Table of Contents

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

x                QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934.

For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2012

OR

o                   TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934.

For the transition period from                    to                      .

Commission file number 0001-34145

Primoris Services Corporation

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (214) 740-5600

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.  Yes x  No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (Section 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).  Yes x  No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).  Yes o  No x

At November 5, 2012, 51,388,406 shares of the registrant’s common stock were outstanding.

Table of Contents

PRIMORIS SERVICES CORPORATION

INDEX

2

Table of Contents

PART I.  FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1.  FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

PRIMORIS SERVICES CORPORATION

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(In Thousands, Except Share Amounts)

(Unaudited)

See Accompanying Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

3

Table of Contents

PRIMORIS SERVICES CORPORATION

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME

(In Thousands, Except Per Share Amounts)

(Unaudited)

See Accompanying Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

4

Table of Contents

PRIMORIS SERVICES CORPORATION

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(In Thousands)

(Unaudited)

See Accompanying Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

5

Table of Contents

SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION

SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF NONCASH INVESTING AND FINANCING ACTIVITIES

See Accompanying Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

6

Table of Contents

PRIMORIS SERVICES CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Dollars In Thousands, Except Share and Per Share Amounts)

(Unaudited)

Note 1—Business Activity

Organization and operations — Primoris Services Corporation and its wholly-owned subsidiaries ARB, Inc. (“ARB”), ARB Structures, Inc., All Day Electric Company, Inc., Onquest, Inc., Born Heaters Canada, ULC, Cardinal Contractors, Inc., GML Coatings, LLC, Stellaris, LLC, James Construction Group LLC (“JCG”) and Rockford Corporation, collectively, are engaged in various construction and product engineering activities. The Company’s underground and directional drilling operations install, replace and repair natural gas, petroleum, telecommunications and water pipeline systems, including large diameter pipeline systems. The Company’s industrial, civil and engineering operations build and provide maintenance services to industrial facilities including power plants, petrochemical facilities, and other processing plants; construct multi-level parking structures; and engage in the construction of highways, bridges and other environmental construction activities. The Company is incorporated in the State of Delaware and in 2011 moved its corporate headquarters from Lake Forest, California to 2100 McKinney Avenue, Suite 1500, Dallas, Texas 75201.

In 2011 the Company entered into a joint venture agreement and formed Blythe Power Constructors for the installation of a parabolic trough solar field and steam generation system in California.

On March 12, 2012, the Company executed an asset purchase agreement with Sprint Pipeline Services, L.P. (“Sprint”).  Headquartered in Pearland (near Houston), Texas, Sprint provides a comprehensive range of pipeline construction, maintenance, upgrade, fabrication and specialty services primarily in the southeastern United States.  The Company formed Primoris Energy Services Corporation, a Texas corporation, to facilitate the acquisition.  The purchase agreement allows the Company to use the Sprint name for three years.

On May 30, 2012, the Company executed an asset purchase agreement with Silva Contracting Company, Inc., Tarmac Materials, LLC and C3 Interests, LLC (collectively “Silva”).  Based outside of Houston, Texas, Silva provides transportation infrastructure maintenance, asphalt paving, and material sales in the Gulf Coast region of the United States. Silva was merged with the operations of JCG.

On September 28, 2012, the Company executed an asset purchase agreement with the Saxon Group.  Based in Suwannee, Georgia, just outside Atlanta, Saxon is a full service industrial construction enterprise with special expertise in the industrial gas processing and power plant sectors. The Saxon balance sheet at closing is included in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet.

Unless specifically noted otherwise, as used throughout these condensed consolidated financial statements, “Primoris”, or “the Company”, “we”, “our”, “us” or “its” refers to the business, operations and financial results of the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiaries.

Note 2—Basis of Presentation

Interim consolidated financial statements — The interim condensed consolidated financial statements for the three-month periods ended September 30, 2012 and 2011 have been prepared in accordance with Rule 10-01 of Regulation S-X of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). As such, certain disclosures, which would substantially duplicate the disclosures contained in the Company’s latest audited consolidated financial statements, have been omitted. This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2012 (the “Third Quarter 2012 Report”) should be read in concert with the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed on March 5, 2012, which contains the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2011.

The interim financial information for the three-month and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2012 and 2011 has been prepared on the same basis as the audited consolidated financial statements; however, the financial statements contained in this Third Quarter 2012 Report do not include all of the information and disclosures required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) for audited financial statements. The interim financial information is unaudited.  In the opinion of management, the unaudited information includes all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring adjustments) necessary for the fair presentation of the interim financial information.  Reclassifications have been made to prior year financial statement presentation to conform to the current year presentation.

