Edgar Filing: OLD POINT FINANCIAL CORP

form10q.htm

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

x QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2011

o TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from _______ to _______

Commission File Number: 000-12896

OLD POINT FINANCIAL CORPORATION

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

VIRGINIA		54-1265373
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

1 West Mellen Street, Hampton, Virginia 23663

(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)

(757) 728-1200

(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)

Not Applicable

(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

x Yes o No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).

x Yes o No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer o	Accelerated filer o

Non-accelerated filer o (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)	Smaller reporting company x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

o Yes x No

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.

4,959,009 shares of common stock ($5.00 par value) outstanding as of October 31, 2011

OLD POINT FINANCIAL CORPORATION

FORM 10-Q

INDEX

PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION

		Page

Item 1	Financial Statements	1

	Consolidated Balance Sheets September 30, 2011 (unaudited) and December 31, 2010	1

	Consolidated Statements of Income Three months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 (unaudited) Nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 (unaudited)	2

	Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders' Equity Nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 (unaudited)	3

	Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows Nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 (unaudited)	4

	Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)	5

Item 2.	Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	27

Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	38

Item 4.	Controls and Procedures	38

	PART II - OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1.	Legal Proceedings	39

Item 1A.	Risk Factors	39

Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	39

Item 3.	Defaults Upon Senior Securities	39

Item 4.	[Removed and Reserved]	39

Item 5.	Other Information	39

Item 6.	Exhibits	40

	Signatures	41

(i)

Index

PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements.

Old Point Financial Corporation and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Balance Sheets

	September 30,			December 31,
	2011			2010
	(unaudited)
Assets

Cash and due from banks	$	13,120,681		$	14,206,869
Interest-bearing due from banks		30,801,094			1,396,462
Federal funds sold		2,598,375			12,827,818
Cash and cash equivalents		46,520,150			28,431,149
Securities available-for-sale, at fair value		209,348,054			206,091,712
Securities held-to-maturity
(fair value approximates $2,272,477 and $1,956,720)		2,252,000			1,952,000
Restricted securities		3,679,300			4,319,600
Loans, net of allowance for loan losses of $9,752,238 and $13,227,791		517,281,949			573,390,522
Premises and equipment, net		30,074,896			29,615,688
Bank-owned life insurance		21,383,235			18,019,727
Foreclosed assets, net of valuation allowance of $2,318,094 and $2,123,930		11,037,696			11,447,794
Other assets		10,991,456			13,573,303
	$	852,568,736		$	886,841,495

Liabilities & Stockholders' Equity

Deposits:
Noninterest-bearing deposits	$	159,162,963		$	129,207,887
Savings deposits		232,083,576			225,209,590
Time deposits		299,155,153			324,796,068
Total deposits		690,401,692			679,213,545
Federal funds purchased and other borrowings		619,210			731,332
Overnight repurchase agreements		37,877,091			50,757,247
Term repurchase agreements		1,915,537			38,959,359
Federal Home Loan Bank advances		35,000,000			35,000,000
Accrued expenses and other liabilities		1,412,784			1,228,363
Total liabilities		767,226,314			805,889,846

Commitments and contingencies

Stockholders' equity:
Common stock, $5 par value, 10,000,000 shares authorized; 4,959,009 and 4,936,989 shares issued and outstanding		24,795,045			24,684,945
Additional paid-in capital		16,282,633			16,026,062
Retained earnings		44,490,439			42,809,769
Accumulated other comprehensive loss, net		(225,695	)		(2,569,127	)
Total stockholders' equity		85,342,422			80,951,649
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity	$	852,568,736		$	886,841,495

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

- 1 -

Index

Old Point Financial Corporation and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Income
	Three Months Ended				Nine Months Ended
	September 30,				September 30,
	2011		2010		2011		2010
	(unaudited)				(unaudited)
Interest and Dividend Income:
Interest and fees on loans	$	7,923,224	$	9,237,260	$	24,516,542	$	27,982,311
Interest on due from banks		2,772		615		4,070		1,817
Interest on federal funds sold		6,855		15,471		21,011		63,954
Interest on securities:
Taxable		1,010,473		854,323		2,809,242		2,507,614
Tax-exempt		31,843		53,104		109,250		220,630
Dividends and interest on all other securities		16,756		11,650		48,852		32,815
Total interest and dividend income		8,991,923		10,172,423		27,508,967		30,809,141

Interest Expense:
Interest on savings deposits		101,393		108,701		309,742		302,159
Interest on time deposits		1,070,753		1,604,779		3,480,563		5,168,834
Interest on federal funds purchased, securities sold under agreements to repurchase and other borrowings		17,170		109,603		87,859		470,751
Interest on Federal Home Loan Bank advances		429,717		429,717		1,275,138		1,969,974
Total interest expense		1,619,033		2,252,800		5,153,302		7,911,718
Net interest income		7,372,890		7,919,623		22,355,665		22,897,423
Provision for loan losses		600,000		1,500,000		2,900,000		7,500,000
Net interest income, after provision for loan losses		6,772,890		6,419,623		19,455,665		15,397,423

Noninterest Income:
Income from fiduciary activities		713,946		718,008		2,244,842		2,319,856
Service charges on deposit accounts		1,090,057		1,068,455		3,156,810		3,663,196
Other service charges, commissions and fees		726,866		719,193		2,285,238		2,163,999
Income from bank-owned life insurance		207,984		216,218		612,900		815,541
Gain on sale of available-for-sale securities, net		386,091		541,241		437,046		541,317
Other operating income		75,802		130,072		218,874		311,119
Total noninterest income		3,200,746		3,393,187		8,955,710		9,815,028

Noninterest Expense:
Salaries and employee benefits		4,834,750		4,539,062		14,360,119		13,691,812
Occupancy and equipment		1,090,300		1,084,972		3,226,185		3,235,289
FDIC insurance		271,462		404,093		942,941		1,050,274
Data processing		358,774		316,123		1,025,173		917,931
Customer development		223,733		215,414		663,203		655,644
Advertising		131,340		177,369		417,874		527,650
Loan expenses		210,285		117,658		627,829		481,531
Other outside service fees		163,336		157,932		464,174		357,518
Employee professional development		136,185		119,047		448,392		379,086
Postage and courier expense		123,365		123,287		366,649		393,689
Legal and audit expenses		176,161		244,760		539,188		564,498
Loss on write-down/sale of foreclosed assets		368,213		480,801		825,763		429,754
Other operating expenses		450,606		421,730		1,296,811		1,423,877
Total noninterest expense		8,538,510		8,402,248		25,204,301		24,108,553
Income before income taxes		1,435,126		1,410,562		3,207,074		1,103,898
Income tax expense		391,847		376,052		783,841		6,919
Net income	$	1,043,279	$	1,034,510	$	2,423,233	$	1,096,979

Basic Earnings per Share:
Average shares outstanding		4,957,623		4,930,578		4,950,056		4,925,571
Net income per share of common stock	$	0.21	$	0.21	$	0.49	$	0.22

Diluted Earnings per Share:
Average shares outstanding		4,957,623		4,932,731		4,950,056		4,931,977
Net income per share of common stock	$	0.21	$	0.21	$	0.49	$	0.22

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

- 2 -

Index

Old Point Financial Corporation and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders' Equity
(unaudited)	Shares of Common Stock			Common Stock			Additional Paid-in Capital		Retained Earnings			Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss			Total

FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2011

Balance at beginning of period		4,936,989		$	24,684,945		$	16,026,062	$	42,809,769		$	(2,569,127	)	$	80,951,649
Comprehensive income:
Net income		0			0			0		2,423,233			0			2,423,233
Unrealized holding gains arising during the period
(net of tax, $1,207,223, and reclassification adjustment)		0			0			0		0			2,343,432			2,343,432
Total comprehensive income		0			0			0		2,423,233			2,343,432			4,766,665
Exercise of stock options		22,020			110,100			174,105		0			0			284,205
Stock compensation expense		0			0			82,466		0			0			82,466
Cash dividends ($0.15 per share)		0			0			0		(742,563	)		0			(742,563	)

Balance at end of period		4,959,009		$	24,795,045		$	16,282,633	$	44,490,439		$	(225,695	)	$	85,342,422

FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2010

Balance at beginning of period		4,916,535		$	24,582,675		$	15,768,840	$	42,518,889		$	(1,261,951	)	$	81,608,453
Comprehensive income:
Net income		0			0			0		1,096,979			0			1,096,979
Unrealized holding gains arising during the period
(net of tax, $567,493, and reclassification adjustment)		0			0			0		0			1,101,602			1,101,602
Total comprehensive income		0			0			0		1,096,979			1,101,602			2,198,581
Exercise of stock options		23,874			119,370			126,514		0			0			245,884
Tax benefit from disqualification of stock options		0			0			16,324		0			0			16,324
Repurchase and retirement of common stock		(3,420	)		(17,100	)		0		(23,974	)		0			(41,074	)
Stock compensation expense		0			0			85,398		0			0			85,398
Cash dividends ($0.20 per share)		0			0			0		(985,124	)		0			(985,124	)

Balance at end of period		4,936,989		$	24,684,945		$	15,997,076	$	42,606,770		$	(160,349	)	$	83,128,442

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

- 3 -

Index

Old Point Financial Corporation and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
	Nine Months Ended
	September 30,
	2011			2010
	(unaudited)
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net income	$	2,423,233		$	1,096,979
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization		1,364,475			1,476,008
Provision for loan losses		2,900,000			7,500,000
Net gain on sale of available-for-sale securities		(437,046	)		(541,317	)
Net amortization of securities		152,189			25,772
Net (gain) loss on disposal of premises and equipment		(1,294	)		3,373
Net loss on write-down/sale of foreclosed assets		825,763			429,754
Income from bank owned life insurance		(612,900	)		(815,541	)
Stock compensation expense		82,466			85,398
Deferred tax (benefit) expense		860,930			(2,038,791	)
Increase in other assets		(675,180	)		(3,268,956	)
Increase (decrease) in other liabilities		184,421			(376,564	)
Net cash provided by operating activities		7,067,057			3,576,115

CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Purchases of available-for-sale securities		(146,849,456	)		(195,846,321	)
Purchases of held-to-maturity securities		(2,000,000	)		(1,370,000	)
Proceeds from sales of restricted securities		640,300			332,900
Proceeds from maturities and calls of securities		97,722,651			88,012,522
Proceeds from sales of available-for-sale securities		51,405,975			90,683,319
Decrease in loans made to customers		53,208,573			15,246,981
Proceeds from sales of foreclosed assets		772,601			1,322,176
Purchases of bank owned life insurance		(2,750,000	)		(940,000	)
Purchases of premises and equipment		(1,822,389	)		(806,309	)
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities		50,328,255			(3,364,732	)

CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Increase in noninterest-bearing deposits		29,955,076			17,565,383
Increase in savings deposits		6,873,986			18,419,190
Decrease in time deposits		(25,640,915	)		(1,823,225	)
Decrease in federal funds purchased, repurchase agreements and other borrowings		(50,036,100	)		(8,010,400	)
Decrease in Federal Home Loan Bank advances		0			(30,000,000	)
Proceeds from exercise of stock options		284,205			245,884
Repurchase and retirement of common stock		0			(41,074	)
Tax benefit from disqualification of stock options		0			16,324
Cash dividends paid on common stock		(742,563	)		(985,124	)
Net cash used in financing activities		(39,306,311	)		(4,613,042	)

Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents		18,089,001			(4,401,659	)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period		28,431,149			47,635,998
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	46,520,150		$	43,234,339

SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION
Cash payments for:
Interest	$	5,374,688		$	8,435,557
Income tax	$	0		$	2,100,000

SUPPLEMENTAL SCHEDULE OF NONCASH TRANSACTIONS
Unrealized gain on investment securities	$	3,550,655		$	1,669,095
Loans transferred to foreclosed assets	$	2,197,810		$	4,277,600

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

- 4 -

Index

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)

Note 1. General

The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements of Old Point Financial Corporation (the Company) and its subsidiaries have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) for interim financial information. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated. In the opinion of management, the accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements contain all adjustments and reclassifications of a normal and recurring nature considered necessary to present fairly the financial positions at September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the results of operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 and statement of cash flows and changes in stockholders’ equity for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010. The results of operations for the interim periods are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the full year.

These financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in the Company's 2010 annual report on Form 10-K. Certain previously reported amounts have been reclassified to conform to current period presentation.

AVAILABLE INFORMATION

The Company maintains a website on the Internet at www.oldpoint.com. The Company makes available free of charge, on or through its website, its proxy statements, annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, and any amendments to those reports as soon as reasonably practicable after such material is electronically filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). The information available on the Company’s Internet website is not part of this Form 10-Q or any other report filed by the Company with the SEC. The public may read and copy any documents the Company files at the SEC’s Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549. The public may obtain information on the operation of the Public Reference Room by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. The Company’s SEC filings can also be obtained on the SEC’s website on the Internet at www.sec.gov.

Note 2. Securities

Amortized costs and fair values of securities held-to-maturity are as follows:

	Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized Losses			Fair Value
	(in thousands)
September 30, 2011
Obligations of U.S. Government agencies	$	1,970	$	13	$	0		$	1,983
Obligations of state and political subdivisions		282		7		0			289
Total	$	2,252	$	20	$	0		$	2,272

December 31, 2010
Obligations of U.S. Government agencies	$	1,670	$	4	$	(7	)	$	1,667
Obligations of state and political subdivisions		282		8		0			290
Total	$	1,952	$	12	$	(7	)	$	1,957

- 5 -

Index

Amortized costs and fair values of securities available-for-sale are as follows:

	Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized Losses			Fair Value
	(in thousands)
September 30, 2011
U.S. Treasury securities	$	600	$	0	$	0		$	600
Obligations of U.S. Government agencies		157,203		1,907		0			159,110
Obligations of state and political subdivisions		2,279		79		0			2,358
Mortgage-backed securities		46,180		164		(2	)		46,342
Money market investments		938		0		0			938
Total	$	207,200	$	2,150	$	(2	)	$	209,348

December 31, 2010
U.S. Treasury securities	$	600	$	0	$	0		$	600
Obligations of U.S. Government agencies		201,601		513		(1,993	)		200,121
Obligations of state and political subdivisions		3,103		69		0			3,172
Mortgage-backed securities		374		8		0			382
Money market investments		1,817		0		0			1,817
Total	$	207,495	$	590	$	(1,993	)	$	206,092

TEMPORARILY IMPAIRED SECURITIES

The following table shows the gross unrealized losses and fair value of the Company’s investments with unrealized losses that are not deemed to be other-than-temporarily impaired, aggregated by investment category and length of time that individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position. The Company had no held-to-maturity securities with unrealized losses at September 30, 2011.

