e10vk
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
(Mark One)
|
|
|
þ |
|
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the fiscal year ended February 29, 2008
OR
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission file number 0-14749
Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Colorado
|
|
84-0910696 |
(State of Incorporation)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
265 Turner Drive, Durango, CO 81303
(Address of principal executive offices)
(970) 259-0554
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Securities Registered Pursuant To Section 12(b) Of The Act:
|
|
|
Title of each class
|
|
Name of each exchange on which registered |
|
|
|
Common Stock $.03 Par Value per Share
|
|
The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC |
Securities Registered Pursuant To Section 12(g) Of The Act: None
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of
the Securities Act. Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or
Section 15 (d) of the Act. Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§
229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of
registrants knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in
Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a
non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definition of large accelerated
filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
(Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer o
|
|
Accelerated filer þ
|
|
Non-accelerated filer o
|
|
Smaller reporting company o |
|
|
|
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
|
|
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
On April 30, 2008, there were 5,980,919 shares of Common Stock outstanding. The aggregate market
value of the Common Stock (based on the closing price as quoted on the
Nasdaq Global Market on August 31, 2007) held by non-affiliates
was $67,078,231. As of
September 30, 2007 Hodges Capital Management, Inc. and
affiliates held 1,024,123 shares of
outstanding Common Stock. These shares have been excluded from the dollar value of Common Stock held
by non-affiliates.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Portions of the registrants proxy statement furnished to stockholders in connection with the 2008
Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the Proxy Statement) are incorporated by reference in Part III of
this Report. The Proxy Statement will be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission within
120 days of the close of the registrants fiscal year.
ROCKY MOUNTAIN CHOCOLATE FACTORY, INC.
FORM 10-K
TABLE OF CONTENTS
2
PART I.
ITEM 1. BUSINESS
General
Founded in 1981 and incorporated in Colorado in 1982, Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory, Inc. (the
Company, and sometimes referred to herein with the pronouns we, us, or our) is an
international franchisor and confectionery manufacturer. The Company is headquartered in Durango,
Colorado and manufactures an extensive line of premium chocolate candies and other confectionery
products. As of March 31, 2008 there were 5 Company-owned and 329 franchised Rocky Mountain
Chocolate Factory stores operating in 38 states, Canada, and the United Arab Emirates.
The Company believes approximately 50% of the products sold at Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory
stores are prepared on the premises. The Company believes this in-store preparation creates a
special store ambiance and the aroma and sight of products being made attracts foot traffic and
assures customers that products are fresh.
The Company believes that its principal competitive strengths lie in its brand name recognition,
its reputation for the quality, variety and taste of its products; the special ambiance of its
stores; its knowledge and experience in applying criteria for selection of new store locations; its
expertise in the manufacture of chocolate candy products and the merchandising and marketing of
chocolate and other candy products; and the control and training infrastructures it has implemented
to assure consistent customer service and execution of successful practices and techniques at its
stores.
The Company believes its manufacturing expertise and reputation for quality has facilitated the
sale of selected products through new distribution channels. The Company is currently selling its
products in a select number of new distribution channels including wholesaling, fundraising,
corporate sales, mail order and internet sales.
The Companys revenues are currently derived from three principal sources: (i) sales to franchisees
and others of chocolates and other confectionery products manufactured by the Company (75-72-69%);
(ii) sales at Company-owned stores of chocolates and other confectionery products (including
products manufactured by the Company) (5-8-11%) and (iii) the collection of initial franchise fees
and royalties from franchisees (20-20-20%). The Companys revenues are derived from domestic
(97-98-98%) and international (3-2-2%) sources. The figures in parentheses show the percentage of
total revenues attributable to each source for fiscal years ended February 28 (29), 2008, 2007 and
2006, respectively.
According to the National Confectioners Association, the total U.S. candy market approximated $29.1
billion of retail sales in 2007 with chocolate generating sales of approximately $16.3 billion.
According to the Department of Commerce, per capita consumption of chocolate in 2006 was
approximately 14 pounds per year nationally and decreased 1% when compared to 2005.
Business Strategy
The Companys objective is to build on its position as a leading international franchisor and
manufacturer of high quality chocolate and other confectionery products. The Company continually
seeks opportunities to profitably expand its business. To accomplish this objective, the Company
employs a business strategy that includes the following elements:
Product Quality and Variety
The Company maintains the unsurpassed taste and quality of its chocolate candies by using only the
finest chocolate and other wholesome ingredients. The Company uses its own proprietary recipes,
primarily developed by the Companys master candy makers. A typical Rocky Mountain Chocolate
Factory store offers up to 100 of the Companys chocolate candies throughout the year and as many
as 200, including many packaged candies, during the holiday seasons. Individual stores also offer
numerous varieties of premium fudge and gourmet caramel apples, as well as other products prepared
in the store from Company recipes.
Store Atmosphere and Ambiance
The Company seeks to establish an enjoyable and inviting atmosphere in each Rocky Mountain
Chocolate Factory store. Each store prepares numerous products, including fudge, barks and caramel
apples, in the store. In-store preparation is designed both to be fun and entertaining for
customers and to convey an image of freshness and homemade quality. The Companys design staff has
developed easily replicable designs and specifications to ensure that the Rocky Mountain Chocolate
Factory concept is consistently implemented throughout the system.
3
In February 2000, the Company retained a nationally recognized design firm to evaluate and update
its existing store design. The objective of the store design project is threefold: (1) increase
average revenue per unit thereby opening untapped real estate environments; (2) further emphasize
the entertainment and freshness value of the Companys in-store confectionery factory; and (3)
improve operational efficiency through optimal store layout. The Company completed the store
redesign project and the testing of the new design in fiscal 2002. Through March 31, 2008, 197
stores incorporating the new design have been opened.
Site Selection
Careful selection of a site is critical to the success of a Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory store.
Many factors are considered by the Company in identifying suitable sites, including tenant mix,
visibility, attractiveness, accessibility, level of foot traffic and occupancy costs. Final site
selection occurs only after the Companys senior management has approved the site. The Company
believes that the experience of its management team in evaluating a potential site is one of the
Companys competitive strengths.
Customer Service Commitment
The Company emphasizes excellence in customer service and seeks to employ and to sell franchises to
motivated and energetic people. The Company also fosters enthusiasm for its customer service
philosophy and the Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory concept through its bi-annual franchisee
convention, regional meetings and other frequent contacts with its franchisees.
Increase Same Store Retail Sales at Existing Locations
The Company seeks to increase profitability of its store system through increasing sales at
existing store locations. Changes in system wide domestic same store retail sales are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
(0.6 |
%) |
2005 |
|
|
4.8 |
% |
2006 |
|
|
2.4 |
% |
2007 |
|
|
0.3 |
% |
2008 |
|
|
(0.9 |
%) |
The Company believes that the negative trend in fiscal 2008 was due to the overall weakening of the
economy and retail environment. The Company experienced positive same store sales of 1.0% and 1.6%
in its fiscal first and second quarters of 2008 followed by decreases in same store sales of (2.5%)
and (4.7%) in its fiscal third and fourth quarters of fiscal 2008 compared with the same periods in
fiscal 2007.
In February 2000, the Company retained a nationally recognized packaging design firm to completely
redesign the packaging featured in the Companys retail stores. The Company has designed a
contemporary and coordinated line of packaged products that capture and convey the freshness, fun
and excitement of the Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory retail store experience. The Company
completed the packaging redesign project during 2002. The Company also believes that the successful
launch of new packaging has had a positive impact on same store sales.
Increase Same Store Pounds Purchased by Existing Locations
In fiscal 2008, same store pounds purchased by franchisees decreased 9.1% compared to the prior
fiscal year. The Company continues to add new products and focus its existing product lines in an
effort to increase same store pounds purchased by existing locations. The Company believes the
decrease in same store pounds purchased was due to a product mix shift from factory-made products
to products made in the store such as caramel apples and fudge.
Enhanced Operating Efficiencies
The Company seeks to improve its profitability by controlling costs and increasing the efficiency
of its operations. Efforts in the last several years, include the purchase of additional automated
factory equipment, implementation of a comprehensive Advanced Planning and Scheduling (APS) system,
implementation of alternative manufacturing strategies and installation of enhanced Point-of-Sale
(POS) systems in all of its Company-owned and 182 of its franchised stores through March 31, 2008.
These measures have significantly improved the Companys ability to deliver its products to its
stores safely, quickly and cost-effectively and impact store operations. Additionally, the
divestiture of substantially all of the Company-owned stores in fiscal 2002 has reduced the
Companys exposure to real estate risk, improved the Companys operating margins and allowed the
Company to increase its focus on franchising.
4
Expansion Strategy
Key elements of the Companys expansion strategy include:
Unit Growth
The cornerstone of the Companys growth strategy is to aggressively pursue unit growth
opportunities in locations where the Company has traditionally been successful, to pursue new and
developing real estate environments for franchisees which appear promising based on early sales
results, and to improve and expand the retail store concept, such that previously untapped and
unfeasible environments (such as most regional centers) generate sufficient revenue to support a
successful Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory location.
High Traffic Environments
The Company currently establishes franchised stores in the following environments: outlet centers,
tourist environments, regional centers, street fronts, airports and other entertainment oriented
environments. The Company, over the last several years, has had a particular focus on regional
center locations. The Company is optimistic that its exciting new store design will allow it to
continue targeting the over 1,400 regional centers in the United States. The Company has
established a business relationship with most of the major developers in the United States and
believes that these relationships provide it with the opportunity to take advantage of attractive
sites in new and existing real estate environments.
Name Recognition and New Market Penetration
The Company believes the visibility of its stores and the high foot traffic at many of its
locations has generated strong name recognition of Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory and demand for
its franchises. The Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory system has historically been concentrated in
the western and Rocky Mountain region of the United States, but recent growth has generated a
gradual easterly momentum as new stores have been opened in the eastern half of the country. This
growth has further increased the Companys name recognition and demand for its franchises.
Distribution of Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory products through specialty markets also increases
name recognition and brand awareness in areas of the country in which the Company has not
previously had a significant presence. The Company believes that by distributing selected Rocky
Mountain Chocolate Factory products through new distribution channels its name recognition will
improve and benefit its entire store system.
Store Concept
The Company seeks to establish a fun and inviting atmosphere in its Rocky Mountain Chocolate
Factory store locations. Unlike most other confectionery stores, each Rocky Mountain Chocolate
Factory store prepares certain products, including fudge and caramel apples, in the store.
Customers can observe store personnel making fudge from start to finish, including the mixing of
ingredients in old-fashioned copper kettles and the cooling of the fudge on large granite or marble
tables, and are often invited to sample the stores products. The Company believes that an average
of approximately 50% of the revenues of franchised stores are generated by sales of products
prepared on the premises. The Company believes the in-store preparation and aroma of its products
enhance the ambiance at Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory stores, are fun and entertaining for its
customers and convey an image of freshness and homemade quality.
Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory stores opened prior to fiscal 2002 have a distinctive country
Victorian decor, which further enhances their friendly and enjoyable atmosphere. Each store
includes finely crafted wood cabinetry, copper and brass accents, etched mirrors and large marble
tables on which fudge and other products are made. To ensure that all stores conform to the Rocky
Mountain Chocolate Factory image, the Companys design staff provides working drawings and
specifications and approves the construction plans for each new store. The Company also controls
the signage and building materials that may be used in the stores.
In fiscal 2002, the Company launched its revised store design concept intended specifically for
high foot traffic regional shopping centers. The revised store design concept is modern with crisp
and clean site lines and an even stronger emphasis on the Companys unique upscale kitchen. The
Company is requiring that all new Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory stores incorporate the revised
store design concept. The Company also requires that key elements of the revised store design
concept be incorporated into existing store design upon renewal of the Franchise Agreement, or
transfer in store ownership.
5
The average store size is approximately 1,000 square feet, approximately 650 square feet of which
is selling space. Most stores are open seven days a week. Typical hours are 10 a.m. to 9 p.m.,
Monday through Saturday, and 12 noon to 6 p.m. on Sundays. Store hours in tourist areas may vary
depending upon the tourist season.
Kiosk Concept
In fiscal 2002, the Company opened its first full service retail kiosk concept. The kiosk is a
vehicle for retail environments where in-line real estate is unavailable or build-out costs and/or
rent factors do not meet the Companys financial criteria. The kiosk, which ranges from 150 to 250
square feet, incorporates the Companys trademark cooking area where caramel apples, fudge and
other popular confections are prepared in front of customers using traditional cooking utensils.
The kiosk also includes the Companys core product and gifting lines in order to provide the
customer with a full Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory experience.
The Company believes the kiosk concept enhances its franchise opportunity by providing more
flexibility in support of existing franchisees expansion programs and allows new franchisees that
otherwise would not qualify for an in-line location an opportunity to join the Rocky Mountain
Chocolate Factory system. As of March 31, 2008 there were 18 kiosks in operation.
Products and Packaging
The Company typically produces approximately 300 chocolate candies and other confectionery
products, using proprietary recipes developed primarily by the Companys master candy makers. These
products include many varieties of clusters, caramels, creams, mints and truffles. The Company
continues to engage in a major effort to expand its product line by developing additional exciting
and attractive new products. During the Christmas, Easter and Valentines Day holiday seasons, the
Company may make as many as 100 additional items, including many candies offered in packages
specially designed for the holidays. A typical Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory store offers up to
100 of these candies throughout the year and up to an additional 100 during holiday seasons.
Individual stores also offer more than 15 premium fudges and other products prepared in the store.
The Company believes that, on average, approximately 40% of the revenues of Rocky Mountain
Chocolate Factory stores are generated by products manufactured at the Companys factory, 50% by
products made in the store using Company recipes and ingredients purchased from the Company or
approved suppliers and the remaining 10% by products, such as ice cream, coffee and other sundries,
purchased from approved suppliers.
The Company uses only the finest chocolates, nut meats and other wholesome ingredients in its
candies and continually strives to offer new confectionery items in order to maintain the
excitement and appeal of its products. The Company develops special packaging for the Christmas,
Valentines Day and Easter holidays, and customers can have their purchases packaged in decorative
boxes and fancy tins throughout the year.
Chocolate candies manufactured by the Company are sold at prices ranging from $14.90 to $24.00 per
pound, with an average price of $18.30 per pound. Franchisees set their own retail prices, though
the Company does recommend prices for all of its products.
Operating Environment
The Company currently establishes Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory stores in five primary
environments: regional centers, tourist areas, outlet centers, street fronts, airports and other
entertainment oriented shopping centers. Each of these environments has a number of attractive
features, including high levels of foot traffic.
Outlet Centers
There are approximately 110 factory outlet centers in the United States, and as of February 29,
2008, there were Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory stores in approximately 67 of these centers in
over 25 states. The Company has established business relationships with most of the major outlet
center developers in the United States. Although not all factory outlet centers provide desirable
locations for the Companys stores, management believes the Companys relationships with these
developers will provide it with the opportunity to take advantage of attractive sites in new and
existing outlet centers.
Tourist Areas, Street Fronts and Other Entertainment Oriented Shopping Centers
As of February 29, 2008, there were approximately 40 Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory stores in
locations considered to be tourist areas, including Fishermans Wharf in San Francisco, California
and the Riverwalk in San Antonio, Texas. Tourist areas are very attractive locations
6
because
they offer high levels of foot traffic and favorable customer spending characteristics, and greatly increase the Companys visibility and name recognition. The Company believes
significant opportunities exist to expand into additional tourist areas with high levels of foot
traffic.
Regional Centers
There are approximately 1,400 regional centers in the United States, and as of February 29, 2008,
there were Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory stores in approximately 95 of these centers, including
locations in the Mall of America in Bloomington, Minnesota; and Fort Collins, Colorado. Although
often providing favorable levels of foot traffic, regional centers typically involve more expensive
rent structures and competing food and beverage concepts. The Companys new store concept is
designed to unlock the potential of the regional center environment.
The Company believes there are a number of other environments that have the characteristics
necessary for the successful operation of Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory stores such as airports
and sports arenas. Twelve franchised Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory stores exist at airport
locations: two at Atlanta International (Hartsfield-Jackson), two at Denver International Airport,
one at Charlotte International Airport, one at Minneapolis International Airport, one at Phoenix
Sky Harbor Airport, one at Salt Lake City International Airport, one at Dallas Fort Worth
International Airport and three in Canada; one at Edmonton International Airport, one at Toronto
Pearson International Airport and one at Vancouver International Airport.
On July 20, 2007 the Company entered into an exclusive airport development agreement (the
Agreement) with The Grove, Inc. Pursuant to this Agreement, The Grove will have the exclusive
right to open Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory stores in all airports in the United States where
there are no Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory stores currently operating or under development.
Additionally, the Agreement sets forth a commission on the initial franchise fee and future royalty
revenue to be paid by the Company to The Grove, Inc. for any third-party, qualified, franchisees
who develop an airport location under the Agreement. The Agreement expires on July 20, 2009 or
upon 30 days written notice of default by the Franchisee.
Franchising Program
General
The Companys franchising philosophy is one of service and commitment to its franchise system, and
the Company continuously seeks to improve its franchise support services. The Companys concept has
consistently been rated as an outstanding franchise opportunity by publications and organizations
rating such opportunities. In January 2008, Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory was rated the number
one franchise opportunity in the candy category by Entrepreneur Magazine. As of March 31, 2008,
there were 329 franchised stores in the Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory system. See the audited
financial statements and the related notes thereto included elsewhere in the report for a
discussion of the revenues, profits or losses and total assets related to the franchising segment
of the Companys business.
Franchisee Sourcing and Selection
The majority of new franchises are awarded to persons referred by existing franchisees, to
interested consumers who have visited Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory stores and to existing
franchisees. The Company also advertises for new franchisees in national and regional newspapers as
suitable potential store locations come to the Companys attention. Franchisees are approved by the
Company on the basis of the applicants net worth and liquidity, together with an assessment of
work ethic and personality compatibility with the Companys operating philosophy.
In fiscal 1992, the Company entered into a franchise development agreement covering Canada with
Immaculate Confections, Ltd. of Vancouver, British Columbia. Pursuant to this agreement, Immaculate
Confections purchased the exclusive right to franchise and operate Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory
stores in Canada. Immaculate Confections, as of March 31, 2008, operated 38 stores under the
agreement.
In fiscal 2000, the Company entered into a franchise development agreement covering the Gulf
Cooperation Council States of United Arab Emirates, Qatar, Bahrain, Saudi Arabia, Kuwait and Oman
with Al Muhairy Group of United Arab Emirates. Pursuant to this agreement, Al Muhairy Group
purchased the exclusive right to franchise and operate Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory stores in
the Gulf Cooperation Council States. Al Muhairy Group, as of March 31, 2008, operated 3 stores
under this agreement.
In fiscal 2008, the Company entered into an airport development agreement with The Grove, Inc.
Pursuant to this Agreement, The Grove will have the exclusive right to open Rocky Mountain
Chocolate Factory stores in all airports in the United States where there are no Rocky Mountain
7
Chocolate Factory stores currently operating or under development. The Grove, Inc., as of March
31, 2008, operated 3 stores under this agreement.
