e10vqza
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q/A
(AMENDMENT NO. 2)
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
|
For the quarterly period ended April 30, 2010
|
|
Commission File Number 000-50421 |
CONNS, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
A Delaware Corporation
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
|
|
06-1672840
(I.R.S. Employer Identification Number) |
3295 College Street
Beaumont, Texas 77701
(409) 832-1696
(Address, including zip
code, and telephone
number, including area code, of registrants
principal executive offices)
NONE
(Former name, former address and former
fiscal year, if changed since last report)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (l) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes o No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a
non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See definition of accelerated filer and
large accelerated filer in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check One):
Large accelerated filer o |
Accelerated filer þ |
Non-accelerated filer o (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
smaller reporting company o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Act). Yes o No þ
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuers classes of common stock, as of
May 24, 2010:
|
|
|
Class |
|
Outstanding |
Common stock, $.01 par value per share
|
|
22,480,848 |
EXPLANATORY NOTE
We are filing this amendment to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended
April 30, 2010, to include information about our retail and credit segments and provide updated
risk factors. As a result of our adoption of new accounting principles that resulted in the
consolidation of our finance subsidiary and the changes in the financial markets and availability
of capital, we have expanded the operational reporting now being used by management to provide more
detailed operating performance information for our retail and credit operations, including
modification of the financial information reported to the chief decision maker and the board of
directors. As such, we are including segment information in the footnotes to the financial
statements and Managements Discussion and Analysis.
This amendment to the original Form 10-Q amends and restates only the information stated above. We
have not updated any disclosures in this amendment to speak as of a later date than the original
filing. All information contained in this amendment and the original Form 10-Q is subject to
updating and supplementing as provided in the periodic reports filed subsequent to the original
filing date with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Part I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements
Conns, Inc.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(in thousands, except share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 31, |
|
|
April 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
(As adjusted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
see Note 1) |
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
(includes balances of VIE of $104 and $107, respectively) |
|
$ |
12,247 |
|
|
$ |
5,708 |
|
Other accounts receivable, net of allowance of $50 and $52, respectively |
|
|
23,254 |
|
|
|
30,291 |
|
Customer accounts receivable, net of allowance of $19,204 and $18,087 respectively
(includes balances of VIE of $279,948 and $262,403, respectively) |
|
|
368,304 |
|
|
|
353,551 |
|
Inventories |
|
|
63,499 |
|
|
|
88,901 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
15,237 |
|
|
|
14,826 |
|
Federal income taxes recoverable |
|
|
8,148 |
|
|
|
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other assets |
|
|
8,050 |
|
|
|
6,628 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
498,739 |
|
|
|
499,905 |
|
Long-term portion of customer accounts receivable, net of
allowance of $16,598 and $15,454, respectively
(includes balances of VIE of $241,971 and $224,193, respectively) |
|
|
318,341 |
|
|
|
302,070 |
|
Property and equipment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land |
|
|
7,682 |
|
|
|
7,490 |
|
Buildings |
|
|
10,480 |
|
|
|
10,378 |
|
Equipment and fixtures |
|
|
23,797 |
|
|
|
23,826 |
|
Transportation equipment |
|
|
1,795 |
|
|
|
1,684 |
|
Leasehold improvements |
|
|
91,299 |
|
|
|
91,320 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal |
|
|
135,053 |
|
|
|
134,698 |
|
Less accumulated depreciation |
|
|
(75,350 |
) |
|
|
(78,335 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total property and equipment, net |
|
|
59,703 |
|
|
|
56,363 |
|
Non-current deferred income tax asset |
|
|
5,485 |
|
|
|
6,404 |
|
Other assets, net (includes balances of VIE of $7,106 and $7,886, respectively) |
|
|
10,198 |
|
|
|
12,287 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
892,466 |
|
|
$ |
877,029 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and Stockholders Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current portion of long-term debt
(includes balances of VIE of $63,900 and $100,000, respectively) |
|
$ |
64,055 |
|
|
$ |
100,162 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
39,944 |
|
|
|
55,238 |
|
Accrued compensation and related expenses |
|
|
5,697 |
|
|
|
5,049 |
|
Accrued expenses |
|
|
31,685 |
|
|
|
24,181 |
|
Income taxes payable |
|
|
2,640 |
|
|
|
7,941 |
|
Deferred revenues and allowances |
|
|
14,596 |
|
|
|
13,353 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
158,617 |
|
|
|
205,924 |
|
Long-term debt
(includes balances of VIE of $282,500 and $220,000, respectively) |
|
|
388,249 |
|
|
|
319,611 |
|
Other long-term liabilities |
|
|
5,195 |
|
|
|
4,995 |
|
Fair value of interest rate swaps |
|
|
337 |
|
|
|
251 |
|
Deferred gains on sales of property |
|
|
905 |
|
|
|
874 |
|
Stockholders equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock ($0.01 par value, 1,000,000 shares authorized; none issued or outstanding) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock ($0.01 par value, 40,000,000 shares authorized;
24,194,555 and 24,204,053 shares issued at January 31, 2010 and April 30, 2010, respectively) |
|
|
242 |
|
|
|
242 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
106,226 |
|
|
|
106,835 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
|
|
(218 |
) |
|
|
(163 |
) |
Retained earnings |
|
|
269,984 |
|
|
|
275,531 |
|
Treasury stock, at cost, 1,723,205 shares |
|
|
(37,071 |
) |
|
|
(37,071 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
339,163 |
|
|
|
345,374 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
892,466 |
|
|
$ |
877,029 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
1
Conns, Inc.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(unaudited)
(in thousands, except earnings per share)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
April 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
(As adjusted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
see Note 1) |
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product sales |
|
$ |
184,817 |
|
|
$ |
150,365 |
|
Repair service agreement commissions, net |
|
|
9,790 |
|
|
|
7,917 |
|
Service revenues |
|
|
5,544 |
|
|
|
4,757 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net sales |
|
|
200,151 |
|
|
|
163,039 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Finance charges and other |
|
|
39,700 |
|
|
|
34,480 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
|
239,851 |
|
|
|
197,519 |
|
Cost and expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of goods sold, including warehousing
and occupancy costs |
|
|
145,870 |
|
|
|
114,157 |
|
Cost of parts sold, including warehousing
and occupancy costs |
|
|
2,587 |
|
|
|
2,372 |
|
Selling, general and administrative expense |
|
|
62,738 |
|
|
|
60,743 |
|
Provision for bad debts |
|
|
5,644 |
|
|
|
6,274 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cost and expenses |
|
|
216,839 |
|
|
|
183,546 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
23,012 |
|
|
|
13,973 |
|
Interest expense, net |
|
|
5,004 |
|
|
|
4,785 |
|
Other (income) expense, net |
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
171 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
18,016 |
|
|
|
9,017 |
|
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
6,660 |
|
|
|
3,470 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
11,356 |
|
|
$ |
5,547 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
0.51 |
|
|
$ |
0.25 |
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
0.50 |
|
|
$ |
0.25 |
|
Average common shares outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
22,447 |
|
|
|
22,475 |
|
Diluted |
|
|
22,689 |
|
|
|
22,477 |
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
2
Conns, Inc.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
Three Months Ended April 30, 2010
(unaudited)
(in thousands, except descriptive shares)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional |
|
|
Compre- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock |
|
|
Paid-in |
|
|
hensive |
|
|
Retained |
|
|
Treasury |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Capital |
|
|
Loss |
|
|
Earnings |
|
|
Stock |
|
|
Total |
|
Balance January 31, 2010
(As adjusted, see Note 1) |
|
|
24,194 |
|
|
$ |
242 |
|
|
$ |
106,226 |
|
|
$ |
(218 |
) |
|
$ |
269,984 |
|
|
$ |
(37,071 |
) |
|
$ |
339,163 |
|
Issuance of shares of common
stock under Employee
Stock Purchase Plan |
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
48 |
|
Stock-based compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
561 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
561 |
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,547 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,547 |
|
Adjustment of fair value of
interest rate swaps
net of tax of $31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
55 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
55 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
55 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
55 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,602 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance April 30, 2010 |
|
|
24,204 |
|
|
$ |
242 |
|
|
$ |
106,835 |
|
|
$ |
(163 |
) |
|
$ |
275,531 |
|
|
$ |
(37,071 |
) |
|
$ |
345,374 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
3
Conns, Inc.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(unaudited) (in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
April 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
(As adjusted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
see Note 1) |
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from operating activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
11,356 |
|
|
$ |
5,547 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation |
|
|
3,291 |
|
|
|
3,352 |
|
Amortization, net |
|
|
110 |
|
|
|
766 |
|
Provision for bad debts |
|
|
5,644 |
|
|
|
6,274 |
|
Stock-based compensation |
|
|
630 |
|
|
|
561 |
|
Discounts and accretion on promotional credit |
|
|
(804 |
) |
|
|
(766 |
) |
Provision for deferred income taxes |
|
|
(946 |
) |
|
|
(192 |
) |
(Gains) losses on sales of property and equipment |
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
171 |
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customer accounts receivable |
|
|
12,731 |
|
|
|
25,521 |
|
Other accounts receivable |
|
|
13,812 |
|
|
|
(7,037 |
) |
Inventory |
|
|
4,992 |
|
|
|
(25,402 |
) |
Prepaid expenses and other assets |
|
|
178 |
|
|
|
1,392 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
(1,003 |
) |
|
|
15,294 |
|
Accrued expenses |
|
|
(4,155 |
) |
|
|
(8,152 |
) |
Income taxes payable |
|
|
3,309 |
|
|
|
13,132 |
|
Deferred revenue and allowances |
|
|
(405 |
) |
|
|
(1,242 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
48,732 |
|
|
|
29,219 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of property and equipment |
|
|
(3,800 |
) |
|
|
(390 |
) |
Proceeds from sales of property |
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
204 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(3,781 |
) |
|
|
(186 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from stock issued under employee benefit plans |
|
|
59 |
|
|
|
48 |
|
Borrowings under lines of credit |
|
|
82,933 |
|
|
|
61,013 |
|
Payments on lines of credit |
|
|
(132,633 |
) |
|
|
(93,511 |
) |
Increase in deferred financing costs |
|
|
(154 |
) |
|
|
(3,089 |
) |
Payment of promissory notes |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(33 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in financing activities |
|
|
(49,796 |
) |
|
|
(35,572 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net change in cash |
|
|
(4,845 |
) |
|
|
(6,539 |
) |
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning of the year |
|
|
11,909 |
|
|
|
12,247 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
End of period |
|
$ |
7,064 |
|
|
$ |
5,708 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
4
Conns, Inc.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited)
April 30, 2010
1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Basis of Presentation. The accompanying unaudited, condensed consolidated financial statements
have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States
for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of
Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States for complete financial statements.
The accompanying financial statements reflect all adjustments that are, in the opinion of
management, necessary for a fair statement of the results for the interim periods presented. All
such adjustments are of a normal recurring nature, except as otherwise described herein. Operating
results for the three month period ended April 30, 2010, are not necessarily indicative of the
results that may be expected for the fiscal year ending January 31, 2011. The financial statements
should be read in conjunction with the Companys (as defined below) audited consolidated financial
statements and the notes thereto included in the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K filed on July
7, 2010.
The Companys balance sheet at January 31, 2010, has been derived from the audited financial
statements at that date, revised for the retrospective application of the new accounting principles
discussed below, but does not include all of the information and footnotes required by accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States for a complete financial presentation. Please
see the Companys Form 8-K for a complete presentation of the audited financial statements for the
fiscal year ended January 31, 2010, together with all required footnotes, and for a complete
presentation and explanation of the components and presentations of the financial statements.
Business Activities. The Company, through its retail stores, provides products and services
to its customer base in seven primary market areas, including southern Louisiana, southeast Texas,
Houston, South Texas, San Antonio/Austin, Dallas/Fort Worth and Oklahoma. Products and services
offered through retail sales outlets include home appliances, consumer electronics, home office
equipment, lawn and garden products, mattresses, furniture, repair service agreements, installment
and revolving credit account programs, and various credit insurance products. These activities are
supported through an extensive service, warehouse and distribution system. For the reasons
discussed below, the Company has aggregated its results into two operating segments: credit and
retail. The Companys retail stores bear the Conns name, and deliver the same products and
services to a common customer group. The Companys customers generally are individuals rather than
commercial accounts. All of the retail stores follow the same procedures and methods in managing
their operations. The Companys management evaluates performance and allocates resources based on
the operating results of its retail and credit segments. With the adoption of the new accounting
principles discussed below, which require the consolidation of the Companys variable interest
entity engaged in receivables securitizations, it began separately evaluating the performance of
its retail and credit operations. As a result, management believes it is appropriate to disclose
separate financial information of its retail and credit segments. The separate financial
information is disclosed in footnote 6 Segment Reporting.
Adoption of New Accounting Principles. The Company enters into securitization transactions to
transfer eligible retail installment and revolving customer receivables and retains servicing
responsibilities and subordinated interests. Additionally, the Company transfers the eligible
customer receivables to a bankruptcy-remote variable interest entity (VIE). In June 2009, the FASB
issued revised authoritative guidance to improve the relevance and comparability of the information
that a reporting entity provides in its financial statements about:
|
|
|
a transfer of financial assets; |
|
|
|
|
the effects of a transfer on its financial position, financial performance, and cash flows; and |
|
|
|
|
a transferors continuing involvement, if any, in
transferred financial assets; and, |
|
|
|
|
Improvements in financial reporting by companies involved with variable interest
entities to provide more relevant and reliable information to users of financial
statements by requiring an enterprise |
5
|
|
|
to perform an analysis to determine whether the enterprises variable interest or
interests give it a controlling financial interest in a variable interest entity. This
analysis identifies the primary beneficiary of a variable interest entity as the
enterprise that has both of the following characteristics: |
|
a) |
|
The power to direct the activities of a variable interest entity that
most significantly impact the entitys economic performance, and |
|
|
b) |
|
The obligation to absorb losses of the entity that could potentially be
significant to the variable interest entity or the right to receive benefits from
the entity that could potentially be significant to the variable interest entity. |
After the effective date, the concept of a qualifying special-purpose entity is no longer relevant
for accounting purposes. Therefore, formerly qualifying special-purpose entities (as defined under
previous accounting standards) should be evaluated for consolidation by reporting entities on and
after the effective date in accordance with the applicable consolidation guidance. If the
evaluation on the effective date results in consolidation, the reporting entity should apply the
transition guidance provided in the pronouncement that requires consolidation. The new FASB-issued
authoritative guidance was effective for the Company beginning February 1, 2010.
The Company determined that it qualifies as the primary beneficiary of its VIE based on the
following considerations:
|
|
|
The Company directs the activities that generate the customer receivables that are transferred to the VIE, |
|
|
|
|
The Company directs the servicing activities related to the collection of the customer receivables transferred to the VIE, |
|
|
|
|
The Company absorbs all losses incurred by the VIE to the extent of its residual
interest in the customer receivables held by the VIE before any other investors incur
losses, and |
|
|
|
|
The Company has the rights to receive all benefits generated by the VIE after
paying the contractual amounts due to the other investors. |
As a result, the Companys adoption of the provisions of the new guidance, effective February 1,
2010, resulted in the Companys VIE, which is engaged in customer receivable financing and
securitization, being consolidated in the Companys balance sheet and the Companys statements of
operations, stockholders equity and cash flows. Previously, the operations of the VIE were
reported off-balance sheet. The Company has elected to apply the provisions of this new guidance by
retrospectively restating prior period financial statements to give effect to the consolidation of
the VIE, presenting the balances at their carrying value as if they had always been carried on its
balance sheet. The retrospective application impacted the comparative prior period financial
statements as follows:
|
|
|
For the three months ended April 30, 2009, Income before income taxes was reduced by approximately $0.3 million. |
|
|
|
|
For the three months ended April 30, 2009, Net income was reduced by approximately $0.2 million. |
|
|
|
|
For the three months ended April 30, 2009, Basic earnings per share was unchanged. |
|
|
|
|
For the three months ended April 30, 2009, Diluted earnings per share was reduced by $0.01. |
|
|
|
|
For the three months ended April 30, 2009, Cash flows from operating activities
was increased by approximately $46.5 million. |
|
|
|
|
For the three months ended April 30, 2009, Cash flows from financing activities
was reduced by approximately $46.5 million. |
|
|
|
|
As of January 31, 2010, the net of current assets and current liabilities
increased approximately $25.4 million; |
|
|
|
|
As of January 31, 2010, Customer accounts receivable, net, were increased
approximately $488.5 million, Net deferred tax assets were increased approximately $3.0
million and Other assets were increased approximately $7.1 million; |
|
|
|
|
As of January 31, 2010, Interests in the securitized assets of its VIE of
approximately $157.7 million was eliminated; |
|
|
|
|
As of January 31, 2010, current and long-term debt were increased approximately
$63.9 million and $282.5 million, respectively; and |
|
|
|
|
As of January 31, 2010, Retained earnings was decreased approximately $5.2
million. |
6
Principles of Consolidation. The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of
Conns, Inc. and all of its wholly-owned subsidiaries (the Company), including the Companys VIE.
The liabilities of the VIE and the assets specifically collateralizing those obligations are not
available for the general use of the Company and have been parenthetically presented on the face of
the Companys balance sheet. All material intercompany transactions and balances have been
eliminated in consolidation.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments. The fair value of cash and cash equivalents,
receivables and accounts payable approximate their carrying amounts because of the short maturity
of these instruments. The fair value of the Companys long-term debt and the VIEs $170 million
2002 Series A variable funding note approximate their carrying amount based on the fact that the
agreements were recently amended and the cost of the borrowings were revised to reflect current
market conditions. The estimated fair value of the VIEs $150 million 2006 Series A medium term
notes was approximately $141 million and $139 million as of April 30, 2010 and January 31, 2010,
respectively, based on its estimate of the rates available at these dates, for instruments with
similar terms and maturities. The Companys interest rate swaps are presented on the balance sheet
at fair value.
Use of Estimates. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally
accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect
the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could
differ from those estimates.
Earnings Per Share. The Company calculates basic earnings per share by dividing net income by
the weighted average number of common shares outstanding. Diluted earnings per share include the
dilutive effects of any stock options granted, as calculated under the treasury-stock method. The
weighted average number of anti-dilutive stock options not included in calculating diluted EPS was
1.5 million and 2.7 million for the three months ended April 30, 2009 and 2010, respectively. The
following table sets forth the shares outstanding for the earnings per share calculations:
The following table sets forth the shares outstanding for the earnings per share calculations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
April 30, |
|
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
Common stock outstanding, net of treasury stock, beginning of period |
|
|
22,444,240 |
|
|
|
22,471,350 |
|
Weighted average common stock issued to employee stock purchase plan |
|
|
2,719 |
|
|
|
3,308 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares used in computing basic earnings per share |
|
|
22,446,959 |
|
|
|
22,474,658 |
|
Dilutive effect of stock options, net of assumed repurchase of treasury stock |
|
|
242,204 |
|
|
|
2,787 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares used in computing diluted earnings per share |
|
|
22,689,163 |
|
|
|
22,477,445 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customer Accounts Receivable. Customer accounts receivable reported in the consolidated
balance sheet includes receivables transferred to the Companys VIE and those receivables not
transferred to the VIE. The Company records the amount of principal and accrued interest on
Customer receivables that is expected to be collected within the next twelve months, based on
contractual terms, in current assets on its consolidated balance sheet. Those amounts expected to
be collected after 12 months, based on contractual terms, are included in long-term assets.
Typically, customer receivables are considered delinquent if a payment has not been received on the
scheduled due date. Additionally, the Company offers reage programs to customers with past due
balances that have experienced a financial hardship; if they meet the conditions of the Companys
reage policy. Reaging a customers account can result in updating an account from a delinquent
status to a current status. Generally, an account that is delinquent more than 120 days and for
which no payment has been received in the past seven months will be charged-off against the
allowance for doubtful accounts and interest accrued subsequent to the last payment will be
reversed. The Company has a secured interest in the merchandise financed by these receivables and
therefore has the opportunity to recover a portion of the charged-off amount.
Interest Income on Customer Accounts Receivable. Interest income is accrued using the Rule of
78s method for installment contracts and the simple interest method for revolving charge accounts,
and is reflected in Finance charges and other. Typically, interest income is accrued until the
contract or account is paid off or charged-off and we provide an allowance for estimated
uncollectible interest. Interest income is recognized on interest-free promotion credit programs
based on the Companys historical experience related
7
to customers that fail to satisfy the requirements of the interest-free programs. Additionally, for
sales on deferred interest and same as cash programs that exceed one year in duration, the
Company discounts the sales to their fair value, resulting in a reduction in sales and customer
receivables, and amortizes the discount amount to Finance charges and other over the term of the
program. The amount of customer receivables carried on the Companys consolidated balance sheet
that were past due 90 days or more and still accruing interest was $54.8 million and $44.7 million
at January 31, 2010, and April 30, 2010, respectively.
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts. The Company records an allowance for doubtful accounts,
including estimated uncollectible interest, for its Customer and Other accounts receivable, based
on its historical net loss experience and expectations for future losses. The net charge-off data
used in computing the loss rate is reduced by the amount of post-charge-off recoveries received,
including cash payments, amounts realized from the repossession of the products financed and, at
times, payments under credit insurance policies. Additionally, the Company separately evaluates the
Primary and Secondary portfolios when estimating the allowance for doubtful accounts. The balance
in the allowance for doubtful accounts and uncollectible interest for customer receivables was
$35.8 million and $33.5 million, at January 31, 2010, and April 30, 2010, respectively.
Additionally, as a result of the Companys practice of reaging customer accounts, if the account is
not ultimately collected, the timing and amount of the charge-off is impacted. If these accounts
had been charged-off sooner the historical net loss rates might have been higher.
Inventories. Inventories consist of finished goods or parts and are valued at the lower of
cost (moving weighted average method) or market.
Other Assets. The Company has certain deferred financing costs for transactions that have
not yet been completed and has not begun amortization of those costs. These costs are included in
Other assets, net, on the balance sheet and will be amortized upon completion of the related
financing transaction or expensed in the event the Company fails to complete such a transaction.
The Company also has certain restricted cash balances included in Other assets. The restricted
cash balances represent collateral for note holders of the Companys VIE, and the amount is
expected to decrease as the respective notes are repaid. However, the required balance could
increase dependent on certain net portfolio yield requirements. The balance of this restricted cash
account was $6.0 million at January 31, 2010, and April 30, 2010.
Comprehensive Income.
Comprehensive income for the three months ended April 30, 2009 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
11,356 |
|
Adjustment of fair value of interest rate swaps, net of tax of $44 |
|
|
(81 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income |
|
$ |
11,275 |
|
|
|
|
|
Subsequent Events. Subsequent events have been evaluated through the date of issuance. No
material subsequent events have occurred since April 30, 2010, that required recognition or
disclosure in the Companys current period financial statements
Reclassifications. Certain reclassifications have been made in the prior years financial
statements to conform to the current years presentation, by reclassifying the balance of
construction-in-progress of approximately $0.9 million from Property and equipment Buildings to
Property and equipment Leasehold improvements, on the consolidated balance sheet.
