---

---

---

---

•

Technology - We have a history of successfully delivering a wide range of technology capabilities rapidly. We provide solutions for the arms control and the intelligence agencies and the DoD service arms, including the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency ("DARPA"). This group focuses largely on distributed autonomous capabilities and systems, tying software and data capabilities together. We were an early developer of the first full spectrum Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance ("ISR") capability and placed it in theater during recent conflicts.

•

Intelligence - We offer intelligence services and solutions and are deeply embedded in our customer's most important missions. We provide systems development and operations support around the globe. We have over a decade of experience dealing with large data ingest, structured and unstructured data, modern cloud processing tools and agile development. We are supporting the army's migration of intelligence applications and infrastructure into the cloud and are providing cloud computing architectures to the intelligence and the defense communities.

•	Cybersecurity - We offer cybersecurity solutions that detect and manage the most sophisticated cyber threats. Our solutions include key management systems to protect transmitted data, development tools to exploit cyber intelligence, and programs to build comprehensive situational awareness on our nation's military and intelligence networks.

•	Federal Health - We developed, fielded and currently maintain a full end-to-end EHR system and numerous behavior health services - healthcare beyond the clinic - for the DoD. Within the DoD, we serve the Defense Health Agency, which provides healthcare to active duty and retired military personnel and their

---

•

Commercial Health - We implement and optimize Electronic Health Record ("EHR") systems at commercial hospitals. In addition, we provide consulting services and operational support focused on high-level initiatives including health care legislation for Meaningful Use and ICD-10 transition, IT strategy, revenue cycle management, accountable care transformation, risk management, technology infrastructure, and project management. Our teams are staffed with clinical subject matter experts who draw upon their deep experience and knowledge of healthcare and IT systems.

•

Life Sciences - We provide Life Science research and development support to the National Institute of Health, Center for Disease Control, Army Medical Research community, commercial biotech companies and the Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research where we employ about 1,800 scientists, technicians, administrators, and support staff. Our professionals operate a wide range of leading-edge research and development laboratories in the areas of genetics and genomics, proteins and proteomics, advanced biomedical computing and information technology, biopharmaceutical development and manufacturing, nanotechnology characterization, and clinical trials management.

•

Process Industries Engineering - We provide process industries engineering services and solutions to a large US market for capital improvement programs for key clients across a number of industries, including mid-tier refineries and large industrial companies. We exploit use of Building Information Modeling as a design tool and to manage the complexities of the systems we design and build. Our leadership in the use of these tools allows us to manage and design complex process systems as efficiently as possible.

•

Security Products - We provide security products, services and solutions that leverage our design, integration and process engineering technologies to build small footprint, minimally-intrusive secure commerce systems for our customers. Our VACIS systems enable the rapid scanning of vehicles and cargo using patented technology that produces a high-quality image using a low radiation dose while using less space and processing higher volumes of cars and trucks than other scanning systems. Our Reveal line of explosive detection systems for checked airline baggage pioneered the “reduced size” segment of this market, with small, flexible systems that can be installed at airport check-in counters. We also have a line of radiation detection systems, which are used today at ports, border crossings, and industrial facilities around the world - including most ports and border crossings in the United States.

•

Power Grid Engineering - We provide power grid engineering services and solutions to a broad customer set and have unique offerings including a Smart Grid as a Service ("SGS") solution. We are working with energy companies to develop analytical products that fully exploit the data enabled by smart grid technology. We provide engineering and consulting to electric utilities and transmission companies. Our focus is on engineering design of the grid from distribution through transmission, and significant substation design and upgrade work. We provide physical and cybersecurity for our utility customers as part of our substantive offerings. We also administer energy efficiency programs for states and utilities and provide an array of consulting services for utilities.

---

•

Federal Environmental and Engineering - We provide consulting and engineering, primarily for the DoD. We support the requirements of the National Environmental Policy Act ("NEPA") as well as other permitting activities. We also have specialty consulting associated with specific environmental issues, such as underwater environmental issues, radiologic clean up, risk assessment training ranges and other specific needs. We support site cleanup and remediation efforts. The other portion of this business is engineering design and build, where we design high-content facilities such as unique testing facilities and training centers.