Training and Support
Each domestic franchisee owner/operator and each store manager for a domestic franchisee is
required to complete a 7-day comprehensive training program in store operations and management. The
Company has established a training center at its Durango headquarters in the form of a full-sized
replica of a properly configured and merchandised Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory store. Topics
covered in the training course include the Companys philosophy of store operation and management,
customer service, merchandising, pricing, cooking, inventory and cost control, quality standards,
record keeping, labor scheduling and personnel management. Training is based on standard operating
policies and procedures contained in an operations manual provided to all franchisees, which the
franchisee is required to follow by terms of the franchise agreement. Additionally, and
importantly, trainees are provided with a complete orientation to Company operations by working in
key factory operational areas and by meeting with members of the senior management of the Company.
The Companys operating objectives include providing Company knowledge and expertise in
merchandising, marketing and customer service to all front-line store level employees to maximize
their skills and ensure that they are fully versed in the Companys proven techniques.
The Company provides ongoing support to franchisees through its field consultants, who maintain
regular and frequent communication with the stores by phone and by site visits. The field
consultants also review and discuss with the franchisee store operating results and provide advice
and guidance in improving store profitability and in developing and executing store marketing and
merchandising programs. The Company has developed a handbook containing a pre-packaged local
store marketing plan, which allows franchisees to implement cost-effective promotional programs
that have proven successful in other Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory stores.
Quality Standards and Control
The franchise agreement for Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory franchisees requires compliance with
the Companys procedures of operation and food quality specifications and permits audits and
inspections by the Company.
Operating standards for Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory stores are set forth in operating manuals.
These manuals cover general operations, factory ordering, merchandising, advertising and accounting
procedures. Through their regular visits to franchised stores, Company field consultants audit
performance and adherence to Company standards. The Company has the right to terminate any
franchise agreement for non-compliance with the Companys operating standards. Products sold at the
stores and ingredients used in the preparation of products approved for on-site preparation must be
purchased from the Company or from approved suppliers.
The Franchise Agreement: Terms and Conditions
The domestic offer and sale of Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory franchises is made pursuant to the
Uniform Franchise Offering Circular prepared in accordance with federal and state laws and
regulations. States that regulate the sale and operation of franchises require a franchiser to
register or file certain notices with the state authorities prior to offering and selling
franchises in those states.
Under the current form of domestic Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory franchise agreement,
franchisees pay the Company (i) an initial franchise fee for each store, (ii) royalties based on
monthly gross sales, and (iii) a marketing fee based on monthly gross sales. Franchisees are
generally granted exclusive territory with respect to the operation of Rocky Mountain Chocolate
Factory stores only in the immediate vicinity of their stores. Chocolate products not made on the
premises by franchisees must be purchased from the Company or approved suppliers. The franchise
agreements require franchisees to comply with the Companys procedures of operation and food
quality specifications, to permit inspections and audits by the Company and to remodel stores to
conform with standards in effect. The Company may terminate the franchise agreement upon the
failure of the franchisee to comply with the conditions of the agreement and upon the occurrence of
certain events, such as insolvency or bankruptcy of the franchisee or the commission by the
franchisee of any unlawful or deceptive practice, which in the judgment of the Company is likely to
adversely affect the Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory system. The Companys ability to terminate
franchise agreements pursuant to such provisions is subject to applicable bankruptcy and state laws
and regulations. See Business Regulation.
8
The agreements prohibit the transfer or assignment of any interest in a franchise without the
prior written consent of the Company. The agreements also give the Company a right of first refusal
to purchase any interest in a franchise if a proposed transfer would result in a change of control
of that franchise. The refusal right, if exercised, would allow the Company to purchase the
interest proposed to be transferred under the same terms and conditions and for the same price as
offered by the proposed transferee.
The term of each Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory franchise agreement is ten years, and franchisees
have the right to renew for one additional ten-year term.
Franchise Financing
The Company does not provide prospective franchisees with financing for their stores, but has
developed relationships with several sources of franchisee financing to whom it will refer
franchisees. Typically, franchisees have obtained their own sources of such financing and have not
required the Companys assistance.
Company Store Program
As of March 31, 2008 there were 5 Company-owned Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory stores.
Company-owned stores provide a training ground for Company-owned store personnel and district
managers and a controllable testing ground for new products and promotions, operating and training
methods and merchandising techniques, which may then be incorporated into the franchise store
operations.
Managers of Company-owned stores are required to comply with all Company operating standards and
undergo training and receive support from the Company similar to the training and support provided
to franchisees. See Franchising Program-Training and Support and Franchising Program-Quality
Standards and Control.
Manufacturing Operations
General
The Company manufactures its chocolate candies at its factory in Durango, Colorado. All products
are produced consistent with the Companys philosophy of using only the finest, highest quality
ingredients to achieve its marketing motto of the Peak of Perfection in Handmade Chocolates®.
It has always been the belief of management that the Company should control the manufacturing of
its own chocolate products. By controlling manufacturing, the Company can better maintain its high
product quality standards, offer unique, proprietary products, manage costs, control production and
shipment schedules and potentially pursue new or under-utilized distribution channels. See the
audited financial statements and the related notes thereto included elsewhere in this report for a
discussion of the revenues, profits or losses and total assets related to the manufacturing segment
of the Companys business.
Manufacturing Processes
The manufacturing process primarily involves cooking or preparing candy centers, including nuts,
caramel, peanut butter, creams and jellies, and then coating them with chocolate or other toppings.
All of these processes are conducted in carefully controlled temperature ranges, and the Company
employs strict quality control procedures at every stage of the manufacturing process. The Company
uses a combination of manual and automated processes at its factory. Although the Company believes
that it is currently preferable to perform certain manufacturing processes, such as dipping of some
large pieces, by hand, automation increases the speed and efficiency of the manufacturing process.
The Company has from time to time automated processes formerly performed by hand where it has
become cost-effective for the Company to do so without compromising product quality or appearance.
The Company seeks to ensure the freshness of products sold in Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory
stores with frequent shipments. Most Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory stores do not have
significant space for the storage of inventory, and the Company encourages franchisees and store
managers to order only the quantities that they can reasonably expect to sell within approximately
two to four weeks. For these reasons, the Company generally does not have a significant backlog of
orders.
Ingredients
The principal ingredients used by the Company are chocolate, nuts, sugar, corn syrup, cream and
butter. The factory receives shipments of ingredients daily. To ensure the consistency of its
products, the Company buys ingredients from a limited number of reliable suppliers. In order to
assure a continuous supply of chocolate and certain nuts, the Company frequently enters into
9
purchase contracts of between six to eighteen months for these products. Because prices for these
products may fluctuate, the Company may benefit if prices rise during the terms of these contracts,
but it may be required to pay above-market prices if prices fall. The Company has one or more
alternative sources for all essential ingredients and therefore believes that the loss of any
supplier would not have a material adverse effect on the Company and its results of operations. The
Company currently also purchases small amounts of finished candy from third parties on a private
label basis for sale in Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory stores.
Trucking Operations
The Company operates eight trucks and ships a substantial portion of its products from the factory
on its own fleet. The Companys trucking operations enable it to deliver its products to the stores
quickly and cost-effectively. In addition, the Company back-hauls its own ingredients and supplies,
as well as product from third parties, on return trips as a basis for increasing trucking program
economics.
Marketing
The Company relies primarily on in-store promotion and point-of-purchase materials to promote the
sale of its products. The monthly marketing fees collected from franchisees are used by the Company
to develop new packaging and in-store promotion and point-of-purchase materials, and to create and
update the Companys local store marketing handbooks.
The Company focuses on local store marketing efforts by providing customizable marketing materials,
including advertisements, coupons, flyers and mail order catalogs generated by its in-house
Creative Services department. The department works directly with franchisees to implement local
store marketing programs.
The Company aggressively seeks low cost, high return publicity opportunities through participation
in local and regional events, sponsorships and charitable causes. The Company has not historically
and does not intend to engage in national advertising in the near future.
Competition
The retailing of confectionery products is highly competitive. The Company and its franchisees
compete with numerous businesses that offer confectionery products. Many of these competitors have
greater name recognition and financial, marketing and other resources than the Company. In
addition, there is intense competition among retailers for real estate sites, store personnel and
qualified franchisees. Competitive market conditions could adversely affect the Company and its
results of operations and its ability to expand successfully.
The Company believes that its principal competitive strengths lie in its name recognition and its
reputation for the quality, value, variety and taste of its products and the special ambiance of
its stores; its knowledge and experience in applying criteria for selection of new store locations;
its expertise in merchandising and marketing of chocolate and other candy products; and the control
and training infrastructures it has implemented to assure execution of successful practices and
techniques at its store locations. In addition, by controlling the manufacturing of its own
chocolate products, the Company can better maintain its high product quality standards for those
products, offer proprietary products, manage costs, control production and shipment schedules and
pursue new or under-utilized distribution channels.
Trade Name and Trademarks
The trade name Rocky Mountain Chocolate FactoryÒ, the phrases, The Peak of Perfection in
Handmade ChocolatesÒ, Americas ChocolatierÒ, The Worlds Chocolatierâ as
well as all other trademarks, service marks, symbols, slogans, emblems, logos and designs used in
the Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory system, are proprietary rights of the Company. All of the
foregoing are believed to be of material importance to the Companys business. The registration for
the trademark Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory has been granted in the United States and Canada.
Applications have been filed to register the Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory trademark and/or
obtained in certain foreign countries.
The Company has not attempted to obtain patent protection for the proprietary recipes developed by
the Companys master candy-maker and is relying upon its ability to maintain the confidentiality of
those recipes.
10
Employees
At February 29, 2008, the Company employed approximately 190 people. Most employees, with the
exception of store, factory and corporate management, are paid on an hourly basis. The Company also
employs some people on a temporary basis during peak periods of store and factory operations. The
Company seeks to assure that participatory management processes, mutual respect and professionalism
and high performance expectations for the employee exist throughout the organization. The Company
believes that it provides working conditions, wages and benefits that compare favorably with those
of its competitors. The Companys employees are not covered by a collective bargaining agreement.
The Company considers its employee relations to be good.
Executive Officers
The executive officers of the Company and their ages at April 30, 2008 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name |
|
Age |
|
Position |
Franklin E. Crail
|
|
|
66 |
|
|
Chairman of the Board, President and Director |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bryan J. Merryman
|
|
|
47 |
|
|
Chief Operating Officer, Chief Financial
Officer, Treasurer and Director |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gregory L. Pope
|
|
|
41 |
|
|
Sr. Vice President Franchise Development
and Operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edward L. Dudley
|
|
|
44 |
|
|
Sr. Vice President Sales and Marketing |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
William K. Jobson
|
|
|
52 |
|
|
Chief Information Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jay B. Haws
|
|
|
58 |
|
|
Vice President Creative Services |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Virginia M. Perez
|
|
|
70 |
|
|
Corporate Secretary |
Mr. Crail co-founded the first Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory store in May 1981. Since the
incorporation of the Company in November 1982, he has served as its President and a Director. He
was elected Chairman of the Board in March 1986. Prior to founding the Company, Mr. Crail was
co-founder and president of CNI Data Processing, Inc., a software firm which developed automated
billing systems for the cable television industry.
Mr. Merryman joined the Company in December 1997 as Vice President Finance and Chief Financial
Officer. Since April 1999 Mr. Merryman has also served the Company as the Chief Operating Officer
and as a Director, and since January 2000 as its Treasurer. Prior to joining the Company, Mr.
Merryman was a principal in Knightsbridge Holdings, Inc. (a leveraged buyout firm) from January
1997 to December 1997. Mr. Merryman also served as Chief Financial Officer of Super Shops, Inc., a
retailer and manufacturer of aftermarket auto parts from July 1996 to November 1997 and was
employed for more than eleven years by Deloitte and Touche LLP, most recently as a senior manager.
Mr. Pope became Sr. Vice President of Franchise Development and Operations in May 2004. Since
joining the Company in October 1990, he has served in various positions including store manager,
new store opener and franchise field consultant. In March 1996 he became Director of Franchise
Development and Support. In June 2001 he became Vice President of Franchise Development, a position
he held until he was promoted to his present position.
Mr. Dudley joined the Company in January 1997 to spearhead the Companys newly formed Product Sales
Development function as Vice President Sales and Marketing, with the goal of increasing the
Companys factory and retail sales. He was promoted to Senior Vice President in June 2001. During
his 10 year career with Baxter Healthcare Corporation, Mr. Dudley served in a number of senior
marketing and sales management capacities, including most recently that of Director, Distribution
Services from March 1996 to January 1997.
Mr. Jobson joined the Company in July 1998 as Director of Information Technology. In June 2001, he
was promoted to Chief Information Officer, a position created to enhance the Companys strategic
focus on information and information technology. From July 1995 to July 1998, Mr. Jobson worked for
ADAC Laboratories in Durango, Colorado, a leading provider of diagnostic imaging and information
systems solutions in the healthcare industry, as Manager of Technical Services and before that,
Regional Manager.
Mr. Haws joined the Company in August 1991 as Vice President of Creative Services. Since 1981, Mr.
Haws had been closely associated with the Company both as a franchisee and marketing/graphic design
consultant. From 1986 to 1991 he operated two Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory franchises located
in San Francisco, California. From 1983 to 1989 he served as Vice President of Marketing for Image
Group, Inc., a marketing communications firm based in Northern California. Concurrently, Mr. Haws
was co-owner of two other Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory franchises located in Sacramento, and
Walnut Creek California. From 1973 to 1983 he was principal of Jay Haws and Associates, an
advertising and graphic design agency.
11
Ms. Perez joined the Company in June 1996 and has served as the Companys corporate secretary
since February, 1997. From 1992 until joining the Company, she was employed by Huettig & Schromm,
Inc., a property management and development firm in Palo Alto, California as executive assistant to
the president and owner. Huettig & Schromm developed, owned and managed over 1,000,000 square feet
of office space in business parks and office buildings on the San Francisco peninsula. Ms. Perez is
a paralegal and has held various administrative positions during her career including executive
assistant to the Chairman and owner of Sunset Magazine & Books, Inc.
Seasonal Factors
The Companys sales and earnings are seasonal, with significantly higher sales and earnings
occurring during the Christmas holiday and summer vacation seasons than at other times of the year,
which causes fluctuations in the Companys quarterly results of operations. In addition, quarterly
results have been, and in the future are likely to be, affected by the timing of new store openings
and the sale of franchises. Because of the seasonality of the Companys business and the impact of
new store openings and sales of franchises, results for any quarter are not necessarily indicative
of the results that may be achieved in other quarters or for a full fiscal year.
Regulation
Each of the Company-owned and franchised stores is subject to licensing and regulation by the
health, sanitation, safety, building and fire agencies in the state or municipality where located.
Difficulties or failures in obtaining the required licensing or approvals could delay or prevent
the opening of new stores. New stores must also comply with landlord and developer criteria.
Many states have laws regulating franchise operations, including registration and disclosure
requirements in the offer and sale of franchises. The Company is also subject to the Federal Trade
Commission regulations relating to disclosure requirements in the sale of franchises and ongoing
disclosure obligations.
Additionally, certain states have enacted and others may enact laws and regulations governing the
termination or non-renewal of franchises and other aspects of the franchise relationship that are
intended to protect franchisees. Although these laws and regulations, and related court decisions,
may limit the Companys ability to terminate franchises and alter franchise agreements, the Company
does not believe that such laws or decisions will have a material adverse effect on its franchise
operations. However, the laws applicable to franchise operations and relationships continue to
develop, and the Company is unable to predict the effect on its intended operations of additional
requirements or restrictions that may be enacted or of court decisions that may be adverse to
franchisers.
Federal and state environmental regulations have not had a material impact on the Companys
operations but more stringent and varied requirements of local governmental bodies with respect to
zoning, land use and environmental factors could delay construction of new stores.
Companies engaged in the manufacturing, packaging and distribution of food products are subject to
extensive regulation by various governmental agencies. A finding of a failure to comply with one or
more regulations could result in the imposition of sanctions, including the closing of all or a
portion of the Companys facilities for an indeterminate period of time. The Companys product
labeling is subject to and complies with the Nutrition Labeling and Education Act of 1990 and the
Food Allergen Labeling and Consumer Protection Act of 2004.
The Company provides a limited amount of trucking services to third parties, to fill available
space on the Companys trucks. The Companys trucking operations are subject to various federal and
state regulations, including regulations of the Federal Highway Administration and other federal
and state agencies applicable to motor carriers, safety requirements of the Department of
Transportation relating to interstate transportation and federal, state and Canadian provincial
regulations governing matters such as vehicle weight and dimensions.
The Company believes it is operating in substantial compliance with all applicable laws and
regulations.
Available Information
The Internet address of the Companys website is www.rmcf.com.
The Company makes available free of charge, through the Companys Internet website, our annual
report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, and amendments to
those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Exchange Act, as soon
as reasonably practicable after we file such material with, or furnish it to, the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the SEC).
12
Item 1A. Risk Factors
Ingredients Subject to the Price Fluctuations
Several of the principal ingredients used in our products, including chocolate and nuts, are
subject to significant price fluctuations. Although cocoa beans, the primary raw material used in
the production of chocolate, are grown commercially in Africa, Brazil and several other countries
around the world, cocoa beans are traded in the commodities market, and their supply and price are
therefore subject to volatility. We believe our principal chocolate supplier purchases most of its
beans at negotiated prices from African growers, often at a premium to commodity prices. The supply
and price of cocoa beans, and in turn of chocolate, are affected by many factors, including
monetary fluctuations and economic, political and weather conditions in countries in which cocoa
beans are grown. We purchase most of our nut meats from domestic suppliers who procure their
products from growers around the world. The price and supply of nuts are also affected by many
factors, including weather conditions in the various regions in which the nuts we use are grown.
Although we often enter into purchase contracts for these products, significant or prolonged
increases in the prices of chocolate or of one or more types of nuts, or the unavailability of
adequate supplies of chocolate or nuts of the quality sought by us, could have a material adverse
effect on us and our results of operations.
Suitable Sites for Franchised Stores at Reasonable Occupancy Costs
Our expansion plans are critically dependent on our ability to obtain suitable sites at reasonable
occupancy costs for our franchised stores and kiosks in the regional center environment. There is
no assurance that we will be able to obtain suitable locations for our franchised stores and kiosks
in this environment at a cost that will allow such stores to be economically viable.
Growth Dependent Upon Attracting and Retaining Qualified Franchisees
Our continued growth and success is dependent in part upon our ability to attract, retain and
contract with qualified franchisees and the ability of those franchisees to operate their stores
successfully and to promote and develop the Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory store concept and our
reputation for an enjoyable in-store experience and product quality. Although we have established
criteria to evaluate prospective franchisees and have been successful in attracting franchisees,
there can be no assurance that franchisees will be able to operate successfully Rocky Mountain
Chocolate Factory stores in their franchise areas in a manner consistent with our concepts and
standards.
Federal, State and Local Regulation
We are subject to regulation by the Federal Trade Commission and must comply with certain state
laws governing the offer, sale and termination of franchises and the refusal to renew franchises.
Many state laws also regulate substantive aspects of the franchisor-franchisee relationship by, for
example, requiring the franchisor to deal with its franchisees in good faith, prohibiting
interference with the right of free association among franchisees and regulating discrimination
among franchisees in charges, royalties or fees. Franchise laws continue to develop and change, and
changes in such laws could impose additional costs and burdens on franchisors. Our failure to
obtain approvals to sell franchises and the adoption of new franchise laws, or changes in existing
laws, could have a material adverse effect on us and our results of operations.
Each of our Company-owned and franchised stores is subject to licensing and regulation by the
health, sanitation, safety, building and fire agencies in the state or municipality where located.