Revenue recognition — The Company typically structures contracts as unit-price, time and material, fixed-price or cost reimbursable plus fee. For fixed price contracts revenue is recognized on the cost-on-total-cost percentage-of-completion method.  In the percentage-of-completion method, estimated revenues and resulting contract income is calculated based on the total costs incurred as a percentage of total estimated costs. Total estimated costs, and thus future contract revenues and income, can be impacted by changes in any of the following: productivity, scheduling, the unit cost of labor, subcontracts, materials and equipment. Additionally, external factors such as weather, client needs, client delays in providing permits and approvals, labor availability, governmental regulation and politics may affect the progress of a project’s completion and thus the timing of revenue recognition. If an estimate of total contract cost compared to the contract value indicates a loss on a contract, the projected loss is recognized in full at the time of the estimate. Recognition of the loss creates a balance sheet reserve for estimated losses on uncompleted contracts. The reserve is used to maintain a zero gross margin for the contract over its remaining construction period.

7

Table of Contents

Revenues on cost-plus, unit-price and time and materials contracts are recognized as the related work is completed.

Most fixed price contracts define specific events or accomplishments that allow progress or interim billing prior to completion of the project.  These events may not be related to costs incurred or overall completion of the project.  Therefore, there can be significant differences between the recognition of revenues using percentage of completion and the billing and cash receipt part of the contract.  Similarly, for cost reimbursable or cost plus contracts, billing may not be possible until all related costs, such as subcontractor invoices, have been collected and documented.  For construction contracts where the amount billed exceeds the revenues recognized per percentage of completion accounting, the amount that the billed amount exceeds the revenue recognized is recognized in the “Billings in excess of costs and estimated earnings” balance sheet liability account.  For projects in which the amounts billed are less than revenues recognized through percentage of completion accounting and for projects which have not been billed awaiting documentation of related costs, the difference between amounts recognized as revenue and amounts billed is recognized in the “Costs and estimated earnings in excess of billings” balance sheet asset account.

In accordance with applicable terms of construction contracts, certain retainage amounts may be withheld by customers until completion and acceptance of the project. Final payments of the majority of such amounts may not be received until the following operating cycle.

Revision in contract estimate — As previously discussed, revenue recognition is based on the percentage-of-completion method for firm fixed-price contracts. Under this method, the costs incurred to date as a percentage of total estimated costs are used to calculate the revenue to be recognized. Total estimated costs, and thus contract income, are impacted by many factors.

For projects that were in process in prior years, but are either completed or continue to be in process during the current year, there can be a difference in revenues and profits related to the prior year, had current year estimates of costs to complete been known in the prior year.  These differences are recorded in the current year.

Customer concentration — The Company operates in multiple industry segments encompassing the construction of commercial, industrial and public works infrastructure assets primarily throughout the United States. Typically, the top ten customers in any one calendar year generate revenues in excess of 50% of total revenues and consist of a different group of customers in each year.

During the three-months and nine-months ending September 30, 2012, revenues generated by the top ten customers were $243.6 million and $607.8 million, respectively, which represented 56.4% and 57.3%, respectively of total revenues during the periods.  During the three and nine month periods ending September 30, 2012, the Louisiana Department of Transportation represented 11.9% and 12.7%, respectively, of total revenues and a large gas and electric utility represented 16.1% and 13.6%, respectively, of total revenues. During the three and nine months ending September 30, 2011, revenues generated by Rockford under the Ruby contract were $48.3 million and $264.7 million, respectively, which represented 12.9% and 24.3%, respectively, of total revenues during the periods.  The Ruby contract was part of a large project for the construction of a natural gas pipeline from Wyoming to Oregon for which field work was substantially completed by the end of the third quarter 2011.  For the three and nine months ending September 30, 2011, work for the Louisiana DOT generated $66.4 million and $191.3 million, or 17.7% and 17.6% of total revenues for the respective periods.

At September 30, 2012, approximately 10.8% of the Company’s accounts receivable were due from one customer, and that customer provided 13.6% of the Company’s revenues for the nine months ended September 30, 2012.  At September 30, 2011, approximately 9.8% of the Company’s accounts receivable was due from one customer, and that customer provided 8.7% of the Company’s revenues for the nine months ended September 30, 2011

Partnerships and joint ventures — As is normal in the construction industry, the company is periodically a member of a partnership or a joint venture.  These partnerships or joint ventures are used primarily for the execution of single contracts or projects.  The Company’s ownership can vary from a small noncontrolling ownership to a significant ownership interest.  Since the majority of these partnerships and joint ventures are not able to finance their activity without additional financial support, they are considered variable interest entities (“VIE”) as defined in FASB ASC Topic 810.  The Company uses the guidelines of ASC Topic 810 to determine whether it is the primary beneficiary of the VIE, which when it is, the Company consolidates the VIE and accounts for the interests of the other parties as a noncontrolling interest.  If the Company is not the primary beneficiary of the VIE, the Company accounts for its noncontrolling interest using the equity method of accounting as per ASC Topic 323.

At September 30, 2012, the Company consolidated the financial results of one VIE, Blythe Power Constructors (“Blythe”), a joint venture formed for the installation of a parabolic trough solar field and steam generation system in California.  For Blythe, net income attributable to the Company and the net income attributable to the noncontrolling interest owners are presented on the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Earnings.  Other financial information is presented in Note 12 - Noncontrolling Interests. Blythe revenue was $7.8 million and $13.6 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012, respectively.  There was no material activity for the joint venture for the same periods in the prior year.