•

Transaction and Valuation Consulting - We provide transaction and asset valuation services for the power industry. Our primary customers are the large lending institutions that require a comprehensive assessment of proposed projects for financing. Our analysts study technologies, designs, operational plans, fuel needs and financial trends in power markets to evaluate the viability of projects. We also provide oversight work at projects site on behalf of lenders or owners.

•

In fiscal 2014, we gained 100% control of a special purpose limited liability company, Plainfield Renewable Energy LLC ("Plainfield"), formed to create a renewable energy project. The Plainfield Renewable Energy Project involves the design, construction, and financing of a 37.5 megawatt biomass-fueled power plant in Plainfield, Connecticut. The acquisition was effected by a consensual foreclosure agreement pursuant to which the project owners agreed to transfer to us all of their equity interest in Plainfield in full satisfaction of certain secured obligations owed by the project owner to us. The foreclosure agreement constituted a change in control and was accounted for as a business combination.

•

In fiscal 2013, we acquired maxIT Healthcare Holdings, Inc. ("maxIT"), a provider of clinical, business and information technology services primarily to commercial hospital groups and other medical delivery organizations. This acquisition by our Health and Engineering segment expanded our commercial consulting practice in Electronic Health Record ("EHR") implementation and optimization and strengthened our capabilities to provide these services to our federal healthcare customers as those customers migrate to commercial off-the-shelf EHR applications.

•	In fiscal 2012, we acquired Vitalize Consulting Solutions, Inc. ("Vitalize"), a provider of clinical, business and information technology services for healthcare enterprises. This acquisition by our Health and Engineering segment expanded our capabilities in both federal and commercial markets to help customers address EHR implementation and optimization demand.

---

•

In fiscal 2011, we acquired Reveal Imaging Technologies, Inc. ("Reveal"), a provider of threat detection products and services. This acquisition by our Health and Engineering segment enhanced our homeland security solutions portfolio by adding U.S. Transportation Security Administration certified explosive detection systems for checked baggage screening to our passenger and cargo inspections systems product offerings.

•	In fiscal 2014, we committed to plans to dispose of Cloudshield, which was historically included in our National Security Solutions segment, primarily focused on producing a suite of cybersecurity hardware and associated software and services. The sale transaction was completed in February 2015.

•	In fiscal 2013, we completed the sale of certain components of our business, which were historically included in our Health and Engineering segment, primarily focused on providing operational test and evaluation services to U.S. Government customers.

•	In fiscal 2012, we completed the sale of certain components of our business which were historically included in our Health and Engineering segment, primarily focused on providing information technology services to international oil and gas companies.

---

•	Employees are inspired to make a difference. We solve the world’s toughest problems; connect cross-enterprise knowledge and technology; and unlock creativity and innovation by embracing differences.

•	Employees are passionate about customer success. We make customer needs our own; create market-leading solutions; and deliver superior results.

•	Employees are united as a team. We behave with ethics and integrity; trust one another; collaborate and share ideas; and create value for our employees, shareholders and communities.

---

•	the engineering and technical services divisions of large defense contractors that provide U.S. Government IT services in addition to other hardware systems and products, including companies such as The Boeing Company, General Dynamics Corporation, Lockheed Martin Corporation, Northrop Grumman Corporation, BAE Systems plc, L-3 Communications Corporation and Raytheon Company;

•	contractors focused principally on technical services, including U.S. Government IT services, such as Booz Allen Hamilton Inc., Engility Holdings, Inc., CACI International Inc, ManTech International Corporation, Serco Group plc, SRA International, Inc. and MITRE Corporation;

•	diversified commercial and U.S. Government IT providers, such as Accenture plc, Computer Sciences Corporation ("CSC"), HP Enterprise Services, International Business Machines Corporation ("IBM") and Unisys Corporation;

•	contractors that provide engineering, consulting, design and construction services, such as Jacobs Engineering Group, URS Corporation, KBR, Inc. and CH2M Hill Companies Ltd.;

•	contractors focused on supplying homeland security product solutions, including American Science and Engineering, Inc., OSI Systems, Inc., L-3 Communications Corporation, General Electric Company and Smiths Group plc;

•	contractors providing supply chain management and other logistics services, including Agility Logistics Corp.; and

•	companies focused on providing health solutions and services to the U.S. Government and hospitals, including Accenture, IBM, CSC, Cerner Corporation, Epic Systems and Allscripts.