2. Supplemental Disclosure of Finance Charges and Other Revenue
The following is a summary of the classification of the amounts included as Finance charges
and other for the three months ended April 30, 2009 and 2010 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months ended |
|
|
|
April 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Interest income and fees on customer receivables |
|
$ |
34,956 |
|
|
$ |
30,393 |
|
Insurance commissions |
|
|
4,630 |
|
|
|
3,837 |
|
Other |
|
|
114 |
|
|
|
250 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Finance charges and other |
|
$ |
39,700 |
|
|
$ |
34,480 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8
3. Supplemental Disclosure of Customer Receivables
The following tables present quantitative information about the receivables portfolios managed
by the Company (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Outstanding Balance |
|
|
|
of Customer Receivables |
|
|
60 Days Past Due (1) |
|
|
Reaged (1) |
|
|
|
January 31, |
|
|
April 30, |
|
|
January 31, |
|
|
April 30, |
|
|
January 31, |
|
|
April 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Primary portfolio: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Installment |
|
$ |
555,573 |
|
|
$ |
532,869 |
|
|
$ |
46,758 |
|
|
$ |
38,577 |
|
|
$ |
93,219 |
|
|
$ |
87,196 |
|
Revolving |
|
|
41,787 |
|
|
|
36,193 |
|
|
|
2,017 |
|
|
|
1,884 |
|
|
|
1,819 |
|
|
|
1,762 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal |
|
|
597,360 |
|
|
|
569,062 |
|
|
|
48,775 |
|
|
|
40,461 |
|
|
|
95,038 |
|
|
|
88,958 |
|
Secondary portfolio: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Installment |
|
|
138,681 |
|
|
|
131,430 |
|
|
|
24,616 |
|
|
|
19,471 |
|
|
|
49,135 |
|
|
|
45,051 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total receivables managed |
|
|
736,041 |
|
|
|
700,492 |
|
|
$ |
73,391 |
|
|
$ |
59,932 |
|
|
$ |
144,173 |
|
|
$ |
134,009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for uncollectible accounts |
|
|
(35,802 |
) |
|
|
(33,541 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowances for promotional credit programs |
|
|
(13,594 |
) |
|
|
(11,330 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current portion of customer accounts
receivable, net |
|
|
368,304 |
|
|
|
353,551 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term customer accounts
receivable, net |
|
$ |
318,341 |
|
|
$ |
302,070 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Receivables transferred to the VIE |
|
$ |
521,919 |
|
|
$ |
486,596 |
|
|
$ |
59,840 |
|
|
$ |
47,540 |
|
|
$ |
122,521 |
|
|
$ |
110,082 |
|
Receivables not transferred to the VIE |
|
|
214,122 |
|
|
|
213,896 |
|
|
|
13,551 |
|
|
|
12,392 |
|
|
|
21,652 |
|
|
|
23,927 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total receivables managed |
|
$ |
736,041 |
|
|
$ |
700,492 |
|
|
$ |
73,391 |
|
|
$ |
59,932 |
|
|
$ |
144,173 |
|
|
$ |
134,009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Amounts are based on end of period balances and accounts could be represented in both the past due and reaged columns shown above. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Credit |
|
|
|
Average Balances |
|
|
Charge-offs (2) |
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
April 30, |
|
|
April 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Primary portfolio: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Installment |
|
$ |
547,980 |
|
|
$ |
542,675 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revolving |
|
|
35,291 |
|
|
|
38,839 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal |
|
|
583,271 |
|
|
|
581,514 |
|
|
$ |
3,916 |
|
|
$ |
6,153 |
|
Secondary portfolio: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Installment |
|
|
159,270 |
|
|
|
134,324 |
|
|
|
1,689 |
|
|
|
2,092 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total receivables managed |
|
$ |
742,541 |
|
|
$ |
715,838 |
|
|
$ |
5,605 |
|
|
$ |
8,245 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Receivables transferred to
the VIE |
|
$ |
615,761 |
|
|
$ |
503,280 |
|
|
$ |
5,249 |
|
|
$ |
6,077 |
|
Receivables not transferred to
the VIE |
|
|
126,780 |
|
|
|
212,558 |
|
|
|
356 |
|
|
|
2,168 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total receivables managed |
|
$ |
742,541 |
|
|
$ |
715,838 |
|
|
$ |
5,605 |
|
|
$ |
8,245 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2) |
|
Amounts represent total credit charge-offs, net of recoveries, on total
customer receivables. |
9
4. Debt and Letters of Credit
The Companys borrowing facilities consist of an asset-based revolving credit facility, a $10
million unsecured revolving line of credit, its VIEs 2002 Series A variable funding note and its
VIEs 2006 Series A medium term notes. Debt consisted of the following at the periods ended (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 31, |
|
|
April 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset-based revolving credit facility |
|
$ |
105,498 |
|
|
$ |
99,400 |
|
2002 Series A Variable Funding Note |
|
|
196,400 |
|
|
|
170,000 |
|
2006 Series A Notes |
|
|
150,000 |
|
|
|
150,000 |
|
Unsecured revolving line of credit for $10 million maturing in September 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other long-term debt |
|
|
406 |
|
|
|
373 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt |
|
|
452,304 |
|
|
|
419,773 |
|
Less current portion of debt |
|
|
64,055 |
|
|
|
100,162 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt |
|
$ |
388,249 |
|
|
$ |
319,611 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Companys $210 million asset-based revolving credit facility provides funding based on a
borrowing base calculation that includes customer accounts receivable and inventory and matures in
August 2011. The credit facility bears interest at LIBOR plus a spread ranging from 325 basis
points to 375 basis points, based on a fixed charge coverage ratio. In addition to the fixed charge
coverage ratio, the revolving credit facility includes a total liabilities to tangible net worth
requirement, a minimum customer receivables cash recovery percentage requirement, a net capital
expenditures limit and combined portfolio performance covenants. The Company was in compliance with
the covenants, as amended, at April 30, 2010. Additionally, the agreement contains cross-default
provisions, such that, any default under another credit facility of the Company or its VIE would
result in a default under this agreement, and any default under this agreement would result in a
default under those agreements. The asset-based revolving credit facility is secured by the assets
of the Company not otherwise encumbered.
The 2002 Series A program functions as a revolving credit facility to fund the transfer of
eligible customer receivables to the VIE. When the outstanding balance of the facility approaches a
predetermined amount, the VIE (Issuer) is required to seek financing to pay down the outstanding
balance in the 2002 Series A variable funding note. The amount paid down on the facility then
becomes available to fund the transfer of new customer receivables or to meet required principal
payments on other series as they become due. The new financing could be in the form of additional
notes, bonds or other instruments as the market and transaction documents might allow. Given the
current state of the financial markets, especially with respect to asset-backed securitization
financing, the Company has been unable to issue medium-term notes or increase the availability
under the existing variable funding note program. The 2002 Series A program consists of $170
million that is renewable annually, at the Companys option, until August 2011 and bears interest
at commercial paper rates plus a spread of 250 basis points. The total commitment under the 2002
Series A program was reduced during the quarter from $200 million at January 31, 2010.
Additionally, in connection with recent amendments to the 2002 Series A facility, the VIE agreed to
reduce the total available commitment to $130 million in April 2011.
The 2006 Series A program, which was consummated in August 2006, is non-amortizing for the
first four years and officially matures in April 2017. However, it is expected that the scheduled
$7.5 million principal payments, which begin in September 2010, will retire the bonds prior to that
date. The VIEs borrowing agreements contain certain covenants requiring the maintenance of various
financial ratios and customer receivables performance standards. The Issuer was in compliance with
the requirements of the agreements, as amended, as of April 30, 2010. The VIEs debt is secured by the Customer accounts
receivable that are transferred to it, which are included in Customer accounts receivable and
Long-term portion of customer accounts receivable on the consolidated balance sheet. The investors
and the securitization trustee have no recourse to the Companys other assets for failure of the
individual customers of the Company and the VIE to pay when due. Additionally, the Company has no
recourse to the VIEs assets to satisfy its obligations. The
10
Companys retained interests in the
customer receivables collateralizing the securitization program and the related cash flows are
subordinate to the investors interests, and would not be paid if the Issuer is unable to repay the
amounts due under the 2002 Series A and 2006 Series A programs. The ultimate realization of the
retained interest is subject to credit, prepayment, and interest rate risks on the transferred
financial assets.
In March 2010, the Company and its VIE completed amendments to the various borrowing
agreements that revised the covenant requirements as of January 31, 2010, and revised certain
future covenant requirements. The revised covenant calculations include both the operating results
and assets and liabilities of the Company and the VIE, effective January 31, 2010, for all
financial covenant calculations. In addition to the covenant changes, the Company, as servicer of
the customer receivables, agreed to implement certain additional collection procedures if certain
performance requirements were not maintained, and agreed to make fee payments to the 2002 Series A
facility providers on the amount of the commitment available at specific future dates. The Company
also agreed to use the proceeds from any capital raising activity it completes to further reduce
the commitments and debt outstanding under the securitization programs debt facilities. The fee
payments will equal the following rates multiplied time the total available borrowing commitment
under the 2002 Series A facility on the dates shown:
|
|
|
50 basis points on May 1, 2010, |
|
|
|
|
100 basis points on August 1, 2010, |
|
|
|
|
110 basis points on November 1, 2010, |
|
|
|
|
115 basis points on February 1, 2011, |
|
|
|
|
115 basis point on May 1, 2011, and |
|
|
|
|
123 basis points on August 1, 2011. |
As of April 30, 2010, the Company had approximately $55.4 million under its asset-based
revolving credit facility, net of standby letters of credit issued, and $10.0 million under its
unsecured bank line of credit immediately available for general corporate purposes. The Company
also had $33.5 million that may become available under its asset-based revolving credit facility as
it grows the balance of eligible customer receivables and its total eligible inventory balances.
The Companys assetbased revolving credit facility provides it the ability to utilize
letters of credit to secure its obligations as the servicer under its VIEs asset-backed
securitization program, deductibles under the Companys property and casualty insurance programs
and international product purchases, among other acceptable uses. At April 30, 2010, the Company
had outstanding letters of credit of $21.7 million under this facility. The maximum potential
amount of future payments under these letter of credit facilities is considered to be the aggregate
face amount of each letter of credit commitment, which totals $21.7 million as of April 30, 2010.
The Company held interest rate swaps with notional amounts totaling $25.0 million as of April
30, 2010, with terms extending through July 2011 for the purpose of hedging against variable
interest rate risk related to the variability of cash flows in the interest payments on a portion
of its variable-rate debt, based on changes in the benchmark one-month LIBOR interest rate. Changes
in the cash flows of the interest rate swaps are expected to exactly offset the changes in cash
flows (changes in base interest rate payments) attributable to fluctuations in the LIBOR interest
rate. For derivative instruments that are designated and qualify as a cash flow hedge, the
effective portion of the gain or loss on the derivative is reported as a component of other
comprehensive income (loss) and reclassified into earnings in the same period or periods during
which the hedged transaction affects earnings. Gains and losses on the derivative representing
either hedge ineffectiveness or hedge components excluded from the assessment of effectiveness are
recognized in current earnings. At April 30, 2010, the estimated net amount of loss that is
expected to be reclassified into earnings within the next twelve months is $0.2 million.
11
For information on the location and amounts of derivative fair values in the statement of
operation, see the tables presented below (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Values of Derivative Instruments |
|
|
|
Liability Derivatives |
|
|
|
January 31, 2010 |
|
|
April 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
Balance |
|
|
|
|
|
Balance |
|
|
|
|
|
Sheet |
|
Fair |
|
|
Sheet |
|
Fair |
|
|
|
Location |
|
Value |
|
|
Location |
|
Value |
|
Derivatives designated as
hedging instruments under |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate contracts |
|
Other liabilities |
|
$ |
337 |
|
|
Other liabilities |
|
$ |
251 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total derivatives designated
as hedging instruments |
|
|
|
$ |
337 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
251 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain or (Loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recognized in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain or (Loss) |
|
|
Location of |
|
|
Income on |
|
|
|
Amount of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reclassified |
|
|
Gain or (Loss) |
|
|
Derivative |
|
|
|
Gain or (Loss) |
|
|
Location of |
|
|
from |
|
|
Recognized in |
|
|
(Ineffective |
|
|
|
Recognized |
|
|
Gain or (Loss) |
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
Income on |
|
|
Portion |
|
|
|
in OCI on |
|
|
Reclassified |
|
|
OCI into |
|
|
Derivative |
|
|
and Amount |
|
|
|
Derivative |
|
|
from |
|
|
Income |
|
|
(Ineffective |
|
|
Excluded from |
|
|
|
(Effective |
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
(Effective |
|
|
Portion |
|
|
Effectiveness |
|
Derivatives in |
|
Portion) |
|
|
OCI into |
|
|
Portion) |
|
|
and Amount |
|
|
Testing) |
|
Cash Flow |
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Income |
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Excluded from |
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Hedging |
|
April 30, |
|
|
April 30, |
|
|
(Effective |
|
|
April 30, |
|
|
April 30, |
|
|
Effectiveness |
|
|
April 30, |
|
|
April 30, |
|
Relationships |
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Portion) |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Testing) |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Interest Rate Contracts |
|
$ |
(81 |
) |
|
$ |
55 |
|
|
Interest income/ (expense) |
|
$ |
(17 |
) |
|
$ |
(98 |
) |
|
Interest income/ (expense) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
(81 |
) |
|
$ |
55 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(17 |
) |
|
$ |
(98 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5. Contingencies
Legal Proceedings. The Company is involved in routine litigation and claims incidental to its
business from time to time, and, as required, has accrued its estimate of the probable costs for
the resolution of these matters. These estimates have been developed in consultation with counsel
and are based upon an analysis of potential results, assuming a combination of litigation and
settlement strategies. It is possible, however, that future results of operations for any
particular period could be materially affected by changes in the Companys assumptions or the
effectiveness of its strategies related to these proceedings. However, the results of these
proceedings cannot be predicted with certainty, and changes in facts and circumstances could impact
the Companys estimate of reserves for litigation.
Repair Service Agreement Obligations. The Company sells repair service agreements that extend
the period of covered warranty service on the products the Company sells. For certain of the repair
service agreements sold, the Company is the obligor for payment of qualifying claims. The Company
is responsible for administering the program, including setting the pricing of the agreements sold
and paying the claims. The typical term for these agreements is between 12 and 36 months. The
pricing is set based on historical claims experience and expectations about future claims. While
the Company is unable to estimate maximum potential claim exposure, it has a history of overall
profitability upon the ultimate resolution of agreements sold. The revenues related to the
agreements sold are deferred at the time of sale and recorded in revenues in the statement of
operations over the life of the agreements. The agreements can be canceled at any time
and any deferred revenue associated with canceled agreements is reversed at the time of
cancellation. The
12
amounts of repair service agreement revenue deferred at January 31, 2010, and
April 30, 2010, are $7.3 million and $7.3 million, respectively, and are included in Deferred
revenue and allowances in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. The following table
presents a reconciliation of the beginning and ending balances of the deferred revenue on the
Companys repair service agreements and the amount of claims paid under those agreements (in
thousands):
Reconciliation of deferred revenues on repair service agreements
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
April 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance in deferred revenues at beginning of period |
|
$ |
7,213 |
|
|
$ |
7,268 |
|
Revenues earned during the period |
|
|
(1,733 |
) |
|
|
(1,787 |
) |
Revenues deferred on sales of new agreements |
|
|
1,833 |
|
|
|
1,801 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance in deferred revenues at end of period |
|
$ |
7,313 |
|
|
$ |
7,282 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total claims incurred during the period, excludes selling expenses |
|
$ |
716 |
|
|
$ |
886 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6. Segment Reporting
Financial information by segment is presented in the following tables for the three months
ended April 30, 2010 and 2009 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended April 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
Retail |
|
|
Credit |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Retail |
|
|
Credit |
|
|
Total |
|
Revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product sales |
|
$ |
184,817 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
184,817 |
|
|
$ |
150,365 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
150,365 |
|
Repair service agreement commissions (net) (a) |
|
|
12,087 |
|
|
|
(2,297 |
) |
|
|
9,790 |
|
|
|
10,925 |
|
|
|
(3,008 |
) |
|
|
7,917 |
|
Service revenues |
|
|
5,544 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,544 |
|
|
|
4,757 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,757 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net sales |
|
|
202,448 |
|
|
|
(2,297 |
) |
|
|
200,151 |
|
|
|
166,047 |
|
|
|
(3,008 |
) |
|
|
163,039 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Finance charges and other |
|
|
114 |
|
|
|
39,586 |
|
|
|
39,700 |
|
|
|
250 |
|
|
|
34,230 |
|
|
|
34,480 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
|
202,562 |
|
|
|
37,289 |
|
|
|
239,851 |
|
|
|
166,297 |
|
|
|
31,222 |
|
|
|
197,519 |
|
Cost and expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of goods and parts sold, including
warehousing and occupancy costs |
|
|
148,457 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
148,457 |
|
|
|
116,529 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
116,529 |
|
Selling, general and administrative expense (b) |
|
|
43,830 |
|
|
|
15,507 |
|
|
|
59,337 |
|
|
|
40,150 |
|
|
|
16,475 |
|
|
|
56,625 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
2,982 |
|
|
|
419 |
|
|
|
3,401 |
|
|
|
3,023 |
|
|
|
1,095 |
|
|
|
4,118 |
|
Provision for bad debts |
|
|
59 |
|
|
|
5,585 |
|
|
|
5,644 |
|
|
|
86 |
|
|
|
6,188 |
|
|
|
6,274 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cost and expenses |
|
|
195,328 |
|
|
|
21,511 |
|
|
|
216,839 |
|
|
|
159,788 |
|
|
|
23,758 |
|
|
|
183,546 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
7,234 |
|
|
|
15,778 |
|
|
|
23,012 |
|
|
|
6,509 |
|
|
|
7,464 |
|
|
|
13,973 |
|
Interest expense, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,004 |
|
|
|
5,004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,785 |
|
|
|
4,785 |
|
Other (income) expense, net |
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
171 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
171 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment income before income taxes |
|
$ |
7,242 |
|
|
$ |
10,774 |
|
|
$ |
18,016 |
|
|
$ |
6,338 |
|
|
$ |
2,679 |
|
|
$ |
9,017 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
213,297 |
|
|
$ |
705,056 |
|
|
$ |
918,353 |
|
|
$ |
209,589 |
|
|
$ |
667,440 |
|
|
$ |
877,029 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Retail repair service agreement commissions exclude repair service agreement
cancellations that are the result of consumer credit account charge-offs. These amounts are
reflected in repair service agreement commissions for the credit segment. |
|
(b) |
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses include the direct expenses of the retail and
credit operations, allocated overhead expenses and a charge to the credit segment to reimburse the
retail segment for expenses it incurs related to occupancy, personnel, advertising and other direct
costs of the retail segment which benefit the credit operations by sourcing credit customers and
collecting payments. The reimbursement received by the retail segment from the credit segment is
estimated using an annual rate of 2.5% times the average portfolio balance for each applicable
period. The amount of overhead allocated to each segment was approximately $2.0 million for each of
the three months ended April 30, 2010 and 2009. The amount of the reimbursement made to the retail
segment by the credit segment was approximately $4.5 million and $4.6 million for the three months
ended April 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively. |
13
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Forward-Looking Statements
This report contains forward-looking statements. We sometimes use words such as believe,
may, will, estimate, continue, anticipate, intend, expect, project and similar
expressions, as they relate to us, our management and our industry, to identify forward-looking
statements. Forward-looking statements relate to our expectations, beliefs, plans, strategies,
prospects, future performance, anticipated trends and other future events. We have based our
forward-looking statements largely on our current expectations and projections about future events
and financial trends affecting our business. Actual results may differ materially. Some of the
risks, uncertainties and assumptions about us that may cause actual results to differ from these
forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to:
|
|
|
our ability to obtain capital for required capital expenditures and costs related to
the opening of new stores or to update, relocate or expand existing stores; |
|
|
|
|
our ability to fund our operations, capital expenditures, debt repayment and
expansion from cash flows from operations, borrowings from our revolving line of credit
and proceeds from securitizations, and proceeds from accessing debt or equity markets; |
|
|
|
|
our ability to renew or replace our existing borrowing facilities on or before the
maturity dates of the facilities; |
|
|
|
|
the cost or terms of any amended, renewed or replacement credit facilities; |
|
|
|
|
our ability to obtain additional funding for the purpose of funding the customer
receivables generated by us, including limitations on our ability to obtain financing
through the commercial paper-based funding sources in our securitization program; |
|
|
|
|
our inability to maintain compliance with debt covenant requirements, including
taking the actions necessary to maintain compliance with the covenants, such as
obtaining amendments to the borrowing facilities that modify the covenant requirements,
which could result in higher borrowing costs; |
|
|
|
|
reduced availability under our asset-based revolving credit facility as a result of
borrowing base requirements and the impact on the borrowing base calculation of changes
in the performance or eligibility of the customer receivables financed by that
facility; |
|
|
|
|
increases in the retained portion of our customer receivables portfolio under our
asset-backed securitization program as a result of changes in performance or types of
customer receivables transferred, or as a result of a change in the mix of funding
sources available to the securitization program, requiring higher collateral levels, or
limitations on our ability to obtain financing through commercial paper-based funding
sources; |
|
|
|
|
the success of our growth strategy and plans regarding opening new stores and
entering adjacent and new markets, including our plans to continue expanding into
existing markets; |
|
|
|
|
our ability to open and profitably operate new stores in existing, adjacent and new
geographic markets; |
|
|
|
|
our intention to update or expand existing stores; |
|
|
|
|
our ability to introduce additional product categories; |
|
|
|
|
the ability of the financial institutions providing lending facilities to us to
fund their commitments; |
14
|
|
|
the effect of any downgrades by rating agencies of our lenders on borrowing costs; |
|
|
|
|
the effect on our borrowing cost of changes in laws and regulations affecting the
providers of debt financing; |
|
|
|
|
the effect of rising interest rates or borrowing spreads that could increase our
cost of borrowing or reduce securitization income; |
|
|
|
|
the effect of rising interest rates or other economic conditions on mortgage
borrowers that could impair our customers ability to make payments on outstanding
credit accounts; |
|
|
|
|
our inability to make customer financing programs available that allow consumers to
purchase products at levels that can support our growth; |
|
|
|
|
the potential for deterioration in the delinquency status of the transferred or
owned credit portfolios or higher than historical net charge-offs in the portfolios
could adversely impact earnings; |
|
|
|
|
technological and market developments, growth trends and projected sales in the home
appliance and consumer electronics industry, including, with respect to digital
products like Blu-ray players, HDTV, LED and 3-D televisions, GPS devices, home
networking devices and other new products, and our ability to capitalize on such
growth; |
|
|
|
|
the potential for price erosion or lower unit sales points that could result in
declines in revenues; |
|
|
|
|
the effect of changes in oil and gas prices that could adversely affect our
customers shopping decisions and patterns, as well as the cost of our delivery and
service operations and our cost of products, if vendors pass on their additional fuel
costs through increased pricing for products; |
|
|
|
|
the ability to attract and retain qualified personnel; |
|
|
|
|
both the short-term and long-term impact of adverse weather conditions (e.g.
hurricanes) that could result in volatility in our revenues and increased expenses and
casualty losses; |
|
|
|
|
changes in laws and regulations and/or interest, premium and commission rates
allowed by regulators on our credit, credit insurance and repair service agreements as
allowed by those laws and regulations; |
|
|
|
|
our relationships with key suppliers and their ability to provide products at
competitive prices and support sales of their products through their rebate and
discount programs; |
|
|
|
|
the adequacy of our distribution and information systems and management experience
to support our expansion plans; |
|
|
|
|
the accuracy of our expectations regarding competition and our competitive
advantages; |
|
|
|
|
changes in our stock price or the number of shares we have outstanding; |
|
|
|
|
the potential for market share erosion that could result in reduced revenues; |
|
|
|
|
the accuracy of our expectations regarding the similarity or dissimilarity of our
existing markets as compared to new markets we enter; |
|
|
|
|
the use of third parties to complete certain of our distribution, delivery and home
repair services; |
|
|
|
|
general economic conditions in the regions in which we operate; and |
15
|
|
|
the outcome of litigation or government investigations affecting our business. |
Additional important factors that could cause our actual results to differ materially from our
expectations are discussed under Risk Factors in our Form 10-K/A filed with the Securities
Exchange Commission on April 12, 2010. In light of these risks, uncertainties and assumptions, the
forward-looking events and circumstances discussed in this report might not happen.
The forward-looking statements in this report reflect our views and assumptions only as of the
date of this report. We undertake no obligation to update publicly or revise any forward-looking
statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as required
by law.
All forward-looking statements attributable to us, or to persons acting on our behalf, are
expressly qualified in their entirety by these cautionary statements.
General
We intend for the following discussion and analysis to provide you with a better understanding
of the financial condition and performance of our retail and credit segments for the indicated
periods, including an analysis of those key factors that contributed to our financial condition and
performance and that are, or are expected to be, the key drivers of our business.
We are a specialty retailer with 76 retail locations in Texas, Louisiana and Oklahoma, that
sells home appliances, including refrigerators, freezers, washers, dryers, dishwashers and ranges,
a variety of consumer electronics, including LCD, LED, 3-D, plasma and DLP televisions, camcorders,
digital cameras, Blu-ray and DVD players, video game equipment, MP3 players and home theater
products, lawn and garden products, mattresses and furniture. We also sell home office equipment,
including computers and computer accessories and continue to introduce additional product
categories for the home and consumer entertainment, such as GPS devices, to help increase same
store sales and to respond to our customers product needs. We require our sales associates to be
knowledgeable of all of our products.
Unlike many of our competitors, we provide flexible in-house credit options for our customers.
In the last three years, we financed, on average, approximately 61% of our retail sales through our
internal credit programs. In addition to interest-bearing installment and revolving charge
contracts, at times, we offer promotional credit programs to certain customers that provide for
same as cash or deferred interest interest-free periods of varying terms, generally three, six,
12, 18, 24 and 36 months, and require monthly payments beginning in the month after the sale. In
turn, we finance substantially all of our customer receivables from these credit programs with cash
flow from operations and through an asset-based revolving credit facility and an asset-backed
securitization facility. In addition to our own credit programs, we use third-party financing
programs to provide a portion of the non-interest bearing financing for purchases made by our
customers.
16
The following tables present, for comparison purposes, information about our credit
portfolios.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Primary Portfolio (1) |
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
1/31/2009 |
|
|
4/30/2009 |
|
|
1/31/2010 |
|
|
4/30/2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total outstanding balance (period end) |
|
$ |
589,922 |
|
|
$ |
579,455 |
|
|
$ |
597,360 |
|
|
$ |
569,062 |
|
Average outstanding customer balance |
|
$ |
1,403 |
|
|
$ |
1,405 |
|
|
$ |
1,339 |
|
|
$ |
1,341 |
|
Number of active accounts (period end) |
|
|
420,585 |
|
|
|
412,387 |
|
|
|
446,203 |
|
|
|
424,383 |
|
Account balances over 60 days past due (period end) |
|
$ |
35,153 |
|
|
$ |
33,003 |
|
|
$ |
48,775 |
|
|
$ |
40,461 |
|
Percent of balances over 60 days past due to
total outstanding balance (period end) |
|
|
6.0 |
% |
|
|
5.7 |
% |
|
|
8.2 |
% |
|
|
7.1 |
% |
Total account balances reaged (period end) |
|
|
90,560 |
|
|
|
88,400 |
|
|
|
95,038 |
|
|
|
88,959 |
|
Percent of reaged balances to
total outstanding balance (period end) |
|
|
15.4 |
% |
|
|
15.3 |
% |
|
|
15.9 |
% |
|
|
15.6 |
% |
Account balances reaged more than six months (period end) |
|
$ |
36,452 |
|
|
$ |
34,716 |
|
|
$ |
35,448 |
|
|
$ |
34,299 |
|
Weighted average credit score of outstanding balances |
|
|
603 |
|
|
|
600 |
|
|
|
600 |
|
|
|
596 |
|
Total applications processed (2) |
|
|
257,840 |
|
|
|
203,559 |
|
|
|
206,422 |
|
|
|
169,289 |
|
Percent of retail sales financed |
|
|
48.9 |
% |
|
|
43.8 |
% |
|
|
54.7 |
% |
|
|
52.8 |
% |
Weighted average origination credit score of sales financed |
|
|
636 |
|
|
|
634 |
|
|
|
631 |
|
|
|
626 |
|
Total applications approved |
|
|
49.9 |
% |
|
|
45.9 |
% |
|
|
52.7 |
% |
|
|
50.5 |
% |
Average down payment |
|
|
5.5 |
% |
|
|
7.6 |
% |
|
|
4.5 |
% |
|
|
4.1 |
% |
Average total outstanding balance |
|
$ |
579,539 |
|
|
$ |
583,271 |
|
|
$ |
601,763 |
|
|
$ |
581,514 |
|
Bad debt charge-offs (net of recoveries) |
|
$ |
4,280 |
|
|
$ |
3,916 |
|
|
$ |
6,516 |
|
|
$ |
6,153 |
|
Percent of bad debt charge-offs (net of
recoveries) to average outstanding balance |
|
|
3.0 |
% |
|
|
2.7 |
% |
|
|
4.3 |
% |
|
|
4.2 |
% |
Estimated percent of reage balances collected (3) |
|
|
89.5 |
% |
|
|
90.4 |
% |
|
|
82.8 |
% |
|
|
83.5 |
% |
17
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Secondary Portfolio (1) |
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
1/31/2009 |
|
|
4/30/2009 |
|
|
1/31/2010 |
|
|
4/30/2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total outstanding balance (period end) |
|
$ |
163,591 |
|
|
$ |
155,097 |
|
|
$ |
138,681 |
|
|
$ |
131,430 |
|
Average outstanding customer balance |
|
$ |
1,394 |
|
|
$ |
1,385 |
|
|
$ |
1,319 |
|
|
$ |
1,309 |
|
Number of active accounts (period end) |
|
|
117,372 |
|
|
|
112,011 |
|
|
|
105,109 |
|
|
|
100,412 |
|
Account balances over 60 days past due (period end) |
|
$ |
19,988 |
|
|
$ |
17,908 |
|
|
$ |
24,616 |
|
|
$ |
19,471 |
|
Percent of balances over 60 days past due to
total outstanding balance (period end) |
|
|
12.2 |
% |
|
|
11.5 |
% |
|
|
17.8 |
% |
|
|
14.8 |
% |
Total account balances reaged (period end) |
|
$ |
50,602 |
|
|
$ |
49,850 |
|
|
$ |
49,135 |
|
|
$ |
45,051 |
|
Percent of reaged balances to
total outstanding balance (period end) |
|
|
30.9 |
% |
|
|
32.1 |
% |
|
|
35.4 |
% |
|
|
34.3 |
% |
Account balances reaged more than six months (period end) |
|
$ |
19,860 |
|
|
$ |
20,185 |
|
|
$ |
21,920 |
|
|
$ |
20,931 |
|
Weighted average credit score of outstanding balances |
|
|
521 |
|
|
|
524 |
|
|
|
526 |
|
|
|
528 |
|
Total applications processed (2) |
|
|
114,133 |
|
|
|
96,443 |
|
|
|
89,615 |
|
|
|
75,345 |
|
Percent of retail sales financed |
|
|
9.4 |
% |
|
|
8.5 |
% |
|
|
6.0 |
% |
|
|
6.4 |
% |
Weighted average origination credit score of sales financed |
|
|
540 |
|
|
|
559 |
|
|
|
555 |
|
|
|
556 |
|
Total applications approved |
|
|
23.2 |
% |
|
|
16.5 |
% |
|
|
19.3 |
% |
|
|
21.4 |
% |
Average down payment |
|
|
20.1 |
% |
|
|
22.9 |
% |
|
|
21.2 |
% |
|
|
17.5 |
% |
Average total outstanding balance |
|
$ |
163,320 |
|
|
$ |
159,270 |
|
|
$ |
141,125 |
|
|
$ |
134,324 |
|
Bad debt charge-offs (net of recoveries) |
|
$ |
2,043 |
|
|
$ |
1,689 |
|
|
$ |
2,325 |
|
|
$ |
2,092 |
|
Percent of bad debt charge-offs (net of
recoveries) to average outstanding balance |
|
|
5.0 |
% |
|
|
4.2 |
% |
|
|
6.6 |
% |
|
|
6.2 |
% |
Estimated percent of reage balances collected (3) |
|
|
90.3 |
% |
|
|
91.9 |
% |
|
|
86.2 |
% |
|
|
87.1 |
% |
18
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Combined Portfolio (1) |
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
1/31/2009 |
|
4/30/2009 |
|
1/31/2010 |
|
4/30/2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total outstanding balance (period end) |
|
$ |
753,513 |
|
|
$ |
734,552 |
|
|
$ |
736,041 |
|
|
$ |
700,492 |
|
Average outstanding customer balance |
|
$ |
1,401 |
|
|
$ |
1,401 |
|
|
$ |
1,335 |
|
|
$ |
1,335 |
|
Number of active accounts (period end) |
|
|
537,957 |
|
|
|
524,398 |
|
|
|
551,312 |
|
|
|
524,795 |
|
Account balances over 60 days past due (period end) |
|
$ |
55,141 |
|
|
$ |
50,911 |
|
|
$ |
73,391 |
|
|
$ |
59,932 |
|
Percent of balances over 60 days past due to
total outstanding balance (period end) |
|
|
7.3 |
% |
|
|
6.9 |
% |
|
|
10.0 |
% |
|
|
8.6 |
% |
Total account balances reaged (period end) |
|
$ |
141,162 |
|
|
$ |
138,250 |
|
|
$ |
144,173 |
|
|
$ |
134,010 |
|
Percent of reaged balances to
total outstanding balance (period end) |
|
|
18.7 |
% |
|
|
18.8 |
% |
|
|
19.6 |
% |
|
|
19.1 |
% |
Account balances reaged more than six months (period end) |
|
$ |
56,312 |
|
|
$ |
54,901 |
|
|
$ |
57,368 |
|
|
$ |
55,230 |
|
Weighted average credit score of outstanding balances |
|
|
585 |
|
|
|
584 |
|
|
|
586 |
|
|
|
583 |
|
Total applications processed (2) |
|
|
371,973 |
|
|
|
300,002 |
|
|
|
296,037 |
|
|
|
244,634 |
|
Percent of retail sales financed |
|
|
58.3 |
% |
|
|
52.3 |
% |
|
|
60.7 |
% |
|
|
59.2 |
% |
Weighted average origination credit score of sales financed |
|
|
620 |
|
|
|
623 |
|
|
|
621 |
|
|
|
616 |
|
Total applications approved |
|
|
41.7 |
% |
|
|
36.4 |
% |
|
|
42.6 |
% |
|
|
41.5 |
% |
Average down payment |
|
|
7.4 |
% |
|
|
9.3 |
% |
|
|
6.2 |
% |
|
|
5.9 |
% |
Average total outstanding balance |
|
$ |
742,859 |
|
|
$ |
742,541 |
|
|
$ |
742,888 |
|
|
$ |
715,838 |
|
Weighted average monthly payment rate |
|
|
5.2 |
% |
|
|
5.8 |
% |
|
|
5.0 |
% |
|
|
6.0 |
% |
Bad debt charge-offs (net of recoveries) |
|
$ |
6,323 |
|
|
$ |
5,605 |
|
|
$ |
8,841 |
|
|
$ |
8,245 |
|
Percent of bad debt charge-offs (net of
recoveries) to average outstanding balance |
|
|
3.4 |
% |
|
|
3.0 |
% |
|
|
4.8 |
% |
|
|
4.6 |
% |
Estimated percent of reage balances collected (3) |
|
|
89.8 |
% |
|
|
91.0 |
% |
|
|
84.0 |
% |
|
|
84.7 |
% |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The Portfolios consist of owned and transferred receivables. |
|
(2) |
|
Unapproved and not declined credit applications in the primary portfolio are referred to the
secondary portfolio. |
|
(3) |
|
Is calculated as 1 minus the percent of actual bad debt charge-offs (net of recoveries) of
reage balances as a percent of average reage balances. The reage bad debt charge-offs are
included as a component of Percent of bad debt charge-offs (net of recoveries) to average
outstanding balance. |
We also derive revenues from repair services on the products we sell and from product
delivery and installation services we provide to our customers. Additionally, acting as an agent
for unaffiliated companies, we sell credit insurance and repair service agreements to protect our
customers from credit losses due to death, disability, involuntary unemployment and property damage
and product failure not covered by a manufacturers warranty. We also derive revenues from the
sale of extended repair service agreements, under which we are the primary obligor, to protect the
customers after the original manufacturers warranty or repair service agreement has expired.
Our business is moderately seasonal, with a greater share of our revenues, pretax and net
income realized during the quarter ending January 31, due primarily to the holiday selling season.
Executive Overview
This narrative is intended to provide an executive level overview of our operations for the
three months ended April 30, 2010. A detailed explanation of the changes in our operations for
this period as compared to the prior year period is included under Results of Operations. Some of
the more specific items impacting our operating and pretax income were:
|
|
For the three months ended April 30, 2010, compared to the same period last year, Total net
sales decreased 18.6% and Finance charges and other decreased 13.1%. Total revenues decreased
17.7% while same store sales decreased 19.7% for the quarter ended April 30, 2010. The sales
decline was primarily driven by: |
19
|
|
|
more challenging economic conditions in Texas compared to the same quarter in the
prior year, as evidenced by the unemployment rate rising from 6.8% in February 2009, to
8.3% in April 2010, and |
|
|
|
|
managements emphasis on improving retail gross margin, which increased from 25.0%
to 27.9% for the three months ended April 30, 2009, and 2010, respectively, while
maintaining price competitiveness. |
|
|
Finance charges and other decreased 13.1% for the three months ended April 30, 2010, when
compared to the same period last year, primarily due to a decrease in interest income and fees
as the average interest income and fee yield earned on the portfolio fell from 18.8% for the
three months April 30, 2009, to 17.0%, for the three months ended April 30, 2010, and the
average balance of customer accounts receivable outstanding fell 3.6%. The interest income and
fee yield fell as a result of the higher level of charge-offs experienced and the reduced
amount of new credit accounts originated in the three months ended April 30, 2010, as compared
to the same quarter in the prior fiscal year. |
|
|
|
Deferred interest and same as cash plans under our consumer credit programs continue to
be an important part of our sales promotion plans and are utilized to provide a wide variety
of financing to enable us to appeal to a broader customer base. For the three months ended
April 30, 2010, $25.6 million, or 17.0%, of our product sales were financed by our deferred
interest and same as cash plans. For the comparable period in the prior year, product sales
financed by our deferred interest and same as cash sales were $27.2 million, or 14.7%. Our
promotional credit programs (same as cash and deferred interest programs), which require
monthly payments, are reserved for our highest credit quality customers, thereby reducing the
overall risk in the portfolio, and are typically used to finance sales of our highest margin
products. We expect to continue to offer promotional credit in the future, including the use
of third-party consumer credit programs, which financed $0.7 million and $13.5 million, of our
product and repair service agreement sales during the three months ended April 30, 2009 and
2010, respectively. |
|
|
|
Our total gross margin (Total revenues less Cost of goods sold) increased from 38.1% to
41.0% for the three months ended April 30, 2010, when compared to the same period in the prior
year. The increase resulted primarily from: |
|
|
|
an increase in retail gross margins (includes gross profit from product sales and
repair service agreement commissions) from 25.0% for the three months ended April 30,
2009, to 27.9% for the three months ended April 30, 2010, respectively, which improved
the total gross margin by 230 basis points. The increase was driven largely by a 300
basis point increase in product gross margins to 24.1% for the three months ended April
30, 2010, as we focused on improving pricing discipline on the sales floor while
maintaining price competitiveness in the marketplace, and |
|
|
|
|
a change in the revenue mix in the quarter ended April 30, 2010, such that higher
gross margin finance charge and other revenues contributed a larger percentage of total
revenues, resulted in an increase in the total gross margin of approximately 60 basis
points. |
|
|
During the three months ended April 30, 2010, Selling, general and administrative (SG&A)
expense was reduced by $2.0 million, though it increased as a percent of revenues to 30.8%
from 26.2% in the prior year period, due to the deleveraging effect of the decline in total
revenues. The $2.0 million reduction in SG&A expense was driven primarily by lower
compensation and related expense and reduced advertising expense, partially offset by
increased amortization expense due to the amendments completed to our credit facilities,
higher charges related to the increased use of third-party finance providers and increased use
of contract delivery and installation services. The prior year period also included a $0.5
million charge to increase our litigation reserves. |
|
|
|
The Provision for bad debts increased to $6.3 million for the three months ended April 30,
2010, from $5.6 million for the same quarter in the prior year period. While our total net
charge-offs of customer and non-customer accounts receivable increased by $2.7 million
compared to the first quarter of the prior fiscal year. In the first quarter we experienced an
improvement in our credit portfolio performance (specifically, the trends in the delinquency
rate, payment rate, net charge-off rate and percent of the portfolio reaged) over the fourth
quarter of fiscal 2010. As such, our allowance for bad debts declined approximately $2.2
million during the three months ended April 30, 2010 from the fourth quarter of fiscal 2010,
after absorbing the higher net charge-offs incurred in the fiscal quarter ended April 30,
2010. |
20
|
|
Net interest expense decreased in the three months ended April 30, 2010, due primarily to
reduced outstanding debt balances. |
|
|
|
The provision for income taxes for the three months ended April 30, 2010, was impacted
primarily by the change in pre-tax income. |
Operational Changes and Resulting Outlook
While we are continuing to assess the availability of capital for new store locations and
growth of the credit portfolio, we do not currently have any new store openings planned.
During the fiscal year ended January 31, 2010, we adjusted our underwriting guidelines and
reduced the volume of credit accounts we originated in our Secondary Portfolio. As a result of the
changes in our underwriting guidelines, we saw improved credit portfolio performance during the
first quarter of fiscal 2011, evidenced by:
|
|
|
a 140 basis point reduction in the 60+ day delinquency percentage from 10.0% at
January 31, 2010, to 8.6% at April 30, 2010, as compared to a 40 basis point reduction
in the same percentage from 7.3% at January 31, 2009, to 6.9% at April 30, 2009, |
|
|
|
|
a 50 basis point, or $10 million, reduction in the percent and balance,
respectively, of the credit portfolio that has been reaged, to 19.1%, or $134.0
million, as of April 30, 2010, as compared to January 31, 2010, and |
|
|
|
|
the payment rate percentage, the amount collected on credit accounts during a
month as a percentage of the portfolio balance at the beginning of the month, increased
in February, March and April of the current year as compared to the same months in the
prior year. |
While we benefited from our operations being concentrated in the Texas, Louisiana and Oklahoma
region in the earlier months of 2009, recent weakness in the health of the national and state
economies have and will present significant challenges to our operations in the coming quarters.
Specifically, future sales volumes, gross profit margins and credit portfolio performance could be
negatively impacted, and thus impact our overall profitability. Additionally, declines in our
future operating performance could impact compliance with our credit facility covenants, which we
recently renegotiated to avoid potentially triggering the default provisions of the credit
facilities. As a result, while we will strive to maintain our market share, improve credit
portfolio performance and reduce expenses, we will also work to maintain our access to the
liquidity necessary to maintain our operations through these challenging times.
The consumer electronics industry depends on new products to drive same store sales increases.
Typically, these new products, such as high-definition and 3-D televisions, Blu-ray and DVD
players, digital cameras, MP3 players and GPS devices are introduced at relatively high price
points that are then gradually reduced as the product becomes mainstream. To sustain positive same
store sales growth, unit sales must increase at a rate greater than the decline in product prices.
The affordability of the product helps drive the unit sales growth. However, as a result of
relatively short product life cycles in the consumer electronics industry, which limit the amount
of time available for sales volume to increase, combined with rapid price erosion in the industry,
retailers are challenged to maintain overall gross margin levels and positive same store sales.
This has historically been our experience, and we continue to adjust our marketing strategies to
address this challenge through the introduction of new product categories and new products within
our existing categories.
21
Application of Critical Accounting Policies
In applying the accounting policies that we use to prepare our consolidated financial
statements, we necessarily make accounting estimates that affect our reported amounts of assets,
liabilities, revenues and expenses. Some of these accounting estimates require us to make
assumptions about matters that are highly uncertain at the time we make the accounting estimates.
We base these assumptions and the resulting estimates on authoritative pronouncements, historical
information and other factors that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances, and we
evaluate these assumptions and estimates on an ongoing basis. We could reasonably use different
accounting estimates, and changes in our accounting estimates could occur from period to period,
with the result in each case being a material change in the financial statement presentation of our
financial condition or results of operations. We refer to accounting estimates of this type as
critical accounting estimates. We believe that the critical accounting estimates discussed below
are among those most important to an understanding of our consolidated financial statements as of
April 30, 2010.
Customer Accounts Receivable. Customer accounts receivable reported in our
consolidated balance sheet include receivables transferred to our VIE and those receivables not
transferred to our VIE. We include the amount of principal and accrued interest on those
receivables that are expected to be collected within the next twelve months, based on contractual
terms, in current assets on our consolidated balance sheet. Those amounts expected to be collected
after 12 months, based on contractual terms, are included in long-term assets. Typically, a
receivable is considered delinquent if a payment has not been received on the scheduled due date.
Additionally, we offer reage programs to customers with past due balances that have experienced a
financial hardship, if they meet the conditions of our reage policy. Reaging a customers account
can result in updating it from a delinquent status to a current status. Generally, an account that
is delinquent more than 120 days and for which no payment has been received in the past seven
months will be charged-off against the allowance for doubtful accounts and interest accrued
subsequent to the last payment will be reversed. We have a secured interest in the merchandise
financed by these receivables and therefore have the opportunity to recover a portion of any
charged-off amount.
Interest Income on Customer Accounts Receivable. Interest income is accrued using the Rule of
78s method for installment contracts and the simple interest method for revolving charge accounts,
and is reflected in Finance charges and other. Typically, interest income is accrued until the
contract or account is paid off or charged-off and we provide an allowance for estimated
uncollectible interest. Interest income is recognized on our interest-free promotional accounts
based on our historical experience related to customers who fail to satisfy the requirements of the
interest-free programs. Additionally, for sales on deferred interest and same as cash programs
that exceed one year in duration, we discount the sales to their fair value, resulting in a
reduction in sales and receivables, and amortize the discount amount in to Finance charges and
other over the term of the program.
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts. We record an allowance for doubtful accounts, including
estimated uncollectible interest, for our Customer accounts receivable, based on our historical net
loss experience and expectations for future losses. The net charge-off data used in computing the
loss rate is reduced by the amount of post-charge-off recoveries received, including cash payments,
amounts realized from the repossession of the products financed and, at times, payments received
under credit insurance policies. Additionally, we separately evaluate the Primary and Secondary
portfolios when estimating the allowance for doubtful accounts. The balance in the allowance for
doubtful accounts and uncollectible interest for customer receivables was $35.8 million and $33.5
million at January 31, 2010, and April 30, 2010, respectively. Additionally, as a result of our
practice of reaging customer accounts, if the account is not ultimately collected, the timing and
amount of the charge-off is impacted. If these accounts had been charged-off sooner the net loss
rates might have been higher. Reaged customer receivable balances represented 19.1% of the total
portfolio balance at April 30, 2010. If the loss rate used to calculate the allowance for doubtful
accounts were increased by 10% at April 30, 2010, we would have increased our Provision for bad
debts by approximately $3.4 million.
Revenue Recognition. Revenues from the sale of retail products are recognized at the time the
customer takes possession of the product. Such revenues are recognized net of any adjustments for
sales incentive offers such as discounts, coupons, rebates, or other free products or services and
discounts of promotional credit sales that will extend beyond one year. We sell repair service
agreements and credit insurance
22
contracts on behalf of unrelated third parties. For contracts where the third parties are the
obligors on the contract, commissions are recognized in revenues at the time of sale, and in the
case of retrospective commissions, at the time that they are earned. Where we sell repair service
renewal agreements in which we are deemed to be the obligor on the contract at the time of sale,
revenue is recognized ratably, on a straight-line basis, over the term of the repair service
agreement. These repair service agreements are renewal contracts that provide our customers
protection against product repair costs arising after the expiration of the manufacturers warranty
and the third party obligor contracts. These agreements typically have terms ranging from 12 to 36
months. These agreements are separate units of accounting and are valued based on the agreed upon
retail selling price. The amount of repair service agreement revenue deferred at January 31, 2010,
and April 30, 2010, was $7.3 million and $7.3 million, respectively, and is included in Deferred
revenues and allowances in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.
Vendor Allowances. We receive funds from vendors for price protection, product rebates
(earned upon purchase or sale of product), marketing, training and promotion programs which are
recorded on the accrual basis as a reduction to the related product cost, cost of goods sold,
compensation expense or advertising expense, according to the nature of the program. We accrue
rebates based on the satisfaction of terms of the program and sales of qualifying products even
though funds may not be received until the end of a quarter or year. If the programs are related to
product purchases, the allowances, credits or payments are recorded as a reduction of product cost;
if the programs are related to product sales, the allowances, credits or payments are recorded as a
reduction of cost of goods sold; if the programs are directly related to promotion, marketing or
compensation expense paid related to the product, the allowances, credits, or payments are recorded
as a reduction of the applicable expense in the period in which the expense is incurred.
Accounting for Leases. We analyze each lease, at its inception and any subsequent renewal, to
determine whether it should be accounted for as an operating lease or a capital lease.
Additionally, monthly lease expense for each operating lease is calculated as the average of all
payments required under the minimum lease term, including rent escalations. Generally, the minimum
lease term begins with the date we take possession of the property and ends on the last day of the
minimum lease term, and includes all rent holidays, but excludes renewal terms that are at our
option. Any tenant improvement allowances received are deferred and amortized into income as a
reduction of lease expense on a straight line basis over the minimum lease term. The amortization
of leasehold improvements is computed on a straight line basis over the shorter of the remaining
lease term or the estimated useful life of the improvements. For transactions that qualify for
treatment as a sale-leaseback, any gain or loss is deferred and amortized as rent expense on a
straight-line basis over the minimum lease term. Any deferred gain would be included in Deferred
gain on sale of property and any deferred loss would be included in Other assets on the
consolidated balance sheets.
23
Results of Operations
The following table sets forth certain statement of operations information as a percentage of
total revenues for the periods indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
April 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product sales |
|
|
76.1 |
% |
|
|
77.0 |
% |
Repair service agreement commissions (net) |
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
|
4.1 |
|
Service revenues |
|
|
2.4 |
|
|
|
2.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net sales |
|
|
82.5 |
|
|
|
83.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Finance charges and other |
|
|
17.5 |
|
|
|
16.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
Costs and expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of goods sold, including warehousing and occupancy cost |
|
|
57.8 |
|
|
|
60.8 |
|
Cost of parts sold, including warehousing and occupancy cost |
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
1.1 |
|
Selling, general and administrative expense |
|
|
30.8 |
|
|
|
26.2 |
|
Provision for bad debts |
|
|
3.2 |
|
|
|
2.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total costs and expenses |
|
|
93.0 |
|
|
|
90.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
7.0 |
|
|
|
9.5 |
|
Interest expense, net |
|
|
2.4 |
|
|
|
2.1 |
|
Other (income) / expense, net |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
4.5 |
|
|
|
7.4 |
|
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
1.8 |
|
|
|
2.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
2.7 |
% |
|
|
4.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Same store sales growth is calculated by comparing the reported sales for all stores that were
open during the entirety of a period and the entirety of the same period in the prior fiscal year.
Sales from closed stores, if any, are removed from each period. Sales from relocated stores have
been included in each period because each store was relocated within the same general geographic
market.
The presentation of gross margins may not be comparable to some other retailers since we
include the cost of our in-home delivery and installation service as part of Selling, general and
administrative expense. Similarly, we include the cost related to operating our purchasing
function in Selling, general and administrative expense. It is our understanding that other
retailers may include such costs as part of their cost of goods sold.
24
Analysis of consolidated statements of operations
Total
consolidated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
2010 vs. 2009 |
|
|
|
April 30, |
|
|
Incr/(Decr) |
|
(in thousands except percentages) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Pct |
|
Revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product sales |
|
$ |
150,365 |
|
|
$ |
184,817 |
|
|
|
($34,452 |
) |
|
|
(18.6 |
)% |
Repair service agreement
commissions (net) |
|
|
7,917 |
|
|
|
9,790 |
|
|
|
(1,873 |
) |
|
|
(19.1 |
) |
Service revenues |
|
|
4,757 |
|
|
|
5,544 |
|
|
|
(787 |
) |
|
|
(14.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net sales |
|
|
163,039 |
|
|
|
200,151 |
|
|
|
(37,112 |
) |
|
|
(18.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Finance charges and other |
|
|
34,480 |
|
|
|
39,700 |
|
|
|
(5,220 |
) |
|
|
(13.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
|
197,519 |
|
|
|
239,851 |
|
|
|
(42,332 |
) |
|
|
(17.6 |
) |
Cost and expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of goods and parts sold |
|
|
116,529 |
|
|
|
148,457 |
|
|
|
(31,928 |
) |
|
|
(21.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross Profit |
|
|
80,990 |
|
|
|
91,394 |
|
|
|
(10,404 |
) |
|
|
(11.4 |
) |
Gross Margin |
|
|
41.0 |
% |
|
|
38.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expense |
|
|
56,625 |
|
|
|
59,337 |
|
|
|
(2,712 |
) |
|
|
(4.6 |
) |
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
4,118 |
|
|
|
3,401 |
|
|
|
717 |
|
|
|
21.1 |
|
Provision for bad debts |
|
|
6,274 |
|
|
|
5,644 |
|
|
|
630 |
|
|
|
11.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total costs and expenses |
|
|
183,546 |
|
|
|
216,839 |
|
|
|
(33,293 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
13,973 |
|
|
|
23,012 |
|
|
|
(9,039 |
) |
|
|
(39.3 |
) |
Operating Margin |
|
|
7.1 |
% |
|
|
9.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense |
|
|
4,785 |
|
|
|
5,004 |
|
|
|
(219 |
) |
|
|
(4.4 |
) |
Other (income) expense |
|
|
171 |
|
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
179 |
|
|
|
(2237.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pretax Income |
|
|
9,017 |
|
|
|
18,016 |
|
|
|
(8,999 |
) |
|
|
(50.0 |
) |
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
3,470 |
|
|
|
6,660 |
|
|
|
(3,190 |
) |
|
|
(47.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income |
|
$ |
5,547 |
|
|
$ |
11,356 |
|
|
|
($5,809 |
) |
|
|
(51.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retail
segment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
2010 vs. 2009 |
|
|
|
April 30, |
|
|
Incr/(Decr) |
|
(in thousands except percentages) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Pct |
|
Revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product sales |
|
$ |
150,365 |
|
|
$ |
184,817 |
|
|
|
($34,452 |
) |
|
|
(18.6 |
)% |
Repair service agreement
commissions (net) (a) |
|
|
10,925 |
|
|
|
12,087 |
|
|
|
(1,162 |
) |
|
|
(9.6 |
) |
Service revenues |
|
|
4,757 |
|
|
|
5,544 |
|
|
|
(787 |
) |
|
|
(14.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net sales |
|
|
166,047 |
|
|
|
202,448 |
|
|
|
(36,401 |
) |
|
|
(18.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Finance charges and other |
|
|
250 |
|
|
|
114 |
|
|
|
136 |
|
|
|
119.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
|
166,297 |
|
|
|
202,562 |
|
|
|
(36,265 |
) |
|
|
(17.9 |
) |
Cost and expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of goods and parts sold |
|
|
116,529 |
|
|
|
148,457 |
|
|
|
(31,928 |
) |
|
|
(21.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross Profit |
|
|
49,768 |
|
|
|
54,105 |
|
|
|
(4,337 |
) |
|
|
(8.0 |
) |
Gross Margin |
|
|
29.9 |
% |
|
|
26.7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expense (b) |
|
|
40,150 |
|
|
|
43,830 |
|
|
|
(3,680 |
) |
|
|
(8.4 |
) |
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
3,023 |
|
|
|
2,982 |
|
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
1.4 |
|
Provision for bad debts |
|
|
86 |
|
|
|
59 |
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
45.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total costs and expenses |
|
|
159,788 |
|
|
|
195,328 |
|
|
|
(35,540 |
) |
|
|
(18.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
6,509 |
|
|
|
7,234 |
|
|
|
(725 |
) |
|
|
(10.0 |
) |
Operating Margin |
|
|
3.9 |
% |
|
|
3.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other (income) expense |
|
|
171 |
|
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
179 |
|
|
|
(2237.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment Income before Income Taxes |
|
$ |
6,338 |
|
|
$ |
7,242 |
|
|
$ |
(904 |
) |
|
|
(12.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25
Credit
segment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
2010 vs. 2009 |
|
|
|
April 30, |
|
|
Incr/(Decr) |
|
(in thousands except percentages) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Pct |
|
Revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product sales |
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
Repair service agreement
commissions (net) (a) |
|
|
(3,008 |
) |
|
|
(2,297 |
) |
|
|
(711 |
) |
|
|
31.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net sales |
|
|
(3,008 |
) |
|
|
(2,297 |
) |
|
|
(711 |
) |
|
|
31.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Finance charges and other |
|
|
34,230 |
|
|
|
39,586 |
|
|
|
(5,356 |
) |
|
|
(13.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
|
31,222 |
|
|
|
37,289 |
|
|
|
(6,067 |
) |
|
|
(16.3 |
) |
Cost and expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expense (b) |
|
|
16,475 |
|
|
|
15,507 |
|
|
|
968 |
|
|
|
6.2 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
1,095 |
|
|
|
419 |
|
|
|
676 |
|
|
|
161.3 |
|
Provision for bad debts |
|
|
6,188 |
|
|
|
5,585 |
|
|
|
603 |
|
|
|
10.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total costs and expenses |
|
|
23,758 |
|
|
|
21,511 |
|
|
|
2,247 |
|
|
|
10.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
7,464 |
|
|
|
15,778 |
|
|
|
(8,314 |
) |
|
|
(52.7 |
) |
Operating Margin |
|
|
23.9 |
% |
|
|
42.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense |
|
|
4,785 |
|
|
|
5,004 |
|
|
|
(219 |
) |
|
|
(4.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment Income before Income Taxes |
|
$ |
2,679 |
|
|
$ |
10,774 |
|
|
$ |
(8,095 |
) |
|
|
(75.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Retail repair service agreement commissions exclude repair service agreement
cancellations that are the result of consumer credit account charge-offs. These amounts
are reflected in repair service agreement commissions for the credit segment. |
|
(b) |
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses include the direct expenses of the
retail and credit operations, allocated overhead expenses and a charge to the credit
segment to reimburse the retail segment for expenses it incurs related to occupancy,
personnel, advertising and other direct costs of the retail segment which benefit the
credit operations by sourcing credit customers and collecting payments. The
reimbursement received by the retail segment from the credit segment is estimated using
an annual rate of 2.5% times the average portfolio balance for each applicable period.
The amount of overhead allocated to each segment was approximately $2.0 million for
each of the three months ended April 30, 2010 and 2009. The amount of reimbursement
made to the retail segment by the credit segment was approximately $4.5 million and
$4.6 million for the three months ended April 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively. |
Three Months Ended April 30, 2010 Compared to Three Months Ended April 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
(Dollars in Millions) |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
% |
|
|
|
Net sales |
|
|
$ |
163.0 |
|
|
|
$ |
200.2 |
|
|
|
|
(37.2 |
) |
|
|
|
(18.6 |
) |
|
|
Finance charges and other |
|
|
|
34.5 |
|
|
|
|
39.7 |
|
|
|
|
(5.2 |
) |
|
|
|
(13.1 |
) |
|
|
Revenues |
|
|
$ |
197.5 |
|
|
|
$ |
239.9 |
|
|
|
|
(42.4 |
) |
|
|
|
(17.7 |
) |
|
|
The $37.2 million decrease in net sales consists of the following:
|
|
|
a $38.2 million same store sales decrease of 19.7%; |
|
|
|
|
a $1.4 million net increase generated by four retail locations that were not open for
the three months in each period. Two new locations were opened subsequent to February 1,
2009 and two of our clearance centers were closed subsequent to February 1, 2009; |
|
|
|
|
a $0.4 million increase resulted from a decrease in discounts on extended-term
non-interest bearing credit sales (those with terms longer than 12 months); and |
|
|
|
|
a $0.8 million decrease in service revenues. |
26
The components of the $37.2 million decrease in net sales were a $34.5 million decrease in
Product sales and a $2.7 million decrease in repair service agreement commissions and service
revenues. The $34.5 million decrease in product sales resulted from the following:
|
|
|
approximately $6.6 million decrease attributable to decreases in total unit sales, due
primarily to decreased unit sales in consumer electronics and appliances, partially offset
by increases in track and furniture and mattresses, and |
|
|
|
|
approximately $27.9 million decrease attributable to an overall decrease in the average
unit price. The decrease was due primarily to a decrease in price points in the electronics
and track categories, partially offset by an increase in appliances. |
The $2.7 million decrease in repair service agreement commissions and service revenues
consisted of:
|
|
|
a $1.2 million decrease in the retail segments repair service agreement commissions due
primarily to the decline in product sales; |
|
|
|
|
a $0.7 million decrease in the credit segments repair service agreement commissions due
to the higher level of credit charge-offs experienced; and |
|
|
|
|
a $0.8 million decrease in the retail segments service revenues due primarily to lower
service labor revenues. |
27
The following table presents net sales by product category in each period, including
repair service agreement commissions and service revenues, expressed both in dollar amounts (in
thousands) and as a percent of total net sales. Classification of sales has been adjusted from
previous presentations to ensure comparability between the categories.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended April 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
Percent |
|
Category |
|
Amount |
|
|
Percent |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Percent |
|
|
Change |
|
Consumer electronics |
|
$ |
53,617 |
|
|
|
32.9 |
% |
|
$ |
78,501 |
|
|
|
39.2 |
% |
|
|
(31.7 |
)%(1) |
Home appliances |
|
|
47,930 |
|
|
|
29.4 |
|
|
|
57,084 |
|
|
|
28.5 |
|
|
|
(16.0 |
)(2) |
Track |
|
|
21,278 |
|
|
|
13.0 |
|
|
|
21,524 |
|
|
|
10.8 |
|
|
|
(1.1 |
)(3) |
Furniture and mattresses |
|
|
18,886 |
|
|
|
11.6 |
|
|
|
19,052 |
|
|
|
9.5 |
|
|
|
(0.9 |
)(4) |
Other |
|
|
8,654 |
|
|
|
5.3 |
|
|
|
8,656 |
|
|
|
4.3 |
|
|
|
(0.0 |
)(5) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total product sales |
|
|
150,365 |
|
|
|
92.2 |
|
|
|
184,817 |
|
|
|
92.3 |
|
|
|
(18.6 |
) |
Repair service agreement
commissions |
|
|
7,917 |
|
|
|
4.9 |
|
|
|
9,790 |
|
|
|
4.9 |
|
|
|
(19.1 |
)(6) |
Service revenues |
|
|
4,757 |
|
|
|
2.9 |
|
|
|
5,544 |
|
|
|
2.8 |
|
|
|
(14.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net sales |
|
$ |
163,039 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
200,151 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
(18.6 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The consumer electronics category declined as the result of a 23.3% drop in unit sales
of flat-panel televisions, compared to a 34.5% increase in the first quarter of the prior
fiscal year, and an approximately 12.2% decline in average selling prices, related
primarily to LCD televisions. |
|
(2) |
|
The home appliance category sales declined during the quarter on lower unit sales in
all appliance categories, though average selling prices increased. |
|
(3) |
|
The track sales (consisting largely of computers, computer peripherals, video game
equipment, portable electronics and small appliances) declined slightly as increased sales
of laptops and the introduction of netbooks, and higher digital camera and accessory sales
were offset primarily by declines in sales of camcorders, GPS devices and video game
hardware. |
|
(4) |
|
The small decline in furniture and mattresses sales, compared to the 7.6% increase in
the same quarter of the prior fiscal year, was driven by the slower economic conditions in
our markets. |
|
(5) |
|
The decrease in delivery revenues included in Other product sales was largely offset by
growth in lawn and garden sales. |
|
(6) |
|
The repair service agreement commissions decrease was driven largely by the decline in
product sales. Additionally, increased cancellations of these agreements as a result of
higher credit charge-offs reduced the repair service agreement commissions. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change |
|
|
(Dollars in Thousands) |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
% |
|
|
Interest income and fees |
|
|
$ |
30,393 |
|
|
|
$ |
34,956 |
|
|
|
|
(4,563 |
) |
|
|
|
(13.1 |
) |
|
|
Insurance commissions |
|
|
|
3,837 |
|
|
|
|
4,630 |
|
|
|
|
(793 |
) |
|
|
|
(17.1 |
) |
|
|
Other income |
|
|
|
250 |
|
|
|
|
114 |
|
|
|
|
136 |
|
|
|
|
119.3 |
|
|
|
Finance charges and other |
|
|
$ |
34,480 |
|
|
|
$ |
39,700 |
|
|
|
|
(5,220 |
) |
|
|
|
(13.1 |
) |
|
|
Interest income and fees and insurance commissions are included in the Finance charges and
other for the credit segment, while Other income is included in Finance charges and other for the
retail segment.
The decrease in Interest income and fees of the credit segment resulted primarily as the
average interest income and fee yield earned on the portfolio fell from 18.8% for the three months
April 30, 2009, to 17.0%, for the three months ended April 30, 2010, and the average balance of
customer accounts receivable outstanding fell 3.6%. The interest income and fee yield dropped as a
result of the higher level of charge-offs experienced and the reduced volume of new credit accounts
originated in the three months ended April 30, 2010, as compared to the same quarter in the prior
fiscal year. Insurance commissions of the credit segment declined due primarily to lower
retrospective commissions and lower interest earnings on funds held by the insurance company for
the payment of claims.
28
The following table provides key portfolio performance information for the three months ended
April 30, 2010 and 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Interest income and fees (a) |
|
$ |
30,393 |
|
|
$ |
34,956 |
|
Net charge-offs (b) |
|
|
(8,245 |
) |
|
|
(5,605 |
) |
Borrowing costs (c) |
|
|
(4,796 |
) |
|
|
(5,022 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net portfolio yield |
|
$ |
17,352 |
|
|
$ |
24,329 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average portfolio balance |
|
$ |
715,838 |
|
|
$ |
742,541 |
|
Interest income and fee yield % (annualized) |
|
|
17.0 |
% |
|
|
18.8 |
% |
Net charge-off % (annualized) |
|
|
4.6 |
% |
|
|
3.0 |
% |
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Included in Finance charges and other. |
|
(b) |
|
Included in Provision for bad debts. |
|
(c) |
|
Included in Interest expense. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change |
|
|
(Dollars in Millions) |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
% |
|
|
Cost of goods sold |
|
|
$ |
114.2 |
|
|
|
$ |
145.9 |
|
|
|
|
(31.7 |
) |
|
|
|
(21.7 |
) |
|
|
Product gross margin percentage |
|
|
|
24.1 |
% |
|
|
|
21.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.0 |
% |
|
|
Product gross margin increased as a percent of product sales from the 2009 period to the 2010
period driven by our focus on improving pricing discipline on the sales floor while maintaining
competitive pricing in the marketplace.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change |
|
|
(Dollars in Millions) |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
% |
|
|
Cost of service parts sold |
|
|
$ |
2.4 |
|
|
|
$ |
2.6 |
|
|
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
|
(8.3 |
) |
|
|
As a percent of service revenues |
|
|
|
49.9 |
% |
|
|
|
46.7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.2 |
% |
|
|
This decrease was due primarily to a 13.4% decrease in parts sales.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change |
|
|
(Dollars in Millions) |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
% |
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expense Retail |
|
|
$ |
43.2 |
|
|
|
$ |
46.8 |
|
|
|
|
(3.6 |
) |
|
|
|
(7.7 |
) |
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expense Credit |
|
|
$ |
17.5 |
|
|
|
$ |
15.9 |
|
|
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
|
|
10.1 |
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expense Total |
|
|
$ |
60.7 |
|
|
|
$ |
62.7 |
|
|
|
|
(2.0 |
) |
|
|
|
(3.2 |
) |
|
|
As a percent of total revenues |
|
|
|
30.8 |
% |
|
|
|
26.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.6 |
% |
|
|
During the three months ended April 30, 2010, Selling, general and administrative (SG&A)
expense was reduced by $2.0 million, though it increased as a percent of revenues to 30.8%, from
26.2% in the prior year period, due to the deleveraging effect of the decline in total revenues.
The $2.0 million reduction in SG&A expense was driven primarily by lower compensation and related
expense and reduced advertising expense, partially offset by increased amortization expense due to
the amendments completed to our credit facilities, higher charges related to the increased use of
third-party finance providers and increased use of contract delivery and installation services. The
prior year period also included a $0.5 million charge to increase our litigation reserves.
Significant SG&A expense increases and decreases related to specific business segments
included the following:
Retail Segment
The following are the significant factors affecting the retail segment:
29
|
|
|
Net advertising expense decreased by approximately $1.5 million from the 2009 period
through improved efficiencies in our advertising program. |
|
|
|
|
Bank and credit card fees increased by approximately $1.0 million from the 2009 period,
primarily due to the use of the third-party finance providers for certain of our
interest-free programs. |
|
|
|
|
Total compensation costs and related expenses decreased approximately $4.2 million from
the 2009 period, primarily due to reduced commissions payable as a result of reduced sales. |
|
|
|
|
Contract delivery and installation costs increased approximately $0.8 million from the
2009 period as we increased our use of third-parties to provide these services. |
Credit Segment
The following are the significant factors affecting the credit segment:
|
|
|
Amortization expense increased approximately $0.6 million from the 2009 period due to
the amendment of our credit facilities. |
|
|
|
|
Total compensation costs and related expenses increased approximately $1.0 million from
the 2009 period as staffing was increased to address increased levels of delinquencies in
the challenging economic environment. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change |
|
|
(Dollars in Millions) |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
% |
|
|
Provision for bad debts |
|
|
$ |
6.3 |
|
|
|
$ |
5.6 |
|
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
|
12.9 |
|
|
|
As a percent of total revenues |
|
|
|
3.2 |
% |
|
|
|
2.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.8 |
% |
|
|
The provision for bad debts is primarily related to the operations of our credit segment, with
approximately $86,000 and $59,000 for the periods ended April 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively,
included in the results of operations for the retail segment.
The Provision for bad debts increased to $6.3 million for the three months ended April 30,
2010, from $5.6 million for the same quarter in the prior year period. While our total net
charge-offs of customer and non-customer accounts receivable increased by $2.7 million compared to
the first quarter of the prior fiscal year, we experienced an improvement in our credit portfolio
performance (specifically, the trends in the delinquency rate, payment rate, net charge-off rate
and percent of the portfolio reaged) since the fourth quarter of fiscal 2010. As such, our
allowance for bad debts declined approximately $2.2 million during the three months ended April 30,
2010, after absorbing the higher net charge-offs incurred in the current year quarter.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change |
|
|
(Dollars in Thousands) |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
% |
|
|
Interest expense, net |
|
|
$ |
4,785 |
|
|
|
$ |
5,004 |
|
|
|
|
(219 |
) |
|
|
|
(4.4 |
) |
|
|
The decrease in interest expense was driven by a decrease in outstanding debt balances during
the three months ended April 30, 2010, as compared to the same period in the prior fiscal year. The
entirety of our interest expense is included in the results of operations of our credit segment.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change |
|
|
(Dollars in Millions) |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
% |
|
|
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
$ |
3.5 |
|
|
|
$ |
6.7 |
|
|
|
|
(3.2 |
) |
|
|
|
(47.9 |
) |
|
|
As a percent of income before income taxes |
|
|
|
38.5 |
% |
|
|
|
37.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.5 |
% |
|
|
The provision for income taxes decreased primarily as a result of the decrease in income
before income taxes.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Current Activities
We require capital to finance our growth as we add new stores and markets to our operations,
which in turn requires additional working capital for increased customer receivables and inventory.
We have
30
historically financed our operations through a combination of cash flow generated from
earnings and external borrowings, including primarily bank debt, extended terms provided by our
vendors for inventory purchases, acquisition of inventory under consignment arrangements and
transfers of customer receivables to our asset-backed securitization facilities.
Since we extend credit in connection with a large portion of our retail, repair service
agreement and credit insurance sales, we have entered into an asset-based revolving credit facility
and created a securitization program to fund the customer receivables generated by the extension of
credit. In order to fund the purchases of eligible customer receivables from us, we have issued
medium-term and variable funding notes secured by the receivables to third parties to obtain cash
for these purchases under the securitization program.
Our $210 million asset-based revolving credit facility provides funding based on a borrowing
base calculation that includes accounts customer receivable and inventory and matures in August
2011. The credit facility bears interest at LIBOR plus a spread ranging from 325 basis points to
375 basis points, based on a fixed charge coverage ratio. In addition to the fixed charge coverage
ratio, the revolving credit facility includes a total liabilities to tangible net worth ratio
requirement, a minimum customer receivables cash recovery percentage requirement, a net capital
expenditures limit and combined portfolio performance covenants. Additionally, the agreement
contains cross-default provisions, such that, any default under another of our credit facilities or
our VIEs credit facilities would result in a default under this agreement, and any default under
this agreement would result in a default under those agreements. We expect, based on current facts
and circumstances, that we will be in compliance with the above covenants for the next 12 months.
A summary of the significant financial covenants that govern our revolving credit facility
compared to our actual compliance status at April 30, 2010, is presented below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Required |
|
|
|
|
Minimum/ |
|
|
Actual |
|
Maximum |
Fixed charge coverage ratio must exceed required minimum (1) |
|
1.38 to 1.00 |
|
1.10 to 1.00 |
Total liabilities to tangible net worth ratio must be lower than required maximum (1) |
|
1.54 to 1.00 |
|
2.00 to 1.00 |
Cash recovery percentage must exceed required minimum (1) |
|
5.99% |
|
4.75% |
Capital expenditures, net must be lower than required maximum |
|
$6.8 million |
|
$22.0 million |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
These covenants are also covenants of our asset-backed securitization credit
facilities. |
Note: All terms in the above table are defined by the revolving credit facility and may or
may not agree directly to the financial statement captions in this document. The covenants are
calculated on a trailing four quarter basis, except for the Cash recovery percentage, which is
calculated on a trailing three month basis.
The 2002 Series A program functions as a revolving credit facility to fund the transfer
of eligible customer receivables. When the facility approaches a predetermined amount, the VIE
(Issuer) is required to seek financing to pay down the outstanding balance in the 2002 Series A
variable funding note. The amount paid down on the facility then becomes available to fund the
transfer of new customer receivables or to meet required principal payments on other series as they
become due. The new financing could be in the form of additional notes, bonds or other instruments
as the market and transaction documents might allow. Given the current state of the financial
markets, especially with respect to asset-backed securitization financing, the Company has been
unable to issue medium-term notes or increase the availability under the existing variable funding
note program. The 2002 Series A program consists of $170 million that is renewable annually, at our
option, until August 2011 and bears interest at commercial paper rates plus a spread of 250 basis
points. The total commitment under the 2002 Series A program was reduced during the quarter from
$200 million at January 31, 2010. Additionally, in connection with recent amendments to the 2002
Series A facility, we agreed to reduce the total available commitment to $130 million in April
2011. The weighted average interest on the variable funding note during the month of April 2010 was
2.8%. The 2006 Series A program, which was consummated in August 2006, is non-amortizing for the
first four years and officially matures in April 2017. However, it is expected that the scheduled
$7.5 million principal payments, which begin in September 2010, will retire the bonds prior to that
date. Private institutional investors, primarily insurance companies, purchased the 2006 Series A
bonds at a weighted fixed rate of 5.75%. The securitization borrowing agreements contain certain
covenants requiring the maintenance of various financial ratios and customer receivables
performance standards. If the three-month average net portfolio yield, as
31
defined by agreements,
falls below 5.0%, then the issuer may be required to fund additions to the cash reserves in the
restricted cash accounts. The three-month average net portfolio yield was 5.6% at April 30, 2010.
The investors and the securitization trustee have no recourse to our other assets for failure of
our or the VIEs individual customers to pay when due. If the issuer is unable to repay the 2002
Series A note and 2006 Series A bonds due to its inability to collect the transferred customer
accounts, the issuer could not pay the subordinated notes it has issued to us in partial payment
for transferred customer accounts, and the 2006 Series A bond holders could claim the balance in
its $6.0 million restricted cash account. We are responsible under a $20.0 million letter of
credit that secures the performance of our obligations or services under the servicing agreement as
it relates to the transferred assets that are part of the asset-backed securitization facility.
The various same as cash and deferred interest credit programs we offer are eligible for
securitization up to the limits provided for in our securitization agreements. This limit is
currently 30.0% of eligible securitized receivables. If we exceed this 30.0% limit, we would be
required to use some of our other capital resources to carry the unfunded balances of the
receivables for the promotional period. The percentage of eligible securitized receivables
represented by promotional customer receivables was 12.3% as of April 30, 2010. There is no
limitation on the amount of same as cash or deferred interest program accounts that can be
carried as collateral under the revolving credit facility. The percentage of all managed customer
receivables represented by promotional receivables was 13.9% as of April 30, 2010.
The issuer is subject to certain affirmative and negative covenants contained in the
transaction documents governing the 2002 Series A variable funding note and 2006 Series A bonds,
including covenants that restrict, subject to specified exceptions: the incurrence of non-permitted
indebtedness and other obligations and the granting of additional liens; mergers, acquisitions,
investments and disposition of assets; and the use of proceeds of the program. The issuer also
makes representations and warranties relating to compliance with certain laws, payment of taxes,
maintenance of its separate legal entity, preservation of its existence, and protection of
collateral and financial reporting.
A summary of the significant financial covenants that govern the 2002 Series A variable
funding note compared to actual compliance status at April 30, 2010, is presented below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Required |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minimum/ |
|
|
As reported |
|
Maximum |
Issuer interest must exceed required minimum |
|
$92.1 million |
|
$74.0 million |
Gross loss rate must be lower than required maximum (a) |
|
|
5.6 |
% |
|
|
10.0 |
% |
Serviced portfolio gross loss rate must be lower than required maximum (b) |
|
|
5.2 |
% |
|
|
10.0 |
% |
Net portfolio yield must exceed required minimum (a) |
|
|
5.6 |
% |
|
|
2.0 |
% |
Serviced portfolio net portfolio yield must exceed required minimum (b) |
|
|
7.3 |
% |
|
|
2.0 |
% |
Payment rate must exceed required minimum (a) |
|
|
6.5 |
% |
|
|
3.0 |
% |
Serviced portfolio payment rate must exceed required minimum (a) |
|
|
5.99 |
% |
|
|
4.75 |
% |
Consolidated net worth must exceed required minimum |
|
$345.4 million |
|
$253.1 million |
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Calculated for those customer receivables transferred to the securitization program. |
|
(b) |
|
Calculated for the total of customer receivables transferred to the securitization
program and those retained by the Company. |
Note: All terms in the above table are defined by the asset backed securitization program and may
or may not agree directly to the financial statement captions in this document.
32
We expect, based on current facts and circumstances, that we will be in compliance with
the above covenants for the next 12 months. Events of default under the 2002 Series A variable
funding note and the 2006 Series A bonds, subject to grace periods and notice provisions in some
circumstances, include, among others: failure of the issuer to pay principal, interest or fees;
violation by the issuer of any of its covenants or agreements; inaccuracy of any representation or
warranty made by the issuer; certain servicer defaults; failure of the trustee to have a valid and
perfected first priority security interest in the collateral; default under or acceleration of
certain other indebtedness; bankruptcy and insolvency events; failure to maintain certain loss
ratios and portfolio yield; change of control provisions and certain other events pertaining to us.
The issuers obligations under the program are secured by the customer receivables and proceeds.
Securitization Facilities
We finance a portion of our eligible customer receivables through asset-backed
securitization facilities
We continue to service the transferred accounts for the VIE, and we receive a monthly
servicing fee, so long as we act as servicer, in an amount equal to .25% multiplied by the average
aggregate principal amount of customer receivables serviced, including the amount of average
aggregate defaulted customer receivables. The issuer records revenues equal to the interest
charged to the customer on the receivables less losses, the cost of funds, the program
administration fees paid in connection with either the 2002 Series A or 2006 Series A bond holders,
the servicing fee and additional earnings to the extent they are available.
In March 2010, we completed amendments to the various borrowing agreements that revised the
covenant requirements as of January 31, 2010, and revised certain future covenant requirements. The
revised covenant calculations include both the operating results and assets and liabilities of us
and the securitization program, effective January 31, 2010, for all financial covenant
calculations. In addition to the covenant changes, we also agreed:
|
|
|
as servicer of the receivables, to implement certain additional collection
procedures if certain performance requirements were not maintained, |
|
|
|
|
to make fee payments to the 2002 Series A facility providers on the amount of the
commitment available at specific future dates, and |
|
|
|
|
to use the proceeds from any capital raising activity we complete to further
reduce the commitments and debt outstanding under the securitization programs debt
facilities. |
As of April 30, 2010, we had additional borrowing capacity of $55.4 million under our
asset-based revolving credit facility, net of standby letters of credit issued, and $10.0 million
under our unsecured bank line of credit immediately available to us for general corporate purposes
and extended vendor terms for
33
purchases of inventory. In addition to the $55.4 million currently
available under the revolving credit facility, an additional $33.5 million may become available as
we grow the balance of eligible customer receivables retained by us and total eligible inventory
balances. While the credit portfolio performance has improved recently, availability under the
asset-based revolving credit facility was reduced by approximately $1.8 million at April 30, 2010,
due to recent level of delinquencies and net charge-offs. This amount may become available in the
future if credit portfolio performance continues to improve. The principal payments received on
customer receivables held by us and by the VIE, which averaged approximately $41.8 million per
month during the three months ended April 30, 2010, are available each month to fund new customer
receivables generated. The weighted average interest rate on borrowings outstanding under the
asset-based revolving credit facility at April 30, 2010, was 4.9%, including the interest expense
associated with our interest rate swaps.
We will continue to finance our operations and future growth through a combination of cash
flow generated from operations and external borrowings, including primarily bank debt, extended
vendor terms for purchases of inventory, acquisition of inventory under consignment arrangements
and the asset-backed securitization facilities. Based on our current operating plans, we believe
that cash generated from operations, available borrowings under our revolving credit facility and
unsecured credit line, extended vendor terms for purchases of inventory, acquisition of inventory
under consignment arrangements and cash flows from the asset-backed securitization program will be
sufficient to fund our operations, store expansion and updating activities and capital programs for
at least 12 months, subject to continued compliance with the covenants in our credit facilities. If
there is a default under any of the facilities that is not waived by the various lenders, it could
result in the requirement to immediately begin repayment of all amounts owed under our credit
facilities, as all of the facilities have cross-default provisions that would result in default
under all of the facilities if there is a default under any one of the facilities. If the repayment
of amounts owed under our credit facilities is accelerated, we may not have sufficient cash and
liquid assets at such time to be able to immediately repay all the amounts owed under the
facilities.
Both the revolving credit facility and the asset-backed securitization program are significant
factors relative to our ongoing liquidity and our ability to meet the cash needs associated with
the growth of our business. Our inability to use either of these programs because of a failure to
comply with their covenants would adversely affect our business operations. Funding of current and
future customer receivables under the borrowing facilities can be adversely affected if we exceed
certain predetermined levels of re-aged customer receivables, size of the secondary portfolio, the
amount of promotional customer receivables, write-offs, bankruptcies or other ineligible customer
receivable amounts.
There are several factors that could decrease cash available, including:
|
|
|
reduced demand or margins for our products; |
|
|
|
|
more stringent vendor terms on our inventory purchases; |
|
|
|
|
loss of ability to acquire inventory on consignment; |
|
|
|
|
increases in product cost that we may not be able to pass on to our customers; |
|
|
|
|
reductions in product pricing due to competitor promotional activities; |
|
|
|
|
changes in inventory requirements based on longer delivery times of the manufacturers
or other requirements which would negatively impact our delivery and distribution
capabilities; |
|
|
|
|
increases in the retained portion of our customer receivables portfolio under our
current asset-backed securitization program as a result of changes in performance or types
of customer receivables transferred (promotional versus non-promotional and primary versus
secondary portfolio), or as a result of a change in the mix of funding sources available
under the asset-backed securitization program, requiring higher collateral levels, or
limitations on our ability to obtain financing through commercial paper-based funding
sources; |
34
|
|
|
reduced availability under our asset-based revolving credit facility as a result of
borrowing base requirements and the impact on the borrowing base calculation of changes in
the performance or eligibility of the customer receivables financed by that facility; |
|
|
|
|
reduced availability under our revolving credit facility or asset-backed securitization
financing facilities as a result of non-compliance with the covenant requirements; |
|
|
|
|
reduced availability under our revolving credit facility or asset-backed securitization
financing facilities as a result of the inability of any of the financial institutions
providing those facilities to fund their commitment, |
|
|
|
|
reductions in the capacity or inability to expand the capacity available for financing
our customer receivables portfolio under existing or replacement asset-backed
securitization programs or a requirement that we retain a higher percentage of the credit
portfolio under such programs; |
|
|
|
|
increases in borrowing costs (interest and administrative fees relative to our customer
receivables portfolio associated with the funding of our customer receivables); |
|
|
|
|
increases in personnel costs or other costs for us to stay competitive in our markets;
and |
|
|
|
|
inability to renew or replace all or a portion of our current credit facilities at
their annual maturity dates. Our asset-based revolving credit facility and the revolving
facility of our securitization program mature in August 2011. The medium term notes issued
under the securitization program begin repayment in September 2010 and we expect them to
be fully repaid by April 2012. |
We are discussing various options to renew or replace our existing credit facilities,
including exploring opportunities to raise capital in the various debt and equity capital markets.
If we are unable to renew or replace our existing credit facilities we could be required to further
reduce the size of the customer credit portfolio in order to repay the amounts outstanding under
our credit facilities. In order to reduce the size of the credit portfolio we would be required to
reduce, or possibly cease, originating new customer receivables until the amounts due under our
credit facilities are repaid. If necessary, in addition to available cash balances, cash flow from
operations and borrowing capacity under our revolving facilities, additional cash to fund our
growth and increases in customer receivables balances could be obtained by:
|
|
|
reducing capital expenditures for new store openings, |
|
|
|
|
reducing the size of our customer credit portfolio; |
|
|
|
|
taking advantage of longer payment terms and financing available for inventory
purchases, |
|
|
|
|
utilizing other sources for providing financing to our customers, |
|
|
|
|
negotiating to expand the capacity available under existing credit facilities, and |
|
|
|
|
accessing equity or debt markets. |
We can provide no assurance that we will be able to obtain these sources of funding on
favorable terms, if at all.
During the three months ended April 30, 2010, net cash provided by operating activities
decreased from $48.7 million provided by operating activities during the three months ended April
30, 2009, to $29.2 million provided by operating activities. The decline was driven primarily by:
|
|
|
cash used for the growth in inventory and other accounts receivable and lower net
income, |
|
|
|
|
partially offset by cash provided from growth in accounts payable, to support the
inventory growth, and an increase in cash received from the decrease in customer
accounts receivable and cash from income taxes, which was driven by a $9.5 million tax
refund received during the quarter. |
In addition to net income and depreciation and amortization, operating cash flows for the current
period were impacted primarily by:
35
|
|
|
the decrease in customer accounts receivable, which drove a $25.5 million increase in
operating cash flows, |
|
|
|
|
a $9.5 million income tax refund received that contributed to the $13.1 million
increase in operating cash flows from income taxes payable, and |
|
|
|
|
a $25.4 million increase in inventory, that was partially offset by a $15.3 million
increase in accounts payable, resulting in a net reduction of operating cash flows of $10.1
million. |
Net cash used in investing activities decreased from $3.8 million used in the fiscal 2010
period to $0.2 million used in the fiscal 2011 period. The net decrease in cash used in investing
activities resulted primarily from a decline in purchases of property and equipment in the current
year period, as we reduced capital expenditures while we assess capital availability for growth in
the credit portfolio, store remodels and new store openings. We estimate that our total capital
expenditures for fiscal 2011 will be approximately $5 million to $10 million, based on our current
plans, which could change based on capital availability.
Net cash from financing activities decreased from $49.8 million used during the three months
ended April 30, 2009, to $35.6 million used during the three months ended April 30, 2010. During
the quarter ended April 30, 2010, we used cash flows from customer accounts receivable collections,
net income and a tax refund, net of other working capital changes, to pay down amounts owed under
our financing facilities. Additionally, we paid approximately $3.1 million in deferred financing
costs, primarily related to the credit facility amendments we completed during the quarter.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Interest rates under our revolving credit facility are variable and are determined, at our
option, as the base rate, which is the prime rate plus the base rate margin, which ranges from
3.25% to 3.75%, or LIBOR plus the LIBOR margin, which ranges from 3.25% to 3.75%. Interest rates
under our securitization programs variable funding note facility are variable and are determined
based on the commercial paper rate plus a spread of 2.50%. Accordingly, changes in the prime rate,
the commercial paper rate or LIBOR, which are affected by changes in interest rates generally, will
affect the interest rate on, and therefore our costs under, these credit facilities.
Since January 31, 2010, the securitization programs variable rate debt has decreased from
$196.4 million, or 56.7% of its total debt, to $170.0 million, or 53.1% of its total debt. As a
result, a 100 basis point increase in interest rates on the variable rate debt would increase
borrowing costs $1.7 million over a 12-month period, based on the balance outstanding at April 30,
2010.
Since January 31, 2010, the balance outstanding under our asset-based revolving credit
facility has decreased from $105.5 million to $99.4 million at April 30, 2010. Additionally, since
January 31, 2010, the notional balance of interest swaps used to fix the rate on a portion of
asset-based revolving credit facility balance has decreased from $40 million to $25 million at
April 30, 2010. As a result, a 100 basis point increase in interest rates on the asset-based
revolving credit facility would increase our borrowing costs by $0.7 million over a 12-month
period, based on the balance outstanding at April 30, 2010, after considering the impact of the
interest rate swaps.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
Based on managements evaluation (with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer (CEO)
and Chief Financial Officer (CFO)), as of the end of the period covered by this report, our CEO and
CFO have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act)), are effective
to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in reports that we file or submit under
the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified
in SEC rules and forms, and is accumulated and communicated to management, including our principal
executive officer and principal financial officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions
regarding required disclosure.
For the quarter ended April 30, 2010, there have been no changes in our internal controls over
financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) that
have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal controls over
financial reporting.
36
PART II OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
On June 7, 2010, the judge in the Texas State District Court of Harris County, Texas, signed
an Order confirming the terms and conditions of the Rule 11 Settlement Agreement between us and the
Texas Attorney General, fully and finally resolving the litigation filed against us by the Texas
Attorney General, which alleged unlawful and deceptive practices in violation of the Texas
Deceptive Trade Practices-Consumer Protection Act. Under the terms of the Settlement and the Order
we did not admit, and continue to deny, any wrongdoing. As part of the Order confirming the
settlement agreement, we made two cash payments, one in the amount of $2.5 million on December 17,
2009 and a second payment in the amount of $2.0 million on February 18, 2010, to the Texas Attorney
General for distribution to consumers as restitution for claims our customers have. We also paid
$250,000 to the Texas Attorney General for its attorneys fees, and agreed to and did donate
$100,000 to the University of Houston Law Center for its use in its consumer protection programs.
We are involved in routine litigation and claims incidental to our business from time to time,
and, as required, have accrued our estimate of the probable costs for the resolution of these
matters. These estimates have been developed in consultation with counsel and are based upon an
analysis of potential results, assuming a combination of litigation and settlement strategies. It
is possible, however, that future results of operations for any particular period could be
materially affected by changes in our assumptions or the effectiveness of our strategies related to
these proceedings. However, the results of these proceedings cannot be predicted with certainty,
and changes in facts and circumstances could impact our estimate of reserves for litigation.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
An investment in our common stock involves risks and uncertainties. You should consider carefully
the following information about these risks and uncertainties before buying shares of our common
stock. The occurrence of any of the risks described below could adversely affect our business
prospects, financial condition or results of operations. In that case, the trading price of our
stock could decline, and you could lose all or part of the value of your investment.
We have significant future capital needs and the inability to obtain funding for our credit
operations may adversely affect our business and expansion plans.
We currently finance our customer receivables through asset-backed securitization facilities and an
asset-based loan facility that together provide $530.0 million in financing commitments as of April
30, 2010. The securitization facilities provide two separate series of asset-backed notes that
allowed us as of April 30, 2010, to borrow up to $320.0 million to finance customer receivables.
Our asset-based revolving credit facility currently is a $210.0 million facility. At April 30,
2010, under our revolving credit facility, we had the ability to borrow $176.5 million, of which we
had drawn $99.4 million and $21.7 million of outstanding letters of credit.
Our ability to raise additional capital through future securitization transactions or other debt or
equity transactions, and to do so on economically favorable terms, depends in large part on factors
that are beyond our control.
These factors include:
|
|
|
conditions in the securities and finance markets generally; |
|
|
|
|
our credit rating or the credit rating of any securities we may issue; |
|
|
|
|
economic conditions; |
|
|
|
|
conditions in the markets for securitized instruments, or other debt or equity
instruments; |
|
|
|
|
the credit quality and performance of our customer receivables; |
|
|
|
|
our overall sales performance and profitability; |
37
|
|
|
our ability to obtain financial support for required credit enhancement; |
|
|
|
|
our ability to adequately service our financial instruments; |
|
|
|
|
the absence of any material downgrading or withdrawal of ratings given to our securities
previously issued in securitization; |
|
|
|
|
our ability to meet debt covenant requirements; and |
|
|
|
|
prevailing interest rates. |
If adequate capital and funds are not available at the time we need capital, we will have to
curtail future growth, which could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition,
operating results or cash
flow. As we grow our business, capital expenditures during future years are likely to exceed our
historical capital expenditures. The ultimate amount of capital expenditures needed will be
dependent on, among other factors, the availability of capital to fund new store openings and
customer receivables portfolio.
In addition, we historically used our customer receivables collateral to raise funds through
securitization programs. In addition, we have in the past completed amendments to our existing
credit facilities and securitization facilities to obtain relief from covenant violations and
revise certain covenant requirements. If we require amendments in the future and are unable to
obtain such amendments or we are unable to arrange substitute financing facilities or other sources
of capital, we may have to limit or cease offering credit through our finance programs due to our
inability to draw under our revolving credit facility upon the occurrence of a default. If
availability under the borrowing base calculations of our revolving credit facility is reduced, or
otherwise becomes unavailable, or we are unable to arrange substitute financing facilities or other
sources of capital, we may have to limit the amount of credit that we make available through our
customer finance programs. A reduction in our ability to offer customer credit will adversely
affect revenues and results of operations and could have a material adverse effect on our results
of operations. Further, our inability or limitations on our ability to obtain funding through
securitization facilities or other sources may adversely affect the profitability of outstanding
accounts under our credit programs if existing customers fail to repay outstanding credit due to
our refusal to grant additional credit.
Additionally, the inability of any of the financial institutions providing our financing facilities
to fund their commitment would adversely affect our ability to fund our credit programs, capital
expenditures and other general corporate needs.
Increased borrowing costs will negatively impact our results of operations.
Because most of our customer receivables have interest rates equal to the highest rate allocated
under applicable law, we will not be able to pass these higher borrowing costs along to our
customers and our results of operations will be negatively impacted.
In addition, the interest rates on our revolving credit facility and the 2002 Series A program
under our asset-backed securitization facility fluctuate upon or down based upon the LIBOR rate,
the prime rate of our administrative agent or the federal funds rate in the case of the revolving
credit facility and the commercial paper rate in the case of the 2002 Series A program. The level
of interest rates in the market in general will impact the interest rate on any debt instruments
issued, if any. Additionally, we may issue debt securities or enter into credit facilities under
which we pay interest at a higher rate than we have historically paid, which would further reduce
our margins and negatively impact our results of operations.
We may not be able to open and profitably operate new stores in existing, adjacent and new
geographic markets.
Dependent on capital availability, we intend to reinstate our new store opening program. New stores
are not likely to be profitable on an operating basis during the first three to six months after
they open and even after that time period may not be profitable or meet our goals. Any of these
circumstances could have a material adverse effect on our financial results. There are a number of
factors that could affect our ability to open and operate new stores consistent with our business
plan, including:
38
|
|
|
the availability of additional financial resources; |
|
|
|
|
the availability of favorable sites in existing adjacent and new markets at price levels
consistent with our business plan; |
|
|
|
|
competition in existing, adjacent and new markets; |
|
|
|
|
competitive conditions, consumer tastes and discretionary spending patterns in adjacent
and new markets that are different from those in our existing markets; |
|
|
|
|
a lack of consumer demand for our products or financing programs at levels that can
support new store growth; |
|
|
|
|
inability to make customer financing programs available that allow consumer to purchase
products at levels that can support new store growth; |
|
|
|
|
limitations created by covenants and conditions under our revolving credit facility and
asset-backed securitization program; |
|
|
|
|
an inability or unwillingness of vendors to supply product on a timely basis at
competitive prices; |
|
|
|
|
the failure to open enough stores in new markets to achieve a sufficient market presence
and realize the benefits of leveraging our advertising and our distribution system; |
|
|
|
|
unfamiliarity with local real estate markets and demographics in adjacent and new
markets; |
|
|
|
|
problems in adapting our distribution and other operational and management systems to an
expanded network of stores; |
|
|
|
|
difficulties associated with the hiring, training and retention of additional skilled
personnel, including store managers; and |
|
|
|
|
higher costs for print, radio and television advertising. |
These factors may also affect the ability of any newly opened stores to achieve sales and
profitability levels comparable with our existing stores or to become profitable at all.
If we are unable to manage our growing business, our revenues may not increase as anticipated, our
cost of operations may rise and our results of operations may decline.
We face many business risks associated with growing companies, including the risk that our
management, financial controls and information systems will be inadequate to support our expansion
in the future. Our growth will require management to expend significant time and effort and
additional resources to ensure the continuing adequacy of our financial controls, operating
procedures, information systems, product purchasing, warehousing and distribution systems and
employee training programs. We cannot predict whether we will be able to manage effectively these
increased demands or respond on a timely basis to the changing demands that our expansion will
impose on our management, financial controls and information systems. If we fail to manage
successfully the challenges of growth, do not continue to improve these systems and controls or
encounter unexpected difficulties during expansion, our business, financial condition, operating
results or cash flows could be materially adversely affected.
We may expand our retail offerings which may have different operating or legal requirements than
our current operations.
In addition to the retail and consumer finance products we currently offer, we may offer other
products and services in the future, including rent-to-own sales. These products and services may
require additional or different operating systems or have additional or different legal or
regulatory requirements than the products
39
and services we currently offer. In the event we
undertake such an expansion and do not have the proper infrastructure or personnel, or do not successfully execute such an expansion, our business,
financial condition, operating results or cash flows could be materially adversely affected.
A decrease in our credit sales or a decline in credit quality could lead to a decrease in our
product sales and profitability.
In the last three fiscal years, we financed, on average, approximately 61% of our retail sales
through our in-house propriety credit programs. Our ability to provide credit as a financing
alternative for our customers depends on many factors, including the quality of our customer
receivable portfolio. Payments on some of our credit accounts become delinquent from time to time,
and some accounts end up in default, due to several factors, such as general and local economic
conditions, including the impact of rising interest rates and unemployment rates. As we expand into
new markets, we will obtain new credit accounts that may present a higher risk than our existing
credit accounts since new credit customers do not have an established credit history with us. A
general decline in the quality of our customer receivable portfolio could lead to a reduction in
the advance rates used or eligible customer receivable balances included in the borrowing base
calculations under our revolving credit facility and thus a reduction of available credit to fund
our finance operations. As a result, if we are required to reduce the amount of credit we grant to
our customers, we most likely would sell fewer products, which would adversely affect our earnings
and cash flows. Further, because approximately 60% of our credit customers have historically made
their credit account payments in our stores, any decrease in credit sales could reduce traffic in
our stores and lower our revenues. A decline in the credit quality of our credit accounts could
also cause an increase in our credit losses, which would result in an adverse effect on our
earnings. A decline in credit quality could also lead to stricter underwriting criteria which would
likely have a negative impact on net sales.
Deterioration in the performance of our customer receivables portfolio could significantly affect
our liquidity position and profitability.
Our liquidity position and profitability are heavily dependent on our ability to collect our
customer receivables. If our customer receivables portfolio were to substantially deteriorate, the
liquidity available to us would most likely be reduced due to the challenges of complying with the
covenants and borrowing base calculations under our revolving credit facility and our earnings may
decline due to higher provisions for bad debt expense, higher net charge-off rates and lower
interest and fee income. In addition, a significant percentage of our current net income and cash
flows is derived from our credit operations and the ability to grow our credit portfolio is
important to our future success.
Our ability to collect from credit customers may be materially impaired by store closings and our
need to rely on a replacement servicer in the event of our liquidation.
We may be unable to collect a large portion of periodic credit payments should our stores close as
many of our customers remit payments in store. During the course of fiscal 2010, approximately
60% of our active credit customers made a payment in one of our stores. In the event of store
closings, credit customers may not pay balances in a timely fashion, or may not pay at all, since a
large number of our customers have not traditionally made payments to a central location.
In addition, we service all of our credit customers through our in-house servicing operation. At
this time, there is not a formalized back-up servicer plan in place for our customer receivables.
In the event of our liquidation, a servicing arrangement would have to be implemented, which could
materially impact the collection of our customer receivables.
In deciding whether to extend credit to customers, we rely on the accuracy and completeness of
information furnished to us by or on behalf of our credit customers. If we and our systems are
unable to detect any misrepresentations in this information, this could have a material adverse
effect on our results of operations and financial condition.
In deciding whether to extend credit to customers, we rely heavily on information furnished to us
by or on behalf of our credit customers and our ability to validate such information through
third-party services, including employment and personal financial information. If a significant
percentage of our credit customers intentionally or negligently misrepresented any of this
information, and we and our systems did not detect such misrepresentations, this could have a
material adverse effect on our ability to effectively manage our credit risk, which could have a
material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition.
40
Our policy of reaging certain delinquent borrowers affects our delinquency statistics and the
timing and amount of our write-offs.
As of April 30, 2010, 19.1% of our credit portfolio consisted of reaged customer receivables.
Reaging is offered to certain eligible past due customers if they meet the conditions of our reage
policy. Our decision to offer a delinquent customer a reage program is based on that borrowers
specific condition, our history with the borrower, the amount of the loan and various other
factors. When we reage a customers account, we move the account from a delinquent status to a
current status. Management exercises a considerable amount of discretion over the reaging process
and has the ability to reage an account multiple times during its life. Treating an otherwise
uncollectible account as current affects our delinquency statistics, as well as impacting the
timing and amount of charge-offs. If these accounts had been charged off sooner, our net loss rates
might have been higher.
If we fail to timely contact delinquent borrowers, then the number of delinquent customer
receivables eventually being charged off could increase.
We contact customers with delinquent credit account balances soon after the account becomes
delinquent. During periods of increased delinquencies it is important that we are proactive in
dealing with borrowers rather than simply allowing customer receivables to go to charge-off.
Historically, when our servicing becomes involved at an earlier stage of delinquency with credit
counseling and workout programs, there is a greater likelihood that the customer receivable will
not be charged off.
During periods of increased delinquencies, it becomes extremely important that we are properly
staffed and trained to assist borrowers in bringing the delinquent balance current and ultimately
avoiding charge-off. If we do not properly staff and train our collections personnel, then the
number of accounts in a delinquent status or charged-off could increase. In addition, managing a
substantially higher volume of delinquent customer receivables typically increases our operational
costs. A rise in delinquencies or charge-offs could have a material adverse effect on our business,
financial condition, liquidity and results of operations.
We rely on internal models to manage risk and to provide accounting estimates. Our results could be
adversely affected if those models do not provide reliable accounting estimates or predictions of
future activity.
We make significant use of business and financial models in connection with our efforts to measure
and monitor our risk exposures and to manage our credit portfolio. For example, we use models as a
basis for credit underwriting decisions, portfolio delinquency, charge-off and collection
expectations and other market risks, based on economic factors and our experience. The information
provided by these models is used in making business decisions relating to strategies, initiatives,
transactions and pricing, as well as our provisions for bad debt expense and the size of our
allowance for doubtful accounts, among other accounting estimates.
Models are inherently imperfect predictors of actual results because they are based on historical
data available to us and our assumptions about factors such as credit demand, payment rates,
default rates, delinquency rates and other factors that may overstate or understate future
experience. Our models could produce unreliable results for a number of reasons, including the
limitations of historical data to predict results due to unprecedented events or circumstances,
invalid or incorrect assumptions underlying the models, the need for manual adjustments in response
to rapid changes in economic conditions, incorrect coding of the models, incorrect data being used
by the models or inappropriate application of a model to products or events outside of the models
intended use. In particular, models are less dependable when the economic environment is outside of
historical experience, as has been the case recently.
In addition, we continually receive new economic data. Our critical accounting estimates, such as
our provision for bad debt expense and the size of our allowance for doubtful accounts, are subject
to change, often significantly, due to the nature and magnitude of changes in economic conditions.
However, there is generally a lag between the availability of this economic information and the
preparation of our consolidated financial statements. When economic conditions change quickly and
in unforeseen ways, there is a risk that the assumptions and inputs reflected in our models are not
representative of current economic conditions.
41
Due to the factors described above and in Managements discussion and analysis of financial
condition and results of operations and elsewhere in this report, we may be required or may deem
it necessary to increase our allowance for doubtful accounts in the future. Increasing our
allowance for doubtful accounts would adversely affect our results of operations and our financial
position.
The dramatic changes in the economy, credit and capital markets have required frequent adjustments
to our models and the application of greater management judgment in the interpretation and
adjustment of the results produced by our models. This application of greater management judgment
reflects the need to take into account updated information while continuing to maintain controlled
processes for model updates, including model development, testing, independent validation and
implementation. As a result of the time and resources, including technical and staffing resources,
that are required to perform these processes effectively, it may not be possible to replace
existing models quickly enough to ensure that they will always properly account for the impacts of
recent information and actions.
The current economic downturn has affected consumer purchases of discretionary items from us as
well as their ability to repay their credit obligations to us, which could have a continued or
prolonged negative effect on our net sales, gross margins and credit portfolio performance.
A significant portion of our net sales represent discretionary spending by our customers. Many
factors affect spending, including regional or world events, war, conditions in financial markets,
general business conditions, interest rates, inflation, energy and gasoline prices, consumer debt
levels, the availability of consumer credit, taxation, unemployment trends and other matters that
influence consumer confidence and spending. Our customers purchases of discretionary items,
including our products, decline during periods when disposable income is lower or periods of actual
or perceived unfavorable economic conditions. If this occurs, our net sales and results of
operations would decline.
Recent turmoil in the national economy, including instability in the financial markets, declining
consumer confidence and falling oil prices have negatively impacted our markets and present
significant challenges to our operations in the coming quarters. Specifically, sales volumes and
gross profit margins have been negatively impacted, and thus negatively impacted our overall
profitability and liquidity, and these effects may continue for several additional fiscal quarters.
Also, the declining economic conditions in our markets have impacted our customers ability to
repay their credit obligations to us and thus our credit portfolio performance, including, net
charge offs and delinquency trends, and we experienced significant declines in same-store sales.
These factors led to a net operating loss in the second half of fiscal 2010, and as a result, we
entered into amendments to our revolving credit facility and our securitization facilities to
modify our covenants. If these conditions persist, we may incur further operating losses in the
future and we may be required to seek covenant relief under our revolving credit facility and our
securitization facilities, curtail our expansion plans, sell assets and take other measures to
continue our access to capital.
We face significant competition from national, regional, local and Internet retailers of home
appliances, consumer electronics and furniture.
The retail market for consumer electronics is highly fragmented and intensely competitive and the
market for home appliances is concentrated among a few major dealers. We currently compete against
a diverse group of retailers, including national mass merchants such as Sears, Wal-Mart, Target,
Sams Club and Costco, specialized national retailers such as Best Buy and Rooms To Go, home
improvement stores such as Lowes and Home Depot, and locally-owned regional or independent retail
specialty stores that sell home appliances, consumer electronics and furniture similar, and often
identical, to those items we sell. We also compete with retailers that market products through
store catalogs and the Internet. In addition, there are few barriers to entry into our current and
contemplated markets, and new competitors may enter our current or future markets at any time.
We may not be able to compete successfully against existing and future competitors. Some of our
competitors have financial resources that are substantially greater than ours and may be able to
purchase inventory at lower costs and better endure economic downturns. As a result, our sales may
decline if we cannot offer competitive prices to our customers or we may be required to accept
lower profit margins. Our competitors may respond more quickly to new or emerging technologies and
may have greater resources to
42
devote to promotion and sale of products and services. If two or more competitors consolidate their
businesses or enter into strategic partnerships, they may be able to compete more effectively
against us.
Our existing competitors or new entrants into our industry may use a number of different strategies
to compete against us, including:
|
|
|
expansion by our existing competitors or entry by new competitors into markets where we
currently operate; |
|
|
|
|
entering the television market as the decreased size of flat-panel televisions allows
new entrants to display and sell these product more easily; |
|
|
|
|
lower pricing; |
|
|
|
|
aggressive advertising and marketing; |
|
|
|
|
extension of credit to customers on terms more favorable than we offer; |
|
|
|
|
larger store size, which may result in greater operational efficiencies, or innovative
store formats; and |
|
|
|
|
adoption of improved retail sales methods. |
Competition from any of these sources could cause us to lose market share, sales and customers,
increase expenditures or reduce prices, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our
results of operations.
If new products are not introduced or consumers do not accept new products, our sales may decline.
Our ability to maintain and increase sales depends to a large extent on the periodic introduction
and availability of new products and technologies. We believe that the introduction and continued
growth in consumer acceptance of new or enhanced products, such as digital Blu-ray players and
digital, high-definition televisions, will have a significant impact on our ability to increase
sales. These products are subject to significant technological changes and pricing limitations and
are subject to the actions and cooperation of third parties, such as movie distributors and
television and radio broadcasters, all of which could affect the success of these and other new
consumer electronics technologies. It is possible that new products will never achieve widespread
consumer acceptance or will be supplanted by alternative products and technologies that do not
offer us a similar sales opportunity or are sold at lower price points or margins.
If we fail to anticipate changes in consumer preferences, our sales will decline.
Our products must appeal to a broad range of consumers whose preferences cannot be predicted with
certainty and are subject to change. Our success depends upon our ability to anticipate and respond
in a timely manner to trends in consumer preferences relating to home appliances, consumer
electronics and furniture. If we fail to identify and respond to these changes, our sales of these
products will decline. In addition, we often make commitments to purchase products from our vendors
up to six months in advance of proposed delivery dates. Significant deviation from the projected
demand for products that we sell may have a material adverse effect on our results of operations
and financial condition, either from lost sales or lower margins due to the need to reduce prices
to dispose of excess inventory.
We may experience significant price pressures over the life cycle of our products from competing
technologies and our competitors and we may not be able to maintain our historical gross margin
levels.
Prices for many of our products decrease over their life cycle. Such decreases often result in
decreased gross profit margins for us. There is also substantial and continuing pressure from
customers to reduce their total costs for products. Suppliers may also seek to reduce our margins
on the sales of their products in order to increase their own profitability. The consumer
electronics industry depends on new products to drive same store sales increases. Typically, these
new products, such as high-definition and 3-D televisions, Blu-
43
ray and DVD players, digital cameras, MP3 players and GPS devices are introduced at relatively high
price points that are then gradually reduced as the product becomes mainstream. To sustain positive
same store sales growth, unit sales must increase at a rate greater than the decline in product
prices. The affordability of the product helps drive the unit sales growth. However, as a result of
relatively short product life cycles in the consumer electronics industry, which limit the amount
of time available for sales volume to increase, combined with rapid price erosion in the industry,
retailers are challenged to maintain overall gross margin levels and positive same store sales.
This has historically been our experience, and we continue to adjust our marketing strategies to
address this challenge through the introduction of new product categories and new products within
our existing categories. Gross margins realized on product sales fell from 24.2% in fiscal year
2008 to 19.5% in fiscal year 2010. If we fail to accurately anticipate the introduction of new
technologies, we may possess significant amounts of obsolete inventory that can only be sold at
substantially lower prices and profit margins than we anticipated. In addition, we may not be able
to maintain our historical margin levels in the future due to increased sales of lower margin
products such as personal electronics products and declines in average selling prices of key
products. If sales of lower margin items continue to increase and replace sales of higher margin
items or our consumer electronics products average selling prices decreases due to the maturity of
their life cycle, our gross margin and overall gross profit levels will be adversely affected.
A disruption in our relationships with, or in the operations of, any of our key suppliers could
cause our sales to decline.
The success of our business and growth strategies depends to a significant degree on our
relationships with our suppliers, particularly our brand name suppliers such as General Electric,
Whirlpool, Frigidaire, Friedrich, Maytag, LG, Mitsubishi, Panasonic, Samsung, Sony, Toshiba, Bose,
Canon, JVC, Serta, Spring Air, Ashley, Lane, Broyhill, Jackson Furniture, Franklin, Hewlett
Packard, Compaq, Poulan, Husqvarna and Toro. We do not have long term supply agreements or
exclusive arrangements with the majority of our vendors. We typically order our inventory and
repair parts through the issuance of individual purchase orders to vendors. We also rely on our
suppliers for cooperative advertising support. We may be subject to rationing by suppliers with
respect to a number of limited distribution items. In addition, we rely heavily on a relatively
small number of suppliers. Our top five suppliers represented 51.7% of our purchases for fiscal
2010, and the top two suppliers represented approximately 23.3% of our total purchases. The loss of
any one or more of these key vendors or failure to establish and maintain relationships with these
and other vendors, and limitations on the availability of inventory or repair parts could have a
material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition. If one of our vendors
were to go out of business, it could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations
and financial condition if such vendor is unable to fund amounts due to us, including payments due
for returns of product and warranty claims.
Our ability to enter new markets successfully depends, to a significant extent, on the willingness
and ability of our vendors to supply merchandise to additional warehouses or stores. If vendors are
unwilling or unable to supply some or all of their products to us at acceptable prices in one or
more markets, our results of operations and financial condition could be materially adversely
affected.
Furthermore, we rely on credit from vendors to purchase our products. As of April 30, 2010, we had
$55.2 million in accounts payable and $88.9 million in merchandise inventories. A substantial
change in credit terms from vendors or vendors willingness to extend credit to us, including
providing inventory under consignment arrangements, would reduce our ability to obtain the
merchandise that we sell, which would have a material adverse effect on our sales and results of
operations.
Our vendors also supply us with marketing funds and volume rebates. If our vendors fail to continue
these incentives it could have a material adverse effect on our sales and results of operations.
You should not rely on our comparable store sales as an indication of our future results of
operations because they fluctuate significantly.
Our historical same store sales growth figures have fluctuated significantly from quarter to
quarter. For example, same store sales growth for each of the quarters of fiscal 2010 and the first
quarter of fiscal 2011 was -4.6%, -5.2%, -9.3%, -31.7% and -19.7%, respectively, while same store
sales growth for each of the
44
quarters for fiscal 2009 was 1.0%, -1.4%, -5.8%, and 12.5%, respectively. A number of factors have
historically affected, and will continue to affect, our comparable store sales results, including:
|
|
|
changes in competition, such as pricing pressure, and the opening of new stores by
competitors in our markets; |
|
|
|
|
general economic conditions; |
|
|
|
|
new product introductions; |
|
|
|
|
consumer trends; |
|
|
|
|
changes in our merchandise mix; |
|
|
|
|
changes in the relative sales price points of our major product categories; |
|
|
|
|
ability to offer credit programs attractive to our customers; |
|
|
|
|
the impact of any new stores on our existing stores, including potential decreases in
existing stores sales as a result of opening new stores; |
|
|
|
|
weather conditions in our markets; |
|
|
|
|
timing of promotional events; |
|
|
|
|
timing, location and participants of major sporting events; |
|
|
|
|
reduction in new store openings; |
|
|
|
|
the percentage of our stores that are mature stores; |
|
|
|
|
the locations of our stores and the traffic drawn to those areas: |
|
|
|
|
how often we update our stores; and |
|
|
|
|
our ability to execute our business strategy effectively. |
Changes in our quarterly and annual comparable store sales results could cause the price of
our common stock to fluctuate significantly.
We experience seasonal fluctuations in our sales and quarterly results.
We typically experience seasonal fluctuations in our net sales and operating results, with the
quarter ending January 31, which includes the holiday selling season, generally accounting for a
larger share of our net sales and net income. We also incur significant additional expenses during
such fiscal quarter due to higher purchase volumes and increased staffing. If we miscalculate the
demand for our products generally or for our product mix during the fiscal quarter ending January
31, or if we experience adverse events, such as bad weather in our markets during our fourth fiscal
quarter, our net sales could decline, resulting in excess inventory or increased sales discounts to
sell excess inventory, which would harm our financial performance. A shortfall in expected net
sales, combined with our significant additional expenses during this fiscal quarter, could cause a
significant decline in our operating results and such sales may not be deferred to future periods.
Our business could be adversely affected by changes in consumer protection laws and regulations.
Federal and state consumer protection laws and regulations, such as the Fair Credit Reporting Act,
limit the manner in which we may offer and extend credit. Because our customers finance through our
credit segment
45
a substantial portion of our sales, any adverse change in the regulation of consumer credit could
adversely affect our total sales and gross margins. For example, new laws or regulations could
limit the amount of interest or fees that may be charged on consumer credit accounts, including by
reducing the maximum interest rate that can be charged in the states in which we operate, or
restrict our ability to collect on account balances, which would have a material adverse effect on
our cash flow and results of operations. Compliance with existing and future laws or regulations,
including regulations that may be applicable to us under the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and
Consumer Protection Act, which is expected to be enacted into law in July 2010, could require us to
make material expenditures, in particular personnel training costs, or otherwise adversely affect
our business or financial results. Failure to comply with these laws or regulations, even if
inadvertent, could result in negative publicity, fines or additional licensing expenses, any of
which could have an adverse effect on our cash flow and results of operations.
Pending litigation relating to the sale of credit insurance and the sale of repair service
agreements in the retail industry could adversely affect our business.
We understand that states attorneys general and private plaintiffs have filed lawsuits against
other retailers relating to improper practices conducted in connection with the sale of credit
insurance in several jurisdictions around the country. We offer credit insurance in our stores on
sales financed under our credit programs and require the customer to purchase property insurance
from us or provide evidence from a third party insurance provider, at their election, in connection
with sales of merchandise on installment credit; therefore, similar litigation could be brought
against us. While we believe we are in full compliance with applicable laws and regulations, if we
are found liable in any future lawsuit regarding credit insurance or repair service agreements, we
could be required to pay substantial damages or incur substantial costs as part of an out-of-court
settlement or require us to modify or suspend certain operations any of which could have a material
adverse effect on our results of operations. An adverse judgment or any negative publicity
associated with our repair service agreements or any potential credit insurance litigation could
also affect our reputation, which could have a negative impact on our cash flow and results of
operations.
46
Adverse or negative publicity, including the publicity related to the settlement of the lawsuit
filed against us by the Texas Attorney General, could cause our business to suffer or result in
copycat lawsuits.
Any negative publicity associated with the settlement of the lawsuit filed against us by the Texas
Attorney General or our repair service agreements or our product replacement agreements or any
other negative publicity could adversely affect our reputation and negatively impact our sales and
results of operations. On November 24, 2009, we settled litigation filed against us earlier in the
year by the Texas Attorney General. The suit alleged that we engaged in deceptive trade practices
in violation of the Texas Deceptive Trade Practices-Consumer Protection Act regarding our service
maintenance and product replacement agreement business activities. The Attorney General alleged,
among other things, that we failed to honor product maintenance and replacement agreements, misled
customers about the nature of our product maintenance and replacement arrangements, and engaged in
false advertising with respect to our product maintenance and replacement agreements. We denied
those allegations in our answer to the suit and, under the terms of the settlement with the Texas
Attorney General, we continue to deny any wrongdoing. However, the negative publicity associated
with this settlement or our service maintenance and replacement program agreements could adversely
affect our reputation and negatively impact our net sales.
The Texas Attorney Generals lawsuit and the resulting changes to our operations could materially
adversely affect our results of operations and financial position.
Under our settlement agreement with the Texas Attorney General relating to litigation filed against
us in May of last year, we consented to certain changes made to the service agreements and
replacement product plan agreements that we sell for a third party insurer and to strengthen the
manner in which we market and service these programs. The impact of the changes in these programs
is unknown and could materially and adversely affect our results of operations.
Our corporate actions may be substantially controlled by our principal shareholders and affiliated
entities.
As of April 1, 2010, two of our stockholders and their affiliated entities beneficially owned
approximately 23.35% and 25.66%, respectively, of our common stock and their interests may conflict
with the will or interests of our other equityholders. While Stephens Inc. and its affiliates hold
their 23.35% of our common stock through a voting trust that will vote the shares in the same
proportion as votes cast by all other stockholders, this voting trust agreement will expire in 2013
and at such time Stephens Inc. and its affiliates will not be restricted on how it votes its
shares. These stockholders, acting individually or as a group, could exert substantial influence
over matters such as electing directors and approving mergers or other business combination
transactions.
If we lose key management or are unable to attract and retain the qualified sales and credit
granting and collection personnel required for our business, our operating results could suffer.
Our future success depends to a significant degree on the skills, experience and continued service
of our key executives or the identification of suitable successors for them. If we lose the
services of any of these individuals, or if one or more of them or other key personnel decide to
join a competitor or otherwise compete directly or indirectly with us, and we are unable to
identify a suitable successor, our business and operations could be harmed, and we could have
difficulty in implementing our strategy. In addition, as our business grows, we will need to
locate, hire and retain additional qualified sales personnel in a timely manner and develop, train
and manage an increasing number of management level sales associates and other employees.
Additionally, if we are unable to attract and retain qualified credit granting and collection
personnel, our ability to perform quality underwriting of new credit transactions and maintain
workloads for our collections personnel at a manageable level, our operation could be adversely
impacted and result in higher delinquency and net charge-offs on our credit portfolio. Competition
for qualified employees could require us to pay higher wages to attract a sufficient number of
employees, and increases in the federal minimum wage or other employee benefits costs could
increase our operating expenses. If we are unable to attract and retain personnel as needed in the
future, our net sales and operating results could suffer.
47
Our costs of doing business could increase as a result of changes in federal, state or local
regulations.
Changes in the federal, state or local minimum wage requirements or changes in other wage or
workplace regulations could increase our cost of doing business. In addition, changes in federal,
state or local regulations governing the sale of some of our products or tax regulations could
increase our cost of doing business. Also, passage of the Employer Free Choice Act or similar laws
in Congress could lead to higher labor costs by encouraging unionization efforts among our
associates and disruption of store operations.
Because our stores are located in Texas, Louisiana and Oklahoma, we are subject to regional risks.
Our 76 stores are located exclusively in Texas, Louisiana and Oklahoma. This subjects us to
regional risks, such as the economy, weather conditions, hurricanes and other natural or man-made
disasters. If the region suffers a continued or another economic downturn or any other adverse
regional event, there could be an adverse impact on our net sales and results of operations and our
ability to implement our planned expansion program once we have adequate capital availability.
Several of our competitors operate stores across the United States and thus are not as vulnerable
to the risks of operating in one region. Additionally, these states in general, and the local
economies where many of our stores are located in particular, are dependent, to a degree, on the
oil and gas industries, which can be very volatile. Additionally, because of fears of climate
change and adverse effects of drilling explosions and oil spills in the Gulf of Mexico, legislation
has been introduced or is being considered, and governmental emergency pronouncements, regulations
and orders have been issued and are under consideration, including moratoriums on offshore
drilling, which, combined with the local economic and employment conditions caused by both, could
materially and adversely impact the oil and gas industries and the areas in which a majority of our
stores are located in Texas and Louisiana. To the extent the oil and gas industries are negatively
impacted by declining commodity prices, climate change or other legislation and other factors, we
could be negatively impacted by reduced employment, or other negative economic factors that impact
the local economies where we have our stores.
In addition, recent turmoil in the national economy, including instability in the financial
markets, has impacted our local markets. In February 2010, the average unemployment rate in Texas,
Louisiana and Oklahoma was 8.2%, 7.3% and 6.8%, respectively compared to 6.8%, 5.9% and 5.5% in
2009, respectively and 4.4%, 3.8% and 3.2% in 2008, respectively. The current recession or a
further downturn in the general economy, or in the region where we have our stores, could have a
negative impact on our net sales and results of operations.
Our information technology infrastructure is vulnerable to damage that could harm our business.
Our ability to operate our business from day to day, in particular our ability to manage our credit
operations and inventory levels, largely depends on the efficient operation of our computer
hardware and software systems. We use management information systems to track inventory information
at the store level, communicate customer information, aggregate daily sales information and manage
our credit portfolio, including processing of credit applications and management of collections.
These systems and our operations are subject to damage or interruption from:
|
|
|
power loss, computer systems failures and Internet, telecommunications or data network
failures; |
|
|
|
|
operator negligence or improper operation by, or supervision of, employees; |
|
|
|
|
physical and electronic loss of data or security breaches, misappropriation and similar
events; |
|
|
|
|
computer viruses; |
|
|
|
|
intentional acts of vandalism and similar events; and |
|
|
|
|
hurricanes, fires, floods and other natural disasters. |
In addition, the software that we have developed to use in our daily operations may contain
undetected errors that could cause our network to fail or our expenses to increase. Any failure of
our systems due to any of these causes, if it is not supported by our disaster recovery plan, could
cause an interruption in our operations and result in reduced net sales and results of operations.
Though we have implemented
48
contingency and disaster recovery processes in the event of one or several technology failures, any
unforeseen failure, interruption or compromise of our systems or our security measures could affect
our flow of business and, if prolonged, could harm our reputation. The risk of possible failures or
interruptions may not be adequately addressed by us or the third parties on which we rely, and such
failures or interruptions could occur. The occurrence of any failures or interruptions could have a
material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, liquidity and results of operations.
If we are unable to maintain our insurance licenses in the states we operate, our results of
operations would suffer.
We derive a significant portion of our revenues and operating income from the commissions we earn
from the sale of various insurance products of third-party insurers to our customers. These
products include credit insurance, repair service agreements and product replacement policies. We
also are the direct obligor on certain extended repair service agreements we offer to our
customers. If for any reason we were unable to maintain our insurance licenses in the states we
operate or if there are material claims or future material litigation involving our repair service
agreements or product replacement policies, our results of operations would suffer.
If we are unable to continue to offer third-party repair service agreements to our customers who
purchase, or have purchased our products, we could incur additional costs or repair expenses, which
would adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.
There are a limited number of insurance carriers that provide repair service agreement programs. If
insurance becomes unavailable from our current providers for any reason, we may be unable to
provide repair service agreements to our customers on the same terms, if at all. Even if we are
able to obtain a substitute provider, higher premiums may be required, which could have an adverse
impact on our profitability if we are unable to pass along the increased cost of such coverage to
our customers. Inability to maintain the repair service agreement program could cause fluctuations
in our repair expenses and greater volatility of earnings and could require us to become the
obligor under new contracts sold.
If we are unable to maintain group credit insurance policies from insurance carriers, which allow
us to offer their credit insurance products to our customers purchasing our merchandise on credit,
our revenues would be reduced and the provision for bad debts might increase.
There are a limited number of insurance carriers that provide credit insurance coverage for sale to
our customers. If credit insurance becomes unavailable for any reason we may be unable to offer
substitute coverage on the same terms, if at all. Even if we are able to obtain substitute
coverage, it may be at higher rates or reduced coverage, which could affect the customer acceptance
of these products, reduce our revenues or increase our credit losses.
Changes in premium and commission rates allowed by regulators on the credit insurance, repair
service agreements or product replacement agreements we sell as allowed by the laws and regulations
in the states in which we operate could affect our revenues.
We derive a significant portion of our revenues and operating income from the sale of various
third-party insurance products to our customers. These products include credit insurance, repair
service agreements and product replacement agreements. If the commission we retain from sales of
those products declines, our operating results would suffer.
Changes in trade regulations, currency fluctuations and other factors beyond our control could
affect our business.
A significant portion of our inventory is manufactured and/or assembled overseas and in Mexico.
Changes in trade regulations, currency fluctuations or other factors beyond our control may
increase the cost of items we purchase or create shortages of these items, which in turn could have
a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition. Conversely,
significant reductions in the cost of these items in U.S. dollars may cause a significant reduction
in the retail prices of those products, resulting in a material adverse effect on our sales,
margins or competitive position. In addition, commissions earned on our credit
49
insurance, repair service agreement or product replacement agreement products could be adversely
affected by changes in statutory premium rates, commission rates, adverse claims experience and
other factors.
We may be unable to protect our intellectual property rights, which could impair our name and
reputation.
We believe that our success and ability to compete depends in part on consumer identification of
the name Conns. We have registered the trademarks Conns and our logo. We intend to protect
vigorously our trademark against infringement or misappropriation by others. A third party,
however, could attempt to misappropriate our intellectual property in the future. The enforcement
of our proprietary rights through litigation could result in substantial costs to us that could
have a material adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations.
Failure to protect the security of our customers information could expose us to litigation,
judgments for damages and undermine the trust placed with us by our customers.
We capture, transmit, handle and store sensitive information, which involves certain inherent
security risks. Such risks include, among other things, the interception of customer data and
information by persons outside us or by our own employees. While we believe we have taken
appropriate steps to protect confidential information, there can be no assurance that we can
prevent the compromise of our customers data or other confidential information. If such a breach
should occur it could have a severe negative impact on our business and results of operations.
Any changes in the tax laws of the states in which we operate could affect our state tax
liabilities. Additionally, beginning operations in new states could also affect our state tax
liabilities.
As we experienced in fiscal year 2008 with the change in the Texas tax law, legislation could be
introduced at any time that changes our state tax liabilities in a way that has an adverse impact
on our results of operations. The Texas margin tax increased our effective rate from approximately
35.1%, before its introduction, to 37.1% in fiscal year 2009 and to 51.2% in fiscal year 2010. Our
recent commencement of operations in Oklahoma and the potential to enter new states in the future
could adversely affect our results of operations, dependent upon the tax laws in place in those
states.
Significant volatility in oil and gasoline prices could affect our customers determination to
drive to our stores, and cause us to raise our delivery charges.
Significant volatility in oil and gasoline prices could adversely affect our customers shopping
decisions and patterns. We rely heavily on our internal distribution system and our next day
delivery policy to satisfy our customers needs and desires, and increases in oil and gasoline
prices could result in increased distribution charges. Such increases may not significantly affect
our competitors.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
None.
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
At the Annual Meeting of Stockholders held on May 25, 2010, the following proposals
were submitted to stockholders with the following results:
1. Election of ten directors
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Shares |
|
|
For |
|
Withheld |
Marvin D. Brailsford |
|
|
17,397,184 |
|
|
|
125,813 |
|
Timothy L. Frank |
|
|
17,398,562 |
|
|
|
124,435 |
|
Jon E. M. Jacoby |
|
|
15,447,102 |
|
|
|
2,075,895 |
|
Bob L. Martin |
|
|
17,398,470 |
|
|
|
124,527 |
|
Douglas H. Martin |
|
|
17,397,107 |
|
|
|
125,890 |
|
50
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Shares |
|
|
For |
|
Withheld |
Dr. William C. Nylin, Jr. |
|
|
17,399,833 |
|
|
|
123,164 |
|
Scott L. Thompson |
|
|
17,345,804 |
|
|
|
177,193 |
|
William T. Trawick |
|
|
15,716,226 |
|
|
|
1,806,771 |
|
Theodore M. Wright |
|
|
17,399,733 |
|
|
|
123,264 |
|
2. Approval of the Audit Committees appointment of Ernst & Young, LLP as our independent
public accountants for the fiscal year ending January 31, 2011.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Shares |
For |
|
|
19,886,964 |
|
Against |
|
|
7,420 |
|
Abstain |
|
|
|
|
Item 5. Other Information
There have been no material changes to the procedures by which security holders may recommend
nominees to our board of directors since we last provided disclosure in response to the
requirements of Item 7(d)(2)(ii)(G) of Schedule 14A.
On May 25, 2010, the base salaries of four of our named executive officers were restored to
their level prior to the temporary ten percent reduction that took place on November 24, 2009.
These officers are Timothy L. Frank, Chief Executive Officer and President, Michael J. Poppe,
Executive Vice-President and Chief Financial Officer, David W. Trahan, President Retail Division
and Reymundo de la Fuente, President Credit Division. The salary of Mr. Frank was restored to
$360,000 and the salaries of Messrs. Poppe, Trahan, and de la Fuente were restored to $265,000.
Mr. Poppe, currently our Chief Financial Officer, was appointed to be our Executive Vice
President and Chief Financial Officer, effective June 1, 2010.
On May 25, 2010, a new schedule of fees paid to the non-employee directors on our board was
adopted.
Each non-employee director of the board in respect of his or her service on the board receives
or will receive:
|
|
|
an annual retainer of $50,000 for the 2010 annual meeting through the 2012 annual
meeting; |
|
|
|
|
an additional annual retainer of $10,000 for the chairs of the Audit Committee and the
Compensation Committee. |
Item 6. Exhibits
The exhibits required to be furnished pursuant to Item 6 of Form 10-Q are listed in the
Exhibit Index filed herewith, which Exhibit Index is incorporated herein by reference.
51
SIGNATURE
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly
caused this Report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CONNS, INC.
|
|
|
By: |
/s/ Michael J. Poppe
|
|
|
|
Michael J. Poppe |
|
|
|
Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer and
duly authorized to sign this
report on behalf of the
registrant) |
|
|
Date: July 7, 2010
52
INDEX TO EXHIBITS
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
Number |
|
Description |
|
|
|
2
|
|
Agreement and Plan of Merger dated January 15, 2003, by and among
Conns, Inc., Conn Appliances, Inc. and Conns Merger Sub, Inc.
(incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 2 to Conns, Inc.
registration statement on Form S-1 (file no. 333-109046) as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 23,
2003). |
|
|
|
3.1
|
|
Certificate of Incorporation of Conns, Inc. (incorporated herein
by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to Conns, Inc. registration statement
on Form S-1 (file no. 333-109046) as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on September 23, 2003). |
|
|
|
3.1.1
|
|
Certificate of Amendment to the Certificate of Incorporation of
Conns, Inc. dated June 3, 2004 (incorporated herein by reference
to Exhibit 3.1.1 to Conns, Inc. Form 10-Q for the quarterly
period ended April 30, 2004 (File No. 000-50421) as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on June 7, 2004). |
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
Amended and Restated Bylaws of Conns, Inc. effective as of June
3, 2008 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.2.3 to
Conns, Inc. Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended April 30,
2008 (File No. 000-50421) as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on June 4, 2008). |
|
|
|
4.1
|
|
Specimen of certificate for shares of Conns, Inc.s common stock
(incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Conns, Inc.
registration statement on Form S-1 (file no. 333-109046) as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on October 29, 2003). |
|
|
|
10.1
|
|
Amended and Restated 2003 Incentive Stock Option Plan
(incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Conns, Inc.
registration statement on Form S-1 (file no. 333-109046) as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 23,
2003).t |
|
|
|
10.1.1
|
|
Amendment to the Conns, Inc. Amended and Restated 2003 Incentive
Stock Option Plan (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit
10.1.1 to Conns Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended April
30, 2004 (File No. 000-50421) as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on June 7, 2004).t |
|
|
|
10.1.2
|
|
Form of Stock Option Agreement (incorporated herein by reference
to Exhibit 10.1.2 to Conns, Inc. Form 10-K for the annual period
ended January 31, 2005 (File No. 000-50421) as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on April 5, 2005).t |
|
|
|
10.2
|
|
2003 Non-Employee Director Stock Option Plan (incorporated herein
by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to Conns, Inc. registration
statement on Form S-1 (file no. 333-109046)as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on September 23,
2003).t |
|
|
|
10.2.1
|
|
Form of Stock Option Agreement (incorporated herein by reference
to Exhibit 10.2.1 to Conns, Inc. Form 10-K for the annual period
ended January 31, 2005 (File No. 000-50421) as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on April 5, 2005).t |
|
|
|
10.3
|
|
Employee Stock Purchase Plan (incorporated herein by reference to
Exhibit 10.3 to Conns, Inc. registration statement on Form S-1
(file no. 333-109046) as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on September 23, 2003).t |
|
|
|
10.4
|
|
Conns 401(k) Retirement Savings Plan (incorporated herein by
reference to Exhibit 10.4 to Conns, Inc. registration statement
on Form S-1 (file no. 333-109046) as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on September 23, 2003).t |
53
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
Number |
|
Description |
|
|
|
10.5
|
|
Shopping Center Lease Agreement dated May 3, 2000, by and between
Beaumont Development Group, L.P., f/k/a Fiesta Mart, Inc., as
Lessor, and CAI, L.P., as Lessee, for the property located at 3295
College Street, Suite A, Beaumont, Texas (incorporated herein by
reference to Exhibit 10.5 to Conns, Inc. registration statement on
Form S-1 (file no. 333-109046) as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on September 23, 2003). |
|
|
|
10.5.1
|
|
First Amendment to Shopping Center Lease Agreement dated September
11, 2001, by and among Beaumont Development Group, L.P., f/k/a
Fiesta Mart, Inc., as Lessor, and CAI, L.P., as Lessee, for the
property located at 3295 College Street, Suite A, Beaumont, Texas
(incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.5.1 to Conns, Inc.
registration statement on Form S-1 (file no. 333-109046) as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 23, 2003). |
|
|
|
10.6
|
|
Industrial Real Estate Lease dated June 16, 2000, by and between
American National Insurance Company, as Lessor, and CAI, L.P., as
Lessee, for the property located at 8550-A Market Street, Houston,
Texas (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.6 to Conns,
Inc. registration statement on Form S-1 (file no. 333-109046) as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 23,
2003). |
|
|
|
10.6.1
|
|
First Renewal of Lease dated November 24, 2004, by and between
American National Insurance Company, as Lessor, and CAI, L.P., as
Lessee, for the property located at 8550-A Market Street, Houston,
Texas (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.6.1 to
Conns, Inc. Form 10-K for the annual period ended January 31,
2005 (File No. 000-50421) as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on April 5, 2005). |
|
|
|
10.7
|
|
Lease Agreement dated December 5, 2000, by and between Prologis
Development Services, Inc., f/k/a The Northwestern Mutual Life
Insurance Company, as Lessor, and CAI, L.P., as Lessee, for the
property located at 4810 Eisenhauer Road, Suite 240, San Antonio,
Texas (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.7 to Conns,
Inc. registration statement on Form S-1 (file no. 333-109046) as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 23,
2003). |
|
|
|
10.7.1
|
|
Lease Amendment No. 1 dated November 2, 2001, by and between
Prologis Development Services, Inc., f/k/a The Northwestern Mutual
Life Insurance Company, as Lessor, and CAI, L.P., as Lessee, for
the property located at 4810 Eisenhauer Road, Suite 240, San
Antonio, Texas (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.7.1
to Conns, Inc. registration statement on Form S-1 (file no.
333-109046) as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
September 23, 2003). |
|
|
|
10.8
|
|
Lease Agreement dated June 24, 2005, by and between Cabot
Properties, Inc. as Lessor, and CAI, L.P., as Lessee, for the
property located at 1132 Valwood Parkway, Carrollton, Texas
(incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 99.1 to Conns, Inc.
Current Report on Form 8-K (file no. 000-50421) as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on June 29, 2005). |
|
|
|
10.9
|
|
Loan and Security Agreement dated August 14, 2008, by and among
Conns, Inc. and the Borrowers thereunder, the Lenders party
thereto, Bank of America, N.A, a national banking association, as
Administrative Agent and Joint Book Runner for the Lenders,
referred to as Agent, JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association, as
Syndication Agent and Joint Book Runner for the Lenders, and
Capital One, N.A., as Co-Documentation Agent (incorporated herein
by reference to Exhibit 99.1 to Conns Inc. Current Report on Form
8-K (File No. 000-50421) as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on August 20,2008). |
|
|
|
10.9.1
|
|
Intercreditor Agreement dated August 14, 2008, by and among Bank of
America, N.A., as the ABL Agent, Wells Fargo Bank, National
Association, as Securitization Trustee, Conn Appliances, Inc. as
the Initial Servicer, Conn Credit Corporation, Inc., as a borrower,
Conn Credit I, L.P., as a borrower and Bank of America, N.A., as
Collateral Agent (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 99.5
to Conns Inc. Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 000-50421) as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August
20,2008). |
54
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
Number |
|
Description |
|
|
|
10.9.2
|
|
First Amendment to Loan and Security Agreement dated August 14,
2008, by and among Conns, Inc. and the Borrowers thereunder,
the Lenders party thereto, Bank of America, N.A, a national
banking association, as Administrative Agent and Joint Book
Runner for the Lenders, referred to as Agent, JPMorgan Chase
Bank, National Association, as Syndication Agent and Joint Book
Runner for the Lenders, and Capital One, N.A., as
Co-Documentation Agent (incorporated herein by reference to
Exhibit 10.1 to Conns Inc. Current Report on Form 8-K (File No.
000-50421) as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on February 12, 2010). |
|
|
|
10.9.3
|
|
Second Amendment to Loan and Security Agreement dated August 14,
2008, by and among Conns, Inc. and the Borrowers thereunder,
the Lenders party thereto, Bank of America, N.A, a national
banking association, as Administrative Agent and Joint Book
Runner for the Lenders, referred to as Agent, JPMorgan Chase
Bank, National Association, as Syndication Agent and Joint Book
Runner for the Lenders, and Capital One, N.A., as
Co-Documentation Agent (incorporated herein by reference to
Exhibit 10.1 to Conns Inc. Current Report on Form 8-K (File No.
000-50421) as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on March 4, 2010). |
|
|
|
10.10
|
|
Receivables Purchase Agreement dated September 1, 2002, by and
among Conn Funding II, L.P., as Purchaser, Conn Appliances, Inc.
and CAI, L.P., collectively as Originator and Seller, and Conn
Funding I, L.P., as Initial Seller (incorporated herein by
reference to Exhibit 10.10 to Conns, Inc. registration
statement on Form S-1 (file no. 333-109046) as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on September 23, 2003). |
|
|
|
10.10.1
|
|
First Amendment to Receivables Purchase Agreement dated August
1, 2006, by and among Conn Funding II, L.P., as Purchaser, Conn
Appliances, Inc. and CAI, L.P., collectively as Originator and
Seller (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.10.1 to
Conns, Inc. Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended October
31, 2006 (File No. 000-50421) as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on September 15, 2006). |
|
|
|
10.11
|
|
Base Indenture dated September 1, 2002, by and between Conn
Funding II, L.P., as Issuer, and Wells Fargo Bank Minnesota,
National Association, as Trustee (incorporated herein by
reference to Exhibit 10.11 to Conns, Inc. registration
statement on Form S-1 (file no. 333-109046) as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on September 23, 2003). |
|
|
|
10.11.1
|
|
First Supplemental Indenture dated October 29, 2004 by and
between Conn Funding II, L.P., as Issuer, and Wells Fargo Bank,
National Association, as Trustee (incorporated herein by
reference to Exhibit 99.1 to Conns, Inc. Current Report on Form
8-K (File No. 000-50421) as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on November 4, 2004). |
|
|
|
10.11.2
|
|
Second Supplemental Indenture dated August 1, 2006 by and
between Conn Funding II, L.P., as Issuer, and Wells Fargo Bank,
National Association, as Trustee (incorporated herein by
reference to Exhibit 99.1 to Conns, Inc. Current Report on Form
8-K (File No. 000-50421) as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on August 23, 2006). |
|
|
|
10.11.3
|
|
Fourth Supplemental Indenture dated August 14, 2008 by and
between Conn Funding II, L.P., as Issuer, and Wells Fargo Bank,
National Association, as Trustee (incorporated herein by
reference to Exhibit 99.4 to Conns, Inc. Current Report on Form
8-K (File No. 000-50421) as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on August 20, 2008). |
|
|
|
10.12
|
|
Amended and Restated Series 2002-A Supplement dated September
10, 2007, by and between Conn Funding II, L.P., as Issuer, and
Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Trustee (incorporated
herein by reference to Exhibit 99.2 to Conns, Inc. Current
Report on Form 8-K (File No. 000-50421) as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on September 11, 2007). |
|
|
|
10.12.1
|
|
Supplement No. 1 to Amended and Restated Series 2002-A
Supplement dated August 14, 2008, by and between Conn Funding
II, L.P., as Issuer, and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association,
as Trustee (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 99.2 to
Conns, Inc. Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 000-50421) as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 20,
2008). |
|
|
|
10.12.1.1
|
|
Supplement No. 2 to Amended and Restated Series 2002-A
Supplement dated August 14, 2008, by and between Conn Funding
II, L.P., as Issuer, and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association,
as |
55
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
Number |
|
Description |
|
|
|
|
|
Trustee (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to
Conns, Inc. Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 000-50421) as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 16,
2010). |
|
|
|
10.12.2
|
|
Amended and Restated Note Purchase Agreement dated September 10,
2007 by and between Conn Funding II, L.P., as Issuer, and Wells
Fargo Bank, National Association, as Trustee (incorporated
herein by reference to Exhibit 99.3 to Conns, Inc. Current
Report on Form 8-K (File No. 000-50421) as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on September 11, 2007). |
|
|
|
10.12.3
|
|
Second Amended and Restated Note Purchase Agreement dated August
14, 2008 by and between Conn Funding II, L.P., as Issuer, and
Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Trustee (incorporated
herein by reference to Exhibit 99.3 to Conns, Inc. Current
Report on Form 8-K (File No. 000-50421) as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on August 20, 2008). |
|
|
|
10.12.4
|
|
Amendment No. 1 to Second Amended and Restated Note Purchase
Agreement dated August 28, 2008 by and between Conn Funding II,
L.P., as Issuer, and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as
Trustee (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.12.4 to
Conns, Inc. Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended October
31, 2008 (File No. 000-50421) as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on August 28, 2008). |
|
|
|
10.12.5
|
|
Amendment No. 2 to Second Amended and Restated Note Purchase
Agreement dated August 10, 2009 by and between Conn Funding II.
L.P., as Issuer, and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as
Trustee (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.14.1 to
Conns, Inc. Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended July 31,
2009 (File No. 000-50421) as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on August 27, 2009). |
|
|
|
10.12.6
|
|
Amendment No. 3 to Second Amended and Restated Note Purchase
Agreement dated August 10, 2009 by and between Conn Funding II.
L.P., as Issuer, and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as
Trustee (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to
Conns, Inc. Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 000-50421) as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 12,
2010). |
|
|
|
10.12.7
|
|
Amendment No. 4 to Second Amended and Restated Note Purchase
Agreement dated August 10, 2009 by and between Conn Funding II.
L.P., as Issuer, and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as
Trustee (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to
Conns, Inc. Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 000-50421) as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 4,
2010). |
|
|
|
10.12.8
|
|
Amendment No. 5 to Second Amended and Restated Note Purchase
Agreement dated August 10, 2009 by and between Conn Funding II.
L.P., as Issuer, and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as
Trustee (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to
Conns, Inc. Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 000-50421) as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 12,
2010). |
|
|
|
10.12.9
|
|
Amendment No. 6 to Second Amended and Restated Note Purchase
Agreement dated August 10, 2009 by and between Conn Funding II.
L.P., as Issuer, and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as
Trustee (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to
Conns, Inc. Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 000-50421) as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 16,
2010). |
|
|
|
10.13
|
|
Servicing Agreement dated September 1, 2002, by and among Conn
Funding II, L.P., as Issuer, CAI, L.P., as Servicer, and Wells
Fargo Bank Minnesota, National Association, as Trustee
(incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.14 to Conns, Inc.
registration statement on Form S-1 (file no. 333-109046) as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 23,
2003). |
|
|
|
10.13.1
|
|
First Amendment to Servicing Agreement dated June 24, 2005, by and
among Conn Funding II, L.P., as Issuer, CAI, L.P., as Servicer,
and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Trustee
(incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.14.1 to Conns,
Inc. Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended October 31, 2005
(File No. 000-50421) as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on August 30, 2005). |
56
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
Number |
|
Description |
|
|
|
10.13.2
|
|
Second Amendment to Servicing Agreement dated November 28, 2005,
by and among Conn Funding II, L.P., as Issuer, CAI, L.P., as
Servicer, and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Trustee
(incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.14.2 to Conns,
Inc. Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended October 31, 2005
(File No. 000-50421) as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on December 1, 2005). |
|
|
|
10.13.3
|
|
Third Amendment to Servicing Agreement dated May 16, 2006, by and
among Conn Funding II, L.P., as Issuer, CAI, L.P., as Servicer,
and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Trustee
(incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.14.3 to Conns,
Inc. Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended October 31, 2006
(File No. 000-50421) as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on September 15, 2006). |
|
|
|
10.13.4
|
|
Fourth Amendment to Servicing Agreement dated August 1, 2006, by
and among Conn Funding II, L.P., as Issuer, CAI, L.P., as
Servicer, and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Trustee
(incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.14.4 to Conns,
Inc. Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended October 31, 2006
(File No. 000-50421) as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on September 15, 2006). |
|
|
|
10.14
|
|
Form of Executive Employment Agreement (incorporated herein by
reference to Exhibit 10.15 to Conns, Inc. registration statement
on Form S-1 (file no. 333-109046) as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on October 29, 2003).t |
|
|
|
10.14.1
|
|
First Amendment to Executive Employment Agreement between Conns,
Inc. and Thomas J. Frank, Sr., Approved by the stockholders May
26, 2005 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.15.1 to
Conns, Inc. Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended October 31,
2005 (file No. 000-50421) as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on August 30, 2005).t |
|
|
|
10.14.2
|
|
Executive Retirement Agreement between Conns, Inc. and Thomas J.
Frank, Sr., approved by the Board of Directors June 2, 2009
(incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.14.2 to Conns,
Inc. Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended April 30, 2009 (file
No. 000-50421) as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on June 4, 2009).t. |
|
|
|
10.14.3
|
|
Non-Executive Employment Agreement between Conns, Inc. and Thomas
J. Frank, Sr., approved by the Board of Directors June 19, 2009
(incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.14.1 to Conns,
Inc. Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended July 31, 2009 (File
No. 000-50421) as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on August 27, 2009).t |
|
|
|
10.15
|
|
Form of Indemnification Agreement (incorporated herein by
reference to Exhibit 10.16 to Conns, Inc. registration statement
on Form S-1 (file no. 333-109046) as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on September 23, 2003).t |
|
|
|
10.16
|
|
Description of Compensation Payable to Non-Employee Directors
(incorporated herein by reference to Form 8-K (file no. 000-50421)
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 2,
2005).t |
|
|
|
10.17
|
|
Dealer Agreement between Conn Appliances, Inc. and Voyager Service
Programs, Inc. effective as of January 1, 1998 (incorporated
herein by reference to Exhibit 10.19 to Conns, Inc. Form 10-K
for the annual period ended January 31, 2006 (File No. 000-50421)
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 30,
2006). |
|
|
|
10.17.1
|
|
Amendment #1 to Dealer Agreement by and among Conn Appliances,
Inc., CAI, L.P., Federal Warranty Service Corporation and Voyager
Service Programs, Inc. effective as of July 1, 2005 (incorporated
herein by reference to Exhibit 10.19.1 to Conns, Inc. Form 10-K
for the annual period ended January 31, 2006 (File No. 000-50421)
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 30,
2006). |
57
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
Number |
|
Description |
|
|
|
10.17.2
|
|
Amendment #2 to Dealer Agreement by and among Conn Appliances,
Inc., CAI, L.P., Federal Warranty Service Corporation and Voyager
Service Programs, Inc. effective as of July 1, 2005 (incorporated
herein by reference to Exhibit 10.19.2 to Conns, Inc. Form 10-K
for the annual period ended January 31, 2006 (File No. 000-50421)
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 30,
2006). |
|
|
|
10.17.3
|
|
Amendment #3 to Dealer Agreement by and among Conn Appliances,
Inc., CAI, L.P., Federal Warranty Service Corporation and Voyager
Service Programs, Inc. effective as of July 1, 2005 (incorporated
herein by reference to Exhibit 10.19.3 to Conns, Inc. Form 10-K
for the annual period ended January 31, 2006 (File No. 000-50421)
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 30,
2006). |
|
|
|
10.17.4
|
|
Amendment #4 to Dealer Agreement by and among Conn Appliances,
Inc., CAI, L.P., Federal Warranty Service Corporation and Voyager
Service Programs, Inc. effective as of July 1, 2005 (incorporated
herein by reference to Exhibit 10.19.4 to Conns, Inc. Form 10-K
for the annual period ended January 31, 2006 (File No. 000-50421)
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 30,
2006). |
|
|
|
10.17.5
|
|
Amendment #5 to Dealer Agreement by and among Conn Appliances,
Inc., CAI, L.P., Federal Warranty Service Corporation and Voyager
Service Programs, Inc. effective as of April 7, 2007 (incorporated
herein by reference to Exhibit 10.18.5 to Conns, Inc. Form 10-Q
for the quarterly period ended October 31, 2007 (File No.
000-50421) as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
August 30, 2007). |
|
|
|
10.18
|
|
Service Expense Reimbursement Agreement between Affiliates
Insurance Agency, Inc. and American Bankers Life Assurance Company
of Florida, American Bankers Insurance Company Ranchers & Farmers
County Mutual Insurance Company, Voyager Life Insurance Company
and Voyager Property and Casualty Insurance Company effective July
1, 1998 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.20 to
Conns, Inc. Form 10-K for the annual period ended January 31,
2006 (File No. 000-50421) as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on March 30, 2006). |
|
|
|
10.18.1
|
|
First Amendment to Service Expense Reimbursement Agreement by and
among CAI, L.P., Affiliates Insurance Agency, Inc., American
Bankers Life Assurance Company of Florida, Voyager Property &
Casualty Insurance Company, American Bankers Life Assurance
Company of Florida, American Bankers Insurance Company of Florida
and American Bankers General Agency, Inc. effective July 1, 2005
(incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.20.1 to Conns,
Inc. Form 10-K for the annual period ended January 31, 2006 (File
No. 000-50421) as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on March 30, 2006). |
|
|
|
10.18.2
|
|
Seventh Amendment to Service Expense Reimbursement Agreement by
and among Conn Appliances, Inc., American Bankers Life Assurance
Company of Florida, American Bankers Insurance Company of Florida,
American Reliable Insurance Company and Reliable Lloyds Insurance
Company effective May 1, 2009 (incorporated herein by reference to
Exhibit 10.14.1 to Conns, Inc. Form 10-Q for the quarterly
period ended July 31, 2009 (File No. 000-50421) as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on August 27, 2009). |
|
|
|
10.19
|
|
Service Expense Reimbursement Agreement between CAI Credit
Insurance Agency, Inc. and American Bankers Life Assurance Company
of Florida, American Bankers Insurance Company Ranchers & Farmers
County Mutual Insurance Company, Voyager Life Insurance Company
and Voyager Property and Casualty Insurance Company effective July
1, 1998 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.21 to
Conns, Inc. Form 10-K for the annual period ended January 31,
2006 (File No. 000-50421) as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on March 30, 2006). |
|
|
|
10.19.1
|
|
First Amendment to Service Expense Reimbursement Agreement by and
among CAI Credit Insurance Agency, Inc., American Bankers Life
Assurance Company of Florida, Voyager Property & Casualty
Insurance Company, American Bankers Life Assurance Company of
Florida, American Bankers Insurance Company of Florida, American
Reliable Insurance Company, and American Bankers General Agency,
Inc. effective July 1, 2005 (incorporated herein by reference to
Exhibit 10.21.1 to Conns, Inc. Form 10-K for the annual period
ended January 31, 2006 (File No. 000-50421) as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on March 30, 2006). |
58
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
Number |
|
Description |
|
|
|
10.19.2
|
|
Fourth Amendment to Service Expense Reimbursement Agreement by and among CAI Credit
Insurance Agency, Inc., American Bankers Life Assurance Company of Florida, American
Bankers Insurance Company of Florida and American Reliable Insurance Company effective
May 1, 2009 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.14.1 to Conns, Inc. Form
10-Q for the quarterly period ended July 31, 2009 (File No. 000-50421) as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 27, 2009). |
|
|
|
10.20
|
|
Consolidated Addendum and Amendment to Service Expense Reimbursement Agreements by and
among Certain Member Companies of Assurant Solutions, CAI Credit Insurance Agency, Inc.
and Affiliates Insurance Agency, Inc. effective April 1, 2004 (incorporated herein by
reference to Exhibit 10.22 to Conns, Inc. Form 10-K for the annual period ended
January 31, 2006 (File No. 000-50421) as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on March 30, 2006). |
|
|
|
10.21
|
|
Series 2006-A Supplement to Base Indenture, dated August 1, 2006, by and between Conn
Funding II, L.P., as Issuer, and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Trustee
(incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.23 to Conns, Inc. Form 10-Q for the
quarterly period ended October 31, 2006 (File No. 000-50421) as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on September 15, 2006). |
|
|
|
11.1
|
|
Statement re: computation of earnings per share is included under Note 1 to the
financial statements. |
|
|
|
12.1
|
|
Statement of computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges (filed herewith). |
|
|
|
21
|
|
Subsidiaries of Conns, Inc. (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 21 to Conns,
Inc. Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended October 31, 2007 (File No. 000-50421) as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 30, 2007). |
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification (Chief Executive Officer) (filed herewith). |
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification (Chief Financial Officer) (filed herewith). |
|
|
|
32.1
|
|
Section 1350 Certification (Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer)
(furnished herewith). |
|
|
|
99.1
|
|
Subcertification by Chairman of the Board in support of Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a)
Certification (Chief Executive Officer) (filed herewith). |
|
|
|
99.2
|
|
Subcertification by President Retail Division in support of Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a)
Certification (Chief Executive Officer) (filed herewith). |
|
|
|
99.3
|
|
Subcertification by President Credit Division in support of Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a)
Certification (Chief Executive Officer) (filed herewith). |
|
|
|
99.4
|
|
Subcertification by Treasurer in support of Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification
(Chief Financial Officer) (filed herewith). |
|
|
|
99.5
|
|
Subcertification by Secretary in support of Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification
(Chief Financial Officer) (filed herewith). |
|
|
|
99.6
|
|
Subcertification of Chairman of the Board, Chief Operating Officer, Treasurer and
Secretary in support of Section 1350 Certifications (Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer) (furnished herewith). |
|
|
|
t |
|
Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.
|
59