Form 10-K
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
(Mark One)
|
|
|
þ |
|
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009
OR
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission file number 1-8323
CIGNA Corporation
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
06-1059331 |
(State or other jurisdiction of
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer |
incorporation or organization)
|
|
Identification No.) |
|
|
|
Two Liberty Place, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
|
|
19192 |
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
(Zip Code) |
Registrants telephone number, including area code (215) 761-1000
Securities registered pursuant to section 12(b) of the Act:
|
|
|
|
|
Name of each exchange on |
Title of each class
|
|
which registered |
|
|
|
Common Stock, Par Value $0.25
|
|
New York Stock Exchange, Inc. |
Securities registered pursuant to section 12(g) of the Act:
None
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in
Rule 405 of the Securities Act.
Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section
13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.
Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed
by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or
for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period
that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation
S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrants knowledge, in
definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K
or any amendment to this Form 10-K. o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated
filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of large
accelerated filer, accelerated filer, and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer þ
|
|
Accelerated filer o
|
|
Non-accelerated filer o
|
|
Smaller Reporting Company o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of
the Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
The aggregate market value of the voting stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant as
of June 30, 2009 was approximately $6.6 billion.
As of January 30, 2010, 274,968,520 shares of the registrants Common Stock were outstanding.
Part III of this Form 10-K incorporates by reference information from the registrants proxy
statement to be dated on or about March 19, 2010.
PART I
A. Description of Business
CIGNA Corporation and its subsidiaries constitute one of the largest investor-owned health
service organizations in the United States. Its subsidiaries are major providers of health care
and related benefits, the majority of which are offered through the workplace, including: health
care products and services; group disability, life and accident insurance; and workers
compensation case management and related services. In addition, the Company has an international
operation that offers life, accident and supplemental health insurance products as well as
international health care products and services to businesses and individuals in selected markets.
The Company also has certain inactive businesses, including a run-off reinsurance operation. CIGNA
Corporation had consolidated shareholders equity of $5.4 billion and assets of $43.0 billion as of
December 31, 2009, and revenues of $18.4 billion for the year then ended. CIGNAs major insurance
subsidiary, Connecticut General Life Insurance Company (CGLIC), traces its origins to 1865.
CIGNA Corporation was incorporated in the State of Delaware in 1981.
As used in this document, CIGNA and the Company may refer to CIGNA Corporation itself, one
or more of its subsidiaries, or CIGNA Corporation and its consolidated subsidiaries. CIGNA
Corporation is a holding company and is not an insurance company. Its subsidiaries conduct various
businesses, which are described in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2009 (Form 10-K).
CIGNAs revenues are derived principally from premiums, fees, mail order pharmacy, other
revenues and investment income. The financial results of CIGNAs businesses are reported in the
following segments:
|
|
Run-off Reinsurance; and |
|
|
Other Operations, including Corporate-owned Life Insurance. |
Available Information
CIGNAs annual, quarterly and current reports, proxy statements and other filings, and any
amendments to these filings, are made available free of charge on its website
(http://www.cigna.com, under the InvestorsSEC Filings captions) as soon as reasonably
practicable after the Company electronically files these materials with, or furnish them to, the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC). The Company uses its website as a channel of
distribution for material company information. Important information, including news releases,
analyst presentations and financial information regarding CIGNA is routinely posted on and
accessible at www.cigna.com. See Code of Ethics and Other Corporate Governance Disclosures in
Part III, Item 10 beginning on page 171 of this Form 10-K for additional available information.
B. Financial Information about Business Segments
The financial information included herein is in conformity with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP), unless otherwise indicated. Certain
reclassifications have been made to prior years financial information to conform to the 2009
presentation. Industry rankings and percentages set forth herein are for the year ended December
31, 2009, unless otherwise indicated. Unless otherwise noted, statements set forth in this
document concerning CIGNAs rank or position in an industry or particular line of business have
been developed internally, based on publicly available information.
Financial data for each of CIGNAs business segments is set forth in Note 22 to the
Consolidated Financial Statements beginning on page 160 of this Form 10-K.
1
C. Strategy
As a global health service organization, CIGNAs mission remains focused on helping the people
it serves improve their health, well-being and sense of security. CIGNAs long-term growth
strategy is based on: (1) growth in targeted geographies, product lines, buying segments and
distribution channels; (2) improving its strategic and financial flexibility; and (3) pursuing
additional opportunities in high-growth markets with particular focus on individuals.
CIGNA expects to focus on the following areas it believes represent the markets or areas with
the most potential for profitable growth:
|
|
In the Health Care segment, the Company is concentrating on: (1) further
enhancing its geographic focus in the middle market in order to create geographic density; (2)
growing the Select market, which generally includes employers with more than 50 but fewer
than 250 employees, by leveraging the Companys customer knowledge, differentiated service
model, product portfolio and distribution model; and (3) engaging those national account
employers who share and will benefit from the Companys value proposition of using health
advocacy and employee engagement to increase productivity, performance and the health outcomes
of their employees. |
|
|
In the Disability and Life segment, CIGNAs strategy is to grow its Disability
business by fully leveraging the key components of its industry-leading disability management
model to reduce medical costs for its clients and return their employees to work sooner
through: (1) early claim notification and outreach, (2) a full suite of clinical and
return-to-work resources, and (3) specialized case management
services. |
|
|
In the International segment, the Company is targeting growth through: (1)
product and channel expansion in its life, accident and health business in key Asian
geographies, (2) the introduction of new expatriate benefits products, and (3) further
geographic expansion. |
The Company plans to improve its strategic and financial flexibility by driving further
reductions in its Health Care operating expenses, improving its medical cost competitiveness in
targeted markets and effectively managing balance sheet exposures.
Also, in connection with CIGNAs long-term business strategy, the Company remains committed to
health advocacy as a means of creating sustainable solutions for employers, improving the health of
the individuals that the Company serves, and lowering the costs of health care for all
constituencies.
Details on the Companys operational strategies are discussed further in the Health Care
segment discussion of Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations (MD&A) section on page 62 of this Form 10-K.
2
D. Health Care
CIGNAs Health Care segment (CIGNA HealthCare) offers insured and self-funded medical,
dental, behavioral health, vision, and prescription drug benefit plans, health advocacy programs
and other products and services that may be integrated to provide individuals with comprehensive
health care benefit programs. CIGNA HealthCare also provides disability and life insurance
products that were historically sold in connection with certain experience-rated medical products.
These products and services are provided and administered by subsidiaries of CIGNA Corporation.
CIGNA HealthCare companies offer these products and services in all 50 states, the District of
Columbia, Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands.
CIGNA HealthCare is focused on helping to improve the health, well-being and sense of security
of the individuals it serves. CIGNA HealthCare believes the most sustainable approach to enhancing
quality and managing health care costs is to fully engage individuals in the decisions that affect
their health and the health care services they receive. To assist individuals in making informed
choices about health care for themselves and their families, CIGNA HealthCare makes available to
its members actionable information about health and advocacy programs as well as about the cost and
quality of health care services and supplies provided to them.
Underlying CIGNA HealthCares operations is a foundation of clinical expertise and an ability
to provide quality service. CIGNA HealthCares strengths include its ability to: (1) integrate
medical and specialty product offerings to achieve a more holistic and integrated approach to
individuals health that promotes consistent care management; and (2) provide predictive modeling
and other analytical tools (for example, through the Companys exclusive access to analytical tools
and algorithms developed by the University of Michigan), to assist in providing targeted outreach
and health advocacy by CIGNAs clinical professionals to CIGNA HealthCare members.
Principal Products and Services and Funding Arrangements
With the exception of Health Maintenance Organization (HMO) as well as Medicare Part D and
Private Fee for Service products, each of CIGNA HealthCares products (as described below) is
offered with multiple funding options (also described below). CIGNA may sell multiple products
under the same funding arrangement to the same employer. Accordingly, the revenue table included
in the Health Care section of the MD&A beginning on page 62 of this Form 10-K reflects both the
product type and funding arrangement.
3
Medical
CIGNA HealthCare provides a wide array of products and services to meet the needs of
employers, other sponsors of health benefit plans and their plan participants (i.e.,
employees/members and their eligible dependents), and individuals, including:
|
|
Network and Open Access Plus Plans. CIGNA HealthCare offers a product line of
indemnity managed care benefit plans. Indemnity benefit plans in the managed care product
line generally use meaningful coinsurance differences for in-network versus out-of-network
care, give members the option of selecting a primary care physician, and use a national
provider network, which is somewhat smaller than the national network used with the preferred
provider (PPO) plan product line. The Network, Network Open Access, and Open Access Plus
In-Network products cover only those services provided by CIGNA HealthCare participating
(in-network) providers and emergency services provided by non-participating
(out-of-network) providers. The Network point of service (POS), Network POS Open Access
and Open Access Plus plans (OAP) cover health care services provided by participating, and
non-participating health care providers, but the members coinsurance obligation is greater
for out-of-network care. |
|
|
Preferred Provider Plans. CIGNA HealthCare also offers a PPO product line that
features a broader national network with generally less favorable provider discounts than the
managed care products described above, no option to select a primary care physician, and
in-network and out-of-network coverage with greater member coinsurance liability for
out-of-network services. |
|
|
Health Maintenance Organizations. HMOs are required by law in most states to
provide coverage for all basic health services. They use various tools to facilitate the
appropriate use of health care services through employed and/or contracted health care
providers. HMOs control unit costs by negotiating rates of reimbursement with providers and
by requiring that certain treatments be authorized for coverage in advance. CIGNA HealthCare
offers HMO plans that require members to obtain all non-emergency services from participating
providers as well as POS HMO plans that also provide a lesser level of insurance coverage for
out-of-network care from non-participating providers. The out-of-network coverage is
generally provided through separate insurance coverage that is sold with the HMO benefits. |
|
|
Voluntary Plans . CIGNA HealthCares voluntary medical products are offered to
employers with 51 or more eligible employees and are designed to meet the insurance needs of
uninsured hourly and part-time employees by offering more limited, (i.e., leaner benefits) and
more affordable coverage than traditional medical plans. |
|
|
CIGNA Choice Fund®, Health Reimbursement Arrangements (HRAs), Health
Savings Accounts (HSAs) and Flexible Spending Accounts (FSAs). In connection with
many of the products described above, CIGNA HealthCare offers the CIGNA Choice Fund suite of consumer-directed products, including HRA, HSA and FSA options. An HRA allows
plan sponsors to choose from a variety of benefit plan designs and for employees to fund
un-reimbursed health care expenses with reimbursement account funds that can be rolled over
from year to year. HSA plans allow plan sponsors to choose from a variety of benefit plan
designs and funding options and combine a high deductible payment feature for a health plan
with a tax-preferred savings account offering mutual fund investment options. Funds in an HSA
can be used to pay the deductible and other eligible tax-deductible medical expenses and can
be rolled over from year to year. In connection with its consumer-directed products, CIGNA
HealthCare offers Custom Benefit BuilderSM, a tool that allows members to customize
plan options including co-payments and deductible levels, to create a personalized benefit
design that meets their individual needs. The HRA and HSA products for employers with
generally more than 50 but fewer than 250 employees are now available in 49 states. An FSA
pays for certain health care-related expenses, that are either not covered or only partially
covered by health care plans, with pretax contributions by employees. Unused FSA account
funds cannot be rolled over from year to year; they are forfeited by the employee. |
|
|
Stop-Loss Coverage. CIGNA HealthCare offers stop-loss insurance coverage for
self-insured plans. This stop-loss coverage reimburses the plan for claims in excess of a
predetermined amount, either for individuals (specific) or the entire group (aggregate),
or both. CIGNA HealthCare also offers stop-loss features in its experience-rated policies
(discussed below). |
|
|
Shared Administration Services. CIGNA HealthCare provides Taft-Hartley trusts and
other self-insured groups access to its national provider network and provides claim
re-pricing and other services (e.g., utilization management). |
4
Specialty
Health Advocacy. CIGNA HealthCare offers medical management, disease management, and
other health advocacy services to employers and other plan sponsors. Services are not only offered
to members covered under CIGNA HealthCare administered plans but also to those individuals who have
elected coverage under a plan offered through their employer by competing insurers/third party
administrators. CIGNA offers a seamless integration of services to address the clinical and
administrative challenges that are inherent in coordinating multiple vendors. Through its health
advocacy programs, CIGNA HealthCare works to help: (1) healthy people stay healthy; (2) people
change behaviors that are putting their health at risk; (3) people with existing health care issues
access quality care and practice healthy self-care; and (4) people with a disabling illness or
injury return to productive work quickly and safely.
CIGNA HealthCare offers a wide array of health advocacy programs and services to help
individuals improve the health of the mind and body, including:
|
|
early intervention by CIGNAs network of approximately 2,350 clinical professionals; |
|
|
CIGNAs online health assessment, powered by analytics from the University of Michigan
Health Management Research Center, which helps members identify potential health risks and
learn what they can do to live a healthier life; |
|
|
the CIGNA Well Aware for Better Health® program, which helps patients with
chronic conditions such as asthma, diabetes, depression and weight complications better manage
their conditions; |
|
|
CIGNA Health Advisor®, one of our fastest-growing offerings, which provides
members with access to a personal health coach to help them reach their health and wellness
goals; |
|
|
CIGNAs Well Informed program, which uses clinical rules-based software to identify
potential gaps and omissions in members health care through analysis of the Companys
integrated medical, behavioral, pharmacy and lab data allowing CIGNA HealthCare to communicate
the gaps to the member and the members doctor; and |
|
|
CIGNAs online coaching capabilities. |
Behavioral Health. CIGNA arranges for the provision of behavioral health care
services to individuals through its network of participating behavioral health care providers and
offers behavioral health care management services, employee assistance programs, and work/life
programs to employer and other groups sponsoring health benefit plans, HMOs, governmental entities
and disability insurers. CIGNA Behavioral Health focuses on integrating its programs and services
to facilitate customized, holistic care.
As of December 31, 2009, CIGNAs behavioral national network had approximately 76,000 access
points to independent psychiatrists, psychologists and clinical social workers and approximately
6,100 facilities and clinics that are reimbursed on a contracted fee-for-service basis.
Dental. CIGNA Dental Health offers a variety of dental care products including dental
health maintenance organization plans, dental preferred provider organization (DPPO) plans,
dental exclusive provider organization plans, traditional dental indemnity plans and a dental
discount program. Employers and other groups can purchase CIGNA Dental Health products as
stand-alone products or integrated with CIGNA HealthCares medical products. As of December 31,
2009, CIGNA Dental Health members totaled approximately 9.9 million, representing employees at more
than one-third of all Fortune 100 companies. Managed dental care products are offered in 36 states
and the District of Columbia through a network of independent providers that have contracted with
CIGNA Dental Health to provide dental services to members.
CIGNA Dental Health members access care from one of the largest dental HMO and dental PPO
networks in the U.S., with approximately 160,000 DPPO-contracted access points (approximately
75,500 unique providers) and approximately 45,400 dental HMO-contracted access points
(approximately 14,000 unique providers).
CIGNA Dental Health stresses preventive dentistry; it believes that promoting preventive care
contributes to a healthier workforce, an improved quality of life, increased productivity and fewer
treatment claims and associated costs over time. CIGNA Dental Health offers members a dental
treatment cost estimator to educate individuals on oral health and aid them in their dental health
care decision-making.
5
Pharmacy. CIGNA Pharmacy offers prescription drug plans to its insured and
self-funded customers both in conjunction with its medical products and on a stand-alone basis.
With a nationwide network of approximately 60,300 contracted pharmacies, CIGNA Pharmacy is a
comprehensive pharmacy benefits manager offering clinical integration programs, specialty pharmacy
solutions, and fast, efficient home delivery pharmacy capabilities that improve outcomes and reduce
costs for a Return On Health®.
Programs that reflect this integration of medical, behavioral and pharmacy offerings include:
|
|
Well Informed. CIGNAs Well Informed program focuses on the chronic conditions most likely
to benefit from disciplined prescription therapy, such as asthma, diabetes, back pain and high
cholesterol. |
|
|
Step Therapy is a program that encourages individuals who take prescription drugs to treat
an ongoing medical condition to use generic and/or preferred brand drugs before progressing to
higher cost brand-named drugs within the relevant therapeutic drug class. This is
accomplished through claim management protocols, which may include communications with the
individual and the individuals physician. |
|
|
Specialty Pharmacy Solutions. Because it offers both medical and pharmacy benefit
management products and services, CIGNA HealthCare is uniquely positioned to manage holistic
care for individuals with chronic conditions. This approach allows individuals to access
medication in the most appropriate setting based on their unique circumstances. This results
in less confusion and disruption in care, which in turn promotes medication adherence and
healthier outcomes. |
|
|
CIGNA Tel-Drug® Home Delivery Pharmacy. CIGNA HealthCare also offers cost-effective mail
order, telephone and on-line pharmaceutical fulfillment services through its home delivery
operation. CIGNA Tel-Drug Home Delivery Pharmacy provides an individual-focused, efficient
home delivery pharmacy with high standards of quality, accuracy and individual care relating
to maintenance and specialty medications. Orders may be submitted through the mail, via phone
or through the internet at myCIGNA.com. |
|
|
CIGNA HealthCare also offers a suite of online tools to individuals, including our
award-winning Prescription Drug Price Quote Tool, which empowers individuals with actionable
information that helps them maximize their benefits and lower their out-of-pocket costs. |
Private Fee For Service. CIGNAs Medicare Advantage private fee-for-service plan,
CIGNA Medicare Access Plan, has been approved by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services to
be a replacement for Original Medicare. The CIGNA Medicare Access Plan offers the same benefits as
Original Medicare Parts A & B, as well as supplemental benefits, including annual physicals,
emergency worldwide coverage and health and wellness programs.
Medicare Part D. CIGNAs Medicare Part D prescription drug program, CIGNA Medicare
Rx®, provides a number of plan options as well as service and information support to
Medicare and Medicaid eligible members. CIGNA Medicare Rx is available in all 50 states
and the District of Columbia.
Retail Pharmacies. CIGNA HealthCare operates 20 retail pharmacies, including on-site
retail pharmacies for members to serve the needs of CIGNA HealthCare members.
CIGNA Onsite Health was formed in 2007. The Company operates onsite health centers at
five CIGNA employee locations and expects to open several onsite health clinics at other employer
locations during 2010. In addition, the Company has multiple health advocates at employer sites
across the country. Onsite operations are projected to expand throughout 2010 and beyond.
Cost Containment Service. CIGNA administers cost containment programs with respect to
health care services/supplies that are covered under benefit plans. These programs, which may
involve contracted vendors, are intended to control health costs through the reduction of
out-of-network utilization, the auditing of provider bills and recovery of overpayments from other
insurance carriers or providers. CIGNA earns fees for providing or arranging these services.
6
Vision. CIGNA Vision offers flexible, cost-effective PPO coverage that includes a
range of both in and out-of-network benefits for routine vision services. CIGNAs national vision
care network, which consists of over 48,000 providers in approximately 21,800 locations, includes
private practice ophthalmologist and optometrist offices, as well as retail eye care centers.
Routine vision products are offered in conjunction with CIGNA HealthCares medical and dental
product offerings.
Funding Arrangements
The segments health care products and services are offered through the following funding
arrangements:
|
|
Experience-rated (Shared ReturnsSM, including minimum premium funding
arrangements); and |
|
|
Administrative Services Only. |
Guaranteed Cost. Under guaranteed cost funding arrangements, policyholders pay a
fixed premium and CIGNA HealthCare bears the risk for claims and costs. The HMO product is offered
only on a guaranteed cost basis.
Experience-rated (Shared ReturnsSM, including minimum premium). Under
insurance policies using an experience-rated funding arrangement, a premium that typically includes
a margin to partially protect against adverse claim fluctuations is determined at the beginning of
the policy period. CIGNA HealthCare generally bears the risk if claims and expenses exceed this
premium. If premiums exceed claims and expenses, any surplus amount is generally first used to
offset prior deficits and otherwise generally returned to the policyholder. For additional
discussion, see Pricing, Reserves and Reinsurance later within this section of the Form 10-K.
Under insurance policies using a minimum premium funding arrangement, instead of paying a
fixed monthly premium, the group policyholder establishes and funds a bank account and authorizes
the insurer to draw upon funds in the account to pay claims and other authorized expenses. The
policyholder pays a significantly reduced monthly residual premium while the policy is in effect
and a supplemental premium (to cover reserves for run-out claims and administrative expenses) upon
termination. Minimum premium funding arrangements combine insurance protection with an element of
self-funding. The policyholder is responsible for funding all claims up to a predetermined
aggregate, maximum monthly amount, and CIGNA HealthCare bears the risk for claim costs incurred in
excess of that amount. As with other experience-rated insurance products, CIGNA HealthCare may
recover deficits from margins in future years if the policy is renewed.
Administrative Services Only. CIGNA HealthCare contracts with employers, unions and
other groups sponsoring self-insured plans on an administrative services only (ASO) basis to
administer claims and perform other plan related services. CIGNA HealthCare collects
administrative service fees in exchange for providing these self-insured plans with access to CIGNA
HealthCares applicable participating provider network and for providing other services and
programs including: claim administration; quality management; utilization management; cost
containment; health advocacy; 24-hour help line; 24/7 call center; case management; disease
management; pharmacy benefit management; behavioral health care management services (through its
provider networks); or any combination of these services. The self-insured plan sponsor is
responsible for self-funding all claims, but may purchase stop-loss insurance from CIGNA HealthCare
or other insurers for claims in excess of a predetermined amount, for either individuals
(specific), the entire group (aggregate), or both.
In 2008, CIGNA purchased Great-West Healthcare, the healthcare division of Great-West Life &
Annuity Insurance Company (Great-West Healthcare). See Note 3 to the Consolidated Financial
Statements beginning on page 112 of this Form 10-K for details about this purchase.
Financial information, including premiums and fees, is presented in the Health Care section of
the MD&A beginning on page 62 and in Note 22 to CIGNAs Consolidated Financial Statements beginning
on page 160 of this Form 10-K.
7
Service and Quality
CIGNA HealthCare operates 11 service centers that together processed approximately 122 million
medical claims in 2009. Satisfying customers and members is a primary business objective and
critical to the Companys success. To further this objective, in 2009, the Company made its call
centers available 24 hours a day, seven days a week. As of December 31, 2009,
CIGNA operates six member service centers that members can call
toll-free about their healthcare benefits, wellness programs and
claims. CIGNA HealthCare customer service representatives are
empowered to immediately resolve a wide range of issues to help members obtain the most from their
benefit plans. In addition, a customer service representative can
resolve a members issue.
If an issue cannot be resolved informally, CIGNA HealthCare has a formal appeals process that can
be initiated by telephone or in writing and involves two levels of internal review. For those
matters not resolved by internal reviews, CIGNA HealthCare members are offered the option of a
voluntary external review of claims. The CIGNA HealthCare formal appeals process addresses member
inquiries and appeals concerning initial coverage determinations based on medical necessity and
other benefits/coverage determinations. CIGNA HealthCares formal appeals process meets National
Committee for Quality Assurance (NCQA), Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974
(ERISA), Utilization Review Accreditation Commission (URAC) and/or applicable state regulatory
requirements.
CIGNA HealthCares commitment to promoting quality care and service to its members is
reflected in a variety of activities including: credentialing medical providers and facilities
that participate in CIGNA HealthCares managed care and PPO networks; developing the CIGNA
CareSM specialist physician designation described below; and participating in
initiatives that provide information to members to enable educated health care decision-making.
Participating Provider Network. CIGNA HealthCare has an extensive national network of
participating health care providers which, as of December 31, 2009, consisted of approximately
5,400 hospitals and approximately 612,000 providers as well as other facilities, pharmacies and
vendors of health care services and supplies (these hospital and provider counts exclude the impact
of the Great-West Healthcare acquisition). As part of the purchase of Great-West Healthcare, CIGNA
acquired the participating provider network of Great-West Healthcare. In many cases, the providers
in the Great-West Healthcare network were already in the CIGNA HealthCare participating provider
network, however, the acquisition has expanded and strengthened CIGNA HealthCares network in some
regions of the country. CIGNA HealthCare continues to consolidate the network it acquired from
Great-West Healthcare with its existing participating provider network.
In most instances, CIGNA HealthCare contracts directly with the participating provider to
provide covered services to members at agreed-upon rates of reimbursement. In some instances,
however, CIGNA HealthCare companies contract with third parties for access to their provider
networks. In addition, CIGNA HealthCare has entered into strategic alliances with several regional
managed care organizations (Tufts Health Plan, HealthPartners, Inc., Health Alliance Plan, and MVP
Health Plan) to gain access to their provider networks and discounts.
CIGNA CareSM. CIGNA Care is a benefit design option
available for CIGNA HealthCare administered plans in 57 service areas across the country. CIGNA
Care is a subset of participating physicians in certain specialties who are designated as CIGNA
Care physicians based on specific clinical quality and cost-efficiency selection criteria. Members
pay reduced co-payments or co-insurance when they receive care from a specialist designated as a
CIGNA Care provider. CIGNA participating specialists are evaluated annually for the CIGNA Care
designation.
Provider Credentialing. CIGNA HealthCare credentials physicians, hospitals and other
health care providers in its participating provider networks using quality criteria which meet or
exceed the standards of external accreditation or state regulatory agencies, or both. Typically,
most providers are re-credentialed every three years.
Health Plan Credentialing. CIGNA continues to demonstrate its commitment to quality
and has expanded its scope of external validation of its quality programs through nationally
recognized accreditation organizations. Each of CIGNAs 23 HMO and POS plans that have undergone an
accreditation review has earned Excellent or Commendable status from the NCQA, a private, nonprofit
organization dedicated to improving health care quality. CIGNAs PPO and Open Access Plus plans in
all 50 states have full accreditation status from NCQA. In addition to achieving outstanding
accreditation outcomes for its HMO, POS, PPO and OAP products, CIGNAs provider transparency,
wellness, utilization management, case management and demand management programs have been awarded
the highest outcomes possible. From NCQA, CIGNA earned Physician & Hospital Quality Certification
and Wellness and Health Promotion Accreditation. From URAC, an independent, nonprofit health care
accrediting organization dedicated to promoting health care quality through accreditation,
certification and commendation, CIGNA has full accreditation for Health Utilization Management,
Case Management and Health Call Centers.
8
HEDIS® Measures. In addition, CIGNA HealthCare participates in NCQAs
Health Plan Employer Data and Information Set (HEDIS®) Quality Compass Report.
HEDIS® Effectiveness of Care measures are a standard set of metrics to evaluate the
effectiveness of managed care clinical programs. CIGNA HealthCares national results compare
favorably to industry averages.
Technology. CIGNA HealthCare understands the critical importance of information
technology to the level of service the Company is able to provide to its members and to the
continued growth of its health care business. The health care marketplace is evolving and the level
of service that is acceptable to consumers today may not be acceptable tomorrow. Therefore, CIGNA
HealthCare continues to strategically invest in its information technology infrastructure and
capabilities including technology essential to fundamental claim administration and customer
service, as well as tools and Internet-enabled technology that support CIGNA HealthCares focus on
engaging members in health care decisions.
For example, CIGNA HealthCare has developed a range of member decision support tools
including:
|
|
myCIGNA.com, CIGNAs consumer Internet portal. The portal is personalized with each
members CIGNA medical, dental and pharmacy plan information; |
|
|
myCignaPlans.com, a website that allows prospective members to compare plan coverage and
pricing options, before enrolling, based on a variety of factors. The application gives
members information on the total health care cost to them and their employer; |
|
|
Health Risk Assessment, an online interactive tool through which members can identify
potential health risks and monitor their health status; |
|
|
a number of interactive online cost and quality information tools that compare hospital
quality and efficiency information, prescription drug choices and average price estimates and
member-specific average out-of-pocket cost estimates for certain medical procedures; and |
|
|
a special website designed for seniors that offers customized features as well as access to
both the myCIGNA.com and cigna.com websites. |
Pricing, Reserves and Reinsurance
Premiums and fees charged for HMO and most health insurance products and life insurance
products are generally set in advance of the policy period and are typically guaranteed for one
year (unless specified events occur, such as changes in benefits, significant changes in enrollment
or laws affecting the coverage or costs). Premium rates for fully insured products are established
either on a guaranteed cost basis or on a retrospectively experience-rated basis.
Charges to customers established on a guaranteed cost basis at the beginning of the policy
period cannot be adjusted to reflect actual claim experience during the policy period. A
guaranteed cost pricing methodology reflects assumptions about future claims, health care inflation
(unit cost, location of delivery of care and utilization), effective medical cost management,
expenses, credit risk, enrollment mix, investment returns, and profit margins. Claim and expense
assumptions may be based in whole or in part on prior experience of the account or on a pool of
accounts, depending on the group size and the statistical credibility of the experience.
Generally, guaranteed cost groups are smaller and less statistically credible than retrospectively
experience-rated groups. In addition, pricing for health care products that use networks of
contracted providers reflects assumptions about the future claims impact on the reimbursement rates
in the provider contracts. Premium rates may vary among accounts to reflect the anticipated
contract mix, family size, industry, renewal date, and other cost-predictive factors. In some
states, premium rates must be approved by the state insurance departments, and state laws may
restrict or limit the use of rating methods.
9
Premiums established for retrospectively experience-rated business may be adjusted for the
actual claim and, in some cases, administrative cost experience of the account through an
experience settlement process subsequent to the policy period. To the extent that the cost
experience is favorable in relation to the prospectively determined premium rates, a portion of the
initial premiums may be credited to the policyholder as an experience refund. If claim experience
is adverse in relation to the initial premiums, CIGNA HealthCare may recover the resulting
experience deficit, according to contractual provisions, through future premiums and experience
settlements, provided the policy remains in force.
CIGNA HealthCare contracts on an ASO basis with customers who fund their own claims. CIGNA
HealthCare charges these customers administrative fees based on the expected cost of administering
their self-funded programs. In some cases, CIGNA HealthCare provides performance guarantees
associated with meeting certain service related and other performance standards. If these
standards are not met, CIGNA HealthCare may be financially at risk up to a stated percentage of the
contracted fee or a stated dollar amount. CIGNA HealthCare establishes liabilities for estimated
payouts associated with these guarantees. See Note 23 to the Consolidated Financial Statements
beginning on page 163 of this Form 10-K for details about these guarantees.
In addition to paying current benefits and expenses under HMO and health insurance policies,
CIGNA HealthCare establishes reserves for amounts estimated to fund reported claims not yet paid,
as well as claims incurred, but not yet reported. Also, liabilities are established for estimated
experience refunds based on the results of retrospectively experience-rated policies and applicable
contract terms.
As of December 31, 2009, approximately $1.0 billion, or 59% of the reserves of CIGNA
HealthCares operations comprised liabilities that are likely to be paid within one year, primarily
for medical and dental claims, as well as certain group disability and life insurance claims. The
reserve amount expected to be paid within one year includes $206 million recoverable from certain
ASO customers and from minimum premium policyholders. The remaining reserves relate primarily to
contracts that are short term in nature, but have long term payouts and include liabilities for
group long-term disability insurance benefits and group life insurance benefits for disabled and
retired individuals, benefits paid in the form of both life and non-life contingent annuities to
survivors and contractholder deposit funds.
CIGNA HealthCare credits interest on experience refund balances to retrospectively
experience-rated policyholders through rates that are set by CIGNA HealthCare taking investment
performance and market rates into consideration. Interest-crediting rates are set at CIGNA
HealthCares discretion. Higher rates are credited to funds with longer expected payout terms
reflecting the fact that higher yields are generally available on investments with longer
maturities. For 2009, the rates of interest credited ranged from 2.25% to 4.0%, with a weighted
average rate of approximately 2.7%.
The profitability of CIGNA HealthCares fully insured health care products depends on the
adequacy of premiums charged relative to claims and expenses. For medical and dental products,
profitability reflects the accuracy of cost projections for health care (unit costs and
utilization), the adequacy of fees charged for administration and risk assumption and effective
medical cost and utilization management.
CIGNA HealthCare reduces its exposure to large catastrophic losses under group life,
disability and accidental death contracts by purchasing reinsurance from unaffiliated reinsurers.
10
Markets and Distribution
CIGNA HealthCare offers products in the following markets:
|
|
national accounts, which are multi-site employers generally with more than 5,000 employees; |
|
|
middle market, which is generally defined as multi-site employers with more than 250 but
fewer than 5,000 employees, and single-site employers with more than 250 employees; |
|
|
Select, which generally includes employers with more than 50 but fewer than 250
employees; |
|
|
small business, which generally includes employers with 2-50 employees; |
|
|
government, which includes employees in federal, state and local governments, primary and
secondary schools, and colleges and universities; |
|
|
Taft-Hartley plans, which includes members covered by union trust funds; |
|
|
seniors, which focuses on the health care needs of individuals 50 years and older; |
|
|
voluntary, which focuses on employers with hourly and part-time uninsured employees; and |
|
|
emerging markets, which includes non-CIGNA HealthCare payors to which leased network and
other services are offered. |
To date, the national and middle markets have comprised a significant amount of CIGNA
HealthCares business. With the acquisition of Great-West Healthcare, the Select, small
business, and emerging markets now constitute a larger share of CIGNA HealthCares business than
before the acquisition.
CIGNA HealthCare employs sales representatives to distribute its products and services through
insurance brokers and insurance consultants or directly to employers. CIGNA HealthCare also
employs representatives to sell utilization review services, managed behavioral health care and
employee assistance services directly to insurance companies, HMOs, third party administrators and
employer groups. As of December 31, 2009, the field sales force for the products and services of
this segment consisted of approximately 880 sales representatives in approximately 110 field
locations.
Competition
CIGNA HealthCares business is subject to intense competition, and industry consolidation has
created an even more competitive business environment. While no one competitor dominates the
health care market, CIGNA HealthCare expects a continuing trend of consolidation in the industry
given the current economic and political environment.
In certain geographic locations, some health care companies may have significant market share
positions. A large number of health care companies and other entities compete in offering similar
products. Competition in the health care market exists both for employers and other groups
sponsoring plans and for the employees in those instances where the employer offers its employees
the choice of products of more than one health care company. Most group policies are subject to
annual review by the policyholder, who may seek competitive quotations prior to renewal.
11
The principal competitive factors are: quality and cost-effectiveness of service and provider
networks; effectiveness of medical care management; product responsiveness to the needs of
customers and their employees; price; cost-containment services; technology; and effectiveness of
marketing and sales. Financial strength of the insurer, as indicated by ratings issued by
nationally recognized rating agencies, is also a competitive factor. For more information
concerning insurance ratings, see Ratings in Section K beginning on page 32 of this Form 10-K.
CIGNA HealthCare believes that its health advocacy capabilities, integrated approach to consumer
engagement, breadth of product offerings, clinical care and medical management capabilities and
funding options are strategic competitive advantages. These advantages allow CIGNA HealthCare to
respond to the diverse needs of its customer base. CIGNA HealthCare also believes that its focus
on helping to improve the health, well-being and sense of security of its members will allow it to
distinguish itself from its competitors.
CIGNA HealthCares principal competitors are:
|
|
other large insurance companies that provide group health and life insurance products; |
|
|
Blue Cross and Blue Shield organizations; |
|
|
stand-alone HMOs and PPOs; |
|
|
third-party administrators; |
|
|
HMOs affiliated with major insurance companies and hospitals; and |
|
|
national managed pharmacy, behavioral health and utilization review services companies. |
Competition also arises from smaller regional or specialty companies with strength in a
particular geographic area or product line, administrative service firms and, indirectly,
self-insurers. In addition to these traditional competitors, a new group of competitors is
emerging. These new competitors are focused on delivering employee benefits and services through
Internet-enabled technology that allows consumers to take a more active role in the management of
their health. This is accomplished primarily through financial incentives, access to enhanced
medical quality data and other information sharing. The effective use of the Companys health
advocacy capabilities, decision support tools (some of which are web-based) and enabling technology
are critical to success in the health care industry, and CIGNA HealthCare believes they will be
competitive differentiators.
Industry Developments
Both state and federal lawmakers have supported a broad range of health care reform efforts.
These efforts intensified in 2009 with major health care legislative proposals being considered in
the U.S. Congress. The possible enactment of proposed reform legislation is uncertain but, if
enacted, could affect the health care industry in general and CIGNA, specifically. To improve the
United States (U.S.) healthcare system in a sustainable way, CIGNA believes that three fundamental
issues need to be addressed; cost, quality and access. CIGNA is intensely committed to developing
workable solutions for reforming the U.S. healthcare system and believes such solutions must first
address the underlying drivers of health care costs. Through continued development and wider
adoption of health advocacy programs, cost management and wellness initiatives, CIGNA believes the
U.S. health care system can better provide all its citizens access to affordable quality
healthcare. For more information concerning health care reform, see Proposed Health Care Reform
in the Industry Developments and Other Matters section of the MD&A on page 79.
12
E. Disability and Life
CIGNAs Disability and Life segment (CIGNA Disability and Life) provides the following
insurance products and their related services: group long-term and short-term disability
insurance, group life insurance, workers compensation and disability case management, and accident
and specialty insurance. These products and services are provided by subsidiaries of CIGNA
Corporation. CIGNA Disability and Life markets products in all 50 states, the District of
Columbia, Puerto Rico, the U.S. Virgin Islands and Canada.
Principal Products and Services
Disability
CIGNA Disability and Life markets group long-term and short-term disability insurance products
and services. These products and services generally provide a fixed level of income to replace a
portion of wages lost because of disability. CIGNA Disability and Life also provides assistance to
the employee in returning to work and assistance to the employer in managing the cost of employee
disability. Group disability coverage is typically employer-paid or a combination of employer and
employee-paid, but may also include coverage paid for entirely by employees.
CIGNA Disability and Life, through its Intracorp® subsidiary, also provides case management
and related services to workers compensation insurers and employers who self-fund workers
compensation and disability benefits.
CIGNA Disability and Lifes disability insurance products may be integrated with other
disability benefit programs, behavioral programs, workers compensation, medical programs, social
security advocacy, and leave of absence administration. CIGNA Disability and Life believes this
integration provides customers with increased efficiency and effectiveness in disability claims
management, enhances productivity and reduces overall costs to employers. Coordinating the
administration of CIGNA Disability and Life disability and CIGNA HealthCares medical programs may
provide enhanced opportunities to influence outcomes, reduce the cost of both medical and
disability events and improve the return to work rate. CIGNA Disability and Life has formalized an
integrated approach to health and wellness through CIGNAs Disability and Healthcare Connect®
program. This program uses information from the CIGNA HealthCare and CIGNA Disability and Life
databases to help identify, treat and manage disabilities before they become chronic, longer in
duration and more costly. Proactive outreach from CIGNA Behavioral Health assists employees
suffering from a mental health condition, either as a primary condition or as a result of another
condition. CIGNA may receive fees for providing these integrated services to customers.
CIGNA Disability and Life is an industry leader in returning employees to work quickly.
Shorter disability claim durations mean higher productivity and lower cost for employers and a
better quality of life for their employees. Data from a recent industry customer satisfaction
survey showed that CIGNA Disability and Lifes short-term and long-term disability claimant
satisfaction levels meet and in certain metrics exceed those of our competitors.
Approximately 8,200 insured disability policies covering approximately 5.1 million lives were
outstanding as of December 31, 2009.
Life Insurance
Group life insurance products include group term life and group universal life. Group term
life insurance may be employer-paid basic life insurance, employee-paid supplemental life insurance
or a combination thereof.
CIGNA Disability and Life provides group universal life insurance to employers. Group
universal life insurance is a voluntary life insurance product in which the owner may accumulate
cash value. The cash value earns interest at rates declared from time to time, subject to a
minimum guaranteed contracted rate, and may be borrowed, withdrawn, or, within certain limits, used
to fund future life insurance coverage.
Approximately 4,300 group life insurance policies covering approximately 4.7 million lives
were outstanding as of December 31, 2009.
13
Other Products and Services
CIGNA Disability and Life offers personal accident insurance coverage, which consists
primarily of accidental death and dismemberment and travel accident insurance to employers. Group
accident insurance may be employer-paid or employee-paid.
CIGNA Disability and Life also offers specialty insurance services that consist primarily of
disability and life, accident, and medical insurance to professional associations, financial
institutions, and participant organizations. Renewal rights to CIGNAs block of student and
participant accident insurance business were sold to an unaffiliated insurer during 2009.
Voluntary benefits are those paid by the employee and are offered at the employers worksite.
CIGNA Disability and Life plans provide employers, among other services, flexible enrollment
options, list billing, medical underwriting, and individual record keeping. CIGNA Disability and
Life designed its voluntary offerings to offer employers a complete and simple way to manage their
benefits, including personalized enrollment communication and administration of the benefits
program.
Financial information, including premiums and fees, is presented in the Disability and Life
section of the MD&A beginning on page 69 and in Note 22 to CIGNAs Consolidated Financial
Statements beginning on page 160 of this Form 10-K.
Pricing, Reserves and Reinsurance
CIGNA Disability and Lifes products and services are offered on a fully insured,
experience-rated and ASO basis. Under fully insured arrangements, policyholders pay a fixed
premium and CIGNA Disability and Life bears the risk for claims and costs. Under experience-rated
funding arrangements, a premium that typically includes a margin to partially protect against
adverse claim fluctuations is determined at the beginning of the policy period. CIGNA Disability
and Life generally bears the risk if claims and expenses exceed this premium. If premiums exceed
claims and expenses, any surplus amount is generally first used to offset prior deficits and is
otherwise generally returned to the policyholder if surplus exceeds minimum contractual levels.
With experience-rated insurance products, CIGNA Disability and Life may recover deficits from
margins in future years if the policy is renewed. Under ASO arrangements, CIGNA Disability and
Life contracts with groups sponsoring self-insured plans to administer claims and perform other
plan related services in return for service fees. The self-insured plan sponsor is responsible for
self funding all claims. The majority of CIGNA Disability and Lifes products and services are
fully insured.
Premiums and fees charged for disability and life insurance products are generally established
in advance of the policy period and are generally guaranteed for one to three years and selectively
guaranteed for up to five years, but policies can in most cases be subject to early termination by
the policyholder or by the insurance company.
Premium rates reflect assumptions about future claims, expenses, credit risk, investment
returns and profit margins. Assumptions may be based in whole or in part on prior experience of the
account or on a pool of accounts, depending on the group size and the statistical credibility of
the experience, which varies by product.
Premiums for group universal life insurance products consist of mortality, administrative and
surrender charges assessed against the policyholders fund balance. Interest credited and
mortality charges for group universal life, and mortality charges on group variable universal life,
may be adjusted prospectively to reflect expected interest and mortality experience. Mortality
charges are subject to guaranteed maximum rates, based on standard mortality tables, which rates
are stated in the policy.
In addition to paying current benefits and expenses, CIGNA Disability and Life establishes
reserves in amounts estimated to be sufficient to pay reported claims not yet paid, as well as
claims incurred but not yet reported. For liabilities with longer-term pay-out periods such as
long-term disability, reserves represent the present value of future expected payments. CIGNA
Disability and Life discounts these expected payments using assumptions for interest rates and the
length of time over which claims are expected to be paid. The annual effective interest rate
assumptions used in determining reserves for most of the long-term disability insurance business is
5% for claims that were incurred in 2009 and 4.75% for claims that were incurred in 2008. For
group universal life insurance, CIGNA Disability and Life establishes reserves for deposits
received and interest credited to the policyholder, less mortality and administrative charges
assessed against the policyholders fund balance.
14
The profitability of this segments products depends on the adequacy of premiums charged and
investment returns relative to claims and expenses. The effectiveness of return to work programs
and mortality levels also impact the profitability of disability insurance products. CIGNA
Disability and Lifes previous claim experience and industry data indicate a correlation between
disability claim incidence levels and economic conditions, with submitted claims rising under
adverse economic conditions, although the impact of the current adverse economic conditions is not
clear. For life insurance products, the degree to which future experience deviates from mortality,
morbidity and expense assumptions also affects profitability.
In order to reduce its exposure to large individual and catastrophic losses under group life,
disability and accidental death policies, CIGNA Disability and Life purchases reinsurance from
unaffiliated reinsurers.
Markets and Distribution
CIGNA Disability and Life markets the group insurance products and services described above to
employers, employees, professional and other associations and groups. In marketing these products,
CIGNA Disability and Life employs a sales force to target customers with 50 or more employees and
the products and services of this segment are primarily distributed through insurance brokers and
consultants, along with some direct sales. As of December 31, 2009, the field sales force for the
products and services of this segment consisted of approximately 200 sales professionals in 27
office locations.
Competition
The principal competitive factors that affect the CIGNA Disability and Life segment are
underwriting and pricing, the quality and effectiveness of claims management, relative operating
efficiency, investment and risk management, distribution methodologies and producer relations, the
breadth and variety of products and services offered, and the quality of customer service. The
Company believes that CIGNA Disability and Lifes claims management capabilities and integration
with CIGNA HealthCares benefits provide a competitive advantage in this marketplace.
For certain products with longer-term liabilities, such as group long-term disability
insurance, the financial strength of the insurer, as indicated by ratings issued by nationally
recognized rating agencies, is also a competitive factor. For more information concerning
insurance ratings, see Ratings in Section K beginning on page 32 of this Form 10-K.
The principal competitors of CIGNAs group disability, life and accident businesses are other
large and regional insurance companies that market and distribute these or similar types of
products.
As of December 31, 2009, CIGNA is one of the top five providers of group disability, life and
accident insurance in the United States, based on premiums.
15
Industry Developments and Strategic Initiatives
The group insurance market remains highly competitive as the rising cost of providing medical
coverage to employees has forced companies to re-evaluate their overall employee benefit spending.
Demographic shifts have further driven demand for products and services that are sufficiently
flexible to meet the evolving needs of employers and employees who want innovative, cost-effective
solutions to their insurance needs. Employers continue to shift towards greater employee
participatory coverage and voluntary purchases.
Employers are also expressing a growing interest in employee wellness, absence management and
productivity and recognizing a strong link between health, productivity and their profitability.
CIGNA is well-positioned to offer employers programs that promote a healthy lifestyle, offer
assistance in returning to work and integrate health care and disability programs. CIGNA believes
it is well positioned to deliver integrated solutions that address these broad employer and
employee needs. CIGNA also believes that its strong disability management portfolio and fully
integrated programs provide employers and employees tools to improve health status. This focus on
managing the employees total absence enables CIGNA to increase the number and likelihood of
interventions and minimize disabling events.
The disability industry is under continuing review by regulators and legislators with respect
to its offset practices regarding Social Security Disability Insurance (SSDI). The Company has
received one Congressional inquiry and has responded to the information request. Also, at least
one state has considered legislation that would restrict the use of such offset provisions in
disability policies. The Company is also involved in related pending civil litigation. If the
industry is forced to change its offset SSDI procedures, the practices and products for this
segment could be significantly impacted.
16
F. International
CIGNAs International segment (CIGNA International) offers life, accident and supplemental
health insurance products as well as international health care products and services. These
products and services are provided by subsidiaries of CIGNA Corporation, including foreign
operating entities.
Principal Products and Services
Life, Accident and Supplemental Health Insurance
CIGNA Internationals life, accident and supplemental health insurance products generally
provide simple, affordable coverage of risks for the health and financial security of individuals.
Supplemental health products provide a specified payment for a variety of health risks and include
personal accident, accidental death, critical illness, hospitalization, dental, cancer and other
dread disease coverages. Variable universal life insurance products are also included in the
product portfolio. CIGNA Internationals life, accident and supplemental health insurance products
are offered in South Korea, Taiwan, the European Union, Hong Kong, Indonesia, China, New Zealand
and Thailand.
International Health Care
CIGNA Internationals health care businesses primarily consist of products and services to
meet the needs of multinational companies and their expatriate employees and dependents. These
benefits include medical, dental, vision, life, accidental death and dismemberment and disability
products. The expatriate benefits products and services are offered through guaranteed cost,
experience-rated, administrative services only, and minimum premium funding arrangements. For
definitions of funding arrangements, see Funding Arrangements in Section D beginning on page 3 of
this Form 10-K. The customers of CIGNA Internationals expatriate benefits business are
multinational companies and international organizations headquartered in the United States, Canada,
Europe, the Middle East, Hong Kong, China and other international locations.
In addition, CIGNA Internationals health care businesses include medical products, which are
primarily provided through group benefits programs to local employees in the United Kingdom and
Spain. These products include medical indemnity insurance coverage, with some offerings having
managed care or administrative service aspects. These products generally provide an alternative or
supplement to government provided national health care programs.
Financial information, including premiums and fees, is presented in the International section
of the MD&A beginning on page 71 and in Note 22 to CIGNAs Consolidated Financial Statements
beginning on page 160 of this Form 10-K.
Pricing, Reserves and Reinsurance
Premiums for CIGNA Internationals life, accident and supplemental health insurance products
are based on assumptions about mortality, morbidity, customer retention, expenses and target profit
margins, as well as interest rates. The profitability of these products is primarily driven by
mortality, morbidity, and customer retention.
Fees for variable universal life insurance products consist of mortality, administrative,
asset management and surrender charges assessed against the contractholders fund balance.
Mortality charges on variable universal life may be adjusted prospectively to reflect expected
mortality experience.
Premiums and fees for CIGNA Internationals health care products reflect assumptions about
future claims, expenses, membership demographics, investment returns, and profit margins. For
products using networks of contracted providers, premiums reflect assumptions about the impact of
provider contracts and utilization management on future claims. Most of the premium volume for the
medical indemnity business is on a guaranteed cost basis. Other premiums are established on an
experience-rated basis. Most contracts permit rate changes at least annually.
The profitability of health care products is dependent upon the accuracy of projections for
health care inflation (unit cost, location of delivery of care, including currency of incurral and
utilization), membership demographics, the adequacy of fees charged for administration and
effective medical cost management.
17
In addition to paying current benefits and expenses, CIGNA International establishes reserves
in amounts estimated to be sufficient to settle reported claims not yet paid, claims incurred but
not yet reported as well as future amounts payable on experience-rated arrangements. Additionally,
for some individual life insurance and supplemental health insurance products, CIGNA International
establishes policy reserves which reflect the present value of expected future obligations less the
present value of expected future premiums attributable to policyholder obligations. CIGNA
International defers acquisition costs, such as commissions, telemarketing, direct response
marketing and policy fulfillment costs, incurred in the sales of long-duration life, accident and
supplemental health products. For most products, these costs are amortized in proportion to
premium revenue recognized, which is impacted by customer retention. For variable universal life
products, acquisition costs are amortized in proportion to expected gross profits.
CIGNA International reduces its exposure to large and/or multiple losses arising out of a
single occurrence by purchasing reinsurance from unaffiliated reinsurers.
Markets and Distribution
CIGNA Internationals life, accident and supplemental health insurance products are generally
marketed through distribution partners with whom the individual insured has an affinity
relationship. These products are sold primarily through direct marketing channels, such as
outbound telemarketing and in-branch bancassurance. Marketing campaigns are conducted through
these channels under a variety of arrangements with affinity partners. These affinity partners
primarily include banks, credit card companies and other financial institutions. CIGNA
International also distributes directly to consumers via direct response television and the
Internet. CIGNA Internationals life, accident and supplemental health insurance businesses are
located in South Korea, Taiwan, the European Union, Hong Kong, Indonesia, China, New Zealand and
Thailand.
CIGNA Internationals health care products are distributed through independent brokers and
consultants, select partners and CIGNA Internationals own sales personnel. The customers of CIGNA
Internationals expatriate benefits business are multinational companies and international
organizations headquartered in the United States, Canada, Europe, the Middle East, Hong Kong, China
and other international locations. In addition, CIGNA Internationals health care businesses
include medical products, which are provided through group and individual benefits programs in the
United Kingdom and Spain.
For CIGNA Internationals life, accident and supplemental health insurance products, a
significant portion of premiums are billed and collected through credit cards. A substantial
contraction in consumer credit could impact CIGNA Internationals ability to retain existing
policies and sell new policies. A decline in customer retention would result in both a reduction
of revenue and an acceleration of the amortization of acquisition related costs.
South Korea represents the single largest geographic market for CIGNA Internationals
businesses. In 2009, South Korea generated 29% of CIGNA Internationals revenues and 49% of its
segment earnings. For information on the concentration of risk with respect to CIGNA
Internationals business in South Korea, see Other Items Affecting International Results in the
International section of the MD&A beginning on page 71 of this Form 10-K.
Competition
Competitive factors in CIGNA Internationals life, accident and supplemental health and
expatriate benefits businesses include product and distribution innovation and differentiation,
efficient management of marketing processes and costs, commission levels paid to distribution
partners, and quality of claims and customer services.
The principal competitive factors that affect CIGNA Internationals health care businesses are
underwriting and pricing, relative operating efficiency, relative effectiveness in network
development and medical cost management, product innovation and differentiation, broker relations,
and the quality of claims and customer service. In most overseas markets, perception of financial
strength is also an important competitive factor.
For the life, accident and supplemental health insurance line of business, competitors are
primarily locally based insurance companies, including insurance subsidiaries of banks primarily in
Asia and Europe. However, insurance company competitors in this segment primarily focus on
traditional product distribution through captive agents, with direct marketing being a secondary
objective. CIGNA International estimates that it has less than 2% market share of the total life
insurance premiums in any given market in which it operates.
18
With respect to the expatriate benefits business, CIGNA International is a market leader in
the U.S. Its primary competitors include U.S.-based and European health insurance companies with
global expatriate benefits operations. For the health care operations in the United Kingdom and
Spain, the primary competitors are regional and local insurers, with CIGNAs market share at less
than 5% of the premiums of the total local health care market.
CIGNA International expects that the competitive environment will intensify as U.S. and
Europe-based insurance and financial services providers pursue global expansion opportunities.
Industry Developments
Pressure on social health care systems and increased wealth and education in emerging markets
is leading to higher demand for products providing health insurance and financial security. In the
life, accident and supplemental health business, direct marketing is growing and attracting new
competitors while industry consolidation among financial institutions and other affinity partners
continues. Increased regulations requiring foreign workers to show proof of health insurance are
creating opportunities for CIGNA Internationals health care businesses. See Risk Factors
beginning on page 35 of this Form 10-K for a discussion of risks related to CIGNA International.
19
G. Run-off Reinsurance
Principal Products and Services
Until 2000, CIGNA offered reinsurance coverage for part or all of the risks written by other
insurance companies (or ceding companies) under life and annuity policies (both group and
individual) and accident policies (workers compensation, personal accident, and catastrophe
coverages). The products and services related to these operations were offered by subsidiaries of
CIGNA Corporation.
In 2000, CIGNA sold its U.S. individual life, group life and accidental death reinsurance
businesses. CIGNA placed its remaining reinsurance businesses (including its accident,
international life, and annuity reinsurance businesses) into run-off as of June 1, 2000, and
stopped underwriting new reinsurance business.
CIGNAs exposures stem primarily from its annuity reinsurance business, including its
reinsurance of guaranteed minimum death benefits (GMDB) and guaranteed minimum income benefits
(GMIB) contracts. Additional exposures arise from its reinsurance of workers compensation and
other personal accident and catastrophic risks.
Life and Annuity Policies
Guaranteed Minimum Death Benefit Contracts
CIGNAs reinsurance segment reinsured GMDB (also known as variable annuity death benefits
(VADBe)), under certain variable annuities issued by other insurance companies. These variable
annuities are essentially investments in mutual funds combined with a death benefit. CIGNA has
equity and other market exposures as a result of this product. The Company purchased
retrocessional protection that covers approximately 5% of the assumed risks. The Company also
maintains a dynamic hedge program (GMDB equity hedge program) to substantially reduce the equity
market exposures relating to GMDB contracts by entering into exchange-traded futures contracts.
For additional information about GMDB contracts, see Guaranteed Minimum Death Benefits under
Run-off Reinsurance section of the MD&A beginning on page 73 and Note 7 to CIGNAs Consolidated
Financial Statements beginning on page 117 of this Form 10-K.
Guaranteed Minimum Income Benefit Contracts
In certain circumstances where CIGNAs reinsurance operations reinsured the GMDB, CIGNA also
reinsured GMIB under certain variable annuities issued by other insurance companies. These variable
annuities are essentially investments in mutual funds combined with minimum income and death
benefits. All reinsured GMIB policies also have a GMDB benefit reinsured by the Company. When
annuitants elect to receive these minimum income benefits, CIGNA may be required to make payments
which will vary based on changes in underlying mutual fund values and interest rates. CIGNA has
retrocessional coverage for 55% of the exposures on these contracts, provided by two external
reinsurers.
For additional information about GMIB contracts, see Guaranteed Minimum Income Benefits
under Run-off Reinsurance section of the MD&A beginning on page 73 and Note 11 to CIGNAs
Consolidated Financial Statements beginning on page 132 of this Form 10-K.
Workers Compensation, Personal Accident and Catastrophe
CIGNA reinsured workers compensation and other personal accident and catastrophic risks in
the London market and in the United States. CIGNA purchased retrocessional coverage in these
markets to reduce the risk of loss on these contracts.
20
Markets and Distribution
These products under CIGNAs Run-off Reinsurance segment were sold principally in North
America and Europe through a small sales force and through intermediaries.
Prior to 2000, CIGNA also purchased reinsurance to reduce the risk of losses on contracts that
it had written. CIGNA determines its net exposure for run-off reinsurance contracts by estimating
the portion of its policy and claim reserves that it expects will be recovered from its reinsurers
(or retrocessionaires) and reflecting these in its financial statements as Reinsurance
Recoverables, or, with respect to GMIB contracts discussed above, as Other Assets.
Other Risks
For more information on policy and claim reserves see the Run-off Reinsurance section of the
MD&A beginning on page 73, and Notes 8 and 11 to CIGNAs Consolidated Financial Statements
beginning on pages 121 and 132 respectively of this Form 10-K. For more information on the risk
associated with Run-off Reinsurance, see the Risk Factors beginning on page 35 of this Form 10-K,
and the Critical Accounting Estimates section of the MD&A beginning on page 55 of this Form 10-K.
21
H. Other Operations
Other Operations consists of:
|
|
non-leveraged and leveraged corporate-owned life insurance; |
|
|
deferred gains recognized from the 1998 sale of the individual life insurance and annuity
business and the 2004 sale of the retirement benefits business; and |
|
|
run-off settlement annuity business. |
The products and services related to these operations are offered by subsidiaries of CIGNA
Corporation.
Corporate-owned Life Insurance (COLI)
Principal Products and Services
The principal products of the COLI business are permanent insurance contracts sold to
corporations to provide coverage on the lives of certain of their employees. Permanent life
insurance provides coverage that, when adequately funded, does not expire after a term of years.
The contracts are primarily non-participating universal life policies. The key distinction between
leveraged and non-leveraged COLI products is that, with leveraged COLI, the product design
anticipates borrowing by the policy owner of a portion of the surrender value, while policy loans
are not a significant feature of non-leveraged COLI.
Universal life policies typically provide flexible coverage and flexible premium payments.
Policy cash values fluctuate with the amount of the premiums paid, mortality and expense charges
assessed, and interest credited to the policy. Variable universal life policies are universal life
contracts in which the cash values vary directly with the performance of a specific pool of
investments underlying the policy.
The principal services provided by the COLI business are issuance and administration of the
insurance policies (e.g., maintenance of records regarding cash values and death benefits, claims
processing, etc.) as well as oversight of the investment management for separate account assets
that support the variable universal life product.
Product Features
Cash values on universal life policies are credited interest at a declared interest rate that
reflects the anticipated investment results of the assets backing these policies and may vary with
the characteristics of each product. Universal life policies generally have a minimum guaranteed
declared interest rate which may be cumulative from the issuance date of the policy. The declared
interest rate may be changed monthly, but is generally changed less frequently. In lieu of
credited interest rates, holders of certain universal life policies may elect to receive credited
income based on changes in an equity index, such as the S&P 500®. No such elections
have been made since 2004.
Cash values on variable universal life policies vary directly with the performance of a
specific pool of investments underlying the policy. A limited number of variable universal life
policies guarantee that the realized investment performance for a quarter, excluding the impact of
unrealized gains/losses and the impact of credit-related events, will not be negative.
Mortality risk is retained according to guidelines established by CIGNA. To the extent a
given policy carries mortality risk that exceeds these guidelines, reinsurance is purchased from
third parties for the balance.
Pricing, Reserves, and Reinsurance
Fees for universal life insurance products consist of mortality, administrative and surrender
charges assessed against the
policyholders fund balance. Interest credited and mortality charges for universal life and
mortality charges on variable
universal life may be adjusted prospectively to reflect expected interest and mortality experience.
For universal life insurance, CIGNA establishes reserves for deposits received and interest
credited to the contractholder, less mortality and administrative charges assessed against the
contractholders fund balance.
22
In order to reduce its exposure to large individual and catastrophe losses, CIGNA purchases
reinsurance from unaffiliated reinsurers.
Markets and Distribution
From 2004 to 2008, the Company was not actively marketing and distributing COLI products. In
2008, the Company decided to re-enter the market for COLI products, and is actively pursuing new
COLI business.
The principal markets for COLI products are regional to national account-sized corporations,
including banks. CIGNAs COLI products are offered through a select group of independent brokers
with particular expertise in the bank market and in the use of COLI for the financing of benefit
plan liabilities.
Competition
The principal competitive factors that affect CIGNAs COLI business are pricing, service,
product innovation and access to third-party distribution.
For CIGNAs COLI business, competitors are primarily national life insurance companies,
including insurance subsidiaries of banks.
CIGNA expects that the competitive environment will intensify as the economy recovers and
competitors develop new investment strategies and product designs, and aggressively price their
offerings to build distribution capacity and gain market share.
Industry Developments and Strategic Initiatives
The legislative environment surrounding COLI has evolved considerably over the past decade,
and there are ongoing discussions at the state and federal levels that have the potential to impact
the policyholders tax treatment and/or administrative requirements. The Pension Protection Act of
2006 included provisions related to the notice requirements given to insured employees and limited
coverage to certain more highly compensated employees. These changes were widely viewed as
clarification of existing rules or industry best practices.
Sale of Individual Life Insurance & Annuity and Retirement Benefits Businesses
CIGNA sold its individual life insurance and annuity business in 1998 and its retirement
benefits business in 2004. Portions of the gains from these sales were deferred because the
principal agreements to sell these businesses were structured as reinsurance arrangements. The
deferred portion relating to the remaining reinsurance is being recognized at the rate that
earnings from the sold businesses would have been expected to emerge, primarily over 15 years on a
declining basis.
Because the individual life and annuity business was sold in an indemnity reinsurance
transaction, CIGNA is not relieved of primary liability for the reinsured business and had
reinsurance recoverables totaling $4.4 billion as of December 31, 2009. Effective as of December
14, 2007, the purchaser placed a significant portion of the assets supporting the reserves for the
purchased business into a trust for the benefit of CIGNA which qualifies to support CIGNAs credit
for the reinsurance ceded under Regulation 114 of the New York Department of Insurance. Trust
assets are limited to cash, certificates of deposits in U.S. banks, and securities specified by
section 1404 (a) of the New York insurance law and consist primarily of fixed maturities. At
December 31, 2009, the value of the trust assets secured approximately 90% of the reinsurance
recoverable. The remaining balance is currently unsecured. If Lincoln National Life Insurance
Company and Lincoln Life & Annuity of New York do not maintain a specified minimum credit or claims
paying rating, these reinsurers are required to fully secure the outstanding balance. S&P has
assigned each of these companies a rating of AA-.
CIGNAs sale of its retirement benefits business primarily took the form of an arrangement
under which CIGNA reinsured with the purchaser of the retirement business the general account
contractholder liabilities under an indemnity reinsurance arrangement and the separate account
liabilities under modified coinsurance and indemnity reinsurance arrangements. Since the sale of
the retirement benefits business in 2004, the purchaser of that business has entered into
agreements with certain insured party contractholders (novation agreements), which relieved CIGNA
of any remaining contractual obligations to the contractholders. As a result, CIGNA reduced
reinsurance recoverables, contractholder deposit funds, and separate account balances for these
obligations.
23
The purchaser of the retirement benefits business deposited assets associated with the
reinsurance of general account contracts into a trust (the Ceded Business Trust) to provide
security to CIGNA for the related reinsurance recoverables. The purchaser is permitted to withdraw
assets from the Ceded Business Trust equal to the reduction in CIGNAs reserves whenever a
reduction occurs. For example, reductions will occur when the purchaser enters into additional
novation agreements and directly assumes liability to the insured party. Assets in the trust must
be greater than or equal to general account statutory liabilities of the ceded business. Trust
assets are limited to those types of investments that are permitted by the state of Connecticut for
general account investing and consist primarily of fixed maturities. As of December 31, 2009,
assets totaling $2.4 billion remained in the Ceded Business Trust, and the remaining reserves for
the purchased business were $1.7 billion.
Settlement Annuity Business
CIGNAs settlement annuity business is a run-off block of contracts. These contracts are
primarily liability settlements with approximately 35% of the liabilities associated with payments
that are guaranteed and not contingent on survivorship. In the case of the contracts that involve
non-guaranteed payments, such payments are contingent on the survival of one or more parties
involved in the settlement.
The
settlement annuities business is premium deficient, meaning initial premiums were not
sufficient to cover all claims and profit. Liabilities are estimates of the present value of
benefits to be paid less the present value of investment income generated by the assets supporting
the product including realized and unrealized capital gains. The Company estimates these
liabilities based on assumptions for investment yields, mortality, and administrative expenses.
Refer to Note 2 to CIGNAs Consolidated Financial Statements beginning on page 103 of this Form
10-K for additional information regarding reserves for this business.
Other Risks
For more information, see the Other Operations section of the MD&A beginning on page 77 of
this Form 10-K.
24
I. Investments and Investment Income
CIGNAs investment operations provide investment management and related services primarily for
CIGNAs corporate invested assets and the insurance-related invested assets in its General Account
(Invested Assets). CIGNA acquires or originates, directly or through intermediaries, various
investments including private placements, public securities, commercial mortgage loans, real estate
and short-term investments. CIGNAs Invested Assets are managed primarily by CIGNA subsidiaries
and external managers with whom CIGNAs subsidiaries contract.
The Invested Assets comprise a majority of the combined assets of the Health Care, Disability
and Life, Run-off Reinsurance and Other Operations segments (collectively, the Domestic
Portfolios). There are, in addition, portfolios containing Invested Assets that consist of the
assets of the International segment (collectively, the International Portfolios). Additionally,
CIGNA subsidiaries or external managers manage Separate Account assets on behalf of
contractholders. These assets are legally segregated from the Companys other businesses and are
not included in the General Account Invested Assets. Income, gains and losses generally accrue
directly to the contractholders.
