================================================================================
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
-----------------
FORM 10-K
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended Commission file number
December 31, 2001 0-18694
CATELLUS DEVELOPMENT
CORPORATION
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware 94-2953477
(State or other
jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or
organization) Identification No.)
201 Mission Street
San Francisco, California 94105
(Address of principal executive offices and zip code)
Registrant's telephone number, including area code:
(415) 974-4500
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Name of each exchange on
Title of each class which registered
------------------- ----------------
Common Stock, $.01 par New York and Chicago
value per share Stock Exchanges, and
Pacific Exchange
Preferred Share Purchase New York and Chicago
Rights Stock Exchanges, and
Pacific Exchange
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports
required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such
filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes [X] No [_]
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item
405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to
the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information
statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any
amendment to this Form 10-K. [_]
The aggregate market value of the voting stock held by non-affiliates of the
Registrant was approximately $1.687 billion on March 7, 2002.
As of March 7, 2002, there were 86,666,897 issued and outstanding shares of
the Registrant's Common Stock.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Portions of the Registrant's Proxy Statement for the 2002 Annual Meeting of
Stockholders are incorporated by reference in Part III.
================================================================================
PART I
Item 1. Business
Catellus Development Corporation (the "Company") is a diversified real
estate operating company with a significant portfolio of rental properties and
developable land. Operations consist primarily of the management, acquisition,
development, and sale of real estate. Our rental properties provide us with a
relatively consistent source of earnings. Our development activities provide
cash flow through sales of land or the conversion of our developable land to
property that is either added to our rental portfolio or sold to tenants,
developers, or other users. We invest in new land to ensure our potential for
growth.
We have four primary lines of business: (1) Asset Management Group, which
provides management and leasing services for our rental portfolio; (2)
Commercial Group, which acquires and develops suburban commercial business
parks for our own rental portfolio or for sale to third parties; (3)
Residential Group, which acquires and develops suburban residential communities
and sells finished lots to homebuilders; and (4) Urban Group, which develops
large urban mixed-use sites for our own rental portfolio or for sale to third
parties.
Our company was originally formed to conduct the non-railroad real estate
activities of the Santa Fe Pacific Corporation and was spun off to stockholders
in 1990. Our railroad heritage has given us a diverse base of developable
properties located near transportation corridors in major urban areas. Over
time, these properties have proven suitable for a variety of product types
(industrial, retail, office, and residential). In addition, we had expanded our
business by acquiring land suitable for similar development. We are a
traditional corporation rather than a real estate investment trust ("REIT");
thus, we may reinvest our earnings without the minimum dividend requirements of
a REIT.
Our principal office is located at 201 Mission Street, San Francisco,
California 94105; our telephone number at that location is (415) 974-4500; and
our website address is www.catellus.com.
Property Portfolio
Rental Portfolio
Our rental portfolio is comprised of commercial buildings, ground leases,
and interests in several joint ventures. We own 30.9 million square feet of
industrial, office, and retail rental buildings. Since the end of 1995, our
portfolio has expanded by more than 16 million square feet (120%), primarily
through our development process. Approximately 36% of these properties, by
square footage, are located in Southern California, 20% in Northern California,
16% in Illinois, 11% in Texas, 6% in Colorado, 4% in Arizona, with the
remainder in seven other states. We also own approximately 8,000 acres of land
subject to leases and approximately 761,000 square feet of interim-use rental
properties intended for development by our Urban Group.