8

Table of Contents

The Company uses the equity method of accounting for the WesPac Energy LLC and St. Bernard Venture Levee Partners projects.  Financial information for these entities is presented in Note 7 — Equity Method Investments.

Multiemployer plans — The Company participates and contributes to a number of multiemployer benefit plans for its union employees at rates determined by the various collective bargaining agreements.  Each plan’s trustees determine the eligibility and allocations of contributions and benefit amounts, determine the types of benefits and administer the plan.  If the Company were to withdraw from a plan, the multiemployer benefit plan requires satisfaction of a withdrawal obligation.  Any potential withdrawal obligation may be material.  Any withdrawal liability would be recorded when it is probable that a liability exists and can be reasonably estimated, in accordance with GAAP.  In November 2011, the Company withdrew from the Central States Southeast and Southwest Areas Pension Fund multiemployer pension plan and recorded a $5 million withdrawal liability as of December 31, 2011.  At this time, the Company has no plans to withdraw from any other agreements.

Inventory and uninstalled contract materials — Inventory consists of expendable construction materials and small tools that will be used in construction projects and is valued at the lower of cost, using first-in, first-out method, or market.  Uninstalled contract materials include certain job-specific materials not yet installed which are valued at acquisition cost using the specific identification method.

Note 3—Recent Accounting Pronouncements

Fair Value Disclosures

In May 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued ASU No. 2011-04, Fair Value Measurement: Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and IFRS, which provides amendments to FASB ASC Topic 820, Fair Value Measurement. The objective of ASU 2011-04 is to create common fair value measurement and disclosure requirements between GAAP and International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”). The amendments clarify existing fair value measurement and disclosure requirements and make changes to particular principles or requirements for measuring or disclosing information about fair value measurements.  On January 1, 2012, the Company adopted ASU 2011-04, which did not have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.

Goodwill Impairment Testing

In September 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-08, Intangibles — Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Testing Goodwill or Impairment (“ASU 2011-08”). ASU 2011-08 provides an option to assess qualitative factors to determine whether the existence of events or circumstances leads to a determination that it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount. If an entity determines that the fair value is not less than its carrying amount, then it is not necessary to perform the two-step impairment test.  An entity can choose to perform the qualitative assessment on none, some or all of its reporting units.  An entity can also bypass the qualitative assessment for any reporting unit in any period and proceed directly to step one of the impairment test, and then resume performing the qualitative assessment in any subsequent period.  ASU 2011-08 also includes new qualitative indicators that replace those currently used to determine whether an interim goodwill impairment test is required to be performed. On January 1, 2012, the Company adopted this standard which did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

Intangible Asset Impairment Testing

In July 2012, the FASB issued ASU 2012-02, Intangibles — Goodwill and Other (Topic 350):  Testing Indefinite-Lived Intangible Assets for Impairment (“ASU 2012-02”).  ASU 2012-02 allows an organization the option of first assessing qualitative factors to determine if a quantitative impairment test of the indefinite-lived intangible asset is necessary.  If the qualitative assessment reveals that it is “more likely than not” that the asset is impaired, a calculation of the asset’s fair value is required.  Otherwise, no quantitative calculation, as outlined in Subtopic 350-30 is necessary.  ASU 2012-02 is effective for annual and interim impairment tests performed for fiscal years beginning after September 15, 2012.  The Company will adopt this standard on October 1, 2012.  The adoption of ASU 2012-02 is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

Note 4—Fair Value Measurements

ASC Topic 820, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures”, defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in GAAP and requires certain disclosures about fair value measurements.  ASC Topic 820 addresses fair value GAAP for financial assets and financial liabilities that are re-measured and reported at fair value at each reporting period and for non-financial assets and liabilities that are re-measured and reported at fair value on a non-recurring basis.

9

Table of Contents

In general, fair values determined by Level 1 use quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. Fair values determined by Level 2 inputs use data points that are observable such as quoted prices, interest rates and yield curves. Fair values determined by Level 3 inputs are “unobservable data points” for the asset or liability and include situations where there is little, if any, market activity for the asset or liability.

The following table presents, for each of the fair value hierarchy levels identified under ASC Topic 820, the Company’s financial assets that are required to be measured at fair value at September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011:

Short-term investments consist primarily of Certificates of Deposit (“CDs”) purchased through the CDARS (Certificate of Deposit Account Registry Service) process and U.S. Treasury bills with various financial institutions that are backed by the federal government FDIC program.

Other financial instruments of the Company consist of accounts receivable, accounts payable and certain accrued liabilities.  These financial instruments generally approximate fair value based on their short-term nature.  The carrying value of the Company’s long-term debt approximates fair value based on comparison with current prevailing market rates for loans of similar risks and maturities.

