generally, particularly the structured mortgage securities market, the financial
markets have been the subject of extraordinary volatility and dramatically widened credit spreads
in numerous sectors. At the same time, the overall level of risk-free interest rates declined
substantially. These market conditions resulted in a significant decrease in the Companys level
of net investment income in 2008, due primarily to the adverse performance of those investments
whose changes in value, positive or negative, are included in the Companys net investment income,
such as investment funds organized as limited partnerships and limited liability companies, trading
account securities and hybrid financial instruments. In an effort to reduce fluctuations of this
type in its net investment income, the Company has repositioned its investment portfolio to reduce
its holdings of these types of investments and, in particular, those investments whose performance
had demonstrated the highest levels of variability. As part of this effort, the Company has
increased its investments in more traditional sectors of the fixed income market such as
mortgage-backed securities and municipal bonds. In addition, in light of the aforementioned market
conditions, the Company is presently maintaining a significantly larger proportion of its portfolio
in short-term investments, which totaled $572.8 million at September 30, 2009 and $401.6 million at
December 31, 2008.
The Company achieved significantly improved levels of investment income in its repositioned
investment portfolio in the second and third quarters of 2009, during which more favorable market
conditions prevailed. However, these market conditions may worsen in the future and may result in
significant fluctuations in net investment income, and as a result, in the Companys results of
operations. Accordingly, there can be no assurance as to the impact of the Companys investment
repositioning on the level or variability of its future net investment income. In addition, while
the total carrying value of the Companys portfolio increased by $509.2 million during the first
nine months of 2009, the Companys realized investment losses during this period from declines in
market value relative to the amortized cost of certain securities that it determined to be other
than temporary increased significantly. In light of the continuing effects of the market conditions
discussed above, losses of this type and magnitude may continue or increase in the future.
The following discussion and analysis of the results of operations and financial condition of the
Company should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements and related notes
included in this document, as well as the Companys annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2008 as amended by Amendment No. 1 thereto on Form 10-K/A (the 2008 Form 10-K).
Capitalized terms used herein without definition have the meanings ascribed to them in the 2008
Form 10-K. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management, in
some instances, to make judgments about the application of these principles. The amounts of assets
and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and
expenses during the reporting period could differ materially from the amounts reported if different
conditions existed or different judgments were utilized. A discussion of how management applies
certain critical accounting policies and makes certain estimates is contained in the 2008 Form 10-K
in the section entitled Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates and should be read in conjunction with the
following discussion and analysis of results of operations and financial condition of the Company.
In addition, a discussion of uncertainties and contingencies which can affect actual results and
could cause future results to differ materially from those expressed in certain forward-looking
statements contained in this Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations can be found below under the caption Forward-Looking Statements And
Cautionary Statements Regarding Certain Factors That May Affect Future Results, in Part I, Item 1A
of the 2008 Form 10-K, Risk Factors.
Results of Operations
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2009 Compared to
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2008
Summary of Results. Net income was $82.3 million, or $1.63 per diluted share, in the first nine
months of 2009 as compared to $38.2 million, or $0.78 per diluted share, in the first nine months
of 2008. Net income in the first nine months of 2009 and 2008 included realized investment losses
(net of the related income tax benefit) of $65.0 million, or $1.28 per diluted share, and $38.8
million, or $0.78 per diluted share, respectively. Net income in the first nine months of 2009
benefited from a significant increase in net investment income, including increased investment
spreads on the Companys asset accumulation products, and was adversely impacted by an increased
level of realized investment losses
due to the continuing effects of the adverse market conditions discussed above. See Introduction.
Net investment income in the first nine months of 2009 reflects an increase in the tax equivalent
weighted average annualized yield to 7.0% from 3.5%. Realized investment losses in the first nine
months of 2009 and 2008 included losses, net of the related income tax benefit, of $61.5 million,
or $1.21 per
-23-
diluted share, and $34.1 million, or $0.69 per diluted share, respectively, due to the
other than temporary declines in the market values of certain fixed maturity securities and other
investments.
Premium and Fee Income. Premium and fee income in the first nine months of 2009 was $1,052.8
million as compared to $1,028.1 million in the first nine months of 2008, an increase of 2%.