---

•

Single Award Contracts. U.S. Government agencies may procure services and products through single award contracts which specify the scope of services or products purchased and identify the contractor that will provide the specified services or products. When an agency has a requirement, the agency will issue a solicitation or request for proposal to which interested contractors can submit a proposal. The process of issuing solicitations or request for proposals and evaluating contractor bids requires the agency to maintain a large, professional procurement staff and the bidding and selection process can take a year or more to complete. For the contractor, this method of contracting may provide greater certainty of the timing and amounts to be received at the time of contract award because it generally results in the customer contracting for a specific scope of services or products from the single successful awardee.

•

Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quantity ("IDIQ") Contracts. The U.S. Government uses IDIQ contracts to obtain commitments from contractors to provide certain services or products on pre-established terms and conditions. The U.S. Government then issues task orders under the IDIQ contracts to purchase the specific services or products it needs. IDIQ contracts are awarded to one or more contractors following a competitive procurement process. Under a single-award IDIQ contract, all task orders under that contract are awarded to one pre-selected contractor. Under a multiple-award IDIQ contract, task orders can be awarded to any of the pre-selected contractors, which can result in further limited competition for the award of task orders. Multiple-award IDIQ contracts that are open for any government agency to use for procurement are commonly referred to as “government-wide acquisition contracts”. IDIQ contracts often have multi-year terms and unfunded ceiling amounts, therefore enabling, but not committing, the U.S. Government to purchase substantial amounts of services or products from one or more contractors. At the time an IDIQ contract is awarded (prior to the award of any task orders), a contractor may have limited or no visibility as to the ultimate amount of services or products that the U.S. Government will purchase under the contract, and in the case of a multiple-award IDIQ, the contractor from which such purchases may be made.

•

U.S. General Services Administration ("GSA") Schedule Contracts. The GSA maintains listings of approved suppliers of services and products with agreed-upon prices for use throughout the U.S. Government. In order for a company to provide services under a GSA Schedule contract, a company must be pre-qualified and awarded a contract by the GSA. When an agency uses a GSA Schedule contract to meet its requirements, the agency, or the GSA on behalf of the agency, conducts the procurement. The user agency, or the GSA on its behalf, evaluates the user agency’s requirements and initiates a competition limited to GSA Schedule qualified contractors. GSA Schedule contracts are designed to provide the user agency with reduced procurement time and lower procurement costs. Similar to IDIQ contracts, at the time a GSA Schedule contract is awarded, a contractor may have limited or no visibility as to the ultimate amount of services or products that the U.S. Government will purchase under the contract.

---

•

Cost-reimbursement contracts provide for reimbursement of our direct contract costs and allocable indirect costs, plus a fee. This type of contract is generally used when uncertainties involved in contract performance do not permit costs to be estimated with sufficient accuracy to use a fixed-price contract. Cost-reimbursement contracts generally subject us to lower risk, but generally require us to use our best efforts to accomplish the scope of the work within a specified time and amount of costs.

•

Time-and-materials ("T&M") contracts typically provide for negotiated fixed hourly rates for specified categories of direct labor plus reimbursement of other direct costs. This type of contract is generally used when there is uncertainty of the extent or duration of the work to be performed by the contractor at the time of contract award or it is not possible to anticipate costs with any reasonable degree of confidence. On T&M contracts, we assume the risk of providing appropriately qualified staff to perform these contracts at the hourly rates set forth in the contracts over the period of performance of the contracts.

•

Fixed-price-level-of-effort ("FP-LOE") contracts are substantially similar to T&M contracts except they require a specified level of effort over a stated period of time on work that can be stated only in general terms. This type of contract is generally used when the contractor is required to perform an investigation or study in a specific research and development area and to provide a report showing the results achieved based on the level of effort. Payment is based on the effort expended rather than the results achieved.