Net investment income and realized investment gains (losses) are not reported separately in
the investment operations. Instead, net investment income is included as a component of earnings
for each of CIGNAs operating segments (Health Care, Disability and Life, Run-off Reinsurance,
Other Operations and International) and Corporate, net of the expenses attributable to the
investment operations. Realized investment gains (losses) are reported for each of CIGNAs
operating segments.
Assets Under Management
CIGNAs Invested Assets under management at December 31, 2009 totaled $19.8 billion. See
Schedule I to CIGNAs 2009 Consolidated Financial Statements on page FS-3 of this Form 10-K for
more information as to the allocation to types of investments.
As of December 31, 2009, CIGNAs separate account funds consisted of:
|
|
$1.4 billion in separate account assets that are managed by the buyer of the retirement
benefits business pursuant to reinsurance arrangements described in the Sales of Individual
Life Insurance & Annuity and Retirement Benefits Businesses sections in Note 3 to the
Consolidated Financial Statements beginning on page 112 of this Form 10-K; |
|
|
$2.6 billion in separate account assets, which constitute a portion of the assets of the
CIGNA Pension Plan; and |
|
|
$3.3 billion in separate account assets, which primarily support certain corporate-owned
life insurance, health care and disability and life products. |
Types of Investments
CIGNA invests in a broad range of asset classes, including domestic and international fixed
maturities and common stocks, commercial mortgage loans, real estate and short-term investments.
Fixed maturity investments include publicly traded and private placement corporate bonds,
government bonds, publicly traded and private placement asset-backed securities, and redeemable
preferred stocks.
For the International Portfolios, CIGNA invests primarily in publicly traded fixed maturities,
short-term investments and time deposits denominated in the currency of the relevant liabilities
and surplus.
Fixed Maturities
CIGNAs fixed maturities are 92% investment grade as determined by external rating agencies
(for public investments) and by CIGNA (for private investments). These assets are well diversified
by individual holding and industry sector. For information about below investment grade holdings,
see the Investment Assets section of the MD&A beginning on page 87 of this Form 10-K.
25
Commercial Mortgages and Real Estate
Commercial mortgage loan investments are subject to underwriting criteria addressing
loan-to-value ratio, debt service coverage, cash flow, tenant quality, leasing, market, location
and borrowers financial strength. Such investments consist primarily of first mortgage loans on
commercial properties and are diversified by property type, location and borrower. CIGNA invests
primarily in commercial mortgages on fully completed and substantially leased commercial
properties. Virtually all of CIGNAs commercial mortgage loans are balloon payment loans, under
which all or a substantial portion of the loan principal is due at the end of the loan term. CIGNA
holds no direct residential mortgages. The weighted average loan-to-value ratio of the Companys
commercial mortgage loan portfolio, based on managements annual valuation completed in the third
quarter of 2009, was approximately 77% and the weighted average debt service coverage was
approximately 1.5 times.
CIGNA enters into joint ventures with local partners to develop, lease, manage, and sell
commercial real estate to maximize investment returns. CIGNAs portfolio of real estate
investments consists of properties under development and stabilized properties, and is diversified
relative to property type and location. Additionally, CIGNA invests in third-party sponsored real
estate funds to maximize investment returns and to maintain diversity with respect to its real
estate related exposure.
CIGNA also could take possession of real estate through foreclosure of delinquent commercial
mortgage loans. CIGNA rehabilitates, re-leases, and sells foreclosed properties, a process that
usually takes from two to four years unless management considers a near-term sale preferable. As
of December 31, 2009, CIGNA held $59 million of foreclosed properties.
Mezzanine and Private Equity Partnerships
CIGNA invests in limited partnership interests in partnerships formed and managed by seasoned,
experienced fund managers with diverse mezzanine and private equity strategies.
Derivative Instruments
CIGNA generally uses derivative financial instruments to minimize its exposure to certain market
risks. CIGNA has also written derivative instruments to minimize certain insurance customers
market risks. In addition, to enhance investment returns, CIGNA may invest in indexed credit
default swaps or other credit derivatives from time to time. However, as of December 31, 2009,
CIGNA held no indexed credit default swaps or other credit derivatives. For information about
CIGNAs use of derivative financial instruments, see Note 13 to CIGNAs 2009 Consolidated
Financial Statements beginning on page 146 of this Form 10-K.
See also the Investment Assets section of the MD&A beginning on page 87, and Notes 1, 12,
and 14 to the Consolidated Financial Statements beginning on pages 103, 141 and 149, respectively,
of this Form 10-K for additional information about CIGNAs investments.
Domestic Portfolios Investment Strategy
As of December 31, 2009, the Domestic Portfolios had $18.3 billion in Invested Assets,
allocated among fixed maturity investments (66%); commercial mortgage loan investments (19%); and
policy loans, real estate investments, short-term investments and mezzanine and private equity
partnership investments (15%).
CIGNA generally manages the characteristics of these assets to reflect the underlying
characteristics of related insurance and contractholder liabilities and related capital
requirements, as well as regulatory and tax considerations pertaining to those liabilities, and
state investment laws. CIGNAs domestic insurance and contractholder liabilities as of December
31, 2009, excluding liabilities of businesses sold through the use of reinsurance arrangements,
were associated with the following products, and the Invested Assets are allocated proportionally
as follows: other life and health, 51%; fully guaranteed annuity, 18%; and interest-sensitive life
insurance, 31%.
26
While the businesses and products supported are described elsewhere in this Form 10-K, the
Invested Assets supporting the insurance and contractholder liabilities of each of the Companys
segments are as follows:
|
|
assets supporting CIGNAs Health Care segment are structured to emphasize investment
income, and provide the necessary liquidity to meet cash flow requirements. |
|
|
assets supporting CIGNAs Disability and Life segment are also structured to emphasize
investment income, and provide necessary liquidity to meet cash flow requirements. Invested
Assets supporting longer-term group disability insurance benefits and group life waiver of
premium benefits are generally managed to an aggregate duration similar to that of the related
benefit cash flows. |
|
|
assets supporting the Run-off Reinsurance segment with respect to reinsurance provided for
guaranteed minimum death benefit contracts and guaranteed minimum income benefit contracts are
structured to emphasize investment income, and provide the necessary liquidity to meet cash
flow requirements. For information about CIGNAs use of derivative financial instruments in
the Run-off Reinsurance segment, see Notes 7 and 11 to CIGNAs Consolidated Financial
Statements beginning on pages 117 and 132 of this Form 10-K. |
|
|
assets supporting CIGNAs Other Operations segment are associated primarily with fully
guaranteed annuities (primarily settlement annuities) and interest-sensitive life insurance
(primarily corporate-owned life insurance products). Because settlement annuities generally
do not permit withdrawal by policyholders prior to maturity, the amount and timing of future
benefit cash flows can be reasonably estimated so funds supporting these products are invested
in fixed income investments whose aggregate duration generally matches the cash flows of the
related benefits. As of December 31, 2009, the duration of assets that supported these
liabilities was approximately 11.2 years. Invested Assets supporting interest-sensitive life
insurance products are primarily fixed income investments and policy loans. Fixed income
investments emphasize investment yield while meeting the liquidity requirements of the related
liabilities. |
Investment strategy and results are affected by the amount and timing of cash available for
investment, competition for investments, economic conditions, interest rates and asset allocation
decisions. CIGNA routinely monitors and evaluates the status of its investments in light of
current economic conditions, trends in capital markets and other factors. Such factors include
industry sector considerations for fixed maturity investments and mezzanine and private equity
partnership investments, and geographic and property-type considerations for commercial mortgage
loan and real estate investments.
International Portfolios Investment Strategy
As of December 31, 2009 the International Portfolios had $1.5 billion in Invested Assets,
allocated among fixed maturity investments (93%), short-term investments (5%) and other investments
(2%). The International Portfolios are primarily managed by external managers with whom CIGNAs
subsidiaries contract.
The characteristics of these assets are generally managed to reflect the underlying
characteristics of related insurance and contractholder liabilities, as well as regulatory and tax
considerations in the countries where CIGNAs subsidiaries operate. CIGNA Internationals Invested
Assets are generally invested in the currency of related liabilities, typically the currency in
which the subsidiaries operate and with an aggregate duration generally matching the duration of
insurance liabilities and surplus. CIGNAs investment policy allows the investment of subsidiary
assets in U.S. dollars to the extent permitted by applicable regulation. CIGNA Internationals
Invested Assets as of December 31, 2009 were held primarily in support of statutory surplus and
liabilities associated with the life, accident and supplemental health and healthcare products
described in Section F on page 17 of this Form 10-K.
27
J. Regulation
CIGNA and its subsidiaries are subject to federal, state and international regulations and
CIGNA has established policies and procedures to comply with applicable requirements.
CIGNAs insurance and HMO subsidiaries must be licensed by the jurisdictions in which they
conduct business. These subsidiaries are subject to numerous state and federal regulations related
to their business operations, including, but not limited to:
|
|
the form and content of customer contracts including benefit mandates (including special
requirements for small groups, generally under 50 employees); |
|
|
the content of agreements with participating providers of covered services; |
|
|
producer appointment and compensation; |
|
|
claims processing and appeals; |
|
|
underwriting practices; |
|
|
reinsurance arrangements; |
|
|
unfair trade and claim practices; |
|
|
protecting the privacy and confidentiality of the information received from members; |
|
|
risk sharing arrangements with providers; and |
|
|
the operation of consumer-directed plans (including health savings accounts, health
reimbursement accounts, flexible spending accounts and debit cards). |
CIGNA and its international subsidiaries comply with regulations in international
jurisdictions where foreign insurers are, in some countries, faced with greater restrictions than
their domestic competitors. These restrictions may include discriminatory licensing procedures,
compulsory cessions of reinsurance, required localization of records and funds, higher premium and
income taxes, and requirements for local participation in an insurers ownership.
CIGNA and its subsidiaries are also subject to state and federal laws relating to
business entities.
Regulatory agencies conduct routine and targeted market conduct examinations of CIGNAs
insurance and HMO subsidiaries to assess compliance with applicable laws and regulations. Other
types of regulatory oversight predominantly as to CIGNA and its subsidiaries products and services
are described below.
Regulation of Insurance Companies
Financial Reporting
Regulators closely monitor the financial condition of licensed insurance companies and HMOs.
States regulate the form and content of statutory financial statements and the type and
concentration of permitted investments. CIGNAs insurance and HMO subsidiaries are required to
file periodic financial reports with regulators in most of the jurisdictions in which they do
business, and their operations and accounts are subject to examination by such agencies at regular
intervals.
28
Guaranty Associations, Indemnity Funds, Risk Pools and Administrative Funds
Most states and certain non-U.S. jurisdictions require insurance companies to support guaranty
associations or indemnity funds, which are established to pay claims on behalf of insolvent
insurance companies. In the United States, these associations levy assessments on member insurers
licensed in a particular state to pay such claims.
Several states also require HMOs to participate in guaranty funds, special risk pools and
administrative funds. For additional information about guaranty fund and other assessments, see
Note 23 to CIGNAs Consolidated Financial Statements beginning on page 163 of this Form 10-K.
Some states also require health insurers and HMOs to participate in assigned risk plans, joint
underwriting authorities, pools or other residual market mechanisms to cover risks not acceptable
under normal underwriting standards.
Solvency and Capital Requirements
Many states have adopted some form of the National Association of Insurance Commissioners
(NAIC) model solvency-related laws and risk-based capital rules (RBC rules) for life and health
insurance companies. The RBC rules recommend a minimum level of capital depending on the types and
quality of investments held, the types of business written and the types of liabilities incurred.
If the ratio of the insurers adjusted surplus to its risk-based capital falls below statutory
required minimums, the insurer could be subject to regulatory actions ranging from increased
scrutiny to conservatorship.
In addition, various non-U.S. jurisdictions prescribe minimum surplus requirements that are
based upon solvency, liquidity and reserve coverage measures. During 2009, CIGNAs HMOs and life
and health insurance subsidiaries, as well as non-U.S. insurance subsidiaries, were compliant with
applicable RBC and non-U.S. surplus rules.
Effective December 31, 2009 the Companys principal life insurance subsidiary, Connecticut
General Life Insurance Company (CGLIC), implemented the NAICs Actuarial Guideline XLIII (also
known as AG 43 or VACARVM), which is applicable to CGLICs statutory reserves for GMDB and GMIB
contracts totaling $1.6 billion as of December 31, 2009. As provided under this guidance, CGLIC
received approval from the State of Connecticut to grade-in the full effect of the guideline over a
3-year period. Accordingly, upon implementation at December 31, 2009, statutory surplus for CGLIC
was reduced by $40 million. If the guidance had been fully implemented at December 31, 2009,
statutory surplus would have been reduced by $110 million. Management does not anticipate that
this implementation will have a material impact on the amount of dividends expected to be paid by
CGLIC to the parent company in 2010. This implementation has no impact on measurement of the
Companys results of operations or financial condition as determined under GAAP.
Holding Company Laws
CIGNAs domestic insurance companies and certain of its HMOs are subject to state laws
regulating subsidiaries of insurance holding companies. Under such laws, certain dividends,
distributions and other transactions between an insurance or HMO subsidiary and its affiliates may
require notification to, or approval by, one or more state insurance commissioners.
Marketing,
Advertising, and Products
In most states, CIGNAs insurance companies and HMO subsidiaries are required to certify
compliance with applicable advertising regulations on an annual basis. CIGNAs insurance companies
and HMO subsidiaries are also required in most states to file and secure regulatory approval of
products prior to the marketing, advertising, and sale of such products. State and/or federal
regulatory scrutiny of life and health insurance company and HMO marketing and advertising
practices, including the adequacy of disclosure regarding products and their administration, may
result in increased regulation. Product offerings, such as the CIGNA limited benefits plans issued
by the Star HRG business acquired in July 2006, attracted increased regulatory scrutiny in 2009.
29
Licensing Requirements
Pharmacy Licensure Laws
Certain CIGNA subsidiaries are pharmacies, which dispense prescription drugs to participants
of benefit plans administered or insured by CIGNA subsidiary HMOs and insurance companies. These
pharmacy-subsidiaries are subject to state licensing requirements and regulation.
International Licensure Laws
CIGNA International subsidiaries are often required to be licensed when entering new markets
or starting new operations in certain jurisdictions. The licensure requirements for these CIGNA
subsidiaries vary by country and are subject to change.
Claim Administration, Utilization Review and Related Services
Certain CIGNA subsidiaries contract for the provision of claim administration, utilization
management and other related services with respect to the administration of self-insured benefit
plans. These CIGNA subsidiaries may be subject to state third-party administration and other
licensing requirements and regulation.
Federal Regulations
Employee Retirement Income Security Act
CIGNA subsidiaries sell most of their products and services to sponsors of employee benefit
plans that are governed by ERISA. CIGNA subsidiaries may be subject to requirements imposed by
ERISA on plan fiduciaries and parties in interest, including regulations affecting claim and
appeals procedures for health, dental, disability, life and accident plans.
Medicare Regulations
Several CIGNA subsidiaries engage in businesses that are subject to federal Medicare
regulations such as:
|
|
those offering individual and group Medicare Advantage (HMO) coverage in Arizona; |
|
|
contractual arrangements with the federal government for the processing of certain Medicare
claims and other administrative services; and |
|
|
those offering Medicare Pharmacy (Part D) and Medicare Advantage Private Fee For Service
products that are subject to federal Medicare regulations. |
Several CIGNA subsidiaries are also subject to reporting requirements pursuant to Section 111
of the Medicare, Medicaid and SCHIP Extension Act of 2007.
Federal Audits of Government Sponsored Health Care Programs
Participation in government sponsored health care programs subjects CIGNA to a variety of
federal laws and regulations and risks associated with audits conducted under these programs.
These audits may occur in years subsequent to CIGNA providing the relevant services under audit.
These risks may include reimbursement claims as well as potential fines and penalties. For
example, the federal government requires Medicare and Medicaid providers to file detailed cost
reports for health care services provided. These reports may be audited in subsequent years.
CIGNA HMOs that contract to provide community-rated coverage to participants in the Federal
Employees Health Benefit Plan may be required to reimburse the federal government if, following an
audit, it is determined that a federal employee group did not receive the benefit of a discount
offered by a CIGNA HMO to one of the two groups closest in size to the federal employee group. See
Health Care in Section D beginning on page 3 of this Form 10-K for additional information about
CIGNAs participation in government health-related programs.
30
Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act Regulations
The federal Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 and its implementing
regulations (HIPAA) impose several different requirements on health insurers, HMOs, health plans,
health care providers and clearinghouses. Health insurers and HMOs are further subject to
regulations related to guaranteed issuance (for groups with 50 or fewer lives), guaranteed renewal,
and portability of health insurance.
HIPAA also imposes minimum standards for health plans, health insurers, health care providers
and their vendors to safeguard the privacy and security of individually identifiable or protected
health information (PHI). In 2009, HIPAAs privacy and security requirements were expanded by the
Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act (HITECH) which enhanced
penalties for HIPAA violations and required regulated entities to provide notice of breaches of
unsecured PHI. CIGNA has a project team addressing the provisions of HITECH.
HIPAA also establishes rules to standardize the format and content of certain electronic
transactions, including but not limited to, eligibility and claims. In 2008, federal regulations
were issued requiring entities subject to HIPAA to update their transaction formats for electronic
data interchange from the current HIPAA 4010 standards to new HIPAA 5010 standards. CIGNA has
launched a project to migrate to the required HIPAA 5010 standards by the January 1, 2012 effective
date. Regulations were also issued in 2008 requiring a conversion from the ICD-9 diagnosis and
procedure code set to the ICD-10 diagnosis and procedure code set. Implementation of the HIPAA
5010 standards is necessary to support the IDC-10 code set. CIGNA has initiated a project to
deliver ICD-10 capabilities by the October 1, 2013 effective date.
Antitrust Regulations
CIGNA subsidiaries are also engaged in activities that may be scrutinized under federal and
state antitrust laws and regulations. These activities include the administration of strategic
alliances with competitors, information sharing with competitors and provider contracting.
Anti-Money Laundering Regulations
Certain CIGNA products (Covered Products as defined in the Bank Secrecy Act) are subject to
U.S. Department of the Treasury anti-money laundering regulations. CIGNA has implemented anti-money
laundering policies designed to ensure that its Covered Products are underwritten and sold in
compliance with these regulations.
Investment-Related Regulations
Depending upon their nature, CIGNAs investment management activities are subject to U.S.
federal securities laws, ERISA, and other federal and state laws governing investment related
activities. In many cases, the investment management activities and investments of individual
insurance companies are subject to regulation by multiple jurisdictions.
Regulatory and Legislative Developments
The business of administering and insuring employee benefit programs, particularly health care
programs, is heavily regulated by federal and state laws and administrative agencies, such as state
departments of insurance and the federal Departments of Labor and Justice, as well as the courts.
In the growing area of consumer-driven plans, health savings accounts, health reimbursement
accounts and flexible spending accounts are also regulated by the U.S. Department of the Treasury
and the Internal Revenue Service. For information on Regulatory and Industry Developments, see
page 79 in the MD&A and Note 23 to CIGNAs Consolidated Financial Statements beginning on page 163
of this Form 10-K.
Federal and state regulation and legislation may affect CIGNAs operations in a variety of
ways. In addition to proposals discussed above related to increased regulation of the health care
industry, other proposed measures that may significantly affect CIGNAs operations include the
expansion of the governments role in the health care arena and alternative assessments and tax
increases specific to the health care insurance industry or health care insurance products as part
of federal health care reform initiatives, as well as other modifications of the Medicare program,
and employee benefit regulation.
The economic and competitive effects of the legislative and regulatory proposals discussed
above on CIGNAs business operations will depend upon the final form of any such legislation or
regulation.
31
K. Ratings
CIGNA and certain of its insurance subsidiaries are rated by nationally recognized rating
agencies. The significance of individual ratings varies from agency to agency. However, companies
that are assigned ratings at the top end of the range have, in the opinion of the rating agency,
the strongest capacity for repayment of debt or payment of claims, while companies at the bottom
end of the range have the weakest capacity.
Insurance ratings represent the opinions of the rating agencies on the financial strength
of a company and its capacity to meet the obligations of insurance policies. The principal agencies
that rate CIGNAs insurance subsidiaries characterize their insurance rating scales as follows:
|
|
|
A.M. Best Company, Inc. (A.M. Best), A++ to S (Superior to Suspended); |
|
|
|
Moodys Investors Service (Moodys), Aaa to C (Exceptional to Lowest); |
|
|
|
Standard & Poors Corp. (S&P), AAA to R (Extremely Strong to Regulatory Action);
and |
|
|
|
Fitch, Inc. (Fitch), AAA to D (Exceptionally Strong to Order of Liquidation). |
As of February 25, 2010, the insurance financial strength ratings for CIGNA subsidiaries,
CGLIC and Life Insurance Company of North America (LINA) were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CGLIC |
|
LINA |
|
|
Insurance |
|
Insurance |
|
|
Ratings(1) |
|
Ratings(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
A.M. Best
|
|
A
(Excellent,
3rd of 16)
|
|
A
(Excellent,
3rd of 16) |
|
|
|
|
|
Moodys
|
|
A2
(Good,
6th of 21)
|
|
A2
(Good,
6th of 21) |
|
|
|
|
|
S&P
|
|
A
(Strong,
6th of 21)
|
|
(Not Rated) |
|
|
|
|
|
Fitch
|
|
A
(Strong,
6th of 24)
|
|
A
(Strong,
6th of 24) |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes the rating assigned, the agencys characterization of the rating and the position
of the rating in the agencys rating scale (e.g., CGLICs rating by A.M. Best is the
3rd highest rating awarded in its scale of 16). |
32
Debt ratings are assessments of the likelihood that a company will make timely payments
of principal and interest. The principal agencies that rate CIGNAs senior debt characterize their
rating scales as follows:
|
|
|
Moodys, Aaa to C (Exceptional to Lowest); |
|
|
|
S&P, AAA to D (Extremely Strong to Default); and |
|
|
|
Fitch, AAA to D (Highest to Default). |
The commercial paper rating scales for those agencies are as follows:
|
|
|
Moodys, Prime-1 to Not Prime (Superior to Not Prime); |
|
|
|
S&P, A-1+ to D (Extremely Strong to Default); and |
|
|
|
Fitch, F-1+ to D (Very Strong to Distressed). |
As of February 25, 2010, the debt ratings assigned to CIGNA Corporation by the following
agencies were as follows:
Debt Ratings(1)
CIGNA CORPORATION
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial |
|
|
Senior Debt |
|
Paper |
Moodys
|
|
Baa2
(Adequate,
9th of 21)
|
|
P2
(Strong,
2nd of 4) |
S&P
|
|
BBB
(Adequate,
9th of 22)
|
|
A2
(Good,
3rd of 7) |
Fitch
|
|
BBB
(Good,
9th of 24)
|
|
F2
(Moderately Strong,
3rd of 7) |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes the rating assigned, the agencys characterization of the rating and the position
of the rating in the applicable agencys rating scale. |
CIGNA is committed to maintaining appropriate levels of capital in its subsidiaries to
support financial strength ratings that meet customers expectations, and to improving the earnings
of the health care business. Lower ratings at the parent company level increase the cost to borrow
funds. Lower ratings of CGLIC and LINA could adversely affect new sales and retention of current
business.
33
L. Miscellaneous
CIGNA and its principal subsidiaries are not dependent on business from one or a few
customers. No customer accounted for 10% or more of CIGNAs consolidated revenues in 2009. CIGNA
and its principal subsidiaries are not dependent on business from one or a few brokers or agents.
In addition, CIGNAs insurance businesses are generally not committed to accept a fixed portion of
the business submitted by independent brokers and agents, and generally all such business is
subject to its approval and acceptance.
CIGNA had approximately 29,300, 30,300, and 26,600 employees as of December 31, 2009, 2008 and
2007, respectively.
34
As a large company operating in a complex industry, CIGNA encounters a variety of risks and
uncertainties including those identified in this Risk Factor discussion and elsewhere in this
report. CIGNA devotes resources to developing enterprise-wide risk management processes, in
addition to the risk management processes within its businesses. These factors represent risks and
uncertainties that could have a material adverse effect on CIGNAs business, liquidity, results of
operations or financial condition. These risks and uncertainties are not the only ones CIGNA
faces. Other risks and uncertainties that CIGNA does not know about now, or that the Company does
not now think are significant and does not appropriately identify and manage, may impair its
business or the trading price of its securities. The following are significant risks identified by
CIGNA.
Future performance of CIGNAs business will depend on the Companys ability to execute on its
strategic and operational initiatives effectively.
The future performance of CIGNAs business will depend in large part on CIGNAs ability to execute
effectively and implement its growth strategy. These strategic and operational initiatives include
(1) growth in targeted geographies, product lines, buying segments and distribution channels; (2)
improving its strategic and financial flexibility; and (3) pursuing additional opportunities in
high-growth markets with particular focus on individuals.
Successful execution of these strategic and operational initiatives depends on a number of factors
including:
|
|
differentiating CIGNAs products and services from those of its competitors by leveraging
its health advocacy capabilities and other strengths in targeted markets, geographies and
buyer segments; |
|
|
developing and introducing new products or programs, because of the inherent risks and
uncertainties associated with product development, particularly in response to government
regulation or the increased focus on consumer directed products; |
|
|
identifying and introducing the proper mix or integration of products that will be accepted
by the marketplace; |
|
|
attracting and retaining sufficient numbers of qualified employees; |
|
|
effectively managing balance sheet exposures; |
|
|
improving medical cost competitiveness in targeted markets;
and |
|
|
further reducing CIGNA HealthCares operating expenses. |
If these initiatives fail or are not executed effectively, it could harm the Companys consolidated
financial position and results of operations. For example, if not managed effectively, the plan to
reduce operating expenses could cut necessary resources and the Companys talent pool and,
consequently, could have long-term effects on the business by decreasing or slowing improvements in
its products and limiting its ability to retain or hire key personnel.
If CIGNA does not adequately invest in and effectively execute on improvements in its information
technology infrastructure and improve its functionality, it will not be able to deliver the
services required in the evolving marketplace at a competitive cost.
CIGNAs success in executing on its consumer engagement strategy depends on the Companys continued
improvements to its information technology infrastructure and customer service offerings. The
marketplace is evolving and the level of service that is acceptable to customers today will not
necessarily be acceptable tomorrow. The Company must continue to invest in long-term solutions
that will enable it to meet customer expectations. CIGNAs success is dependent, in large part, on
maintaining the effectiveness of existing technology systems and continuing to deliver and enhance
technology systems that support the Companys business processes in a cost-efficient and
resource-efficient manner. CIGNA also must develop new systems to meet the current market standard
and keep pace with continuing changes in information processing technology, evolving industry and
regulatory standards and customer needs. System development projects are long term in nature, may
be more costly than expected to complete and may not deliver the expected benefits upon completion.
35
CIGNAs business depends on its ability to properly maintain the integrity or security of its data
or to strategically implement new information systems.
CIGNAs business depends on effective information systems and the integrity and timeliness of the
data it uses to run its business. CIGNAs business strategy requires providing members and
providers with Internet-enabled products and information to meet their needs. CIGNAs ability to
adequately price its products and services, establish reserves, provide effective and efficient
service to its customers, and to timely and accurately report its financial results also depends
significantly on the integrity of the data in its information systems. If the information CIGNA
relies upon to run its businesses were found to be inaccurate or unreliable due to fraud or other
error, or if CIGNA were to fail to maintain effectively its information systems and data integrity,
the Company could have problems with, among other things: operational disruptions, which may
impact customers, physicians and other health care providers; determining medical cost estimates
and establishing appropriate pricing; retaining and attracting customers; and regulatory
compliance.
If CIGNA were unable to maintain the security of any sensitive data residing on the Companys
systems, whether due to its own actions or those of any vendors, CIGNAs reputation would be
adversely affected and the Company could be exposed to litigation or other actions, fines or
penalties.
If CIGNA fails to manage successfully its outsourcing projects and key vendors, CIGNAs business
could be disrupted.
CIGNA takes steps to monitor and regulate the performance of independent third parties who provide
services or to whom the Company delegates selected functions. These third parties include
information technology system providers, independent practice associations, call center and claim
service providers and specialty service providers.
Arrangements with key vendors may make CIGNAs operations vulnerable if third parties fail to
satisfy their obligations to the Company, including their obligations to maintain and protect the
security and confidentiality of the Companys information and data, as a result of their
performance, changes in their own operations, financial condition, or other matters outside of
CIGNAs control. In addition, to the extent CIGNA outsources selected services or selected
functions to third parties in foreign jurisdictions, the Company could be exposed to risks inherent
in conducting business outside of the United States, including international economic and political
conditions, additional costs associated with complying with foreign laws and fluctuations in
currency values. Further, CIGNA may not fully realize on a timely basis the anticipated economic
and other benefits of the outsourcing projects or other relationships it enters into with key
vendors, which could result in substantial costs or other operational or financial problems for the
Company. Terminating or transitioning arrangements with key vendors could result in additional
costs and a risk of operational delays, potential errors and possible control issues as a result of
the termination or during the transition phase.
In 2006, CIGNA entered into an agreement with IBM pursuant to which IBM operates certain software
applications and significant portions of CIGNAs information technology infrastructure, including
the provision of services relating to its call center application, enterprise content management,
risk-based capital analytical infrastructure and voice and data communications network. The 2006
contract with IBM includes several service level agreements, or SLAs, related to issues such as
performance and job disruption with significant financial penalties if these SLAs are not met.
However, the Company may not be adequately indemnified against all possible losses through the
terms and conditions of the agreement and the fees paid could be a subject of dispute between the
parties. In addition, some of CIGNAs termination rights are contingent upon payment of a fee,
which may be significant. If CIGNAs relationship with IBM is abruptly terminated, the Companys
customers may experience disruption of service.
36
Sustained or significant deterioration in economic conditions could significantly impact the
Companys customers.
The Company is exposed to risks associated with the potential financial instability of its
customers, many of which could be adversely affected by volatile conditions in the financial
markets. Customers could experience cash flow problems and other financial difficulties in times
of a sustained or significant deterioration in the economy. As a result, they may modify, delay or
cancel plans to purchase the Companys products, may make changes in the mix of products purchased
that are unfavorable to the Company, or may be forced to reduce their workforces. Specifically,
higher unemployment rates as a result of a prolonged economic downturn has lead and may continue to
lead to lower enrollment in the Companys employer group plans, lower enrollment in our
non-employer individual plans and a higher number of employees opting out of CIGNAs employer group
plans. The adverse economic conditions could also cause employers to stop offering certain health
care coverage as an employee benefit or elect to offer this coverage on a voluntary,
employee-funded basis as a means to reduce their operating costs. In addition, the economic
downturn could negatively impact the Companys employer group renewal prospects and our ability to
increase premiums and could result in cancellation of products and services by customers. This
could also result in increased unemployment and an increase in the number of claims submitted. All
of these developments could lead to a decrease in CIGNAs membership levels and premium and fee
revenues. Further, if customers are not successful in generating sufficient revenue or are
precluded from securing financing, they may not be able to pay, or may delay payment of, accounts
receivable that are owed to the Company.
A downgrade in the financial strength ratings of CIGNAs insurance subsidiaries could adversely
affect new sales and retention of current business, and a downgrade in CIGNAs debt ratings would
increase the cost of borrowed funds and affect ability to access capital.
Financial strength, claims paying ability and debt ratings by recognized rating organizations are
an important factor in establishing the competitive position of insurance companies and health
benefits companies. Ratings information by nationally recognized ratings agencies is broadly
disseminated and generally used throughout the industry. CIGNA believes the claims paying ability
and financial strength ratings of its principal insurance subsidiaries are an important factor in
marketing its products to certain of CIGNAs customers. In addition, CIGNA Corporations debt
ratings impact both the cost and availability of future borrowings, and accordingly, its cost of
capital. Each of the rating agencies reviews CIGNAs ratings periodically and there can be no
assurance that current ratings will be maintained in the future. In addition, a downgrade of these
ratings could make it more difficult to raise capital and to support business growth at CIGNAs
insurance subsidiaries.
A description of CIGNA Corporation ratings, other subsidiary ratings, as well as more information
on these ratings, is included in Ratings in Section K beginning on page 32 of this Form 10-K.
Unfavorable claims experience related to workers compensation and personal accident insurance
exposures in CIGNAs Run-off Reinsurance business could result in losses.
Unfavorable claims experience related to workers compensation and personal accident insurance
exposures in CIGNAs Run-off
Reinsurance business is possible and could result in future losses. Further, CIGNA could have
losses attributable to its inability to recover amounts from retrocessionaires or ceding companies
either due to disputes with the retrocessionaires or ceding companies or their financial condition.
If CIGNAs reserves for amounts recoverable from retrocessionaires or ceding companies, as well as
reserves associated with underlying reinsurance exposures are insufficient, it could result in
losses.
37
CIGNAs equity hedge program for its guaranteed minimum death benefits contracts could fail to
reduce the risk of stock market declines.
As part of its Run-off Reinsurance business, CIGNA reinsured a guaranteed minimum death benefit
under certain variable annuities issued by other insurance companies. CIGNA maintains a hedge
program to reduce equity market risks related to these contracts by selling domestic and
foreign-denominated exchange-traded futures contracts. The purpose of this program is to reduce
the adverse effects of potential future domestic and international stock market declines on CIGNAs
liabilities for these contracts. Under the program, increases in liabilities under the annuity
contracts from a declining equity market are offset by gains on the futures contracts. However,
the program will not perfectly offset the change in the liability in part because the market does
not offer futures contracts that exactly match the diverse mix of equity fund investments held by
contractholders. The impact of this mismatch may be higher in periods of significant volatility and
may result in higher losses to the Company. In addition, the number of futures contracts used in
the program is adjusted only when certain tolerances are exceeded and in periods of highly volatile
equity markets when actual volatility exceeds the expected volatility assumed in the liability
calculation, losses will result. Further, CIGNA could have difficulty in entering into appropriate
futures contracts. See Run-off Reinsurance in Section G beginning on page 20 of this Form 10-K
for more information on the program.
Actual experience could differ significantly from CIGNAs assumptions used in estimating CIGNAs
liabilities for reinsurance contracts covering guaranteed minimum death benefits or minimum income
benefits.
CIGNA estimates reserves for guaranteed minimum death benefit and minimum income benefit exposures
based on assumptions regarding lapse, partial surrender, mortality, interest rates, volatility,
reinsurance recoverables, and, for minimum income benefit exposures, annuity income election rates.
These estimates are currently based on CIGNAs experience and future expectations. CIGNA monitors
actual experience to update these reserve estimates as necessary. CIGNA regularly evaluates the
assumptions used in establishing reserves and changes its estimates if actual experience or other
evidence suggests that earlier assumptions should be revised. In addition, the Company could have
losses attributable to its inability to recover amounts from retrocessionaires. See Notes 7 and 11
to CIGNAs Consolidated Financial Statements beginning on pages 117 and 132, respectively of this
Form 10-K, for more information on assumptions used for the Companys guaranteed minimum death
benefit and minimum income benefit exposures.
Significant stock market declines could result in larger net liabilities for guaranteed minimum
death benefit contracts or for guaranteed minimum income benefit contracts, the recognition of
additional pension obligations and increased funding for those obligations, and increased pension
plan expenses.
The Company calculates a provision for expected future partial surrenders as part of the liability
for guaranteed minimum death benefit contracts. As equity markets decline, the amount of
guaranteed death benefit exposure increases and the equity hedge program is designed to offset the
corresponding change in the liability. If a contractholder withdraws substantially all of its
mutual fund investments, the liability increases reflecting the lower assumed future premiums, the
lower likelihood of lapsation, and the lower likelihood of account
values recovering sufficiently to
reduce death benefit exposure in future periods. These effects are not covered by the Companys
equity hedge program. Thus if equity markets decline, the provision for expected future partial
surrenders increases and there is no corresponding offset from the hedge program. As equity
markets decline, the claim amounts that the Company expects to pay out for the guaranteed minimum
income benefit business increases resulting in increased net liabilities and related losses.
CIGNA currently has unfunded obligations in its frozen pension plan. A significant decline in the
value of the plans equity and fixed income investments or unfavorable changes in applicable laws
or regulations could materially change the timing and amount of required plan funding, which could
increase CIGNAs expenses and reduce the cash available to CIGNA, including its subsidiaries. See
Note 10 to CIGNAs Consolidated Financial Statements beginning
on page 126 of this Form 10-K for
more information on the Companys obligations under the pension plan.
38
Significant changes in market interest rates affect the value of CIGNAs financial instruments that
promise a fixed return or benefit and the value of particular assets and liabilities.
As an insurer, CIGNA has substantial investment assets that support insurance and contractholder
deposit liabilities. Generally low levels of interest rates on investments, such as those
experienced in United States financial markets during recent years, have negatively impacted the
level of investment income earned by the Company in recent periods, and such lower levels of
investment income would continue if these lower interest rates were to continue.
Substantially all of the Companys investment assets are in fixed interest-yielding debt securities
of varying maturities, fixed redeemable preferred securities and commercial mortgage loans. The
value of these investment assets can fluctuate significantly with changes in market conditions. A
rise in interest rates could reduce the value of the Companys investment portfolio and increase
interest expense if CIGNA were to access its available lines of credit.
The Company is also exposed to interest rate and equity risk based upon the discount rate and
expected long-term rate of return assumptions associated with the Companys pension and other
post-retirement obligations. Sustained declines in interest rates could have an adverse impact on
the funded status of the Companys pension plans and the Companys re-investment yield on new
investments.
Changes in interest rates may also impact the discount rate and expected long-term rate of return
assumptions associated with the Companys guaranteed minimum death benefit liabilities.
Significant, sustained declines in interest rates could cause the Company to reduce these long-term
assumptions, resulting in increased liabilities.
In addition, changes in interest rates impact the assumed market returns and the discount rate used
in the fair value calculations for the Companys liabilities for guaranteed minimum income
benefits. Significant interest rate declines could significantly increase the Companys
liabilities for these contracts.
As the 7-year Treasury rate (claim interest rate) declines, the claim amounts that the Company
expects to pay out for the guaranteed minimum income benefit business increases. For a subset of
the business, there is a contractually guaranteed floor of 3% for the claim interest rate.
Significant interest rate declines could significantly increase the Companys net liabilities for
guaranteed minimum income benefit contracts because of increased exposures.
New accounting pronouncements or guidance could require CIGNA to change the way in which it
accounts for operations.
The Financial Accounting Standards Board, the Securities and Exchange Commission, and other
regulatory bodies may issue new accounting standards or pronouncements, or changes in the
interpretation of existing standards or pronouncements, from time to time, which could have a
significant effect on CIGNAs reported results of operations and financial condition.
CIGNA faces risks related to litigation and regulatory investigations.
CIGNA is routinely involved in numerous claims, lawsuits, regulatory audits, investigations and
other legal matters arising in the ordinary course of the business of administering and insuring
employee benefit programs. Such legal matters include benefit claims, breach of contract actions,
tort claims, and disputes regarding reinsurance arrangements. In addition, CIGNA incurs and likely
will continue to incur liability for claims related to its health care business, such as failure to
pay for or provide health care, poor outcomes for care delivered or arranged, provider disputes,
including disputes over compensation, and claims related to self-funded business. Also, there are
currently, and may be in the future, attempts to bring class action lawsuits against the industry.
Court decisions and legislative activity may increase CIGNAs exposure for any of these types of
claims. In some cases, substantial non-economic or punitive damages may be sought. CIGNA currently
has insurance coverage for some of these potential liabilities. Other potential liabilities may not
be covered by insurance, insurers may dispute coverage or the amount of insurance may not be
sufficient to cover the entire damages awarded. In addition, certain types of damages, such as
punitive damages, may not be covered by insurance, and insurance coverage for all or certain forms
of liability may become unavailable or prohibitively expensive in the future. It is possible that
the resolution of one or more of the legal matters and claims described in this risk factor could
result in losses material to CIGNAs consolidated results of operations, liquidity or financial
condition.
39
A description of material legal actions and other legal matters in which CIGNA is currently
involved is included under Legal Proceedings in Item 3 beginning on page 44, Note 23 to CIGNAs
Consolidated Financial Statements beginning on page 163 of this Form 10-K and Regulation in
Section J beginning on page 28. The outcome of litigation and other legal matters is always
uncertain, and outcomes that are not justified by the evidence or existing law can occur. CIGNA
believes that it has valid defenses to the legal matters pending against it and is defending itself
vigorously.
CIGNAs business is subject to substantial government regulation, which, along with new regulation,
could increase its costs of doing business and could adversely affect its profitability.
CIGNAs business is regulated at the international, federal, state and local levels. The laws and
rules governing CIGNAs business and interpretations of those laws and rules are subject to
frequent change. Broad latitude is given to the agencies administering those regulations. Existing
or future laws and rules could force CIGNA to change how it does business, restrict revenue and
enrollment growth, increase health care, technology and administrative costs including pension
costs and capital requirements, take other actions such as changing its reserve levels with respect
to certain reinsurance contracts, change business practices in disability payments and increase
CIGNAs liability in federal and state courts for coverage determinations, contract interpretation
and other actions.
CIGNA must comply with the various regulations applicable to its business. In addition, CIGNA must
obtain and maintain regulatory approvals to market many of its products, to increase prices for
certain regulated products and to consummate some of its acquisitions and divestitures. Delays in
obtaining or failure to obtain or maintain these approvals could reduce the Companys revenue or
increase its costs.
For further information on regulatory matters relating to CIGNA, see Regulation in Section J
beginning on page 28 and Legal Proceedings in Item 3 beginning on page 44 of this Form 10-K.
CIGNA operates a pharmacy benefit management business, primary care clinics and a staff model HMO,
which are subject to a number of risks and uncertainties, in addition to those CIGNA faces with its
health care business.
CIGNAs pharmacy benefit management business is subject to federal and state regulation, including
federal and state anti-remuneration laws, ERISA, HIPAA and laws related to the operation of
Internet and mail-service pharmacies.
The Companys pharmacy benefit management business would also be adversely affected by an inability
to contract on favorable terms with pharmaceutical manufacturers and could suffer claims and
reputational harm in connection with purported errors by CIGNAs mail order or retail pharmacy
businesses. Disruptions at any of the Companys pharmacy business facilities due to failure of
technology or any other failure or disruption to these systems or to the infrastructure due to
fire, electrical outage, natural disaster, acts of terrorism or some other catastrophic event could
reduce CIGNAs ability to process and dispense prescriptions and provide products and services to
customers.
The Company employs physicians, nurse practitioners, nurses and other health care professionals at
onsite low acuity and primary care clinics it operates for the Companys customers (as well as
certain clinics for Company employees). The Company also owns and operates medical facilities in
the Phoenix, Arizona metropolitan area, including multispecialty health care centers, outpatient
surgery and urgent care centers, low acuity clinics, laboratory, pharmacy and other operations that
employ primary care as well as specialty care physicians and other types of health care
professionals. As a direct employer of health care professionals and as an operator of primary and
low-acuity care clinics and other types of medical facilities, the Company is subject to liability
for negligent acts, omissions, or injuries occurring at one of its clinics or caused by one of its
employees. Even if any claims brought against the Company were unsuccessful or without merit, it
would have to defend against such claims. The defense of any such actions may be time-consuming and
costly, and may distract managements attention. As a result, CIGNA may incur significant expenses
and the Companys financial results could be adversely affected.
40
CIGNA faces competitive pressure, particularly price competition, which could result in premiums
which are insufficient to cover the cost of the healthcare services delivered to its members and
inadequate medical claims reserves.
While health plans compete on the basis of many factors, including service quality of clinical
resources, claims administration services and medical management programs, and quality and
sufficiency of provider networks, CIGNA expects that price will continue to be a significant basis
of competition. CIGNAs customer contracts are subject to negotiation as customers seek to contain
their costs, and customers may elect to reduce benefits in order to constrain increases in their
benefit costs. Such an election may result in lower premiums for the Companys products, although
it may also reduce CIGNAs costs. Alternatively, the Companys customers may purchase different
types of products that are less profitable, or move to a competitor to obtain more favorable
premiums.
In addition, significant merger and acquisition activity has occurred in the health care industry
giving rise to speculation and uncertainty regarding the status of companies, which potentially can
affect marketing efforts and public perception. Consolidation may make it more difficult for the
Company to retain or increase customers, to improve the terms on which CIGNA does business with its
suppliers, or to maintain its competitive position or increase profitability. Factors such as
business consolidations, strategic alliances, legislative reform and marketing practices create
pressure to contain premium price increases, despite increasing medical costs. For example, the
Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act gives banks and other financial institutions the ability to affiliate with
insurance companies, which may lead to new competitors with significant financial resources in the
insurance and health benefits fields.
If CIGNA does not compete effectively in its markets, if CIGNA sets rates too high in highly
competitive markets to keep or increase its market share, if membership does not increase as it
expects, or if it declines, or if CIGNA loses accounts with favorable medical cost experience while
retaining or increasing membership in accounts with unfavorable medical cost experience, CIGNAs
product margins and growth could be adversely affected.
CIGNAs profitability depends, in part, on its ability to accurately predict and control future
health care costs through underwriting criteria, provider contracting, utilization management and
product design. Premiums in the health care business are generally fixed for one-year periods.
Accordingly, future cost increases in excess of medical cost projections reflected in pricing
cannot generally be recovered in the current contract year through higher premiums. Although CIGNA
bases the premiums it charges on its estimate of future health care costs over the fixed premium
period, actual costs may exceed what was estimated and reflected in premiums. Factors that may
cause actual costs to exceed premiums include: medical cost inflation; higher than expected
utilization of medical services; the introduction of new or costly treatments and technology; and
membership mix.
CIGNA records medical claims reserves for estimated future payments. The Company continually
reviews estimates of future payments relating to medical claims costs for services incurred in the
current and prior periods and makes necessary adjustments to its reserves. However, actual health
care costs may exceed what was estimated.
Public perception of CIGNAs products and practices as well as of the health benefits industry, if
negative, could reduce enrollment in CIGNAs health benefits programs.
The health care industry in general, and CIGNA specifically, are subject to negative publicity,
which can arise either from perceptions regarding the industry or CIGNAs business practices or
products. This risk may be increased as CIGNA offers new products, such as products with limited
benefits or an integrated line of products targeted at market segments beyond those in which CIGNA
traditionally has operated. Negative publicity may adversely affect the CIGNA brand and its
ability to market its products and services, which could reduce the number of enrollees in CIGNAs
health benefits programs.
Large-scale public health epidemics, bio-terrorist activity, natural disasters or other extreme
events could cause CIGNAs covered medical and disability expenses, pharmacy costs and mortality
experience to rise significantly, and in severe circumstances, could cause operational disruption.
If widespread public health epidemics such as an influenza pandemic, bio-terrorist or other attack,
or catastrophic natural disaster were to occur, CIGNAs covered medical and disability expenses,
pharmacy costs and mortality experience could rise significantly, depending on the governments
actions and the responsiveness of public health agencies and insurers. In addition, depending on
the severity of the situation, a widespread outbreak could curtail economic activity in general,
and CIGNAs operations in particular, which could result in operational and financial disruption to
CIGNA. Such disruption could, among other things, impact the timeliness of claims and revenue.
41
CIGNAs business depends on the uninterrupted operation of its systems and business functions,
including information technology and other business systems.
CIGNAs business is highly dependent upon its ability to perform, in an efficient and uninterrupted
fashion, its necessary business functions, such as: claims processing and payment; internet
support and customer call centers; and the processing of new and renewal business. A power outage,
pandemic, or failure of one or more of information technology, telecommunications or other systems
could cause slower system response times resulting in claims not being processed as quickly as
clients desire, decreased levels of client service and client satisfaction, and harm to CIGNAs
reputation. In addition, because CIGNAs information technology and telecommunications systems
interface with and depend on third-party systems, CIGNA could experience service denials if demand
for such service exceeds capacity or a third-party system fails or experiences an interruption. If
sustained or repeated, such a business interruption, systems failure or service denial could result
in a deterioration of CIGNAs ability to pay claims in a timely manner, provide customer service,
write and process new and renewal business, or perform other necessary corporate functions. This
could result in a materially adverse effect on CIGNAs business results and liquidity.
A security breach of CIGNAs computer systems could also interrupt or damage CIGNAs operations or
harm CIGNAs reputation. In addition, CIGNA could be subject to liability if sensitive customer
information is misappropriated from CIGNAs computer systems. These systems may be vulnerable to
physical break-ins, computer viruses, programming errors, attacks by third parties or similar
disruptive problems. Any publicized compromise of security could result in a loss of customers or
a reduction in the growth of customers, increased operating expenses, financial losses, additional
litigation or other claims, which could have a material adverse effect on CIGNAs business.
CIGNA is focused on further developing its business continuity program to address the continuation
of core business operations. While CIGNA continues to test and assess its business continuity
program to satisfy the needs of CIGNAs core business operations and addresses multiple business
interruption events, there is no assurance that core business operations could be performed upon
the occurrence of such an event.
Global market, economic and geopolitical conditions may cause fluctuations in equity market prices,
interest rates and credit spreads which could impact the Companys ability to raise or deploy
capital as well as affect the Companys overall liquidity.
If the capital markets and credit market experience extreme volatility and disruption, there could
be downward pressure on stock prices and credit capacity for certain issuers without regard to
those issuers underlying financial strength. Extreme disruption in the credit markets could
adversely impact the Companys availability and cost of credit in the future. In addition,
unpredictable or unstable market conditions could result in reduced opportunities to find suitable
opportunities to raise capital.
CIGNA is subject to potential changes in the political environment, which could adversely
affect the markets for its products.
Policy changes on the local, state and federal level, such as the expansion of the governments
role in the health care arena and alternative assessments and tax increases specific to the health
care insurance industry or health care insurance products as part of federal health care reform
initiatives, could fundamentally change the dynamics of CIGNAs industry.
CIGNA faces risks in successfully managing the integration of Great-West Healthcare (or any other
acquisition).
CIGNA acquired Great-West Healthcare with the expectation that the acquisition will result in
various benefits, including, among others, a broader distribution and provider network in certain
geographic areas, an expanded range of health benefits and products, cost savings, increased
profitability of the acquired business by improving its total medical cost position, and
achievement of operating efficiencies. Achieving the anticipated benefits of the acquisition is
subject to a number of uncertainties, including whether CIGNA integrates Great-West Healthcare in
an efficient and effective manner, and general competitive factors in the marketplace. Failure to
achieve these anticipated benefits could limit CIGNAs ability to grow membership, particularly in
the Select market, result in increased costs, decreases in the amount of expected revenues and
diversion of managements time and energy.
CIGNA faces intense competition to attract and retain key people.
CIGNA would be adversely impacted if it failed to attract additional key people and retain current
key people, as this could result in the inability to effectively execute the Companys key
initiatives and business strategy.
42
CIGNA would be adversely affected if its prevention, detection or control systems fail to detect
and implement required changes to maintain regulatory compliance or prevent fraud.
Failure of CIGNAs prevention, detection or control systems related to regulatory compliance and
compliance with CIGNAs internal policies, including data systems security and unethical conduct by
managers and employees, could adversely affect CIGNAs reputation and also expose it to litigation
and other proceedings, fines and penalties. Federal and state governments have made investigating
and prosecuting health care and other insurance fraud and abuse a priority. Fraud and abuse
prohibitions encompass a wide range of activities, including kickbacks for referral of members,
billing for unnecessary medical services, improper marketing, and violations of patient privacy
rights. The regulations and contractual requirements applicable to us and other participants are
complex and subject to change. Although the Company believes its compliance efforts are adequate,
ongoing vigorous law enforcement and the highly technical regulatory scheme mean that its
compliance efforts in this area will continue to require significant resources.
In addition, provider or member fraud that is not prevented or detected could impact CIGNAs
medical costs or those of its self-insured customers. Further, during an economic downturn,
CIGNAs segments, including HealthCare, Disability and Life and International, may see increased
fraudulent claims volume which may lead to additional cost because of an increase in disputed
claims and litigation.
The Companys international operations face political, legal, operational, regulatory, economic and
other risks that present unique challenges and could negatively affect those operations or our
long-term growth.
The Companys international operations face political, legal, operational, regulatory,
economic and other risks, including government intervention and censorship that the Company does
not face in its domestic operations. CIGNA International faces the risk of discriminatory
regulation, nationalization or expropriation of assets, price controls or other pricing issues and
exchange controls or other restrictions that prevent it from transferring funds from these
operations out of the countries in which it operates or converting local currencies that CIGNA
International holds into U.S. dollars or other currencies. Additionally, foreign currency exchange
rates and fluctuations may have an impact on the future costs or on future sales and cash flows
from the Companys international operations, and any measures that it may implement to reduce the
effect of volatile currencies and other risks of its international operations may not be effective.
Some of CIGNAs foreign insurance operations are, and are likely to continue to be, in emerging
markets where these risks are heightened. In addition, CIGNA International relies on local sales
forces for some of its operations in these countries and may encounter labor problems and less
flexible employee relationships which can be difficult and expensive to terminate. In some
countries, CIGNA International voluntarily operates or is required to operate with local business
partners with the resulting risk of managing partner relationships to the business objectives.
The Company is currently planning to expand its international operations in markets where it
currently operates and in targeted new markets. This may require
considerable management time before any significant revenues and
earnings are generated.
International operations also require the Company to devote significant management resources
to implement its controls and systems in new markets, to comply with the U.S. anti-bribery and
anti-corruption as well as anti-money laundering provisions and similar laws in local jurisdictions
and to overcome logistical and other challenges based on differing languages, cultures and time
zones.
43
|
|
|
Item 1B. |
|
UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS |
None.
CIGNAs headquarters, including staff support operations, along with CIGNA Disability and Life
Insurance, the domestic office of CIGNA International, and portions of CIGNA HealthCare, are
located in approximately 460,000 square feet of leased office space at Two Liberty Place, 1601
Chestnut Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. CIGNA HealthCare is located in approximately 825,000
square feet of owned office space in the Wilde Building, located at 900 Cottage Grove Road,
Bloomfield, Connecticut. In addition, CIGNA owns or leases office buildings, or parts thereof,
throughout the United States and in other countries. CIGNA believes its properties are adequate
and suitable for its business as presently conducted. For additional information concerning leases
and property, see Notes 2 and 21 to CIGNAs Consolidated Financial Statements beginning on pages
103 and 159 of this Form 10-K. This paragraph does not include information on investment
properties.
|
|
|
Item 3. |
|
LEGAL PROCEEDINGS |
The information contained under Litigation and Other Legal Matters in Note 23 to CIGNAs
2009 Financial Statements which begins on page 163 of this Form 10-K, is incorporated herein by
reference.
|
|
|
Item 4. |
|
SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS |
None.
44
Executive Officers of the Registrant
All officers are elected to serve for a one-year term or until their successors are elected.
Principal occupations and employment during the past five years are listed below.
WILLIAM L. ATWELL, 59, President of CIGNA International beginning September 2008; Managing Director
of Atwell and Associates, LLC from January 2006 until August 2008; and Executive Vice President of
The Charles Schwab Corporation from August 2000 to December 2005.
DAVID M. CORDANI, 44, Chief Executive Officer of CIGNA beginning December 2009; President
of CIGNA beginning June 2008; Chief Operating Officer of CIGNA from June 2008 until December 2009;
President, CIGNA HealthCare from July 2005 until June 2008; Senior Vice President, Customer
Segments & Marketing, CIGNA HealthCare from July 2004 until July 2005; Senior Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer, CIGNA HealthCare, from September 2002 until July 2004; and a Director of
CIGNA since October 2009.
ANNMARIE T. HAGAN, 49, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of CIGNA beginning May
2009; Vice President, Chief Accounting Officer and Controller of CIGNA from July 2008 until May
2009; and Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer of CIGNA from March 2003 until July 2008.
MATTHEW G. MANDERS, 48, President, CIGNA, US Service, Clinical and Specialty beginning
January 2010; President, CIGNA HealthCare, Total Health, Productivity, Network & Middle Market from
June 2009 until January 2010; Customer Segments from July 2006 until June 2009; and President,
CIGNA HealthCare, Middle Market Segment from August 2004 until July 2006.
JOHN M. MURABITO, 51, Executive Vice President of CIGNA beginning August 2003, with
responsibility for Human Resources and Services.
CAROL ANN PETREN, 57, Executive Vice President and General Counsel of CIGNA beginning May 2006, and
Senior Vice President and Deputy General Counsel of MCI from August 2003 until March 2006.
MICHAEL WOELLER, 57, Executive Vice President and Chief Information Officer of CIGNA beginning
October 2007; Vice Chairman and Senior Vice President and Chief Information Officer, Canadian
Imperial Bank of Commerce from April 2000 until October 2007.
45
PART II
|
|
|
Item 5. |
|
MARKET FOR REGISTRANTS COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF
EQUITY SECURITIES |
The information under the caption Quarterly Financial DataStock and Dividend Data appears on
page 169 and the number of shareholders of record as of December 31, 2009 appears under the caption
Highlights on page 47 of this Form 10-K. CIGNAs common stock is listed with, and trades on, the
New York Stock Exchange under the symbol CI.
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
The following table provides information about CIGNAs share repurchase activity for the quarter
ended December 31, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Approximate dollar value of |
|
|
|
Total # of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total # of shares |
|
|
shares that may yet be |
|
|
|
shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
purchased |
|
|
purchased |
|
|
|
purchased |
|
|
Average price |
|
|
as part of publicly |
|
|
as part of publicly announced |
|
Period |
|
(1) |
|
|
paid per share |
|
|
announced program (2) |
|
|
program (3) |
|
October 1-31, 2009 |
|
|
220 |
|
|
$ |
28.83 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
$ |
448,919,605 |
|
November 1-30, 2009 |
|
|
1,879 |
|
|
$ |
30.38 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
$ |
448,919,605 |
|
December 1-31, 2009 |
|
|
959 |
|
|
$ |
32.91 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
$ |
448,919,605 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
3,058 |
|
|
$ |
31.06 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes shares tendered by employees as payment of taxes withheld on the exercise of
stock options and the vesting of restricted stock granted under the Companys equity
compensation plans. Employees tendered 220 shares in October, 1,879 shares in November,
and 959 shares in December. |
|
(2) |
|
CIGNA has had a repurchase program for many years, and has had varying levels of
repurchase authority and activity under this program. The program has no expiration date.
CIGNA suspends activity under this program from time to time, generally without public
announcement. Remaining authorization under the program was $449 million as of December
31, 2009 and February 25, 2010. |
|
(3) |
|
Approximate dollar value of shares is as of the last date of the applicable month. |
46
|
|
|
Item 6. |
|
SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA |
Highlights
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in millions, except per share amounts) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Premiums and fees and other revenues |
|
$ |
16,161 |
|
|
$ |
17,004 |
|
|
$ |
15,376 |
|
|
$ |
13,987 |
|
|
$ |
14,449 |
|
Net investment income |
|
|
1,014 |
|
|
|
1,063 |
|
|
|
1,114 |
|
|
|
1,195 |
|
|
|
1,358 |
|
Mail order pharmacy revenues |
|
|
1,282 |
|
|
|
1,204 |
|
|
|
1,118 |
|
|
|
1,145 |
|
|
|
883 |
|
Realized investment gains (losses) |
|
|
(43 |
) |
|
|
(170 |
) |
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
219 |
|
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
$ |
18,414 |
|
|
$ |
19,101 |
|
|
$ |
17,624 |
|
|
$ |
16,546 |
|
|
$ |
16,684 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Results of Operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Health Care |
|
$ |
731 |
|
|
$ |
664 |
|
|
$ |
679 |
|
|
$ |
653 |
|
|
$ |
688 |
|
Disability and Life |
|
|
284 |
|
|
|
273 |
|
|
|
254 |
|
|
|
226 |
|
|
|
227 |
|
International |
|
|
183 |
|
|
|
182 |
|
|
|
176 |
|
|
|
138 |
|
|
|
109 |
|
Run-off Reinsurance |
|
|
185 |
|
|
|
(646 |
) |
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
(14 |
) |
|
|
(64 |
) |
Other Operations |
|
|
86 |
|
|
|
87 |
|
|
|
109 |
|
|
|
106 |
|
|
|
339 |
|
Corporate |
|
|
(142 |
) |
|
|
(162 |
) |
|
|
(97 |
) |
|
|
(95 |
) |
|
|
(12 |
) |
Realized investment gains (losses), net of taxes and
noncontrolling interest |
|
|
(26 |
) |
|
|
(110 |
) |
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
145 |
|
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders income from continuing operations |
|
|
1,301 |
|
|
|
288 |
|
|
|
1,120 |
|
|
|
1,159 |
|
|
|
1,276 |
|
Income from continuing operations attributable to
noncontrolling interest |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations |
|
|
1,304 |
|
|
|
290 |
|
|
|
1,123 |
|
|
|
1,159 |
|
|
|
1,277 |
|
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of taxes |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
349 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
1,305 |
|
|
$ |
294 |
|
|
$ |
1,118 |
|
|
$ |
1,155 |
|
|
$ |
1,626 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders income per share from continuing operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
4.75 |
|
|
$ |
1.04 |
|
|
$ |
3.91 |
|
|
$ |
3.46 |
|
|
$ |
3.30 |
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
4.73 |
|
|
$ |
1.03 |
|
|
$ |
3.86 |
|
|
$ |
3.43 |
|
|
$ |
3.26 |
|
Shareholders net income per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
4.75 |
|
|
$ |
1.05 |
|
|
$ |
3.89 |
|
|
$ |
3.45 |
|
|
$ |
4.20 |
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
4.73 |
|
|
$ |
1.05 |
|
|
$ |
3.84 |
|
|
$ |
3.42 |
|
|
$ |
4.15 |
|
Common dividends declared per share |
|
$ |
0.04 |
|
|
$ |
0.04 |
|
|
$ |
0.04 |
|
|
$ |
0.03 |
|
|
$ |
0.03 |
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
43,013 |
|
|
$ |
41,406 |
|
|
$ |
40,065 |
|
|
$ |
42,399 |
|
|
$ |
44,893 |
|
Long-term debt |
|
$ |
2,436 |
|
|
$ |
2,090 |
|
|
$ |
1,790 |
|
|
$ |
1,294 |
|
|
$ |
1,338 |
|
Shareholders equity |
|
$ |
5,417 |
|
|
$ |
3,592 |
|
|
$ |
4,748 |
|
|
$ |
4,330 |
|
|
$ |
5,360 |
|
Per share |
|
$ |
19.75 |
|
|
$ |
13.25 |
|
|
$ |
16.98 |
|
|
$ |
14.63 |
|
|
$ |
14.74 |
|
Common shares outstanding (in thousands) |
|
|
274,257 |
|
|
|
271,036 |
|
|
|
279,588 |
|
|
|
98,654 |
|
|
|
121,191 |
|
Shareholders of record |
|
|
8,888 |
|
|
|
9,014 |
|
|
|
8,696 |
|
|
|
9,117 |
|
|
|
9,440 |
|
Employees |
|
|
29,300 |
|
|
|
30,300 |
|
|
|
26,600 |
|
|
|
27,100 |
|
|
|
28,000 |
|
Effective January 1, 2009, the Company adopted the Financial Accounting Standards Boards (FASB)
updated earnings per share guidance. Prior year amounts have been restated. See Note 4 to the
Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information.
Effective January 1, 2009, the Company adopted the FASBs updated guidance on accounting for
noncontrolling interests. Prior years net income, income from continuing operations, and revenues
have been restated. See Note 2(B) to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional
information.
On April 1, 2008, the Company acquired the Healthcare division of Great-West Life and Annuity, Inc.
For additional information, see the Health Care section of the Managements Discussion and
Analysis beginning on page 62 of this Form 10-K.
In 2008, the Company recorded significant charges related to the guaranteed minimum income benefits
and guaranteed minimum death benefits businesses as well as an after-tax litigation charge of $52
million in Corporate related to the CIGNA pension plan. For additional information, see the
Run-off Reinsurance section of the Managements Discussion and Analysis beginning on page 73 and
Note 23 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
During 2007, CIGNA completed a three-for-one stock split of CIGNAs common shares. Per share
figures for 2006 and 2005 reflect the stock split.
Pro forma common shares outstanding, calculated as if the stock split had occurred at the beginning
of the prior periods, were as follows: 295,963 in 2006 and 363,573 in 2005.
47
|
|
|
Item 7. |
|
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS |
INDEX
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
55 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
62 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
69 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
71 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
73 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
77 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
78 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
78 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
79 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
80 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
87 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
93 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
95 |
|
INTRODUCTION
In this filing and in other marketplace communications, CIGNA Corporation and its subsidiaries (the
Company) make certain forward-looking statements relating to the Companys financial condition
and results of operations, as well as to trends and assumptions that may affect the Company.
Generally, forward-looking statements can be identified through the use of predictive words (e.g.,
Outlook for 2010). Actual results may differ from the Companys predictions. Some factors that
could cause results to differ are discussed throughout Managements Discussion and Analysis
(MD&A), including in the Cautionary Statement beginning on page 95 of this Form 10-K. The
forward-looking statements contained in this filing represent managements estimate as of the date
of this filing. Management does not assume any obligation to update these estimates.
Unless otherwise indicated, financial information in the MD&A is presented in accordance with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (GAAP). Certain reclassifications
have been made to prior period amounts to conform to the presentation of 2009 amounts. In
addition, certain amounts have been restated as a result of the adoption of new accounting
pronouncements. See Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information.
Overview
The Company constitutes one of the largest investor-owned health service organizations in the
United States. Its subsidiaries are major providers of health care and related benefits, the
majority of which are offered through the workplace. In addition, the Company has an international
operation that offers life, accident and supplemental health insurance products as well as
international health care products and services to businesses and individuals in selected markets.
The Company also has certain inactive businesses, including a Run-off Reinsurance segment.
48
Ongoing Operations
The Companys ability to increase revenue, shareholders net income and operating cash flows from
ongoing operations is directly related to progress on the execution of its strategic initiatives,
the success of which is measured by certain key factors, including the Companys ability to:
|
|
profitably price products and services at competitive levels that reflect emerging
experience; |
|
|
maintain and grow its customer base; |
|
|
cross sell its various health and related benefit products; |
|
|
invest available cash at attractive rates of return for appropriate durations; |
|
|
reduce other operating expenses in the Health Care segment; and |
|
|
effectively deploy capital. |
Strategy
As a global health service organization, CIGNAs mission remains focused on helping the people
it serves improve their health, well-being and sense of security. CIGNAs long-term growth
strategy is based on: (1) growth in targeted geographies, product lines, buying segments and
distribution channels; (2) improving its strategic and financial flexibility; and (3) pursuing
additional opportunities in high-growth markets with particular focus on individuals.