Premiums from core group employee benefit products, which include disability, group life, excess
workers compensation, travel accident and dental insurance and assumed workers compensation and
casualty reinsurance, increased 2% to $1,013.4 million in the first nine months of 2009 from $991.4
million in the first nine months of 2008. Assumed workers compensation and casualty reinsurance
is included in the Companys core group employee benefit products beginning in the third quarter of
2009. Accordingly, to assist in comparability with prior periods, premiums from this product have
also been included in premiums from core group employee benefit products for prior periods.
Premiums from excess workers compensation insurance for self-insured employers were $205.5 million
in the first nine months of 2009 as compared to $196.9 million in the first nine months of 2008, an
increase of 4%. Excess workers compensation new business production, which represents the amount
of new annualized premium sold, increased 111% to $41.0 million in the first nine months of 2009
from $19.4 million in the first nine months of 2008. Premiums from assumed workers compensation
and casualty reinsurance increased 59% to $25.4 million in the first nine months of 2009 from $16.0
million in the first nine months of 2008. SNCCs retention of its existing customers in the first
nine months of 2009 remained strong.
Premiums from the Companys other core group employee benefit products were $782.5 million and
$778.5 million in the first nine months of 2009 and 2008, respectively. During the first nine
months of 2009 and 2008, premiums from the Companys group life products were $300.1 million and
$301.7 million, respectively, and premiums from the Companys group disability products were $422.8
million and $425.5 million, respectively. In the first nine months of 2009, premiums from the
Companys turnkey disability business increased 12% to $41.0 million from $36.7 million in the
first nine months of 2008. New business production for the Companys other core group employee
benefit products declined to $141.0 million in the first nine months of 2009 as compared to $178.7
million in the first nine months of 2008. Beginning in the third quarter of 2009, production from
the Companys turnkey disability product is included in core group employee benefit product
production. Accordingly, to assist in comparability with prior periods, production from turnkey
disability product has also been included in core production for prior periods. The level of
production achieved from the Companys other core group employee benefit products reflects the
Companys focus on the small case niche (insured groups of 10 to 500 individuals). The Company
continued to implement price increases for certain existing group disability and group life
insurance customers during the first nine months of 2009. The Companys deposits from LPTs, which
are recorded as liabilities rather than as premiums, were $30.9 million in the first nine months of
2009 as compared to $1.2 million in the first nine months of 2008.
Deposits from the Companys asset accumulation products were $232.2 million in the first nine
months of 2009 as compared to $195.8 million in the first nine months of 2008. This increase in
deposits is primarily due to the decrease in short-term interest rates, which has caused fixed
annuity products to be an attractive alternative to competing investment products such as
certificates of deposit. Deposits from the Companys asset accumulation products, consisting of
new annuity sales and issuances of funding agreements, are recorded as liabilities rather than as
premiums. The Company is continuing to maintain its discipline in setting the crediting rates
offered on its asset accumulation products in 2009 in an effort to achieve its targeted interest
rate spreads on these products.
Net Investment Income. Net investment income in the first nine months of 2009 was $243.6 million
as compared to $112.5 million in the first nine months of 2008. This increase reflects an increase
in the tax equivalent weighted average annualized yield on invested assets to 7.0% for the first
nine months of 2009 from 3.5% for the first nine months of 2008, primarily attributable to the
improved performance of the Companys investments in investment funds organized as limited
partnerships and limited liability companies and a higher level of investment income from the
Companys fixed maturity security portfolio . Average invested assets were $4,962.3 million and
$4,778.8 million in the first nine months of 2009 and 2008, respectively.
Net Realized Investment Losses. Net realized investment losses were $99.9 million in the first
nine months of 2009 compared to $59.7 million in the first nine months of 2008. The Company
monitors its investments on an ongoing basis. When the market value of a security classified as
available for sale declines below its cost, the decline is included as a component of accumulated
other comprehensive income or loss, net of the related income tax benefit and adjustment to cost of
business acquired, on the Companys balance sheet. If management judges the decline to be other
than temporary, the portion of the decline related to credit losses is recognized as a realized
investment loss in the Companys income
statement and the remaining portion of the decline continues to be included as a component of
accumulated other comprehensive income or loss. Due to the continuing effects of the adverse
market conditions for financial assets described above, the Company recognized $137.0 million of
losses in the first nine months of 2009 due to the other than temporary declines in the market
values of certain fixed maturity securities and other investments, of which $94.5 million was
recognized as credit-related realized investment losses and $42.5 million remained as a component
of accumulated other comprehensive income. The Company recognized $52.5 million of realized losses
due to other than temporary impairments in the first nine months of 2008. See
-24-
Introduction. The
Companys investment strategy results in periodic sales of securities and, therefore, the
recognition of realized investment gains and losses. During the first nine months of 2009 and
2008, the Company recognized $5.4 million and $7.2 million, respectively, of net losses on the
sales of securities.