•

Firm-fixed-price ("FFP") contracts provide for a fixed price for specified products, systems and/or services. This type of contract is generally used when the government acquires products and services on the basis of reasonably definitive specifications and which have a determinable fair and reasonable price. These contracts offer us potential increased profits if we can complete the work at lower costs than planned. While FFP contracts allow us to benefit from cost savings, these contracts also increase our exposure to the risk of cost overruns.

---

•	require certification and disclosure of all cost and pricing data in connection with certain contract negotiations;

•	define allowable and unallowable costs and otherwise govern our right to reimbursement under various cost-based U.S. Government contracts;

•	require compliance with U.S. Government Cost Accounting Standards ("CAS");

•	require reviews by the Defense Contract Audit Agency ("DCAA"), Defense Contract Management Agency ("DCMA") and other U.S. Government agencies of compliance with government standards for a contractor’s business systems;

•	restrict the use and dissemination of information classified for national security purposes and the export of certain products and technical data; and

•	require us not to compete for work if an organizational conflict of interest, as defined by these laws and regulations, related to such work exists and/or cannot be appropriately mitigated.

---

---

---

•	the FAR and supplements, which regulate the formation, administration and performance of U.S. Government contracts;

•	the Truth in Negotiations Act, which requires certification and disclosure of cost and pricing data in connection with certain contract negotiations;

•	the Procurement Integrity Act, which regulates access to competitor bid and proposal information and government source selection information and our ability to provide compensation to certain former government officials;

•	the Civil False Claims Act, which provides for substantial civil penalties for violations, including for submission of a false or fraudulent claim to the U.S. Government for payment or approval; and

•	the U.S. Government Cost Accounting Standards, which impose accounting requirements that govern our right to reimbursement under certain cost-based U.S. Government contracts.

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

•	we may not be able to identify, compete effectively for or complete suitable acquisitions and investments at prices we consider attractive;

•	we may not be able to accurately estimate the financial effect of acquisitions and investments on our business and we may not realize anticipated synergies or acquisitions may not result in improved operating performance;

•	we may encounter performance problems with acquired technologies, capabilities and products, particularly with respect to those that are still in development when acquired;

•	we may have trouble retaining key employees and customers of an acquired business or otherwise integrating such businesses, such as incompatible accounting, information management, or other control systems, which could result in unforeseen difficulties;

•	we may assume material liabilities that were not identified as part of our due diligence or for which we are unable to receive a purchase price adjustment or reimbursement through indemnification;

•	we may assume legal or regulatory risks, particularly with respect to smaller businesses that have immature business processes and compliance programs;

•	acquired entities or joint ventures may not operate profitably, which could adversely affect our operating income or operating margins and we may be unable to recover investments in any such acquisitions;

•	acquisitions, investments and joint ventures may require us to spend a significant amount of cash or to issue capital stock, resulting in dilution of ownership; and

•	we may not be able to effectively influence the operations of our joint ventures or we may be exposed to certain liabilities if our joint venture partners do not fulfill their obligations.

---

---

---

---

---

---

•	Our certificate of incorporation provides that our bylaws and certain provisions of our certificate of incorporation may be amended by only two-thirds or more voting power of all of the outstanding shares entitled to vote. These supermajority voting requirements could impede our stockholders’ ability to make changes to our certificate of incorporation and bylaws.

•

Our certificate of incorporation contains certain supermajority voting provisions, which generally provide that mergers and certain other business combinations between us and a related person be approved by the holders of securities having at least 80% of our outstanding voting power, as well as by the holders of a majority of the voting power of such securities that are not owned by the related person.

•	Our stockholders may not act by written consent. As a result, a holder, or holders, controlling a majority of our capital stock are limited in their ability to take certain actions other than in connection with its annual stockholders’ meeting or a special meeting called at the request of qualified stockholders as provided in our certificate of incorporation and bylaws.

