Edgar Filing: Community Bankers Trust Corp

Large accelerated filer

Accelerated filer

Non-accelerated filer

Smaller reporting company

Amendment #4

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D. C. 20549

FORM 10-K/A

(Amendment No. 4)

x	ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008

¨	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from to

Commission file number 001-32590

COMMUNITY BANKERS TRUST CORPORATION

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware

20-2652949

(State or other jurisdiction of

incorporation of organization)

(I.R.S. Employer

Identification No.)

4235 Innslake Drive, Suite 200

Glen Allen, Virginia

23060

(Address of principal executive offices)

(Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code (804) 934-9999

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:


Title of each class		Name of each exchange on which registered
Units, each consisting of one share of Common Stock and one Warrant		NYSE Amex
Common Stock, $0.01 par value		NYSE Amex
Warrants to Purchase Common Stock		NYSE Amex

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ¨ No x

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Act. Yes ¨ No x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes ¨ No ¨

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes ¨ No x

State the aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates computed by reference to the price at which the common equity was last sold, or the average bid and asked price of such common equity, as of the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter. $93,445,412

On March 2, 2009, there were 21,468,455 shares of the registrant’s common stock, par value $.01, outstanding, which is the only class of the registrant’s common stock.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

None

EXPLANATORY NOTE

The Registrant hereby amends its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 (filed on March 31, 2009 with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Commission”)), as amended by its Annual Report on Form 10-K/A (Amendment No. 1) (filed on April 30, 2009 with the Commission), its Annual Report on Form 10-K/A (Amendment No. 2) (filed on May 21, 2009 with the Commission) and its Annual Report on Form 10-K/A (Amendment No. 3) (filed on January 14, 2011 with the Commission), as set forth in this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A (Amendment No. 4).

This Form 10-K/A (Amendment No. 4) reflects the following items in response to outstanding comments from the staff of the Commission’s Division of Corporation Finance:

•

a “restatement” note to the financial statements to quantify expressly changes in line items on its consolidated financial statements for the period ended December 31, 2008, following adjustments that the Registrant has previously made to correct valuation errors in the fair value of stock options issued by the Registrant in settlement of outstanding stock options of its predecessors (TransCommunity Financial Corporation and BOE Financial Services of Virginia, Inc.) as of the applicable merger dates.

•

a new material weakness as of December 31, 2008, and the remediation of it, related to the omission of certain financial and other information related to the Registrant’s predecessors from the original Form 10-K filing.

As previously presented in an earlier amendment, and as compared to the original Form 10-K filing, this Form 10-K/A (Amendment No. 4) includes financial statements and related information with respect to each of the Registrant’s predecessors, as the Registrant was a special purpose acquisition company with nominal results prior to the acquisition of each of these entities on May 31, 2008, and enhanced disclosure relating to goodwill and intangible assets, fair value measurements, FDIC-covered assets and asset quality in response to comments from the Commission.

The only items that the Registrant is amending in this Form 10-K/A are Items 8, 9A and 15, as set forth below. The disclosures that the Registrant has presented in this Form 10-K/A are as of the date of the original filing, and the Registrant has not undertaken to update such disclosures for any subsequent events or developments.

TABLE OF CONTENTS


	Page
Part II

Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data		3

Item 9A. Controls and Procedures		105

Part IV

Item 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules		108

PART II

ITEM 8.

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

Index to Financial Statements


Community Bankers Trust Corporation
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firms			4
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2008 (Restated) and December 31, 2007			7
Consolidated Statements of Income for the year ended December 31, 2008 and the nine months ended December 31, 2007			8
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity for the year ended December 31, 2008 (Restated) and the nine months ended December 31, 2007			9
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the year ended December 31, 2008 (Restated) and the nine months ended December 31, 2007			10
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements			11

TransCommunity Financial Corporation
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm			44
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of May 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007			45
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the five months ended May 31, 2008 and the year ended December 31, 2007			46
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity for the five months ended May 31, 2008 and the year ended December 31, 2007			47
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the five months ended May 31, 2008 and the year ended December 31, 2007			48
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements			49

BOE Financial Services of Virginia, Inc.
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firms			72
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of May 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007			74
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the five months ended May 31, 2008 and the year ended December 31, 2007			75
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity for the five months ended May 31, 2008 and the year ended December 31, 2007			76
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the five months ended May 31, 2008 and the year ended December 31, 2007			78
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements			79

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders Community Bankers Trust Corporation.

We have audited the accompanying balance sheet of Community Bankers Trust Corporation (formerly Community Bankers Acquisition Corp.) (a corporation in the development stage) as of December 31, 2007 and the related statements of income, stockholders’ equity and cash flows for the nine months ended December 31, 2007. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Corporation’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free from material misstatement. The Corporation is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audit included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Community Bankers Trust Corporation (formerly Community Bankers Acquisition Corp.) as of December 31, 2007 and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the nine months ended December 31, 2007, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

/s/ MILLER ELLIN & COMPANY, LLP

New York, NY

March 26, 2008

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

LOGO

To the Board of Directors and Shareholders

Community Bankers Trust Corporation

Glen Allen, Virginia

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of Community Bankers Trust Corporation and subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2008, and the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, stockholders’ equity and cash flows for the year then ended. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audit.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Community Bankers Trust Corporation and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2008, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for the year then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2008, based on criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (the “COSO criteria”). Our report dated March 31, 2011 expressed an opinion that Community Bankers Trust Corporation and subsidiaries had not maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2008, based on the COSO criteria.

LOGO

Galax, Virginia

April 22, 2010, except for

Note 2, as to which the

date is March 31, 2011

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

LOGO

To the Board of Directors and Shareholders

Community Bankers Trust Corporation

Glen Allen, Virginia

We have audited the internal control over financial reporting of Community Bankers Trust Corporation and subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2008, based on criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (the “COSO criteria”). The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audit also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

A material weakness is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the Company’s annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. The following material weaknesses have been identified and included in management’s assessment.

Management failed to reconcile goodwill related to a recent business acquisition to supporting information. As a result a material error related to the capitalization of merger related expenses went undetected. In addition, there were several material balance sheet reclassifications that did not impact net income.

In addition, management failed to include certain financial information related to predecessor companies in the initial 2008 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

These material weaknesses were considered in determining the nature, timing, and extent of audit tests applied in our audit of the 2008 financial statements, and this report does not affect our report dated April 22, 2010, except for note 2, which is date March 31, 2011, on those financial statements. The financial statements were adjusted for these errors.

In our opinion, because of the effect of the material weaknesses described above on the achievement of the objectives of the control criteria, the Company has not maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2008, based on the COSO criteria.

We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheet of the Company as of December 31, 2008 and the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, shareholders’ equity, and cash flows for the year then ended and our report dated April 22, 2010, except for note 2, as to which the date is March 31, 2011, expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.

LOGO

Galax, Virginia

March 31, 2011

COMMUNITY BANKERS TRUST CORPORATION

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

as of December 31, 2008 (Restated) and 2007


	December 31, 2008			December 31, 2007
	(Dollars in thousands)
ASSETS
Cash and due from banks	$	10,864		$	162
Interest bearing bank deposits		107,376			—
Federal funds sold		10,193			—

Total cash and cash equivalents		128,433			162
United States Treasury securities held in trust fund		—			58,453
Securities available for sale, at fair value		193,992			—
Securities held to maturity, fair value of $94,965 at December 31, 2008		94,865			—
Equity securities, restricted, at cost		3,612			—

Total securities		292,469			58,453
Loans held for sale		200
Loans		523,298			—
Allowance for loan losses		(6,939	)		—

Net loans		516,359			—
Bank premises and equipment		24,111			—
Other real estate owned		223			—
Bank owned life insurance		6,300			—
Core deposit intangibles, net		17,163			—
Goodwill		37,184			—
Other assets		7,798			826

Total assets	$	1,030,240		$	59,441


LIABILITIES
Deposits:
Noninterest bearing	$	59,699		$	—
Interest bearing		746,649			—

Total deposits		806,348			—
Federal Home Loan Bank advances		37,900			—
Trust preferred capital notes		4,124			—
Deferred payment to underwriter		—			2,100
Other liabilities		17,465			339

Total liabilities		865,837			2,439

Common stock, subject to conversion, 1,499,250 shares at conversion value		—			11,690
STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Preferred stock (5,000,000 shares authorized)		17,680			—
Warrants on preferred stock		1,037			—
Discount on preferred stock		(1,031	)
Common stock (50,000,000 shares authorized $.01 par value) 21,468,455 and 9,375,000 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2008, and December 31, 2007, respectively		215			94
Additional paid in capital		146,076			42,989
Retained earnings		1,691			2,229
Accumulated other comprehensive loss		(1,265	)		—

Total stockholders’ equity		164,403			45,312

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	1,030,240		$	59,441

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements

COMMUNITY BANKERS TRUST CORPORATION

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME

For the Year Ended December 31, 2008 and Nine Months Ended December 31, 2007


	December 31, 2008		December 31, 2007
	(Dollars and shares in thousands, except per share data)
Interest and dividend income
Interest and fees on loans	$	19,694	$	—
Interest on federal funds sold		90		—
Interest on deposits in other banks		356		—
Interest and dividends on securities
Taxable		2,297		1,944
Nontaxable		898		—

Total interest income		23,335		1,944
Interest expense
Interest on deposits		7,695		—
Interest on federal funds purchased		131		—
Interest on other borrowed funds		734		—

Total interest expense		8,560		—

Net interest income		14,775		1,944
Provision for loan losses		2,572		—

Net interest income after provision for loan losses		12,203		1,944

Noninterest income
Service charges on deposit accounts		1,185		—
Other		595		—

Total noninterest income		1,780		—

Noninterest expense
Salaries and employee benefits		5,590		—
Occupancy expenses		884		—
Equipment expenses		665		—
Legal fees		429		—
Data processing fees		499		—
Amortization of intangibles		975		—
Other operating expenses		3,585		263

Total noninterest expense		12,627		263

Net income before income tax expense		1,356		1,681
Income tax expense		133		576

Net income	$	1,223	$	1,105

Net income per share — basic	$	0.07	$	0.12

Net income per share — diluted	$	0.07	$	0.09

Weighted average number of shares outstanding
Basic		16,430		9,375
Diluted		17,518		11,807

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements

COMMUNITY BANKERS TRUST CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

FOR THE TWELVE MONTHS and NINE MONTHS ENDED

DECEMBER 31, 2008 (Restated) AND 2007, respectively

(Dollars and shares in thousands)


	Preferred Stock		Warrants		Discount on Preferred Stock			Common Stock						Additional Paid in Capital			Retained Earnings			Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income			Total
								Common Stock
								Shares			Amount
Balance, March 31, 2007	$	—	$	—	$	—			9,375		$	94		$	43,061		$	1,124		$	—		$	44,279
Change in shares subject to conversion		—		—		—			—			—			(72	)		—			—			(72	)
Comprehensive income:
Net income		—		—		—			—			—			—			1,105			—			1,105

Total comprehensive income																								1,105

Balance December 31, 2007		—		—		—			9,375			94			42,989			2,229			—			45,312
Issuance of preferred stock and related warrants		17,680		1,037		(1,037	)		—			—			—			—			—			17,680
Amortization of preferred stock warrants		—		—		6			—			—			—			(6	)		—			—
Redemption of shares related to appraisal rights		—		—		—			(2	)		—			(11	)		—			—			(11	)
Transfer of shares previously subject to conversion		—		—		—			—						11,690			—			—			11,690
Issuance of stock related to business combination						—			13,502			135			100,769			—			—			100,904
Issuance of options and stock awards related to business combination		—		—		—			—			—			1,487			—			—			1,487
Redemption of shares, net of fractional shares									(1,407	)		(14	)		(10,813	)		—			—			(10,827	)
Repurchase of warrants		—		—		—			—			—			(35	)		—			—			(35	)
Comprehensive income:
Net income		—		—		—			—			—			—			1,223			—			1,223
Change in unrealized gain in investment securities, net of tax of $238		—		—		—			—			—			—			—			(462	)		(462	)
Change in funded status of pension plan, net of tax of $413		—		—		—			—			—			—			—			(803	)		(803	)

Total comprehensive income																								(42	)
Dividends paid on common stock ($.08 per share)																		(1,755	)					(1,755	)

Balance December 31, 2008	$	17,680	$	1,037	$	(1,031	)		21,468		$	215		$	146,076		$	1,691		$	(1,265	)	$	164,403

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements

COMMUNITY BANKERS TRUST CORPORATION

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

For the Year Ended December 31, 2008 (Restated) and

Nine Months Ended December 31, 2007


	2008			2007
	(Dollars in thousands)
Operating activities:
Net income	$	1,223		$	1,105
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:
Depreciation and intangibles amortization		1,663			—
Provision for loan losses		2,572			—
Deferred taxes		110			—
Amortization of security premiums and accretion of discounts, net		117			—
Net amortization of preferred warrants		6
Net decrease in loans held for sale		506			—
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Increase in other assets		(6,832	)		(809	)
Increase (decrease) in accrued expenses and other liabilities		5,357			(476	)

Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities		4,722			(180	)

Investing activities:
Net increase in federal funds sold		(10,335	)		—
Proceeds from securities sales, calls, maturities and paydowns		68,562			—
Purchase of securities		(204,549	)		(334	)
Net increase in loans		(47,992	)		—
Purchase of premises and equipment, net		(2,655	)		—
Securities acquired in bank acquisition		(29,420	)		—
Cash acquired in bank acquisitions		10,016			—

Net cash used in investing activities		(216,373	)		(334	)

Financing activities:
Net increase in noninterest bearing and interest bearing demand deposits		9,689			—
Increase in deposits from bank acquisition		305,197			—
Net increase in Federal Home Loan Bank advances		20,000			—
Cash paid to redeem shares related to asserted appraisal rights and retire warrants		(46	)		—
Cash dividends paid		(1,755	)		—
Issuance of preferred stock		17,680			—
Cash paid to shareholders for converted shares		(10,843	)		—

Net cash provided by financing activities		339,922			—

Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents		128,271			(514	)

Cash and cash equivalents:
Beginning of the period		162			676

End of the period	$	128,433		$	162

Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information:
Interest paid	$	5,780		$	—
Income taxes paid		406			—
Transfers of OREO property		223			—
Non-cash transactions related to the acquisition of TFC and BOE assets and liabilities
Increase in assets and liabilities:
Loans	$	471,864			—
Securities		71,123			—
Other assets		83,664			—
Non-interest bearing deposits		52,790			—
Interest bearing deposits		438,672			—
Borrowings		32,359			—
Other Liabilities		10,216			—

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements

COMMUNITY BANKERS TRUST CORPORATION

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 1.

Nature of Banking Activities and Significant Accounting Policies

Organization

Community Bankers Trust Corporation (the “Company”) is a bank holding company that was incorporated under Delaware law on April 6, 2005. The Company is headquartered in Glen Allen, Virginia and is the holding company for Essex Bank (the “Bank”), a Virginia state bank with 25 full-service offices in Virginia, Maryland and Georgia.

The Company was initially formed as a special purpose acquisition company to effect a merger, capital stock exchange, asset acquisition or other similar business combination with an operating business in the banking industry. Prior to its acquisition of two bank holding companies in 2008, the Company’s activities were limited to organizational matters, completing its initial public offering and seeking and evaluating possible business combination opportunities. On May 31, 2008, the Company acquired each of TransCommunity Financial Corporation, a Virginia corporation (“TFC”), and BOE Financial Services of Virginia, Inc., a Virginia corporation (“BOE”). The Company changed its corporate name in connection with the acquisitions. On November 21, 2008, the Bank acquired certain assets and assumed all deposit liabilities relating to four former branch offices of The Community Bank (“TCB”), a Georgia state-chartered bank. On January 30, 2009, the Bank acquired certain assets and assumed all deposit liabilities relating to seven former branch offices of Suburban Federal Savings Bank, Crofton, Maryland (“SFSB”).

The Bank was established in 1926 and is headquartered in Tappahannock, Virginia. The Bank engages in a general commercial banking business and provides a wide range of financial services primarily to individuals and small businesses, including individual and commercial demand and time deposit accounts, commercial and consumer loans, travelers checks, safe deposit box facilities, investment services and fixed rate residential mortgages. Fourteen offices are located in Virginia, primarily from the Chesapeake Bay to just west of Richmond, seven are located in Maryland along the Baltimore-Washington corridor and four are located in the Atlanta, Georgia metropolitan market.

Predecessors

From its inception until consummation of the acquisitions of TFC and BOE on May 31, 2008, the Company was a special purpose acquisition company, as described above, and had no substantial operations. Accordingly, since the Company’s operating activities prior to the acquisitions were insignificant relative to those of TFC and BOE, management believes that both TFC and BOE are the Company’s predecessors. Management has reached this conclusion based upon an evaluation of facts and circumstances, including the historical life of each of TFC and BOE, the historical level of operations of each of TFC and BOE, the purchase price paid for each of TFC and BOE and the fact that the consolidated Company’s operations, revenues and expenses after the acquisitions are most similar in all respects to those of BOE’s and TFC’s historical periods. Accordingly, the statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and the accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements of TFC and BOE for the periods ended May 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007. These statements have also been presented.

Principles of Consolidation

The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and the Bank, its wholly-owned subsidiary. All material intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. FASB Interpretation No. 46(R) requires that the Company no longer eliminate through consolidation the equity investment in BOE Statutory Trust I, which approximated $124,000 at December 31, 2008. The subordinated debt of the Trust is reflected as a liability of the Company.

COMMUNITY BANKERS TRUST CORPORATION

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Cash and Cash Equivalents

For purposes of the consolidated statements of cash flows, the Company has defined cash and cash equivalents as cash and due from banks, interest-bearing bank balances, and Federal funds sold.

Securities

Debt securities that management has the positive intent and ability to hold to maturity are classified as “held to maturity” and recorded at amortized cost. Securities not classified as held to maturity, including equity securities with readily determinable fair values, are classified as “available for sale” and recorded at fair value, with unrealized gains and losses excluded from earnings and reported in other comprehensive income.

Purchase premiums and discounts are recognized in interest income using the interest method over the terms of the securities. Declines in the fair value of held-to-maturity and available-for-sale securities below their cost that are deemed to be other than temporary are reflected in earnings as realized losses. In estimating other than temporary impairment losses, management considers (1) the length of time and the extent to which the fair value has been less than cost, (2) the financial condition and near-term prospects of the issuer, and (3) the intent and ability of the Company to retain its investment in the issuer for a period of time sufficient to allow for any anticipated recovery in fair value. Gains and losses on the sale of securities are recorded on the trade date and are determined using the specific identification method.

Restricted Securities

The Company is required to maintain an investment in the capital stock of certain correspondent banks. The Company’s investment in these securities is recorded at cost.

Loans Held for Sale

Mortgage loans originated and intended for sale in the secondary market are carried at the lower of cost or estimated market in the aggregate. Net unrealized losses are recognized through a valuation allowance by charges to income. Mortgage loans held for sale are sold with the mortgage servicing rights released by the Company.

The Company enters into commitments to originate certain mortgage loans whereby the interest rate on the loans is determined prior to funding (rate lock commitments). Rate lock commitments on mortgage loans that are intended to be sold are considered to be derivatives. The period of time between issuance of a loan commitment and closing and the sale of the loan generally ranges from thirty to ninety days. The Company protects itself from changes in interest rates through the use of best efforts forward delivery commitments, whereby the Company commits to sell a loan at the time the borrower commits to an interest rate with the intent that the buyer has assumed interest rate risk on the loan. As a result, the Company is not exposed to losses nor will it realize significant gains related to its rate lock commitments due to changes in interest rates. The correlation between the rate lock commitments and the best efforts contracts is very high due to their similarity. Because of this high correlation, the gain or loss that occurs on the rate lock commitments is immaterial.

Loans

The Bank grants mortgage, commercial and consumer loans to customers. A substantial portion of the loan portfolio is represented by mortgage loans. The ability of the Bank’s debtors to honor their contracts is dependent upon the real estate and general economic conditions in the Bank’s market area.

COMMUNITY BANKERS TRUST CORPORATION

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Loans that management has the intent and ability to hold for the foreseeable future or until maturity or pay-off generally are reported at their outstanding unpaid principal balances adjusted for charge-offs, the allowance for loan losses, and any deferred fees or costs on originated loans. Interest income is accrued on the unpaid principal balance. Loan origination fees, net of certain direct origination costs, are deferred and recognized as an adjustment of the related loan yield using the interest method.

The accrual of interest on mortgage and commercial loans is discontinued at the time the loan is 90 days delinquent unless the credit is well-secured and in process of collection. Consumer loans are typically charged off no later than 180 days past due. In all cases, loans are placed on non-accrual or charged-off at an earlier date if collection of principal or interest is considered doubtful.

All interest accrued but not collected for loans that are placed on non-accrual or charged-off is reversed against interest income. The interest on these loans is accounted for on the cash-basis or cost-recovery method, until qualifying for return to accrual. Loans are returned to accrual status when all of the principal and interest amounts contractually due are brought current and future payments are reasonably assured.

Allowance for Loan Losses

The allowance for loan losses is established as losses are estimated to have occurred through a provision for loan losses charged to earnings. Loan losses are charged against the allowance when management believes the uncollectability of a loan balance is confirmed. Subsequent recoveries, if any, are credited to the allowance.

The allowance is an amount that management believes is appropriate to absorb estimated losses relating to specifically identified loans, as well as probable credit losses inherent in the balance of the loan portfolio, based on an evaluation of the collectability of existing loans and prior loss experience. This evaluation also takes into consideration such factors as changes in the nature and volume of the loan portfolio, overall portfolio quality, review of specific problem loans, and current economic conditions that may affect the borrower’s ability to pay. This evaluation does not include the effects of expected losses on specific loans or groups of loans that are related to future events or expected changes in economic conditions. While management uses the best information available to make its evaluation, future adjustments to the allowance may be necessary if there are significant changes in economic conditions. In addition, regulatory agencies, as an integral part of their examination process, periodically review the Bank’s allowance for loan losses, and may require the Bank to make additions to the allowance based on their judgment about information available to them at the time of their examinations.

The allowance consists of specific, general and unallocated components. For loans that are also classified as impaired, an allowance is established when the discounted cash flows (or collateral value or observable market price) of the impaired loan is lower than the carrying value of that loan. The general component covers non-classified loans and is based on historical loss experience adjusted for qualitative factors. An unallocated component is maintained to cover uncertainties that could affect management’s estimate of probable losses. The unallocated component of the allowance reflects the margin of imprecision inherent in the underlying assumptions used in the methodologies for estimating specific and general losses in the portfolio.

A loan is considered impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable that the Bank will be unable to collect the scheduled payments of principal or interest when due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. Factors considered by management in determining impairment include payment status, collateral value, and the probability of collecting scheduled principal and interest payments when due. Loans that experience insignificant payment delays and payment shortfalls generally are not classified as impaired. Management determines the significance of payment delays and payment shortfalls on a case-by-case basis, taking into consideration all of the circumstances surrounding the loan and the borrower, including the length of the delay, the reasons for the delay, the borrower’s prior payment record, and the amount of the shortfall in relation to the principal and interest owed. Impairment is measured on a loan by loan basis for commercial and construction loans by either the present value of the expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate, the loan’s obtainable market price, or the fair value of the collateral if the loan is collateral dependent.

Large groups of smaller balance homogeneous loans are collectively evaluated for impairment. Accordingly, the Bank does not separately identify individual consumer and residential loans for impairment disclosures.

COMMUNITY BANKERS TRUST CORPORATION

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Accounting for Certain Loans or Debt Securities Acquired in a Transfer

On January 1, 2005, Statement of Position (SOP) 03-3, Accounting for Certain Loans or Debt Securities Acquired in a Transfer (AICPA, Technical Practice Aids, ACC sec. 10,880) was adopted for loan acquisitions. SOP 03-3 requires acquired loans to be recorded at fair value and prohibits carrying over valuation allowances in the initial accounting for acquired impaired loans. Loans carried at fair value, mortgage loans held for sale, and loans to borrowers in good standing under revolving credit arrangements are excluded from the scope of SOP 03-3. SOP 03-3 limits the yield that may be accreted to the excess of the undiscounted expected cash flows over the investor’s initial investment in the loan. The excess of the contractual cash flows over expected cash flows may not be recognized as an adjustment of yield. Subsequent increases in cash flows to be collected are recognized prospectively through an adjustment of the loan’s yield over its remaining life. Decreases in expected cash flows are recognized as impairments.

In our acquisition of TFC and BOE, the preliminary fair value of SOP 03-3 loans was determined based on assigned risk ratings, expected cash flows and the fair value of the collateral. The fair value of non SOP 03-3 loans was determined based on preliminary estimates of default probabilities. The Company determined which purchased loans were impaired at the time of the acquisition, and considered those loans for SOP 03-3 application. Those loans that were not considered impaired at the time of acquisition were not considered for SOP 03-3.

As a result of the acquisitions of TFC and BOE, the Company had loans amounting to approximately $5.0 million as of December 31, 2008 which met the criteria of SOP 03-3. Due to the immateriality of these loans in relation to the overall financial condition of the Company, detailed disclosures have not been included in these financial statements.

Bank Premises and Equipment

Bank premises and equipment are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation. Land is carried at cost. Depreciation of bank premises and equipment is computed on the straight-line method over estimated useful lives of 10 to 50 years for premises and 3 to 20 years for equipment, furniture and fixtures.

Costs of maintenance and repairs are charged to expense as incurred and major improvements are capitalized. Upon sale or retirement of depreciable properties, the cost and related accumulated depreciation are eliminated from the accounts and the resulting gain or loss is included in the determination of income.

Other Real Estate Owned

Real estate acquired through, or in lieu of, loan foreclosure is held for sale and is initially recorded at the lower of the loan balance or the fair value at the date of foreclosure net of estimated disposal costs, establishing a new cost basis. Subsequent to foreclosure, valuations are periodically performed by management and the assets are carried at the lower of the carrying amount or the fair value less costs to sell. Revenues and expenses from operations and changes in the valuation allowance are included in other operating expenses. Costs to bring a property to salable condition are capitalized up to the fair value of the property while costs to maintain a property in salable condition are expensed as incurred. The Company had $223,000 in other real estate at December 31, 2008.