CIGNA expects to focus on the following areas it believes represent the markets or areas with
the most potential for profitable growth:
|
|
In the Health Care segment, the Company is concentrating on: (1) further
enhancing its geographic focus in the middle market in order to create geographic density; (2)
growing the Select market, which generally includes employers with more than 50 but fewer
than 250 employees, by leveraging the Companys customer knowledge, differentiated service
model, product portfolio and distribution model; and (3) engaging those national account
employers who share and will benefit from the Companys value proposition of using health
advocacy and employee engagement to increase productivity, performance and the health outcomes
of their employees. |
|
|
In the Disability and Life segment, CIGNAs strategy is to grow its Disability
business by fully leveraging the key components of its industry-leading disability management
model to reduce medical costs for its clients and return their employees to work sooner
through: (1) early claim notification and outreach, (2) a full suite of clinical and
return-to-work resources, and (3) specialized case management services. |
|
|
In the International segment, the Company is targeting growth through: (1)
product and channel expansion in its life, accident and health business in key Asian
geographies, (2) the introduction of new expatriate benefits products, and (3) further
geographic expansion. |
The Company plans to improve its strategic and financial flexibility by driving further
reductions in its Health Care operating expenses, improving its medical cost competitiveness in
targeted markets and effectively managing balance sheet exposures.
Also, in connection with CIGNAs long-term business strategy, the Company remains committed to
health advocacy as a means of creating sustainable solutions for employers, improving the health of
the individuals that the Company serves, and lowering the costs of health care for all
constituencies.
49
Run-off Operations
Effectively managing the various exposures of its run-off operations is important to the Companys
ongoing profitability, operating cash flows and available capital. The results are influenced by a
range of economic factors, especially movements in equity markets and interest rates. In order to
substantially reduce the impact of equity market movements on the liability for guaranteed minimum
death benefits (GMDB, also known as VADBe), the Company operates an equity hedge program. The
Company actively monitors the performance of the hedge program, and evaluates the cost/benefit of
hedging other risks. Results are also influenced by behavioral factors, including future partial
surrender election rates for GMDB contracts, annuity election rates for guaranteed minimum income
benefits (GMIB) contracts, annuitant lapse rates, as well as the collection of amounts
recoverable from retrocessionaires. The Company actively studies policyholder behavior experience
and adjusts future expectations based on the results of the studies, as warranted. The Company
also performs regular audits of ceding companies to ensure that premiums received and claims paid
properly reflect the underlying risks, and to maximize the probability of subsequent collection of
claims from retrocessionaires. Finally, the Company monitors the financial strength and credit
standing of the retrocessionaires and establishes or collects collateral when warranted.
Summary
The Companys overall results are influenced by a range of economic and other factors, especially:
|
|
cost trends and inflation for medical and related services; |
|
|
utilization patterns of medical and other services; |
|
|
the tort liability system; |
|
|
developments in the political environment both domestically and internationally, including
efforts to reform the U.S. health care system; |
|
|
interest rates, equity market returns, foreign currency fluctuations and credit market
volatility, including the availability and cost of credit in the future; and |
|
|
federal, state and international regulation. |
The Company regularly monitors the trends impacting operating results from the above mentioned key
factors to appropriately respond to economic and other factors affecting its operations. The
Companys ability to achieve its financial objectives is dependent upon its ability to effectively
execute on its strategy and to appropriately respond to emerging economic, industry and
company-specific trends. See the Health Care section of the MD&A beginning on page 62 of this Form
10-K for further discussion on the Companys plans to execute on its strategic initiatives.
Acquisition of Great-West Healthcare
On April 1, 2008, the Company acquired the Healthcare division of Great-West Life and Annuity, Inc.
(Great-West Healthcare or the acquired business). See Note 3 to the Consolidated Financial
Statements for additional information.
50
Initiatives to Lower Operating Expenses
As part of its strategy, the Company has undertaken several initiatives to realign its organization
and consolidate support functions in an effort to increase efficiency and responsiveness to
customers and to reduce costs.
During 2008 and 2009, the Company conducted a comprehensive review to reduce the operating expenses
of its ongoing businesses (cost reduction program). As a result, the Company recognized
severance-related and real estate charges in other operating expenses.
Severance charges in 2008 and 2009 resulted from reductions of approximately 2,350 positions in the
Companys workforce.
Cost reduction activity for 2008 and 2009 was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pre-tax (In millions) |
|
Severance |
|
|
Real estate |
|
|
Total |
|
Fourth quarter 2008 charge (balance carried to January 1, 2009) |
|
$ |
44 |
|
|
$ |
11 |
|
|
$ |
55 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Second quarter |
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14 |
|
Third quarter |
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
|
Fourth quarter |
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal 2009 charges |
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44 |
|
Less: Payments |
|
|
55 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
58 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2009 |
|
$ |
33 |
|
|
$ |
8 |
|
|
$ |
41 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Health Care segment recorded $37 million pre-tax ($24 million after-tax) of the 2009
charges and $44 million pre-tax ($27 million after-tax) of the 2008 charge. The remainder of the
2009 and 2008 charges were reported as follows: Disability and Life: $5 million pre-tax ($4
million after-tax) in 2009 and $3 million pre-tax ($2 million after-tax) in 2008; and
International: $2 million pre-tax ($1 million after-tax) in 2009 and $8 million pre-tax ($6 million
after-tax) in 2008.
Substantially all severance is expected to be paid by the end of 2010. Upon completion of the job
eliminations, the Company expects annualized after-tax savings from this cost reduction program to
be approximately $130 million in 2011 and beyond. A portion of the savings was realized in 2009
while most is expected to be realized in 2010.
51
CONSOLIDATED RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The Company measures the financial results of its segments using segment earnings (loss), which
is defined as shareholders income (loss) from continuing operations before after-tax realized
investment results. Adjusted income from operations is defined as consolidated segment earnings
(loss) excluding special items (defined below) and the results of the GMIB business. Adjusted
income from operations is another measure of profitability used by the Companys management because
it presents the underlying results of operations of the Companys businesses and permits analysis
of trends in underlying revenue, expenses and shareholders net income. This measure is not
determined in accordance with GAAP and should not be viewed as a substitute for the most directly
comparable GAAP measure, which is shareholders income from continuing operations.
Summarized below is a reconciliation between shareholders income from continuing operations and
adjusted income from operations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial Summary |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Premiums and fees |
|
$ |
16,041 |
|
|
$ |
16,253 |
|
|
$ |
15,008 |
|
Net investment income |
|
|
1,014 |
|
|
|
1,063 |
|
|
|
1,114 |
|
Mail order pharmacy revenues |
|
|
1,282 |
|
|
|
1,204 |
|
|
|
1,118 |
|
Other revenues |
|
|
120 |
|
|
|
751 |
|
|
|
368 |
|
Realized investment gains (losses) |
|
|
(43 |
) |
|
|
(170 |
) |
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
|
18,414 |
|
|
|
19,101 |
|
|
|
17,624 |
|
Benefits and expenses |
|
|
16,516 |
|
|
|
18,719 |
|
|
|
15,990 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations before taxes |
|
|
1,898 |
|
|
|
382 |
|
|
|
1,634 |
|
Income taxes |
|
|
594 |
|
|
|
92 |
|
|
|
511 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations |
|
|
1,304 |
|
|
|
290 |
|
|
|
1,123 |
|
Less: income from continuing operations attributable to noncontrolling interest |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders income from continuing operations |
|
|
1,301 |
|
|
|
288 |
|
|
|
1,120 |
|
Less: realized investment gains (losses), net of taxes |
|
|
(26 |
) |
|
|
(110 |
) |
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment earnings |
|
|
1,327 |
|
|
|
398 |
|
|
|
1,110 |
|
Less: adjustments to reconcile to adjusted income from operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Results of GMIB business (after-tax): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Charge on adoption of fair value measurements for GMIB contracts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(131 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Results of GMIB business excluding charge on adoption |
|
|
209 |
|
|
|
(306 |
) |
|
|
(91 |
) |
Special items (after-tax): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Curtailment gain (See Note 10 to the Consolidated Financial Statements) |
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost reduction charges (See Note 6 to the Consolidated Financial Statements) |
|
|
(29 |
) |
|
|
(35 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Completion of IRS examination (See Note 19 to the Consolidated Financial Statements) |
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23 |
|
Charges related to litigation matters (See Note 23 to the Consolidated Financial Statements) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(76 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted income from operations |
|
$ |
1,097 |
|
|
$ |
946 |
|
|
$ |
1,178 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Summarized below is adjusted income from operations by segment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted Income (Loss) From Operations |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Health Care |
|
$ |
729 |
|
|
$ |
715 |
|
|
$ |
679 |
|
Disability and Life |
|
|
279 |
|
|
|
275 |
|
|
|
248 |
|
International |
|
|
182 |
|
|
|
188 |
|
|
|
174 |
|
Run-off Reinsurance |
|
|
(24 |
) |
|
|
(209 |
) |
|
|
80 |
|
Other Operations |
|
|
85 |
|
|
|
87 |
|
|
|
104 |
|
Corporate |
|
|
(154 |
) |
|
|
(110 |
) |
|
|
(107 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
1,097 |
|
|
$ |
946 |
|
|
$ |
1,178 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
52
Overview of 2009 Consolidated Results of Operations
Shareholders income from continuing operations for the year ended December 31, 2009 was
significantly higher than 2008, reflecting improved adjusted income from operations, as explained
below, as well as the following:
|
|
substantially improved results in the GMIB business due to improved equity market
conditions and generally higher interest rates; |
|
|
improved realized investment results, also reflecting better market conditions during 2009;
and |
|
|
the favorable year over year impact of the following special items as noted in the above
table: completion of the IRS examination; the curtailment gain on the pension plan; and the
absence of litigation charges in 2009. |
Adjusted income from operations increased 16% in 2009 compared with 2008, primarily reflecting
significantly improved results in the Run-off Reinsurance segment due to a lower amount of reserve
strengthening for the GMDB business in 2009 compared with 2008. This result was primarily due to
improved equity market conditions in 2009. Also, in the aggregate, adjusted income from operations
from the Companys ongoing operating segments (Health Care, Disability and Life, and International)
improved slightly in 2009 over 2008. These favorable effects were partially offset by higher
unallocated costs (including interest) reported in Corporate.
Overview of 2008 Consolidated Results of Operations
Shareholders income from continuing operations for the year ended December 31, 2008 declined
significantly compared with 2007, reflecting lower adjusted income from operations as explained
below, as well as the following:
|
|
higher losses in the GMIB business, reflecting the deterioration in the financial markets
in 2008 and the effect of adopting new fair value guidance; |
|
|
significant net realized investment losses primarily due to impairments caused largely by
the deterioration in the financial markets. These losses were partially offset by gains on
the sale of real estate; and |
|
|
special charges for litigation and cost reduction matters discussed below. |
Adjusted income from operations decreased 20% in 2008 compared with 2007 due to losses in the GMDB
business resulting from the adverse equity market conditions in 2008, partially offset by higher
earnings in each of the Companys ongoing operating segments.
Special Items and GMIB
Management does not believe that the special items noted in the table above are representative of
the Companys underlying results of operations. Accordingly, the Company excluded these special
items from adjusted income from operations in order to facilitate an understanding and comparison
of results of operations and permit analysis of trends in underlying revenue, expenses and
shareholders income from continuing operations.
Special items for 2009 included a curtailment gain resulting from the decision to freeze the
pension plan (see Note 10 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information),
cost reduction charges related to the previously announced 2008 cost reduction program (see the
Introduction section of the MD&A beginning on page 48 of this Form 10-K), and benefits resulting
from the completion of the 2005 and 2006 IRS examinations (see Note 19 to the Consolidated
Financial Statements for additional information).
Special items for 2008 included a cost reduction charge related to the previously announced 2008
cost reduction program (see the Introduction section of the MD&A beginning on page 48 of this Form
10-K), a litigation matter related to the CIGNA Pension Plan (see Note 23 to the Consolidated
Financial Statements for additional information) reported in Corporate and charges related to
certain other litigation matters, which are reported in the Health Care segment.
The special item for 2007 consisted of previously unrecognized tax benefits resulting from the
completion of the IRS examination for the 2003 and 2004 tax years.
The Company also excludes the results of the GMIB business from adjusted income from operations
because the fair value of GMIB assets and liabilities must be recalculated each quarter using
updated capital market assumptions. The resulting changes in fair value, which are reported in
shareholders net income, are volatile and unpredictable. See the Critical Accounting Estimates
section of the MD&A beginning on page 55 of this Form 10-K for more information on the effect of
capital market assumption changes on shareholders net income. Because of this volatility, and
since the GMIB business is in run-off, management does not believe that its results are meaningful
in assessing underlying results of operations.
53
Outlook for 2010
The Company expects 2010 adjusted income from operations to be comparable to or slightly higher
than 2009. Information is not available for management to reasonably estimate the future results
of the GMIB business or realized investment results due in part to interest rate and stock market
volatility and other internal and external factors. This outlook includes an assumption that GMDB
(also known as VADBe) results will be approximately break-even for full-year 2010, reflective of
the Companys view that the long-term reserve assumptions are appropriate and assumes that capital
markets remain stable during the year. In addition, the Company is not able to identify or
reasonably estimate the financial impact of special items in 2010 however they may include
potential adjustments associated with cost reduction, litigation, and tax-related items.
The Companys outlook for 2010 is subject to the factors cited in the Cautionary Statement
beginning on page 95 of this Form 10-K and the sensitivities discussed in the Critical Accounting
Estimates section of the MD&A beginning on page 55 of this Form 10-K. If unfavorable equity market
and interest rate movements occur, the Company could experience losses related to investment
impairments and the GMIB and GMDB businesses. These losses could adversely impact the Companys
consolidated results of operations and financial condition by potentially reducing the capital of
the Companys insurance subsidiaries and reducing their dividend-paying capabilities.
Revenues
Total
revenues decreased by 4% in 2009, compared with 2008, and increased by 8% in 2008 compared
with 2007. Changes in the components of total revenue are described more fully below.
Premiums and Fees
Premiums
and fees decreased by 1% in 2009, compared with 2008, reflecting membership declines in
Health Care resulting from higher unemployment and the unfavorable effect of foreign currency
translation in International, offset by the absence of premium and fees from the acquired business
in the first quarter of 2008 since this business was acquired April 1, 2008.
Premiums and fees increased by 8% in 2008, compared with 2007 reflecting the impact of the acquired
business, growth in the Disability and Life segment, as well as growth and rate increases in the
International segment. See segment reporting discussions for additional details.
Net Investment Income
Net
investment income decreased by 5% in 2009, compared with 2008, primarily due to lower income
from real estate funds and security partnerships, unfavorable foreign exchange rates and lower
investment yields partially offset by higher invested assets.
Net
investment income decreased by 5% in 2008, compared with 2007, primarily due to lower yields
driven by declines in short-term interest rates, commercial mortgage pre-payment fees, and income
from security partnerships.
Mail Order Pharmacy Revenues
Mail
order pharmacy revenues increased by 6% in 2009, compared with 2008, primarily due to rate
increases and by 8% in 2008, compared with 2007 due to increased script volume and rate increases.
Other Revenues
Other revenues include the impact of futures contracts associated with the GMDB equity hedge
program. In 2009, the Company reported losses of $282 million associated with the GMDB equity
hedge program, compared with gains of $333 million in 2008. The losses in 2009 primarily reflected
increases in stock market values, while the gains in 2008 primarily reflected declines in stock
market values. Excluding the impact of the futures contracts associated with the GMDB equity hedge
program, Other revenues decreased 4% in 2009, compared with 2008, primarily reflecting declines in
amortization of deferred gains on the sales of the retirement benefits and individual life
insurance and annuity businesses.
Excluding the impact of the futures contracts associated with the GMDB equity hedge program, Other
revenues increased 5% in 2008, compared with 2007, primarily reflecting the impact of the acquired
business. In 2008, the Company reported a gain of $333 million associated with the GMDB equity
hedge program, compared with a loss of $32 million in 2007.
54
Realized Investment Results
Realized investment results in 2009 were significantly improved compared to 2008 primarily due to:
|
|
lower asset write-downs on fixed maturities largely reflecting improved market conditions; |
|
|
gains on sales of fixed maturities and equities in 2009 compared with losses in 2008; and |
|
|
gains on hybrid securities in 2009 compared with losses in 2008 (changes in fair value for
these securities are reported in realized investment results). |
These favorable effects were partially offset by higher impairments of investments in real estate
entities and commercial mortgage loans in 2009 due to the impact of the continued weak economic
environment on the commercial real estate market and the absence of significant gains on the sales
of real estate ventures reported during 2008.
Realized investment results in 2008 were lower than in 2007, primarily due to higher losses
associated with asset write-downs and increases in valuation allowances primarily due to higher
interest rates and credit losses resulting from adverse economic conditions during 2008. In
addition, the Company had higher losses on sales of fixed maturities and equity securities. These
losses were partially offset by higher gains on sales of real estate investments held in joint
ventures.
See Note 14 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING ESTIMATES
The preparation of consolidated financial statements in accordance with GAAP requires management to
make estimates and assumptions that affect reported amounts and related disclosures in the
consolidated financial statements. Management considers an accounting estimate to be critical if:
|
|
it requires assumptions to be made that were uncertain at the time the estimate was made;
and |
|
|
changes in the estimate or different estimates that could have been selected could have a
material effect on the Companys consolidated results of operations or financial condition. |
Management has discussed the development and selection of its critical accounting estimates with
the Audit Committee of the Companys Board of Directors and the Audit Committee has reviewed the
disclosures presented below.
In addition to the estimates presented in the following table, there are other accounting estimates
used in the preparation of the Companys consolidated financial statements, including estimates of
liabilities for future policy benefits other than those identified in the following table, as well
as estimates with respect to goodwill, unpaid claims and claim expenses, postemployment and
postretirement benefits other than pensions, certain compensation accruals, and income taxes.
Management believes the current assumptions used to estimate amounts reflected in the Companys
consolidated financial statements are appropriate. However, if actual experience differs from the
assumptions used in estimating amounts reflected in the Companys consolidated financial
statements, the resulting changes could have a material adverse effect on the Companys
consolidated results of operations, and in certain situations, could have a material adverse effect
on the Companys liquidity and financial condition.
See Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further information on significant
accounting policies that impact the Company.
55
|
|
|
|
|
Balance Sheet Caption / |
|
|
|
|
Nature of Critical Accounting Estimate |
|
Assumptions / Approach Used |
|
Effect if Different Assumptions Used |
Future policy benefits
Guaranteed minimum death
benefits (GMDB also known as
VADBe)
These liabilities are estimates of
the present value of net amounts
expected to be paid, less the
present value of net future
premiums expected to be received.
The amounts to be paid represent
the excess of the guaranteed death
benefit over the values of
contractholders accounts. The
death benefit coverage in force at
December 31, 2009 (representing
the amount payable if all of
approximately 590,000
contractholders had submitted
death claims as of that date) was
approximately $7 billion.
Liabilities for future policy
benefits for these contracts as of
December 31 were as follows (in
millions):
2009 $1,285
2008 $1,609
|
|
The Company estimates
these liabilities based on
assumptions for lapse,
partial surrender,
mortality, interest rates
(mean investment
performance and discount
rate), and volatility.
These assumptions are
based on the Companys
experience and future
expectations over the
long-term period. The
Company monitors actual
experience to update these
estimates as necessary.
Lapse refers to the full
surrender of an annuity
prior to a
contractholders death.
Partial surrender refers
to the fact that most
contractholders have the
ability to withdraw
substantially all of their
mutual fund investments
while retaining any
available death benefit
coverage in effect at the
time of the withdrawal.
Once a partial surrender
is made, the liability
increases reflecting lower
future assumed premiums, a
lower likelihood of lapse,
and a lower likelihood of
account values recovering
sufficiently to reduce the
death benefit exposure in
future periods. These
effects are not covered by
the Companys GMDB equity
hedge program. Market
declines could expose the
Company to higher amounts
of death benefit exposure
that can be retained by
contractholders subsequent
to a significant partial
surrender and to higher
election rates of future
partial surrenders. Thus,
if equity markets decline,
the Companys liability
for partial surrenders
increases and there is no
corresponding offset from
the hedge program. The
election rate for expected
future partial surrenders
is updated quarterly based
on emerging experience.
Interest rates include
both (a) the mean
investment performance
assumption, and (b) the
liability discount rate
assumption. The mean
investment performance for
underlying equity mutual
funds considers the
Companys GMDB equity
hedge program which
reflects the average
short-term interest rate
to be earned over the life
of the program. The mean
investment performance for
underlying fixed income
mutual funds considers the
expected market return
over the life of the
contracts.
|
|
Current assumptions used to estimate these
liabilities are detailed in Note 7 to the
Consolidated Financial Statements. Based on current
and historical market, industry and
Company-specific experience and managements
judgment, the Company believes that it is
reasonably likely that the unfavorable changes in
the key assumptions and/or conditions described
below could occur. If these unfavorable assumption
changes were to occur, the approximate after-tax
decrease in shareholders net income would be as
follows:
5% increase in mortality rates $30
million
10% decrease in lapse rates $25 million
10% increase in election rates for future
partial surrenders $5 million
50 basis point decrease in interest rates:
Mean Investment Performance $20 million
Discount Rate $25 million
10% increase in volatility $20 million
As of December 31, 2009, if contractholder account
values invested in underlying equity mutual funds
declined by 10% due to equity market performance,
the after-tax decrease in shareholders net income
resulting from an increase in the provision for
partial surrenders would be approximately $10
million.
As of December 31, 2009, if contractholder account
values invested in underlying bond/money market
mutual funds declined by 2% due to bond/money
market performance, the after-tax decrease in
shareholders net income resulting from an increase
in the provision for partial surrenders and an
increase in unhedged exposure would be
approximately $10 million.
The amounts would be reflected in the Run-off
Reinsurance segment. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Volatility refers to the
degree of variation of
future market returns of
the underlying mutual fund
investments. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Health Care medical claims payable
Medical claims payable for the
Health Care segment include both
reported claims and estimates for
losses incurred but not yet
reported.
Liabilities for medical claims
payable as of December 31 were as
follows (in millions):
2009 gross $921; net
$715
2008 gross $924; net
$713
These liabilities are presented
above both gross and net of
reinsurance and other
recoverables.
These liabilities generally
exclude amounts for administrative
services only business.
See Note 5 to the Consolidated
Financial Statements for
additional information.
|
|
The Company develops
estimates for Health Care
medical claims payable
using actuarial principles
and assumptions based on
historical and projected
claim payment patterns,
medical cost trends, which
are impacted by the
utilization of medical
services and the related
costs of the services
provided (unit costs),
benefit design,
seasonality, and other
relevant operational
factors. The Company
consistently applies these
actuarial principles and
assumptions each reporting
period, with consideration
given to the variability
of these factors, and
recognizes the actuarial
best estimate of the
ultimate liability within
a level of confidence, as
required by actuarial
standards of practice,
which require that the
liabilities be adequate
under moderately adverse
conditions.
The Companys estimate of
the liability for medical
claims incurred but not
yet reported is primarily
calculated using
historical claim payment
patterns and expected
medical cost trends. The
Company analyzes the
historical claim payment
patterns by comparing the
dates claims were
incurred, generally the
dates services were
provided, to the dates
claims were paid to
determine completion
factors, which are a
measure of the time to
process claims. A
completion factor is
calculated for each month
of incurred claims. The
Company uses historical
completion factors
combined with an analysis
of current trends and
operational factors to
develop current estimates
of completion factors.
The Company estimates the
ultimate liability for
claims incurred in each
month by applying the
current estimates of
completion factors to the
current paid claims data.
|
|
For the year ended December 31, 2009, actual
experience differed from the Companys key
assumptions, resulting in $43 million of favorable
incurred claims related to prior years medical
claims payable or 0.6% of the current year incurred
claims as reported for the year ended December 31,
2008. For the year ended December 31, 2008, actual
experience differed from the Companys key
assumptions, resulting in $60 million of favorable
incurred claims related to prior years medical
claims, or 0.9% of the current year incurred claims
reported for the year ended December 31, 2007.
Specifically, the favorable impact is due to faster
than expected completion factors and lower than
expected medical cost trends, both of which
included an assumption for moderately adverse
experience.
The corresponding impact of favorable prior year
development on net income was not material for the
year ended December 31, 2009. The change in the
amount of the incurred claims related to prior
years in the medical claims payable liability does
not directly correspond to an increase or decrease
in shareholders net income. |
56
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance Sheet Caption / |
|
|
|
|
Nature of Critical Accounting Estimate |
|
Assumptions / Approach Used |
|
Effect if Different Assumptions Used |
|
|
The difference between
this estimate of the
ultimate liability and the
current paid claims data
is the estimate of the
remaining claims to be
paid for each incurral
month. These monthly
estimates are aggregated
and included in the
Companys Health Care
medical claims payable at
the end of each reporting
period. Completion
factors are used to
estimate the health care
medical claims payable for
all months where claims
have not been completely
resolved and paid, except
for the most recent month
as described below. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Completion factors are
impacted by several key
items including changes in
the level of claims
processed electronically
versus manually
(auto-adjudication),
changes in provider claims
submission rates,
membership changes and the
mix of products. As
noted, the Company uses
historical completion
factors combined with an
analysis of current trends
and operational factors to
develop current estimates
of completion factors.
This approach implicitly
assumes that historical
completion rates will be a
useful indicator for the
current period. It is
possible that the actual
completion rates for the
current period will
develop differently from
historical patterns, which
could have a material
impact on the Companys
medical claims payable and
net income. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Claims incurred in the
most recent month have
limited paid claims data,
since a large portion of
health care claims are not
submitted to the Company
for payment in the month
services have been
provided. This makes the
completion factor approach
less reliable for claims
incurred in the most
recent month. As a
result, in any reporting
period, for the estimates
of the ultimate claims
incurred in the most
recent month, the Company
primarily relies on
medical cost trend
analysis, which reflects
expected claim payment
patterns and other
relevant operational
considerations. Medical
cost trend is impacted by
several key factors
including medical service
utilization and unit costs
and the Companys ability
to manage these factors
through benefit design,
underwriting, provider
contracting and the
Companys medical
management initiatives.
These factors are affected
by changes in the level
and mix of medical
benefits offered,
including inpatient,
outpatient and pharmacy,
the impact of copays and
deductibles, changes in
provider practices and
changes in consumer
demographics and
consumption behavior. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Because historical trend
factors are often not
representative of current
claim trends, the trend
experienced for the most
recent history along with
an analysis of emerging
trends, have been taken
into consideration in
establishing the liability
for medical claims payable
at December 31, 2009 and
2008. It is possible that
the actual medical trend
for the current period
will develop differently
from the expected, which
could have a material
impact on the Companys
medical claims payable and
net income. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For each reporting period,
the Company evaluates key
assumptions by comparing
the assumptions used in
establishing the medical
claims payable to actual
experience. When actual
experience differs from
the assumptions used in
establishing the
liability, medical claims
payable are increased or
decreased through current
period net income.
Additionally, the Company
evaluates expected future
developments and emerging
trends which may impact
key assumptions. The
estimation process
involves considerable
judgment, reflecting the
variability inherent in
forecasting future claim
payments. The adequacy of
these estimates is highly
sensitive to changes in
the Companys key
assumptions, specifically
completion factors, which
are impacted by actual or
expected changes in the
submission and payment of
medical claims, and
medical cost trends, which
are impacted by actual or
expected changes in the
utilization of medical
services and unit costs. |
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
|
|
Balance Sheet Caption / |
|
|
|
|
Nature of Critical Accounting Estimate |
|
Assumptions / Approach Used |
|
Effect if Different Assumptions Used |
Accounts payable, accrued
expenses and other liabilities, and
Other assets
Guaranteed minimum income benefits (GMIB)
These liabilities are estimates of
the present value of net amounts
expected to be paid, less the
present value of net future
premiums expected to be received.
The amounts to be paid represent
the excess of the expected value of
the income benefit over the value
of the annuitants accounts at the
time of annuitization.
The assets associated with these
contracts represent receivables in
connection with reinsurance that
the Company has purchased from two
external reinsurers, which covers
55% of the exposures on these
contracts.
As discussed in Note 2(B) to the
Consolidated Financial Statements,
the Company implemented new
guidance for fair value
measurements on January 1, 2008. At
adoption, the Company was required
to change certain assumptions to
reflect those that it believes a
hypothetical market participant
would use to determine an exit
price. As a result, the Company
recorded a charge of $131 million
after-tax, net of reinsurance ($202
million pre-tax).
Liabilities related to these
contracts as of December 31, were
as follows (in millions):
2009 $903
2008 $1,757
As of December 31, estimated
amounts receivable related to these
contracts from two external
reinsurers, were as follows (in
millions):
2009 $482
2008 $953
|
|
The Company considers the
various assumptions used
to estimate the fair
values of assets and
liabilities associated
with these contracts in
two categories: 1) capital
market inputs; and 2)
future annuitant behavior
and other assumptions.
Capital market inputs
include market returns and
discount rates, claim
interest rates and market
volatility. This group of
assumptions is largely
based on market-observable
inputs.
Interest rates include (a)
market returns, (b) the
liability discount rate
assumption and (c) the
projected interest rates
used to calculate the
reinsured income benefit
at the time of
annuitization (claim
interest rate).
Volatility refers to the
degree of variation of
future market returns of
the underlying mutual fund
investments.
The second group of
assumptions consists of
future annuitant behavior
and other inputs, and
includes annuity election
rates, lapse, mortality,
nonperformance risk (for
both the Company and its
retrocessionnaires), and a
risk and profit charge.
This group of assumptions
is based on the Companys
experience, industry data,
and managements judgment.
Annuity election rates
refer to the proportion of
annuitants who elect to
receive their income
benefit as an annuity.
Lapse refers to the full
surrender of an annuity
prior to annuitization of
the policy.
Nonperformance risk refers
to the markets perception
that either the Company
will not fulfill its GMIB
liability (own credit) or
the Company will not
collect on its GMIB
retrocessional coverage
(reinsurer credit risk).
Risk and profit charge
refers to the amount that
a hypothetical market
participant would include
in the valuation to cover
the uncertainty of
outcomes and the desired
return on capital.
|
|
Current assumptions used to estimate these
liabilities are detailed in Note 11 to the
Consolidated Financial Statements. The
Companys results of operations are expected to
be volatile in future periods because most
capital market assumptions will be based
largely on market-observable inputs at the
close of each period including interest rates
and market implied volatilities.
Based on current and historical market,
industry and Company-specific experience and
managements judgment, the Company believes
that it is reasonably likely that the
unfavorable changes in the key assumptions
and/or conditions described below could occur.
If these unfavorable assumption changes were to
occur, the approximate after-tax decrease in
shareholders net income, net of estimated
amounts receivable from reinsurers, would be as
follows:
50 basis point decrease in interest
rates (which are aligned with LIBOR) used for
projecting market returns and discounting
$15 million
50 basis point decrease in interest
rates used for projecting claim exposure
(7-year Treasury rates) $25 million
20% increase in implied market
volatility $5 million
5% decrease in mortality $1 million
10% increase in annuity election rates
$5 million
10% decrease in lapse rates $5
million
10% increase to the risk and profit
charge $3 million
Market declines which reduce annuitants
account values expose the Company to higher
potential claims which results in a larger net
liability. If annuitants account values
invested in underlying equity mutual funds as
of December 31, 2009 declined by 10% due to
equity market performance, the approximate
after-tax decrease in shareholders net income,
net of estimated amounts receivable from
reinsurers, would be approximately $20 million.
If annuitants account values invested in
underlying bond/money market/mutual funds as of
December 31, 2009 declined by 2% due to
bond/money market performance, the approximate
after-tax decrease in shareholders net income,
net of estimated amounts receivable from
reinsurers, would be approximately $2 million.
If credit default swap spreads used to evaluate
the nonperformance risk of the Company were to
narrow or the credit rating of its principal
life insurance subsidiary were to improve, it
would cause a decrease in the discount rate of
the GMIB liability, resulting in an unfavorable
impact to earnings. If the discount rate
decreased by 25 bps due to this, the
approximate after-tax decrease in shareholders
net income would be approximately $10 million. |
|
|
58
|
|
|
|
|
Balance Sheet Caption / |
|
|
|
|
Nature of Critical Accounting Estimate |
|
Assumptions / Approach Used |
|
Effect if Different Assumptions Used |
|
|
|
|
If credit default swap spreads
used to evaluate the nonperformance
risk of the Companys GMIB
retrocessionnaires were to widen or
the retrocessionnaires credit
ratings were to weaken, it would
cause an increase in the discount
rate of the GMIB asset, resulting
in an unfavorable impact to
earnings. If the discount rate
increased by 25 bps due to this,
the approximate after-tax decrease
in shareholders net income would
be approximately $5 million.
All of these estimated impacts due
to unfavorable changes in
assumptions could vary from quarter
to quarter depending on actual
reserve levels, the actual market
conditions or changes in the
anticipated view of a hypothetical
market participant as of any future
valuation date.
The amounts would be reflected in
the Run-off Reinsurance segment in
GMIB expense. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reinsurance recoverables
Reinsurance recoverables in
Run-off Reinsurance
Collectability of reinsurance
recoverables requires an
assessment of risks that such
amounts will not be collected,
including risks associated with
reinsurer default and disputes
with reinsurers regarding
applicable coverage.
Gross and net reinsurance
recoverables in the Run-off
Reinsurance segment as of December
31, were as follows (in millions):
|
|
The amount of reinsurance
recoverables in the
Run-off Reinsurance
segment, net of reserves,
represents managements
best estimate of
recoverability, including
an assessment of the
financial strength of
reinsurers.
|
|
A 10% reduction of net reinsurance
recoverables due to
uncollectability at December 31,
2009, would reduce shareholders
net income by approximately $10
million after-tax.
The amounts would be reflected in
the Run-off Reinsurance segment.
See Note 8 to the Consolidated
Financial Statements for additional
information. |
|
|
|
|
|
2009 gross $127;
net $121
2008 gross $180;
net $169 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable, accrued expenses
and other liabilities pension
liabilities
These liabilities are estimates of
the present value of the qualified
and nonqualified pension benefits
to be paid (attributed to employee
service to date) net of the fair
value of plan assets. The accrued
pension benefit liability as of
December 31 was as follows (in
millions):
2009 $1,513
2008 $1,853
See Note 10 to the Consolidated
Financial Statements for
additional information.
|
|
The Company estimates
these liabilities and the
related expense with
actuarial models using
various assumptions
including discount rates
and an expected long-term
return on plan assets.
Discount rates are set by
applying actual annualized
yields at various
durations from the
Citigroup Pension
Liability curve, without
adjustment, to the
expected cash flows of the
pension liabilities.
The expected long-term
return on plan assets for
the domestic qualified
pension plan is developed
considering actual
historical returns,
expected long-term market
conditions, plan asset mix
and managements
investment strategy. In
addition, to measure
pension costs the Company
uses a market-related
asset value method for
domestic qualified pension
plan assets invested in
non-fixed income
investments, which are
approximately 80% of total
plan assets. This method
recognizes the difference
between actual and
expected returns in the
non-fixed income portfolio
over 5 years, a method
that reduces the
short-term impact of
market fluctuations on
pension cost. At December
31, 2009, the
market-related asset value
was approximately $3.3
billion compared with a
market value of $2.9
billion.
|
|
Using past experience, the Company
expects that it is reasonably
possible that a favorable or
unfavorable change in these key
assumptions of 50 basis points
could occur. An unfavorable change
is a decrease in these key
assumptions with resulting impacts
as discussed below.
If discount rates for the qualified
and nonqualified pension plans
decreased by 50 basis points:
annual pension costs for
2010 would decrease by
approximately $3 million,
after-tax; and
the accrued pension benefit
liability would increase by
approximately $200 million as of
December 31, 2009 resulting in an
after-tax decrease to shareholders
equity of approximately $130
million as of December 31, 2009.
If the expected long-term return on
domestic qualified pension plan
assets decreased by 50 basis
points, annual pension costs for
2010 would increase by
approximately $10 million,
after-tax.
If the Company used the market
value of assets to measure pension
costs as opposed to the
market-related value, annual
pension cost for 2010 would
increase by approximately $30
million, after-tax.
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
|
|
Balance Sheet Caption / |
|
|
|
|
Nature of Critical Accounting Estimate |
|
Assumptions / Approach Used |
|
Effect if Different Assumptions Used |
|
|
The accumulated unrecognized actuarial
loss of $1.6 billion at December 31, 2009
primarily reflects the significant decline in
the value of equity securities during 2008.
The actuarial loss is adjusted for
unrecognized changes in market-related asset
values and amortized over the average
remaining life expectancy of plan
participants if the adjusted loss exceeds 10%
of the market-related value of plan assets or
10% of the projected benefit obligation,
whichever is greater. As of December 31,
2009, approximately $0.7 billion of the
adjusted actuarial loss exceeded 10% of the
projected benefit obligation. As a result,
approximately $16 million after-tax will be
expensed in 2010 net income. For the year
ended December 31, 2009, $22 million
after-tax was expensed in net income.
|
|
If the December 31, 2009 fair
values of domestic qualified plan
assets decreased by 10%, the
accrued pension benefit liability
would increase by approximately
$285 million as of December 31,
2009 resulting in an after-tax
decrease to shareholders equity of
approximately $185 million.
An increase in these key
assumptions would result in impacts
to annual pension costs, the
accrued pension liability and
shareholders equity in an opposite
direction, but similar amounts. |
|
Investments Fixed maturities
Recognition of losses from other-
than- temporary impairments of
public and private placement
fixed maturities
To assess whether a fixed
maturitys decline in fair value
below its amortized cost is other
than temporary, the Company
evaluates the expected recovery in
value and its intent to sell or
the likelihood of a required sale
of the fixed maturity prior to an
expected recovery.
When the Company does not expect
to recover a fixed maturitys
amortized cost, its fair value and
expected future cash flows must be
estimated by management to record
an impairment loss. The credit
portion of an impairment loss is
recognized in net income and
measured as the difference between
a fixed maturitys amortized cost
and the net present value of its
projected future cash flows. The
non-credit portion, if any, is
recognized in a separate component
of shareholders equity.
See Note 2 (C) to the Consolidated
Financial Statements for
additional information regarding the Companys accounting policies
for fixed maturities.
|
|
When evaluating whether a loss is other than
temporary, the Company considers factors
including;
length of time and severity of
decline;
financial health and specific
near term prospects of the issuer;
changes in the regulatory, economic
or general market environment of the issuers
industry or geographic region; and
the Companys intent to sell or the
likelihood of a required sale prior to
recovery.
Management estimates other-than-temporary
impairments based on fair values using quoted
market prices for public securities with
active markets and generally the present
value of future cash flows for private
placement bonds and other public securities.
Expected future cash flows for each fixed
maturity are based on the Companys
assessment of qualitative and quantitative
factors, including the probability of
default, and the estimated timing and amount
of any recovery in value. See Note 11 to the
Consolidated Financial Statements for a
discussion of the Companys fair value
measurements.
The Company recognized other-than-temporary impairments of investments in fixed
maturities as follows (in millions,
after-tax):
|
|
For all fixed maturities with cost
in excess of their fair value, if
this excess was determined to be
other-than-temporary, shareholders
net income for the year ended
December 31, 2009 would have
decreased by approximately $86
million after-tax.
For private placement bonds
considered impaired, a decrease of
10% of all expected future cash
flows for the impaired bonds would
reduce shareholders net income by
approximately $2 million after-tax. |
|
|
2009 $31
2008 $138
2007 $20
See Note 12 to the Consolidated Financial
Statements for a discussion of the Companys
review of declines in fair value. |
|
|
60
|
|
|
|
|
Balance Sheet Caption / |
|
|
|
|
Nature of Critical Accounting Estimate |
|
Assumptions / Approach Used |
|
Effect if Different Assumptions Used |
Investments Commercial
Mortgage Loans Valuation Reserves
Recognition of losses from valuation
reserves for impaired commercial
mortgage loans
To determine whether a commercial
mortgage loan is impaired, the
Company evaluates the likelihood of
collecting all interest and principal
payments in accordance with the
contractual terms of the original
loan agreement. When it is probable
that the Company will not collect
amounts due according to the terms of
the original loan agreement, a loan
is considered impaired and the
Company must estimate the fair value
of the underlying property to measure
an impairment loss. An impairment
loss is recorded using a valuation
allowance for an impaired commercial
mortgage loans carrying value in
excess of the estimated fair value of
its underlying property. Changes to
valuation reserves are recorded in
Realized investment gains (losses).
See Note 2 (C) to the Consolidated
Financial Statements for additional
information regarding the Companys
accounting policies for commercial
mortgage loans.
|
|
The Companys evaluation of the likelihood of collecting
all contractual payments and the collateral fair value
for commercial mortgage loans is a qualitative and
quantitative process which is subject to uncertainties.
The Company carefully evaluates all facts and
circumstances for each loan and its supporting
collateral.
When evaluating the likelihood of collecting the
contractual payments of a commercial mortgage loan, the
Company considers factors including:
financial statements, budgets and operating plans
for the property;
inspection reports of the property completed by
third party servicers;
debt service coverage of the underlying
collateral;
the borrowers continuing financial commitment to
the property; and
conditions and factors pertinent to the property
and its local market.
When it becomes probable that all contractual payments
will not be collected according to the terms of the
original loan agreement, the Company calculates the
estimated fair value of the underlying property based on
a 10-year discounted cash flow analysis. Factors key to
this valuation include the following:
|
|
If property values declined by 10%
across the commercial mortgage loan
portfolio as of December 31, 2009,
approximately 20% of the
portfolios loans would have
carrying values in excess of their
underlying properties fair values
totaling approximately $85 million.
And if each of these loans were
considered impaired as of December
31, 2009, shareholders net income
would decrease by approximately $55
million after-tax.
If underlying property values
declined by 10% for impaired
commercial mortgage loans with
valuation reserves as of December
31, 2009, shareholders net income
would decrease by approximately $8
million after-tax. |
|
|
net operating income of the property;
rental and growth rates for the property and its
local market;
capital requirements for the property; and
current market discount and
capitalization rates. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
These evaluations are based primarily on an in-depth
review of the commercial mortgage loan portfolio which is
completed annually in the third quarter. The Company
updates this annual review as material changes in these
factors are identified.
The Company recognized impairment losses from commercial
mortgage loan valuation reserves as follows (in millions,
after-tax): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 $11
2008 $0
2007 $0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See the Investment Assets section of the MD&A beginning
on page 87 for discussion of the Companys problem and
potential problem mortgage loans and Note 12 to the
Consolidated Financial Statements for further information
surrounding impaired commercial mortgage loans. |
|
|
61
SEGMENT REPORTING
Operating segments generally reflect groups of related products, but the International segment is
generally based on geography. The Company measures the financial results of its segments using
segment earnings (loss), which is defined as shareholders income (loss) from continuing
operations excluding after-tax realized investment gains and losses. Adjusted income from
operations for each segment is defined as segment earnings excluding special items and the results
of the Companys GMIB business. Adjusted income from operations is another measure of
profitability used by the Companys management because it presents the underlying results of
operations of the segment and permits analysis of trends. This measure is not determined in
accordance with GAAP and should not be viewed as a substitute for the most directly comparable GAAP
measure, which is segment earnings. Each segment provides a reconciliation between segment
earnings and adjusted income from operations.
Health Care Segment
Segment Description
The Health Care segment includes medical, dental, behavioral health, prescription drug and other
products and services that may be integrated to provide consumers with comprehensive health care
solutions. This segment also includes group disability and life insurance products that were
historically sold in connection with certain experience-rated medical products. These products and
services are offered through a variety of funding arrangements such as guaranteed cost,
retrospectively experience-rated and administrative services only arrangements.
The Company measures the operating effectiveness of the Health Care segment using the following key
factors:
|
|
segment earnings and adjusted income from operations; |
|
|
sales of specialty products to core medical customers; |
|
|
changes in operating expenses per member; and |
|
|
medical expense as a percentage of premiums (medical care ratio) in the guaranteed cost
business. |
Results of Operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial Summary |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Premiums and fees |
|
$ |
11,384 |
|
|
$ |
11,665 |
|
|
$ |
10,666 |
|
Net investment income |
|
|
181 |
|
|
|
200 |
|
|
|
202 |
|
Mail order pharmacy revenues |
|
|
1,282 |
|
|
|
1,204 |
|
|
|
1,118 |
|
Other revenues |
|
|
262 |
|
|
|
267 |
|
|
|
250 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment revenues |
|
|
13,109 |
|
|
|
13,336 |
|
|
|
12,236 |
|
Mail order pharmacy cost of goods sold |
|
|
1,036 |
|
|
|
961 |
|
|
|
904 |
|
Benefits and other expenses |
|
|
10,943 |
|
|
|
11,359 |
|
|
|
10,295 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefits and expenses |
|
|
11,979 |
|
|
|
12,320 |
|
|
|
11,199 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before taxes |
|
|
1,130 |
|
|
|
1,016 |
|
|
|
1,037 |
|
Income taxes |
|
|
399 |
|
|
|
352 |
|
|
|
358 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment earnings |
|
|
731 |
|
|
|
664 |
|
|
|
679 |
|
Less: special items (after-tax) included in segment earnings: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Curtailment gain (See Note 10 to the Consolidated Financial Statements) |
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost reduction charge (See Note 6 to the Consolidated Financial Statements) |
|
|
(24 |
) |
|
|
(27 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Completion of IRS examination (See Note 19 to the Consolidated Financial Statements) |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Charge related to litigation matters (See Note 23 to the Consolidated Financial Statements) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(24 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted income from operations |
|
$ |
729 |
|
|
$ |
715 |
|
|
$ |
679 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Realized investment gains (losses), net of taxes |
|
$ |
(19 |
) |
|
$ |
(13 |
) |
|
$ |
14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
62
The Health Care segments adjusted income from operations for 2009, as compared with 2008, was
favorably impacted by the absence of a $7 million after-tax adjustment related to a large
experience-rated life and non-medical account in run-out recorded in the first quarter of 2008.
Excluding this item, adjusted income from operations for 2009 was slightly higher than 2008
reflecting:
|
|
lower operating expenses, excluding the impact of an additional quarter from the acquired
business (effective April 1, 2008), primarily driven by cost reduction initiatives and pension
plan changes, partially offset by higher management incentive compensation and higher
information technology spend; |
|
|
higher stop loss earnings largely from the acquired business (effective April 1, 2008),
tempered by lower margins on the remaining book; and |
|
|
improved specialty earnings. |
These favorable effects were largely offset by:
|
|
lower guaranteed cost earnings primarily reflecting a higher medical care ratio driven by
unfavorable prior year development, as well as higher in-year claims due, in part to H1N1
flu-related claims; and |
|
|
lower investment income primarily reflecting lower income from real estate funds. |
The Health Care segments adjusted income from operations in 2008, as compared with 2007, was
favorably impacted by lower management incentive compensation expense of $21 million after-tax.
Excluding the items mentioned above, adjusted income from operations increased in 2008 compared
with 2007 due to:
|
|
earnings from the acquired business (effective April 1, 2008); |
|
|
higher service fees due to membership growth and rate increases; |
|
|
favorable specialty earnings due to increased sales to core medical customers as well as
strong performance in the direct specialty business; and |
|
|
improved Medicare Part D results due in part to increased membership. |
These favorable effects were partially offset by:
|
|
lower membership and a higher medical care ratio in the guaranteed cost business; |
|
|
lower medical margins in the experience-rated business; and |
|
|
higher operating expenses reflecting spending on operational improvement initiatives,
including segment expansion and investments in information technology, partially offset by
expense reductions in certain areas, primarily service operations. |
63
Revenues
The table below shows premiums and fees for the Health Care segment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Medical: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guaranteed cost excluding voluntary/limited benefits (1),(2) |
|
$ |
3,148 |
|
|
$ |
3,504 |
|
|
$ |
3,877 |
|
Voluntary/limited benefits |
|
|
232 |
|
|
|
200 |
|
|
|
160 |
|
Experience-rated (2),(3) |
|
|
1,699 |
|
|
|
1,953 |
|
|
|
1,877 |
|
Stop loss |
|
|
1,274 |
|
|
|
1,197 |
|
|
|
589 |
|
Dental |
|
|
731 |
|
|
|
785 |
|
|
|
773 |
|
Medicare |
|
|
595 |
|
|
|
400 |
|
|
|
349 |
|
Medicare Part D |
|
|
342 |
|
|
|
327 |
|
|
|
326 |
|
Other (4) |
|
|
515 |
|
|
|
518 |
|
|
|
473 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total medical |
|
|
8,536 |
|
|
|
8,884 |
|
|
|
8,424 |
|
Life and other non-medical |
|
|
179 |
|
|
|
184 |
|
|
|
235 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total premiums |
|
|
8,715 |
|
|
|
9,068 |
|
|
|
8,659 |
|
Fees (2),(5) |
|
|
2,669 |
|
|
|
2,597 |
|
|
|
2,007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total premiums and fees |
|
$ |
11,384 |
|
|
$ |
11,665 |
|
|
$ |
10,666 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes guaranteed cost premiums primarily associated with open access and commercial HMO, as well as other risk-related products. |
|
(2) |
|
Premiums and/or fees associated with certain specialty products are also included. |
|
(3) |
|
Includes minimum premium members, who have a risk profile similar to experience-rated funding arrangements. The risk portion of minimum
premium revenue is reported in experience-rated medical premium whereas the self funding portion of minimum premium revenue is recorded in fees.
Also, includes certain non-participating cases for which special customer level reporting of experience is required. |
|
(4) |
|
Other medical premiums include risk revenue and specialty products. |
|
(5) |
|
Represents administrative service fees for medical members and related specialty product fees for non-medical members as well as fees related to
Medicare Part D of $41 million in 2009, $69 million in 2008, and $61 million in 2007. |
Premiums and fees decreased by 2% in 2009, compared with 2008, primarily reflecting lower
membership largely due to disenrollment resulting from higher unemployment. This impact was
partially offset by:
|
|
rate actions across all products; |
|
|
increases in fees relating to specialty products; |
|
|
membership growth in the Medicare private fee for service and Voluntary products; and |
|
|
the impact of the acquired business (effective April 1, 2008). |
Premiums and fees increased 9% in 2008, compared with 2007, primarily reflecting:
|
|
the impact of the acquired business (effective April 1, 2008); |
|
|
increases in the experience-rated business due to rate increases; |
|
|
higher other medical premiums due to increased sales to core medical customers and rate
increases in specialty business; and |
|
|
higher service fees due to increased membership and rate increases. |
These factors were partially offset by a decrease in the guaranteed cost business which was due to
membership declines largely in commercial HMO business partially offset by rate increases.
Net investment income decreased by 10% in 2009 compared with 2008 primarily reflecting lower income
from real estate funds partially offset by higher invested assets. Net investment income decreased
by 1% in 2008 compared with 2007 primarily reflecting lower yields partially offset by higher
average assets.
Other revenues for the Health Care segment consist of revenues earned on direct channel sales of
certain specialty products, including behavioral health and disease management.
64
Benefits and Expenses
Health Care segment benefits and expenses consist of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Medical claims expense |
|
$ |
6,927 |
|
|
$ |
7,252 |
|
|
$ |
6,798 |
|
Other benefit expenses |
|
|
169 |
|
|
|
193 |
|
|
|
225 |
|
Mail order pharmacy cost of goods sold |
|
|
1,036 |
|
|
|
961 |
|
|
|
904 |
|
Other operating expenses |
|
|
3,847 |
|
|
|
3,914 |
|
|
|
3,272 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total benefits and expenses |
|
$ |
11,979 |
|
|
$ |
12,320 |
|
|
$ |
11,199 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Medical claims expense decreased by 4% in 2009 compared with 2008 largely due to lower
membership, particularly in the experience-rated and guaranteed cost businesses. This impact was
partially offset by growth in Medicare membership and increases in medical expenses due to medical
cost inflation as well as H1N1 flu-related claims.
Medical claims expense increased 7% in 2008 compared with 2007 largely due to the impact of the
acquired business.
Other benefit expenses include expenses associated with life, long-term disability and other
non-medical products. These expenses have decreased 12% in 2009 compared with 2008 and 14% in 2008
compared with 2007, primarily reflecting the continued run-off of this business, as the Health Care
segment no longer actively markets these products.
Other operating expenses include expenses related to:
|
|
both retail and mail order pharmacy; |
|
|
|
disease management; |
|
|
|
voluntary and limited benefits; |
|
|
|
Medicare claims administration businesses; and |
|
|
|
integration costs associated with the acquired business. |
Excluding the items noted above, as well as special items, other operating expenses increased
slightly in 2009, compared with 2008, primarily due to expenses related to the acquired business
(effective April 1, 2008), higher management incentive compensation and higher information
technology spend, mostly offset by cost reduction initiatives and pension plan changes as a result
of the comprehensive review of ongoing expenses, as well as lower volume-related expenses. Other
operating expenses increased in 2008, compared with 2007, primarily reflecting expenses related to
the acquired business and higher spending on operational improvement initiatives, including market
segment expansion and investments in information technology. This increase was partially offset by
lower management incentive compensation expenses in 2008.
65
Other Items Affecting Health Care Results
Medical Membership
The Health Care segments medical membership includes any individual for whom the Company retains
medical underwriting risk, who uses the Companys network for services covered under their medical
coverage or for whom the Company administers medical claims. As of December 31, estimated medical
membership was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Guaranteed cost excluding voluntary/limited benefits (1) |
|
|
780 |
|
|
|
891 |
|
|
|
1,038 |
|
Voluntary/limited benefits |
|
|
221 |
|
|
|
201 |
|
|
|
180 |
|
Medicare |
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total guaranteed cost |
|
|
1,053 |
|
|
|
1,127 |
|
|
|
1,249 |
|
Experience-rated (2) |
|
|
761 |
|
|
|
864 |
|
|
|
907 |
|
Service |
|
|
9,226 |
|
|
|
9,688 |
|
|
|
8,013 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total medical membership |
|
|
11,040 |
|
|
|
11,679 |
|
|
|
10,169 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes guaranteed cost members primarily associated with open access and commercial HMO, as well as other risk-related products. |
|
(2) |
|
Includes minimum premium members, who have a risk profile similar to experience-rated members. |
The net decrease in the Health Care segments medical membership was 5.5% as of December 31,
2009 when compared with December 31, 2008. The decrease was primarily driven by disenrollment
across all funding arrangements as a result of higher unemployment. The net increase in medical
membership of 15% as of December 31, 2008 compared with December 31, 2007 was due to the
acquisition of Great-West Healthcare, effective April 1, 2008.
Operational Strategies
The Health Care segment is focused on several operational strategies including improving the
efficiency of its operations, while growing its customer base in targeted markets and meeting the
needs of its customers. Savings generated from the reduction of operating expenses will provide
the financial flexibility and capital to make investments that will enable the Company to enhance
its capabilities, particularly in product development and the delivery of customer service, health
advocacy and related technology. These capabilities are critical to enabling the Health Care
segment to execute on its strategies to achieve profitable growth and retain customers. Successful
execution of these operational strategies is critical to maintaining and improving its competitive
position in the healthcare marketplace.
The operational strategies currently underway are discussed below.
Reducing operating expenses. The Company operates in an intensely competitive marketplace and its
ability to establish a competitive cost structure over time is crucial to achieving its overall
strategy. Accordingly, the Health Care segment is focused on reducing operating expenses, while
investing prudently in technology and service capabilities to drive future growth.
The Health Care segments operating expenses are comprised of three components and are
approximately allocated as follows: healthcare (70%), specialty and market segment expansion
(20%), and premium taxes/commissions (10%).
|
|
|
The healthcare component is the primary focus of the cost reduction activity. This
component includes: |
|
|
|
fulfillment activities, which are comprised of service operations,
technology, and medical and network management; |
|
|
|
customer acquisition, which represent costs for sales and account
management, underwriting, and marketing and product development; and |
|
|
|
staff functions, which represent finance, legal and human resources. |
|
|
|
The specialty and market segment expansion and the premium tax/commission expense
components would increase over time as revenues grow. Specialty includes pharmacy,
Medicare Part D, disease management, dental and behavioral coverages. |
66
In 2009, excluding the impact of Great-West Healthcare, the Health Care segment significantly
reduced healthcare operating expenses and expects to continue to meaningfully reduce these over
time. These reductions are, and will continue to be, driven by actions in the following areas:
|
|
|
employment-related savings; |
|
|
|
vendor management and procurement actions; |
|
|
|
reduction of the Health Care segments real estate footprint; |
|
|
|
leveraging technology to drive operating efficiencies; and |
|
|
|
targeted outsourcing actions. |
The Health Care segment expects to drive reductions in its operating expenses while remaining
focused on its other business strategies including investing in areas that are critical to the
Companys growth initiatives and segment expansions, ensuring continued excellence in customer
service and clinical programs, and leveraging technology to drive further operating efficiencies.
Profitable growth and customer retention. The Health Care segment continues to focus on retaining
profitable relationships, expanding on those relationships and growing profitable new business by
focusing on:
|
|
|
targeted market segments where buyers value our health improvement capabilities; |
|
|
|
targeted geographic regions where the Company already has a strong market presence and
competitive networks; |
|
|
|
providing a diverse product portfolio that meets current market needs, as well as
emerging consumer-directed trends; |
|
|
|
developing and implementing the systems, information technology and infrastructure to
deliver member service that keeps pace with the emerging consumer-directed market trends;
and |
|
|
|
increasing penetration of our specialty healthcare programs and services and
cross-selling products sold primarily by other segments of the Company. |
The Health Care segment is focused on market segment and product expansion. With respect to market
segment expansion, the focus is predominantly in the Middle Market (employers with generally more
than 250 but fewer than 5,000 employees), Select (employers with generally more than 50 but fewer
than 250 employees), and Individual market segments. The Health Care segment is focusing on
several strategic growth industries and targeting key geographic markets within the Select and
Middle Market segments that align with our competitive strengths. The Health Care segment expects
to grow its presence in these market segments by leveraging its customer knowledge, differentiated
service model, product portfolio and distribution model. The Health Care segment continues to
increase its penetration into the Individual market segment and will refine its strategy for this
market segment pending the outcome of health care reform legislation. In the National market
segment (multi-site, multi-state commercial employers with generally more than 5,000 employees),
the Company will selectively focus on clients that value its differentiated product offering.
These clients include those seeking engagement and incentive based programs designed to improve
health, and those that purchase multiple products and services from a single company.
Driving additional cross-selling is also key to the Companys integrated benefits value
proposition. The Company is expanding network access for its dental product and improving network
flexibility to drive better alignment with customers needs including increasing disability and
pharmacy penetration across the entire book.
Offering products that meet emerging customer and market trends. In addition to designing lower
cost plan offerings to meet emerging customer and market trends, enhancements to the Companys
suite of products (CIGNA Choice Fund® CIGNA Health Advisor, CIGNA Incentive Points Program, CIGNA
Choicelinx/Custom Benefit Builder) offer various options to customers and employers that are key to
our customer engagement strategy. By providing tools to our customers which will facilitate access
and greater understanding of their healthcare choices, customers are better equipped to make
effective health related decisions. CIGNAs Cost of Care Estimator, Quicken Health and
improvements to customer Explanation of Benefits and Health Statements are a part of the Companys
strategy to engage the individual by making information more available and easier to understand.
67
Effectively managing medical costs. The Health Care segment operates under a centralized medical
management model, which helps improve the health, well being and sense of security of its members,
while reducing infrastructure expenses and driving productivity.
The Health Care segment is focused on continuing to effectively manage medical utilization and unit
costs. The Company believes that by increasing the quality of medical care and improving access to
care it can drive reductions in total medical cost and better outcomes, resulting in healthier
members. To help achieve this, the Company continues to focus on contracting with providers to
strengthen its networks in targeted markets, enhancing clinical capabilities and engaging its
customers and clients/employers. In connection with the April 2008 Great-West Healthcare
acquisition, the Company continues to integrate its offerings onto one extensive preferred provider
network, in order to offer access to a broad range of utilization review and case management
services at a competitive medical cost.
Delivering superior service to customers and health care professionals. The Company is focused on
delivering consistent, reliable and superior service to customers, health care professionals and
clients. The Company believes that further enhancing service can improve customer retention and,
when combined with useful health information and tools, can help motivate customers to become more
engaged in their personal health. This will help to promote healthy outcomes thereby removing cost
from the healthcare system. The evolution of the consumer-driven health care market is driving
increased product and service complexity and is raising customers expectations with respect to
service levels, which is expected to require significant investment, management attention and
heightened interaction with customers.
The Company continues to focus on the development and enhancement of its service model that is
capable of meeting the challenges brought on by the increasing product and service complexity and
the heightened expectations of health care customers. The Company continues to make significant
investments in the development and implementation of systems and technology to improve the provider
service experience for customers and health care professionals (e.g. opening its Call Center 24/7),
thereby enhancing its capabilities and improving its competitive position.
68
Disability and Life Segment
Segment Description
The Disability and Life segment includes group disability, life, accident and specialty insurance
and case management for disability and workers compensation.
Key factors for this segment are:
|
|
premium growth, including new business and customer retention; |
|
|
benefits expense as a percentage of earned premium (loss ratio); and |
|
|
other operating expense as a percentage of earned premiums and fees (expense ratio). |
Results of Operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial Summary |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Premiums and fees |
|
$ |
2,634 |
|
|
$ |
2,562 |
|
|
$ |
2,374 |
|
Net investment income |
|
|
244 |
|
|
|
256 |
|
|
|
276 |
|
Other revenues |
|
|
113 |
|
|
|
117 |
|
|
|
131 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment revenues |
|
|
2,991 |
|
|
|
2,935 |
|
|
|
2,781 |
|
Benefits and expenses |
|
|
2,598 |
|
|
|
2,553 |
|
|
|
2,435 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before taxes |
|
|
393 |
|
|
|
382 |
|
|
|
346 |
|
Income taxes |
|
|
109 |
|
|
|
109 |
|
|
|
92 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment earnings |
|
|
284 |
|
|
|
273 |
|
|
|
254 |
|
Less: special items (after-tax) included in segment earnings: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Curtailment gain (See Note 10 to the Consolidated Financial Statements) |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost reduction charge (See Note 6 to the Consolidated Financial Statements) |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Completion of IRS examination (See Note 19 to the Consolidated Financial
Statements) |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted income from operations |
|
$ |
279 |
|
|
$ |
275 |
|
|
$ |
248 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Realized investment (losses), net of taxes |
|
$ |
(1 |
) |
|
$ |
(48 |
) |
|
$ |
(5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Disability and Life segments adjusted income from operations increased 1% in 2009
compared to 2008 reflecting:
|
|
favorable claims experience in the disability insurance business and the favorable
after-tax impact of disability reserve studies of $20 million in 2009 compared with $8 million
in 2008. The results in 2008 also included a $3 million favorable after-tax impact of a
reinsurance settlement. The favorable claims experience and reserve study impacts are largely
driven by continued strong disability claims management programs; |
|
|
improved claims experience in the accident business including the favorable after-tax
impact of reserve studies of $5 million in 2009 compared with $3 million in 2008; and |
|
|
higher premiums and fees in the disability and life businesses. |
Largely offsetting these factors were:
|
|
lower results in the group life insurance business in 2009 primarily due to less favorable
current year life claims experience, partially offset by the favorable after-tax impact of
reserve studies of $9 million in 2009 compared with $3 million in 2008; |
|
|
a higher operating expense ratio, including a litigation expense charge of $4 million; |
|
|
lower net investment income; and |
|
|
the absence of the 2008 favorable after-tax impact of specialty reserve studies of $2
million. |
69
The Disability and Life segments adjusted income from operations increased 11% in 2008 compared to
2007 reflecting:
|
|
improved claims experience in the disability insurance business and the favorable after-tax
impact of disability reserve studies of $8 million in 2008 compared with $12 million in 2007.
The results in 2008 also included a $3 million favorable after-tax impact of a reinsurance
settlement. The favorable claims experience and reserve study impacts are largely driven by
continued strong disability claims management programs; |
|
|
improved claims experience in the specialty business including the favorable after-tax
impact of reserve studies of $2 million in 2008 compared with an unfavorable impact of $10
million in 2007; |
|
|
a lower expense ratio due to effective operating expense management and lower management
incentive compensation; and |
|
|
business growth resulting in increased premiums and fees in the disability, life and
accident businesses. |
These factors were partially offset by:
|
|
lower results in the group life insurance business due to less favorable life claims
experience and lower year over year favorable after-tax impacts of reserve studies of $3
million in 2008 compared with $7 million in 2007; |
|
|
less favorable accident claims experience driven by higher average new claims size. Group
accident results included the favorable after-tax impact of reserve studies of $3 million in both
2008 and 2007; and |
|
|
lower net investment income. |
Revenues
Premiums and fees increased by 3% in 2009 reflecting disability and life sales growth and solid
persistency, partially offset by lower employment levels at the customers we serve, the Companys
exit from a large, low-margin assumed government life reinsurance program and the sale of the
renewal rights for the student and participant accident business. Premiums and fees increased by
8% in 2008 reflecting new sales growth and solid customer retention in the disability, life and
accident lines of business, partially offset by less favorable customer retention in the specialty
line of business.
Net investment income decreased by 5% in 2009 reflecting lower yields and lower security and real
estate partnership income. Net investment income decreased by 7% in 2008 reflecting lower yields
and lower security partnership income.
Benefits and Expenses
Excluding the pre-tax impact of the reserve studies, expense charge and special items noted above,
benefits and expenses increased 3% in 2009 compared with 2008, primarily reflecting:
|
|
disability and life business growth; |
|
|
less favorable life claims experience driven by the higher average size of death claims;
and |
|
|
a higher expense ratio in 2009 compared with 2008 reflecting strategic investments in the
claim operations and information technology initiatives partially offset by a continued focus
on operating expense management and lower disability and workers compensation case management
expenses. |
These effects were partially offset by:
|
|
more favorable accident claim experience, driven by lower new claims; |
|
|
more favorable disability claims experience resulting from higher resolutions driven by
strong disability management programs partially offset by higher new claims; and |
|
|
the Companys exit from the government life insurance program and sale of the renewal
rights for the student and participant accident business. |
70
Excluding the pre-tax impact of the reserve studies, reinsurance settlement and cost reduction
charge noted above, benefits and expenses increased 5% in 2008 compared with 2007, reflecting:
|
|
business growth in the disability, life and accident lines of business; and |
|
|
less favorable claims experience in the life and accident businesses. |
These effects were partially offset by:
|
|
favorable claims experience in the disability and specialty businesses; and |
|
|
a lower expense ratio, driven by continued focus on operating expense management, lower
disability and workers compensation case management expenses and lower management incentive
compensation expenses. |
International Segment
Segment Description
The International segment includes life, accident and supplemental health insurance products and
international health care products and services, including those offered to expatriate employees of
multinational corporations.