•	Our board of directors may issue, without stockholder approval, shares of undesignated preferred stock. The ability to authorize undesignated preferred stock makes it possible for our board of directors to issue preferred stock with voting or other rights or preferences that could impede the success of any attempt to acquire us.

•	developments in the U.S. Government defense budget, including budget reductions, sequestration, implementation of spending limits or changes in budgetary priorities, or delays in the U.S. Government budget process or approval of raising the debt ceiling;

---

•	delays in the U.S. Government contract procurement process or the award of contracts and delays or loss of contracts as a result of competitor protests;

•	changes in U.S. Government procurement rules, regulations, and practices;

•	our compliance with various U.S. Government and other government procurement rules and regulations;

•	governmental reviews, audits and investigations of our company;

•	our ability to effectively compete and win contracts with the U.S. Government and other customers;

•	our reliance on information technology spending by hospitals/health care organizations;

•	our reliance on infrastructure investments by industrial and natural resources organizations;

•	energy efficiency and alternative energy sourcing investments;

•	investments by U.S. Government and commercial organizations in environment impact and remediation projects;

•	our ability to attract, train and retain skilled employees, including our management team, and to obtain security clearances for our employees;

•	our ability to accurately estimate costs associated with our firm-fixed-price and other contracts;

•	our ability to comply with certain agreements entered into in connection with the CityTime matter;

•	resolution of legal and other disputes with our customers and others or legal or regulatory compliance issues;

•	cybersecurity, data security or other security threats, system failures or other disruptions of our business;

•	our ability to effectively acquire businesses and make investments;

•	our ability to maintain relationships with prime contractors, subcontractors and joint venture partners;

•	our ability to manage performance and other risks related to customer contracts, including complex engineering or design build projects;

•	the failure of our inspection or detection systems to detect threats;

•	the adequacy of our insurance programs designed to protect us from significant product or other liability claims;

•	our ability to manage risks associated with our international business;

•	our ability to declare future dividends based on our earnings, financial condition, capital requirements and other factors, including compliance with applicable law and our agreements;

•	risks associated with the spin-off of our technical, engineering and enterprise information technology services business, such as unknown liabilities and risks associated with joint performance;

•	our ability to grow our commercial health and engineering businesses, which could be negatively affected by budgetary constraints faced by hospitals and by developers of energy and infrastructure projects; and

•	our ability to execute our business plan and long-term management initiatives effectively and to overcome these and other known and unknown risks that we face.

---

---

---

---

---

---

(1)	The total number of shares purchased includes: (i) shares surrendered to satisfy statutory tax withholdings obligations related to vesting of restricted stock awards; and (ii) shares surrendered in payment of the exercise price of non-qualified stock options and/or to satisfy statutory tax withholdings obligations.

(2)	We may repurchase up to 20 million shares of Leidos common stock under the 2013 Stock Repurchase Program, which was publicly announced in December 2013.

---

(1)	References to financial data are to the Company's continuing operations, unless otherwise noted. The operating results of the spin-off of New SAIC are included in discontinued operations.

(2)	Fiscal 2015 results include goodwill impairment charges of $486 million, intangible asset impairment charges of $41 million and a tangible asset impairment charge of $40 million. For further information see, Note 4 "Goodwill and Intangible assets" and Note 3 "Acquisitions" of the combined notes to the consolidated financial statements contained within this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

(3)	Fiscal 2014 results include charges related to intangible asset impairments ($51 million), bad debt expense ($44 million), and separation transaction and restructuring expenses ($65 million). For further information see, Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

(4)	Fiscal 2012 results include a $540 million loss provision recorded in connection with resolution of the CityTime matter described in Note 19 "Legal Proceedings" of the combined notes to consolidated financial statements contained within this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

---

---

•	Achieving internal, or non-acquisition related, annual revenue growth through internal collaboration and better leveraging of key differentiators across our company and the deployment of resources and investments into higher growth markets;

•	Increasing the growth of our operating profits through improving the quality of our revenues and contract profitability, continued improvement in our information technology ("IT") systems infrastructure and related business processes for greater effectiveness and efficiency across all business functions; and

•	Disciplined deployment of our cash resources and use of our capital structure to enhance shareholder value while retaining an appropriate amount of financial leverage, through internal growth initiatives, stock repurchases, dividends, strategic acquisitions, debt level management and other uses to achieve our goals.