Difficulties or failures in obtaining required licenses or approvals from such agencies could delay
or prevent the opening of a new store. We and our franchisees are also subject to laws governing
our relationships with employees, including minimum wage requirements, overtime, working and safety
conditions and citizenship requirements. Because a significant number of our employees are paid at
rates related to the federal minimum wage, increases in the minimum wage would increase our labor
costs. The failure to obtain required licenses or approvals, or an increase in the minimum wage
rate, employee benefits costs (including costs associated with mandated health insurance coverage)
or other costs associated with employees, could have a material adverse effect on us and our
results of operations.
Companies engaged in the manufacturing, packaging and distribution of food products are subject to
extensive regulation by various governmental agencies. A finding of a failure to comply with one or
more regulations could result in the imposition of sanctions, including the closing of all or a
portion of our facilities for an indeterminate period of time, and could have a material adverse
effect on us and our results of operations.
13
Competition
The retailing of confectionery products is highly competitive. We and our franchisees compete with
numerous businesses that offer confectionery products. Many of these competitors have greater name
recognition and financial, marketing and other resources than we do. In addition, there is intense
competition among retailers for real estate sites, store personnel and qualified franchisees.
Competitive market conditions could have a material adverse effect on us and our results of
operations and our ability to expand successfully.
Consumer Tastes and Trends
The sale of our products is affected by changes in consumer tastes and eating habits, including
views regarding consumption of chocolate. Numerous other factors that we cannot control, such as
economic conditions, demographic trends, traffic patterns and weather conditions, influence the
sale of our products. Changes in any of these factors could have a material adverse effect on us
and our results of operations.
Adverse Changes in National or Regional U.S. Economic Conditions
Adverse economic changes could have a significant negative impact on U.S. consumer spending,
particularly discretionary spending, which, in turn, could directly affect the Companys overall
revenues. Consumer confidence, recessionary and inflationary trends, equity market levels, consumer
credit availability, interest rates, consumers disposable income and spending levels, energy
prices, job growth and unemployment rates may impact the volume of customer traffic and level of
sales in our locations. Negative trends in any of these economic conditions, whether national or
regional in nature, could adversely affect our financial results, including our net sales and
profitability.
Company Manufactured Products
We believe that approximately 40% of franchised stores revenues are generated by sales of products
manufactured by and purchased from us, 50% by sales of products made in the stores with ingredients
purchased from us or approved suppliers and 10% by sales of products purchased from approved
suppliers for resale in the stores. Franchisees sales of products manufactured by us generate
higher revenues to us than sales of store-made or other products. A significant decrease in the
amount of products franchisees purchase from us, therefore, could adversely affect our total
revenues and results of operations. Such a decrease could result from franchisees decisions to
sell more store-made products or products purchased from third party suppliers.
Inflation Costs of Ingredients and Labor
Inflationary factors such as increases in the costs of ingredients, energy and labor directly
affect our operations. Most of our leases provide for cost-of-living adjustments and require us to
pay taxes, insurance and maintenance expenses, all of which are subject to inflation. Additionally,
our future lease costs for new facilities may reflect potentially escalating costs of real estate
and construction. There is no assurance that we will be able to pass on our increased costs to our
customers.
Seasonality of Sales
Our sales and earnings are seasonal, with significantly higher sales and earnings occurring during
the Christmas and summer vacation seasons than at other times of the year, which causes
fluctuations in our quarterly results of operations. In addition, quarterly results have been, and
in the future are likely to be, affected by the timing of new store openings and the sale of
franchises. Because of the seasonality of our business and the impact of new store openings and
sales of franchises, results for any quarter are not necessarily indicative of the results that may
be achieved in other quarters or for a full fiscal year. See Managements Discussion and Analysis
of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
None.
14
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES
The Companys manufacturing operations and corporate headquarters are located at its 53,000 square
foot manufacturing facility, which it owns, in Durango, Colorado. During fiscal 2008, the Companys
factory produced approximately 2.84 million pounds of chocolate candies, an increase of 4% from the
approximately 2.73 million pounds produced in fiscal 2007. During fiscal 2008 the Company conducted
a study of factory capacity. As a result of this study, the Company believes the factory has the
capacity to produce approximately 5.3 million pounds per year. In January 1998, the Company
acquired a two-acre parcel adjacent to its factory to ensure the availability of adequate space to
expand the factory as volume demands.
As of March 31, 2008, all of the 5 Company-owned stores were occupied pursuant to non-cancelable
leases of five to ten years having varying expiration dates from April 2008 to August 2017, some of
which contain optional five-year renewal rights. The Company does not deem any individual store
lease to be significant in relation to its overall operations.
The Company acts as primary lessee of some franchised store premises, which it then subleases to
franchisees, but the majority of existing locations are leased by the franchisee directly. Current
Company policy is not to act as primary lessee on any further franchised locations. At March 31,
2008, the Company was the primary lessee at 3 of its 329 franchised stores. The subleases for such
stores are on the same terms as the Companys leases of the premises. For information as to the
amount of the Companys rental obligations under leases on both Company-owned and franchised
stores, see Note 5 of Notes to financial statements.
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
The Company is not currently involved in any material legal proceedings other than ordinary routine
litigation incidental to its business.
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
None
Part II.
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANTS COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER
MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
Market Information
The Companys Common Stock trades on the National Global Market which is part of The Nasdaq Stock
Market under the trading symbol RMCF. On July 10, 2007 the Board of Directors declared a 5% stock
dividend payable on July 31, 2007 to shareholders of record as of July 20, 2007. On February 19,
2008, the Board of Directors declared a fourth quarter cash dividend of $0.10 cents per common
share outstanding. The cash dividend was paid March 14, 2008 to shareholders of record as of
February 29, 2008.
The Company declared these stock and cash dividends because the Company felt that its Common Stock
lacked sufficient shares and related liquidity to satisfy an increasing number of investors
interested in purchasing the Companys Common Stock. All of the following items in this Item 5.
have been adjusted, where necessary, for the effects of the stock dividend.
Between January 9, 2008 and February 8, 2008, the Company repurchased 391,600 shares at an average
price of $11.94. Between August 15, 2007 and August 28, 2007, the Company repurchased 16,000 shares
at an average price of $15.96 per share. Between March 1, 2007 and May 15, 2007 the Company
repurchased 76,335 shares at an average price of $13.12 per share. Between May 1, 2006 and
February 28, 2007 the Company repurchased 253,141 shares at an average price of $12.94 per share.
Between March 24, 2006 and April 28, 2006 the Company repurchased 74,249 shares at an average price
of $14.90 per share. Between October 7, 2005 and February 3, 2006 the Company repurchased 185,429
Company shares at an average price of $14.63 per share. Between April 18 and April 20, 2005, the
Company repurchased 18,529 Company shares at an average price of $13.28 per share.
The Company made these purchases because the Company felt that its Common Stock was undervalued and
that such purchases would therefore be in the best interest of the Company and its stockholders.
15
The table below sets forth high and low price information for the Common Stock for each quarter of
fiscal years 2008 and 2007, and dividend information.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended February 29, 2008 |
|
HIGH |
|
LOW |
|
Dividends declared |
Fourth Quarter |
|
$ |
17.69 |
|
|
$ |
10.45 |
|
|
|
.1000 |
|
Third Quarter |
|
$ |
18.04 |
|
|
$ |
15.40 |
|
|
|
.1000 |
|
Second Quarter |
|
$ |
18.00 |
|
|
$ |
14.20 |
|
|
|
.0950 |
|
First Quarter |
|
$ |
15.18 |
|
|
$ |
12.62 |
|
|
|
.0952 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended February 28, 2007 |
|
HIGH |
|
LOW |
|
Dividends declared |
Fourth Quarter |
|
$ |
14.75 |
|
|
$ |
12.65 |
|
|
|
.0857 |
|
Third Quarter |
|
$ |
14.26 |
|
|
$ |
11.86 |
|
|
|
.0857 |
|
Second Quarter |
|
$ |
13.81 |
|
|
$ |
11.11 |
|
|
|
.0762 |
|
First Quarter |
|
$ |
15.24 |
|
|
$ |
12.14 |
|
|
|
.0762 |
|
On April 30, 2008 the closing price for the Common Stock was $12.30.
Holders
On April 30, 2008 there were approximately 400 record holders of the Companys Common Stock. The
Company believes that there are more than 800 beneficial owners of its Common Stock.
Repurchases
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(c) Total Number of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares Purchased as |
|
(d) Approximate Dollar Value |
|
|
(a) Total Number |
|
(b) Average |
|
Part of Publicly |
|
of Shares that May Yet Be |
|
|
of Shares |
|
Price Paid per |
|
Announced Plans or |
|
Purchased Under the Plans or |
Period |
|
Purchased |
|
Share |
|
Programs(1) |
|
Programs(2) |
December 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,649,960 |
|
January 2008 |
|
|
141,600 |
|
|
|
12.63 |
|
|
|
141,600 |
|
|
|
2,861,373 |
|
February 2008 |
|
|
250,000 |
|
|
|
11.55 |
|
|
|
250,000 |
|
|
|
3,003,867 |
|
Total |
|
|
391,600 |
|
|
|
11.94 |
|
|
|
391,600 |
|
|
|
3,003,867 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
During the fourth quarter of Fiscal 2008 ending February 29, 2008, the Company
purchased 391,600 shares in the open market. |
|
(2) |
|
On January 5, 2006, May 4, 2006 and May 25, 2006 the Company announced plans to
repurchase up to $2,000,000 of the Companys common stock, on May 10, 2007 the Company
announced plans to repurchase up to $5,000,000 of the Companys common stock and on
February 19, 2008 the Company announced plans to repurchase up to $3,000,000 of the
Companys common stock in the open market or in private transactions, whenever deemed
appropriate by management. The plans were only to expire once the designated amounts
were reached. The January 5, 2006 plan was completed in May 2006. The May 4, 2006 plan
was completed in July 2006. The May 25, 2006 plan was completed in May 2007. The May
10, 2007 plan was completed in February 2008. The Company plans to continue the February
19, 2008 plan until it has been completed. |
16
Comparison of Return on Equity
The following graph reflects the total return, which assumes reinvestment of dividends, of a
$100 investment in the Companys Common Stock, in the Nasdaq Index, in the Russell 2000 Index and
in a Peer Group Index of companies in the confectionery industry, on February 28, 2003.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Base Period |
|
Return |
|
Return |
|
Return |
|
Return |
|
Return |
Company/Index Name |
|
2/2003 |
|
2/2004 |
|
2/2005 |
|
2/2006 |
|
2/2007 |
|
2/2008 |
|
Rocky
Mountain Chocolate Factory, Inc. |
|
|
100.00 |
|
|
|
215.97 |
|
|
|
540.76 |
|
|
|
551.24 |
|
|
|
502.19 |
|
|
|
503.38 |
|
Nasdaq Index US |
|
|
100.00 |
|
|
|
152.22 |
|
|
|
154.10 |
|
|
|
172.40 |
|
|
|
183.46 |
|
|
|
172.24 |
|
Russell 2000 Index |
|
|
100.00 |
|
|
|
164.41 |
|
|
|
180.08 |
|
|
|
209.95 |
|
|
|
230.67 |
|
|
|
201.98 |
|
Peer Group(l) |
|
|
100.00 |
|
|
|
117.82 |
|
|
|
151.42 |
|
|
|
141.44 |
|
|
|
148.50 |
|
|
|
164.43 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Comprised of the following companies: The Hershey Company, Imperial Sugar Company, Monterey Gourmet Foods, Inc.,
Paradise, Inc., Tootsie Roll Industries, Inc., Valhi, Inc. and Wrigley (Wm.), Jr. Company. |
ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
The selected financial data presented below for the fiscal years ended February 28 or 29, 2004
through 2008, are derived from the Financial Statements of the Company, which have been audited by
Ehrhardt Keefe Steiner & Hottman PC, independent registered public accounting firm. The selected
financial data should be read in conjunction with the Financial Statements and related Notes
thereto included elsewhere in this Report and Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations.
17
(Amounts in thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
YEARS ENDED FEBRUARY 28 or 29, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
Selected Statement of Operations Data |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
$ |
31,878 |
|
|
$ |
31,573 |
|
|
$ |
28,074 |
|
|
$ |
24,524 |
|
|
$ |
21,133 |
|
Operating income |
|
|
7,914 |
|
|
|
7,561 |
|
|
|
6,459 |
|
|
|
5,339 |
|
|
|
3,779 |
|
Net income |
|
$ |
4,961 |
|
|
$ |
4,745 |
|
|
$ |
4,065 |
|
|
$ |
3,317 |
|
|
$ |
2,319 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic Earnings per Common
Share |
|
$ |
.78 |
|
|
$ |
.74 |
|
|
$ |
.62 |
|
|
$ |
.53 |
|
|
$ |
.38 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted Earnings per
Common Share |
|
$ |
.76 |
|
|
$ |
.71 |
|
|
$ |
.58 |
|
|
$ |
.49 |
|
|
$ |
.35 |
|
Weighted average
common shares
outstanding |
|
|
6,341 |
|
|
|
6,432 |
|
|
|
6,582 |
|
|
|
6,307 |
|
|
|
6,147 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average
common shares
outstanding, assuming
dilution |
|
|
6,501 |
|
|
|
6,659 |
|
|
|
7,009 |
|
|
|
6,806 |
|
|
|
6,619 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selected Balance Sheet Data |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Working capital |
|
$ |
5,152 |
|
|
$ |
7,503 |
|
|
$ |
7,533 |
|
|
$ |
8,008 |
|
|
$ |
6,394 |
|
Total assets |
|
|
16,147 |
|
|
|
18,456 |
|
|
|
19,057 |
|
|
|
19,248 |
|
|
|
17,967 |
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,539 |
|
|
|
1,986 |
|
Stockholders equity |
|
|
11,655 |
|
|
|
14,515 |
|
|
|
15,486 |
|
|
|
13,894 |
|
|
|
11,590 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Dividend Declared per
Common Share |
|
$ |
.390 |
|
|
$ |
.324 |
|
|
$ |
.271 |
|
|
$ |
.200 |
|
|
$ |
.102 |
|
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
A Note About Forward Looking Statements
The following discussion and analysis of the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company should be read in conjunction with the audited financial statements and related Notes of
the Company included elsewhere in this report. This Managements Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations and other parts of this Annual Report on Form 10-K
contain forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. The nature of the
Companys operations and the environment in which it operates subject it to changing economic,
competitive, regulatory and technological conditions, risks and uncertainties. The statements,
other than statements of historical fact, included in this report are forward-looking statements.
Many of the forward-looking statements contained in this document may be identified by the use of
forward-looking words such as will, intend, believe, expect, anticipate, should,
plan, estimate and potential, or similar expressions. Factors which could cause results to
differ include, but are not limited to: changes in the confectionery business environment,
seasonality, consumer interest in the Companys products, general economic conditions, consumer
trends, costs and availability of raw materials, competition and the effect of government
regulation. Government regulation which the Company and its franchisees either are or may be
subject to and which could cause results to differ from forward-looking statements include, but are
not limited to: local, state and federal laws regarding health, sanitation, safety, building and
fire codes, franchising, employment, manufacturing, packaging and distribution of food products and
motor carriers. For a detailed discussion of the risks and uncertainties that may cause the
Companys actual results to differ from the forward-looking statements contained herein, please see
the Risk Factors contained in this document at 1A. These forward-looking statements apply only as
of the date of this report. As such they should not be unduly relied upon for more current
circumstances. Except as required by law, the Company is not obligated to release publicly any
revisions to these forward-looking statements that might reflect events or circumstances occurring
after the date of this report or those that might reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events.
The Company is a product-based international franchisor. The Companys revenues and profitability
are derived principally from its franchised system of retail stores that feature chocolate and
other confectionery products. The Company also sells its candy in selected locations outside its
system of retail stores to build brand awareness. The Company operates five retail units as a
laboratory to test marketing, design and operational initiatives.
The Company is subject to seasonal fluctuations in sales because of the location of its
franchisees, which have traditionally been located in resort or tourist locations. As the Company
expands its geographical diversity to include regional centers, it has seen some
moderation to its seasonal sales mix. Seasonal fluctuation in sales causes fluctuations in
18
quarterly results of operations. Historically, the strongest sales of the Companys products have
occurred during the Christmas holiday and summer vacation seasons. Additionally, quarterly results
have been, and in the future are likely to be, affected by the timing of new store openings and
sales of franchises. Because of the seasonality of the Companys business and the impact of new
store openings and sales of franchises, results for any quarter are not necessarily indicative of
results that may be achieved in other quarters or for a full fiscal year.
The most important factors in continued growth in the Companys earnings are ongoing unit growth,
increased same store sales and increased same store pounds purchased from the factory.
Historically, unit growth has more than offset decreases in same store sales and same store pounds
purchased.
The Companys ability to successfully achieve expansion of its Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory
franchise system depends on many factors not within the Companys control including the
availability of suitable sites for new store establishment and the availability of qualified
franchisees to support such expansion.
Efforts to reverse the decline in same store pounds purchased from the factory by franchised stores
and to increase total factory sales depend on many factors, including new store openings,
competition, the receptivity of the Companys franchise system to the Companys product
introductions and promotional programs. Same store pounds purchased from the factory by franchised
stores declined approximately 9% in the first quarter, second quarter and third quarter; 12% in the
fourth quarter and 9% overall in fiscal 2008.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
The Companys discussion and analysis of its financial condition and results of operations are
based upon the Companys financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The preparation of these
financial statements requires the Company to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported
amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses and the related disclosures. Estimates and
assumptions include, but are not limited to, the carrying value of accounts and notes receivable
from franchisees, inventories, the useful lives of fixed assets, goodwill, and other intangible
assets, income taxes, contingencies and litigation. The Company bases its estimates on analyses, of
which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that
are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates.
We believe that the following represent our more critical estimates and assumptions used in the
preparation of our financial statements, although not all inclusive.
Accounts and Notes Receivable In the normal course of business, the Company extends credit to
customers, primarily franchisees, that satisfy pre-defined credit criteria. The Company believes
that it has limited concentration of credit risk primarily because its receivables are often
secured by the assets of the franchisees to which the Company ordinarily extends credit, including,
but not limited to, their franchise rights and inventories. An allowance for doubtful accounts is
determined through analysis of the aging of accounts receivable, assessments of collectability
based on historical trends, and an evaluation of the impact of current and projected economic
conditions. The process by which the Company performs its analysis is conducted on a customer by
customer, or franchisee by franchisee, basis and takes into account, among other relevant factors,
sales history, outstanding receivables, customer financial strength, as well as customer specific
and geographic market factors relevant to projected performance. The Company monitors the
collectability of its accounts receivable on an ongoing basis by assessing the credit worthiness of
its customers and evaluating the impact of reasonably likely changes in economic conditions that
may impact credit risks. Estimates with regard to the collectability of accounts receivable are
reasonably likely to change in the future.
The Company recorded expense of approximately $48,000 per year for potential uncollectible accounts
over the three-year period ended February 29, 2008. Write-offs of uncollectible accounts net of
recoveries averaged approximately $54,000 over the same period. The provision for uncollectible
accounts is recognized as general and administrative expense in the Statements of Income. Over the
past three years, the allowances for doubtful notes and accounts have ranged from 2.6% to 4.4% of
gross receivables.