The Company may continue to recognize losses due to other than temporary declines in security
market values in the future, particularly in light of the ongoing volatility in the financial
markets, and such losses may be significant. The extent of such losses will depend on, among other
things, future developments in the global economy, financial and credit markets, credit spreads,
interest rates, the outlook for the performance by the issuers of their obligations under such
securities and changes in security values. The Company continuously monitors its investments in
securities whose fair values are below the Companys amortized cost pursuant to its procedures for
evaluation for other than temporary impairment in valuation. See Note B to the Consolidated
Financial Statements and the section in the 2008 Form 10-K entitled Managements Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations Critical Accounting Policies and
Estimates for a description of these procedures, which take into account a number of factors. It
is not possible to predict the extent of any future changes in value, positive or negative, or the
results of the future application of these procedures, with respect to these securities. For
further information concerning the Companys investment portfolio, see Liquidity and Capital
Resources Investments.
Benefits and Expenses. Policyholder benefits and expenses were $1,073.4 million in the first nine
months of 2009 as compared to $1,015.1 million in the first nine months of 2008. This increase
primarily reflects the increase in premiums from the Companys group employee benefit products
discussed above, and does not reflect significant additions to reserves for prior years claims and
claim expenses. However, there can be no assurance that future periods will not include additions
to reserves of this type, which will depend on the Companys future loss development. If the
Company were to experience significant adverse loss development in the future, the Companys
results of operations could be materially adversely affected. The combined ratio (loss ratio plus
expense ratio) for group employee benefit products was 93.3% and 91.8% in the first nine months of
2009 and 2008, respectively. The increase in the combined ratio in the first nine months of 2009
resulted primarily from increased spending on new product development at SNCC. Amortization of cost
of business acquired was accelerated by $1.2 million during the first nine months of 2009 primarily
due to the increase in the Companys tax equivalent weighted average annualized yield on invested
assets. The weighted average annualized crediting rate on the Companys asset accumulation
products was 4.3% and 4.2% in the first nine months of 2009 and 2008, respectively.
Income Tax Expense. Income tax expense was $19.3 million in the first nine months of 2009 as
compared to $3.4 million in the first nine months of 2008, primarily due to the higher level of
operating income. The Companys effective tax rate increased to 19.0% in the first nine months of
2009 from 8.2% in the first nine months of 2008 primarily due to the proportionately lower level of
tax-exempt interest income earned on invested assets.
Three Months Ended September 30, 2009 Compared to
Three Months Ended September 30, 2008
Summary of Results. For the third quarter of 2009, net income was $20.8 million, or $0.39 per
diluted share, as compared to a net loss of $(9.8) million, or $(0.20) per diluted share, for the
third quarter of 2008. Net income (loss) in the third quarters of 2009 and 2008 included realized
investment losses (net of the related income tax benefit) of $32.8 million, or $0.61 per diluted
share, and $21.9 million, or $0.45 per diluted share, respectively. Net income in the third
quarter of 2009 benefited from a significant increase in net investment income, including increased
investment spreads on the Companys asset accumulation products, and was adversely impacted by
realized investment losses due to the continuing effects of the adverse market conditions discussed
above. See Introduction. Net investment income in the third quarter of 2009, which increased
357% from the third quarter of 2008, reflects an increase in the tax equivalent weighted average
annualized yield to 7.0% from 2.0%. Investment losses in the third quarter of 2009 and 2008
included losses, net of the related income tax benefit, of $33.8 million, or $0.63 per diluted
share, and $18.3 million, or $0.38 per diluted share, respectively, due to the other than temporary
declines in the market values of certain fixed maturity securities and other investments.
Premium and Fee Income. Premium and fee income for the third quarter of 2009 was $342.6 million
and $345.0 million for the third quarters of 2009 and 2008, respectively. Premiums from core group
employee benefit products were $329.8 million and $333.1 million in the third quarters of 2009 and
2008, respectively. Premiums from excess workers compensation insurance for self-insured
employers increased 4% to $68.7 million in the third quarter of 2009 from $66.2 million in the
third quarter of 2008. Excess workers compensation new business production, which represents the
amount of new annualized premium sold, increased 37% to $15.7 million in the third quarter of 2009
from $11.4 million in the third quarter of 2008. Premium from the assumed workers compensation
and casualty reinsurance product increased 72% to $10.4 million in the third quarter of 2009 from
$6.0 million in the third quarter of 2008. SNCCs rates declined modestly on its third quarter
2009 renewals and SIRs are up modestly for third quarter 2009 new and renewal policies. SNCCs
retention of its existing customers in the third quarter of 2009 remained strong.