September 30, 2011

Less Than Twelve Months

More Than Twelve Months

Total

Gross

Unrealized

Losses

Fair

Value

Gross

Unrealized

Losses

Fair

Value

Gross

Unrealized

Losses

Fair

Value

(in thousands)

Securities Available-for-Sale

Debt securities:

Mortgage-backed securities

10,276

- 6 -

Index

	December 31, 2010
	Less Than Twelve Months				More Than Twelve Months				Total
	Gross				Gross				Gross
	Unrealized		Fair		Unrealized		Fair		Unrealized		Fair
	Losses		Value		Losses		Value		Losses		Value
	(in thousands)
Securities Available-for-Sale
Obligations of U. S. Government agencies	$	1,993	$	128,362	$	0	$	0	$	1,993	$	128,362

Securities Held-to-Maturity
Obligations of U. S. Government agencies	$	7	$	762	$	0	$	0	$	7	$	762

Total	$	2,000	$	129,124	$	0	$	0	$	2,000	$	129,124

Obligations of U.S. Government agencies

The U.S. Government agencies portfolio had fifteen investments with unrealized losses at December 31, 2010. This portfolio had no investments with unrealized losses as of September 30, 2011. The unrealized losses were caused by increases in market interest rates. The contractual terms of those investments do not permit the issuer to sell the securities at a price less than the amortized cost basis of the investments. Because the Company does not intend to sell the investments, and management believes it is unlikely that the Company will be required to sell the investments before recovery of their amortized cost basis, which may be at maturity, the Company does not consider those investments to be other-than-temporarily impaired at December 31, 2010.

Mortgage-backed securities

The Company’s portfolio of mortgage-backed securities had one investment with unrealized losses at September 30, 2011. This portfolio had no investments with unrealized losses as of December 31, 2010. The unrealized losses were caused by increases in market interest rates. Because the Company does not intend to sell the investments, and management believes it is unlikely that the Company will be required to sell the investments before recovery of their amortized cost basis, which may be at maturity, the Company does not consider those investments to be other-than-temporarily impaired at September 30, 2011.

OTHER-THAN-TEMPORARILY IMPAIRED SECURITIES

Management assesses whether the Company intends to sell or it is more-likely-than-not that the Company will be required to sell a security before recovery of its amortized cost basis less any current-period credit losses. For debt securities that are considered other-than-temporarily impaired and that the Company does not intend to sell and will not be required to sell prior to recovery of the amortized cost basis, the Company separates the amount of the impairment into the amount that is credit related (credit loss component) and the amount due to all other factors. The credit loss component is recognized in earnings and is the difference between the security’s amortized cost basis and the present value of its expected future cash flows. The remaining difference between the security’s fair value and the present value of future expected cash flows is due to factors that are not credit related and is recognized in other comprehensive income.

The present value of expected future cash flows is determined using the best-estimate cash flows discounted at the effective interest rate implicit to the security at the date of purchase or the current yield to accrete an asset-backed or floating rate security. The methodology and assumptions for establishing the best-estimate cash flows vary depending on the type of security. The asset-backed securities cash flow estimates are based on bond specific facts and circumstances that may include collateral characteristics, expectations of delinquency and default rates, loss severity and prepayment speeds, and structural support, including subordination and guarantees. The corporate bond cash flow estimates are derived from scenario-based outcomes of expected corporate restructurings or the disposition of assets using bond specific facts and circumstances including timing, security interests, and loss severity.

The Company has a process in place to identify debt securities that could potentially have a credit impairment that is other than temporary. This process involves monitoring late payments, pricing levels, downgrades by rating agencies, key financial ratios, financial statements, revenue forecasts, and cash flow projections as indicators of credit issues. On a quarterly basis, management reviews all securities to determine whether an other-than-temporary decline in value exists and whether losses should be recognized. Management considers relevant facts and circumstances in evaluating whether a credit or interest rate-related impairment of a security is other-than-temporary. Relevant facts and circumstances considered include: (a) the extent and length of time the fair value has been below cost; (b) the reasons for the decline in value; (c) the financial position and access to capital of the issuer, including the current and future impact of any specific events and (d) for fixed maturity securities, the Company’s intent to sell a security or whether it is more-likely-than-not the Company will be required to sell the security before the recovery of its amortized cost which, in some cases, may extend to maturity and for equity securities, the Company’s ability and intent to hold the security for a period of time that allows for the recovery in value.

- 7 -

Index

The Company has not recorded impairment charges on securities for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 or the year ended December 31, 2010.

The unrealized losses in the securities portfolio as of September 30, 2011 relate to mortgage-backed securities, and the unrealized losses in the securities portfolio as of December 31, 2010 relate to obligations of U.S. Government agencies. In analyzing an issuer's financial condition, management considers whether the securities are issued by the federal government or its agencies, whether downgrades by bond rating agencies have occurred, and industry analysts' reports. The unrealized losses are a result of changes in market interest rates and not credit issues. Since the Company has the ability to hold debt securities until maturity, or for the foreseeable future if classified as available-for-sale, no declines are deemed to be other than temporary.

The restricted securities category on the balance sheets is comprised of Federal Home Loan Bank of Atlanta (FHLB) and Federal Reserve Bank (FRB) stock. These stocks are classified as restricted securities because their ownership is restricted to certain types of entities and the securities lack a market. Therefore, FHLB and FRB stock is carried at cost and evaluated for impairment. When evaluating these stocks for impairment, their value is determined based on the ultimate recoverability of the par value rather than by recognizing temporary declines in value. Restricted stock is viewed as a long-term investment and management believes that the Company has the ability and the intent to hold this stock until its value is recovered.

The Company evaluated the positive and negative factors of FHLB stock for impairment and determined the stock not to be impaired at September 30, 2011 or December 31, 2010. This analysis is based on the following information. The FHLB reported net income of approximately $278 million for 2010, and paid a quarterly dividend for all four quarters of 2010. In 2011, the FHLB reported net income of approximately $51 million for the first quarter and $38 million for the second quarter, and declared a first quarter dividend in May 2011 and a second quarter dividend in August. On October 27, 2011, the FHLB declared a third quarter dividend and announced it would continue repurchasing excess stock from shareholders.

Note 3. Loans and the Allowance for Loan Losses

The following is a summary of the balances in each segment of the Company’s loan portfolio:

	September 30,			December 31,
	2011			2010
	(in thousands)
Mortgage loans on real estate:
Residential 1-4 family	$	79,758		$	89,690
Commercial		297,249			344,347
Construction		19,466			19,206
Second mortgages		14,939			16,105
Equity lines of credit		35,942			39,048
Total mortgage loans on real estate		447,354			508,396
Commercial loans		35,299			36,053
Consumer loans		18,356			24,389
Other		26,025			17,781
Total loans		527,034			586,619
Less: Allowance for loan losses		(9,752	)		(13,228	)
Loans, net of allowance and deferred fees	$	517,282		$	573,391

- 8 -

Index

Overdrawn deposit accounts are reclassified as loans and included in the Other category in the table above. Overdrawn deposit accounts totaled $601 thousand and $607 thousand at September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively.

CREDIT QUALITY INFORMATION

The Company uses internally-assigned risk grades to estimate the capability of borrowers to repay the contractual obligations of their loan agreements as scheduled or at all. The Company’s internal risk grade system is based on experiences with similarly graded loans. Credit risk grades are updated at least quarterly as additional information becomes available, at which time management analyzes the resulting scores to track loan performance.

The Company’s internally assigned risk grades are as follows:

Pass: Loans are of acceptable risk.

Other Assets Especially Mentioned (OAEM): Loans have potential weaknesses that deserve management’s close attention.

Substandard: Loans reflect significant deficiencies due to several adverse trends of a financial, economic or managerial nature.

Doubtful: Loans have all the weaknesses inherent in a substandard loan with added characteristics that make collection or liquidation in full based on currently existing facts, conditions and values highly questionable or improbable.

Loss: Loans have been charged off because they are considered uncollectible and of such little value that their continuance as bankable assets is not warranted.

The following table presents credit quality exposures by internally assigned risk ratings:

Credit Quality Information

As of September 30, 2011

(in thousands)

	Pass		OAEM		Substandard		Doubtful		Total
Mortgage loans on real estate:
Residential 1-4 family	$	74,352	$	683	$	4,723	$	0	$	79,758
Commercial		276,652		2,627		17,970		0		297,249
Construction		18,970		399		97		0		19,466
Second mortgages		14,206		0		733		0		14,939
Equity lines of credit		35,079		162		701		0		35,942
Total mortgage loans on real estate		419,259		3,871		24,224		0		447,354
Commercial loans		34,538		346		415		0		35,299
Consumer loans		18,297		0		59		0		18,356
Other		26,025		0		0		0		26,025
Total	$	498,119	$	4,217	$	24,698	$	0	$	527,034

Credit Quality Information

As of December 31, 2010

(in thousands)

	Pass		OAEM		Substandard		Doubtful		Total
Mortgage loans on real estate:
Residential 1-4 family	$	75,803	$	2,383	$	11,504	$	0	$	89,690
Commercial		287,551		23,969		30,000		2,827		344,347
Construction		18,052		0		1,154		0		19,206
Second mortgages		15,010		0		1,095		0		16,105
Equity lines of credit		37,206		1,109		733		0		39,048
Total mortgage loans on real estate		433,622		27,461		44,486		2,827		508,396
Commercial loans		33,275		2,179		599		0		36,053
Consumer loans		23,981		1		407		0		24,389
Other		17,693		87		1		0		17,781
Total	$	508,571	$	29,728	$	45,493	$	2,827	$	586,619

As of September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 the Company did not have any loans internally classified as Loss.

AGE ANALYSIS OF PAST DUE LOANS BY CLASS

All classes of loans are considered past due if the required principal and interest payments have not been received as of the date such payments were due. Interest and fees continue to accrue on past due loans until the date the loan is placed in nonaccrual status, if applicable. The following table includes an aging analysis of the recorded investment of past due loans. Also included in the table below are loans that are 90 days or more past due as to interest and principal and still accruing interest, either because they are (1) well-secured and in the process of collection or (2) real estate loans or loans exempt under regulatory rules from being classified as nonaccrual. Loans in nonaccrual status that are also past due are included in the aging categories in the table below.

- 9 -

Index

Age Analysis of Past Due Loans at September 30, 2011

	30 - 59 Days Past Due		60 - 89 Days Past Due		90 or More Days Past Due		Total Past Due		Total Current Loans (1)		Total Loans		Recorded Investment > 90 Days Past Due and Accruing
	(in thousands)
Mortgage loans on real estate:
Residential 1-4 family	$	808	$	188	$	965	$	1,961	$	77,797	$	79,758	$	175
Commercial		0		0		0		0		297,249		297,249		0
Construction		0		0		0		0		19,466		19,466		0
Second mortgages		0		358		119		477		14,462		14,939		0
Equity lines of credit		158		384		0		542		35,400		35,942		0
Total mortgage loans on real estate		966		930		1,084		2,980		444,374		447,354		175
Commercial loans		33		0		37		70		35,229		35,299		0
Consumer loans		56		9		15		80		18,276		18,356		15
Other		56		0		3		59		25,966		26,025		3
Total	$	1,111	$	939	$	1,139	$	3,189	$	523,845	$	527,034	$	193

Age Analysis of Past Due Loans at December 31, 2010

	30 - 59 Days Past Due		60 - 89 Days Past Due		90 or More Days Past Due		Total Past Due		Total Current Loans (1)		Total Loans		Recorded Investment > 90 Days Past Due and Accruing
	(in thousands)
Mortgage loans on real estate:
Residential 1-4 family	$	1,550	$	85	$	1,641	$	3,276	$	86,414	$	89,690	$	0
Commercial		240		617		10,555		11,412		332,935		344,347		0
Construction		0		0		16		16		19,190		19,206		16
Second mortgages		475		0		187		662		15,443		16,105		33
Equity lines of credit		597		0		22		619		38,429		39,048		0
Total mortgage loans on real estate		2,862		702		12,421		15,985		492,411		508,396		49
Commercial loans		78		11		0		89		35,964		36,053		0
Consumer loans		297		49		69		415		23,974		24,389		23
Other		79		0		1		80		17,701		17,781		1
Total	$	3,316	$	762	$	12,491	$	16,569	$	570,050	$	586,619	$	73

(1) For purposes of these tables, Total Current Loans includes loans that are 1 - 29 days past due.

NONACCRUAL LOANS

The Company generally places non-consumer loans in nonaccrual status when the full and timely collection of interest or principal becomes uncertain, part of the principal balance has been charged off and no restructuring has occurred or the loan reaches 90 days past due. Under regulatory rules, consumer loans, which are loans to individuals for household, family and other personal expenditures, and loans secured by 1-4 family residential properties are not required to be placed in nonaccrual status. Although consumer loans and loans secured by 1-4 family residential property are not required to be placed in nonaccrual status, the Company may place a consumer loan or loan secured by 1-4 family residential property in nonaccrual status, if necessary to avoid a material overstatement of interest income.

- 10 -

Index

Generally, consumer loans not secured by real estate or other collateral are placed in nonaccrual status only when part of the principal has been charged off. These loans are charged off or written down to the net realizable value of the collateral when deemed uncollectible, due to bankruptcy or other factors, or when they reach 90 days past due based on loan product, industry practice, terms and other factors.

When management places a loan in nonaccrual status, the accrued unpaid interest receivable is reversed against interest income and the loan is accounted for by the cash or cost recovery method, until it qualifies for return to accrual status. Generally, management returns a loan to accrual status if (a) all delinquent interest and principal become current under the terms of the loan agreement or (b) the loan is both well-secured and in the process of collection and collectability is no longer doubtful.

