SCHEDULE 14A
Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
Filed by the Registrant ☐ Filed by a Party other than the Registrant ☒
Check the appropriate box:
☐ | Preliminary Proxy Statement | |
☐ | Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2)) | |
☐ | Definitive Proxy Statement | |
☒ | Definitive Additional Materials | |
☐ | Soliciting Material Pursuant to § 240.14a-12 |
INNOVIVA, INC.
(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)
Sarissa Capital Domestic Fund LP
Sarissa Capital Offshore Master Fund LP
Sarissa Capital Fund GP LLC
Sarissa Capital Fund GP LP
Sarissa Capital Offshore Fund GP LLC
Sarissa Capital Management GP LLC
Sarissa Capital Management LP
Dr. Alexander J. Denner
Mr. Mark DiPaolo
Mr. George W. Bickerstaff, III
Mr. Jules Haimovitz
Dr. Odysseas Kostas
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)
Payment of Filing Fee (check the appropriate box):
☒ | No fee required. | |||
☐ | Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rule 14a-6(i)(4) and 0-11. | |||
1) | Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:
| |||
2) | Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:
| |||
3) | Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):
| |||
4) | Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:
| |||
5) | Total fee paid:
| |||
☐ | Fee paid previously with preliminary materials. | |||
☐ | Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing. | |||
1) | Amount Previously Paid:
| |||
2) | Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:
| |||
3) | Filing Party:
| |||
4) | Date Filed:
|
On April 12, 2017, Sarissa Capital Management LP, together with the other Participants (as defined below), issued the following press release in connection with its solicitation of proxies for the 2017 annual meeting of shareholders of Innoviva, Inc. The Participants also posted the press release to www.dfking.com/INVA:
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
EGAN-JONES SUPPORTS ALL THREE SARISSA CAPITAL NOMINEES FOR INNOVIVA BOARD
************
All three proxy governance firms support Sarissa Capital
and recommend Innoviva shareholders VOTE ON THE GOLD CARD
All three proxy governance firms recommend that shareholders
VOTE AGAINST Innovivas executive compensation
Greenwich, CT, April 12, 2017 Sarissa Capital Management LP announced today that Egan-Jones, an influential independent proxy voting and corporate governance advisory firm, announced its support for all three Sarissa nominees to the Board of Directors of Innoviva, Inc. (NASDAQ: INVA) at its 2017 annual meeting to be held on April 20, 2017 at 8:30 a.m. EDT in Philadelphia.
| Egan-Jones recommends that Innoviva shareholders VOTE ON THE GOLD CARD FOR GEORGE BICKERSTAFF, JULES HAIMOVITZ and ODYSSEAS KOSTAS |
| Egan-Jones recommends that shareholders VOTE AGAINST INNOVIVAS EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION |
With the added support of Egan-Jones, all three independent proxy voting and corporate governance firms support Sarissa nominees and agree that Innoviva is in need of change. We urge shareholders to read the important analysis set forth in the Egan-Jones report.
Egan-Jones is justifiably critical of non-management directors Barbara Duncan, Catherine J. Friedman, Patrick G. LePore, Paul A. Pepe, James L. Tyree and William H. Waltrip. Egan-Jones states:
We believe that the independent directors fell short in their fiduciary duties in the process of Sarissas dialogue with Innoviva. As shown in the Background to the Solicitation, we believe that the CEO consciously blocked the Sarissas initiatives as shown by his attendance with the independent directors in the whole solicitation process. [Emphasis Added]
Egan-Jones is particularly critical of the NomGov Committee former chairman Paul A. Pepe and members Patrick G. LePore, James L. Tyree and William H. Waltrip. We have said all along that Innoviva was not interested in constructive dialogue and was attempting to mislead shareholders by suggesting otherwise. Egan-Jones notes that the NomGov Committee refused to engage with Sarissa:
We believe that the Companys corporate governance practices are flawed in particular how the Nominating Committee scouted for new directors. We believe that the Boards Nominating Committee failed to follow the due process in screening the candidates for directors and intentionally rejected Sarissas attempts to engage in a dialogue as shown by lack of meetings to discuss the qualifications of the nominees. [Emphasis Added]
Egan-Jones agrees that our nominees George Bickerstaff, Jules Haimovitz and Odysseas Kostas can help fix problems at Innoviva. These qualified nominees understand that shareholder capital must be optimized for the benefit of shareholders, not management, and will work hard to do so at Innoviva. In supporting each of Bickerstaff, Haimovitz and Kostas, Egan-Jones states:
We believe that the proposed new members of the Board will fix the Companys culture in misallocating its capital as evidenced by Innovivas operating expenses of approximately $25 million per year, or $1.8 million per employee versus excessive employee pay of nearly $14 million per year, or $1 million per employee. [Emphasis Added]
Egan-Jones further notes:
We believe that the proposed new members of the Board will bring new perspectives in fair compensation practices, policies and procedures that are centered on a competitive pay-for-performance culture and strongly aligned with the long-term interest of its shareholders. [Emphasis Added]
INNOVIVA DOES NOT MARKET OR SELL ANY DRUGS. IT JUST COLLECTS ROYALTIES.