-25-
Premiums from the Companys other core group employee benefit products were $250.8 million and
$260.9 million in the third quarters of 2009 and 2008, respectively. During the third quarter of
2009 and 2008 premiums from the Companys group life products were $95.8 million and $100.8
million, respectively, and premiums from the Companys group disability products were $135.6
million and $142.7 million, respectively. Premiums from the Companys turnkey disability business
were $13.0 million during the third quarter of 2009 compared to $12.6 million during the third
quarter of 2008. New business production for the Companys other core group employee benefit
products was $48.8 million and $62.7 million in the third quarters of 2009 and 2008, respectively.
The level of production achieved from these products reflects the Companys focus on the small case
niche (insured groups of 10 to 500 individuals). The Company continued to implement price
increases for certain existing disability and group life customers. The Companys deposits from
LPTs, which are recorded as liabilities rather than as premiums, were $7.2 million in the third
quarter of 2009. The Company had no deposits from LPTs in the third quarter of 2008.
Deposits from the Companys asset accumulation products increased 31% to $57.5 million in the third
quarter of 2009 from $44.0 million in the third quarter of 2008. This increase in deposits is
primarily attributable to the decrease in short-term interest rates, which has caused fixed annuity
products to be an attractive alternative to other competing investment products such as
certificates of deposit. Deposits from the Companys asset accumulation products, consisting of
new annuity sales and issuances of funding agreements, are recorded as liabilities rather than as
premiums.
Net Investment Income. Net investment income in the third quarter of 2009 was $88.7 million as
compared to $19.4 million in the third quarter of 2008, an increase of 357%. This increase
reflects an increase in the tax equivalent weighted average annualized yield on invested assets to
7.0% for the third quarter of 2009 from 2.0% for the third quarter of 2008, primarily attributable
to the improved performance of the Companys investments in investment funds organized as limited
partnerships and limited liability companies and a higher level of investment income from the
Companys fixed maturity security portfolio resulting from the portfolio repositioning discussed
above. See Introduction. Average invested assets increased 14% to $5,417.7 million in the third
quarter of 2009 from $4,756.2 million in the third quarter of 2008.
Net Realized Investment Losses. Net realized investment losses were $50.5 million in the third
quarter of 2009 compared to $33.7 million in the third quarter of 2008. The Company monitors its
investments on an ongoing basis. When the market value of a security classified as available for
sale declines below its cost, the decline is included as a component of accumulated other
comprehensive income or loss, net of the related income tax benefit and adjustment to cost of
business acquired, on the Companys balance sheet. If management judges the decline to be other
than temporary, the portion of the decline related to credit losses is reported as a realized
investment loss in the Companys income statement and the remaining portion of the decline related
to other factors continues to be included as a component of additional other comprehensive income
or loss. Due to the continuing effects of the adverse market conditions for financial assets
discussed above, the Company recognized $73.8 million of losses in the third quarter of 2009 due to
the other than temporary declines in the market values of certain fixed maturity securities and
other investments, of which $52.0 million was recognized as realized investment losses related to
credit losses and $21.7 million remained as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income
on the balance sheet related to noncredit losses. The Company recognized $28.2 million of realized
losses due to other than temporary impairments in the third quarter of 2008. The Companys
investment strategy results in periodic sales of securities and, therefore, the recognition of
realized investment gains and losses. During the third quarters of 2009 and 2008, the Company
recognized $1.6 million and $(5.5) million, respectively, of net gains (losses) on sales of
securities.
The Company may recognize additional losses due to other than temporary declines in security market
values in the future, and such losses may be significant. See Nine Months Ended September 30, 2009
Compared to Nine Months Ended September 30, 2008 Net Realized Investment Losses.