Goodwill and Other Intangibles

SFAS No. 141, Business Combinations, requires that the purchase method of accounting be used for all business combinations after June 30, 2001. With purchase acquisitions, the Company is required to record assets acquired, including any intangible assets, and liabilities assumed at fair value, which involves relying on estimates based on third party valuations, such as appraisals, or internal valuations based on discounted cash flow analysis or

COMMUNITY BANKERS TRUST CORPORATION

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

other valuation methods. The Company adopted SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets. Accordingly, goodwill is no longer subject to amortization over its estimated useful life, but is subject to at least an annual assessment for impairment by applying a fair value-based test. Additionally, under SFAS No. 142, acquired intangible assets (such as core deposit intangibles) are separately recognized if the benefit of the assets can be sold, transferred, licensed, rented, or exchanged, and amortized over their useful lives. SFAS No. 142 discontinued any amortization of goodwill and other intangible assets with indefinite lives, but required an impairment review at least annually or more often if certain conditions exist. The Company follows SFAS No. 147, Acquisitions of Certain Financial Instruments, and determined that any core deposit intangibles will be amortized over the estimated useful life.

Advertising Costs

The Company follows the policy of expensing advertising costs as incurred, which total $308,000 for 2008.

Income Taxes

Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are determined using the liability (or balance sheet) method. Under this method, the net deferred tax asset or liability is determined based on the tax effects of the temporary differences between the book and tax bases of the various balance sheet assets and liabilities and gives current recognition to changes in tax rates and laws.

When tax returns are filed, it is highly certain that some positions taken would be sustained upon examination by the taxing authorities, while others are subject to uncertainty about the merits of the position taken or the amount of the position that would be ultimately sustained. The benefit of a tax position is recognized in the financial statements in the period during which, based on all available evidence, management believes it is more likely than not that the position will be sustained upon examination, including the resolution of appeals or litigation processes, if any. Tax positions taken are not offset or aggregated with other positions. Tax positions that meet the more-likely-than-not recognition threshold are measured as the largest amount of tax benefit that is more than 50 percent likely of being realized upon settlement with the applicable taxing authority. The portion of the benefits associated with tax positions taken that exceeds the amount measured as described above is reflected as a liability for unrecognized tax benefits in the accompanying balance sheet along with any associated interest and penalties that would be payable to the taxing authorities upon examination.

Interest and penalties associated with unrecognized tax benefits are classified as additional income taxes in the statement of income.

As of December 31, 2008 and 2007, the Company did not have any tax benefit disallowed under FASB Interpretation 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes (“FIN 48”).

A valuation allowance is provided when it is more likely than not that some portion of the deferred tax asset will not be realized. In management’s opinion, it is more likely than not that the results of future operations will generate sufficient taxable income to recognize the deferred tax assets.

Included in deferred tax assets are the tax benefits derived from net operating loss carryforwards totaling $2,945 million relating to an acquisition, which expire in various amounts from 2021 through 2024. Management expects to utilize all of these carryforward amounts prior to expiration.

The Company and its subsidiaries are subject to U. S. federal income tax as well as various state income taxes. All years from 2005 through 2008 are open to examination by the respective tax authorities.

COMMUNITY BANKERS TRUST CORPORATION

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Earnings Per Share

Basic earnings per share (EPS) is computed based on the weighted average number of shares outstanding and excludes any dilutive effects of options, warrants and convertible securities. Diluted EPS is computed in a manner similar to basic EPS, except for certain adjustments to the numerator and the denominator. Diluted EPS gives effect to all dilutive potential common shares that were outstanding during the period. Potential common shares that may be issued by the Company relate solely to outstanding stock options and warrants and are determined using the treasury stock method. Preferred stock was issued on December 19, 2008. No dividend was declared on this stock during 2008.

Stock-Based Compensation

Prior to the Company’s mergers with BOE and TFC, both of these entities had stock-based compensation plans, which are more fully described in Note 13.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) reached a consensus on Emerging Issues Task Force (“EITF”) Issue 06-4, “Accounting for Deferred Compensation and Postretirement Benefit Aspects of Endorsement Split-Dollar Life Insurance Arrangements,” (“EITF Issue 06-4”). In March 2007, the FASB reached a consensus on EITF Issue 06-10, “Accounting for Collateral Assignment Split-Dollar Life Insurance Arrangements,” (“EITF Issue 06-10”). Both of these standards require a company to recognize an obligation over an employee’s service period based upon the substantive agreement with the employee such as the promise to maintain a life insurance policy or provide a death benefit postretirement. The Company adopted the provisions of these standards effective January 1, 2008. The adoption of these standards was not material to the consolidated financial statements.

In September 2006, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements” (SFAS 157). SFAS 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in generally accepted accounting principles, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. SFAS 157 does not require any new fair value measurements, but rather, provides enhanced guidance to other pronouncements that require or permit assets or liabilities to be measured at fair value. This Statement is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007 and interim periods within those years. The FASB has approved a one-year deferral for the implementation of the Statement for nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial statements on a nonrecurring basis. The Company adopted SFAS 157 effective January 1, 2008. The adoption of SFAS 157 was not material to the consolidated financial statements.

In February 2007, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 159, “The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities” (SFAS 159). This Statement permits entities to choose to measure many financial instruments and certain other items at fair value. The objective of this Statement is to improve financial reporting by providing entities with the opportunity to mitigate volatility in reported earnings caused by measuring related assets and liabilities differently without having to apply complex hedge accounting provisions. The fair value option established by this Statement permits all entities to choose to measure eligible items at fair value at specified election dates. A business entity shall report unrealized gains and losses on items for which the fair value option has been elected in earnings at each subsequent reporting date. The fair value option may be applied instrument by instrument and is irrevocable. SFAS 159 is effective as of the beginning of an entity’s first fiscal year that begins after November 15, 2007, with early adoption available in certain circumstances. The Company adopted SFAS 159 effective January 1, 2008. The Company decided not to report any existing financial assets or liabilities at fair value that are not already reported, thus the adoption of this statement did not have a material impact on the (consolidated) financial statements.

COMMUNITY BANKERS TRUST CORPORATION

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

In December 2007, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 141(R), “Business Combinations” (SFAS 141(R)). The Standard will significantly change the financial accounting and reporting of business combination transactions. SFAS 141(R) establishes principles for how an acquirer recognizes and measures the identifiable assets acquired, liabilities assumed, and any noncontrolling interest in the acquiree; recognizes and measures the goodwill acquired in the business combination or a gain from a bargain purchase; and determines what information to disclose to enable users of the financial statements to evaluate the nature and financial effects of the business combination. SFAS 141(R) is effective for acquisition dates on or after the beginning of an entity’s first year that begins after December 15, 2008. The Company does not expect the implementation of SFAS 141(R) to have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements, at this time.

In December 2007, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 160, “Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements an Amendment of ARB No. 51” (SFAS 160). The Standard will significantly change the financial accounting and reporting of noncontrolling (or minority) interests in consolidated financial statements. SFAS 160 is effective as of the beginning of an entity’s first fiscal year that begins after December 15, 2008, with early adoption prohibited. The Company does not expect the implementation of SFAS 160 to have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements, at this time.

In November 2007, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 109, “Written Loan Commitments Recorded at Fair Value Through Earnings” (SAB 109). SAB 109 expresses the current view of the staff that the expected net future cash flows related to the associated servicing of the loan should be included in the measurement of all written loan commitments that are accounted for at fair value through earnings. SEC registrants are expected to apply the views in Question 1 of SAB 109 on a prospective basis to derivative loan commitments issued or modified in fiscal quarters beginning after December 15, 2007. Implementation of SAB 109 did not have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.

In December 2007, the SEC issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 110, “Use of a Simplified Method in Developing Expected Term of Share Options” (SAB 110). SAB 110 expresses the current view of the staff that it will accept a company’s election to use the simplified method discussed in SAB 107 for estimating the expected term of “plain vanilla” share options regardless of whether the company has sufficient information to make more refined estimates. The staff noted that it understands that detailed information about employee exercise patterns may not be widely available by December 31, 2007. Accordingly, the staff will continue to accept, under certain circumstances, the use of the simplified method beyond December 31, 2007. Implementation of SAB 110 did not have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.

In March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161, “Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities — an amendment of SFAS No. 133,” (“SFAS No. 161”). SFAS No. 161 requires that an entity provide enhanced disclosures related to derivative and hedging activities. SFAS No. 161 is effective for the Company on January 1, 2009.

In April 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position (FSP) No. 142-3, “Determination of the Useful Life of Intangible Assets” (“FSP No. 142-3”). FSP No. 142-3 amends the factors an entity should consider in developing renewal or extension assumptions used in determining the useful life of recognized intangible assets under FASB SFAS No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets” (“SFAS No. 142”). The intent of FSP No. 142-3 is to improve the consistency between the useful life of a recognized intangible asset under SFAS No. 142 and the period of expected cash flows used to measure the fair value of the assets under SFAS No. 141(R). FSP No. 142-3 is effective for the Company on January 1, 2009, and applies prospectively to intangible assets that are acquired individually or with a group of other assets in business combinations and asset acquisitions. The adoption of FSP No. 142-3 is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In May 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 162, “The Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles,” (“SFAS No. 162”). SFAS No. 162 identifies the sources of accounting principles and the framework for selecting the principles to be used in the preparation of financial statements of nongovernmental entities that are presented in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles. SFAS No. 162 is effective 60 days following the SEC’s approval of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board amendments to AU Section 411, “The Meaning of Present Fairly in Conformity With Generally Accepted Accounting Principles.” Management does not expect the adoption of the provision of SFAS No. 162 to have any impact on the consolidated financial statements.

COMMUNITY BANKERS TRUST CORPORATION

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

In September 2008, the FASB issued FSP FAS 133-1 and FIN 45-4, “Disclosures about Credit Derivatives and Certain Guarantees: An Amendment of FASB Statement No. 133 and FASB Interpretation No. 45; and Clarification of the Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 161,” (“FSP 133-1 and FIN 45-4”). FSP 133-1 and FIN 45-4 require a seller of credit derivatives to disclose information about its credit derivatives and hybrid instruments that have embedded credit derivatives to enable users of financial statements to assess their potential effect on its financial position, financial performance and cash flows. The disclosures required by FSP 133-1 and FIN 45-4 will be effective for the Company on December 31, 2008 and is not expected to have a material impact on the consolidated financial statements.

In October 2008, the FASB issued FSP FAS 157-3, “Determining the Fair Value of a Financial Asset When the Market for That Asset Is Not Active,” (“FSP 157-3”). FSP 157-3 clarifies the application of SFAS No. 157 in determining the fair value of a financial asset during periods of inactive markets. FSP 157-3 was effective as of September 30, 2008 and did not have material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In December 2008, the FASB issued FSP No. FAS 140-4 and FIN 46(R)-8, “Disclosures by Public Entities (Enterprises) about Transfers of Financial Assets and Interests in Variable Interest Entities.” FSP No. FAS 140-4 and FIN 46(R)-8 requires enhanced disclosures about transfers of financial assets and interests in variable interest entities. The FSP is effective for interim and annual periods ending after December 15, 2008. Since the FSP requires only additional disclosures concerning transfers of financial assets and interest in variable interest entities, adoption of the FSP will not affect the Company’s financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

In January 2009, the FASB reached a consensus on EITF Issue 99-20-1. This FSP amends the impairment guidance in EITF Issue No. 99-20, “Recognition of Interest Income and Impairment on Purchased Beneficial Interests and Beneficial Interests That Continue to Be Held by a Transferor in Securitized Financial Assets,” to achieve more consistent determination of whether an other-than-temporary impairment has occurred. The FSP also retains and emphasizes the objective of an other-than-temporary impairment assessment and the related disclosure requirements in FASB Statement No. 115, “Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities,” and other related guidance. The FSP is effective for interim and annual reporting periods ending after December 15, 2008 and shall be applied prospectively. The FSP was effective as of December 31, 2008 and did not have a material impact on the consolidated financial statements.

Business Combinations

On September 7, 2007, the Company issued a press release and filed a Current Report on Form 8-K reporting that it had entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of September 5, 2007, with TFC (the “TFC Agreement”), which provided for the merger of TFC with and into the Company. Effective May 31, 2008 at 11:58 p.m., the Company consummated the merger between the Company and TFC pursuant to the terms of the TFC Agreement (the “TFC Merger”). In connection with the TFC Merger, TransCommunity Bank, N.A., a wholly-owned subsidiary of TFC, became a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company. The material terms of the TFC Merger Agreement and certain financial and other information about the Company and TFC are contained in the Company’s registration statement on Form S-4 (SEC File No. 333-148675) originally filed January 15, 2008, as amended, the definitive joint proxy statement/prospectus thereto, filed March 31, 2008 (hereinafter referred to as the “TFC Merger Proxy”), TFC’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007, filed March 31, 2008 (SEC File No. 000-33355), and TFC’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2008, filed May 15, 2008 (SEC File No. 000-33355).

On December 14, 2007, the Company issued a press release and filed a Current Report on Form 8-K reporting that it had entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of December 14, 2007, with BOE Financial Services of Virginia, Inc. (the “BOE Agreement”), which provided for the merger of BOE with and into the Company. Effective May 31, 2008 at 11:59 p.m., the Company consummated the merger between the Company and BOE pursuant to the terms of the BOE Agreement (the “BOE Merger”). In connection with the BOE Merger, the

COMMUNITY BANKERS TRUST CORPORATION

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Bank, a wholly-owned subsidiary of BOE, became a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company. The material terms of the BOE Merger Agreement and certain financial and other information about the Company and BOE are contained in the Company’s registration statement on Form S-4 (SEC File No. 333-149384) originally filed February 26, 2008, as amended, the definitive joint proxy statement/prospectus thereto, filed March 31, 2008 (hereinafter referred to as the “BOE Merger Proxy”), BOE’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007, filed March 31, 2008 (SEC File No. 000-31711), and BOE’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2008, filed May 15, 2008 (SEC File No. 000-31711).

Prior to the mergers, $54.35 million of the net proceeds from the CBTC initial public offering including $2.1 million of deferred underwriting discounts and commissions was held in trust by CBTC for the purpose of completing a business combination. Of such funds, $45.6 million was released to the Company upon completion of the TFC Business Combination and BOE Merger, after payment of the deferred discount and $10.8 million to stockholders who converted their shares to cash.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Management estimates that are particularly susceptible to significant change in the near term relate to the determination of the allowance for loan losses, the valuation of other real estate owned, and the valuation of deferred tax assets.

Reclassifications

Certain reclassifications have been made to prior period balances to conform to the current year provisions.

Note 2. Restatement

During 2008, management discovered that there was an error in the fair value of stock options issued by the Company in settlement of the TFC and BOE stock options outstanding as of the respective merger dates. When correcting this valuation error, the adjustment was inadvertently recorded twice. The result was an understatement of Goodwill and Deferred Taxes Liabilities of approximately $2.9 million and $1.5 million, respectively. Other assets decreased because the error correction resulted in a net deferred tax liability position as opposed to a net deferred tax asset position. An adjustment has been made to correct this error.

Specific line items of the financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2008 affected by the restatement are as follows:


(dollars in thousands)
	As filed		Restated
Consolidated Balance Sheet
Goodwill		34,285		37,184	(1)
Other assets		9,507		7,798	(2)
Total assets		1,029,050		1,030,240	(1),(2)

Other liabilities		16,992		17,465	(3)
Total liabilities		865,364		865,837	(3)

Additional paid in capital		145,359		146,076	(4)
Total stockholders’ equity		163,686		164,403	(4)

Consolidated Statement of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity
Issuance of stock related to business combination		100,052		100,769	(4)
Balance December 31, 2008		145,359		146,076	(4)

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
Non-cash transactions related to the acquisition of TFC and BOE assets and liabilities
Other assets		81,487		83,664	(5)
Other liabilities		8,756		10,216	(6)

Adjustments

(1)	to correct goodwill related to the revised calculation of the fair value of stock options in the amount of $2.177 million and for reclassification of merger and acquisition costs of $723,000

(2)	to correct deferred tax assets related to the revised calculation of the fair value of stock options in the amount of ($987,000) and for the reclassification of merger and acquisition costs to goodwill of ($723,000)

(3)	to correct deferred tax liabilities related to the revised calculation of the fair value of stock options

(4)	to correct additional paid in capital related to the revised calculation of the fair value of stock options

(5)	to correct the increase in other assets for the change in goodwill related to the revised calculation of the fair value of stock options

(6)	to correct the increase in other liabilities for the change in deferred taxes related to the revised calculation of the fair value of stock options

COMMUNITY BANKERS TRUST CORPORATION

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 3. Securities

The amortized cost and fair value of securities available for sale and held to maturity as of December 31, 2008 are as follows (dollars in thousands):


	Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized					Fair Value
	Amortized Cost		Gains		Losses			Fair Value
Securities Available for Sale
U.S. Treasury issue and other U.S. Government agencies	$	28,732	$	358	$	(21	)	$	29,069
Mortgage backed securities		93,619		803		(66	)		94,356
State, county and municipal		64,600		478		(2,184	)		62,894
Corporate & other bonds		7,418		19		(188	)		7,249
Other securities		323		111		(10	)		424

Total securities available for sale	$	194,692	$	1,769	$	(2,469	)	$	193,992


	Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized					Fair Value
	Amortized Cost		Gains		Losses			Fair Value
Securities Held to Maturity
U.S. Treasury issue and other U.S. Government agencies	$	5,997	$	37	$	—		$	6,034
Mortgage backed securities		79,595		62		—			79,657
State, county and municipal		9,273		1		—			9,274

Total securities held to maturity	$	94,865	$	100	$	—		$	94,965

As of December 31, 2007, securities of $58.5 million consisted solely of U. S. Treasuries held in trust, and were recorded at amortized cost.

In estimating other than temporary impairment losses, management considers, the length of time and the extent to which the fair value has been less than cost, the financial condition and short-term prospects for the issuer, and the intent and ability of management to hold its investment for a period of time to allow a recovery in fair value. As of December 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007, there were no investments held that had other than temporary impairment losses.

Presented below is a summary of securities available for sale with unrealized losses segregated at December 31, 2008:


	Less than 12 Months					12 Months or More				Total
	Fair Value		Unrealized Loss			Fair Value		Unrealized Loss		Fair Value		Unrealized Loss
	(Dollars in thousands)
Securities available for sale
U.S. Treasury issue and other U.S. Government agencies	$	1,583	$	(21	)	$	—	$	—	$	1,583	$	(21	)
State, county and municipal		33,005		(2,184	)		—		—		33,005		(2,184	)
Corporate & other bonds		4,475		(187	)		—		—		4,475		(187	)
Mortgage backed securities		2,812		(66	)		—		—		2,812		(66	)
Other securities		186		(10	)		—		—		186		(10	)

Total	$	42,061	$	(2,468	)	$	—	$	—	$	42,061	$	(2,468	)

There were no unrealized losses on securities held to maturity as of December 31, 2008. In addition, there were no unrealized losses reported for U.S. Treasuries held in trust as of December 31, 2007.

COMMUNITY BANKERS TRUST CORPORATION

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

The unrealized losses in the investment portfolio as of December 31, 2008 are generally a result of market fluctuations that occur daily. The unrealized losses are from 97 securities that are all of investment grade, backed by insurance, U.S. government agency guarantees, or the full faith and credit of local municipalities throughout the United States. The Company has the ability and intent to hold these securities to maturity or until a recovery of value. Market prices are affected by conditions beyond the control of the Company. Investment decisions are made by the management group of the Company and reflect the overall liquidity and strategic asset/liability objectives of the Company. Management analyzes the securities portfolio frequently and manages the portfolio to provide an overall positive impact to the Company’s income statement and balance sheet.

The amortized cost and fair value of securities as of December 31, 2008, by contractual maturity are shown below. Expected maturities may differ from contractual maturities because issuers may have the right to call or prepay obligations without any penalties.


	Held to Maturity				Available for Sale
	Amortized Cost		Fair Value		Amortized Cost		Fair Value
	(Dollars in thousands)
Due in one year or less	$	—	$	—	$	22,803	$	22,823
Due after one year through five years		17,834		17,891		70,887		71,640
Due after five years through ten years		68,397		68,403		78,280		78,552
Due after ten years		8,634		8,672		22,399		20,553

		94,865		94,966		194,369		193,568
Other securities		—		—		323		424

Total securities	$	94,865	$	94,966	$	194,692	$	193,992

Proceeds from sales, principal repayments, calls and maturities of securities available for sale during 2008:


	Amount
	(Dollars in thousands)
Proceeds from sales	$	110
Proceeds from call, maturities and paydowns		68,452

Total proceeds	$	68,562

Gross realized gains		—
Gross realized losses		—

Net realized gain	$	—

Securities with amortized costs of $18.927 million at December 31, 2008 were pledged to secure public deposits and for other purposes required or permitted by law. On December 31, 2008 and 2007, there were no securities issued, other than U.S. government and agencies, that comprised more than 10% of the consolidated shareholders’ equity.

Note 4. Loans

The loan portfolio consisted of various loan types as follows (dollars in thousands):


	December 31, 2008
Mortgage loans on real estate:
Residential 1-4 family	$	129,607
Commercial		158,062
Construction		139,515
Second Mortgages		15,599
Multifamily		9,370
Agriculture		5,143

Total real estate loans		457,296
Commercial Loans		45,320
Consumer installment loans		14,457
All other loans		7,005

Gross loans		524,078
Less: unearned income		(780	)

Loans, net of unearned income	$	523,298

COMMUNITY BANKERS TRUST CORPORATION

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

The Company had an approximate $5.154 million in nonperforming assets at December 31, 2008. These nonperforming assets consisted of 84 credits and one piece of OREO property. Interest forfeited on non-accrual loans for the year ended December 31, 2008 was $251,000.

At December 31, 2008, the Company’s allowance for credit losses is comprised of the following: (i) any specific valuation allowances calculated in accordance with SFAS No. 114, Accounting by Creditors for Impairment of a Loan (SFAS 114), (ii) general valuation allowances calculated in accordance with SFAS 5 based on economic conditions and other qualitative risk factors, and (iii) historical valuation allowances calculated using historical loan loss experience of the former banks. Management identified loans subject to impairment in accordance with SFAS 114.

The following is a summary of information for impaired and non-accrual loans as of December 31, 2008 (dollars in thousands):


	Amount
Impaired loans without a valuation allowance	$	13,301
Impaired loans with a valuation allowance		12,915

Total impaired loans	$	26,216

Valuation allowance related to impaired loans	$	3,115
Total non-accrual loans	$	4,534
Total loans ninety days or more past due and still accruing	$	397
Average investment in impaired loans	$	8,240

Interest income recognized on impaired loans	$	768

Interest income recognized on a cash basis on impaired loans	$	768

Analysis of the loan valuation allowance is as follows:


	Year Ended December 31, 2008
Balance, beginning of year	$	—
Allowance from acquired banks		5,305

Loans charged-off		(980	)
Recoveries		42
Provision for loan losses		2,572

Balance, end of year	$	6,939

COMMUNITY BANKERS TRUST CORPORATION

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 5. Premises and Equipment

A summary of the bank premises and equipment at December 31, 2008 follows: (dollars in thousands):


Land	$	5,914
Land improvements and buildings		13,900
Leasehold improvements		53
Furniture and equipment		2,223
Construction in progress		2,661

Total		24,751
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization		(640	)

Bank premises and equipment, net	$	24,111

Depreciation expense for the year ended December 31, 2008 amounted to $640,000.

Note 6. Mergers and Acquisitions

In relation to the mergers with TFC and BOE on May 31, 2008, which is further described in Note 1, the Company followed the acquisition method of accounting as outlined in SFAS 141, Business Combinations. Under SFAS 141, the Company is required to implement purchase accounting rules, where the acquirer recognizes and measures the identifiable assets acquired, liabilities assumed, and any noncontrolling interest in the acquiree; recognizes and measures the goodwill acquired in the business combination or a gain from a bargain purchase; and determines what information to disclose to enable users of the financial statements to evaluate the nature and financial effects of the business combination. Management relied on external analysis by appraisers in determining the fair value of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed. Based on that appraisal, the following table provides the calculation and allocation of the purchase price used in the financial statements:


	BOE			TFC
	(Dollars in thousands)
Value of shares issues ($7.42 per share)	$	51,624		$	48,563
Value of stock options issued		997			1,207
Merger related costs		1,928			2,068

Purchase price		54,549			51,838
Book value of net assets acquired		30,096			29,052

Excess of purchase over book value of net assets	$	24,453		$	22,786

Allocation of excess purchase price:
Core deposit intangible	$	9,643		$	5,309
Fair value adjustments:
Loans		656			1,423
Investment securities		2			—
Bank premises		2,684			675
Time deposit		(992	)		(1,954	)
Deferred taxes		(4,738	)		(2,653	)
Goodwill		17,198			19,986

	$	24,453		$	22,786

Fair value of assets acquired
Cash and cash equivalents	$	5,784		$	4,232
Investment securities		57,021			11,285
Loans		234,715			243,303
Bank premises and equipment		13,296			8,770
Bank owned life insurance		6,158			—
Core deposit intangibles		9,643			5,309
Goodwill		17,198			19,986

Fair value of assets acquired	$	343,815		$	292,885

Fair value of liabilities assumed
Deposits	$	257,374		$	234,088
FHLB advances		17,900			—
Trust preferred capital notes		4,124			—
Other		9,207			6,160

Fair value of liabilities assumed	$	288,605		$	240,248

Net assets acquired, at fair value	$	55,210		$	52,637

COMMUNITY BANKERS TRUST CORPORATION

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

The merger transaction was accounted for under the purchase method of accounting and is intended to qualify as a tax-free reorganization under Section 368(a) of the Internal Revenue Code. The merger resulted in $37.2 million of estimated goodwill and $15.0 million of core deposit intangible assets. The estimated goodwill is subject to possible adjustments during the one year period from the date of the merger. The core deposit intangible asset was based on an independent valuation and will be amortized over the estimated life of the core deposits ranging from 2.6 to nine years. There were no funds borrowed by the Company to finance these mergers.

The Company analyzed the effect of canceling certain contracts between Bank and their vendors in order to produce efficiencies from the merger. Costs of canceling the contracts were material and changed the amount of goodwill associated with the merger.

The Company’s consolidated financial statements include the results of operations of the Bank only from the date of acquisitions. Pro forma condensed consolidated income statements for the years ended December 31, 2008, and 2007 are shown as if the merger occurred at the beginning of each year as follows:


Pro forma information	2008			2007
	(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
Interest income	$	38,221		$	38,480
Interest expense		(15,622	)		(15,371	)

Net interest income		22,599			23,109
Provision for loan losses		(4,120	)		(1,692	)
Other income		3,063			3,068
Other expenses		(25,740	)		(19,962	)
Income tax expense		(40	)		1,903
Discontinued operations		—			(77	)

Net income	$	(4,238	)	$	6,349

Earnings per share	$	(0.19	)	$	0.28

On November 21, 2008, the Bank acquired certain assets and assumed all deposit liabilities relating to four former branch offices of TCB. The transaction was consummated pursuant to a Purchase and Assumption Agreement, dated November 21, 2008, by and among the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”), as Receiver for The Community Bank, the Bank and the FDIC.