Revenue Recognition The Company recognizes revenue on sales of products to franchisees and other
customers at the time of delivery. Through fiscal 2006, franchise fee revenue was recognized upon
completion of all significant initial services provided to the franchisee and upon satisfaction of
all material conditions of the franchise agreement. The initial $5,000
portion of the fee was recognized upon signing of the franchise agreement. The balance of the fee
19
was recognized upon the franchisees commitment to a property lease. Beginning in fiscal 2007,
franchise fee revenue is recognized upon the opening of the store. The Company also recognizes a
marketing and promotion fee of one percent (1%) of the Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory franchised
stores gross retail sales and a royalty fee based on gross retail sales. Beginning with franchise
store openings in the third quarter of fiscal year 2004, the Company modified its royalty
structure. Under the current structure, the Company recognizes no royalty on franchised stores
retail sales of products purchased from the Company and recognizes a ten percent (10%) royalty on
all other sales of product sold at franchise locations. For franchise stores opened prior to the
third quarter of fiscal 2004 the Company recognizes a royalty fee of five percent (5%) of
franchised stores gross retail sales.
Inventories The Companys inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market value and are
reduced by an allowance for slow-moving, excess, discontinued and shelf-life expired inventories.
Our estimate for such allowance is based on our review of inventories on hand compared to estimated
future usage and demand for our products. Such review encompasses not only potentially perishable
inventories but also specialty packaging, much of it specific to certain holiday seasons. If actual
future usage and demand for our products are less favorable than those projected by our review,
inventory write-downs may be required. We closely monitor our inventory, both perishable and
non-perishable, and related shelf and product lives. Historically we have experienced low levels of
obsolete inventory or returns of products that have exceeded their shelf life. Over the three-year
period ended February 29, 2008, the Company recorded expense averaging approximately $68,000 per
year for potential inventory losses, or approximately 0.4% of total cost of sales for that period.
Goodwill Goodwill consists of the excess of purchase price over the fair market value of
acquired assets and liabilities. Effective March 1, 2002, under SFAS 142 all goodwill with
indefinite lives is no longer subject to amortization. SFAS 142 requires that an impairment test be
conducted annually or in the event of an impairment indicator. Our test conducted in fiscal 2008
showed no impairment of our goodwill.
Other accounting estimates inherent in the preparation of the Companys financial statements
include estimates associated with its evaluation of the recoverability of deferred tax assets, as
well as those used in the determination of liabilities related to litigation and taxation. Various
assumptions and other factors underlie the determination of these significant estimates. The
process of determining significant estimates is fact specific and takes into account factors such
as historical experience, current and expected economic conditions, and product mix. The Company
constantly re-evaluates these significant factors and makes adjustments where facts and
circumstances dictate. Historically, actual results have not significantly deviated from those
determined using the estimates described above.
As discussed in Note 5 to the financial statements, the Company is involved in litigation
incidental to its business, the disposition of which is expected to have no material effect on the
Companys financial position or results of operations. It is possible, however, that future results
of operations for any particular quarterly or annual period could be materially affected by changes
in the Companys assumptions related to these proceedings.
Results of Operations
Fiscal 2008 Compared To Fiscal 2007
Results Summary
Basic earnings per share increased 5.4% from $.74 in fiscal 2007 to $.78 in fiscal 2008. Revenues
increased 1.0% from fiscal 2007 to fiscal 2008. Operating income increased 4.7% from $7.6 million
in fiscal 2007 to $7.9 million in fiscal 2008. Net income increased 4.6% from $4.7 million in
fiscal 2007 to $5.0 million in fiscal 2008. The increase in revenue, earnings per share, operating
income, and net income in fiscal 2008 compared to fiscal 2007 was due primarily to increased sales
to specialty markets, increased number of franchised stores in operation and the corresponding
increases in revenue.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($s in thousands) |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
Change |
|
% Change |
Factory sales |
|
$ |
23,758.2 |
|
|
$ |
22,709.0 |
|
|
$ |
1,049.2 |
|
|
|
4.6 |
% |
Retail sales |
|
|
1,800.0 |
|
|
|
2,626.7 |
|
|
|
(826.7 |
) |
|
|
(31.5 |
%) |
Royalty and marketing fees |
|
|
5,696.9 |
|
|
|
5,603.8 |
|
|
|
93.1 |
|
|
|
1.7 |
% |
Franchise fees |
|
|
623.1 |
|
|
|
633.8 |
|
|
|
(10.7 |
) |
|
|
(1.7 |
%) |
Total |
|
$ |
31,878.2 |
|
|
$ |
31,573.3 |
|
|
$ |
304.9 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
% |
20
Factory Sales
Factory sales increased in fiscal 2008 compared to fiscal 2007 due to an increase of 28.8% in
product shipments to specialty markets and growth in the average number of stores in operation to
324 in fiscal 2008 from 310 in fiscal 2007. Same store pounds purchased in fiscal 2008 were down
approximately 9% from fiscal 2007, more than offsetting the increase in the average number of
franchised stores in operation and mostly offsetting the increase in specialty market sales. The
Company believes the decrease in same store pounds purchased is due primarily to a product mix
shift from factory products to products made in the stores and softening in the retail sector of
the economy.
Retail Sales
The decrease in retail sales resulted primarily from a decrease in the average number of
Company-owned stores in operation from 8 in fiscal 2007 to 5 in fiscal 2008. Same store sales at
Company-owned stores increased 1.1% from fiscal 2007 to fiscal 2008.
Royalties, Marketing Fees and Franchise Fees
The increase in royalties and marketing fees resulted from growth in the average number of domestic
units in operation from 266 in fiscal 2007 to 281 in fiscal 2008 partially offset by a decrease in
same store sales of 0.9%. Franchise fee revenues decreased due to a decrease in the number of
franchises sold during the same period last year.
Costs and Expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% |
($s in thousands) |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
Change |
|
Change |
Cost of sales factory adjusted |
|
$ |
15,948.7 |
|
|
$ |
14,942.9 |
|
|
$ |
1,005.8 |
|
|
|
6.7 |
% |
Cost of sales retail |
|
|
729.8 |
|
|
|
1,045.7 |
|
|
|
(315.9 |
) |
|
|
(30.2 |
%) |
Franchise costs |
|
|
1,498.7 |
|
|
|
1,570.0 |
|
|
|
(71.3 |
) |
|
|
(4.5 |
%) |
Sales and marketing |
|
|
1,503.2 |
|
|
|
1,538.5 |
|
|
|
(35.3 |
) |
|
|
(2.3 |
%) |
General and administrative |
|
|
2,505.7 |
|
|
|
2,538.7 |
|
|
|
(33.0 |
) |
|
|
(1.3 |
%) |
Retail operating |
|
|
994.8 |
|
|
|
1,502.1 |
|
|
|
(507.3 |
) |
|
|
(33.8 |
%) |
Total |
|
$ |
23,180.9 |
|
|
$ |
23,137.9 |
|
|
$ |
43.0 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
% |
Adjusted Gross margin
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% |
($s in thousands) |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
Change |
|
Change |
Factory adjusted gross margin |
|
$ |
7,809.5 |
|
|
$ |
7,766.1 |
|
|
$ |
43.4 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
% |
Retail |
|
|
1,070.2 |
|
|
|
1,581.0 |
|
|
|
(510.8 |
) |
|
|
(32.3 |
%) |
Total |
|
$ |
8,879.7 |
|
|
$ |
9,347.1 |
|
|
$ |
(467.4 |
) |
|
|
(5.0 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Percent) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Factory adjusted gross margin |
|
|
32.9 |
% |
|
|
34.2 |
% |
|
|
(1.3 |
%) |
|
|
(3.8 |
%) |
Retail |
|
|
59.5 |
% |
|
|
60.2 |
% |
|
|
(0.7 |
%) |
|
|
(1.2 |
%) |
Total |
|
|
34.7 |
% |
|
|
36.9 |
% |
|
|
(2.2 |
%) |
|
|
(6.0 |
%) |
Adjusted gross margin is equal to gross margin minus depreciation and amortization expense. We
believe adjusted gross margin is helpful in understanding our past performance as a supplement to
gross margin and other performance measures calculated in conformity with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States (GAAP). We believe that adjusted gross margin is useful
to investors because it provides a measure of operating performance and our ability to generate
cash that is unaffected by non-cash accounting measures. Additionally, we use adjusted gross
margin rather than gross margin to make incremental pricing decisions. Adjusted gross margin has
limitations as an analytical tool because it excludes the impact of depreciation and amortization
expense and you should not consider it in isolation or as a substitute for any measure reported
under GAAP. Our use of capital assets makes depreciation and amortization expense a necessary
element of our costs and our ability to generate income. Due to these limitations, we use adjusted
gross margin as a measure of performance only in conjunction with GAAP measures of performance such
as gross margin. The following table provides a reconciliation of adjusted gross margin to gross
margin, the most comparable performance measure under GAAP:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($s in thousands) |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
Factory adjusted gross margin |
|
$ |
7,809.5 |
|
|
$ |
7,766.1 |
|
Less: Depreciated and Amortization |
|
|
389.3 |
|
|
|
412.6 |
|
Factory GAAP gross margin |
|
$ |
7,420.2 |
|
|
$ |
7,353.5 |
|
21
Cost of Sales
Factory adjusted gross margin declined 130 basis points from fiscal 2007 to fiscal 2008 due
primarily to increased costs and mix of product sold during fiscal 2008 versus fiscal 2007.
Company-owned store margin declined 70 basis points from fiscal 2007 to fiscal 2008 due primarily
to a change in mix of product sold associated with a decrease in the average number of company
stores in operation.
Franchise Costs
The decrease in franchise costs is due to lower incentive compensation costs. As a percentage of
total royalty and marketing fees and franchise fee revenue, franchise costs decreased to 23.7% in
fiscal 2008 from 25.2% in fiscal 2007.
Sales and Marketing
The decrease in sales and marketing was due primarily to lower incentive compensation costs.
General and Administrative
The decrease in general and administrative costs is due primarily to lower incentive compensation
costs related to Company performance. As a percentage of total revenues, general and administrative
expenses decreased to 7.9% in fiscal 2008 compared to 8.0% in fiscal 2007.
Retail Operating Expenses
The decrease in retail operating expenses was due primarily to a decrease in the average number of
Company-owned stores during fiscal 2008 versus fiscal 2007. Retail operating expenses, as a
percentage of retail sales, decreased from 57.2% in fiscal 2007 to 55.3% in fiscal 2008 due to a
larger decrease in costs relative to the decrease in revenues associated with a decrease in the
average number of Company stores in operation.
Depreciation and Amortization
Depreciation and amortization of $783,000 in fiscal 2008 decreased 10.4% from $874,000 incurred in
fiscal 2007 due to the sale or closure of four Company-owned stores and certain assets becoming
fully depreciated.
Other, Net
Other, net of $101,000 realized in fiscal 2008 represents an increase of $34,000 from the $67,000
realized in fiscal 2007, due primarily to higher average outstanding balances of invested cash
during fiscal 2008. Notes receivable balances and related interest income declined in fiscal 2008
because of two notes maturing or being paid in full compared with fiscal 2007. The Company also
incurred interest expense related to use of an operating line of credit.
Income Tax Expense
The Companys effective income tax rate in fiscal 2008 was 38.1% which is an increase of 0.3%
compared to fiscal 2007. The increase in the effective tax rate is primarily due to increased
income in states with higher income tax rates.
In July 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued FASB Interpretation No. 48,
Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes (FIN 48). FIN 48 clarifies the accounting for
uncertainty in income taxes recognized in an enterprises financial statements in accordance with
FASB Statement No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes. FIN 48 prescribes a recognition threshold and
measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position
taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. The Company adopted FIN 48 effective March 1, 2007
with no impact on the Companys financial statements.
Fiscal 2007 Compared To Fiscal 2006
Results Summary
Basic earnings per share increased 18.5% from $.62 in fiscal 2006 to $.74 in fiscal 2007. Revenues
increased 12.5% from fiscal 2006 to fiscal 2007. Operating income increased 17.1% from $6.5 million
in fiscal 2006 to $7.6 million in fiscal 2007. Net income increased 16.7% from $4.1 million in
fiscal 2006 to $4.7 million in fiscal 2007. The increase in revenue, earnings per share, operating
income, and net income in fiscal 2007 compared to fiscal 2006 was due
primarily to increased number of franchised stores in operation, increased sales to speciality
22
markets and the corresponding increases in revenue.
Revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($s in thousands) |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
Change |
|
% Change |
Factory sales |
|
$ |
22,709.0 |
|
|
$ |
19,297.2 |
|
|
$ |
3,411.8 |
|
|
|
17.7 |
% |
Retail sales |
|
|
2,626.7 |
|
|
|
3,046.0 |
|
|
|
(419.3 |
) |
|
|
(13.8 |
%) |
Royalty and marketing fees |
|
|
5,603.8 |
|
|
|
5,047.9 |
|
|
|
555.9 |
|
|
|
11.0 |
% |
Franchise fees |
|
|
633.8 |
|
|
|
682.5 |
|
|
|
(48.7 |
) |
|
|
(7.1 |
%) |
Total |
|
$ |
31,573.3 |
|
|
$ |
28,073.6 |
|
|
$ |
3,499.7 |
|
|
|
12.5 |
% |
Factory Sales
The increase in factory sales was due to the growth in the average number of franchised stores in
operation to 302 in fiscal 2007 from 285 in fiscal 2006 and an increase of 53.3% in sales to
specialty markets. Partially offsetting this increase was a 2.6% decrease in same store pounds
purchased from the factory by franchised stores when compared to the same period in the prior year.
The Company believes that this same store pounds decrease reflects an unseasonably hot summer in
many regions of the country. Historically, retail sales of chocolate products suffer when weather
conditions are unusually hot in particular markets.
Retail Sales
The decrease in retail sales resulted primarily from a decrease in the average number of
Company-owned stores in operation from 9 in fiscal 2006 to 7 in fiscal 2007. Same store sales at
Company-owned stores increased 6.9% from fiscal 2006 to fiscal 2007.
Royalties, Marketing Fees and Franchise Fees
The increase in royalties and marketing fees resulted from growth in the average number of domestic
units in operation from 251 in fiscal 2006 to 266 in fiscal 2007 plus an increase in same store
sales of 0.3%. Franchise fee revenues decreased due to a decrease in the number of franchises sold
during the same period last year.
Costs and Expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% |
($s in thousands) |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
Change |
|
Change |
Cost of sales factory adjusted |
|
$ |
14,942.9 |
|
|
$ |
12,732.3 |
|
|
$ |
2,210.6 |
|
|
|
17.4 |
% |
Cost of sales retail |
|
|
1,045.7 |
|
|
|
1,224.3 |
|
|
|
(178.6 |
) |
|
|
(14.6 |
%) |
Franchise costs |
|
|
1,570.0 |
|
|
|
1,466.3 |
|
|
|
103.7 |
|
|
|
7.1 |
% |
Sales and marketing |
|
|
1,538.5 |
|
|
|
1,321.0 |
|
|
|
217.5 |
|
|
|
16.5 |
% |
General and administrative |
|
|
2,538.7 |
|
|
|
2,239.1 |
|
|
|
299.6 |
|
|
|
13.4 |
% |
Retail operating |
|
|
1,502.1 |
|
|
|
1,755.7 |
|
|
|
(253.6 |
) |
|
|
(14.4 |
%) |
Total |
|
$ |
23,137.9 |
|
|
$ |
20,738.7 |
|
|
$ |
2,399.2 |
|
|
|
11.6 |
% |
Adjusted Gross margin
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% |
|
($s in thousands) |
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
Change |
|
Factory adjusted gross margin |
|
$ |
7,766.1 |
|
|
$ |
6,564.9 |
|
|
$ |
1,201.2 |
|
|
|
18.3 |
% |
Retail |
|
|
1,581.0 |
|
|
|
1,821.7 |
|
|
|
(240.7 |
) |
|
|
(13.2 |
%) |
Total |
|
$ |
9,347.1 |
|
|
$ |
8,386.6 |
|
|
$ |
960.5 |
|
|
|
11.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Percent) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Factory adjusted gross margin |
|
|
34.2 |
% |
|
|
34.0 |
% |
|
|
0.2 |
% |
|
|
0.6 |
% |
Retail |
|
|
60.2 |
% |
|
|
59.8 |
% |
|
|
0.4 |
% |
|
|
0.7 |
% |
Total |
|
|
36.9 |
% |
|
|
37.5 |
% |
|
|
(0.6 |
%) |
|
|
(1.6 |
%) |
Adjusted gross margin is equal to gross margin minus depreciation and amortization expense. We
believe adjusted gross margin is helpful in understanding our past performance as a supplement to
gross margin and other performance measures calculated in conformity with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States (GAAP). We believe that adjusted gross margin is useful
to investors because it provides a measure of operating performance and our ability to generate
cash that is unaffected by non-cash accounting measures. Additionally, we use adjusted gross
margin rather than gross margin to make incremental pricing decisions. Adjusted gross margin has
limitations as an analytical tool because it excludes the impact of depreciation and amortization
expense and you should not consider it in isolation or as a substitute for any measure reported
under GAAP. Our use of capital assets makes depreciation and amortization expense a necessary
element of our costs and our ability to generate income.
23
Due to these limitations, we use adjusted
gross margin as a measure of performance only in conjunction with GAAP measures of performance such
as gross margin. The following table
provides a reconciliation of adjusted gross margin to gross margin, the most comparable performance
measure under GAAP:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($s in thousands) |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
Factory adjusted gross margin |
|
$ |
7,766.1 |
|
|
$ |
6,564.9 |
|
Less: Depreciated and Amortization |
|
|
412.6 |
|
|
|
381.1 |
|
Factory GAAP gross margin |
|
$ |
7,353.5 |
|
|
$ |
6,183.8 |
|
Cost of Sales
Factory margins were consistent from fiscal 2006 to fiscal 2007. Higher commodity and labor costs
were offset by increased production volume, which lowered fixed costs per unit of production.
Increases in Company-owned store margin is due to changes in mix of product sold.
Franchise Costs
The increase in franchise costs is due to increased professional fees and incentive compensation
costs. As a percentage of total royalty and marketing fees and franchise fee revenue, franchise
costs decreased to 25.2% in fiscal 2007 from 25.6% in fiscal 2006. This decrease as a percentage of
royalty, marketing and franchise fees is primarily a result of higher franchise revenues relative
to costs.
Sales and Marketing
The increase in sales and marketing was due primarily to increased incentive compensation costs and
expenses related to a 53.3% increase in sales to specialty markets.
General and Administrative
The increase in general and administrative costs is due primarily to increased incentive
compensation costs related to Company performance. As a percentage of total revenues, general and
administrative expenses were unchanged at 8.0% in fiscal 2007 compared to 8.0% in fiscal 2006.
Retail Operating Expenses
The decrease in retail operating expenses was due primarily to a decrease in the average number of
Company-owned stores during fiscal 2007 versus fiscal 2006. Retail operating expenses, as a
percentage of retail sales, decreased from 57.6% in fiscal 2006 to 57.2% in fiscal 2007 due to a
larger decrease in costs relative to the increase in revenues.
Depreciation and Amortization
Depreciation and amortization of $874,000 in fiscal 2007 was essentially unchanged from the
$876,000 incurred in fiscal 2006.