Note 5—Accounts Receivable

The following is a summary of the Company’s accounts receivable at the dates shown:

Note 6—Costs and Estimated Earnings on Uncompleted Contracts

Costs and estimated earnings on uncompleted contracts consist of the following at:

These net amounts are included in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet under the following captions:

10

Table of Contents

Note 7—Equity Method Investments

WesPac Energy LLC

On July 1, 2010, the Company acquired a 50% membership interest in WesPac Energy LLC, a Nevada limited liability company (“WesPac”), from Kealine Holdings, LLC (“Kealine”), a Nevada limited liability company.  Kealine holds the remaining 50% membership interest in WesPac. We have no future obligation to make any additional investments into WesPac. All key investment, management and operating decisions of WesPac require unanimous approval from a management committee equally represented by Kealine and us.  The Company believes its ownership interest in WesPac will broaden our exposure to a variety of pipeline, terminal and energy-related infrastructure opportunities across North America.

The following is a summary of the financial position and results as of and for the periods ended:

At the end of 2011, a major oil refining third party terminated two potential projects.  WesPac expensed $5.4 million.  In March 2012, the third party reimbursed WesPac for its share of the terminated project costs.

In December 2011, the Company reduced its $5.0 million basis difference by $1.7 million to recognize an estimate for an other than temporary decrease in the value of its basis difference between the Company’s original investment and its pro-rata share of the WesPac equity.

St.—Bernard Levee Partners

The Company purchased a 30% interest in St.—Bernard Levee Partners (“Bernard”) in the fourth quarter 2009 for $300 and accounts for this investment under the equity method. Bernard is engaged in construction activities in Louisiana.  Bernard distributed $4,200 and $33,274 to its equity holders during the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively, of which, the Company’s share, as calculated under the joint venture agreement, was $1,260 and $8,942 for the same periods in 2012 and 2011, respectively.  The project is expected to be finalized during the fourth quarter 2012.  The following is a summary of the financial position and results as of and for the periods ended:

11

Table of Contents

Note 8 — Business Combinations

Sprint Pipeline Services, L.P.

On March 12, 2012, the Company executed an asset purchase agreement with Sprint Pipeline Services, L.P. (“Sprint”).  Headquartered in Pearland (near Houston), Texas, Sprint provides a comprehensive range of pipeline construction, maintenance, upgrade, fabrication and specialty services primarily in the southeastern United States.  The Company formed Primoris Energy Services Corporation, a Texas corporation, to facilitate the acquisition.  The purchase agreement allows the Company to use the Sprint name for three years.

The fair value of the consideration to selling shareholders consisted of the following:

On the closing date, we paid the sellers $19,228 in cash and in the second quarter paid an additional $1,969 once the final valuation of the net book value of assets purchased was completed.

We issued the sellers 62,052 shares of our common stock with a contractually agreed upon value of $1,000 based on the average closing price of our common stock for the 20 business days prior to the closing date.  The fair value of the stock issued was $980 based on the stock price on the closing date.

The Company will issue additional cash to the sellers, contingent upon Sprint meeting certain operating performance targets for the remainder of 2012 and for the twelve months ending December 31, 2013.  As discussed in Note 13 — Contingent Earnout Liabilities, the estimated fair value of the contingency was $6,200 on the acquisition date and $6,617 as of September 30, 2012.

The acquisition was accounted for using the acquisition method of accounting.  Accordingly, the assets acquired and liabilities assumed were measured at their estimated fair value at the acquisition date.  Sprint’s results of operations have been included in the Company’s consolidated financial statements from March 12, 2012.

The following table summarizes the fair value of the assets acquired and the liabilities assumed:

12

Table of Contents

The significant identifiable tangible assets acquired include primarily accounts receivable and property, plant and equipment.  The Company determined that the book value of accounts receivable reflected fair value of those assets.  The Company estimated the fair value of fixed assets on the effective date of the acquisition based on comparable market values for equipment of similar condition and age.

During the second quarter 2012, the Company finalized its estimates of the fair value of the acquired assets and liabilities of Sprint.  The final revision resulted in a change from the values recorded at March 31, 2012, including a decrease in the fair value of the consideration paid to the sellers of $147, an increase in capital lease obligations of $920, an increase of $830 in property, plant and equipment, and a net decrease in working capital of $57.

We used the assistance of an independent third-party to determine the fair value of the intangible assets acquired for the acquisition.

The fair value measurements of the intangible assets were based primarily on significant unobservable inputs and thus represent a Level 3 measurement as defined in Note 3 — Fair Value Measurements. Based on the Company’s assessment, the acquired intangible assets categories, fair value and average amortization periods, on a straight-line basis, are as follows:

The fair value of the tradename was determined based on the “relief from royalty” method, which was selected based on external research of third party trade name licensing agreements and their royalty rate levels and management estimates.  The useful life was based on the agreement providing for the use of the Sprint tradename for three years.

The fair value for the non-compete agreements was based on a discounted “income approach” model, including estimated financial results with and without the non-compete agreements in place.  The agreements were analyzed based on the potential impact of competition that certain individuals could have on the financial results, assuming the agreements were not in place.  An estimate of the probability of competition was applied and the results were compared to a similar model assuming the agreements were in place.