COMMUNITY BANKERS TRUST CORPORATION

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Management evaluated the applicability of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 141 “Business Combinations”, as well as EITF 98-3 “Determining Whether a Nonmonetary Transaction Involves Receipt of Productive Assets or of a Business” in determining the accounting for this transaction. This guidance outlines that for a transferred set of activities and assets to be a business, it must contain all the inputs and processes necessary for it to continue to conduct normal operations after the transferred set is separated from the transferor, which includes the ability to sustain a revenue stream by providing its outputs to customers. Based upon an assessment of the transaction, management determined that there were significant limitations on the resources transferred and, therefore, concluded that the net assets acquired did not meet the definition of a “Business” as defined by these authoritative standards. Accordingly, the transaction was accounted for as an asset purchase.

Pursuant to the terms of the Purchase and Assumption Agreement, the Bank assumed approximately $619.0 million in deposits, approximately $233.9 million of which were deemed to be core deposits, and paid the FDIC a premium of 1.36% on the core deposits amounting to approximately $3.2 million. All deposits insured prior to the closing of the transaction maintained their current insurance coverage.

The Company also acquired assets amounting to approximately $87.5 million as follows (dollars in thousands):


Cash and cash equivalents	$	54,439
Investment securities		31,304
Loans and accrued interest		1,593
Other assets		135

Total assets	$	87,471

The loans acquired were those fully secured by deposit accounts. the Bank had not purchased any additional loans as of December 31, 2008.

The Bank had 60 days to evaluate and, at its sole option, purchase any of the remaining TCB loans. As a result, the Bank purchased 175 loans totaling approximately $21 million on January 9, 2009. Also, the Bank had 90 days to evaluate and, at its sole option, purchase the premises and equipment. The Bank agreed to purchase all four former banking premises of TCB for $6.4 million on February 19, 2009.

The former branch offices of TCB opened on November 24, 2008 under the name “Essex Bank, a division of the Bank.”

Note 7. Goodwill and Other Intangibles

The Company follows SFAS 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, which prescribes the accounting for goodwill and intangible assets subsequent to initial recognition. Provisions within SFAS 142 discontinue any amortization of goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite lives, and require at least an annual impairment review or more often if certain impairment conditions exist. With the TFC and BOE mergers consummated May 31, 2008, there were significant amounts of goodwill and other intangible assets recorded, and no impairments were experienced in the period reported.

Core deposit intangible assets are amortized over the period of expected benefit, ranging from 2.6 to 9 years. Due to the mergers with TFC and BOE on May 31, 2008, the Company recorded approximately $15.0 million in core deposit intangible assets and $34.3 million in goodwill. Additionally, BOE assumed all deposits of The Community Bank, Loganville, GA on November 21, 2008, which were purchased for a premium of approximately $3.2 million.

COMMUNITY BANKERS TRUST CORPORATION

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Goodwill and other intangible assets are presented in the following table:


	December 31, 2008
	Gross Carrying Value		Accumulated Amortization		Net Carrying Value
	(Dollars in thousands)
Goodwill	$	37,184	$	—	$	37,184
Core deposit intangibles		18,132		969		17,163

Note 8. Fair Value Measurements

The Company utilizes fair value measurements to record fair value adjustments to certain assets and liabilities and to determine fair value disclosures. Securities available-for-sale, trading securities and derivatives, if present, are recorded at fair value on a recurring basis. Additionally, from time to time, the Company may be required to record at fair value other assets on a nonrecurring basis, such as loans held for sale, loans held for investment and certain other assets. These nonrecurring fair value adjustments typically involve application of lower of cost or market accounting or write-downs of individual assets.

Fair Value Hierarchy

Under SFAS 157, Fair Value Measurement, the Company groups assets and liabilities at fair value in three levels, based on the markets in which the assets and liabilities are traded and the reliability of the assumptions used to determine fair value. These levels are:

Level 1 — Valuation is based upon quoted prices for identical instruments traded in active markets.

Level 2 — Valuation is based upon quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active, and model-based valuation techniques for which all significant assumptions are observable in the market.

Level 3 — Valuation is generated from model-based techniques that use at least one significant assumption not observable in the market. These unobservable assumptions reflect estimates of assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability. Valuation techniques include use of option pricing models, discounted cash flow models and similar techniques.

Following is a description of valuation methodologies used for assets and liabilities recorded at fair value.

Investment Securities Available-for-Sale

Investment securities available-for-sale are recorded at fair value each reporting period. Fair value measurement is based upon quoted prices, if available. If quoted prices are not available, fair values are measured using independent pricing models or other model-based valuation techniques such as the present value of future cash flows, adjusted for the security’s credit rating, prepayment assumptions and other factors such as credit loss assumptions. Level 1 securities include those traded on an active exchange, such as the New York Stock Exchange, U.S. Treasury securities that are traded by dealers or brokers in active over-the-counter markets and money market funds. Level 2 securities include mortgage-backed securities issued by government sponsored entities, municipal bonds and corporate debt securities. Securities classified as Level 3 include asset-backed securities in less liquid markets.

COMMUNITY BANKERS TRUST CORPORATION

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Impaired Loans

The Company does not record unimpaired loans held for investment at fair value each reporting period. However, from time to time, a loan is considered impaired and an allowance for loan losses is established. Loans for which it is probable that payment of interest and principal will not be made in accordance with the contractual terms of the loan agreement are considered impaired. Once a loan is identified as individually impaired, management measures the impairment in accordance with SFAS 114, Accounting by Creditors for Impairment of a Loan. The fair value of impaired loans is estimated using one of several methods, including collateral value, market value of similar debt, enterprise value, and liquidation value and discounted cash flows. Those impaired loans not requiring an allowance represent loans for which the fair value of the expected repayments or collateral exceed the recorded investments in such loans. In accordance with SFAS 157, impaired loans where an allowance is established based on the fair value of collateral require classification in the fair value hierarchy. The Bank frequently obtains appraisals prepared by external professional appraisers for classified loans greater than $250,000 when the most recent appraisal is greater than 12 months old. The appraisal, based on the date of preparation, becomes only a part of the determination of the amount of any loan write-off, with current market conditions and the collateral’s location being other determinants. When the fair value of the collateral is based on an observable market price or a current appraised value, the Company records the impaired loan as nonrecurring Level 2.

The Bank may also identify collateral deterioration based on current market sales data, including price and absorption, as well as input from real estate sales professionals and developers, county or city tax assessments, market data and on-site inspections by Bank personnel. Internally prepared estimates generally result from current market data and actual sales data related to the Bank’s collateral or where the collateral is located. When management determines the fair value of the collateral is further impaired below the appraised value and there is no observable market price, the Company records the impaired loan as nonrecurring Level 3. In instances where an appraisal received subsequent to an internally prepared estimate reflects a higher collateral value, management does not revise the carrying amount.

Reviews of classified loans are performed by management on a quarterly basis. At December 31, 2008, substantially all of the impaired loans were evaluated based on the fair value of the collateral.

Foreclosed Assets

Foreclosed assets are adjusted to fair value upon transfer of the loans to foreclosed assets. Subsequently, foreclosed assets are carried at the lower of carrying value or fair value. Fair value is based upon independent market prices, appraised values of the collateral or management’s estimation of the value of the collateral. When the fair value of the collateral is based on an observable market price or a current appraised value, the Company records the foreclosed asset as a nonrecurring Level 2. When an appraised value is not available or management determines the fair value of the collateral is further impaired below the appraised value and there is no observable market price, the Company records the foreclosed asset as nonrecurring Level 3.

Assets and Liabilities recorded at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis

The table below presents the recorded amount of assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis.


	December 31, 2008
	Total		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
Securities available for sale	$	193,992	$	424	$	193,568	$	—
Loans held for	$	200	$	—	$	200	$	—

Total assets at fair value	$	194,192	$	424	$	193,768	$	—

Total liabilities at fair value	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—

The Company had no Level 3 assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis at December 31, 2008.

Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Nonrecurring Basis

The Company may be required, from time to time, to measure certain assets at fair value on a nonrecurring basis in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. These include assets that are measured at the lower of cost or market that were recognized at fair value below cost at the end of the period. The table below presents the recorded amount of assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis.

COMMUNITY BANKERS TRUST CORPORATION

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements


	December 31, 2008
	Total		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
	(In thousands)
Loans — impaired loans, net	$	9,800	$	—	$	8,814	$	986
Other real estate owned (OREO)		223		—		223		—

Total assets at fair value	$	10,023	$	—	$	9,037	$	986

Total liabilities at fair value	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—

Note 9. Deposits


Balance by deposit type	December 31, 2008
	(Dollars in thousands)
NOW	$	76,575
MMDA		55,200
Savings		34,688
Time deposits less than $100,000		303,424
Time deposits greater than $100,000		276,762

Total interest-bearing deposits	$	746,649

The aggregate amount of time deposits in denominations of $100,000 or more at December 31, 2008 was $276.8 million.

The scheduled maturities of time deposits at December 31, 2008 (dollars in thousands) are as follows:


2009	$	452,601
2010		78,293
2011		29,963
2012		9,907
2013		9,290
Thereafter		132

Total	$	580,186

Note 10. Income Taxes

The tax effects of temporary differences that give rise to significant portions of the deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities as of December 31, 2008, follows (dollars in thousands):


	2008
Deferred tax assets:
Allowance for loan losses	$	2,309
Deferred compensation		590
Non-accrual loan interest		59
Accrued pension		569
FAS 158 adjustment pension		413
Stock based compensation		70
Net operating loss carryforward		2,945
Alternative minimum tax credit		108
Unrealized loss on available for sale securities		238
Other		65

	$	7,366

Deferred tax liabilities:
Depreciation		296
Purchase accounting adjustment		7,468
Other		75

	$	7,839

Net deferred tax liability	$	473

COMMUNITY BANKERS TRUST CORPORATION

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

The Company has analyzed the tax positions taken or expected to be taken in its tax returns and concluded it has no liability related to uncertain tax positions in accordance with FIN 48. The Company has analyzed the valuation allowances for Deferred Tax Assets and the fact that no allowance is required. All years from 2005 through 2008 are subject to audit by taxing authorities. As of December 31, 2008 the Company had $8.661 million of net operating losses which expire in 2021 through 2024.

Allocation of the income tax expense between current and deferred portions is as follows (dollars in thousands):


	2008			For the Nine Months Ended December 31, 2007
Current tax provision	$	243		$	576
Deferred tax (benefit)		(110	)		—

	$	133		$	576

The following is a reconciliation of the expected income tax expense with the reported expense for each year:


	2008			2007
Statutory federal income tax rate		34.0	%		34.0	%
(Reduction) in taxes resulting from:
Municipal interest		(21.0	)		—
Bank owned life insurance income		(4.1	)		—
Other, net		0.9			0.3

		9.8	%		34.3	%

Note 11. Borrowings

The Company uses borrowings in conjunction with deposits to fund lending and investing activities. Borrowings include funding of a short-term and long-term nature. Short-term funding includes overnight borrowings from correspondent banks and securities sold under an agreement to repurchase. Long-term borrowings are obtained through the Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB) of Atlanta. At December 31, 2008, there were no short-term borrowings. The following information is provided for long-term borrowings balances, rates, and maturities with the FHLB (dollars in thousands):


	December 31, 2008
Federal Home Loan Bank Advances	$	37,900

Maximum month-end outstanding balance	$	37,900
Average outstanding balance during the year	$	15,861
Average interest rate during the year		4.63	%
Average interest rate at end of year		3.14	%

COMMUNITY BANKERS TRUST CORPORATION

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements


	Fixed Rate		Adjustable Rate		Total
2009	$	—	$	900	$	900
2010		—		—		—
2011		—		—		—
2012		22,000		—		22,000
2013		10,000		—		10,000
Thereafter		5,000		—		5,000

Total	$	37,000	$	900	$	37,900

The Company has unsecured lines of credit with correspondent banks available for overnight borrowing totaling approximately $45,500,000.

Note 12. Employee Benefit Plans

The Company adopted the Bank’s noncontributory, defined benefit pension plan for all full-time pre-merger Bank employees over 21 years of age. Benefits are generally based upon years of service and the employees’ compensation. The Bank funds pension costs in accordance with the funding provisions of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act.

The following table provides a reconciliation of the changes in the plan’s benefit obligations and fair value of assets for the period from merger date to ended December 31, 2008. (dollars in thousands):


	2008
Change in Benefit Obligation
Benefit obligation, assumed in merger	$	5,166
Service cost		271
Interest cost		225
Actuarial loss		(158	)
Benefits paid		(65	)

Benefit obligation, ending	$	5,439

Change in Plan Assets
Fair value of plan assets, assumed in merger	$	3,493
Actual return on plan assets		(878	)
Employer contributions		—
Benefits paid		(65	)

Fair value of plan assets, ending	$	2,550

Funded Status	$	(2,889	)

Amounts Recognized in the Balance Sheet
Other assets	$	—
Other liabilities		2,889
Amounts Recognized in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income
Net loss	$	1,216
Prior service cost		5
Net obligation at transition		(5	)
Deferred tax		(413	)

Total amount recognized	$	803

COMMUNITY BANKERS TRUST CORPORATION

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

The accumulated benefit obligation for the defined benefit pension plan was $3.658 million at December 31, 2008.

The following table provides the components of net periodic benefit cost for the plan for the year ended December 31, 2008 (dollars in thousands):


	2008
Components of Net Periodic Benefit Cost
Service cost	$	218
Interest cost		180
Expected return on plan assets		(187	)
Amortization of prior service cost		2
Amortization of net obligation at transition		(2	)
Recognized net actuarial loss		10

Net periodic benefit cost	$	221

Total recognized in net periodic benefit cost and accumulated other comprehensive (loss)	$	1,024

The weighted-average assumptions used in the measurement of the Company’s benefit obligation and net periodic benefit cost are shown in the following table:


	2008
Discount rate		6.00	%
Expected return on plan		8.50	%
Rate of compensation		4.00	%

Long-Term Rate of Return

The plan sponsor selects the expected long-term rate of return on assets assumption in consultation with their investment advisors and actuary. This rate is intended to reflect the average rate of earnings expected to be earned on the funds invested or to be invested to provide plan benefits. Historical performance is reviewed, especially with respect to real rates of return (net of inflation), for the major asset classes held or anticipated to be held by the trust, and for the trust itself. Undue weight is not given to recent experience that may not continue over the measurement period, with higher significance placed on current forecasts of future long-term economic conditions.

Because assets are held in a qualified trust, anticipated returns are not reduced for taxes. Further, solely for this purpose, the plan is assumed to continue in force and not terminate during the period during which assets are invested. However, consideration is given to the potential impact of current and future investment policy, cash flow into and out of the trust, and expenses (both investment and non-investment) typically paid from plan assets (to the extent such expenses are not explicitly estimated within periodic cost).

Asset Allocation

The pension plan’s weighted-average asset allocations at December 31, 2008, by asset category are as follows:


	2008
Asset Category
Mutual funds — fixed income		32	%
Mutual funds — equity		63	%
Cash and equivalents		5	%

Total		100	%

COMMUNITY BANKERS TRUST CORPORATION

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

The trust fund is sufficiently diversified to maintain a reasonable level of risk without imprudently sacrificing return, with a targeted asset allocation of 40% fixed income and 60% equities. The investment manager selects investment fund managers with demonstrated experience and expertise, and funds with demonstrated historical performance, for the implementation of the plan’s investment strategy. The investment manager will consider both actively and passively managed investment strategies and will allocate funds across the asset classes to develop an efficient investment structure.

It is the responsibility of the trustee to administer the investments of the trust within reasonable costs, being careful to avoid sacrificing quality. These costs include, but are not limited to, management and custodial fees, consulting fees, transaction costs and other administrative costs chargeable to the trust.

The Company did not to contribute to its pension plan in 2008.

Estimated future benefit payments, which reflect expected future service, as appropriate, are as follows (dollars in thousands):


2009	$	88
2010		125
2011		159
2012		158
2013		175
2014-2018		1,354

401(k) Plan

The Company adopted the 401(k) Plans that previously existed with both TFC and BOE prior to the merger. Under the BOE 401(k) Plan, employees have a contributory 401(k) profit sharing plan which covers substantially all employees. The employee may contribute up to 100% of compensation, subject to statutory limitations. The Company matches 50% of employee contributions up to 4% of compensation. The plan also provides for an additional discretionary contribution to be made by the Company as determined each year. Any employees that started with the Company after the merger, and meet the service requirements, would be included in the BOE 401(k) Plan.

Under the TFC 401(k) Plan, employees have a contributory 401(k) profit share plan which covers substantially all employees. The employee may contribute up to 100% of compensation, subject to statutory limitations. The Company matches 100% of employee contributions on the first 3% of compensation, then the Company matches 50% of employee contributions on the next 2% of compensation. The plan also provides for additional discretionary contributions to be made by the Company as determined each year. The amounts charged to expense under these plans for the year ended December 31, 2008 was $201,000.

Deferred Compensation Agreements

The Company has deferred compensation agreements with certain key employees and the Board of Directors. The retirement benefits to be provided are fixed based upon the amount of compensation earned and deferred. Deferred compensation expense amounted to $144,000 for the year ended December 31, 2008. These contracts are funded by life insurance policies.

Note 13. Stock Option Plans and Warrants

Prior to the mergers, both TFC and BOE maintained stock option plans as incentives for certain officers and directors. During 2007, TFC replaced its stock option plan with an equity compensation plan that issued restricted stock awards. Under the terms of these plans, all options and awards were fully vested and exercisable, and any unrecognized compensation expenses were accelerated. Due to the mergers on May 31, 2008, these plans were terminated by the Company, replacement options were granted by the Company to former employees of at TFC and BOE exchange rates of 1.42 and 5.7278, respectively.

COMMUNITY BANKERS TRUST CORPORATION

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

A summary of the options is shown in the following table:


	TFC 2008		BOE 2008
Options issued in connection with bank acquisition		332,351		161,426
Options outstanding at December 31		332,351		161,426
Options exercisable at December 31		332,351		161,426
Weighted average exercise price	$	6.83	$	4.13
Weighted average remaining contracted life at December 31		51 months		57 months

Options were valued at $1,488 million using the Black-Shoals model at the time of acquisition of TFC and BOE by the Company. Options were part of the acquisition and were not expensed by the Company. Assumptions were for a discount rate of 4.06% and 25% volatility with a remaining term of 4.83 years for TFC options and 5.25 years for BOE options.

The intrinsic values of options outstanding and exercisable at December 31, 2008 were $24,000. No options have been exercised since the merger. Currently, the Company does not have any stock-based compensation plan that is issuing new instruments. However, the Company’s Compensation Committee and Board of Directors are considering various types of stock-based compensation plans to be presented to shareholders at its 2009 annual meeting.

On June 8, 2006, the Company sold 7,500,000 units (“Units”) in the Offering. Each Unit consists of one share of the Company’s common stock, $0.01 par value, and one Redeemable Common Stock Purchase Warrant (“Warrant”). Each Warrant will entitle the holder to purchase one share of common stock from the Company at an exercise price of $5.00 commencing on the completion of a Business Combination and expiring five years from the date of the Offering. The Warrants will be redeemable by the Company at a price of $0.01 per Warrant upon 30 days’ notice after the Warrants become exercisable, only in the event that the last sale price of the common stock is at least $11.50 per share for any 20 trading days within a 30 trading day period ending on the third business day prior to the date on which notice of the redemption is given.

In addition, the Company sold an option to purchase an aggregate of up to 525,000 units for $100, to I-Bankers Securities, Inc., Maxim Group LLC and Legend Merchant Group, Inc. or their designees, the representatives of the underwriters (the “Underwriters”). The units issuable upon exercise of this option are identical to those offered in the Initial Public Offering, except that each of the warrants underlying this option entitles the holder to purchase one share of common stock at a price of $7.50. This option is exercisable at $10.00 per unit commencing on the later of the consummation of a Business Combination or one year from the date of the Offering. This option expires June 4, 2011. In lieu of the payment of the exercise price, this option may be converted into units on a net-share settlement or cashless exercise basis to the extent that the market value of the units at the time of conversion exceeds the exercise price of this option. This option may only be exercised or converted by the option holder and cannot be redeemed by the Company for cash.

COMMUNITY BANKERS TRUST CORPORATION

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 14. Earnings Per Share

The following shows the weighted average number of shares used in computing earnings per share and the effect on the weighted average number of shares of diluted potential stock. Potential dilutive common stock had no effect on income available to common stockholders.


	Income (Numerator)		Weighted Average Shares (Denominator)		Per Share Amount
	(Dollars and shares in thousands, except per share data)
For the Twelve Months ended December 31, 2008
Basic EPS	$	1,223		16,430	$	0.07
Effect of dilutive options and warrants		—		1,088		—

Diluted EPS	$	1,223		17,518	$	0.07

For the Nine Months ended December 31, 2007
Basic EPS	$	1,105		9,375	$	0.12
Effect of dilutive warrants		—		2,432		(0.03	)

Diluted EPS	$	1,105		11,807	$	0.09

No options were excluded from the computation for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007.

Note 15. Related Party Transactions

In the ordinary course of business, the Bank has and expects to continue to have transactions, including borrowings, with its executive officers, directors, and their affiliates. All such loans are made on substantially the same terms as those prevailing at the time for comparable loans to unrelated persons.

With the merger of the entities on May 31, 2008, a new Corporate directorate and Executive officer staff was named for Community Bankers Trust Corporation. Various directors and executive officers had loans outstanding with their respective Bank’s prior to the merger. The table below depicts both direct and indirect loans assumed by the new entity as well as advances and repayments subsequent to May 31, 2008 (dollars in thousands).


	2008
Balance, assumed at merger	$	3,042
Principal additions		1,855
Repayments and reclassifications		(219	)

Balance, end of year	$	4,678

Indirect loans assumed at the merger equaled $1.118 million of the amount stated above, and $1.116 million of the balance at year-end 2008.

Note 16. Commitments and Contingent Liabilities

In the normal course of business, there are outstanding various commitments and contingent liabilities, such as guarantees, commitments to extend credit, etc., which are not reflected in the accompanying consolidated financial statements. The Bank does not anticipate losses as a result of these transactions. See Note 19 with respect to financial instruments with off-balance-sheet risk.

The following table presents the Company’s contractual obligations and scheduled payment amounts due at the various intervals over the next five years and beyond as of December 31, 2008 (dollars in thousands):


	Total		Less than 1 year		1-3 Years		4-5 Years		More than 5 Years
Trust preferred debt	$	4,124	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	4,124
Federal Home Loan Bank Debt		37,900		900		—		32,000		5,000
Operating leases		7,476		499		914		779		5,284

Total contractual obligations	$	49,500	$	1,399	$	914	$	32,779	$	14,408

COMMUNITY BANKERS TRUST CORPORATION

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 17. Dividend Limitations on Affiliate Bank

Transfers of funds from the banking subsidiary to the parent corporation in the form of loans, advances and cash dividends are restricted by federal and state regulatory authorities. As of December 31, 2008, the aggregate amount of unrestricted funds, which could be transferred from the banking subsidiary to the parent corporation, without prior regulatory approval, totaled $50.575 million (22.92% of net assets).

Note 18. Concentration of Credit Risk

At December 31, 2008, the Bank’s loan portfolio consisted of commercial, real estate and consumer (installment) loans. Real estate secured loans represented the largest concentration at 87.26% of traditional loan portfolio (BOE and TFC). Subsequent to December 31, 2008, loans have been added to the portfolio from the transactions in Georgia and most notably in Maryland.

The Bank maintains a portion of its cash balances with several financial institutions located in its market area. Accounts at each institution are secured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation up to $250,000. Uninsured balances were approximately $5.108 million at December 31, 2008.

Note 19. Financial Instruments With Off-Balance Sheet Risk

The Bank is party to financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk in the normal course of business to meet the financing needs of its customers. These financial instruments include commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit. Those instruments involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit and interest rate risk in excess of the amount recognized in the balance sheet. The contract amounts of those instruments reflect the extent of involvement the Bank has in particular classes of financial instruments.

The Bank’s exposure to credit loss in the event of nonperformance by the other party to the financial instrument for commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit is represented by the contractual amount of those instruments. The Bank uses the same credit policies in making commitments and conditional obligations as it does for on-balance sheet instruments.

A summary of the contract amounts of the Bank’s exposure to off-balance sheet risk as of December 31, 2008:


	Amount
	(Dollars in thousands)
Commitments with off-balance sheet risk:
Commitments to extend credit	$	106,378
Standby letters of credit		12,356

Total commitments with off-balance sheet risk	$	118,734

Commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend to a customer as long as there is no violation of any condition established in the contract. Commitments generally have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses and may require payment of a fee. Since many of the commitments are expected to expire without being drawn upon, the total commitment amounts do not necessarily represent future cash requirements. The Bank evaluates each customer’s credit worthiness on a case-by-case basis. The amount of collateral obtained, if deemed necessary by the Bank upon extension of credit, is based on management’s credit evaluation of the counterparty. Collateral held varies but may include accounts receivable, inventory, property and equipment, and income-producing commercial properties.

COMMUNITY BANKERS TRUST CORPORATION

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Unfunded commitments under commercial lines of credit, revolving credit lines and overdraft protection agreements are commitments for possible future extensions of credit to existing customers. These lines of credit are generally uncollateralized and usually do not contain a specified maturity date and may be drawn upon only to the total extent to which the Bank is committed.

Standby letters of credit are conditional commitments issued by the Bank to guarantee the performance of a customer to a third party. Those guarantees are primarily issued to support public and private borrowing arrangements, including commercial paper, bond financing, and similar transactions. The credit risk involved in issuing letters of credit is essentially the same as that involved in extending loan facilities to customers. The amount of collateral obtained, if deemed necessary by the Bank upon extension of credit, is based on management’s evaluation of the counterparty. Since most of the letters of credit are expected to expire without being drawn upon, they do not necessarily represent future cash requirements.

Note 20. Minimum Regulatory Capital Requirements

The Company (on a consolidated basis) and the Bank are subject to various regulatory capital requirements administered by the federal banking agencies. Failure to meet minimum capital requirements can initiate certain mandatory and possibly additional discretionary actions by regulators that, if undertaken, could have a direct material effect on the Company’s and Bank’s financial statements. Under capital adequacy guidelines and the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action, the Company and the Bank must meet specific capital guidelines that involve quantitative measures of their assets, liabilities and certain off-balance sheet items as calculated under regulatory accounting practices. The capital amounts and classification are also subject to qualitative judgments by the regulators about components, risk weightings, and other factors. Prompt corrective action provisions are not applicable to bank holding companies.