The following table provides information on our rental portfolio:
Number of
Buildings Square Feet Owned Net Book Value
-------------- -------------------- ----------------------------------
December 31, December 31, December 31,
-------------- -------------------- ----------------------------------
2001 2000 1999 2001 2000 1999 2001 2000 1999
---- ---- ---- ------ ------ ------ ---------- ---------- ----------
(In thousands)
Rental Portfolio
Industrial...................... 187 198 200 27,594 26,251 22,240 $ 943,340 $ 874,168 $ 739,158
Office.......................... 27 24 24 2,442 1,625 1,622 297,707 205,179 200,760
Retail.......................... 19 21 20 864 880 881 96,263 94,085 92,946
Ground and other leases......... -- -- -- -- -- -- 142,913 92,803 64,071
Operating joint ventures........ -- -- -- -- -- -- (13,026) (16,092) (2,916)
--- --- --- ------ ------ ------ ---------- ---------- ----------
Subtotal..................... 233 243 244 30,900 28,756 24,743 1,467,197 1,250,143 1,094,019
=== === === ====== ====== ======
Accumulated depreciation..... (325,130) (287,039) (264,213)
---------- ---------- ----------
Total........................ $1,142,067 $ 963,104 $ 829,806
========== ========== ==========
2
Developable Land Inventory
We have developable land capable of supporting up to an estimated 42.7
million square feet of commercial development and approximately 10,200 units of
residential development as of December 31, 2001. Approximately 97% of the total
commercial development potential and 99% of the potential residential lots are
entitled. Approximately 69% of the total commercial development potential by
square footage is located in seven sub-markets in California: San Francisco,
Silicon Valley, San Francisco's East Bay Area, Los Angeles County, Orange
County, The Inland Empire (San Bernardino and Riverside counties), and the City
of San Diego; approximately 12% in Texas; approximately 10% in Illinois; with
the remainder in four other states. All of the residential land for potential
development is located in California, with approximately 76% in Northern
California and 24% in Southern California.
The following schedule summarizes the estimated development potential of our
land inventory as of December 31, 2001:
Commercial Residential Hotel
------------- --------------- -------
(Square feet) (Lots or units) (Rooms)
Commercial........................ 29,517,000 -- --
Residential....................... -- 6,967 --
Urban............................. 13,141,000 3,273 500
---------- ------ ---
Total............................. 42,658,000 10,240 500
========== ====== ===
Entitled.......................... 41,331,000 10,126 500
Entitlements/approvals in progress 1,327,000 114 --
The following table shows the net book value of our developable land
inventory for the years presented:
Net Book Value
----------------------------
December 31,
----------------------------
2001 2000 1999
-------- -------- --------
(In thousands)
Commercial.............. $188,527 $174,329 $193,520
Residential............. 49,614 64,479 116,118
Urban................... 258,504 366,136 323,859
-------- -------- --------
Subtotal............. 496,645 604,944 633,497
Accumulated depreciation (9,888) (15,819) (14,838)
-------- -------- --------
Total............ $486,757 $589,125 $618,659
======== ======== ========
Asset Management Group
The Asset Management Group manages our rental portfolio of industrial,
office, retail, ground lease properties, and operating joint ventures. The
group provides the following services: (1) leasing and management services; (2)
acquisition and sale of rental property for, or from, our portfolio; (3)
management and disposition services for our other land holdings; and (4) ground
lease management services for a third party before the contract expired in 2000.
3
The following table summarizes our rental portfolio property operating
income by property type:
Property Operating Income/(1)/
-----------------------------
Year Ended December 31,
-----------------------------
2001 2000 1999
-------- -------- --------
(In thousands)
Rental Portfolio
Industrial..................................... $111,409 $ 98,831 $ 76,958
Office......................................... 24,362 20,228 19,043
Retail......................................... 9,778 10,511 9,512
Ground and other leases........................ 20,237 14,724 14,474
Land development............................... 6,432 7,196 5,554
Equity in earnings of operating joint venture.. 8,833 9,809 10,668
-------- -------- --------
Total....................................... $181,051 $161,299 $136,209
======== ======== ========
--------
/(1) Property operating income is rental revenue less property operating costs.