The customer relationships were valued utilizing the “excess earnings method” of the income approach.  The estimated discounted cash flows associated with existing customers and projects were based on historical and market participant data.  Such discounted cash flows were net of fair market returns on the various tangible and intangible assets that are necessary to realize the potential cash flows.

Goodwill largely consists of expected benefits from the geographic expansion and presence of Sprint in the Gulf Coast of the United States and its energy-related opportunities for specialized pipeline construction and related services.  Goodwill also includes the value of the assembled workforce of the Sprint business.  Based on the current tax treatment of the Sprint acquisition, goodwill and other intangible assets are deductible for income tax purposes over a fifteen-year period.

Silva Companies

On May 30, 2012, the Company executed an asset purchase agreement with Silva Contracting Company, Inc., Tarmac Materials, LLC and C3 Interests, LLC (collectively “Silva”).  Based outside of Houston, Texas, Silva provides transportation infrastructure maintenance, asphalt paving and material sales in the Gulf Coast region of the United States. Silva was merged with the operations of JCG.

The acquisition was accounted for using the acquisition method of accounting.  The assets acquired and liabilities assumed were measured at their estimated fair value at the acquisition date and such estimates are preliminary and subject to change.  The final determination of the fair value of the assets acquired is expected to be completed during the fourth quarter 2012.  Silva’s results of operations have been included in the Company’s consolidated financial statements from May 30, 2012.  On the closing date, we paid the sellers $13,934 and will pay an additional $175 in the fourth quarter 2012.  We received $14,675 in property, plant and equipment, $903 in accounts and retention receivables and accounts payable of $1,469.

The Saxon Group

On September 28, 2012, the Company executed an asset purchase agreement with The Saxon Group (“Saxon”).  Based in Suwannee, Georgia, just outside of Atlanta, Saxon is a full service industrial construction enterprise with special expertise in the industrial gas processing and power plant sectors.

13

Table of Contents

The acquisition was accounted for using the acquisition method of accounting.  The assets acquired and liabilities assumed were measured at their estimated fair value at the acquisition date.  The estimates are preliminary and subject to change.  The final determination of the fair value of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed has not been completed because of the short period of time from the date of the Saxon acquisition to the end of the quarter.  The Saxon purchase was included in the Company’s consolidated balance sheet as of September 30, 2012 but there were no results of operations as the acquisition date was on the last business day of the quarter.  We paid the sellers $550 in cash and paid off a note for $2,429, a total cash payment of $2,979.  We received $3,399 in property, plant and equipment, $2,316 in accounts and retention receivables, accounts payable of $2,857 and $121 of other net working capital.

The preliminary fair value for the non-compete agreements of $100 was based on a discounted “income approach” model, including estimated financial results with and without the non-compete agreements in place.  The agreements were analyzed based on the potential impact of competition that certain individuals could have on the financial results, assuming the agreements were not in place.  An estimate of the probability of competition was applied and the results were compared to a similar model assuming the agreements were in place.

The customer relationships were valued at $1,300 and backlog was valued at $100 utilizing the “excess earnings method” of the income approach.  The estimated discounted cash flows associated with existing customers and projects were based on historical and market participant data.  Such discounted cash flows were net of fair market returns on the various tangible and intangible assets that are necessary to realize the potential cash flows.

Goodwill of $450 largely consists of expected benefits from the geographic expansion and presence of Saxon in the Atlanta, Georgia area and it’s expertise in the industrial gas processing and power plant sectors.  Goodwill also includes the value of the assembled workforce of the Saxon business.  Based on the current tax treatment of the Saxon acquisition, goodwill and other intangible assets are deductible for income tax purposes over a fifteen-year period.

Supplemental Unaudited Pro Forma Information for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011

In accordance with ASC Topic 805 we are combining the Sprint, the Silva and the Saxon acquisition information.  The following pro forma information for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011 presents the combined results of operations of Sprint, Silva and Saxon combined, as if the acquisitions had each occurred at the beginning of 2011. The supplemental pro forma information has been adjusted to include:

·                                          the pro forma impact of amortization of intangible assets and depreciation of property, plant and equipment, based on the purchase price allocations;

·                                          the pro forma impact of the expense associated with the amortization of the discount for the fair value of the contingent consideration for potential earnout liabilities that may be achieved in 2012 and 2013 for the Sprint acquisition and 2013 or 2014 for the Saxon acquisition;

·                                          the pro forma tax effect of both the income before income taxes and the pro forma adjustments, calculated using a tax rate of 39.0% for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011 and the applicable periods in 2012; and

·                                          the pro forma increase in weighted average shares outstanding includes 62,052 shares of common stock issued as part of the Sprint acquisition.

The pro forma results are presented for illustrative purposes only and are not necessarily indicative of, or intended to represent, the results that would have been achieved had the Sprint, Silva and Saxon transactions been completed on January 1, 2011.  The pro forma results do not reflect any operating efficiencies and associated cost savings that the Company might have achieved with respect to the combined companies.