Quantitative measures established by regulation to ensure capital adequacy require the Company and the Bank to maintain minimum amounts and ratios (set forth in the table below) of total and Tier 1 capital (as defined in the regulations) to risk weighted assets (as defined), and of Tier 1 capital (as defined) to average assets (as defined). Management believes, as of December 31, 2008, that the Company and Bank met all capital adequacy requirements to which they are subject.

As of December 31, 2008, the most recent notification from the Federal Reserve Bank categorized the Bank as well capitalized under the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action. To be categorized as well capitalized, an institution must maintain minimum total risk-based, Tier 1 risk-based, and Tier 1 leverage ratios as set forth in the table. There are no conditions or events since that notification that management believes have changed the Bank’s category.

The Company’s and the Bank’s actual capital amounts and ratios as of December 31, 2008 in the table.


						Required for Capital					Required in Order to be
	Actual					Adequacy Purposes					Well Capitalized Under PCA
	Amount		Ratio			Amount		Ratio			Amount		Ratio
	(Dollars in thousands)
Total Capital to risk weighted assets
CBTC consolidated	$	125,523		20.00	%	$	48,609		8.00	%		NA		NA
Bank of Essex		62,517		10.30	%		48,535		8.00	%	$	60,669		10.00	%
Tier 1 Capital to risk weighted assets
CBTC consolidated		114,965		18.92	%		24,305		4.00	%		NA		NA
Bank of Essex		55,959		9.22	%		24,267		4.00	%		36,401		6.00	%
Tier 1 Capital to average adjusted assets
CBTC consolidated		114,965		12.54	%		36,675		4.00	%		NA		NA
Bank of Essex		55,959		6.12	%		36,594		4.00	%		45,742		5.00	%

COMMUNITY BANKERS TRUST CORPORATION

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

On February 11, 2009 the Company invested $50 million in the Bank which will result in an increase in the Banks regulatory Capital.

Note 21. Fair Value of Financial Instruments and Interest Rate Risk

The fair value of a financial instrument is the current amount that would be exchanged between willing parties, other than in a forced liquidation. Fair value is best determined based upon quoted market prices. However, in many instances, there are no quoted market prices for the Company’s various financial instruments. In cases where quoted market prices are not available, fair values are based on estimates using present value or other valuation techniques. Those techniques are significantly affected by the assumptions used, including the discount rate and estimates of future cash flows. Accordingly, the fair value estimates may not be realized in an immediate settlement of the instrument. SFAS No. 107 excludes certain financial instruments and all nonfinancial instruments from its disclosure requirements. Accordingly, the aggregate fair value amounts presented may not necessarily represent the underlying fair value of the Company.

The following methods and assumptions were used to estimate the fair value of each class of financial instruments for which it is practicable to estimate that value:

Cash and Short-Term Investments

For those short-term instruments, the carrying amount is a reasonable estimate of fair value.

Securities

For securities held for investment purposes, fair values are based on quoted market prices or dealer quotes.

Restricted Securities

The carrying value of restricted securities approximates their fair value based on the redemption provisions of the respective entity.

Loans Receivable

For certain homogeneous categories of loans, such as some residential mortgages, and other consumer loans, fair value is estimated using the quoted market prices for securities backed by similar loans, adjusted for differences in loan characteristics. The fair value of other types of loans is estimated by discounting the future cash flows using the current rates at which similar loans would be made to borrowers with similar credit ratings and for the same remaining maturities.

Deposit Liabilities

The fair value of demand deposits, savings accounts, and certain money market deposits is the amount payable on demand at the reporting date. The fair value of fixed-maturity certificates of deposit is estimated using the rates currently offered for deposits of similar remaining maturities.

Long-Term Borrowings

The fair values of the Company’s long-term borrowings are estimated using discounted cash flow analyses based on the Company’s current incremental borrowing rates for similar types of borrowing arrangements.

COMMUNITY BANKERS TRUST CORPORATION

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Accrued Interest

The carrying amounts of accrued interest approximate fair value.

Off-Balance Sheet Financial Instruments

The fair value of commitments to extend credit is estimated using the fees currently charged to enter into similar agreements, taking into account the remaining terms of the agreements and the present creditworthiness of the counterparties. For fixed-rate loan commitments, fair value also considers the difference between current levels of interest rates and the committed rates.

The fair value of stand-by letters of credit is based on fees currently charged for similar agreements or on the estimated cost to terminate them or otherwise settle the obligations with the counterparties at the reporting date.

At December 31, 2008, the fair values of loan commitments and stand-by letters of credit were deemed to be immaterial.

The carrying amounts and estimated fair values of the Company’s financial instruments are as follows (dollars in thousands):


	2008
	Carrying Amount		Fair Value
Financial assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	128,433	$	128,433
Securities available for sale		193,992		193,992
Securities held to maturity		94,865		94,966
Loans held for sale		200		200
Net loans		516,359		497,930
Accrued interest receivable		4,014		4,014
Financial liabilities:
Deposits		806,348		813,374
Borrowings		42,024		46,819
Accrued interest payable		4,325		4,325

The Company assumes interest rate risk (the risk that general interest rate levels will change) as a result of its normal operations. As a result, the fair values of the Company’s financial instruments will change when interest rate levels change and that change may be either favorable or unfavorable to the Company. Management attempts to match maturities of assets and liabilities to the extent believed necessary to minimize interest rate risk. However, borrowers with fixed rate obligations are less likely to prepay in a rising rate environment and more likely to prepay in a falling rate environment. Conversely, depositors who are receiving fixed rates are more likely to withdraw funds before maturity in a rising rate environment and less likely to do so in a falling rate environment. Management monitors rates and maturities of assets and liabilities and attempts to minimize interest rate risk by adjusting terms of new loans and deposits and by investing in securities with terms that mitigate the Company’s overall interest rate risk.

Note 22. Trust Preferred Capital Notes

On December 12, 2003, BOE Statutory Trust I, a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, was formed for the purpose of issuing redeemable capital securities. On December 12, 2003, $4.124 million of trust preferred securities were issued through a direct placement. The securities have a LIBOR-indexed floating rate of interest. Since May 31, 2008 through December 31, 2008, the weighted-average interest rate was 6.33%. The securities have a mandatory redemption date of December 12, 2033 and are subject to varying call provisions which began December 12, 2008. The principal asset of the Trust is $4.124 million of the Company’s junior subordinated debt securities with the like maturities and like interest rates to the capital securities.

COMMUNITY BANKERS TRUST CORPORATION

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

The trust preferred notes may be included in Tier 1 capital for regulatory capital adequacy determination purposes up to 25% of Tier 1 capital after its inclusion. The portion of the trust preferred not considered as Tier 1 capital may be included in Tier 2 capital. At December 31, 2008, all trust preferred notes were included in Tier 1 capital.

The obligations of the Company with respect to the issuance of the Capital Securities constitute a full and unconditional guarantee by the Company of the Trust’s obligations with respect to the Capital Securities.

Subject to certain exceptions and limitations, the Company may elect from time to time to defer interest payments on the junior subordinated debt securities, which would result in a deferral of distribution payments on the related Capital Securities.

Note 23. Lease Commitments

The following table represents a summary of non-cancelable operating leases for bank premises that have initial or remaining terms in excess of one year as of December 31, 2008 are as follows (dollars in thousands):


	December 31, 2008
2009	$	499
2010		510
2011		404
2012		385
2013		394
Thereafter		5,284

Total of future payments	$	7,476

The table above incorporates a lease for a future branch location in Midlothian, Virginia. This lease was executed in November of 2008 and will commence once the branch opens for business, which is expected in April 2009, subject to regulatory approval. The total anticipated lease payments for this lease aggregate $5.479 million.

Note 24. Other Noninterest Expense

Other noninterest expense totals are presented in the following tables. Components of these expenses exceeding 1% of the aggregate of total net interest income and total noninterest income for any of the past two years is stated separately (dollars in thousands):


	December 31, 2008		December 31, 2007
Professional services	$	226	$	—
Marketing & advertising expense		308		—
Bank franchise tax		416		—
Telephone and internet line		193		—
Stationery, printing & supplies		222		—
Travel and entertainment		205		—
FDIC/OCC expense		239		—
Software and maintenance support		221		—
Directors fees		365		—
Other expenses		1,190		263

Total other operating expenses	$	3,585	$	263

COMMUNITY BANKERS TRUST CORPORATION

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 25. Parent Corporation Only Financial Statements

COMMUNITY BANKERS TRUST CORPORATION

PARENT COMPANY ONLY BALANCE SHEET

AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2008


	December 31, 2008
	(Dollars in thousands)
ASSETS
Cash	$	58,328
Equity securities, restricted, at cost		424
Other assets		1,250
Investments in subsidiaries		108,521

Total assets	$	168,523

LIABILITIES
Other liabilities	$	138
Balances due to subsidiary bank		575
Balances due to non-bank subsidiary		4,124

Total liabilities		4,837
STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Preferred stock (5,000,000 shares authorized)		17,680
Warrants on preferred stock		1,037
Discount on preferred stock		(1,031	)
Common stock (50,000,000 shares authorized $0.01 par value) 21,468,455 issued and outstanding at December 31, 2008		215
Additional paid in capital		145,359
Retained earnings		1,691
Accumulated other comprehensive loss		(1,265	)

Total stockholders’ equity	$	163,686

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	168,523

COMMUNITY BANKERS TRUST CORPORATION

PARENT COMPANY ONLY STATEMENT OF INCOME

FOR THE TWELVE MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2008


	December 31, 2008
	(Dollars in thousands)
Income:
Interest and dividend income	$	556

Total income		556
Expenses
Interest expense		71
Furniture and equipment expenses		6
Bank franchise taxes		159
Professional and legal expenses		434
Other operating expenses		517

Total expenses		1,187
Equity in income of subsidiaries		1,987
Net income before income taxes		1,356

Income tax expense		133

Net income	$	1,223

COMMUNITY BANKERS TRUST CORPORATION

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

COMMUNITY BANKERS TRUST CORPORATION

PARENT COMPANY ONLY STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS

YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2008


	2008
	(Dollars in thousands)
Operating activities:
Net income	$	1,223
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation		5
Net amortization of preferred warrants		6
Increase in other assets		(5,695	)
Decrease in other liabilities, net		(620	)

Net cash and cash equivalents used in operating activities		(5,081	)

Investing activities:
Purchases of investment securities		(242	)
Maturity of securities held in trust		58,453

Net cash and cash equivalents provided by investing activities		58,211

Financing activities:
Issuance of preferred stock		17,680
Cash dividends paid		(1,755	)
Cash paid to redeem shares related to asserted appraisal rights and retire warrants		(46	)
Cash paid to shareholders for converted shares		(10,843	)

Net cash and cash equivalents provided by financing activities		5,036

Increase in cash and cash equivalents		58,166
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of the period		162

Cash and cash equivalents at end of the period	$	58,328

Note 26. Subsequent Events

On Friday, January 30, 2009, Community Bankers Trust Corporation announced that the Bank entered into a purchase and assumption agreement with the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”), as receiver for SFSB, providing for the assumption by BOE, effective 6:00 p.m. on Friday, January 30, 2009, of all deposit liabilities and the purchase of certain assets of SFSB. BOE assumed approximately $312 million in deposits, all of which are deemed to be core deposits. BOE received a discount on these deposits of $45 million. BOE purchased approximately $348 million in loans and other assets, and will be providing loan servicing to SFSB’s existing loan customers. BOE has entered into a loss share arrangement with the FDIC with respect to the assets purchased. All deposits have been fully assumed and all deposits maintain their current insurance coverage.

The Company filed a Form 8-K on February 4, 2009 disclosing this transaction. In a letter to the SEC dated March 13, 2009, the Company proposed that it would provide financial information and disclosures in an amended Form 8-K.

COMMUNITY BANKERS TRUST CORPORATION

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 27. Preferred Stock

On December 19, 2008, under the Department of the Treasury’s TARP Capital Purchase Program, the Company issued to the U.S. Treasury 17,680 shares of Fixed Rate Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock, Series A (Series A Preferred Stock), and a 10-year warrant to purchase up to 780,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $3.40 per share. Cumulative dividends on the Series A Preferred Stock are payable at 5% per annum through December 19, 2013, and at a rate of 9% per annum thereafter. The warrant is exercisable at any time until December 19, 2018, and the number of shares of common stock underlying the warrant and the exercise price are subject to adjustment for certain dilutive events. If, on or prior to December 31, 2009, the Company receives aggregate gross cash proceeds of at least $17,680,000 from sales of Tier 1 qualifying perpetual preferred stock or common stock, the number of shares of common stock issuable upon exercise will be reduced by one-half of the original number of shares of common stock.

The Company received proceeds of $17.68 million for the Series A Preferred Stock and the Warrant. The Company allocated the proceeds based on a relative fair value basis between the Series A Preferred Stock and the Warrant, recording $16.64 million and $1.04 million, respectively. Fair value of the preferred stock was estimated based on a discounted cash flow model using an estimated life of 50 years and a discount rate of 12%. Fair value of the stock warrant was estimated using a Black-Scholes model assuming stock price volatility of 27.5%, a dividend yield of 0.5%, a risk-free rate of 1.35% and an expected life of five years. The $16.64 million of Series A Preferred Stock is net of a discount of $1.04 million. The discount will be accreted to the $17.68 million redemption price over a five year period. The accretion of the discount and dividends on the preferred stock reduce retained earnings.

Each share of Series A Preferred Stock issued and outstanding has no par value, has a liquidation preference of $1,000 and is redeemable at the Company’s option, subject to approval of the Federal Reserve, at a redemption price equal to $1,000 plus accrued and unpaid dividends, provided that through December 18, 2011, the Series A Preferred Stock is redeemable only in an amount up to the aggregate net cash proceeds received from sales of Tier 1 qualifying perpetual preferred stock or common stock, and only once such sales have resulted in aggregate gross proceeds of at least approximately $4.4 million.

The Series A Preferred Stock has a preference over the Company’s common stock upon liquidation. Dividends on the preferred stock, if declared, are payable quarterly in arrears. The Company’s ability to declare or pay dividends on, or purchase, redeem or otherwise acquire, its common stock is subject to certain restrictions in the event that the Company fails to pay or set aside full dividends on the preferred stock for the latest completed dividend period. In addition, pursuant to the U.S. Treasury’s TARP Capital Purchase Program, until at the earliest of December 19, 2011 or the redemption of all of the Series A Preferred Stock to third parties, the Company must obtain the consent of the U.S. Treasury to raise the Company’s common stock dividend or to repurchase any shares of common stock or other preferred stock, with certain exceptions.

TRANSCOMMUNITY FINANCIAL CORPORATION

Index to Financial Statements


	Page
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm		44

Consolidated Balance Sheets as of May 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007		45

Consolidated Statements of Operations for the five months ended May 31, 2008 and the year ended December 31, 2007		46

Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity for the five months ended May 31, 2008 and the year ended December 31, 2007		47

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the five months ended May 31, 2008 and the year ended December 31, 2007		48

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements		49

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

Board of Directors and Stockholders

TransCommunity Financial Corporation

Glen Allen, Virginia

We have audited the consolidated statements of financial condition of TransCommunity Financial Corporation and subsidiary (the Company) as of May 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007, and the related consolidated statements of operations, changes in stockholders’ equity and cash flows for the five-month period ended May 31, 2008 and year ended December 31, 2007. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of TransCommunty Financial Corporation and subsidiary at May 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for the five-month period ended May 31, 2008 and year ended December 31, 2007, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

As described in Note 1, on September 5, 2007, the Company entered into an agreement to merge with Community Bankers Acquisition Corp. This merger was effective at the close of business on May 31, 2008. These consolidated financial statements do not contain any fair value or other adjustments related to this merger.

/s/ ELLIOTT DAVIS, LLC

Galax, Virginia

April 22, 2010

TRANSCOMMUNITY FINANCIAL CORPORATION

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION

MAY 31, 2008 AND DECEMBER 31, 2007

(dollars in thousands)


	May 31 2008			December 31 2007
Assets
Cash and due from banks	$	4,232		$	2,204
Federal funds sold		—			2,107

Total cash and cash equivalents		4,232			4,311
Securities available for sale, at fair value		11,285			10,243
Securities held to maturity, fair value of $6,393 at December 31, 2007		—			6,400

Total securities		11,285			16,643
Loans		241,880			205,480
Allowance for loan losses		(3,426	)		(3,036	)

Net loans		238,454			202,444
Bank premises and equipment		8,129			8,205
Other real estate owned		180			180
Deferred tax asset		4,751			3,312
Other assets		3,022			3,176

Total assets	$	270,053		$	238,271

Liabilities
Deposits:
Noninterest bearing	$	25,677		$	20,390
Interest bearing		206,457			183,208

Total deposits		232,134			203,598
Federal funds purchased		5,218			—
Accrued interest payable		805			682
Other liabilities		3,509			758

Total liabilities		241,666			205,038

Stockholders’ Equity
Preferred stock (15,000,000 shares authorized $.01 par value)		—			—
Common stock (25,000,000 shares authorized $.01 par value) 4,586,741 shares issued and outstanding at May 31, 2008, and December 31, 2007, respectively		46			46
Additional paid in capital		40,104			39,926
Retained earnings (deficit)		(11,817	)		(6,764	)
Accumulated other comprehensive income		54			25

Total stockholders’ equity		28,387			33,233

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	270,053		$	238,271

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

TRANSCOMMUNITY FINANCIAL CORPORATION

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

FOR THE FIVE MONTHS ENDED MAY 31, 2008 AND THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2007

(dollars in thousands)


	May 31, 2008			December 31, 2007
Interest and Dividend Income
Interest and fees on loans	$	6,849		$	15,795
Interest on federal funds sold		26			570
Interest and dividends on securities		236			778

Total Interest and Dividend Income		7,111			17,143

Interest expense
Interest on deposits		3,295			6,628
Interest federal funds purchased		23			38
Interest on other borrowed funds		—			10

Total Interest expense		3,318			6,676

Net interest income		3,793			10,467
Provision for loan losses		1,348			1,686

Net interest income after provision for loan losses		2,445			8,781

Noninterest income
Service charges on bank accounts		342			1,110
Fees, commissions including nonbanking activities		72			—
Other Misc		15			—

Total Noninterest income		429			1,110

Noninterest expenses
Salaries and employee benefits		3,708			5,433
Occupancy expenses		318			723
Equipment expenses		295			699
Other		3,908			3,788

Total Noninterest expenses		8,229			10,643

Loss before taxes and other adjustments		(5,355	)		(752	)
Income tax benefit		1,454			3,325

Net income (loss) from continuing operations		(3,901	)		2,573
Net loss from discontinued operations		—			(77	)

Net income (loss)	$	(3,901	)	$	2,496

Net (loss) income per share from continuing operations (basic and diluted)	$	(0.85	)	$	0.56

Net (loss) income per share (basic and diluted)	$	(0.85	)	$	0.54

Weighted average number of shares outstanding		4,586,741			4,586,741

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

TRANSCOMMUNITY FINANCIAL CORPORATION

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

FIVE MONTHS ENDED MAY 31, 2008 AND THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2007

(dollars in thousands)


	Shares of Common Stock		Common Stock		Additional Paid in Capital		Accumulated Deficit			Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)			Total
Balance, December 31, 2006		4,582	$	46	$	39,809	$	(9,262	)	$	(40	)	$	30,553
Net income		—		—		—		2,496			—			2,496
Unrealized gain on securities available for sale, net of taxes of $13		—		—		—		—			65			65

Total comprehensive gain														2,561

Common stock issued		5		—		38		—						38
Deferred compensation expense		—		—		79		—						79
Dissolution of Subsidiary		—		—		—		2						2

Balance, December 31, 2007		4,587	$	46	$	39,926	$	(6,764	)	$	25		$	33,233
Net loss		—		—		—		(3,901	)		—			(3,901	)
Unrealized gain on securities available for sale, net of taxes of $14		—		—		—		—			29			29

Total comprehensive loss														(3,872	)
Stock compensation		—		—		178		—						178
Special dividends paid		—		—		—		(1,152	)					(1,152	)

Balance, May 31, 2008		4,587	$	46	$	40,104	$	(11,817	)	$	54		$	28,387

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

TRANSCOMMUNITY FINANCIAL CORPORATION

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

FOR THE FIVE MONTHS ENDED MAY 31, 2008 AND YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2007

(dollars in thousands)


	2008			2007
Operating activities:
Net income (loss) from continuing operations	$	(3,901	)	$	2,573
Net loss from discontinued operations		—			(77	)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:
Provision for loan losses		1,348			1,686
Amortization of security premiums and accretion of discounts, net		(13	)		(13	)
Depreciation		240			557
Stock-based compensation expense		178			79
(Gain) loss on disposition of property		—			(4	)
(Increase) decrease in other assets		154			(890	)
Increase in interest payable		123			142
Addition to (recognition of) net deferred tax asset		(1,439	)		(3,325	)
Increase in accrued expenses and other liabilities		2,751			406

Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities		(559	)		1,134

Investing activities:
Purchase of securities held to maturity		—			(6,000	)
Purchase of securities available for sale		(7,205	)		(22,922	)
Proceeds from maturities of securities held to maturity		6,400			21,025
Proceeds from maturities of securities available for sale		6,205			26,363
Purchase of Federal Reserve Bank stock		—			(42	)
Net increase in loans		(37,358	)		(54,976	)
Proceeds from sale of premise and equipment		—			6
Purchase of premises and equipment, net		(164	)		(2,015	)

Net cash used in investing activities		(32,122	)		(38,561	)

Financing activities:
Net change in federal funds purchased		5,218			(1,517	)
Net proceeds from stock options exercised		—			38
Dividends paid		(1,152	)		—
Net other borrowings repayments		—			(500	)
Net increase (decrease) in noninterest bearing and interest bearing demand deposits		(615	)		3,858
Net increase (decrease) in savings deposits		(392	)		696
Net increase in time deposits		29,543			34,072

Net cash provided by financing activities		32,602			36,647

Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents		(79	)		(780	)

Cash and cash equivalents:
Beginning of the period	$	4,311		$	5,091

End of the period	$	4,232		$	4,311

Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information:
Interest paid	$	3,195		$	6,535

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

TRANSCOMMUNITY FINANCIAL CORPORATION

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

NOTE 1 NATURE OF OPERATIONS AND SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

TransCommunity Financial Corporation (“TFC”) was a bank holding company whose principal activity was the formation, ownership and operation of independently-managed community banks. TFC’s first subsidiary, the Bank of Powhatan, N.A. (“Bank of Powhatan”), was organized as a national banking association in 1999, and commenced operations on March 20, 2000. TFC’s second subsidiary, Bank of Goochland, N.A. (“Bank of Goochland”), was organized and incorporated during 2002, and commenced operations on November 25, 2002. On April 19, 2004, TFC established its third independent community bank in the central Virginia area, the Bank of Louisa, N.A. (“Bank of Louisa”), TFC initially established the Bank of Louisa in July 2003 as a branch of Bank of Powhatan. The assets and liabilities of this branch office were transferred to Bank of Louisa contemporaneously with the receipt by that bank of its independent national banking charter in April 2004. On December 11, 2006, TFC commenced the operations of the Bank of Rockbridge, its fourth subsidiary bank (“Bank of Rockbridge” together with Bank of Powhatan, Bank of Goochland, and Bank of Louisa, the “banks”.)

Effective June 30, 2007, the TFC consolidated the charters of its banks to create TransCommunity Bank, N.A. This new bank is subject to regulation by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. The bank branches operate under their market names and provide general banking services to individuals, small- and medium-sized businesses and the professional communities of Powhatan, Goochland, Rockbridge, and Louisa Counties of Virginia and surrounding areas. TFC is subject to regulation by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.

On January 1, 2001, the Bank of Powhatan purchased Main Street Mortgage and Investment Corporation (“Main Street”) which became a wholly-owned subsidiary of the bank. Main Street originated commercial and residential real estate loans for investors throughout the state. However, in November of 2006, the Board of Directors voted to discontinue the operations of Main Street.

On September 5, 2007, TFC entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the “Merger Agreement”) with Community Bankers Acquisition Corp. (“CBAC”). Effective at the close of business May 31, 2008, CBAC consummated the merger between the CBAC and TFC pursuant to the terms of the Merger Agreement. In connection with the Merger Agreement, TFC became a wholly-owned subsidiary of CBAC. The material terms of the Merger Agreement and certain financial and other information about CBAC and TFC are contained in the CBAC’s registration statement on Form S-4 (SEC File No. 333-148675) originally filed January 15, 2008, as amended, the definitive joint proxy statement/prospectus thereto, filed March 31, 2008 (hereinafter referred to as the “TFC Merger Proxy”), TFC’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007, filed March 31, 2008 (SEC File No. 000-33355), and TFC’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2008, filed May 15, 2008 (SEC File No. 000-33355).

SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Basis of financial presentation

The accounting and reporting policies of TFC and its subsidiaries conform to accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (US GAAP) and predominant practices within the banking industry. The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of TFC and its wholly-owned subsidiaries. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated.

The preparation of financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements. These estimates and assumptions also affect reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

The principal estimate that is particularly susceptible to significant change in the near term relates to the allowance for loan losses. The evaluation of the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses includes an analysis of the individual loans and overall risk characteristics and size of the different loan portfolios, and takes into consideration current economic and market conditions, the capability of specific borrowers to pay specific loan obligations, and current loan collateral values.

TRANSCOMMUNITY FINANCIAL CORPORATION

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

In connection with the determination of the estimated losses on loans, management obtains independent appraisals for significant collateral. Actual losses on specific loans, which also are encompassed in the analysis, may vary from estimated losses.

Principles of consolidation

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of TFC, which is a bank holding company that owns all of the outstanding common stock of its banking subsidiary, Bank of Powhatan, Bank of Goochland, Bank of Louisa, Bank of Rockbridge, and Main Street Mortgage and Investment Corporation, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of Bank of Powhatan. All significant inter-company balances and transactions have been eliminated.

Cash and cash equivalents

Cash and cash equivalents are defined as the sum of cash on hand, non interest-bearing amounts due from banks and federal funds sold. Generally, federal funds are sold for a one day period.

The Bank is required to maintain average cash balances on hand or with the Federal Reserve Bank. TFC met this requirement and held a reserve balance of $71,000 at May 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007.

Investment securities

TFC accounts for its investment securities in accordance with SFAS No.115, Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities. Investment securities that TFC has the ability and intent to hold to maturity are classified as held-to-maturity and are stated at cost, adjusted for premium amortization and discount accretion. Securities which are held for indefinite periods of time which management intends to use as part of its

TRANSCOMMUNITY FINANCIAL CORPORATION

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

asset/liability management strategy, or that may be sold in response to changes in interest rates, changes in prepayment risk, increased capital requirements or other similar factors, are classified as available-for-sale and are carried at fair market value. Net unrealized gains and losses for such securities, net of income tax effect, are charged/credited directly to accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), a component of shareholders’ equity. Securities transactions are accounted for on a trade date basis. Gains or losses on disposition of investment securities are based on the net proceeds and the adjusted carrying amount of the securities sold using the specific identification method.

As of May 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007, TFC did not have any foreign investment securities or securities designated as trading account investments.

SFAS No.133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activity, established accounting and reporting standards for derivative instruments, including certain derivative instruments embedded in other contracts, and for hedging activities. It requires that an entity recognize all derivatives as either assets or liabilities in the statement of financial position and measure those instruments at fair value. SFAS No.133 was amended by SFAS No.138, Accounting for Certain Derivative Instruments and Certain Hedging Activities. TFC’s adoption of SFAS No.133, as amended, did not have a material impact on its financial condition or results of operations. TFC did not have any derivatives at May 31, 2008 or December 31, 2007 or during the periods then ended.

TFC adopted EITF 03-1, The Meaning of Other than Temporary Impairment and Its Application to Certain Investments, as of December 31, 2003. EITF 03-1 includes certain required quantitative and qualitative disclosures for investment securities accounted for under SFAS No. 115, Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities, that are impaired at the balance sheet date, but an other-than-temporary impairment has not been recognized. In November 2005, the FASB issued Staff Position FSP No. FAS 115-1 and FAS 124-1, The Meaning of Other-Than-Temporary Impairment and Its Application to Certain Investments. This FSP provides guidance on determining when an investment is considered impaired, whether that impairment is other than temporary, and the measurement of an impairment loss. The FSP also provides accounting considerations subsequent to the recognition of an other-than-temporary impairment and requires certain disclosures about unrealized losses that have not been recognized as other-than-temporary impairments. TFC adopted FSP No. FAS 115-1 and FAS 124-1 as of December 31, 2005. The disclosures required under EITF 03-1 and FSP No. FAS 115-1 and FAS 124-1 are included in these consolidated financial statements.

Loans and allowance for loan losses

Loans that management has the intent and the ability to hold for the foreseeable future or until maturity or payoff are stated at the amount of unpaid principal net of unearned discount, unamortized loan fees and loan origination costs and an allowance for loan losses. The allowance for loan losses is established through a provision for loan losses charged to expense. Loans are charged against the allowance for loan losses when management believes that the collectability of principal is unlikely. The allowance for loan losses is maintained at a level that management considers adequate to provide for credit losses inherent in the loan portfolios at the reporting date. The level of the allowance is based on management’s evaluation of risk of loss in the loan portfolios after consideration of prevailing and anticipated economic conditions, including estimates and appraisals, among other items, known or anticipated at each reporting date. On a periodic basis during the year, management makes credit reviews of the loan portfolios designed to identify any changes in the loans since initial booking impacting their quality rating. This review is designed to identify potential changes that may need to be made to the loan loss reserve.

Interest income on loans is credited to operations based upon the principal amount outstanding. The net amounts of origination fees, origination costs and commitment fees are deferred and recognized over the lives of the related loans and leases as adjustments of yield. When management believes there is sufficient doubt as to the ultimate collectability of interest on any loan, the accrual of applicable interest is discontinued. A loan is generally classified as non-accrual when principal and interest have consistently been in default for a period of 90 days or more or because of deterioration in the financial condition of the borrower, and payment in full of principal or interest is not expected. Loans past due 90 days or more and still accruing interest are loans that are generally well-secured and expected to be restored to a current status in the near future or are in the process of collection. In all cases, loans are placed on non-accrual or are charged off at an earlier date if collection of principal or interest is considered doubtful.

TRANSCOMMUNITY FINANCIAL CORPORATION

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

All interest accrued but not collected for loans that are placed on non-accrual or charged off is reversed against interest income. The interest on these loans is accounted for on the cash-basis or cost-recovery method, until qualifying for return to accrual. Loans are returned to accrual status when all the principal and interest amounts contractually due are brought current and future payments are reasonably assured.

TFC follows SFAS No.114, Accounting by Creditors for Impairment of a Loan, as amended by SFAS No.118, Accounting by Creditors for Impairment of a Loan – Income Recognition and Disclosures. This standard requires that certain impaired loans be measured based on the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rates, except that as a practical expedient, a creditor may measure impairment based on a loan’s observable market price, or the fair value of the collateral if the loan is collateral dependent. Regardless of the measurement method, a creditor must measure impairment based on the fair value of the collateral when the creditor determines that foreclosure is probable.

Premises and equipment

Premises and equipment are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation and amortization. Depreciation is computed primarily on the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets. Leasehold improvements are amortized over the term of the lease or estimated useful life, whichever is shorter.

TFC follows SFAS No.144, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets. SFAS No.144 retained the existing requirements to recognize and measure the impairment of long-lived assets to be held and used or to be disposed of by sale. SFAS No.144 also changed the requirements relating to reporting the effects of a disposal or discontinuation of a segment of a business.

Transfers of Financial Assets

TFC follows SFAS No. 140, Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities - a replacement of SFAS No. 125 (“Statement 140”). Transfers of financial assets are accounted for as sales when control over the assets has been surrendered. Control over transferred assets is deemed to be surrendered when (1) the assets have been isolated from TFC, (2) the transferee obtains the right (free of conditions that constrain it from taking advantage of that right) to pledge or exchange the transferred assets, and (3) TFC does not maintain effective control over the transferred assets through an agreement to repurchase them before their maturity.

Goodwill and intangible assets

SFAS No. 141, Business Combinations, requires that the purchase method of accounting be used for all business combinations. For purchase acquisitions, TFC is required to record assets acquired, including identifiable intangible assets, and liabilities assumed at their fair value, which in many instances involves estimates based on third party valuations, such as appraisals, or internal valuations based on discounted cash flow analysis or other valuation techniques. SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, prescribes the accounting for goodwill and intangible assets subsequent to initial recognition. The provisions of SFAS No. 142 discontinue the amortization of goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite lives but require at least an annual impairment review, and more frequently if certain impairment indicators are in evidence. TFC adopted SFAS 147, Acquisitions of Certain Financial Institutions, on January 1, 2002 and determined that core deposit intangibles will continue to be amortized over the estimated useful life.

Income taxes

TFC accounts for income taxes under the liability method. Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on the difference between the financial statement and tax basis of assets and liabilities as measured by the enacted tax rates that expect to be in effect when these differences reverse. Deferred tax expense is the result of changes in deferred tax assets and liabilities. The principal types of accounts resulting in differences

TRANSCOMMUNITY FINANCIAL CORPORATION

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

between assets and liabilities for financial statement and tax return purposes are the allowance for loan losses, interest income on non-accrual loans, depreciation and amortization, difference between book and tax basis of assets acquired and net operating loss carryforwards. TFC and its subsidiaries file a consolidated federal income tax return.

In 2006, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 48 (FIN 48), Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes – an Interpretation of SFAS No. 109. FIN 48 clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in an enterprise’s financial statements in accordance with SFAS No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes. FIN 48 also prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in an enterprise’s tax return. FIN 48 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006. Accordingly, TFC adopted FIN 48 effective January 1, 2007. The adoption of FIN 48 did not have any impact on TFC’s consolidated financial position.

TFC monitors changes in tax statutes and regulations to determine if significant changes will occur over the next 12 months. No material changes have been projected; however, management believes changes will occur at the expiration of statutes of limitations and accrual of interest. As TFC is not currently under examination, changes from settlements can not be projected. If this position would change it is unlikely to have a material impact on income tax expense during the next 12 months.

Deferred tax asset

TFC has a deferred tax asset of approximately $4.8 million and $3.3 million as of May 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively. Prior period net operating losses of approximately $2.5 million are a significant portion of the asset. Management has assessed TFC’s ability to recognize these losses and has concluded that it is more likely than not that TFC will be able to fully utilize them within the statutory allowed timeframe therefore, a valuation allowance was not deemed necessary. This assessment considered factors such as budgeted earnings for 2008 and beyond and the cost savings under the consolidation of the subsidiary banks in 2007.

Other real estate owned

Other real estate owned is recorded at lower of cost or market value less costs of disposal. When property is acquired, the excess, if any, of the loan balance over fair market value is charged to the allowance for loan losses. Periodically thereafter, the asset is reviewed for subsequent declines in the estimated fair market value. Subsequent declines, if any, holding costs and gains, and losses on subsequent sale are included in the consolidated statements of operations. TFC had other real estate owned of approximately $180,000 as of May 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007.

Marketing costs

TFC expenses marketing costs as incurred. Marketing expenses for the five months ended May 31, 2008 and the year ended December 31, 2007 were approximately $37,000 and $219,000 respectively.

Earnings per share

Basic earnings per share excludes dilution and is computed by dividing income available to common shareholders by the weighted average common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per share takes into account the potential dilution that could occur if stock options or other contracts to issue common stock were exercised and converted into common stock. Stock options for 234,050 and 275,175 shares of common stock were not considered in computing diluted earnings per share for May 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively, because they were anti-dilutive. Shares were anti-dilutive since the exercise price exceeded the current market price.

TRANSCOMMUNITY FINANCIAL CORPORATION

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Stock-based compensation

In December 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 123R, “Share-Based Payment,” that addresses the accounting for share-based payment transactions in which an enterprise exchanges its equity instruments for goods and services. The Statement eliminates the ability to account for share-based compensation transactions using Accounting Principles Board (“APB”) Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, and requires instead that such transactions be accounted for using a fair-value-based method. SFAS No. 123R required implementation by the beginning of the first fiscal year that begins after June 15, 2005. On January 1, 2006, TFC implemented SFAS No. 123R using the modified prospective transition method. See Note 11 for more information about TFC’s stock-based compensation programs.

Comprehensive income (loss)

TFC follows the disclosure provisions of SFAS No.130, Reporting Comprehensive Income. SFAS No. 130 requires the reporting of comprehensive income which includes net income (loss) as well as certain other items that result in a change to shareholders’ equity during the period.

New Accounting Pronouncements

In September 2006, the FASB released SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurement, which provides guidance for using fair value to measure assets and liabilities. SFAS No. 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in generally accepted accounting principles, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. The standard also responds to investors’ requests for more information about the extent to which companies’ measure assets and liabilities at fair value, the information used to measure fair value, and the effect that fair value measurements have on earnings. SFAS No. 157 will apply whenever another standard requires (or permits) assets or liabilities to be measured at fair value. The standard does not expand the use of fair value to any new circumstances. SFAS No. 157 is effective for financial statements issued for financial years beginning after November 15, 2007. However, in February 2008, the FASB decided to defer the effective date for one year for nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities that are recognized or disclosed at fair value on a non-recurring basis. The provisions of the Statement will generally be applied on a prospective basis as of the effective date. For certain securities and financial instruments, the provisions are to be applied retrospectively as a cumulative effect adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings. TFC does not have any instruments for which retrospective application is required. TFC does not expect implementation of any changes required by SFAS 157 to have a material effect on its consolidated financial statements.

In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities. This standard permits entities to choose to measure many financial instruments and certain other items at fair value. Unrealized gains and losses on items for which the fair value option has been elected are reported in earnings. This Statement is effective as of the beginning of an entity’s first fiscal year beginning after November 15, 2007. Early adoption was permitted as of the beginning of the fiscal year that begins on or before November 15, 2007, provided the entity also elects to apply the provisions of SFAS 157 Fair Value Measurement. TFC adopted SFAS 159 effective January 1, 2008, and has elected not to measure any of its current eligible financial assets or liabilities at fair value upon adoption, but may elect to do so with future eligible financial assets or liabilities.

In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS 141(R), Business Combinations, which is a revision of SFAS 141, Business Combinations. SFAS 141(R) establishes principles and requirements for how an acquirer in a business combination: recognizes and measures in its financial statements the identifiable assets acquired, the liabilities assumed and any noncontrolling interest in the acquiree; recognizes and measures the goodwill acquired in the business combination or a gain from a bargain purchase; and discloses information to enable users of the financial statements to evaluate the nature and financial effects of the business combination. This Statement is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008, and is to be applied prospectively. TFC is evaluating the potential result SFAS 141(R) will have on it consolidated financial statements.

In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS 160, Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements. SFAS 160 amends Accounting Research Bulletin (ARB) No. 51, Consolidated Financial Statements, to establish accounting and reporting standards for the noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary and for the deconsolidation of a subsidiary. This Statement clarifies that a noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary is an ownership interest in the consolidated entity that should be clearly reported as equity in the consolidated financial statements. Additionally,

TRANSCOMMUNITY FINANCIAL CORPORATION

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

SFAS 160 requires that the amount of consolidated net income attributable to the parent and to the noncontrolling interest are to be clearly identified and presented on the face of the consolidated statement of income. The provisions of this Statement are effective for fiscal years beginning on or after December 15, 2008, and earlier application is prohibited. SFAS will affect only those entities that have an outstanding noncontrolling interest in one or more subsidiaries or that deconsolidate a subsidiary. As a result, this Statement does not apply to TFC.

NOTE 2 INVESTMENT SECURITIES

The amortized cost and estimated fair value of securities are as follows (dollars in thousands):

As of May 31, 2008


Securities Available for Sale	Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized (Losses)			Fair Value
US Treasury issue and other US Government agencies	$	11,204	$	92	$	(11	)	$	11,285


As of December 31, 2007
Securities Available for Sale	Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized (Losses)			Fair Value
US Treasury issue and other US Government agencies	$	10,205	$	48	$	(10	)	$	10,243


Securities Held to Maturity	Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized (Losses)			Fair Value
US Treasury issue and other US Government agencies	$	6,400	$	—	$	(7	)	$	6,393

TRANSCOMMUNITY FINANCIAL CORPORATION

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

At May 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007, gross unrealized losses totaled approximately $11,000 and $17,000, respectively. Securities in an unrealized loss position were as follows (dollars in thousands):


As of May 31, 2008

	Less than 12 months					12 months or More				Total
Securities Available for Sale	Fair Value		Unrealized Loss			Fair Value		Unrealized Loss		Fair Value		Unrealized Loss
US Treasury issue and other US Government agencies	$	5,204	$	(11	)	$	—	$	—	$	5,204	$	(11	)


As of December 31, 2007

	Less than 12 months					12 months or More				Total
Securities Available for Sale	Fair Value		Unrealized Loss			Fair Value		Unrealized Loss		Fair Value		Unrealized Loss
US Treasury issue and other US Government agencies	$	4,194	$	(10	)	$	—	$	—	$	4,194	$	(10	)


	Less than 12 months					12 months or More				Total
Securities Held to Maturity	Fair Value		Unrealized Loss			Fair Value		Unrealized Loss		Fair Value		Unrealized Loss
US Treasury issue and other US Government agencies	$	2,893	$	(7	)	$	—	$	—	$	2,893	$	(7	)

The 2008 unrealized loss is the aggregate of two U.S. Agency notes. The 2007 unrealized loss is the aggregate of eight U.S. Agency notes. The unrealized loss positions in both years were primarily related to interest rate movements as there is minimal credit risk exposure in these investments. All securities are investment grade or better. No impairment loss has been recognized on these securities due to management having both the intent and the ability to hold these securities until maturity or call dates.

Management evaluates securities for other-than-temporary impairment at least on a quarterly basis and more frequently when economic or market concerns warrant such evaluation. Consideration is given to (1) the length of time and the extent to which the fair value has been less than cost, (2) the financial condition and near-term prospects of the issuer, and (3) the intent and ability of TFC to retain its investment in the issuer for a period of time sufficient to allow for any anticipated recovery in fair value.

The amortized cost, fair value, and weighted average yield of investment securities at May 31, 2008, by contractual maturity, are shown in the following schedule (dollars in thousands).


	Amortized Cost		Fair Value		Weighted Average Yield
Due in one year or less	$	2,000	$	2,011		4.915	%
Due after one year through five years		9,204		9,274		4.020	%

	$	11,204	$	11,285		4.180	%

Expected maturities may differ from contractual maturities because borrowers may have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties.

The carrying amount (which approximates fair value) of securities pledged to secure public deposits amounted to $8.8 million and $12.2 million at May 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively.

TRANSCOMMUNITY FINANCIAL CORPORATION

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

The Bank is required to hold stock in the Federal Reserve Bank. The investment in Federal Reserve Bank stock is recorded at cost of approximately $873,000 as of May 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007. TFC also held stock in Virginia Bankers Association Title Insurance Company amounting to approximately $65,000 as of May 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007. These stock components are classified as “Other Assets” in the Consolidated Balance Sheet.

There were no securities sold during the periods reported.

NOTE 3 LOANS

Loans receivable outstanding, by type, at May 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007 are summarized as follows (dollars in thousands):


	May 31, 2008			December 31, 2007
Mortgage Loans on Real Estate
Residential 1-4 Family	$	35,697		$	38,849
Commercial		47,792			62,026
Construction		94,608			41,201
Multifamily		2,605			2,111
Agriculture		1,431			1,450

Total Real Estate Loans		182,133			145,637
Commercial loans		44,339			49,683
Consumer and installment loans		15,552			10,413
All other loans		338			35

Gross Loans		242,362			205,768
Less: unearned income		(482	)		(288	)

Loans, net of unearned income	$	241,880		$	205,480

The following is a summary of information pertaining to impaired and non-accrual loans (dollars in thousands):


	May 31, 2008		December 31, 2007
Impaired loans without a valuation allowance	$	381	$	379
Impaired loans with a valuation allowance		2,927		1,576

Total Impaired Loans	$	3,308	$	1,955

Valuation allowance related to impaired loans	$	549	$	484

Total Non-Accrual Loans	$	3,734	$	1,955

Total loans 90 days past due and still accruing	$	—	$	—


	5 Months Ended May 31, 2008		Year Ended December 31, 2007
Average balance of impaired loans	$	2,632	$	1,952

Interest income recognized on impaired loans	$	46	$	87

Interest income recognized on a cash basis on impaired loans	$	47	$	87

TRANSCOMMUNITY FINANCIAL CORPORATION

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

The Bank had approximately $4.0 million in nonperforming assets at May 31, 2008. These nonperforming assets consisted of 34 non-accrual loans and 2 OREO properties. Interest forfeited on non-accrual loans for the five months ended May 31, 2008 was approximately $41,000.

At May 31, 2008, TFC’s allowance for credit losses is comprised of the following: (i) any specific valuation allowances calculated in accordance with SFAS No. 114, Accounting by Creditors for Impairment of a Loan (SFAS 114), (ii) general valuation allowances calculated in accordance with SFAS 5 based on economic conditions and other qualitative risk factors, and (iii) historical valuation allowances calculated using historical loan loss experience. Management identified loans subject to impairment in accordance with SFAS 114.

A summary of the changes in the allowance for the loan losses is shown in the following schedule (dollars in thousands):


	5 Months Ended May 31, 2008			Year Ended December 31, 2007
Balance, beginning of period	$	3,036		$	2,065
Loans charged off:
Commercial		(836	)		(205	)
Real Estate		(122	)		(443	)
Other		—			(69	)

Total loans charged off		(958	)		(717	)

Recoveries:
Real Estate		—			2

Total recoveries		—			2

Net charge offs		(958	)		(715	)
Provision for loan losses		1,348			1,686

Balance, end of period	$	3,426		$	3,036

TFC has entered into transactions with certain directors, executive officers, significant stockholders, and their affiliates. Such transactions were made in the ordinary course of business on substantially the same terms and conditions, including interest rates and collateral, as those prevailing at the same time for comparable transactions with other customers, and did not, in the opinion of management, involve more than normal credit risk or present other unfavorable features.

The aggregate amount of loans to such related parties at December 31, 2007 was approximately $525,000. This balance had not materially changed at May 31, 2008.

NOTE 4 PREMISES AND EQUIPMENT

Premises and equipment at May 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007 is summarized as follows:


	May 31, 2008			December 31, 2007
Land	$	1,906		$	1,818
Land improvements and buildings		5,918			4,631
Leasehold improvements		58			58
Furniture and Equipment		3,055			2,927
Construction in progress		37			1,405

Total		10,974			10,839
Less: Accumulated Depreciation and Amortization		(2,845	)		(2,634	)

Bank premises and equipment, net	$	8,129		$	8,205

TRANSCOMMUNITY FINANCIAL CORPORATION

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

The depreciation expense on premises and equipment for the five months ended May 31, 2008 and the year ended December 31, 2007 was approximately $240,000 and $557,000, respectively.

Construction in progress at December 31, 2007 consisted primarily of construction for the Bank of Goochland branch that relocated to 1949 Sandy Hook Road, Goochland, VA from its prior leased facility effective January 22, 2008. At the time the branch was occupied, the balance in construction in progress was reclassified into Land Improvements and Building.

NOTE 5 DEPOSITS

Deposits, by product type, at May 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007 were as follows (dollars in thousands):


	May 31, 2008		December 31, 2007
NOW	$	15,575	$	21,186
MMDA		20,291		20,586
Savings		9,782		10,174
Time deposits less than $100,000		81,338		74,097
Time deposits greater than $100,000		79,471		57,169

Total interest-bearing deposits	$	206,457	$	183,212

Total non-interest bearing	$	25,677	$	20,386

Total Deposits	$	232,134	$	203,598

The following table provides the average balance and average rate paid for interest bearing deposits, by product type (dollars thousands):


	Five Months Ended May 31, 2008					Year Ended December 31, 2007
	Average Balance		Average Rate			Average Balance		Average Rate
NOW	$	19,688		1.28	%	$	20,228		1.42	%
MMDA		19,638		2.85	%		16,981		2.58	%
Savings		9,980		1.38	%		10,097		1.54	%
Time deposits less than $100,000		77,990		4.83	%		63,639		4.98	%
Time deposits greater than $100,000		64,635		4.94	%		50,072		5.16	%

Total interest-bearing deposits	$	191,931		4.12	%	$	161,017		4.12	%

TRANSCOMMUNITY FINANCIAL CORPORATION

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

As of May 31, 2008, the time remaining until maturity of time deposits $100,000 and greater is as follows (dollars in thousands):


	CD’s		Other		Total
Within 3 months	$	17,871	$	1,128	$	18,999
3 - 6 months		7,580		935		8,515
6 - 12 months		21,366		481		21,847
Over 12 months		26,750		3,360		30,110

	$	73,567	$	5,904	$	79,471

NOTE 6 BORROWINGS

TFC uses borrowings in conjunction with deposits to fund lending and investing activities. At May 31, 2008, there were no long-term borrowings. Short-term funding includes overnight borrowings from correspondent banks. The following information is provided for short term borrowings balances, rates, and maturities (dollars in thousands):


	May 31, 2008			December 31, 2007
Fed Funds Purchased	$	5,218		$	—

Maximum month end outstanding balance	$	7,400		$	1,952
Average outstanding balance during the period	$	2,171		$	645
Average interest rate during the period		2.56	%		5.90	%
Average interest rate at end of period		2.34	%		N/A

NOTE 7 DIVIDENDS

A principal source of funds for TFC in future years is anticipated to be dividends paid by the bank. Dividends paid by the bank are limited by banking regulations. Approval of the Comptroller of the Currency is required if the dividends declared by a national bank, in any year, exceed the sum of (1) net income for the current year and (2) income, net of dividends, for the preceding two years.

In January of 2007, the Bank of Powhatan and the Bank of Goochland each paid TFC a $300,000 dividend out of their respective retained earnings.

On May 30, 2008, TFC paid a one-time special dividend of $0.25 per share of TFC’s common stock to shareholders of record as of May 8, 2008. The payment of the special dividend was authorized by TFC’s board of directors on April 28, 2008, and was contingent on the satisfaction of all of the conditions to the closing of the Merger with CBAC.

TRANSCOMMUNITY FINANCIAL CORPORATION

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

NOTE 8 INCOME TAXES

The components of the deferred tax assets and liabilities at May 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007 are as follows (dollars in thousands):


	May 31 2008		December 31 2007
Deferred tax assets
Allowance for loan loss	$	1,003	$	952
Stock compensation award		70		119
Deferred compensation		434		—
Goodwill		65		65
Net operating loss carryforwards		3,307		2,397
Alternative minimum tax credit		18		21
Other		30		37

Total deferred tax assets		4,927		3,591

Deferred tax liabilities:
Unrealized loss on investment securities		28		13
Depreciation		148		173
Other		—		93

Total deferred tax liabilities		176		279

Net deferred tax asset	$	4,751	$	3,312

Allocation of income tax benefit between current and deferred portions is as follows (dollars in thousands):


	May 31, 2008			December 31, 2007
Current (benefit) expense	$	—		$	1
Deferred benefit		(1,454	)		(3,326	)


Net income tax benefit	$	(1,454	)	$	(3,325	)

During 2008, management concluded that it is more likely than not that TFC will be able to fully utilize its net operating losses within the statutory allowed timeframe therefore, a valuation allowance was not deemed necessary.

The following table summarizes the differences between the actual income tax expense and the amounts computed using the federal statutory tax rates for the periods ended May 31, 2008 and the year ended December 31, 2007 (dollars in thousands):


	May 31, 2008			December 31, 2007
Income tax expense (benefit) at the applicable federal tax rate	$	(1,820	)	$	(256	)
Change in valuation allowance for deferred taxes		—			(3,387	)
True up of deferred tax asset		—			251
Nondeductible expense / transaction costs		322			(18	)
Other		44			85

Income tax benefit	$	(1,454	)	$	(3,325	)

TFC had analyzed the tax positions taken or expected to be taken in its tax returns and concluded it has no liability related to uncertain tax positions in accordance with FIN 48.

TRANSCOMMUNITY FINANCIAL CORPORATION

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

NOTE 9 CONCENTRATION OF CREDIT RISK

Most of the loans are made to customers in the banks’ trade areas. Accordingly, the ultimate collectability of the banks’ loan portfolio is susceptible to changes in local economic conditions. The types of loans made are described in Note 3. Collateral required is determined on an individual basis depending on the nature of the loan and the financial condition of the borrower. TFC has a concentration of loans secured by real estate. At May 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007, real estate loans represented 75.2% and 70.8% of the loans in the consolidated portfolio, respectively. Real estate lending by the banks generally consists of commercial real estate loans, construction and development loans, and residential and home equity loans.

TFC maintains deposits at other high credit quality commercial banks that may, at times, exceed federally insured limits.

NOTE 10 SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA FOR DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS

On January 1, 2001, the Bank of Powhatan purchased Main Street Mortgage and Investment Corporation (“Main Street”) which became a wholly-owned subsidiary of the bank. Main Street originated commercial and residential real estate loans for investors throughout the state. In November of 2006, the Board of Directors voted to discontinue the operations of Main Street.