The following table presents loans in nonaccrual status by class of loan:

Nonaccrual Loans by Class

(in thousands)
	September 30, 2011		December 31, 2010

Mortgage loans on real estate:
Residential 1-4 family	$	3,105	$	6,302
Commercial		8,218		13,281
Construction		0		37
Second mortgages		477		540
Equity lines of credit		384		427
Total mortgage loans on real estate		12,184		20,587
Commercial loans		151		178
Consumer loans		13		116
Total	$	12,348	$	20,881

The following table presents the interest income that the Company would have earned under the original terms of its nonaccrual loans and the actual interest recorded by the Company on nonaccrual loans for the period presented:

	Nine Months Ended
	September 30, 2011
	(in thousands)
Interest income that would have been recorded under original loan terms	$	1,202
Actual interest income recorded for the period		515
Reduction in interest income on nonaccrual loans	$	687

MODIFICATIONS

The Company’s loan portfolio also includes certain loans that have been modified in a Troubled Debt Restructuring (TDR), where economic concessions have been granted to borrowers who are experiencing financial difficulties. These concessions typically result from the Company’s loss mitigation activities and could include reduction in the interest rate below current market rates, payment extensions, forgiveness of principal, forbearance or other actions intended to maximize collection. Certain TDRs are classified as nonperforming at the time of restructure and may only be returned to performing status after considering the borrower’s sustained repayment performance for a reasonable period, generally six months. When the Company modifies a loan, management evaluates any possible impairment as stated in the impaired loan section above.

The Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update 2011-02 “A Creditor’s Determination of Whether a Restructuring Is a Troubled Debt Restructuring” (ASU 2011-02). As a result of adopting ASU 2011-02, the Company reassessed all restructurings that occurred on or after January 1, 2011 to determine whether the restructurings are now considered TDRs. The Company identified as TDRs certain loans for which the allowance for loan losses had previously been measured under a general allowance methodology. Upon identifying those loans as TDRs, the Company classified those loans as impaired. ASU 2011-02 requires prospective application of the impairment measurement for those loans newly identified as impaired. As of September 30, 2011, the end of the first interim period of adoption, the recorded investment in loans for which the allowance was previously measured under a general allowance methodology and are now impaired was $2.0 million and the allowance for loan losses associated with those loans, on the basis of a current evaluation of the loss, was zero.

- 11 -

Index

The following table includes the number of modifications, the recorded investment before and after modification, and the current investment on September 30, 2011 for loans modified in a TDR, by class of loan:

Troubled Debt Restructurings by Class

At September 30, 2011

(dollars in thousands)

	Number of Modifications		Recorded Investment Prior to Modification		Recorded Investment After Modification		Current Investment on September 30, 2011
Mortgage loans on real estate:
Residential 1-4 family		1	$	175	$	175	$	175
Commercial		3		2,743		1,910		1,830
Construction		0		0		0		0
Second mortgages		1		10		10		10
Equity lines of credit		0		0		0		0
Total mortgage loans on real estate		5		2,928		2,095		2,015
Commercial loans		0		0		0		0
Consumer loans		0		0		0		0
Other		0		0		0		0
Total		5	$	2,928	$	2,095	$	2,015

All loans in the table above are currently performing according to their modified terms and therefore are not included in the Company’s total nonperforming assets discussed elsewhere in this quarterly report.

The following tables present TDRs during the periods indicated, by class of loan:

Troubled Debt Restructurings by Class

For the Three Months Ended September 30, 2011

(dollars in thousands)

	Number of Modifications		Recorded Investment Prior to Modification		Recorded Investment After Modification		Current Investment on September 30, 2011
Mortgage loans on real estate:
Residential 1-4 family		1	$	175	$	175	$	175
Commercial		0		0		0		0
Construction		0		0		0		0
Second mortgages		1		10		10		10
Equity lines of credit		0		0		0		0
Total mortgage loans on real estate		2		185		185		185
Commercial loans		0		0		0		0
Consumer loans		0		0		0		0
Other		0		0		0		0
Total		2	$	185	$	185	$	185

- 12 -

Index

Troubled Debt Restructurings by Class

For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2011

(dollars in thousands)

	Number of Modifications		Recorded Investment Prior to Modification		Recorded Investment After Modification		Current Investment on September 30, 2011
Mortgage loans on real estate:
Residential 1-4 family		1	$	175	$	175	$	175
Commercial		1		362		260		257
Construction		0		0		0		0
Second mortgages		1		10		10		10
Equity lines of credit		0		0		0		0
Total mortgage loans on real estate		3		547		445		442
Commercial loans		0		0		0		0
Consumer loans		0		0		0		0
Other		0		0		0		0
Total		3	$	547	$	445	$	442

Both the residential 1-4 family and the second mortgages loans were given interest rates below the current market for customers with similar risk profiles. The financial effects of these modifications can not be determined due to the fact that these loans would not have been made if the loans had not been restructurings of troubled loans already on the Company’s books. The commercial real estate TDR was given a principal reduction of $102 thousand.

IMPAIRED LOANS

A loan is considered impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable that the Company will be unable to collect all amounts due from the borrower in accordance with the contractual terms of the loan. Impaired loans include nonperforming commercial loans and loans modified in a troubled debt restructuring. When management identifies a loan as impaired, the impairment is measured based on the present value of expected future cash flows, discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate, except when the sole or remaining source of repayment for the loan is the operation or liquidation of the collateral. In these cases, management uses the current fair value of the collateral, less selling costs when foreclosure is probable, instead of the discounted cash flows. If management determines that the value of the impaired loan is less than the recorded investment in the loan (net of previous charge-offs, deferred loan fees or costs and unamortized premium or discount), impairment is recognized through an allowance estimate or a charge-off to the allowance.

When the ultimate collectability of the total principal of an impaired loan is in doubt and the loan is in nonaccrual status, all payments are applied to principal under the cost-recovery method. For financial statement purposes, the recorded investment in the loan is the actual principal balance reduced by payments that would otherwise have been applied to interest. When reporting information on these loans to the applicable customers, the unpaid principal balance is reported as if payments were applied to principal and interest under the original terms of the loan agreements. Therefore, the unpaid principal balance reported to the customer would be higher than the recorded investment in the loan for financial statement purposes. When the ultimate collectability of the total principal of the impaired loan is not in doubt and the loan is in nonaccrual status, contractual interest is credited to interest income when received under the cash-basis method.

The following table includes the recorded investment and unpaid principal balances for impaired loans with the associated allowance amount, if applicable. Also presented are the average recorded investments in the impaired loans and the related amount of interest recognized during 2010 and the first nine months of 2011. The average balances are calculated based on the month-end balance of the loans for the year ended December 31, 2010 and on the daily average balance for the nine months ended September 30, 2011.

- 13 -

Index

Impaired Loans by Class

(in thousands)

	As of September 30, 2011								Nine Months Ended September 30, 2011
			Recorded Investment
	Unpaid Principal Balance		Without Valuation Allowance		With Valuation Allowance		Associated Allowance		Average Recorded Investment		Interest Income Recognized
Mortgage loans on real estate:
Residential 1-4 family	$	2,958	$	674	$	2,217	$	186	$	4,842	$	546
Commercial		10,250		2,050		7,999		2,664		9,541		336
Construction		0		0		0		0		0		0
Second mortgages		497		106		381		31		498		14
Equity lines of credit		371		369		0		0		401		15
Total mortgage loans on real estate	$	14,076	$	3,199	$	10,597	$	2,881	$	15,282	$	911
Commercial loans		126		0		114		50		128		0
Total	$	14,202	$	3,199	$	10,711	$	2,931	$	15,410	$	911

Impaired Loans by Class

(in thousands)

	As of December 31, 2010								Year Ended December 31, 2010
			Recorded Investment
	Unpaid Principal Balance		Without Valuation Allowance		With Valuation Allowance		Associated Allowance		Average Recorded Investment		Interest Income Recognized
Mortgage loans on real estate:
Residential 1-4 family	$	5,850	$	5,008	$	810	$	70	$	4,298	$	320
Commercial		13,319		3,798		9,400		2,827		14,320		593
Construction		0		0		0		0		194		5
Second mortgages		508		100		404		62		377		33
Equity lines of credit		405		262		143		11		300		24
Total mortgage loans on real estate	$	20,082	$	9,168	$	10,757	$	2,970	$	19,489	$	975
Commercial loans		184		178		0		0		73		13
Total	$	20,266	$	9,346	$	10,757	$	2,970	$	19,562	$	988

MONITORING OF LOANS AND EFFECT OF MONITORING FOR THE ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN LOSSES

Loan officers are responsible for continual portfolio analysis and prompt identification and reporting of problem loans, which includes assigning a risk grade to each applicable loan at its origination and revising such grade as the situation dictates. Loan officers maintain frequent contact with borrowers, which should enable the loan officer to identify potential problems before other personnel. In addition, meetings with loan officers and upper management are held to discuss problem loans and review risk grades. Nonetheless, in order to avoid over-reliance upon loan officers for problem loan identification, the Bank’s loan review system provides for review of loans and risk grades by individuals who are independent of the loan approval process. Risk grades and historic loss rates by risk grades are used as a component of the calculation of the allowance for loan losses.

ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN LOSSES

Management has an established methodology to determine the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses that assesses the risks and losses inherent in the loan portfolio. For purposes of determining the allowance for loan losses, the Company has segmented certain loans in the portfolio by product type. Loans are segmented into the following pools: commercial, real estate-construction, real estate-mortgage, consumer and other loans. The Company also sub-segments the real estate-mortgage segment into four classes: residential 1-4 family, commercial real estate, second mortgages and equity lines of credit. The Company uses an internally developed risk evaluation model in the estimation of the credit risk process. The model and assumptions used to determine the allowance are independently validated and reviewed to ensure that the theoretical foundation, assumptions, data integrity, computational processes and reporting practices are appropriate and properly documented.

Each portfolio segment has risk characteristics as follows:

Commercial: Commercial loans carry risks associated with the successful operation of a business or project, in addition to other risks associated with the ownership of a business. The repayment of these loans may be dependent upon the profitability and cash flows of the business. In addition, there is risk associated with the value of collateral other than real estate which may depreciate over time and cannot be appraised with as much precision.

- 14 -

Index

Real estate-construction: Construction loans carry risks that the project will not be finished according to schedule, the project will not be finished according to budget and the value of the collateral may at any point in time be less than the principal amount of the loan. Construction loans also bear the risk that the general contractor, who may or may not be the loan customer, may be unable to finish the construction project as planned because of financial pressure unrelated to the project.

Real estate-mortgage: Residential mortgage loans and equity lines of credit carry risks associated with the continued credit-worthiness of the borrower and changes in the value of the collateral. Commercial real estate loans carry risks associated with the successful operation of a business if owner occupied. If non-owner occupied, the repayment of these loans may be dependent upon the profitability and cash flow from rent receipts.

Consumer loans: Consumer loans carry risks associated with the continued credit-worthiness of the borrowers and the value of the collateral. Consumer loans are more likely than real estate loans to be immediately adversely affected by job loss, divorce, illness or personal bankruptcy.

Other loans: Other loans are loans to mortgage companies, loans for purchasing or carrying securities, and loans to insurance, investment and finance companies. These loans carry risks associated with the successful operation of a business. In addition, there is risk associated with the value of collateral other than real estate which may depreciate over time, may depend on interest rates or may fluctuate in active trading markets.

To determine the balance of the allowance account for each segment of the loan portfolio, management pools each segment by risk grade individually and applies a historical loss percentage. At September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the historical loss percent was based on losses sustained in each segment of the portfolio over the previous eight quarters.

Management also provides an allocated component of the allowance for loans that are classified as impaired. An allocated allowance is established when the discounted value of future cash flows from the impaired loan (or the collateral value or observable market price of the impaired loan) is lower than the carrying value of that loan.

Based on credit risk assessments and management’s analysis of qualitative factors, additional loss factors are applied to loan balances. These additional qualitative factors include: the economy, trends in growth, concentrations, changes in underwriting, changes in management and changes in the legal and regulatory environment.

THE COMPANY’S ESTIMATION PROCESS

See the Management’s Discussion and Analysis in this quarterly report on Form 10-Q for further discussion of the components of the allowance for loan losses.

ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN LOSSES BY SEGMENT

The total allowance reflects management’s estimate of loan losses inherent in the loan portfolio at the balance sheet date. The Company considers the allowance for loan losses of $9.8 million adequate to cover loan losses inherent in the loan portfolio at September 30, 2011. The following table presents, by portfolio segment, the changes in the allowance for loan losses and the recorded investment in loans. Allocation of a portion of the allowance to one category of loans does not preclude its availability to absorb losses in other categories.

- 15 -

Index

ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN LOSSES AND RECORDED INVESTMENT IN LOANS

(in thousands)

September 30, 2011	Commercial			Real Estate - Construction			Real Estate - Mortgage			Consumer			Other			Total
Allowance for Loan Losses:
Balance at the beginning of period	$	799		$	441		$	11,498		$	357		$	133		$	13,228
Charge-offs		(877	)		0			(5,861	)		(298	)		(160	)		(7,196	)
Recoveries		133			0			561			91			35			820
Provision for loan losses		722			(78	)		1,796			163			297			2,900
Ending balance	$	777		$	363		$	7,994		$	313		$	305		$	9,752
Ending balance individually evaluated for impairment	$	50		$	0		$	2,881		$	0		$	0		$	2,931
Ending balance collectively evaluated for impairment		727			363			5,113			313			305			6,821
Ending balance	$	777		$	363		$	7,994		$	313		$	305		$	9,752
Loan Balances:
Ending balance individually evaluated for impairment	$	114		$	0		$	13,796		$	0		$	0		$	13,910
Ending balance collectively evaluated for impairment		35,185			19,466			414,092			18,356			26,025			513,124
Ending balance	$	35,299		$	19,466		$	427,888		$	18,356		$	26,025		$	527,034

December 31, 2010	Commercial			Real Estate - Construction			Real Estate - Mortgage			Consumer			Other			Total
Allowance for Loan Losses:
Balance at the beginning of period	$	935		$	354		$	5,552		$	672		$	351		$	7,864
Charge-offs		(556	)		(126	)		(2,971	)		(655	)		(180	)		(4,488	)
Recoveries		192			0			636			155			69			1,052
Provision for loan losses		228			213			8,281			185			(107	)		8,800
Ending balance	$	799		$	441		$	11,498		$	357		$	133		$	13,228
Ending balance individually evaluated for impairment	$	0		$	0		$	2,970		$	0		$	0		$	2,970
Ending balance collectively evaluated for impairment		799			441			8,528			357			133			10,258
Ending balance	$	799		$	441		$	11,498		$	357		$	133		$	13,228
Loan Balances:
Ending balance individually evaluated for impairment	$	178		$	0		$	19,925		$	0		$	0		$	20,103
Ending balance collectively evaluated for impairment		35,875			19,206			469,265			24,389			17,781			566,516
Ending balance	$	36,053		$	19,206		$	489,190		$	24,389		$	17,781		$	586,619

CHANGES IN ACCOUNTING METHODOLOGY

There were no changes in the Company’s accounting methodology for the allowance for loan losses during the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2011.