14

Table of Contents

Note 9—Intangible Assets

At September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, intangible assets totaled $32,452 and $32,021, respectively, net of amortization.  The September 30, 2012 balance includes the effect of the Sprint and Saxon acquisitions (See Note 8 — Business Combinations).  The table below summarizes the intangible asset categories, amounts and the average amortization periods, which are generally on a straight-line basis, as follows:

Amortization expense of intangible assets was $1,476 and $2,053 for the three months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively, and amortization expense for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011 was $4,669 and $7,586, respectively.  Estimated future amortization expense for intangible assets is as follows:

Note 10—Accounts Payable and Accrued Liabilities

At September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, accounts payable included retention amounts of approximately $16,613 and $13,980, respectively.  These amounts due to subcontractors have been retained pending contract completion and customer acceptance of jobs.

The following is a summary of accrued expenses and other current liabilities at:

15

Table of Contents

Note 11—Credit Arrangements

As of September 30, 2012, the Company had a Loan and Security Agreement (the “Agreement”) with The PrivateBank and Trust Company (the “Lender”) for a revolving line of credit in the total aggregate amount of $35,000.  The maturity dates, as amended, are as follows:

·                                          a revolving loan in the amount of $20,000 (the “Revolving Loan A”), with a maturity date of October 26, 2014; and

·                                          a revolving loan in the amount of $15,000 (the “Revolving Loan B”), with a maturity date of October 25, 2012.

Under the Agreement, the Lender agreed to issue letters of credit of up to $15,000 under Revolving Loan A.  As of September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, total commercial letters of credit outstanding under Revolving Loan A totaled $3,284 and $4,009, respectively.  Other than the commercial letters of credit, there were no borrowings under these two lines of credit during the period January 1, 2011 through September 30, 2012.  At September 30, 2012, available borrowing capacity under Revolving Loan A was $16,716 and under Revolving Loan B was $15,000.

The principal amount of each of Revolving Loan A and Revolving Loan B will bear interest at either: (i) LIBOR plus an applicable margin as specified in the Agreement, or (ii) the prime rate announced by the Lender plus an applicable margin as specified in the Agreement. The principal amount of any loan bearing interest at LIBOR plus an applicable margin may not be prepaid without being subject to certain penalties. There is no prepayment penalty for any loan bearing interest at the prime rate announced by the Lender plus an applicable margin.

All loans made by the Lender under the Agreement are secured by our assets, including, among others, our cash, inventory, equipment (excluding equipment subject to certain permitted liens) and accounts receivable. Certain of our subsidiaries have executed joint and several guaranties in favor of the Lender for all amounts under the Agreement.  The Agreement and the line of credit facilities contain various restrictive covenants, including, among others, restrictions on investments, capital expenditures, minimum tangible net worth and debt service coverage requirements.  The Company was in compliance with the bank covenants at September 30, 2012.

Subsequent to the end of the third quarter 2012, the Company entered into the Eighth Amendment to the Agreement with the Lender (the “Amended Agreement”) executed on October 29, 2012 and effective October 16, 2012.  The Amended Agreement provides for a revolving line of credit in the total aggregate amount of $49,000.  The Amended Agreement extends the maturity dates and provides for the revolving loan amounts as follows:

·                        a revolving loan in the amount of $30,000 (the “Revolving Loan A”), with a maturity date of October 26, 2015; and

·                        a revolving loan in the amount of $19,000 (the “Revolving Loan B”), with a maturity date of October 24, 2013, decreasing to $5,000 as of December 31, 2012.

Under the Amended Agreement, the Lender agreed to issue letters of credit of up to $30,000 under Revolving Loan A.  The other terms and conditions of the Amended Agreement remain unchanged.

The Company has a credit facility with a Canadian bank for purposes of issuing commercial letters of credit in Canada, for an amount of up to $10,000 in Canadian dollars. The credit facility has an annual renewal and provides for the issuance of commercial letters of credit for a term of up to five years. The facility requires an annual fee of 1% for any issued and outstanding commercial letters of credit. Letters of credit can be denominated in either Canadian or U.S. dollars. As of September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, total commercial letters of credit outstanding under this credit facility totaled $1,246 and $4,036 in Canadian dollars, respectively.  As of September 30, 2012, the available borrowing capacity under this credit facility was $8,754 in Canadian dollars. The credit facility contains a working capital restrictive covenant for our Canadian subsidiary, Born Heaters Canada.  At September 30, 2012, the Company was in compliance with the bank covenant.

In 2011, the Company entered into an agreement with Bank of the West whereby the Company agrees to maintain a cash balance at the bank equal to the full amount of certain commercial letters of credit.  At both September 30, 2012, the amount of letters of credit with a maturity of twelve months and the related restricted cash amounted to $2,023 and was $3,823 as of December 31, 2011.  The amounts are included as part of “customer retention deposits and restricted cash” on the balance sheet.

Subordinated promissory note — Rockford.  In connection with the acquisition of Rockford, the Company executed an unsecured promissory note (the “Rockford Note”) on November 12, 2010 in favor of the sellers of Rockford with an initial principal amount of $16,712.  The principal amount of the Rockford Note was divided into two portions.  Approximately $9,669 of the Rockford Note was designated as “Note A” and approximately $7,043 of the note was designated as “Note B”.  Note B was paid in full on March 10, 2011.