The following provides details of the loss from discontinued operations for Main Street for the year ended December 31, 2007 (dollars in thousands).


Noninterest Income	$	2
Occupancy expenses		(45	)
Equipment costs		(4	)
Other operating expenses		(30	)

Loss from discontinued operations	$	(77	)

NOTE 11 STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION

2001 Stock Option Plan

Under TFC’s Stock Option Plan (the “Plan”), TFC may grant options to its directors, officers and employees for up to 330,000 of common stock. Annual grants of stock options are limited to 10,000 shares for each employee and 7,500 shares for each director. Both incentive stock options and non-qualified stock options may be granted under the plan. Effective January 1, 2006, TFC adopted SFAS No. 123(R), Share-Based Payment, which requires that compensation cost relating to share-based payment transactions be recognized in the financial statements with measurement based upon the fair value of the equity or liability instruments issued.

The Plan was adopted by the Board of Directors of the Bank of Powhatan on May 8, 2001. This Plan was adopted by TFC effective August 15, 2001 in connection with the Reorganization whereby the Bank of Powhatan became a subsidiary of TFC. The purpose of the Plan is to reward employees and directors for services rendered and investment risks undertaken to date and to promote the success of TFC and its subsidiaries by providing incentives to employees and directors that will promote the alignment of their personal financial interest with the long-term financial success of TFC, its subsidiaries and with growth in shareholder value. The exercise price may not be less than 100% of the fair market value of the shares on the grant date. Unless the Stock Option Committee determines otherwise, one-third of a grant becomes vested and exercisable on each of the first three anniversaries of the initial grant date. Each grant becomes fully vested and exercisable in the event of a change in control of TFC. All options are subject to exercise or forfeiture if TFC’s capital falls below its minimum requirements as determined by its primary regulator, and TFC’s primary regulator so directs. The Plan will expire on May 7, 2011, unless terminated sooner by the Board of Directors.

TRANSCOMMUNITY FINANCIAL CORPORATION

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

The fair value of each option granted is estimated on the date of grant using the “Black Scholes Option Pricing” method with the following assumptions for the five months ended May 31, 2008 and the year ended December 31, 2007.


Expected volatility	20.0	%
Expected dividend	—
Expected term (years)	10.00
Risk free rate	4.04	%

The expected volatility is based on historical volatility of comparable peer banks. The risk free interest rates for periods within the contractual life of the awards are based on the U. S. Treasury yield curve at the time of the grant. The expected life is based on the historical exercise experience. The dividend yield assumption is based on TFC’s history and expectation of dividend payouts.

A summary of the options outstanding at May 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007 is shown in the following table:


	2008					2007
	Number of Shares			Weighted Average Exercise Price		Number of Shares			Weighted Average Exercise Price
Outstanding at beginning of the period		275,175		$	9.74		246,725		$	9.95
Granted		—			—		56,000			8.53
Forfeited		(41,125	)		10.00		(8,000	)		8.50
Exercised		—			—		(5,000	)		7.65
Expired		—			—		(14,550	)		9.47

Outstanding at end of the period		234,050		$	9.70		275,175		$	9.74

Options exercisable at end of period		234,050		$	9.70		233,175		$	9.97

Weighted-average fair value per option of options granted during the year		N/A				$	1.84

Weighted-average remaining contracted life for outstanding and exercisable shares at May 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007.		55 months					52 months

There was no total intrinsic value of the options outstanding and exercisable as of May 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007. As of December 31, 2007, the unrecognized compensation expense related to nonvested options was $45,000. Total cash received from exercised options during for the five months ended May 31, 2008, and the year ended December 31,2007, was $0 and $38,000, respectively.

TRANSCOMMUNITY FINANCIAL CORPORATION

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

The following table summarizes nonvested options outstanding at May 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007:


	2008				2007
	Number of Shares		Weighted Average Grant-Date Fair Value		Number of Shares		Weighted Average Grant-Date Fair Value
Nonvested at January 1		42,000	$	1.30		5,367	$	1.30
Granted		—		—		56,000		1.84
Less: Vested		42,000		1.30		11,367		1.30
Forfeited		—		—		8,000		1.76

Nonvested at May 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007		—	$	—		42,000	$	1.76

2007 Equity Compensation Plan

On May 29, 2007, the shareholders of TFC approved the TransCommunity Financial Corporation 2007 Equity Compensation Plan (the “2007 Plan”). The 2007 Plan authorizes the Compensation Committee of TFC’s Board of Directors to grant one or more of the following awards to directors, officers, key employees, consultants and advisors to TFC and its subsidiary who are designated by the Compensation Committee: options, stock appreciation rights, stock awards, performance share awards, incentive awards, and stock units. The Compensation Committee will administer the 2007 Plan.

TFC is authorized to issue under the 2007 Plan up to 250,000 shares of its common stock. Generally, if an award is forfeited, expires or terminates, the shares allocated to that award under the 2007 Plan may be reallocated to new awards under the 2007 Plan. Shares surrendered pursuant to the exercise of a stock option or other award or in satisfaction of tax withholding requirements under the 2007 Plan may also be reallocated to other awards. The 2007 Plan provides that if there is a stock split, stock dividend or other event that affects TFC’s capitalization, appropriate adjustments will be made in the number of shares that may be issued under the 2007 Plan and in the number of shares and price of all outstanding grants and awards made before such event.

The 2007 Plan also provides that no award may be granted more than 10 years after the earlier of the date that it is approved by TFC’s shareholders or the date it is adopted by TFC’s Board of Directors, which was February 28, 2007.

The Board of Directors may amend or terminate the 2007 Plan at any time, provided that no such amendment will be made without shareholder approval if (i) the amendment would increase the aggregate number of shares of Common Stock that may be issued under the 2007 Plan (other than as permitted under the 2007 Plan), (ii) the amendment changes the class of individuals eligible to become participants or (iii) such approval is required under any applicable law, rule or regulation.

On July 25, 2007, agreements with market presidents and corporate senior officers were executed for restricted stock awards totaling 22,375 shares of common stock at a per share price of $7.75 under the 2007 Equity Compensation Plan. The agreements grant fifty percent of the restricted stock on a three year vesting schedule as follows:


Date		Percentage
March 1, 2008		20%
March 1, 2009		20%
March 1, 2010		60%

TRANSCOMMUNITY FINANCIAL CORPORATION

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

The remaining one-half of the restricted stock would have been issued March 1, 2010 if corporate pre-tax income for 2009 equals or exceeds $3.0 million. Compensation costs associated with service-based awards were recognized over the period of the service term. Compensation costs associated with the performance-based awards would have been recognized once it is probable that the performance target is achievable. TFC will record costs related to the performance-based awards, and none of the performance award was accrued through December 31, 2007.

Stock-based compensation expense of approximately $178,000 and $79,000 was recorded for the five months ended May 31, 2008 and the year ended December 31, 2007, respectively.

Pursuant to the terms of the 2001 Stock Option Plan and the 2007 Equity Compensation Plan, all options and awards were fully vested upon the change of control which occurred on May 31, 2008.

NOTE 12 REGULATORY MATTERS

TFC is subject to various regulatory capital requirements administered by the federal banking agencies. If TFC, or its subsidiary bank, fails to meet minimum capital requirements, its primary regulators can initiate certain mandatory and discretionary actions. If such actions are undertaken, they could have a direct material effect on TFC’s financial statements. Under capital adequacy guidelines and the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action, TFC’s subsidiary bank must meet specific capital guidelines that involve quantitative measures of the bank’s assets, liabilities, and certain off-balance sheet items as calculated under regulatory accounting practices. Capital amounts and classification are also subject to qualitative judgments by the regulators about components, risk weightings, and other factors. Prompt corrective action provisions are not applicable to bank holding companies.

Quantitative measures are established by bank regulations to ensure capital adequacy. The Bank is required to maintain minimum amounts and ratios of total and Tier 1 capital (as defined in the regulations) to risk-weighted assets (as defined) and of Tier 1 capital (as defined) to average assets (as defined). At May 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007, management believes that TFC met all capital adequacy requirements to which they are subject.

TFC assesses its compliance with regulatory capital requirements on quarterly basis. The actual and required capital amounts and ratios as of March 31, 2008 (the last quarter for which the calculation was made) and December 31, 2007 were as follows:


	March 31 2008			December 31 2007
	(in thousands)
Tier 1 Leverage Capital Ratio
Amount		32,737			29,896
Actual Ratio		13.36	%		13.61	%
Minimum Capital Requirement		4.00	%		4.00	%

Tier 1 Risk-Based Capital Ratio
Amount		32,737			29,896
Actual Ratio		13.64	%		13.95	%
Minimum Capital Requirement		4.00	%		4.00	%

Total Risk-Based Capital Ratio
Amount		35,736			32,574
Actual Ratio		14.89	%		15.20	%
Minimum Capital Requirement		8.00	%		8.00	%

TRANSCOMMUNITY FINANCIAL CORPORATION

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

NOTE 13 FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 107 (SFAS 107), Disclosures About the Fair Value of Financial Statements, defines the fair value of a financial instrument as the amount at which a financial instrument could be exchanged in a current transaction between willing parties, other than in a forced liquidation sale. As the majority of TFC’s financial instruments lack an available trading market, significant estimates, assumptions and present value calculations are required to determine estimated fair value.

Changes in the assumptions or methodologies used to estimate fair values may materially affect the estimated amounts. Also, management is concerned that there may not be reasonable comparability between TFC and other financial institutions due to the wide range of permitted assumptions and methodologies in the absence of active markets. This lack of uniformity gives rise to a high degree of subjectivity in estimating financial instrument fair values.

TFC has determined estimated fair values using the best available data and an estimation methodology suitable for each category of financial instruments. The estimation methodology used, the estimated fair values, and the recorded carrying value of financial instruments at May 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007 are as follows (dollars in thousands):


	May 31, 2008				December 31, 2007
	Estimated Fair Value		Carrying Value		Estimated Fair Value		Carrying Value
Financial assets:
Cash and due from banks	$	4,232	$	4,232	$	2,204	$	2,204
Federal funds sold		—		—		2,107		2,107
Investment securities		11,285		11,285		16,636		16,643
Loans, net		239,877		238,454		200,902		202,444
Accrued interest receivable		1,427		1,427		1,357		1,357

Financial liabilities:
Demand deposits:
Noninterest bearing	$	25,677	$	25,677	$	20,390	$	20,390
Interest bearing		41,772		35,866		41,768		41,768
Savings deposits		10,174		9,782		10,174		10,174
Time deposits		162,763		160,809		131,739		131,266
Federal funds purchased		5,218		5,218		—		—
Accrued interest payable		805		805		682		682

The estimated fair values of cash and due from banks and federal funds sold are the stated values. The estimated fair values of investment securities are based on quoted market prices if available or on the quoted market prices of comparable instruments if quoted market prices are not available. The gross loan portfolio and time deposits are valued using a present value discounted cash flow method where market prices are not available. The discount rate used in these calculations is the estimated current market rate adjusted for credit risk. All other financial instruments have fair values that approximate the carrying value.

The fair value of commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit are considered immaterial.

SFAS 157 is an extension of SFAS 107 and further defines the fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in GAAP, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. This Statement applies under other accounting pronouncements that require or permit fair value measurements, the Board having previously concluded in those accounting pronouncements that fair value is the relevant measurement attribute. Accordingly, this Statement does not require any new fair value measurements.

TRANSCOMMUNITY FINANCIAL CORPORATION

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Expanded disclosures required by SFAS 157 include the establishment of three input levels in considering how fair value is applied.

Level 1 inputs are quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the reporting entity has the ability to access at the measurement date. An active market for the asset or liability is a market in which transactions for the asset or liability occur with sufficient frequency and volume to provide pricing information on an ongoing basis.

Level 2 inputs are inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. If the asset or liability has a specified (contractual) term, a Level 2 input must be observable for substantially the full term of the asset or liability. In TFC’s banking environment, an example may be the difference between interest rates in effect at the contractual date as compared with those for similar financial assets and liabilities that are in effect at the measurement date, or TFC’s year end.

Level 3 inputs are unobservable inputs for the asset or liability. Unobservable inputs shall be used to measure fair value to the extent that observable inputs are not available, thereby allowing for situations in which there is little, if any, market activity for the asset or liability at the measurement date. However, the fair value measurement objective remains the same, that is, an exit price from the perspective of a market participant that holds the asset or owes the liability. Therefore, unobservable inputs shall reflect the reporting entity’s own assumptions about the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability (including assumptions about risk). Unobservable inputs shall be developed based on the best information available in the circumstances, which might include the reporting entity’s own data.

Assets and Liabilities recorded at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis

The table below presents the recorded amount of assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis (dollars in thousands):


May 31, 2008	Total		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
Investment securities available for sale
U.S. Treasury issue and U.S. Government Agencies	$	11,285	$	—	$	11,285	$	—

Total assets at fair value	$	11,285	$	—	$	11,285	$	—

Total liabilities at fair value	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—

TFC had no level 1 or level 3 assets or other liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis at May 31, 2008.

Assets and Liabilities measured at Fair Value on a Nonrecurring Basis

TFC may be required, from time to time, to measure certain assets at fair value on a nonrecurring basis in accordance with U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principals. These include assets which are measured at the lower of cost or market that were recognized at fair value fair value below cost at the end of the period. The table below presents the recorded amount of assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis (dollars in thousands):


May 31, 2008	Total		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
Financial assets:
Loans – impaired, net	$	2,927	$	—	$	2,927	$	—
Other real estate owned (OREO)		187		—		187		—

Total assets at fair value	$	3,114	$	—	$	3,114	$	—

Total liabilities at fair value	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—

TFC had no level 1 or level 3 assets or other liabilities measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis at May 31, 2008.

TRANSCOMMUNITY FINANCIAL CORPORATION

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

NOTE 14 FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS WITH OFF-BALANCE SHEET RISK

In the normal course of business, the bank has outstanding commitments and contingent liabilities, such as commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit, which are not included in the accompanying consolidated financial statements. The bank’s exposure to credit loss in the event of nonperformance by the other party to the financial instruments for commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit is represented by the contractual or notional amount of those instruments. The bank uses the same credit policies in making such commitments as it does for instruments that are included in the consolidated balance sheets.

Financial instruments whose contract amounts represent credit risk were as follows (dollars in thousands):


	May 31 2008		December 31 2007
Commitments to extend credit	$	50, 521	$	46,860
Standby letters of credit	$	4,288	$	3,615

Commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend to a customer as long as there is no violation of any condition established in the contract. Commitments generally have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses and may require payment of a fee. Since many of the commitments are expected to expire without being drawn upon, the total commitment amounts do not necessarily represent future cash requirements. The bank evaluates each customer’s creditworthiness on a case-by-case basis. The amount of collateral obtained, if deemed necessary by the bank upon extension of credit, is based on management’s credit evaluation. Collateral held varies but may include accounts receivable, inventory, property and equipment, and income-producing commercial properties.

Standby letters of credit are conditional commitments issued by the bank to guarantee the performance of a customer to a third party. Standby letters of credit generally have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses and may require payment of a fee. The credit risk involved in issuing letters of credit is essentially the same as that involved in extending loan facilities to customers. The bank’s policy for obtaining collateral, and the nature of such collateral, is essentially the same as that involved in making commitments to extend credit.

TRANSCOMMUNITY FINANCIAL CORPORATION

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

NOTE 15 COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENT LIABILITIES

TFC leases banking facilities and other office space under operating leases that expire at various dates through 2014 and that contain certain renewal options. Pursuant to the terms of non-cancelable lease agreements in effect at May 31, 2008, pertaining to premises, future minimum rent commitments under various operating leases are as follows:


	(dollars in thousands)
2008	$	247
2009		434
2010		402
2011		292
2012		273
Thereafter		596

	$	2,244

NOTE 16 OTHER OPERATING EXPENSES


	Five Months Ended May 31, 2008		Year Ended December 31, 2007
	(dollars in thousands)
Merger and acquisition costs	$	1,029	$	—
Data processing fees		1,917		843
Legal and accounting fees		260		788
Consulting fees		—		557
OCC and FDIC assessment		95		163
Directors fees		73		114
Supplies		139		368
Franchise taxes		81		161
Marketing		37		219
Other		277		575

Total	$	3,908	$	3,788

The 2008 merger and acquisition costs were incurred as a result of the merger with CBAC, and include costs for legal, investment banking and other professional services associated with the merger transaction. Approximately $1.7 million of the 2008 Data Processing expenses include the discontinuation of a contract with TFC’s external data processing provider.

NOTE 17 DEFINED CONTRIBUTION PENSION PLAN

TFC has a defined contribution pension plan in the form of a 401(k) plan (the “401(k) Plan”) covering substantially all of its employees. Under the 401(k) Plan, employees can contribute pretax salary dollars subject to Internal Revenue Service ceilings. TFC matches up to 4% of salaries contributed by their employees and additionally contributes 5% of compensation regardless of what the employee contributes. Total expenses for the 401(k) Plan for the five months ended May 31, 2008 and the year ended December 31, 2007 were approximately $154,000 and $337,000, respectively.

NOTE 18 PARENT ONLY FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

TransCommunity Financial Corporation conducts no other business other than owning the stock of TransCommunity Bank. Accordingly, the only significant asset of the Holding Company is its investment in the Bank and there are no liabilities.

TRANSCOMMUNITY FINANCIAL CORPORATION

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

NOTE 19 SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

At the close of business on May 31, 2008, TFC merged with CBAC. The financial statements have been adjusted for all material subsequent events that have occurred since that day, as well as, additional information related to events that existed at that date.

BOE FINANCIAL SERVICES OF VIRGINIA, INC.

AND SUBSIDIARIES

Index to Financial Statements


	Page

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firms		72

Consolidated Balance Sheets as of May 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007		74

Consolidated Statements of Operations for the five months ended May 31, 2008 and the year ended December 31, 2007		75

Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity for the five months ended May 31, 2008 and the year ended December 31, 2007		76

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the five months ended May 31, 2008 and the year ended December 31, 2007		78

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements		79

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

Board of Directors and Stockholders

BOE Financial Services of Virginia, Inc.

Tappahannock, Virginia

We have audited the consolidated balance sheet of BOE Financial Services of Virginia, Inc. and subsidiary (the Company) as of May 31, 2008 and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity and cash flows for the five-month period ended May 31, 2008. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of BOE Financial Services of Virginia, Inc. and subsidiary at May 31, 2008 and the results of their operations and their cash flows for the five-month period ended May 31, 2008 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

/s/ ELLIOTT DAVIS, LLC

Galax, Virginia

April 22, 2010

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders

BOE Financial Services of Virginia, Inc.

Tappahannock, Virginia

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of BOE Financial Services of Virginia, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2007, and the related consolidated statements of income, stockholders’ equity and cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2007. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Corporation’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of BOE Financial Services of Virginia, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2007, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2007, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

We were not engaged to examine management’s assertion about the effectiveness of BOE Financial Services of Virginia, Inc. and subsidiaries’ internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2007 included in the accompanying Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting and, accordingly, we do not express an opinion thereon.

LOGO

Winchester, Virginia

March 17, 2008

BOE FINANCIAL SERVICES OF VIRGINIA, INC.

AND SUBSIDIARIES

Consolidated Balance Sheets

May 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007

(dollars in thousands)


	May 31, 2008		December 31, 2007
Assets
Cash and due from banks	$	5,784	$	4,100
Securities available for sale, at fair value		54,019		52,543
Securities held to maturity (fair value approximates $3,015 and $3,010 at May 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively)		3,000		3,000
Equity securities, restricted, at cost		1,879		1,761
Loans held for sale		706		497
Loans, net of allowance for loan losses of $2,729 in 2008 and $2,595 in 2007		230,624		218,954
Bank premises and equipment, net		10,811		10,663
Accrued interest receivable		1,624		1,514
Intangible assets, net		346		398
Other assets		9,010		9,001

Total assets	$	317,803	$	302,431

Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
Liabilities
Deposits:
Noninterest-bearing	$	27,113	$	26,220
Interest-bearing		229,269		218,373

Total deposits	$	256,382	$	244,593
Federal funds purchased		5,117		3,152
Federal Home Loan Bank advances		17,900		17,000
Trust preferred capital notes		4,124		4,124
Accrued interest payable		850		1,007
Other liabilities		3,749		2,445

Total liabilities	$	288,122	$	272,321

Commitments and Contingent Liabilities
Stockholders’ Equity
Preferred stock, $5 par value, authorized 100,000 shares; no shares issued and outstanding	$	—	$	—
Common stock, $5 par value, authorized 10,000,000 shares; issued and outstanding 1,214,673 and 1,212,294 shares		6,073		6,062
Additional paid-in capital		5,622		5,577
Retained earnings		17,950		18,872
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net		36		(401	)

Total stockholders’ equity	$	29,681	$	30,110

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	317,803	$	302,431

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

BOE FINANCIAL SERVICES OF VIRGINIA, INC.

AND SUBSIDIARIES

Consolidated Statements of Operations

Five Months Ended May 31, 2008 and Year Ended December 31, 2007

(dollars in thousands)


	May 31 2008			December 31 2007
Interest and Dividend Income
Interest and fees on loans	$	6,737		$	16,202
Interest on federal funds sold		18			73
Interest and dividends on securities:
Taxable		465			1,085
Non Taxable		555			1,334
Total interest and dividend income	$	7,775		$	18,694
Interest Expense
Interest on deposits	$	3,266		$	7,586
Interest on borrowings		479			1,109
Total interest expense	$	3,745		$	8,695
Net interest income	$	4,030		$	9,999
Provision for Loan Losses		200			6
Net interest income after provision for loan losses	$	3,830		$	9,993
Noninterest Income
Service charge income	$	464		$	1,110
Other		390			848
Total noninterest income	$	854		$	1,958
Noninterest Expenses
Salaries and benefits	$	2,493		$	4,777
Occupancy expenses		216			517
Equipment expenses		286			514
Data processing		394			608
Professional Fees		631			—
Amortization of intangibles		52			126
Other operating expenses		810			2,221

Total noninterest expenses	$	4,882		$	8,763

Net income (loss) before income taxes	$	(198	)	$	3,188

Income tax benefit (expense)	$	10		$	(580	)
Net income (loss)	$	(188	)	$	2,608

Earnings per share, basic	$	(0.15	)	$	2.16

Earnings per share, diluted	$	(0.15	)	$	2.15

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

BOE FINANCIAL SERVICES OF VIRGINIA, INC.

AND SUBSIDIARIES

Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity

Five Months Ended May 31, 2008 and Year Ended December 31, 2007

(dollars in thousands, except per share data)


	Common Stock		Additional Paid-In Capital		Retained Earnings			Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)			Comprehensive Income		Total
Balance, December 31, 2006	$	6,041	$	5,477	$	17,256		$	(727	)			$	28,047
Comprehensive income:
Net income – 2007		—		—		2,608			—		$	2,608		2,608
Other comprehensive income, net of tax:
Unrealized gain on securities available for sale, net of deferred taxes of $68		—		—		—			—			132		—
Add reclassification adjustment, net of taxes of $ 13		—		—		—			—			24		—
Minimum pension liability adjustment, net of deferred taxes of $88		—		—		—			—			170		—

Total Other comprehensive income, net of tax		—		—		—			326		$	326		326

Total comprehensive income		—		—		—			—		$	2,934		—

Cash dividends, $0.82 per share		—		—		(992	)		—					(992	)
Issuance of common stock under dividend reinvestment plan		19		92		—			—					111
Exercise of stock options		2		8		—			—					10

Balance, December 31, 2007	$	6,062	$	5,577	$	18,872		$	(401	)			$	30,110

continued

BOE FINANCIAL SERVICES OF VIRGINIA, INC.

AND SUBSIDIARIES

Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity

(Continued)

Five Months Ended May 31, 2008 and Year Ended December 31, 2007

(dollars in thousands)


	Common Stock		Additional Paid-In Capital		Retained Earnings			Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)			Comprehensive Income			Total
Balance, December 31, 2007 (brought forward)	$	6,062	$	5,577	$	18,872		$	(401	)				$	30,110
Comprehensive income:
Net loss – Five months ended May 31, 2008		—		—		(188	)		—		$	(188	)		(188	)
Other comprehensive income, net of tax:
Unrealized gain on securities available for sale, net of deferred taxes of $214		—		—		—			—			417			—
Add reclassification adjustment												(3	)
Minimum pension liability adjustment, net of deferred taxes of $15		—		—		—			—			23			—

Total Other comprehensive income, net of tax		—		—		—			437		$	437			437

Total comprehensive income		—		—		—			—		$	249			—

Effect of changing pension plan measurement date						(62	)								(62	)
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principal						(137	)								(137	)
Cash dividends, $0.44 per share		—		—		(535	)		—						(535	)
Issuance of common stock under dividend reinvestment plan and exercise of stock options		11		45		—			—						56

Balance, May 31, 2008	$	6,073	$	5,622	$	17,950		$	36					$	29,681

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

BOE FINANCIAL SERVICES OF VIRGINIA, INC.

AND SUBSIDIARIES

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

Five Months Ended May 31, 2008 and Year Ended December 31, 2007

(dollars in thousands)


	May 31, 2008			December 31, 2007
Cash Flows from Operating Activities
Net (loss) income	$	(188	)	$	2,608
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and intangible amortization		335			676
Net increase in loans available for sale		(119	)		(459	)
Provision for loan losses		200			6
(Gains) losses on sale of securities		(6	)		37
Losses on disposal of premises and equipment		92			5
Gains on sale of loans		(90	)		(37	)
Deferred income tax (benefit)		(196	)		(173	)
Amortization of security premiums and accretion of discounts		36			125
Increase in accrued interest receivable and other assets		(73	)		(636	)
Increase in accrued expenses and other liabilities		897			574

Net cash provided by operating activities	$	888		$	2,726

Cash Flows from Investing Activities
Proceeds from sales, principal repayments, calls and maturities of securities available for sale	$	2,364		$	21,638
Purchase of restricted equity securities		(118	)		(208	)
Purchase of securities available for sale		(3,232	)		(18,143	)
Net (increase) in loans to customers		(11,870	)		(24,469	)
Purchase of bank-owned life insurance		—			—
Purchases of premises and equipment		(523	)		(765	)
Proceeds from disposal of premises and equipment		—			—

Net cash used in investing activities	$	(13,379	)	$	(21,947	)

Cash Flows from Financing Activities
Net increase in deposits	$	11,789		$	13,728
Increase (decrease) in federal funds purchased		1,965			(55	)
Increase in Federal Home Loan Bank advances		900			5,000
Dividends paid		(535	)		(992	)
Net proceeds from issuance of common stock		56			120

Net cash provided by financing activities	$	14,175		$	17,801

Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents	$	1,684		$	(1,420	)
Cash and Cash Equivalents
Beginning of year		4,100			5,520

End of year	$	5,784		$	4,100

Supplemental Disclosure of Cash Flow Information
Cash paid during year:
Interest	$	3,902		$	8,539

Income taxes	$	127		$	900

Noncash Investing and Financing Activities
Unrealized gain (loss) on securities available for sale	$	631		$	237
Pension liability adjustment	$	252		$	258

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

BOE FINANCIAL SERVICES OF VIRGINIA, INC.

AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 1. Nature of Banking Activities and Significant Accounting Policies

BOE Financial Services of Virginia, Inc. (“BOE”) is a bank holding company, which owns all of the stock of the Bank and BOE Statutory Trust I (the Trust), its sole subsidiaries. The Bank provides commercial, residential and consumer loans, and a variety of deposit products to its customers in the Northern Neck and Richmond regions of Virginia.

Essex Services, Inc. is a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Bank and was formed to sell title insurance to the Bank’s mortgage loan customers. Essex Services, Inc. also offers insurance and investment products through affiliations with two limited liability companies.

On December 14, 2007, BOE entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the “Merger Agreement”) with Community Bankers Acquisition Corp. (“CBAC”). Effective at the close of business May 31, 2008, CBAC consummated the merger between the CBAC and BOE pursuant to the terms of the Merger Agreement. In connection with the Merger Agreement, the Bank, a wholly-owned subsidiary of BOE, became a wholly-owned subsidiary of CBAC. The material terms of the Merger Agreement and certain financial and other information about CBAC and BOE are contained in BOE’s registration statement on Form S-4 (SEC File No. 333-149384) originally filed February 26, 2008, as amended, the definitive joint proxy statement/prospectus thereto, filed March 31, 2008 (hereinafter referred to as the “BOE Merger Proxy”), BOE’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007, filed March 31, 2008 (SEC File No. 000-31711), and BOE’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2008, filed May 15, 2008 (SEC File No. 000-31711).

Principles of Consolidation

The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of BOE Financial Services of Virginia, Inc. and its wholly-owned subsidiary, Bank of Essex. All material intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. FASB Interpretation No. 46(R) requires that BOE no longer eliminate through consolidation the equity investment in BOE Statutory Trust I, which approximated $124,000 at May 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007. The subordinated debt of the Trust is reflected as a liability of BOE.

Securities

Purchase premiums and discounts are recognized in interest income using the interest method over the terms of the securities. Declines in the fair value of held-to-maturity and available-for-sale securities below their cost that are deemed to be other than temporary are reflected in earnings as realized losses. In estimating other than temporary impairment losses, management considers (1) the length of time and the extent to which the fair value has been less than cost, (2) the financial condition and near-term prospects of the issuer, and (3) the intent and ability of BOE to retain its investment in the issuer for a period of time sufficient to allow for any anticipated recovery in fair value. Gains and losses on the sale of securities are recorded on the trade date and are determined using the specific identification method.

Restricted Securities

BOE is required to maintain an investment in the capital stock of certain correspondent banks. BOE’s investment in these securities is recorded at cost.

BOE FINANCIAL SERVICES OF VIRGINIA, INC.

AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Loans

Allowance for Loan Losses

The allowance is an amount that management believes will be adequate to absorb estimated losses relating to specifically identified loans, as well as probable credit losses inherent in the balance of the loan portfolio, based on an evaluation of the collectability of existing loans and prior loss experience. This evaluation also takes into consideration such factors as changes in the nature and volume of the loan portfolio, overall portfolio quality, review of specific problem loans, and current economic conditions that may affect the borrower’s ability to pay. This evaluation does not include the effects of expected losses on specific loans or groups of loans that are related to future events or expected changes in economic conditions. While management uses the best information available to make its evaluation, future adjustments to the allowance may be necessary if there are significant changes in economic conditions. In addition, regulatory agencies, as an integral part of their examination process, periodically review the Bank’s allowance for loan losses, and may require the Bank to make additions to the allowance based on their judgment about information available to them at the time of their examinations.

BOE FINANCIAL SERVICES OF VIRGINIA, INC.

AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

into consideration all of the circumstances surrounding the loan and the borrower, including the length of the delay, the reasons for the delay, the borrower’s prior payment record, and the amount of the shortfall in relation to the principal and interest owed. Impairment is measured on a loan by loan basis for commercial and construction loans by either the present value of the expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate, the loan’s obtainable market price, or the fair value of the collateral if the loan is collateral dependent.

Loans Held for Sale

BOE enters into commitments to originate certain mortgage loans whereby the interest rate on the loans is determined prior to funding (rate lock commitments). Rate lock commitments on mortgage loans that are intended to be sold are considered to be derivatives. The period of time between issuance of a loan commitment and closing and the sale of the loan generally ranges from thirty to ninety days. BOE protects itself from changes in interest rates through the use of best efforts forward delivery commitments, whereby BOE commits to sell a loan at the time the borrower commits to an interest rate with the intent that the buyer has assumed interest rate risk on the loan. As a result, BOE is not exposed to losses nor will it realize significant gains related to its rate lock commitments due to changes in interest rates. The correlation between the rate lock commitments and the best efforts contracts is very high due to their similarity. Because of this high correlation, the gain or loss that occurs on the rate lock commitments is immaterial.

Bank Premises and Equipment

Bank premises and equipment are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation. Land is carried at cost. Depreciation of bank premises and equipment is computed on the straight-line method over estimated useful lives of 10 to 50 years for premises and 5 to 20 years for equipment, furniture and fixtures.

Intangibles

Intangible assets consist of core deposit premiums from a branch acquisition. Intangible assets are being amortized on a straight-line basis over 15 years.

Other Real Estate

Real estate acquired through, or in lieu of, loan foreclosure is held for sale and is initially recorded at the lower of the loan balance or the fair value at the date of foreclosure net of estimated disposal costs, establishing a new cost basis. Subsequent to foreclosure, valuations are periodically performed by management and the assets are carried at the lower of the carrying amount or the fair value less costs to sell. Revenues and expenses from operations and changes in the valuation allowance are included in other operating expenses. Costs to bring a property to salable condition are capitalized up to the fair value of the property while costs to maintain a property in salable condition are expensed as incurred. BOE had no other real estate at May 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007.

BOE FINANCIAL SERVICES OF VIRGINIA, INC.

AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Income Taxes

BOE has a deferred tax asset of approximately $1.0 million and $903,000 as of May 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively. The tax effects of temporary differences that give rise to significant portions of the deferred tax asset include Loan Loss Allowances, Deferred Compensation, and Accrued Pension expenses. These are offset by deferred tax liabilities of which Depreciation expense makes up a significant portion.

BOE adopted the provisions of FIN 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes, on January 1, 2007 with no impact on the financial statements.

Interest and penalties associated with unrecognized tax benefits are classified as additional income taxes in the statements of operations.

Earnings Per Share

Basic earnings per share (EPS) is computed based on the weighted average number of shares outstanding and excludes any dilutive effects of options, warrants and convertible securities. Diluted earnings per share is computed in a manner similar to basic EPS, except for certain adjustments to the numerator and the denominator. Diluted EPS gives effect to all dilutive potential common shares that were outstanding during the period. Potential common shares that may be issued by BOE relate solely to outstanding stock options and are determined using the treasury stock method.

Stock-Based Compensation

At December 31, 2006, BOE had two stock-based compensation plans, which are described more fully in Note 9. Effective January 1, 2006, BOE adopted SFAS No. 123 (revised 2004), “Share-Based Payment” (SFAS 123R). SFAS 123R requires the costs resulting from all share-based payments be recognized in the financial statements. Stock-based compensation is estimated at the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option valuation model for determining fair value. Prior to adopting SFAS 123R, BOE accounted for the plans under the recognition and measurement principles of APB Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, and related Interpretations. No stock-based employee compensation cost was reflected in net income, as all options granted under the plans had an exercise price equal to the market value of the underlying common stock on the date of grant.

No stock-based compensation expense was recognized for the five months ended May 31, 2008 and the year ended December 31, 2007, as no stock options were granted or vested. Effective December 22, 2005, BOE accelerated the vesting of all unvested stock options under the stock-based compensation plans.

BOE FINANCIAL SERVICES OF VIRGINIA, INC.

AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Cash and Cash Equivalents

For purposes of the consolidated statements of cash flows, BOE has defined cash equivalents as cash and due from banks, interest-bearing bank balances, and Federal funds sold.

Advertising Costs

BOE follows the policy of charging the costs of advertising to expense as incurred. Total advertising expense incurred for the five months ended May 31, 2008 and the year ended December 31, 2007 was approximately $85,000 and $273,000, respectively.

Use of Estimates

Reclassifications

Certain reclassifications have been made to prior period balances to conform to the current year provisions.

BOE FINANCIAL SERVICES OF VIRGINIA, INC.

AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 2. Securities

The amortized cost and fair value of securities available for sale as of May 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007 are as follows (dollars in thousands):


	Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized (Losses)			Fair Value
	May 31, 2008
U.S. Treasury issue and other US government agencies	$	749	$	4	$	—		$	753
Mortgage-backed securities		13,050		129		(40	)		13,139
Obligations of state and political subdivisions		38,215		474		(69	)		38,620
Corporate and other bonds		1,109		1		(9	)		1,101
Other equity securities		81		329		(4	)		406

Total	$	53,204	$	937	$	(122	)	$	54,019


	Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized (Losses)			Fair Value
	December 31, 2007
U.S. Treasury issue and other US government agencies	$	499	$	—	$	(1	)	$	498
Mortgage-backed securities		13,669		55		(77	)		13,647
Obligations of state and political subdivisions		37,410		207		(351	)		37,266
Corporate and other bonds		701		3		—			704
Other equity securities		81		351		(4	)		428

Total	$	52,360	$	616	$	(433	)	$	52,543

BOE FINANCIAL SERVICES OF VIRGINIA, INC.

AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

The amortized cost and fair value of securities available for sale as of May 31, 2008, by contractual maturity are shown below (dollars in thousands). Expected maturities may differ from contractual maturities because issuers may have the right to call or prepay obligations without any penalties.


	Amortized Cost		Fair Value		Weighted Average Yield
Due in one year or less	$	4,146	$	4,168		4.98	%
Due after one year through five years		25,360		25,575		5.01
Due after five years through ten years		20,877		21,101		5.40
Due after ten years		2,740		2,769		3.66
Other equity securities		81		406		N/A
Total	$	53,204	$	54,019

At May 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007, BOE owned one U.S. Government Agency bond in the held to maturity classification with a book value of $3,000,000. The market value of the bond was $3,015,000 and $3,009,900 at May 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively. The bond matures in 2024.

Proceeds from sales, principal repayments, calls and maturities of securities available for sale during the five months ended May 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007 were approximately $2.4 million and $21.6 million, respectively. Gross realized gains of approximately $6,000 and $51,000 and gross realized losses of $0 and approximately $88,000 were recognized on those sales for the five months ended May 31, 2008 and the year ended December 31, 2007, respectively. The tax provision applicable to these net realized gains amounted to approximately $5,000 and $13,000, respectively.

Securities with amortized costs of approximately $6.6 million were pledged to secure public deposits and for other purposes required or permitted by law at May 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007.

A summary of investments in an unrealized loss position at May 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007 follows (dollars in thousands):


	Duration of the Unrealized Loss
	Less Than 12 Months					12 Months or More
	Fair Value		Unrealized (Losses)			Fair Value		Unrealized (Losses)
May 31, 2008
U.S. Treasury issue and other government agencies	$	—	$	—		$	—	$	—
Mortgage-backed securities		3,620		(40	)		—		—
Obligations of state and political subdivisions		6,896		(69	)		—		—
Corporate and other bonds		600		(10	)		—
Other equity securities		14		(4	)		—		—

Total temporarily impaired securities	$	11,130	$	(123	)	$	—	$	—


December 31, 2007
U.S. Treasury securities	$	759	$	—		$	498	$	(1	)
U.S. Agency and mortgage-backed securities		—		—			5,730		(77	)
Obligations of state and political subdivisions		8,134		(133	)		13,479		(218	)
Corporate securities		11		(4	)		—		—

Total temporarily impaired securities	$	8,904	$	(137	)	$	19,707	$	(296	)

BOE FINANCIAL SERVICES OF VIRGINIA, INC.

AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

The unrealized losses in the investment portfolio as of May 31, 2008, are generally a result of market fluctuations that occur daily. The unrealized losses are from 41securities that are all of investment grade, backed by insurance, U.S. government agency guarantees, or the full faith and credit of local municipalities throughout the United States. BOE has the ability and intent to hold these securities to maturity or until a recovery of value. Market prices are affected by conditions beyond the control of BOE. Investment decisions are made by the management group of BOE and reflect the overall liquidity and strategic asset/liability objectives of BOE. Management analyzes the securities portfolio frequently and manages the portfolio to provide an overall positive impact to BOE’s income statement and balance sheet.

Note 3. Loans

Major classifications of loans are summarized as follows:


	May 31, 2008			December 31, 2007
	(in thousands)
Mortgage loans on real estate:
Residential 1-4 family	$	63,801		$	59,451
Commercial		85,121			74,996
Construction		31,830			36,603
Second mortgages and equity lines of credit		16,964			15,240
Multifamily		924			922
Agriculture		3,697			3,413

Total real estate loans		202,337			190,625
Commercial loans		20,298			18,728
Consumer and installment loans		5,224			6,532
All other loans		5,694			5,842

Gross Loans	$	233,553		$	221,727
Less: Unearned income		(200	)		(178	)

Loans, net of unearned income	$	233,353		$	221,549

BOE FINANCIAL SERVICES OF VIRGINIA, INC.

AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

The following table indicates the dollar amount of the allowance for loan losses, including charge offs and recoveries by loan type for the five months ended May 31, 2008 and the year ended December 31, 2007 (dollars in thousands):


	Five Months Ended May 31, 2008			Year Ended December 31, 2007
Balance, beginning of year	$	2,595		$	2,400
Loans charged off:
Real estate		—			(23	)
Commercial		—			(116	)
Consumer and instalment loans		(91	)		(117	)

Total charge-offs		(91	)		(256	)

Recoveries:
Real estate		—			407
Commercial		5			6
Consumer and instalment loans		20			32

Total Recoveries		25			445

Net (charge-offs) recoveries		(66	)		189
Provision for loan losses		200			6

Balance, end of year	$	2,729		$	2,595

BOE FINANCIAL SERVICES OF VIRGINIA, INC.

AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

The following is a summary of information pertaining to impaired loans (dollars in thousands):


	May 31, 2008		December 31, 2007
Impaired loans without a valuation allowance	$	885	$	—
Impaired loans with a valuation allowance		1,721		2,030

Total impaired loans	$	2,606	$	2,030

Valuation allowance related to impaired loans	$	628	$	469

Non-accrual loans	$	63	$	96

Loans past due ninety days or more and still accruing	$	334	$	18

Average balance of impaired loans	$	2,318	$	2,563

Interest income recognized on impaired loans	$	28	$	199

Interest income recognized on a cash basis on impaired loans	$	24	$	184

BOE has not committed to lend additional funds to these debtors.

Note 4. Premises and Equipment

A summary of the cost and accumulated depreciation of bank premises and equipment at May 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007 (dollars in thousands):


	May 31, 2008		December 31, 2007
Land	$	3,007	$	2,831
Buildings		7,979		7,947
Furniture and fixtures		4,934		4,995
Construction in progress		479		323

	$	16,399	$	16,096
Accumulated depreciation		5,588		5,433

	$	10,811	$	10,663

Depreciation expense for the five months ended May 31, 2008 and the year ended December 31, 2007, amounted to approximately $283,000 and $550,000, respectively.

Commitments related to Construction in Progress at May 31, 2008 amounted to $2.9 million.

BOE FINANCIAL SERVICES OF VIRGINIA, INC.

AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 5. Deposits

Deposits by product type at May 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007 were as follows (dollars in thousands):


	May 31, 2008		December 31, 2007
NOW	$	28,669	$	28,403
MMDA		19,116		16,520
Savings		21,485		19,529
Time deposits less than $100,000		107,838		106,356
Time deposits $100,000 and greater		52,161		47,565

Total interest-bearing deposits		229,269		218,373
Total non-interest bearing		27,113		26,220

Total Deposits	$	256,382	$	244,593

The following table provides the average balance and average rate paid for interest bearing deposits, by product type (dollars thousands):


	Five Months Ended May 31, 2008					Year Ended December 31, 2007
	Average Balance		Average Rate			Average Balance		Average Rate
NOW	$	27,558		0.35	%	$	26,391		0.34	%
MMDA		16,673		2.34	%		16,195		2.71	%
Savings		20,836		1.12	%		20,408		1.22	%
Time deposits less than $100,000		107,703		4.46	%		101,983		4.64	%
Time deposits greater than $100,000		52,093		4.45	%		42,766		4.85	%

Total interest-bearing deposits	$	224,863		3.49	%	$	207,742		3.65	%

The scheduled maturities of time deposits $100,000 and greater at May 31, 2008 are as follows (dollars in thousands):


	CD’s		Other		Total
Within 3 months	$	11,679	$	927	$	12,606
3 - 6 months		11,497		900		12,397
6 - 12 months		20,576		545		21,121
Over 12 months		5,502		535		6,037

	$	49,254	$	2,907	$	52,161

At May 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007 overdraft demand deposits reclassified to loans totalled approximately $140,000 and $129,000, respectively.

Note 6. Income Taxes

BOE files income tax returns in the U.S. federal jurisdiction and the state of Virginia. With few exceptions, BOE is no longer subject to U.S. federal, state and local income tax examinations by tax authorities for years prior to 2004.

BOE FINANCIAL SERVICES OF VIRGINIA, INC.

AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

BOE adopted the provisions of FIN 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes, on January 1, 2007 with no impact on the financial statements.

The tax effects of temporary differences that give rise to significant portions of the deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities follows:


	May 31, 2008		December 31, 2007
Deferred tax assets:
Allowance for loan losses	$	707	$	638
Deferred compensation		414		268
Accrued pension		480		394

	$	1,601	$	1,300

Deferred tax liabilities:
Depreciation	$	225	$	245
Discount accretion on securities		17		13
Partnership losses		48		52
Unrealized gain on securities available for sale		305		62
Other		5		25

	$	600	$	397

Net deferred tax assets	$	1,001	$	903

Allocation of the income tax expense between current and deferred portions is as follows:


	May 31, 2008			December 31, 2007
Current tax provision	$	276		$	753
Deferred tax (benefit)		(286	)		(173	)

	$	(10	)	$	580

BOE FINANCIAL SERVICES OF VIRGINIA, INC.

AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

The following is a reconciliation of the expected income tax expense with the reported expense for each year:


	May 31, 2008			December 31, 2007
Statutory Federal income tax rate	$	(67	)	$	1,084
(Reduction) in taxes resulting from:
Municipal interest		(164	)		(387	)
Non-deductable transaction costs		234			—
Other, net		(13	)		(117	)

Income tax expense (benefit)	$	(10	)	$	580

Note 7. Federal Home Loan Bank Advances and Lines of Credit

BOE uses borrowings in conjunction with deposits to fund lending and investing activities. Short-term funding includes overnight borrowings from correspondent banks. Long term borrowings are obtained through the FHLB of Atlanta.

BOE has unsecured lines of credit with correspondent banks available for overnight borrowing totalling approximately $16,500,000. The following is information regarding borrowings against these lines of credit (dollars in thousands):


	May 31, 2008			December 31, 2007
Fed Funds Purchased	$	5,117		$	3,152

Maximum month end outstanding balance	$	5,117		$	5,280
Average outstanding balance during the period	$	1,499		$	742
Average interest rate during the period		3.37	%		5.90	%
Average interest rate at end of period		2.74	%		2.38	%

The following is information regarding borrowings against these lines of credit (dollars in thousands):


	May 31, 2008			December 31, 2007
FHLB Advances	$	17,900		$	17,000

Maximum month end outstanding balance	$	24,500		$	18,000
Average outstanding balance during the period	$	20,519		$	16,326
Average interest rate during the period		3.94	%		5.90	%
Average interest rate at end of period		4.02	%		4.75	%

Advances on the FHLB lines are secured by all of BOE’s first lien loans on one-to-four unit single-family dwellings The amount of available credit is limited to seventy-five percent of qualifying collateral. Any borrowings in excess of the qualifying collateral require pledging of additional assets.

BOE FINANCIAL SERVICES OF VIRGINIA, INC.

AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

As of May 31, 2008, the amount of the advances and their maturity dates are as follows (dollars in thousands):


Maturities	Fixed Rate		Adjustable Rate		Total
2009	$	—	$	900	$	900
2010		—		—		—
2011		—		—		—
2012		12,000		—		12,000
2013		—		—		—
Thereafter		5,000		—		5,000

Total	$	17,000	$	900	$	17,900

Note 8. Employee Benefit Plans

Corporation has a noncontributory, defined benefit pension plan for all full-time employees over 21 years of age. Benefits are generally based upon years of service and the employees’ compensation. BOE funds pension costs in accordance with the funding provisions of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act.

The following tables provide a reconciliation of the changes in the plan’s benefit obligations and fair value of assets over the five months ended May 31, 2008 and the year ended December 31, 2007, computed as of October 1, 2007 (dollars in thousands):


	May 31, 2008			December 31, 2007
Change in Benefit Obligation
Benefit obligation, beginning	$	4,969		$	4,538
Service cost		195			328
Interest cost		161			271
Actuarial loss		(113	)		(102	)
Benefits paid		(46	)		(66	)

Benefit obligation, ending	$	5,166		$	4,969

Change in Plan Assets
Fair value of plan assets, beginning	$	3,810		$	3,463
Actual return on plan assets		(271	)		413
Employer contributions		—			—
Benefits paid		(46	)		(66	)

Fair value of plan assets, ending	$	3,493		$	3,810

Funded Status	$	(1,673	)	$	(1,159	)
Unrecognized net actuarial loss		—			—
Unrecognized net obligation at transition		—			—
Unrecognized prior service cost		—			—

Accrued benefit cost	$	(1,673	)	$	(1,159	)

Amounts Recognized in the Balance Sheet
Other assets	$	—		$	—
Other liabilities		1,411			1,159
Amounts Recognized in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
Net loss	$	834		$	791
Prior service cost		4			14
Net obligation at transition		(4	)		(13	)
Deferred tax		(284	)		(269	)

Total amount recognized	$	550		$	523

BOE FINANCIAL SERVICES OF VIRGINIA, INC.

AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

The accumulated benefit obligation for the defined benefit pension plan was $3,040,294 at September 30, 2007.

The following table provides the components of net periodic benefit cost for the plan for the five months ended May 31, 2008 and the year ended December 31, 2007:


	May 31, 2008			December 31 2007
Components of Net Periodic Benefit Cost
Service cost	$	155		$	329
Interest cost		129			271
Expected return on plan assets		(134	)		(293	)
Amortization of prior service cost		1			3
Amortization of net obligation at transition		(1	)		(3	)
Recognized net actuarial loss		7			35

Net periodic benefit cost	$	157		$	342

Other Changes in Plan Assets and Benefit Obligations Recognized in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
Net loss / (gain)	$	38		$	(257	)
Prior service cost		—			—
Amortization of prior service cost		(9	)		(3	)
Net obligation at transition		—			—
Amortization of net obligation at transition		9			3
Deferred income tax (benefit) expense		(15	)		87

Total recognized in other comprehensive (loss)	$	23		$	(170	)

Total recognized in net periodic benefit cost and accumulated other comprehensive loss	$	184		$	172

BOE FINANCIAL SERVICES OF VIRGINIA, INC.

AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

The weighted-average assumptions used in the measurement of BOE’s benefit obligation are shown in the following table:


	2008			2007
Discount rate		6.25	%		6.25	%
Expected return on plan assets		8.50	%		8.50	%
Rate of compensation increase		4.00	%		5.00	%

The weighted-average assumption used in the measurement of BOE’s net periodic benefit cost are shown in the following table:


	2008			2007
Discount rate		6.00	%		6.00	%
Expected return on plan assets		8.00	%		8.50	%
Rate of compensation increase		4.00	%		5.00	%

BOE FINANCIAL SERVICES OF VIRGINIA, INC.

AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Long-Term Rate of Return

Asset Allocation

The pension plan’s weighted-average asset allocations at September 30, 2007, by asset category, are as follows:


Asset Category
Mutual funds - fixed income	35	%
Mutual funds - equity	60	%
Cash and equivalents	5	%

	100	%

401(k) Plan

BOE has also adopted a contributory 401(k) profit sharing plan which covers substantially all employees. The employee may contribute up to 15% of compensation, subject to statutory limitations. BOE matches 50% of employee contributions up to 4% of compensation. The plan also provides for an additional discretionary contribution to be made by BOE as determined each year. The amounts charged to expense under this plan for the five months ended May 31, 2008 and the year ended December 31, 2007 were approximately $33,000 and $56,000, respectively.

BOE FINANCIAL SERVICES OF VIRGINIA, INC.

AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Deferred Compensation Agreements

BOE has deferred compensation agreements with certain key employees and the Board of Directors. The retirement benefits to be provided are fixed based upon the amount of compensation earned and deferred. Deferred compensation expense amounted to approximately $93,000 and $221,000 for the five months ended May 31, 2008 and the year ended December 31, 2007, respectively. These contracts are funded by life insurance policies.

Note 9. Stock Option Plans

During the year ended December 31, 2000, BOE adopted stock option plans for all employees and outside directors. The plans provide that 110,000 shares of BOE’s common stock will be reserved for both incentive and non-statutory stock options to purchase common stock of BOE. The exercise price per share for incentive stock options and non-statutory stock options shall not be less than the fair market value of a share of common stock on the date of grant, and may be exercised at such times as may be specified by the Board of Directors in the participant’s stock option agreement. Each incentive and non-statutory stock option shall expire not more than ten years from the date the option is granted. The options vest at the rate of one quarter per year from the grant date. Effective December 22, 2005, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors approved the acceleration of vesting of all unvested stock options under the plans.

A summary of the status of the stock plans follows:


	2008					2007
	Number of Shares			Weighted Average Exercise Price		Number of Shares			Weighted Average Exercise Price
Outstanding at beginning of the period		29,359		$	23.86		29,718		$	23.92
Granted		—			—		—			—
Forfeited		—			—		—			—
Exercised		(1,305	)		20.73		(359	)		28.70

Outstanding at end of the period		28,054		$	24.01		29,359		$	23.86

Options exercisable at end of period		28,054		$	24.01		29,359		$	23.86

Weighted-average remaining contractual life for outstanding and exercisable shares at May 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007		5.25 years					5.50 years
Aggregate intrinsic value	$	223,148				$	230,129

The aggregate intrinsic value of a stock option in the table above represents the total pre-tax intrinsic value (the amount by which the current market value of the underlying stock exceeds the exercise price of the option) that would have been received by option holders had all option holders exercised their options on May 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007. This amount changes with changes in the market value of BOE’s stock.

The total intrinsic value of options exercised during the five months ended May 31, 2008 and the year ended December 31, 2007 was approximately $12,000 and $1,000, respectively.

BOE FINANCIAL SERVICES OF VIRGINIA, INC.

AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 10. Earnings Per Share


	Five months ended May 31, 2008					Year ended December 31, 2007
	Shares		Per Share			Shares		Per Share
Basic earnings per share		1,213,285	$	(0.15	)		1,209,761	$	2.16

Effect of dilutive stock options		—					5,183

Diluted earnings per share		1,213,285	$	(0.15	)		1,214,944	$	2.15

At May 31, 2008, there were 28,054 options in the money that were excluded from the earnings per share calculation, as the effect would have been anti-dilutive.

No options were excluded from the computation for the year ended December 31, 2007.

Note 11. Related Party Transactions


	May 31, 2008			December 31, 2007
Balance, beginning of period	$	3,331		$	2,885
Principal additions		1,243			1,303
Repayments and reclassifications		(1,762	)		(857	)

Balance, end of period	$	2,812		$	3,331

Note 12. Commitments and Contingent Liabilities

In the normal course of business, there are outstanding various commitments and contingent liabilities, such as guarantees, commitments to extend credit, etc., which are not reflected in the accompanying consolidated financial statements. The Bank does not anticipate losses as a result of these transactions. See Note 15 with respect to financial instruments with off-balance-sheet risk.

As members of the Federal Reserve System, the Bank is required to maintain certain average reserve balances. For the final weekly reporting period in the five months ended May 31, 2008 and the year ended December 31, 2007, the aggregate amount of daily average required balances was approximately $25,000.

The Bank is required to maintain certain required reserve balances with a correspondent bank. Those required balances were $250,000 at May 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007.

BOE FINANCIAL SERVICES OF VIRGINIA, INC.

AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 13. Concentration of Credit Risk

The Bank has a diversified loan portfolio consisting of commercial, real estate and consumer (instalment) loans. Substantially all of the Bank’s customers are residents or operate business ventures in its market area consisting of Essex, King William, Hanover, Henrico and adjacent counties. Therefore, a substantial portion of its debtors’ ability to honor their contracts and the Bank’s ability to realize the value of any underlying collateral, if needed, is influenced by the economic conditions in this market area.

The Bank maintains a portion of its cash balances with several financial institutions located in its market area. Accounts at each institution are secured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation up to $100,000. Uninsured balances were approximately $609,000 and $428,000 at May 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively.

Note 14. Financial Instruments With Off-Balance-Sheet Risk

The Bank is party to financial instruments with off-balance-sheet risk in the normal course of business to meet the financing needs of its customers. These financial instruments include commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit. Those instruments involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit and interest rate risk in excess of the amount recognized in the balance sheet. The contract amounts of those instruments reflect the extent of involvement the Bank has in particular classes of financial instruments.

A summary of the contract amounts of the Bank’s exposure to off-balance-sheet risk as of May 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007 is as follows (dollars in thousands):


	May 31, 2008		December 31, 2007
Commitments to extend credit	$	42,161	$	58,573
Standby letters of credit		1,209		3,867

Unfunded commitments under commercial lines-of credit, revolving credit lines and overdraft protection agreements are commitments for possible future extensions of credit to existing customers. These lines-of-credit are generally uncollateralized and usually do not contain a specified maturity date and may not be drawn upon to the total extent to which the Bank is committed.

BOE FINANCIAL SERVICES OF VIRGINIA, INC.

AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

issuing letters of credit is essentially the same as that involved in extending loan facilities to customers. The amount of collateral obtained, if deemed necessary by the Bank upon extension of credit, is based on management’s evaluation of the counterparty. Since most of the letters of credit are expected to expire without being drawn upon, they do not necessarily represent future cash requirements.

Note 15. Minimum Regulatory Capital Requirements

BOE (on a consolidated basis) and the Bank are subject to various regulatory capital requirements administered by the federal banking agencies. Failure to meet minimum capital requirements can initiate certain mandatory and possibly additional discretionary actions by regulators that, if undertaken, could have a direct material effect on BOE’s and Bank’s financial statements. Under capital adequacy guidelines and the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action, BOE and the Bank must meet specific capital guidelines that involve quantitative measures of their assets, liabilities and certain off-balance-sheet items as calculated under regulatory accounting practices. The capital amounts and classification are also subject to qualitative judgments by the regulators about components, risk weightings, and other factors. Prompt corrective action provisions are not applicable to bank holding companies

Quantitative measures established by regulation to ensure capital adequacy require BOE and the Bank to maintain minimum amounts and ratios (set forth in the table below) of total and Tier 1 capital (as defined in the regulations) to risk weighted assets (as defined), and of Tier 1 capital (as defined) to average assets (as defined). Management believes, as of May 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007, that BOE and Bank met all capital adequacy requirements to which they are subject.

As of December 31, 2007, the Bank was considered well capitalized under the regulatory capital guidelines. To be categorized as well capitalized, an institution must maintain minimum total risk-based, Tier 1 risk-based, and Tier 1 leverage ratios as set forth in the table. There are no conditions or events since that notification that management believes have changed the Bank’s category.

BOE’s and the Bank’s actual capital amounts and ratios as of March 31, 2008, the last quarter for which the calculation was made, and December 31, 2007, are presented in the table below. The amounts and ratios for BOE approximate the Bank totals.


	Actual					Minimum Capital Requirement					Minimum To Be Well Capitalized Under Prompt Corrective Action Provisions
	Amount		Ratio			Amount		Ratio			Amount		Ratio
	(dollars in thousands)
As of March 31, 2008:
Total Capital (to Risk Weighted Assets)	$	36,174		15.2	%	$	18,990		8.00	%	$	23,737		10.00	%
Tier 1 Capital (to Risk Weighted Assets)	$	33,932		14.3	%	$	9,495		4.00	%	$	14,242		6.00	%
Tier 1 Capital (to Average Assets)	$	33,932		11.0	%	$	12,316		4.00	%	$	15,394		5.00	%
As of December 31, 2007:
Total Capital (to Risk Weighted Assets)	$	36,076		15.7	%	$	18,415		8.00	%	$	23,018		10.00	%
Tier 1 Capital (to Risk Weighted Assets)	$	33,886		14.7	%	$	9,207		4.00	%	$	13,811		6.00	%
Tier 1 Capital (to Average Assets)	$	33,886		11.4	%	$	11,911		4.00	%	$	14,889		5.00	%

BOE FINANCIAL SERVICES OF VIRGINIA, INC.

AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 16. Fair Value of Financial Instruments and Interest Rate Risk

The fair value of a financial instrument is the current amount that would be exchanged between willing parties, other than in a forced liquidation. Fair value is best determined based upon quoted market prices. However, in many instances, there are no quoted market prices for BOE’s various financial instruments. In cases where quoted market prices are not available, fair values are based on estimates using present value or other valuation techniques. Those techniques are significantly affected by the assumptions used, including the discount rate and estimates of future cash flows. Accordingly, the fair value estimates may not be realized in an immediate settlement of the instrument. SFAS No. 107 excludes certain financial instruments and all nonfinancial instruments from its disclosure requirements. Accordingly, the aggregate fair value amounts presented may not necessarily represent the underlying fair value of BOE.

Expanded disclosures required by SFAS 157 include the establishment of three input levels in considering how fair value is applied.

Level 2 inputs are inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. If the asset or liability has a specified (contractual) term, a Level 2 input must be observable for substantially the full term of the asset or liability. In BOE’s banking environment, an example may be the difference between interest rates in effect at the contractual date as compared with those for similar financial assets and liabilities that are in effect at the measurement date, or BOE’s year end.

The following methods and assumptions were used to estimate the fair value of each class of financial instruments for which it is practicable to estimate that value:

Cash and Short-Term Investments

For those short-term instruments, the carrying amount is a reasonable estimate of fair value.

100

BOE FINANCIAL SERVICES OF VIRGINIA, INC.

AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Securities

For securities held for investment purposes, fair values are based on quoted market prices or dealer quotes.

Restricted Securities

The carrying value of restricted securities approximates their fair value based on the redemption provisions of the respective entity.

Loans held for sale

Loans held for sale are recorded at the lower of cost or fair value each reporting period, and are comprised of residential mortgages. These loans are held for a short period of time with the intention of being sold on the secondary market. Therefore, the fair value is determined on rates currently offered using observable market information, which does not deviate materially from the cost value. If there are any adjustments to record the loan at the lower of cost of market value, it would be reflected in the consolidated statements of income. It was determined that the cost value recorded at May 31, 2008 was similar to the fair value, and therefore no adjustment was necessary. Due to the observable market data available in pricing these loans held for sale, they were considered as Level 2.

Loans Receivable

Deposit Liabilities

Long-Term Borrowings

The fair values of BOE’s long-term borrowings are estimated using discounted cash flow analyses based on BOE’s current incremental borrowing rates for similar types of borrowing arrangements.

Accrued Interest

The carrying amounts of accrued interest approximate fair value.

Off-Balance-Sheet Financial Instruments

101

BOE FINANCIAL SERVICES OF VIRGINIA, INC.

AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

At May 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007, the fair values of loan commitments and stand-by letters of credit were deemed to be immaterial.

The carrying amounts and estimated fair values of BOE’s financial instruments are as follows:


	May 31, 2008				December 31, 2007
	Carrying Amount		Estimated Fair Value		Carrying Amount		Estimated Fair Value
	(in thousands)
Financial assets:
Cash and short-term investments	$	5,784	$	5,784	$	4,100	$	4,100
Securities		57,019		57,021		55,543		55,553
Restricted securities		1,879		1,879		1,761		1,761
Loans, net of allowance		231,330		231,986		219,451		226,180
Accrued interest receivable		1,624		1,624		1,514		1,514

Financial liabilities:
Deposits	$	256,382	$	257,374	$	244,593	$	247,083
Federal funds purchased		5,117		5,117		3,152		3,152
Federal Home Loan Bank advances		17,900		17,920		17,000		17,218
Trust preferred capital notes		4,124		4,010		4,124		4,164
Accrued interest payable		850		850		1,007		1,007

BOE assumes interest rate risk (the risk that general interest rate levels will change) as a result of its normal operations. As a result, the fair values of BOE’s financial instruments will change when interest rate levels change and that change may be either favorable or unfavorable to BOE. Management attempts to match maturities of assets and liabilities to the extent believed necessary to minimize interest rate risk. However, borrowers with fixed rate obligations are less likely to prepay in a rising rate environment and more likely to prepay in a falling rate environment. Conversely, depositors who are receiving fixed rates are more likely to withdraw funds before maturity in a rising rate environment and less likely to do so in a falling rate environment. Management monitors rates and maturities of assets and liabilities and attempts to minimize interest rate risk by adjusting terms of new loans and deposits and by investing in securities with terms that mitigate BOE’s overall interest rate risk.

102

BOE FINANCIAL SERVICES OF VIRGINIA, INC.

AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Assets and Liabilities recorded at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis

The table below presents the recorded amount of assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis (dollars in thousands):


May 31, 2008	Total		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
Investment securities available for sale
U.S. Treasury issue and U.S. Government Agencies	$	753	$	—	$	753	$	—
Mortgage-backed securities		13,139		—		13,139		—
Obligations of state and political subdivisions		38,620		—		38,620		—
Corporate and other bonds		1,101		—		1,101		—
Other equity securities		406		406		—		—

Total securities available for sale		54,019		406		53,613

Loans held for sale		706				706

Total assets at fair value	$	54,725	$	406	$	54,319	$	—

Total liabilities at fair value	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—

BOE had no level 3 assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis at May 31, 2008.

Assets and Liabilities measured at Fair Value on a Nonrecurring Basis

BOE may be required, from time to time, to measure certain assets at fair value on a nonrecurring basis in accordance with U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principals. These include assets which are measured at the lower of cost or market that were recognized at fair value fair value below cost at the end of the period. The table below presents the recorded amount of assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis (dollars in thousands):


May 31, 2008	Total		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
Financial assets:
Loans – impaired, net	$	1,093	$	—	$	—	$	1,093

Total assets at fair value	$	1,093	$	—	$	—	$	1,093

Total liabilities at fair value	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—

BOE had no level 1 or level 2 assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis at May 31, 2008.

Note 17. Trust Preferred Capital Notes

On December 12, 2003, BOE Statutory Trust I, a wholly-owned subsidiary of BOE, was formed for the purpose of issuing redeemable capital securities. On December 12, 2003, $4.1 million of trust preferred securities were issued through a direct placement. The securities have a LIBOR-indexed floating rate of interest. During the five months ended May 31, 2008 and the year ended December 31, 2007, the weighted-average interest rate was 6.95% and 8.70%. The securities have a mandatory redemption date of December 12, 2033 and are subject to varying call provisions beginning December 12, 2008. The principal asset of the Trust is $4.1 million of BOE’s junior subordinated debt securities with the like maturities and like interest rates to the capital securities.

The trust preferred notes may be included in Tier 1 capital for regulatory capital adequacy determination purposes up to 25% of Tier 1 capital after its inclusion. The portion of the trust preferred not considered as Tier 1 capital may be included in Tier 2 capital. At December 31, 2007, all trust preferred notes were included in Tier 1 capital.

103

BOE FINANCIAL SERVICES OF VIRGINIA, INC.

AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

The obligations of BOE with respect to the issuance of the Capital Securities constitute a full and unconditional guarantee by BOE of the Trust’s obligations with respect to the Capital Securities.

Subject to certain exceptions and limitations, BOE may elect from time to time to defer interest payments on the junior subordinated debt securities, which would result in a deferral of distribution payments on the related Capital Securities. BOE has not elected to defer any interest payments during the period ended May 31, 2008 or the year ended December 31, 2007.

Note 18. Parent Only Financial Statements

BOE Financial Services of Virginia, Inc. conducts no other business other than owning the stock of the Bank. Accordingly, the only significant asset of the Holding Company is its investment in the Bank and there are no liabilities.

Note 19. Subsequent Events

At the close of business on May 31, 2008, BOE merged with CBAC. The financial statements have been adjusted for all material subsequent events that have occurred since that day, as well as, additional information related to events that existed at that date.

104

ITEM 9A.

CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

As of the end of the period covered by this annual report, the Company’s management, with the participation of the Company’s chief executive officer and chief financial officer (“the Certifying Officers”), conducted evaluations of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures. As defined under Section 13a — 15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), the term “disclosure controls and procedures” means controls and other procedures of an issuer that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the issuer in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the Commission’s rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by an issuer in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to the issuer’s management, including the Certifying Officers, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures.

Based on this evaluation, the Certifying Officers have concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were not effective to ensure that material information is recorded, processed, summarized and reported by management of the Company on a timely basis in order to comply with the Company’s disclosure obligations under the Exchange Act and the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder. Such conclusion was based on errors related to the accrual of certain costs related to the goodwill acquired through the Company’s mergers with TFC and BOE, as described below. These officers believe that the corrections of these errors have been handled as contemplated by the requirement for disclosure controls and procedures under the Exchange Act.

Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

The management of the Company is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. The Company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed under the supervision of the Company’s chief executive officer and chief financial officer to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of the Company’s financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.

As of December 31, 2008, management assessed the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on the criteria for effective internal control over financial reporting established in “Internal Control — Integrated Framework,” issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations (“COSO”) of the Treadway Commission. This assessment included controls over the preparation of the schedules equivalent to the basic

105

financial statements in accordance with the instructions for the Consolidated Financial Statements for Bank Holding Companies (Form FR Y-9C) to meet the reporting requirements of Section 112 of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Improvement Act.

During its assessment, management identified the material weakness described below, which resulted in a material misstatement that created the need for the Company to restate its consolidated financial statements included on its Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q as of and for the period ended September 30, 2008. Subsequent to the filing of that Form 10-Q, management identified errors related to the Company’s accounting for the goodwill acquired through the Company’s mergers with TFC and BOE. The errors were based on the failure of the Company to reconcile merger-related goodwill on a regular basis and errors in the calculation of certain elements of goodwill and resulted in the entry of an amount in excess of the actual accrued merger costs. This material misstatement resulted in an overstatement of goodwill and retained earnings as of September 30, 2008. It also resulted in an understatement of salaries and employee benefits expense and an overstatement of net income, each by $375,000, for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008. Other errors resulted in the reclassification of material amounts on the balance sheet related to the business combination.

During the evaluation of these accounting errors, we concluded that they were the result of a material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting with respect to the accounting for non-routine transactions. A material weakness is a significant deficiency (as defined in the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board’s Auditing Standard No. 2), or combination of deficiencies, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement in the annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis by employees in the normal course of their work. Specifically, our policies and procedures did not provide for timely review of significant non-routine transactions and related accounting entries.

Furthermore, following the submission of the original Form 10-K filing, management determined that an additional material weakness, related to the omission from that filing of certain financial and other information related to the Company’s predecessors, existed as of December 31, 2008. Management determined that sufficient guidance existed at the date of the original filing in order for the Company to have been able to make the determination that the predecessors’ information should have been included in the Company’s original filing.

The Company assumed deposits and acquired certain assets from the FDIC, in its capacity as receiver of The Community Bank of Loganville, Georgia, on November 21, 2008. Such balances constituted approximately 22% of total assets and 27% of total deposits of the consolidated financial statement amounts as of December 31, 2008. As permitted by the Securities and Exchange Commission, management excluded the assumed deposits and liabilities and acquired assets from its assessment of the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2008.

Based on the assessment, which excluded The Community Bank acquisition, as described above, management determined that the Company did not maintain effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2008 because of the material weaknesses described above.

106

Elliott Davis, LLC, the independent registered public accounting firm that audited the consolidated financial statements of the Company included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, has issued an attestation report on management’s assessment of the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2008. The report is included in Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data”, above under the heading “Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.”

Remediation Steps to Address Material Weakness

As a result of the errors described above, we will restate certain financial statements included in our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2008. The errors occurred as a result of the miscalculations of accounting entries and did not result from any fraudulent activities. The errors were nonrecurring and noncash in nature. We continue to evaluate our financial accounting staff levels and expertise and are implementing appropriate oversight and review procedures. We believe that we are taking the necessary corrective actions to eliminate the material weakness.

Furthermore, following the original Form 10-K, we submitted amendments to the original Form 10-K filing to include the financial and other information related to the Company’s predecessors that applicable guidance required to be included in such filing. As a result, the Company has remediated the material weakness related to that specific issue.

There were no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act) that occurred during the quarter ended December 31, 2008, that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

107

PART IV

ITEM 15.

EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES

(a) The following documents are filed as part of this Form 10-K/A:

1. Consolidated Financial Statements. Reference is made to the Consolidated Financial Statements, the reports thereon and the notes thereto commencing at page 3 of this Form 10-K/A with respect to the Company and the Predecessor Entities.

2. Financial Statement Schedules. All supplemental schedules are omitted as inapplicable or because the required information is included in the Consolidated Financial Statements or notes thereto.

3. Exhibits


Exhibit No.		Description

2.1		Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of September 5, 2007, by and between Community Bankers Acquisition Corp. and TransCommunity Financial Corporation (1)

2.2		Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of December 13, 2007, by and between Community Bankers Acquisition Corp. and BOE Financial Services of Virginia, Inc. (2)

2.3		Purchase and Assumption Agreement, dated as of November 21, 2008, by and among the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, as Receiver for The Community Bank, Bank of Essex and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (3)

2.4		Purchase and Assumption Agreement, dated as of January 30, 2009, by and among the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, Receiver of Suburban Federal Savings Bank, Crofton, Maryland, Bank of Essex and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (4)

3.1		Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation (5)

3.2		Certificate of Designations for Fixed Rate Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock, Series A (6)

3.3		Amended and Restated Bylaws (7)

4.1		Specimen Unit Certificate (8)

4.2		Specimen Common Stock Certificate (8)

4.3		Specimen Warrant Certificate (8)

4.4		Form of Unit Purchase Option to be granted to the representatives (8)

108


Exhibit No.		Description

4.5		Form of Warrant Agreement between Continental Stock Transfer & Trust Company and Community Bankers Acquisition Corp. (9)

4.6		Warrant Clarification Agreement dated as of January 29, 2007 between the Company and Continental Stock Transfer and Trust Co. (10)

4.7		Unit Purchase Option Clarification Agreement dated as of January 29, 2007 between the Company and the holders (10)

4.8		Warrant to Purchase 780,000 Shares of Common Stock (6)

10.1		Investment Management Trust Agreement between Continental Stock Transfer & Trust Company and Community Bankers Acquisition Corp. (8)

10.2		Stock Escrow Agreement between Community Bankers Acquisition Corp., Continental Stock Transfer & Trust Company and the Initial Stockholders (9)

10.3		Registration Rights Agreement among Community Bankers Acquisition Corp. and the Initial Stockholders (9)

10.4		Letter Agreement, dated December 19, 2008, including the Securities Purchase Agreement – Standard Terms incorporated by reference therein, between the Company and the United States Department of the Treasury (6)

10.5		Employment Agreement between Community Bankers Acquisition Corp. and George M. Longest, Jr. (11)

10.6		Employment Agreement between Community Bankers Acquisition Corp. and Bruce E. Thomas (11)

10.7		Employment Agreement by and between TransCommunity Financial Corporation and Patrick J. Tewell (11)

10.8		Employment Agreement by and between TransCommunity Financial Corporation and M. Andrew McLean (11)

10.9		Change in Control Agreement by and between TransCommunity Financial Corporation and Patrick J. Tewell (11)

10.10		Change in Control Agreement by and between TransCommunity Financial Corporation and M. Andrew McLean (11)

10.11		Employment Agreement between Community Bankers Trust Corporation and Gary A. Simanson (12)

10.12		Form of Waiver, executed by each of George M. Longest, Bruce E. Thomas, Patrick J. Tewell, Gary A. Simanson and M. Andrew McLean (6)

10.13		Form of Letter Agreement, executed by each of George M. Longest, Bruce E. Thomas, Patrick J. Tewell, Gary A. Simanson and M. Andrew McLean with the Company (6)

10.14		Separation Agreement and Release between Community Bankers Trust Corporation and Bruce B. Nolte (13)

10.15		TransCommunity Financial Corporation 2001 Stock Option Plan, as amended and restated effective March 27, 2003 (14)

10.16		Form of Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement for Employee for TransCommunity Financial Corporation 2001 Stock Option Plan (15)

10.17		Form of Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement for Director for TransCommunity Financial Corporation 2001 Stock Option Plan (15)

10.18		TransCommunity Financial Corporation 2007 Equity Compensation Plan (16)

10.19		Form of Restricted Stock Award Agreement for TransCommunity Financial Corporation 2007 Equity Compensation Plan (17)

10.20		BOE Financial Services of Virginia, Inc. Stock Incentive Plan (18)

10.21		First Amendment to BOE Financial Services of Virginia, Inc.’s Stock Incentive Plan (19)

109


Exhibit No.		Description

10.22		BOE Financial Services of Virginia, Inc. Stock Option Plan for Outside Directors (18)

10.23		First Amendment to BOE Financial Services of Virginia, Inc. Stock Option Plan for Outside Directors (19)

21.1		Subsidiaries of Community Bankers Trust Corporation*

23.1		Consent of Rosen Seymour Shapss Martin & Company LLP**

23.2		Consent of Yount, Hyde & Barbour, P.C.**

23.3		Consent of Elliott Davis, LLC**

31.1		Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification for Chief Executive Officer*

31.2		Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification for Chief Financial Officer*

31.3		Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification for Chief Executive Officer (Amendment No. 1)*

31.4		Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification for Chief Financial Officer (Amendment No. 1)*

31.5		Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification for Chief Executive Officer (Amendment No. 2)*

31.6		Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification for Chief Financial Officer (Amendment No. 2)*

31.7		Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification for Chief Executive Officer (Amendment No. 3)*

31.8		Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification for Chief Financial Officer (Amendment No. 3)*

31.9		Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification for Chief Executive Officer (Amendment No. 4)**

31.10		Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification for Chief Financial Officer (Amendment No. 4)**

32.1		Section 1350 Certifications**

*	Previously filed.

**	Filed herewith.

(1)	Incorporated by reference to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on September 7, 2007 (File No. 001-32590).

(2)	Incorporated by reference to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on December 14, 2007 (File No. 001-32590).

(3)	Incorporated by reference to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on November 28, 2008 (File No. 001-32590).

(4)	Incorporated by reference to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on February 5, 2009 (File No. 001-32590).

(5)	Incorporated by reference to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June 5, 2008 (File No. 001-32590).

(6)	Incorporated by reference to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on December 23, 2008 (File No. 001-32590).

(7)	Incorporated by reference to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on July 1, 2008 (File No. 001-32590).

(8)	Incorporated by reference to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 or amendments thereto (File No. 333-124240).

(9)	Incorporated by reference to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on November 14, 2007 (File No. 001-32590).

(10)	Incorporated by reference to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on February 12, 2007 (File No. 001-32590).

(11)	Incorporated by reference to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K/A filed on July 28, 2008 (File No. 001-32590).

(12)	Incorporated by reference to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on November 14, 2008 (File No. 001-32590).

(13)	Incorporated by reference to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on August 1, 2008 (File No. 001-32590).

(14)	Incorporated by reference to TransCommunity Financial Corporation’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB filed on May 14, 2003 (File No. 000-33355).

110

(15)	Incorporated by reference to TransCommunity Financial Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-KSB filed on March 30, 2005 (File No. 000-33355).

(16)	Incorporated by reference to TransCommunity Financial Corporation’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on August 13, 2007 (File No. 000-33355).

(17)	Incorporated by reference to TransCommunity Financial Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on July 31, 2007 (File No. 000-33355).

(18)	Incorporated by reference to Exhibit A of the Proxy Statement included in BOE Financial Services of Virginia, Inc.’s Registration Statement on Form S-4 filed on March 24, 2000 (File No. 333-33260).

(19)	Incorporated by reference to BOE Financial Services of Virginia, Inc.’s Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed on November 8, 2000 (File No. 333-49538).

(b) Exhibits. See Item 15(a)3. above.

111

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.


	COMMUNITY BANKERS TRUST CORPORATION
	(Registrant)

Date: April 8, 2011	By:	/s/ Bruce E. Thomas
		Bruce E. Thomas
		Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

112