Note 4. Share-Based Compensation

Share-based compensation arrangements include stock options, restricted stock awards, performance-based awards, stock appreciation rights and employee stock purchase plans. Accounting standards require all share-based payments to employees to be valued using a fair value method on the date of grant and to be expensed based on that fair value over the applicable vesting period.

There were no options granted in the first nine months of 2011 or in 2010.

On March 9, 2008, the Company’s 1998 Stock Option Plan expired. Options to purchase 165,710 shares of common stock were outstanding under the Company’s 1998 Stock Option Plan at September 30, 2011. The exercise price of each option equals the market price of the Company’s common stock on the date of the grant and each option’s maximum term is ten years.

- 16 -

Index

Stock option activity for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 is summarized below:

	Shares			Weighted Average Exercise Price		Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life (in years)		Aggregate Intrinsic Value (in thousands)
Options outstanding, January 1, 2011		225,127		$	19.62
Granted		0			0
Exercised		(22,020	)		12.91
Canceled or expired		(37,397	)		14.66
Options outstanding, September 30, 2011		165,710		$	21.64		4.71	$	0
Options exercisable, September 30, 2011		127,226		$	22.12		4.30	$	0

The aggregate intrinsic value of a stock option in the table above represents the total pre-tax intrinsic value (the amount by which the current market value of the underlying stock exceeds the exercise price of the option) that would have been received by the option holders had all option holders exercised their options on September 30, 2011.This amount changes based on changes in the market value of the Company’s common stock. As of September 30, 2011, the outstanding options had no intrinsic value because the exercise prices of all outstanding options were above the market value of a share of the Company’s common stock.

No in-the-money options were exercised during the nine months ended September 30, 2011. However, six option-holders chose to exercise options where the option price was greater than the current market value. Proceeds from these exercises were $284 thousand.

As of September 30, 2011, there was $109 thousand of unrecognized compensation cost related to nonvested options. This cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 12 months.

Note 5. Pension Plan

The Company provides pension benefits for eligible participants through a non-contributory defined benefit pension plan. The plan was frozen effective September 30, 2006; therefore, no additional participants will be added to the plan. The components of net periodic pension plan cost are as follows:

Three months ended September 30,	2011			2010
	Pension Benefits
Interest cost	$	76,031		$	78,430
Expected return on plan assets		(104,964	)		(97,295	)
Amortization of net loss		42,585			31,702
Net periodic pension plan cost	$	13,652		$	12,837

Nine months ended September 30,	2011			2010
	Pension Benefits
Interest cost	$	228,095		$	235,292
Expected return on plan assets		(314,893	)		(291,886	)
Amortization of net loss		127,756			95,105
Net periodic pension plan cost	$	40,958		$	38,511

At September 30, 2011, management had not yet determined the amount, if any, that the Company will contribute to the plan in the year ending December 31, 2011.

Note 6. Earnings per Share

Basic earnings per share is computed by dividing net income by the weighted average number of shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per share is computed using the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period, including the effect of dilutive potential common shares attributable to outstanding stock options.

- 17 -

Index

The Company did not include an average of 198 thousand potential common shares attributable to outstanding stock options in the diluted earnings per share calculation for the first nine months of 2011 because they were antidilutive.

Note 7. Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In January 2010, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2010-06, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (Topic 820): Improving Disclosures about Fair Value Measurements.” ASU 2010-06 amends Subtopic 820-10 to clarify existing disclosures, require new disclosures, and includes conforming amendments to guidance on employers’ disclosures about postretirement benefit plan assets. ASU 2010-06 is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2009, except for disclosures about purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements in the roll forward of activity in Level 3 fair value measurements. Those disclosures are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2010 and for interim periods within those fiscal years. The adoption of the new guidance did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In July 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-20, “Receivables (Topic 310): Disclosures about the Credit Quality of Financing Receivables and the Allowance for Credit Losses.” The new disclosure guidance significantly expands the existing requirements and will lead to greater transparency into a company’s exposure to credit losses from lending arrangements. The extensive new disclosures of information as of the end of a reporting period became effective for both interim and annual reporting periods ending on or after December 15, 2010. Specific disclosures regarding activity that occurred before the issuance of the ASU, such as the allowance roll forward and modification disclosures, will be required for periods beginning on or after December 15, 2010. The Company has included the required disclosures in its consolidated financial statements.

In December 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-28, “Intangibles – Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): When to Perform Step 2 of the Goodwill Impairment Test for Reporting Units with Zero or Negative Carrying Amounts.” The amendments in this ASU modify Step 1 of the goodwill impairment test for reporting units with zero or negative carrying amounts. For those reporting units, an entity is required to perform Step 2 of the goodwill impairment test if it is more likely than not that a goodwill impairment exists. The amendments in this ASU are effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2010. Early adoption is not permitted. The adoption of the new guidance did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In December 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-29, “Business Combinations (Topic 805): Disclosure of Supplementary Pro Forma Information for Business Combinations.” The guidance requires pro forma disclosure for business combinations that occurred in the current reporting period as though the acquisition date for all business combinations that occurred during the year had been as of the beginning of the annual reporting period. If comparative financial statements are presented, the pro forma information should be reported as though the acquisition date for all business combinations that occurred during the current year had been as of the beginning of the comparable prior annual reporting period. ASU 2010-29 is effective for business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after the beginning of the first annual reporting period beginning on or after December 15, 2010. Early adoption is permitted. The adoption of the new guidance did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

The SEC has issued Final Rule No. 33-9002, “Interactive Data to Improve Financial Reporting”, which requires companies to submit financial statements in extensible business reporting language (XBRL) format with their SEC filings on a phased-in schedule. Large accelerated filers and foreign large accelerated filers using U.S. GAAP were required to provide interactive data reports starting with their first quarterly report for fiscal periods ending on or after June 15, 2010. All remaining filers are required to provide interactive data reports starting with their first quarterly report for fiscal periods ending on or after June 15, 2011. The Company complied with this Rule beginning with the filing of its June 30, 2011 quarterly report on Form 10-Q.

In March 2011, the SEC issued Staff Accounting Bulletin (SAB) 114. This SAB revises or rescinds portions of the interpretive guidance included in the codification of the Staff Accounting Bulletin Series. This update is intended to make the relevant interpretive guidance consistent with current authoritative accounting guidance issued as a part of the FASB’s Codification. The principal changes involve revision or removal of accounting guidance references and other conforming changes to ensure consistency of referencing through the SAB Series. The effective date for SAB 114 is March 28, 2011. The adoption of the new guidance did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

- 18 -

Index

In April 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-02, “Receivables (Topic 310): A Creditor’s Determination of Whether a Restructuring Is a Troubled Debt Restructuring.” The amendments in this ASU clarify the guidance on a creditor’s evaluation of whether it has granted a concession to a debtor. The amendments also clarify the guidance on a creditor’s evaluation of whether a debtor is experiencing financial difficulty. The amendments in this ASU are effective for the first interim or annual period beginning on or after June 15, 2011. Early adoption is permitted. Retrospective application to the beginning of the annual period of adoption for modifications occurring on or after the beginning of the annual adoption period is required. As a result of applying these amendments, an entity may identify receivables that are newly considered to be impaired. For purposes of measuring impairment of those receivables, an entity should apply the amendments prospectively for the first interim or annual period beginning on or after June 15, 2011. The Company has adopted ASU 2011-02 and included the required disclosure in its consolidated financial statements.

In April 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-03, “Transfers and Servicing (Topic 860): Reconsideration of Effective Control for Repurchase Agreements.” The amendments in this ASU remove from the assessment of effective control (1) the criterion requiring the transferor to have the ability to repurchase or redeem the financial assets on substantially the agreed terms, even in the event of default by the transferee and (2) the collateral maintenance implementation guidance related to that criterion. The amendments in this ASU are effective for the first interim or annual period beginning on or after December 15, 2011. The guidance should be applied prospectively to transactions or modifications of existing transactions that occur on or after the effective date. Early adoption is not permitted. The Company is currently assessing the impact that ASU 2011-03 will have on its consolidated financial statements.

In May 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-04, “Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820): Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRSs).” This ASU is the result of joint efforts by the FASB and International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) to develop a single, converged fair value framework on how (not when) to measure fair value and what disclosures to provide about fair value measurements. The ASU is largely consistent with existing fair value measurement principles in U.S. GAAP (Topic 820), with many of the amendments made to eliminate unnecessary wording differences between U.S. GAAP and IFRSs. The amendments are effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2011 with prospective application. Early application is not permitted. The Company is currently assessing the impact that ASU 2011-04 will have on its consolidated financial statements.

In June 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-05, “Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Presentation of Comprehensive Income.” The objective of this ASU is to improve the comparability, consistency and transparency of financial reporting and to increase the prominence of items reported in other comprehensive income by eliminating the option to present components of other comprehensive income as part of the statement of changes in stockholders’ equity. The amendments require that all non-owner changes in stockholders’ equity be presented either in a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements. The single statement of comprehensive income should include the components of net income, a total for net income, the components of other comprehensive income, a total for other comprehensive income, and a total for comprehensive income. In the two-statement approach, the first statement should present total net income and its components followed consecutively by a second statement that should present all the components of other comprehensive income, a total for other comprehensive income, and a total for comprehensive income. The amendments do not change the items that must be reported in other comprehensive income, the option for an entity to present components of other comprehensive income either net of related tax effects or before related tax effects, or the calculation or reporting of earnings per share. The amendments in this ASU should be applied retrospectively. The amendments are effective for fiscal years and interim periods within those years beginning after December 15, 2011. Early adoption is permitted because compliance with the amendments is already permitted. The amendments do not require transition disclosures. The Company is currently assessing the impact that ASU 2011-05 will have on its consolidated financial statements.

In August 2011, the SEC issued Final Rule No. 33-9250, “Technical Amendments to Commission Rules and Forms related to the FASB’s Accounting Standards Codification.” The SEC has adopted technical amendments to various rules and forms under the Securities Act of 1933 (Securities Act), the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Exchange Act) and the Investment Company Act of 1940 (Investment Company Act). These revisions were necessary to conform those rules and forms to the FASB Accounting Standards Codification. The technical amendments include revision of certain rules in Regulation S-X, certain items in Regulation S-K, and various rules and forms prescribed under the Securities Act, Exchange Act and Investment Company Act. The rule was effective as of August 12, 2011. The adoption of the rule did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

- 19 -

Index

In September 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-08, “Intangibles – Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Testing Goodwill for Impairment.” The amendments in this ASU permit an entity to first assess qualitative factors related to goodwill to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of the reporting unit is less than its carrying amount as a basis for determining whether it is necessary to perform the two-step goodwill test described in Topic 350. The more-likely-than-not threshold is defined as having a likelihood of more than 50 percent. Under the amendments in this ASU, an entity is not required to calculate the fair value of a reporting unit unless the entity determines that it is more likely than not that its fair value is less than its carrying amount. The amendments in this ASU are effective for annual and interim goodwill impairment tests performed for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2011. Early adoption is permitted, including for annual and interim goodwill impairment tests performed as of a date before September 15, 2011, if an entity’s financial statements for the most recent annual or interim period have not yet been issued. The Company is currently assessing the impact that ASU 2011-08 will have on its consolidated financial statements.

Note 8. Fair Value Measurements

The Company uses fair value measurements to record fair value adjustments to certain assets and liabilities and to determine fair value disclosures. In accordance with the Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures topic of FASB ASU 2010-06, the fair value of a financial instrument is the price that would be received in the sale of an asset or transfer of a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. Fair value is best determined based upon quoted market prices. However, in many instances, there are no quoted market prices for the Company’s various financial instruments. In cases where quoted market prices are not available, fair values are based on estimates using present value or other valuation techniques. Those techniques are significantly affected by the assumptions used, including the discount rate and estimate of future cash flows. Accordingly, the fair value estimates may not be realized in an immediate settlement of the instrument.

The fair value guidance provides a consistent definition of fair value, which focuses on exit price in an orderly transaction (that is, not a forced liquidation or distressed sale) between market participants at the measurement date under current market conditions. If there has been a significant decrease in the volume and level of activity for the asset or liability, a change in valuation technique or the use of multiple valuation techniques may be appropriate. In such instances, determining the price at which willing market participants would transact at the measurement date under current market conditions depends on the facts and circumstances and requires the use of significant judgment. The fair value can be a reasonable point within a range that is most representative of fair value under current market conditions.

FAIR VALUE HIERARCHY

In accordance with this guidance, the Company groups its financial assets and financial liabilities generally measured at fair value in three levels, based on the markets in which the assets and liabilities are traded and the reliability of the assumptions used to determine fair value.

	Level 1 –	Valuation is based on quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the reporting entity has the ability to access at the measurement date. Level 1 assets and liabilities generally include debt and equity securities that are traded in an active exchange market. Valuations are obtained from readily available pricing sources for market transactions involving identical assets or liabilities.

	Level 2 –	Valuation is based on inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. The valuation may be based on quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities; quoted prices in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the asset or liability.

	Level 3 –	Valuation is based on unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities. Level 3 assets and liabilities include financial instruments whose value is determined using pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies, or similar techniques, as well as instruments for which determination of fair value requires significant management judgment or estimation.

- 20 -

Index

A financial instrument’s categorization within the valuation hierarchy is based upon the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement.

ASSETS MEASURED AT FAIR VALUE ON A RECURRING BASIS

Debt and equity securities with readily determinable fair values are classified as “available-for-sale” and recorded at fair value, with unrealized gains and losses excluded from earnings and reported in other comprehensive income. Securities available-for-sale are recorded at fair value on a recurring basis. Fair value measurement is based upon quoted market prices, when available (Level 1). If quoted market prices are not available, fair values are measured utilizing independent valuation techniques of identical or similar securities for which significant assumptions are derived primarily from or corroborated by observable market data. Third party vendors compile prices from various sources and may determine the fair value of identical or similar securities by using pricing models that consider observable market data (Level 2). In certain cases where there is limited activity or less transparency around inputs to the valuation, securities are classified within Level 3 of the valuation hierarchy. Currently, all of the Company’s available-for-sale securities are considered to be Level 2 securities.

The following table presents the balances of certain financial assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis:

			Fair Value Measurements at September 30, 2011 Using
			(in thousands)
Description	Balance		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)

Available-for-sale securities
U.S. Treasury securities	$	600	$	0	$	600	$	0
Obligations of U.S. Government agencies		159,110		0		159,110		0
Obligations of state and political subdivisions		2,358		0		2,358		0
Mortgage-backed securities		46,342		0		46,342		0
Money market investments		938		0		938		0
Total available-for-sale securities	$	209,348	$	0	$	209,348	$	0

			Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2010 Using
			(in thousands)
Description	Balance		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)

Available-for-sale securities
U.S. Treasury securities	$	600	$	0	$	600	$	0
Obligations of U.S. Government agencies		200,121		0		200,121		0
Obligations of state and political subdivisions		3,172		0		3,172		0
Mortgage-backed securities		382		0		382		0
Money market investments		1,817		0		1,817		0
Total available-for-sale securities	$	206,092	$	0	$	206,092	$	0

ASSETS MEASURED AT FAIR VALUE ON A NONRECURRING BASIS

Under certain circumstances, adjustments are made to the fair value for assets and liabilities although they are not measured at fair value on an ongoing basis.

Impaired loans

Loans are designated as impaired when, in the judgment of management based on current information and events, it is probable that all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement will not be collected. The measurement of loss associated with impaired loans can be based on either the observable market price of the loan or the fair value of the collateral. Fair value is measured based on the value of the collateral securing the loans. Collateral may be in the form of real estate or business assets including equipment, inventory, and accounts receivable. The vast majority of the collateral is real estate. The value of real estate collateral is determined utilizing an income or market valuation approach based on an appraisal conducted by an independent, licensed appraiser outside of the Company using observable market data (Level 2). However, if the collateral is a house or building in the process of construction or if an appraisal of the real estate property is over two years old, then the fair value is considered Level 3. The value of business equipment is based upon an outside appraisal if deemed significant, or the net book value on the applicable business’ financial statements if not considered significant using observable market data. Likewise, values for inventory and accounts receivable collateral are based on financial statement balances or aging reports (Level 3). Impaired loans allocated to the allowance for loan losses are measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis. Any fair value adjustments are recorded in the period incurred as part of the provision for loan losses on the Consolidated Statements of Income.

- 21 -

Index

Foreclosed assets

Loans are transferred to foreclosed assets when the collateral securing them is foreclosed on. The measurement of loss associated with foreclosed assets is based on the fair value of the collateral compared to the unpaid loan balance and anticipated costs to sell the property. If there is a contract for the sale of a property, and management reasonably believes the transaction will be consummated in accordance with the terms of the contract, fair value is based on the sale price in that contract (Level 1). Lacking such a contract, the value of real estate collateral is determined utilizing an income or market valuation approach based on an appraisal conducted by an independent, licensed appraiser outside of the Company using observable market data (Level 2). However, if the collateral is a house or building in the process of construction or if an appraisal of the real estate property is over two years old, then the fair value is considered Level 3. Any fair value adjustments to foreclosed assets are recorded in the period incurred and expensed against current earnings.

The following table presents the financial instruments carried on the consolidated balance sheets by caption and by level in the fair value hierarchy for which a nonrecurring change in fair value has been recorded:

			Carrying Value at September 30, 2011
			(in thousands)

Description	Fair Value		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)

Assets:
Impaired loans	$	7,780	$	0	$	5,852	$	1,928
Foreclosed assets	$	11,038	$	847	$	10,191	$	0

			Carrying Value at December 31, 2010
			(in thousands)

Description	Fair Value		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)

Assets:
Impaired loans	$	7,787	$	523	$	6,182	$	1,082
Foreclosed assets	$	11,448	$	0	$	11,448	$	0

The following methods and assumptions were used by the Company in estimating fair value disclosures for financial instruments:

CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS

The carrying amounts of cash and short-term instruments, including interest-bearing due from banks, approximate fair values.

- 22 -

Index

INVESTMENT SECURITIES

Where quoted prices are available in an active market, securities are classified within Level 1 of the valuation hierarchy. Securities are classified as Level 2 if quoted market prices are not available. Fair value is estimated using pricing models and discounted cash flows that consider standard input factors such as observable market data, benchmark yields, interest rate volatilities, broker/dealer quotes and credit spreads. In certain cases where there is limited activity or less transparency around inputs to the valuation, securities are classified in Level 3.

RESTRICTED SECURITIES

The restricted security category is comprised of FHLB and FRB stock. These stocks are classified as restricted securities because their ownership is restricted to certain types of entities and they lack a market. Therefore, the carrying amounts of restricted securities approximate fair value.

LOANS RECEIVABLE

For variable-rate loans that reprice frequently and with no significant change in credit risk, fair values are based on carrying values. Fair values for certain mortgage loans (e.g., 1-4 family residential), credit card loans, and other consumer loans are based on quoted market prices of similar loans sold in conjunction with securitization transactions, adjusted for differences in loan characteristics. Fair values for other loans (e.g., commercial real estate and investment property mortgage loans, commercial and industrial loans) are estimated using discounted cash flow analyses, using interest rates currently being offered for loans with similar terms to borrowers of similar credit quality. Fair values for non-performing loans are estimated using discounted cash flow analyses or underlying collateral values, where applicable.

BANK-OWNED LIFE INSURANCE

Bank-owned life insurance represents insurance policies on certain officers of the Company. The cash value of the policies is estimated using information provided by the insurance carrier. These policies are carried at their cash value, which approximates the fair value.

DEPOSIT LIABILITIES

The fair value of demand deposits, savings and certain money market deposits is the amount payable on demand at the reporting date. The fair value of certificates of deposits is estimated by discounting the future cash flows using the rates currently offered for deposits of similar remaining maturities.

SHORT-TERM BORROWINGS

The carrying amounts of federal funds purchased, overnight repurchase agreements, and other short-term borrowings maturing within 90 days approximate their fair values. Fair values of other short-term borrowings are estimated using discounted cash flow analyses based on the Company's current incremental borrowing rates for similar types of borrowing arrangements.

LONG-TERM BORROWINGS

The fair values of the Company's long-term borrowings are estimated using discounted cash flow analyses based on the Company's current incremental borrowing rates for similar types of borrowing arrangements.

ACCRUED INTEREST

The carrying amounts of accrued interest approximate fair value.

COMMITMENTS TO EXTEND CREDIT AND IRREVOCABLE LETTERS OF CREDIT

The fair value of commitments is estimated using the fees currently charged to enter into similar agreements, taking into account the remaining terms of the agreements and the present credit-worthiness of the counterparties. For fixed-rate loan commitments, fair value also considers the difference between current levels of interest rates and the committed rates. The fair value of letters of credit is based on fees currently charged for similar agreements or on the estimated cost to terminate them or otherwise settle the obligations with the counterparties at the reporting date. At September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the fair value of fees charged for loan commitments and irrevocable letters of credit was immaterial.

- 23 -

Index

The estimated fair values, and related carrying or notional amounts, of the Company's financial instruments are as follows:

	September 30, 2011				December 31, 2010
	Carrying		Fair		Carrying		Fair
	Amount		Value		Amount		Value
	(in thousands)
Financial assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	46,520	$	46,520	$	28,431	$	28,431
Securities available-for-sale		209,348		209,348		206,092		206,092
Securities held-to-maturity		2,252		2,272		1,952		1,957
Restricted securities		3,679		3,679		4,320		4,320
Loans, net of allowances for loan losses		517,282		516,842		573,391		571,906
Bank owned life insurance		21,383		21,383		18,020		18,020
Accrued interest receivable		2,431		2,431		2,652		2,652

Financial liabilities:
Deposits	$	690,402	$	692,344	$	679,214	$	682,001
Federal funds purchased and other borrowings		619		619		731		731
Overnight repurchase agreements		37,877		37,877		50,757		50,757
Term repurchase agreements		1,916		1,916		38,959		38,955
Federal Home Loan Bank advances		35,000		39,602		35,000		39,260
Accrued interest payable		603		603		824		824

Note 9. Segment Reporting

The Company operates in a decentralized fashion in three principal business segments: The Old Point National Bank of Phoebus (the Bank), Old Point Trust & Financial Services, N. A. (Trust), and the Company as a separate segment (for purposes of this Note, the Parent). Revenues from the Bank’s operations consist primarily of interest earned on loans and investment securities and service charges on deposit accounts. Trust’s operating revenues consist principally of income from fiduciary activities. The Parent’s revenues are mainly interest and dividends received from the Bank and Trust companies. The Company has no other segments.

The Company’s reportable segments are strategic business units that offer different products and services. They are managed separately because each segment appeals to different markets and, accordingly, requires different technologies and marketing strategies.

- 24 -

Index

Information about reportable segments, and reconciliation of such information to the consolidated financial statements as of and for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 follows:

	Three Months Ended September 30, 2011
	Bank		Trust		Unconsolidated Parent			Eliminations			Consolidated
Revenues
Interest and dividend income	$	8,980,855	$	10,139	$	1,134,786		$	(1,133,857	)	$	8,991,923
Income from fiduciary activities		0		713,946		0			0			713,946
Other income		2,437,145		65,431		75,000			(90,776	)		2,486,800
Total operating income		11,418,000		789,516		1,209,786			(1,224,633	)		12,192,669

Expenses
Interest expense		1,619,245		0		3,089			(3,301	)		1,619,033
Provision for loan losses		600,000		0		0			0			600,000
Salaries and employee benefits		4,195,687		510,582		128,481			0			4,834,750
Other expenses		3,500,412		223,337		70,787			(90,776	)		3,703,760
Total operating expenses		9,915,344		733,919		202,357			(94,077	)		10,757,543

Income before taxes		1,502,656		55,597		1,007,429			(1,130,556	)		1,435,126

Income tax expense (benefit)		408,793		18,904		(35,850	)		0			391,847

Net income	$	1,093,863	$	36,693	$	1,043,279		$	(1,130,556	)	$	1,043,279

Total assets	$	848,274,180	$	4,882,446	$	85,589,149		$	(86,177,039	)	$	852,568,736

	Three Months Ended September 30, 2010
	Bank		Trust		Unconsolidated Parent			Eliminations			Consolidated
Revenues
Interest and dividend income	$	10,159,276	$	12,515	$	1,127,461		$	(1,126,829	)	$	10,172,423
Income from fiduciary activities		0		718,008		0			0			718,008
Other income		2,594,607		96,448		75,000			(90,876	)		2,675,179
Total operating income		12,753,883		826,971		1,202,461			(1,217,705	)		13,565,610

Expenses
Interest expense		2,254,951		0		3,123			(5,274	)		2,252,800
Provision for loan losses		1,500,000		0		0			0			1,500,000
Salaries and employee benefits		3,881,046		530,575		127,441			0			4,539,062
Other expenses		3,656,342		224,303		73,417			(90,876	)		3,863,186
Total operating expenses		11,292,339		754,878		203,981			(96,150	)		12,155,048

Income before taxes		1,461,544		72,093		998,480			(1,121,555	)		1,410,562

Income tax expense (benefit)		387,571		24,511		(36,030	)		0			376,052

Net income	$	1,073,973	$	47,582	$	1,034,510		$	(1,121,555	)	$	1,034,510

Total assets	$	914,325,739	$	4,996,581	$	83,373,669		$	(83,979,375	)	$	918,716,614

- 25 -

Index

	Nine Months Ended September 30, 2011
	Bank		Trust		Unconsolidated Parent			Eliminations			Consolidated
Revenues
Interest and dividend income	$	27,476,064	$	30,119	$	2,678,818		$	(2,676,034	)	$	27,508,967
Income from fiduciary activities		0		2,244,842		0			0			2,244,842
Other income		6,503,875		253,421		225,000			(271,428	)		6,710,868
Total operating income		33,979,939		2,528,382		2,903,818			(2,947,462	)		36,464,677

Expenses
Interest expense		5,153,941		0		9,267			(9,906	)		5,153,302
Provision for loan losses		2,900,000		0		0			0			2,900,000
Salaries and employee benefits		12,444,063		1,524,632		391,424			0			14,360,119
Other expenses		10,255,450		682,616		177,544			(271,428	)		10,844,182
Total operating expenses		30,753,454		2,207,248		578,235			(281,334	)		33,257,603

Income before taxes		3,226,485		321,134		2,325,583			(2,666,128	)		3,207,074

Income tax expense (benefit)		772,305		109,186		(97,650	)		0			783,841

Net income	$	2,454,180	$	211,948	$	2,423,233		$	(2,666,128	)	$	2,423,233

Total assets	$	848,274,180	$	4,882,446	$	85,589,149		$	(86,177,039	)	$	852,568,736

	Nine Months Ended September 30, 2010
	Bank			Trust		Unconsolidated Parent			Eliminations			Consolidated
Revenues
Interest and dividend income	$	30,767,195		$	40,457	$	1,354,548		$	(1,353,059	)	$	30,809,141
Income from fiduciary activities		0			2,319,856		0			0			2,319,856
Other income		7,191,614			346,248		228,038			(270,728	)		7,495,172
Total operating income		37,958,809			2,706,561		1,582,586			(1,623,787	)		40,624,169

Expenses
Interest expense		7,919,228			0		9,267			(16,777	)		7,911,718
Provision for loan losses		7,500,000			0		0			0			7,500,000
Salaries and employee benefits		11,745,806			1,557,484		388,522			0			13,691,812
Other expenses		9,792,181			710,300		184,988			(270,728	)		10,416,741
Total operating expenses		36,957,215			2,267,784		582,777			(287,505	)		39,520,271

Income before taxes		1,001,594			438,777		999,809			(1,336,282	)		1,103,898

Income tax expense (benefit)		(45,095	)		149,184		(97,170	)		0			6,919

Net income	$	1,046,689		$	289,593	$	1,096,979		$	(1,336,282	)	$	1,096,979

Total assets	$	914,325,739		$	4,996,581	$	83,373,669		$	(83,979,375	)	$	918,716,614

The accounting policies of the segments are the same as those described in the summary of significant accounting policies reported in the Company’s 2010 annual report on Form 10-K. The Company evaluates performance based on profit or loss from operations before income taxes, not including nonrecurring gains or losses.

The Bank extends a line of credit to the Parent. This line of credit may be used, from time to time and among other purposes, to repurchase the Parent’s publicly traded stock. As of September 30, 2011, $244 thousand was drawn under the line of credit and $6 thousand remained available. Interest is charged at the Wall Street Journal Prime Rate minus 0.5%, with a floor of 5.0%. This loan is secured by a held-to-maturity security with a book value of $282 thousand and a market value of $289 thousand at September 30, 2011. Both the Parent and the Trust companies maintain deposit accounts with the Bank, on terms substantially similar to those available to other customers. These transactions are eliminated to reach consolidated totals.

- 26 -

Index

Note 10. Commitments and Contingencies

The Company has plans to expand the building of a current branch office. On January 25, 2011 the Company signed a contract with a general contractor for construction of the building. The contract entitles the contractor to the cost of construction plus a fee of 2.50%. The Company anticipates that the project will likely cost between $8.0 million and $10.0 million over the next two to three years. $86 thousand has been disbursed as of September 30, 2011.

There have been no other material changes in the Company’s commitments and contingencies from those disclosed in the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K.

Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

The following discussion is intended to assist readers in understanding and evaluating the financial condition, changes in financial condition and the results of operations of the Company. The Company consists of the parent company and its wholly-owned subsidiaries, The Old Point National Bank of Phoebus (the Bank) and Old Point Trust & Financial Services, N. A. (Trust), collectively referred to as the Company. This discussion should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and other financial information contained elsewhere in this report.

Caution About Forward-Looking Statements

In addition to historical information, this report may contain forward-looking statements. For this purpose, any statement that is not a statement of historical fact may be a forward-looking statement. These forward-looking statements may include, but are not limited to, statements regarding profitability, liquidity, the loan portfolio, allowance for loan losses, the security portfolio, interest rate sensitivity, asset quality, levels of net loan charge-offs and nonperforming assets, noninterest expense (and components of noninterest expense), noninterest income from bank-owned life insurance, income taxes, expected impact of efforts to restructure the balance sheet, market risk, growth strategy, investment strategy, product and service offerings and financial and other goals. Forward-looking statements often use words such as “believes,” “expects,” “plans,” “may,” “will,” “should,” “projects,” “contemplates,” “anticipates,” “forecasts,” “intends” or other words of similar meaning. Forward-looking statements can also be identified by the fact that they do not relate strictly to historical or current facts. Forward-looking statements are subject to numerous assumptions, risks and uncertainties, and actual results could differ materially from historical results or those anticipated by such statements.

There are many factors that could have a material adverse effect on the operations and future prospects of the Company including, but not limited to, changes in interest rates, general economic and business conditions, the quality or composition of the loan or investment portfolios, the size of the provision for loan losses, the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses, the level of nonperforming assets, impaired loans and charge-offs, the local real estate market, results of internal assessments and external bank regulatory examinations, the value of collateral securing loans, the value of and the Company’s ability to sell foreclosed assets, the cost to expand a current branch office, volatility and disruption in national and international financial markets, government intervention in the U.S. financial system, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) premiums and/or assessments, demand for loan and other products, deposit flows, competition, and accounting principles, policies and guidelines. Monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. Government could also adversely affect the Company; such policies include the impact of any regulations or programs implemented pursuant to the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008 (EESA), the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA), the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (Dodd-Frank Act) and other policies of the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC), U.S. Treasury and the Federal Reserve Board.

The Company has experienced reduced earnings due to the current economic climate. Dramatic declines in the residential and commercial real estate markets in recent years have resulted in increases in nonperforming assets and significant write-downs of asset values by the Company as well as by other financial institutions in the U.S. Concerns about future economic conditions and financial markets generally have reduced the availability of funding to certain financial institutions, leading to a tightening of credit and reduction of business activity.

In July 2010, the President signed into law the Dodd-Frank Act, which implements far-reaching changes across the financial regulatory landscape. It is not clear what other impacts the Dodd-Frank Act, regulations promulgated thereunder and other regulatory initiatives of the U.S. Treasury and other bank regulatory agencies will have on the financial markets and the financial services industry. The limited credit availability currently being experienced could continue to affect the U.S. banking industry and the broader U.S. and global economies, which would have an effect on all financial institutions, including the Company.

- 27 -

Index

These risks and uncertainties, in addition to the risks and uncertainties identified in the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010, should be considered in evaluating the forward-looking statements contained herein, and readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on such statements. Any forward-looking statement speaks only as of the date on which it is made, and the Company undertakes no obligation to update any forward-looking statement to reflect events or circumstances after the date on which it is made. In addition, past results of operations are not necessarily indicative of future results.

General

The Company is the parent company of the Bank and Trust. The Bank is a locally managed community bank serving the Hampton Roads localities of Hampton, Newport News, Norfolk, Virginia Beach, Chesapeake, Williamsburg/James City County, York County and Isle of Wight County. The Bank currently has 21 branch offices. Trust is a wealth management services provider.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

As of September 30, 2011, there have been no significant changes with regard to the critical accounting policies and estimates disclosed in the Company’s 2010 annual report on Form 10-K. That disclosure included a discussion of the accounting policy that requires management’s most difficult, subjective or complex judgments: the allowance for loan losses. For a discussion of the Company’s policies for calculating the allowance for loan losses, see Note 3 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Earnings Summary

Net income for the third quarter of 2011 was $1.0 million, effectively unchanged from the third quarter of 2010. For the nine months ending September 30, 2011, net income was $2.4 million, as compared to net income of $1.1 million for the same period in 2010. The increase in year to date net income was primarily due to a reduction in the provision for loan losses, from $7.5 million in the first nine months of 2010 to $2.9 million in the same period of 2011. Decreases in loans and in nonperforming assets between September 30, 2010 and September 30, 2011 allowed management to reduce the provision. Basic and diluted earnings per share for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011 were $0.21 and $0.49, respectively. Basic and diluted earnings per share were $0.21 for the three months ended and $0.22 for the nine months ended September 30, 2010.

Net Interest Income

The principal source of earnings for the Company is net interest income. Net interest income is the difference between interest and fees generated by earning assets and interest expense paid to fund them. Changes in the volume and mix of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities, as well as their respective yields and rates, have a significant impact on the level of net interest income. The net interest yield is calculated by dividing tax-equivalent net interest income by average earning assets. Although both total interest and dividend income and total interest expense decreased during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011, from the same periods in 2010, total interest and dividend income decreased slightly more than total interest expense, causing net interest income to slightly decrease for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011 compared to the same periods in 2010..

Net interest income, on a fully tax equivalent basis, was $7.4 million in the third quarter of 2011, a decrease of $553 thousand from the third quarter of 2010. The net interest yield was 3.87% in the third quarter of 2011, 10 basis points higher than the 3.77% net interest yield in the equivalent period in 2010. The higher net interest yield in the third quarter of 2011 as compared to the third quarter of 2010 was the result of two factors. First, average interest-bearing liabilities declined faster than average earning assets. Second, net interest yield was affected by the rate on interest-bearing liabilities decreasing 24 basis points, while the yield on earning assets decreased by only 11 basis points.

Tax-equivalent interest income decreased by $1.2 million, or 11.62%, in the third quarter of 2011 compared to the same period of 2010. Average earning assets for the third quarter of 2011 decreased $79.9 million, or 9.45%, compared to the third quarter of 2010. Interest expense decreased $634 thousand, or 28.14%, and average interest-bearing liabilities decreased by $84.5 thousand, or 12.35% in the third quarter of 2011 compared to the same period of 2010. The decrease in interest expense is a result of the decrease in average interest-bearing liabilities and the 24 basis-point decrease in the average rate on interest-bearing liabilities in the third quarter of 2011 compared to the third quarter of 2010.

- 28 -

Index

For the nine months ended September 30, 2011, tax-equivalent net interest income was $22.5 million, down 2.58% from the first nine months of 2010. The net interest yield of 3.83% in the first nine months of 2011 was 26 basis points higher than the yield for the same period of 2010, due to the rate on interest-bearing liabilities decreasing faster than the yield on earning assets. Tax-equivalent interest income for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 decreased $3.4 million, or 10.83%, from the first nine months of 2010, while interest expense fell $2.8 million, or 34.87% between the same periods. The reduction in average interest-bearing liabilities was not enough to offset the loss of income from lower average earning assets, resulting in lower net interest income for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2011 as compared to the nine-month period ended September 30, 2010.

The yield on average earning assets and cost of average interest-bearing liabilities both decreased due to the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) lowering the Federal Funds Target Rate during 2008 from 4.25% to a range of 0.00% to 0.25%. The FOMC has kept the Federal Funds Target Rate unchanged during 2009, 2010 and the first nine months of 2011. As higher-yielding earning assets and higher-cost interest-bearing liabilities that were booked prior to 2008 mature, they are being replaced with lower-yielding earning assets and lower-cost interest-bearing liabilities. Assuming that the FOMC keeps interest rates at current levels, management believes that the decrease of the average rate on interest-bearing liabilities will slow as a high percentage of the Company’s interest-bearing liabilities have already re-priced.

The following table shows an analysis of average earning assets, interest-bearing liabilities and rates and yields. Nonaccrual loans are included in loans outstanding.

AVERAGE BALANCE SHEETS, NET INTEREST INCOME* AND RATES*
	For the quarter ended September 30,
	2011								2010
	Average Balance			Interest Income/ Expense		Yield/ Rate**			Average Balance			Interest Income/ Expense		Yield/ Rate**
						(in thousands)
ASSETS
Loans*	$	533,960		$	7,940		5.95	%	$	619,241		$	9,252		5.98	%
Investment securities:
Taxable		201,208			1,010		2.01	%		186,227			854		1.83	%
Tax-exempt*		2,684			49		7.30	%		4,517			80		7.08	%
Total investment securities		203,892			1,059		2.08	%		190,744			934		1.96	%
Interest-bearing due from banks		4,243			3		0.28	%		1,132			1		0.35	%
Federal funds sold		18,863			7		0.15	%		29,249			15		0.21	%
Other investments		4,472			17		1.52	%		4,977			11		0.88	%
Total earning assets		765,430		$	9,026		4.72	%		845,343		$	10,213		4.83	%
Allowance for loan losses		(10,163	)							(12,138	)
Other nonearning assets		85,484								82,090
Total assets	$	840,751							$	915,295

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
Time and savings deposits:
Interest-bearing transaction accounts	$	10,941		$	1		0.04	%	$	10,663		$	1		0.04	%
Money market deposit accounts		169,873			88		0.21	%		164,714			95		0.23	%
Savings accounts		48,473			12		0.10	%		46,010			12		0.10	%
Time deposits, $100,000 or more		126,433			437		1.38	%		145,729			645		1.77	%
Other time deposits		175,187			634		1.45	%		199,196			960		1.93	%
Total time and savings deposits		530,907			1,172		0.88	%		566,312			1,713		1.21	%
Federal funds purchased, repurchase agreements and other borrowings		33,925			17		0.20	%		83,028			110		0.53	%
Federal Home Loan Bank advances		35,000			430		4.91	%		35,000			430		4.91	%
Total interest-bearing liabilities		599,832			1,619		1.08	%		684,340			2,253		1.32	%
Demand deposits		154,338								129,741
Noninterest-bearing repurchase agreements		0								16,265
Other liabilities		1,934								2,233
Stockholders' equity		84,647								82,716
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity	$	840,751							$	915,295
Net interest income/yield				$	7,407		3.87	%				$	7,960		3.77	%

- 29 -

Index

	For the nine months ended September 30,
	2011								2010
	Average Balance			Interest Income/ Expense		Yield/ Rate**			Average Balance			Interest Income/ Expense		Yield/ Rate**
						(in thousands)
ASSETS
Loans*	$	552,864		$	24,566		5.92	%	$	627,677		$	28,028		5.95	%
Investment securities:
Taxable		201,845			2,809		1.86	%		179,912			2,508		1.86	%
Tax-exempt*		3,031			166		7.30	%		6,110			334		7.29	%
Total investment securities		204,876			2,975		1.94	%		186,022			2,842		2.04	%
Interest-bearing due from banks		2,153			4		0.25	%		1,186			2		0.22	%
Federal funds sold		17,171			21		0.16	%		40,807			64		0.21	%
Other investments		4,637			49		1.41	%		4,948			33		0.89	%
Total earning assets		781,701		$	27,615		4.71	%		860,640		$	30,969		4.80	%
Allowance for loan losses		(10,828	)							(10,563	)
Other nonearning assets		85,098								79,760
Total assets	$	855,971							$	929,837

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
Time and savings deposits:
Interest-bearing transaction accounts	$	11,541		$	5		0.06	%	$	10,948		$	5		0.06	%
Money market deposit accounts		169,650			268		0.21	%		156,955			262		0.22	%
Savings accounts		47,753			36		0.10	%		44,998			35		0.10	%
Time deposits, $100,000 or more		130,749			1,440		1.47	%		164,020			2,072		1.68	%
Other time deposits		179,489			2,041		1.52	%		183,994			3,097		2.24	%
Total time and savings deposits		539,182			3,790		0.94	%		560,915			5,471		1.30	%
Federal funds purchased, repurchase agreements and other borrowings		42,927			88		0.27	%		92,329			471		0.68	%
Federal Home Loan Bank advances		35,000			1,275		4.86	%		51,827			1,970		5.07	%
Total interest-bearing liabilities		617,109			5,153		1.11	%		705,071			7,912		1.50	%
Demand deposits		142,208								123,946
Noninterest-bearing repurchase agreements		12,265								16,230
Other liabilities		1,703								2,438
Stockholders' equity		82,686								82,152
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity	$	855,971							$	929,837
Net interest income/yield				$	22,462		3.83	%				$	23,057		3.57	%

*Computed on a fully tax-equivalent basis using a 34% rate

**Annualized

Provision for Loan Losses

The provision for loan losses is a charge against earnings necessary to maintain the allowance for loan losses at a level consistent with management’s evaluation of the portfolio. This expense is based on management’s estimate of credit losses that may be sustained in the loan portfolio. Management’s evaluation included credit quality trends, collateral values, the findings of internal credit quality assessments and results from external bank regulatory examinations. These factors, as well as identified impaired loans, historical losses and current economic and business conditions, were used in developing estimated loss factors for determining the loan loss provision.

The provision for loan losses was $600 thousand in the third quarter of 2011, as compared to $1.5 million in the third quarter of 2010 and was $2.9 million for the first nine months of 2011, as compared to $7.5 million in the first nine months of 2010. The Company was able to reduce the provision in 2011 due to a decrease of nonperforming loans and improvement in loan risk ratings as shown in Note 3 of the Consolidated Financial Statements contained in this quarterly report on Form 10-Q. In addition, management concluded that the lower provision was appropriate based on its analysis of the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses.

Net loans charged off were $822 thousand for the third quarter of 2011 as compared to $1.1 million for the third quarter of 2010. For the first nine months of 2011 and 2010, net loans charged off were $6.4 million and $3.3 million, respectively. Of the $6.4 million of net loans charged off in 2011, $4.2 million was due to three loans. More than half of the $6.4 million of net loans charged off during the first nine months of 2011 was included in the 2010 provision for loan losses when management determined that these losses were probable.

- 30 -

Index

On an annualized basis, net loan charge-offs were 1.61% of total loans for the first nine months of 2011 compared with 0.70% for the same period in 2010. While net loans charged off remain high compared to historic levels and reflect ongoing difficulties in the commercial and consumer real estate sectors, the significantly elevated level of charge-offs that occurred in the first quarter of 2011 was not repeated in the second or third quarter of 2011. Management does not anticipate the significantly elevated level of charge-offs that occurred in the first quarter of 2011 to be repeated in the fourth quarter of 2011. On a quarter-to-quarter basis, the Company’s net charge-offs for the first quarter of 2011 were elevated, at $4.7 million, while second quarter net charge-offs were $810 thousand, and third quarter net charge-offs were $822 thousand. Management believes that net loans charged off will remain relatively high as compared to historic levels until the economic recovery becomes more pronounced.

Nonperforming assets consist of nonaccrual loans, loans past due 90 days or more and accruing interest, restructured loans that are not performing according to their modified terms, and foreclosed assets. See Note 3 of the financial statements for an explanation of these categories. Foreclosed assets consist of real estate from foreclosures on loan collateral. The majority of the loans 90 days past due but still accruing interest are classified as substandard. As noted below, substandard loans are a component of the allowance for loan losses. When a loan changes from “past due 90 days or more and accruing interest” status to “nonaccrual” status, the loan is reviewed for impairment. If the loan is considered impaired, then the difference between the value of the collateral and the principal amount outstanding on the loan is charged off. If the Company is waiting on an appraisal to determine the collateral’s value or is in negotiations with the borrower or other parties that may affect the value of the collateral, management allocates funds to cover the deficiency to the allowance for loan losses based on information available to management at that time.

As of September 30, 2011, the Company had five TDRs with a carrying value of $2.0 million at September 30, 2011. These loans are performing in accordance with the new terms and are therefore not considered nonperforming assets. The five TDRs are disclosed in Note 3 in this quarterly report on Form 10Q. All TDRs are considered impaired and are included on the impaired loan section of the analysis for loan losses.

- 31 -

Index

The following table presents information on nonperforming assets:

NONPERFORMING ASSETS

	September 30,		December 31,		Increase
	2011		2010		(Decrease)
	(in thousands)
Nonaccrual loans
Commercial	$	151	$	178	$	(27	)
Real estate-construction		0		37		(37	)
Real estate-mortgage (1)		12,184		20,550		(8,366	)
Consumer loans		13		116		(103	)
Total nonaccrual loans	$	12,348	$	20,881	$	(8,533	)
Loans past due 90 days or more and accruing interest
Commercial	$	0	$	0	$	0
Real estate-construction		0		16		(16	)
Real estate-mortgage (1)		175		33		142
Consumer loans		15		23		(8	)
Other		3		1		2
Total loans past due 90 days or more and accruing interest	$	193	$	73	$	120
Restructured loans
Real estate-mortgage (1)	$	2,015	$	1,639	$	376
Total restructured loans		2,015		1,639		376
Less restructured loans currently in compliance (2)		2,015		1,639		376
Net nonperforming restructured loans	$	0	$	0	$	0
Foreclosed assets
Real estate-construction	$	4,070	$	4,074	$	(4	)
Real estate-mortgage (1)		6,968		7,374		(406	)
Total foreclosed assets	$	11,038	$	11,448	$	(410	)
Total nonperforming assets	$	23,579	$	32,402	$	(8,823	)

(1) The real estate-mortgage segment includes residential 1 – 4 family, commercial real estate, second mortgages and equity lines of credit.

(2) As of September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 all of the Company's restructured loans were performing in compliance with their modified terms.

Nonperforming assets as of September 30, 2011 were $23.6 million, or 27.23% lower than nonperforming assets as of December 31, 2010. The largest decrease in nonperforming assets was in the category of nonaccrual loans, which decreased by $8.5 million. Nonaccrual loans totaling $13.4 million were sold without recourse in the second and third quarters of 2011; $1.1 million of the second and third quarter 2011 charge-offs were related to these loans. In future periods, the Company will evaluate opportunities to further improve asset quality and reduce nonaccrual loans through non-recourse sales of these loans.

The majority of the balance of nonaccrual loans at September 30, 2011 was related to a few large credit relationships. Of the $12.3 million of nonaccrual loans at September 30, 2011, $9.3 million or 75.32% was comprised of four credit relationships: $3.3 million, $3.0 million, $1.7 million, and $1.3 million. The loans that make up the nonaccrual balance have been written down to their net realizable value. As shown in the table above, the majority of the nonaccrual loans were collateralized by real estate at September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010.

Management believes the Company has excellent credit quality review processes in place to identify problem loans quickly. As seen by the reduction in nonperforming assets during the first nine months of 2011, the quality of the Company’s loan portfolio has improved with nonperforming assets stabilizing due to charge-offs and non-recourse sales of nonaccrual loans. Management believes that the elevated levels of nonperforming assets in prior quarters was primarily due to economic conditions, depressed commercial and residential real estate markets and the effects of unemployment on borrowers. However, management remains cautious about the future and is well aware that if the economy does not improve, nonperforming assets could increase in future periods. As was seen in recent financial periods, the effect of a sustained increase in nonperforming assets would be lower earnings caused by larger contributions to the loan loss provision, which in turn would be driven by larger impairments in the loan portfolio and higher levels of loan charge-offs.

- 32 -

Index

As of September 30, 2011, the allowance for loan losses was 41.36% of nonperforming assets and 77.76% of nonperforming loans. The definition of nonperforming loans is nonperforming assets less foreclosed assets. The allowance for loan losses was 1.85% of total loans on September 30, 2011 and 2.25% of total loans on December 31, 2010.

Allowance for Loan Losses

The allowance for loan losses is based on several components. In evaluating the adequacy of the allowance, each segment of the loan portfolio is divided into several pools of loans based on the Company’s internally assigned risk grades:

Doubtful–specific identification

Substandard–specific identification

Pool–substandard

Pool–other assets especially mentioned (rated just above substandard)

Pool–pass loans (all other loans)

Historical loss rates, adjusted for the current economic environment, are applied to the above five pools of loans for each segment of the loan portfolio, except for impaired loans which have losses specifically calculated on an individual loan basis. Historical loss is one of the components of the allowance. Historical loss is based on the Company’s loss experience during the past eight quarters, which management believes reflects the risk related to each segment of loans in the current economic environment. The historical loss component of the allowance amounted to $5.3 million and $5.1 million as of September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively. This increase is due to higher charge-offs in the first, second and third quarters of 2011 as compared to the level of charge-offs in certain quarters included in past historical loss periods. The Company uses a rolling eight-quarter average to calculate the historical loss component of the allowance, so lower charge-offs in the first three quarters of 2009 are no longer included in the calculation as of September 30, 2011, which has caused the historical loss component to increase.

In addition, nonperforming loans and both performing and nonperforming TDRs are analyzed for impairment under U.S. GAAP and are allocated based on this analysis. Increases in nonperforming loans and TDRs affect this portion of the adequacy review. The Company’s nonperforming loans and nonperforming TDRs fall into the following pools of loans: doubtful–specific identification and substandard–specific identification. Performing TDRs can fall into any of the five pools noted above. Therefore, changes in nonperforming loans and TDRs affect the dollar amount of the allowance. Unless the nonperforming loan or TDR is not impaired (i.e. the collateral value is considered sufficient), increases in nonperforming loans and TDRs are reflected as an increase in the allowance for loan losses.

The majority of the Company’s nonperforming loans and TDRs are collateralized by real estate. When reviewing loans for impairment, the Company obtains current appraisals when applicable. Any loan balance that is in excess of the appraised value is allocated in the allowance. In the current real estate market, appraisers may have difficulty finding comparable sales, which is causing some appraisals to be very low. As a result, the Company is being conservative in its valuation of collateral which results in higher than normal charged off loans and higher than normal increases to the Company’s allowance for loan losses. As of September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the impaired loan component of the allowance for loan losses amounted to $2.9 million and $3.0 million, respectively, and for each quarter is reflected as a valuation allowance related to impaired loans in Note 3 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in this Form 10-Q. As shown in the impaired loan tables in Note 3, the recorded investment in impaired loans at September 30, 2011 was $13.9 million. Although the impaired loan component of the allowance has not decreased as compared to December 31, 2010, the majority of the $2.9 million impaired loan component as of September 30, 2011 is associated with two impaired loans.

The final component of the allowance consists of qualitative factors and includes items such as the economy, growth trends, loan concentrations, and legal and regulatory changes. The qualitative component of the allowance amounted to $1.5 million and $5.1 million as of September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively. The reduction in this component is due to several reasons. Total loans have declined $59.6 or 10.16% from December 31, 2010 to September 30, 2011. In addition, as detailed in Note 3 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in this Form 10-Q, nonaccruals have declined $8.5 million when comparing December 31, 2010 to September 30, 2011 and the credit quality of the loan portfolio has dramatically improved with OAEM, substandard and doubtful loans dropping from $78.0 million or 13.3% of the total loan portfolio at December 31, 2010 to $28.9 million or 5.49% of the total loan portfolio at September 30, 2011. The large drop in risk rated assets indicates that the quality of the loan portfolio is improving. The strength of the loan portfolio is also supported by the improvement in past due loans. As detailed in Note 3 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in this Form 10-Q past due loans have dropped from $16.6 million or 2.82% of total loans as of December 31, 2010 to $3.2 million or 0.61% of total loans as of September 30, 2011.

- 33 -

Index

As a result of these changes and management’s belief that nonperforming assets are declining and will continue to decline, the Company added, through the provision, $600 thousand and $2.9 million to the allowance for loan losses in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011. Management believes that the allowance has been appropriately funded for additional losses on existing loans, based on currently available information. The Company will continue to monitor the loan portfolio and levels of nonperforming loans closely and make changes to the allowance for loan losses when management concludes such changes are necessary.

Noninterest Income

For the third quarter of 2011, noninterest income decreased $192 thousand, or 5.67%, as compared to the same period in 2010. Noninterest income generated by gains on sale of available-for-sale securities was $386 thousand for the third quarter of 2011, $155 thousand lower than for the same period of 2010. Noninterest income from fiduciary duties and bank-owned life insurance also decreased during the third quarter of 2011 as compared to the third quarter of 2010, although these declines were partially offset by higher other service charges, commissions and fees during the third quarter of 2011. Other operating income also decreased from the third quarter of 2010 to the same period in 2011, partly due to reduced income from the Company’s joint venture, Old Point Mortgage, LLC, which was $36 thousand lower in the third quarter of 2011 as compared to the third quarter of 2010.

For the nine months ended September 30, 2011, noninterest income decreased by $859 thousand as compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2010. In the noninterest income category of service charges on deposit accounts, overdraft fee income was $533 thousand lower in the nine months ended September 30, 2011 than the same period in 2010, due to changes to Regulation E in the third quarter of 2010. The changes to Regulation E require customers to authorize in advance overdrafts caused by debit card and ATM transactions. The Company has made an effort to educate customers on the benefits of its overdraft programs, and as a result, overdraft fee income for the third quarter of 2011 was up $40 thousand from the third quarter of 2010. Despite this positive sign, the Company expects continued uncertainty regarding overdraft fee income.

To compensate for the uncertainty in overdraft fee income, the Company is developing and marketing other income-producing products, such as remote deposit capture and lockbox services, to help drive future noninterest income. As a result of this emphasis, income from merchant processing and debit cards together have grown $196 thousand, or 14.57%, between the first nine months of 2010 and the same period in 2011. These two income line items are included in the other service charge, commissions and fees category of noninterest income.

Two noninterest items were elevated during the first nine months of 2010, impacting the year-over-year comparison of the Company’s 2011 noninterest income. For the nine months ended September 30, 2011 as compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2010, the decline in noninterest income from bank owned life insurance is principally due to life insurance proceeds received by the Company during 2010 that were not received in 2011. The Company has purchased additional life insurance policies during the third quarters of 2010 and 2011 which should increase noninterest income in future periods. In addition, gains on sales of securities were $104 lower during the first nine months of 2011 as compared to 2010.

The majority of the decrease in the other operating income category when comparing the nine months ended September 30, 2011 to the same period in 2010, related to reduced income from the Company’s joint venture, Old Point Mortgage, LLC, which was $59 thousand lower in the first nine months of 2011 as compared to the same period of 2010.

Noninterest Expense

The Company’s noninterest expense increased by $136 thousand for the third quarter of 2011, as compared to the third quarter of 2010. The largest increase when comparing the third quarters of 2011 and 2010 is in the salaries and employee benefits category, which increased $296 thousand during the third quarter of 2011, due to the hiring of additional employees in 2011 as discussed further below. The increase in salaries and benefits expense is partially offset by reductions in the FDIC insurance and advertising categories which reduced by $133 thousand and $46 thousand, respectively for the three months ended September 30, 2011 as compared to the same period in 2010. The reduction in FDIC insurance expense was due to changes effective April 1, 2011 in the method for calculating this expense. Management believes that these changes will continue to have a positive impact on the Company’s FDIC insurance expense. The Company has reduced advertising expenses as part of its efforts to control noninterest expenses, focusing on earned publicity rather than paid advertising.

- 34 -

Index

The Company’s noninterest expense increased by $1.1 million when comparing the first nine months of 2011 to the first nine months of 2010. For the nine months ending September 30, 2011, salaries and employee benefits increased by $668 thousand over the same period in 2010 as the Company added 12.5 full-time equivalent employees. Many of these newly hired employees are in the Company’s private banking and corporate lending areas and were hired to increase small business lending, treasury services, and lending in areas other than commercial real estate as part of management’s focus on increasing loans and noninterest income.

Partially as a result of the Company’s focus on developing additional income-producing products, such as remote deposit capture and lockbox services, the Company’s data processing expenses increased for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 as compared to the same period in 2010. As the Company continues to offer and promote these products, data processing expense may remain elevated over the Company’s historical levels.

Other significant areas of noninterest expense that increased in the nine months ended September 30, 2011 were loan expenses and losses on write-downs and sales of foreclosed assets. Both expense categories have increased as the Company manages problem loans created by the economic downturn. This increased focus has helped the Company to significantly reduce nonperforming assets as discussed above. However, these expenses will likely continue to be elevated for the foreseeable future.

Balance Sheet Review

At September 30, 2011, the Company had total assets of $852.6 million, a decrease of $34.3 million or 3.86% compared to total assets of $886.8 million as of December 31, 2010. This decrease is largely due to the current economic environment as loan demand has fallen and the Company’s loan portfolio has decreased during 2011. Net loans as of September 30, 2011 were $517.3 million, a decrease of 9.79% from $573.4 million at December 31, 2010. Loan balances have declined for several reasons, including: higher than normal amortization of residential loans due to an attractive refinance market; closer management of revolving credits; purposeful exiting of troubled credits; partial charge-offs of some larger troubled loans to properly account for reasonable collateral value; regularly scheduled payoffs exceeding loan demand from qualified borrowers and reduced quality loan demand in the Company’s market.

The Company’s holdings of “Alt-A” type mortgage loans such as adjustable rate and nontraditional type loans were inconsequential, amounting to less than 1.00% of the Company’s loan portfolio as of September 30, 2011.

The Company does not have a formal program for subprime lending. The Company is required by law to comply with the requirements of the Community Reinvestment Act (the CRA), which imposes on financial institutions an affirmative and ongoing obligation to meet the credit needs of their local communities, including low- and moderate-income borrowers. In order to comply with the CRA and meet the credit needs of its local communities, the Company finds it necessary to make certain loans with subprime characteristics.

For the purposes of this discussion, a “subprime loan” is defined as a loan to a borrower having a credit score of 660 or below. The majority of the Company’s subprime loans are to customers in the Company’s local market area.

The following table details the Company’s loans with subprime characteristics that were secured by 1-4 family first mortgages, 1-4 family open-end and 1-4 family junior lien loans for which the Company has recorded a credit score in its system.

- 35 -

Index

Loans Secured by 1 - 4 Family First Mortgages,

1 - 4 Family Open-end and 1 - 4 Family Junior Liens

As of September 30, 2011

(in thousands)

	Amount		Percent
Subprime	$	22,953		21.2	%
Non-subprime		85,432		78.8	%
	$	108,385		100.0	%

Total loans	$	527,034
Percentage of Real Estate-Secured Subprime Loans to Total Loans				4.36	%

In addition to the subprime loans secured by real estate discussed above, as of September 30, 2011, the Company had an additional $2.7 million in subprime consumer loans that were either unsecured or secured by collateral other than real estate. Together with the subprime loans secured by real estate, the Company’s total subprime loans as of September 30, 2011 were $25.7 million, amounting to 4.87% of the Company’s total loans at September 30, 2011.

Additionally, the Company has no investments secured by “Alt-A” type mortgage loans such as adjustable rate and nontraditional type mortgages or subprime loans.

Average assets for the first nine months of 2011 were $856.0 million compared to $929.8 million for the first nine months of 2010. The reduction in average assets as of September 30, 2011 as compared to average assets as of September 30, 2010 was due mainly to the decline in average loans of $74.8 million, due to the factors impacting the loan portfolio identified above.

Total available-for-sale and held-to-maturity securities at September 30, 2011 was $211.6 million, an increase of 1.71% from $208.0 million at December 31, 2010. Since loan demand continues to be slow and yields on investment securities are low, the Company has placed an increased emphasis on improving the Company’s net interest margin by reducing dependence on higher-cost sources of funding. As a result of these balance sheet decisions on how to allocate excess liquidity, management has improved the Company’s net interest margin. The net interest margin for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 was 3.83%, a 26 basis point improvement over the 3.57% net interest margin for the same period in 2010. The Company’s goal is to provide maximum return on the investment portfolio within the framework of its asset/liability objectives. The objectives include managing interest sensitivity, liquidity and pledging requirements.

At September 30, 2011, noninterest-bearing and savings deposits were $36.8 million higher than comparable deposits at December 31, 2010. In addition to improving the Company’s net interest margin, the Company has focused on building customer relationships. A portion of the growth in noninterest-bearing and savings deposits was due to the sale of high-quality treasury services. Customers pay for these services either with compensating balances or with fees which flow to noninterest income. As seen by both the balance sheets and the income statement, these efforts are working. The liability side of the balance sheet has shifted from higher cost non-relationship funds to lower cost, service providing accounts. The Company reduced its higher cost time deposits and repurchase agreement balances by $75.6 million since December 31, 2010.

Term repurchase agreements also decreased during the nine months ended September 30, 2011, partially due to the exiting of certain high-cost, non-relationship accounts and partially due to an internal restructuring of the accounts of a single large customer from repurchase agreements to noninterest-bearing deposit accounts. Because the FDIC recently modified how deposit insurance premiums are calculated and noninterest-bearing deposits are now fully insured, the Company was able to make this change and free up the securities that were used as collateral for the repurchase agreement.

Capital Resources

Total stockholders’ equity as of September 30, 2011 was $85.3 million, up 5.42% from $81.0 million at December 31, 2010. Under applicable banking regulations, Total Capital is comprised of core capital (Tier 1) and supplemental capital (Tier 2). Tier 1 capital consists of common stockholders’ equity and retained earnings less goodwill. Tier 2 capital consists of certain qualifying debt and a qualifying portion of the allowance for loan losses. The following is a summary of the Company’s capital ratios at September 30, 2011. As shown below, these ratios were all well above the regulatory minimum levels, and demonstrate that the Company’s capital position remains strong.

- 36 -

Index

	2011 Regulatory Minimums	September 30, 2011
Tier 1	4.00%	14.26%

Total Capital	8.00%	15.51%

Tier 1 Leverage	4.00%	10.18%

Book value per share was $17.21 at September 30, 2011 up from $16.84 at September 30, 2010. Cash dividends were $248 thousand or $0.05 per share in the third quarter of 2011 and $247 thousand or $0.05 per share in the third quarter of 2010. The common stock of the Company has not been extensively traded.

Liquidity

Liquidity is the ability of the Company to meet present and future financial obligations through either the sale or maturity of existing assets or the acquisition of additional funds through liability management. Liquid assets include cash, interest-bearing deposits with banks, federal funds sold, investments in securities and loans maturing within one year.

A major source of the Company’s liquidity is its large stable deposit base. In addition, secondary liquidity sources are available through the use of borrowed funds if the need should arise, including secured advances from the FHLB. As of the end of the third quarter of 2011, the Company had $219.5 million in FHLB borrowing availability. The Company has available short-term unsecured borrowed funds in the form of federal funds lines with correspondent banks. As of the end of the third quarter of 2011, the Company had $33.0 million available in federal funds lines to handle any short-term borrowing needs.

In the current economic climate, the Company’s available sources of additional liquidity have tightened. Although the Company remains very liquid, two secondary sources of liquidity have become more limited. Available federal funds lines of credit decreased during 2010 as a result of more stringent requirements from correspondent banks. The Company could have maintained these lines if it was willing to pledge collateral, such as investment securities. Since the Company rarely utilizes these lines, management chose to keep a reserve of unpledged securities and allow the lines to be reduced. In the first quarter of 2011, a federal funds line was reinstated which increased the Company’s total federal funds line of credit to $25 million from $15 million as of December 31, 2010. In July 2011, a second federal funds line was reinstated which increased the Company’s total federal funds line of credit to $33 million. Management anticipates that as the economy improves, the requirements will continue to be relaxed and the remaining federal funds lines that were reduced will be readily available once again.

Similarly in 2010, the FHLB instituted more stringent requirements for securing advances. The FHLB is applying a discount rate to loans used as collateral to simulate the falling value of the properties securing those loans. Even with these additional collateral requirements, the Company still has more than sufficient collateral to pledge against outstanding FHLB advances.

Other than the decrease in federal funds lines of credit from pre-recession levels and the more stringent requirements for the FHLB advances, management is not aware of any market or institutional trends, events or uncertainties that are expected to have a material effect on the liquidity, capital resources or operations of the Company. Nor is management aware of any current recommendations by regulatory authorities that would have a material affect on liquidity, capital resources or operations. The Company’s internal sources of such liquidity are deposits, loan and investment repayments and securities available-for-sale. The Company’s primary external source of liquidity is advances from the FHLB.

As a result of the Company’s management of liquid assets, the availability of borrowed funds and the ability to generate liquidity through liability funding, management believes that the Company maintains overall liquidity sufficient to satisfy its depositors’ requirements and to meet its customers’ future borrowing needs.

Contractual Obligations

In the normal course of business there are various outstanding contractual obligations of the Company that will require future cash outflows. In addition, there are commitments and contingent liabilities, such as commitments to extend credit that may or may not require cash outflows. For a detailed discussion of the Company’s commitments and contingencies, see Note 10 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in this quarterly report on Form 10-Q.

- 37 -

Index

As of September 30, 2011, other than those disclosed above, there have been no material changes outside the ordinary course of business in the Company’s contractual obligations disclosed in the Company’s 2010 annual report on Form 10-K.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

As of September 30, 2011, there were no material changes in the Company's off-balance sheet arrangements disclosed in the Company’s 2010 annual report on Form 10-K.

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.

An important element of earnings performance and the maintenance of sufficient liquidity is proper management of the interest sensitivity gap. The interest sensitivity gap is the difference between interest sensitive assets and interest sensitive liabilities in a specific time interval. This gap can be managed by repricing assets or liabilities, which are variable rate instruments, by replacing an asset or liability at maturity or by adjusting the interest rate during the life of the asset or liability. Matching the amounts of assets and liabilities maturing in the same time interval helps to offset interest rate risk and to minimize the impact of rising or falling interest rates on net interest income.

The Company determines the overall magnitude of interest sensitivity risk and then formulates policies governing asset generation and pricing, funding sources and pricing, and off-balance sheet commitments. These decisions are based on management’s expectations regarding future interest rate movements, the state of the national and regional economy, and other financial and business risk factors. The Company uses computer simulations to measure the effect of various interest rate scenarios on net interest income. This modeling reflects interest rate changes and the related impact on net interest income and net income over specified time horizons.

Based on scheduled maturities only, the Company was liability sensitive as of September 30, 2011. It should be noted, however, that non-maturing deposit liabilities, which consist of interest checking, money market, and savings accounts, are less interest sensitive than other market driven deposits. At September 30, 2011, non-maturing deposit liabilities totaled $391.2 million or 56.67% of total deposit liabilities.

In a rising rate environment, changes in these deposit rates have historically lagged behind the changes in earning asset rates, thus mitigating the impact from the liability sensitivity position. The asset/liability model allows the Company to reflect the fact that non-maturing deposits are less rate sensitive than other deposits by using a decay rate. The decay rate is a type of artificial maturity that simulates maturities for non-maturing deposits over the number of months that more closely reflects historic data. Using the decay rate, the model reveals that the Company is asset sensitive.

When the Company is asset sensitive, net interest income should improve if interest rates rise since assets will reprice faster than liabilities. Conversely, if interest rates fall, net interest income should decline, depending on the optionality (prepayment speeds) of the assets. When the Company is liability sensitive, net interest income should fall if rates rise and rise if rates fall.

The most likely scenario represents the rate environment as management forecasts it to occur. Management uses a “static” test to measure the effects of changes in interest rates, or “shocks”, on net interest income. This test assumes that management takes no steps to adjust the balance sheet to respond to the shock by repricing assets/liabilities, as discussed in the first paragraph of this section.

Under the rate environment forecasted by management, rate shocks in 50 to 100 basis point increments are applied to assess the impact on the Company’s earnings at September 30, 2011. The rate shock model reveals that a 50 basis point decrease in rates would cause an approximate 0.40% annual decrease in net interest income. The rate shock model reveals that a 50 basis point rise in rates would cause an approximate 1.00% annual increase in net interest income and that a 100 basis point rise in rates would cause an approximate 2.24% increase in net interest income.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures.

Disclosure Controls and Procedures. Management evaluated, with the participation of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act)) as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on that evaluation, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures are effective as of the end of the period covered by this report to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports that the Company files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms and that such information is accumulated and communicated to management, including the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

- 38 -

Index

In designing and evaluating its disclosure controls and procedures, management recognized that disclosure controls and procedures, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the disclosure controls and procedures are met. The design of any disclosure controls and procedures also is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions.

Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act). No changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting occurred during the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2011 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Because of its inherent limitations, a system of internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

PART II - OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings.

There are no pending legal proceedings to which the Company, or any of its subsidiaries, is a party or to which the property of the Company or any of its subsidiaries is subject that, in the opinion of management, may materially impact the financial condition of the Company.

Item 1A. Risk Factors.

There have been no material changes in the risk factors faced by the Company from those disclosed in the Company’s 2010 annual report on Form 10-K.

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.

Pursuant to the Company’s stock option plans, participants may exercise stock options by surrendering shares of the Company’s common stock that the participants already own. Shares surrendered by participants of these plans are repurchased at current market value pursuant to the terms of the applicable stock options. During the quarter ended September 30, 2011, the Company did not repurchase any shares related to the exercise of stock options.

During the quarter ended September 30, 2011, the Company did not repurchase any shares pursuant to the Company’s stock repurchase program.

Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities.

None.

Item 4. [Removed and Reserved].

Item 5. Other Information.

The Company has made no changes to the procedures by which security holders may recommend nominees to its board of directors.

- 39 -

Index

Item 6. Exhibits.

Exhibit No.

Description

3.1

Articles of Incorporation of Old Point Financial Corporation, as amended effective June 22, 2000 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to Form 10-K filed March 12, 2009)

3.2

Bylaws of Old Point Financial Corporation, as amended and restated March 8, 2011 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to Form 8-K filed March 10, 2011)

31.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

31.2

Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

32.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

101

The following materials from Old Point Financial Corporation’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2011, formatted in XBRL (Extensible Business Reporting Language), furnished herewith: (i) Consolidated Balance Sheets (unaudited), (ii) Consolidated Statements of Income (unaudited), (iii) Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity (unaudited), (iv) Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (unaudited), and (v) Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)

- 40 -

Index

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

	OLD POINT FINANCIAL CORPORATION


November 14, 2011	/s/ Robert F. Shuford, Sr.
	Robert F. Shuford, Sr.
	Chairman, President & Chief Executive Officer
	(Principal Executive Officer)

November 14, 2011	/s/Laurie D. Grabow
	Laurie D. Grabow
	Chief Financial Officer & Senior Vice President/Finance
	(Principal Financial & Accounting Officer)

- 41 -