The key factors for this segment are:
|
|
premium growth, including new business and customer retention; |
|
|
benefits expense as a percentage of earned premium (loss ratio); |
|
|
operating expense as a percentage of earned premium (expense ratio); and |
|
|
impact of foreign currency movements. |
Results of Operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial Summary |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Premiums and fees |
|
$ |
1,882 |
|
|
$ |
1,870 |
|
|
$ |
1,800 |
|
Net investment income |
|
|
69 |
|
|
|
79 |
|
|
|
77 |
|
Other revenues |
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment revenues |
|
|
1,973 |
|
|
|
1,967 |
|
|
|
1,884 |
|
Benefits and expenses |
|
|
1,717 |
|
|
|
1,679 |
|
|
|
1,610 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before taxes |
|
|
256 |
|
|
|
288 |
|
|
|
274 |
|
Income taxes |
|
|
70 |
|
|
|
104 |
|
|
|
96 |
|
Income attributable to noncontrolling interest |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment earnings |
|
|
183 |
|
|
|
182 |
|
|
|
176 |
|
Less: special items (after-tax) included in segment earnings: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost reduction charge (See Note 6 to the Consolidated Financial Statements) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Curtailment gain (See Note 10 to the Consolidated Financial Statements) |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Completion of IRS examination (See Note 19 to the Consolidated Financial
Statements) |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted income from operations |
|
$ |
182 |
|
|
$ |
188 |
|
|
$ |
174 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impact of foreign currency movements included in segment earnings |
|
$ |
(15 |
) |
|
$ |
(13 |
) |
|
$ |
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Realized investment gains (losses), net of taxes |
|
$ |
2 |
|
|
$ |
(3 |
) |
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
71
During the second quarter of 2009, the Companys International segment implemented a capital
management strategy to permanently invest the earnings of its South Korean operation overseas.
Income taxes for this operation will therefore be recorded at the tax rate of the foreign
jurisdiction. The International segments adjusted income from operations reflected favorable tax
adjustments of $14 million from the implementation of this strategy for 2009. In addition to the
implementation effect, adjusted income from operations also reflects $8 million from the ongoing
impact of the lower tax rate on the permanently invested earnings for 2009. Excluding the impact
of the South Korean tax adjustments and foreign currency movements, the International segments
adjusted income from operations decreased 7% for 2009, compared with 2008. The decrease was
primarily driven by unfavorable claims experience in the life, accident and supplemental health
insurance business and the expatriate employee benefits business. The unfavorable effects were
partially offset by revenue growth and competitively strong margins in both businesses. The impact
of foreign currency movements was calculated by comparing the reported results to what the results
would have been had the exchange rates remained constant with the prior years comparable period
exchange rates. Special items were generally not denominated in foreign currency.
Excluding the impact of foreign currency movements noted in the table above, the International
segments adjusted income from operations increased 16% in 2008 compared with 2007, primarily due
to continued growth in the life, accident and supplemental health insurance business and the
expatriate employee benefits business, as well as continued competitively strong margins.
Revenues
Premiums and fees. Excluding the effect of foreign currency movements, premiums and fees were
$2,042 million in 2009 compared with reported premiums of $1,870 million in 2008, an increase of
9%. The increase was primarily attributable to new sales growth in the life, accident and
supplemental health insurance operations, particularly in South Korea, and membership growth in the
expatriate employee benefits business. Excluding the effect of foreign currency movements,
premiums and fees were $1,971 million in 2008 compared with reported premiums of $1,800 million in
2007, an increase of 10%. This increase was primarily attributable to new sales growth in the
life, accident and supplemental health insurance operations, particularly in Taiwan and South
Korea, and membership growth in the expatriate employee benefits business.
To exclude the effect of foreign currency movements, premiums and fees were calculated using the
prior years comparable period exchange rates, allowing foreign currency neutral comparison to the
prior years reported premiums and fees.
Net investment income decreased by 13% in 2009 compared with 2008. The decrease was primarily due
to unfavorable foreign currency movements, particularly in South Korea. Net investment income
increased by 3% in 2008 compared with 2007. The increase was primarily due to higher asset levels
offset by unfavorable foreign currency movements.
Benefits and Expenses
Benefits and expenses increased by 2% in 2009, compared with 2008. The increase was primarily
driven by higher loss ratios, business growth and increased amortization of deferred acquisition
costs, partially offset by foreign currency movements.
Benefits and expenses increased by 4% in 2008 compared with 2007, primarily due to business growth
in all lines of business, partially offset by foreign currency movements, primarily in South
Korea. Loss ratios decreased in 2008 in the life, accident and supplemental health business due to
favorable claims experience.
Expense ratios decreased in 2009 reflecting effective expense management. Expense ratios increased
slightly in 2008 in the life, accident and supplemental health business and the expatriate benefits
business as a result of higher expenses to support growth initiatives and expansion. Expense
ratios in the life, accident and health and expatriate benefits businesses continue to be strong
due to effective expense management.
Other Items Affecting International Results
For the Companys International segment, South Korea is the single largest geographic market. South
Korea generated 29% of the segments revenues and 49% of the segments earnings in 2009. Due to
the concentration of business in South Korea, the International segment is exposed to potential
losses resulting from economic and geopolitical developments in that country, as well as foreign
currency movements affecting the South Korean currency, which could have a significant impact on
the segments results and the Companys consolidated financial results.
72
Run-off Reinsurance Segment
Segment Description
The Companys reinsurance operations were discontinued and are now an inactive business in run-off
mode since the sale of the U.S. individual life, group life and accidental death reinsurance
business in 2000. This segment is predominantly comprised of GMDB, GMIB, workers compensation and
personal accident reinsurance products.
The determination of liabilities for GMDB and GMIB requires the Company to make critical accounting
estimates. In 2008, the Company updated the assumptions for GMIB and the effects of hypothetical
changes in those assumptions in connection with the implementation of the FASBs fair value
disclosure and measurement guidance (ASC 820). The Company describes the assumptions used to
develop the reserves for GMDB in Note 7 to the Consolidated Financial Statements and for the assets
and liabilities associated with GMIB in Note 11 to the Consolidated Financial Statements. The
Company also provides the effects of hypothetical changes in those assumptions in the Critical
Accounting Estimates section of the MD&A beginning on page 55 of this Form 10-K.
The Company excludes the results of the GMIB business from adjusted income from operations because
the fair value of GMIB assets and liabilities must be recalculated each quarter using updated
capital market assumptions. The resulting changes in fair value, which are reported in
shareholders net income, are volatile and unpredictable. See the Critical Accounting Estimates
section of the MD&A beginning on page 55 of this Form 10-K for more information on the effect of
capital market assumption changes on shareholders net income.
Results of Operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial Summary |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Premiums and fees |
|
$ |
29 |
|
|
$ |
43 |
|
|
$ |
60 |
|
Net investment income |
|
|
113 |
|
|
|
104 |
|
|
|
93 |
|
Other revenues |
|
|
(283 |
) |
|
|
331 |
|
|
|
(47 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment revenues |
|
|
(141 |
) |
|
|
478 |
|
|
|
106 |
|
Benefits and expenses |
|
|
(419 |
) |
|
|
1,499 |
|
|
|
160 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes (benefits) |
|
|
278 |
|
|
|
(1,021 |
) |
|
|
(54 |
) |
Income taxes (benefits) |
|
|
93 |
|
|
|
(375 |
) |
|
|
(43 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment earnings (loss) |
|
|
185 |
|
|
|
(646 |
) |
|
|
(11 |
) |
Less: results of GMIB business (after-tax) included in segment
earnings (loss): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Charge on adoption of fair value measurements for GMIB contracts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(131 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Results of GMIB business excluding charge on adoption |
|
|
209 |
|
|
|
(306 |
) |
|
|
(91 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted income (loss) from operations |
|
$ |
(24 |
) |
|
$ |
(209 |
) |
|
$ |
80 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Realized investment gains (losses), net of taxes |
|
$ |
(2 |
) |
|
$ |
(19 |
) |
|
$ |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Overview of 2009 Results
Overall segment results, including GMIB, improved significantly in 2009 compared with 2008.
Segment earnings were favorably affected by substantially higher results from the GMIB business
reflecting improved equity markets and generally higher interest rates. In addition, adjusted
income from operations for Run-off Reinsurance improved significantly in 2009 compared with 2008
due to significantly reduced losses in the GMDB business ($52 million after-tax for 2009, compared
with $267 million for 2008) resulting from a substantially lower amount of reserve strengthening.
The improvement in GMDB results in 2009 primarily reflected the recovery and stabilization of the
financial markets. Adjusted income from operations also included the favorable after-tax impact of
reserve studies for the workers compensation and personal accident business of $16 million in 2009
and $30 million in 2008.
73
Overview of 2008 Results
Segment loss for 2008 reflected significant losses from the GMIB business of $437 million,
including a charge of $131 million related to the implementation of new fair value accounting
guidance in 2008. Excluding this charge, GMIB losses in 2008 primarily reflected the declines in
equity market and interest rates and increased market volatility.
In addition, adjusted loss from operations for Run-off Reinsurance was significantly higher in 2008
primarily reflecting a loss in the GMDB business of $267 million after-tax primarily reflecting
reserve strengthening. This loss was primarily related to declines in equity markets and interest
rates and increased market volatility. Adjusted loss from operations for Run-off Reinsurance in
2008 compared with 2007 was also negatively impacted by reduced favorable settlement activity
related to personal accident and workers compensation.
See the Benefits and Expenses section for further discussion around the results of the GMIB and
GMDB businesses.
Other Revenues
Other revenues included pre-tax losses of $282 million in 2009 from futures contracts used in the
GMDB equity hedge program (see Note 7 to the Consolidated Financial Statements), compared with
pre-tax gains of $333 million in 2008 and pre-tax losses of $32 million in 2007. Amounts
reflecting corresponding changes in liabilities for GMDB contracts were included in benefits and
expenses consistent with GAAP when a premium deficiency exists (see below Other Benefits and
Expenses). The Company held futures contract positions related to this program with a notional
amount of $1.0 billion at December 31, 2009.
Benefits and Expenses
Benefits and expenses were comprised of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
GMIB (income) expense |
|
$ |
(304 |
) |
|
$ |
690 |
|
|
$ |
147 |
|
Other benefits and expenses |
|
|
(115 |
) |
|
|
809 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefits and expenses |
|
$ |
(419 |
) |
|
$ |
1,499 |
|
|
$ |
160 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GMIB (Income) Expense. Under the GAAP guidance for fair value measurements, the Companys
results of operations are expected to be volatile in future periods because capital market
assumptions needed to estimate the assets and liabilities for the GMIB business are based largely
on market-observable inputs at the close of each reporting period including interest rates (LIBOR
swap curve) and market-implied volatilities. See Note 11 to the Consolidated Financial Statements
for additional information about assumptions and asset and liability balances related to GMIB.
For 2009 the pre-tax income for GMIB was $304 million, and was primarily due to the following
factors:
|
|
increases in interest rates: $248 million; |
|
|
increases in underlying account values in the period, driven by favorable equity market and
bond fund returns, resulting in reduced exposures: $98 million; |
|
|
specific adjustments to nonperformance risk for the Company net of nonperformance risk of
its reinsurers: $16 million; and |
|
|
updates to the risk and profit charge estimates: $30 million. |
These favorable effects were partially offset by:
|
|
higher than expected claim experience: $26 million; |
|
|
increases to the annuitization assumption, reflecting higher utilization experience: $21
million; |
|
|
updates to the lapse assumption: $14 million; |
|
|
updates to fund correlation assumptions: $4 million; and |
|
|
other amounts, including experience varying from assumptions, model and in-force updates:
$23 million. |
74
GMIB expense in 2008 includes a pre-tax charge of $202 million for the adoption of the FASBs fair
value disclosure and measurement guidance, which is discussed in Notes 2(B) and 11 to the
Consolidated Financial Statements.
Excluding the charge on adoption of the FASBs fair value disclosure and measurement guidance, the
GMIB business generated additional pre-tax expense of $488 million in 2008 primarily as a result
of:
|
|
decreases in interest rates since December 31, 2007: $232 million; |
|
|
the impact of declines in underlying account values in the period, driven by declines in
equity markets and bond fund returns during 2008, resulting in increased exposure: $158
million; |
|
|
updates to the risk and profit charge estimate: $50 million; |
|
|
updates to other assumptions that are used in the fair value calculation: $25 million; and |
|
|
other amounts including the compounding effects of declines in interest rates and equity
markets, as well as experience varying from assumptions: $23 million. |
Excluding the charge to update assumptions for annuity elections and lapse rates, the GMIB business
generated additional pre-tax expense of $61 million in 2007, primarily the result of unfavorable
annuitization and lapse experience.
The GMIB liabilities and related assets are calculated using a complex internal model and
assumptions from the viewpoint of a hypothetical market participant. This resulting liability (and
related asset) is higher than the Company believes will ultimately be required to settle claims
primarily because market-observable interest rates are used to project growth in account values of
the underlying mutual funds to estimate fair value from the viewpoint of a hypothetical market
participant. The Companys payments for GMIB claims are expected to occur over the next 15 to 20
years and will be based on actual values of the underlying mutual funds and the 7-year Treasury
rate at the dates benefits are elected. Management does not believe that current market-observable
interest rates reflect actual growth expected for the underlying mutual funds over that timeframe,
and therefore believes that the recorded liability and related asset do not represent what
management believes will ultimately be required as this business runs off.
However, significant declines in mutual fund values that underlie the contracts (increasing the
exposure to the Company) together with declines in the 7-year treasury rates (used to determine
claim payments) similar to what occurred during 2008 would increase the expected amount of claims
that would be paid out for contractholders who choose to annuitize. It is also possible that such
unfavorable market conditions would have an impact on the level of contractholder annuitizations,
particularly if these unfavorable market conditions persisted for an extended period.
Other Benefits and Expenses. Other benefits and expenses reflected income for 2009, compared to
expense during 2008. This fluctuation reflects the impact of significant improvements in the
equity markets on guaranteed minimum death benefit contracts, compared with equity market declines
during 2008. Equity market improvements result in increases in the underlying annuity account
values, which decreases the exposure under the contracts. Equity market declines result in
decreases in the underlying annuity account values, which increases the exposure under the
contracts. These changes in benefits expense are partially offset by futures gains and losses,
discussed in Other Revenues above.
Although 2009 benefit expenses included reserve strengthening of $73 million ($47 million
after-tax) to increase GMDB reserves, no additional reserve strengthening was required for GMDB
after the first quarter, primarily due to the stabilization and recovery of equity markets. The
components of the first quarter reserve strengthening were:
|
|
adverse impacts of overall market declines of $50 million ($32 million after-tax). This
includes (a) $39 million ($25 million after-tax) primarily related to the provision for future
partial surrenders and (b) $11 million ($7 million after-tax) related to declines in the
values of contractholders non-equity investments such as bond funds, neither of which is
included in the GMDB equity hedge program; |
|
|
adverse volatility-related impacts of $11 million ($7 million after-tax) due to turbulent
equity market conditions, including higher than expected claims and the performance of the
diverse mix of equity fund investments held by contractholders being different than expected;
and |
|
|
adverse interest rate impacts of $12 million ($8 million after-tax). Interest rate risk is
not covered by the GMDB equity hedge program, and the interest rate returns on the futures
contracts were less than the Companys long-term assumption for mean investment performance. |
75
During 2008, the Company recorded additional other benefits expenses of $412 million ($267 million
after-tax) primarily to strengthen GMDB reserves following an analysis of experience and reserve
assumptions. These amounts were due to:
|
|
adverse impacts of overall market declines of $210 million ($136 million after-tax). This
includes (a) $185 million ($120 million after-tax) related to the provision for partial
surrenders, including $40 million ($26 million after-tax) for an increase in the assumed
election rates for future partial surrenders and (b) $25 million ($16 million after-tax)
related to declines in the values of contractholders non-equity investments such as bond
funds, neither of which is included in the GMDB equity hedge program; |
|
|
adverse volatility-related impacts due to turbulent equity market conditions. Volatility
risk is not covered by the GMDB equity hedge program. Also, the equity market volatility,
particularly during the second half of the year, impacted the effectiveness of the hedge
program. In aggregate, these volatility-related impacts totaled $182 million ($118 million
after-tax). The GMDB equity hedge program is designed so that changes in the value of a
portfolio of actively managed futures contracts will offset changes in the liability resulting
from equity market movements. In periods of equity market declines, the liability will
increase; the program is designed to produce gains on the futures contracts to offset the
increase in the liability. However, the program will not perfectly offset the change in the
liability, in part because the market does not offer futures contracts that exactly match the
diverse mix of equity fund investments held by contractholders, and because there is a time
lag between changes in underlying contractholder mutual funds, and corresponding changes in
the hedge position. In 2008, the impact of this mismatch was higher than most prior periods
due to the relatively large changes in market indices from day to day. In addition, the
number of futures contracts used in the program is adjusted only when certain tolerances are
exceeded and in periods of highly volatile equity markets when actual volatility exceeds the
expected volatility assumed in the liability calculation, losses will result. These
conditions have had an adverse impact on earnings, and during 2008, the increase in the
liability due to equity market movements was only partially offset by the results of the
futures contracts; and |
|
|
adverse interest rate impacts. Interest rate risk is not covered by the GMDB equity hedge
program, and the interest rate returns on the futures contracts were less than the Companys
long-term assumption for mean investment performance generating an additional $14 million ($9
million after-tax). |
See Note 7 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information about assumptions
and reserve balances related to GMDB.
Segment Summary
The Companys payment obligations for underlying reinsurance exposures assumed by the Company under
these contracts are based on ceding companies claim payments. For GMDB and GMIB, claim payments
vary because of changes in equity markets and interest rates, as well as mortality and policyholder
behavior. For workers compensation and personal accident, the claim payments relate to accidents
and injuries. Any of these claim payments can extend many years into the future, and the amount of
the ceding companies ultimate claims, and therefore the amount of the Companys ultimate payment
obligations and corresponding ultimate collection from retrocessionaires may not be known with
certainty for some time.
The Companys reserves for underlying reinsurance exposures assumed by the Company, as well as for
amounts recoverable from retrocessionaires, are considered appropriate as of December 31, 2009,
based on current information. However, it is possible that future developments, which could
include but are not limited to worse than expected claim experience and higher than expected
volatility, could have a material adverse effect on the Companys consolidated results of
operations and could have a material adverse effect on the Companys financial condition. The
Company bears the risk of loss if its payment obligations to cedents increase or if its
retrocessionaires are unable to meet, or successfully challenge, their reinsurance obligations to
the Company.
76
Other Operations Segment
Segment Description
Other Operations consist of:
|
|
non-leveraged and leveraged corporate-owned life insurance (COLI); |
|
|
deferred gains recognized from the 1998 sale of the individual life insurance and annuity
business and the 2004 sale of the retirement benefits business; and |
|
|
run-off settlement annuity business. |
COLI has contributed the majority of the earnings in 2009, 2008 and 2007 for Other Operations.
Federal legislation enacted in 1996 affected certain policies sold by the COLI business by
eliminating on a prospective basis the tax deduction for policy loan interest for most leveraged
COLI products. There have been no sales of this particular product since 1997. As a result of an
Internal Revenue Service initiative to settle tax disputes regarding leveraged products, some
customers have surrendered their policies and management expects earnings associated with these
products to continue to decline. Management does not expect this initiative to have a significant
impact on the future operating results of the segment.
Results of Operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial Summary |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Premiums and fees |
|
$ |
112 |
|
|
$ |
113 |
|
|
$ |
108 |
|
Net investment income |
|
|
407 |
|
|
|
414 |
|
|
|
437 |
|
Other revenues |
|
|
64 |
|
|
|
71 |
|
|
|
82 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment revenues |
|
|
583 |
|
|
|
598 |
|
|
|
627 |
|
Benefits and expenses |
|
|
466 |
|
|
|
468 |
|
|
|
473 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before taxes |
|
|
117 |
|
|
|
130 |
|
|
|
154 |
|
Income taxes |
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment earnings |
|
|
86 |
|
|
|
87 |
|
|
|
109 |
|
Less: special items (after-tax) included in segment earnings: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Completion of IRS examination (See Note 19 to the
Consolidated Financial Statements) |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted income from operations |
|
$ |
85 |
|
|
$ |
87 |
|
|
$ |
104 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Realized investment (losses), net of taxes |
|
$ |
(6 |
) |
|
$ |
(27 |
) |
|
$ |
(2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted income from operations for Other Operations declined in 2009 compared with 2008,
reflecting a continued decline in deferred gain amortization associated with the sold businesses
offset by increased COLI earnings driven by higher investment income and improved operating
expenses.
Adjusted income from operations for Other Operations declined in 2008 compared with 2007,
reflecting lower results from the COLI business driven by less favorable mortality and lower
interest margins. Interest margins decreased due to the movement of assets from the general
account to separate accounts, and lower interest rates. In addition, the continuing decline in
deferred gain amortization associated with sold businesses contributed to lower earnings.
Revenues
Net investment income. Net investment income decreased 2% in 2009 compared with 2008, primarily
reflecting lower average invested assets and lower real estate income. Net investment income
decreased 5% in 2008 compared with 2007 primarily reflecting lower average invested assets due in
part to the movement of assets from the general account to separate accounts in the COLI business
as well as lower interest rates.
Other revenues. Other revenues decreased 10% in 2009 compared with 2008 and decreased 13% in 2008
compared with 2007 primarily due to lower deferred gain amortization related to the sold retirement
benefits and individual life insurance and annuity businesses. The amount of the deferred gain
amortization recorded was $32 million in 2009, $38 million in 2008 and $47 million in 2007.
77
Corporate
Description
Corporate reflects amounts not allocated to other segments, such as net interest expense (defined
as interest on corporate debt less net investment income on investments not supporting segment
operations), interest on uncertain tax positions, certain litigation matters, intersegment
eliminations, compensation cost for stock options and certain corporate overhead expenses such as
directors expenses.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial Summary |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Segment loss |
|
$ |
(142 |
) |
|
$ |
(162 |
) |
|
$ |
(97 |
) |
Less: special items (after-tax) included in segment loss: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Charge related to litigation matter (See Note 23 to the
Consolidated Financial Statements) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(52 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Completion of IRS examination (See Note 19 to the
Consolidated Financial Statements) |
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted loss from operations |
|
$ |
(154 |
) |
|
$ |
(110 |
) |
|
$ |
(107 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporates adjusted loss from operations was higher in 2009, compared with 2008, primarily
reflecting:
|
|
higher net interest expense attributable to lower average invested assets and increased
debt used for general corporate purposes, including the repayment of some of the Companys
outstanding commercial paper issued to finance the acquired business; |
|
|
higher directors deferred compensation expenses caused by an increase in the Companys
stock price during 2009 compared with a decrease during 2008; and |
|
|
spending on certain strategic initiatives. |
Corporates adjusted loss from operations was higher in 2008, compared with 2007, primarily
reflecting higher net interest expense attributable to lower average invested assets and increased
debt to finance the acquired business. These factors were partially offset by lower directors
deferred compensation expenses caused by a decline in the Companys stock price in 2008.
DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS
Description
Discontinued operations represent results associated with certain investments or businesses that
have been sold or are held for sale.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial Summary |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Income before income (taxes) benefits |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
3 |
|
|
$ |
25 |
|
Income (taxes) benefits |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
Impairment loss, net of tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(23 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from discontinued operations,
net of taxes |
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
$ |
4 |
|
|
$ |
(5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discontinued operations for 2009 primarily represents a tax benefit from a past divestiture
resolved at the completion of the 2005 and 2006 IRS examinations.
Discontinued operations for 2008 primarily represents a gain of $3 million after-tax from the
settlement of certain issues related to a past divestiture.
78
Discontinued operations for 2007 primarily reflects:
|
|
impairment losses related to the dispositions of several Latin American insurance
operations as discussed in Note 3 to the Consolidated Financial Statements; and |
|
|
realized gains on the disposition of certain directly-owned real estate investments as
discussed in Note 14 to the Consolidated Financial Statements. |
INDUSTRY DEVELOPMENTS AND OTHER MATTERS
Proposed Health Care Reform
Addressing the affordability and availability of health insurance, including reducing the number of
uninsured, is a major initiative of President Obama and the U.S. Congress, and proposals that may
address these issues are pending in the U.S. Congress. The proposals vary and include measures
that would change the dynamics of the health care industry and/or the employers role in the
provision of benefits, such as the potential creation of a new government-run health plan(s) that
would compete with the Company and other private health plans; the potential creation of federal or
state-level exchanges (or similar constructs) that could serve as a distribution mechanism and/or
additional regulatory structure for certain segments of the health care market; potential changes
to medical coverage, such as expansion of eligibility under existing public programs, minimum
medical benefit ratios for health plans, and mandatory issuance of insurance coverage; requirements
that would limit the ability of health plans and insurers to vary premiums based on assessments of
underlying risk; and new taxes and assessments specific to health care insurers and/or certain
benefit plan designs. Any comprehensive health care reform package enacted will likely be phased
in over a number of years and would be subject to a broader regulatory process. Because of the
unsettled nature of these initiatives and the numerous steps required to implement them the Company
remains uncertain as to the ultimate impact these changes will have on its business. For
additional discussion regarding our risks related to health care reform, see Item 1A. Risk
Factors beginning on page 35 of this Form 10-K.
Other Matters
The disability industry is under continuing review by regulators and legislators with respect to
its offset practices regarding Social Security Disability Insurance (SSDI). There has been
specific inquiry as to the industrys role in providing assistance to individuals with their
applications for SSDI. The Company has received one Congressional inquiry and has responded to the
information request. Also, legislation prohibiting the offset of SSDI payments against private
disability insurance payments for prospectively issued policies was introduced but not enacted in
the Connecticut state legislature. The Company is also involved in related pending litigation. If
the industry is forced to change its offset SSDI procedures, the practices and products for the
Companys Disability and Life segment could be significantly impacted.
In 1998, the Company sold its individual life insurance and annuity business to The Lincoln
National Life Insurance Company and its affiliates (Lincoln). Because this business was sold in
an indemnity reinsurance transaction, the Company is not relieved of primary liability for the
reinsured business and had reinsurance recoverables totaling $4.4 billion as of December 31, 2009.
Lincoln has secured approximately 90% of its reinsurance obligations under these arrangements by
placing assets into a trust which qualifies under Regulation 114 of the New York Insurance
Department.
The Companys remaining reinsurance recoverables from Lincoln are unsecured. If Lincoln National
Life Insurance Company and Lincoln Life & Annuity of New York do not maintain a specified financial
strength rating, at the Companys request, Lincoln is contractually required to provide additional
assurance that it will meet its reinsurance obligations, to include placing assets in a trust to
secure these remaining reinsurance recoverables. S&P has assigned each of these reinsurers a
rating of AA-.
79
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial Summary |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Short-term investments |
|
$ |
493 |
|
|
$ |
236 |
|
|
$ |
21 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
924 |
|
|
$ |
1,342 |
|
|
$ |
1,970 |
|
Short-term debt |
|
$ |
104 |
|
|
$ |
301 |
|
|
$ |
3 |
|
Long-term debt |
|
$ |
2,436 |
|
|
$ |
2,090 |
|
|
$ |
1,790 |
|
Shareholders equity |
|
$ |
5,417 |
|
|
$ |
3,592 |
|
|
$ |
4,748 |
|
Liquidity
The Company maintains liquidity at two levels: the subsidiary level and the parent company level.
Liquidity requirements at the subsidiary level generally consist of:
|
|
claim and benefit payments to policyholders; and |
|
|
|
operating expense requirements, primarily for employee compensation and benefits. |
The Companys subsidiaries normally meet their operating requirements by: |
|
|
|
maintaining appropriate levels of cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments; |
|
|
|
using cash flows from operating activities; |
|
|
|
selling investments; |
|
|
|
matching investment durations to those estimated for the related insurance and contractholder liabilities; and |
|
|
|
borrowing from its parent company. |
Liquidity requirements at the parent level generally consist of:
|
|
debt service and dividend payments to shareholders; and |
|
|
|
pension plan funding. |
The parent normally meets its liquidity requirements by:
|
|
maintaining appropriate levels of cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments; |
|
|
|
collecting dividends from its subsidiaries; |
|
|
|
using proceeds from issuance of debt and equity securities; and |
|
|
|
borrowing from its subsidiaries. |
Cash flows for the years ended December 31, were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Operating activities |
|
$ |
745 |
|
|
$ |
1,656 |
|
|
$ |
1,342 |
|
Investing activities |
|
$ |
(1,485 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,572 |
) |
|
$ |
269 |
|
Financing activities |
|
$ |
307 |
|
|
$ |
314 |
|
|
$ |
(1,041 |
) |
Cash flows from operating activities consist of cash receipts and disbursements for premiums
and fees, mail order pharmacy and other revenues, gains (losses) recognized in connection with the
Companys GMDB equity hedge program, investment income, taxes, and benefits and expenses.
Because certain income and expense transactions do not generate cash, and because cash transactions
related to revenue and expenses may occur in periods different from when those revenues and
expenses are recognized in shareholders net income, cash flows from operating activities can be
significantly different from shareholders net income.
80
Cash flows from investing activities generally consist of net investment purchases or sales and net
purchases of property and equipment, which includes capitalized software, as well as cash used to
acquire businesses.
Cash flows from financing activities are generally comprised of issuances and re-payment of debt at
the parent level, proceeds on the issuance of common stock resulting from stock option exercises,
and stock repurchases. In addition, the subsidiaries report net deposits/withdrawals to/from
investment contract liabilities (which include universal life insurance liabilities) because such
liabilities are considered financing activities with policyholders.
2009:
Operating activities
For the year ended December 31, 2009, cash flows from operating activities were less than net
income by $560 million. Net income contains certain after-tax non-cash income and expense items,
including:
|
|
GMIB income of $209 million; |
|
|
|
a curtailment gain of $30 million, net of a cost reduction charge of $29 million; |
|
|
|
tax benefits related to the IRS examination of $20 million; |
|
|
|
depreciation and amortization charges of $174 million; and |
|
|
|
realized investment losses of $26 million. |
Cash flows from operating activities were lower than net income excluding the non-cash items noted
above by $530 million. This decrease was primarily due to pre-tax cash outflows of $282 million
associated with the GMDB equity hedge program which did not affect shareholders net income and
pre-tax contributions to the domestic pension plans of approximately $410 million, partially offset
by the favorable effect of the pension contributions on tax payments.
Cash flows from operating activities decreased by $911 million in 2009 compared with
2008. Excluding the results of the GMDB equity hedge program (which did not affect net income),
cash flows from operating activities decreased by $296 million. This decrease in 2009 primarily
reflects pre-tax contributions to the qualified domestic pension plan of approximately $410 million
for 2009 compared with none for 2008, partially offset by the favorable effect of the pension
contributions on tax payments.
Investing activities
Cash used in investing activities was $1.5 billion. This use of cash primarily consisted of net
purchases of investments of $1.2 billion and net purchases of property and equipment of $307
million.
Financing activities
Cash provided from financing activities primarily consisted of net proceeds from the issuance of
long-term debt of $346 million, partially offset by repayments of short-term debt, principally
commercial paper, of $199 million. Financing activities also included net deposits to
contractholder deposit funds of $89 million and proceeds on issuances of common stock of $30
million.
81
2008:
Operating activities
For the year ended December 31, 2008, cash flows from operating activities were greater than net
income by $1.4 billion. Net income contains certain after-tax non-cash income and expense items,
including:
|
|
GMIB expense of $437 million including the effect of adoption of new fair value measurement
guidance of $131 million; |
|
|
|
GMDB charges of $267 million; |
|
|
|
litigation accruals of $76 million and cost reduction charges of $35 million; |
|
|
|
depreciation and amortization charges of $159 million; and |
|
|
|
realized investment losses of $110 million. |
Cash flows from operating activities were higher than net income excluding the non-cash items noted
above by $278 million. This increase was primarily due to cash inflows associated with the GMDB
equity hedge program of $333 million.
Cash flows from operating activities increased by $314 million in 2008 compared with
2007. Excluding the results of the GMDB equity hedge program (which did not affect net income),
cash flows from operating activities decreased by $51 million. This decrease in 2008 primarily
reflects higher payments for certain prepaid expenses in 2008.
Investing activities
Cash used in investing activities was $2.6 billion, consisting of $1.3 billion to fund the
acquisition of Great-West Healthcare, net purchases of investments of $988 million and net
purchases of property and equipment of $257 million.
Financing activities
Cash provided from financing activities primarily consisted of proceeds from the net issuance of
short-term debt of $298 million and long-term debt of $297 million. These borrowing arrangements
were entered into for general corporate purposes, including the financing of the acquisition of
Great-West Healthcare. Financing activities also included net deposits to contractholder deposit
funds of $91 million, proceeds from the issuance of common stock under the Companys stock plans of
$37 million and dividends on and repurchases of common stock of $392 million.
Interest Expense
Interest expense on long-term debt, short-term debt and capital leases was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Interest expense |
|
$ |
166 |
|
|
$ |
146 |
|
|
$ |
122 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The increase in interest expense in 2009 was primarily due to the issuance of debt used for
general corporate purposes, including the repayment of some of the Companys outstanding commercial
paper issued to finance the acquired business.
The increase in 2008 was primarily due to the issuance of debt in connection with the Great-West
Healthcare acquisition.
82
Capital Resources
The Companys capital resources (primarily retained earnings and the proceeds from the issuance of
debt and equity securities) provide protection for policyholders, furnish the financial strength to
underwrite insurance risks and facilitate continued business growth.
Management, guided by regulatory requirements and rating agency capital guidelines, determines the
amount of capital resources that the Company maintains. Management allocates resources to new
long-term business commitments when returns, considering the risks, look promising and when the
resources available to support existing business are adequate.
The Company prioritizes its use of capital resources to:
|
|
provide capital necessary to support growth and maintain or improve the financial strength
ratings of subsidiaries; |
|
|
consider acquisitions that are strategically and economically advantageous; and |
|
|
return capital to investors through share repurchase. |
The availability of capital resources will be impacted by equity and credit market conditions.
Extreme volatility in credit or equity market conditions may reduce the Companys ability to issue
debt or equity securities. Significant volatility and deterioration of the equity markets during
2008 resulted in reduced retained earnings and the capital available for growth, acquisitions, and
share repurchase.
On May 4, 2009, the Company issued $350 million of 8.50% Notes ($349 million, net of debt discount,
with an effective interest rate of 9.90% per year). The difference between the stated and
effective interest rates primarily reflects the effect of treasury locks. See Note 13 to the
Consolidated Financial Statements for further information. Interest is payable on May 1 and
November 1 of each year beginning November 1, 2009. The proceeds of this debt were used for
general corporate purposes, including the repayment of some of the Companys outstanding commercial
paper. These Notes will mature on May 1, 2019.
On March 4, 2008, the Company issued $300 million of 6.35% Notes (with an effective interest rate
of 6.68% per year). The difference between the stated and effective interest rates primarily
reflects the effect of treasury locks. Interest is payable on March 15 and September 15 of each
year beginning September 15, 2008. The proceeds of this debt were used for general corporate
purposes, including financing the acquisition of Great-West Healthcare. These Notes will mature on
March 15, 2018.
The Company may redeem these Notes, at any time, in whole or in part, at a redemption price equal
to the greater of:
|
|
100% of the principal amount of the Notes to be redeemed; or |
|
|
the present value of the remaining principal and interest payments on the Notes being
redeemed discounted at the applicable Treasury Rate plus 50 basis points (8.5% Notes due 2019)
or 40 basis points (6.35% Notes due 2018). |
On March 14, 2008, the Company entered into a commercial paper program (the Program). Under the
Program, the Company is authorized to sell from time to time short-term unsecured commercial paper
notes up to a maximum of $500 million. The proceeds are used for general corporate purposes,
including working capital, capital expenditures, acquisitions and share repurchases. The Company
uses the credit facility described below as back-up liquidity to support the outstanding commercial
paper. If at any time funds are not available on favorable terms under the Program, the Company
may use the Credit Agreement (see below) for funding. In October 2008, the Company added an
additional dealer to its Program. As of December 31, 2009, the Company had $100 million in
commercial paper outstanding, at a weighted average interest rate of 0.35% and remaining maturities
ranging from 11 to 35 days.
In June 2007, the Company amended and restated its five-year committed revolving credit and letter
of credit agreement for $1.75 billion, which permits up to $1.25 billion to be used for letters of
credit. This agreement is diversified among 22 banks, with three banks each having 11% of the
commitment and the other 21 banks having the remaining 67% of the commitment. The credit agreement
includes options, which are subject to consent by the administrative agent and the committing
banks, to increase the commitment amount up to $2.0 billion and to extend the term of the
agreement. The Company entered into the agreement for general corporate purposes, including support
for the issuance of commercial paper and to obtain statutory reserve credit for certain reinsurance
arrangements. There was a $27 million letter of credit issued as of December 31, 2009.
83
Liquidity and Capital Resources Outlook
At December 31, 2009, there was approximately $475 million in cash available at the parent company
level. In 2010, the parent companys debt service consists of scheduled interest payments of $168
million on outstanding long-term debt of $2.4 billion at December 31, 2009 and approximately $100
million of commercial paper that will mature over the next three months. There are no scheduled
long-term debt repayments in 2010. The Company expects to either repay the commercial paper or
refinance it either by issuing long-term debt or re-issuing commercial paper.
The Company funds its qualified pension plans at least at the minimum amount required by the
Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA) and the Pension Protection Act of 2006.
For 2010, the Company expects minimum required contributions to be approximately $70 million. This
amount could change based on final valuation amounts. In addition, the Company currently plans to
make voluntary contributions of approximately $140 million during 2010. Based on its current
funded status, the Company does not believe that the litigation matter discussed in Note 23 to the
Consolidated Financial Statements would have an impact on 2010 funding requirements even if
resolved in 2010. Future years contributions will ultimately be based on a wide range of factors
including but not limited to asset returns, discount rates, and funding targets.
The availability of resources at the parent company level is partially dependent on dividends from
the Companys subsidiaries, most of which are subject to regulatory restrictions and rating agency
capital guidelines, and partially dependent on the availability of liquidity from the issuance of
debt or equity securities.
The Company expects, based on current projections for cash activity, to have sufficient liquidity
to meet its obligations.
However, the Companys cash projections may not be realized and the demand for funds could exceed
available cash if:
|
|
ongoing businesses experience unexpected shortfalls in earnings; |
|
|
|
regulatory restrictions or rating agency capital guidelines reduce the amount of dividends available to be distributed
to the parent company from the insurance and HMO subsidiaries (including the impact of equity market deterioration and
volatility on subsidiary capital); |
|
|
|
significant disruption or volatility in the capital and credit markets reduces the Companys ability to raise capital
or creates unexpected losses related to the GMDB and GMIB businesses; |
|
|
|
a substantial increase in funding over current projections is required for the Companys pension plan; or |
|
|
|
a substantial increase in funding is required for the Companys GMDB equity hedge program. |
84
In those cases, the Company expects to have the flexibility to satisfy liquidity needs through a
variety of measures, including intercompany borrowings and sales of liquid investments. The parent
company may borrow up to $400 million from CGLIC without prior state approval. In addition, the
Company may use short-term borrowings, such as the commercial paper program and the committed line
of credit agreement of up to $1.75 billion subject to the maximum debt leverage covenant in its
line of credit agreement. As of December 31, 2009, the Company had an additional $1.5 billion of
borrowing capacity within the maximum debt leverage covenant in the line of credit agreement in
addition to the $2.5 billion of debt outstanding.
Though the Company believes it has adequate sources of liquidity, significant disruption or
volatility in the capital and credit markets could affect the Companys ability to access those
markets for additional borrowings or increase costs associated with borrowing funds.
Solvency
regulation. Many states have adopted some form of the National Association of
Insurance Commissioners (NAIC) model solvency-related laws and risk-based capital rules (RBC
rules) for life and health insurance companies. The RBC rules recommend a minimum level of
capital depending on the types and quality of investments held, the types of business written and
the types of liabilities incurred. If the ratio of the insurers adjusted surplus to its
risk-based capital falls below statutory required minimums, the insurer could be subject to
regulatory actions ranging from increased scrutiny to conservatorship.
In addition, various non-U.S. jurisdictions prescribe minimum surplus requirements that are based
upon solvency, liquidity and reserve coverage measures. During 2009, the Companys HMOs and life
and health insurance subsidiaries, as well as non-U.S. insurance subsidiaries, were compliant with
applicable RBC and non-U.S. surplus rules.
Effective December 31, 2009 the Companys principal life insurance subsidiary, CGLIC, implemented
the NAICs Actuarial Guideline XLIII (also known as AG 43 or VACARVM), which is applicable to
CGLICs statutory reserves for GMDB and GMIB contracts totaling $1.6 billion as of December 31,
2009. As provided under this guidance, CGLIC received approval from the State of Connecticut to
grade-in the full effect of the guideline over a 3-year period. Accordingly, upon implementation
at December 31, 2009, statutory surplus for CGLIC was reduced by $40 million. If the guidance had
been fully implemented at December 31, 2009, statutory surplus would have been reduced by $110
million. Management does not anticipate that this implementation will have a material impact on
the amount of dividends expected to be paid by CGLIC to the parent company in 2010. This
implementation has no impact on measurement of the Companys results of operations or financial
condition as determined under GAAP.
Guarantees and Contractual Obligations
The Company is contingently liable for various contractual obligations entered into in the ordinary
course of business. The maturities of the Companys primary contractual cash obligations, as of
December 31, 2009, are estimated to be as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions, on an |
|
|
|
|
|
Less than 1 |
|
|
1-3 |
|
|
4-5 |
|
|
After 5 |
|
undiscounted basis) |
|
Total |
|
|
year |
|
|
years |
|
|
years |
|
|
years |
|
On-Balance Sheet: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Insurance liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contractholder deposit funds |
|
$ |
7,613 |
|
|
$ |
667 |
|
|
$ |
840 |
|
|
$ |
769 |
|
|
$ |
5,337 |
|
Future policy benefits |
|
|
11,040 |
|
|
|
452 |
|
|
|
852 |
|
|
|
860 |
|
|
|
8,876 |
|
Health Care medical claims
payable |
|
|
921 |
|
|
|
914 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unpaid claims and claims
expenses |
|
|
4,315 |
|
|
|
1,292 |
|
|
|
941 |
|
|
|
606 |
|
|
|
1,476 |
|
Short-term debt |
|
|
103 |
|
|
|
103 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
4,620 |
|
|
|
168 |
|
|
|
753 |
|
|
|
278 |
|
|
|
3,421 |
|
Non-recourse obligations |
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other long-term liabilities |
|
|
1,355 |
|
|
|
617 |
|
|
|
218 |
|
|
|
134 |
|
|
|
386 |
|
Off-Balance Sheet: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase obligations |
|
|
1,173 |
|
|
|
495 |
|
|
|
483 |
|
|
|
144 |
|
|
|
51 |
|
Operating leases |
|
|
500 |
|
|
|
116 |
|
|
|
190 |
|
|
|
104 |
|
|
|
90 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
31,665 |
|
|
$ |
4,826 |
|
|
$ |
4,307 |
|
|
$ |
2,895 |
|
|
$ |
19,637 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
85
On-Balance Sheet:
|
|
Insurance liabilities. Contractual cash obligations for insurance liabilities, excluding
unearned premiums and fees, represent estimated net benefit payments for health, life and
disability insurance policies and annuity contracts. Recorded contractholder deposit funds
reflect current fund balances primarily from universal life customers. Contractual cash
obligations for these universal life contracts are estimated by projecting future payments
using assumptions for lapse, withdrawal and mortality. These projected future payments
include estimated future interest crediting on current fund balances based on current
investment yields less the estimated cost of insurance charges and mortality and
administrative fees. Actual obligations in any single year will vary based on actual
morbidity, mortality, lapse, withdrawal, investment and premium experience. The sum of the
obligations presented above exceeds the corresponding insurance and contractholder liabilities
of $15.3 billion recorded on the balance sheet because the recorded insurance liabilities
reflect discounting for interest and the recorded contractholder liabilities exclude future
interest crediting, charges and fees. The Company manages its investment portfolios to
generate cash flows needed to satisfy contractual obligations. Any shortfall from expected
investment yields could result in increases to recorded reserves and adversely impact results
of operations. The amounts associated with the sold retirement benefits and individual life
insurance and annuity businesses are excluded from the table above as net cash flows
associated with them are not expected to impact the Company. The total amount of these
reinsured reserves excluded is approximately $6.2 billion. |
|
|
Short-term debt represents commercial paper and current obligations under capital leases. |
|
|
Long-term debt includes scheduled interest payments. Capital leases are included in
long-term debt and represent obligations for software licenses. |
|
|
Nonrecourse obligations represent principal and interest payments due which may be limited
to the value of specified assets, such as real estate properties held directly or in joint
ventures. |
|
|
Other long-term liabilities. These items are presented in accounts payable, accrued
expenses and other liabilities in the Companys Consolidated Balance Sheets. This table
includes estimated payments for GMIB contracts, pension and other postretirement and
postemployment benefit obligations, supplemental and deferred compensation plans, interest
rate and foreign currency swap contracts, and certain tax and reinsurance liabilities. |
Estimated payments of $127 million for deferred compensation, non-qualified and International
pension plans and other postretirement and postemployment benefit plans are expected to be paid
in less than one year. The Companys best estimate is that contributions to the qualified
domestic pension plan during 2010 will be approximately $210 million. The Company expects to
make payments subsequent to 2010 for these obligations, however subsequent payments have been
excluded from the table as their timing is based on plan assumptions which may materially differ
from actual activities (see Note 10 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further
information on pension and other postretirement benefit obligations).
The above table also does not contain $214 million of gross liabilities for uncertain tax
positions because the Company cannot reasonably estimate the timing of their resolution with the
respective taxing authorities. See Note 19 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for the
year ended December 31, 2009 for further information.
Off-Balance Sheet:
|
|
Purchase obligations. As of December 31, 2009, purchase obligations consisted of estimated
payments required under contractual arrangements for future services and investment
commitments as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
|
|
|
Fixed maturities |
|
$ |
72 |
|
Commercial mortgage loans |
|
|
41 |
|
Real estate |
|
|
10 |
|
Limited liability entities (other long-term investments) |
|
|
591 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total investment commitments |
|
|
714 |
|
Future service commitments |
|
|
459 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total purchase obligations |
|
$ |
1,173 |
|
|
|
|
|
86
The Company had commitments to invest in limited liability entities that hold real estate,
loans to real estate entities or securities. See Note 12(C) to the Consolidated Financial
Statements for additional information.
Future service commitments include an agreement with IBM for various information technology (IT)
infrastructure services. The Companys remaining commitment under this contract is
approximately $376 million over the next four years. The Company has the ability to terminate
this agreement with 90 days notice, subject to termination fees.
|
|
The Companys remaining estimated future service commitments primarily represent contracts for
certain outsourced business processes and IT maintenance and support. The Company generally has
the ability to terminate these agreements, but does not anticipate doing so at this time.
Purchase obligations exclude contracts that are cancelable without penalty or those that do not
specify minimum levels of goods or services to be purchased. |
|
|
Operating leases. For additional information, see Note 21 to the Consolidated Financial
Statements. |
Guarantees
The Company, through its subsidiaries, is contingently liable for various financial and other
guarantees provided in the ordinary course of business. See Note 23 to the Consolidated Financial
Statements for additional information on guarantees.
Share Repurchase
The Company maintains a share repurchase program, which was authorized by its Board of Directors.
The decision to repurchase shares depends on market conditions and alternative uses of capital.
The Company has, and may continue from time to time, to repurchase shares on the open market
through a Rule 10b5-1 plan which permits a company to repurchase its shares at times when it
otherwise might be precluded from doing so under insider trading laws or because of self-imposed
trading blackout periods.
The Company did not repurchase any shares in 2009. In 2008 the Company repurchased 10.0 million
shares for $378 million.
The total remaining share repurchase authorization as of February 25, 2010, was $449 million.
INVESTMENT ASSETS
The Companys investment assets do not include separate account assets. Additional information
regarding the Companys investment assets and related accounting policies is included in Notes 2,
11, 12, 14 and 17 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Fixed Maturities
Investments in fixed maturities (bonds) include publicly traded and privately placed debt
securities, mortgage and other asset-backed securities, preferred stocks redeemable by the investor
and trading securities. Fixed maturities and equity securities include hybrid securities. Fair
values are based on quoted market prices when available. When market prices are not available,
fair value is generally estimated using discounted cash flow analyses, incorporating current market
inputs for similar financial instruments with comparable terms and credit quality. In instances
where there is little or no market activity for the same or similar instruments, the Company
estimates fair value using methods, models and assumptions that the Company believes a hypothetical
market participant would use to determine a current transaction price.
The Company performs ongoing analyses on prices to conclude that they represent reasonable
estimates of fair value. This process involves quantitative and qualitative analysis and is
overseen by the Companys investment professionals. This process also includes review of pricing
methodologies, pricing statistics and trends and back testing recent trades.
The Companys fixed maturity portfolio continues to be diversified by issuer and industry type,
with no single industry constituting more than 10% of total invested assets as of December 31,
2009.
87
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Federal government and agency |
|
$ |
571 |
|
|
$ |
762 |
|
State and local government |
|
|
2,521 |
|
|
|
2,486 |
|
Foreign government |
|
|
1,070 |
|
|
|
944 |
|
Corporate |
|
|
8,585 |
|
|
|
6,856 |
|
Federal agency mortgage-backed |
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
37 |
|
Other mortgage-backed |
|
|
121 |
|
|
|
125 |
|
Other asset-backed |
|
|
541 |
|
|
|
571 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
13,443 |
|
|
$ |
11,781 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other mortgage-backed assets consist principally of commercial mortgage-backed securities and
collateralized mortgage obligations of which $37 million were residential mortgages and home equity
lines of credit, all of which were originated using standard underwriting practices and are not
considered sub-prime loans.
Quality ratings
As of December 31, 2009, $12.3 billion, or 92%, of the fixed maturities in the Companys investment
portfolio were investment grade (Baa and above, or equivalent), and the remaining $1.1 billion were
below investment grade. Most of the bonds that are below investment grade are rated at the higher
end of the non-investment grade spectrum.
Private placement investments are generally less marketable than publicly-traded bonds, but yields
on these investments tend to be higher than yields on publicly-traded bonds with comparable credit
risk. The fair value of private placement investments was $5.1 billion as of December 31, 2009 and
$4.4 billion as of December 31, 2008. The Company maintains controls on its participation in
private placement investments. In particular, the Company performs a credit analysis of each
issuer, diversifies investments by industry and issuer and requires financial and other covenants
that allow the Company to monitor issuers for deteriorating financial strength so the Company can
take remedial actions, if warranted.
Because of the higher yields and the inherent risk associated with privately placed investments and
below investment grade securities, gains or losses from such investments could affect future
results of operations. However, since management matches the duration of assets to the duration of
liabilities, it expects to hold a significant portion of these assets for the long term and
therefore, does not expect such gains or losses to be material to the Companys liquidity or
financial condition.
The value of the Companys fixed maturity portfolio increased $574 million in 2009 driven by a
decline in market yields. Although asset values have improved significantly, there are securities
with amortized cost in excess of fair value by $133 million as of December 31, 2009.
As of December 31, 2009, approximately 64% or $1,605 million of the Companys total investments in
state and local government securities of $2,521 million were guaranteed by monoline bond insurers.
The quality ratings of these investments with and without this guaranteed support as of December
31, 2009 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
|
|
|
With |
|
|
Without |
|
(In millions) |
|
Quality Rating |
|
Guarantee |
|
|
Guarantee |
|
State and local governments |
|
Aaa |
|
$ |
61 |
|
|
$ |
59 |
|
|
|
Aa1-Aa3 |
|
|
1,143 |
|
|
|
971 |
|
|
|
A1-A3 |
|
|
341 |
|
|
|
448 |
|
|
|
Baa1-Baa3 |
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
72 |
|
|
|
Not available |
|
|
|
|
|
|
55 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total state and local
governments |
|
|
|
$ |
1,605 |
|
|
$ |
1,605 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
88
As of December 31, 2009, approximately 79% or $428 million of the Companys total investments
in other asset-backed securities of $541 million were guaranteed by monoline bond insurers. All of
these securities had quality ratings of Baa2 or better. Quality ratings without considering the
guarantees for these other asset-backed securities were not available.
As of December 31, 2009, the Company had no direct investments in monoline bond insurers.
Guarantees provided by various monoline bond insurers for certain of the Companys investments in
state and local governments and other asset-backed securities as of December 31, 2009 were:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
Guarantor Quality |
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2009 |
|
Guarantor |
|
Rating |
|
|
|
|
|
Indirect Exposure |
|
AMBAC |
|
Caa2 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
196 |
|
MBIA, Inc. |
|
Baa1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,204 |
|
Financial
Securities
Assurance |
|
Aa3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
594 |
|
Financial Guaranty
Insurance Co. |
|
Not rated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,033 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company continues to underwrite investments in these securities focusing on the underlying
issuers credit quality, without regard for guarantees. As such, this portfolio of state and local
government securities, guaranteed by monoline bond insurers is of high quality with approximately
92% rated A3 or better without their guarantees.
Commercial Mortgage Loans
The Companys commercial mortgage loans are made exclusively to commercial borrowers. These fixed
rate loans are diversified by property type, location and borrower to reduce exposure to potential
losses. Loans are secured by the related property and are generally made at less than 75% of the
propertys value at origination of the loan. In addition to property value, the Company evaluates
the quality of each commercial mortgage loan using debt service coverage, which is the ratio of
the estimated cash flows from the property to the required loan
payments (principal and interest).
The Company completed its annual in depth review of its commercial mortgage loan portfolio in the
third quarter of 2009. This review included an analysis of each propertys financial statements as
of December 31, 2008, rent rolls and operating plans and budgets for 2009, a physical inspection of
the property and other pertinent factors. Based on each propertys value determined during this
review, the portfolios average loan to value ratio increased from 64% as of December 31, 2008 to
77% at December 31, 2009, driven by an average decline in property values of 18% since completion
of the previous review during the third quarter of 2008. This 18% decrease is less than reported
declines in commercial real estate values of 20% to 30% from peak prices achieved in late 2006 and
into early 2007 to real estate values estimated during the second quarter of 2009. This was driven
by managements decision to not fully reflect peak prices in prior valuations, along with declines
in value recognized during the Companys 2008 portfolio review. In 2009, overall debt service
coverage for the portfolio of commercial mortgage loans was approximately 1.5, which was unchanged
since the 2008 portfolio review.
89
The following table reflects the commercial mortgage loan portfolio as of December 31, 2009
summarized by loan to value ratio based on the annual loan review completed in July, 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loan to Value Distribution |
|
|
|
Amortized Cost |
|
|
|
|
Loan to Value Ratios |
|
Senior |
|
|
Subordinated |
|
|
Total |
|
|
% of Mortgage Loans |
|
Below 50% |
|
$ |
199 |
|
|
$ |
164 |
|
|
$ |
363 |
|
|
|
10 |
% |
50% to 59% |
|
|
309 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
309 |
|
|
|
9 |
% |
60% to 69% |
|
|
383 |
|
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
420 |
|
|
|
12 |
% |
70% to 79% |
|
|
524 |
|
|
|
72 |
|
|
|
596 |
|
|
|
17 |
% |
80% to 89% |
|
|
838 |
|
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
885 |
|
|
|
25 |
% |
90% to 99% |
|
|
666 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
683 |
|
|
|
19 |
% |
100% or above |
|
|
251 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
266 |
|
|
|
8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Totals |
|
$ |
3,170 |
|
|
$ |
352 |
|
|
$ |
3,522 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As summarized above, $352 million or 10% of the commercial mortgage loan portfolio is
comprised of subordinated notes and loans, including $319 million of loans secured by first
mortgages, which were fully underwritten and originated by the Company using its standard
underwriting procedures. Senior interests in these first mortgage loans were then sold to other
institutional investors. This strategy allowed the Company to effectively utilize its origination
capabilities to underwrite high quality loans with strong borrower sponsorship, limit individual
loan exposures, and achieve attractive risk adjusted yields. In the event of a default, the Company
would pursue remedies up to and including foreclosure jointly with the holders of the senior
interests, but would receive repayment only after satisfaction of the senior interest.
There are seven loans where the aggregate carrying value of the mortgage loans exceeds the value of
the underlying properties by $16 million. Five of these loans have current debt service coverage of
1.0 or greater and two with debt service coverage below 1.0 have other mitigating factors including
strong borrower sponsorship.
Although the property value declines increased the portfolio loan to value ratios, all but four of
the approximately 180 loans that comprise the Companys total mortgage loan portfolio continue to
perform under their contractual terms, and the actual aggregate default rate is 3.6%. Given the
quality and diversity of the underlying real estate, positive debt service coverage, significant
borrower cash investment averaging nearly 30%, and only $201 million of loans maturing in the next
twelve months, the Company remains confident that the vast majority of borrowers will continue to
perform as required.
Commercial real estate fundamentals and values continued to decline in 2009 after completion of the
portfolio review in the third quarter. While the vast majority of loans in the Companys portfolio
have positive debt service coverage of at least 1.0, the Company expects declines in debt service
coverage to reflect further deterioration in fundamentals (higher vacancy rates and lower rental
rates) resulting from ongoing weak economic conditions. Managements current view is that property
values have fallen by approximately 10% on average from values estimated as part of the third
quarter 2009 portfolio review. However, the value of well located, well leased, institutional
quality real estate appears to be stabilizing. See Critical Accounting Estimates beginning on page
55 of this Form 10-K for more information on the effect of declines in property values on
commercial mortgage loans.
Other Long-term Investments
The Companys other long-term investments include $561 million in private equity and real estate
funds as well as direct investments in real estate joint ventures. The funds typically invest in
mezzanine debt or equity of privately held companies and equity real estate. Because these
investments have a subordinate position in the capital structure, the Company assumes a higher
level of risk for higher expected returns. Many of these entities have experienced a decline in
value over the last several quarters due to economic weakness and the disruption in the capital
markets. To mitigate risk, these investments are diversified across approximately 60 separate
partnerships, and approximately 35 general partners who manage one or more of these partnerships.
Also, the funds underlying investments are diversified by industry sector, property type, and
geographic region. No single partnership investment exceeds 8% of the Companys private equity and
real estate partnership portfolio. Given the current economic environment, future impairments are
possible; however, management does not expect those losses to have a material effect on the
Companys financial condition.
90
Problem and Potential Problem Investments
Problem bonds and commercial mortgage loans are either delinquent by 60 days or more or have been
restructured as to terms (interest rate or maturity date). Potential problem bonds and
commercial mortgage loans are considered current (no payment more than 59 days past due), but
management believes they have certain characteristics that increase the likelihood that they may
become problems. The characteristics management considers include, but are not limited to, the
following:
|
|
request from the borrower for restructuring; |
|
|
principal or interest payments past due by more than 30 but fewer than 60 days; |
|
|
downgrade in credit rating; |
|
|
collateral losses on asset-backed securities; and |
|
|
for commercial mortgages, deterioration of debt service coverage below 1.0 or value
declines resulting in estimated loan-to-value ratios increasing to 100% or more. |
The Company recognizes interest income on problem bonds and commercial mortgage loans only when
payment is actually received because of the risk profile of the underlying investment. The amount
that would have been reflected in net income if interest on non-accrual investments had been
recognized in accordance with the original terms was not significant for 2009 or 2008.
The following table shows problem and potential problem investments at amortized cost, net of
valuation reserves and write-downs:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
(In millions) |
|
Gross |
|
|
Reserve |
|
|
Net |
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Reserve |
|
|
Net |
|
Problem bonds |
|
$ |
103 |
|
|
$ |
(49 |
) |
|
$ |
54 |
|
|
$ |
94 |
|
|
$ |
(59 |
) |
|
$ |
35 |
|
Problem commercial mortgage loans |
|
|
169 |
|
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
158 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreclosed real estate |
|
|
59 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
59 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total problem investments |
|
$ |
331 |
|
|
$ |
(60 |
) |
|
$ |
271 |
|
|
$ |
94 |
|
|
$ |
(59 |
) |
|
$ |
35 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Potential problem bonds |
|
$ |
94 |
|
|
$ |
(10 |
) |
|
$ |
84 |
|
|
$ |
140 |
|
|
$ |
(14 |
) |
|
$ |
126 |
|
Potential problem commercial
mortgage loans |
|
|
245 |
|
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
239 |
|
|
|
92 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
92 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total potential problem investments |
|
$ |
339 |
|
|
$ |
(16 |
) |
|
$ |
323 |
|
|
$ |
232 |
|
|
$ |
(14 |
) |
|
$ |
218 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net problem investments represent 1.5% of total investments excluding policy loans. Net
problem investments increased $236 million during 2009 primarily reflecting deterioration on six
commercial mortgage loans totaling $217 million, one of which is held as foreclosed real estate.
Net potential problem investments represent 1.8% of total investments excluding policy loans. Net
potential problem investments increased $105 million during 2009 primarily reflecting the addition
of nine loans totaling $169 million to the potential problem loan list that were exhibiting signs
of distress such as an elevated loan to value ratio or a low or negative debt service coverage.
These loans were all performing according to their original contractual terms as of December 31,
2009 and although they are showing signs of distress, most of these loans are adequately
collateralized. These additional nine loans were added to potential problem investments as a
result of managements in-depth commercial mortgage loan portfolio review completed in the third
quarter of 2009.
91
Commercial mortgage loans are considered impaired when it is probable that the Company will not
collect amounts due according to the terms of the original loan agreement. Problem and potential
problem commercial mortgage loans totaling $222 million, presented in the above table, are
considered impaired. During 2009, the Company recorded a $17 million pre-tax ($11 million
after-tax) increase to valuation reserves on impaired commercial mortgage loans. See Note 12 to
the Consolidated Financial Statements and the Critical Accounting Estimates section of the MD&A
beginning on page 55 of this Form 10-K for additional information regarding impaired commercial
mortgage loans.
Summary
The Company recorded after-tax realized investment losses for investment asset write-downs and
changes in valuation reserves as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Credit-related (1) |
|
$ |
61 |
|
|
$ |
44 |
|
Other (2) |
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
97 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total (3) |
|
$ |
69 |
|
|
$ |
141 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Credit-related losses
include other-than-temporary
declines in value of fixed
maturities and equity
securities, and impairments
of commercial mortgage loans
and real estate entities.
The amount related to credit
losses on fixed maturities
for which a portion of the
impairment was recognized in
other comprehensive income
was not significant. |
|
(2) |
|
Prior to adoption of new
GAAP guidance for
other-than-temporary
impairments on April 1,
2009, Other primarily
represented the impact of
rising market yields on
investments where the
Company could not
demonstrate the intent and
ability to hold until
recovery. |
|
(3) |
|
Includes
other-than-temporary
impairments on debt
securities of $31 million in
2009, $138 million in 2008
and $20 million in 2007.
These impairments are
included in both the credit
related and other categories
above. |
The financial markets experienced a significant improvement during 2009. Both investment
grade and below investment grade corporate credit indices reported significantly lower credit
spreads and the S&P 500 posted a return of approximately 25% during this period. While credit
spreads tightened in 2009 and asset values increased significantly, substantial uncertainty remains
concerning the economic environment. As a result of this economic environment, risks in the
Companys investment portfolio remain elevated.
Continued economic weakness for an extended period could cause default rates to increase and
recoveries to decline resulting in additional impairment losses for the Company. Future realized
and unrealized investment results will be impacted largely by market conditions that exist when a
transaction occurs or at the reporting date. These future conditions are not reasonably
predictable. Management believes that the vast majority of the Companys fixed maturity
investments will continue to perform under their contractual terms, and that declines in their fair
values below carrying value are temporary. Based on the strategy to match the duration of invested
assets to the duration of insurance and contractholder liabilities, the Company expects to hold a
significant portion of these assets for the long term. Therefore, future credit-related losses are
not expected to have a material adverse effect on the Companys liquidity or financial condition.
While management believes the commercial mortgage loan portfolio is positioned to perform well due
to the solid aggregate loan to value ratio, strong debt service coverage and minimal underwater
position, the commercial real estate market continues to exhibit significant signs of distress and
if these conditions remain for an extended period or worsen substantially, it could result in an
increase in problem and potential problem loans. Given the current economic environment, future
impairments are possible; however, management does not expect those losses to have a material
effect on the Companys financial condition.
92
MARKET RISK
Financial Instruments
The Companys assets and liabilities include financial instruments subject to the risk of potential
losses from adverse changes in market rates and prices. The Companys primary market risk
exposures are:
|
|
Interest-rate risk on fixed-rate, domestic, medium-term instruments. Changes in market
interest rates affect the value of instruments that promise a fixed return and impact the
value of liabilities for reinsured GMDB and GMIB contracts. |
|
|
Foreign currency exchange rate risk of the U.S. dollar primarily to the South Korean won,
Taiwan dollar, euro, British pound, New Zealand dollar, and Hong Kong dollar. An unfavorable
change in exchange rates reduces the carrying value of net assets denominated in foreign
currencies. |
|
|
Equity price risk for domestic equity securities and for the value of reinsured GMDB and
GMIB contracts resulting from unfavorable changes in variable annuity account values based on
underlying mutual fund investments. |
For further discussion of reinsured contracts, see Note 7 for GMDB contracts and Note 11 for GMIB
contracts in the Consolidated Financial Statements.
The Companys Management of Market Risks
The Company predominantly relies on three techniques to manage its exposure to market risk:
|
|
Investment/liability matching. The Company generally selects investment assets with
characteristics (such as duration, yield, currency and liquidity) that correspond to the
underlying characteristics of its related insurance and contractholder liabilities so that the
Company can match the investments to its obligations. Shorter-term investments support
generally shorter-term life and health liabilities. Medium-term, fixed-rate investments
support interest-sensitive and health liabilities. Longer-term investments generally support
products with longer pay out periods such as annuities and long-term disability liabilities. |
|
|
Use of local currencies for foreign operations. The Company generally conducts its
international business through foreign operating entities that maintain assets and liabilities
in local currencies. While this technique does not reduce the Companys foreign currency
exposure of its net assets, it substantially limits exchange rate risk to those net assets. |
|
|
Use of derivatives. The Company generally uses derivative financial instruments to
minimize certain market risks and, from time to time, to enhance investment returns. |
See Notes 2(C) and 13 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information about
financial instruments, including derivative financial instruments.