Benefits and Expenses. Policyholder benefits and expenses were $350.6 million in the third quarter
of 2009 as compared to $343.9 million in the third quarter of 2008. This increase primarily
reflects the increase in premiums from the
Companys group employee benefit products discussed above, and does not reflect significant
additions to reserves for prior years claims and claim expenses. However, there can be no
assurance that future periods will not include additions to reserves of this type, which will
depend on the Companys future loss development. If the Company were to experience significant
adverse loss development in the future, the Companys results of operations could be materially
adversely affected. The combined ratio (loss ratio plus expense ratio) for group employee benefit
products was 93.7% and 92.3% in the third quarters of 2009 and 2008, respectively. The increase in
the combined ratio in the third quarter of 2009 primarily resulted from increased spending on new
product development at SNCC. The weighted average annualized crediting rate on the Companys
asset accumulation products was 4.5% and 4.1% in the third quarters of 2009 and 2008, respectively.
Income Tax Expense (Benefit). Income tax expense (benefit) was $2.3 million in the third quarter
of 2009 as compared to $(11.8) million in the third quarter of 2008, primarily due to the increased
level of operating income. The Companys effective tax rate was 10.0% in the third quarter of 2009
as compared to 54.6% in the third quarter of 2008.
-26-
Liquidity and Capital Resources
General. The Companys current liquidity needs include principal and interest payments on
outstanding borrowings under its Amended and Restated Credit Agreement with Bank of America, N.A.,
as administrative agent, and a group of major banking institutions (the Amended Credit Agreement)
and interest payments on the 2033 Senior Notes and 2007 Junior Debentures, as well as funding its
operating expenses and dividends to stockholders. The 2033 Senior Notes mature in their entirety
in May 2033 and are not subject to any sinking fund requirements. The 2007 Junior Debentures will
become due on May 15, 2037, but only to the extent that the Company has received sufficient net
proceeds from the sale of certain specified qualifying capital securities. Any remaining
outstanding principal amount will be due on May 1, 2067. The 2033 Senior Notes and the 2007 Junior
Debentures contain certain provisions permitting their early redemption by the Company. For
descriptions of these provisions, see Notes E and I to the Consolidated Financial Statements
included in the 2008 Form 10-K.
As a holding company that does not conduct business operations in its own right, substantially all
of the assets of the Company are comprised of its ownership interests in its insurance
subsidiaries. In addition, the Company had approximately $94.7 million of financial resources
available at the holding company level at September 30, 2009, primarily comprised of short-term
investments and investments in investment subsidiaries whose assets are primarily invested in
investment funds organized as limited partnerships and limited liability companies. Other sources
of liquidity at the holding company level include dividends paid from subsidiaries, primarily
generated from operating cash flows and investments, and borrowings under the Amended Credit
Agreement. The Companys insurance subsidiaries would be permitted, without prior regulatory
approval, to make dividend payments totaling $100.1 million during 2009, of which $3.6 million has
been paid to the Company during the first nine months of 2009. However, the level of dividends
that could be paid consistent with maintaining the insurance subsidiaries risk-based capital and
other measures of capital adequacy at levels consistent with its current claims-paying and
financial strength ratings from rating agencies is likely to be substantially lower than such
amount. In general, dividends from the Companys non-insurance subsidiaries are not subject to
regulatory or other restrictions. In addition, the Company is presently categorized as a well
known seasoned issuer under Rule 405 of the Securities Act. As such, the Company has the ability
to file automatically effective shelf registration statements for unspecified amounts of different
securities, allowing for immediate, on-demand offerings.
In October 2006, the Company entered into the Amended Credit Agreement, which, among other things,
increased the maximum borrowings available to $250 million, improved the pricing terms and extended
the maturity date from May 2010 to October 2011. On November 8, 2007, the amount of the facility
was increased to $350 million, and certain financial institutions were added as new lenders,
pursuant to a supplement to the Amended Credit Agreement. Borrowings under the Amended Credit
Agreement bear interest at a rate equal to the LIBOR rate for the borrowing period selected by the
Company, which is typically one month, plus a spread which varies based on the Companys Standard &
Poors and Moodys credit ratings. Based on the current levels of such ratings, the spread is
currently equal to 62.5 basis points. The Amended Credit Agreement contains various financial and
other affirmative and negative covenants, along with various representations and warranties,
considered ordinary for this type of credit agreement. The covenants include, among others, a
maximum Company consolidated debt to capital ratio, a minimum Company consolidated net worth,
minimum statutory risk-based capital requirements for RSLIC and SNCC, and certain limitations on
investments and subsidiary indebtedness. As of September 30, 2009, the Company was in compliance
in all material respects with the financial and various other affirmative and negative covenants in
the Amended Credit Agreement. At September 30, 2009, the Company had $222.0 million of outstanding
borrowings and $128.0 million of borrowings remaining available under the Amended Credit Agreement.