Note A is due and payable on October 31, 2013 and bears interest at different rates until maturity.  At present, Note A bears interest at a rate equal to 8%.  The balance outstanding for Note A at September 30, 2012 was $5,000.  As a result of a dispute related to a certain liability at the time of the closing of the transaction and as provided for under the terms of the Rockford Agreement, the Company ceased further principal and interest payments in May 2012 until resolution of the issue.  The Company also placed $5,000 in an interest bearing escrow account which will remain in escrow until resolution of the dispute.  The Company has included this escrow amount on its September 30, 2012 balance sheet as “customer retention deposits and restricted cash” and has included the Note A outstanding balance of $5,000 in “accrued expenses and other current liabilities”.

16

Table of Contents

While any amount is outstanding under Note A, we have agreed not to take certain actions without the prior written consent of the Rockford Note holders’ representative.  We have agreed not to: (i) incur any obligations for seller financing associated with the acquisition of a business without subordinating it to the Rockford Note, (ii) make any payment on outstanding indebtedness that has been subordinated to the Rockford Note, (iii) make any distribution or declare or pay any dividends (except for regular, quarterly dividends), and (iv) consummate any transaction that would require prepayment under the Rockford Note, if we are not permitted to do so by our senior lender and/or surety companies.

The sellers have entered into subordination agreements with our senior lender and bonding agencies, pursuant to which the Rockford Note is subordinated to amounts owed to our senior lender and bonding agencies.

Subordinated promissory note — JCG.  In connection with the acquisition of JCG, the Company executed an unsecured, subordinated promissory note (the “JCG Note”) on December 18, 2009 in favor of the sellers of JCG with an initial principal amount of $53,500. The JCG Note was due and payable on December 15, 2014 and bore interest at differing rates until maturity.  The JCG Note was paid in full on March 12, 2012.

Note 12 — Noncontrolling Interests

The Company applies the provisions of ASC Topic 810-10-45, which establishes accounting and reporting standards for ownership interests of parties other than the Company in subsidiaries, such as joint ventures and partnerships,.

For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012, net income attributable to noncontrolling interests in the Blythe joint venture were $432 and $600, respectively.  Since Blythe is a partnership, no tax effect was recognized for the income for either period.  There was no material activity for the noncontrolling interests during the same periods in the prior year.  There were no distributions to noncontrolling interests and no capital contributions made by noncontrolling interests during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012 nor for the same periods in 2011.

As of September 30, 2012, the carrying value of the assets and liabilities associated with the operations of the Blythe joint venture included $5,537 of cash, $6,931 of accounts receivable and current liabilities of $8,568.  As of December 31, 2011, the carrying value of the assets and liabilities associated with the Blythe joint venture was $2,546 and $2,540, respectively. The net assets of the joint venture are restricted for use by the project and are not available for general operations of the Company.

Note 13 — Contingent Earnout Liabilities

Sprint Earnout Consideration

As part of the Sprint acquisition on March 12, 2012, the Company agreed to issue additional cash to the sellers, contingent upon Sprint meeting certain operating performance targets for the remainder of 2012 and for the twelve months ending December 31, 2013.

The 2012 earnout target is measured by income before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (“EBITDA”), as defined in the purchase agreement, for the remainder of the calendar year 2012.  If 2012 EBITDA is at least $7,000, we have agreed to pay $4,000 in cash to the sellers.  The estimated fair value of the 2012 potential contingent consideration on the acquisition date was $3,455.

The 2013 earnout target provides for an additional cash payment of $4,000 to the sellers if 2013 EBITDA is at least $7,750.  The estimated fair value of the 2013 potential contingent consideration on the acquisition date was $2,745.

At September 30, 2012, the estimated fair value of the potential contingent consideration for the 2012 earnout was $3,688 and for the 2013 earnout target, it was $2,929.

Saxon Earnout Consideration

As part of the Saxon acquisition on September 28, 2012, the Company agreed to issue additional cash of $2,500 to the sellers, contingent upon Saxon meeting certain operating performance targets.  The earnout target is measured by income before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (“EBITDA”), as defined in the purchase agreement.  The Company will pay $2,500 in cash to the sellers if they achieve one of the following two targets: (1) EBITDA for the twelve month period ending December 31, 2013 of at least $4,000 or; (2) EBITDA for the eighteen month period ending June 30, 2014 of at least $4,750.  The estimated fair value of the potential contingent consideration on the acquisition date was $1,950.

17

Table of Contents

Rockford Earnout Consideration

As part of the 2010 Rockford acquisition, the Company agreed to issue additional cash and common stock to the sellers, contingent upon Rockford meeting certain operating performance targets for the fourth quarter 2010, for the five quarters ending December 31, 2011 and for the year ended December 31, 2012. The maximum amount of this consideration was $18,400, which, when measured on a fair value basis as of the acquisition date, was estimated at $14,272 and was classified as a liability on the Company’s consolidated balance sheet.