Effect of Market Fluctuations on the Company
The examples that follow illustrate the effect of hypothetical changes in market rates or prices on
the fair value of certain financial instruments including:
|
|
hypothetical changes in market interest rates, primarily for fixed maturities and
commercial mortgage loans, partially offset by liabilities for long-term debt and GMIB
contracts; |
|
|
hypothetical changes in market rates for foreign currencies, primarily for the net assets
of foreign subsidiaries denominated in a foreign currency; and |
|
|
hypothetical changes in market prices for equity exposures, primarily for equity securities
and GMIB contracts. |
In addition, hypothetical effects of changes in equity indices and foreign exchange rates are
presented separately for futures contracts used in the GMDB equity hedge program.
93
Management believes that actual results could differ materially from these examples because:
|
|
these examples were developed using estimates and assumptions; |
|
|
changes in the fair values of all insurance-related assets and liabilities have been
excluded because their primary risks are insurance rather than market risk; |
|
|
changes in the fair values of investments recorded using the equity method of accounting
and liabilities for pension and other postretirement and postemployment benefit plans (and
related assets) have been excluded, consistent with the disclosure guidance; and |
|
|
changes in the fair values of other significant assets and liabilities such as goodwill,
deferred policy acquisition costs, taxes, and various accrued liabilities have been excluded;
because they are not financial instruments, their primary risks are other than market risk. |
The effects of hypothetical changes in market rates or prices on the fair values of certain of the
Companys financial instruments, subject to the exclusions noted above (particularly insurance
liabilities), would have been as follows as of December 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Market scenario for |
|
|
|
|
|
certain non-insurance |
|
Loss in fair value |
|
financial
instruments (in millions) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
100 basis point increase in
interest rates |
|
$ |
700 |
|
|
$ |
700 |
|
10% strengthening in U.S.
dollar to foreign currencies |
|
$ |
190 |
|
|
$ |
160 |
|
10% decrease in market prices
for equity exposures |
|
$ |
50 |
|
|
$ |
50 |
|
The Companys foreign operations hold investment assets, such as fixed maturities, that are
generally invested in the currency of the related liabilities. Due to the increase in the fair
value of these investments in 2009, which are primarily denominated in the South Korean won, the
effect of a hypothetical 10% strengthening in U.S. dollar to foreign currencies at December 31,
2009 was greater than that effect at December 31, 2008.
The effect of a hypothetical increase in interest rates was determined by estimating the present
value of future cash flows using various models, primarily duration modeling and, for GMIB
contracts, stochastic modeling. The effect of a hypothetical strengthening of the U.S. dollar
relative to the foreign currencies held by the Company was estimated to be 10% of the U.S. dollar
equivalent fair value. The effect of a hypothetical decrease in the market prices of equity
exposures was estimated based on a 10% decrease in the equity mutual fund values underlying
guaranteed minimum income benefits reinsured by the Company and a 10% decrease in the value of
equity securities held by the Company. See Note 11 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for
additional information.
The Company uses futures contracts as part of a GMDB equity hedge program to substantially reduce
the effect of equity market changes on certain reinsurance contracts that guarantee minimum death
benefits based on unfavorable changes in underlying variable annuity account values. The
hypothetical effect of a 10% increase in the S&P 500, S&P 400, Russell 2000, NASDAQ, TOPIX
(Japanese), EUROSTOXX and FTSE (British) equity indices and a 10% weakening in the U.S. dollar to
the Japanese yen, British pound and euro would have been a decrease of approximately $100 million
in the fair value of the futures contracts outstanding under this program as of December 31, 2009.
A corresponding decrease in liabilities for GMDB contracts would result from the hypothetical 10%
increase in these equity indices and 10% weakening in the U.S. dollar. See Note 7 to the
Consolidated Financial Statements for further discussion of this program and related GMDB
contracts.
As noted above, the Company manages its exposures to market risk by matching investment
characteristics to its obligations.
Stock Market Performance
The performance of equity markets can have a significant effect on the Companys businesses,
including on:
|
|
risks and exposures associated with GMDB (see Note 7 to the Consolidated Financial
Statements) and GMIB contracts (see Note 11 to the Consolidated Financial Statements); and |
|
|
pension liabilities since equity securities comprise a significant portion of the assets of
the Companys employee pension plans. |
94
CAUTIONARY STATEMENT FOR PURPOSES OF THE SAFE HARBOR PROVISIONS OF THE
PRIVATE SECURITIES LITIGATION REFORM ACT OF 1995
CIGNA Corporation and its subsidiaries (the Company) and its representatives may from time to
time make written and oral forward-looking statements, including statements contained in press
releases, in the Companys filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, in its reports to
shareholders and in meetings with analysts and investors. Forward-looking statements may contain
information about financial prospects, economic conditions, trends and other uncertainties. These
forward-looking statements are based on managements beliefs and assumptions and on information
available to management at the time the statements are or were made. Forward-looking statements
include but are not limited to the information concerning possible or assumed future business
strategies, financing plans, competitive position, potential growth opportunities, potential
operating performance improvements, trends and, in particular, the Companys productivity
initiatives, litigation and other legal matters, operational improvement initiatives in the health
care operations, and the outlook for the Companys results for full year 2010 and beyond.
Forward-looking statements include all statements that are not historical facts and can be
identified by the use of forward-looking terminology such as the words believe, expect, plan,
intend, anticipate, estimate, predict, potential, may, should or similar expressions.
You should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements. The Company cautions that
actual results could differ materially from those that management expects, depending on the outcome
of certain factors. Some factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from the
forward-looking statements include:
|
1. |
|
increased medical costs that are higher than anticipated in establishing premium rates in the
Companys health care operations, including increased use and costs of medical services; |
|
|
2. |
|
increased medical, administrative, technology or other costs resulting from new legislative
and regulatory requirements imposed on the Companys employee benefits businesses; |
|
|
3. |
|
challenges and risks associated with implementing operational improvement initiatives and
strategic actions in the ongoing operations of the businesses, including those related to: (i)
growth in targeted geographies, product lines, buying segments and distribution channels, (ii)
offering products that meet emerging market needs, (iii) strengthening underwriting and
pricing effectiveness, (iv) strengthening medical cost and medical membership results, (v)
delivering quality member and provider service using effective technology solutions, (vi)
lowering administrative costs and (vii) transitioning to an integrated operating company
model, including operating efficiencies related to the transition; |
|
|
4. |
|
risks associated with pending and potential state and federal class action lawsuits, disputes
regarding reinsurance arrangements, other litigation and regulatory actions challenging the
Companys businesses, including disputes related to payments to providers, government
investigations and proceedings, and tax audits and related litigation; |
|
|
5. |
|
heightened competition, particularly price competition, which could reduce product margins
and constrain growth in the Companys businesses, primarily the Health Care business; |
|
|
6. |
|
risks associated with the Companys mail order pharmacy business which, among other things,
includes any potential operational deficiencies or service issues as well as loss or
suspension of state pharmacy licenses; |
|
|
7. |
|
significant changes in interest rates and deterioration in the loan to value ratios of
commercial real estate investments for a sustained period of time; |
|
|
8. |
|
downgrades in the financial strength ratings of the Companys insurance subsidiaries, which
could, among other things, adversely affect new sales and retention of current business as
well as the downgrade in the financial strength ratings of reinsurers which could result in
increased statutory reserve or capital requirements; |
|
|
9. |
|
limitations on the ability of the Companys insurance subsidiaries to dividend capital to the
parent company as a result of downgrades in the subsidiaries financial strength ratings,
changes in statutory reserve or capital requirements or other financial constraints; |
|
|
10. |
|
the inability of the hedge program adopted by the Company to substantially reduce equity
market risks for reinsurance contracts that guarantee minimum death benefits under certain
variable annuities (including possible market difficulties in entering into appropriate
futures contracts and in matching such contracts to the underlying equity risk); |
|
|
11. |
|
adjustments to the reserve assumptions (including lapse, partial surrender, mortality,
interest rates and volatility) used in estimating the Companys liabilities for reinsurance
contracts covering guaranteed minimum death benefits under certain variable annuities; |
|
|
12. |
|
adjustments to the assumptions (including annuity election rates and amounts collectible
from reinsurers) used in estimating the Companys assets and liabilities for reinsurance
contracts covering guaranteed minimum income benefits under certain variable annuities; |
|
|
13. |
|
significant stock market declines, which could, among other things, result in increased
expenses for guaranteed minimum income benefit contracts, guaranteed minimum death benefit
contracts and the Companys pension plan in future periods as well as the recognition of
additional pension obligations; |
|
|
14. |
|
unfavorable claims experience related to workers compensation and personal accident
exposures of the run-off reinsurance business, including losses attributable to the inability
to recover claims from retrocessionaires; |
95
|
15. |
|
significant deterioration in economic conditions and significant market volatility, which
could have an adverse effect on the Companys operations, investments, liquidity and access to
capital markets; |
|
|
16. |
|
significant deterioration in economic conditions and significant market volatility, which
could have an adverse effect on the businesses of our customers (including the amount and type
of healthcare services provided to their workforce and our customers ability to pay
receivables) and our vendors (including their ability to provide services); |
|
|
17. |
|
changes in public policy and in the political environment, which could affect state and
federal law, including legislative and regulatory proposals related to health care issues
(including health care reform legislation that could include, among other items, a broad based
public sector alternative and/or alternative assessments and tax increases specific to the
Companys industry), which could increase cost and affect the market for the Companys health
care products and services; and amendments to income tax laws, which could affect the taxation
of employer provided benefits and certain insurance products such as corporate-owned life
insurance; |
|
|
18. |
|
potential public health epidemics and bio-terrorist activity, which could, among other
things, cause the Companys covered medical and disability expenses, pharmacy costs and
mortality experience to rise significantly, and cause operational disruption, depending on the
severity of the event and number of individuals affected; |
|
|
19. |
|
risks associated with security or interruption of information systems, which could, among
other things, cause operational disruption; |
|
|
20. |
|
challenges and risks associated with the successful management of the Companys outsourcing
projects or key vendors, including the agreement with IBM for provision of technology
infrastructure and related services; |
|
|
21. |
|
the ability to successfully integrate and operate the businesses acquired from Great-West by,
among other things, renewing insurance and administrative services contracts on competitive
terms, retaining and growing membership, realizing revenue, expense and other synergies,
successfully leveraging the information technology platform of the acquired businesses, and
retaining key personnel; and |
|
|
22. |
|
the ability of the Company to execute its growth plans by successfully managing Great-West
Healthcares outsourcing projects and leveraging the Companys capabilities and those of the
businesses acquired from Great-West to further enhance the combined organizations network
access position, underwriting effectiveness, delivery of quality member and provider service,
and increased penetration of its membership base with differentiated product offerings. |
This list of important factors is not intended to be exhaustive. Other sections of the Form 10-K,
including the Risk Factors section, and other documents filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission include both expanded discussion of these factors and additional risk factors and
uncertainties that could preclude the Company from realizing the forward-looking statements. The
Company does not assume any obligation to update any forward-looking statements, whether as a
result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as required by law.
96
Managements Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
Management of CIGNA Corporation (the Company) is responsible for establishing and maintaining
adequate internal controls over financial reporting. The Companys internal controls were designed
to provide reasonable assurance to the Companys Management and Board of Directors that the
Companys consolidated published financial statements for external purposes were prepared in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. The Companys internal controls over
financial reporting include those policies and procedures that:
|
(i) |
|
pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly
reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets and liabilities of the Company; |
|
(ii) |
|
provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit
preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the Company are being made only in
accordance with authorization of management and directors of the Company; and |
|
(iii) |
|
provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized
acquisitions, use or disposition of the Companys assets that could have a material effect
on the financial statements. |
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or
detect misstatements.
Management assessed the effectiveness of the Companys internal controls over financial reporting
as of December 31, 2009. In making this assessment, Management used the criteria set forth by the
Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) in Internal
Control-Integrated Framework. Based on Managements assessment and the criteria set forth by COSO,
it was determined that the Companys internal controls over financial reporting are effective as of
December 31, 2009.
The Companys independent registered public accounting firm, PricewaterhouseCoopers, has audited
the effectiveness of the Companys internal control over financial reporting, as stated in their
report located on page 168 in this Form 10-K.
97
|
|
|
Item 7A. |
|
QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK |
The information contained under the caption Market Risk in the MD&A section of this Form 10-K is
incorporated by reference.
98
|
|
|
Item 8. |
|
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA |
CIGNA Corporation
Consolidated Statements of Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions, except per share amounts) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the years ended December 31, |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Premiums and fees |
|
$ |
16,041 |
|
|
$ |
16,253 |
|
|
$ |
15,008 |
|
Net investment income |
|
|
1,014 |
|
|
|
1,063 |
|
|
|
1,114 |
|
Mail order pharmacy revenues |
|
|
1,282 |
|
|
|
1,204 |
|
|
|
1,118 |
|
Other revenues |
|
|
120 |
|
|
|
751 |
|
|
|
368 |
|
Realized investment gains (losses) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other-than-temporary impairments on debt
securities, net |
|
|
(47 |
) |
|
|
(213 |
) |
|
|
(31 |
) |
Other realized investment gains |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total realized investment gains (losses) |
|
|
(43 |
) |
|
|
(170 |
) |
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
|
18,414 |
|
|
|
19,101 |
|
|
|
17,624 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefits and Expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Health Care medical claims expense |
|
|
6,927 |
|
|
|
7,252 |
|
|
|
6,798 |
|
Other benefit expenses |
|
|
3,407 |
|
|
|
4,285 |
|
|
|
3,401 |
|
Mail order pharmacy cost of goods sold |
|
|
1,036 |
|
|
|
961 |
|
|
|
904 |
|
Guaranteed minimum income benefits (income) expense |
|
|
(304 |
) |
|
|
690 |
|
|
|
147 |
|
Other operating expenses |
|
|
5,450 |
|
|
|
5,531 |
|
|
|
4,740 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total benefits and expenses |
|
|
16,516 |
|
|
|
18,719 |
|
|
|
15,990 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from Continuing Operations before Income
Taxes |
|
|
1,898 |
|
|
|
382 |
|
|
|
1,634 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income taxes (benefits): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current |
|
|
275 |
|
|
|
313 |
|
|
|
511 |
|
Deferred |
|
|
319 |
|
|
|
(221 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total taxes |
|
|
594 |
|
|
|
92 |
|
|
|
511 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from Continuing Operations |
|
|
1,304 |
|
|
|
290 |
|
|
|
1,123 |
|
Income (Loss) from Discontinued Operations, Net of
Taxes |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income |
|
|
1,305 |
|
|
|
294 |
|
|
|
1,118 |
|
Less: Net Income Attributable to Noncontrolling
Interest |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders Net Income |
|
$ |
1,302 |
|
|
$ |
292 |
|
|
$ |
1,115 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic Earnings Per Share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders income from continuing operations |
|
$ |
4.75 |
|
|
$ |
1.04 |
|
|
$ |
3.91 |
|
Shareholders income (loss) from discontinued
operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.01 |
|
|
|
(0.02 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders net income |
|
$ |
4.75 |
|
|
$ |
1.05 |
|
|
$ |
3.89 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted Earnings Per Share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders income from continuing operations |
|
$ |
4.73 |
|
|
$ |
1.03 |
|
|
$ |
3.86 |
|
Shareholders income (loss) from discontinued
operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.02 |
|
|
|
(0.02 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders net income |
|
$ |
4.73 |
|
|
$ |
1.05 |
|
|
$ |
3.84 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends Declared Per Share |
|
$ |
0.04 |
|
|
$ |
0.04 |
|
|
$ |
0.04 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amounts Attributable to CIGNA: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders income from continuing operations |
|
$ |
1,301 |
|
|
$ |
288 |
|
|
$ |
1,120 |
|
Shareholders income (loss) from discontinued
operations |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders Net Income |
|
$ |
1,302 |
|
|
$ |
292 |
|
|
$ |
1,115 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of these
statements.
99
CIGNA Corporation
Consolidated Balance Sheets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions, except per share amounts) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed maturities, at fair value (amortized cost, $12,580;
$11,492) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
13,443 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
11,781 |
|
Equity securities, at fair value (cost, $137; $140) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
113 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
112 |
|
Commercial mortgage loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,522 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,617 |
|
Policy loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,549 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,556 |
|
Real estate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
124 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
53 |
|
Other long-term investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
595 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
632 |
|
Short-term investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
493 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
236 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,839 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,987 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
|
|
|
|
924 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,342 |
|
Accrued investment income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
238 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
225 |
|
Premiums, accounts and notes receivable, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,361 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,407 |
|
Reinsurance recoverables |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,597 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,973 |
|
Deferred policy acquisition costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
943 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
789 |
|
Property and equipment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
862 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
804 |
|
Deferred income taxes, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,029 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,617 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,876 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,878 |
|
Other assets, including other intangibles |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,056 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,520 |
|
Separate account assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,288 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,864 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
43,013 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
41,406 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contractholder deposit funds |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
8,484 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
8,539 |
|
Future policy benefits |
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,136 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,754 |
|
Unpaid claims and claim expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,968 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,037 |
|
Health Care medical claims payable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
921 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
924 |
|
Unearned premiums and fees |
|
|
|
|
|
|
427 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
414 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total insurance and contractholder liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,936 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,668 |
|
Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,797 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,869 |
|
Short-term debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
104 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
301 |
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,436 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,090 |
|
Nonrecourse obligations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16 |
|
Separate account liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,288 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,864 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
37,584 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37,808 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contingencies Note 23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock (par value per share, $0.25; shares issued,
351) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
88 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
88 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,514 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,502 |
|
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation), fixed maturities |
|
$ |
378 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(147 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Net unrealized appreciation, equity securities |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
Net unrealized depreciation, derivatives |
|
|
(30 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Net translation of foreign currencies |
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(60 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Postretirement benefits liability adjustment |
|
|
(958 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(861 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(618 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,074 |
) |
Retained earnings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,625 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,374 |
|
Less treasury stock, at cost |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,192 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,298 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,417 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,592 |
|
Noncontrolling interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,429 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,598 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and equity |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
43,013 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
41,406 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders Equity Per Share |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
19.75 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
13.25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of these
statements.
100
CIGNA Corporation
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income
and Changes in Total Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
Compre- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compre- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compre- |
|
|
|
|
(In millions, except per share amounts) |
|
hensive |
|
|
Total |
|
|
hensive |
|
|
Total |
|
|
hensive |
|
|
Total |
|
For the years ended December 31, |
|
Income |
|
|
Equity |
|
|
Income |
|
|
Equity |
|
|
Income |
|
|
Equity |
|
Common Stock, beginning of year |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
88 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
88 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
40 |
|
Effect of issuance of stock for stock split |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock, end of year |
|
|
|
|
|
|
88 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
88 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
88 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional Paid-In Capital, beginning of year |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,502 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,474 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,451 |
|
Effect of issuance of stock for stock split |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(48 |
) |
Effect of issuance of stock for employee benefit plans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
71 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional Paid-In Capital, end of year |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,514 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,502 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,474 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss),
beginning of year |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,074 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(169 |
) |
Implementation effect of updated guidance on
other-than-temporary impairments (see Note 2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(18 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Implementation effect of updated guidance on certain
hybrid
financial instruments (See Note 2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12 |
) |
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation), fixed
maturities |
|
$ |
543 |
|
|
|
543 |
|
|
$ |
(287 |
) |
|
|
(287 |
) |
|
$ |
(47 |
) |
|
|
(47 |
) |
Net unrealized depreciation, equity securities |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on securities |
|
|
540 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(287 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(50 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation), derivatives |
|
|
(17 |
) |
|
|
(17 |
) |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
(4 |
) |
Net translation of foreign currencies |
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
(121 |
) |
|
|
(121 |
) |
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
Postretirement benefits liability adjustment |
|
|
(97 |
) |
|
|
(97 |
) |
|
|
(723 |
) |
|
|
(723 |
) |
|
|
258 |
|
|
|
258 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income (loss) |
|
|
474 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,125 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
232 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss), end of year |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(618 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,074 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retained Earnings, beginning of year |
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,374 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,113 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,177 |
|
Implementation effect of updated guidance on
other-than-temporary impairments (See Note 2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Implementation effect of updated guidance on certain
hybrid
financial instruments (See Note 2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12 |
|
Implementation effect of updated guidance on uncertain
tax positions (See Note 2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(29 |
) |
Shareholders net income |
|
|
1,302 |
|
|
|
1,302 |
|
|
|
292 |
|
|
|
292 |
|
|
|
1,115 |
|
|
|
1,115 |
|
Effect of issuance of stock for employee benefit plans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(58 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(20 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(151 |
) |
Common dividends declared (per share: $0.04; $0.04;
$0.04) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retained Earnings, end of year |
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,625 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,374 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,113 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Treasury Stock, beginning of year |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,298 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,978 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,169 |
) |
Repurchase of common stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(378 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,158 |
) |
Other, primarily issuance of treasury stock for employee
benefit plans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
106 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
58 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
349 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Treasury Stock, end of year |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,192 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,298 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,978 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders Comprehensive Income (Loss) and
Shareholders Equity |
|
|
1,776 |
|
|
|
5,417 |
|
|
|
(833 |
) |
|
|
3,592 |
|
|
|
1,347 |
|
|
|
4,748 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noncontrolling interest, beginning of year |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income attributable
to noncontrolling interest |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noncontrolling interest, end of year |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Comprehensive Income and Total Equity |
|
$ |
1,782 |
|
|
$ |
5,429 |
|
|
$ |
(833 |
) |
|
$ |
3,598 |
|
|
$ |
1,350 |
|
|
$ |
4,754 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of these
statements.
101
CIGNA Corporation
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the years ended December 31, |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Cash Flows from Operating Activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
1,305 |
|
|
$ |
294 |
|
|
$ |
1,118 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by
operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Income) loss from discontinued operations |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
5 |
|
Insurance liabilities |
|
|
(357 |
) |
|
|
485 |
|
|
|
(24 |
) |
Reinsurance recoverables |
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
63 |
|
|
|
159 |
|
Deferred policy acquisition costs |
|
|
(109 |
) |
|
|
(74 |
) |
|
|
(106 |
) |
Premiums, accounts and notes receivable |
|
|
49 |
|
|
|
219 |
|
|
|
47 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
452 |
|
|
|
(860 |
) |
|
|
(134 |
) |
Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities |
|
|
(1,321 |
) |
|
|
1,466 |
|
|
|
150 |
|
Current income taxes |
|
|
55 |
|
|
|
(72 |
) |
|
|
10 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
319 |
|
|
|
(221 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Realized investment (gains) losses |
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
170 |
|
|
|
(16 |
) |
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
268 |
|
|
|
244 |
|
|
|
194 |
|
Gains on sales of businesses (excluding discontinued operations) |
|
|
(32 |
) |
|
|
(38 |
) |
|
|
(47 |
) |
Mortgage loans originated and held for sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(80 |
) |
Proceeds from sales of mortgage loans held for sale |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
76 |
|
Other, net |
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
(17 |
) |
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
745 |
|
|
|
1,656 |
|
|
|
1,342 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows from Investing Activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from investments sold: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed maturities |
|
|
927 |
|
|
|
1,459 |
|
|
|
1,012 |
|
Equity securities |
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
Commercial mortgage loans |
|
|
61 |
|
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
1,293 |
|
Other (primarily short-term and other long-term investments) |
|
|
910 |
|
|
|
492 |
|
|
|
260 |
|
Investment maturities and repayments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed maturities |
|
|
1,100 |
|
|
|
872 |
|
|
|
973 |
|
Commercial mortgage loans |
|
|
94 |
|
|
|
98 |
|
|
|
123 |
|
Investments purchased: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed maturities |
|
|
(2,916 |
) |
|
|
(2,681 |
) |
|
|
(2,150 |
) |
Equity securities |
|
|
(14 |
) |
|
|
(18 |
) |
|
|
(27 |
) |
Commercial mortgage loans |
|
|
(175 |
) |
|
|
(488 |
) |
|
|
(693 |
) |
Other (primarily short-term and other long-term investments) |
|
|
(1,187 |
) |
|
|
(776 |
) |
|
|
(394 |
) |
Property and equipment sales |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
82 |
|
Property and equipment purchases |
|
|
(307 |
) |
|
|
(257 |
) |
|
|
(262 |
) |
Acquisition of Great-West Healthcare, net of cash acquired |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,319 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Cash provided by investing activities of discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
70 |
|
Other (primarily other acquisitions/dispositions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
(46 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities |
|
|
(1,485 |
) |
|
|
(2,572 |
) |
|
|
269 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows from Financing Activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits and interest credited to contractholder deposit funds |
|
|
1,312 |
|
|
|
1,305 |
|
|
|
1,175 |
|
Withdrawals and benefit payments from contractholder deposit funds |
|
|
(1,223 |
) |
|
|
(1,214 |
) |
|
|
(1,368 |
) |
Change in cash overdraft position |
|
|
53 |
|
|
|
(17 |
) |
|
|
(20 |
) |
Net change in short-term debt |
|
|
(199 |
) |
|
|
298 |
|
|
|
|
|
Net proceeds on issuance of long-term debt |
|
|
346 |
|
|
|
297 |
|
|
|
498 |
|
Repayment of long-term debt |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(378 |
) |
Repurchase of common stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(378 |
) |
|
|
(1,185 |
) |
Issuance of common stock |
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
248 |
|
Common dividends paid |
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
(14 |
) |
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities |
|
|
307 |
|
|
|
314 |
|
|
|
(1,041 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of foreign currency rate changes on cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
(26 |
) |
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(418 |
) |
|
|
(628 |
) |
|
|
578 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year |
|
|
1,342 |
|
|
|
1,970 |
|
|
|
1,392 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of year |
|
$ |
924 |
|
|
$ |
1,342 |
|
|
$ |
1,970 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental Disclosure of Cash Information: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income taxes paid, net of refunds |
|
$ |
220 |
|
|
$ |
366 |
|
|
$ |
455 |
|
Interest paid |
|
$ |
158 |
|
|
$ |
140 |
|
|
$ |
122 |
|
The accompanying Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of these
statements.
102
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 1 Description of Business
CIGNA Corporation together with its subsidiaries (referred to collectively as the Company)
constitutes one of the largest investor-owned health service organizations in the United States.
Its subsidiaries are major providers of health care and related benefits, the majority of which are
offered through the workplace, including health care products and services such as medical
coverages, pharmacy, behavioral health, dental benefits, and disease management; group disability,
life and accident insurance; and disability and workers compensation case management and related
services. In addition, the Company has an international operation that offers life, accident and
supplemental health insurance products and international health care products and services to
businesses and individuals in selected markets. The Company also has certain inactive businesses,
including a run-off reinsurance operation.
Note 2 Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
A. Basis of Presentation
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of CIGNA Corporation, its significant
subsidiaries, and variable interest entities for which the Company has determined it is the primary
beneficiary. Intercompany transactions and accounts have been eliminated in consolidation.
These consolidated financial statements were prepared in conformity with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP). Amounts recorded in the consolidated
financial statements reflect managements estimates and assumptions about medical costs, investment
valuation, interest rates and other factors. Significant estimates are discussed throughout these
Notes; however, actual results could differ from those estimates.
In preparing these consolidated financial statements, the Company has evaluated events that
occurred between the balance sheet date and February 25, 2010.
Certain reclassifications have been made to prior period amounts to conform to the presentation of
2009 amounts. In addition, certain amounts have been restated as a result of the adoption of new
accounting pronouncements.
Discontinued operations. Summarized financial data for discontinued operations in 2009 primarily
represents a tax benefit from a past divestiture resolved at the completion of the 2005 and 2006
IRS examinations.
Discontinued operations for 2008 primarily represents an after-tax gain of $3 million from the
settlement of certain issues related to a past divestiture.
Discontinued operations for 2007 primarily reflects:
|
|
impairment losses related to the dispositions of several Latin American insurance
operations as discussed in Note 3; and |
|
|
realized gains on the disposition of certain directly-owned real estate investments as
discussed in Note 14. |
Unless otherwise indicated, amounts in these Notes exclude the effects of discontinued operations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Income before income (taxes) benefits |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
3 |
|
|
$ |
25 |
|
Income (taxes) benefits |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
Impairment loss, net of tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(23 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from discontinued operations,
net of taxes |
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
$ |
4 |
|
|
$ |
(5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Variable interest entities. As of December 31, 2009 and 2008 the Company determined it was not
a primary beneficiary in any variable interest entities.
103
B. Recent Accounting Pronouncements
Accounting Standards Codification. The Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) has
established the Accounting Standards Codification (Codification or ASC) as the single source of
authoritative accounting guidance effective for financial reporting in 2009. Therefore, the
Company has used the Codification section or description when referring to GAAP.
Other-than-temporary impairments. On April 1, 2009, the Company adopted the FASBs updated
guidance for evaluating whether an impairment is other than temporary for fixed maturities with
declines in fair value below amortized cost (ASC 320). It requires assessing the Companys intent
to sell or whether it is more likely than not that the Company will be required to sell such fixed
maturities before their fair values recover. If so, an impairment loss is recognized in net income
for the excess of the amortized cost over fair value. The Company must also determine if it does
not expect to recover the amortized cost of fixed maturities with declines in fair value (even if
it does not intend to sell or will not be required to sell these fixed maturities). In this case,
the credit portion of the impairment loss is recognized in net income and the non-credit portion of
an impairment loss is recognized in a separate component of shareholders equity. A
reclassification adjustment from retained earnings to accumulated other comprehensive income was
required for previously impaired fixed maturities that have a non-credit loss as of the date of
adoption, net of related tax effects.
The cumulative effect of adoption increased the Companys retained earnings with an offsetting
decrease to accumulated other comprehensive income of $18 million, with no overall change to
shareholders equity. See Note 12 for information on the Companys other-than-temporary
impairments including additional required disclosures.
Noncontrolling interests in subsidiaries. Effective January 1, 2009, the Company adopted the
FASBs updated guidance on accounting for noncontrolling interests (ASC 810) through retroactive
restatement of prior financial statements and reclassified $3 million of noncontrolling interest as
of January 1, 2007 from Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities to Noncontrolling
interest in total equity. In addition, net income attributable to the noncontrolling interest of
$2 million in 2008 and $3 million in 2007 has been reclassified to be included in net income, with
a reduction to net income to determine net income attributable to the Companys shareholders
(shareholders net income).
Earnings per share. Effective January 1, 2009, the Company adopted the FASBs updated earnings per
share guidance (ASC 260) for determining participating securities that requires unvested restricted
stock awards containing rights to nonforfeitable dividends to be included in the denominator of
both basic and diluted earnings per share (EPS) calculations. Prior period EPS data have been
restated to reflect the adoption of this guidance. See Note 4 for the effects of this guidance on
previously reported EPS amounts.
Business combinations. Effective January 1, 2009, the Company adopted the FASBs guidance on
accounting for business combinations (ASC 805) that requires fair value measurements for all future
acquisitions, including contingent purchase price and certain contingent assets or liabilities of
the entity to be acquired, requires acquisition-related and restructuring costs to be expensed as
incurred and requires changes in tax items after the acquisition date to be reported in income tax
expense. There were no effects to the Companys Consolidated Financial Statements at adoption.
Derivatives disclosures. Effective January 1, 2009, the Company expanded its disclosures on
derivatives and hedging activities to comply with the FASBs updated guidance (ASC 815) that
requires the Company to disclose the purpose for using derivative instruments, their accounting
treatment and related effects on financial condition, results of operations and liquidity. See
Note 13 for information on the Companys derivative financial instruments including these
additional required disclosures.
Fair value measurements. Effective January 1, 2008, the Company adopted the FASBs fair value
disclosure and measurement guidance (ASC 820) that expands disclosures about fair value
measurements and clarifies how to measure fair value by focusing on the price that would be
received when selling an asset or paid to transfer a liability (exit price). In addition, the FASB
amended the fair value guidance in 2008 to provide additional guidance for determining the fair
value of a financial asset when the market for that instrument is not active. In 2009, the Company
also adopted FASB guidance on measuring the fair value of non-financial assets and liabilities,
certain financial liabilities and investments in certain entities using their net asset value or
its equivalent. See Note 11 for information on the Companys fair value measurements. In addition,
in 2009 the Company adopted new FASB guidance on expanded fair value disclosures for assets
supporting its pension and other postretirement benefit plans. See Note 10 for further
information.
104
The Company carries certain financial instruments at fair value in the financial statements
including approximately $14 billion in invested assets at December 31, 2009. The Company also
carries derivative instruments at fair value, including assets and liabilities for reinsurance
contracts covering guaranteed minimum income benefits (GMIB assets and liabilities) under certain
variable annuity contracts issued by other insurance companies and related retrocessional
contracts. The Company also reports separate account assets at fair value; however, changes in the
fair values of these assets accrue directly to policyholders and are not included in the Companys
revenues and expenses. At the adoption of this fair value guidance, there were no effects to the
Companys measurements of fair values for financial instruments other than for GMIB assets and
liabilities discussed below. In addition, there were no effects to the Companys measurements of
financial assets and non-financial assets and liabilities from adopting the FASBs 2008 and 2009
amendments to their fair value guidance.
At adoption, the Company was required to change certain assumptions used to estimate the fair
values of GMIB assets and liabilities. Because there is no market for these contracts, the
assumptions used to estimate their fair values at adoption were determined using a hypothetical
market participants view of exit price, rather than using historical market data and actual
experience to establish the Companys future expectations. Certain of these assumptions (primarily
related to annuitant behavior) have limited or no observable market data so determining an exit
price requires the Company to exercise significant judgment and make critical accounting estimates.
On adoption, the Company recorded a charge of $131 million after-tax, net of reinsurance ($202
million pre-tax), in Run-off Reinsurance.
The Companys results of operations related to this business are expected to continue to be
volatile in future periods because several underlying assumptions (primarily interest rates) will
be based on current market-observable inputs which will likely change each period. See Note 11 for
additional information.
Transfers of financial assets. In 2009, the FASB issued guidance for accounting for transfers of
financial assets (ASC 860) that changes the requirements for recognizing the transfer of financial
assets and requires additional disclosures about a transferors continuing involvement in
transferred financial assets. The guidance also eliminates the concept of a qualifying special
purpose entity when assessing transfers of financial instruments. The recognition and measurement
provisions of this guidance must be applied to transfers that occur on or after January 1, 2010.
On adoption, the Company does not expect a material effect to its results of operations or
financial condition.
Variable interest entities. In 2009, the FASB amended guidance (ASC 810) that requires quarterly
qualitative analysis to determine whether a variable interest entity must be consolidated by the
Company primarily based on the entitys purpose and design, the Companys ability to direct the
entitys activities that most significantly impact its economic performance, and the Companys
right or obligation to participate in that performance. A variable interest entity is
insufficiently capitalized or is not controlled through voting or similar rights. These amendments
must also be applied to qualifying special-purpose entities formerly excluded from such analysis.
Any changes in the Companys consolidated entities resulting from these requirements may be
recognized through an adjustment to retained earnings for the cumulative effect of implementing at
the January 1, 2010 date of adoption or through retrospective restatement of prior period financial
statements. In addition, this guidance requires the Company to disclose any significant judgments
and assumptions made in determining whether it must consolidate a variable interest entity. On
adoption, the Company does not expect a material effect to its results of operations or financial
condition.
Fair value option. Effective January 1, 2008, the Company adopted FASB updated guidance for the
fair value option for financial assets and liabilities (ASC 825), which permits entities to choose
fair value measurement at the time of acquisition of many financial instruments, including
insurance contracts, with subsequent changes in fair value to be reported in net income for the
period. The adoption of this guidance did not impact the Companys consolidated financial
statements, as no items were elected for fair value measurement.
Uncertain tax positions. Effective January 1, 2007, the Company implemented updated FASB guidance
(ASC 740) on accounting for uncertain tax positions that are more likely than not to result in a
benefit if challenged by the Internal Revenue Service (IRS). The cumulative effect of
implementing the guidance for unrecognized tax benefits decreased opening retained earnings by $29
million. See Note 19 for additional information.
Certain financial instruments. Effective January 1, 2007, the Company adopted updated FASB
guidance on accounting for certain hybrid financial instruments (ASC 815). At adoption, the Company
elected to fair value certain existing investments in preferred stock and debt securities with call
or conversion features (hybrid securities) and future changes in the fair value of these
investments will be reported in net income. As a result, the Company reclassified $12 million
after-tax of unrealized appreciation from the opening balance of accumulated other comprehensive
loss to retained earnings with no net change to total shareholders equity. See Note 12(A) for a
review of instruments that the Company has elected to fair value.
105
C. Investments
The Companys accounting policies for investment assets are discussed below:
Fixed maturities and equity securities. Fixed maturities include bonds, mortgage and other
asset-backed securities and preferred stocks redeemable by the investor. Equity securities include
common stocks and preferred stocks that are non-redeemable or redeemable only by the issuer. These
investments are primarily classified as available for sale and are carried at fair value with
changes in fair value recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) within
shareholders equity. Beginning April 1, 2009, when the Company determines it does not expect to
recover the amortized cost basis of fixed maturities with declines in fair value (even if it does
not intend to sell or will not be required to sell these fixed maturities), the credit portion of
the impairment loss is recognized in net income and the non-credit portion, if any, is recognized
in a separate component of shareholders equity. The credit portion is the difference between the
amortized cost basis of the fixed maturity and the net present value of its projected future cash
flows. Projected future cash flows are based on qualitative and quantitative factors, including
probability of default, and the estimated timing and amount of recovery. For mortgage and
asset-backed securities, estimated future cash flows are based on assumptions about the collateral
attributes including prepayment speeds, default rates and changes in value. Equity securities and,
prior to April 1, 2009, fixed maturities were considered impaired, and their cost basis was written
down to fair value through earnings, when management did not expect to recover the amortized cost,
or if the Company could not demonstrate its intent or ability to hold the investment until full
recovery. Fixed maturities and equity securities also include certain trading and hybrid
securities carried at fair value with changes in fair value reported in realized investment gains
and losses, beginning after the implementation of updated guidance on certain hybrid financial
instruments on January 1, 2007. The Company elected fair value accounting for certain hybrid
securities to simplify accounting and mitigate volatility in results of operations and financial
condition.
Commercial mortgage loans. Mortgage loans held by the Company are made exclusively to commercial
borrowers, therefore there is no exposure to either prime or sub-prime residential mortgages.
Generally, commercial mortgage loans are carried at unpaid principal balances and are issued at a
fixed rate of interest. Commercial mortgage loans held for sale are carried at the lower of unpaid
principal balance or fair value with any resulting valuation allowance reported in realized
investment gains and losses. Commercial mortgage loans are considered impaired when it is probable
that the Company will not collect amounts due according to the terms of the original loan
agreement. Impaired loans are carried at the lower of unpaid principal or fair value of the
underlying collateral. Valuation reserves reflect any changes in fair value. The Company
estimates the fair value of the underlying collateral using internal valuations generally based on
discounted cash flow analyses.
Policy loans. Policy loans are carried at unpaid principal balances.
Real estate. Investment real estate can be held and used or held for sale. The Company
accounts for real estate as follows:
|
|
Real estate held and used is expected to be held longer than one year and includes real
estate acquired through the foreclosure of commercial mortgage loans. The Company carries
real estate held and used at depreciated cost less any write-downs to fair value due to
impairment and assesses impairment when cash flows indicate that the carrying value may not be
recoverable. Depreciation is generally calculated using the straight-line method based on the
estimated useful life of the particular real estate asset. |
|
|
Real estate is held for sale when a buyers investigation is completed, a deposit has
been received and the sale is expected to be completed within the next year. Real estate held
for sale is carried at the lower of carrying value or current fair value, less estimated costs
to sell, and is not depreciated. Valuation reserves reflect any changes in fair value. |
|
|
The Company uses several methods to determine the fair value of real estate, but relies
primarily on discounted cash flow analyses and, in some cases, third-party appraisals. |
At the time of foreclosure, properties are reclassified from commercial mortgage loans to real
estate. The Company rehabilitates, re-leases and sells foreclosed properties. This process
usually takes from two to four years unless management considers a near-term sale preferable.
Other long-term investments. Other long-term investments include investments in unconsolidated
entities. These entities include certain limited partnerships and limited liability companies
holding real estate, securities or loans. These investments are carried at cost plus the Companys
ownership percentage of reported income or loss in cases where the Company has significant
influence, otherwise the investment is carried at cost. Income from certain entities is reported
on a one quarter lag depending on when their financial information is received. Also included in
other long-term investments are loans to unconsolidated real estate entities secured by the equity
interests of these real estate entities, which are carried at unpaid principal balances (mezzanine
loans). These other long-term investments are considered impaired, and written down to their fair
value, when cash flows indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable. Fair value is
generally determined based on a discounted cash flow analysis.
106
Additionally, other long-term investments include interest rate and foreign currency swaps carried
at fair value. See Note 13 for information on the Companys accounting policies for these
derivative financial instruments.
Short-term investments. Investments with maturities of less than one year from time of purchase are
classified as short-term, available for sale and carried at fair value, which approximates cost.
Derivative financial instruments. Note 13 discusses the Companys accounting policies for
derivative financial instruments.
Net investment income. When interest and principal payments on investments are current, the
Company recognizes interest income when it is earned. The Company stops recognizing interest
income when interest payments are delinquent or when certain terms (interest rate or maturity date)
of the investment have been restructured. Net investment income on these investments is only
recognized when interest payments are actually received. Interest and dividends earned on trading
and hybrid securities are included in net investment income.
Investment gains and losses. Realized investment gains and losses result from sales, investment
asset write-downs, changes in the fair values of trading and hybrid securities and certain
derivatives and changes in valuation reserves, based on specifically identified assets. Realized
investment gains and losses on the disposition of certain directly owned real estate investments
are eliminated from ongoing operations and reported in discontinued operations when the operations
and cash flows of the underlying assets are clearly distinguishable and the Company has no
significant continuing involvement in their operations.
Unrealized gains and losses on fixed maturities and equity securities carried at fair value
(excluding trading and hybrid securities) and certain derivatives are included in accumulated other
comprehensive income (loss), net of:
|
|
amounts required to adjust future policy benefits for the run-off settlement annuity
business; and |
D. Cash and Cash Equivalents
Cash equivalents consist of short-term investments with maturities of three months or less from the
time of purchase that are classified as held to maturity and carried at amortized cost. The
Company reclassifies cash overdraft positions to accounts payable, accrued expenses and other
liabilities when the legal right of offset does not exist.
E. Premiums, Accounts and Notes Receivable and Reinsurance Recoverables
Premiums, accounts and notes receivable are reported net of an allowance for doubtful accounts of
$43 million as of December 31, 2009 and $50 million as of December 31, 2008. Reinsurance
recoverables are estimates of amounts that the Company will receive from reinsurers and are
recorded net of an allowance for unrecoverable reinsurance of $15 million as of December 31, 2009
and $23 million as of December 31, 2008. The Company estimates these allowances for doubtful
accounts for premiums, accounts and notes receivable, as well as for reinsurance recoverables,
using managements best estimate of collectibility, taking into consideration the aging of
receivables, historical collection patterns and other economic factors.
F. Deferred Policy Acquisition Costs
Acquisition costs include sales compensation, commissions, direct response marketing,
telemarketing, premium taxes and other costs that the Company incurs in connection with new and
renewal business. Depending on the product line they relate to, the Company records acquisition
costs in different ways. Acquisition costs for:
|
|
Universal life products are deferred and amortized in proportion to the present value of
total estimated gross profits over the expected lives of the contracts. |
|
|
Annuity and other individual life insurance (primarily international) and group health
indemnity products are deferred and amortized, generally in proportion to the ratio of
periodic revenue to the estimated total revenues over the contract periods. |
|
|
Other products are expensed as incurred. |
107
For universal life, annuity and other individual products, management estimates the present value
of future revenues less expected payments. For group health indemnity products, management
estimates the sum of future expected claims and related costs less unearned premiums and
anticipated net investment income. If managements estimates are less than the deferred costs, the
Company reduces deferred policy acquisition costs and records an expense. Anticipated investment
income is considered in the calculation of premium deficiency losses for short-duration contracts.
The Company recorded in other operating expenses amortization for policy acquisition costs of $299
million in 2009, $314 million in 2008 and $242 million in 2007. There are no deferred policy
acquisition costs attributable to the sold individual life insurance and annuity and retirement
businesses or the run-off reinsurance operations.
G. Property and Equipment
Property and equipment is carried at cost less accumulated depreciation. When applicable, cost
includes interest, real estate taxes and other costs incurred during construction. Also included
in this category is internal-use software that is acquired, developed or modified solely to meet
the Companys internal needs, with no plan to market externally. Costs directly related to
acquiring, developing or modifying internal-use software are capitalized.
The Company calculates depreciation and amortization principally using the straight-line method
based on the estimated useful life of each asset as follows: buildings and improvements, 1 year to
40 years; and equipment and software, 1 year to 10 years. See Note 9 for additional information.
H. Goodwill
Goodwill represents the excess of the cost of businesses acquired over the fair value of their net
assets. Substantially all goodwill relates to the Health Care segment. The Company evaluates
goodwill for impairment annually during the third quarter at the reporting unit level, based on
discounted cash flow analyses and writes it down through results of operations if impaired.
Consistent with prior years, the Companys evaluations used the best information available at the
time, including reasonable assumptions and projections consistent with those used in its annual
planning process. The discounted cash flow analyses used a range of discount rates that correspond
with the Companys weighted average cost of capital, consistent with that used for investment
decisions considering the specific and detailed operating plans and strategies within the Health
Care segment. The resulting discounted cash flow analyses indicated an estimated fair value for the
reporting units of the Health Care segment exceeding their carrying values, including goodwill and
other intangibles. Finally, the Company determined that no events or circumstances occurred
subsequent to the annual evaluation of goodwill that would more likely than not reduce the fair
value of the reporting units of the Health Care segment below their carrying values. See Note 9 for
additional information.
I. Other Assets, including Other Intangibles
Other assets consist of various insurance-related assets and the gain position of certain
derivatives, primarily GMIB assets. The Companys other intangible assets include purchased
customer and producer relationships, provider networks, and trademarks. The Company amortizes
other intangibles on an accelerated or straight-line basis over periods from 1 to 30 years.
Management revises amortization periods if it believes there has been a change in the length of
time that an intangible asset will continue to have value. Costs incurred to renew or extend the
terms of these intangible assets are generally expensed as incurred. See Note 9 for additional
information.
J. Separate Account Assets and Liabilities
Separate account assets and liabilities are contractholder funds maintained in accounts with
specific investment objectives. The assets of these accounts are legally segregated and are not
subject to claims that arise out of any of the Companys other businesses. These separate account
assets are carried at fair value with equal amounts for related separate account liabilities. The
investment income, gains and losses of these accounts generally accrue to the contractholders and
are not included in the Companys revenues and expenses. Fees earned for asset management services
are reported in premiums and fees.
K. Contractholder Deposit Funds
Liabilities for contractholder deposit funds include deposits received from customers for
investment-related and universal life products and investment earnings on their fund balances.
These liabilities are adjusted to reflect administrative charges and, for universal life fund
balances, mortality charges.
108
L. Future Policy Benefits
Future policy benefits are liabilities for the present value of estimated future obligations under
long-term life and supplemental health insurance policies and annuity products currently in force.
These obligations are estimated using actuarial methods and primarily consist of reserves for
annuity contracts, life insurance benefits, guaranteed minimum death benefit (GMDB) contracts and
certain life, accident and health insurance products in our International operations.
Obligations for annuities represent specified periodic benefits to be paid to an individual or
groups of individuals over their remaining lives. Obligations for life insurance policies
represent benefits to be paid to policyholders, net of future premiums to be received. Management
estimates these obligations based on assumptions as to premiums, interest rates, mortality and
surrenders, allowing for adverse deviation. Mortality, morbidity, and surrender assumptions are
based on either the Companys own experience or actuarial tables. Interest rate assumptions are
based on managements judgment considering the Companys experience and future expectations, and
range from 1.5% to 10%. Obligations for the run-off settlement annuity business include
adjustments for investment returns consistent with requirements of GAAP when a premium deficiency
exists.
Certain reinsurance contracts contain guaranteed minimum death benefits under variable annuities
issued by other insurance companies. These obligations represent the guaranteed death benefit in
excess of the contractholders account values (based on underlying equity and bond mutual fund
investments). These obligations are estimated based on assumptions regarding lapse, partial
surrenders, mortality, interest rates (mean investment performance and discount rate), market
volatility as well as investment returns and premiums, consistent with the requirements of GAAP
when a premium deficiency exists. Lapse, partial surrenders, mortality, interest rates and
volatility are based on managements judgment considering the Companys experience and future
expectations. The results of futures contracts used in the GMDB equity hedge program are reflected
in the liability calculation as a component of investment returns. See also Note 7 for additional
information.
M. Unpaid Claims and Claims Expenses
Liabilities for unpaid claims and claim expenses are estimates of payments to be made under
insurance coverages (primarily long-term disability, workers compensation and life and health) for
reported claims and for losses incurred but not yet reported.
The Company develops these estimates for losses incurred but not yet reported using actuarial
principles and assumptions based on historical and projected claim incidence patterns, claim size
and the length of time over which payments are expected to be made. The Company consistently
applies these actuarial principles and assumptions each reporting period, with consideration given
to the variability of these factors, and recognizes the actuarial best estimate of the ultimate
liability within a level of confidence, as required by actuarial standards of practice, which
require that the liabilities be adequate under moderately adverse conditions.
The Companys estimate of the liability for disability claims reported but not yet paid is
primarily calculated as the present value of expected benefit payments to be made over the
estimated time period that a policyholder remains disabled. The Company estimates the expected
time period that a policyholder may be disabled by analyzing the rate at which an open claim is
expected to close (claim resolution rate). Claim resolution rates may vary based upon the length
of time a policyholder is disabled, the covered benefit period, cause of disability, benefit design
and the policyholders age, gender and income level. The Company uses historical resolution rates
combined with an analysis of current trends and operational factors to develop current estimates of
resolution rates. The reserve for the gross monthly disability benefits due to a policyholder is
reduced (offset) by the income that the policyholder receives under other benefit programs, such as
Social Security Disability Income, workers compensation, statutory disability or other group
disability benefit plans. For awards of such offsets that have not been finalized, the Company
estimates the probability and amount of the offset based on the Companys experience over the past
three to five years.
The Company discounts certain claim liabilities related to group long-term disability and workers
compensation because benefit payments may be made over an extended period. Discount rate
assumptions are based on projected investment returns for the asset portfolios that support these
liabilities and range from 3.5% to 7.3%. When estimates change, the Company records the adjustment
in benefits and expenses in the period in which the change in estimate is identified. Discounted
liabilities associated with the long-term disability and certain workers compensation businesses
were $3.1 billion at December 31, 2009 and $3.2 billion at December 31, 2008.
109
N. Health Care Medical Claims Payable
Medical claims payable for the Health Care segment include both reported claims and estimates for
losses incurred but not yet reported.
The Company develops these estimates using actuarial principles and assumptions based on historical
and projected claim payment patterns, medical cost trends, which are impacted by the utilization of
medical services and the related costs of the services provided (unit costs), benefit design,
seasonality, and other relevant operational factors. The Company consistently applies these
actuarial principles and assumptions each reporting period, with consideration given to the
variability of these factors, and recognizes the actuarial best estimate of the ultimate liability
within a level of confidence, as required by actuarial standards of practice, which require that
the liabilities be adequate under moderately adverse conditions.
The Companys estimate of the liability for medical claims incurred but not yet reported is
primarily calculated using historical claim payment patterns and expected medical cost trends. The
Company analyzes the historical claim payment patterns by comparing the dates claims were incurred,
generally the dates services were provided, to the dates claims were paid to determine completion
factors, which are a measure of the time to process claims. A completion factor is calculated for
each month of incurred claims. The Company uses historical completion factors combined with an
analysis of current trends and operational factors to develop current estimates of completion
factors. The Company estimates the ultimate liability for claims incurred in each month by
applying the current estimates of completion factors to the current paid claims data. The
difference between this estimate of the ultimate liability and the current paid claims data is the
estimate of the remaining claims to be paid for each incurral month. These monthly estimates are
aggregated and included in the Companys Health Care medical claims payable at the end of each
reporting period. Completion factors are used to estimate the Health Care medical claims payable
for all months where claims have not been completely resolved and paid, except for the most recent
month as described below.
Completion factors are impacted by several key items including changes in the level of claims
processed electronically versus manually (auto-adjudication), changes in provider claims submission
rates, membership changes and the mix of products. As noted, the Company uses historical
completion factors combined with an analysis of current trends and operational factors to develop
current estimates of completion factors. This approach implicitly assumes that historical
completion rates will be a useful indicator for the current period. It is possible that the actual
completion rates for the current period will develop differently from historical patterns, which
could have a material impact on the Companys medical claims payable and net income.
Claims incurred in the most recent month have limited paid claims data, since a large portion of
health care claims are not submitted to the Company for payment in the month services have been
provided. This makes the completion factor approach less reliable for claims incurred in the most
recent month. As a result, in any reporting period, for the estimates of the ultimate claims
incurred in the most recent month, the Company primarily relies on medical cost trend analysis,
which reflects expected claim payment patterns and other relevant operational considerations.
Medical cost trend is impacted by several key factors including medical service utilization and
unit costs and the Companys ability to manage these factors through benefit design, underwriting,
provider contracting and the Companys medical management initiatives. These factors are affected
by changes in the level and mix of medical benefits offered, including inpatient, outpatient and
pharmacy, the impact of copays and deductibles, changes in provider practices and changes in
consumer demographics and consumption behavior.
Because historical trend factors are often not representative of current claim trends, the trend
experienced for the most recent history along with an analysis of emerging trends, have been taken
into consideration in establishing the liability for Health Care medical claims payable at December
31, 2009 and 2008. It is possible that the actual medical trend for the current period will
develop differently from that expected, which could have a material impact on the Companys medical
claims payable and net income.
For each reporting period, the Company evaluates key assumptions by comparing the assumptions used
in establishing the medical claims payable to actual experience. When actual experience differs
from the assumptions used in establishing the liability, medical claims payable are increased or
decreased through current period net income. Additionally, the Company evaluates expected future
developments and emerging trends which may impact key assumptions. The estimation process involves
considerable judgment, reflecting the variability inherent in forecasting future claim payments.
The adequacy of these estimates is highly sensitive to changes in the Companys key assumptions,
specifically completion factors, which are impacted by actual or expected changes in the submission
and payment of medical claims, and medical cost trends, which are impacted by actual or expected
changes in the utilization of medical services and unit costs.
110
O. Unearned Premiums and Fees
Premiums for life, accident and health insurance are recognized as revenue on a pro rata basis over
the contract period. Fees for mortality and contract administration of universal life products are
recognized ratably over the coverage period. The unrecognized portion of these amounts is recorded
as unearned premiums and fees.
P. Accounts Payable, Accrued Expenses and Other Liabilities
Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities consist principally of pension, other
postretirement and postemployment benefits and various insurance-related liabilities, including
amounts related to reinsurance contracts and insurance-related assessments that management can
reasonably estimate. Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities also include certain
overdraft positions and the loss position of certain derivatives, primarily for GMIB contracts (see
Note 13). Legal costs to defend the Companys litigation and arbitration matters are expensed when
incurred in cases for which the Company cannot reasonably estimate the ultimate cost to defend. In
cases for which the Company can reasonably estimate the cost to defend, these costs are recognized
when the claim is reported.
Q. Translation of Foreign Currencies
The Company generally conducts its international business through foreign operating entities that
maintain assets and liabilities in local currencies, which are generally their functional
currencies. The Company uses exchange rates as of the balance sheet date to translate assets and
liabilities into U.S. dollars. Translation gains or losses on functional currencies, net of
applicable taxes, are recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss). The Company uses
average monthly exchange rates during the year to translate revenues and expenses into U.S.
dollars.
R. Premiums and Fees, Revenues and Related Expenses
Premiums for life, accident and health insurance and managed care coverages are recognized as
revenue on a pro rata basis over the contract period. Benefits and expenses are recognized when
incurred.
Premiums for individual life insurance and individual and group annuity products, excluding
universal life and investment-related products, are recognized as revenue when due. Benefits and
expenses are matched with premiums.
Revenue for investment-related products is recognized as follows:
|
|
Net investment income on assets supporting investment-related products is recognized as
earned. |
|
|
Contract fees, which are based upon related administrative expenses, are recognized in
premiums and fees as they are earned ratably over the contract period. |
Benefits and expenses for investment-related products consist primarily of income credited to
policyholders in accordance with contract provisions.
Revenue for universal life products is recognized as follows:
|
|
Net investment income on assets supporting universal life products is recognized as earned. |
|
|
Fees for mortality and surrender charges are recognized as assessed, which is as earned. |
|
|
Administration fees are recognized as services are provided. |
Benefits and expenses for universal life products consist of benefit claims in excess of
policyholder account balances. Expenses are recognized when claims are submitted, and income is
credited in accordance with contract provisions.
Contract fees and expenses for administrative services only programs and pharmacy programs and
services are recognized as services are provided. Mail order pharmacy revenues and cost of goods
sold are recognized as each prescription is shipped.
111
S. Stock Compensation
The Company records compensation expense for stock awards and options over their vesting periods
based on the estimated fair value of the stock options, which is calculated using an option-pricing
model. Compensation expense is recorded for restricted stock grants and units over their vesting
periods based on fair value, which is equal to the market price of the Companys common stock on
the date of grant.
T. Participating Business
The Companys participating life insurance policies entitle policyholders to earn dividends that
represent a portion of the earnings of the Companys life insurance subsidiaries. Participating
insurance accounted for approximately 1% of the Companys total life insurance in force at the end
of 2009 and approximately 2% of the Companys total life insurance in force at the end of 2008 and
2007.
U. Income Taxes
The Company and its domestic subsidiaries file a consolidated United States federal income tax
return. The Companys foreign subsidiaries file tax returns in accordance with foreign law. U.S.
taxation of these foreign subsidiaries may differ in timing and amount from taxation under foreign
laws. Reportable amounts, including credits for foreign tax paid by these subsidiaries, are
reflected in the U.S. tax return of the affiliates domestic parent.
The Company recognizes deferred income taxes when the financial statement and tax-based carrying
values of assets and liabilities are different and recognizes deferred income tax liabilities on
the unremitted earnings of foreign subsidiaries that are not permanently invested overseas. For
subsidiaries whose earnings are considered permanently invested overseas, income taxes are accrued
at the local foreign tax rate. The Company establishes valuation allowances against deferred tax
assets if it is more likely than not that the deferred tax asset will not be realized. The need
for a valuation allowance is determined based on the evaluation of various factors, including
expectations of future earnings and managements judgment. Note 19 contains detailed information
about the Companys income taxes.
The Company recognizes interim period income taxes by estimating an annual effective tax rate and
applying it to year-to-date results. The estimated annual effective tax rate is periodically
updated throughout the year based on actual results to date and an updated projection of full year
income. Although the effective tax rate approach is generally used for interim periods, taxes on
significant, unusual and infrequent items are recognized at the statutory tax rate entirely in the
period the amounts are realized.
Note 3 Acquisitions and Dispositions
The Company may from time to time acquire or dispose of assets, subsidiaries or lines of
business. Significant transactions are described below.
A. Great-West Healthcare Acquisition
On April 1, 2008, the Company acquired the Healthcare division of Great-West Life and Annuity, Inc.
(Great-West Healthcare or the acquired business) through 100% indemnity reinsurance agreements
and the acquisition of certain affiliates and other assets and liabilities of Great-West
Healthcare. The purchase price of approximately $1.5 billion consisted of a payment to the seller
of approximately $1.4 billion for the net assets acquired and the assumption of net liabilities
under the reinsurance agreement of approximately $0.1 billion. Great-West Healthcare primarily
sells medical plans on a self-funded basis with stop loss coverage to select and regional employer
groups. Great-West Healthcares offerings also include the following specialty products: stop
loss, life, disability, medical, dental, vision, prescription drug coverage, and accidental death
and dismemberment insurance. The acquisition, which was accounted for as a purchase, was financed
through a combination of cash and the issuance of both short and long-term debt.
In accordance with the FASBs guidance on accounting for business combinations, the Company
completed its allocation of the total purchase price to the tangible and intangible net assets
acquired based on managements estimates of their fair values. Accordingly, approximately $290
million was allocated to intangible assets, primarily customer relationships and internal-use
software. The weighted average amortization period was 9 years for customer relationships and 6
years for internal-use software. The remainder, net of tangible net assets acquired, was goodwill
which approximated $1.1 billion and was allocated entirely to the Health Care segment.
Substantially all of the goodwill is tax deductible and is being amortized over 15 years for
federal income tax purposes.
112
The condensed balance sheet of Great-West Healthcare at the acquisition date was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
|
|
|
Investments |
|
$ |
147 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
55 |
|
Premiums, accounts and notes receivable |
|
|
226 |
|
Reinsurance recoverables |
|
|
12 |
|
Property and equipment (primarily capitalized software) |
|
|
142 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
7 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
1,095 |
|
Other assets, including other intangibles |
|
|
151 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets acquired |
|
|
1,835 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Future policy benefits |
|
|
78 |
|
Unpaid claims and claim expenses |
|
|
15 |
|
Health Care medical claims payable |
|
|
90 |
|
Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities (1) |
|
|
278 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities acquired |
|
|
461 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net assets acquired |
|
$ |
1,374 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes $18 million of liabilities related to integration activities: severance of $14
million and consolidation of facilities of $4 million. |
The results of Great-West Healthcare have been included in the Companys Consolidated
Financial Statements from the date of acquisition.
The following table presents selected unaudited pro forma information for the Company assuming the
acquisition had occurred as of January 1, 2007. The pro forma information does not purport to
represent what the Companys actual results would have been if the acquisition had occurred as of
the date indicated or what such results would be for any future periods.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, |
|
(In millions, except per share amounts) |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Total revenues |
|
$ |
19,469 |
|
|
$ |
19,173 |
|
Shareholders
income from continuing operations |
|
$ |
309 |
|
|
$ |
1,224 |
|
Shareholders
net income |
|
$ |
313 |
|
|
$ |
1,219 |
|
Earnings per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders
income from continuing operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
1.11 |
|
|
$ |
4.27 |
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
1.11 |
|
|
$ |
4.22 |
|
Shareholders
net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
1.13 |
|
|
$ |
4.26 |
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
1.12 |
|
|
$ |
4.20 |
|
B. Sale of the Chilean Insurance Operations
On August 10, 2007, the Company completed the sale of its Chilean insurance operations, which was
classified as a discontinued operation in the second quarter of 2007. The Company recognized an
impairment loss in the second quarter of 2007 for this business of $19 million after-tax primarily
relating to the write-off of unrecoverable tax assets and foreign currency translation losses.
113
C. Sale of Retirement Benefits Business
In 2004, the Company sold its retirement benefits business, excluding the corporate life insurance
business, for cash proceeds of $2.1 billion. The sale resulted in an initial after-tax gain of $809
million, of which $267 million after-tax was recognized immediately and
the remaining amount was deferred. The Company recognized deferred gains of $4 million after-tax in
2009 and 2008, as well as $5 million after-tax in 2007. As of December 31, 2009, the remaining
deferred gain of $29 million after-tax will be recognized in the Companys results of operations
through 2032.
D. Sale of Individual Life Insurance and Annuity Business
In 1998, the Company sold its individual life insurance and annuity business for cash proceeds of
$1.4 billion. The sale generated an after-tax gain of approximately $800 million, the majority of
which was deferred and is recognized at the rate that earnings from the sold business would have
been expected to emerge (primarily over 15 years on a declining basis). The Company recognized
deferred gains of $18 million after-tax in 2009, $21 million after-tax in 2008 and $25 million
after-tax in 2007. The remaining deferred gain of $90 million after-tax will be recognized in the
Companys results of operations through 2027.
Note 4 Earnings Per Share
Basic and diluted earnings per share were computed as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of |
|
|
|
|
(In millions, except per share amounts) |
|
Basic |
|
|
Dilution |
|
|
Diluted |
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders income from continuing
operations |
|
$ |
1,301 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,301 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares (in thousands): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average |
|
|
274,058 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
274,058 |
|
Options |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,299 |
|
|
|
1,299 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shares |
|
|
274,058 |
|
|
|
1,299 |
|
|
|
275,357 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPS |
|
$ |
4.75 |
|
|
$ |
(0.02 |
) |
|
$ |
4.73 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders income from continuing
operations |
|
$ |
288 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
288 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares (in thousands): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average |
|
|
277,317 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
277,317 |
|
Options |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,526 |
|
|
|
1,526 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shares |
|
|
277,317 |
|
|
|
1,526 |
|
|
|
278,843 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPS |
|
$ |
1.04 |
|
|
$ |
(0.01 |
) |
|
$ |
1.03 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders income from continuing
operations |
|
$ |
1,120 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,120 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares (in thousands): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average |
|
|
286,357 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
286,357 |
|
Options |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,776 |
|
|
|
3,776 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shares |
|
|
286,357 |
|
|
|
3,776 |
|
|
|
290,133 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPS |
|
$ |
3.91 |
|
|
$ |
(0.05 |
) |
|
$ |
3.86 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
114
As described in Note 2, effective in 2009, the Company adopted the FASBs new guidance for
determining participating securities which requires the Companys unvested restricted stock awards
to be included in weighted average shares instead of being considered a common stock equivalent.