Other, Net
Other, net of $67,000 realized in fiscal 2007 represents a decrease of $9,000 from the $76,000
realized in fiscal 2006, due primarily to lower interest income on lower average outstanding
balances of notes receivable and invested cash. Notes receivable balances are declining due to
payments and the Company has been using its excess cash to repurchase stock. The Company also
incurred less interest expense on lower average balances of long-term debt. The Company paid its
long-term debt in full during the first quarter of fiscal 2006.
Income Tax Expense
The Companys effective income tax rate in fiscal 2007 was 37.8%, which is the same as the
effective rate in fiscal 2006.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
As of February 29, 2008, working capital was $5.2 million compared with $7.5 million as of February
28, 2007. The change in working capital was due primarily to operating results less the payment of
$2.4 million in cash dividends and the repurchase and retirement of $5.9 million of the Companys
common stock.
Cash and cash equivalent balances decreased from $2.8 million as of February 28, 2007 to $676,000
24
as of February 29, 2008 as a result of cash flows generated by operating and investing activities
being less than cash flows used in financing activities. The Companys current ratio was 2.35 to
1 at February 29, 2008 in comparison with 3.30 to 1 at February 28, 2007. The Company monitors
current and anticipated future levels of cash and cash equivalents in relation to anticipated
operating, financing and investing requirements.
The Company has a $5.0 million credit line, of which $4.7 million was available (subject to certain
borrowing base limitations) as of February 29, 2008, secured by substantially all of the Companys
assets except retail store assets. The credit line is subject to renewal in July, 2008.
The table below presents significant contractual obligations of the Company at February 29, 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Amounts in thousands) |
|
Less than |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
After 5 |
|
|
|
|
Contractual Obligations |
|
1 year |
|
|
1-3 Years |
|
|
4-5 years |
|
|
years |
|
|
Total |
|
Line of credit |
|
|
300 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
300 |
|
Notes payable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating leases |
|
|
418 |
|
|
|
621 |
|
|
|
203 |
|
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
1,294 |
|
Other long-term
obligations |
|
|
87 |
|
|
|
141 |
|
|
|
150 |
|
|
|
386 |
|
|
|
764 |
|
Total Contractual
cash obligations |
|
|
805 |
|
|
|
762 |
|
|
|
353 |
|
|
|
438 |
|
|
|
2,358 |
|
For fiscal 2009, the Company anticipates making capital expenditures of approximately $500,000,
which will be used to maintain and improve existing factory and administrative infrastructure and
update certain Company-owned stores. The Company believes that cash flow from operations will be
sufficient to fund capital expenditures and working capital requirements for fiscal 2009. If
necessary, the Company has available bank lines of credit to help meet these requirements.
Impact of Inflation
Inflationary factors such as increases in the costs of ingredients and labor directly affect the
Companys operations. Most of the Companys leases provide for cost-of-living adjustments and
require it to pay taxes, insurance and maintenance expenses, all of which are subject to inflation.
Additionally, the Companys future lease cost for new facilities may include potentially escalating
costs of real estate and construction. There is no assurance that the Company will be able to pass
on increased costs to its customers.
Depreciation expense is based on the historical cost to the Company of its fixed assets, and is
therefore potentially less than it would be if it were based on current replacement cost. While
property and equipment acquired in prior years will ultimately have to be replaced at higher
prices, it is expected that replacement will be a gradual process over many years.
Seasonality
The Company is subject to seasonal fluctuations in sales, which cause fluctuations in quarterly
results of operations. Historically, the strongest sales of the Companys products have occurred
during the Christmas holiday and summer vacation seasons. In addition, quarterly results have been,
and in the future are likely to be, affected by the timing of new store openings and sales of
franchises. Because of the seasonality of the Companys business and the impact of new store
openings and sales of franchises, results for any quarter are not necessarily indicative of results
that may be achieved in other quarters or for a full fiscal year.
New Accounting Pronouncements
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS 157, Fair Value Measurements. SFAS 157 establishes a
framework for measuring fair value under GAAP and expands disclosures about fair value measurement.
SFAS 157 also creates consistency and comparability in fair value measurements among the many
accounting pronouncements that require fair value measurements but does not require any new fair
value measurements. SFAS 157 is effective for fiscal years (including interim periods) beginning
after November 15, 2007. The Company will adopt SFAS No. 157 in fiscal 2009 and does not expect it
to have a significant impact on the Companys financial statements.
In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and
Financial Liabilities Including an amendment of FASB Statement No. 115. This standard amends
SFAS 115, Accounting for Certain Investment in Debt and Equity Securities, with respect to
accounting for a transfer to the trading category for all entities with available-for-sale and
trading securities electing the fair value option. This standard allows companies to elect fair
value accounting for many financial instruments and other items that currently are not required
25
to
be accounted as such, allows different applications for electing the option for a single item or
groups of items, and requires disclosures to facilitate comparisons of similar assets and
liabilities that are accounted for differently in relation to the fair value option. SFAS 159 is
effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. The Company will adopt SFAS No. 159
in fiscal 2009 and does not expect it to have a significant impact on the Companys financial
statements.
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141 (revised 2007), Business Combinations, which
replaces FASB Statement No. 141. SFAS No. 141R establishes principles and requirements for how an
acquirer recognizes and measures in its financial statements the identifiable assets acquired, the
liabilities assumed, any non controlling interest in the acquiree and the goodwill acquired. The
Statement also establishes disclosure requirements which will enable users to evaluate the nature
and financial effects of the business combination. SFAS No. 141R is effective as of the beginning
of an entitys fiscal year that begins after December 15, 2008 (Fiscal 2010). The Company is in the
process of evaluating the potential impact, if any, of the adoption of SFAS No. 141R.
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160, Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial
Statements an amendment of Accounting Research Bulletin No. 51, which establishes accounting and
reporting standards for ownership interests in subsidiaries held by parties other than the parent,
the amount of consolidated net income attributable to the parent and to the noncontrolling
interest, changes in a parents ownership interest and the valuation of retained noncontrolling
equity investments when a subsidiary is deconsolidated. The Statement also establishes reporting
requirements that provide sufficient disclosures that clearly identify and distinguish between the
interests of the parent and the interests of the noncontrolling owners. SFAS No.160 is effective as
of the beginning of an entitys fiscal year that begins after December 15, 2008 (Fiscal 2010). The
Company is in the process of evaluating the potential impact, if any, of the adoption of SFAS No.
160.
26
ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
The Company does not engage in commodity futures trading or hedging activities and does not enter
into derivative financial instrument transactions for trading or other speculative purposes. The
Company also does not engage in transactions in foreign currencies or in interest rate swap
transactions that could expose the Company to market risk. However, the Company is exposed to some
commodity price and interest rate risks.
The Company frequently enters into purchase contracts of between six to eighteen months for
chocolate and certain nuts. These contracts permit the Company to purchase the specified commodity
at a fixed price on an as-needed basis during the term of the contract. Because prices for these
products may fluctuate, the Company may benefit if prices rise during the terms of these contracts,
but it may be required to pay above-market prices if prices fall and it is unable to renegotiate
the terms of the contract.
The Company has a $5.0 million bank line of credit that bears interest at a variable rate. As of
February 29, 2008, $300,000 was outstanding under the line of credit. The Company does not believe
that it is exposed to any material interest rate risk related to the line of credit.
The Chief Financial Officer and Chief Operating Officer of the Company has primary responsibility
over the Companys long-term and short-term debt and has primary responsibility for determining the
timing and duration of commodity purchase contracts and negotiating the terms and conditions of
those contracts.
27
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page |
|
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
|
33 |
|
Notes to Financial Statements |
|
|
34 |
|
28
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of
Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory, Inc.
Durango, Colorado
We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory, Inc. (the
Company) as of February 29, 2008 and
February 28, 2007, and the related statements of income, changes
in stockholders equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended February 29,
2008. Our audits also included the financial statement schedule II for each of the three years in
the period ended February 29, 2008. We also have audited the Companys internal control over
financial reporting as of February 29, 2008, based on criteria
established in Internal
Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway
Commission (COSO). The Companys management is responsible for these financial statements, for
maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the
effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in the accompanying
Managements Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial
Reporting, included in item 9A. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and an opinion on the
effectiveness of the Companys internal control over financial reporting based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement and
whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material
respects. Our audits of financial statements included examining, on a test basis, evidence
supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting
principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial
statement presentation. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining
an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material
weakness exists and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal
control based on the assessed risk. Our audits also included performing such other procedures as we
considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis
for our opinions.
A companys internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable
assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial
statements for external purposes in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States. A companys internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and
procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately
and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide
reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial
statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and
expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and
directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely
detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the companys assets that could have
a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or
detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are
subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that
the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material
respects, the financial position of the Company as of February 29, 2008 and February 28, 2007, and
the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended
February 29, 2008 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States
of America. Also, in our opinion, the related financial statement schedule II for each of the three
years in the period ended February 29, 2008, when considered in relation to the basic financial
statements taken as a whole, presents fairly in all material respects the information set forth
therein. Also in our opinion, the Company maintained in all material respects, effective internal
control over financial reporting as of February 29, 2008 based
on criteria established in Internal
Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway
Commission (COSO).
Ehrhardt Keefe Steiner & Hottman PC
May 14, 2008
Denver, Colorado
29
ROCKY MOUNTAIN CHOCOLATE FACTORY, INC.
STATEMENTS OF INCOME
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FOR
THE YEARS ENDED FEBRUARY 28 OR 29 |
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
Revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales |
|
$ |
25,558,198 |
|
|
$ |
25,335,739 |
|
|
$ |
22,343,209 |
|
Franchise and royalty fees |
|
|
6,319,985 |
|
|
|
6,237,594 |
|
|
|
5,730,403 |
|
Total revenues |
|
|
31,878,183 |
|
|
|
31,573,333 |
|
|
|
28,073,612 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs and Expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales, exclusive of
depreciation and amortization
expense of $389,273, $412,546
and $381,141, respectively |
|
|
16,678,472 |
|
|
|
15,988,620 |
|
|
|
13,956,550 |
|
Franchise costs |
|
|
1,498,709 |
|
|
|
1,570,026 |
|
|
|
1,466,322 |
|
Sales & marketing |
|
|
1,503,224 |
|
|
|
1,538,476 |
|
|
|
1,320,979 |
|
General and administrative |
|
|
2,505,676 |
|
|
|
2,538,667 |
|
|
|
2,239,109 |
|
Retail operating |
|
|
994,789 |
|
|
|
1,502,134 |
|
|
|
1,755,738 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
782,951 |
|
|
|
873,988 |
|
|
|
875,940 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total costs and expenses |
|
|
23,963,821 |
|
|
|
24,011,911 |
|
|
|
21,614,638 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Income |
|
|
7,914,362 |
|
|
|
7,561,422 |
|
|
|
6,458,974 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Income (Expense) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(1,566 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(19,652 |
) |
Interest income |
|
|
102,360 |
|
|
|
67,071 |
|
|
|
95,360 |
|
Other, net |
|
|
100,794 |
|
|
|
67,071 |
|
|
|
75,708 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income Before Income Taxes |
|
|
8,015,156 |
|
|
|
7,628,493 |
|
|
|
6,534,682 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income Tax Expense |
|
|
3,053,780 |
|
|
|
2,883,575 |
|
|
|
2,470,110 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income |
|
$ |
4,961,376 |
|
|
$ |
4,744,918 |
|
|
$ |
4,064,572 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic Earnings per Common Share |
|
$ |
.78 |
|
|
$ |
.74 |
|
|
$ |
.62 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted Earnings per Common Share |
|
$ |
.76 |
|
|
$ |
.71 |
|
|
$ |
.58 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average Common Shares
Outstanding |
|
|
6,341,286 |
|
|
|
6,432,123 |
|
|
|
6,581,612 |
|
Dilutive Effect of Employee
Stock Options |
|
|
159,386 |
|
|
|
227,350 |
|
|
|
427,780 |
|
Weighted Average Common Shares
Outstanding, Assuming Dilution |
|
|
6,500,672 |
|
|
|
6,659,473 |
|
|
|
7,009,392 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.
30
ROCKY MOUNTAIN CHOCOLATE FACTORY, INC.
BALANCE SHEETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AS OF FEBRUARY 28 or 29 |
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
675,642 |
|
|
$ |
2,830,175 |
|
Accounts receivable, less allowance for
doubtful accounts of $114,271 and
$187,519, respectively |
|
|
3,801,172 |
|
|
|
3,756,212 |
|
Notes receivable |
|
|
22,435 |
|
|
|
50,600 |
|
Refundable income taxes |
|
|
63,357 |
|
|
|
|
|
Inventories, less reserve for slow
moving inventory of $194,719 and
$147,700, respectively |
|
|
4,015,459 |
|
|
|
3,482,139 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
117,846 |
|
|
|
272,871 |
|
Other |
|
|
267,184 |
|
|
|
367,420 |
|
Total current assets |
|
|
8,963,095 |
|
|
|
10,759,417 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and Equipment, Net |
|
|
5,665,108 |
|
|
|
5,754,122 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes receivable |
|
|
205,916 |
|
|
|
310,453 |
|
Goodwill, net |
|
|
939,074 |
|
|
|
939,074 |
|
Intangible assets, net |
|
|
276,247 |
|
|
|
349,358 |
|
Other |
|
|
98,020 |
|
|
|
343,745 |
|
Total other assets |
|
|
1,519,257 |
|
|
|
1,942,630 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
16,147,460 |
|
|
$ |
18,456,169 |
|
Liabilities and Stockholders Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Line of Credit |
|
$ |
300,000 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
1,710,380 |
|
|
|
898,794 |
|
Accrued salaries and wages |
|
|
430,498 |
|
|
|
931,614 |
|
Other accrued expenses |
|
|
467,543 |
|
|
|
585,402 |
|
Dividend payable |
|
|
599,473 |
|
|
|
551,733 |
|
Deferred income |
|
|
303,000 |
|
|
|
288,500 |
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
3,810,894 |
|
|
|
3,256,043 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred Income Taxes |
|
|
681,529 |
|
|
|
685,613 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and Contingencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $.03 par value; 100,000,000
shares authorized; 100,000,000 and
5,980,919, 6,418,905 shares issued and
outstanding, respectively |
|
|
179,428 |
|
|
|
192,567 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
7,047,142 |
|
|
|
6,987,558 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
4,428,467 |
|
|
|
7,334,388 |
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
11,655,037 |
|
|
|
14,514,513 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
16,147,460 |
|
|
$ |
18,456,169 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.
31
ROCKY MOUNTAIN CHOCOLATE FACTORY, INC.
STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FOR THE YEARS ENDED FEBRUARY 28 or 29 |
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
Common Stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of year |
|
$ |
192,567 |
|
|
$ |
197,881 |
|
|
$ |
193,301 |
|
Repurchase and retirement of common stock |
|
|
(14,518 |
) |
|
|
(9,822 |
) |
|
|
(6,119 |
) |
Issuance of common stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
55 |
|
Exercise of stock options and other |
|
|
1,379 |
|
|
|
4,482 |
|
|
|
10,644 |
|
Balance at end of year |
|
|
179,428 |
|
|
|
192,567 |
|
|
|
197,881 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional Paid-In Capital |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of year |
|
|
6,987,558 |
|
|
|
10,363,107 |
|
|
|
11,041,971 |
|
Repurchase and retirement of common stock |
|
|
(5,918,087 |
) |
|
|
(4,371,268 |
) |
|
|
(2,952,323 |
) |
Stock dividends declared |
|
|
5,415,148 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs related to stock splits and
dividends |
|
|
(9,647 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,902 |
) |
Issuance of common stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,797 |
|
|
|
37,444 |
|
Exercise of stock options and other |
|
|
388,290 |
|
|
|
819,992 |
|
|
|
1,062,085 |
|
Tax benefit from employee stock
transactions |
|
|
183,880 |
|
|
|
159,930 |
|
|
|
1,182,830 |
|
Balance at end of year |
|
|
7,047,142 |
|
|
|
6,987,558 |
|
|
|
10,363,107 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retained Earnings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of year |
|
|
7,334,388 |
|
|
|
4,924,830 |
|
|
|
2,658,298 |
|
Net income |
|
|
4,961,376 |
|
|
|
4,744,918 |
|
|
|
4,064,572 |
|
Stock dividends declared |
|
|
(5,415,148 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash dividends declared |
|
|
(2,452,149 |
) |
|
|
(2,078,208 |
) |
|
|
(1,798,040 |
) |
Adoption of SAB 108 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(257,152 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of year |
|
|
4,428,467 |
|
|
|
7,334,388 |
|
|
|
4,924,830 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Stockholders Equity |
|
$ |
11,655,037 |
|
|
$ |
14,514,513 |
|
|
$ |
15,485,818 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of year |
|
|
6,418,905 |
|
|
|
6,596,016 |
|
|
|
6,443,354 |
|
Repurchase and retirement of common stock |
|
|
(483,935 |
) |
|
|
(327,390 |
) |
|
|
(203,958 |
) |
Issuance of common stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
876 |
|
|
|
1,840 |
|
Exercise of stock options and other |
|
|
45,949 |
|
|
|
149,403 |
|
|
|
354,780 |
|
Balance at end of year |
|
|
5,980,919 |
|
|
|
6,418,905 |
|
|
|
6,596,016 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.
32
ROCKY MOUNTAIN CHOCOLATE FACTORY, INC.
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FOR THE YEARS ENDED FEBRUARY 28 or 29 |
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
Cash Flows From Operating Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
4,961,376 |
|
|
$ |
4,744,918 |
|
|
$ |
4,064,572 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to
net cash provided by operating
activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
782,951 |
|
|
|
873,988 |
|
|
|
875,940 |
|
Provision for loss on accounts receivable |
|
|
75,000 |
|
|
|
70,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for inventory loss |
|
|
90,000 |
|
|
|
70,000 |
|
|
|
45,000 |
|
Loss on sale of assets |
|
|
34,744 |
|
|
|
101 |
|
|
|
37,411 |
|
Expense recorded for stock options |
|
|
58,355 |
|
|
|
201,269 |
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
150,941 |
|
|
|
(133,432 |
) |
|
|
4,195 |
|
Changes in operating assets and
liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable |
|
|
(117,460 |
) |
|
|
(711,456 |
) |
|
|
(445,921 |
) |
Refundable income taxes |
|
|
(63,357 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
364,630 |
|
Inventories |
|
|
(623,320 |
) |
|
|
(613,905 |
) |
|
|
(461,207 |
) |
Other assets |
|
|
76,891 |
|
|
|
104,843 |
|
|
|
(236,640 |
) |
Accounts payable |
|
|
811,586 |
|
|
|
(246,616 |
) |
|
|
56,934 |
|
Income taxes payable |
|
|
(167,965 |
) |
|
|
(33,729 |
) |
|
|
(824,860 |
) |
Accrued liabilities |
|
|
(449,784 |
) |
|
|
452,255 |
|
|
|
602,187 |
|
Deferred income |
|
|
14,500 |
|
|
|
5,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
5,634,458 |
|
|
|
4,783,236 |
|
|
|
4,082,241 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows From Investing Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additions to notes receivable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(124,452 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Proceeds received on notes receivable |
|
|
132,702 |
|
|
|
211,143 |
|
|
|
345,442 |
|
Proceeds (expense) from sale or
distribution of assets |
|
|
29,382 |
|
|
|
434,335 |
|
|
|
(4,395 |
) |
Decrease in other assets |
|
|
158,826 |
|
|
|
(134,221 |
) |
|
|
15,748 |
|
Purchase of property and equipment |
|
|
(578,433 |
) |
|
|
(201,037 |
) |
|
|
(1,300,314 |
) |
Net cash provided by (used in) investing
activities |
|
|
(257,523 |
) |
|
|
185,768 |
|
|
|
(943,519 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows From Financing Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net change in line of credit |
|
|
300,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments on long-term debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,665,084 |
) |
Costs of stock split or dividend |
|
|
(9,647 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,902 |
) |
Issuance of common stock |
|
|
331,313 |
|
|
|
623,206 |
|
|
|
1,072,729 |
|
Tax benefit of stock option exercise |
|
|
183,880 |
|
|
|
159,930 |
|
|
|
1,182,830 |
|
Repurchase and redemption of common stock |
|
|
(5,932,605 |
) |
|
|
(4,381,090 |
) |
|
|
(2,958,441 |
) |
Dividends paid |
|
|
(2,404,409 |
) |
|
|
(2,030,625 |
) |
|
|
(1,710,980 |
) |
Net cash used in financing activities |
|
|
(7,531,468 |
) |
|
|
(5,628,579 |
) |
|
|
(4,087,848 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Decrease In Cash And Cash Equivalents |
|
|
(2,154,533 |
) |
|
|
(659,575 |
) |
|
|
(949,126 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash And Cash Equivalents At
Beginning Of Year |
|
|
2,830,175 |
|
|
|
3,489,750 |
|
|
|
4,438,876 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash And Cash Equivalents At End Of Year |
|
$ |
675,642 |
|
|
$ |
2,830,175 |
|
|
$ |
3,489,750 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.