During the first quarter of 2006, the Company issued $100.0 million in aggregate principal amount
of fixed and floating
rate funding agreements with maturities of three to five years in connection with the issuance by
an unconsolidated special purpose vehicle of funding agreement-backed notes in a corresponding
principal amount. Based on the Companys investment at risk compared to that of the holders of the
funding agreement-backed notes, the Company has concluded that it is not the primary beneficiary of
the special purpose vehicle that issued the funding agreement-backed notes. During the first nine
months of 2009, the Company repaid $35.0 million in aggregate principal amount of floating rate
funding agreements at their maturity. At September 30, 2009 and 2008, the Companys reserves
related to the funding agreements were $65.2 million and $100.2 million, respectively.
On May 1, 2009, the Company sold 3.0 million shares of its Class A Common Stock in a public
offering at a price to the public of $17.50 per share pursuant to an underwriting agreement dated
April 28, 2009 with Barclays Capital Inc., as underwriter. On August 21, 2009, the Company sold an
additional 3.5 million shares of its Class A Common Stock in a public offering at a price to the
public of $21.00 per share pursuant to an underwriting agreement dated August 18, 2009 also with
Barclays Capital Inc., as underwriter. The total proceeds to the Company from these two offerings
was $120.6 million, net of related underwriting discounts, commissions and expenses. The Company
intends to use the proceeds from these offerings for general corporate purposes.
-27-
On November 4, 2009, the Companys Board of Directors declared a cash dividend of $.10 per share on
the Companys Class A Common Stock and Class B Common Stock, which will be paid on December 2,
2009.
The Company and its subsidiaries expect available sources of liquidity to exceed their current and
long-term cash requirements.
Investments. The Companys overall investment strategy emphasizes safety and liquidity, while
seeking the best available return, by focusing on, among other things, managing the Companys
interest-sensitive assets and liabilities and seeking to minimize the Companys exposure to
fluctuations in interest rates. The Companys investment portfolio, which totaled $5,723.0 million
at September 30, 2009, consists primarily of investments in fixed maturity securities, short-term
investments, mortgage loans and equity securities. The Companys investment portfolio also includes
investments in investment funds organized as limited partnerships and limited liability companies
and trading account securities which collectively totaled $268.7 million at September 30, 2009. At
September 30, 2009, the total carrying value of the portfolio of private placement corporate loans,
mortgage loans, interests in limited partnerships and limited liability companies and equity
securities formerly managed on the Companys behalf by D.B. Zwirn & Co., L.P. was $113.1 million.
In connection with the assumption by Fortress Investment Group LLC of D.B. Zwirns investment
management functions with respect to the investment funds formerly managed by D.B. Zwirn, the
Company has terminated its investment management arrangements with D.B. Zwirn and entered into new
investment management arrangements with Fortress relating to such portfolio.
During the first nine months of 2009, the market value of the Companys investment portfolio, in
relation to its amortized cost, increased by $509.2 million from year-end 2008, before related
decreases in the cost of business acquired of $41.6 million and the federal income tax provision of
$163.7 million. At September 30, 2009, gross unrealized appreciation and gross unrealized
depreciation, before the related income tax expense or benefit and the related adjustment to cost
of business acquired, with respect to the fixed maturity securities in the Companys portfolio
totaled $219.8 million (of which $197.5 million was attributable to investment grade securities)
and $278.4 million (of which $142.1 million was attributable to investment grade securities),
respectively. During the first nine months of 2009, the Company recognized pre-tax net investment
losses of $99.9 million. The weighted average credit rating of the securities in the Companys
fixed maturity portfolio having ratings by nationally recognized statistical rating organizations
was A at September 30, 2009. While ratings of this type are intended to address credit risk,
they do not address other risks, such as prepayment and extension risks.
See Forward-Looking Statements and Cautionary Statements Regarding Certain Factors That May Affect
Future Results, and Part I, Item 1A of the 2008 Form 10-K, Risk Factors, for a discussion of
various risks relating to the Companys investment portfolio.
Reinsurance. The Company cedes portions of the risks relating to its group employee benefit
products and variable life insurance products under indemnity reinsurance agreements with various
unaffiliated reinsurers. The Company pays reinsurance premiums which are generally based upon
specified percentages of the Companys premiums on the business reinsured. These agreements expire
at various intervals as to new risks, and replacement agreements are negotiated on terms believed
appropriate in light of then-current market conditions. The Company currently cedes through
indemnity reinsurance 100% of its excess workers compensation risks between $10.0 million and
$50.0 million per occurrence, 85% of its excess workers compensation risks between $50.0 million
and $100.0 million per occurrence and 100% of its excess workers compensation risks between $100.0
million and $150.0 million per occurrence. Effective July 1, 2009, the Company entered into a
reinsurance agreement under which it cedes 50% (compared to 30% previously) of its excess
workers compensation risks between $150.0 million and $200.0 million, per occurrence. In
addition, effective July 1, 2009, the Company entered into a new reinsurance agreement under which
it cedes 15% of its excess workers compensation risks between $200.0 million and $250.0 million,
per occurrence. The Company also currently cedes through indemnity reinsurance up to $10 million
of coverage with respect to workers compensation losses resulting from certain naturally occurring
catastrophic events. Reductions in the Companys reinsurance coverages will decrease the
reinsurance premiums paid by the Company under these arrangements and thus increase the Companys
premium income, and will also increase the Companys risk of loss with respect to the relevant
policies. Generally, increases in the Companys reinsurance coverages will increase the reinsurance
premiums paid by the Company under these arrangements and thus decrease the Companys premium
income, and will also decrease the Companys risk of loss with respect to the relevant policies.
Cash Flows. Operating activities increased cash by $336.1 million and $267.5 million in the first
nine months of 2009 and 2008, respectively. Net investing activities used $557.4 million and
$500.3 million of cash during the first nine months of 2009 and 2008, respectively, primarily for
purchases of securities. Financing activities provided $239.8 million of cash during the first
nine months of 2009, principally from deposits to policyholder accounts and proceeds from the
issuance of 6.5 million shares of its Class A Common Stock in two separate public offerings,
partially offset by the repayment of $35.0 million in aggregate principal amount of floating rate
funding agreements at their maturity. During the first nine months of 2008, financing activities
provided $250.8 million of cash, principally from deposits to policyholder accounts.
-28-
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
There have been no material changes in the Companys exposure to market risk or its management of
such risk since December 31, 2008.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
As of the end of the period covered by this report, an evaluation was performed under the
supervision and with the participation of the Companys management, including the Companys Chief
Executive Officer (CEO) and Senior Vice President and Treasurer (the individual who acts in the
capacity of chief financial officer), of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the
Companys disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in the rules and regulations of the
Securities and Exchange Commission). Based on that evaluation, the Companys management, including
the CEO and Senior Vice President and Treasurer, concluded that the Companys disclosure controls
and procedures were effective. There were no changes in the Companys internal control over
financial reporting during the fiscal quarter to which this report relates that have materially
affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Companys internal control over
financial reporting.
Forward-Looking Statements And Cautionary Statements Regarding Certain Factors That May Affect
Future Results
In connection with, and because it desires to take advantage of, the safe harbor provisions of
the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, the Company cautions readers regarding
certain forward-looking statements in the above Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations and elsewhere in this Form 10-Q and in any other statement
made by, or on behalf of, the Company, whether in future filings with the Securities and Exchange
Commission or otherwise. Forward-looking statements are statements not based on historical
information and which relate to future operations, strategies, financial results, prospects,
outlooks or other developments. Some forward-looking statements may be identified by the use of
terms such as expects, believes, anticipates, intends, judgment, outlook or other
similar expressions. Forward-looking statements are necessarily based upon estimates and
assumptions that are inherently subject to significant business, economic, competitive and other
uncertainties and contingencies, many of which are beyond the Companys control and many of which,
with respect to future business decisions, are subject to change. Examples of such uncertainties
and contingencies include, among other important factors, those affecting the insurance industry
generally, such as the economic and interest rate environment, federal and state legislative and
regulatory developments, including but not limited to changes in financial services, employee
benefit and tax laws and regulations, changes in accounting rules and interpretations thereof,
market pricing and competitive trends relating to insurance products and services, acts of
terrorism or war, and the availability and cost of reinsurance, and those relating specifically to
the Companys business, such as the level of its insurance premiums and fee income, the claims
experience, persistency and other factors affecting the profitability of its insurance products,
the performance of its investment portfolio and changes in the Companys investment strategy,
acquisitions of companies or blocks of business,
and ratings by major rating organizations of the Company and its insurance subsidiaries. These
uncertainties and contingencies can affect actual results and could cause actual results to differ
materially from those expressed in any forward-looking statements made by, or on behalf of, the
Company. Certain of these uncertainties and contingencies are described in more detail in Part I,
Item 1A of the 2008 Form 10-K, Risk Factors. The Company disclaims any obligation to update
forward-looking information.
-29-
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1A. Risk Factors
The following discussion, which supplements the significant factors that may affect our business
and operations described in Part I, Item 1A of the 2008 Form 10-K, Risk Factors, updates and
supersedes the discussion contained therein under the heading The Company may be adversely
impacted by a decline in the ratings of its insurance subsidiaries or its own credit ratings:
The Company may be adversely impacted by a decline in the ratings of its insurance
subsidiaries or its own credit ratings.
Ratings with respect to claims-paying ability and financial strength have become an increasingly
important factor impacting the competitive position of insurance companies. The financial strength
ratings of RSLIC as of August 2009 as assigned by A.M. Best, Fitch, Moodys and Standard & Poors
were A (Excellent), A- (Strong), A3 (Good) and A (Strong), respectively. The financial strength
ratings of SNCC as of August 2009 as assigned by A.M. Best, Fitch, Moodys and Standard & Poors
were A (Excellent), A- (Strong), A3 (Good) and A (Strong), respectively. These ratings are
significantly influenced by the risk-based capital ratios and levels of statutory capital and
surplus of these subsidiaries. In addition, these rating agencies may implement changes to their
internal models that have the effect of increasing or decreasing the amount of capital these
subsidiaries must hold in order to maintain these ratings. Each of the rating agencies reviews its
ratings of companies periodically and there can be no assurance that current ratings will be
maintained in the future. In June 2009, Moodys revised the outlook on its ratings relating to
RSLIC and SNCC, as well as the Company, to negative from stable. In April 2009, Fitch Ratings
downgraded its current ratings relating to RSLIC and SNCC to A- (Good) from A (Good), the Companys
senior unsecured debt to BBB- from BBB and the Companys 2007 Junior Debentures to BB+ from BBB.
In December 2008, A.M. Best revised the outlook on its ratings relating to RSLIC and SNCC, as well
as the Company, to negative from stable. In October 2008, Standard & Poors revised the outlook
on its ratings relating to RSLIC and SNCC, as well as the Company, to negative from stable.
Claims-paying and financial strength ratings relating to the Companys insurance subsidiaries are
based upon factors relevant to the policyholders of such subsidiaries and are not directed toward
protection of investors in the Company. Downgrades in the ratings of the Companys insurance
subsidiaries could adversely affect sales of their products, increase policyholder withdrawals and
could have a material adverse effect on the results of the Companys operations. In addition,
downgrades in the Companys credit ratings, which are based on factors similar to those considered
by the rating agencies in their evaluations of its insurance subsidiaries, could materially
adversely affect its ability to access the capital markets and could increase the cost of its
borrowings under the Amended Credit Agreement. The Companys senior unsecured debt ratings as of
November 2009 from A.M. Best, Fitch, Moodys and Standard & Poors were bbb, BBB-, Baa3 and BBB+,
respectively. The ratings for the Companys 2007 Junior Debentures as of November 2009 from A.M.
Best, Fitch, Moodys and
Standard & Poors were bb+, BB+, Ba1 and BBB-, respectively. The ratings for RSLICs funding
agreements as of November 2009 from A.M. Best, Moodys and Standard & Poors were a, A3, and A,
respectively.
-30-
Item 6. Exhibits
|
11.1 |
|
Computation of Results per Share of Common Stock (incorporated by reference to
Note G to the Consolidated
Financial Statements included elsewhere herein) |
|
|
31.1 |
|
Certification by the Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of
Periodic Report Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) or 15d-14(a) |
|
|
31.2 |
|
Certification by the Senior Vice President and Treasurer of Periodic Report
Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) or 15d-14(a) |
|
|
32.1 |
|
Certification of Periodic Report Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as Adopted
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
DELPHI FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. (Registrant)
|
|
|
/s/ ROBERT ROSENKRANZ
|
|
|
Robert Rosenkranz |
|
|
Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ THOMAS W. BURGHART
|
|
|
Thomas W. Burghart |
|
|
Senior Vice President and Treasurer
(Principal Accounting and Financial Officer) |
|
|
Date: November 9, 2009
-31-