The 2010 earnout target for the fourth quarter 2010 was achieved, and in March 2011, the Company issued 494,095 shares of common stock to the sellers, reducing the liability and increasing stockholders’ equity.

The 2011 earnout target was achieved and the liability as of December 31, 2011 was $6,900.  In April 2012, the Company issued 232,637 shares of common stock to the sellers and made cash payment of $3,450.

A final contingent earnout liability exists for 2012 based on Rockford’s financial performance as measured by income before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (“EBITDA”), as defined in the purchase agreement, for the calendar year 2012.  If 2012 EBITDA is at least $14,000, we would pay $6,900 in cash to the sellers in 2013.

At September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, the estimated fair value of the potential contingent consideration for the 2012 earnout was $6,362 and $5,818, respectively.  The $544 change in the fair value of this liability was a non-cash charge to “other expense” in the consolidated statement of income for the nine month period ended September 30, 2012.

Note 14—Related Party Transactions

Primoris has entered into various leasing transactions with Stockdale Investment Group, Inc. (“SIGI”).  Brian Pratt, our Chief Executive Officer, President and Chairman of the Board of Directors and our largest stockholder, holds a majority interest and is the chairman, president and chief executive officer and a director of SIGI.  John M. Perisich, our Senior Vice President and General Counsel, is secretary of SIGI.  Primoris leases properties located in Bakersfield (lease expires October 31, 2015), Pittsburg (lease expires September 30, 2014) and San Dimas (lease expires March 30, 2019) in California, and in Pasadena, Texas (leases expire in July 2019 and June 2021) from SIGI. During the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, the Company paid $695 and $681, respectively, in lease payments to SIGI for the use of these properties.

The Company entered into a $6,100 agreement in 2010 to construct a wastewater facility for Pluris, LLC, a private company in which Brian Pratt holds the majority interest.  The transaction was reviewed and approved by the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company.  During the nine months ending September 30, 2012 the Company recognized related party revenues of $0 and $5,430 for the same period in the prior year.  The project was substantially completed at December 31, 2011.

Primoris leases a property from Roger Newnham, one of our stockholders and a manager of our subsidiary, Born Heaters Canada. The property is located in Calgary, Canada. During the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, Primoris paid $212 and $210, respectively, in lease payments to Mr. Newnham for the use of this property. The term of the lease is through December 31, 2014.

As a result of the November 2010 acquisition of Rockford, the Company entered into a lease for property from Lemmie Rockford, one of our stockholders.  The property is located in Toledo, Washington.  During the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, Primoris paid $68 and $68, respectively, in lease payments to Mr. Rockford for the use of this property.  The lease expires on January 15, 2015.

Note 15—Income Taxes

The effective tax rate on income from continuing operations before taxes and noncontrolling interests for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 was 38.15%.  The effective tax rate for income attributable to Primoris is 38.5%.  The rate differs from the U.S. federal statutory rate of 35% due primarily to state income taxes and the “Domestic Production Activity Deduction”.

To determine its quarterly provision for income taxes, the Company uses an estimated annual effective tax rate, which is based on expected annual income, statutory tax rates and tax planning opportunities available in the various jurisdictions in which we operate. Certain significant or unusual items are separately recognized in the quarter in which they occur and can be a source of variability in the effective tax rate from quarter to quarter.  The Company recognizes interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions, if any, as an income tax expense.

Income taxes are accounted for under the asset and liability method. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences of temporary differences between the financial reporting basis and tax basis of the Company’s assets and liabilities. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date.

18

Table of Contents

In the third quarter 2012, we concluded the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) examinations of our federal income tax returns for 2008 and 2009.  The conclusion of these examinations did not have a material impact on the financial statements.  The tax years 2010 through 2011 remain open to examination by the IRS.  The statute of limitations of state and foreign jurisdictions vary generally between 3 to 5 years.  Accordingly, the tax years 2007 through 2011 generally remain open to examination by the other major taxing jurisdictions in which the Company operates.

Note 16—Dividends and Earnings Per Share

The Company has paid or declared cash dividends during 2012 as follows:

·                                    On November 3, 2011, the Company declared a cash dividend of $0.03 per common share, payable to stockholders of record on December 31, 2011.  The dividend, totaling $1,532, was paid on January 16, 2012.

·                                    On February 24, 2012, the Company declared a cash dividend of $0.03 per common share, payable to stockholders of record on March 30, 2012.  The dividend, totaling $1,537, was paid on April 16, 2012.

·                                    On May 4, 2012, the Company declared a cash dividend of $0.03 per common share, payable to stockholders of record on June 29, 2012.  The dividend, totaling $1,542, was paid on July 16, 2012.

·                                    On August 3, 2012, the Company declared a cash dividend of $0.03 per common share, payable to stockholders of record on October 1, 2012.  The dividend, totaling $1,542, was paid on October 15, 2012.

The table below presents the computation of basic and diluted earnings per share for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011: