SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
FORM 20-F
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended:
|
30 June 2004 | |
Commission file number:
|
1-10691 |
DIAGEO plc
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
England
(Jurisdiction of incorporation or organisation)
8
Henrietta Place, London W1G 0NB, England
(Address of principal executive offices)
Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of each class | Name of each exchange on which registered | |||
American Depositary Shares |
New York Stock Exchange | |||
Ordinary
shares of 28101/108 pence each |
New York Stock Exchange* | |||
9.42%
Cumulative guaranteed preferred securities, series A** |
New York Stock Exchange |
* | Not for trading, but only in connection with the registration of American Depositary Shares representing such ordinary shares, pursuant to the requirements of the Securities and Exchange Commission. | |||
** | Issued by Grand Metropolitan Delaware, LP, of which the Registrant is the sole general partner, and guaranteed as to certain payments by the Registrant. |
Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: |
None | |||
Securities for which there is a reporting obligation pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Act: |
None |
Indicate the number of outstanding shares of each of the issuers classes of capital or common stock as of the close of the period covered by the Annual Report: 3,057,472,410 ordinary shares of 28101/108 pence each.
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Indicate by check mark which financial statement item the Registrant has elected to follow.
This document comprises the annual report on Form 20-F and the annual report to shareholders for the year ended 30 June 2004 of Diageo plc (the 2004 Form 20-F). Reference is made to the cross reference to Form 20-F table on page 165 hereof (the Form 20-F Cross reference table). Only (i) the information in this document that is referenced in the Form 20-F Cross reference table, (ii) the cautionary statement concerning forward-looking statements on page 19 and (iii) the Exhibits, shall be deemed to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission for any purpose, including incorporation by reference into the Registration Statements on Form F-3 (File Nos. 333-10410 and 333-14100) and Registration Statements on Form S-8 (File Nos. 333-08090, 333-08092 and 333-08092 amendment, 333-08094, 333-08096 and 333-08096 amendment, 333-08098, 333-08100, 333-08102, 333-08104, 333-08106, 333-09770, 333-11460 and 333-11462), and any other documents, including documents filed by Diageo plc pursuant to the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, which purport to incorporate by reference the 2004 Form 20-F. Any information herein which is not referenced in the Form 20-F Cross reference table, or the Exhibits themselves, shall not be deemed to be so incorporated by reference.
Contents
7 | ||||||||
7 | ||||||||
7 | ||||||||
15 | ||||||||
16 | ||||||||
16 | ||||||||
16 | ||||||||
19 | ||||||||
20 | ||||||||
21 | ||||||||
35 | ||||||||
48 | ||||||||
48 | ||||||||
51 | ||||||||
52 | ||||||||
52 | ||||||||
53 | ||||||||
54 | ||||||||
55 | ||||||||
57 | ||||||||
57 | ||||||||
60 | ||||||||
63 | ||||||||
74 | ||||||||
80 | ||||||||
82 | ||||||||
83 | ||||||||
85 | ||||||||
86 | ||||||||
86 | ||||||||
87 | ||||||||
87 | ||||||||
88 | ||||||||
90 | ||||||||
148 | ||||||||
149 | ||||||||
151 | ||||||||
152 | ||||||||
153 | ||||||||
153 | ||||||||
154 | ||||||||
155 | ||||||||
157 | ||||||||
159 | ||||||||
159 | ||||||||
160 | ||||||||
163 | ||||||||
164 | ||||||||
165 | ||||||||
166 | ||||||||
Exhibit 12.1 | ||||||||
Exhibit 12.2 | ||||||||
Exhibit 13.1 | ||||||||
Exhibit 13.2 | ||||||||
Exhibit 14.1 |
This is the Annual Report on Form 20-F of Diageo plc for the year ended 30 June 2004.
This document contains forward-looking statements that involve risk and uncertainty. There are a number of factors that could cause actual results and developments to differ materially from those expressed or implied by these forward-looking statements, including factors beyond Diageos control. For more details, please refer to the cautionary statement concerning forward-looking statements on page 19.
The market data contained in this document is taken from independent industry sources in the markets in which Diageo operates.
This report includes names of Diageos products, which constitute trademarks or trade names which Diageo owns or which others own and licence to Diageo for use. In this report, the term company refers to Diageo plc and the terms group and Diageo refer to the company and its consolidated subsidiaries, except as the context otherwise requires. A glossary of terms used in this report is included at the end of the document.
Diageos consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United Kingdom (UK GAAP), which is the groups primary reporting framework. Unless otherwise indicated all other financial information contained in this document has been prepared in accordance with UK GAAP. The principal differences between UK and US GAAP are discussed in the operating and financial review and set out in the consolidated financial statements.
2 Diageo Annual Report 2004
Five year information
The following table presents selected consolidated financial data for Diageo for the five years ended 30 June 2004 and as at the respective year ends. The UK GAAP data for the five years ended 30 June 2004 and the US GAAP data for the four years ended 30 June 2004 have been derived from Diageos audited consolidated financial statements. The US GAAP data for the year ended 30 June 2000 has been extracted from Diageos US GAAP audited consolidated financial statements. The UK GAAP data for the two years ended 30 June 2003 have been restated following the adoption of FRS 17, UITF 38 and application note (G) to FRS 5 Reporting the substance of transactions. In addition, the UK GAAP data for the two years ended 30 June 2001 have been restated following the adoption of UITF 38 and application note (G) to FRS 5 Reporting the substance of transactions.
Year ended 30 June | ||||||||||||||||||||
2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2000 | |||||||||||||||||
2004 | (restated) | (restated) | (restated) | (restated) | ||||||||||||||||
Profit and loss account data(1) | £ million | £ million | £ million | £ million | £ million | |||||||||||||||
UK GAAP |
||||||||||||||||||||
Turnover: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Premium drinks |
8,891 | 8,802 | 8,539 | 7,498 | 7,041 | |||||||||||||||
Discontinued operations(2) |
| 479 | 2,361 | 4,609 | 4,230 | |||||||||||||||
Total turnover |
8,891 | 9,281 | 10,900 | 12,107 | 11,271 | |||||||||||||||
Operating profit before exceptional items:(3)(4) |
||||||||||||||||||||
Premium drinks |
1,911 | 1,902 | 1,670 | 1,432 | 1,280 | |||||||||||||||
Discontinued operations(2) |
| 53 | 330 | 673 | 677 | |||||||||||||||
Total operating profit before exceptional items |
1,911 | 1,955 | 2,000 | 2,105 | 1,957 | |||||||||||||||
Exceptional items charged to operating profit(4) |
(40 | ) | (168 | ) | (470 | ) | (228 | ) | (181 | ) | ||||||||||
Operating profit |
1,871 | 1,787 | 1,530 | 1,877 | 1,776 | |||||||||||||||
Other exceptional items(4) |
(58 | ) | (1,318 | ) | 750 | (4 | ) | (166 | ) | |||||||||||
Profit for the year |
1,392 | 50 | 1,589 | 1,210 | 985 | |||||||||||||||
US GAAP(2) |
||||||||||||||||||||
Sales |
8,777 | 9,153 | 10,760 | 11,868 | 11,015 | |||||||||||||||
Gains/(losses) on disposals of businesses |
97 | 16 | 1,843 | (8 | ) | 75 | ||||||||||||||
Net income(5) |
1,700 | 434 | 2,554 | 758 | 798 | |||||||||||||||
Per
share data |
pence | pence | pence | pence | pence | |||||||||||||||
UK GAAP |
||||||||||||||||||||
Dividend per share(6) |
27.6 | 25.6 | 23.8 | 22.3 | 21.0 | |||||||||||||||
Earnings per share: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Basic |
45.9 | 1.6 | 47.9 | 35.8 | 29.0 | |||||||||||||||
Diluted |
45.9 | 1.6 | 47.9 | 35.8 | 29.0 | |||||||||||||||
Earnings before exceptional items per ordinary share: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Basic |
48.2 | 47.7 | 43.1 | 41.7 | 37.2 | |||||||||||||||
Diluted |
48.2 | 47.7 | 43.1 | 41.7 | 37.1 | |||||||||||||||
US GAAP |
||||||||||||||||||||
Basic earnings per ordinary share |
56.1 | 13.9 | 77.0 | 22.4 | 23.5 | |||||||||||||||
Diluted earnings per ordinary share |
56.1 | 13.9 | 77.0 | 22.4 | 23.5 | |||||||||||||||
Basic earnings per ADS |
224.4 | 55.6 | 308.0 | 89.6 | 94.0 | |||||||||||||||
Diluted earnings per ADS |
224.4 | 55.6 | 308.0 | 89.6 | 94.0 | |||||||||||||||
3 Diageo Annual Report 2004
|
Five year information |
As at 30 June | ||||||||||||||||||||
2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2000 | |||||||||||||||||
2004 | (restated) | (restated) | (restated) | (restated) | ||||||||||||||||
Balance sheet data(1) | £ million | £ million | £ million | £ million | £ million | |||||||||||||||
UK GAAP |
||||||||||||||||||||
Net current assets/(liabilities)(7) |
44 | (1,023 | ) | (686 | ) | (512 | ) | (119 | ) | |||||||||||
Total assets |
14,090 | 15,188 | 17,545 | 16,737 | 15,943 | |||||||||||||||
Net borrowings(7) |
4,144 | 4,870 | 5,496 | 5,479 | 5,545 | |||||||||||||||
Shareholders funds |
3,692 | 2,801 | 5,029 | 5,328 | 4,518 | |||||||||||||||
Called up share capital(8) |
885 | 897 | 930 | 987 | 990 | |||||||||||||||
US GAAP |
||||||||||||||||||||
Total assets(9) |
23,071 | 24,071 | 26,153 | 25,955 | 24,868 | |||||||||||||||
Long term obligations(7) |
3,381 | 3,149 | 3,892 | 4,029 | 3,753 | |||||||||||||||
Shareholdersequity |
10,287 | 9,344 | 11,316 | 11,880 | 11,802 | |||||||||||||||
million | million | million | million | million | ||||||||||||||||
Number of ordinary shares(8) |
3,057 | 3,100 | 3,215 | 3,411 | 3,422 | |||||||||||||||
Notes to the selected consolidated financial data
1 New UK GAAP accounting policiesThe group has adopted the reporting requirements of FRS 17 Retirement benefits in its primary financial statements from 1 July 2003. The group also complies from 1 July 2003 with the following requirements issued by the UKs Accounting Standards Board:UITF abstract 38 Accounting for ESOP trusts and the amendment to FRS 5 Reporting the substance of transactions.
FRS 17 Retirement benefits This standard replaces the use of the actuarial values for assessing pension costs in favour of a market-based approach. In order to cope with the volatility inherent in this measurement basis, the standard requires that the profit and loss account shows the relatively stable ongoing service cost, the expected return on assets and the interest on the liabilities. Differences between expected and actual returns on assets, and the impact on the liabilities of changes in the assumptions, are reflected in the statement of total recognised gains and losses.
UITF abstract 38 Accounting for ESOP trusts This abstract changes the presentation of an entitys own shares held in an employee share trust from requiring them to be recognised as assets to requiring them to be deducted in arriving at shareholders funds. It also has consequential changes to UITF 17 requiring that the expense to the profit and loss account should be the difference between the fair value of the shares at the date of award and the amount that an employee is required to pay for the shares (i.e. the intrinsic valueof the award).
4 Diageo Annual Report 2004
|
Five year information |
FRS 5 Reporting the substance of transactions The amendment to the standard added a new application note (G) on revenue recognition. This requires that revenue should be stated at fair value of the right to consideration. Diageo incurs certain promotional expenditure, where permitted under local law (for example, slotting fees, whereby fees are paid to retailers for prominence of display, listing or agreement not to delist Diageos products) that are not wholly independent of the invoiced product price. Such expenditure is now deducted from turnover. The change, which has no impact on operating profit, reduced turnover and operating costs by £159 million in the year ended 30 June 2003 (2002 £382 million including £217 million in respect of discontinued operations; 2001 £714 million including £632 million in respect of discontinued operations; 2000 £599 million including £523 million in respect of discontinued operations).
2 Discontinued operations Included within UK GAAP discontinued operations are the quick service restaurants business (Burger King sold 13 December 2002) and the packaged food businesses (Pillsbury sold 31 October 2001). The quick service restaurants and packaged food businesses have been included in continuing operations under US GAAP. There are no discontinued operations under US GAAP.
3 Brands and goodwill An analysis of goodwill amortisation charged to UK GAAP operating profit is as follows: | ||||||||||||||||||||
Year ended 30 June | ||||||||||||||||||||
2004 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2000 | ||||||||||||||||
£ million | £ million | £ million | £ million | £ million | ||||||||||||||||
Premium drinks |
(2 | ) | (2 | ) | (2 | ) | (2 | ) | (1 | ) | ||||||||||
Discontinued operations |
| (2 | ) | (10 | ) | (24 | ) | (16 | ) | |||||||||||
(2 | ) | (4 | ) | (12 | ) | (26 | ) | (17 | ) | |||||||||||
4 Exceptional items An analysis of exceptional items before taxation under UK GAAP is as follows: | ||||||||||||||||||||
Year ended 30 June | ||||||||||||||||||||
2003 | 2002 | |||||||||||||||||||
2004 | (restated) | (restated) | 2001 | 2000 | ||||||||||||||||
£ million | £ million | £ million | £ million | £ million | ||||||||||||||||
Exceptional items (charged)/credited to operating profit |
||||||||||||||||||||
Premium drinks: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Seagram integration costs |
(40 | ) | (177 | ) | (164 | ) | | | ||||||||||||
Guinness/UDV integration costs |
| (48 | ) | (48 | ) | (74 | ) | | ||||||||||||
Other integration and restructuring costs |
| | (17 | ) | (79 | ) | (83 | ) | ||||||||||||
Bass distribution rights |
| 57 | | | | |||||||||||||||
José Cuervo settlement |
| | (220 | ) | | | ||||||||||||||
(40 | ) | (168 | ) | (449 | ) | (153 | ) | (83 | ) | |||||||||||
Discontinued operations |
| | (21 | ) | (75 | ) | (98 | ) | ||||||||||||
(40 | ) | (168 | ) | (470 | ) | (228 | ) | (181 | ) | |||||||||||
Other exceptional items |
||||||||||||||||||||
Share of associates exceptional items |
(13 | ) | (21 | ) | (41 | ) | | (3 | ) | |||||||||||
(Losses)/gains on disposal of fixed assets |
(35 | ) | (43 | ) | (22 | ) | 19 | 5 | ||||||||||||
(Losses)/gains on disposal and termination of businesses |
(10 | ) | (1,254 | ) | 813 | (23 | ) | (168 | ) | |||||||||||
(58 | ) | (1,318 | ) | 750 | (4 | ) | (166 | ) | ||||||||||||
5 Diageo Annual Report 2004
|
Five year information |
5 Unusual items An analysis of unusual (charges)/income, excluding gains/(losses) on disposal of businesses and (losses)/gains on disposal of fixed assets, included in, and affecting the comparability of, operating income and net income under US GAAP, is as follows: | ||||||||||||||||||||
Year ended 30 June | ||||||||||||||||||||
2004 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2000 | ||||||||||||||||
£ million | £ million | £ million | £ million | £ million | ||||||||||||||||
Seagram integration costs |
(40 | ) | (154 | ) | (82 | ) | | | ||||||||||||
Other integration and restructuring costs |
| (48 | ) | (48 | ) | (169 | ) | (115 | ) | |||||||||||
Bass distribution rights |
| 57 | | | | |||||||||||||||
José Cuervo settlement |
| | (194 | ) | | | ||||||||||||||
Derivative instruments in respect of General Mills shares |
28 | (4 | ) | 166 | | | ||||||||||||||
Burger King impairment charges and transaction costs |
(38 | ) | (750 | ) | (135 | ) | | | ||||||||||||
(50 | ) | (899 | ) | (293 | ) | (169 | ) | (115 | ) | |||||||||||
6 Dividends The Diageo plc board expects that Diageo will pay an interim dividend in April and a final dividend in October of each year. Approximately 40% of the total dividend in respect of any financial year is expected to be paid as an interim dividend and approximately 60% as a final dividend. The payment of any future dividends, subject to shareholder approval, will depend upon Diageos earnings, financial condition and such other factors as the Diageo plc board deems relevant.
Year ended 30 June | ||||||||||||||||||||||
2004 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2000 | ||||||||||||||||||
pence | pence | pence | pence | pence | ||||||||||||||||||
Per ordinary share |
Interim | 10.6 | 9.9 | 9.3 | 8.9 | 8.4 | ||||||||||||||||
Final | 17.0 | 15.7 | 14.5 | 13.4 | 12.6 | |||||||||||||||||
Total | 27.6 | 25.6 | 23.8 | 22.3 | 21.0 | |||||||||||||||||
$ | $ | $ | $ | $ | ||||||||||||||||||
Per ADS |
Interim | 0.77 | 0.61 | 0.54 | 0.51 | 0.53 | ||||||||||||||||
Final | 1.24 | 1.06 | 0.90 | 0.78 | 0.72 | |||||||||||||||||
Total | 2.01 | 1.67 | 1.44 | 1.29 | 1.25 | |||||||||||||||||
7 Definitions Net current assets/(liabilities) are defined as current assets less current liabilities. Net borrowings are defined as total borrowings (i.e. short term borrowings and long term borrowings plus finance lease obligations) less cash at bank and liquid resources, interest rate and foreign currency swaps and current asset investments. Long term obligations are defined as long term borrowings and capital lease obligations which fall due after more than one year.
8 Share capital The called up share capital represents the par value of ordinary shares of 28101/108 pence in issue. The number of ordinary shares represents the number of shares in issue and fully paid up at the balance sheet date. Of these, 43 million (2003 45 million; 2002 39 million; 2001 35 million; 2000 30 million) are held in employee share trusts and are deducted in arriving at shareholders funds. During the year ended 30 June 2004 the group repurchased for cancellation 43 million ordinary shares at a cost of £306 million (2003 116 million ordinary shares, cost of £852 million; 2002 198 million ordinary shares, cost of £1,658 million; 2001 18 million ordinary shares, cost of £108 million; 2000 10 million ordinary shares, cost of £54 million).
6 Diageo Annual Report 2004
|
Five year information |
9 Burger King Under UK GAAP, the sale of Burger King was accounted for as a disposal and the results prior to disposal are presented within discontinued operations. Under US GAAP, the transaction is not accounted for as a disposal due to the size of the investment made by the buyer and Diageos continuing involvement through the guarantee provided by Diageo in respect of the acquisition finance. Under US GAAP, the results of Burger King prior to 13 December 2002 (the completion date) are presented as continuing operations in the income statement and, on the completion of the transaction, a charge for impairment has been recognised rather than a loss on disposal. Following the completion date, Diageo does not recognise profits of Burger King in its income statement but will, generally, reflect losses as an impairment charge against the assets retained on the balance sheet. In the US GAAP balance sheet, the total assets and total liabilities of Burger King at 30 June 2004 (including consideration deferred under US GAAP) classified within other long term assetsand other long term liabilities were each £1.2 billion (2003 £1.3 billion). The transaction will be accounted for as a disposal when the uncertainties related to the guarantee provided in respect of the acquisition finance have been substantially resolved and/or the buyers cumulative investment meets or exceeds minimum levels.
10 Exchange rates A substantial portion of the groups assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses is denominated in currencies other than pound sterling, principally US dollars. For a discussion of the impact of exchange rate fluctuations on the companys financial condition and results of operations, see Operating and financial review Risk management.
The following table shows, for the periods indicated, information regarding the US dollar/pound sterling exchange rate, based on the noon buying rate, expressed in US dollars per £1. | ||||||||||||||||||||
Year ended 30 June | ||||||||||||||||||||
2004 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2000 | ||||||||||||||||
$ | $ | $ | $ | $ | ||||||||||||||||
Period end |
1.81 | 1.65 | 1.52 | 1.41 | 1.51 | |||||||||||||||
Average rate (a) |
1.75 | 1.59 | 1.45 | 1.45 | 1.59 | |||||||||||||||
(a) The average of the noon buying rates on the last business day of each month during the year. These rates have been provided for your convenience. They are not necessarily the rates that have been used in this document for currency translations or in the preparation of the consolidated financial statements. See note 2 (i)(c) to the consolidated financial statements for the actual rates used.
The following table shows period end and average US dollar/pound sterling noon buying exchange rates by month, for the period to 31 August 2004, expressed in US dollars per £1. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
2004 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
August | July | June | May | April | March | |||||||||||||||||||
$ | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | |||||||||||||||||||
Period end |
1.80 | 1.82 | 1.81 | 1.83 | 1.77 | 1.84 | ||||||||||||||||||
Average rate |
1.82 | 1.84 | 1.83 | 1.79 | 1.80 | 1.83 | ||||||||||||||||||
7 Diageo Annual Report 2004
Business description
Overview
Diageo is one of the worlds leading beverage alcohol businesses with a portfolio of international brands. Diageo was the eleventh largest publicly quoted company in the United Kingdom in terms of market capitalisation on 10 September 2004, with a market capitalisation of approximately £21.5 billion.
Strategy
In December 2002 Diageo completed its strategic transition to a focused premium drinks company. Since announcing the planned realignment of its business focus in 2000, Diageo has exited the food business, selling Pillsbury to General Mills in October 2001 and divesting of Burger King in December 2002. Over the same period, it enhanced its premium drinks business with the purchase of parts of the Seagram spirits and wine businesses in December 2001. The completion of these transactions and the integration of the Seagram brands has strongly enhanced Diageos position in the premium drinks industry, and furthered its strategic objectives of building focus in its core business.
Market participation Diageo targets its geographical priorities in terms of major, key and venture markets. The major markets are amongst the biggest premium drinks markets in the world. They account for the majority of Diageos operating profit, and serve as the primary drivers for Diageos business. Key markets are those where Diageo has a high relative market share and they further enhance growth, while the innovative and entrepreneurial venture markets support the long term reach of Diageos business.
Product offering At the brand level, Diageo manages its brands in terms of global priority brands, local priority brands, and category brands. Acting as the main focus for the business, global priority brands are Diageos primary growth drivers across markets. At the individual market level, local priority brands are those which drive growth on a significant, yet more limited geographic scale. Category brands comprise the smaller scale brands in Diageos portfolio.
Business effectiveness Diageos size provides an opportunity for significant scale efficiencies in operations and marketing effectiveness. Strategically, Diageo is focused on using this scale to maximise cost efficiencies, and to enable the dissemination of consumer insight across its portfolio.
Premium drinks
Diageo is engaged in a broad range of activities within the beverage alcohol industry. Its operations include producing, distilling, brewing, bottling, packaging, distributing, developing and marketing a range of brands in approximately 180 territories around the world. Diageo markets a wide range of recognised beverage alcohol brands including a number of the worlds leading spirits and beer brands. The brand ranking information below, when comparing volume information with competitors, has been sourced from data published during 2004 by Impact. Market data information is taken from industry sources in the markets in which Diageo operates. Sixteen of the groups owned brands were among the top 100 premium distilled spirits brands worldwide, as ranked by Impact, in calendar year 2003.
8 Diageo Annual Report 2004
|
Business description |
In the year ended 30 June 2004, Diageo sold 98.2 million equivalent units of spirits (including ready to drink), 2.5 million equivalent units of wine and 21.4 million equivalent units of beer. In the year ended 30 June 2004, ready to drink products contributed 7.2 million equivalent units of total premium drinks volume of which Smirnoff Ice accounted for 5.2 million equivalent units. Volume has been measured on an equivalent units basis to nine litre cases of spirits. An equivalent unit represents one nine litre case of spirits, which is approximately 272 servings. A serving comprises 33ml of spirits, 165ml of wine, or 330ml of ready to drink or beer. Therefore, to convert volume of products other than spirits to equivalent units, the following guide has been used: beer in hectolitres divide by 0.9, wine in nine litre cases divide by five and ready to drink in nine litre cases divide by 10.
Global priority brands
Smirnoff vodka and Smirnoff ready to drink products
Johnnie Walker Scotch whiskies
Guinness stout
Baileys Original Irish Cream liqueur
JεB Scotch whisky
Captain Morgan rum
José Cuervo tequila (agency brand in North America and many European and international markets)
Tanqueray gin
Other spirits brands include:
|
Wine brands include: | Other beer brands include: | ||
Crown Royal Canadian whisky
|
Beaulieu Vineyard wine | Harp Irish lager | ||
Buchanans De Luxe whisky
|
Sterling Vineyards wine | Smithwicks ale | ||
Gordons gin and vodka
|
Blossom Hill wine | Malta non-alcoholic malt | ||
Windsor Premier whisky
|
Piat DOr wine | Red Stripe lager | ||
Bells Extra Special whisky |
||||
Dimple/Pinch whisky |
||||
Seagrams 7 Crown American whiskey |
||||
Old Parr whisky |
||||
Seagrams VO Canadian whisky |
||||
Bundaberg rum |
Diageos agency agreements vary depending on the particular brand, but tend to be for a fixed number of years. There can be no assurances that Diageo will be able to prevent termination of distribution rights or rights to manufacture under licence, or renegotiate distribution rights or rights to manufacture under licence on favourable terms when they expire. See Acquisitions and disposals/termination of businesses and distribution rights for information in respect of José Cuervo and Bass Ale in the United States and Brown-Forman brands in the United Kingdom. Diageos principal agency brand is José Cuervo in North America and many European and international markets.
Global priority brands Diageo has eight global priority brands that it markets worldwide. Diageo considers these brands to have the greatest current and future earnings potential. Each global priority brand is marketed consistently around the world, and therefore can achieve scale benefits. The group manages and invests in these brands on a global basis. In the year ended 30 June 2004, global priority brands contributed 59% of premium drinks total volume and achieved turnover of £5,148 million.
9 Diageo Annual Report 2004
|
Business description |
Other brands Diageo manages its other brands by category, analysing them between local priority brands and category brands.
Production Diageo owns production facilities including maltings, distilleries, breweries, packaging plants, maturation warehouses, cooperages, vineyards and distribution warehouses. Production also occurs at plants owned and operated by third parties and joint ventures at a number of locations internationally.
Approximately 75% of total production (including third party production) is undertaken in five Diageo production areas, namely the United Kingdom, Baileys, Guinness, Santa Vittoria and North America centres. The majority of these production centres have several production facilities. The locations, principal activities, products, production capacity and production volume in 2004 of these principal production centres are set out in the following table: | ||||||||||||
Production | ||||||||||||
Production | volume in | |||||||||||
capacity* | 2004* | |||||||||||
Production centre | Location | Principal products | million | million | ||||||||
United Kingdom
|
United Kingdom | Scotch whisky, gin, vodka, rum, ready to drink |
58 | 38 | ||||||||
Baileys
|
Ireland | Irish cream liqueur, vodka | 12 | 8 | ||||||||
Guinness
|
Ireland, United Kingdom | Beers, ready to drink | 13 | 10 | ||||||||
Santa Vittoria
|
Italy | Vodka, wine, rum, ready to drink |
8 | 5 | ||||||||
North America
|
United States, Canada | Vodka, gin, tequila, rum, Canadian whisky, American whiskey, flavored malt beverages, wine, ready to drink |
75 | 34 | ||||||||
Diageo is currently completing the restructuring of its production operations in Canada to reduce excess capacity following the acquisition of the Seagram spirits and wine businesses, and the associated enforced sale of the Malibu brand. The facility in LaSalle, Quebec (capacity of 10 million equivalent units) is planned to close in the first half of year ending 30 June 2005.
10 Diageo Annual Report 2004
|
Business description |
Diageos principal brewing facilities are at the St Jamess Gate brewery in Dublin and in Kilkenny, Waterford and Dundalk in the Republic of Ireland, Park Royal in London, England and in Nigeria, Kenya, Malaysia, Jamaica and Cameroon. Ireland is the main export centre for the Guinness brand. In other countries, Guinness is brewed under licence arrangements. Guinness Draught in cans and bottles, which uses an in-container system to replicate the taste of Guinness Draught, is packaged at Runcorn and Belfast in the United Kingdom.
Property, plant and equipment Diageo owns or leases land and buildings throughout the world. The principal production facilities are described above. As at 30 June 2004, Diageos land and buildings were included in the groups consolidated balance sheet under UK GAAP at a net book value of £772 million. Diageos largest individual facility, in terms of net book value of property, is St Jamess Gate brewery in Dublin. Approximately 98% by value of the groups properties were owned and approximately 2% are held under leases running for 50 years or longer. Diageos properties primarily are a variety of manufacturing, distilling, brewing, bottling and administration facilities spread across the groups worldwide operations, as well as vineyards in the United States. Approximately 58% and 19% of the book value of Diageos land and buildings comprises properties located in the United Kingdom and the United States, respectively.
Raw materials The group has a number of contracts for the forward purchasing of its raw material requirements in order to minimise the effect of raw material price fluctuations. Long term contracts are in place for the purchase of significant raw materials including glass, other packaging, tequila, neutral spirits, cream, rum and grapes. In addition, forward contracts are in place for the purchase of other raw materials including sugar and cereals to minimise the effects of short term price fluctuations.
Marketing and distribution Diageo is committed to investing in its brands. £1,039 million was spent worldwide on marketing on premium drinks brands in the year ended 30 June 2004. Marketing was focused on the eight global priority brands, which accounted for 68% of total marketing expenditure in the year ended 30 June 2004.
An analysis of turnover and operating profit before exceptional items by market for the year ended 30 June 2004 is as follows: | ||||||||
Operating profit before | ||||||||
Turnover | exceptional items | |||||||
£ million | £ million | |||||||
Major markets: |
||||||||
North America |
2,659 | 694 | ||||||
Great Britain |
1,411 | 207 | ||||||
Ireland |
961 | 126 | ||||||
Spain |
454 | 113 | ||||||
5,485 | 1,140 | |||||||
Key markets |
2,275 | 511 | ||||||
Venture markets |
1,131 | 260 | ||||||
Total premium drinks |
8,891 | 1,911 | ||||||
11 Diageo Annual Report 2004
|
Business description |
North America North America is the largest market for Diageo, and the largest premium drinks market in the world. Throughout 2004, in North America, Diageo marketed its products through 14 business teams or clusters (previously five separate spirits in market companies (IMCs)), Diageo Chateau & Estates Wines (DC&E), Diageo-Guinness USA (DG-USA), a Canadian IMC and a 50% distribution joint venture with Moët Hennessy Schieffelin & Somerset (S&S). From 1 July 2004 Diageo and Moët Hennessy have agreed to restructure their joint venture arrangements in the United States. Diageo has moved the management of its brands into its existing North American operation, significantly simplifying the management of its full range of products and enhancing its interface with its distributors. These brands include Johnnie Walker, Tanqueray, Tanqueray No. TEN, Cîroc, JεB, Buchanans, Pinch, Cardhu and The Six Classic Malts of Scotland Talisker, Lagavulin, Oban, Glenkinchie, Dalwhinnie and Cragganmore. S&S will become a company dedicated to the brands of Moët Hennessy, Marnier Lapostolle and Ruffino.
Great Britain Diageo markets its products in Great Britain via three business units; Diageo GB (spirits, beer and ready to drink), Percy Fox & Co (wines) and Justerini & Brooks Retail (private client wines). Products are distributed both via independent wholesalers and directly to the major grocers, convenience and specialist stores. In the on trade (for example, licensed major bars and restaurants), products are sold through the major brewers, multiple retail groups and smaller regional independent brewers and wholesalers.
12 Diageo Annual Report 2004
|
Business description |
Ireland Ireland, comprising the Republic of Ireland and Northern Ireland, is an important market for Diageo. The Guinness, Smirnoff and Baileys brands are market leaders in their respective categories of long alcoholic drinks, vodka and cream liqueurs. Budweiser and Carlsberg lagers, also major products in the Diageo portfolio, are brewed and sold under licence in addition to the other local priority brands of Smithwicks ale and Harp lager. In both countries, Diageo sells and distributes directly to both the on trade and the off trade (for example, retail shops and wholesalers) through a telesales operation, extensive outlet rep callage and third party logistics providers. Diageo brews and packages a range of beers in Ireland for export to the United Kingdom, the United States and other international markets. Diageo also produces Baileys in Ireland for export to all global markets.
Spain Spain is an important Scotch whisky market for Diageo, and Diageo owns two of the top five Scotch whisky brands by volume in Spain, with JεB at number one and Johnnie Walker Red Label at number five. This is Diageos most important JεB market, contributing 47% of Diageos JεB total volume. With Cacique and Pampero, Diageo Spain leads the dark rum segment, which is the fastest growing segment in Spain. Distribution in Spain is primarily through Diageos own distribution company.
Key markets There are 15 key markets. These are markets which make a significant contribution in their own right, but still rely on Diageos global functions to support their businesses. Key markets are: Africa (excluding North Africa), Australia/New Zealand, Brazil/Paraguay, Colombia, France, Germany, Greece/Turkey, Japan, South Korea, Mexico, Taiwan, Thailand, Uruguay, Venezuela and Global Duty Free.
Venture markets Venture markets comprise all other markets, including the Middle East, North Africa, Jamaica, Central America, the Caribbean and the Southern Cone, Canaries, Portugal, Belgium, Netherlands, the Nordics, Italy, Switzerland, Poland, Russia, Singapore, Indonesia, Philippines and Malaysia. In these markets there is a focus on fewer brands and lean but flexible organisation structures are deployed whilst global best practices in areas such as consumer marketing, customer management and people development are applied.
Seasonal impacts Christmas provides the peak period for premium drinks sales. Historically, approximately 30% of premium drinks sales volume occurs in the last three months of each calendar year.
13 Diageo Annual Report 2004
|
Business description |
Employees Releasing the potential of every employee is one of Diageos core strategic imperatives. The focus is on accessing the very best possible talent, from the widest possible talent pools, to provide the ideas, innovation and performance outcomes necessary to achieve the companys ambitions for itself and its stakeholders. This is achieved by placing employees in working environments which truly inspire their performance and development. Employee policies are designed to support these goals and to do so in a manner that is fair and equitable to all. These policies take account of external legislation and internal codes of conduct, as well as Diageos values as an organisation.
Diageos average number of employees during each of the three years ended 30 June 2004 was as follows: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2004 | 2003 | 2002 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Full time | Part time | Total | Full time | Part time | Total | Full time | Part time | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Premium drinks |
22,548 | 1,172 | 23,720 | 23,427 | 1,134 | 24,561 | 22,841 | 1,078 | 23,919 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Discontinued operations |
| | | 8,965 | 5,429 | 14,394 | 25,734 | 12,471 | 38,205 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
22,548 | 1,172 | 23,720 | 32,392 | 6,563 | 38,955 | 48,575 | 13,549 | 62,124 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Competition Diageo competes on the basis of consumer loyalty, quality and price.
Research and development The overall nature of the groups business does not demand substantial expenditure on research and development. However, the group has ongoing programmes for developing new drinks products. In the year ended 30 June 2004, the groups research and development expenditure amounted to £11 million (2003 £15 million; 2002 £28 million). Research and development expenditure is written off in the year in which it is incurred.
Trademarks Diageo produces and distributes branded goods and is therefore substantially dependent on the maintenance and protection of its trademarks. All brand names mentioned in this document are trademarks. The group also holds numerous licences and trade secrets, as well as having substantial trade knowledge related to its products. The group believes that its significant trademarks are registered and/or otherwise protected (insofar as legal protections are available) in all material respects in its most important markets.
Regulations and taxes In the United States, the beverage alcohol industry is subject to strict federal and state government regulations covering virtually every aspect of its operations, including production, marketing, sales, distribution, pricing, labelling, packaging and advertising.
14 Diageo Annual Report 2004
|
Business description |
Spirits, wine and beer are subject to national import and excise duties in many markets around the world. Most countries impose excise duties on beverage alcohol products, although the form of such taxation varies significantly from a simple application to units of alcohol by volume, to advanced systems based on imported or wholesale value of the product. Several countries impose additional import duty on distilled spirits, often discriminating between categories (such as Scotch whisky or bourbon) in the rate of such tariffs. Within the European Union, such products are subject to different rates of excise duty in each country, but within an overall European Union framework, there are minimum rates of excise duties that can be applied.
Business services Diageo has committed to re-engineer its key business activities with customers, consumers, suppliers and the processes that summarise and report financial performance. In that regard, global processes are being designed, built and implemented across a number of markets and global supply.
Associates Diageos principal associate in the premium drinks segment is Moët Hennessy. It also owns shares in a number of other associates. In the year ended 30 June 2004, premium drinks share of profits of associates before interest, exceptional items and tax was £193 million, of which Moët Hennessy accounted for £176 million.
Moët Hennessy Diageo owns 34% of Moët Hennessy, the spirits and wine subsidiary of LVMH Moët Hennessy-Louis Vuitton SA (LVMH). LVMH is based in France and is listed on the Paris Stock Exchange. Moët Hennessy is also based in France and is a producer and exporter of a number of brands in its main business areas of champagne and cognac. Its principal products include champagne brands, Moët & Chandon (including Dom Pérignon), Veuve Clicquot and Mercier, all of which are included in the top 10 champagne brands worldwide by volume, and Hennessy which is the top cognac brand worldwide by volume.
Acquisitions and disposals/termination of businesses and distribution rights Diageo has made a number of strategic acquisitions and disposals of brands, distribution rights and equity interests in premium drinks businesses.
Seagram On 21 December 2001, Diageo and Pernod Ricard completed the acquisition of the Seagram spirits and wine businesses from Vivendi for $8.15 billion (£5.62 billion) in cash, subject to certain debt, working capital and other adjustments. Diageos share of the purchase price after adjustments was £3.7 billion.
15 Diageo Annual Report 2004
|
Business description |
Diageo has accounted for the transaction as an acquisition, reflecting profits and losses arising from those businesses and related assets acquired for its own use, consolidated from the acquisition date. For those businesses and assets acquired and/or held jointly pending their disposal (disposal assets), Diageo and Pernod Ricard shared the net proceeds of disposal in the proportion 60.9% and 39.1% respectively. The disposals of these businesses were substantially completed within 12 months of the original acquisition.
Other In September 2002, Diageo announced that it would relinquish its 1998 US Importation and Distribution Agreement rights for Bass Ale to Bass parent company, Interbrew, effective 30 June 2003 for a consideration of $105 million (£69 million). Under the 1998 agreement, Diageo had the right to continue selling and marketing the brand in the United States until July 2016. The consideration included $10 million as a contribution to inventory management costs during the year ended 30 June 2003, and this element of the consideration has been accounted for as operating income. The balance of the consideration, net of provisions and legal expenses, of £57 million has been accounted for as an exceptional operating item in the year ended 30 June 2003.
Other businesses
General Mills, Inc Following the disposal of Pillsbury and a subsequent sale of shares in General Mills, the group holds an equity stake of 79 million ordinary shares (21%) in General Mills. The following business description is based on publicly available information about General Mills filed with the SEC. General Mills is a global consumer foods company based in the United States. General Mills owns a number of brand names and its primary objective is to build the equity of these brands with strong consumer directed advertising and innovative merchandising. The principal businesses owned by General Mills are Big G ready-to-eat cereals, Betty Crocker dessert, baking, dinner mix and snack products, Yoplait and Colombo yoghurt and former Pillsbury brands such as Pillsburys refrigerated dough and other dough based goods, Old El Paso Mexican foods, Progresso soups, Green Giant vegetables and a foodservice business.
16 Diageo Annual Report 2004
|
Business description |
On 23 June 2004, Paul Walsh, CEO of Diageo plc, and John M Keenan, a Diageo plc designated representative, resigned from the General Mills board. In addition, Diageo and General Mills amended the stockholders agreement to permanently eliminate Diageos right to board representation. As a result, Diageo ceased to equity account for its share of the results of General Mills from that date and will, in the year ending 30 June 2005, only recognise the dividends received from General Mills in its profit and loss account. In the year ended 30 June 2004 dividends amounting to £50 million were received from General Mills.
Discontinued operations
Quick service restaurants Diageo completed the disposal of Burger King on 13 December 2002. See Operating and financial review Off-balance sheet arrangements. Burger King is a leading company in the worldwide quick service restaurant industry. In the year ended 30 June 2003, Burger King contributed turnover of £479 million and operating profit of £53 million to Diageo.
Packaged food Diageo completed the disposal of Pillsbury to General Mills on 31 October 2001. Pillsbury contributed turnover of £1,455 million and operating profit before exceptional items of £177 million in the year ended 30 June 2002. As a division of Diageo, Pillsbury produced and distributed leading food brands including Pillsburys refrigerated dough and other dough based goods, Old El Paso Mexican foods, Progresso soups, Green Giant vegetables and Häagen-Dazs ice cream, and, in addition, operated a foodservice business.
Recent developments
On 8 September 2004 Diageo announced that from 1 October 2004 it has created a new pan-regional organisation comprising Diageo North America, Diageo Europe and Diageo International. North America will continue to comprise the United States and Canada. The newly created Diageo Europe will cover all European countries and territories, including Russia. Diageo International will bring together Africa, Asia Pacific and the Latin American groups of markets. In addition, the company announced the following changes to its Executive Committee and management structure, effective 1 October 2004. Andrew Morgan has been appointed President, Diageo Europe; Stuart Fletcher has been appointed President, Diageo International and Nick Rose will take responsibility for Global Supply and information systems, in addition to his existing role as chief financial officer. It was also confirmed that Ian Meakins will leave the company on 31 October 2004.
Risk factors
Diageo faces competition that may reduce its market share and margins Diageo faces competition from several international companies as well as local and regional companies in the countries in which it operates. Diageo competes with drinks companies across a wide range of consumer drinking occasions. Within a number of categories, consolidation or realignment is taking place. Consolidation is also taking place amongst Diageos customers in many countries. Increased competition and unanticipated actions by competitors or customers could lead to downward pressure on prices and/or a decline in Diageos market share in any of these categories, which would adversely affect Diageos results and hinder its growth potential.
Diageo may not be able to derive the expected benefits from its strategy to focus on premium drinks or its change and cost-saving programmes designed to enhance earnings On 17 July 2000, Diageo announced the integration of its spirits, wine and beer businesses to create a premium drinks business as part of an integrated strategy to be a focused premium drinks company. In line with this strategy, Diageo acquired certain of the Seagram spirits and wine businesses on 21 December 2001. There can be no assurance that Diageos strategic focus on premium drinks will result in better opportunities for growth and improved margins.
Systems change programmes may not deliver the benefits intended and systems failures could lead to business disruption Certain change programmes have been undertaken (especially in the United States, Ireland and Great Britain) designed to improve the effectiveness and efficiency of end-to-end operating, administrative and financial systems and processes. This includes moving transaction processing from a number of markets to shared service centres. There can be no certainty that these programmes will deliver the expected benefits. There is likely to be disruption caused to production processes and possibly to administrative and financial systems as further changes to such processes are effected. They could also lead to adverse customer or consumer reaction. Any failure of information systems could adversely impact Diageos ability to operate. As with all large systems, Diageos information systems could be penetrated by outside parties intent on extracting information, corrupting information or disrupting business processes. Such unauthorised access could disrupt Diageos business and/or lead to loss of assets.
Regulatory decisions and changes in the legal and regulatory environment could increase Diageos costs and liabilities or limit its business activities Diageos operations are subject to extensive regulatory requirements regarding production, product liability, distribution, marketing, labelling, advertising and labour and environmental issues. Changes in laws, regulations or governmental policy, could cause Diageo to incur material additional costs or liabilities that could adversely affect its business. In particular, governmental bodies in countries where Diageo operates may impose new labelling, product or production requirements, limitations on the advertising activities used to market beverage alcohol, restrictions on retail outlets or other restrictions on marketing and distribution. Regulatory authorities under whose laws Diageo operates may also have enforcement power that can subject the group to actions such as product recall, seizure of products or other sanctions, which could have an adverse effect on its sales or damage its reputation.
17 Diageo Annual Report 2004
|
Business description |
US regulatory authorities are considering possible changes to the regulation of flavored malt beverages. Discussions are taking place in respect of possible rule changes related to the alcohol content in flavored malt beverages. Revised rules could result in changes in the methods by which Diageo currently produces flavored malt beverages and therefore increase the costs of production and/or distribution of these products. In addition, possible regulatory changes could impose adverse federal tax consequences on the import and sale of flavored malt beverages. Flavored malt beverages form a component of Diageos growth strategy within the United States and it is possible that the implementation of any regulatory changes by the US authorities could have an adverse effect on Diageos future profitability.
Demand for Diageos products may be adversely affected by changes in consumer preferences and tastes Diageos portfolio includes certain of the worlds leading beverage alcohol brands as well as brands of local prominence. Maintaining Diageos competitive position depends on its continued ability to offer products that have a strong appeal to consumers. Consumer preferences may shift due to a variety of factors, including changes in demographic and social trends, changes in travel, vacation or leisure activity patterns and a downturn in economic conditions, which may reduce consumers willingness to purchase premium branded products. In addition, concerns about health effects due to negative publicity regarding alcohol consumption, negative dietary effects, regulatory action or any litigation or customer complaints against companies in the industry may have an adverse effect on Diageos profitability.
If the social acceptability of Diageos products declines, or if the litigation directed at the beverage alcohol industry were to succeed, Diageos sales volume could decrease and the business could be materially adversely affected In recent years, there has been increased social and political attention directed to the beverage alcohol industry. Diageo believes that this attention is the result of public concern over problems related to alcohol abuse, including drink driving, underage drinking and health consequences from the misuse of alcohol. If, as a result, the general social acceptability of beverage alcohol were to decline significantly, sales of Diageos products could materially decrease.
Diageos operating results may be adversely affected by increased costs or shortages of raw materials or labour or disruption to production facilities The raw materials which Diageo uses for the production of its beverage products are largely commodities that are subject to price volatility caused by changes in global supply and demand, weather conditions, agricultural uncertainty or governmental controls. If commodity price changes result in unexpected increases in raw materials cost or the cost of packaging materials, Diageo may not be able to increase its prices to offset these increased costs without suffering reduced volume, revenue and operating income. Diageo may be adversely affected by shortages of such raw materials or packaging materials.
18 Diageo Annual Report 2004
|
Business description |
inventory is stored primarily in Scotland, and the loss through contamination, fire or other natural disaster of all or a portion of the stock of any one of those aged product categories could result in a significant reduction in supply of those products, and consequently, Diageo would not be able to meet consumer demand for these products as it arises. In addition, there can be no assurance that insurance proceeds would cover the replacement value of Diageos maturing inventory or other assets were such assets to be lost due to contamination, fire or natural disasters or destruction resulting from negligence or the acts of third parties.
Diageos business may be adversely impacted by unfavourable economic conditions or political or other developments and risks in the countries in which it operates Diageos business is dependent on general economic conditions in the United States, Great Britain and other important markets. A significant deterioration in these conditions, including a reduction in consumer spending levels, could have a material adverse effect on Diageos business and results of operations. In addition, Diageo may be adversely affected by political and economic developments in any of the countries where Diageo has distribution networks, production facilities or marketing companies. Diageos operations are also subject to a variety of other risks and uncertainties related to trading in numerous foreign countries, including political or economic upheaval and the imposition of any import, investment or currency restrictions, including tariffs and import quotas or any restrictions on the repatriation of earnings and capital. Current examples of such potential upheaval are currency restrictions and potential further disruption to movement of goods into and out of Venezuela, affecting both imports of goods (principally Scotch whisky into Venezuela) and export of rum (Cacique, especially to Spain), unrest in the Middle East, and the impact on tourism and travel of both terrorist threats and ongoing fears of global pandemics, such as SARS. These disruptions can affect Diageos ability to import or export products and to repatriate funds, as well as affecting the levels of consumer demand (for example in duty free outlets at airports or in on trade premises in affected regions) and therefore Diageos levels of sales or profitability.
Diageos premium drinks operations may be adversely affected by failure to renegotiate distribution and manufacturing rights on favourable terms Diageos premium drinks business has a number of distribution agreements for brands owned by it or by other companies. These agreements vary depending on the particular brand, but tend to be for a fixed number of years. There can be no assurance that Diageo will be able to renegotiate distribution rights on favourable terms when they expire or that agreements will not be terminated. Failure to renew distribution agreements on favourable terms could have an adverse impact on Diageos revenues and operating income. In addition, Diageos sales may be adversely affected by any disputes with distributors of its products.
Diageo may not be able to protect its intellectual property rights Given the importance of brand recognition to its business, Diageo has invested considerable effort in protecting its intellectual property rights, including trademark registration and domain names. Diageos patents cover some of its process technology, including some aspects of its bottle marking technology. Diageo also uses security measures and agreements to protect its confidential information. However, Diageo cannot be certain that the steps it has taken will be sufficient or that third parties will not infringe on or misappropriate its intellectual property rights. Moreover, some of the countries in which Diageo operates offer less intellectual property protection than Europe or North America. Given the attractiveness of Diageos brands to consumers, it is not uncommon for counterfeit products to be manufactured. Diageo cannot be certain that the steps it takes to prevent, detect and eliminate counterfeit products will be effective in preventing material loss of profits or erosion of brand equity resulting from lower quality or even dangerous counterfeit product reaching the market. If Diageo is unable to protect its intellectual property rights against infringement or misappropriation, this could materially harm its future financial results and ability to develop its business.
Diageo remains exposed to factors affecting the US food industry While Diageos strategy is to focus on premium drinks, it remains exposed to factors affecting the US food industry through its equity interest in General Mills and its residual exposure to Burger King. Following the disposal of Pillsbury to General Mills, Diageo now holds approximately 21% of General Millsoutstanding share capital. The market value of this interest may be affected adversely by a variety of factors, including the performance of General Mills and the extent to which that performance meets investors expectations, economic conditions in the United States, including the US financial markets, and the dilution of Diageos holding as a result of future issues of shares by General Mills. On 15 October 2003, General Mills announced that it had received a formal request from the US Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC) concerning its sales practices and related accounting. General Mills stated that the SEC had advised the company that it had not reached any conclusions related to the information request. See Business description other businesses.
19 Diageo Annual Report 2004
|
Business description |
refinancing by Burger King on a non-guaranteed basis prior to the end of the five years. There are no assurances, however, that such refinancing will occur or that no liability will arise with respect to the financing of the Burger King disposal. Both General Mills and Burger King may also be subject to factors affecting the food industry generally, including increased competition, changes in consumer preferences and concerns over obesity and the potential for related litigation or regulation. These factors could also affect Diageos ability over time to reduce its equity interest in, or affect the price it receives for, General Mills shares. They could also result in Diageo not fully recovering the book value of its subordinated debt due from Burger King and/or having to make payments under the guarantee of Burger Kings debt.
It may be difficult to effect service of US process and enforce US legal process against the directors of Diageo Diageo is a public limited company incorporated under the laws of England and Wales. The majority of Diageos directors and officers, and some of the experts named in this document, reside outside of the United States, principally in the United Kingdom. A substantial portion of Diageos assets, and the assets of such persons are located outside of the United States. Therefore, it may not be possible to effect service of process within the United States upon Diageo or these persons in order to enforce judgements of US courts against Diageo or these persons based on the civil liability provisions of the US Federal Securities laws. There is doubt as to the enforceability in England and Wales, in original actions or in actions for enforcement of judgements of US courts, of civil liabilities solely based on the US Federal Securities laws.
Cautionary statement concerning forward-looking statements
This document contains statements with respect to the financial condition, results of operations and business of Diageo and certain of the plans and objectives of Diageo with respect to these items. These forward-looking statements are made pursuant to the Safe Harbor provisions of the United States Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. In particular, all statements that express forecasts, expectations and projections with respect to future matters, including trends in results of operations, margins, growth rates, overall market trends, the impact of interest or exchange rates, the availability of financing to Diageo and parties or consortia who have purchased Diageos assets, actions of parties or consortia who have purchased Diageos assets, anticipated cost savings or synergy and the completion of Diageos strategic transactions, are forward-looking statements. By their nature, forward-looking statements involve risk and uncertainty because they relate to events and depend on circumstances that will occur in the future. There are a number of factors that could cause actual results and developments to differ materially from those expressed or implied by these forward-looking statements, including factors that are outside Diageos control.
These factors include, but are not limited to:
| increased competitive product and pricing pressures and unanticipated actions by competitors that could impact Diageos market share, increase expenses and hinder growth potential; |
| the effects of business combinations, partnerships, acquisitions or disposals, existing or future, and the ability to realise expected synergy and/or costs savings; |
| Diageos ability to complete future acquisitions and disposals; |
| legal and regulatory developments, including changes in regulations regarding consumption of, or advertising for, beverage alcohol, changes in accounting standards, taxation requirements, such as the impact of excise tax increases with respect to the premium drinks business and environmental laws; |
| developments in the alcohol advertising class actions and any similar proceedings; |
| changes in the food industry in the United States, including increased competition and changes in consumer preferences; |
| changes in consumer preferences and tastes, demographic trends or perceptions about health related issues; |
| changes in the cost of raw materials and labour costs; |
| changes in economic conditions in countries in which Diageo operates, including changes in levels of consumer spending; |
| levels of marketing, promotional and innovation expenditure by Diageo and its competitors; |
| renewal of distribution rights on favourable terms when they expire; |
| termination of existing distribution rights in respect of agency brands; |
| technological, developments that may affect the distribution of products or impede Diageos ability to protect its intellectual property rights; and |
| changes in financial and equity markets, including significant interest rate and foreign currency rate fluctuations, which may affect Diageos access to or increase the cost of financing or which may affect Diageos financial results. |
All oral and written forward-looking statements made on or after the date of this document and attributable to Diageo are expressly qualified in their entirety by the above factors and the Risk factors contained in this document for the year ended 30 June 2004 . Any forward-looking statements made by or on behalf of Diageo speak only as of the date they are made. Diageo does not undertake to update forward-looking statements to reflect any changes in Diageos expectations with regard thereto or any changes in events, conditions circumstances on which any such statement is based. The reader should, however, consult any additional disclosures that Diageo may make in documents it files with the SEC.
20 Diageo Annual Report 2004
Operating and financial review
Introduction
Information presented Diageos strategy is to focus on its branded drinks businesses with international potential. Diageo completed the disposal of its quick service restaurants business on 13 December 2002 and the combination of its packaged food business with General Mills on 31 October 2001. In accordance with UK GAAP, the results of the quick service restaurants and the packaged food businesses have been included within discontinued operations in the comparative periods.
Presentation of information in relation to the premium drinks business In addition to describing the significant factors impacting on the profit and loss account compared to the prior year for both of the years ended 30 June 2004 and 30 June 2003, additional information is also presented on the operating performance of the premium drinks segment.
Volume Volume has been measured on an equivalent units basis to nine litre cases of spirits. An equivalent unit represents one nine litre case of spirits, which is approximately 272 servings. A serving comprises 33ml of spirits, 165ml of wine, or 330ml of ready to drink or beer. Therefore, to convert volume of products, other than spirits, to equivalent units, the following guide has been used: beer in hectolitres divide by 0.9, wine in nine litre cases divide by 5 and ready to drink in nine litre cases divide by 10.
Non-GAAP measures Organic movement in volume, net sales (after deducting excise duties) and operating profit before exceptional items are measures not specifically used in the consolidated financial statements themselves (non-GAAP measures). The performance of the premium drinks segment is discussed using these measures.
21 Diageo Annual Report 2004
|
Operating and financial review |
In order to assist the reader of the financial statements, the comparisons of both 2004 with 2003 and 2003 with 2002 include tables which present the exchange, disposal, acquisition and organic components of the year on year movement for each of turnover, net sales (after deducting excise duties) and operating profit before exceptional items.
Calculation of organic movement Where a business, brand, brand distribution right or agency agreement was disposed of, or terminated, in the current year, the group, in organic movement calculations, adjusts the results for the prior year to exclude the amount the group earned in that period that it could not have earned in the current period (i.e. the period between the date in the prior period, equivalent to the date of the disposal in the current period, and the end of the prior period). As a result, the organic movement numbers reflect only comparable trading performance. Similarly, if a business was disposed of part way through the equivalent prior period, then its contribution would also be completely excluded from that prior periods performance in the organic movement calculation, since the group recognised no contribution from that business in the current year.
Operating results 2004 compared with 2003
Summary consolidated profit and loss account | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Year ended 30 June 2004 | Year ended 30 June 2003 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Before | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Before | exceptional | Exceptional | ||||||||||||||||||||||
exceptional | Exceptional | items | items | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||
items | items | Total | (restated) | (restated) | (restated) | |||||||||||||||||||
£ million | £ million | £ million | £ million | £ million | £ million | |||||||||||||||||||
Turnover |
8,891 | | 8,891 | 9,281 | | 9,281 | ||||||||||||||||||
Operating costs |
(6,980 | ) | (40 | ) | (7,020 | ) | (7,326 | ) | (168 | ) | (7,494 | ) | ||||||||||||
Operating profit |
1,911 | (40 | ) | 1,871 | 1,955 | (168 | ) | 1,787 | ||||||||||||||||
Share of
associates profits |
451 | (13 | ) | 438 | 478 | (21 | ) | 457 | ||||||||||||||||
Disposal of fixed assets |
(35 | ) | (35 | ) | (43 | ) | (43 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Disposal of businesses |
(10 | ) | (10 | ) | (1,254 | ) | (1,254 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Finance charges |
(295 | ) | | (295 | ) | (315 | ) | | (315 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Profit before taxation |
2,067 | (98 | ) | 1,969 | 2,118 | (1,486 | ) | 632 | ||||||||||||||||
Taxation |
(517 | ) | 30 | (487 | ) | (543 | ) | 52 | (491 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Profit after taxation |
1,550 | (68 | ) | 1,482 | 1,575 | (1,434 | ) | 141 | ||||||||||||||||
Minority interests |
(90 | ) | | (90 | ) | (91 | ) | | (91 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Profit for the year |
1,460 | (68 | ) | 1,392 | 1,484 | (1,434 | ) | 50 | ||||||||||||||||
Turnover On a reported basis, turnover decreased by £390 million (4%) from £9,281 million (of which Burger King contributed £479 million) in the year ended 30 June 2003 to £8,891 million in the year ended 30 June 2004. For premium drinks, turnover increased by £89 million (1%). Turnover was adversely impacted by exchange rate movements of £271 million, principally arising from weakening of the US dollar. The effect of disposals and the termination of certain distribution rights, principally Bass Ale in North America and the Brown-Forman agency brands in Great Britain, reduced premium drinks turnover by £105 million.
Operating costs On a reported basis, operating costs decreased by £474 million (6%) from £7,494 million (of which Burger King costs were £426 million) in the year ended 30 June 2003 to £7,020 million in the year ended 30 June 2004. Exceptional operating costs declined from £168 million to £40 million in the year ended 30 June 2004, and exchange benefited premium drinks operating costs in the year ended 30 June 2004, before exceptional items, by £166 million. Before the impact of exchange, operating costs before exceptional items for premium drinks increased by £246 million of which excise duties accounted for £73 million and increased marketing expenditure accounted for £41 million. On a reported basis, marketing investment for premium drinks increased 1% from £1,026 million to £1,039 million. Marketing investment on global priority brands (excluding ready to drink) grew 10% to £569 million, while marketing spend on ready to drink brands declined by £28 million (14%) to £166 million.
22 Diageo Annual Report 2004
|
Operating and financial review |
Operating profit Reported operating profit increased by £84 million from £1,787 million (of which Burger King contributed £53 million) to £1,871 million. Exceptional items charged to operating profit were £40 million in the year ended 30 June 2004 compared with £168 million in the year ended 30 June 2003. Exchange rate movements reduced operating profit before exceptional items for the year ended 30 June 2004 by £105 million (US dollar reduction of £107 million, euro benefit of £29 million, other currencies reduction of £27 million). Disposals and the termination of certain distribution rights contributed an incremental £13 million to operating profit before exceptional items in the year ended 30 June 2003 compared to the year ended 30 June 2004.
Exceptional operating costs Operating profit for the year is after £40 million of exceptional costs in respect of the integration of the Seagram spirits and wine businesses, acquired in December 2001 (2003 £177 million; 2002 £164 million). Approximately £8 million of these costs were employee related, £8 million in respect of putting in place new distribution and broker agreements as part of the Next Generation Growth programme, £4 million in respect of write-downs of assets, and the balance of £20 million included legal and professional and systems costs. The majority of these costs were incurred in North America.
Post employment plans Post employment charges calculated under FRS 17 resulted in a charge to operating profit of £101 million (2003 £110 million) and other finance charges of £18 million (2003 income of £36 million). The figures for the year ended 30 June 2003 have been restated onto an FRS 17 basis.
Associates The groups share of profits of associates before exceptional items was £451 million for the year compared to £478 million last year. The 21% equity interest in General Mills contributed £258 million in the year ended 30 June 2004 compared with £287 million last year. The weakness of the US dollar accounted for £25 million of this decrease. On 23 June 2004, Paul Walsh, CEO of Diageo plc, and John M. Keenan, a Diageo plc designated representative, resigned from the General Mills board. As a result, Diageo ceased to equity account for its share of the results of General Mills from that date. Diageos 34% equity interest in Moët Hennessy contributed £176 million to share of profits of associates before exceptional items (2003 £177 million).
Finance charges Finance charges decreased from £315 million to £295 million in the year ended 30 June 2004.
Non-operating exceptional items Non-operating exceptional items before taxation were a charge of £45 million in the year ended 30 June 2004 compared with a charge of £1,297 million (including £1,441 million in respect of Burger King) in the year ended 30 June 2003. These charges comprise £41 million (2003 £41 million) in respect of the dilution of the investment in General Mills, following the issue of additional shares by General Mills, and a £10 million cost in respect of disposed businesses, offset by a £6 million gain arising on the disposal of fixed assets. The £10 million cost in respect of disposed businesses represents a £13 million loss on the sale of premium drinks brands, and a £26 million charge on the reassessment of the provisions required following the disposal of Burger King, offset by a credit of £29 million arising on the review of the provision held against the guarantee given by Diageo in connection with the sale of Pillsbury.
Profit before taxation After exceptional items, the profit before taxation and minority interests increased by £1,337 million from £632 million to £1,969 million in the year ended 30 June 2004.
Exchange rates Based on current exchange rates, the impact of adverse exchange rate movements on profit before exceptional items and taxation for the financial year ending 30 June 2005 is estimated to be £100 million (excluding transaction exchange on share of profits of associates).
Taxation The effective rate of taxation on profit before exceptional items for the year was 25%, compared with 25.6% for the year ended 30 June 2003, restated from the originally reported 25% following compliance with the new accounting pronouncements for post employment plans and share trusts.
23 Diageo Annual Report 2004
|
Operating and financial review |
Dividend The directors recommend a final dividend of 17.0 pence per share, an increase of 8.3% on last years final dividend. The full dividend would therefore be 27.6 pence per share, an increase of 7.8%. Subject to approval by shareholders, the final dividend will be paid on 25 October 2004 to shareholders on the register on 17 September 2004. Payment to US ADR holders will be made 29 October 2004. A dividend re-investment plan is available in respect of the final dividend and the plan notice date is 4 October 2004.
Premium drinks The following discussion provides additional commentary on the trading performance of the premium drinks business with the equivalent period in the prior year.
The organic movement calculations for turnover, net sales (after deducting excise duties) and operating profit before exceptional items for the year ended 30 June 2004 were as follows: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
2003 | Disposals | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Reported | and | Organic | 2004 | Organic | ||||||||||||||||||||
(restated)* | Exchange | transfers | movement | Reported | movement | |||||||||||||||||||
£ million | £ million | £ million | £ million | £ million | % | |||||||||||||||||||
Turnover |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Major markets: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
North America |
2,759 | (242 | ) | (71 | ) | 213 | 2,659 | 9 | ||||||||||||||||
Great Britain |
1,380 | | (8 | ) | 39 | 1,411 | 3 | |||||||||||||||||
Ireland |
953 | 37 | (1 | ) | (28 | ) | 961 | (3 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Spain |
418 | 20 | (2 | ) | 18 | 454 | 4 | |||||||||||||||||
5,510 | (185 | ) | (82 | ) | 242 | 5,485 | 5 | |||||||||||||||||
Key markets |
2,080 | (49 | ) | 125 | 119 | 2,275 | 6 | |||||||||||||||||
Venture markets |
1,212 | (37 | ) | (148 | ) | 104 | 1,131 | 10 | ||||||||||||||||
Total premium drinks |
8,802 | (271 | ) | (105 | ) | 465 | 8,891 | 6 | ||||||||||||||||
Net sales (after deducting excise duties) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Major markets: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
North America |
2,299 | (203 | ) | (65 | ) | 209 | 2,240 | 10 | ||||||||||||||||
Great Britain |
790 | | (5 | ) | (5 | ) | 780 | (1 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Ireland |
638 | 25 | | (22 | ) | 641 | (3 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Spain |
316 | 15 | (2 | ) | 13 | 342 | 4 | |||||||||||||||||
4,043 | (163 | ) | (72 | ) | 195 | 4,003 | 5 | |||||||||||||||||
Key markets |
1,637 | (49 | ) | 90 | 111 | 1,789 | 7 | |||||||||||||||||
Venture markets |
956 | (29 | ) | (112 | ) | 75 | 890 | 9 | ||||||||||||||||
Total premium drinks |
6,636 | (241 | ) | (94 | ) | 381 | 6,682 | 6 | ||||||||||||||||
Excise duties |
2,166 | 2,209 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Turnover |
8,802 | 8,891 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Operating profit before exceptional items |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Major markets: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
North America |
708 | (86 | ) | (13 | ) | 85 | 694 | 14 | ||||||||||||||||
Great Britain |
203 | | 6 | (2 | ) | 207 | (1 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Ireland |
131 | 9 | | (14 | ) | 126 | (10 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Spain |
96 | 7 | | 10 | 113 | 10 | ||||||||||||||||||
1,138 | (70 | ) | (7 | ) | 79 | 1,140 | 7 | |||||||||||||||||
Key markets |
502 | (30 | ) | 13 | 26 | 511 | 5 | |||||||||||||||||
Venture markets |
262 | (5 | ) | (19 | ) | 22 | 260 | 9 | ||||||||||||||||
Total premium drinks |
1,902 | (105 | ) | (13 | ) | 127 | 1,911 | 7 | ||||||||||||||||
24 Diageo Annual Report 2004
|
Operating and financial review |
Notes
(2) The reported operating profit before exceptional items for the year ended 30 June 2003 has been restated following the adoption of FRS 17 Retirement benefits, and UITF abstract 38 Accounting for ESOP trusts. The operating profit before exceptional items has been reduced by £74 million in respect of the following markets £21 million for North America, £16 million for Great Britain, £10 million for Ireland, £3 million for Spain, £20 million for key markets and £4 million for venture markets.
(3) The exchange adjustments for turnover, net sales (after deducting excise duties) and operating profit before exceptional items are principally in respect of the US dollar and the euro.
(4) Disposals include the transfer of Portugal to venture markets from key markets, and Germany to key markets from venture markets, effective 1 July 2003. This adjustment represents the differential between the incremental amounts contributed by Germany compared to the amounts contributed by Portugal in the year ended 30 June 2003 £139 million for turnover, £104 million for net sales (after deducting excise duties) and £18 million for operating profit before exceptional items. In addition, disposals for turnover, net sales (after deducting excise duties) and operating profit before exceptional items were principally in respect of the termination of distribution rights for Bass Ale in North America and Brown-Forman agency brands in the United Kingdom, the disposals of Gilbeys Green and White Whisky in India, and the partial disposal of Don Julio in Mexico.
(5) There have been no acquisitions of subsidiaries in the last 24 months.
(6) In the calculation of operating profit before exceptional items the overheads included in disposals were only those directly attributable to the businesses disposed of, and do not result from subjective judgements of management.
(7) The organic movement percentage is the amount in the column headed organic movement in the table above expressed as a percentage of the aggregate of the first three columns. The basis of the calculation of the organic movement is explained on page 21.
Organic brand performance | ||||||||||||
Equivalent | Volume | Net sales* | ||||||||||
units | movement | movement | ||||||||||
million | % | % | ||||||||||
Global priority brands |
||||||||||||
Smirnoff |
24.2 | 5 | 4 | |||||||||
Johnnie Walker |
11.7 | 9 | 10 | |||||||||
Guinness |
11.6 | 2 | 4 | |||||||||
Baileys |
6.6 | 7 | 8 | |||||||||
JεB |
6.0 | (1 | ) | (1 | ) | |||||||
Captain Morgan |
6.0 | 12 | 18 | |||||||||
José Cuervo |
4.2 | 1 | 5 | |||||||||
Tanqueray |
2.0 | 2 | 5 | |||||||||
Total global priority brands |
72.3 | 5 | 6 | |||||||||
Local priority brands |
22.7 | | 3 | |||||||||
Category brands |
27.1 | 3 | 9 | |||||||||
Total premium drinks |
122.1 | 4 | 6 | |||||||||
25 Diageo Annual Report 2004
|
Operating and financial review |
Additional information:
| On a reported basis total volume increased 2% from 119.3 million equivalent units to 122.1 million equivalent units | |||
| On a reported basis net sales (after deducting excise duties) increased 1% from £6,636 million to £6,682 million | |||
| Smirnoff volume, excluding ready to drink, was up 6% and net sales (after deducting excise duties) was up 8% | |||
| Captain Morgan volume, excluding ready to drink, was up 8% and net sales (after deducting excise duties) was up 10% |
| Volume growth of the global priority brands, excluding ready to drink, was 5%, compared to 4% in the year ended 30 June 2003. Net sales (after deducting excise duties) growth of the global priority brands, excluding ready to drink, was 6% |
Marketing investment Premium drinks marketing investment increased 1% on a reported basis from £1,026 million to £1,039 million. Organic marketing investment increased 6%, with a further 1% organic growth in promotional spend paid to customers which has been reclassified against turnover under application note (G) to FRS 5.
Analysis by individual market
The figures for 2003 have been restated to reflect the adoption of FRS 17
Retirement benefits, UITF abstract 38 Accounting for ESOP trusts, and the
amendment to FRS 5 Reporting the substance of transactions (see New
accounting standards on page 55). |
||||||||||||||||
2004 | 2003 | |||||||||||||||
Operating | ||||||||||||||||
Operating | Turnover | profit* | ||||||||||||||
Turnover | profit* | (restated) | (restated) | |||||||||||||
£ million | £ million | £ million | £ million | |||||||||||||
Major markets |
||||||||||||||||
North America |
2,659 | 694 | 2,759 | 708 | ||||||||||||
Great Britain |
1,411 | 207 | 1,380 | 203 | ||||||||||||
Ireland |
961 | 126 | 953 | 131 | ||||||||||||
Spain |
454 | 113 | 418 | 96 | ||||||||||||
5,485 | 1,140 | 5,510 | 1,138 | |||||||||||||
Key markets |
2,275 | 511 | 2,080 | 502 | ||||||||||||
Venture markets |
1,131 | 260 | 1,212 | 262 | ||||||||||||
Total premium drinks |
8,891 | 1,911 | 8,802 | 1,902 | ||||||||||||
26 Diageo Annual Report 2004
|
Operating and financial review |
North America
Summary:
| Continued strong performance by Diageo in this important market |
| Continued growth in global priority brands, together with mix improvement throughout the business, delivered double-digit growth in organic net sales (after deducting excise duties) |
| Further improvement in operating margin by 1.2 percentage points |
| Share gains in four of the six spirits categories |
| Smirnoff ready to drink volume up 15%, following new product launches |
| Incremental Seagram synergy benefit of £31 million |
| Marketing investment up 9% behind priority brands |
| Distributor strategy is on track |
Key measures: | |||||||||||||||||||
Reported | Organic | ||||||||||||||||||
2004 | 2003 | movement | movement | ||||||||||||||||
£ million | £ million | % | % | ||||||||||||||||
Volume |
1 | 3 | |||||||||||||||||
Turnover |
2,659 | 2,759 | (4 | ) | 9 | ||||||||||||||
Net sales (after deducting excise duties) |
2,240 | 2,299 | (3 | ) | 10 | ||||||||||||||
Marketing |
359 | 369 | (3 | ) | 9 | ||||||||||||||
Operating profit before exceptional items |
694 | 708 | (2 | ) | 14 | ||||||||||||||
Reported performance Turnover was down from £2,759 million to £2,659 million in the year ended 30 June 2004. Operating profit before exceptional items decreased £14 million (2%), from £708 million in the year ended 30 June 2003 to £694 million in the year ended 30 June 2004.
Organic performance Exchange rate movements accounted for a reduction in turnover of £242 million, principally as a result of a weakness in the US dollar which moved from £1 = $1.59 in the year ended 30 June 2003 to £1 = $1.74 in the year ended 30 June 2004. In addition, the termination of distribution rights for Bass Ale in June 2003 and Cuervo 1800 in October 2002 reduced turnover by £58 million and £8 million, respectively. Other disposals, including Kamchatka in the United States and Gibsons Whiskey in Canada, adversely affected turnover by £5 million. At constant exchange rates the turnover of brands owned or distributed throughout both periods was £213 million higher in the year ended 30 June 2004 than in the comparable period, as discussed within organic brand performance below. These factors combined to produce an overall decrease in turnover of £100 million.
Organic brand performance: | |||||||||||
Volume | Net sales* | ||||||||||
movement | movement | ||||||||||
% | % | ||||||||||
Smirnoff |
3 | 12 | |||||||||
Johnnie Walker |
6 | 11 | |||||||||
José Cuervo |
1 | 6 | |||||||||
Baileys |
6 | 9 | |||||||||
Captain Morgan |
13 | 20 | |||||||||
Tanqueray |
| 4 | |||||||||
Guinness |
5 | 5 | |||||||||
JεB |
2 | (1 | ) | ||||||||
Total global priority brands |
5 | 10 | |||||||||
Local priority brands |
| 4 | |||||||||
Category brands |
2 | 22 | |||||||||
Total |
3 | 10 | |||||||||
27 Diageo Annual Report 2004
|
Operating and financial review |
Additional information:
| Smirnoff volume, excluding ready to drink, was flat and net sales (after deducting excise duties) was up 5% |
| Captain Morgan volume, excluding ready to drink, was up 9% and net sales (after deducting excise duties) was up 11% |
| From 1 July 2003, terms of trade were harmonised between the former UDV and Seagram brands and freight is now billed as net sales (after deducting excise duties) for all brands. The actual freight cost is reported as cost of goods sold. This change increased reported net sales (after deducting excise duties) in the year by approximately 2 percentage points versus the prior year |
| Crown Royal, Diageos highest volume and most profitable local priority brand, grew volume 3% |
New packaging was introduced for Smirnoff, marketing investment increased and pricing was revised to enable Smirnoff to compete in the higher growth segment of premium vodka. In the short term this has led to flat volume and some share erosion for Smirnoff, excluding ready to drink. However, along with the stronger growth of Smirnoff Twist and the growth of Smirnoff ready to drink, price and mix improved. Smirnoff ready to drink volume was up 15% due to the launch of Smirnoff Twisted V and share grew 15.1 percentage points to approximately 45% of the segment.
28 Diageo Annual Report 2004
|
Operating and financial review |
Great Britain
Summary:
| Despite good volume growth margin pressures negatively impacted net sales (after deducting excise duties) |
| Solid organic volume growth in spirits, with strong performances from Smirnoff Red and Gordons Gin |
| Diageos share of UK spirits grew from 23.6% to 24.8% in the year |
| Blossom Hill grew volume by 37%. Diageos volume share of branded wines segment is now 13.7% versus 11.4% last year |
| Guinness volume down 3% and ready to drink volume down 14% both in line with the decline in their respective segments |
| Reduced marketing spend due to fewer new product launches and lower ready to drink investment |
Key measures: | |||||||||||||||||||
Reported | Organic | ||||||||||||||||||
2004 | 2003 | movement | movement | ||||||||||||||||
£ million | £ million | % | % | ||||||||||||||||
Volume |
5 | 6 | |||||||||||||||||
Turnover |
1,411 | 1,380 | 2 | 3 | |||||||||||||||
Net sales (after deducting excise duties) |
780 | 790 | (1 | ) | (1 | ) | |||||||||||||
Marketing |
124 | 139 | (11 | ) | (11 | ) | |||||||||||||
Operating profit before exceptional items |
207 | 203 | 2 | (1 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Reported and organic performance Turnover in Great Britain was up 2% from £1,380 million to £1,411 million in the year ended 30 June 2004. The £31 million improvement was due to an organic increase of £39 million, offset by £8 million of disposals.
Organic brand performance: | |||||||||||
Volume | Net sales* | ||||||||||
movement | movement | ||||||||||
% | % | ||||||||||
Smirnoff |
11 | (6 | ) | ||||||||
Guinness |
(3 | ) | (2 | ) | |||||||
Baileys |
5 | 12 | |||||||||
Total global priority brands |
5 | (1 | ) | ||||||||
Local priority brands |
1 | (6 | ) | ||||||||
Category brands |
16 | 6 | |||||||||
Total |
6 | (1 | ) | ||||||||
In Great Britain, continued strong performance from spirits and wine, particularly Smirnoff Red up 19%, Gordons up 10% and Blossom Hill up 37%, drove 6% volume growth despite challenging trading conditions in beer and ready to drink. Share of spirits grew 1.2 percentage points to 24.8%.
29 Diageo Annual Report 2004
|
Operating and financial review |
Guinness share in the beer category declined slightly, by 0.1 percentage points, the result of a 5% volume decline in the on trade, offset by 2% volume growth in the off trade. A price increase for Guinness Draught was implemented on 1 February 2004.
Ireland
Summary:
| The results for Ireland reflect the continued decline of the beverage alcohol market, down a further 1%, and the shift from the on trade, where Diageo has the majority of its business, to the off trade |
| Guinness volume declined 6% and net sales (after deducting excise duties) decreased by 3%, benefiting from price increases |
| Diageo implemented a major restructuring to bring in a less complex and therefore lower cost operating model in response to the changes in the beverage alcohol market |
Key measures: | |||||||||||||||||||
Reported | Organic | ||||||||||||||||||
2004 | 2003 | movement | movement | ||||||||||||||||
£ million | £ million | % | % | ||||||||||||||||
Volume |
(4 | ) | (4 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Turnover |
961 | 953 | 1 | (3 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Net sales (after deducting excise duties) |
641 | 638 | | (3 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Marketing |
76 | 67 | 13 | 9 | |||||||||||||||
Operating profit before exceptional items |
126 | 131 | (4 | ) | (10 | ) | |||||||||||||
Reported performance In Ireland, turnover increased on a reported basis from £953 million in the year ended 30 June 2003 to £961 million in the year ended 30 June 2004. Operating profit before exceptional items was down from £131 million to £126 million.
Organic performance Although reported turnover was up £8 million, the main reason for this was the strength of the euro, which had a beneficial impact of £37 million. The weighted average exchange rate used for translation strengthened from £1 = 1.52 for the year ended 30 June 2003 to £1 = 1.45 for the year ended 30 June 2004. Market decline and brand performance reduced turnover by £28 million and disposals reduced it by £1 million.
Organic brand performance: | |||||||||||
Volume | Net sales* | ||||||||||
movement | movement | ||||||||||
% | % | ||||||||||
Guinness |
(6 | ) | (3 | ) | |||||||
Smirnoff |
(4 | ) | (11 | ) | |||||||
Baileys |
(12 | ) | (11 | ) | |||||||
Total global priority brands |
(6 | ) | (5 | ) | |||||||
Local priority brands |
(4 | ) | (3 | ) | |||||||
Category brands |
9 | | |||||||||
Total |
(4 | ) | (3 | ) | |||||||
30 Diageo Annual Report 2004
|
Operating and financial review |
The beverage alcohol market in Ireland declined by a further 1% in the year, impacted by some decline in consumer confidence and an acceleration in the shift from the on to the off trade. The shift towards the off trade is largely attributed to lifestyle and demographics changes, continued price competition in the off trade and to the initial impact in the on trade of the smoking ban introduced in March 2004. The on trade declined by 6% and now represents 57% of the market volume, while the off trade grew by 7%.
Spain
Summary:
| Diageos organic volume grew by 3% and share increased by 0.6 percentage points despite further decline in the Spanish spirits market |
| Performance by brand was mixed, but overall mix improved, driven by volume growth in Johnnie Walker and Cacique as well as price increases implemented in April 2004 |
Key measures: | |||||||||||||||||||
Reported | Organic | ||||||||||||||||||
2004 | 2003 | movement | movement | ||||||||||||||||
£ million | £ million | % | % | ||||||||||||||||
Volume |
2 | 3 | |||||||||||||||||
Turnover |
454 | 418 | 9 | 4 | |||||||||||||||
Net sales (after deducting excise duties) |
342 | 316 | 8 | 4 | |||||||||||||||
Marketing |
68 | 64 | 6 | 1 | |||||||||||||||
Operating profit before exceptional items |
113 | 96 | 18 | 10 | |||||||||||||||
Reported performance Reported turnover was £454 million in the year ended 30 June 2004, up 9% against the £418 million reported in the prior year. Reported operating profit before exceptional items was up £17 million (18%) from £96 million in the year ended 30 June 2003 to £113 million in the current year.
Organic performance Favourable exchange rate variances due to the strength of the euro positively impacted reported turnover by £20 million. There was a £2 million adverse impact from the loss of the distribution rights for Lagunilla wines in January 2003. Organic growth of brands owned throughout this and the comparable period contributed £18 million.
31 Diageo Annual Report 2004
|
Operating and financial review |
Organic brand performance: | |||||||||||
Volume | Net sales* | ||||||||||
movement | movement | ||||||||||
% | % | ||||||||||
JεB |
(1 | ) | (3 | ) | |||||||
Baileys |
3 | 7 | |||||||||
Johnnie Walker |
13 | 13 | |||||||||
Smirnoff |
2 | (6 | ) | ||||||||
Total global priority brands |
2 | 1 | |||||||||
Local priority brands |
12 | 16 | |||||||||
Category brands |
(6 | ) | 2 | ||||||||
Total |
3 | 4 | |||||||||
JεB volume was down in the standard scotch and local whisky category which continues to decline. However, JεB remains the number one brand with 26% share of the category. The withdrawal of JεB Twist negatively impacted mix and net sales (after deducting excise duties) were down 3% despite a 3% price increase in April.
Key markets
Summary:
| Improved performance by the global priority brands delivered improved operating profit growth in the year | |||
| Strong growth in Africa and Australia and excellent results in Latin America despite difficult economic conditions | |||
| Challenging conditions in Europe |
Key measures: | |||||||||||||||||||
Reported | Organic | ||||||||||||||||||
2004* | 2003** | movement | movement | ||||||||||||||||
£ million | £ million | % | % | ||||||||||||||||
Volume |
7 | 4 | |||||||||||||||||
Turnover |
2,275 | 2,080 | 9 | 6 | |||||||||||||||
Net sales (after deducting excise duties) |
1,789 | 1,637 | 9 | 7 | |||||||||||||||
Marketing |
280 | 220 | 27 | 10 | |||||||||||||||
Operating profit before exceptional items |
511 | 502 | 2 | 5 | |||||||||||||||
32 Diageo Annual Report 2004
|
Operating and financial review |
From 1 July 2003, Germany has been reported within key markets (previously within venture markets) and Portugal has been reported within venture markets (previously within key markets).
Reported performance Reported turnover in the year ended 30 June 2004 was £2,275 million, up 9% on the prior year figure of £2,080 million. Operating profit before exceptional items was up 2% at £511 million for the year ended 30 June 2004.
Organic performance Turnover in key markets was up £195 million compared with the year ended 30 June 2003. There were unfavourable exchange movements of £49 million, principally on the Venezuelan bolivar and the Nigerian naira, offset by a £119 million improvement in organic performance. In addition, the Germany/Portugal transfer noted above increased turnover by £139 million. The sale of 50% of Don Julio in January 2003 (which has since been accounted for as an associate) negatively impacted turnover by £14 million.
Organic brand performance: | |||||||||||
Volume | Net sales* | ||||||||||
movement | movement | ||||||||||
% | % | ||||||||||
Johnnie Walker |
6 | 8 | |||||||||
Smirnoff |
8 | 4 | |||||||||
Guinness |
11 | 20 | |||||||||
Baileys |
9 | 8 | |||||||||
JεB |
(7 | ) | (5 | ) | |||||||
Total global priority brands |
7 | 8 | |||||||||
Local priority brands |
1 | 5 | |||||||||
Category brands |
1 | 4 | |||||||||
Total |
4 | 7 | |||||||||
Overall key markets volume growth was achieved through strong performance in Africa, Latin America, Australia and global duty free. Volume growth together with price increases in Africa and Australia and overall favourable mix delivered 7% net sales (after deducting excise duties) growth.
33 Diageo Annual Report 2004
|
Operating and financial review |
Net sales (after deducting excise duties) in Africa grew 16%, benefiting primarily from price increases. Marketing investment increased 23% to support top-line growth and the launch of Guinness Extra Smooth. In South Africa, a partnership with Heineken and Namibia Breweries was formed, brandhouse, to capture the opportunity provided by the consumer trend towards trading up to premium brands.
Venture markets
Summary:
| Continued volume growth in global priority brands and mix improvement on category brands drove organic operating profit growth of 9%. | |||
| Strong performances from Johnnie Walker, Smirnoff and Baileys | |||
| Declining ready to drink segment | |||
| Strong growth in the Middle East, Americas and Caribbean and Asia (ex Philippines) | |||
| Mixed performance across Europe with significant growth achieved in Portugal, Russia and the Nordics | |||
| Underperformance in balance of Europe largely due to ready to drink segment decline | |||
| Marketing investment up sharply in strategically selected markets |
34 Diageo Annual Report 2004
|
Operating and financial review |
Key measures: | |||||||||||||||||||
Reported | Organic | ||||||||||||||||||
2004* | 2003** | movement | movement | ||||||||||||||||
£ million | £ million | % | % | ||||||||||||||||
Volume |
(3 | ) | 7 | ||||||||||||||||
Turnover |
1,131 | 1,212 | (7 | ) | 10 | ||||||||||||||
Net sales (after deducting excise duties) |
890 | 956 | (7 | ) | 9 | ||||||||||||||
Marketing |
132 | 167 | (21 | ) | 6 | ||||||||||||||
Operating profit before exceptional items |
260 | 262 | (1 | ) | 9 | ||||||||||||||
From 1 July 2003, Portugal has been reported within venture markets (previously within key markets) and Germany has been reported within key markets (previously within venture markets).
Reported performance Reported turnover in venture markets was down £81 million (7%) in the year ended 30 June 2004 compared with the year ended 30 June 2003. Reported operating profit before exceptional items declined by £2 million (1%) in the current year, compared with the £262 million reported in the year ended 30 June 2003.
Organic performance Strong organic turnover performance of the brands in venture markets, up £104 million against the prior year, was principally offset by the Germany/Portugal transfer noted above (decrease of £139 million) and adverse exchange rate movements of £37 million. In addition, the impact of disposals reduced turnover in the current year by £9 million (principally Gilbeys Green and White Whisky in India), leading to an overall decrease of £81 million compared with the year ended 30 June 2003.
Organic brand performance: | |||||||||||
Volume | Net sales* | ||||||||||
movement | movement | ||||||||||
% | % | ||||||||||
Johnnie Walker |
13 | 13 | |||||||||
Smirnoff |
9 | 1 | |||||||||
Guinness |
(1 | ) | 2 | ||||||||
Baileys |
9 | 7 | |||||||||
JεB |
6 | 6 | |||||||||
Total global priority brands |
9 | 7 | |||||||||
Local priority brands |
(17 | ) | 3 | ||||||||
Category brands |
5 | 15 | |||||||||
Total |
7 | 9 | |||||||||
Volume growth of Johnnie Walker was driven by growth of 24% in Asia venture markets through expanding brand awareness and availability and investment in proven growth drivers. Volume of Johnnie Walker in China grew 68%, albeit from a small base.
35 Diageo Annual Report 2004
|
Operating and financial review |
Red Stripe, venture markets only local priority brand, recorded a 17% volume decline due to duty and price increases in the second half of fiscal 2003, and a tough economic environment in Jamaica. However, the brand achieved a 3% net sales (after deducting excise duties) growth due to the substantial price increases.
Operating results 2003 compared with 2002
Summary consolidated profit and loss account | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2003 | 2002 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Before | Before | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
exceptional | Exceptional | exceptional | Exceptional | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
items | items | Total | items | items | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||
(restated) | (restated) | (restated) | (restated) | (restated) | (restated) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
£ million | £ million | £ million | £ million | £ million | £ million | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Turnover |
9,281 | | 9,281 | 10,900 | | 10,900 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Operating costs |
(7,326 | ) | (168 | ) | (7,494 | ) | (8,900 | ) | (470 | ) | (9,370 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Operating profit |
1,955 | (168 | ) | 1,787 | 2,000 | (470 | ) | 1,530 | |||||||||||||||||||
Share of
associates profits |
478 | (21 | ) | 457 | 324 | (41 | ) | 283 | |||||||||||||||||||
Disposal of fixed assets |
(43 | ) | (43 | ) | (22 | ) | (22 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
Disposal of businesses |
(1,254 | ) | (1,254 | ) | 813 | 813 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Finance charges |
(315 | ) | | (315 | ) | (295 | ) | | (295 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Profit before taxation |
2,118 | (1,486 | ) | 632 | 2,029 | 280 | 2,309 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Taxation |
(543 | ) | 52 | (491 | ) | (512 | ) | (121 | ) | (633 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Profit after taxation |
1,575 | (1,434 | ) | 141 | 1,517 | 159 | 1,676 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Minority interests |
(91 | ) | | (91 | ) | (87 | ) | | (87 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Profit for the year |
1,484 | (1,434 | ) | 50 | 1,430 | 159 | 1,589 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Turnover
Overall Turnover decreased by £1,619 million (15%) from £10,900 million in the prior year to £9,281 million in the year ended 30 June 2003, following the disposals of Pillsbury in October 2001 and Burger King in December 2002, both of which are accounted for as discontinued operations and which contributed £479 million to turnover in the year ended 30 June 2003 compared with £2,361 million in the prior year.
36 Diageo Annual Report 2004
|
Operating and financial review |
Continuing operations premium drinks For continuing operations, which now represents Diageos premium drinks business, turnover increased by £263 million (3%) from £8,539 million in the year ended 30 June 2002 to £8,802 million in the year ended 30 June 2003. The Seagram spirits and wine businesses, which were acquired on 21 December 2001, contributed £1,214 million to turnover during the year, compared with £573 million in the six month period ended 30 June 2002. This increase attributable to the acquired Seagram business was partly offset by the impact of brands which were disposed of during the two year period ended 30 June 2003 of £327 million, principally due to Malibu (impact of £107 million), North American wine brands (£42 million) which were sold in May and April 2002 respectively, and the loss of the distribution rights of Jack Daniels and Southern Comfort in Great Britain, effective August 2002 (£108 million). Turnover was also adversely impacted by the effect of exchange rate movements, primarily the US dollar, which reduced turnover by an estimated £303 million. The remaining £243 million increase in turnover reflects the underlying performance of the ongoing brand portfolio which saw volume increase by 1%.
Discontinued operations Burger King contributed £479 million to turnover in the year ended 30 June 2003 compared with £1,123 million in the year ended 30 June 2002, following the disposal of Burger King in December 2002. Turnover in the year ended 30 June 2002 also included £1,238 million from Pillsbury which was sold on 31 October 2001.
Operating costs
Overall Operating costs decreased by £1,876 million (20% on a reported basis) from £9,370 million in the year ended 30 June 2002 to £7,494 million in the year ended 30 June 2003. This decrease was caused by the disposals of Pillsbury in October 2001, which had £1,061 million operating costs in the prior year, and Burger King in December 2002, whose operating costs fell by £565 million reflecting the reduction in the period of ownership by the group. Operating costs of premium drinks decreased by £250 million.
Continuing operations premium drinks For continuing operations, which now represents Diageos premium drinks business, operating costs decreased by £250 million (3% on a reported basis) from £7,318 million in the year ended 30 June 2002 to £7,068 million in the year ended 30 June 2003. Operating exceptional costs for continuing operations decreased by £281 million from £449 million in the prior year to £168 million (these are discussed under exceptional operating costs below).
Operating profit before exceptional items
Overall Operating profit before exceptional items decreased by £45 million from £2,000 million to £1,955 million. The decrease reflects an increase attributable to premium drinks of £232 million, offset by a reduced contribution of £277 million from discontinued operations.
Continuing operations premium drinks Operating profit before exceptional items for premium drinks increased by £232 million (14%) from £1,670 million to £1,902 million. The Seagram businesses, in the six months ended 31 December 2002, contributed £211 million, but this was offset by a £73 million impact of businesses disposed of, primarily Malibu (impact of £40 million) and North American wine brands (£5 million) which were sold in May and April 2002 respectively, and the loss of the distribution rights of Jack Daniels and Southern Comfort in the United Kingdom, effective August 2002 (£10 million). £132 million of the increase in operating profit before exceptional items is attributable to the organic performance of the brand portfolio, discussed in more detail below. Exchange rate movements, net of the effect of currency hedging, had an adverse impact on operating profit before exceptional items of £38 million.
Discontinued operations The results for the year included an operating profit contribution of £53 million from discontinued operations (Burger King only), compared with £330 million in the year ended 30 June 2002 (Burger King and Pillsbury).
Exceptional operating costs
Overall The operating profit for the year ended 30 June 2003 is after exceptional operating charges of £168 million compared to £470 million (including £21 million in respect of discontinued operations) for the year ended 30 June 2002. This comprised integration and restructuring costs of £225 million, offset by £57 million received on the termination of Bass distribution rights in the United States.
37 Diageo Annual Report 2004
|
Operating and financial review |
Continuing operations premium drinks In the year ended 30 June 2003, £177 million was incurred in respect of the integration of the Seagram spirits and wine businesses, acquired in December 2001 (year ended 30 June 2002 £164 million). Approximately £43 million of these costs were employee related, £7 million were in respect of write downs of tangible fixed assets, £57 million were incurred in putting in place new distributor and broker agreements as part of the Next Generation Growth programme in the United States, and the balance included consultancy and systems costs. The majority of these costs were incurred in North America and the United Kingdom. It is expected that the total programme cost of restructuring and integrating the business will be approximately $700 million (£460 million) of which $590 million (£390 million) is expected to be cash. As a result of the amount charged to the profit and loss account in the two years ended 30 June 2003, it is anticipated that approximately 2,200 jobs will be lost of which some 1,800 had been terminated by 30 June 2003. On completion of the programme it is anticipated that some 2,500 jobs will be lost and that integration synergy will reduce Diageos annual cost base by approximately £115 million in the year ending 30 June 2005. The above merger synergy represents a management estimate and, as a forward-looking statement, involves risk and uncertainty. The expected level of synergy is based on a number of assumptions, including certain expectations concerning: the integration of back offices and sales forces in subsidiary regional offices resulting in headcount reductions and rationalisation of facilities; headcount reductions in central and regional offices; and procurement savings through improvement of supplier terms.
Discontinued operations There were no exceptional operating costs in relation to discontinued operations in the year ended 30 June 2003. In the prior year, exceptional operating costs for discontinued operations comprised £21 million in relation to the restructuring of franchisee loan financing arrangements in anticipation of the disposal of the Burger King business.
Associates
The groups share of profits of associates before exceptional items was £478 million for the year compared with £324 million in the year ended 30 June 2002. The 21% equity interest in General Mills contributed £287 million (£143 million in the eight months ended 30 June 2002). Exceptional items for associates comprised £18 million for Diageos share of General Mills exceptional costs incurred on its restructuring of the acquired Pillsbury business, and £3 million in respect of restructuring within Moët Hennessy.
Finance charges
Finance charges increased by £20 million (7%) from £295 million in the prior year to £315 million in the year ended 30 June 2003. The net interest charge decreased by £54 million, from £399 million in the prior year to £345 million in the year ended 30 June 2003 as the net benefits of £76 million in respect of the disposal of businesses, of £27 million from exchange rate related movements, and of £44 million from the reduction in interest rates were offset by other factors. These factors included an increase of £14 million in the amount relating to the share of General Mills interest charge, the effect of business acquisitions, principally the Seagram spirits and wine businesses, of £60 million and the funding of the share repurchases which increased the interest charge by £43 million. Other finance income was £30 million in the year ended 30 June 2003, compared with £104 million in the prior year. This adverse movement is principally due to a lower level of finance income in respect of the groups post employment plans in the year ended 30 June 2003 (£36 million) than in the year ended 30 June 2002 (£104 million).
Non operating exceptional items
Non operating exceptional items before taxation comprise losses of £43 million on disposal of fixed assets and losses of £1,254 million on disposal of businesses in the year ended 30 June 2003 compared with losses of £22 million and gains of £813 million respectively in the prior year.
Taxation
The effective rate of taxation on profit before exceptional items for the year ended 30 June 2003 was 25.6%, restated from the originally reported 25%, compared with 25.2% for the year ended 30 June 2002. The restatement was made following compliance with the accounting pronouncements for post employment plans and share trusts which Diageo adopted from 1 July 2003. After exceptional items the effective
38 Diageo Annual Report 2004
|
Operating and financial review |
rate of taxation was 77.7% for the year ended 30 June 2003 compared with 27.4% for the year ended 30 June 2002. The effective rate of taxation for the year ended 30 June 2003 reflected the fact that the pre tax loss on the disposal of Burger King was £1,441 million with associated tax relief of £80 million.
Premium drinks
The following discussion provides additional commentary on the trading performance of the premium drinks business with the equivalent period in the prior year.
The organic movement calculations for turnover, net sales (after deducting excise duties) and operating profit before exceptional items for the year ended 30 June 2003 were as follows: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2002 | Organic | 2003 | Organic | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reported | Exchange | movement | Reported | movement | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(restated) | (restated) | Disposals | Acquisitions | (restated) | (restated) | (restated) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
£ million | £ million | £ million | £ million | £ million | £ million | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Turnover |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Major markets: |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
North America |
2,641 | (234 | ) | (105 | ) | 444 | 13 | 2,759 | 1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Great Britain |
1,418 | | (135 | ) | 17 | 80 | 1,380 | 6 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Ireland |
937 | 40 | (15 | ) | 1 | (10 | ) | 953 | (1 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Spain |
368 | 20 | (11 | ) | 35 | 6 | 418 | 2 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
5,364 | (174 | ) | (266 | ) | 497 | 89 | 5,510 | 2 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Key markets |
2,031 | (108 | ) | (30 | ) | 141 | 46 | 2,080 | 2 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Venture markets |
1,144 | (21 | ) | (31 | ) | 12 | 108 | 1,212 | 10 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Total premium drinks |
8,539 | (303 | ) | (327 | ) | 650 | 243 | 8,802 | 3 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Net sales (after deducting excise duties) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Major markets: |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
North America |
2,202 | (194 | ) | (95 | ) | 373 | 13 | 2,299 | 1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Great Britain |
847 | | (84 | ) | 9 | 18 | 790 | 2 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Ireland |
625 | 27 | (13 | ) | 1 | (2 | ) | 638 | | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Spain |
286 | 17 | (10 | ) | 26 | (3 | ) | 316 | (1 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||
3,960 | (150 | ) | (202 | ) | 409 | 26 | 4,043 | 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Key markets |
1,584 | (89 | ) | (27 | ) | 100 | 69 | 1,637 | 5 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Venture markets |
876 | (22 | ) | (26 | ) | 9 | 119 | 956 | 14 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Total premium drinks |
6,420 | (261 | ) | (255 | ) | 518 | 214 | 6,636 | 4 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Excise duties |
2,119 | 2,166 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Turnover |
8,539 | 8,802 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Operating profit before exceptional items |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Major markets: |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
North America |
523 | (2 | ) | (30 | ) | 154 | 63 | 708 | 13 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Great Britain |
187 | | (17 | ) | 4 | 29 | 203 | 17 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Ireland |
136 | 6 | (2 | ) | | (9 | ) | 131 | (7 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Spain |
90 | 1 | (2 | ) | 11 | (4 | ) | 96 | (4 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||
936 | 5 | (51 | ) | 169 | 79 | 1,138 | 9 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Key markets |
501 | (41 | ) | (12 | ) | 39 | 15 | 502 | 3 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Venture markets |
233 | (2 | ) | (10 | ) | 3 | 38 | 262 | 17 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Total premium drinks |
1,670 | (38 | ) | (73 | ) | 211 | 132 | 1,902 | 8 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
39 Diageo Annual Report 2004
|
Operating and financial review |
Notes
(1) The reported turnover and net sales (after deducting excise duties) for the years ended 30 June 2003 and 30 June 2002 have been restated following the adoption of application note G to FRS 5 Reporting the substance of transactions. The change reduced turnover and net sales (after deducting excise duties) by £159 million in the year ended 30 June 2003 (year ended 30 June 2002 £165 million) in respect of the following markets: £36 million for North America, £49 million for Great Britain, £6 million for Spain, £49 million for key markets and £19 million for venture markets (year ended 30 June 2002: £28 million, £49 million, £12 million, £47 million and £29 million, respectively).
(2) The reported operating profit before exceptional items for the years ended 30 June 2003 and 30 June 2002 has been restated following the adoption of FRS 17 Retirement benefits and UITF abstract 38 Accounting for ESOP trusts. The operating profit before exceptional items has been reduced by £74 million (year ended 30 June 2002 £96 million) in respect of the following markets: £21 million for North America, £16 million for Great Britain, £10 million for Ireland, £3 million for Spain, £20 million for key markets and £4 million for venture markets (year ended 30 June 2002: £27 million, £17 million, £15 million, £4 million, £23 million and £10 million, respectively).
(3) The exchange adjustments for turnover, net sales (after deducting excise duties) and operating profit before exceptional items are principally in respect of the US dollar.
(4) Disposal adjustments for turnover, net sales (after deducting excise duties) and operating profit before exceptional items respectively were in relation to the disposal of Malibu rum (£107 million, £93 million, £40 million); the termination of the distribution rights for Jack Daniels and Southern Comfort in the United Kingdom (£113 million, £70 million, £10 million); the sale of Glen Ellen/MG Vallejo wines (£42 million, £38 million, £5 million); the transfer of distribution rights of Cuervo 1800 (£27 million, £22 million, £10 million); the sale of Croft Inns (£10 million, £10 million, £nil); the sale of Gilbeys Green and White Label whiskies in India (£9 million, £8 million, £1 million); the termination of distribution rights for Drambuie (£7 million, £4 million, £1 million); the sale of Croft and Delaforce port and sherry brands (£5 million, £4 million, £2 million); and other disposals (£7 million, £6 million, £4 million).
(5) Acquisition adjustments for turnover, net sales (after deducting excise duties) and operating profit before exceptional items, respectively, were in respect of the purchase of the Seagram spirits and wine businesses (£650 million, £518 million, £211 million).
(6) In the calculation of operating profit before exceptional items, the overheads included in disposals were only those directly attributable to the businesses disposed of, and do not result from subjective judgements of management.
(7) The organic movement percentage is the amount in the column headed organic movement in the table above expressed as a percentage of the aggregate of the first three columns. The basis of the calculation of the organic movement is explained on page 21.
Organic brand performance | ||||||||||||
Net | ||||||||||||
sales (after | ||||||||||||
deducting | ||||||||||||
Equivalent | Volume | excise duties) | ||||||||||
units | movement | movement | ||||||||||
Million | % | % | ||||||||||
Smirnoff |
23.0 | 6 | 8 | |||||||||
Johnnie Walker |
10.8 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||
Guinness |
11.4 | 2 | 6 | |||||||||
Baileys |
6.2 | 10 | 13 | |||||||||
JεB |
6.0 | (5 | ) | (6 | ) | |||||||
Captain Morgan* |
2.5 | (1 | ) | (12 | ) | |||||||
José Cuervo |
4.2 | 7 | 7 | |||||||||
Tanqueray |
1.9 | 3 | 7 | |||||||||
Total global priority brands |
66.0 | 3 | 5 | |||||||||
Local priority brands |
17.1 | (1 | ) | 4 | ||||||||
Category brands |
26.8 | (3 | ) | 1 | ||||||||
109.9 | 1 | 4 | ||||||||||
Acquisitions |
9.4 | |||||||||||
Total in year ended 30 June 2003 |
119.3 | |||||||||||
40 Diageo Annual Report 2004
|
Operating and financial review |
Analysis by individual market
North America
Key measures: | ||||||||||||||||
2003 | 2002 | Reported | Organic | |||||||||||||
(restated) | (restated) | movement | movement | |||||||||||||
£ million | £ million | % | % | |||||||||||||
Volume |
15 | 1 | ||||||||||||||
Turnover |
2,759 | 2,641 | 4 | 1 | ||||||||||||
Net sales (after deducting excise duties) |
2,299 | 2,202 | 4 | 1 | ||||||||||||
Marketing |
369 | 380 | (3 | ) | (6 | ) | ||||||||||
Operating profit before exceptional items |
708 | 523 | 35 | 13 | ||||||||||||
Reported performance Turnover in North America increased 4% from £2,641 million in the year ended 30 June 2002 to £2,759 million in the year ended 30 June 2003. Operating profit before exceptional items increased 35% from £523 million in the year ended 30 June 2002 to £708 million in the year ended 30 June 2003.
Organic performance The increase in turnover was primarily due to the turnover derived from the Seagram brands, acquired in the joint acquisition of the Seagram spirits and wine businesses in December 2001, which contributed £444 million in the six months ended 31 December 2002. The effect of brand disposals and of exchange rate movements in the US dollar reduced turnover in the year ended 30 June 2003 by £105 million and £234 million, respectively. The disposal impact is primarily attributable to the disposal of Malibu in May 2002 (£37 million), the Glen Ellen wine business in May 2002 (£37 million) and Cuervo 1800 in September 2002 (£24 million).
Organic brand performance: | ||||||||
Net | ||||||||
sales (after | ||||||||
deducting | ||||||||
Volume | excise duties) | |||||||
movement | movement | |||||||
% | % | |||||||
Smirnoff |
4 | (2 | ) | |||||
Johnnie Walker |
2 | 7 | ||||||
José Cuervo |
10 | 9 | ||||||
Baileys |
14 | 17 | ||||||
Tanqueray |
2 | 7 | ||||||
Guinness |
1 | 1 | ||||||
Captain Morgan |
(6 | ) | (17 | ) | ||||
JεB |
(6 | ) | (6 | ) | ||||
Total global priority brands |
4 | 2 | ||||||
Local priority brands |
1 | 4 | ||||||
Category brands |
(7 | ) | (3 | ) | ||||
Total |
1 | 1 | ||||||
| Smirnoff volume excluding ready to drink was up 9% and net sales (after deducting excise duties) were up 11% | |||
| Excluding Captain Morgan Gold, volume of Captain Morgan was up 8% and net sales (after deducting excise duties) were up 10% | |||
| Excluding ready to drink, total volume was up 3% and net sales (after deducting excise duties) were up 5% |
Volume growth in North America was driven by the strong performance of the priority spirits brands. Global priority brand volume excluding ready to drink grew 7%. Ready to drink volume, which includes flavored malt beverages and ready to drink in the United States and ready to drink in Canada, was down 17%, representing a decline in Smirnoff ready to drink of 11% and the withdrawal of Captain Morgan Gold.
41 Diageo Annual Report 2004
|
Operating and financial review |
Smirnoff ready to drink volume was down 11%. The launch of Smirnoff Ice Triple Black in January 2003 partially offset softness in Smirnoff Ice.
Other business performance drivers:
| At 30 June 2003, almost 80% of Diageos volume was distributed through dedicated sales teams | |||
| Ready to drink segment under pressure | |||
| Efficiencies generated savings of over 10% in media planning and buying | |||
| Share of US spirits brands increased by 0.3 percentage points to 27.3% |
Diageo North America continued to progress its strategic initiatives. In particular its Next Generation Growth programme made excellent further progress. In the second half of the year ended 30 June 2003, new distribution and brokerage agreements were reached in nine more states and additional distributors established dedicated sales forces. At 30 June 2003 distributors and brokers in 34 states and Washington DC, representing nearly 80% of Diageos volume, were supporting Diageos brands, with just under 2,000 sales personnel working in teams solely dedicated to Diageo and S&S brands.
Great Britain
Key measures: | ||||||||||||||||
2003 | 2002 | Reported | Organic | |||||||||||||
(restated) | (restated) | movement | movement | |||||||||||||
£ million | £ million | % | % | |||||||||||||
Volume |
(2 | ) | 5 | |||||||||||||
Turnover |
1,380 | 1,418 | (3 | ) | 6 | |||||||||||
Net sales (after deducting excise duties) |
790 | 847 | (7 | ) | 2 | |||||||||||
Marketing |
139 | 142 | (2 | ) | | |||||||||||
Operating profit before exceptional items |
203 | 187 | 9 | 17 | ||||||||||||
Reported performance Turnover in Great Britain was down 3% on a reported basis from £1,418 million in the previous year to £1,380 million in the year ended 30 June 2003. Operating profit before exceptional items was up £16 million from £187 million in the year ended 30 June 2002 to £203 million in the year ended 30 June 2003.
42 Diageo Annual Report 2004
|
Operating and financial review |
Organic performance The principal reason for the decrease in turnover was the termination of the distribution rights for Jack Daniels and Southern Comfort in Great Britain in August 2002 which reduced turnover by £108 million. The acquired Seagram brands contributed £17 million to turnover in the six months ended 31 December 2002. The organic increase in the year was £80 million (6%).
Organic brand performance: | ||||||||
Net | ||||||||
sales (after | ||||||||
deducting | ||||||||
Volume | excise duties) | |||||||
movement | movement | |||||||
% | % | |||||||
Smirnoff |
7 | (1 | ) | |||||
Guinness |
(1 | ) | (1 | ) | ||||
Baileys |
29 | 30 | ||||||
Total global priority brands |
6 | 2 | ||||||
Local priority brands |
(3 | ) | (11 | ) | ||||
Category brands |
14 | 14 | ||||||
Total |
5 | 2 | ||||||
| Smirnoff volume excluding ready to drink was up 11% and net sales (after deducting excise duties) were up 16% |
| Excluding ready to drink total volume was up 6% and net sales (after deducting excise duties) were up 7% |
Great Britain achieved solid volume growth in the year ended 30 June 2003 and again increased share, driven by growth of the global priority spirits brands. Growth in the spirits brands offset the decline in volume in ready to drink and beer.
Other business performance drivers:
| Increased resources behind sales execution |
A comprehensive restructuring of the customer sales force drove growth in Great Britain. The new structure both increased frequency of contact with customers and generated more effective sales promotions.
43 Diageo Annual Report 2004
|
Operating and financial review |
Ireland
Key measures: | ||||||||||||||||
2003 | 2002 | Reported | Organic | |||||||||||||
(restated) | (restated) | movement | movement | |||||||||||||
£ million | £ million | % | % | |||||||||||||
Volume |
(6 | ) | (5 | ) | ||||||||||||
Turnover |
953 | 937 | 2 | (1 | ) | |||||||||||
Net sales (after deducting excise duties) |
638 | 625 | 2 | | ||||||||||||
Marketing |
67 | 65 | 3 | | ||||||||||||
Operating profit before exceptional items |
131 | 136 | (4 | ) | (7 | ) | ||||||||||
Reported performance In Ireland, turnover increased £16 million from £937 million in the prior year to £953 million in the year ended 30 June 2003.
Organic performance Exchange rate movements increased turnover by £40 million, partially offset by an organic decline in turnover of £10 million. Operating profit before exceptional items was £5 million lower than the previous year at £131 million. Favourable exchange rate movements on the euro of £6 million were more than offset by the weaker performance of the brands compared to the year ended 30 June 2002.
Organic brand performance: | ||||||||||||
Net | ||||||||||||
sales (after | ||||||||||||
deducting | ||||||||||||
Volume | excise duties) | |||||||||||
movement | movement | |||||||||||
% | % | |||||||||||
Guinness |
(4 | ) | | |||||||||
Smirnoff |
(5 | ) | (7 | ) | ||||||||
Baileys |
(2 | ) | (1 | ) | ||||||||
Total global priority brands |
(4 | ) | (1 | ) | ||||||||
Local priority brands |
(5 | ) | (1 | ) | ||||||||
Category brands |
(7 | ) | 1 | |||||||||
Total |
(5 | ) | | |||||||||
Other business performance drivers:
| Continued decline in the beverage alcohol market driven by a weakening economic environment |
As previously described, the beverage alcohol market in Ireland deteriorated further as a result of declining consumer confidence, the continuing slowdown in economic growth and the excise duty increase on spirits and ready to drink which led to retail price increases of around 20%. The social aspects of drinking are a significant issue in Ireland. As part of its ongoing social responsibility programme, Diageo participated fully in the establishment of MEAS a new independent association established as part of the social responsibility programme undertaken by the industry.
44 Diageo Annual Report 2004
|
Operating and financial review |
Spain
Key measures: | ||||||||||||||||
2003 | 2002 | Reported | Organic | |||||||||||||
(restated) | (restated) | movement | movement | |||||||||||||
£ million | £ million | % | % | |||||||||||||
Volume |
5 | (1 | ) | |||||||||||||
Turnover |
418 | 368 | 14 | 2 | ||||||||||||
Net sales (after deducting excise duties) |
316 | 286 | 10 | (1 | ) | |||||||||||
Marketing |
64 | 65 | (2 | ) | (9 | ) | ||||||||||
Operating profit before exceptional items |
96 | 90 | 7 | (4 | ) | |||||||||||
Reported performance Turnover in the Spanish market increased £50 million to £418 million in the year ended 30 June 2003 compared with the prior year. Operating profit before exceptional items was up £6 million to £96 million in the year ended 30 June 2003.
Organic performance The reasons for the increase in turnover are the favourable impact of exchange rate movements in the year (£20 million) and the benefit of the acquired Seagram brands, principally Cacique, which contributed £35 million to turnover in the six months ended 31 December 2002.
Organic brand performance: | ||||||||||||
Net | ||||||||||||
sales (after | ||||||||||||
deducting | ||||||||||||
Volume | excise duties) | |||||||||||
movement | movement | |||||||||||
% | % | |||||||||||
JεB |
(3 | ) | (7 | ) | ||||||||
Baileys |
(2 | ) | 1 | |||||||||
Johnnie Walker |
(4 | ) | (14 | ) | ||||||||
Smirnoff |
(8 | ) | (2 | ) | ||||||||
Total global priority brands |
(4 | ) | (7 | ) | ||||||||
Local priority brands |
25 | 16 | ||||||||||
Category brands |
3 | 13 | ||||||||||
Total |
(1 | ) | (1 | ) | ||||||||
Other business performance drivers:
| Market share gains on JεB, Baileys, Johnnie Walker Red Label and Cacique |
In the Scotch segment, Diageos brands gained share slightly with gains by JεB and Johnnie Walker Red Label partially offset by share decline in VAT69.
45 Diageo Annual Report 2004
|
Operating and financial review |
Key markets
Key measures: | ||||||||||||||||
2003 | 2002 | Reported | Organic | |||||||||||||
(restated) | (restated) | movement | movement | |||||||||||||
£ million | £ million | % | % | |||||||||||||
Volume |
| (2 | ) | |||||||||||||
Turnover |
2,080 | 2,031 | 2 | 2 | ||||||||||||
Net sales (after deducting excise duties) |
1,637 | 1,584 | 3 | 5 | ||||||||||||
Marketing |
220 | 198 | 11 | 11 | ||||||||||||
Operating profit before exceptional items |
502 | 501 | | 3 | ||||||||||||
Reported performance In key markets, turnover increased £49 million from £2,031 million in the year ended 30 June 2002 to £2,080 million in the year ended 30 June 2003. Operating profit before exceptional items was up £1 million at £502 million for the year ended 30 June 2003.
Organic performance Turnover was boosted by the acquired Seagram brands which contributed £141 million in the six months ended 31 December 2002, and by an organic increase of £46 million. However, unfavourable exchange variances of £108 million (principally in respect of the Venezuelan bolivar), and the impact of disposals of £30 million (principally Malibu £24 million) reduced turnover.
Organic brand performance: | ||||||||
Net | ||||||||
sales (after | ||||||||
deducting | ||||||||
Volume | excise duties) | |||||||
movement | movement | |||||||
% | % | |||||||
Johnnie Walker |
(1 | ) | (3 | ) | ||||
Guinness |
9 | 29 | ||||||
JεB |
(10 | ) | (9 | ) | ||||
Smirnoff |
2 | 11 | ||||||
Baileys |
(2 | ) | 2 | |||||
Total global priority brands |
1 | 5 | ||||||
Local priority brands |
(3 | ) | 15 | |||||
Category brands |
(5 | ) | (1 | ) | ||||
Total |
(2 | ) | 5 | |||||
46 Diageo Annual Report 2004
|
Operating and financial review |
Other business performance drivers:
| Strong performance in Africa | |||
| Strong volume growth in Australia | |||
| Continued impact of difficult economic situation in Latin America | |||
| Impact of SARS in Asia and Global Duty Free in the year ended 30 June 2003 | |||
| Competitor pricing in Portugal |
As previously noted, several of Diageos key markets are in geographies which faced the most difficult challenges in the year ended 30 June 2003. The overall profitability of the key markets in Latin America declined. This was partially offset by growth in Africa and in South Korea while other key markets broadly maintained operating profit year on year.
47 Diageo Annual Report 2004
|
Operating and financial review |
Venture markets
Key measures: | ||||||||||||||||
2003 | 2002 | Reported | Organic | |||||||||||||
(restated) | (restated) | movement | movement | |||||||||||||
£ million | £ million | % | % | |||||||||||||
Volume |
2 | 6 | ||||||||||||||
Turnover |
1,212 | 1,144 | 6 | 10 | ||||||||||||
Net sales (after deducting excise duties) |
956 | 876 | 9 | 14 | ||||||||||||
Marketing |
167 | 138 | 21 | 27 | ||||||||||||
Operating profit before exceptional items |
262 | 233 | 12 | 17 | ||||||||||||
Reported performance Turnover in venture markets increased by £68 million from £1,144 million in the year ended 30 June 2002 to £1,212 million in the year ended 30 June 2003. Operating profit before exceptional items, at £262 million for the year ended 30 June 2003, was £29 million higher than in the previous year.
Organic performance The main factor for the improvement in turnover was the strong organic growth which added £108 million to turnover compared with the previous year. However, this was offset by unfavourable exchange movements of £21 million and the disposal of brands of £31 million (principally Malibu £17 million and Gilbeys Green and White Label whiskies £9 million).
Organic brand performance: | ||||||||
Net | ||||||||
sales (after | ||||||||
deducting | ||||||||
Volume | excise duties) | |||||||
movement | movement | |||||||
% | % | |||||||
Johnnie Walker |
7 | 10 | ||||||
Smirnoff |
25 | 82 | ||||||
Guinness |
1 | 3 | ||||||
Baileys |
11 | 10 | ||||||
JεB |
4 | 4 | ||||||
Total global priority brands |
11 | 22 | ||||||
Local priority brands |
(3 | ) | 10 | |||||
Category brands |
(2 | ) | (1 | ) | ||||
Total |
6 | 14 | ||||||
| Smirnoff volume excluding ready to drink was up 4% and net sales (after deducting excise duties) were up 8% |
| Excluding ready to drink, volume was up 2% and net sales (after deducting excise duties) were up 4% |
Volume growth reflected strong growth in global priority brands. In addition, ready to drink was an important contributor to venture markets growth with further rollouts of Smirnoff Red and Black Ice as well as the full year benefit of the previous years launches.
Other business performance drivers:
| Marketing investment up 27% mainly behind ready to drink launches and longer term growth projects | |||
| Operating profit growth led by the Caribbean, Middle East, Nordics and Germany |
48 Diageo Annual Report 2004
|
Operating and financial review |
Marketing investment grew by 27% due to investment to support ready to drink launches as well as investment to support longer term growth behind Baileys in Germany, Italy, the Caribbean and venture markets in Latin America and Johnnie Walker in Asia and the Caribbean.
Trend information
On 8 July 2004 Diageo issued a statement about current trading. The following is an extract from this statement:
Liquidity and capital resources
Cash flow A summary of the cash flow and reconciliation to movement in net borrowings for the three years ended 30 June 2004 is as follows: | ||||||||||||
Year ended 30 June | ||||||||||||
2003 | 2002 | |||||||||||
2004 | (restated) | (restated) | ||||||||||
£ million | £ million | £ million | ||||||||||
Operating profit |
1,871 | 1,787 | 1,530 | |||||||||
Exceptional operating costs |
40 | 168 | 470 | |||||||||
Restructuring and integration payments |
(97 | ) | (185 | ) | (148 | ) | ||||||
Depreciation and amortisation charge |
224 | 249 | 300 | |||||||||
Increase in working capital |
(13 | ) | (227 | ) | (125 | ) | ||||||
Other items |
96 | 178 | (19 | ) | ||||||||
Net cash inflow from operating activities |
2,121 | 1,970 | 2,008 | |||||||||
Dividends received from associates |
224 | 60 | 87 | |||||||||
Interest and dividends paid to minority interests |
(299 | ) | (355 | ) | (400 | ) | ||||||
Taxation |
(298 | ) | (105 | ) | (311 | ) | ||||||
Net sale/(purchase) of investments |
9 | (20 | ) | (8 | ) | |||||||
Net capital expenditure |
(307 | ) | (341 | ) | (520 | ) | ||||||
Free cash flow |
1,450 | 1,209 | 856 | |||||||||
Acquisitions and disposals |
(34 | ) | 833 | 1,508 | ||||||||
Equity dividends paid |
(800 | ) | (767 | ) | (758 | ) | ||||||
Issue of share capital |
4 | 4 | 11 | |||||||||
Net purchase of own shares for share trusts |
(4 | ) | (65 | ) | (64 | ) | ||||||
Own shares purchased for cancellation |
(306 | ) | (852 | ) | (1,658 | ) | ||||||
Exchange adjustments |
371 | 227 | 267 | |||||||||
Non-cash items |
45 | 37 | (179 | ) | ||||||||
Decrease/(increase) in net borrowings |
726 | 626 | (17 | ) | ||||||||
49 Diageo Annual Report 2004
|
Operating and financial review |
The primary sources of the groups liquidity over the last three fiscal years have been cash generated from operations and cash received from disposals. A portion of these funds has been used to fund acquisitions, share repurchases, to pay interest, dividends and taxes, and to fund capital expenditure.
Capital repayments The groups management is committed to enhancing shareholder value, both by investing in the businesses and brands so as to improve the return on investment and by managing the capital structure so as to reduce the cost of capital, while maintaining prudent financial ratios. See Risk management below.
Borrowings Following a board review in June 2003, the group policy with regard to the expected maturity profile of net borrowings of group financing companies is to limit the proportion of such borrowings maturing within 12 months to 50% of gross borrowings less money market demand deposits, and the level of commercial paper to 30% of gross borrowings less money market demand deposits. Previously group policy was to maintain the proportion of borrowings maturing within one year at below 60% of total borrowings, and to maintain the level of commercial paper at below 50% of total borrowings. In addition, it is group policy to maintain backstop facility terms from relationship banks to support commercial paper obligations.
50 Diageo Annual Report 2004
|
Operating and financial review |
The groups net borrowings comprise the following: | ||||||||||||
As at 30 June | ||||||||||||
2004 | 2003 | 2002 | ||||||||||
£ million | £ million | £ million | ||||||||||
Overdrafts |
(74 | ) | (83 | ) | (295 | ) | ||||||
Other borrowings due within one year |
(1,927 | ) | (3,480 | ) | (3,423 | ) | ||||||
Borrowings due within one year |
(2,001 | ) | (3,563 | ) | (3,718 | ) | ||||||
Borrowings due between one and three years |
(910 | ) | (919 | ) | (2,755 | ) | ||||||
Borrowings due between three and five years |
(1,499 | ) | (1,267 | ) | (332 | ) | ||||||
Borrowings due after more than five years |
(907 | ) | (795 | ) | (624 | ) | ||||||
Finance leases |
| (1 | ) | (28 | ) | |||||||
Interest rate and foreign currency swaps |
6 | 484 | 365 | |||||||||
Gross borrowings after the impact of foreign currency swaps |
(5,311 | ) | (6,061 | ) | (7,092 | ) | ||||||
Offset by: |
||||||||||||
Cash at bank and liquid resources |
1,167 | 1,191 | 1,596 | |||||||||
(4,144 | ) | (4,870 | ) | (5,496 | ) | |||||||
The groups gross borrowings (after the impact of foreign currency swaps) were denominated in the following currencies: | ||||||||||||||||||||
Total | US dollar | Sterling | Euro | Other | ||||||||||||||||
£ million | % | % | % | % | ||||||||||||||||
Gross borrowings |
||||||||||||||||||||
2004 |
(5,311 | ) | 81 | (9 | ) | 22 | 6 | |||||||||||||
2003 |
(6,061 | ) | 80 | (9 | ) | 24 | 5 | |||||||||||||
2002 |
(7,092 | ) | 77 | | 18 | 5 | ||||||||||||||
Cash at bank and liquid resources were denominated in the following currencies (liquid resources represent amounts placed with financial institutions which require notice of withdrawals of more than 24 hours to avoid an interest penalty, and amounts placed with government agencies): | ||||||||||||||||||||
Total | US dollar | Sterling | Euro | Other | ||||||||||||||||
£ million | % | % | % | % | ||||||||||||||||
Cash at bank and liquid resources |
||||||||||||||||||||
2004 |
1,167 | 49 | 13 | 13 | 25 | |||||||||||||||
2003 |
1,191 | 53 | 14 | 15 | 18 | |||||||||||||||
2002 |
1,596 | 46 | 33 | 7 | 14 | |||||||||||||||
The following table summarises the groups borrowings, excluding overdrafts and interest rate and foreign currency swaps. | ||||||||||||
As at 30 June | ||||||||||||
2004 | 2003 | 2002 | ||||||||||
£ million | £ million | £ million | ||||||||||
Global bonds |
(1,639 | ) | (1,808 | ) | (657 | ) | ||||||
Yankee bonds |
(384 | ) | (423 | ) | (788 | ) | ||||||
Zero coupon bonds |
| (712 | ) | (714 | ) | |||||||
Guaranteed notes |
(220 | ) | (242 | ) | (263 | ) | ||||||
Preferred capital securities |
(412 | ) | (455 | ) | (493 | ) | ||||||
Medium term notes |
(919 | ) | (593 | ) | (1,067 | ) | ||||||
Commercial paper |
(377 | ) | (863 | ) | (1,600 | ) | ||||||
Others |
(1,292 | ) | (1,366 | ) | (1,580 | ) | ||||||
(5,243 | ) | (6,462 | ) | (7,162 | ) | |||||||
51 Diageo Annual Report 2004
|
Operating and financial review |
During the year ended 30 June 2004, the group borrowed 300 million (£201 million) in the form of a medium term note that matures in 2006, $500 million (£275 million) in the form of a global bond that matures in 2006, $200 million (£110 million) in the form of a medium term note that matures in 2007, 500 million (£336 million) in the form of a medium term note that matures in 2009, and $500 million (£275 million) in the form of a global bond that matures in 2011. These proceeds have been used in the ongoing cash management and funding activities of the group. During the year ended 30 June 2003, the group borrowed $1,000 million (£550 million) in the form of a global bond that matures in 2007, $1,000 million (£550 million) in the form of a global bond that matures in 2008, and $200 million (£110 million) in the form of a medium term note that matures in 2018. During the year ended 30 June 2002, the group borrowed £500 million in the form of a guaranteed bond, ¥5,000 million (£25 million) and 100 million (£67 million) in the form of medium term notes that matured in 2002, and 300 million (£201 million) and $100 million (£55 million) in the form of medium term notes that matured in 2003.
Contractual
obligations |
||||||||||||||||||||
As at 30 June 2004 | Payments due by period | |||||||||||||||||||
Less than | More than | |||||||||||||||||||
1 year | 1-3 years | 3-5 years | 5 years | Total | ||||||||||||||||
£ million | £ million | £ million | £ million | £ million | ||||||||||||||||
Long term debt obligations |
1,550 | 910 | 1,499 | 907 | 4,866 | |||||||||||||||
Operating leases |
66 | 105 | 85 | 262 | 518 | |||||||||||||||
Purchase obligations |
601 | 665 | 352 | 650 | 2,268 | |||||||||||||||
Provisions for liabilities and charges and creditors
greater than one year |
123 | 130 | 11 | 20 | 284 | |||||||||||||||
2,340 | 1,810 | 1,947 | 1,839 | 7,936 | ||||||||||||||||
52 Diageo Annual Report 2004
|
Operating and financial review |
Off-balance sheet arrangements
In connection with the disposal of businesses, the group has given guarantees of third party debt which were necessary to complete the disposals on the most favourable terms. The directors are not aware of any instances of default by the borrowers at present, but the ability of the borrowers to continue to be in compliance with the guaranteed debt instruments, and in particular remaining current on payments of interest and repayments of principal, is significantly dependent on the current and future operations of those borrowers and their affiliates. Diageo has guaranteed up to $850 million (£467 million) of external borrowings of Burger King until December 2007. These loans had an original term of five years from December 2002, although Diageo and Burger King agreed to structure their arrangements to encourage refinancing by Burger King on a non-guaranteed basis prior to the end of five years. The primary covenants under the guarantee are pari passu ranking and negative pledge. See Additional information for shareholders Material contracts Agreement for the sale of Burger King Corporation for further information. In connection with the disposal of Pillsbury in October 2001, Diageo has guaranteed debt of International Multifoods Corporation, a wholly owned subsidiary of The JM Smucker Company as from 18 June 2004, to the amount of $200 million (£110 million), repayable in November 2009.
Risk management
The groups funding, liquidity and exposure to interest rate and foreign exchange rate risks are managed by the groups treasury department. The treasury department uses a combination of derivative and conventional financial instruments to manage these underlying treasury risks.
Currency risk The group publishes its consolidated financial statements in sterling and conducts business in many foreign currencies. As a result, it is subject to foreign currency exchange risk due to exchange rate movements which will affect the groups transaction costs, and the translation of the results and underlying net assets of its foreign subsidiaries.
53 Diageo Annual Report 2004
|
Operating and financial review |
Interest rate risk The group has an exposure to interest rate risk and within this category of market risk, is most vulnerable to changes in US dollar, sterling and euro interest rates. To manage interest rate risk, the group manages its proportion of fixed to variable rate borrowings within limits approved by the board, primarily through issuing long term fixed rate bonds, medium term notes and floating rate commercial paper, and by utilising interest rate swaps, cross currency interest rate swaps and swaptions. The profile of fixed rate to floating rate net borrowings is maintained according to the duration measure that is equivalent to an approximate 50% fixed and 50% floating amortising profile. The number of years within the amortising profile depends on a template approved by the board. The floating element of US dollar borrowing is partly protected using interest rate collars. Following the June 2002 policy review, the level of interest rate collars will continue to reduce. Remaining interest rate collars as at 30 June 2004 will take up to approximately two years to expire. In addition, where appropriate, the group may use forward rate agreements to manage short term interest rate exposures. Swaps, swaptions, forward rate agreements and collars are accounted for as hedges. Such management serves to increase the accuracy of the business planning process. Diageo has a target range for cash interest cover (defined as operating profit before exceptional items, interest, tax, depreciation, amortisation and share of associates profits, and after dividends received from associates, over net interest cash flow including minority interest dividends) of five to eight times and under the current economic environment Diageos intention is to be at the higher end of this range. The top limit may, however, be exceeded on certain occasions. The full impact of International Financial Reporting Standards on Diageos interest rate risk management policy and the extent to which Diageo will be able to continue to hedge account for interest rate derivatives are under review. The interest expense recognised in the consolidated profit and loss account may be more sensitive to changes in interest rates under International Financial Reporting Standards than under current hedge accounting.
Liquidity risk Following the June 2003 board review, the groups policy with regard to the expected maturity profile of group financing companies borrowings is to limit the proportion of such borrowings maturing within 12 months to 50% of gross borrowings less money market demand deposits and the level of commercial paper to 30% of gross borrowings less money market demand deposits. Previously group policy was to maintain the proportion of borrowings maturing within 12 months at below 60% of total borrowings, and to maintain the level of commercial paper at below 50% of total borrowings. In addition, it is group policy to maintain backstop facility terms from relationship banks to support commercial paper obligations.
Credit risk A large number of major international financial institutions are counterparties to the interest rate swaps, foreign exchange contracts and deposits transacted by the group. Group policy is to enter into such transactions only with counterparties with a long term credit rating of A or better. The group monitors its credit exposure to its counterparties, together with their credit ratings.
Commodity price risk The group uses commodity futures and options to hedge against price risk in certain commodities. All commodity futures and options contracts hedge a projected future purchase of raw material. Commodity futures or options are then either closed out at the time the raw material is purchased or they are exchanged with the company manufacturing the raw material to determine the contract price. Commodity contracts are held in the balance sheet at fair value but any gains and losses are deferred until the contracts are closed out or exchanged. Open contracts at 30 June 2004 and gains and losses realised in the year or deferred at the balance sheet date were not significant.
Employee share schemes Awards and option grants vesting under the various employee share schemes are generally satisfied by the transfer of existing shares. These awards and option grants are hedged through the purchase of shares or call options. Exceptions to this policy are in respect of exercises under certain GrandMet and international schemes that are satisfied by the issue of new equity.
Insurance The group purchases insurance for commercial, or where required, for legal or contractual reasons. In addition, the group retains insurable risk where external insurance is not considered an economic means of financing these losses.
Sensitivity analysis
For financial instruments held, the group has used a sensitivity analysis technique that measures the change in the fair value of the groups financial instruments from hypothetical changes in market rates.
54 Diageo Annual Report 2004
|
Operating and financial review |
Sensitivity analysis table at 30 June 2004 | |||||||||||||
Fair value changes arising from: | |||||||||||||
1% fall | 10% | ||||||||||||
Estimated | in interest | weakening | |||||||||||
fair value | rates | in sterling | |||||||||||
£ million | £ million | £ million | |||||||||||
Borrowings |
(5,463 | ) | (170 | ) | (509 | ) | |||||||
Interest rate contracts |
(5 | ) | 58 | (2 | ) | ||||||||
Foreign exchange contracts: |
|||||||||||||
Transaction |
38 | | (101 | ) | |||||||||
Balance sheet translation |
19 | | (132 | ) | |||||||||
Guaranteed preferred securities |
(320 | ) | | (36 | ) | ||||||||
Written call options re General Mills shares* |
(41 | ) | (3 | ) | (5 | ) | |||||||
Other financial net assets |
2,077 | 7 | 238 | ||||||||||
Critical UK GAAP accounting policies
The consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United Kingdom. Diageos accounting policies are set out in the notes to the consolidated financial statements in this annual report. In applying these policies the directors are required to make estimates and subjective judgements that may affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the balance sheet date and reported profit for the year. The directors base these on a combination of past experience and any other evidence that is relevant to the particular circumstance. The actual outcome could differ from those estimates. Of Diageos accounting policies, the directors consider that policies in relation to the following areas are of greater complexity and/or particularly subject to the exercise of judgement.
Brands, goodwill and other intangibles Acquired brands are held on the consolidated balance sheet at cost. Where brands are regarded as having indefinite useful economic lives, they are not amortised. Assessment of the useful economic life of an asset, or that an asset has an indefinite life, requires considerable management judgement.
Post employment benefits Diageo accounts for post employment benefits in accordance with FRS 17. Application of FRS 17 requires the exercise of judgement in relation to various assumptions including future pay rises in excess of inflation, employee and pensioner demographics and the future expected returns on assets.
55 Diageo Annual Report 2004
|
Operating and financial review |
The net liability for post employment benefits is partly determined by the market value at the end of the year of the assets owned by the post employment plans. A 10% movement in worldwide equity values would increase/decrease the net pension liability before tax at 30 June 2004 by approximately £280 million.
Operating exceptional items Operating exceptional items are those that, in managements judgement, are material items that arise from events or transactions that fall within the ordinary activities of the group but, by virtue of their size or incidence, should be separately disclosed if the consolidated financial statements are to properly reflect the results for the period. The determination of which items should be separately disclosed as operating exceptional items requires a significant degree of judgement. Exceptional items under UK GAAP do not represent extraordinary items under US GAAP.
Financial instruments The group uses financial instruments to hedge its exposures to fluctuations in interest rates and foreign exchange rates. Instruments accounted for as hedges are structured so as to reduce the market risk associated with the underlying transaction being hedged and are designated as a hedge at the inception of the contract. While UK GAAP includes prescriptive disclosure requirements in relation to financial instruments, it does not include a standard on hedge accounting. Nevertheless, under UK GAAP, hedging principles are generally applied whereby the cash flows on hedge instruments are matched to the underlying hedged risks, with hedging instruments held in the balance sheet at amortised cost. In the absence of detailed guidance under UK GAAP, judgement must be applied in the establishment and application of accounting policies in relation to financial instruments accounted for as hedges.
New accounting standards
The financial information included in this annual report complies, to the extent detailed below, with the following pronouncements issued by the UK Accounting Standards Board (ASB). New UK and US accounting pronouncements that will impact the UK and US GAAP information are also set out below.
United Kingdom The group has adopted the reporting requirements of FRS 17 Retirement benefits in its primary financial statements from 1 July 2003. The group also complies from 1 July 2003 with the following requirements issued by the UKs Accounting Standards Board: UITF abstract 38 Accounting for ESOP trusts, and the amendment to FRS 5 Reporting the substance of transactions.
FRS 17 Retirement benefits This standard replaces the use of the actuarial values for assessing pension costs in favour of a market-based approach. In order to cope with the volatility inherent in this measurement basis, the standard requires that the profit and loss account shows the relatively stable ongoing service cost, the expected return on assets and the interest on the liabilities. Differences between expected and actual returns on assets, and the impact on the liabilities of changes in the assumptions, are reflected in the statement of total recognised gains and losses.
UITF abstract 38 Accounting for ESOP trusts This abstract changes the presentation of an entitys own shares held in an employee share trust from requiring them to be recognised as assets to requiring them to be deducted in arriving at shareholders funds. It also has consequential changes to UITF 17 requiring that the expense to the profit and loss account should be the difference between the fair value of the shares at the date of award and the amount that an employee may be required to pay for the shares (i.e. the intrinsic value of the award).
FRS 5 Reporting the substance of transactions The amendment to the standard added a new application note (G) on revenue recognition. This requires that revenue should be stated at fair value of the right to consideration. Diageo incurs certain promotional expenditure, where permitted under local law (for example, slotting fees, whereby fees are paid to retailers for prominence of display, listing or agreement not to delist Diageos products) that are not wholly independent of the invoiced product price. Such expenditure is now deducted from turnover. The change, which has no impact on operating profit, reduced turnover and operating costs by £159 million in the year ended 30 June 2003 (year ended 30 June 2002 £382 million; year ended 30 June 2001 £714 million; year ended 30 June 2000 £599 million).
The following pronouncements have recently been issued by the ASB.
FRS 20 Share-based payments In April 2004 the ASB issued FRS 20 Share-based payments. The standard requires that share based payments should give rise to a charge in the profit and loss account that is allocated to the period of service the award relates to. The charge is measured by reference to the fair value of goods or services received or, for transactions with employees, by reference to the fair value of
56 Diageo Annual Report 2004
|
Operating and financial review |
the equity instrument at the date of grant. It is effective for periods beginning on or after 1 January 2005. The group is currently evaluating the impact of adopting this standard.
FRS 21 Events after the balance sheet date In May 2004 the ASB issued FRS 21 Events after the balance sheet date. The standard amends the accounting treatment to be adopted by entities for events occurring between the balance sheet date and the date when the financial statements are authorised for issue. Under the standard, dividends declared after the balance sheet date will be non-adjusting post balance sheet events. The standard is effective for periods beginning on or after 1 January 2005.
United States The following US GAAP pronouncements have been recently issued.
SFAS No.132(R) Employers Disclosures About Pensions and Other Postretirement Benefits In December 2003, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued a revised SFAS No. 132. The group has provided the additional disclosures in respect of the groups postretirement plans in note 5 and note 32 to the consolidated financial statements.
FIN 46 and FIN 46(R) Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities In January 2003, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 46 Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities (FIN 46) and in December 2003 a revised interpretation was issued (FIN 46(R)) which clarified certain provisions of FIN 46 and provided for further scope exemptions. FIN 46(R) requires variable interest entities to be consolidated by the party that has a variable interest that will absorb a majority of the entitys expected losses and/or receive a majority of the entitys expected residual returns or both (the primary beneficiary). A variable interest entity (VIE) has one or more of the following characteristics: (1) the total equity investment at risk is not sufficient to permit the entity to finance its activities without additional subordinated financial support being provided; (2) the equity holders lack the ability (through voting rights or otherwise) to make decisions about an entitys activities; or (3) the equity holders lack the obligation to absorb the expected losses of the entity or lack the right to receive the expected residual returns of the entity.
EITF No. 03-6 Participating Securities and the Two-Class Method under FASB Statement No.128, Earnings per Share In March 2004, the Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) of the FASB issued EITF Issue No. 03-6. This issue addressed changes in the reporting and calculation requirements for earnings per share, providing the method to be used when a company has granted holders of any form of security rights to participate in the earnings of the company along with the participation rights of common stockholders. The group has reviewed the contractual rights granted for stock options and concluded that EITF 03-6 does not affect the groups reporting and disclosure.
FSP No. 106-2 Accounting and Disclosure Requirements Related to the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement and Modernization Act of 2003 In December 2003, the United States Congress enacted into law the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement and Modernization Act of 2003 (the Act). The Act established a prescription drug benefit under Medicare (Medicare Part D), and a federal subsidy to sponsors of retiree health care benefit plans that provide a benefit that is at least actuarially equivalent to Medicare Part D. In May 2004, the FASB issued Staff Position No.106-2 Accounting and Disclosure Requirements Related to the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement and Modernization Act of 2003 (FSP 106-2). The group is in the process of determining the impact of this issue on the business, results of operations, financial position and liquidity. Therefore, in accordance with FSP 106-2, the US GAAP accumulated postretirement benefit obligation and net period postretirement benefit cost included in the consolidated financial statements do not reflect the effects of the Act. This is because the group is currently determining whether the benefits conferred by the US plans are actuarially equivalent to Medicare Part D under the Act.
EITF No. 03-1 The Meaning of Other Than Temporary Impairment and Its Application to Certain Investments In June 2004, the EITF issued EITF Issue No. 03-1. The issue includes determining the meaning of other than temporary impairment and its application to debt and equity securities within the scope of SFAS No.115 Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities (SFAS No. 115) and equity securities that are not subject to the scope of SFAS No. 115 and not accounted for under the equity method of accounting.
57 Diageo Annual Report 2004
|
Operating and financial review |
The Task Force reached a consensus that the application guidance in EITF 03-1 should be used to determine when an investment is considered impaired, whether that impairment is other than temporary, and the measurement of an impairment loss. The guidance also includes accounting considerations subsequent to the recognition of an other than temporary impairment and requires certain disclosures about unrealised losses that have not been recognised as other than temporary impairments. These disclosure requirements became effective for periods ended prior to 30 June 2004. The recognition and measurement guidance of EITF 03-1 should be applied to other than temporary impairment evaluations in reporting periods beginning after 15 June 2004. The group considers that there were no unrealised losses requiring additional disclosures at 30 June 2004 and will evaluate, as the need arises, the impact of EITF 03-1 on the business, results of operations, financial position, and liquidity.
Conversion to International Financial Reporting Standards
The European Union has issued a regulation requiring most companies listed in the EU to comply with accounting standards issued by the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB), and adopted by the EU, in the preparation of their consolidated accounts for financial reporting periods beginning on or after 1 January 2005. The EUs objective is to improve financial reporting and enhance transparency, in order to assist the free flow of capital and improve the efficiency of the capital markets. Diageo therefore expects to have to present its consolidated financial statements for the year ending 30 June 2006 in compliance with International Financial Reporting Standards and International Accounting Standards (together IFRSs).
Discussion of US GAAP differences | |||||||||||||
Diageos consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with UK GAAP, which is the groups primary reporting framework. Reconciliations between UK and US GAAP are set out in note 32 to the consolidated financial statements and this section explains the principal differences. | |||||||||||||
Year ended 30 June | |||||||||||||
2003 | 2002 | ||||||||||||
2004 | (restated) | (restated) | |||||||||||
£ million | £ million | £ million | |||||||||||
Turnover UK GAAP |
8,891 | 9,281 | 10,900 | ||||||||||
US GAAP |
8,777 | 9,153 | 10,760 | ||||||||||
Effect on net income of significant differences between UK and US GAAP: |
|||||||||||||
Net income in accordance with UK GAAP |
1,392 | 50 | 1,589 | ||||||||||
Adjustments to conform with US GAAP: |
|||||||||||||
Inventories |
(37 | ) | (46 | ) | (58 | ) | |||||||
Pensions and other post employment benefits |
10 | 95 | 51 | ||||||||||
Derivative instruments in respect of General Mills shares |
28 | (4 | ) | 166 | |||||||||
Other derivative instruments |
111 | (189 | ) | (100 | ) | ||||||||
Burger King impairment charges and transaction costs |
| 693 | (135 | ) | |||||||||
Disposals of businesses |
69 | (177 | ) | 1,022 | |||||||||
Other items |
(16 | ) | 25 | 92 | |||||||||
Deferred taxation |
143 | (13 | ) | (73 | ) | ||||||||
Net income in accordance with US GAAP |
1,700 | 434 | 2,554 | ||||||||||
58 Diageo Annual Report 2004
|
Operating and financial review |
The UK GAAP turnover and net income for the years ended 30 June 2003 and 2002 have been restated to reflect the adoption of FRS 17 Retirement benefits, UITF abstract 38 Accounting for ESOP trusts and application note (G) to FRS 5 Reporting the substance of transactions. See note 1 to the consolidated financial statements.
Turnover
UK GAAP turnover (sales in US terminology) for the year ended 30 June 2004 was £114 million (2003 £128 million; 2002 £140 million) higher than turnover under US GAAP, as the accounting treatment for joint arrangements (between the group and LVMH) is different. Under UK GAAP, the group includes in turnover its attributable share of turnover of joint arrangements, measured according to the terms of the arrangement and sales to joint arrangements by Diageo companies are eliminated on consolidation. Under US GAAP, joint arrangements have been accounted for during the year under the equity method of accounting and the groups share of sales of the joint arrangements is not included as part of group sales. Sales to joint arrangements by Diageo companies are accounted for as part of turnover.
Net income
The significant reconciling items in net income are as follows:
Inventories The fair value of the net assets under US GAAP of the Guinness Group was higher than the net assets under UK GAAP, primarily in respect of maturing whisky inventories. The fair value of the inventories at the date of acquisition (17 December 1997) was £601 million higher under US GAAP compared to UK GAAP. The increase in inventory values is unwinding over a number of years on the sale of the whisky to third parties. In the year ended 30 June 2004, £37 million (2003 £46 million; 2002 £58 million) of the fair value increase was realised.
Pension and other post employment benefits Under UK GAAP, the pension cost for the period is based on an actuarial valuation at the start of the financial period. The current service cost is charged to operating profit. The interest cost (being the unwinding of the discount on the funds liabilities for the period) and the expected return on assets for the period (calculated using the market value of assets), are charged/credited to finance charges in the profit and loss account. Any amount arising from changes in the assumptions used for the actuarial valuation at the commencement of the year and those at the end of the year and any differences between the actual return on the plans assets and the expected return on the plans assets are included in the statement of total recognised gains and losses. The surplus or deficit in post employment plans at the balance sheet date is part of the groups consolidated net assets.
Derivative instruments in respect of General Mills shares Under the terms of the contingent value right received in connection with the disposal of Pillsbury, in the year ended 30 June 2003, Diageo received a cash payment of £173 million from General Mills. Under UK GAAP, this was recognised in the profit and loss account as an exceptional gain on the disposal of businesses. However, under US GAAP, this was recognised in the profit and loss account in the year ended 30 June 2002 as a derivative and was accordingly held at its estimated fair value with changes in this fair value included in the profit and loss account. The group received cash in settlement of the contingent value right on 1 May 2003.
Other derivative instruments The group uses derivative financial instruments for risk management purposes. Under UK GAAP, changes in the fair value of interest rate derivatives and derivatives hedging forecast transactions are not recognised until realised. Changes in the fair value of derivatives hedging the translation of net assets of overseas operations are taken to the statement of total recognised gains and losses.
59 Diageo Annual Report 2004
|
Operating and financial review |
Burger King impairment charges and transaction costs Under UK GAAP, the sale of Burger King was accounted for as a disposal and the results prior to the disposal date are presented within discontinued operations. Net income for the year ended 30 June 2003 reflected a pre tax charge in relation to the sale of Burger King of £1,441 million and £750 million under UK and US GAAP, respectively, representing £691 million of the total UK/US GAAP difference in net income. Under US GAAP, the transaction is not accounted for as a disposal due to the size of the investment made by the buyer and Diageos continuing involvement through the guarantee provided by Diageo in respect of the acquisition finance. However, a charge for impairment was recognised rather than a loss on disposal. The charge for impairment under US GAAP was lower than the loss on disposal under UK GAAP principally because the goodwill and brands acquired on the original acquisition of the quick service restaurants business were being amortised over 40 years up to 30 June 2001 (prior to the adoption of SFAS No. 142), whereas no amortisation had been charged on the goodwill and brands under UK GAAP. By the date of disposal, Diageo had incurred additional cumulative amortisation (including related deferred tax) under US GAAP of £609 million on the goodwill and brands of Burger King. Other differences arising between UK and US GAAP, principally in respect of derivative instruments, reduced the charge under US GAAP by £82 million. In the US GAAP balance sheet, the total assets and total liabilities of Burger King at 30 June 2004 (including consideration deferred under US GAAP) classified within other long term assets and other long term liabilities were each £1.2 billion (2003 £1.3 billion). Under US GAAP, the transaction will be accounted for as a disposal when the uncertainties related to the guarantee provided in respect of the acquisition finance have been substantially resolved and/or the buyers cumulative investment meets or exceeds minimum levels.
Disposals of businesses Under UK GAAP, the group made losses on disposals of other businesses of £10 million compared with gains of £97 million under US GAAP in the year ended 30 June 2004. The principal reason for the difference was the recognition of the deferred gain established on the sale of Pillsbury. In connection with the disposal of Pillsbury in the year ended 30 June 2002, Diageo guaranteed the debt of a third party to the amount of $200 million (£110 million). Under UK GAAP, Diageo provided for the amounts which it could have paid to settle the potential liability or transfer it to a third party as a cost of the transaction. On 18 June 2004, International Multifoods Corporation was acquired by the JM Smucker Company, as a result of which the provision being carried in respect of the guarantee has been reviewed and revised. Under US GAAP, Diageo had deferred the element of the gain on disposal of Pillsbury equivalent to the amount guaranteed. As a result of the acquisition of International Multifoods Corporation by JM Smucker, the deferred gain under US GAAP has been recognised in the year ended 30 June 2004, and a provision, against the guarantee, equal to that under UK GAAP has been established.
Exceptional and extraordinary items Under UK GAAP, exceptional items are those that, in managements judgement, are material items that arise from events or transactions that fall within the ordinary activities of the group but, by virtue of their size or incidence, should be separately disclosed if the consolidated financial statements are to properly reflect the results for the period. US GAAP does not have such a category. Under US GAAP, certain of these items are treated in accordance with paragraph 26 of APB 30 as a separate component of income from continuing operations, if appropriate. The group has had no extraordinary items under either UK or US GAAP for the three years ended 30 June 2004.
60 Diageo Annual Report 2004 |
Directors and senior management
Age | Position (committees) | |||
Directors |
||||
Lord Blyth of Rowington |
64 | Chairman, non-executive director3* | ||
Paul S Walsh |
49 | Chief executive, executive director2* | ||
Nicholas C Rose |
46 | Chief financial officer, executive director2 | ||
Rodney F Chase |
61 | Non-executive director1,3,4 | ||
Lord Hollick of Notting Hill |
59 | Senior non-executive director1,3,4* | ||
Maria Lilja |
60 | Non-executive director1,3,4 | ||
J Keith Oates |
62 | Non-executive director1*,3,4 | ||
William S Shanahan |
64 | Non-executive director1,3,4 | ||
H Todd Stitzer |
52 | Non-executive director1,3,4 | ||
Jonathan R Symonds |
45 | Non-executive director1,3,4 | ||
Paul A Walker |
47 | Non-executive director1,3,4 | ||
Other members of the executive committee | ||||
Stuart R Fletcher |
47 | Market president2 | ||
James N D Grover |
46 | Global business support director2 | ||
Robert M Malcolm |
52 | President, global marketing, sales and innovation2 | ||
Ian K Meakins |
48 | Market president2 | ||
Ivan M Menezes |
45 | Market president2 | ||
Andrew Morgan |
48 | Market president2 | ||
Timothy D Proctor |
54 | General counsel2 | ||
Gareth Williams |
51 | Human resources director2 | ||
Officer |
||||
Susanne Bunn |
45 | Company secretary | ||
Key to committees:
Information in respect of the directors and senior management is set out below:
Lord (James) Blyth retired as chairman of The Boots Company PLC at the end of July 2000, having joined in 1987 as chief executive and become chairman in 1998. He was formerly group chief executive of the Plessey Company and Head of Defence Sales at the Ministry of Defence. He was appointed a non-executive director of Diageo plc in January 1999 and chairman in July 2000. Lord Blyth is also a non-executive director of Anixter Inc, in the USA, and a vice chairman of Greenhill & Co, Inc.
Paul Walsh joined GrandMets brewing division in 1982 and became finance director in 1986. He held financial positions with Inter-Continental Hotels and the GrandMet Food Sector from 1987 to 1989 and was appointed division chief executive of Pillsbury in 1990, becoming chief executive officer of The Pillsbury Company in 1992. He was appointed to the GrandMet board in October 1995 and to the Diageo plc board in December 1997. He became chief operating officer of Diageo in January 2000 and chief executive in September 2000. He is also a non-executive director of Centrica plc and a Governor of Henley Management Centre and a non-executive director of FedEx Corporation, in the USA. He resigned as a non-executive director of General Mills, Inc in June 2004.
Nicholas (Nick) Rose joined GrandMet in June 1992 initially as group treasurer, and became group controller in 1995. He was appointed finance director of International Distillers & Vintners in 1996 and became finance director of United Distillers & Vintners in December 1997. He was appointed to the Diageo plc board in June 1999 and became chief financial officer in July 1999. He is also a non-executive director of Scottish Power plc and a non-executive director of Moët Hennessy SNC, in France.
Rodney Chase is deputy chairman and senior non-executive director of Tesco plc. He is also a non-executive director of Computer Sciences Corporation, in the USA, and a senior adviser to the European Advisory Council of Lehman Brothers. Mr Chase retired as deputy group chief executive of BP plc in April 2003. He was appointed a non-executive director of Diageo plc in January 1999 and became senior non-executive director and chairman of the remuneration committee in October 2003. He will retire at this years AGM.
Lord (Clive) Hollick is chief executive of United Business Media plc. He joined Hambros Bank in 1967 and was appointed a director in 1973. He was appointed Managing Director of J H Vavasseur & Co in 1974 which developed into MAI plc, a major international media and financial services group which in 1996 merged with United News and Media plc. He is also a founding trustee of the Institute of Public Policy Research, chairman of Londons South Bank Centre and a non-executive director of Honeywell International Inc, in the USA. On 25 February 2004 he was appointed a non-executive director of South Bank Federation Limited and on 7 May 2004 he was appointed a non-executive director of Channel 5 Television Group Limited. Lord Hollick was appointed a non-executive director of Diageo plc in December 2001 and succeeded Mr Chase as senior non-executive director and chairman of the remuneration committee on 2 September 2004.
61 Diageo Annual Report 2004
|
Directors and senior management |
Maria Lilja played a leading role in building Nyman & Schultz, a long-established Scandinavian travel management company, which was acquired by American Express in 1993. She served as head of American Express Europe from 1996 to 2000. She is also non-executive chairman of Mandator AB and a non-executive director of Bilia AB, Intrum Justitia AB, Observer AB and Poolia AB, all in Sweden. She was appointed a non-executive director of Diageo plc in November 1999.
J Keith Oates is a senior adviser to Coutts Bank, Monaco. He was formerly deputy chairman of Marks and Spencer plc until 1999 and was the founder chairman of Marks & Spencer Financial Services. His previous experience includes being a BBC governor, a non-executive director of British Telecommunications plc, John Laing plc and the Financial Services Authority and chairman of Quest. He became a non-executive director of Guinness PLC in June 1995 and was appointed a non-executive director of Diageo plc in December 1997. Mr Oates will retire after this years AGM.
William (Bill) Shanahan is president of The Colgate-Palmolive Company. He joined Colgate-Palmolive in 1965 as a sales assistant in the international sales department and subsequently held various positions within the company in general management and marketing roles. In 1983 he was appointed an officer of the corporation, in 1989 he became chief operating officer and, in 1992, was appointed president. He was appointed a non-executive director of Diageo plc in May 1999.
H Todd Stitzer is chief executive of Cadbury Schweppes Public Limited Company. He joined Cadbury Schweppes in 1983 as an assistant general counsel and subsequently held a number of marketing, sales, strategy and general management posts, prior to being appointed to his current role in May 2003. He was appointed a non-executive director of Diageo plc on 23 June 2004.
Jonathan (Jon) Symonds is chief financial officer of AstraZeneca PLC. He is also a member of the Accounting Standards Board, joint Chairman of the Business Tax Forum and, since November 2003, chairman of the 100 Group of Finance Directors. Prior to joining AstraZeneca in 1997, he was a partner at KPMG. Mr Symonds was appointed a non-executive director of Diageo plc on 1 May 2004 and, subject to election by shareholders, it is proposed that he will succeed Mr Oates as chairman of the audit committee after this years AGM.
Paul Walker is chief executive of The Sage Group plc. He joined Sage in 1984 and was appointed Finance Director in 1987, then group chief executive in 1994. He is also a non-executive director of MyTravel Group plc. He was appointed a non-executive director of Diageo plc in June 2002.
Sir Robert Wilson retired as a non-executive director at the AGM in October 2003.
Stuart Fletcher was appointed president, key markets in September 2000. He joined Guinness PLC in 1986 as deputy controller of Guinness Brewing Worldwide and was appointed controller in 1987. He previously held a number of financial positions with Procter & Gamble in the United Kingdom, both in consumer goods and industrial products, and with United Glass. In 1988 he became finance and operations director, United Distillers Japan and in 1990 chief financial officer of Schenley Inc. In 1993 he was appointed regional finance director for United Distillers Asia Pacific Region and was made acting regional managing director for United Distillers Pacific Region in January 1995. In August 1995 he became finance director of Guinness Brewing Worldwide and then served as president of Guinness Americas and Caribbean region based in the United States before becoming managing director of developing and seed markets for Guinness Limited in June 1999. He is also a non-executive director of Moët Hennessy SNC, in France.
James (Jim) Grover was appointed global business support director in February 2004. He joined GrandMet in 1993, initially as the strategic development director of GrandMet Food Sector (encompassing GrandMets worldwide packaged food and Burger King businesses), and subsequently, strategic development director of The Pillsbury Company. He was appointed group strategy director of GrandMet in March 1997 and strategy director of Diageo in December 1997. Previously he worked as a management consultant, initially with Booz-Allen & Hamilton, Inc and subsequently with OC&C Strategy Consultants. He was the partner responsible for their consumer goods practice at OC&C and advised a broad array of multinational food companies on a wide variety of strategic issues.
Robert (Rob) Malcolm was appointed president, global marketing, sales and innovation in September 2000. He joined United Distillers & Vintners as scotch category director in 1999 and was appointed global marketing director later that year. Previously, he held various marketing positions with Procter & Gamble in the United States from 1975 until his appointment in 1988 as vice president and general manager Personal Cleansing Products, USA and in 1992 as vice president and general manager for the Arabian Peninsula. From 1995 to 1999 he was vice president, general manager Beverages, Europe Middle East Africa.
Ian Meakins was appointed president, European major markets and global supply in September 2000. He joined United Distillers in 1991 as marketing director, White Spirits, Europe Region having worked for Procter & Gamble and Bain & Co and been a founding partner of the Kalchas Group, strategic management consultants in 1988. From 1992 he was managing director of United Distillers Boutari (then a joint venture between United Distillers and Boutari) in Greece. He was appointed United Distillers marketing director Worldwide in September 1994 before being appointed United Distillers, managing director Europe in July 1997. From December 1997, he was United Distillers & Vintners deputy managing director, Europe and then United Distillers & Vintners managing director, venture markets. In December 1999 he became global operations managing director for United Distillers & Vintners. He is also a non-executive director of mmO2 plc. Mr Meakins will leave Diageo in October 2004 to take up an appointment as chief executive of Alliance UniChem plc.
62 Diageo Annual Report 2004
|
Directors and senior management |
Ivan Menezes was appointed president and chief executive officer of Diageo North America in January 2004, having been chief operating officer, North America since July 2002. He previously served as both managing director and then president, venture markets of Guinness United Distillers & Vintners. Before these appointments, he served as global marketing director for United Distillers & Vintners in the United Kingdom from September 1998 and as group integration director for Diageo plc from May 1997. Previously he worked across a variety of sales, marketing and strategy roles with Nestlé in Asia, Booz-Allen & Hamilton, Inc in North America and Whirlpool in Europe.
Andrew Morgan was appointed president, venture markets in July 2002. He joined United Distillers in 1987 and held various positions in Europe regions, including general manager, Greece and regional director for southern Europe. He was appointed United Distillers, managing director of International Region in January 1995 and United Distillers & Vintners regional managing director, international in 1997. He was appointed group chief information officer and president New Business Ventures for Guinness United Distillers & Vintners in September 2000 having previously been director Global Strategy and Innovation for United Distillers & Vintners.
Timothy (Tim) Proctor was appointed general counsel of Diageo in January 2000, having been director, Worldwide Human Resources, Glaxo Wellcome since 1998. Prior to this, he was senior vice president, Human Resources, General Counsel and secretary for Glaxos US operating company. He has over 20 yearsinternational legal experience, including 13 years with Merck and six years with Glaxo Wellcome.
Gareth Williams was appointed human resources director in January 1999. He joined the GrandMet Brewing Division in 1984 and moved through a number of personnel positions to become director of Management Development and Resourcing for the division in 1987. From 1990 to 1994 he held a series of human resources positions in International Distillers & VintnersNorth American spirits and wine division, before returning to the United Kingdom to become group organisation and management development director of GrandMet. In 1996 he became human resources director for International Distillers & Vintnersglobal business and in January 1998 took the same title in United Distillers & Vintners, following the merger of Guinness and GrandMet. Prior to joining GrandMet, he spent 10 years with Ford of Britain in a number of personnel and employee relations positions.
Paul Clinton left Diageo in December 2003.
Susanne Bunn was appointed company secretary of Diageo plc in March 2003. She joined the group in February 1989 as assistant secretary in the GrandMet UK Foods division and since then has held various company secretarial positions within the group. She was appointed joint deputy secretary in December 1997 and became sole deputy secretary at the end of 2000.
63 Diageo Annual Report 2004 |
Directors remuneration report
Dear shareholder
During recent months the remuneration committee of Diageo plc has conducted a review of the remuneration policy for our senior executives. During this review we have taken note of the comments made by shareholders prior to our last AGM. As a result of this review we are proposing to make some changes. These changes, which are outlined in this letter, are intended to ensure that we continue, within a framework of good corporate governance, to be able to attract and retain the best global talent to ensure we deliver Diageos strategy. We trust that these changes will receive your support at our Annual General Meeting in October 2004.
Summary of changes
| Annual cash bonuses will be capped at no more than 200% of base salary per annum. This is a reduction in our previous maximum annual bonus. | |||
| We will be seeking shareholder approval to increase the maximum level of annual awards under our long term performance-related share plan (the TSR plan) to 250% of base salary in order to allow us to continue to compete for top global talent. This is an increase from the current maximum award of 150% of base salary. We have changed the comparator group against which we will measure total shareholder return performance for future awards in order to better reflect the current product and geographic mix of Diageos business. | |||
| The ability to retest the earnings per share performance condition under our senior executive share option plan will be removed for future grants of share options. | |||
| Notice periods in the senior executive contracts will remain 12 months and the mitigation of payments on termination is under review. |
Summary remuneration policy
Our revised remuneration policy will be as follows:
| Our senior executive remuneration arrangements are intended to attract and retain the best global talent. | |||
| We believe that pay should vary significantly with performance over both the short and long term. | |||
| Our base salaries are set at the median of the relevant market for each role. | |||
| Annual bonuses are paid in cash after the end of each financial year and are determined by performance in the year against pre-set stretching business targets. | |||
| Our long term incentives comprise a combination of share option grants and share awards in each year, and vary with three year EPS and TSR performance respectively. | |||
| Our senior executives are required to hold shares in Diageo to participate fully in our share option and share award plans. |
Detailed changes
Annual bonuses Before the start of each financial year and in light of the strategic plan for that year, the remuneration committee will determine annual performance targets. One of these targets will be profit performance and the other measure may vary from year to year, depending upon the particular area of focus for the business. The effect of foreign exchange movements will be eliminated in assessing the performance delivered.
Senior executive share option plan (SESOP) Currently, under our share option plan, options vest on a sliding scale depending upon our earnings per share performance after grant, as follows:
| If EPS growth exceeds RPI growth by less than 12 percentage points over three years then none of the options can be exercised. | |||
| If EPS growth is at least 12 percentage points greater than that of RPI, but less than 15 percentage points, then one half of the options may be exercised. | |||
| If EPS growth exceeds RPI growth by 15 percentage points or more over three years then all of the options may be exercised. |
We intend to cancel the ability to retest whether the performance criterion has been met for future grants of options. The performance criterion itself will remain unchanged as it continues to provide a challenging level of performance expectation in the current economic environment.
64 Diageo Annual Report 2004
|
Directors remuneration report |
Share awards under the TSR plan Under this plan, senior executives are granted a conditional right to receive shares. The shares vest on a sliding scale depending on the total shareholder return performance of Diageo plc over a three year period relative to a peer group of companies.
Relative TSR performance | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Above upper quartile | Upper quartile to median | Median | Below median | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ranking in peer group |
1-2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10-18 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
% of award released |
150 | 142 | 114 | 94 | 83 | 72 | 61 | 50 | Nil | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
For example, if a conditional award is made at the new maximum level of 250% of salary and if Diageo achieves a median ranking of position 9, 50% of the shares will be released, i.e. 125% of salary.
This can be illustrated graphically:
In setting this level of award the remuneration committee has considered the total remuneration packages paid in the top 30 companies in the FTSE100 by market capitalisation, excluding those in the financial services sector. We believe it is appropriate to position remuneration in Diageo between the median and upper quartile of this group, given the size and complexity of Diageos business globally.
TSR plan comparator group We have also reviewed the relevance of the comparator companies against which we measure the TSR performance of Diageo. Following the re-shaping of our business, we intend to amend the comparator group, introducing more drinks companies and removing some smaller food companies, as follows:
Companies removed: | ||||||
Allied Domecq |
Colgate-Palmolive | PepsiCo | Altria (formerly Philip Morris) | |||
Anheuser-Busch |
Gillette | Pernod Ricard (new) | Campbell Soup | |||
Brown-Forman (new) |
Heineken | Procter & Gamble | Kelloggs | |||
Cadbury Schweppes (new) |
Heinz | SABMiller (new) | McDonalds | |||
Carlsberg Coca-Cola |
Interbrew (new) Nestlé |
Unilever | Yum! Brands (formerly Tricon) |
TSR plan measurement period Currently TSR performance is measured over the calendar year. We will align the measurement period with our financial year by making a half sized award in February 2005 (with the performance period for this award running from January 2005 to December 2007), and then resuming full sized awards from July 2005 (with the performance period running from July 2005 to June 2008).
Executive contracts We have noted the recent shift in corporate governance sentiment amongst UK institutional shareholders. Our contracts currently provide for a rolling 12 month notice period. Terms of executive contracts and the mitigation of compensation payable on termination are under review.
Lord Hollick of Notting Hill
Non-executive director
65 Diageo Annual Report 2004
|
Directors remuneration report |
What this report covers
This report to shareholders for the year ended 30 June 2004 covers:
| the policy under which executive and non-executive directors were remunerated; and |
| tables of information showing details of the remuneration and share interests of all the directors. |
The report was approved by a duly appointed and authorised committee of the board of directors on 1 September 2004 and was signed on its behalf by Lord Hollick, who succeeded RF Chase as senior non-executive director and chairman of the remuneration committee on 2 September 2004. As required by The Directors Remuneration Report Regulations 2002 (the Regulations), this report will be subject to an advisory shareholder vote at the Annual General Meeting.
The remuneration committee
The remuneration committee is responsible for making recommendations to the board on remuneration policy as applied to Diageos senior executives, being the executive directors and the executive committee. It consists wholly of independent non-executive directors: RF Chase, Lord Hollick, M Lilja, JK Oates, WS Shanahan, HT Stitzer (from 23 June 2004), JR Symonds (from 1 May 2004) and PA Walker. The chairman and the chief executive may, by invitation, attend remuneration committee meetings, except when their own remuneration is discussed. No director is involved in determining his or her own remuneration. The committee met five times during the year. The meetings were fully attended, except that M Lilja, WS Shanahan and PA Walker were each unable to attend one meeting. The committee reviewed its own effectiveness through a self-assessment in December. The committees terms of reference are available at www.diageo.com and on request from the company secretary.
Advice
During the year ended 30 June 2004, Diageos human resources director and director of performance and reward were invited by the remuneration committee to provide their views and advice. The remuneration committee also appointed the following independent and expert consultants:
| Deloitte & Touche LLP who provided external market data on levels of senior executive remuneration. They also provide accountancy and tax services to Diageo, including services to support the process for assessing risk management and control systems and processes. |
| Kepler Associates who reviewed and confirmed the total shareholder return of Diageo and the peer group companies for the 2001 TSR plan, the performance cycle for which ended on 31 December 2003. They provided no other services to Diageo during the year. |
Additional remuneration survey data published by Monks Partnership, Mercer Human Resource Consulting and Towers Perrin was presented to the committee.
Remuneration philosophy
Diageos remuneration philosophy for senior executives is based on a belief in:
| performance-related compensation. It influences and supports performance and the creation of a high performing organisation; | |||
| rewarding sustainable performance. It is at the heart of Diageos corporate strategy and is vital to meeting investors goals; | |||
| measuring performance over three years. It aligns with the time cycle over which management decisions are reflected in the creation of value in this business; | |||
| a mix of base salary, cash incentives, options and shares. It provides a balanced portfolio of incentives and rewards; | |||
| paying competitive total remuneration. It helps Diageo compete for the best talent among companies with global operations and global consumers; | |||
| simplicity and transparency. |
The board of directors continues to set stretching performance targets for the business and its leaders in the context of the prevailing economic climate. To achieve these stretch targets requires exceptional business management and strategic execution to deliver performance well above sectoral norms. This approach to target setting reflects the aspirational performance environment which Diageo wishes to create.
66 Diageo Annual Report 2004
|
Directors remuneration report |
Detailed remuneration policy | |||||||||
Remuneration | Paid in order to | Delivered as | Detailed policy | ||||||
Base salary |
| reflect the value of the | | cash | | reviewed annually usually with effect from | |||
individual and their role | | monthly | 1 October | ||||||
| reflect skills and experience | | benchmarked against comparator group of relevant companies taking into account country where role based | ||||||
| set at median of relevant comparator group for each role | ||||||||
Annual performance |
| incentivise year on year | | cash | | based on overall Diageo financial | |||
bonus |
delivery of short term | | variable value | performance | |||||
performance goals | | annual payment | | at least 70% based on a profit measure | |||||
| non-pensionable | | targets set by reference to annual operating plan | ||||||
| on target performance earns no more than 100% of salary* | ||||||||
| maximum payable is 200% of salary* | ||||||||
Share options |
| incentivise three year | | market value share | | maximum annual grant of 375% of salary | |||
(Senior executive share |
real earnings growth | options | | EPS performance test operates on a | |||||
option plan) |
above a minimum | | variable value | sliding scale | |||||
threshold | | long term incentive | | no longer a retest facility* | |||||
| incentivise increasing | | discretionary annual | ||||||
Diageos share price over three to 10 years | grant | ||||||||
Share awards |
| incentivise three year | | shares | | maximum annual award is 250% of | |||
(TSR plan) |
total shareholder return | | highly variable | salary** | |||||
relative to a selected | | long term incentive | | none of the award vests for performance | |||||
peer group of | | discretionary annual | below median | ||||||
companies | award | | for outstanding performance, achieving first or second position, 150% of the award vests, i.e. a maximum of 375% of salary* | ||||||
| peer group aligned to our core business and geographical mix* | ||||||||
| performance period aligned to financial year* | ||||||||
Pension |
| to provide competitive | | deferred cash | | pension accrues at 1/30th of annual basic | |||
postretirement | | lump sum/monthly | salary subject to Inland Revenue limits | ||||||
compensation and | | normal retirement age of 62 | |||||||
benefits, that reward long term sustained performance in the business | | pension at normal retirement age will not be less than ⅔rds of basic salary in prior 12 months | |||||||
The remuneration policy delivers a mix of fixed and variable, cash and share based, short and long term performance-related remuneration. Broadly, if the incentive plan performance targets are achieved, for every £100 of remuneration earned, £29 is fixed and £71 is performance-related. £29 of the performance-related remuneration is based on annual performance and the remainder on at least three year performance. Sustained achievement of stretch performance targets can result in the incentive plans paying out at the maximum level, and delivering an additional £68 of remuneration.
Share ownership
Senior executives are required to hold shares in Diageo to participate fully in the share option and share award plans. This policy extends to the top 100 senior leaders and reflects Diageos belief that its most senior leaders should also be shareholders. The executive directors were required to hold shares equivalent to 150% of their basic salary by 1 January 2003, rising to 225% by 1 January 2005.
67 Diageo Annual Report 2004
|
Directors remuneration report |
Service contracts
The chairman has a letter of appointment for an initial five year term from 1 July 2000. As previously disclosed, this has been extended by the board to 30 June 2007. It is terminable on six months notice by either party or, if terminated by the company, by payment of six months fees in lieu of notice.
External appointments
With the specific approval of the board in each case, executive directors may accept external appointments as non-executive directors of other companies and retain any related fees paid to them.
Remuneration policy for non-executive directors
Diageos policy on non-executive directorsremuneration is that:
| within the limits set by the shareholders from time to time, remuneration should be sufficient to attract, motivate and retain world-class non-executive talent; | |||
| remuneration practice should be consistent with recognised best-practice standards for non-executive directorsremuneration; and | |||
| non-executive directors should not be granted share options by the company. |
The fees of non-executive directors are normally reviewed every two years with effect from 1 January. Fees are reviewed in the light of market practice in large UK companies and anticipated workload, tasks and liabilities. The current annual fees after the most recent review, effective from January 2003, are:
From | ||||
1 Jan 2003 | ||||
Base fee |
£ 50,000 | |||
Senior non-executive director |
£ 20,000 | |||
Chairman of audit committee |
£ 20,000 | |||
Chairman of remuneration committee |
£ 10,000 | |||
68 Diageo Annual Report 2004
|
Directors remuneration report |
Directors remuneration for the year ended 30 June 2004
Emoluments
2004 | 2003 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Share | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Basic | Performance | incentive | Other | |||||||||||||||||||||
salary | bonus | plan | benefits(b) | Total | Total | |||||||||||||||||||
£000 | £000 | £000 | £000 | £000 | £000 | |||||||||||||||||||
Chairman fees |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Lord Blyth (a) |
450 | | | 47 | 497 | 485 | ||||||||||||||||||
Executive directors |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
NC Rose |
472 | 736 | 3 | 44 | 1,255 | 1,107 |