Prior years share information has been restated as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
Diluted |
|
|
|
As originally |
|
|
|
|
|
|
As originally |
|
|
|
|
|
|
reported |
|
|
As adjusted |
|
|
reported |
|
|
As adjusted |
|
Shareholders
income from
continuing
operations |
|
$ |
1.05 |
|
|
$ |
1.04 |
|
|
$ |
1.04 |
|
|
$ |
1.03 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
Diluted |
|
|
|
As originally |
|
|
|
|
|
|
As originally |
|
|
|
|
|
|
reported |
|
|
As adjusted |
|
|
reported |
|
|
As adjusted |
|
Shareholders
income from
continuing
operations |
|
$ |
3.95 |
|
|
$ |
3.91 |
|
|
$ |
3.88 |
|
|
$ |
3.86 |
|
The following outstanding employee stock options were not included in the computation of
diluted earnings per share because their effect would have increased diluted earnings per share
(antidilutive) as their exercise price was greater than the average share price of the Companys
common stock for the period.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Antidilutive options |
|
|
8.8 |
|
|
|
6.3 |
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
Note 5 Health Care Medical Claims Payable
Medical claims payable for the Health Care segment reflects estimates of the ultimate cost of
claims that have been incurred but not yet reported, those which have been reported but not yet
paid (reported claims in process) and other medical expense payable, which primarily comprises
accruals for provider incentives and other amounts payable to providers. Incurred but not yet
reported comprises the majority of the reserve balance as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Incurred but not yet reported |
|
$ |
790 |
|
|
$ |
782 |
|
Reported claims in process |
|
|
114 |
|
|
|
114 |
|
Other medical expense payable |
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Medical claims payable |
|
$ |
921 |
|
|
$ |
924 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
115
Activity in medical claims payable was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Balance at January 1, |
|
$ |
924 |
|
|
$ |
975 |
|
|
$ |
960 |
|
Less: Reinsurance and other amounts
recoverable |
|
|
211 |
|
|
|
258 |
|
|
|
250 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at January 1, net |
|
|
713 |
|
|
|
717 |
|
|
|
710 |
|
Acquired April 1, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
90 |
|
|
|
|
|
Incurred claims related to: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current year |
|
|
6,970 |
|
|
|
7,312 |
|
|
|
6,878 |
|
Prior years |
|
|
(43 |
) |
|
|
(60 |
) |
|
|
(80 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total incurred |
|
|
6,927 |
|
|
|
7,252 |
|
|
|
6,798 |
|
Paid claims related to: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current year |
|
|
6,278 |
|
|
|
6,716 |
|
|
|
6,197 |
|
Prior years |
|
|
647 |
|
|
|
630 |
|
|
|
594 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total paid |
|
|
6,925 |
|
|
|
7,346 |
|
|
|
6,791 |
|
Balance at December 31, net |
|
|
715 |
|
|
|
713 |
|
|
|
717 |
|
Add: Reinsurance and other amounts
recoverable |
|
|
206 |
|
|
|
211 |
|
|
|
258 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, |
|
$ |
921 |
|
|
$ |
924 |
|
|
$ |
975 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reinsurance and other amounts recoverable reflect amounts due from reinsurers and
policyholders to cover incurred but not reported and pending claims for minimum premium products
and certain administrative services only business where the right of offset does not exist. See
Note 8 for additional information on reinsurance. For the year ended December 31, 2009, actual
experience differed from the Companys key assumptions resulting in favorable incurred claims
related to prior years medical claims payable of $43 million, or 0.6% of the current year incurred
claims as reported for the year ended December 31, 2008. Actual completion factors resulted in a
reduction in medical claims payable of $21 million, or 0.3% of the current year incurred claims as
reported for the year ended December 31, 2008 for the insured book of business. Actual medical cost
trend resulted in a reduction in medical claims payable of $22 million, or 0.3% of the current year
incurred claims as reported for the year ended December 31, 2008 for the insured book of business.
For the year ended December 31, 2008, actual experience differed from the Companys key
assumptions, resulting in favorable incurred claims related to prior years medical claims payable
of $60 million, or 0.9% of the current year incurred claims as reported for the year ended December
31, 2007. Actual completion factors resulted in a reduction of the medical claims payable of $29
million, or 0.4% of the current year incurred claims as reported for the year ended December 31,
2007 for the insured book of business. Actual medical cost trend resulted in a reduction of the
medical claims payable of $31 million, or 0.5% of the current year incurred claims as reported for
the year ended December 31, 2007 for the insured book of business.
The favorable impacts in 2009 and 2008 relating to completion factors and medical cost trend
variances are primarily due to the release of the provision for moderately adverse conditions,
which is a component of the assumptions for both completion factors and medical cost trend,
established for claims incurred related to prior years. This release was substantially offset by
the provision for moderately adverse conditions established for claims incurred related to the
current year.
The corresponding impact of prior year development on shareholders net income was not material for
the years ended December 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008. The change in the amount of the incurred
claims related to prior years in the medical claims payable liability does not directly correspond
to an increase or decrease in the Companys shareholders net income recognized for the following
reasons:
First, due to the nature of the Companys retrospectively experience-rated business, only
adjustments to medical claims payable on accounts in deficit affect shareholders net income. An
increase or decrease to medical claims payable on accounts in deficit, in effect, accrues to the
Company and directly impacts shareholders net income. An account is in deficit when the
accumulated medical costs and administrative charges, including profit charges, exceed the
accumulated premium received. Adjustments to medical claims payable on accounts in surplus accrue
directly to the policyholder with no impact on the Companys shareholders net income. An account
is in surplus when the accumulated premium received exceeds the accumulated medical costs and
administrative charges, including profit charges.
116
Second, the Company consistently recognizes the actuarial best estimate of the ultimate liability
within a level of confidence, as required by actuarial standards of practice, which require that
the liabilities be adequate under moderately adverse conditions. As the Company establishes the
liability for each incurral year, the Company ensures that its assumptions appropriately consider
moderately adverse conditions. When a portion of the development related to the prior year incurred
claims is offset by an increase determined appropriate to address moderately adverse conditions for
the current year incurred claims, the Company does not consider that offset amount as having any
impact on shareholders net income.
Note 6 Initiatives to Lower Operating Expenses
As part of its strategy, the Company has undertaken several initiatives to realign its organization
and consolidate support functions in an effort to increase efficiency and responsiveness to
customers and to reduce costs.
During 2008 and 2009, the Company conducted a comprehensive review to reduce the operating expenses
of its ongoing businesses (cost reduction program). As a result, the Company recognized
severance-related and real estate charges in other operating expenses.
Severance charges in 2008 and 2009 resulted from reductions of approximately 2,350 positions in the
Companys workforce.
Cost reduction activity for 2008 and 2009 was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pre-tax (In millions) |
|
Severance |
|
|
Real Estate |
|
|
Total |
|
Fourth Quarter 2008 charge (balance
carried to January 1, 2009) |
|
$ |
44 |
|
|
$ |
11 |
|
|
$ |
55 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Second Quarter |
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14 |
|
Third Quarter |
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
|
Fourth Quarter |
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal 2009 charges |
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44 |
|
Less: Payments |
|
|
55 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
58 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2009 |
|
$ |
33 |
|
|
$ |
8 |
|
|
$ |
41 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Health Care segment recorded $37 million pre-tax ($24 million after-tax) of the 2009
charges and $44 million pre-tax ($27 million after-tax) of the 2008 charge. The remainder of the
2009 and 2008 charges were reported as follows: Disability and Life: $5 million pre-tax ($4
million after-tax) in 2009 and $3 million pre-tax ($2 million after-tax) in 2008; and
International: $2 million pre-tax ($1 million after-tax) in 2009 and $8 million pre-tax ($6 million
after-tax) in 2008. Substantially all severance is expected to be paid by the end of 2010.
Note 7 Guaranteed Minimum Death Benefit Contracts
The Companys reinsurance operations, which were discontinued in 2000 and are now an inactive
business in run-off mode, reinsured a guaranteed minimum death benefit (GMDB), also known as
variable annuity death benefits (VADBe), under certain variable annuities issued by other
insurance companies. These variable annuities are essentially investments in mutual funds combined
with a death benefit. The Company has equity and other market exposures as a result of this
product. In periods of declining equity markets and in periods of flat equity markets following a
decline, the Companys liabilities for these guaranteed minimum death benefits increase.
Conversely, in periods of rising equity markets, the Companys liabilities for these guaranteed
minimum death benefits decrease.
117
In order to substantially reduce the equity market exposures relating to guaranteed minimum death
benefit contracts, the Company operates a dynamic hedge program (GMDB equity hedge program),
using exchange-traded futures contracts. The hedge program is designed to offset both positive
and negative impacts of changes in equity markets on the GMDB liability. The hedge program
involves detailed, daily monitoring of equity market movements and rebalancing the futures
contracts within established parameters. While the hedge program is actively managed, it may not
exactly offset changes in the GMDB liability due to, among other things, divergence between the
performance of the underlying mutual funds and the hedge instruments, high levels of volatility in
the equity markets, and differences between actual contractholder behavior and what is assumed.
The performance of the underlying mutual funds compared to the hedge instruments is further
impacted by a time lag, since the data is not reported and incorporated into the required hedge
position on a real time basis. Although this hedge program does not qualify for GAAP hedge
accounting, it is an economic hedge because it is designed to reduce and is effective in reducing
equity market exposures resulting from this product. The results of the futures contracts are
included in other revenue and amounts reflecting corresponding changes in liabilities for these
GMDB contracts are included in benefits and expenses.
In 2000, the Company determined that the GMDB reinsurance business was premium deficient because
the recorded future policy benefit reserve was less than the expected present value of future
claims and expenses less the expected present value of future premiums and investment income using
revised assumptions based on actual and expected experience. As a result, the Company increased
its reserves. Since that time, the Company has tested for premium deficiency by performing a
reserve review on a quarterly basis using current market conditions and assumptions. Under premium
deficiency accounting, if the recorded reserve is determined insufficient, an increase to the
reserve is reflected as a charge to current period income. Consistent with GAAP, the Company does
not recognize gains on premium deficient long duration products.
The Company had future policy benefit reserves for GMDB contracts of $1.3 billion as of December
31, 2009, and $1.6 billion as of December 31, 2008. The determination of liabilities for GMDB
requires the Company to make critical accounting estimates. The Company estimates its liabilities
for GMDB exposures using a complex internal model run using many scenarios and based on assumptions
regarding lapse, future partial surrenders, mortality, interest rates (mean investment performance
and discount rate) and volatility. Lapse refers to the full surrender of an annuity prior to a
contractholders death. Future partial surrender refers to the fact that most contractholders have
the ability to withdraw substantially all of their mutual fund investments while retaining the
death benefit coverage in effect at the time of the withdrawal. Mean investment performance for
underlying equity mutual funds refers to market rates expected to be earned on the hedging
instruments over the life of the GMDB equity hedge program, and for underlying fixed income mutual
funds refers to the expected market return over the life of the contracts. Market volatility
refers to market fluctuation. These assumptions are based on the Companys experience and future
expectations over the long-term period, consistent with the long-term nature of this product. The
Company regularly evaluates these assumptions and changes its estimates if actual experience or
other evidence suggests that assumptions should be revised. If actual experience differs from the
assumptions (including lapse, future partial surrenders, mortality, interest rates and volatility)
used in estimating these liabilities, the result could have a material adverse effect on the
Companys consolidated results of operations, and in certain situations, could have a material
adverse effect on the Companys financial condition.
118
The following provides information about the Companys reserving methodology and assumptions for
GMDB as of December 31, 2009:
|
|
The reserves represent estimates of the present value of net amounts expected to be paid,
less the present value of net future premiums. Included in net amounts expected to be paid is
the excess of the guaranteed death benefits over the values of the contractholders accounts
(based on underlying equity and bond mutual fund investments). |
|
|
The reserves include an estimate for partial surrenders that essentially lock in the death
benefit for a particular policy based on annual election rates that vary from 0-22% depending
on the net amount at risk for each policy and whether surrender charges apply. |
|
|
The assumed mean investment performance for the underlying equity mutual funds considers
the Companys GMDB equity hedge program using futures contracts, and is based on the Companys
view that short-term interest rates will average 5% over future periods, but considers that
current short-term rates are less than 5%. The mean investment performance assumption for the
underlying fixed income mutual funds (bonds and money market) is 5% based on a review of
historical returns. The investment performance for underlying equity and fixed income mutual
funds is reduced by fund fees ranging from 1-3% across all funds. The results of futures
contracts are reflected in the liability calculation as a component of investment returns. |
|
|
The volatility assumption is based on a review of historical monthly returns for each key
index (e.g. S&P 500) over a period of at least ten years. Volatility represents the
dispersion of historical returns compared to the average historical return (standard
deviation) for each index. The assumption is 16-30%, varying by equity fund type; 4-10%,
varying by bond fund type; and 2% for money market funds. These volatility assumptions are
used along with the mean investment performance assumption to project future return scenarios. |
|
|
The discount rate is 5.75%. |
|
|
The mortality assumption is 70-75% of the 1994 Group Annuity Mortality table, with 1%
annual improvement beginning January 1, 2000. |
|
|
The lapse rate assumption is 0-21%, depending on contract type, policy duration and the
ratio of the net amount at risk to account value. |
Although first quarter 2009 results included reserve strengthening of $73 million pre-tax ($47
million after-tax), no additional reserve strengthening was required since then, primarily due to
the stabilization and recovery of equity markets. The components of the first quarter reserve
strengthening were:
|
|
adverse impacts of overall market declines of $50 million pre-tax ($32 million after-tax).
This is comprised of (a) $39 million pre-tax ($25 million after-tax) primarily related to the
provision for future partial surrenders, and (b) $11 million pre-tax ($7 million after-tax)
related to declines in the values of contractholders non-equity investments such as bond
funds, neither of which is included in the GMDB equity hedge program; |
|
|
adverse volatility-related impacts of $11 million pre-tax ($7 million after-tax) due to
turbulent equity market conditions, including higher than expected claims and the performance
of the diverse mix of equity fund investments held by contractholders being different than
expected; and |
|
|
adverse interest rate impacts of $12 million pre-tax ($8 million after-tax). Interest rate
risk is not covered by the GMDB equity hedge program, and the interest rate returns on the
futures contracts were less than the Companys long-term assumption for mean investment
performance. |
119
During 2008, the Company recorded additional benefits expenses of $412 million pre-tax ($267
million after-tax) primarily to strengthen GMDB reserves following an analysis of experience and
reserve assumptions. The amounts were primarily due to:
|
|
adverse impacts of overall market declines of $210 million pre-tax ($136 million
after-tax). This is comprised of (a) $185 million ($120 million after-tax) related to the
provision for partial surrenders, including $40 million ($26 million after-tax) for an
increase in the assumed election rates for future partial surrenders and (b) $25 million ($16
million after-tax) related to declines in the values of contractholders non-equity
investments such as bond funds, neither of which is included in the GMDB equity hedge program; |
|
|
adverse volatility-related impacts due to turbulent equity market conditions. Volatility
risk is not covered by the GMDB equity hedge program. Also, the equity market volatility,
particularly during the second half of the year impacted the effectiveness of the hedge
program. In aggregate, these volatility-related impacts totaled $182 million of the pre-tax
charge ($118 million after-tax). The GMDB equity hedge program is designed so that changes in
the value of a portfolio of actively managed futures contracts will offset changes in the
liability resulting from equity market movements. In periods of equity market declines, the
liability will increase; the hedge program is designed to produce gains on the futures
contracts to offset the increase in the liability. However, the hedge program will not
perfectly offset the change in the liability, in part because the market does not offer
futures contracts that exactly match the diverse mix of equity fund investments held by
contractholders, and because there is a time lag between changes in underlying contractholder
mutual funds, and corresponding changes in the hedge position. In 2008, the impact of this
mismatch was higher than most prior periods due to the relatively large changes in market
indices from day to day. In addition, the number of futures contracts used in the hedge
program is adjusted only when certain tolerances are exceeded and in periods of highly
volatile equity markets when actual volatility exceeds the expected volatility assumed in the
liability calculation, losses will result. These conditions have had an adverse impact on
earnings, and during 2008, the increase in the liability due to equity market movements was
only partially offset by the results of the futures contracts; and |
|
|
adverse interest rate impacts. Interest rate risk is not covered by the GMDB equity hedge
program, and the interest rate returns on the futures contracts were less than the Companys
long-term assumption for mean investment performance generating $14 million of the pre-tax
charge ($9 million after-tax). |
Activity in future policy benefit reserves for these GMDB contracts was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Balance at January 1, |
|
$ |
1,609 |
|
|
$ |
848 |
|
|
$ |
862 |
|
Add: Unpaid Claims |
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
Less: Reinsurance and other amounts
recoverable |
|
|
83 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at January 1, net |
|
|
1,560 |
|
|
|
850 |
|
|
|
862 |
|
Add: Incurred benefits |
|
|
(122 |
) |
|
|
822 |
|
|
|
62 |
|
Less: Paid benefits |
|
|
170 |
|
|
|
112 |
|
|
|
74 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance, net |
|
|
1,268 |
|
|
|
1,560 |
|
|
|
850 |
|
Less: Unpaid Claims |
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
Add: Reinsurance and other amounts
recoverable |
|
|
53 |
|
|
|
83 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, |
|
$ |
1,285 |
|
|
$ |
1,609 |
|
|
$ |
848 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefits paid and incurred are net of ceded amounts. Incurred benefits reflect the favorable
or unfavorable impact of a rising or falling equity market on the liability, and include the
charges discussed above. As discussed below, losses or gains have been recorded in other revenues
as a result of the GMDB equity hedge program to reduce equity market exposures.
120
The majority of the Companys exposure arises under annuities that guarantee that the benefit
received at death will be no less than the highest historical account value of the related mutual
fund investments on a contractholders anniversary date. Under this type of death benefit, the
Company is liable to the extent the highest historical anniversary account value exceeds the fair
value of the related mutual fund investments at the time of a contractholders death. Other
annuity designs that the Company reinsured guarantee that the benefit received at death will be:
|
|
the contractholders account value as of the last anniversary date (anniversary reset); or |
|
|
no less than net deposits paid into the contract accumulated at a specified rate or net
deposits paid into the contract. |
The table below presents the account value, net amount at risk and average attained age of
underlying contractholders for guarantees in the event of death, by type of benefit as of December
31. The net amount at risk is the death benefit coverage in force or the amount that the Company
would have to pay if all contractholders died as of the specified date, and represents the excess
of the guaranteed benefit amount over the fair value of the underlying mutual fund investments.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in millions) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Highest anniversary annuity value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Account value |
|
$ |
13,890 |
|
|
$ |
13,154 |
|
Net amount at risk |
|
$ |
5,953 |
|
|
$ |
9,489 |
|
Average attained age of contractholders
(weighted by exposure) |
|
|
69 |
|
|
|
68 |
|
Anniversary value reset |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Account value |
|
$ |
1,403 |
|
|
$ |
1,322 |
|
Net amount at risk |
|
$ |
113 |
|
|
$ |
336 |
|
Average attained age of contractholders
(weighted by exposure) |
|
|
61 |
|
|
|
59 |
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Account value |
|
$ |
1,918 |
|
|
$ |
1,846 |
|
Net amount at risk |
|
$ |
914 |
|
|
$ |
1,280 |
|
Average attained age of contractholders
(weighted by exposure) |
|
|
68 |
|
|
|
67 |
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Account value |
|
$ |
17,211 |
|
|
$ |
16,322 |
|
Net amount at risk |
|
$ |
6,980 |
|
|
$ |
11,105 |
|
Average attained age of contractholders
(weighted by exposure) |
|
|
69 |
|
|
|
68 |
|
Number of contractholders (approx.) |
|
|
590,000 |
|
|
|
650,000 |
|
As discussed above, the Company operates a GMDB equity hedge program to substantially reduce
the equity market exposures of this business by selling exchange-traded futures contracts, which
are expected to rise in value as the equity market declines and decline in value as the equity
market rises. In addition, the Company uses foreign currency futures contracts to reduce the
international equity market and foreign currency risks associated with this business. The notional
amount of futures contract positions held by the Company at December 31, 2009 was $1.0
billion. The Company recorded in other revenues pre-tax losses of $282 million in 2009, compared
with pre-tax gains of $333 million in 2008 and pre-tax losses of $32 million in 2007 from these
futures contracts.
The Company has also written reinsurance contracts with issuers of variable annuity contracts that
provide annuitants with certain guarantees related to minimum income benefits. All reinsured GMIB
policies also have a GMDB benefit reinsured by the Company. See Note 11 for further information.
Note 8 Reinsurance
The Companys insurance subsidiaries enter into agreements with other insurance companies to assume
and cede reinsurance. Reinsurance is ceded primarily to limit losses from large exposures and to
permit recovery of a portion of direct losses. Reinsurance is also used in acquisition and
disposition transactions where the underwriting company is not being acquired. Reinsurance does not
relieve the originating insurer of liability. The Company regularly evaluates the financial
condition of its reinsurers and monitors its concentrations of credit risk.
121
Retirement benefits business. The Company had a reinsurance recoverable of $1.7 billion as of
December 31, 2009, and $1.9 billion as of December 31, 2008 from Prudential Retirement Insurance
and Annuity Company resulting from the sale of the retirement benefits business, which was
primarily in the form of a reinsurance arrangement. The reinsurance recoverable, which is reduced
as the Companys reinsured liabilities are paid or directly assumed by the reinsurer, is secured
primarily by fixed maturities and mortgage loans equal to or greater than 100% of the reinsured
liabilities held in a trust established for the benefit of the Company. As of December 31, 2009,
the fair value of trust assets exceeded the reinsurance recoverable and S&P had assigned this
reinsurer a rating of AA-.
Individual life and annuity reinsurance. The Company had reinsurance recoverables totaling $4.4
billion as of December 31, 2009 and $4.6 billion as of December 31, 2008 from The Lincoln National
Life Insurance Company and Lincoln Life & Annuity of New York resulting from the 1998 sale of the
Companys individual life insurance and annuity business through indemnity reinsurance
arrangements. A substantial portion of the reinsurance recoverables are secured by investments
held in a trust established for the benefit of the Company. At December 31, 2009, the trust assets
secured approximately 90% of the reinsurance recoverables. The remaining balance is currently
unsecured. If Lincoln National Life Insurance Company and Lincoln Life & Annuity of New
York do not maintain a specified minimum credit or claims paying rating, these reinsurers are
required to fully secure the outstanding balance. S&P has assigned each of these
companies a rating of AA-.
Other Ceded and Assumed Reinsurance
Ceded Reinsurance: Ongoing operations. The Companys insurance subsidiaries have reinsurance
recoverables from various reinsurance arrangements in the ordinary course of business for its
Health Care, Disability and Life, and International segments as well as the non-leveraged and
leveraged corporate-owned life insurance business. Reinsurance recoverables of $294 million as of
December 31, 2009 are expected to be collected from more than 90 reinsurers which have been
assigned the following financial strength ratings by S&P:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reinsurance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recoverable |
|
|
|
Reinsurance |
|
|
Percent |
|
|
Protected |
|
Ongoing operations (In millions) |
|
Recoverable |
|
|
of Total |
|
|
by Collateral |
|
AA- (Single reinsurer) |
|
$ |
47 |
|
|
|
16 |
% |
|
|
0 |
% |
AA- or higher (Other reinsurers) |
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
11 |
% |
|
|
0 |
% |
A (Single reinsurer) |
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
10 |
% |
|
|
0 |
% |
A+ to A- (Other reinsurers) |
|
|
111 |
|
|
|
38 |
% |
|
|
4 |
% |
Unrated (Single reinsurer) |
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
12 |
% |
|
|
99 |
% |
Below A- or unrated (Other
reinsurers) |
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
13 |
% |
|
|
37 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
294 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
18 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The collateral protecting the recoverables includes assets held in trust and letters of
credit. The Company reviews its reinsurance arrangements and establishes reserves against the
recoverables in the event that recovery is not considered probable. As of December 31, 2009, the
Companys recoverables related to these segments were net of a reserve of $9 million.
Assumed and Ceded reinsurance: Run-off Reinsurance segment. The Companys Run-off Reinsurance
operations assumed risks related to GMDB contracts, GMIB contracts, workers compensation, and
personal accident business. The Companys Run-off Reinsurance operations also purchased
retrocessional coverage to reduce the risk of loss on these contracts.
Liabilities related to GMDB, workers compensation and personal accident are included in future
policy benefits and unpaid claims. Because the GMIB contracts are treated as derivatives under
GAAP, the asset related to GMIB is recorded in the Other assets, including other intangibles
caption and the liability related to GMIB is recorded in the Accounts payable, accrued expenses,
and other liabilities caption on the Companys Consolidated Balance Sheets (see Notes 11 and 23 for
additional discussion of the GMIB assets and liabilities).
122
The reinsurance recoverables for GMDB, workers compensation, and personal accident of $121 million
as of December 31, 2009 are expected to be collected from approximately 80 retrocessionaires which
have been assigned the following financial strength ratings from S&P:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reinsurance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recoverable |
|
|
|
Reinsurance |
|
|
Percent |
|
|
Protected |
|
Run-off Reinsurance segment (In millions) |
|
Recoverable |
|
|
of Total |
|
|
by Collateral |
|
AA- or higher |
|
$ |
32 |
|
|
|
26 |
% |
|
|
11 |
% |
A (Single reinsurer) |
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
30 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
A- (Single reinsurer) |
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
14 |
% |
|
|
50 |
% |
A+ to A- (Other reinsurers) |
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
13 |
% |
|
|
5 |
% |
Below A- or unrated |
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
17 |
% |
|
|
31 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
121 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
45 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The collateral protecting the recoverables includes letters of credit and assets held in
trust. The Company reviews its reinsurance arrangements and establishes reserves against the
recoverables in the event that recovery is not considered probable. As of December 31, 2009, the
Companys recoverables related to this segment were net of a reserve of $6 million.
The Companys payment obligations for underlying reinsurance exposures assumed by the Company under
these contracts are based on the ceding companies claim payments. For GMDB, claim payments vary
because of changes in equity markets and interest rates, as well as mortality and contractholder
behavior. For workers compensation and personal accident, the payments relate to accidents and
injuries. Any of these claim payments can extend many years into the future, and the amount of the
ceding companies ultimate claims, and therefore the amount of the Companys ultimate payment
obligations and corresponding ultimate collection from retrocessionaires, may not be known with
certainty for some time.
Summary. The Companys reserves for underlying reinsurance exposures assumed by the Company, as
well as for amounts recoverable from reinsurers/retrocessionaires for both ongoing operations and
the run-off reinsurance operation, are considered appropriate as of December 31, 2009, based on
current information. However, it is possible that future developments could have a material
adverse effect on the Companys consolidated results of operations and, in certain situations, such
as if actual experience differs from the assumptions used in estimating reserves for GMDB, could
have a material adverse effect on the Companys financial condition. The Company bears the risk of
loss if its retrocessionaires do not meet or are unable to meet their reinsurance obligations to
the Company.
123
In the Companys Consolidated Income Statements, Premiums and fees were presented net of ceded
premiums, and Total benefits and expenses were presented net of reinsurance recoveries, in the
following amounts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Premiums and Fees |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-duration contracts: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Direct |
|
$ |
13,886 |
|
|
$ |
13,969 |
|
|
$ |
13,585 |
|
Assumed |
|
|
1,076 |
|
|
|
1,221 |
|
|
|
329 |
|
Ceded |
|
|
(192 |
) |
|
|
(242 |
) |
|
|
(178 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,770 |
|
|
|
14,948 |
|
|
|
13,736 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-duration contracts: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Direct |
|
|
1,499 |
|
|
|
1,521 |
|
|
|
1,485 |
|
Assumed |
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
53 |
|
|
|
70 |
|
Ceded: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Individual life insurance and
annuity business sold |
|
|
(209 |
) |
|
|
(220 |
) |
|
|
(230 |
) |
Other |
|
|
(52 |
) |
|
|
(49 |
) |
|
|
(53 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,271 |
|
|
|
1,305 |
|
|
|
1,272 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
16,041 |
|
|
$ |
16,253 |
|
|
$ |
15,008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reinsurance recoveries |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Individual life insurance and
annuity business sold |
|
$ |
322 |
|
|
$ |
368 |
|
|
$ |
323 |
|
Other |
|
|
178 |
|
|
|
282 |
|
|
|
106 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
500 |
|
|
$ |
650 |
|
|
$ |
429 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The increase in assumed premiums in 2008 primarily reflects the effect of the reinsurance
assumed in connection with the acquisition of Great-West Healthcare in 2008. The effects of
reinsurance on written premiums and fees for short-duration contracts were not materially different
from the recognized premium and fee amounts shown in the above table.
124
Note 9 Goodwill, Other Intangibles, and Property and Equipment
Substantially all goodwill relates to the Health Care segment and increased by approximately $1.1
billion during 2008 as a result of the acquisition of Great-West Healthcare.
Other intangible assets were comprised of the following at December 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
Net Carrying |
|
|
Amortization |
|
(Dollars in millions) |
|
Cost |
|
|
Amortization |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Period (Years) |
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customer relationships |
|
$ |
386 |
|
|
$ |
254 |
|
|
$ |
132 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
Other |
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total reported in other
assets, including other
intangibles |
|
|
432 |
|
|
|
266 |
|
|
|
166 |
|
|
|
|
|
Internal-use software
reported in property and
equipment |
|
|
1,168 |
|
|
|
692 |
|
|
|
476 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other intangible assets |
|
$ |
1,600 |
|
|
$ |
958 |
|
|
$ |
642 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customer relationships |
|
$ |
381 |
|
|
$ |
230 |
|
|
$ |
151 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
Other |
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total reported in other
assets, including other
intangibles |
|
|
424 |
|
|
|
236 |
|
|
|
188 |
|
|
|
|
|
Internal-use software
reported in property and
equipment |
|
|
998 |
|
|
|
545 |
|
|
|
453 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other intangible assets |
|
$ |
1,422 |
|
|
$ |
781 |
|
|
$ |
641 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment was comprised of the following as of December 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
Net Carrying |
|
(Dollars in millions) |
|
Cost |
|
|
Amortization |
|
|
Value |
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Internal-use software |
|
$ |
1,168 |
|
|
$ |
692 |
|
|
$ |
476 |
|
Other property and
equipment |
|
|
1,194 |
|
|
|
808 |
|
|
|
386 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total property and
equipment |
|
$ |
2,362 |
|
|
$ |
1,500 |
|
|
$ |
862 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Internal-use software |
|
$ |
998 |
|
|
$ |
545 |
|
|
$ |
453 |
|
Other property and
equipment |
|
|
1,252 |
|
|
|
901 |
|
|
|
351 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total property and
equipment |
|
$ |
2,250 |
|
|
$ |
1,446 |
|
|
$ |
804 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization was comprised of the following for the years ended December 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in millions) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Internal-use software |
|
$ |
147 |
|
|
$ |
143 |
|
|
$ |
111 |
|
Other property and equipment |
|
|
91 |
|
|
|
76 |
|
|
|
74 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization of property
and equipment |
|
|
238 |
|
|
|
219 |
|
|
|
185 |
|
Other intangibles |
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total depreciation and amortization |
|
$ |
268 |
|
|
$ |
244 |
|
|
$ |
194 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company estimates annual pre-tax amortization for intangible assets, including
internal-use software, over the next five calendar years to be as follows: $145 million in 2010,
$125 million in 2011, $100 million in 2012, $66 million in 2013, and $49 million in 2014.
125
Note 10 Pension and Other Postretirement Benefit Plans
A. Pension and Other Postretirement Benefit Plans
The Company and certain of its subsidiaries provide pension, health care and life insurance defined
benefits to eligible retired employees, spouses and other eligible dependents through various
plans. On May 8, 2009, the Company announced a freeze of its primary domestic defined benefit
pension plans effective July 1, 2009. A curtailment of benefits occurred as a result of this action
since it eliminated the accrual of benefits effective July 1, 2009 for active employees enrolled in
these domestic pension plans. Accordingly, the Company recognized a pre-tax curtailment gain of
$46 million ($30 million after-tax) during the second quarter of 2009, which was the remaining
unamortized negative prior service cost at May 31, 2009.
The Company measures the assets and liabilities of its domestic pension and other postretirement
benefit plans as of December 31. The following table summarizes the projected benefit obligations
and assets related to the Companys domestic and international pension and other postretirement
benefit plans as of, and for the year ended, December 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension |
|
|
Other Postretirement |
|
|
|
Benefits |
|
|
Benefits |
|
(In millions) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Change in benefit obligation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefit obligation, January 1 |
|
$ |
4,101 |
|
|
$ |
4,045 |
|
|
$ |
376 |
|
|
$ |
426 |
|
Service cost |
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
74 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
Interest cost |
|
|
250 |
|
|
|
242 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
(Gain) loss from past experience |
|
|
255 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
59 |
|
|
|
(20 |
) |
Benefits paid from plan assets |
|
|
(247 |
) |
|
|
(246 |
) |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
(3 |
) |
Benefits paid other |
|
|
(30 |
) |
|
|
(24 |
) |
|
|
(37 |
) |
|
|
(36 |
) |
Translation of foreign currencies |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amendments |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(16 |
) |
Curtailment |
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefit obligation, December 31 |
|
|
4,363 |
|
|
|
4,101 |
|
|
|
419 |
|
|
|
376 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in plan assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of plan assets,
January 1 |
|
|
2,248 |
|
|
|
3,417 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
Actual return on plan assets |
|
|
436 |
|
|
|
(921 |
) |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
Benefits paid |
|
|
(247 |
) |
|
|
(246 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
(3 |
) |
Translation of foreign currencies |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contributions |
|
|
412 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of plan assets,
December 31 |
|
|
2,850 |
|
|
|
2,248 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funded Status |
|
$ |
(1,513 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,853 |
) |
|
$ |
(395 |
) |
|
$ |
(352 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The postretirement benefits liability adjustment included in accumulated other comprehensive
loss consisted of the following as of December 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension |
|
|
Other Postretirement |
|
|
|
Benefits |
|
|
Benefits |
|
(In millions) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Unrecognized net gain (loss) |
|
$ |
(1,558 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,548 |
) |
|
$ |
22 |
|
|
$ |
84 |
|
Unrecognized prior service cost |
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
69 |
|
|
|
88 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Postretirement benefits
liability adjustment |
|
$ |
(1,563 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,498 |
) |
|
$ |
91 |
|
|
$ |
172 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
126
During 2009, the Companys postretirement benefits liability adjustment increased by $146
million pre-tax ($97 million after-tax) resulting in a decrease to shareholders equity. The
increase in the liability was primarily due to:
|
|
decreases in discount rates for both the pension and other postretirement benefit plans; |
|
|
actuarial losses primarily relating to census changes and updated medical trend assumptions
resulting from the 2009 plan valuations; and |
|
|
the effect of the 2009 curtailment. |
Those impacts were partially offset by actual returns on pension plan assets being more favorable
than expected in 2009, as both equity and fixed income markets improved considerably in 2009.
Pension benefits. The Companys pension plans were underfunded by $1.5 billion in 2009 and $1.9
billion in 2008 and had related accumulated benefit obligations of $4.3 billion as of December 31,
2009 and $4.1 billion as of December 31, 2008.
The Company funds its qualified pension plans at least at the minimum amount required by the
Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA) and the Pension Protection Act of 2006.
For 2010, the Company expects minimum required contributions to be approximately $70 million. This
amount could change based on final valuation amounts. In addition, the Company currently plans to
make voluntary contributions of approximately $140 million during 2010. Based on its current
funded status, the Company does not believe that the litigation matter discussed in Note 23 to the
Consolidated Financial Statements would have an impact on 2010 funding requirements even if
resolved in 2010. Future years contributions will ultimately be based on a wide range of factors
including but not limited to asset returns, discount rates, and funding targets.
Components of net pension cost for the years ended December 31 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Service cost |
|
$ |
43 |
|
|
$ |
74 |
|
|
$ |
73 |
|
Interest cost |
|
|
250 |
|
|
|
242 |
|
|
|
231 |
|
Expected long-term return on plan assets |
|
|
(239 |
) |
|
|
(234 |
) |
|
|
(209 |
) |
Amortization of: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss from past experience |
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
57 |
|
|
|
119 |
|
Prior service cost |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
Curtailment |
|
|
(46 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net pension cost |
|
$ |
38 |
|
|
$ |
128 |
|
|
$ |
213 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
127
The Company expects to recognize pre-tax losses of $24 million in 2010 from amortization of
past experience. This estimate is based on a weighted average amortization period for the frozen
and inactive plans of approximately 30 years, as this period is now based on the average expected
remaining life of plan participants. As a result of the plan freeze, the workforce is considered
inactive for pension accounting purposes because employees will no longer earn pension benefits.
Other postretirement benefits. Unfunded retiree health benefit plans had accumulated benefit
obligations of $268 million at December 31, 2009, and $235 million at December 31, 2008. Retiree
life insurance plans had accumulated benefit obligations of $150 million as of December 31, 2009
and $141 million as of December 31, 2008.
Components of net other postretirement benefit cost for the years ended December 31 were as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Service cost |
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
$ |
2 |
|
Interest cost |
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
Expected long-term return on plan assets |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
Amortization of: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net gain from past experience |
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
(6 |
) |
Prior service cost |
|
|
(18 |
) |
|
|
(17 |
) |
|
|
(17 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net other postretirement benefit cost |
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
$ |
(1 |
) |
|
$ |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company expects to recognize in 2010 pre-tax gains of $19 million related to amortization
of prior service cost and pre-tax gains of $1 million from amortization of past experience. The
original amortization period is based on an average remaining service period of active employees
associated with the other postretirement benefit plans of approximately 9 years. The remaining
amortization period for prior service cost is approximately 4 years.
The estimated rate of future increases in the per capita cost of health care benefits is 9% in
2010, decreasing by 0.5% per year to 5% in 2017 and beyond. This estimate reflects the Companys
current claim experience and managements estimate that rates of growth will decline in the future.
A 1% increase or decrease in the estimated rate would change 2009 reported amounts as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
Increase |
|
|
Decrease |
|
Effect on total service and interest cost |
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
Effect on postretirement benefit obligation |
|
$ |
12 |
|
|
$ |
11 |
|
128
Plan assets. The target investment allocation percentages (58% equity securities, 20% fixed
income, 7% real estate and 15% other) are developed by management as guidelines, although the fair
values of each asset category are expected to vary as a result of changes in market conditions.
The pension plan asset portfolio has been most heavily weighted towards equity securities,
consisting of domestic and international investments, in an effort to synchronize the expected
higher rate of return on equities over the long-term with the overall long-term nature of the
pension benefit obligations. The diversification of the pension plan assets into other investments
is intended to mitigate the volatility in returns, while also providing adequate liquidity to fund
benefit distributions.
As of December 31, 2009, pension plan assets included $2.6 billion invested in the separate
accounts of Connecticut General Life Insurance Company (CGLIC) and Life Insurance Company of
North America, which are subsidiaries of the Company, as well as an additional $0.3 billion
invested directly in funds offered by the buyer of the retirement benefits business.
The fair values of plan assets by category and by hierarchy as defined by GAAP are as follows. See
Note 11 for a definition of the levels within the fair value hierarchy.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted Prices in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Significant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Active Markets for |
|
|
Significant Other |
|
|
Unobservable |
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
Identical Assets |
|
|
Observable Inputs |
|
|
Inputs |
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
(Level 1) |
|
|
(Level 2) |
|
|
(Level 3) |
|
|
Total |
|
Plan assets at fair value: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed maturities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal government and agency |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
6 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
6 |
|
Foreign government |
|
|
|
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26 |
|
Corporate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
88 |
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
114 |
|
Mortgage and other asset-backed |
|
|
|
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22 |
|
Fund investments and pooled separate accounts (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
300 |
|
|
|
118 |
|
|
|
418 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total fixed maturities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
442 |
|
|
|
144 |
|
|
|
586 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Domestic |
|
|
1,341 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
1,365 |
|
International, including funds and pooled separate accounts
(1) |
|
|
171 |
|
|
|
195 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
366 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total equity securities |
|
|
1,512 |
|
|
|
196 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
1,731 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate, including pooled separate accounts (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
160 |
|
|
|
160 |
|
Securities partnerships |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
257 |
|
|
|
257 |
|
Guaranteed deposit account contract |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
29 |
|
Cash equivalents |
|
|
|
|
|
|
87 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
87 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total plan assets at fair value |
|
$ |
1,512 |
|
|
$ |
725 |
|
|
$ |
613 |
|
|
$ |
2,850 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
A pooled separate account has several participating benefit plans and each owns a share of the
total pool of investments. |
129
Plan assets in Level 1 include exchange-listed equity securities. Level 2 assets primarily
include:
|
|
fixed income and international equity funds priced using their daily net asset value which
is the exit price; and |
|
|
fixed maturities valued using recent trades of similar securities or pricing models as
described below. |
Because many fixed maturities do not trade daily, fair values are often derived using recent trades
of securities with similar features and characteristics. When recent trades are not available,
pricing models are used to determine these prices. These models calculate fair values by
discounting future cash flows at estimated market interest rates. Such market rates are derived by
calculating the appropriate spreads over comparable U.S. Treasury securities, based on the credit
quality, industry and structure of the asset.
Plan assets classified in Level 3 include securities partnerships and equity real estate
generally valued based on the pension plans ownership share of the equity of the investee
including changes in the fair values of its underlying investments. In addition, investments in
pooled separate accounts principally invested in equity real estate and fixed income funds that are
priced using the net asset value are classified in Level 3 due to restrictions on withdrawal.
The following table summarizes the changes in pension plan assets classified in Level 3 for the
year ended December 31, 2009. Actual return on plan assets in this table may include changes in
fair value that are attributable to both observable and unobservable inputs.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guaranteed |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed |
|
|
Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities |
|
|
Deposit Account |
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
Maturities |
|
|
Securities |
|
|
Real Estate |
|
|
Partnerships |
|
|
Contract |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at January 1, 2009 |
|
$ |
31 |
|
|
$ |
14 |
|
|
$ |
208 |
|
|
$ |
264 |
|
|
$ |
32 |
|
|
$ |
549 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actual return on plan assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets still held at
reporting date |
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(104 |
) |
|
|
(31 |
) |
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
(119 |
) |
Assets sold during the
period |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total actual return on plan
assets |
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(104 |
) |
|
|
(31 |
) |
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
(114 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases, sales, settlements |
|
|
(75 |
) |
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
56 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
3 |
|
Transfers into Level 3 |
|
|
175 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
175 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2009 |
|
$ |
144 |
|
|
$ |
23 |
|
|
$ |
160 |
|
|
$ |
257 |
|
|
$ |
29 |
|
|
$ |
613 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The assets related to other postretirement benefit plans are invested in deposit funds with
interest credited based on fixed income investments in the general account of CGLIC. As there are
significant unobservable inputs in determining the fair value of these assets, they are classified
as Level 3. During 2009, these assets earned a return of $2 million, which was offset by a net
withdrawal from the fund of $2 million.
130
Assumptions for pension and other postretirement benefit plans. Management determined the present
value of the projected benefit obligation and the accumulated other postretirement benefit
obligation and related benefit costs based on the following weighted average assumptions as of and
for the years ended December 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Discount rate: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension benefit obligation |
|
|
5.50 |
% |
|
|
6.25 |
% |
Other postretirement benefit obligation |
|
|
5.25 |
% |
|
|
6.25 |
% |
Pension benefit cost |
|
|
6.25 |
% |
|
|
6.25 |
% |
Other postretirement benefit cost |
|
|
6.25 |
% |
|
|
6.25 |
% |
Expected long-term return on plan assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension benefit cost |
|
|
8.00 |
% |
|
|
8.00 |
% |
Other postretirement benefit cost |
|
|
5.00 |
% |
|
|
5.00 |
% |
Expected rate of compensation increase: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Projected pension benefit obligation |
|
|
3.50 |
% |
|
|
3.50 |
% |
Pension benefit cost |
|
|
3.50 |
% |
|
|
3.50 |
% |
Other postretirement benefit obligation |
|
|
3.00 |
% |
|
|
3.00 |
% |
Other postretirement benefit cost |
|
|
3.00 |
% |
|
|
3.00 |
% |
Discount rates are set by applying actual annualized yields at various durations from the
Citigroup Pension Liability curve, without adjustment, to the expected cash flows of the
postretirement benefits liabilities. The Company believes that the Citigroup Pension Liability
curve is the most representative curve to use because it is derived from a broad array of bonds in
various industries throughout the domestic market for high quality bonds. Further, Citigroup
monitors the bond portfolio to ensure that only high quality issues are included. Accordingly, the
Company does not believe that any adjustment is required to the Citigroup curve. Expected
long-term rates of return on plan assets were developed considering actual long-term historical
returns, expected long-term market conditions, plan asset mix and managements investment strategy.
Actual and target investment allocations are very similar at December 31, 2009.
To measure pension costs, the Company uses a market-related asset valuation for domestic pension
plan assets invested in non-fixed income investments. The market-related value of pension assets
recognizes the difference between actual and expected long-term returns in the portfolio over 5
years, a method that reduces the short-term impact of market fluctuations. At December 31, 2009,
the market-related asset value was approximately $3.3 billion compared with a market value of
approximately $2.9 billion.
Benefit payments. The following benefit payments, including expected future services, are expected
to be paid in:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Postretirement |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefits |
|
|
|
Pension |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net of Medicare |
|
(In millions) |
|
Benefits |
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Part D Subsidy |
|
2010 |
|
$ |
502 |
|
|
$ |
44 |
|
|
$ |
40 |
|
2011 |
|
$ |
343 |
|
|
$ |
42 |
|
|
$ |
40 |
|
2012 |
|
$ |
332 |
|
|
$ |
42 |
|
|
$ |
40 |
|
2013 |
|
$ |
319 |
|
|
$ |
41 |
|
|
$ |
39 |
|
2014 |
|
$ |
321 |
|
|
$ |
40 |
|
|
$ |
38 |
|
2015-2019 |
|
$ |
1,526 |
|
|
$ |
176 |
|
|
$ |
169 |
|
131
B. 401(k) Plans
The Company sponsors a 401(k) plan in which the Company matches a portion of employees pre-tax
contributions. Another 401(k) plan with an employer match was frozen in 1999. Participants in the
active plan may invest in a fund that invests in the Companys common stock, several diversified
stock funds, a bond fund and a fixed-income fund.
The Company may elect to increase its matching contributions if the Companys annual performance
meets certain targets. A substantial amount of the Companys matching contributions are invested
in the Company common stock. The Companys expense for these plans was $36 million for 2009,
$34 million for 2008 and $35 million for 2007.
Note 11 Fair Value Measurements
The Company carries certain financial instruments at fair value in the financial statements
including fixed maturities, equity securities, short-term investments and derivatives. Other
financial instruments are measured at fair value under certain conditions, such as when impaired
or, for commercial mortgage loans, when classified as held for sale.
Fair value is defined as the price at which an asset could be exchanged in an orderly transaction
between market participants at the balance sheet date. A liabilitys fair value is defined as the
amount that would be paid to transfer the liability to a market participant, not the amount that
would be paid to settle the liability with the creditor.
Fair values are based on quoted market prices when available. When market prices are not
available, fair value is generally estimated using discounted cash flow analyses, incorporating
current market inputs for similar financial instruments with comparable terms and credit
quality. In instances where there is little or no market activity for the same or similar
instruments, the Company estimates fair value using methods, models and assumptions that the
Company believes a hypothetical market participant would use to determine a current transaction
price. These valuation techniques involve some level of estimation and judgment by the Company
which becomes significant with increasingly complex instruments or pricing models. Where
appropriate, adjustments are included to reflect the risk inherent in a particular methodology,
model or input used.
The Companys financial assets and liabilities carried at fair value have been classified based
upon a hierarchy defined by GAAP. The hierarchy gives the highest ranking to fair values
determined using unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities
(Level 1) and the lowest ranking to fair values determined using methodologies and models with
unobservable inputs (Level 3). An assets or a liabilitys classification is based on the lowest
level input that is significant to its measurement. For example, a Level 3 fair value measurement
may include inputs that are both observable (Levels 1 and 2) and unobservable (Level 3). The
levels of the fair value hierarchy are as follows:
|
|
Level 1 Values are unadjusted quoted prices for identical assets and liabilities in
active markets accessible at the measurement date. Active markets provide pricing data for
trades occurring at least weekly and include exchanges and dealer markets. |
|
|
Level 2 Inputs include quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active
markets, quoted prices from those willing to trade in markets that are not active, or other
inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by market data for the term of the
instrument. Such inputs include market interest rates and volatilities, spreads and yield
curves. An instrument is classified in Level 2 if the Company determines that unobservable
inputs are insignificant. |
|
|
Level 3 Certain inputs are unobservable (supported by little or no market activity) and
significant to the fair value measurement. Unobservable inputs reflect the Companys best
estimate of what hypothetical market participants would use to determine a transaction price
for the asset or liability at the reporting date. |
132
Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities Carried at Fair Value
The following tables provide information as of December 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008 about the
Companys financial assets and liabilities carried at fair value. Similar disclosures for separate
account assets, which are also recorded at fair value on the Companys Consolidated Balance Sheets,
are provided separately as gains and losses related to these assets generally accrue directly to
policyholders. In addition, Note 10 contains similar tables for the Companys pension plan assets.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted Prices in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Significant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Active Markets for |
|
|
Significant Other |
|
|
Unobservable |
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
Identical Assets |
|
|
Observable Inputs |
|
|
Inputs |
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
(Level 1) |
|
|
(Level 2) |
|
|
(Level 3) |
|
|
Total |
|
Financial assets at fair value: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed maturities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal government and agency |
|
$ |
43 |
|
|
$ |
527 |
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
$ |
571 |
|
State and local government |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,521 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,521 |
|
Foreign government |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,056 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
1,070 |
|
Corporate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,241 |
|
|
|
344 |
|
|
|
8,585 |
|
Federal agency mortgage-backed |
|
|
|
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34 |
|
Other mortgage-backed |
|
|
|
|
|
|
114 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
121 |
|
Other asset-backed |
|
|
|
|
|
|
92 |
|
|
|
449 |
|
|
|
541 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total fixed maturities (1) |
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
12,585 |
|
|
|
815 |
|
|
|
13,443 |
|
Equity securities |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
81 |
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
113 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal |
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
12,666 |
|
|
|
845 |
|
|
|
13,556 |
|
Short-term investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
493 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
493 |
|
GMIB assets (2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
482 |
|
|
|
482 |
|
Other derivative assets (3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total financial assets at fair value, excluding
separate accounts |
|
$ |
45 |
|
|
$ |
13,175 |
|
|
$ |
1,327 |
|
|
$ |
14,547 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial liabilities at fair value: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GMIB liabilities |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
903 |
|
|
$ |
903 |
|
Other derivative liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total financial liabilities at fair value |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
30 |
|
|
$ |
903 |
|
|
$ |
933 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Fixed maturities includes $274 million of net appreciation required to adjust future policy
benefits for the run-off settlement annuity business including $38 million of appreciation for
securities classified in Level 3. |
|
(2) |
|
The GMIB assets represent retrocessional contracts in place from two external reinsurers
which cover 55% of the exposures on these contracts. The assets are net of a liability of $15
million for the future cost of reinsurance. |
|
(3) |
|
Other derivative assets includes $12 million of interest rate and foreign currency swaps
qualifying as cash flow hedges and $4 million of interest rate swaps not designated as
accounting hedges. |
133
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted Prices in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Significant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Active Markets for |
|
|
Significant Other |
|
|
Unobservable |
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
Identical Assets |
|
|
Observable Inputs |
|
|
Inputs |
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
(Level 1) |
|
|
(Level 2) |
|
|
(Level 3) |
|
|
Total |
|
Financial assets at fair value: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed maturities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal government and agency |
|
$ |
38 |
|
|
$ |
724 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
762 |
|
State and local government |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,486 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,486 |
|
Foreign government |
|
|
|
|
|
|
923 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
944 |
|
Corporate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,526 |
|
|
|
330 |
|
|
|
6,856 |
|
Federal agency mortgage-backed |
|
|
|
|
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37 |
|
Other mortgage-backed |
|
|
|
|
|
|
121 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
125 |
|
Other asset-backed |
|
|
|
|
|
|
57 |
|
|
|
514 |
|
|
|
571 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total fixed maturities (1) |
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
10,874 |
|
|
|
869 |
|
|
|
11,781 |
|
Equity securities |
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
84 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
112 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal |
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
10,958 |
|
|
|
889 |
|
|
|
11,893 |
|
Short-term investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
236 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
236 |
|
GMIB assets (2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
953 |
|
|
|
953 |
|
Other derivative assets (3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total financial assets at fair value, excluding
separate accounts |
|
$ |
46 |
|
|
$ |
11,239 |
|
|
$ |
1,842 |
|
|
$ |
13,127 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial liabilities at fair value: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GMIB liabilities |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,757 |
|
|
$ |
1,757 |
|
Other derivative liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total financial liabilities at fair value |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
36 |
|
|
$ |
1,757 |
|
|
$ |
1,793 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Fixed maturities includes $514 million of net appreciation required to adjust future policy
benefits for the run-off settlement annuity business including $111 million of appreciation
for securities classified in Level 3. |
|
(2) |
|
The GMIB assets represent retrocessional contracts in place from two external reinsurers
which cover 55% of the exposures on these contracts. The assets are net of a liability of $17
million for the future cost of reinsurance. |
|
(3) |
|
Other derivative assets include $40 million of interest rate and foreign currency swaps
qualifying as cash flow hedges and $5 million of interest rate swaps not designated as
accounting hedges. |
Level 1 Financial Assets
Assets in Level 1 include actively-traded U.S. government bonds and exchange-listed equity
securities. Given the narrow definition of Level 1 and the Companys investment asset strategy to
maximize investment returns, a relatively small portion of the Companys investment assets are
classified in this category.
Level 2 Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities
Fixed maturities and equity securities. Approximately 93% as of December 31, 2009 and 92% as of
December 31, 2008 of the Companys investments in fixed maturities and equity securities are
classified in Level 2 including most public and private corporate debt and equity securities,
federal agency and municipal bonds, non-government mortgage and asset-backed securities and
preferred stocks. Because many fixed maturities and preferred stocks do not trade daily, fair
values are often derived using recent trades of securities with similar features and
characteristics. When recent trades are not available, pricing models are used to determine these
prices. These models calculate fair values by discounting future cash flows at estimated market
interest rates. Such market rates are derived by calculating the appropriate spreads over
comparable U.S. Treasury securities, based on the credit quality, industry and structure of the
asset.
Typical inputs and assumptions to pricing models include, but are not limited to, benchmark yields,
reported trades, broker-dealer quotes, issuer spreads, liquidity, benchmark securities, bids,
offers, reference data, and industry and economic events. For mortgage and asset-backed
securities, inputs and assumptions may also include characteristics of the issuer, collateral
attributes, prepayment speeds and credit rating.
134
Short-term investments. Short-term investments are carried at fair value, which approximates
cost. On a regular basis the Company compares market prices for these securities to recorded
amounts to validate that current carrying amounts approximate exit prices. The short-term nature
of the investments and corroboration of the reported amounts over the holding period support their
classification in Level 2.
Other derivatives. Amounts classified in Level 2 represent over-the-counter instruments such as
swap contracts. Fair values for these instruments are determined using market observable inputs
including forward currency and interest rate curves and widely published market observable
indices. Credit risk related to the counterparty and the Company is considered when estimating the
fair values of these derivatives. However, the Company is largely protected by collateral
arrangements with counterparties, and determined that no adjustment for credit risk was required as
of December 31, 2009. The nature and use of these other derivatives are described further in Note
13.
Level 3 Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities
The Company classifies certain newly issued, privately placed, complex or illiquid securities, as
well as assets and liabilities relating to guaranteed minimum income benefits in Level 3.
Fixed maturities and equity securities. Approximately 6% as of December 31, 2009 and 7% as of
December 31, 2008 of fixed maturities and equity securities are priced using significant
unobservable inputs and classified in this category, including:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
(In millions) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Mortgage and asset-backed securities |
|
$ |
456 |
|
|
$ |
518 |
|
Primarily private corporate bonds |
|
|
288 |
|
|
|
270 |
|
Subordinated loans and private equity
investments |
|
|
101 |
|
|
|
101 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
845 |
|
|
$ |
889 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair values of mortgage and asset-backed securities and corporate bonds are determined using
pricing models that incorporate the specific characteristics of each asset and related assumptions
including the investment type and structure, credit quality, industry and maturity date in
comparison to current market indices, spreads and liquidity of assets with similar
characteristics. For mortgage and asset-backed securities, inputs and assumptions to pricing may
also include collateral attributes and prepayment speeds. Recent trades in the subject security or
similar securities are assessed when available, and the Company may also review published research
as well as the issuers financial statements in its evaluation. Subordinated loans and private
equity investments are valued at transaction price in the absence of market data indicating a
change in the estimated fair values.
Guaranteed minimum income benefit contracts. Because cash flows of the GMIB liabilities and assets
are affected by equity markets and interest rates, and are settled in lump sum payments, the
Company reports these liabilities and assets as derivatives at fair value. The Company estimates
the fair value of the assets and liabilities for GMIB contracts using assumptions regarding capital
markets (including market returns, interest rates and market volatilities of the underlying equity
and bond mutual fund investments), future annuitant behavior (including mortality, lapse, and
annuity election rates), and non-performance risk, as well as risk and profit charges. At adoption
of the FASBs new guidance for fair value measurements in 2008, the Company updated assumptions to
reflect those that the Company believes a hypothetical market participant would use to determine a
current exit price for these contracts and recorded an increase in the net GMIB liability as
described in Note 2(B). As assumptions related to annuitant behavior used to estimate fair values
for these contracts are largely unobservable, the Company classifies GMIB assets and liabilities in
Level 3. The Company considered the following in determining the view of a hypothetical market
participant:
|
|
that the most likely transfer of these assets and liabilities would be through a
reinsurance transaction with an independent insurer having a market capitalization and credit
rating similar to that of the Company; and |
|
|
that because this block of contracts is in run-off mode, an insurer looking to acquire
these contracts would have similar existing contracts with related administrative and risk
management capabilities. |
135
These GMIB assets and liabilities are estimated with a complex internal model using many scenarios
to determine the present value of net amounts expected to be paid, less the present value of net
future premiums expected to be received adjusted for risk and profit charges that the Company
estimates a hypothetical market participant would require to assume this business. Net amounts
expected to be paid include the excess of the expected value of the income benefits over the values
of the annuitants accounts at the time of annuitization. Generally, market return, interest rate
and volatility assumptions are based on market observable information. Assumptions related to
annuitant behavior reflect the Companys belief that a hypothetical market participant would
consider the actual and expected experience of the Company as well as other relevant and available
industry resources in setting policyholder behavior assumptions. The Company is also required to
adjust for nonperformance risk to reflect the markets perception of the risk that either the
Company will not fulfill its GMIB liability (own credit) or the Company will not collect on its
GMIB retrocessional coverage (reinsurer credit risk). The significant assumptions used to value
the GMIB assets and liabilities as of December 31, 2009 were as follows:
|
|
The market return and discount rate assumptions are based on the market-observable LIBOR swap curve. |
|
|
|
The projected interest rate used to calculate the reinsured income benefits is indexed to the 7-year Treasury Rate at
the time of annuitization (claim interest rate) based on contractual terms. That rate was 3.39% at December 31, 2009
and must be projected for future time periods. These projected rates vary by economic scenario and are determined by an
interest rate model using current interest rate curves and the prices of instruments available in the market including
various interest rate caps and zero-coupon bonds. For a subset of the business, there is a contractually guaranteed
floor of 3% for the claim interest rate. |
|
|
|
The market volatility assumptions for annuitants underlying mutual fund investments that are modeled based on the S&P
500, Russell 2000 and NASDAQ Composite are based on the market-implied volatility for these indices for three to seven
years grading to historical volatility levels thereafter. For the remaining 56% of underlying mutual fund investments
modeled based on other indices (with insufficient market-observable data), volatility is based on the average
historical level for each index over the past 10 years. Using this approach, volatility ranges from 17% to 33% for
equity funds, 4% to 12% for bond funds and 1% to 2% for money market funds. |
|
|
|
The mortality assumption is 70% of the 1994 Group Annuity Mortality table, with 1% annual improvement beginning January
1, 2000. |
|
|
|
The annual lapse rate assumption reflects experience that differs by the company issuing the underlying variable
annuity contracts, ranges from 2% to 17% and depends on the time since contract issue and the relative value of the
guarantee. |
|
|
|
The annual annuity election rate assumption reflects experience that differs by the company issuing the underlying
variable annuity contracts and depends on the annuitants age, the relative value of the guarantee and whether a
contractholder has had a previous opportunity to elect the benefit. Immediately after the expiration of the waiting
period, the assumed probability that an individual will annuitize their variable annuity contract is up to 80%. For
the second and subsequent annual opportunities to elect the benefit, the assumed probability of election is up to 30%.
Actual data is still emerging for the Company as well as the industry and the estimates are based on this limited data. |
|
|
|
The nonperformance risk adjustment is incorporated by adding an additional spread to the discount rate in the
calculation of both (1) the GMIB liability to reflect a hypothetical market participants view of the risk of the
Company not fulfilling its GMIB obligations, and (2) the GMIB asset to reflect a hypothetical market participants view
of the reinsurers credit risk, after considering collateral. The estimated market-implied spread is company-specific
for each party involved to the extent that company-specific market data is available and based on industry averages for
similarly rated companies when company-specific data is not available. The spread is impacted by the credit default
swap (CDS) spreads of the specific parent companies, adjusted to reflect subsidiaries credit ratings relative to
their parent company. The additional spread over LIBOR incorporated into the discount rate was 10 to 110 basis points
for the GMIB liability and 0 to 140 basis points for the GMIB reinsurance asset for that portion of the interest rate
curve most relevant to these policies. |
|
|
|
The risk and profit charge assumption is based on the Companys estimate of the capital and return on capital that
would be required by a hypothetical market participant. |
The Company regularly evaluates each of the assumptions used in establishing these assets and
liabilities by considering how a hypothetical market participant would set assumptions at each
valuation date. Capital markets assumptions are expected to change at each valuation date
reflecting current observable market conditions. Other assumptions may also change based on a
hypothetical market participants view of actual experience as it emerges over time or other
factors that impact the net liability. If the emergence of future experience or future assumptions
differs from the assumptions used in estimating these assets and liabilities, the resulting impact
could be material to the Companys consolidated results of operations, and in certain situations,
could be material to the Companys financial condition.
136
GMIB liabilities are reported in the Companys Consolidated Balance Sheets in Accounts payable,
accrued expenses and other liabilities. GMIB assets associated with these contracts represent net
receivables in connection with reinsurance that the Company has purchased from two external
reinsurers and are reported in the Companys Consolidated Balance Sheets in Other assets, including
other intangibles. As of December 31, 2009, S&P has given a financial strength rating of AA to one
reinsurer. The receivable from the second reinsurer is fully collateralized by assets held in a
trust.
Changes in Level 3 Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities Carried at Fair Value
The following tables summarize the changes in financial assets and financial liabilities classified
in Level 3 for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008. These tables exclude separate account
assets as changes in fair values of these assets accrue directly to policyholders. Gains and losses
reported in this table may include changes in fair value that are attributable to both observable
and unobservable inputs.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed Maturities & |
|
|
GMIB |
|
|
GMIB |
|
|
GMIB |
|
(In millions) |
|
Equity Securities |
|
|
Assets |
|
|
Liabilities |
|
|
Net |
|
Balance at 1/1/09 |
|
$ |
889 |
|
|
$ |
953 |
|
|
$ |
(1,757 |
) |
|
$ |
(804 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gains (losses) included in income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Results of GMIB |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(365 |
) |
|
|
669 |
|
|
|
304 |
|
Other |
|
|
(18 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total gains (losses) included in net income |
|
|
(18 |
) |
|
|
(365 |
) |
|
|
669 |
|
|
|
304 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gains included in other comprehensive income |
|
|
59 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Losses required to adjust future policy benefits for
settlement annuities (1) |
|
|
(72 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases, issuances, settlements |
|
|
(29 |
) |
|
|
(106 |
) |
|
|
185 |
|
|
|
79 |
|
Transfers into Level 3 |
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at 12/31/09 |
|
$ |
845 |
|
|
$ |
482 |
|
|
$ |
(903 |
) |
|
$ |
(421 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total gains (losses) included in net income attributable to
instruments held at the reporting date |
|
$ |
(20 |
) |
|
$ |
(365 |
) |
|
$ |
669 |
|
|
$ |
304 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Amounts do not accrue to shareholders. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed Maturities & |
|
|
GMIB |
|
|
GMIB |
|
|
GMIB |
|
(In millions) |
|
Equity Securities |
|
|
Assets |
|
|
Liabilities |
|
|
Net |
|
Balance at 1/1/08 |
|
$ |
732 |
|
|
$ |
173 |
|
|
$ |
(313 |
) |
|
$ |
(140 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gains (losses) included in income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of adoption of new fair value measurement guidance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
244 |
|
|
|
(446 |
) |
|
|
(202 |
) |
Results of GMIB, excluding adoption effect |
|
|
|
|
|
|
604 |
|
|
|
(1,092 |
) |
|
|
(488 |
) |
Other |
|
|
(21 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total gains (losses) included in net income |
|
|
(21 |
) |
|
|
848 |
|
|
|
(1,538 |
) |
|
|
(690 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Losses included in other comprehensive income |
|
|
(17 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gains required to adjust future policy benefits for settlement annuities (1) |
|
|
91 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases, issuances, settlements |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
(68 |
) |
|
|
94 |
|
|
|
26 |
|
Transfers into Level 3 |
|
|
103 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at 12/31/08 |
|
$ |
889 |
|
|
$ |
953 |
|
|
$ |
(1,757 |
) |
|
$ |
(804 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total gains (losses) included in net income attributable to
instruments held at the reporting date |
|
$ |
(18 |
) |
|
$ |
848 |
|
|
$ |
(1,538 |
) |
|
$ |
(690 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Amounts do not accrue to shareholders. |
137
As noted in the table above, total gains and losses included in net income are reflected in
the following captions in the Consolidated Statements of Income:
|
|
Realized investment gains (losses) and net investment income for amounts related to fixed
maturities and equity securities; and |
|
|
Guaranteed minimum income benefits expense for amounts related to GMIB assets and
liabilities. |
Reclassifications impacting Level 3 financial instruments are reported as transfers in or out of
the Level 3 category as of the beginning of the quarter in which the transfer occurs. Therefore
gains and losses in income only reflect activity for the period the instrument was classified in
Level 3. Typically, investments that transfer out of Level 3 are classified in Level 2 as market
data on the securities becomes more readily available.
The Company provided reinsurance for other insurance companies that offer a guaranteed minimum
income benefit, and then retroceded a portion of the risk to other insurance companies. These
arrangements with third-party insurers are the instruments still held at the reporting date for
GMIB assets and liabilities in the table above. Because these reinsurance arrangements remain in
effect at the reporting date, the Company has reflected the total gain or loss for the period as
the total gain or loss included in income attributable to instruments still held at the reporting
date. However, the Company reduces the GMIB assets and liabilities resulting from these
reinsurance arrangements when annuitants lapse, die, elect their benefit, or reach the age after
which the right to elect their benefit expires.