SO WHY IS INNOVIVAS SPENDING AND COMPENSATION SO EXORBITANT?
IT IS TIME FOR INNOVIVA TO BE OPTIMIZED FOR SHAREHOLDERS.
Time is of the essence. We urge you to VOTE THE GOLD PROXY CARD to help us fix the problems at Innoviva. If you want to follow the recommendations of ISS, Glass Lewis and Egan-Jones and vote for Sarissa nominees YOU MUST VOTE ON THE GOLD CARD AND YOU CANNOT VOTE THE WHITE CARD. Returning a white card, even if you withhold on Innovivas nominees, will not be a vote for the Sarissa nominees, and it would revoke any vote you previously submitted on the GOLD CARD. PLEASE VOTE NOW by signing, dating and returning the GOLD proxy card or by voting by phone or internet.
If you have any questions regarding your GOLD proxy card or need assistance in voting, please contact our proxy solicitor:
D.F. KING & CO., INC.
STOCKHOLDERS CALL TOLLFREE: (800) 5496746
BANKS AND BROKERAGE FIRMS CALL: (212) 2695550
WWW.DFKING.COM/INVA.
Contacts:
Sarissa Capital Management LP Melinda Zech 203-302-2330
|
D.F. King & Co., Inc. Edward McCarthy or Peter Aymar 212-269-5550
|
- 2 -
CERTAIN INFORMATION CONCERNING THE PARTICIPANTS
ON MARCH 22, 2017, SARISSA CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LP (SARISSA), TOGETHER WITH THE OTHER PARTICIPANTS IN SARISSAS PROXY SOLICITATION (THE PARTICIPANTS), FILED A DEFINITIVE PROXY STATEMENT AND ACCOMPANYING GOLD PROXY CARD WITH THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION (THE SEC) TO BE USED TO SOLICIT PROXIES IN CONNECTION WITH THE 2017 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS OF INNOVIVA, INC. (THE COMPANY). STOCKHOLDERS ARE URGED TO READ THE DEFINITIVE PROXY STATEMENT AND OTHER DOCUMENTS RELATED TO THE SOLICITATION OF PROXIES FROM THE STOCKHOLDERS OF THE COMPANY BECAUSE THEY CONTAIN IMPORTANT INFORMATION, INCLUDING INFORMATION RELATING TO THE PARTICIPANTS. THE DEFINITIVE PROXY STATEMENT AND A FORM OF PROXY IS AVAILABLE TO STOCKHOLDERS OF THE COMPANY AT NO CHARGE AT THE SECS WEBSITE AT WWW.SEC.GOV. THE DEFINITIVE PROXY STATEMENT AND A FORM OF PROXY IS ALSO AVAILABLE BY CONTACTING SARISSAS PROXY SOLICITOR, D.F. KING & CO., INC., BY TELEPHONE AT THE FOLLOWING NUMBERS: STOCKHOLDERS CALL TOLLFREE: (800) 5496746 AND BANKS AND BROKERAGE FIRMS CALL: (212) 2695550, OR THROUGH THE INTERNET AT WWW.DFKING.COM/INVA
Consent of the author and publication to use the quotations contained in the material filed herewith as proxy soliciting material was neither sought nor obtained.
- 3 -