•	Revenues for fiscal 2015 decreased 12% from the prior year. The revenue contraction for the year was due to a decrease in National Security Solutions segment revenues of 11% and Health and Engineering segment revenues of 14%.

•

Operating loss from continuing operations was $214 million for fiscal 2015 as compared to an operating income from continuing operations of $163 million for fiscal 2014. The operating loss from continuing operations in fiscal 2015 included $486 million of goodwill impairment charges, $41 million of intangible asset impairment charges and $40 million of a tangible asset impairment charge. The operating income from continuing operations in fiscal 2014 included $65 million of separation transaction and restructuring expenses, $51 million of intangible asset impairment charges, $44 million of bad debt expense primarily related to receivables for two energy design-build construction projects, and $35 million of infrastructure costs to establish two stand-alone companies.

•

Diluted loss per share from continuing operations for fiscal 2015 was $4.46 as compared to diluted earnings per share from continuing operations of $0.98 in fiscal 2014 primarily due to the aforementioned reductions in operating income from continuing operations of $377 million. In addition, there was a decrease in the diluted weighted average number of shares outstanding of 9 million shares, or 11%, primarily due to shares repurchased under our accelerated stock repurchase programs.

•	Cash and cash equivalents increased $13 million during fiscal 2015 primarily due to cash provided by operations of $396 million and $80 million proceeds from the U.S. Treasury cash grant, partially offset by debt repurchase payments of $175 million, stock repurchases of $215 million, and dividend payments of $95 million.

•	Net bookings (as defined in “Key Performance Measures—Bookings and Backlog”) were approximately $3.6 billion for fiscal 2015, as compared to $4.9 billion in the prior year. Total backlog was $7.8 billion and $9.3 billion at January 30, 2015 and January 31, 2014, respectively.

---

---

---

---

•

Funded Backlog. Funded backlog for contracts with government agencies primarily represents contracts for which funding is appropriated less revenues previously recognized on these contracts, and does not include the unfunded portion of contracts where funding is incrementally appropriated or authorized on a quarterly or annual basis by the U.S. Government and other customers, even though the contract may call for performance over a number of years. Funded backlog for contracts with non-government agencies and commercial customers represents the estimated value on contracts, which may cover multiple future years, under which we are obligated to perform, less revenues previously recognized on these contracts.

•

Negotiated Unfunded Backlog. Negotiated unfunded backlog represents estimated amounts of revenue to be earned in the future from (1) negotiated contracts for which funding has not been appropriated or otherwise authorized and (2) unexercised priced contract options. Negotiated unfunded backlog does not include future potential task orders expected to be awarded under IDIQ, GSA Schedule, or other master agreement contract vehicles.

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

(1)	As a result of executing the interest rate swap agreements, the carrying value of $466 million includes a fair value adjustment of $17 million attributable to changes in the benchmark interest rate, the six-month LIBOR rate, from the inception of the interest rate swap agreements to January 30, 2015.

---

---

(1)	Includes total interest payments on our outstanding debt of $63 million in fiscal 2016 through 2020 and $670 million in fiscal 2021 and thereafter. The total interest payments on our outstanding debt are calculated based on the stated fixed rates of the senior unsecured notes and do not reflect the variable interest component due to the interest rate swap agreements.

(2)

Other long-term liabilities were allocated by fiscal year as follows: a liability for our foreign defined benefit pension plan is based upon the expected near-term contributions to the plan (for a discussion of potential changes in these pension obligations, see Note 15 of the combined notes to consolidated financial statements contained within this Annual Report on Form 10-K); liabilities under deferred compensation arrangements are based upon the average annual payments in prior years upon termination of employment by participants; and other liabilities are based on the fiscal year that the liabilities are expected to be realized. The table above does not include income tax liabilities for uncertain tax positions of $6 million and $4 million of additional tax liabilities, as we are not able to reasonably estimate the timing of payments in individual years due to uncertainties in the timing of audit outcomes and when settlements will become due.