33
NOTE 1 NATURE OF OPERATIONS AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Nature of Operations
Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory, Inc. is an international franchiser, confectionery manufacturer
and retail operator in the United States, Canada, and the United Arab Emirates. The Company
manufactures an extensive line of premium chocolate candies and other confectionery products. The
Companys revenues are currently derived from three principal sources: sales to franchisees and
others of chocolates and other confectionery products manufactured by the Company; the collection
of initial franchise fees and royalties from franchisees sales; and sales at Company-owned stores
of chocolates and other confectionery products. The following table summarizes the number of Rocky
Mountain Chocolate Factory stores at February 29, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sold, Not Yet |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Open |
|
Open |
|
Total |
Company owned stores
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
Franchise stores Domestic stores
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
266 |
|
|
|
280 |
|
Franchise stores Domestic kiosks
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
Franchise stores International
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
41 |
|
Cash Equivalents
The Company considers all highly liquid instruments purchased with an original maturity of six
months or less to be cash equivalents. The Company continually monitors its positions with, and the
credit quality of, the financial institutions it invests with. As of the balance sheet date, and
periodically throughout the year, the Company has maintained balances in various operating accounts
in excess of federally insured limits, approximately $257,000 at February 29, 2008.
Accounts and Notes Receivable
At the time that accounts, notes and royalties receivable are originated, the Company considers a
reserve for doubtful accounts. The provision for uncollectible amounts is continually reviewed and
adjusted to maintain the allowance at a level considered adequate to cover future losses. The
allowance is managements best estimate of uncollectible amounts and is determined based on
historical performance that is tracked by the Company on an ongoing basis. The losses ultimately
incurred could differ materially in the near term from the amounts estimated in determining the
allowance. At February 29, 2008, the Company has $228,000 of notes receivable outstanding. The
notes require monthly payments and bear interest at rates ranging from 8.0% to 8.5%. The notes
mature through February 2012 and are secured by the assets financed.
Inventories
Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market. Cost is determined using the first-in,
first-out method.
Property and Equipment and Other Assets
Property and equipment are recorded at cost. Depreciation and amortization are computed using the
straight-line method based upon the estimated useful life of the asset, which range from five to
thirty-nine years. Leasehold improvements are amortized on the straight-line method over the
lives of the respective leases or the service lives of the improvements, whichever is shorter.
The Company reviews its long-lived assets through analysis of estimated fair value, including
identifiable intangible assets, whenever events or changes indicate the carrying amount of such
assets may not be recoverable. The Companys policy is to review the recoverability of all assets,
at a minimum, on an annual basis.
Income Taxes
The Company recognizes deferred tax liabilities and assets based on the differences between the tax
basis of assets and liabilities and their reported amounts in the financial statements that will
result in taxable or deductible amounts in future years. The Companys temporary differences are
listed in Note 6.
Goodwill
Goodwill arose from two transaction types. The first type was the result of the incorporation of
34
NOTE 1 NATURE OF OPERATIONS AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES CONTINUED
the Company after its inception as a partnership. The goodwill recorded was the excess of the
purchase price of the Company over the fair value of its assets. The Company has allocated this
goodwill equally between its Franchising and Manufacturing operations. The second type was the
purchase of various retail stores, either individually or as a group, for which the purchase price
was in excess of the fair value of the assets acquired.
Insurance and Self-Insurance Reserves
The Company uses a combination of insurance and self-insurance plans to provide for the potential
liabilities for workers compensation, general liability, property insurance, director and
officers liability insurance, vehicle liability and employee health care benefits. Liabilities
associated with the risks that are retained by the Company are estimated, in part, by considering
historical claims experience, demographic factors, severity factors and other assumptions. While
the Company believes that its assumptions are appropriate, the estimated accruals for these
liabilities could be significantly affected if future occurrences and claims differ from these
assumptions and historical trends.
Sales
Sales of products to franchisees and other customers are recognized at the time of delivery. Sales
of products at retail stores are recognized at the time of sale.
Shipping Fees
Shipping fees charged to customers by the Companys trucking department are reported as sales.
Shipping costs incurred by the Company for inventory are reported as cost of sales or inventory.
Franchise and Royalty Fees
Franchise fee revenue is recognized upon opening of the franchise store. Also see Note 14 to these
financial statements. In addition to the initial franchise fee, The Company also recognizes a
marketing and promotion fee of one percent (1%) of the Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory franchised
stores gross retail sales and a royalty fee based on gross retail sales. Beginning with franchise
store openings in the third quarter of fiscal year 2004, the Company modified its royalty
structure. Under the current structure, the Company recognizes no royalty on franchised stores
retail sales of products purchased from the Company and recognizes a ten percent (10%) royalty on
all other sales of product sold at franchise locations. For franchise stores opened prior to the
third quarter of fiscal 2004 the Company recognizes a royalty fee of five percent (5%) of
franchised stores gross retail sales.
Use of Estimates
In preparing financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in
the United States of America, management is required to make estimates and assumptions that affect
the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities,
at the date of the financial statements, and revenues and expenses during the reporting period.
Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Vulnerability Due to Certain Concentrations
As of February 29, 2008, the Company had notes receivable of approximately $228,000 due from two
franchisees. The notes are collateralized by the underlying store assets. The Company is,
therefore, vulnerable to changes in the cash flow from these locations.
Stock-Based Compensation
At February 29, 2008, the Company had stock-based compensation plans for employees and nonemployee
directors which authorized the granting of stock options.
Prior to March 1, 2006, the Company accounted for the plans under the measurement and recognition
provisions of Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to
Employees, and related Interpretations, permitted under Statement of Financial Accounting Standard
No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation (SFAS No. 123). As a result, employee stock
option-based compensation was included as a pro forma disclosure in the Notes to the Companys
Financial Statements for prior year periods.
Effective March 1, 2006, the Company adopted the recognition provisions of Statement of Financial
Accounting Standard No. 123R, Share-Based Payment (SFAS No. 123R), using the
35
NOTE 1 NATURE OF OPERATIONS AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES CONTINUED
modified-prospective transition method. Under this transition method, compensation cost in 2006
includes the portion vesting in the period for (1) all share-based payments granted prior to,
but not vested, as of March 1, 2006, based on the grant date fair value estimated in accordance
with the original provisions of SFAS No. 123, and (2) all share-based payments granted subsequent
to March 1, 2006, based on the grant date fair value estimated in accordance with the provisions of
SFAS No. 123R. Results for the prior periods have not been restated.
The Company recognized $33,198 related equity-based compensation expense during the year ended
February 29, 2008. Compensation costs related to share-based compensation are generally amortized
over the vesting period in selling, general and administrative expenses in the statement of
operations.
On February 21, 2006, the Company accelerated the vesting of all outstanding stock options and
recognized a share-based compensation charge related to this acceleration. The Company recognized
an additional share-based compensation charge of $25,158 for the year ended February 29, 2008
related to this acceleration due to changes in certain estimates and assumptions related to
employee turnover since the acceleration date. Adjustments in future periods may be necessary as
actual results could differ from these estimates and assumptions.
Prior to adopting SFAS No. 123R, the Company presented all benefits from tax deductions arising
from equity-based compensation as a non-cash transaction in the Statement of Cash Flows. SFAS No.
123R requires that the tax benefits in excess of the compensation cost recognized for those
exercised options be classified as cash provided by financing activities. The excess tax benefit
included in net cash provided by financing activities for the years ended February 28 or 29, 2008,
2007 and 2006 was $183,880, $159,930 and $1,182,830 respectively.
The weighted-average fair value of stock options granted during the years ended February 28, 29,
2008 and 2007 was $2.69 and $0 per share, respectively. As of February 29, 2008, there was $0 of
unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested share-based compensation.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
Net Income as reported
|
|
$ |
4,961 |
|
|
$ |
4,745 |
|
|
$ |
4,065 |
|
Stock-based compensation expense
included in reported net income, net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43 |
|
Deduct stock-based compensation
expense determined under fair value
based method, net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(676 |
) |
Net Income pro forma
|
|
|
4,961 |
|
|
|
4,745 |
|
|
|
3,432 |
|
Basic Earnings per Share-as reported
|
|
|
.78 |
|
|
|
.74 |
|
|
|
.62 |
|
Diluted Earnings per Share-as reported
|
|
|
.76 |
|
|
|
.71 |
|
|
|
.58 |
|
Basic Earnings per Share-pro forma
|
|
|
.78 |
|
|
|
.74 |
|
|
|
.52 |
|
Diluted Earnings per Share-pro forma
|
|
|
.76 |
|
|
|
.71 |
|
|
|
.49 |
|
Earnings Per Share
Basic earnings per share is computed as net earnings divided by the weighted average number of
common shares outstanding during each year. Diluted earnings per share reflects the potential
dilution that could occur from common shares issuable through stock options. During 2008, 2007 and
2006, 136,119, 140,389, and 144,186 stock options were excluded from diluted shares as their affect
was anti-dilutive.
Advertising and Promotional Expenses
The Company expenses advertising costs as incurred. Total advertising expense amounted to $261,663,
$308,052, and $354,367 for the fiscal years ended February 28 or 29, 2008, 2007 and 2006,
respectively.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The Companys financial instruments consist of cash and cash equivalents, trade receivables,
payables, notes receivable, and debt. The fair value of all instruments approximates the carrying
value.
Reclassifications
Certain reclassifications have been made to the prior years financial statements in order to
conform to the current year presentation.
36
NOTE 2 INVENTORIES
Inventories consist of the following at February 28 or 29:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
Ingredients and supplies
|
|
$ |
1,985,929 |
|
|
$ |
1,730,850 |
|
Finished candy
|
|
|
2,029,530 |
|
|
|
1,751,289 |
|
|
|
$ |
4,015,459 |
|
|
$ |
3,482,139 |
|
NOTE 3 PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT, NET
Property and equipment consists of the following at February 28 or 29:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
Land
|
|
$ |
513,618 |
|
|
$ |
513,618 |
|
Building
|
|
|
4,717,230 |
|
|
|
4,717,230 |
|
Machinery and equipment
|
|
|
6,855,408 |
|
|
|
6,284,433 |
|
Furniture and fixtures
|
|
|
699,473 |
|
|
|
673,194 |
|
Leasehold improvements
|
|
|
428,937 |
|
|
|
418,764 |
|
Transportation equipment
|
|
|
350,714 |
|
|
|
350,714 |
|
|
|
|
13,565,380 |
|
|
|
12,957,953 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less accumulated depreciation
|
|
|
7,900,272 |
|
|
|
7,203,831 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment, net
|
|
$ |
5,665,108 |
|
|
$ |
5,754,122 |
|
NOTE 4 LINE OF CREDIT AND LONG-TERM DEBT
Line of Credit
At February 29, 2008 the Company had a $5.0 million line of credit from a bank, collateralized by
substantially all of the Companys assets with the exception of the Companys retail store assets.
Draws may be made under the line at 75% of eligible accounts receivable plus 50% of eligible
inventories. Interest on borrowings is at prime less 50 basis points (5.50% at February 29, 2008).
At February 29, 2008, $4.7 million was available for borrowings under the line of credit, subject
to borrowing base limitations. Terms of the line require that the line be rested (that is, that
there be no outstanding balance) for a period of 30 consecutive days during the term of the loan.
Additionally, the line of credit is subject to various financial ratio and leverage covenants. At
February 29, 2008 the Company was in compliance with all such covenants. The credit line is subject
to renewal in July, 2008.
NOTE 5 COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Operating leases
The Company conducts its retail operations in facilities leased under five to ten-year
noncancelable operating leases. Certain leases contain renewal options for between five and ten
additional years at increased monthly rentals. The majority of the leases provide for contingent
rentals based on sales in excess of predetermined base levels.
The following is a schedule by year of future minimum rental
payments required under such leases for the years ending
February 28 or 29:
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
$ |
159,000 |
|
2010
|
|
|
207,000 |
|
2011
|
|
|
171,000 |
|
2012
|
|
|
100,000 |
|
2013
|
|
|
103,000 |
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
52,000 |
|
Total
|
|
$ |
792,000 |
|
In some instances, in order to retain the right to site selection or because of requirements
imposed by the lessor, the Company has leased space for its proposed franchise outlets. When a
franchise was sold, the store was subleased to the franchisee who is responsible for the monthly
rent and other obligations under the lease. The Companys liability as primary lessee on sublet
franchise outlets, all of which is offset by sublease rentals, is as follows for the years ending
February 28 or 29:
37
NOTE 5 COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES CONTINUED
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
$ |
87,300 |
|
2010
|
|
|
69,700 |
|
2011
|
|
|
71,800 |
|
2012
|
|
|
73,900 |
|
2013
|
|
|
76,100 |
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
386,300 |
|
|
|
$ |
765,100 |
|
The following is a schedule of lease expense for all retail operating leases for the three years
ended February 28 or 29:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
Minimum rentals
|
|
$ |
336,859 |
|
|
$ |
438,797 |
|
|
$ |
611,535 |
|
Less sublease rentals
|
|
|
(100,900 |
) |
|
|
(108,200 |
) |
|
|
(239,300 |
) |
Contingent rentals
|
|
|
22,476 |
|
|
|
26,640 |
|
|
|
23,921 |
|
|
|
$ |
258,435 |
|
|
$ |
357,237 |
|
|
$ |
396,156 |
|
In fiscal year 2008 the Company entered into an operating
lease for warehouse space in the immediate vicinity of
its manufacturing operation. The following is a
schedule, by year, of future minimum rental payments
required under such lease for the years ending February
28 or 29:
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
$ |
102,000 |
|
2010
|
|
|
102,000 |
|
2011
|
|
|
34,000 |
|
|
|
$ |
238,000 |
|
The Company also leases trucking equipment under
operating leases. The following is a schedule by year of
future minimum rental payments required under such leases
for the years ending February 28 or 29:
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
$ |
157,000 |
|
2010
|
|
|
58,200 |
|
2011
|
|
|
48,500 |
|
|
|
$ |
263,700 |
|
The following is a schedule of lease expense for trucking equipment operating leases for the three
years ended February 28 or 29:
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
222,682
|
|
187,599
|
|
308,719 |
Purchase contracts
The Company frequently enters into purchase contracts of between six to eighteen months for
chocolate and certain nuts. These contracts permit the Company to purchase the specified commodity
at a fixed price on an as-needed basis during the term of the contract. Because prices for these
products may fluctuate, the Company may benefit if prices rise during the terms of these contracts,
but it may be required to pay above-market prices if prices fall and it is unable to renegotiate
the terms of the contract. Currently the Company has contracted for approximately $1,825,517 of
raw materials under such agreements.
Contingencies
The Company is party to various legal proceedings arising in the ordinary course of business.
Management believes that the resolution of these matters will not have a significant adverse effect
on the Companys financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
38
NOTE 6 INCOME TAXES
Income tax expense is comprised of the following for the years ending February 28 or 29:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
Current |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal |
|
$ |
2,435,496 |
|
|
$ |
2,533,401 |
|
|
$ |
2,147,826 |
|
State |
|
|
467,342 |
|
|
|
483,605 |
|
|
|
318,089 |
|
Total Current |
|
|
2,902,838 |
|
|
|
3,017,007 |
|
|
|
2,465,915 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal |
|
|
131,776 |
|
|
|
(120,018 |
) |
|
|
3,774 |
|
State |
|
|
19,166 |
|
|
|
(13,414 |
) |
|
|
421 |
|
Total Deferred |
|
|
150,942 |
|
|
|
(133,432 |
) |
|
|
4,195 |
|
Total |
|
$ |
3,053,780 |
|
|
$ |
2,883,575 |
|
|
$ |
2,470,110 |
|
A reconciliation of the statutory federal income tax rate and the effective rate as a percentage of
pretax income is as follows for the years ending February 28 or 29:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
Statutory rate
|
|
|
34.0 |
% |
|
|
34.0 |
% |
|
|
34.0 |
% |
State income taxes, net of federal benefit
|
|
|
4.0 |
% |
|
|
4.1 |
% |
|
|
3.2 |
% |
Other
|
|
|
0.1 |
% |
|
|
(0.3 |
%) |
|
|
.6 |
% |
Effective Rate
|
|
|
38.1 |
% |
|
|
37.8 |
% |
|
|
37.8 |
% |
The components of deferred income taxes at February 28 or 29 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Deferred Tax Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts and notes |
|
$ |
43,538 |
|
|
$ |
70,882 |
|
Inventories |
|
|
74,188 |
|
|
|
55,831 |
|
Accrued compensation |
|
|
34,512 |
|
|
|
42,701 |
|
Loss provisions and deferred income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
143,925 |
|
Self insurance accrual |
|
|
20,214 |
|
|
|
15,368 |
|
Amortization, design costs |
|
|
74,649 |
|
|
|
67,208 |
|
|
|
|
247,101 |
|
|
|
395,915 |
|
Deferred Tax Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
(803,066 |
) |
|
|
(808,657 |
) |
Loss provisions and deferred income |
|
|
(7,718 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Net deferred tax liability |
|
$ |
(563,683 |
) |
|
$ |
(412,742 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current deferred tax assets |
|
$ |
117,846 |
|
|
$ |
272,871 |
|
Non-current deferred tax liabilities |
|
|
(681,529 |
) |
|
|
(685,613 |
) |
Net deferred tax liability |
|
$ |
(563,683 |
) |
|
$ |
(412,742 |
) |
The Company files income tax returns in the U.S. federal and various state taxing jurisdictions.
With few exceptions, the Company is no longer subject to U.S. federal and state tax examinations in
its major tax jurisdictions for periods before fiscal year 2004.
Realization of the Companys deferred tax assets is dependent upon the Company generating
sufficient taxable income, in the appropriate tax jurisdictions, in future years to obtain benefit
from the reversal of net deductible temporary differences. The amount of deferred tax assets
considered realizable is subject to adjustment in future periods if estimates of future taxable
income are changed. Management believes that it is more likely than not that the Company will
realize the benefits of its deferred tax assets as of February 29, 2008.
In July 2006, the FASB issued Interpretation 48 (FIN 48), Accounting for Uncertainty in Income
Taxes, an interpretation of SFAS No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes. FIN 48 clarifies the
accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in an enterprises financial statements in
accordance with SFAS No. 109. The interpretation applies to all tax positions accounted for in
accordance with Statement 109 and requires a more-likely-than-not recognition threshold. A tax
position that meets the more-likely-than-not recognition threshold is initially and subsequently
measured as the largest amount of tax benefit that is greater than 50 percent likely of being
realized upon ultimate settlement with a taxing authority that has full knowledge of all relevant
information. Subsequent recognition, derecognition, and measurement is based on managements best
judgment given the facts, circumstances and information available at the reporting date. FIN 48 is
effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006. Early adoption is permitted as of the
beginning of an enterprises fiscal year, provided the enterprise has not yet issued financial
statements, including financial statements for any interim period, for that fiscal year. The
Company adopted FIN No. 48 as of March 1, 2007. The adoption of FIN 48 did not have a material
impact on the Companys balance sheet or statement of income.
The Company does not have any significant unrecognized tax benefits
and does not anticipate a significant increase or decrease in
unrecognized tax benefits within the next twelve months. Amounts
are recognized for income tax related interest and penalties as a
component of general and administrative expense in the statement of
income and are immaterial for years
ended February 29, 2008 and February 28, 2007.
39
NOTE 7 STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
Stock Issuance
In March 2006, the Company issued 584 shares of stock, valued at $12,500, for partial payment of
certain sales services for one year. In June 2006 the Company issued 250 shares of stock valued at
$3,322 for franchise recognition at the Companys National Convention.
In September 2005, the Company issued 1,752 shares of stock, valued at $37,500, for certain
licensing rights for five years and partial payment of certain sales services for one year.
Stock Dividends
On July 10, 2007 the Board of Directors declared a 5 percent stock dividend payable on July 31,
2007 to shareholders of record as of July 20, 2007. Shareholders received one additional share of
Common Stock for every twenty shares owned prior to the record date. Subsequent to the dividend
there were 6,380,945 shares outstanding.
On February 15, 2005 the Board of Directors declared a 5 percent stock dividend payable on March
10, 2005 to shareholders of record as of February 28, 2005. Shareholders received one additional
share of Common Stock for every twenty shares owned prior to the record date. Subsequent to the
dividend there were 4,602,135 shares outstanding.
Stock Splits
On May 18, 2005 the Board of Directors approved a four-for-three stock split payable June 13, 2005
to shareholders of record at the close of business on May 31, 2005. Shareholders received one
additional share of common stock for every three shares owned prior to the record date.
Immediately prior to the split there were 4,639,244 shares outstanding. Subsequent to the split
there were 6,186,007 shares outstanding.
All share and per share data have been restated in all years presented to give effect to the stock
dividends and stock splits.
Stock Repurchases
Between January 9, 2008 and February 8, 2008, the Company repurchased 391,600 shares at an average
price of $11.94. Between August 15, 2007 and August 28, 2007, the Company repurchased 16,000 shares
at an average price of $15.96 per share. Between March 1, 2007 and May 15, 2007 the Company
repurchased 76,335 shares at an average price of $13.12 per share. Between May 1, 2006 and
February 28, 2007 the Company repurchased 253,141 shares at an average price of $12.94 per share.
Between March 24, 2006 and April 28, 2006 the Company repurchased 74,249 shares at an average price
of $14.90 per share. Between October 7, 2005 and February 3, 2006 the Company repurchased 185,429
Company shares at an average price of $14.63 per share. Between April 18 and April 20, 2005, the
Company repurchased 18,529 Company shares at an average price of $13.28 per share.
Cash Dividend
The Company paid a quarterly cash dividend of $0.0643 per common share on March 16, 2005, June 16,
2005 and September 16, 2005 to shareholders of record on March 11, 2005, June 3, 2005 and September
1, 2005 respectively. The Company paid a quarterly cash dividend of $0.0667 per common share on
December 16, 2005 to shareholders of record on December 1, 2005. The Company paid a quarterly cash
dividend of $0.0762 per common share on March 16, 2006, June 16, 2006 and September 16, 2006 to
shareholders of record on March 8, 2006, June 2, 2006 and September 1, 2006, respectively. The
Company paid a quarterly cash dividend of $0.0857 per common share on December 15, 2006 and March
16, 2007 to shareholders of record on December 1, 2006 and March 2, 2007. The Company paid a
quarterly cash dividend of $0.0952 per common share on June 15, 2007 to shareholders of record on
June 1, 2007. The Company paid a quarterly cash dividend of $0.0950 per common share on September
14, 2007 to shareholders of record on September 4, 2007. The Company paid a quarterly cash
dividend of $0.10 per common share on December 14, 2007 and March 14, 2008 to shareholders of
record on December 3, 2007 and February 29, 2008.
Future declaration of dividends will depend on, among other things, the Companys results of
operations, capital requirements, financial condition and on such other factors as the Companys
Board of Directors may in its discretion consider relevant and in the best long term interest of
the shareholders.
40
NOTE 8 STOCK OPTION PLANS
In fiscal 2008 shareholders approved the 2007 Equity Incentive Plan (the 2007 Plan). The 2007
Plan allows awards of stock options; stock appreciation rights; stock awards, restricted stock, and
stock units; performance shares and performance units; other stock or cash based awards. As of
February 29, 2008, no awards had been made under the 2007 Plan and 391,325 shares of common stock
is available for award under the plan consisting of 300,000 shares originally authorized, 85,340
previously reserved for issuance under earlier plans and 5,985 shares forfeited under suspended
plans.
Under the 1995 Stock Option Plan (the 1995 Plan), the 2004 Stock Option Plan (the 2004 Plan)the
Nonqualified Stock Option Plan for Nonemployee Directors (the Directors Plan) and the 2000
Nonqualified Stock Option Plan for Nonemployee Directors (the 2000 Directors Plan), options to
purchase up to 970,200, 441,000, 279,720 and 299,060 shares,
respectively, of the Companys common stock were previously authorized to be granted at prices not less than market
value at the date of grant. Options granted may not have a term exceeding ten years under the 1995
plan, the 2004 plan and the Directors Plan. Options granted may not have a term exceeding five
years under the 2000 Directors Plan. Options representing the right to purchase 68,875, 292,446, 0
and 38,808 shares of the Companys common stock were outstanding under the 1995 Plan, the 2004
Plan, the Directors Plan, and the 2000 Directors Plan, respectively, at February 29, 2008. On
February 21, 2006, the Company accelerated the vesting of all outstanding stock options in order to
prevent past option grants from having an impact on future results. The options outstanding under
these plans will expire, if not exercised through February 2016.
The fair value of each option grant is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes
option-pricing model utilizing the following weighted average assumptions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
Expected dividend yield |
|
|
2.60 |
% |
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
2.18 |
% |
Expected stock price volatility |
|
|
20 |
% |
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
30 |
% |
Risk-free interest rate |
|
|
4.69 |
% |
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
4.5 |
% |
Expected life of options |
|
5 years |
|
|
n/a |
|
|
5 years |
Information with respect to options outstanding under the Plans at February 29, 2008, and changes
for the three years then ended was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average |
|
|
Shares |
|
Exercise Price |
Outstanding at beginning of year |
|
|
440,041 |
|
|
$ |
9.80 |
|
Granted |
|
|
12,936 |
|
|
|
13.16 |
|
Exercised |
|
|
(45,813 |
) |
|
|
7.23 |
|
Forfeited |
|
|
(7,035 |
) |
|
|
18.69 |
|
Outstanding at end of year |
|
|
400,129 |
|
|
$ |
10.05 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options exercisable at February 29, 2008 |
|
|
400,129 |
|
|
$ |
10.05 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average |
|
|
Shares |
|
Exercise Price |
Outstanding at beginning of year |
|
|
604,670 |
|
|
$ |
8.61 |
|
Granted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised |
|
|
(149,404 |
) |
|
|
4.17 |
|
Forfeited |
|
|
(15,225 |
) |
|
|
17.83 |
|
Outstanding at end of year |
|
|
440,041 |
|
|
$ |
9.80 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options exercisable at February 28, 2007 |
|
|
440,041 |
|
|
$ |
9.80 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average |
|
|
Shares |
|
Exercise Price |
Outstanding at beginning of year |
|
|
808,500 |
|
|
$ |
4.47 |
|
Granted |
|
|
157,122 |
|
|
|
17.28 |
|
Exercised |
|
|
(354,778 |
) |
|
|
3.02 |
|
Forfeited |
|
|
(6,174 |
) |
|
|
7.41 |
|
Outstanding at end of year |
|
|
604,670 |
|
|
|
8.61 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options
exercisable at February 28, 2006 |
|
|
604,670 |
|
|
$ |
8.61 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average fair value per share of
options granted during 2008, 2007 and 2006
were $2.69, $0 and $3.03, respectively. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41
NOTE 8 STOCK OPTION PLANS CONTINUED
Additional information about stock options outstanding at February 29, 2008 is summarized
as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options Outstanding |
|
|
Number |
|
Weighted average remaining |
|
Weighted average |
Range of exercise prices |
|
exercisable |
|
contractual life |
|
exercise price |
$1.527 to 3.748 |
|
|
68,875 |
|
|
|
4.17 |
|
|
|
3.35 |
|
$5.857 to 7.415 |
|
|
189,630 |
|
|
|
6.22 |
|
|
|
7.38 |
|
$13.162 to 20.571 |
|
|
141,624 |
|
|
|
6.76 |
|
|
|
16.87 |
|
NOTE 9 OPERATING SEGMENTS
The Company classifies its business interests into two reportable segments: Franchising and
Manufacturing. The Company has five Company-owned stores. Company-owned stores provide an
environment for testing new products and promotions, operating and training methods and
merchandising techniques. Company management evaluates these stores in relation to their
contribution to franchising efforts. The accounting policies of the segments are the same as those
described in the summary of significant accounting policies in Note 1. The Company evaluates
performance and allocates resources based on operating contribution, which excludes unallocated
corporate general and administrative costs, provision for loss on accounts and income tax expense
or benefit. The Companys reportable segments are strategic businesses that utilize common
merchandising, distribution, and marketing functions, as well as common information systems and
corporate administration. All inter-segment sales prices are market based. Each segment is
managed separately because of the differences in required infrastructure and the difference in
products and services:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Franchising |
|
Manufacturing |
|
Other |
|
Total |
FY 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
$ |
8,119,957 |
|
|
$ |
25,531,054 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
33,651,011 |
|
Intersegment revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,772,828 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,772,828 |
) |
Revenue from external customers |
|
|
8,119,957 |
|
|
|
23,758,226 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31,878,183 |
|
Segment profit (loss) |
|
|
3,416,155 |
|
|
|
7,190,535 |
|
|
|
(2,591,534 |
) |
|
|
8,015,156 |
|
Total assets |
|
|
2,341,722 |
|
|
|
11,494,058 |
|
|
|
2,311,680 |
|
|
|
16,147,460 |
|
Capital expenditures |
|
|
25,835 |
|
|
|
415,377 |
|
|
|
137,221 |
|
|
|
578,433 |
|
Total depreciation & amortization |
|
|
186,865 |
|
|
|
410,660 |
|
|
|
185,426 |
|
|
|
782,951 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FY 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
$ |
8,864,314 |
|
|
$ |
24,656,272 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
33,520,596 |
|
Intersegment revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,947,253 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,947,253 |
) |
Revenue from external customers |
|
|
8,864,314 |
|
|
|
22,709,019 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31,573,333 |
|
Segment profit (loss) |
|
|
3,222,840 |
|
|
|
7,084,812 |
|
|
|
(2,679,159 |
) |
|
|
7,628,493 |
|
Total assets |
|
|
2,438,225 |
|
|
|
10,660,079 |
|
|
|
5,357,865 |
|
|
|
18,456,169 |
|
Capital expenditures |
|
|
32,703 |
|
|
|
108,372 |
|
|
|
59,962 |
|
|
|
201,037 |
|
Total depreciation & amortization |
|
|
233,346 |
|
|
|
434,398 |
|
|
|
206,244 |
|
|
|
873,988 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FY 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
$ |
8,776,429 |
|
|
$ |
21,035,748 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
29,812,177 |
|
Intersegment revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,738,565 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,738,565 |
) |
Revenue from external customers |
|
|
8,776,429 |
|
|
|
19,297,183 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,073,612 |
|
Segment profit (loss) |
|
|
2,986,944 |
|
|
|
5,884,990 |
|
|
|
(2,337,252 |
) |
|
|
6,534,682 |
|
Total assets |
|
|
2,964,486 |
|
|
|
10,209,790 |
|
|
|
5,883,204 |
|
|
|
19,057,480 |
|
Capital expenditures |
|
|
90,757 |
|
|
|
878,871 |
|
|
|
330,686 |
|
|
|
1,300,314 |
|
Total depreciation & amortization |
|
|
264,658 |
|
|
|
406,494 |
|
|
|
204,788 |
|
|
|
875,940 |
|
NOTE 10 SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW INFORMATION
For the three years ended February 28 or 29:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
Interest paid |
|
$ |
1,566 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
19,872 |
|
Income taxes paid |
|
|
2,950,281 |
|
|
|
2,890,807 |
|
|
|
560,485 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Cash Operating Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue Recognition Changes (Note 14) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(129,928 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
Income taxes payable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
156,276 |
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(283,500 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
257,152 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Cash Investing Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividend payable |
|
$ |
47,740 |
|
|
$ |
47,583 |
|
|
$ |
87,060 |
|
Issue stock for rights and services |
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,822 |
|
|
|
37,500 |
|
Fair value of assets received upon
settlement of notes and accounts
receivable: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Store to be operated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
200,000 |
|
Inventory |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,815 |
|
Note receivable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
153,780 |
|
42
NOTE 11 EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLAN
The Company has a 401(k) plan called the Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory, Inc. 401(k) Plan.
Eligible participants are permitted to make contributions up to statutory limits. The Company makes
a matching contribution, which vests ratably over a 3-year period, and is 25% of the employees
contribution up to a maximum of 1.5% of the employees compensation. During the years ended
February 28 or 29, 2008, 2007 and 2006, the Companys contribution was approximately $41,000,
$40,000, and $46,000, respectively, to the plan.
NOTE 12 SUMMARIZED QUARTERLY DATA (UNAUDITED)
Following is a summary of the quarterly results of operations for the fiscal years ended February
28 or 29, 2008 and 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Quarter |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First |
|
|
Second |
|
|
Third |
|
|
Fourth |
|
|
Total |
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue |
|
$ |
7,278,885 |
|
|
$ |
7,548,079 |
|
|
$ |
8,765,471 |
|
|
$ |
8,285,748 |
|
|
$ |
31,878,183 |
|
Gross margin before
depreciation |
|
|
2,123,512 |
|
|
|
2,324,799 |
|
|
|
2,222,255 |
|
|
|
2,209,160 |
|
|
|
8,879,726 |
|
Net income |
|
|
1,031,617 |
|
|
|
1,333,353 |
|
|
|
1,265,555 |
|
|
|
1,330,851 |
|
|
|
4,961,376 |
|
Basic earnings per share |
|
|
.16 |
|
|
|
.21 |
|
|
|
.20 |
|
|
|
.21 |
|
|
|
.78 |
|
Diluted earnings per share |
|
|
.16 |
|
|
|
.20 |
|
|
|
.19 |
|
|
|
.21 |
|
|
|
.76 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Quarter |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First |
|
|
Second |
|
|
Third |
|
|
Fourth |
|
|
Total |
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue |
|
$ |
6,768,412 |
|
|
$ |
6,779,569 |
|
|
$ |
9,094,436 |
|
|
$ |
8,930,916 |
|
|
$ |
31,573,333 |
|
Gross margin before
depreciation |
|
|
2,012,762 |
|
|
|
2,071,381 |
|
|
|
2,622,621 |
|
|
|
2,640,355 |
|
|
|
9,347,119 |
|
Net income |
|
|
930,541 |
|
|
|
1,039,790 |
|
|
|
1,331,795 |
|
|
|
1,442,792 |
|
|
|
4,744,918 |
|
Basic earnings per share |
|
|
.14 |
|
|
|
.16 |
|
|
|
.21 |
|
|
|
.22 |
|
|
|
.74 |
|
Dilute earnings per share |
|
|
.14 |
|
|
|
.16 |
|
|
|
.20 |
|
|
|
.22 |
|
|
|
.71 |
|
The Company has evaluated the impact of changes to revenue recognition on a quarterly basis and
determined that the change is not significant to the results of any quarter. See Note 14 to the
Consolidated Financial Statements.
NOTE 13 GOODWILL AND INTANGIBLE ASSETS
Intangible assets consist of the following at February 28 or 29:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization |
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
Period |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Amortization |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Amortization |
|
Intangible assets subject to amortization |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Store design |
|
10 Years |
|
|
205,777 |
|
|
|
127,314 |
|
|
|
205,777 |
|
|
|
106,204 |
|
Packaging licenses |
|
3-5 Years |
|
|
120,830 |
|
|
|
109,164 |
|
|
|
120,830 |
|
|
|
104,164 |
|
Packaging design |
|
10 Years |
|
|
430,973 |
|
|
|
264,855 |
|
|
|
430,973 |
|
|
|
217,854 |
|
Trademark |
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
777,580 |
|
|
|
501,333 |
|
|
|
777,580 |
|
|
|
428,222 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intangible assets not subject to amortization |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Franchising segment- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Company stores goodwill |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,011,458 |
|
|
|
267,020 |
|
|
|
1,011,458 |
|
|
|
267,020 |
|
Franchising goodwill |
|
|
|
|
|
|
295,000 |
|
|
|
197,682 |
|
|
|
295,000 |
|
|
|
197,682 |
|
Manufacturing segment-Goodwill |
|
|
|
|
|
|
295,000 |
|
|
|
197,682 |
|
|
|
295,000 |
|
|
|
197,682 |
|
Total Goodwill |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,601,458 |
|
|
|
662,384 |
|
|
|
1,601,458 |
|
|
|
662,384 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total intangible assets |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,379,038 |
|
|
$ |
1,163,717 |
|
|
$ |
2,379,038 |
|
|
$ |
1,090,606 |
|
Amortization expense related to intangible assets totaled $73,111, $73,111, and $77,092 during the
fiscal year ended February 28 or 29, 2008, 2007 and 2006. The aggregate estimated amortization
expense for intangible assets remaining as of February 29, 2008 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
73,100 |
|
2010 |
|
|
73,100 |
|
2011 |
|
|
64,400 |
|
2012 |
|
|
37,700 |
|
2013 |
|
|
7,000 |
|
Thereafter |
|
|
947 |
|
Total |
|
|
256,247 |
|
During fiscal year 2007 the Company sold or closed four Company stores. The sale and closures
resulted in the reduction of Company store goodwill and related accumulated amortization of
$264,504 and $69,827, respectively, for a net decrease in goodwill of $194,677.
43
NOTE 14 REVENUE RECOGNITION CHANGES
Historically the Company has recognized franchise fees upon completion of all significant initial
services provided to the franchisee and upon satisfaction of all material conditions of the
franchise agreement. Effective with the fourth quarter of fiscal 2007, the Company decided to
change that policy to more closely coincide with industry practice, that is, to recognize franchise
fees when the franchise store opens. Due to the change the Company recorded adjustments to its
March 1, 2006 balance sheet as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in deferred income |
|
$ |
283,500 |
|
Decrease in income taxes payable |
|
|
107,163 |
|
Decrease in retained earnings |
|
|
176,337 |
|
Historically the Company has recognized factory revenue upon shipment of candy to franchisees on
Company trucks. Effective with the fourth quarter of fiscal 2007, the Company decided to change
that policy to recognize factory revenue upon delivery of candy to franchisees. Due to the change
the Company recorded adjustments to its March 1, 2006 balance sheet as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Decrease in accounts receivable |
|
$ |
379,636 |
|
Increase in inventory |
|
|
249,708 |
|
Decrease in income taxes payable |
|
|
49,113 |
|
Decrease in retained earnings |
|
|
80,815 |
|
NOTE 15 RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS 157, Fair Value Measurements. SFAS 157 establishes a
framework for measuring fair value under GAAP and expands disclosures about fair value measurement.
SFAS 157 also creates consistency and comparability in fair value measurements among the many
accounting pronouncements that require fair value measurements but does not require any new fair
value measurements. SFAS 157 is effective for fiscal years (including interim periods) beginning
after November 15, 2007. The Company will adopt SFAS No. 157 in fiscal 2009 and does not expect it
to have a significant impact on the Companys financial statements.
In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and
Financial Liabilities Including an amendment of FASB Statement No. 115. This standard amends
SFAS 115, Accounting for Certain Investment in Debt and Equity Securities, with respect to
accounting for a transfer to the trading category for all entities with available-for-sale and
trading securities electing the fair value option. This standard allows companies to elect fair
value accounting for many financial instruments and other items that currently are not required to
be accounted as such, allows different applications for electing the option for a single item or
groups of items, and requires disclosures to facilitate comparisons of similar assets and
liabilities that are accounted for differently in relation to the fair value option. SFAS 159 is
effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. The Company will adopt SFAS No. 159
in fiscal 2009 and does not expect it to have a significant impact on the Companys financial
statements.
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141 (revised 2007), Business Combinations, which
replaces FASB Statement No. 141. SFAS No. 141R establishes principles and requirements for how an
acquirer recognizes and measures in its financial statements the identifiable assets acquired, the
liabilities assumed, any non controlling interest in the acquiree and the goodwill acquired. The
Statement also establishes disclosure requirements which will enable users to evaluate the nature
and financial effects of the business combination. SFAS No. 141R is effective as of the beginning
of an entitys fiscal year that begins after December 15, 2008 (Fiscal 2010). The Company is in the
process of evaluating the potential impact, if any, of the adoption of SFAS No. 141R.
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160, Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial
Statements an amendment of Accounting Research Bulletin No. 51, which establishes accounting and
reporting standards for ownership interests in subsidiaries held by parties other than the parent,
the amount of consolidated net income attributable to the parent and to the noncontrolling
interest, changes in a parents ownership interest and the valuation of retained noncontrolling
equity investments when a subsidiary is deconsolidated. The Statement also establishes reporting
requirements that provide sufficient disclosures that clearly identify and distinguish between the
interests of the parent and the interests of the
noncontrolling owners. SFAS No.160 is effective as of the beginning of an entitys fiscal year that
begins after December 15, 2008 (Fiscal 2010). The Company is in the process of evaluating the
potential impact, if any, of the adoption of SFAS No. 160.
44
ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH
ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
None
ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Disclosure Controls and Procedures and Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
Limitations on Controls and Procedures Because of their inherent limitations, disclosure controls
and procedures and internal control over financial reporting (collectively, Control Systems) may
not prevent or detect all failures or misstatements of the type sought to be avoided by Control
Systems. Also, projections of any evaluation of the effectiveness of the Companys Control Systems
to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in
conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
Management, including the Companys Chief Executive Officer (the CEO) and Chief Financial Officer
(the CFO), does not expect that the Companys Control Systems will prevent all error or all
fraud. A Control System, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable,
not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the Control System are met. Further, the design of a
Control System must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of
controls must be considered relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all
Control Systems, no evaluation can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances
of fraud, if any, within the Company have been detected. These reports by management, including the
CEO and CFO, on the effectiveness of the Companys Control Systems express only reasonable
assurance of the conclusions reached.
Disclosure Controls and Procedures The Company maintains disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange
Act)) that are designed to ensure that material information relating to the Company is made known
to the officers who certify the Companys financial reports and to other members of senior
management and the Board of Directors. These disclosure controls and procedures are designed to
ensure that information required to be disclosed in the Companys reports that are filed or
submitted under the Exchange Act, are recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time
periods specified in the SECs rules and forms.
Management, with the participation of the CEO and CFO, has evaluated the effectiveness, as of
February 29, 2008, of the Companys disclosure controls and procedures. Based on that evaluation,
the CEO and CFO have concluded that the Companys disclosure controls and procedures were effective
as of February 29, 2008.
Managements Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting Management is
responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting (as
defined in Rule 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act). The Companys internal control
over financial reporting is a process designed under supervision of the Companys principal
executive officer and principal financial officer to provide reasonable assurance regarding the
reliability of financial reporting and preparation of the Companys financial statements for
external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Management, with the
participation of the CEO and CFO, has evaluated the effectiveness, as of February 29, 2008, of the
Companys internal control over financial reporting. In making this evaluation, management used the
criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission in its
publication Internal Control-Integrated Framework. Based on that evaluation, the CEO and CFO have
concluded that the Companys internal control over financial reporting was effective as of February
29, 2008.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting There were no changes in the Companys
internal control over financial reporting identified in connection with the evaluation required by
paragraph (d) of Section 240.13a-15 of the Exchange Act that occurred during the Companys last
fiscal quarter (the Companys fourth quarter in the case of an annual report) that have materially
affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Companys internal control over
financial reporting.
Attestation
Report of the Registered Public Accounting Firm The
operating effectiveness of our internal control over financial
reporting as of February 29, 2008 has been audited by Ehrhardt
Keefe Steiner & Hottman PC, an independent registered public
accounting firm, as stated in their report, which is included herein.
45
ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION
None
PART III.
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT
Certain information with respect to the executive officers of the Company is set forth in the
section entitled Executive Officers in Part I of this report.
The information required by this item with respect to directors will be set forth in our Definitive
Proxy Statement for our Annual Meeting of Stockholders, to be filed no later than June 30, 2008
under the caption Election of Directors and Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership
Reporting Compliance and is incorporated herein by this reference.
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
The information required by this item will be set forth in our Definitive Proxy Statement for our
Annual Meeting of Stockholders, to be filed no later than June 30, 2008 is under the caption
Executive Compensation and is incorporated herein by this reference.
ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER
MATTERS
The information required by this item will be set forth in our Definitive Proxy Statement for our
Annual Meeting of Stockholders, to be filed no later than June 30, 2008 under the caption Security
Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters is
incorporated herein by this reference.
The following table provides information with respect to the Companys equity compensation plans as
of February 29, 2008.
Equity Compensation Plan Information
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
securities to be |
|
|
|
|
|
|
issued upon exercise |
|
Weighted average |
|
Number of |
|
|
of outstanding |
|
exercise price of |
|
securities remaining |
|
|
options, warrants and |
|
outstanding options, |
|
available for future |
Plan category |
|
rights |
|
warrants and rights |
|
issuance |
Equity compensation
plans approved by
security holders |
|
|
400,129 |
|
|
$ |
10.05 |
|
|
|
391,325 |
|
Equity compensation
plans not approved
by security holders |
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
Total |
|
|
400,129 |
|
|
$ |
10.05 |
|
|
|
391,325 |
|
ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
The information required by this item will be set forth in our Definitive Proxy Statement for our
Annual Meeting of Stockholders, to be filed no later than June 30, 2008 is under the caption
Certain Transactions is incorporated herein by this reference.
ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES
The information required by this item will be set forth in our Definitive Proxy Statement for our
Annual Meeting of Stockholders, to be filed no later than June 30, 2008 is under the caption
Principal Accountant Fees and Services is incorporated herein by this reference.
46
PART IV.
ITEM 15. EXHIBITS and FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
(a) The following documents are filed as part of this report:
1. Financial Statements
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page |
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firms |
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Statements of Income |
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance Sheets |
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Statements of Changes in Stockholders Equity |
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Statements of Cash Flows |
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes to Financial Statements |
|
|
34 |
|
2. Financial Statement Schedules
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page |
SCHEDULE II Valuation and Qualifying Accounts |
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
SCHEDULE II Valuation and Qualifying Accounts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at |
|
Additions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning of |
|
Charged to |
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at End |
|
|
Period |
|
Costs & Exp. |
|
Deductions |
|
of Period |
Year Ended February 29, 2008
Valuation Allowance for
Accounts and Notes
Receivable |
|
|
187,519 |
|
|
|
75,000 |
|
|
|
148,248 |
|
|
|
114,271 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended February 28, 2007
Valuation Allowance for
Accounts and Notes
Receivable |
|
|
98,925 |
|
|
|
70,000 |
|
|
|
(18,594 |
) |
|
|
187,519 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended February 29, 2006
Valuation Allowance for
Accounts and Notes
Receivable |
|
|
132,646 |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
33,721 |
|
|
|
98,925 |
|
47
3. Exhibits
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
|
|
Number |
|
Description |
|
Incorporated by Reference to |
|
|
|
|
|
3.1
|
|
Articles of Incorporation of the Registrant, as amended
|
|
Exhibit 3.1 to Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Registrant for the year ended February 28,2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
Amended and Restated By-laws of the Registrant
|
|
Exhibit 3.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K of the Registrant filed December 14, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
4.1
|
|
Specimen Common Stock Certificate
|
|
Exhibit 4.1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Registrant for the fiscal year ended February 28, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
4.2
|
|
Business Loan Agreement dated July 31, 2007 between Wells Fargo Bank and the Registrant
|
|
Exhibit 10.3 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Registrant for the quarter ended August 31, 2007 and Exhibit 4.2 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Registrant for the quarter ended August 31, 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
4.3
|
|
Promissory Note dated July 31, 2006 in the amount of $5,000,000 between Wells Fargo
Bank and the Registrant.
|
|
Exhibit 4.4 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Registrant for the quarter ended August 31, 2006. |
|
|
|
|
|
10.1
|
|
Form of Employment Agreement between the Registrant and its officers
|
|
Exhibit 10.1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Registrant for the fiscal year ended February 28, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
10.2
|
|
Airport Development Agreement between The Grove, Inc. and the Registrant
|
|
Exhibit 10.1 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Registrant for the quarter ended November 30, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
10.3
|
|
Current form of franchise agreement used by the Registrant
|
|
Exhibit 10.1 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Registrant for the quarter ended August 31, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
10.4
|
|
Form of Real Estate Lease between the Registrant as Lessee and franchisee as Sublessee
|
|
Exhibit 10.7 to Registration Statement on Form S-18 (Registration No. 33-2016-D). |
|
|
|
|
|
10.4
|
|
1995 Stock Option Plan of the Registrant
|
|
Exhibit 10.9 to Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration No. 33-62149) filed August 25, 1995. |
|
|
|
|
|
10.5
|
|
2007 Equity Incentive Plan of the Registrant
|
|
Exhibit 99.1 to Registration Statement on Form S-8 (Registration No. 333-145986) filed on September 11, 2007. |
|
|
|
|
|
10.6
|
|
Form of Indemnification Agreement between the Registrant and its directors
|
|
Exhibit 10.7 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Registrant for the fiscal year ended February 28, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
10.7
|
|
Form of Indemnification Agreement between the Registrant and its officers
|
|
Exhibit 10.8 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Registrant for the fiscal year ended February 28, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
10.8
|
|
1995 Stock Option Plan of the Registrant
|
|
Exhibit 10.9 to Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration No. 33-62149) filed August 25, 1995. |
|
|
|
|
|
10.9
|
|
Forms of Incentive Stock Option Agreement for 1995 Stock Option Plan
|
|
Exhibit 10.10 to Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration No. 33-62149) filed on August 25, 1995. |
48
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
|
|
Number |
|
Description |
|
Incorporated by Reference to |
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibits continued |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.10
|
|
Forms of Nonqualified Stock Option Agreement for 1995 Stock Option Plan
|
|
Exhibit 10.11 to Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration No. 33-62149) filed on August 25, 1995. |
|
|
|
|
|
10.10
|
|
2000 Nonqualified Stock Option Plan for Nonemployee Directors
|
|
Exhibit 99.1 to Registration Statement on Form S-8 (Registration No. 333-109936 filed on October 23, 2003. |
|
|
|
|
|
10.11
|
|
2004 Stock Option Plan of the Registrant
|
|
Exhibit 99.1 to Registration Statement on Form S-8 (Registration No. 333-119107) filed September 17, 2004. |
|
|
|
|
|
10.12
|
|
Commodity Contract with Guittard Chocolate Company*
|
|
Filed herewith. |
|
|
|
|
|
23.1
|
|
Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
|
|
Filed herewith. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
Certification Pursuant To
Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, Chief Executive Officer
|
|
Filed herewith. |
|
|
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Certification Pursuant To Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, Chief Financial Officer
|
|
Filed herewith. |
|
|
|
|
|
32.1
|
|
Certification Pursuant To Section 906 Of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, Chief Executive Officer
|
|
Furnished herewith. |
|
|
|
|
|
32.2
|
|
Certification Pursuant To Section 906 Of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, Chief Financial Officer
|
|
Furnished herewith |
|
|
|
* |
|
Contains material that has been omitted pursuant to a request for
confidential treatment and such material has been filed separately
with the Commission. |
49
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto
duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ROCKY MOUNTAIN CHOCOLATE FACTORY, INC. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date: May 14, 2008
|
|
|
|
/S/ Bryan J. Merryman
BRYAN J. MERRYMAN
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chief Operating Officer, Chief
Financial Officer, Treasurer and
Director |
|
|
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed
below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates
indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
Date: May 14, 2008
|
|
/S/ Franklin E. Crail
FRANKLIN E. CRAIL
|
|
|
|
|
Chairman of the Board of
Directors, President, and
Director
(principal executive officer) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date: May 14, 2008
|
|
/S/ Bryan J. Merryman
BRYAN J. MERRYMAN
|
|
|
|
|
Chief Operating Officer, Chief
Financial Officer, Treasurer and
Director
(principal financial and
accounting officer) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date: May 14, 2008
|
|
/S/ Gerald A. Kien
GERALD A. KIEN, Director
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date: May 14, 2008
|
|
/S/ Lee N. Mortenson
LEE N. MORTENSON, Director
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date: May 14, 2008
|
|
/S/ Fred M. Trainor
FRED M. TRAINOR, Director
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date: May 14, 2008
|
|
/S/ Clyde Wm. Engle
CLYDE Wm. ENGLE, Director
|
|
|
50
EXHIBIT INDEX
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
|
|
Number |
|
Description |
|
Incorporated by Reference to |
|
|
|
|
|
3.1
|
|
Articles of Incorporation of the Registrant, as amended
|
|
Exhibit 3.1 to Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Registrant for the year ended February 28,2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
Amended and Restated By-laws of the Registrant
|
|
Exhibit 3.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K of the Registrant filed December 14, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
4.1
|
|
Specimen Common Stock Certificate
|
|
Exhibit 4.1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Registrant for the fiscal year ended February 28, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
4.2
|
|
Business Loan Agreement dated July 31, 2007 between Wells Fargo Bank and the Registrant
|
|
Exhibit 10.3 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Registrant for the quarter ended August 31, 2007 and Exhibit 4.2 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Registrant for the quarter ended August 31, 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
4.3
|
|
Promissory Note dated July 31, 2006 in the amount of $5,000,000 between Wells Fargo
Bank and the Registrant.
|
|
Exhibit 4.4 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Registrant for the quarter ended August 31, 2006. |
|
|
|
|
|
10.1
|
|
Form of Employment Agreement between the Registrant and its officers
|
|
Exhibit 10.1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Registrant for the fiscal year ended February 28, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
10.2
|
|
Airport Development Agreement between The Grove, Inc. and the Registrant
|
|
Exhibit 10.1 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Registrant for the quarter ended November 30, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
10.3
|
|
Current form of franchise agreement used by the Registrant
|
|
Exhibit 10.1 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Registrant for the quarter ended August 31, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
10.4
|
|
Form of Real Estate Lease between the Registrant as Lessee and franchisee as Sublessee
|
|
Exhibit 10.7 to Registration Statement on Form S-18 (Registration No. 33-2016-D). |
|
|
|
|
|
10.4
|
|
1995 Stock Option Plan of the Registrant
|
|
Exhibit 10.9 to Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration No. 33-62149) filed August 25, 1995. |
|
|
|
|
|
10.5
|
|
2007 Equity Incentive Plan of the Registrant
|
|
Exhibit 99.1 to Registration Statement on Form S-8 (Registration No. 333-145986) filed on September 11, 2007. |
|
|
|
|
|
10.6
|
|
Form of Indemnification Agreement between the Registrant and its directors
|
|
Exhibit 10.7 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Registrant for the fiscal year ended February 28, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
10.7
|
|
Form of Indemnification Agreement between the Registrant and its officers
|
|
Exhibit 10.8 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Registrant for the fiscal year ended February 28, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
10.8
|
|
1995 Stock Option Plan of the Registrant
|
|
Exhibit 10.9 to Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration No. 33-62149) filed August 25, 1995. |
|
|
|
|
|
10.9
|
|
Forms of Incentive Stock Option Agreement for 1995 Stock Option Plan
|
|
Exhibit 10.10 to Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration No. 33-62149) filed on August 25, 1995. |
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
|
|
Number |
|
Description |
|
Incorporated by Reference to |
|
|
|
|
|
EXHIBIT INDEX continued |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.10
|
|
Forms of Nonqualified Stock Option Agreement for 1995 Stock Option Plan
|
|
Exhibit 10.11 to Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration No. 33-62149) filed on August 25, 1995. |
|
|
|
|
|
10.10
|
|
2000 Nonqualified Stock Option Plan for Nonemployee Directors Of the Registrant
|
|
Exhibit 99.1 to Registration Statement on Form S-8 (Registration No. 333-109936 filed on October 23, 2003. |
|
|
|
|
|
10.11
|
|
2004 Stock Option Plan of the Registrant
|
|
Exhibit 99.1 to Registration Statement on Form S-8 (Registration No. 333-119107) filed September 17, 2004. |
|
|
|
|
|
10.12
|
|
Commodity Contract with Guittard Chocolate Company*
|
|
Filed herewith. |
|
|
|
|
|
23.1
|
|
Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
|
|
Filed herewith. |
|
|
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
Certification Pursuant To
Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, Chief Executive Officer
|
|
Filed herewith. |
|
|
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Certification Pursuant To Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, Chief Financial Officer
|
|
Filed herewith. |
|
|
|
|
|
32.1
|
|
Certification Pursuant To Section 906 Of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, Chief Executive Officer
|
|
Furnished herewith. |
|
|
|
|
|
32.2
|
|
Certification Pursuant To Section 906 Of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, Chief Financial Officer
|
|
Furnished herewith |
|
|
|
* |
|
Contains material that has been omitted pursuant to a request for
confidential treatment and such material has been filed separately
with the Commission. |