Under FASBs guidance for fair value measurements, the Companys GMIB assets and liabilities are
expected to be volatile in future periods because the underlying capital markets assumptions will
be based largely on market-observable inputs at the close of each reporting period including
interest rates and market-implied volatilities.
For 2009, the net pre-tax gain for GMIB was $304 million, and was primarily due to the following
factors:
|
|
increases in interest rates ($248 million); |
|
|
increases in underlying account values in the period, driven by favorable equity market and
bond fund returns, resulting in reduced exposures ($98 million); |
|
|
specific adjustments to nonperformance risk for the Company net of nonperformance risk of
its reinsurers ($16 million); and |
|
|
updates to the risk and profit charge estimates ($30 million). |
These favorable effects were partially offset by:
|
|
higher than expected claim experience ($26 million); |
|
|
increases to the annuitization assumption, reflecting higher utilization experience ($21
million); |
|
|
updates to the lapse assumption ($14 million); |
|
|
updates to fund correlation assumptions ($4 million); and |
|
|
other amounts, including experience varying from assumptions, model and in-force updates
($23 million). |
Excluding the net increase for the effect of adoption of FASBs guidance for fair value
measurement, the increase in the net GMIB liability for 2008 was primarily driven by the impact of
declines in underlying account values in the period, driven by declines in equity markets and bond
fund returns, resulting in increased exposures and decreases in interest rates since December 31,
2007.
138
Separate account assets
Fair values and changes in the fair values of separate account assets generally accrue directly to
the policyholders and are excluded from the Companys revenues and expenses. As of December 31,
2009 and December 31, 2008 separate account assets were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted Prices in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Significant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Active Markets for |
|
|
Significant Other |
|
|
Unobservable |
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
Identical Assets |
|
|
Observable Inputs |
|
|
Inputs |
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
(Level 1) |
|
|
(Level 2) |
|
|
(Level 3) |
|
|
Total |
|
Guaranteed separate accounts (See
Note 22) |
|
$ |
275 |
|
|
$ |
1,480 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,755 |
|
Non-guaranteed separate accounts (1) |
|
|
1,883 |
|
|
|
3,100 |
|
|
|
550 |
|
|
|
5,533 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total separate account assets |
|
$ |
2,158 |
|
|
$ |
4,580 |
|
|
$ |
550 |
|
|
$ |
7,288 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Non-guaranteed separate accounts include $2.6 billion in assets supporting the Companys
pension plan, including $517 million classified in Level 3. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted Prices in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Significant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Active Markets for |
|
|
Significant Other |
|
|
Unobservable |
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
Identical Assets |
|
|
Observable Inputs |
|
|
Inputs |
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
(Level 1) |
|
|
(Level 2) |
|
|
(Level 3) |
|
|
Total |
|
Guaranteed separate accounts (See
Note 22) |
|
$ |
233 |
|
|
$ |
1,557 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,790 |
|
Non-guaranteed separate accounts (1) |
|
|
1,093 |
|
|
|
2,506 |
|
|
|
475 |
|
|
|
4,074 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total separate account assets |
|
$ |
1,326 |
|
|
$ |
4,063 |
|
|
$ |
475 |
|
|
$ |
5,864 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Non-guaranteed separate accounts include $1.5 billion in assets supporting the Companys
pension plan, including $435 million classified in Level 3. |
Separate account assets in Level 1 include exchange-listed equity securities. Level 2 assets
primarily include:
|
|
equity securities and corporate and structured bonds valued using recent trades of similar
securities or pricing models that discount future cash flows at estimated market interest
rates as described above; and |
|
|
actively-traded institutional and retail mutual fund investments and separate accounts
priced using the daily net asset value which is the exit price. |
Separate account assets classified in Level 3 include investments primarily in securities
partnerships and real estate generally valued based on the separate accounts ownership share of
the equity of the investee including changes in the fair values of its underlying investments.
139
The following tables summarize the change in separate account assets reported in Level 3 for the
years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
|
|
|
Balance at 1/1/09 |
|
$ |
475 |
|
Policyholder losses (1) |
|
|
(86 |
) |
Purchases, issuances, settlements |
|
|
4 |
|
Transfers into Level 3 |
|
|
157 |
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at 12/31/09 |
|
$ |
550 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Included in this amount are losses of $92 million attributable to instruments still held at the
reporting date. |
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
|
|
|
Balance at 1/1/08 |
|
$ |
403 |
|
Policyholder gains (1) |
|
|
11 |
|
Purchases, issuances, settlements |
|
|
78 |
|
Transfers out of Level 3 |
|
|
(17 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Balance at 12/31/08 |
|
$ |
475 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Included in this amount are losses of $4 million attributable
to instruments still held at the reporting date. |
Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value under Certain Conditions
Some financial assets and liabilities are not carried at fair value each reporting period, but may
be measured using fair value only under certain conditions, such as commercial mortgage loans and
investments in real estate entities when they become impaired. During 2009, impaired commercial
mortgage loans with carrying values of $143 million were written down to their fair values of $126
million, resulting in pre-tax realized investment losses of $17 million. Also during 2009,
impaired real estate entities with carrying values of $48 million were written down to their fair
values of $12 million, resulting in pre-tax realized investment losses of $36 million. These fair
value measurements were based on discounted cash flow analyses using significant unobservable
inputs, and were classified in Level 3. For 2008, the amounts required to adjust these assets and
liabilities to their fair values were not significant.
140
Fair Value Disclosures for Financial Instruments Not Carried at Fair Value
Most financial instruments that are subject to fair value disclosure requirements are carried in
the Companys consolidated financial statements at amounts that approximate fair value. The
following table provides the fair values and carrying values of the Companys financial instruments
not recorded at fair value that are subject to fair value disclosure requirements at December 31,
2009 and December 31, 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying |
|
(In millions) |
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Value |
|
Commercial mortgage loans |
|
$ |
3,323 |
|
|
$ |
3,522 |
|
|
$ |
3,401 |
|
|
$ |
3,617 |
|
Contractholder deposit funds, excluding
universal life products |
|
$ |
940 |
|
|
$ |
941 |
|
|
$ |
889 |
|
|
$ |
915 |
|
Long-term debt, excluding capital leases |
|
$ |
2,418 |
|
|
$ |
2,427 |
|
|
$ |
1,684 |
|
|
$ |
2,077 |
|
The fair values presented in the table above have been estimated using market information when
available. The following is a description of the valuation methodologies and inputs used by the
Company to determine fair value.
Commercial mortgage loans. The Company estimates the fair value of commercial mortgage loans
generally by discounting the contractual cash flows at estimated market interest rates that reflect
the Companys assessment of the credit quality of the loans. Market interest rates are derived by
calculating the appropriate spread over comparable U.S. Treasury rates, based on the property type,
quality rating and average life of the loan. The quality ratings reflect the relative risk of the
loan, considering debt service coverage, the loan to value ratio and other factors. Fair values of
impaired mortgage loans are based on the estimated fair value of the underlying collateral
generally determined using an internal discounted cash flow model.
Contractholder deposit funds, excluding universal life products. Generally, these
funds do not have stated maturities. Approximately 45% of these balances can be withdrawn by the
customer at any time without prior notice or penalty. The fair value for these contracts is the
amount estimated to be payable to the customer as of the reporting date, which is generally the
carrying value. Most of the remaining contractholder deposit funds are reinsured by the buyers of
the individual life and annuity and retirement benefits businesses. The fair value for these
contracts is determined using the fair value of these buyers assets supporting these reinsured
contracts. The Company had a reinsurance recoverable equal to the carrying value of these
reinsured contracts.
Long-term debt, excluding capital leases. The fair value of long-term debt is based on quoted
market prices for recent trades. When quoted market prices are not available, fair value is
estimated using a discounted cash flow analysis and the Companys estimated current borrowing rate
for debt of similar terms and remaining maturities.
Fair
values of off-balance sheet financial instruments were not material.
Note 12 Investments
A. Fixed Maturities and Equity Securities
Securities in the following table are included in fixed maturities and equity securities on the
Companys Consolidated Balance Sheets. These securities are carried at fair value with changes in
fair value reported in other realized investment gains (losses).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Included in fixed maturities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trading securities (amortized cost: $8; $13) |
|
$ |
8 |
|
|
$ |
13 |
|
Hybrid securities (amortized cost: $37; $10) |
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
51 |
|
|
$ |
23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Included in equity securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hybrid securities (amortized cost: $109; $123) |
|
$ |
81 |
|
|
$ |
84 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
141
Fixed maturities and equity securities included $197 million at December 31, 2009 and $211
million at December 31, 2008, which were pledged as collateral to brokers as required under certain
futures contracts. These fixed maturities and equities securities were primarily corporate
securities.
The following information about fixed maturities excludes trading and hybrid securities. The
amortized cost and fair value by contractual maturity periods for fixed maturities were as follows
at December 31, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Fair |
|
(In millions) |
|
Cost |
|
|
Value |
|
Due in one year or less |
|
$ |
624 |
|
|
$ |
640 |
|
Due after one year through five years |
|
|
3,923 |
|
|
|
4,155 |
|
Due after five years through ten years |
|
|
4,765 |
|
|
|
5,048 |
|
Due after ten years |
|
|
2,570 |
|
|
|
2,853 |
|
Mortgage and other asset-backed
securities |
|
|
653 |
|
|
|
696 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
12,535 |
|
|
$ |
13,392 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actual maturities could differ from contractual maturities because issuers may have the right
to call or prepay obligations, with or without penalties. Also, in some cases the Company may
extend maturity dates.
Mortgage-backed assets consist principally of commercial mortgage-backed securities and
collateralized mortgage obligations of which $37 million were residential mortgages and home equity
lines of credit, all of which were originated utilizing standard underwriting practices and are not
considered sub-prime loans.
Gross unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on fixed maturities (excluding trading securities and
hybrid securities) by type of issuer is shown below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Appre- |
|
|
Depre- |
|
|
Fair |
|
(In millions) |
|
Cost |
|
|
ciation |
|
|
ciation |
|
|
Value |
|
Federal government and
agency |
|
$ |
398 |
|
|
$ |
174 |
|
|
$ |
(1 |
) |
|
$ |
571 |
|
State and local government |
|
|
2,341 |
|
|
|
188 |
|
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
2,521 |
|
Foreign government |
|
|
1,040 |
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
1,070 |
|
Corporate |
|
|
8,104 |
|
|
|
529 |
|
|
|
(98 |
) |
|
|
8,535 |
|
Federal agency
mortgage-backed |
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34 |
|
Other mortgage-backed |
|
|
125 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
120 |
|
Other asset-backed |
|
|
494 |
|
|
|
55 |
|
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
541 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
12,535 |
|
|
$ |
990 |
|
|
$ |
(133 |
) |
|
$ |
13,392 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
Federal government and agency |
|
$ |
359 |
|
|
$ |
403 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
762 |
|
State and local government |
|
|
2,391 |
|
|
|
117 |
|
|
|
(22 |
) |
|
|
2,486 |
|
Foreign government |
|
|
882 |
|
|
|
70 |
|
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
944 |
|
Corporate |
|
|
7,197 |
|
|
|
167 |
|
|
|
(529 |
) |
|
|
6,835 |
|
Federal agency
mortgage-backed (1) |
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37 |
|
Other mortgage-backed |
|
|
149 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(25 |
) |
|
|
124 |
|
Other asset-backed |
|
|
455 |
|
|
|
128 |
|
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
570 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
11,469 |
|
|
$ |
886 |
|
|
$ |
(597 |
) |
|
$ |
11,758 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Federal agency mortgage-backed securities were first purchased in 2008 as part of the acquired
business. |
142
The above table includes investments with a fair value of $2.3 billion supporting the
Companys run-off settlement annuity business, with gross unrealized appreciation of $326 million
and gross unrealized depreciation of $52 million at December 31, 2009. Such unrealized amounts are
required to support future policy benefit liabilities of this business and, accordingly, are not
included in accumulated other comprehensive income. At December 31, 2008, investments supporting
this business had a fair value of $2.5 billion, gross unrealized appreciation of $624 million and
gross unrealized depreciation of $110 million.
As of December 31, 2009, the Company had commitments to purchase $72 million of fixed maturities
bearing interest at a fixed market rate.
Review of declines in fair value. Management reviews fixed maturities for impairment based on
criteria that include:
|
|
length of time and severity of decline; |
|
|
|
financial health and specific near term prospects of the issuer; |
|
|
|
changes in the regulatory, economic or general market environment of the issuers industry
or geographic region; and |
|
|
|
the Companys intent to sell or the likelihood of a required sale prior to recovery. |
Fixed maturities (excluding trading and hybrid securities) which were primarily investment grade
corporate bonds with a decline in fair value from cost were as follows, including the length of
time of such decline:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Number |
|
(Dollars in millions) |
|
Value |
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Depreciation |
|
|
of Issues |
|
Fixed maturities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One year or less: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment grade |
|
$ |
1,637 |
|
|
$ |
1,671 |
|
|
$ |
(34 |
) |
|
|
333 |
|
Below investment grade |
|
$ |
79 |
|
|
$ |
85 |
|
|
$ |
(6 |
) |
|
|
55 |
|
More than one year: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment grade |
|
$ |
754 |
|
|
$ |
838 |
|
|
$ |
(84 |
) |
|
|
120 |
|
Below investment grade |
|
$ |
57 |
|
|
$ |
66 |
|
|
$ |
(9 |
) |
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in millions) |
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
Fixed maturities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One year or less: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment grade |
|
$ |
2,930 |
|
|
$ |
3,255 |
|
|
$ |
(325 |
) |
|
|
622 |
|
Below investment grade |
|
$ |
372 |
|
|
$ |
425 |
|
|
$ |
(53 |
) |
|
|
113 |
|
More than one year: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment grade |
|
$ |
920 |
|
|
$ |
1,130 |
|
|
$ |
(210 |
) |
|
|
214 |
|
Below investment grade |
|
$ |
49 |
|
|
$ |
58 |
|
|
$ |
(9 |
) |
|
|
13 |
|
As of December 31, 2009, the unrealized depreciation of investment grade fixed maturities is
primarily due to increases in market yields since purchase. Approximately $40 million of the
unrealized depreciation is due to securities with a decline in value of greater than 20%. The
remaining $93 million of the unrealized depreciation is due to securities with declines in value of
less than 20%. There were no equity securities with a material decline in fair value from cost as
of December 31, 2009. See Note 14(B) for discussion of impairments included in realized investment
gains and losses.
B. Commercial Mortgage Loans and Real Estate
Mortgage loans held by the Company are made exclusively to commercial borrowers; therefore there is
no exposure to either prime or sub-prime residential mortgages. The Companys commercial mortgage
loans and real estate investments are diversified by property type, location and, for commercial
mortgage loans, borrower. Generally, commercial mortgage loans are carried at unpaid principal
balances and are issued at a fixed rate of interest.
In connection with the Companys investment strategy to enhance investment yields by selling senior
participations, commercial mortgage loans include loans that were originated with the intent to
sell of $75 million as of December 31, 2008. There were no loans held for sale as of December 31,
2009.
143
At December 31, commercial mortgage loans and real estate investments were distributed among the
following property types and geographic regions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Property type |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Office buildings |
|
$ |
1,161 |
|
|
$ |
1,118 |
|
Apartment buildings |
|
|
901 |
|
|
|
988 |
|
Industrial |
|
|
595 |
|
|
|
546 |
|
Hotels |
|
|
499 |
|
|
|
512 |
|
Retail facilities |
|
|
426 |
|
|
|
441 |
|
Other |
|
|
64 |
|
|
|
65 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
3,646 |
|
|
$ |
3,670 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Geographic region |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pacific |
|
$ |
1,069 |
|
|
$ |
1,102 |
|
South Atlantic |
|
|
735 |
|
|
|
779 |
|
New England |
|
|
582 |
|
|
|
546 |
|
Central |
|
|
517 |
|
|
|
512 |
|
Middle Atlantic |
|
|
408 |
|
|
|
394 |
|
Mountain |
|
|
335 |
|
|
|
337 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
3,646 |
|
|
$ |
3,670 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2009, scheduled commercial mortgage loan maturities were as follows (in
millions): $278 in 2010, $394 in 2011, $644 in 2012, $613 in 2013 and $1,593 thereafter.
Actual maturities could differ from contractual maturities for several reasons: borrowers may have
the right to prepay obligations, with or without prepayment penalties; the maturity date may be
extended; and loans may be refinanced.
Real estate investments with a carrying value of $55 million at December 31, 2009 and $13 million
at December 31, 2008 were non-income producing during the preceding twelve months.
As of December 31, the Company had impaired commercial mortgage loans and related valuation
reserves (excluding loans held for sale) as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
(In millions) |
|
Gross |
|
|
Reserves |
|
|
Net |
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Reserves |
|
|
Net |
|
Impaired commercial
mortgage loans with
valuation reserves |
|
$ |
143 |
|
|
$ |
(17 |
) |
|
$ |
126 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Impaired commercial
mortgage loans with
no valuation
reserves |
|
|
96 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
96 |
|
|
|
59 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
59 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
239 |
|
|
$ |
(17 |
) |
|
$ |
222 |
|
|
$ |
59 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
59 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During 2009, the Company recorded a $17 million pre-tax ($11 million after-tax) increase to
valuation reserves on impaired commercial mortgage loans. Commercial mortgage loans without
valuation reserves are also considered impaired (probable that the Company will not collect all
amounts due according to the terms of the original loan agreements); however, the Company expects
to recover their remaining carrying value primarily because it is less than the fair value of the
underlying collateral of these loans. The average recorded investment in impaired mortgage loans
was $116 million during December 31, 2009 and $12 million during December 31, 2008. Pre-tax
interest income recognized on impaired commercial mortgage loans was $3 million in 2009 and $1
million in 2008.
As of December 31, 2009, the Company had commitments to extend credit under commercial mortgage
loan agreements of $41 million, all of which were at a fixed rate of interest. These loan
commitments are diversified by property type and geographic region. As of December 31, 2009, the
Company had commitments to contribute additional equity of $10 million to real estate investments.
The Company expects to disburse most of the committed amounts in 2010.
144
C. Other Long-term Investments
As of December 31, other long-term investments consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Real estate entities |
|
$ |
289 |
|
|
$ |
321 |
|
Securities partnerships |
|
|
272 |
|
|
|
242 |
|
Interest rate and foreign currency swaps |
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
45 |
|
Mezzanine loans |
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
Other |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
595 |
|
|
$ |
632 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments in real estate entities and securities partnerships with a carrying value of $121
million at December 31, 2009 and $96 million at December 31, 2008 were non-income producing during
the preceding twelve months.
As of December 31, 2009, the Company had commitments to contribute:
|
|
$253 million to limited liability entities that hold either real estate or loans to real
estate entities that are diversified by property type and geographic region; and |
|
|
$338 million to entities that hold securities diversified by issuer and maturity date. |
The Company expects to disburse approximately 40% of the committed amounts in 2010 and the
remaining amounts by 2015.
D. Short-Term Investments and Cash Equivalents
Short-term investments and cash equivalents included corporate securities of $624 million, federal
government securities of $402 million and money market funds of $104 million at December 31, 2009.
The Companys short-term investments and cash equivalents at December 31, 2008 included corporate
securities of $1.1 billion, federal government securities of $126 million and money market funds of
$147 million.
E. Concentration of Risk
As of December 31, 2009 and 2008, the Company did not have a concentration of investments in a
single issuer or borrower exceeding 10% of shareholders equity.
145
Note 13 Derivative Financial Instruments
The Companys investment strategy is to manage the characteristics of investment assets (such as
duration, yield, currency and liquidity) to meet the varying demands of the related insurance and
contractholder liabilities (such as paying claims, investment returns and withdrawals). As part of
this investment strategy, the Company typically uses derivatives to minimize interest rate, foreign
currency and equity price risks. The Company routinely monitors exposure to credit risk associated
with derivatives and diversifies the portfolio among approved dealers of high credit quality to
minimize credit risk. In addition, the Company has written or sold contracts to guarantee minimum
income benefits and, from time to time, to enhance investment returns.
The Company uses hedge accounting when derivatives are designated, qualify and are highly effective
as hedges. Effectiveness is formally assessed and documented at inception and each period
throughout the life of a hedge using various quantitative methods appropriate for each hedge,
including regression analysis and dollar offset. Under hedge accounting, the changes in fair value
of the derivative and the hedged risk are generally recognized together and offset each other when
reported in shareholders net income.
The Company accounts for derivative instruments as follows:
|
|
Derivatives are reported on the balance sheet at fair value with changes in fair values
reported in net income or accumulated other comprehensive income. |
|
|
Changes in the fair value of derivatives that hedge market risk related to future cash
flows and that qualify for hedge accounting are reported in a separate caption in
accumulated other comprehensive income. These hedges are referred to as cash flow hedges. |
|
|
A change in the fair value of a derivative instrument may not always equal the change in
the fair value of the hedged item; this difference is referred to as hedge ineffectiveness.
Where hedge accounting is used, the Company reflects hedge ineffectiveness in net income
(generally as part of realized investment gains and losses). |
Certain subsidiaries of the Company are parties to over-the-counter derivative instruments that
contain provisions requiring both parties to such instruments to post collateral depending on net
liability thresholds and the partys financial strength or credit rating. The collateral posting
requirements vary by counterparty. The aggregate fair value of derivative instruments with such
credit-risk-related contingent features where subsidiaries of the Company were in a net liability
position as of December 31, 2009 was $29 million for which the Company was not required to post
collateral with its counterparties. If the various contingent features underlying the agreements
were triggered as of December 31, 2009, the Company would be required to post collateral equal to
the total net liability. Such subsidiaries are parties to certain other derivative instruments
that contain termination provisions for which the counterparties could demand immediate payment of
the total net liability position if the financial strength rating of the subsidiary were to decline
below specified levels. As of December 31, 2009, there was no net liability position under such
derivative instruments.
See Note 7 for a discussion of derivatives associated with GMDB contracts and Note 11 for a
discussion of derivatives arising from GMIB contracts.
The table below presents information about the nature and accounting treatment of the Companys
primary derivative financial instruments including the Companys purpose for entering into specific
derivative transactions, and their locations and effect on the financial statements as of and for
the period ended December 31, 2009. Derivatives in the Companys separate accounts are not
included because associated gains and losses generally accrue directly to policyholders.
146
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Instrument / Volume |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of Activity |
|
Primary Risk |
|
Purpose |
|
Cash Flows |
|
Accounting Policy |
|
|
|
Derivatives Designated as Accounting Hedges Cash Flow Hedges |
|
|
Interest rate swaps
$160 million of
par value of
related investments
Foreign currency
swaps $179
million of U.S.
dollar equivalent
par value of
related investments
Combination swaps
(interest rate and
foreign currency)
$54 million of U.S.
dollar equivalent
par value of
related investments |
|
Interest rate and foreign currency |
|
To hedge the interest
and/or foreign currency
cash flows of fixed
maturities and
commercial mortgage
loans to match
associated liabilities.
Currency swaps are
primarily euros,
Australian dollars,
Canadian dollars and
British pounds for
periods of up to 12
years.
|
|
The Company
periodically exchanges
cash flows between
variable and fixed
interest rates and/or
between two currencies
for both principal and
interest. Net interest
cash flows are reported
in net investment
income and included in
operating activities.
|
|
Using cash flow hedge accounting, fair values are
reported in other long-term investments or other
liabilities and accumulated other comprehensive income
and amortized into net investment income or reported in
other realized investment gains and losses as interest
or principal payments are received.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value
Effect on the Financial Statements (in millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2009 |
|
Gain (Loss) Recognized in Other Comprehensive Income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts Payable, Accrued |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Instrument |
|
Other Long-Term Investments |
|
Expenses and Other Liabilities |
|
For the year ended December 31, 2009 |
|
|
Interest rate swaps |
|
$ |
|
8 |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(5 |
) |
|
|
Foreign currency swaps |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
(24 |
) |
|
|
Interest rate and foreign currency swaps |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
|
12 |
|
$ |
|
30 |
|
$ |
(41 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchased options
$312 million of
cash surrender
value of related
life insurance
policies
|
|
Interest rate |
|
To hedge the
possibility of early
policyholder cash
surrender when the
amortized cost of
underlying invested
assets is greater than
their fair values.
|
|
The Company pays a fee
and may receive or pay
cash, based on the
difference between the
amortized cost and fair
values of underlying
invested assets at the
time of policyholder
surrender. These cash
flows will be reported
in financing
activities.
|
|
Using cash flow hedge accounting, fair values are
reported in other assets or other liabilities, with
changes in fair value reported in accumulated other
comprehensive income and amortized to other benefit
expenses over the life of the underlying invested
assets.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value
Effect on the Financial Statements |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair values reported in other assets and other comprehensive income were less than $1 million. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Treasury lock |
|
Interest rate |
|
To hedge the
variability of and fix
at inception date, the
benchmark Treasury rate
component of future
interest payments on
debt to be issued.
|
|
The Company paid the
fair value of the
contracts at their
expiration and reported
the cash outflow in
operating activities.
|
|
Using cash flow hedge accounting, fair values were
reported in short-term investments or other
liabilities, with changes in fair value reported in
accumulated other comprehensive income. The net
cumulative gain or loss from the contracts are
amortized to interest expense over the life of the debt
issued.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value
Effect on the Financial Statements |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In the first quarter of 2009, all treasury locks matured and the Company recognized a gain of $14 million in other comprehensive income,
resulting in net cumulative losses of $26 million. These losses are amortized to interest expense over the life of the debt beginning in the
second quarter of 2009. |
The amount of gains (losses) reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income into income
was not significant. No gains (losses) were recognized due to ineffectiveness and no amounts were
excluded from the assessment of hedge ineffectiveness.
147
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Instrument / Volume of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Activity |
|
Primary Risk |
|
Purpose |
|
Cash Flows |
|
Accounting Policy |
|
|
Derivatives Not Designated as Accounting Hedges |
|
|
Futures $1,058
million of U.S.
dollar equivalent
market price of
outstanding
contracts
|
|
Equity and foreign currency |
|
To reduce domestic and
international equity
market exposures for
certain reinsurance
contracts that
guarantee minimum
death benefits (GMDB)
resulting from changes
in variable annuity
account values based
on underlying mutual
funds. Currency
futures are primarily
euros, Japanese yen
and British pounds.
|
|
The Company
receives (pays)
cash daily in the
amount of the
change in fair
value of the
futures contracts.
Cash flows are
included in
operating
activities.
|
|
Fair value changes are reported in other revenues.
Amounts not yet settled from the previous days fair
value change (daily variation margin) are reported in
premiums, accounts and notes receivable, net or
accounts payable, accrued expenses and other
liabilities.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value
Effect on the Financial Statements (in millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the year ended December 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
Futures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(283 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swaps
$76 million of
par value of
related investments
|
|
Interest rate |
|
To hedge the interest
cash flows of fixed
maturities to match
associated
liabilities.
|
|
The Company
periodically
exchanges cash
flows between
variable and fixed
interest rates for
both principal and
interest. Net
interest cash flows
are reported in
other realized
investment gains
(losses) and
included in
operating
activities.
|
|
Fair values are reported in other long-term
investments or other liabilities, with changes in fair
value reported in other realized investment gains
(losses).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Effect on the Financial Statements (in millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other Realized Investment Gains (Losses) |
|
|
|
|
Other Long-Term Investments |
|
|
|
|
|
For the year ended December 31, 2009 |
|
|
Interest rate swaps |
|
$ |
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Written options
(GMIB liability)
$1,183 million of
maximum potential
undiscounted future
payments as defined
in Note 23
Purchased options
(GMIB asset) $651
million of maximum
potential
undiscounted future
receipts as defined
in Note 23
|
|
Equity and interest rate |
|
The Company has
written reinsurance
contracts with issuers
of variable annuity
contracts that provide
annuitants with
certain guarantees of
minimum income
benefits, resulting
from the level of
variable annuity
account values
compared with a
contractually
guaranteed amount.
Payment by the Company
depends on the actual
account value in the
underlying mutual
funds and the level of
interest rates when
the contractholders
elect to receive
minimum income
payments. The Company
purchased reinsurance
contracts to reduce a
portion of the market
risk assumed. These
contracts are
accounted for as
written and purchased
options.
|
|
The Company
periodically
receives (pays)
fees based on
either
contractholders
account values or
deposits increased
at a contractual
rate. The Company
will also pay
(receive) cash
depending on
changes in account
values and interest
rates when
contractholders
first elect to
receive minimum
income payments.
These cash flows
are reported in
operating
activities.
|
|
Fair values are reported in other liabilities (GMIB
liability) and other assets (GMIB asset). Changes in
fair value are reported in guaranteed minimum income
benefits (income) expense.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Effect on the Financial Statements (in millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2009 |
|
Guaranteed Minimum Income Benefits (Income) Expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts Payable, Accrued |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Instrument |
|
Other Assets |
|
Expenses and Other Liabilities |
|
For the year ended December 31, 2009 |
|
|
Written options (GMIB
liability) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
903 |
|
$ |
(669 |
) |
|
|
Purchased options (GMIB
asset) |
|
|
|
482 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
365 |
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
|
482 |
|
$ |
|
903 |
|
$ |
(304 |
) |
148
Note 14 Investment Income and Gains and Losses
A. Net Investment Income
The components of pre-tax net investment income for the years ended December 31 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Fixed maturities |
|
$ |
748 |
|
|
$ |
729 |
|
|
$ |
722 |
|
Equity securities |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
Commercial mortgage loans |
|
|
223 |
|
|
|
219 |
|
|
|
240 |
|
Policy loans |
|
|
92 |
|
|
|
86 |
|
|
|
81 |
|
Real estate |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
Other long-term investments |
|
|
(30 |
) |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
Short-term investments and cash |
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
78 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,049 |
|
|
|
1,092 |
|
|
|
1,158 |
|
Less investment expenses |
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment income |
|
$ |
1,014 |
|
|
$ |
1,063 |
|
|
$ |
1,114 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment income for separate accounts (which is not reflected in the Companys revenues) was
$22 million for 2009, $148 million for 2008, and $215 million for 2007.
B. Realized Investment Gains and Losses
The following realized gains and losses on investments for the years ended December 31 exclude
amounts required to adjust future policy benefits for the run-off settlement annuity business.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Fixed maturities |
|
$ |
2 |
|
|
$ |
(237 |
) |
|
$ |
(26 |
) |
Equity securities |
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
(31 |
) |
|
|
13 |
|
Commercial mortgage loans |
|
|
(20 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
8 |
|
Other investments, including derivatives |
|
|
(37 |
) |
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Realized investment gains (losses) from continuing operations, before income taxes |
|
|
(43 |
) |
|
|
(170 |
) |
|
|
16 |
|
Less income taxes (benefits) |
|
|
(17 |
) |
|
|
(60 |
) |
|
|
5 |
|
Less realized gains attributable to noncontrolling interests |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Realized investment gains (losses) from continuing operations |
|
|
(26 |
) |
|
|
(110 |
) |
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Realized investment gains from discontinued operations, before income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25 |
|
Less income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Realized investment gains from discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net realized investment gains (losses) |
|
$ |
(26 |
) |
|
$ |
(110 |
) |
|
$ |
26 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
149
Included in pre-tax realized investment gains (losses) above were asset write-downs and changes in
valuation reserves as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Credit related (1) |
|
$ |
93 |
|
|
$ |
67 |
|
|
$ |
18 |
|
Other (2) |
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
150 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total (3) |
|
$ |
106 |
|
|
$ |
217 |
|
|
$ |
40 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Credit-related losses include
other-than-temporary declines in fair value of fixed
maturities and equity securities, and impairments of
commercial mortgage loans and real estate entities.
The amount related to credit losses on fixed
maturities for which a portion of the impairment was
recognized in other comprehensive income was not
significant. |
|
(2) |
|
Prior to adoption of new GAAP guidance for
other-than-temporary impairments on April 1, 2009,
other primarily represented the impact of rising
market yields on investments where the Company could
not demonstrate the intent and ability to hold until
recovery. |
|
(3) |
|
Includes other-than-temporary impairments on
debt securities of $47 million in 2009, $213 million
in 2008 and $31 million in 2007. These impairments
are included in both the credit related and other
categories above. |
The Company recognized pre-tax gains of $13 million in 2009 and pre-tax losses of $31 million in
2008 on hybrid securities. Losses in 2008 include $14 million on hybrid securities (classified as
equity securities) of certain quasi-federal government agencies where the Company believes that the
decline in fair value is other than temporary.
Realized investment losses in 2009 in other investments, including derivatives primarily represent
impairments of real estate entities. In 2008, gains primarily represented gains on the sales of
real estate properties held in joint ventures.
Realized investment gains and (losses) that are not reflected in the Companys revenues for the
years ended December 31 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Separate accounts |
|
$ |
(25 |
) |
|
$ |
(146 |
) |
|
$ |
652 |
|
Investment gains required to adjust future policy benefits for the run-off settlement annuity business |
|
$ |
51 |
|
|
$ |
8 |
|
|
$ |
18 |
|
Sales information for available-for-sale fixed maturities and equity securities, for the years
ended December 31 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Proceeds from sales |
|
$ |
949 |
|
|
$ |
1,465 |
|
|
$ |
1,040 |
|
Gross gains on sales |
|
$ |
51 |
|
|
$ |
13 |
|
|
$ |
26 |
|
Gross losses on sales |
|
$ |
(9 |
) |
|
$ |
(53 |
) |
|
$ |
(12 |
) |
150
Note 15 Debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Short-term: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial paper |
|
$ |
100 |
|
|
$ |
299 |
|
Current maturities of long-term debt |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total short-term debt |
|
$ |
104 |
|
|
$ |
301 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Uncollateralized debt: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7% Notes due 2011 |
|
$ |
222 |
|
|
$ |
222 |
|
6.375% Notes due 2011 |
|
|
226 |
|
|
|
226 |
|
5.375% Notes due 2017 |
|
|
250 |
|
|
|
250 |
|
6.35% Notes due 2018 |
|
|
300 |
|
|
|
300 |
|
8.5% Notes due 2019 |
|
|
349 |
|
|
|
|
|
6.37% Notes due 2021 |
|
|
78 |
|
|
|
78 |
|
7.65% Notes due 2023 |
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
100 |
|
8.3% Notes due 2023 |
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
7.875% Debentures due 2027 |
|
|
300 |
|
|
|
300 |
|
8.3% Step Down Notes due 2033 |
|
|
83 |
|
|
|
83 |
|
6.15% Notes due 2036 |
|
|
500 |
|
|
|
500 |
|
Other |
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-term debt |
|
$ |
2,436 |
|
|
$ |
2,090 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Under a universal shelf registration statement filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission,
the Company issued $350 million of 8.5% Notes on May 4, 2009 ($349 million, net of debt discount,
with an effective interest rate of 9.90% per year). The difference between the stated and
effective interest rates primarily reflects the effect of treasury locks. See Note 13 for further
information. Interest is payable on May 1 and November 1 of each year beginning November 1, 2009.
These Notes will mature on May 1, 2019.
On March 4, 2008, the Company issued $300 million of 6.35% Notes (with an effective interest rate
of 6.68% per year). The difference between the stated and effective interest rates primarily
reflects the effect of treasury locks. Interest is payable on March 15 and September 15 of each
year beginning September 15, 2008. These Notes will mature on March 15, 2018.
The Company may redeem these Notes, at any time, in whole or in part, at a redemption price equal
to the greater of:
|
|
100% of the principal amount of the Notes to be redeemed; or |
|
|
the present value of the remaining principal and interest payments
on the Notes being redeemed discounted at the applicable Treasury
Rate plus 40 basis points. |
Maturities of debt and capital leases are as follows (in millions): $4 in 2010, $452 in 2011, $3
in 2012, $3 in 2013, none in 2013 and the remainder in years after 2013. Interest expense on
long-term debt, short-term debt and capital leases was $166 million in 2009, $146 million in 2008,
and $122 million in 2007.
On March 14, 2008, the Company entered into a commercial paper program (the Program). Under the
Program, the Company is authorized to sell from time to time short-term unsecured commercial paper
notes up to a maximum of $500 million. The proceeds are used for general corporate purposes,
including working capital, capital expenditures, acquisitions and share repurchases. The Company
uses the credit facility entered into in June 2007, as back-up liquidity to support the outstanding
commercial paper. If at any time funds are not available on favorable terms under the Program, the
Company may use its credit facility for funding. In October 2008, the Company added an additional
dealer to its Program. As of December 31, 2009, the Company had $100 million in commercial paper
outstanding, at a weighted average interest rate of 0.35%, used for corporate purposes.
151
In June 2007, the Company amended and restated its five-year revolving credit and letter of credit
agreement for $1.75 billion, which permits up to $1.25 billion to be used for letters of credit.
The agreement includes options, which are subject to consent by the administrative agent and the
committing bank, to increase the commitment amount up to $2.0 billion and to extend the term of the
agreement. The Company entered into the agreement for general corporate purposes, including the
support for the issuance of commercial paper and to obtain statutory reserve credit for certain
reinsurance arrangements. There was a $27 million letter of credit issued as of December 31, 2009.
As of December 31, 2009, the Company had an additional $1.5 billion of borrowing capacity within
the maximum debt leverage covenant in the line of credit agreement in addition to the $2.5 billion
of debt outstanding.
Note 16 Common and Preferred Stock
As of December 31, the Company had issued the following shares:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Shares in thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Common: Par value $0.25
600,000 shares authorized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding January 1 |
|
|
271,036 |
|
|
|
279,588 |
|
Issued for stock option and other benefit plans |
|
|
3,221 |
|
|
|
1,458 |
|
Repurchase of common stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10,010 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding December 31 |
|
|
274,257 |
|
|
|
271,036 |
|
Treasury stock |
|
|
76,689 |
|
|
|
79,910 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issued December 31 |
|
|
350,946 |
|
|
|
350,946 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company maintains a share repurchase program, which was authorized by its Board of Directors.
The decision to repurchase shares depends on market conditions and alternative uses of capital.
The Company has, and may continue from time to time, to repurchase shares on the open market
through a Rule 10b5-1 plan that permits a company to repurchase its shares at times when it
otherwise might be precluded from doing so under insider trading laws or because of self-imposed
trading blackout periods.
The Company has authorized a total of 25 million shares of $1 par value preferred stock. No shares
of preferred stock were outstanding at December 31, 2009 or 2008.
152
Note 17 Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) excludes amounts required to adjust future policy
benefits for the run-off settlement annuity business.
Changes in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Expense) |
|
|
After- |
|
(In millions) |
|
Pre-Tax |
|
|
Benefit |
|
|
Tax |
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net unrealized appreciation, securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Implementation effect of updated guidance on other-than-temporary impairments |
|
$ |
(27 |
) |
|
$ |
9 |
|
|
$ |
(18 |
) |
Net unrealized appreciation on securities arising during the year |
|
|
843 |
|
|
|
(292 |
) |
|
|
551 |
|
Reclassification adjustment for (gains) included in shareholders net income |
|
|
(14 |
) |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net unrealized appreciation, securities |
|
$ |
802 |
|
|
$ |
(280 |
) |
|
$ |
522 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net unrealized depreciation, derivatives |
|
$ |
(30 |
) |
|
$ |
13 |
|
|
$ |
(17 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net translation of foreign currencies |
|
$ |
76 |
|
|
$ |
(28 |
) |
|
$ |
48 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Postretirement benefits liability adjustment: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reclassification adjustment for amortization of net losses from past
experience and prior service costs |
|
$ |
7 |
|
|
$ |
(3 |
) |
|
$ |
4 |
|
Curtailment gain |
|
|
(46 |
) |
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
(30 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reclassification adjustment included in shareholders net income |
|
|
(39 |
) |
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
(26 |
) |
Net change arising from assumption and plan changes and experience |
|
|
(107 |
) |
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
(71 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net postretirement benefits liability adjustment |
|
$ |
(146 |
) |
|
$ |
49 |
|
|
$ |
(97 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Expense) |
|
|
After- |
|
(In millions) |
|
Pre-Tax |
|
|
Benefit |
|
|
Tax |
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net unrealized depreciation, securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net unrealized depreciation on securities arising during the year |
|
$ |
(706 |
) |
|
$ |
245 |
|
|
$ |
(461 |
) |
Reclassification adjustment for losses included in net income |
|
|
268 |
|
|
|
(94 |
) |
|
|
174 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net unrealized depreciation, securities |
|
$ |
(438 |
) |
|
$ |
151 |
|
|
$ |
(287 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net unrealized appreciation, derivatives |
|
$ |
9 |
|
|
$ |
(3 |
) |
|
$ |
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net translation of foreign currencies: |
|
$ |
(183 |
) |
|
$ |
62 |
|
|
$ |
(121 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Postretirement benefits liability adjustment: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reclassification adjustment for amortization of net losses from past
experience and prior service costs |
|
$ |
21 |
|
|
$ |
(7 |
) |
|
$ |
14 |
|
Net change arising from assumption and plan changes and experience |
|
|
(1,134 |
) |
|
|
397 |
|
|
|
(737 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net postretirement benefits liability adjustment |
|
$ |
(1,113 |
) |
|
$ |
390 |
|
|
$ |
(723 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
153
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Expense) |
|
|
After- |
|
(In millions) |
|
Pre-Tax |
|
|
Benefit |
|
|
Tax |
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net unrealized depreciation, securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Implementation effect of updated guidance on accounting for hybrid financial instruments |
|
$ |
(18 |
) |
|
$ |
6 |
|
|
$ |
(12 |
) |
Net unrealized depreciation on securities arising during the year |
|
|
(68 |
) |
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
(44 |
) |
Reclassification due to sale of discontinued operations |
|
|
(23 |
) |
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
(15 |
) |
Reclassification adjustment for losses included in shareholders net income |
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net unrealized depreciation, securities |
|
$ |
(96 |
) |
|
$ |
34 |
|
|
$ |
(62 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net unrealized depreciation, derivatives |
|
$ |
(6 |
) |
|
$ |
2 |
|
|
$ |
(4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net translation of foreign currencies: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net translation of foreign currencies arising during the year |
|
$ |
33 |
|
|
$ |
(10 |
) |
|
$ |
23 |
|
Reclassification due to sale of discontinued operations |
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net translation of foreign currencies |
|
$ |
41 |
|
|
$ |
(13 |
) |
|
$ |
28 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Postretirement benefits liability adjustment: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reclassification adjustment for amortization of net losses from past
experience and prior service costs |
|
$ |
95 |
|
|
$ |
(33 |
) |
|
$ |
62 |
|
Net change arising from assumption and plan changes and experience |
|
|
301 |
|
|
|
(105 |
) |
|
|
196 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net postretirement benefits liability adjustment |
|
$ |
396 |
|
|
$ |
(138 |
) |
|
$ |
258 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 18 Shareholders Equity and Dividend Restrictions
State insurance departments and foreign jurisdictions that regulate certain of the Companys
subsidiaries prescribe accounting practices (which differ in some respects from GAAP) to determine
statutory net income and surplus. The Companys life insurance and HMO company subsidiaries are
regulated by such statutory requirements. The statutory net income for the years ended, and
statutory surplus as of, December 31 of the Companys life insurance and HMO subsidiaries were as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Net income |
|
$ |
1,088 |
|
|
$ |
420 |
|
|
$ |
1,130 |
|
Surplus |
|
$ |
4,728 |
|
|
$ |
3,638 |
|
|
$ |
3,346 |
|
As of December 31, 2009, statutory surplus for each of the Companys life insurance and HMO
subsidiaries is sufficient to meet the minimum required by regulators. As of December 31, 2009,
the Companys life insurance and HMO subsidiaries had investments on deposit with state departments
of insurance with statutory carrying values of $349 million. The Companys life insurance and HMO
subsidiaries are also subject to regulatory restrictions that limit the amount of annual dividends
or other distributions (such as loans or cash advances) insurance companies may extend to the
parent company without prior approval of regulatory authorities. The maximum dividend distribution
that the Companys life insurance and HMO subsidiaries may make during 2010 without prior approval
is approximately $1.0 billion. Restricted net assets of the Company as of December 31, 2009, were
approximately $4.0 billion. One of the Companys life insurance subsidiaries is permitted to loan
up to $400 million to the parent company without prior approval.
154
Note 19 Income Taxes
A. Income Tax Expense
The components of income taxes for the years ended December 31 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Current taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. income |
|
$ |
211 |
|
|
$ |
255 |
|
|
$ |
462 |
|
Foreign income |
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
57 |
|
|
|
36 |
|
State income |
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
275 |
|
|
|
313 |
|
|
|
511 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred taxes (benefits) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. income |
|
|
279 |
|
|
|
(224 |
) |
|
|
1 |
|
Foreign income |
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
State income |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
319 |
|
|
|
(221 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total income taxes |
|
$ |
594 |
|
|
$ |
92 |
|
|
$ |
511 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total income taxes for the years ended December 31 were different from the amount computed using
the nominal federal income tax rate of 35% for the following reasons:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Tax expense at nominal rate |
|
$ |
664 |
|
|
$ |
135 |
|
|
$ |
571 |
|
Tax-exempt interest income |
|
|
(31 |
) |
|
|
(32 |
) |
|
|
(32 |
) |
Effect of permanently invested foreign earnings |
|
|
(23 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends received deduction |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
(3 |
) |
Resolution of federal tax matters |
|
|
(27 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(26 |
) |
State income tax (net of federal income tax benefit) |
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
Change in valuation allowance |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
(24 |
) |
Other |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total income taxes |
|
$ |
594 |
|
|
$ |
92 |
|
|
$ |
511 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company has historically accrued U.S. income taxes on the undistributed earnings of foreign
subsidiaries. In 2009, the Company determined that the prospective earnings of its South Korean
operation are to be permanently invested overseas. Income taxes for this operation will therefore
be accrued at the tax rate of the foreign jurisdiction. As a result, shareholders net income
increased for 2009 by $23 million essentially representing unrecognized deferred tax liabilities
attributable to the South Korean investment which is considered to be permanent in nature.
155
B. Deferred Income Taxes
Deferred income tax assets and liabilities as of December 31 are shown below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Deferred tax assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee and retiree benefit plans |
|
$ |
774 |
|
|
$ |
921 |
|
Investments, net |
|
|
111 |
|
|
|
130 |
|
Other insurance and contractholder liabilities |
|
|
430 |
|
|
|
454 |
|
Deferred gain on sale of business |
|
|
67 |
|
|
|
78 |
|
Policy acquisition expenses |
|
|
144 |
|
|
|
147 |
|
Loss carryforwards |
|
|
104 |
|
|
|
111 |
|
Other accrued liabilities |
|
|
111 |
|
|
|
110 |
|
Bad debt expense |
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
Other |
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax assets before valuation allowance |
|
|
1,791 |
|
|
|
2,012 |
|
Valuation allowance for deferred tax assets |
|
|
(116 |
) |
|
|
(126 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax assets, net of valuation allowance |
|
|
1,675 |
|
|
|
1,886 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
291 |
|
|
|
238 |
|
Unrepatriated foreign income, net |
|
|
151 |
|
|
|
135 |
|
Unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments and foreign currency translation |
|
|
204 |
|
|
|
(104 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred tax liabilities |
|
|
646 |
|
|
|
269 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred income tax assets |
|
$ |
1,029 |
|
|
$ |
1,617 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Management believes consolidated taxable income to be generated in the future will be sufficient in
amount and character to support realization of the Companys net deferred tax assets of $1.0
billion as of December 31, 2009 and $1.6 billion as of December 31, 2008. This determination is
based upon the Companys consistent overall earnings history and future earnings expectations.
Other than deferred tax benefits attributable to operating loss and foreign tax credit
carryforwards, there are no constraints on the period of time within which the Companys deferred
tax assets must be realized. Federal operating loss carryforwards of $283 million were available
to offset future taxable income of the generating companies, and begin to expire in 2022. Foreign
tax credit carryforwards of $11 million were generated in 2009 and may be carried forward 10 years.
The Companys deferred tax asset is net of a federal and state valuation allowance (see table
above). The valuation allowance reflects managements assessment that certain deferred tax assets
may not be realizable. As was the case at December 31, 2008, the valuation allowance at December
31, 2009 relates primarily to operating losses, and other deferred tax benefits, of the run-off
reinsurance operations. It is reasonably possible there could be a significant decline in the
level of valuation allowance recorded against deferred tax benefits of the reinsurance operations
within the next 12 months.
C.
Uncertain Tax Positions
A reconciliation of unrecognized tax benefits for the years ended December 31 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Balance at January 1, |
|
$ |
164 |
|
|
$ |
260 |
|
|
$ |
245 |
|
Increase (decrease) due to prior year positions |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
(119 |
) |
|
|
(31 |
) |
Increase due to current year positions |
|
|
76 |
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
51 |
|
Reduction related to settlements with taxing authorities |
|
|
(28 |
) |
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Reduction related to lapse of applicable statute
of limitations |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, |
|
$ |
214 |
|
|
$ |
164 |
|
|
$ |
260 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
156
The December 31, 2009 balance included $119 million that would impact net income if recognized.
Over the next twelve months, the Company has determined it reasonably possible that the level of
unrecognized tax benefits could increase or decrease significantly, subject to developments in
certain matters in dispute with the IRS. The Company, however, is currently unable to reasonably
estimate the potential impact of such changes.
The Company classifies net interest expense on uncertain tax positions and any applicable penalties
as a component of income tax expense, but excludes these amounts from the liability for uncertain
tax positions. The Companys liability for net interest and penalties was $13 million at December
31, 2009, $19 million at December 31, 2008 and $17 million at December 31, 2007. The 2009 decline
included $13 million associated with the completion of an IRS examination.
During 2009, the IRS completed its examination of the Companys 2005 and 2006 tax years, resulting
in a decline in the liability for uncertain tax positions of $36 million, of which $8 million
impacted shareholders net income. In addition, the Company recorded a reduction of interest and
penalties of $13 million resulting in a total impact to shareholders net income of $21 million of
which:
|
|
$20 million is reflected in continuing operations; and |
|
|
$1 million is reflected in discontinued operations. |
During 2007, the IRS completed its examination of the Companys 2003 and 2004 tax years. As a
result, the Company recorded shareholders net income of $25 million, primarily attributable to the
recognition of previously unrecognized tax benefits, of which:
|
|
$23 million is reflected in continuing operations; and |
|
|
$2 million is associated with the disposition of Lovelace Health Systems, Inc. in 2003, and
is reflected in discontinued operations. |
D. Federal Income Tax Examinations, Litigation and Other Matters
During the first quarter of 2009, final resolution was reached in one of the two disputed issues
associated with the IRS examination of the Companys 2003 and 2004 consolidated federal income tax
returns. The second of these disputed matters remains unresolved and on June 4, 2009 the Company
initiated litigation of this matter by filing a petition in the United States Tax Court. Due to
the nature of the litigation process, timing of the resolution of this matter is uncertain. Though
the Company expects to prevail, unfavorable resolution of this litigation would result in a charge
to shareholders net income of up to $15 million, representing net interest expense on the
cumulative incremental tax for all affected years. In addition, two issues remain unresolved from
the IRS examination of the Companys 2005 and 2006 consolidated federal income tax returns. One of
these unresolved issues is the same matter which remains in dispute from the prior IRS examination.
The Company will attempt to resolve the other matter through the administrative appeals process,
and filed a formal protest of the proposed adjustments on March 31, 2009.
The IRS has commenced examination of the Companys 2007 and 2008 consolidated federal income tax
returns, completion of which is not expected during 2010. The Company conducts business in
numerous states and foreign jurisdictions, and may be engaged in multiple audit proceedings at any
given time. Generally, no further state or foreign audit activity for years prior to 2002 is
expected.
Congress could initiate tax reform legislation in 2010 that potentially includes changes to the
U.S. taxation of foreign operations, similar to provisions previously considered for 2010. If
ultimately enacted, these changes could increase the Companys effective tax rate.
Note 20 Employee Incentive Plans
The People Resources Committee of the Board of Directors awards stock options, restricted stock and
deferred stock to certain employees. To a very limited extent, the Committee has issued common
stock instead of cash compensation and dividend equivalent rights as part of restricted and
deferred stock units. The Company issues shares from Treasury stock for option exercises, awards
of restricted stock and payment of deferred and restricted stock units.
Compensation cost and related tax benefits for these awards were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Compensation cost |
|
$ |
42 |
|
|
$ |
41 |
|
|
$ |
37 |
|
Tax benefits |
|
$ |
15 |
|
|
$ |
14 |
|
|
$ |
13 |
|
157
The Company had the following number of shares of common stock available for award at December 31:
23.3 million in 2009, 28.5 million in 2008 and 31.1 million in 2007.
Stock options. The Company awards options to purchase the Companys common stock at the market
price of the stock on the grant date. Options vest over periods ranging from one to five years and
expire no later than 10 years after the grant date.
The table below shows the status of, and changes in, common stock options during the last three
years:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
(Options in thousands) |
|
Options |
|
|
Exercise Price |
|
|
Options |
|
|
Exercise Price |
|
|
Options |
|
|
Exercise Price |
|
Outstanding January 1 |
|
|
12,258 |
|
|
$ |
35.48 |
|
|
|
11,430 |
|
|
$ |
32.69 |
|
|
|
17,955 |
|
|
$ |
29.24 |
|
Granted |
|
|
4,709 |
|
|
$ |
14.15 |
|
|
|
2,311 |
|
|
$ |
46.53 |
|
|
|
1,662 |
|
|
$ |
46.97 |
|
Exercised |
|
|
(1,167 |
) |
|
$ |
25.32 |
|
|
|
(1,058 |
) |
|
$ |
27.40 |
|
|
|
(7,757 |
) |
|
$ |
27.67 |
|
Expired or canceled |
|
|
(2,049 |
) |
|
$ |
33.42 |
|
|
|
(425 |
) |
|
$ |
40.67 |
|
|
|
(430 |
) |
|
$ |
34.73 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding December 31 |
|
|
13,751 |
|
|
$ |
29.34 |
|
|
|
12,258 |
|
|
$ |
35.48 |
|
|
|
11,430 |
|
|
$ |
32.69 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options exercisable at year-end |
|
|
8,578 |
|
|
$ |
33.53 |
|
|
|
8,687 |
|
|
$ |
31.19 |
|
|
|
8,383 |
|
|
$ |
29.37 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation expense of $19 million related to unvested stock options at December 31, 2009 will be
recognized over the next two years (weighted average period).
The table below summarizes information for stock options exercised during the last three years:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Intrinsic value of options exercised |
|
$ |
7 |
|
|
$ |
23 |
|
|
$ |
169 |
|
Cash received for options exercised |
|
$ |
30 |
|
|
$ |
26 |
|
|
$ |
203 |
|
Excess tax benefits realized from options exercised |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
6 |
|
|
$ |
39 |
|
The following table summarizes information for outstanding common stock options at December 31,
2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions, except options in |
|
Options |
|
|
Options |
|
thousands) |
|
Outstanding |
|
|
Exercisable |
|
Number |
|
|
13,751 |
|
|
|
8,578 |
|
Total intrinsic value |
|
$ |
123 |
|
|
$ |
41 |
|
Weighted average exercise price |
|
$ |
29.34 |
|
|
$ |
33.53 |
|
Weighted average remaining
contractual life |
|
6.0 years |
|
|
4.3 years |
|
The weighted average fair value of options granted under employee incentive plans was $4.60 for
2009, $14.33 for 2008 and $16.05 for 2007, using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model and the
following assumptions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Dividend yield |
|
|
0.3 |
% |
|
|
0.1 |
% |
|
|
0.1 |
% |
Expected volatility |
|
|
40.0 |
% |
|
|
35.0 |
% |
|
|
35.0 |
% |
Risk-free interest rate |
|
|
1.6 |
% |
|
|
2.2 |
% |
|
|
4.7 |
% |
Expected option life |
|
4 years |
|
|
4 years |
|
|
4 years |
The expected volatility reflects the Companys past daily stock price volatility. The Company does
not consider volatility implied in the market prices of traded options to be a good indicator of
future volatility because remaining maturities of traded options are less than one year. The
risk-free interest rate is derived using the four-year U.S. Treasury bond yield rate as of the
award date for the primary grant. Expected option life reflects the Companys historical
experience excluding activity related to options granted under a replacement option feature. This
feature was cancelled in 2004.
158
Restricted stock. The Company awards restricted stock to its employees or directors with vesting
periods ranging from one to five years. These awards are generally in one of two forms:
restricted stock grants or restricted stock units. Restricted stock grants are the most widely
used form of restricted stock awards and are used for substantially all U.S.-based employees
receiving restricted stock awards. Recipients of restricted stock grants are entitled to receive
dividends and to vote during the vesting period, but forfeit their awards if their employment
terminates before the vesting date. Awards of restricted stock units are generally limited to
international employees. A restricted stock unit represents a right to receive a common share of
stock when the unit vests. Recipients of restricted stock units are entitled to receive
hypothetical dividends, but cannot vote during the vesting period. They forfeit their units if
their employment terminates before the vesting date.
The table below shows the status of, and changes in, restricted stock grants and units during the
last three years:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average Fair Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average Fair Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average Fair Value |
|
(Awards in thousands) |
|
Grants/Units |
|
|
at Award Date |
|
|
Grants/Units |
|
|
at Award Date |
|
|
Grants/Units |
|
|
at Award Date |
|
Outstanding January 1 |
|
|
2,347 |
|
|
$ |
40.53 |
|
|
|
2,482 |
|
|
$ |
34.28 |
|
|
|
2,802 |
|
|
$ |
26.72 |
|
Awarded |
|
|
2,678 |
|
|
$ |
18.14 |
|
|
|
820 |
|
|
$ |
43.90 |
|
|
|
698 |
|
|
$ |
47.20 |
|
Vested |
|
|
(557 |
) |
|
$ |
32.00 |
|
|
|
(760 |
) |
|
$ |
23.81 |
|
|
|
(750 |
) |
|
$ |
19.06 |
|
Forfeited |
|
|
(355 |
) |
|
$ |
33.79 |
|
|
|
(195 |
) |
|
$ |
40.47 |
|
|
|
(268 |
) |
|
$ |
31.45 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding December 31 |
|
|
4,113 |
|
|
$ |
27.65 |
|
|
|
2,347 |
|
|
$ |
40.53 |
|
|
|
2,482 |
|
|
$ |
34.28 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The fair value of vested restricted stock was: $10 million in 2009, $35 million in 2008 and $36
million in 2007.
At the end of 2009, approximately 2,880 employees held 4.1 million restricted stock grants and
units with $63 million of related compensation expense to be recognized over the next three years
(weighted average period).
Note 21 Leases, Rentals and Outsourced Service Arrangements
Rental expenses for operating leases, principally for office space, amounted to $138 million in
2009, $131 million in 2008 and $114 million in 2007. As of December 31, 2009, future net minimum
rental payments under non-cancelable operating leases were
approximately $500 million, payable as
follows (in millions): $116 in 2010, $107 in 2011, $83 in 2012, $60
in 2013, $44 in 2014 and $90
thereafter.
The Company also has several outsourced service arrangements with third parties, primarily for
human resource and information technology support services. The initial service periods under
these arrangements range from two to seven years and their related costs are reported consistent
with operating leases over the service period based on the pattern of use. The Company recorded in
other operating expense $115 million in 2009, $113 million in 2008 and $87 million in 2007 for
these arrangements.
159
Note 22 Segment Information
The Companys operating segments generally reflect groups of related products, except for the
International segment which is generally based on geography. In accordance with GAAP, operating
segments that do not require separate disclosure may be combined. The Company measures the
financial results of its segments using segment earnings (loss), which is defined as income
(loss) from continuing operations excluding after-tax realized investment gains and losses.
Consolidated pre-tax income from continuing operations is primarily attributable to domestic
operations. Consolidated pre-tax income from continuing operations generated by the Companys
foreign operations was approximately 9% in 2009, 36% in 2008 and 11% in 2007.
The Company determines segment earnings (loss) consistent with the accounting policies for the
consolidated financial statements, except that amounts included in Corporate are not allocated to
segments. The Company allocates certain other operating expenses, such as systems and other key
corporate overhead expenses, on systematic bases. Income taxes are generally computed as if each
segment were filing a separate income tax return. The Company does not report total assets by
segment since this is not a metric used to allocate resources or evaluate segment performance.
The Company presents segment information as follows:
Health Care includes medical, dental, behavioral health, prescription drug and other products and
services that may be integrated to support consumer-focused health care programs. This segment
also includes group disability and life insurance products that were historically sold in
connection with certain experience-rated medical products.
Disability and Life includes group:
|
|
disability and workers compensation case management; |
International includes:
|
|
life, accident and supplemental health insurance products; and |
|
|
international health care products and services including those offered to expatriate
employees of multinational corporations. |
Run-off Reinsurance includes accident, workers compensation, international life and health, GMDB
and GMIB reinsurance businesses. The Company stopped underwriting new reinsurance business in
2000.
The Company also reports results in two other categories.
Other Operations consist of:
|
|
non-leveraged and leveraged corporate-owned life insurance (COLI); |
|
|
deferred gains recognized from the 1998 sale of the individual life insurance and annuity
business and the 2004 sale of the retirement benefits business; and |
|
|
run-off settlement annuity business. |
Corporate reflects amounts not allocated to segments, such as interest expense on corporate debt
and on uncertain tax positions, net investment income on investments not supporting segment
operations, intersegment eliminations, compensation cost for stock options and certain corporate
overhead expenses.
160
Summarized segment financial information for the years ended December 31 was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Health Care |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Premiums and fees: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Medical: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guaranteed cost excluding voluntary / limited benefits (1),(2) |
|
$ |
3,148 |
|
|
$ |
3,504 |
|
|
$ |
3,877 |
|
Voluntary/limited benefits |
|
|
232 |
|
|
|
200 |
|
|
|
160 |
|
Experience-rated (2),(3) |
|
|
1,699 |
|
|
|
1,953 |
|
|
|
1,877 |
|
Stop loss |
|
|
1,274 |
|
|
|
1,197 |
|
|
|
589 |
|
Dental |
|
|
731 |
|
|
|
785 |
|
|
|
773 |
|
Medicare |
|
|
595 |
|
|
|
400 |
|
|
|
349 |
|
Medicare Part D |
|
|
342 |
|
|
|
327 |
|
|
|
326 |
|
Other (4) |
|
|
515 |
|
|
|
518 |
|
|
|
473 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total medical |
|
|
8,536 |
|
|
|
8,884 |
|
|
|
8,424 |
|
Life and other non-medical |
|
|
179 |
|
|
|
184 |
|
|
|
235 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total premiums |
|
|
8,715 |
|
|
|
9,068 |
|
|
|
8,659 |
|
Fees (2),(5) |
|
|
2,669 |
|
|
|
2,597 |
|
|
|
2,007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total premiums and fees |
|
|
11,384 |
|
|
|
11,665 |
|
|
|
10,666 |
|
Mail order pharmacy revenues |
|
|
1,282 |
|
|
|
1,204 |
|
|
|
1,118 |
|
Other revenues |
|
|
262 |
|
|
|
267 |
|
|
|
250 |
|
Net investment income |
|
|
181 |
|
|
|
200 |
|
|
|
202 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment revenues |
|
$ |
13,109 |
|
|
$ |
13,336 |
|
|
$ |
12,236 |
|
Income taxes |
|
$ |
399 |
|
|
$ |
352 |
|
|
$ |
358 |
|
Segment earnings |
|
$ |
731 |
|
|
$ |
664 |
|
|
$ |
679 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes guaranteed cost premiums primarily associated with open access and commercial HMO, as well as other risk-related products. |
|
(2) |
|
Premiums and/or fees associated with certain specialty products are also included. |
|
(3) |
|
Includes minimum premium members who have a risk profile similar to experience-rated funding arrangements. The risk portion of minimum premium revenue is reported in
experience-rated medical premium whereas the self funding portion of minimum premium revenue is recorded in fees. Also includes certain non-participating cases for which special
customer level reporting of experience is required. |
|
(4) |
|
Other medical premiums include risk revenue for specialty products. |
|
(5) |
|
Represents administrative service fees for medical members and related specialty product fees for non-medical members as well as fees related to Medicare Part D of $41 million in
2009, $69 million in 2008 and $61 million in 2007. |
161
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Disability and Life |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Premiums and fees: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Life |
|
$ |
1,301 |
|
|
$ |
1,261 |
|
|
$ |
1,148 |
|
Disability |
|
|
1,057 |
|
|
|
1,004 |
|
|
|
942 |
|
Other |
|
|
276 |
|
|
|
297 |
|
|
|
284 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
2,634 |
|
|
|
2,562 |
|
|
|
2,374 |
|
Other revenues |
|
|
113 |
|
|
|
117 |
|
|
|
131 |
|
Net investment income |
|
|
244 |
|
|
|
256 |
|
|
|
276 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment revenues |
|
$ |
2,991 |
|
|
$ |
2,935 |
|
|
$ |
2,781 |
|
Income taxes |
|
$ |
109 |
|
|
$ |
109 |
|
|
$ |
92 |
|
Segment earnings |
|
$ |
284 |
|
|
$ |
273 |
|
|
$ |
254 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
International |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Premiums and fees: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Health Care |
|
$ |
884 |
|
|
$ |
856 |
|
|
$ |
845 |
|
Life, Accident and Health |
|
|
998 |
|
|
|
1,014 |
|
|
|
955 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
1,882 |
|
|
|
1,870 |
|
|
|
1,800 |
|
Other revenues |
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
Net investment income |
|
|
69 |
|
|
|
79 |
|
|
|
77 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment revenues |
|
$ |
1,973 |
|
|
$ |
1,967 |
|
|
$ |
1,884 |
|
Income taxes |
|
$ |
70 |
|
|
$ |
104 |
|
|
$ |
96 |
|
Equity in income of investees |
|
$ |
11 |
|
|
$ |
8 |
|
|
$ |
3 |
|
Segment earnings |
|
$ |
183 |
|
|
$ |
182 |
|
|
$ |
176 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Run-off Reinsurance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Premiums and fees and other revenues |
|
$ |
(254 |
) |
|
$ |
374 |
|
|
$ |
13 |
|
Net investment income |
|
|
113 |
|
|
|
104 |
|
|
|
93 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment revenues |
|
$ |
(141 |
) |
|
$ |
478 |
|
|
$ |
106 |
|
Income taxes (benefits) |
|
$ |
93 |
|
|
$ |
(375 |
) |
|
$ |
(43 |
) |
Segment earnings (loss) |
|
$ |
185 |
|
|
$ |
(646 |
) |
|
$ |
(11 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Premiums and fees and other revenues |
|
$ |
176 |
|
|
$ |
184 |
|
|
$ |
190 |
|
Net investment income |
|
|
407 |
|
|
|
414 |
|
|
|
437 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment revenues |
|
$ |
583 |
|
|
$ |
598 |
|
|
$ |
627 |
|
Income taxes |
|
$ |
31 |
|
|
$ |
43 |
|
|
$ |
45 |
|
Segment earnings |
|
$ |
86 |
|
|
$ |
87 |
|
|
$ |
109 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other revenues and eliminations |
|
$ |
(58 |
) |
|
$ |
(53 |
) |
|
$ |
(55 |
) |
Net investment income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment revenues |
|
$ |
(58 |
) |
|
$ |
(43 |
) |
|
$ |
(26 |
) |
Income tax benefits |
|
$ |
(91 |
) |
|
$ |
(81 |
) |
|
$ |
(42 |
) |
Segment loss |
|
$ |
(142 |
) |
|
$ |
(162 |
) |
|
$ |
(97 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Realized investment gains (losses) from continuing operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Realized investment gains (losses) from continuing operations |
|
$ |
(43 |
) |
|
$ |
(170 |
) |
|
$ |
16 |
|
Income taxes (benefits) |
|
|
(17 |
) |
|
|
(60 |
) |
|
|
5 |
|
Less: Realized investment gain attributable to noncontrolling interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Realized investment gains (losses) from continuing operations,
net of taxes and noncontrolling interest |
|
$ |
(26 |
) |
|
$ |
(110 |
) |
|
$ |
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Premiums and fees and other revenues |
|
$ |
16,161 |
|
|
$ |
17,004 |
|
|
$ |
15,376 |
|
Mail order pharmacy revenues |
|
|
1,282 |
|
|
|
1,204 |
|
|
|
1,118 |
|
Net investment income |
|
|
1,014 |
|
|
|
1,063 |
|
|
|
1,114 |
|
Realized investment gains (losses) from continuing operations |
|
|
(43 |
) |
|
|
(170 |
) |
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
$ |
18,414 |
|
|
$ |
19,101 |
|
|
$ |
17,624 |
|
Income taxes |
|
$ |
594 |
|
|
$ |
92 |
|
|
$ |
511 |
|
Segment earnings |
|
$ |
1,327 |
|
|
$ |
398 |
|
|
$ |
1,110 |
|
Realized investment gains (losses) from continuing operations,
net of taxes and noncontrolling interest |
|
$ |
(26 |
) |
|
$ |
(110 |
) |
|
$ |
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders income from continuing operations |
|
$ |
1,301 |
|
|
$ |
288 |
|
|
$ |
1,120 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
162
Premiums and fees, mail order pharmacy revenues and other revenues by product type were as follows
for the years ended December 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Medical |
|
$ |
12,089 |
|
|
$ |
12,337 |
|
|
$ |
11,276 |
|
Disability |
|
|
1,063 |
|
|
|
994 |
|
|
|
945 |
|
Life, Accident and Health |
|
|
2,748 |
|
|
|
2,766 |
|
|
|
2,619 |
|
Mail order pharmacy |
|
|
1,282 |
|
|
|
1,204 |
|
|
|
1,118 |
|
Other |
|
|
261 |
|
|
|
907 |
|
|
|
536 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
17,443 |
|
|
$ |
18,208 |
|
|
$ |
16,494 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 23 Contingencies and Other Matters
The Company, through its subsidiaries, is contingently liable for various guarantees provided in
the ordinary course of business.
A. Financial Guarantees Primarily Associated with the Sold Retirement Benefits Business
Separate account assets are contractholder funds maintained in accounts with specific investment
objectives. The Company records separate account liabilities equal to separate account assets. In
certain cases, primarily associated with the sold retirement benefits business (which was sold in
April 2004), the Company guarantees a minimum level of benefits for retirement and insurance
contracts, written in separate accounts. The Company establishes an additional liability if
management believes that the Company will be required to make a payment under these guarantees.
The Company guarantees that separate account assets will be sufficient to pay certain retiree or
life benefits. The sponsoring employers are primarily responsible for ensuring that assets are
sufficient to pay these benefits and are required to maintain assets that exceed a certain
percentage of benefit obligations. This percentage varies depending on the asset class within a
sponsoring employers portfolio (for example, a bond fund would require a lower percentage than a
riskier equity fund) and thus will vary as the composition of the portfolio changes. If employers
do not maintain the required levels of separate account assets, the Company or an affiliate of the
buyer has the right to redirect the management of the related assets to provide for benefit
payments. As of December 31, 2009, employers maintained assets that exceeded the benefit
obligations. Benefit obligations under these arrangements were $1.7 billion as of December 31,
2009. As of December 31, 2009, approximately 75% of these guarantees are reinsured by an affiliate
of the buyer of the retirement benefits business. The remaining guarantees are provided by the
Company with minimal reinsurance from third parties. There were no additional liabilities required
for these guarantees as of December 31, 2009. Separate account assets supporting these guarantees
are classified in Levels 1 and 2 of the GAAP fair value hierarchy. See Note 11 for further
information on the fair value hierarchy.
The Company does not expect that these financial guarantees will have a material effect on the
Companys consolidated results of operations, liquidity or financial condition.
B. Guaranteed Minimum Income Benefit Contracts
The Companys reinsurance operations, which were discontinued in 2000 and are now an inactive
business in run-off mode, reinsured minimum income benefits under certain variable annuity
contracts issued by other insurance companies. A contractholder can elect the guaranteed minimum
income benefit (GMIB) within 30 days of any eligible policy anniversary after a specified
contractual waiting period. The Companys exposure arises when the guaranteed annuitization benefit
exceeds the annuitization benefit based on the policys current account value. At the time of
annuitization, the Company pays the excess (if any) of the minimum benefit guaranteed under the
contract over the benefit based on the current account value in a lump sum to the direct writing
insurance company.
In periods of declining equity markets or declining interest rates, the Companys GMIB liabilities
increase. Conversely, in periods of rising equity markets and rising interest rates, the Companys
liabilities for these benefits decrease.
The Company estimates the fair value of the GMIB assets and liabilities using assumptions for
market returns and interest rates, volatility of the underlying equity and bond mutual fund
investments, mortality, lapse, annuity election rates, non-performance risk, and risk and profit
charges. See Note 11 for additional information on how fair values for these liabilities and
related receivables for retrocessional coverage are determined.
163
The Company is required to disclose the maximum potential undiscounted future payments for GMIB
contracts. Under these guarantees, the future payment amounts are dependent on equity and bond
fund market and interest rate levels prior to and at the date of annuitization election, which must
occur within 30 days of a policy anniversary, after the appropriate waiting period. Therefore, the
future payments are not fixed and determinable under the terms of the contract. Accordingly, the
Company has estimated the maximum potential undiscounted future payments using hypothetical adverse
assumptions, defined as follows:
|
|
no annuitants surrendered their accounts; |
|
|
all annuitants lived to elect their benefit; |
|
|
all annuitants elected to receive their benefit on the next available date (2010 through
2014); and |
|
|
all underlying mutual fund investment values remained at the December 31, 2009 value of
$1.3 billion with no future returns. |
The maximum potential undiscounted payments that the Company would make under those assumptions
would aggregate $1.2 billion before reinsurance recoveries. The Company expects the amount of
actual payments to be significantly less than this hypothetical undiscounted aggregate amount. The
Company has retrocessional coverage in place from two external reinsurers which covers 55% of the
exposures on these contracts. The Company bears the risk of loss if its retrocessionaires do not
meet or are unable to meet their reinsurance obligations to the Company.
C. Certain Other Guarantees
The Company had indemnification obligations to lenders of up to $235 million as of December 31,
2009 related to borrowings by certain real estate joint ventures which the Company either records
as an investment or consolidates. These borrowings, which are nonrecourse to the Company, are
secured by the joint ventures real estate properties with fair values in excess of the loan
amounts and mature at various dates beginning in 2010 through 2017. The Companys indemnification
obligations would require payment to lenders for any actual damages resulting from certain acts
such as unauthorized ownership transfers, misappropriation of rental payments by others or
environmental damages. Based on initial and ongoing reviews of property management and operations,
the Company does not expect that payments will be required under these indemnification
obligations. Any payments that might be required could be recovered through a refinancing or sale
of the assets. In some cases, the Company also has recourse to partners for their proportionate
share of amounts paid. There were no liabilities required for these indemnification obligations as
of December 31, 2009.
As part of the reinsurance and administrative service arrangements, the Company pays claims for the
group medical and long-term disability business of Great-West Healthcare and collects related
amounts due from their third-party reinsurers. Any uncollected amounts will represent additional
assumed liabilities of the Company and decrease shareholders net income if and when these amounts
are determined uncollectible. At December 31, 2009, there were no receivables recorded for paid
claims due from third-party reinsurers for this business and unpaid claims related to this business
were estimated at $22 million.
As of December 31, 2009, the Company guaranteed that it would compensate the lessors for a
shortfall of up to $44 million in the market value of certain leased equipment at the end of each
lease. Guarantees of $28 million expire in 2012 and $16 million expire in 2016. The Company had
additional liabilities for these guarantees of $8 million as of December 31, 2009.
The Company had indemnification obligations as of December 31, 2009 in connection with acquisition
and disposition transactions. These indemnification obligations are triggered by the breach of
representations or covenants provided by the Company, such as representations for the presentation
of financial statements, the filing of tax returns, compliance with law or the identification of
outstanding litigation. These obligations are typically subject to various time limitations,
defined by the contract or by operation of law, such as statutes of limitation. In some cases, the
maximum potential amount due is subject to contractual limitations based on a percentage of the
transaction purchase price, while in other cases limitations are not specified or applicable. The
Company does not believe that it is possible to determine the maximum potential amount due under
these obligations, since not all amounts due under these indemnification obligations are subject to
limitation. There were no liabilities required for these indemnification obligations as of
December 31, 2009.
The Company contracts on an administrative services only (ASO) basis with customers who fund
their own claims. The Company charges these customers administrative fees based on the expected
cost of administering their self-funded programs. In some cases, the Company provides performance
guarantees associated with meeting certain service related and other performance standards. If
these standards are not met, the Company may be financially at risk up to a stated percentage of
the contracted fee or a stated dollar amount. The Company establishes liabilities for estimated
payouts associated with these guarantees. Approximately 10% of reported ASO fees were at risk for
the periods reported, with actual reimbursements of generally less than 1% of reported ASO fees in
2009, 2008 and 2007.
164
The Company does not expect that these certain other guarantees will have a material adverse effect
on the Companys consolidated results of operations, liquidity or financial condition.
D. Regulatory and Industry Developments
Employee benefits regulation. The business of administering and insuring employee benefit
programs, particularly health care programs, is heavily regulated by federal and state laws and
administrative agencies, such as state departments of insurance and the Federal Departments of
Labor and Justice, as well as the courts. Regulation and judicial decisions have resulted in
changes to industry and the Companys business practices and will continue to do so in the
future. In addition, the Companys subsidiaries are routinely involved with various claims,
lawsuits and regulatory and IRS audits and investigations that could result in financial liability,
changes in business practices, or both. Health care regulation in its various forms could have an
adverse effect on the Companys health care operations if it inhibits the Companys ability to
respond to market demands or results in increased medical or administrative costs without improving
the quality of care or services.
Other possible regulatory and legislative changes or judicial decisions that could have an adverse
effect on the Companys employee benefits businesses include:
|
|
additional mandated benefits or services that increase costs; |
|
|
legislation that would grant plan participants broader rights to sue their health plans; |
|
|
changes in public policy and in the political environment, which could affect state and
federal law, including legislative and regulatory proposals related to health care issues,
which could increase cost and affect the market for the Companys health care products and
services; and pension legislation, which could increase pension cost; |
|
|
changes in Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA) regulations resulting
in increased administrative burdens and costs; |
|
|
additional restrictions on the use of prescription drug formularies and rulings from
pending purported class action litigation, which could result in adjustments to or the
elimination of the average wholesale price or AWP of pharmaceutical products as a benchmark
in establishing certain rates, charges, discounts, guarantees and fees for various
prescription drugs; |
|
|
additional privacy legislation and regulations that interfere with the proper use of
medical information for research, coordination of medical care and disease and disability
management; |
|
|
additional variations among state laws mandating the time periods and administrative
processes for payment of health care provider claims; |
|
|
legislation that would exempt independent physicians from antitrust laws; and |
|
|
changes in federal tax laws, such as amendments that could affect the taxation of employer
provided benefits. |
The employee benefits industry remains under scrutiny by various state and federal government
agencies and could be subject to government efforts to bring criminal actions in circumstances that
could previously have given rise only to civil or administrative proceedings.
Concentration of risk. For the Companys International segment, South Korea is the single largest
geographic market. South Korea generated 29% of the segments revenues and 49% of the segments
earnings for year ended December 31, 2009. Due to the concentration of business in South Korea,
the International segment is exposed to potential losses resulting from economic and geopolitical
developments in that country, as well as foreign currency movements affecting the South Korean
currency, which could have a significant impact on the segments results and the Companys
consolidated financial results.
E. Litigation and Other Legal Matters
The Company is routinely involved in numerous claims, lawsuits, regulatory and IRS audits,
investigations and other legal matters arising, for the most part, in the ordinary course of the
business of administering and insuring employee benefit programs including payments to providers
and benefit level disputes. Litigation of income tax matters is accounted for under FASBs
accounting guidance for uncertainty in income taxes. Further information can be found in Note 19.
An increasing number of claims are being made for substantial non-economic, extra-contractual or
punitive damages. The outcome of litigation and other legal matters is always uncertain, and
outcomes that are not justified by the evidence can occur. The Company believes that it has valid
defenses to the legal matters pending against it and is defending itself vigorously and has
recorded accruals in accordance with GAAP. Nevertheless, it is possible that resolution of one or
more of the legal matters currently pending or threatened could result in losses material to the
Companys consolidated results of operations, liquidity or financial condition.
165
Managed care litigation. On April 7, 2000, several pending actions were consolidated in the United
States District Court for the Southern District of Florida in a multi-district litigation
proceeding captioned In re Managed Care Litigation challenging, in general terms, the mechanisms
used by managed care companies in connection with the delivery of or payment for health care
services. The
consolidated cases include Shane v. Humana, Inc., et al., Mangieri v. CIGNA Corporation, Kaiser and
Corrigan v. CIGNA Corporation, et al. and Amer. Dental Assn v. CIGNA Corp. et al.
In 2004, the court approved a settlement agreement between the physician class and CIGNA. However,
a dispute over disallowed claims under the settlement submitted by a representative of certain
class member physicians is in arbitration. Separately, in 2005, the court approved a settlement
between CIGNA and a class of non-physician health care providers. Only the American Dental
Association case remains unresolved. On March 2, 2009, the Court dismissed with prejudice five of
the six counts of the complaint. On March 20, 2009, the Court declined to exercise supplemental
jurisdiction over the remaining state law claim and dismissed the case. Plaintiffs filed a notice
of appeal on April 17, 2009. The appeal is fully briefed and pending and oral argument is
scheduled for February 26, 2010 before the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit.
CIGNA denies the allegations and will continue to vigorously defend itself.
CIGNA has received insurance recoveries related to the In re Managed Care Litigation. In 2008, the
Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County ruled that the Company is not entitled to insurance
recoveries from one of the two insurers from which the Company is pursuing further recoveries.
CIGNA appealed that decision and on June 3, 2009, the Superior Court of Pennsylvania reversed the
trial courts decision, remanding the case to the trial court for further proceedings.
Broker compensation. Beginning in 2004, the Company, other insurance companies and certain
insurance brokers received subpoenas and inquiries from various regulators, including the New York
and Connecticut Attorneys General, the Florida Office of Insurance Regulation, the U.S. Attorneys
Office for the Southern District of California and the U.S. Department of Labor relating to their
investigations of insurance broker compensation. CIGNA cooperated with the inquiries and
investigations.
On August 1, 2005, two CIGNA subsidiaries, Connecticut General Life Insurance Company and Life
Insurance Company of North America, were named as defendants in a multi-district litigation
proceeding, In re Insurance Brokerage Antitrust Litigation, consolidated in the United States
District Court for the District of New Jersey. The complaint alleges that brokers and insurers
conspired to hide commissions, thus increasing the cost of employee benefit plans, and seeks treble
damages and injunctive relief. Numerous insurance brokers and other insurance companies are named
as defendants. In 2008, the court ordered the clerk to enter judgment against plaintiffs and in
favor of the defendants. Plaintiffs appealed. CIGNA denies the allegations and will continue to
vigorously defend itself.
Amara cash balance pension plan litigation. On December 18, 2001, Janice Amara filed a class action
lawsuit, captioned Janice C. Amara, Gisela R. Broderick, Annette S. Glanz, individually and on
behalf of all others similarly situated v. CIGNA Corporation and CIGNA Pension Plan, in the United
States District Court for the District of Connecticut against CIGNA Corporation and the CIGNA
Pension Plan on behalf of herself and other similarly situated participants in the CIGNA Pension
Plan affected by the 1998 conversion to a cash balance formula. The plaintiffs allege various ERISA
violations including, among other things, that the Plans cash balance formula discriminates
against older employees; the conversion resulted in a wear away period (during which the
pre-conversion accrued benefit exceeded the post-conversion benefit); and these conditions are not
adequately disclosed in the Plan.
In 2008, the court issued a decision finding in favor of CIGNA Corporation and the CIGNA Pension
Plan on the age discrimination and wear away claims. However, the court found in favor of the
plaintiffs on many aspects of the disclosure claims and ordered an enhanced level of benefits from
the existing cash balance formula for the majority of the class, requiring class members to receive
their frozen benefits under the pre-conversion CIGNA Pension Plan and their accrued benefits under
the post-conversion CIGNA Pension Plan. The court also ordered, among other things, pre-judgment
and post-judgment interest. Both parties appealed the courts decisions to the United States
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit which issued a decision on October 6, 2009 affirming the
District Courts judgment and order on all issues. On January 4, 2010, the Company and the
plaintiffs filed separate petitions for a writ of certiorari to the United States Supreme Court.
The implementation of the judgment is currently stayed. The Company will continue to vigorously
defend itself in this case. In the second quarter of 2008, the Company recorded a charge of
$80 million pre-tax ($52 million after-tax), which principally reflects the Companys best estimate
of the liabilities related to the court order.
166
Ingenix. On February 13, 2008, State of New York Attorney General Andrew M. Cuomo announced an
industry-wide investigation into the use of data provided by Ingenix, Inc., a subsidiary of
UnitedHealthcare, used to calculate payments for services provided by out-of-network providers. The
Company received four subpoenas from the New York Attorney Generals office in connection with this
investigation and responded appropriately. On February 17, 2009, the Company entered into an
Assurance of Discontinuance resolving the investigation. In connection with the industry-wide
resolution, the Company contributed $10 million to the establishment of a new non-profit company
that will compile and provide the data currently provided by Ingenix. In addition, on March 28,
2008, the Company received a voluntary request for production of documents from the Connecticut
Attorney Generals office seeking certain out-of-network claim payment information. The Company has
responded appropriately. Since January 2009, the Company has received and responded to inquiries
regarding the use of Ingenix data from the Illinois and Texas Attorneys General and the Departments
of Insurance in Illinois, Florida, Vermont, Georgia, Pennsylvania, Connecticut, and Alaska.
The Company was named as a defendant in seven putative nationwide class actions asserting that due
to the use of data from Ingenix, Inc., the Company improperly underpaid claims, an industry-wide
issue. Two actions were brought on behalf of members, (Franco v. CIGNA Corp. et al., and Chazen v.
CIGNA Corp. et al.), and five actions were brought on behalf of providers, (American Medical
Association et al. v. CIGNA Corp. et al., Shiring et al. v. CIGNA Corp. et al.; Higashi et al. v.
CGLIC et al.; Pain Management and Surgery Center of Southeast Indiana v. CGLIC et al.; and North
Peninsula Surgical Center v. Connecticut General Life Insurance Co. et al.). Six of the seven
matters have been consolidated into the Franco case pending in the United States District Court for
the District of New Jersey. The consolidated amended complaint, filed on August 7, 2009, asserts
claims under ERISA, the RICO statute, the Sherman Antitrust Act and New Jersey state law. CIGNA
filed a motion to dismiss the consolidated amended complaint on September 9, 2009, which is now
fully briefed and pending. Discovery is ongoing and class certification is scheduled to be briefed
in March and April of 2010. The one remaining class action that has not yet been consolidated in
the Franco case is North Peninsula Surgical Center, filed on July 6, 2009, in the United States
District Court for the Central District of California, asserting claims under ERISA, the Sherman
Antitrust Act and state unfair competition law. The North Peninsula case was voluntarily dismissed
on September 29, 2009 and re-filed in the United States District Court for the District of New
Jersey on November 12, 2009. The new complaint includes ERISA and state law unfair competition
claims only. The case is expected to be consolidated into the Franco case in the near future.
On June 9, 2009, CIGNA filed motions in the United States District Court for the Southern District
of Florida to enforce the In re Managed Care Litigation settlement described above by enjoining the
RICO and antitrust causes of action asserted by the provider and medical association plaintiffs in
the Ingenix litigation on the ground that they arose prior to and were released in the April 2004
settlement. On November 30, 2009, the Court granted the motions and ordered the provider and
association plaintiffs to withdraw their RICO and antitrust claims from the Ingenix litigation by
December 21, 2009. The plaintiffs filed notices of appeal with the United States Court of Appeals
for the Eleventh Circuit on December 10 and 11, 2009, along with motions to stay the order pending
appeal. On January 12, 2010, the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit stayed
the order pending resolution of the appeal.
One of the provider plaintiffs, Pain Management and Surgery Center of Southern Indiana, filed a
voluntary dismissal of its claims on November 11, 2009.
It is reasonably possible that others could initiate additional litigation or additional regulatory
action against the Company with respect to use of data provided by Ingenix, Inc. The Company denies
the allegations asserted in the investigations and litigation and will vigorously defend itself in
these matters.
INDUSTRY DEVELOPMENTS AND OTHER MATTERS
The disability industry is under continuing review by regulators and legislators with respect to
its offset practices regarding Social Security Disability Insurance (SSDI). There has been
specific inquiry as to the industrys role in providing assistance to individuals with their
applications for SSDI. The Company has received one Congressional inquiry and has responded to the
information request. Also, legislation prohibiting the offset of SSDI payments against private
disability insurance payments for prospectively issued policies was introduced but not enacted in
the Connecticut state legislature. The Company is also involved in related pending litigation. If
the industry is forced to change its offset SSDI procedures, the practices and products for the
Companys Disability and Life segment could be significantly impacted.
167
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the Board of Directors
and Shareholders of CIGNA Corporation
In our opinion, the accompanying consolidated balance sheets and the related consolidated
statements of income, comprehensive income and changes in total equity and cash flows
present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of CIGNA Corporation and its
subsidiaries (the Company) at December 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, and the results of their
operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2009
in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Also
in our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over
financial reporting as of December 31, 2009, based on criteria established in Internal Control -
Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission
(COSO). The Companys management is responsible for these financial statements, for maintaining
effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of
internal control over financial reporting, included in Managements Annual Report on Internal
Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express opinions on these financial
statements and on the Companys internal control over financial reporting based on our integrated
audits. We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting
Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to
obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material
misstatement and whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all
material respects. Our audits of the financial statements included examining, on a test basis,
evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the
accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall
financial statement presentation. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included
obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a
material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of
internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audits also included performing such other
procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audits provide a
reasonable basis for our opinions.
As discussed in Note 2(B) to the Consolidated Financial Statements, the Company adopted ASC 820
Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures effective January 1, 2008.
A companys internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable
assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial
statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A
companys internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i)
pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the
transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that
transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance
with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company
are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company;
and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized
acquisition, use, or disposition of the companys assets that could have a material effect on the
financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or
detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are
subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that
the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
|
|
|
/s/ Pricewaterhouse Coopers LLP
|
|
|
|
|
|
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania |
|
|
February 25, 2010 |
|
|
168
Quarterly Financial Data (unaudited)
The following unaudited quarterly financial data is presented on a consolidated basis for each
of the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008. Quarterly financial results necessarily rely
heavily on estimates. This and certain other factors, such as the seasonal nature of portions of
the insurance business, suggest the need to exercise caution in drawing specific conclusions from
quarterly consolidated results.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
(In millions, except per share amounts) |
|
March 31 |
|
|
June 30 |
|
|
Sept. 30 |
|
|
Dec. 31 |
|
Consolidated Results |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
$ |
4,773 |
|
|
$ |
4,488 |
|
|
$ |
4,517 |
|
|
$ |
4,636 |
|
Income from continuing operations before income taxes |
|
|
273 |
|
|
|
630 |
|
|
|
487 |
|
|
|
508 |
|
Shareholders net income |
|
|
208 |
(1) |
|
|
435 |
(2) |
|
|
329 |
(3) |
|
|
330 |
(4) |
Shareholders net income per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
0.76 |
|
|
|
1.59 |
|
|
|
1.20 |
|
|
|
1.20 |
|
Diluted |
|
|
0.76 |
|
|
|
1.58 |
|
|
|
1.19 |
|
|
|
1.19 |
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
$ |
4,569 |
|
|
$ |
4,863 |
|
|
$ |
4,852 |
|
|
$ |
4,817 |
|
Income from continuing operations before income taxes |
|
|
74 |
|
|
|
413 |
|
|
|
233 |
|
|
|
(338 |
) |
Shareholders net income (loss) |
|
|
58 |
(5) |
|
|
272 |
(6) |
|
|
171 |
(7) |
|
|
(209) |
(8) |
Shareholders net income (loss) per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
0.21 |
|
|
|
0.97 |
|
|
|
0.62 |
|
|
|
(0.77 |
) |
Diluted |
|
|
0.20 |
|
|
|
0.96 |
|
|
|
0.62 |
|
|
|
(0.77 |
) |
Stock and Dividend Data |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Price range of common stock high |
|
$ |
23.06 |
|
|
$ |
25.60 |
|
|
$ |
33.00 |
|
|
$ |
38.12 |
|
low |
|
$ |
12.68 |
|
|
$ |
16.84 |
|
|
$ |
23.10 |
|
|
$ |
26.83 |
|
Dividends declared per common share |
|
$ |
0.040 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Price range of common stock high |
|
$ |
56.98 |
|
|
$ |
44.43 |
|
|
$ |
44.13 |
|
|
$ |
34.47 |
|
low |
|
$ |
36.75 |
|
|
$ |
35.07 |
|
|
$ |
31.76 |
|
|
$ |
8.00 |
|
Dividends declared per common share |
|
$ |
0.040 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The first quarter of 2009 includes an after-tax gain of $23 million for the GMIB business, an
after-tax benefit of $20 million associated with the completion of the 2005 and 2006 IRS
examinations and an after-tax charge of $47 million to strengthen GMDB reserves. |
|
(2) |
|
The second quarter of 2009 includes an after-tax gain of $110 million for the GMIB business,
an after-tax benefit of $30 million associated with a pension curtailment gain, and an
after-tax charge of $9 million for the cost reduction program. |
|
(3) |
|
The third quarter of 2009 includes an after-tax gain of $16 million for the GMIB business and
an after-tax charge of $7 million for the cost reduction program. |
|
(4) |
|
The fourth quarter of 2009 includes an after-tax gain of $60 million for the GMIB business
and an after-tax charge of $13 million for the cost reduction program. |
|
(5) |
|
The first quarter of 2008 includes an after-tax loss of $195 million for the GMIB business
and an after-tax charge of $24 million associated with litigation matters. |
|
(6) |
|
The second quarter of 2008 includes an after-tax benefit of $34 million for the GMIB business
and an after-tax charge of $52 million associated with litigation matters. |
|
(7) |
|
The third quarter of 2008 includes an after-tax loss of $61 million for the GMIB business. |
|
(8) |
|
The fourth quarter of 2008 includes an after-tax loss of $215 million for the GMIB business,
an after-tax loss of $192 million for the GMDB business and an after-tax charge of $35 million
for the cost reduction program partially offset by an after-tax benefit of $47 million for a
reduction in management incentive compensation accruals. |
169
Five-Year Cumulative Total Shareholder Return*
December 31, 2004 December 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12/31/04 |
|
|
12/30/05 |
|
|
12/29/06 |
|
|
12/31/07 |
|
|
12/31/08 |
|
|
12/31/09 |
|
CIGNA |
|
$ |
100 |
|
|
$ |
137 |
|
|
$ |
162 |
|
|
$ |
198 |
|
|
$ |
62 |
|
|
$ |
130 |
|
S&P 500 Index |
|
$ |
100 |
|
|
$ |
105 |
|
|
$ |
121 |
|
|
$ |
128 |
|
|
$ |
81 |
|
|
$ |
102 |
|
S&P Mgd. Health
Care, Life & Health
Ins. Indexes** |
|
$ |
100 |
|
|
$ |
138 |
|
|
$ |
136 |
|
|
$ |
155 |
|
|
$ |
72 |
|
|
$ |
90 |
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Assumes that the value of the investment in CIGNA common stock and each index was $100 on
December 31, 2004 and that all dividends were reinvested. |
|
** |
|
Weighted average of S&P Managed Health Care (75%) and Life & Health Insurance (25%) Indexes. |
170
|
|
|
Item 9. |
|
CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE |
None.
|
|
|
Item 9A. |
|
CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES |
A. Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Based on an evaluation of the effectiveness of CIGNAs disclosure controls and procedures
conducted under the supervision and with the participation of CIGNAs management, CIGNAs Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that, as of the end of the period covered
by this report, CIGNAs disclosure controls and procedures are effective to ensure that information
required to be disclosed by CIGNA in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is
recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the SECs rules
and forms.
B. Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
Managements Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
The Companys management report on internal control over financial reporting under the caption
Managements Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting on page 97 in this Form
10-K.
Attestation Report of the Registered Public Accounting Firm
The attestation report of CIGNAs independent registered public accounting firm, on the
effectiveness of CIGNAs internal control over financial reporting appears under the caption
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm on page 168 of this Form 10-K.
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
There have been no changes in CIGNAs internal control over financial reporting identified in
connection with the evaluation described in the above paragraph that have materially affected, or
are reasonably likely to materially affect, CIGNAs internal control over financial reporting.
|
|
|
Item 9B. |
|
OTHER INFORMATION |
None.
PART III
Item 10. DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT
A. Directors of the Registrant
The information under the captions The Board of Directors Nominees for Terms to Expire in
April 2013, Directors Who Will Continue in Office, Board of Directors and Committee Meetings,
Membership, Attendance and Independence (as it relates to Audit Committee disclosure), and
Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance in CIGNAs proxy statement to be dated on
or about March 19, 2010 is incorporated by reference.
B. Executive Officers of the Registrant
See PART I Executive Officers of the Registrant on page 45 in this Form 10-K.
171
C. Code of Ethics and Other Corporate Governance Disclosures
CIGNAs Code of Ethics is the Companys code of business conduct and ethics, and applies to
CIGNAs directors, officers (including the chief executive officer, chief financial officer and
chief accounting officer) and employees. The Code of Ethics is posted on the Corporate Governance
section found on the About Us page of the Companys website, www.cigna.com. In the event the
Company substantively amends its Code of Ethics or waives a provision of the Code, CIGNA intends to
disclose the amendment or waiver on the Corporate Governance section of the Companys website.
In addition, the Companys corporate governance guidelines (Board Practices) and the charters
of its board committees (audit, corporate governance, executive, finance and people resources) are
available on the Corporate Governance section of the Companys website. These corporate governance
documents, as well as the Code of Ethics, are available in print to any shareholder who requests
them.
|
|
|
Item 11. |
|
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION |
The information under the captions Director Compensation, Report of the People Resources
Committee, Compensation Discussion and Analysis and Executive Compensation in CIGNAs proxy
statement to be dated on or about March 19, 2010 is incorporated by reference.
172
|
|
|
Item 12. |
|
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER
MATTERS |
The following table presents information regarding CIGNAs equity compensation plans as of December
31, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
|
(b) |
|
|
(c) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities Remaining |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available For Future |
|
|
|
Securities To Be Issued |
|
|
Weighted Average |
|
|
Issuance Under Equity |
|
|
|
Upon Exercise Of |
|
|
Exercise Price Per Share Of |
|
|
Compensation Plans |
|
|
|
Outstanding Options, |
|
|
Outstanding Options, |
|
|
(Excluding Securities |
|
Plan Category |
|
Warrants And Rights |
|
|
Warrants And Rights |
|
|
Reflected In Column (a)) |
|
Equity Compensation Plans Approved by Security Holders |
|
|
13,751,414 |
|
|
$ |
29.34 |
|
|
|
23,278,830 |
|
Equity Compensation Plans Not Approved by
Security Holders |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
13,751,414 |
|
|
$ |
29.34 |
|
|
|
23,278,830 |
|
The information under the captions Stock held by Directors, Nominees and Executive Officers and
Largest Security Holders in CIGNAs proxy statement to be dated on or about March 19, 2010 is
incorporated by reference.
|
|
|
Item 13. |
|
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS |
The information under the caption Certain Transactions in CIGNAs proxy statement to be
dated on or about March 19, 2010 is incorporated by reference.
|
|
|
Item 14. |
|
PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES |
The information under the captions Policy for the Pre-Approval of Audit and Non-Audit
Services and Fees to Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm in CIGNAs proxy statement to
be dated on or about March 19, 2010 is incorporated by reference.
PART IV
|
|
|
Item 15. |
|
EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES |
(a) (1) The following Financial Statements appear on pages 99 through 168:
Consolidated Statements of Income for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007.
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2009 and 2008.
Consolidated
Statements of Comprehensive Income and Changes in Total Equity for the
years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007.
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.
(2) The financial statement schedules are listed in the Index to Financial Statement
Schedules on page FS-1.
(3) The exhibits are listed in the Index to Exhibits beginning on page E-1.
173
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto
duly authorized.
Date: February 25, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
CIGNA CORPORATION
|
|
|
By: |
/s/ Annmarie T. Hagan |
|
|
|
Annmarie T. Hagan |
|
|
|
Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer) |
|
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been
signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities indicated
as of February 25, 2010.
|
|
|
Signature |
|
Title |
|
|
|
|
|
Chief Executive Officer and Director |
David M. Cordani
|
|
(Principal Executive Officer) |
|
|
|
|
|
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
Annmarie T. Hagan
|
|
(Principal Financial Officer) |
|
|
|
|
|
Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer |
Mary T. Hoeltzel
|
|
(Principal Accounting Officer) |
|
|
|
|
|
Chairman of the Board |
Isaiah Harris, Jr. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director |
Jane E. Henney, M.D. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director |
Peter N. Larson |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director |
Roman Martinez IV |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director |
John M. Partridge |
|
|
|
|
|
174
|
|
|
Signature |
|
Title |
|
|
|
|
|
Director |
James E. Rogers |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director |
Carol Cox Wait |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director |
Eric C. Wiseman |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director |
Donna F. Zarcone |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director |
William D. Zollars |
|
|
175
{THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK}
176
CIGNA CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PAGE |
|
|
|
FS-2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Schedules |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FS-3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FS-4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FS-10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FS-12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FS-13 |
|
Schedules other than those listed above are omitted because they are not required or are not
applicable, or the required information is shown in the financial statements or notes thereto.
FS-1
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm on
Financial Statement Schedules
To the Board of Directors
and Shareholders of CIGNA Corporation
Our audits of the consolidated financial statements and of the effectiveness of internal control
over financial reporting referred to in our report dated February 25, 2010 (which report and
consolidated financial statements are included under Item 8 in this Annual Report on Form 10-K)
also included an audit of the financial statement schedules listed in Item 15(a)(2) of this Form
10-K. In our opinion, these financial statement schedules present fairly, in all material
respects, the information set forth therein when read in conjunction with the related consolidated
financial statements.
|
|
|
/s/ Pricewaterhouse Coopers LLP
|
|
|
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania |
|
|
February 25, 2010 |
|
|
FS-2
CIGNA CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
SCHEDULE I
SUMMARY OF INVESTMENTS-OTHER THAN INVESTMENTS IN RELATED PARTIES
December 31, 2009
(in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount at |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
which shown in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair |
|
|
the Consolidated |
|
Type of Investment |
|
Cost |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Balance Sheet |
|
|
Fixed maturities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bonds: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States government and government
agencies and authorities |
|
$ |
398 |
|
|
$ |
571 |
|
|
$ |
571 |
|
States, municipalities and political subdivisions |
|
|
2,341 |
|
|
|
2,521 |
|
|
|
2,521 |
|
Foreign governments |
|
|
1,040 |
|
|
|
1,070 |
|
|
|
1,070 |
|
Public utilities |
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
52 |
|
All other corporate bonds |
|
|
8,074 |
|
|
|
8,510 |
|
|
|
8,510 |
|
Asset backed securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States government agencies mortgage-backed |
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
34 |
|
Other mortgage-backed |
|
|
126 |
|
|
|
121 |
|
|
|
121 |
|
Other asset-backed |
|
|
494 |
|
|
|
541 |
|
|
|
541 |
|
Redeemable preferred stocks |
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total fixed maturities |
|
|
12,580 |
|
|
|
13,443 |
|
|
|
13,443 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stocks: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Industrial, miscellaneous and all other |
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
Non redeemable preferred stocks |
|
|
118 |
|
|
|
90 |
|
|
|
90 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total equity securities |
|
|
137 |
|
|
|
113 |
|
|
|
113 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial mortgage loans on real estate |
|
|
3,522 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,522 |
|
Policy loans |
|
|
1,549 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,549 |
|
Real estate investments |
|
|
124 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
124 |
|
Other long-term investments |
|
|
545 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
595 |
|
Short-term investments |
|
|
493 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
493 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investments |
|
$ |
18,950 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
19,839 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FS-3
CIGNA CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
SCHEDULE II
CONDENSED FINANCIAL INFORMATION OF CIGNA CORPORATION
(REGISTRANT)
STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the year ended |
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other revenues |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest |
|
|
160 |
|
|
|
140 |
|
|
|
116 |
|
Intercompany interest |
|
|
80 |
|
|
|
220 |
|
|
|
325 |
|
Other |
|
|
68 |
|
|
|
108 |
|
|
|
49 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
308 |
|
|
|
468 |
|
|
|
490 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss before income taxes |
|
|
(308 |
) |
|
|
(468 |
) |
|
|
(489 |
) |
Income tax benefit |
|
|
(118 |
) |
|
|
(161 |
) |
|
|
(164 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss of parent company |
|
|
(190 |
) |
|
|
(307 |
) |
|
|
(325 |
) |
Equity in income of subsidiaries from continuing operations |
|
|
1,491 |
|
|
|
595 |
|
|
|
1,445 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders income from continuing operations |
|
|
1,301 |
|
|
|
288 |
|
|
|
1,120 |
|
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of taxes |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders net income |
|
$ |
1,302 |
|
|
$ |
292 |
|
|
$ |
1,115 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Financial Statements on pages FS-7 through FS-9.
FS-4
CIGNA CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
SCHEDULE II
CONDENSED FINANCIAL INFORMATION OF CIGNA CORPORATION
(REGISTRANT)
BALANCE SHEETS
(in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
Investments in subsidiaries |
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,674 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,275 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
586 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
723 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
14,260 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
12,999 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intercompany |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,517 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,088 |
|
Short-term debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
299 |
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,347 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,998 |
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,879 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,022 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
8,843 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
9,407 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders Equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock (shares issued, 351) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
88 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
88 |
|
Additional paid in capital |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,514 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,502 |
|
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) fixed maturities |
|
$ |
378 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(147 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Net unrealized appreciation equity securities |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
Net unrealized depreciation derivatives |
|
|
(30 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Net translation of foreign currencies |
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(60 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Postretirement benefits liability adjustment |
|
|
(958 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(861 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(618 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,074 |
) |
Retained earnings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,625 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,374 |
|
Less treasury stock, at cost |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,192 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,298 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,417 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,592 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and shareholders equity |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
14,260 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
12,999 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Financial Statements on pages FS-7 through FS-9.
FS-5
CIGNA CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
SCHEDULE II
CONDENSED FINANCIAL INFORMATION OF CIGNA CORPORATION
(REGISTRANT)
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the year ended |
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows from Operating Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders Net Income |
|
$ |
1,302 |
|
|
$ |
292 |
|
|
$ |
1,115 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile shareholders net income
to net cash provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity in income of subsidiaries |
|
|
(1,494 |
) |
|
|
(595 |
) |
|
|
(1,445 |
) |
(Income) loss from discontinued operations |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
5 |
|
Dividends received from subsidiaries |
|
|
650 |
|
|
|
535 |
|
|
|
1,026 |
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
(401 |
) |
|
|
74 |
|
|
|
87 |
|
Other, net |
|
|
356 |
|
|
|
(116 |
) |
|
|
275 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
412 |
|
|
|
186 |
|
|
|
1,063 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows from Investing Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by investing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows from Financing Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net change in intercompany debt |
|
|
(579 |
) |
|
|
(426 |
) |
|
|
(271 |
) |
Net change in short-term debt |
|
|
(199 |
) |
|
|
299 |
|
|
|
|
|
Net proceeds on issuance of long-term debt |
|
|
346 |
|
|
|
297 |
|
|
|
498 |
|
Repayment of long-term debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(376 |
) |
Issuance of common stock |
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
248 |
|
Common dividends paid |
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
(14 |
) |
|
|
(11 |
) |
Repurchase of common stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(378 |
) |
|
|
(1,185 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in financing activities |
|
|
(413 |
) |
|
|
(185 |
) |
|
|
(1,097 |
) |
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
(13 |
) |
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of year |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Financial Statements on pages FS-7 through FS-9.
FS-6
CIGNA CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
SCHEDULE II
CONDENSED FINANCIAL INFORMATION OF CIGNA CORPORATION
(REGISTRANT)
NOTES TO CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The accompanying condensed financial statements should be read in conjunction with the
Consolidated Financial Statements and the accompanying notes thereto in the Annual Report.
|
|
|
Note 1
|
|
For purposes of these condensed financial statements, CIGNA Corporations (the Company)
wholly owned and majority owned subsidiaries are recorded using the equity basis of
accounting. Certain reclassifications have been made to prior years amounts to conform to
the 2009 presentation. |
|
|
|
Note 2
|
|
On April 25, 2007, the Companys Board of Directors approved a three-for-one stock split
(in the form of a stock dividend) of the Companys common shares. The stock split was
effective on June 4, 2007 for shareholders of record as of the close of business on May 21,
2007. |
|
|
|
Note 3
|
|
Short-term and long-term debt consisted of the following at December 31: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Short-term: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial Paper |
|
$ |
100 |
|
|
$ |
299 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total short-term debt |
|
$ |
100 |
|
|
$ |
299 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Uncollateralized debt: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7% Notes due 2011 |
|
$ |
222 |
|
|
$ |
222 |
|
6.375% Notes due 2011 |
|
|
226 |
|
|
|
226 |
|
5.375% Notes due 2017 |
|
|
250 |
|
|
|
250 |
|
6.35% Notes due 2018 |
|
|
300 |
|
|
|
300 |
|
8.5% Notes due 2019 |
|
|
349 |
|
|
|
|
|
7.65% Notes due 2023 |
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
100 |
|
8.3% Notes due 2023 |
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
7.875 % Debentures due 2027 |
|
|
300 |
|
|
|
300 |
|
8.3% Step Down Notes due 2033 |
|
|
83 |
|
|
|
83 |
|
6.15% Notes due 2036 |
|
|
500 |
|
|
|
500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-term debt |
|
$ |
2,347 |
|
|
$ |
1,998 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Under a universal shelf registration statement filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (SEC), the Company issued $350 million of 8.5% Notes on May 7, 2009 (with an
effective interest rate of 9.9% per year). The difference between the stated and effective
interest rates primarily reflects the effect of treasury locks. Interest is payable on May 1
and November 1 of each year beginning November 1, 2009. These Notes will mature on May 1,
2019.
FS-7
On March 4, 2008, the Company issued $300 million of 6.35% Notes (with an effective interest
rate of 6.68% per year). The difference between the stated and effective interest rates
primarily reflects the effect of treasury locks. Interest is payable on March 15 and
September 15 of each year beginning September 15, 2008. These Notes will mature on March 15,
2018.
The Company may redeem these Notes, at any time, in whole or in part, at a redemption price
equal to the greater of:
|
|
|
100% of the principal amount of the Notes to be redeemed; or |
|
|
|
the present value of the remaining principal and interest payments on the Notes being
redeemed discounted at the applicable Treasury Rate plus 50 basis points. |
On March 14, 2008, the Company entered into a new commercial paper program (the Program).
Under the Program, the Company is authorized to sell from time to time short-term unsecured
commercial paper notes up to a maximum of $500 million. The proceeds are used for general
corporate purposes, including working capital, capital expenditures, acquisitions and share
repurchases. The Company uses the credit facility entered into in June 2007, as back-up
liquidity to support the outstanding commercial paper. If at any time funds are not
available on favorable terms under the Program, the Company may use its credit agreement for
funding. In October 2008, the Company added an additional dealer to its Program. As of
December 31, 2009, the Company had $100 million in commercial paper outstanding, at a
weighted average interest rate of 0.35%, used for general corporate purposes.
In June 2007, the Company amended and restated its five year revolving credit and letter of
credit agreement for $1.75 billion, which permits up to $1.25 billion to be used for letters
of credit. The credit agreement includes options, which are subject to consent by the
administrative agent and the committing bank, to increase the commitment amount up to $2.0
billion and to extend the term of the agreement. The Company entered into the agreement for
general corporate purposes, including support for the issuance of commercial paper and to
obtain statutory reserve credit for certain reinsurance arrangements. There was a $27
million of letter of credit issued as of December 31, 2009.
Maturities of long-term debt are as follows (in millions): none in 2010, $448 in 2011, none
in 2012 and 2013 and the remainder in years after 2014.
Interest paid on short- and long-term debt amounted to $153 million, $135 million and $116
million for 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
Note 4 Intercompany liabilities consist primarily of loans payable to CIGNA Holdings, Inc. of
$4.6 billion as of December 31, 2009 and $5.1 billion as of December 31, 2008. Interest was
accrued at an average monthly rate of 1.56% and 4.23% for 2009 and 2008, respectively.
FS-8
|
|
|
Note 5
|
|
As of December 31, 2009, the Company had guarantees and similar agreements in place to
secure payment obligations or solvency requirements of certain wholly owned subsidiaries as
follows: |
|
|
|
The Company has arranged for bank letters of credit in the
amount of $41 million in support of its indirect wholly owned
subsidiaries. As of December 31, 2009, approximately
$33 million of the letters of credit were issued to support
CIGNA Global Reinsurance Company, an indirect wholly owned subsidiary
domiciled in Bermuda. These letters of credit primarily secure the
payment of insureds claims from run-off reinsurance operations.
As of December 31, 2009, approximately $8 million of the
letters of credit were issued to provide collateral support for
various other indirectly wholly owned subsidiaries of the Company. |
|
|
|
The Company has provided a capital commitment deed in an amount up to $185 million
in favor of CIGNA Global Reinsurance Company. This deed is equal to the letters of
credit securing the payment of insureds claims from run-off reinsurance operations.
This deed is required by Bermuda regulators to have these letters of credit for the
London run-off reinsurance operations included as admitted assets. |
|
|
|
Various indirect, wholly owned subsidiaries have obtained surety bonds in the normal
course of business. If there is a claim on a surety bond and the subsidiary is unable
to pay, the Company guarantees payment to the company issuing the surety bond. The
aggregate amount of such surety bonds as of December 31, 2009 was $60 million. |
|
|
|
The Company is obligated under a $27 million letter of credit required by the
insurer of its high-deductible self-insurance programs to indemnify the insurer for
claim liabilities that fall within deductible amounts for policy years dating back to
1994. |
|
|
|
The Company also provides solvency guarantees aggregating $34 million under state
and federal regulations in support of its indirect wholly owned medical HMOs in several
states. |
|
|
|
The Company has arranged an $80 million letter of credit in support of CIGNA Europe
Insurance Company, an indirect wholly owned subsidiary. The Company has agreed to
indemnify the banks providing the letters of credit in the event of any draw. CIGNA
Europe Insurance Company is the holder of the letters of credit. |
|
|
|
In addition, the Company has agreed to indemnify payment of losses included in CIGNA
Europe Insurance Companys reserves on the assumed reinsurance business transferred
from ACE. As of December 31, 2009, the reserve was $105 million. |
In 2009, no payments have been made on these guarantees and none are pending. The Company
provided other guarantees to subsidiaries that, in the aggregate, do not represent a material
risk to the Companys results of operations, liquidity or financial condition.
FS-9
CIGNA CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
SCHEDULE III
SUPPLEMENTARY INSURANCE INFORMATION
(In millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred |
|
|
Future policy |
|
|
Medical claims |
|
|
|
|
|
|
policy |
|
|
benefits and |
|
|
payable and |
|
|
Unearned |
|
|
|
acquisition |
|
|
contractholder |
|
|
unpaid |
|
|
premiums |
|
Segment |
|
costs |
|
|
deposit funds |
|
|
claims |
|
|
and fees |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2009: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Health Care |
|
$ |
60 |
|
|
$ |
507 |
|
|
$ |
1,098 |
|
|
$ |
76 |
|
Disability and Life |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
1,023 |
|
|
|
3,122 |
|
|
|
32 |
|
International |
|
|
808 |
|
|
|
1,003 |
|
|
|
228 |
|
|
|
282 |
|
Run-off Reinsurance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,287 |
|
|
|
288 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other Operations |
|
|
69 |
|
|
|
12,800 |
|
|
|
161 |
|
|
|
37 |
|
Corporate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
943 |
|
|
$ |
16,620 |
|
|
$ |
4,889 |
|
|
$ |
427 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2008: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Health Care |
|
$ |
60 |
|
|
$ |
551 |
|
|
$ |
1,138 |
|
|
$ |
70 |
|
Disability and Life |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
956 |
|
|
|
3,104 |
|
|
|
36 |
|
International |
|
|
650 |
|
|
|
843 |
|
|
|
205 |
|
|
|
265 |
|
Run-off Reinsurance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,611 |
|
|
|
356 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other Operations |
|
|
72 |
|
|
|
13,332 |
|
|
|
158 |
|
|
|
43 |
|
Corporate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
789 |
|
|
$ |
17,293 |
|
|
$ |
4,961 |
|
|
$ |
414 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2007: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Health Care |
|
$ |
51 |
|
|
$ |
533 |
|
|
$ |
1,198 |
|
|
$ |
75 |
|
Disability and Life |
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
879 |
|
|
|
3,080 |
|
|
|
39 |
|
International |
|
|
682 |
|
|
|
912 |
|
|
|
230 |
|
|
|
331 |
|
Run-off Reinsurance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
875 |
|
|
|
452 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
Other Operations |
|
|
74 |
|
|
|
13,542 |
|
|
|
142 |
|
|
|
50 |
|
Corporate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
816 |
|
|
$ |
16,741 |
|
|
$ |
5,102 |
|
|
$ |
496 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FS-10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of deferred |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
policy |
|
|
Other |
|
Premiums |
|
|
investment |
|
|
Benefit |
|
|
acquisition |
|
|
operating |
|
and fees (1) |
|
|
income (2) |
|
|
expenses (1)(3) |
|
|
expenses |
|
|
expenses (4) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
11,384 |
|
|
$ |
181 |
|
|
$ |
7,096 |
|
|
$ |
141 |
|
|
$ |
4,742 |
|
|
2,634 |
|
|
|
244 |
|
|
|
1,922 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
670 |
|
|
1,882 |
|
|
|
69 |
|
|
|
1,080 |
|
|
|
146 |
|
|
|
491 |
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
113 |
|
|
|
(146 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(273 |
) |
|
112 |
|
|
|
407 |
|
|
|
398 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
62 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(16 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
191 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
16,041 |
|
|
$ |
1,014 |
|
|
$ |
10,334 |
|
|
$ |
299 |
|
|
$ |
5,883 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
11,665 |
|
|
$ |
200 |
|
|
$ |
7,445 |
|
|
$ |
138 |
|
|
$ |
4,737 |
|
|
2,562 |
|
|
|
256 |
|
|
|
1,914 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
633 |
|
|
1,870 |
|
|
|
79 |
|
|
|
1,003 |
|
|
|
164 |
|
|
|
512 |
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
104 |
|
|
|
782 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
717 |
|
|
113 |
|
|
|
414 |
|
|
|
408 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
54 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
215 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
16,253 |
|
|
$ |
1,063 |
|
|
$ |
11,537 |
|
|
$ |
314 |
|
|
$ |
6,868 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
10,666 |
|
|
$ |
202 |
|
|
$ |
7,023 |
|
|
$ |
100 |
|
|
$ |
4,076 |
|
|
2,374 |
|
|
|
276 |
|
|
|
1,819 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
610 |
|
|
1,800 |
|
|
|
77 |
|
|
|
997 |
|
|
|
124 |
|
|
|
489 |
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
93 |
|
|
|
(24 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
184 |
|
|
108 |
|
|
|
437 |
|
|
|
400 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
61 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
(16 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
129 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
15,008 |
|
|
$ |
1,114 |
|
|
$ |
10,199 |
|
|
$ |
242 |
|
|
$ |
5,549 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Amounts presented are shown net of the effects of reinsurance. See Note 8 to the
Consolidated Financial Statements included in CIGNAs 2009 Annual Report. |
|
(2) |
|
The allocation of net investment income is based upon the investment year method, the
identification of certain portfolios with specific segments, or a combination of both. |
|
(3) |
|
Benefit expenses include Health Care medical claims expense and other benefit expenses. |
|
(4) |
|
Other operating expenses include mail order pharmacy cost of
goods sold, GMIB (income) expense and
other operating expenses, and excludes amortization of deferred policy acquisition expenses. |
FS-11
CIGNA CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
SCHEDULE IV
REINSURANCE
(in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ceded to |
|
|
Assumed |
|
|
|
|
|
|
of amount |
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
other |
|
|
from other |
|
|
Net |
|
|
assumed |
|
|
|
amount |
|
|
companies |
|
|
companies |
|
|
amount |
|
|
to net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2009: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Life insurance in force |
|
$ |
544,687 |
|
|
$ |
50,011 |
|
|
$ |
71,107 |
|
|
$ |
565,783 |
|
|
|
12.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Premiums and fees: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Life insurance and annuities |
|
$ |
1,909 |
|
|
$ |
297 |
|
|
$ |
305 |
|
|
$ |
1,917 |
|
|
|
15.9 |
% |
Accident and health insurance |
|
|
13,476 |
|
|
|
156 |
|
|
|
804 |
|
|
|
14,124 |
|
|
|
5.7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
15,385 |
|
|
$ |
453 |
|
|
$ |
1,109 |
|
|
$ |
16,041 |
|
|
|
6.9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2008: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Life insurance in force |
|
$ |
392,803 |
|
|
$ |
44,116 |
|
|
$ |
108,106 |
|
|
$ |
456,793 |
|
|
|
23.7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Premiums and fees: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Life insurance and annuities |
|
$ |
1,885 |
|
|
$ |
281 |
|
|
$ |
333 |
|
|
$ |
1,937 |
|
|
|
17.2 |
% |
Accident and health insurance |
|
|
13,605 |
|
|
|
230 |
|
|
|
891 |
|
|
|
14,316 |
|
|
|
6.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
15,490 |
|
|
$ |
511 |
|
|
$ |
1,224 |
|
|
$ |
16,253 |
|
|
|
7.8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2007: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Life insurance in force |
|
$ |
376,065 |
|
|
$ |
42,886 |
|
|
$ |
99,281 |
|
|
$ |
432,460 |
|
|
|
23.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Premiums and fees: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Life insurance and annuities |
|
$ |
1,759 |
|
|
$ |
280 |
|
|
$ |
355 |
|
|
$ |
1,834 |
|
|
|
19.4 |
% |
Accident and health insurance |
|
|
13,311 |
|
|
|
181 |
|
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
13,174 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
15,070 |
|
|
$ |
461 |
|
|
$ |
399 |
|
|
$ |
15,008 |
|
|
|
2.7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FS-12
CIGNA CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
SCHEDULE V
VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS AND RESERVES
(in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Charged |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Credited) |
|
|
Charged |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at |
|
|
to |
|
|
(Credited) |
|
|
Other |
|
|
Balance |
|
|
|
beginning |
|
|
costs and |
|
|
to other |
|
|
deductions |
|
|
at end |
|
Description |
|
of period |
|
|
expenses |
|
|
accounts |
|
|
-describe (1) |
|
|
of period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment asset valuation reserves: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial mortgage loans |
|
$ |
3 |
|
|
$ |
17 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(3 |
) |
|
$ |
17 |
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Premiums, accounts and notes
receivable |
|
$ |
50 |
|
|
$ |
(2 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(5 |
) |
|
$ |
43 |
|
Deferred tax asset valuation allowance |
|
$ |
126 |
|
|
$ |
(2 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(8 |
) |
|
$ |
116 |
|
Reinsurance recoverables |
|
$ |
23 |
|
|
$ |
(7 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(1 |
) |
|
$ |
15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment asset valuation reserves: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial mortgage loans |
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
$ |
2 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
3 |
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Premiums, accounts and notes
receivable |
|
$ |
54 |
|
|
$ |
12 |
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
$ |
(17 |
) |
|
$ |
50 |
|
Deferred tax asset valuation allowance |
|
$ |
150 |
|
|
$ |
(15 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(9 |
) |
|
$ |
126 |
|
Reinsurance recoverables |
|
$ |
27 |
|
|
$ |
(3 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(1 |
) |
|
$ |
23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment asset valuation reserves: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial mortgage loans |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Premiums, accounts and notes
receivable |
|
$ |
46 |
|
|
$ |
15 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(7 |
) |
|
$ |
54 |
|
Deferred tax asset valuation allowance |
|
$ |
174 |
|
|
$ |
(19 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(5 |
) |
|
$ |
150 |
|
Reinsurance recoverables |
|
$ |
161 |
|
|
$ |
(23 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(111 |
) |
|
$ |
27 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Reflects charge-offs upon write-off of underlying receivable balances. The change in the deferred tax valuation allowance in 2009, 2008 and
2007 reflects a reserve release upon the write-off of a portion of the underlying deferred tax asset, resulting in no earnings impact. The change
in reinsurance recoverables reflects settlement of underlying reinsurance recoverables, resulting in no earnings impact. |
FS-13
INDEX TO EXHIBITS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number |
|
Description |
|
Method of Filing |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.1 |
|
|
Restated Certificate of
Incorporation of the
registrant as last amended
April 23, 2008
|
|
Filed as Exhibit 3.1 to the
registrants Form 10-Q for the
period ended March 31, 2008
and incorporated herein by
reference. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.2 |
|
|
By-Laws of the registrant as
last amended and restated
October 28, 2009
|
|
Filed herewith. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.1 |
|
|
Indenture
dated August 16, 2006 between CIGNA Corporation and U.S. Bank
National Association
|
|
Filed as Exhibit 4.1 to the
registrants Form S-3ASR on August 17, 2006 and incorporated herein
by reference. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.2 |
|
|
Indenture
dated January 1, 1994 between CIGNA Corporation and Marine Midland
Bank
|
|
Filed herewith. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.3 |
|
|
Indenture
dated June 30, 1988 between CIGNA Corporation and Bankers Trust
|
|
Filed herewith. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibits 10.1 through 10.25 are identified as compensatory plans, management contracts or
arrangements pursuant to Item 15 of Form 10-K. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.1 |
|
|
Deferred Compensation Plan for
Directors of CIGNA Corporation,
as amended and restated January
1, 1997
|
|
Filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the
registrants Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 2006
and incorporated herein by
reference. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.2 |
|
|
Deferred Compensation Plan of
2005 for Directors of CIGNA
Corporation, effective January
1, 2005
|
|
Filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the
registrants Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 2007
and incorporated herein by
reference. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.3 |
|
|
CIGNA Corporation Non-Employee
Director Compensation Program
as amended and restated
effective January 1, 2008
|
|
Filed as Exhibit 10.4 to the
registrants Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 2007
and incorporated herein by
reference. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.4 |
|
|
CIGNA
Corporation Non-Employee Director
Compensation Program amended and restated effective
January 1, 2010
|
|
Filed herewith. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.5 |
|
|
CIGNA Restricted Share
Equivalent Plan for
Non-Employee Directors as
amended and restated effective
January 1, 2008
|
|
Filed as Exhibit 10.3 to the
registrants Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 2007
and incorporated herein by
reference. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.6 |
|
|
CIGNA Corporation Compensation
Program for Independent Vice
Chairman/Chairman of the Board
of Directors
|
|
Filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the
registrants Form 10-Q for the
period ended September 30, 2009
and incorporated herein by
reference. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.7 |
|
|
CIGNA Corporation Stock Plan,
as amended and restated through
July 2000
|
|
Filed herewith. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.8 |
|
|
CIGNA Stock Unit Plan, as
amended and restated effective
July 22, 2008
|
|
Filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the
registrants Form 10-Q for the
period ended September 30, 2008
and incorporated herein by
reference. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.9 |
|
|
CIGNA Executive Severance
Benefits Plan as amended and
restated effective July 22,
2008
|
|
Filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the
registrants Form 10-Q for the
period ended September 30, 2008
and incorporated herein by
reference. |
E-1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number |
|
Description |
|
Method of Filing |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.10 |
|
|
Description of
Severance Benefits
for Executives in
Non-Change of
Control
Circumstances
|
|
Filed herewith. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.11 |
|
|
CIGNA Executive
Incentive Plan
amended and restated
as of January 1,
2008
|
|
Filed as Exhibit
10.8 to the
registrants Form
10-K for the year
ended December 31,
2007 and
incorporated herein
by reference. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.12 |
|
|
CIGNA Long-Term
Incentive Plan as
amended and restated
effective as of
January 1, 2008
|
|
Filed as Exhibit
10.9 to the
registrants Form
10-K for the year
ended December 31,
2007 and
incorporated herein
by reference. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.13 |
|
|
CIGNA Deferred
Compensation Plan,
as amended and
restated October 24,
2001
|
|
Filed as Exhibit
10.10 to the
registrants Form
10-K for the year
ended December 31,
2006 and
incorporated herein
by reference. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.14 |
|
|
CIGNA Deferred
Compensation Plan of
2005 effective as of
January 1, 2005
|
|
Filed as Exhibit
10.12 to the
registrants Form
10-K for the year
ended December 31,
2007 and
incorporated herein
by reference. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.15 |
(a) |
|
CIGNA Supplemental Pension Plan as
amended and restated effective August
1, 1998
|
|
Filed herewith. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(b) |
|
Amendment No. 1 to the CIGNA Supplemental Pension
Plan, amended and restated effective as of
September 1, 1999
|
|
Filed herewith. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(c) |
|
Amendment No. 2 dated December
6, 2000 to the CIGNA
Supplemental Pension
|
|
Filed as Exhibit 10.12(c) to
the registrants Form 10-K for
the year ended December 31,
2006 and incorporated herein by
reference. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.16 |
(a) |
|
CIGNA Supplemental Pension
Plan of 2005 effective as
of January 1, 2005
|
|
Filed as Exhibit 10.15 to
the registrants Form 10-K
for the year ended
December 31, 2007 and
incorporated herein by
reference. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(b) |
|
Amendment No. 1 to the
CIGNA Supplemental Pension
Plan of 2005
|
|
Filed as Exhibit 10.1 to
the registrants Form 10-Q
for the quarterly period
ended June 30, 2009 and
incorporated herein by
reference. |
E-2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number |
|
Description |
|
Method of Filing |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.17 |
|
|
CIGNA Supplemental
401(k) Plan
effective January
1, 2010
|
|
Filed herewith. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.18 |
|
|
Description of
CIGNA Corporation
Financial Services
Program
|
|
Filed herewith. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.19 |
|
|
Description of
Mandatory Deferral
of Non-Deductible
Executive
Compensation
Arrangement
|
|
Filed as Exhibit 10.14 to the
registrants Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2006 and
incorporated herein by reference. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.20 |
|
|
Agreement and Release dated December 9,
2009 with Mr. Hanway
|
|
Filed as Exhibit
10.1 to the
registrants Form
8-K filed on
December 9, 2009
and incorporated
herein by
reference. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.21 |
|
|
Schedule regarding Amended Deferred
Stock Unit Agreements effective December
31, 2008 with Messrs. Hanway, Bell and
Murabito and Form of Amended Deferred
Stock Unit Agreement
|
|
Filed as Exhibit 10.20 to the
registrants Form 10-K for the period ended December 31,
2008 and incorporated herein by reference. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.22 |
|
|
Agreement and Release dated May 22, 2009
with Mr. Bell
|
|
Filed as Exhibit
10.1 to the
registrants Form
8-K filed on May
26, 2009 and
incorporated herein
by reference. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.23 |
|
|
Form of CIGNA Long-Term Incentive Plan:
Nonqualified Stock Option and Grant
Letter
|
|
Filed as Exhibit
10.22 to the
registrants Form
10-K for the period
ended December 31,
2007 and
incorporated herein
by reference. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.24 |
|
|
Form of CIGNA Long-Term Incentive Plan:
Restricted Stock Grant and Grant Letter
|
|
Filed herewith. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.25 |
|
|
Asset and Stock Purchase Agreement by
and among Great-West Life & Annuity
Insurance Company, et al and Connecticut
General Life Insurance Company
|
|
Filed as Exhibit
10.23 to the
registrants Form
10-K for the period
ended December 31,
2007 and
incorporated herein
by reference. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
Computation of Ratios of Earnings to
Fixed Charges
|
|
Filed herewith. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
Subsidiaries of the Registrant
|
|
Filed herewith. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
Consent of Independent Registered Public
Accounting Firm
|
|
Filed herewith. |
E-3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number |
|
Description |
|
Method of Filing |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.1 |
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer
of CIGNA Corporation pursuant to Rule
13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
|
|
Filed herewith. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.2 |
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer
of CIGNA Corporation pursuant to Rule
13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
|
|
Filed herewith. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.1 |
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer
of CIGNA Corporation pursuant to Rule
13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) and 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350
|
|
Furnished herewith. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.2 |
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer
of CIGNA Corporation pursuant to Rule
13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) and 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350
|
|
Furnished herewith. |
The registrant will furnish to the
Commission upon request a copy of any other instruments defining the rights of holders of long-term debt.
Shareholders may obtain copies of exhibits by writing to CIGNA Corporation, Shareholder Services
Department, 1601 Chestnut Street, TL18, Philadelphia, PA 19192.
E-4