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

(1)	The following equity compensation plans approved by security holders are included in this plan category: the 2006 Equity Incentive Plan and the 2006 Employee Stock Purchase Plan.

(2)

Represents (i) 2,429,467 shares of Leidos common stock reserved for future issuance for performance-based awards assuming achievement of the target level of performance for unearned performance-based awards (does not include an additional 63,531 shares if the maximum level of performance is achieved) and other stock awards under the 2006 Equity Incentive Plan, (ii) 287,687 shares of Leidos common stock issuable pursuant to dividend equivalent rights and (iii) 3,581,216 shares of Leidos common stock reserved for future issuance upon the exercise of outstanding options awarded under the 2006 Equity Incentive Plan. Does not include shares to be issued pursuant to purchase rights under the 2006 Employee Stock Purchase Plan.

(3)	Does not include shares to be issued for performance-based and other stock awards and shares of stock issuable pursuant to dividend equivalent rights, which will not require any payment upon issuance of those shares.

(4)

Represents 12,488,011 shares of Leidos common stock under the 2006 Employee Stock Purchase Plan and 3,782,915 shares of Leidos common stock under the 2006 Equity Incentive Plan. The maximum number of shares initially available for issuance under the 2006 Employee Stock Purchase Plan was 2.3 million. The 2006 Employee Stock Purchase Plan provides for an automatic increase to the share reserve on the first day of each fiscal year beginning on February 1, 2007 in an amount equal to the lesser of (i) 2.3 million shares, (ii) two percent of the number of shares of Leidos common stock outstanding on the last day of the immediately preceding fiscal year or (iii) a number determined by the compensation committee of the board of directors. The 2006 Equity Incentive Plan was amended in June 2012 to provide that the maximum number of shares available for issuance thereunder is 12.5 million. Those shares (i) that are issued under the 2006 Equity Incentive Plan that are forfeited or repurchased at the original purchase price or less or that are issuable upon exercise of awards granted under the plan that expire or become unexercisable for any reason after their grant date without having been exercised in full, (ii) that are withheld from an option or stock award pursuant to a Company-approved net exercise provision, or (iii) that are not delivered to or are award shares surrendered by a holder in consideration for applicable tax withholding will continue to be available for issuance under the plan.

(5)	The Stock Compensation Plan and the Management Stock Compensation Plan have not been approved by security holders and are included in this plan category. These plans do not provide for a maximum number of shares available for future issuance.

---

---

---

---

---

*	Executive Compensation Plans and Arrangements

†	Confidential treatment has been granted with respect to certain portions of these exhibits.

††	Confidential treatment has been requested with respect to certain portions of this exhibit.

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

(1)	As a result of executing the interest rate swap agreements, the carrying value of $466 million includes a fair value adjustment of $17 million attributable to changes in the benchmark interest rate, the six-month LIBOR rate, from the inception of the interest rate swap agreements to January 30, 2015.

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

(1)	Income (loss) from continuing operations and net income relate to Leidos Holdings, Inc. only. See Leidos, Inc.'s amounts detailed below

(2)	Earnings (loss) per share from continuing operations are computed independently for each of the quarters presented and therefore may not sum to the total for the fiscal year.

(3)	Fiscal 2015 quarterly results include goodwill impairment charges of $486 million in the second quarter, intangible asset impairment charges of $24 million and $17 million in the second and third quarter, respectively, and a tangible asset impairment charge of $40 million in the fourth quarter. For further information see, Note 3 - Acquisitions and Note 4 - Goodwill and Intangible Assets.

(4)

Fiscal 2014 quarterly results include the following charges: 1) intangible asset impairment charges of $30 million and $19 million in the second and third quarter, respectively; 2) bad debt expense for certain receivables related to two energy design-build construction projects of $42 million in the third quarter; and 3) separation transaction and restructuring expenses in each of the quarters of approximately $14 million, $19 million, $25 million, and $7 million, respectively. For further information see, Note 1 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies and Note 4 - Goodwill and Intangible Assets.

---