/
Building Inventory
The following table summarizes our building inventory as of December 31,
2001:
Year-End
Rentable Square Year Building
City State Feet Built Major Tenant Occupancy %
---- ----- --------------- ----- ------------------------------- -----------
Denver CO 360,118 2001 Aspen Pet Products Inc. 100%
Denver CO 350,969 2001 United Stationers Supply Co. 88%
Woodridge IL 167,529 2001 Metro Exhibit 74%
Denver CO 160,750 2001 Loving Kayman LLC 100%
Broomfield CO 121,461 2001 American Skandia Life Assurance 100%
Ontario CA 120,620 2001 Scripto Tokai 100%
Fremont CA 100,528 2001 Level 3 Communications Inc. 100%
Fremont CA 65,332 2001 Level 3 Communications Inc. 100%
Emeryville CA 23,923 2001 Michaels 100%
Woodridge IL 513,674 2000 Prairie Packaging, Inc. 100%
Ontario CA 504,530 2000 New Balance Athletic Shoe 100%
Rancho Cucamonga CA 443,190 2000 APL Logistics, Inc. 100%
Rancho Cucamonga CA 441,970 2000 APL Logistics, Inc. 100%
Grand Prairie TX 422,622 2000 APL Logistics, Inc. 100%
Ontario CA 373,283 2000 The Hain Food Group 100%
Woodridge IL 367,999 2000 Central American Distribution 100%
Ontario CA 359,996 2000 The Gillette Company 100%
Woodridge IL 263,007 2000 Corporate Express Office Prods. 100%
Oakland CA 147,500 2000 United States Postal Service 100%
Rancho Cucamonga CA 56,490 2000 Carpenter Technology 100%
Woodridge IL 532,560 1999 The Gillette Company 100%
Grand Prairie TX 423,700 1999 APL Logistics, Inc. 100%
Romeoville IL 402,266 1999 APL Logistics, Inc. 100%
Woodridge IL 396,489 1999 Central American Warehouse 100%
Woodridge IL 351,799 1999 Central American Warehouse 100%
Grand Prairie TX 343,200 1999 APL Logistics, Inc 100%
Fremont CA 187,168 1999 Peripheral Computer Support 100%
Portland OR 180,000 1999 Spicers Paper, Inc. 100%
Louisville KY 166,600 1999 Clark Material Handling 100%
4
Year-End
Rentable Square Year Building
City State Feet Built Major Tenant Occupancy %
---- ----- --------------- ----- ------------------------------ -----------
Woodridge IL 165,127 1999 Plastic Film Corp of America 100%
Portland OR 165,000 1999 Synetics Solutions Inc. 100%
Denver CO 156,139 1999 Marriott Distribution Services 100%
Woodridge IL 114,591 1999 Packaging Consultants 100%
Portland OR 103,500 1999 Fujicolor 44%
Richmond CA 88,845 1999 Dicon Fiberoptics, Inc. 57%
Fremont CA 60,000 1999 Fiberstars, Inc. 100%
Fremont CA 53,395 1999 Sonic Mfg. Technologies 100%
Richmond CA 42,500 1999 Dicon Fiberoptics, Inc. 100%
Ontario CA 526,408 1998 Sweetheart Holdings, Inc. 75%
Stockton CA 500,199 1998 APL Logistics, Inc. 100%
Denver CO 325,972 1998 Quantum Logistics, Inc. 100%
Woodridge IL 240,280 1998 APL Logistics, Inc. 100%
City of Industry CA 183,855 1998 Liberty Glove Inc. 100%
Oakland CA 176,826 1998 Public Storage Pick Up & 100%
Delivery
Woodridge CA 158,871 1998 Athena Industries, Inc. 100%
City of Industry CA 140,380 1998 Graybar Electric Company 100%
City of Industry CA 138,124 1998 Unipac Shipping Co. 100%
Santa Fe Springs CA 130,421 1998 R.A. Phillips Industries 100%
Denver CO 129,442 1998 Callisto Corporation 100%
City of Industry CA 109,448 1998 Playhut, Inc. 100%
Fremont CA 102,626 1998 Mouse Systems 100%
Fremont CA 476,177 1997 Office Depot, Inc. 100%
Aberdeen MD 470,707 1997 Saks Fifth Avenue 100%
City of Industry CA 298,050 1997 Viewsonic Corporation 100%
Union City CA 234,588 1997 Spicers Paper, Inc. 100%
Garland TX 227,023 1997 Interceramic, Inc 100%
Garland TX 226,906 1997 Ascendant Solutions 100%
Ontario CA 180,608 1997 Tyco Healthcare Group 100%
Fremont CA 174,460 1997 Galgon Industries, Inc. 100%
Anaheim CA 130,466 1997 Anixter Inc. 100%
Fremont CA 127,452 1997 Victron, Inc. 100%
Ontario CA 37,000 1997 Los Angeles Times Communic. 100%
City of Industry CA 230,992 1996 Owens & Minor West, Inc. 100%
Ontario CA 201,454 1996 Mclane Company, Inc. 100%
Fremont CA 158,400 1996 Home Depot USA, Inc. 100%
Oklahoma City OK 124,905 1996 Mackie Automotive Systems 100%
Fremont CA 114,948 1996 Exhibitgroup, Inc. 100%
Fremont CA 94,080 1996 Galgon Industries, Inc. 100%
Vernon CA 41,712 1996 Lucky Brand Dungarees 100%
Vernon CA 30,840 1996 Hanju, Inc. 100%
Vernon CA 27,798 1996 Lucky Brand Dungarees 100%
Ontario CA 300,136 1995 Dunlop Tire Corporation 100%
Santa Fe Springs CA 100,000 1995 Spicers Paper, Inc. 100%
---------- ------------------------------ -----------
-------------------
Subtotal 1995-2001 16,169,924 (73 Buildings) 98%
---------- ------------------------------ -----------
-------------------
Grove City OH 300,211 1994 Valley Industries, LLC 100%
Garland TX 262,000 1994 Interceramic, Inc. 100%
Emeryville CA 117,000 1994 KMart Corporation 100%
5
Year-End
Rentable Square Year Building
City State Feet Built Major Tenant Occupancy %
---- ----- --------------- ----- ----------------------------- -----------
Emeryville CA 102,501 1994 Home Depot USA, Inc. 100%
Fullerton CA 100,000 1994 Adams Rite Aerospace, Inc. 100%
Emeryville CA 96,954 1994 Sportmart, Inc. 100%
Emeryville CA 59,195 1994 Pak 'N Save 100%
Anaheim CA 17,575 1994 Los Angeles Times Communic. 100%
Emeryville CA 4,897 1994 Mattress Discounters 100%
Emeryville CA 3,561 1994 The Casual Male Inc. 100%
Emeryville CA 3,537 1994 ABS Distributors, LLC 100%
Grove City OH 360,412 1993 Lennox Industries Inc. 84%
Grove City OH 305,268 1993 McGraw Hill, Inc. 100%
Woodridge IL 261,400 1993 Dollar Tree Stores, Inc. 100%
Ontario CA 149,406 1992 THMX Holdings, LLC 100%
Livermore CA 148,440 1992 Owen & Minor West, Inc. 100%
Woodridge IL 148,416 1992 VSA, Inc. 100%
Anaheim CA 130,595 1992 Micro Technology, Inc. 100%
Anaheim CA 79,846 1992 Partition Installations 100%
Vernon CA 47,000 1992 John S. Dull & Associates 100%
Anaheim CA 36,800 1992 SCP Superior Acquisition Co. 100%
Anaheim CA 26,200 1992 S-B Power Tool Company 100%
City of Industry CA 449,049 1991 Circuit City Stores, Inc. 100%
Woodridge IL 265,057 1991 Sportmart Inc. 100%
Woodridge IL 116,544 1991 Argo Turboseve Corp. 80%
Union City CA 105,408 1991 California Supply North 100%
Woodridge IL 97,964 1991 Argonne National Laboratory 100%
Vernon CA 49,250 1991 Brambles Information Mgmt. 100%
Santa Fe Springs CA 41,921 1991 U.S. Truck Driving School 90%
Santa Fe Springs CA 35,973 1991 Hotchkis Performance 90%
Vernon CA 30,840 1991 Alto Products 100%
Santa Fe Springs CA 30,418 1991 Chang, J. & Chun, Ansik 67%
Santa Fe Springs CA 14,644 1991 Marinco Electric 90%
Santa Fe Springs CA 11,814 1991 Unique And Casual 65%
Ontario CA 412,944 1990 Cott Beverages USA, Inc. 100%
Santa Fe Springs CA 237,814 1990 La Salle Paper Company 100%
Garland TX 200,000 1990 Sears Logistics Services 100%
Tempe AZ 165,646 1990 Vacant 0%
Ontario CA 141,150 1990 Pacific Trading And Marketing 100%
Livermore CA 131,128 1990 Nature Kist 68%
Union City CA 116,993 1990 Tyco Printed Circuit Group 100%
Anaheim CA 94,086 1990 Alliance Imaging, Inc 48%
Corona CA 70,103 1990 Jeff Bruntjens Action Auto 93%
Corona CA 61,724 1990 RCI Management 97%
Vernon CA 48,187 1990 Mister S 100%
Vernon CA 26,923 1990 Barth And Dreyfuss 100%
Vernon CA 26,653 1990 Maruhana U.S.A. Corp. 100%
--------- ----------------------------- -----------
-------------------
Subtotal 1990-1994 5,743,447 (47 Buildings) 94%
--------- ----------------------------- -----------
-------------------
6
Year-End
Rentable Square Year Building
City State Feet Built Major Tenant Occupancy %
---- ----- --------------- ----- --------------------------------- -----------
Stockton CA 435,609 1989 Ralphs Grocery Company 85%
Ontario CA 405,864 1989 Specialty Merchandise 100%
Santa Ana CA 66,106 1989 County of Orange 100%
Anaheim CA 39,285 1989 V & M Restoration 100%
Anaheim CA 28,185 1989 Shaxon Industries 100%
Santa Ana CA 24,968 1989 Quanterra Incorporate 100%
Anaheim CA 24,955 1989 Specification Seals Co. 100%
Anaheim AZ 20,705 1989 Automation Products 100%
Phoenix CA 206,263 1988 Freeport Logistics, Inc 100%
Vernon AZ 137,307 1988 Pepboys of California 100%
Tempe CA 133,291 1988 EGL, Eagle Global Log 100%
Carson CA 133,240 1988 F.R.T. International 100%
Carson CA 118,545 1988 Expeditors International 100%
Union City CA 115,200 1988 California Equipment Distributors 100%
Livermore CA 92,022 1988 Trans Western Polymers 100%
Vernon CA 85,349 1988 Saldana, Jeronimo C. 79%
Union City CA 82,944 1988 Orthopedic Systems, Inc. 100%
Union City CA 77,760 1988 NRT 100%
Livermore CA 76,800 1988 Trans Western Polymers 100%
Tustin CA 69,763 1988 Terumo Medical Corporation 100%
Tustin CA 59,505 1988 Vitalcom, Inc. 100%
Northridge CA 56,806 1988 101Communications LLC 100%
Orange CA 54,177 1988 Freedom Communications 100%
Northridge CA 53,292 1988 Infolink Screening Services 67%
Northridge CA 43,117 1988 Physician Support Systems 100%
Santa Ana CA 36,225 1988 Applied Industrial Technology 100%
Los Angeles CA 31,311 1988 Tanimura Distributing 100%
Stockton CA 314,392 1987 Ralphs Grocery Company 100%
Phoenix AZ 221,116 1987 Packaging Resources Inc. 100%
Santa Fe Springs CA 98,882 1987 Galleher Hardwood Company 100%
Union City CA 88,704 1987 Am Pac Tire Distribution 62%
Union City CA 86,496 1987 Logitech, Inc. 100%
Santa Fe Springs CA 70,756 1987 Atlantic, Inc. 100%
Anaheim CA 52,195 1987 Vacant 0%
Anaheim CA 51,153 1987 Meiho Technology, Inc 100%
Union City CA 44,909 1987 EXP Pharmaceutical Waste Mgmt. 100%
Anaheim CA 40,640 1987 Nelco Products, Inc. 100%
Anaheim CA 32,074 1987 Saint Gobain Industries 100%
Los Angeles CA 30,104 1987 Tanimura Distributing 100%
La Mirada CA 220,000 1986 Mohawk Industries, Inc. 100%
Union City CA 126,144 1986 Vacant 0%
Tempe AZ 111,337 1986 Vacant 0%
Orange CA 108,222 1986 Data Aire, Inc. 100%
Tempe AZ 93,366 1986 Southern Wine & Spirits 100%
Vernon CA 77,184 1986 Jade Apparel, Inc. 100%
Tustin CA 75,226 1986 Scantron Corporation 100%
7
Year-End
Rentable Square Year Building
City State Feet Built Major Tenant Occupancy %
---- ----- --------------- ----- ------------------------------ -----------
San Jose CA 70,903 1986 Aon Consulting, Inc. 94%
San Jose CA 69,956 1986 Puma Technology Inc. 100%
Northridge CA 61,536 1986 Reynolds And Reynolds 48%
Orange CA 42,918 1986 FYI, Inc. 100%
Orange CA 40,000 1986 Control Air Conditioning Corp. 100%
Orange CA 35,000 1986 Cano Container Corporation 100%
Vernon CA 28,875 1986 Master Knits USA, Inc 100%
Fullerton CA 268,254 1985 Apace Moving Systems 46%
San Jose CA 77,092 1985 MCI Worldcom Communications 100%
San Jose CA 71,514 1985 Parametric Technology 93%
San Jose CA 69,956 1985 Copithorne & Bellows 100%
San Jose CA 68,474 1985 MCI Worldcom Communications 100%
Fullerton CA 50,000 1985 Sonic Air Systems, Inc. 100%
Anaheim CA 20,000 1985 Vacant 0%
Anaheim CA 12,307 1985 Alliance Imaging 100%
Anaheim CA 10,668 1985 Koosharem Corporation 100%
------------------ ---------- ------------------------------ -----------
Subtotal 1985-1989 5,648,947 (62 Buildings) 89%
------------------ ---------- ------------------------------ -----------
Subtotal pre-1985 3,337,701 (51 Buildings) 88%
------------------ ---------- ------------------------------ -----------
TOTAL 30,900,019 (233 Buildings) 94.40%
================== ========== ============================== ===========
Building Occupancy
The rental buildings were 94.4% leased as of December 31, 2001, with the
vacant space predominately in our older buildings. Fifty-two percent of the
rental buildings in our portfolio were constructed between 1995 and 2001, 19%
between 1990 and 1994, 18% between 1985 and 1989, with the remainder built
prior to 1985. Our goal is to continually upgrade the quality of our portfolio,
and we have identified older buildings and other properties likely to be sold
over time.
Leasing. The following table summarizes our leasing statistics for our
rental portfolio:
As of December 31,
-------------------------
2001 2000 1999
------ ------ ------
(Square feet in thousands
Industrial Buildings
Square feet owned.. 27,594 26,251 22,240
Square feet leased. 26,103 25,143 20,824
Percent leased..... 94.6% 95.8% 93.6%
Office Buildings
Square feet owned.. 2,442 1,625 1,622
Square feet leased. 2,260 1,513 1,508
Percent leased..... 92.5% 93.1% 93.0%
Retail Buildings
Square feet owned.. 864 880 881
Square feet leased. 820 856 827
Percent leased..... 94.9% 97.3% 93.9%
Total
Square feet owned.. 30,900 28,756 24,743
Square feet leased. 29,183 27,512 23,159
Percent leased..... 94.4% 95.7% 93.6%
8
Lease Expirations. The following table summarizes our lease expirations in
our rental portfolio as of December 31, 2001:
2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Thereafter
----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ---- ----- ----- ----------
Percent................... 11.3% 12.6% 13.7% 15.3% 10.2% 4.0% 2.0% 4.3% 8.4% 18.2%
Square feet (in thousands) 3,285 3,665 4,004 4,451 2,964 1,176 586 1,255 2,454 5,343
Approximately 198,000 square feet of month-to-month leases are shown as
expiring in 2002.
Rental Portfolio
Following is a discussion of our rental portfolio by property type:
Industrial Buildings
At December 31, 2001, our rental portfolio includes 187 industrial buildings
aggregating 27.6 million square feet that were 94.6% leased.
The following table summarizes the industrial buildings in our rental
portfolio as of, or for, the year ended
December 31, 2001:
Property Property
Number Operating Operating
of Buildings Square Feet Revenues Costs Income
------------ ----------- -------- --------- ---------
(In thousands, except for number of buildings)
Southern California 99 10,385 $ 58,275 $12,048 $ 46,227
Northern California 37 5,058 36,491 7,590 28,901
Illinois........... 16 4,466 20,023 5,198 14,825
Texas.............. 9 2,613 10,896 2,485 8,411
Colorado........... 6 1,483 6,970 1,706 5,264
Arizona............ 9 1,133 4,280 2,008 2,272
Oregon............. 3 449 2,437 448 1,989
Other.............. 8 2,007 4,449 929 3,520
--- ------ -------- ------- --------
Total....... 187 27,594 $143,821 $32,412 $111,409
=== ====== ======== ======= ========
The following table summarizes the lease expirations for our industrial
buildings as of December 31, 2001:
2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Thereafter
----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ---- ---- ----- ----- ----------
Percent................... 10.5% 12.6% 13.4% 14.8% 10.7% 3.8% 2.0% 4.3% 9.3% 18.6%
Square feet (in thousands) 2,731 3,296 3,508 3,857 2,790 997 513 1,111 2,423 4,877
Of the 2,731,000 square feet of leased industrial space that is scheduled to
expire in 2002, 38% is located in Southern California, 31% in Illinois, 17% in
Northern California, with the remainder in eight other states. Approximately
141,000 square feet of month-to-month leases are shown as expiring in 2002.
In 2001, we constructed, completed, and added to our rental portfolio 1.3
million square feet of industrial buildings. In addition, during the years, we
purchased 0.5 million square feet and sold 0.5 million square feet of
industrial buildings.
Office Buildings
At December 31, 2001, our rental portfolio includes 27 office buildings
aggregating 2.4 million square feet that were 92.5% leased.
9
The following table summarizes the office buildings in our rental portfolio
as of, or for, the year ended December 31, 2001:
Number Property Property
of Square Operating Operating
Buildings Feet Revenues Costs Income
--------- ------ -------- --------- ---------
(In thousands, except for number of buildings)
Northern California 10 526 $13,578 $ 4,324 $ 9,254
Illinois........... 2 468 11,864 6,365 5,499
Southern California 11 575 8,645 3,790 4,855
Texas.............. 2 695 4,528 2,170 2,358
Colorado........... 1 121 2,430 523 1,907
Oregon............. 1 57 953 464 489
-- ----- ------- ------- -------
Totals...... 27 2,442 $41,998 $17,636 $24,362
== ===== ======= ======= =======
The following table summarizes the lease expirations for our office
buildings as of December 31, 2001:
2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Thereafter
---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ----------
Percent................... 21.8% 12.9% 17.1% 24.2% 4.7% 7.9% 1.2% 1.4% 0% 8.8%
Square feet (in thousands) 492 291 386 548 106 179 27 30 1 200
Of the 492,000 square feet of leased office space scheduled to expire in
2002, 45% is located in Northern California and 24% in Southern California.
Approximately 46,000 square feet of month-to-month leases are shown as expiring
in 2002.
In 2001, we completed and added to our rental portfolio a
121,000-square-foot office building and purchased two office buildings totaling
698,000 square feet.
Retail Buildings
At December 31, 2001, our rental portfolio includes 19 retail buildings
aggregating 864,000 square feet that were 94.9% leased.
The following table summarizes the retail buildings in our rental portfolio
as of, or for, the year ended December 31, 2001:
Property Property
Number of Square Operating Operating
Buildings Feet Revenues Costs Income
--------- ------ -------- --------- ---------
(In thousands, except for number of buildings)
Northern California 9 481 $ 7,923 $2,336 $5,587
Southern California 7 246 4,079 1,116 2,963
Colorado........... 1 100 1,505 614 891
Oregon............. 2 37 543 206 337
-- --- ------- ------ ------
Totals............. 19 864 $14,050 $4,272 $9,778
== === ======= ====== ======
The following table summarizes the lease expirations for our retail
buildings as of December 31, 2001:
2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Thereafter
---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ----------
Percent................... 7.6% 9.6% 13.4% 5.6% 8.3% 0% 5.7% 13.9% 3.6% 32.3%
Square feet (in thousands) 62 79 110 46 68 0 46 114 30 265
Of the 62,000 square feet of leased retail space scheduled to expire in
2002, 80% is in Southern California, 13% in Colorado, and 6% in Northern
California. Approximately 11,000 square feet of month-to-month leases are shown
as expiring in 2002. In 2001, we completed and added to our portfolio a
24,000-square-foot retail building and sold 40,000 square feet of older retail
buildings.
10
Ground Leases
We own approximately 8,000 acres of ground leases, some of which are being
marketed for sale.
The following table summarizes our ground leases for the year ended December
31, 2001:
Property Property
Operating Operating
Revenues Costs Income
-------- --------- ---------
(In thousands)
Southern California $ 9,706 $1,471 $ 8,235
Northern California 9,496 822 8,674
Other states....... 3,754 426 3,328
------- ------ -------
Totals...... $22,956 $2,719 $20,237
======= ====== =======
Land Development
In addition to 30.9 million square feet of buildings in our rental
portfolio, we also own interim-use properties that we intend to convert to land
development by our Urban Group. As of December 31, 2001, our interim-use land
development portfolio included 16 buildings aggregating approximately 761,000
square feet. At December 31, 2001, the portfolio was 92.2% leased. We expect
that the level of income generated from this category will decline as land
development occurs over the next several years.
The following table summarizes our interim-use land development buildings as
of, or for, the year ended December 31, 2001:
Property Property
Number Operating Operating
of Buildings Square Feet (1) Revenues Costs Income
------------ --------------- -------- --------- ---------
(In thousands, except for number of buildings)
Northern California 11 628 $ 5,987 $1,756 $4,231
Southern California 5 133 6,069 3,868 2,201
-- --- ------- ------ ------
Totals...... 16 761 $12,056 $5,624 $6,432
== === ======= ====== ======
--------
/(1) Interim-use land development buildings are not included in the total
square feet of rental portfolio. /
Rental Operating Joint Venture Portfolio
The Asset Management Group had direct or indirect equity interests in four
joint ventures that owned rental properties during the year. These joint
ventures provided us with cash distributions of $5.7 million and earnings of
$8.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2001. We also own direct or
indirect equity interests in development joint ventures. For the year ended
December 31, 2001, these development joint ventures provided us with cash
distributions of $38 million and earnings of $26 million, primarily from our
Residential Group joint venture interests. We owned joint venture interests in
the following operating properties, except for the apartment joint venture
whose assets were sold (as noted), for the years presented.
Equity in Earnings
-----------------------
Year Ended December 31,
-----------------------
No. of Ownership
Ventures Size Interest 2001 2000 1999
-------- --------------- --------- ------ ------ -------
(In thousands)
Hotel(1)......... 3 1,937 rooms 16-50% $8,570 $9,835 $10,567
Office........... 1 202,000 sq. ft. 67% 263 (26) 67
Apartments(2).... 1 387 units 50% -- -- 34
- ------ ------ -------
Total..... 5 $8,833 $9,809 $10,668
= ====== ====== =======
--------
/(1) Includes a hotel parking lot joint venture. /
/(2) Sold in February 1999. /
11
Sales
During 2001, we sold property from our rental portfolio. Of the gain in
2001, approximately $5.0 million came from the sale, to the respective tenants,
of older buildings, built from 1937 to 1994, comprising 156,000 square feet;
approximately $19.0 million from the sale to investors of multi-tenant
buildings comprising 350,000 square feet, which were built in the 1970s and
1980s and have an average tenant size of less than 8,000 square feet; and
approximately $17.0 million from the sale of approximately 1,100 acres of land
subject to ground leases, mostly pursuant to the exercise of purchase options.
The following table summarizes the sales of our rental properties for the
periods presented:
Year Ended December 31,
----------------------------
2001 2000 1999
-------- -------- --------
(In thousands)
Sales..................... $ 71,818 $ 89,323 $ 91,020
Cost of sales............. (30,744) (46,410) (61,205)
-------- -------- --------
Gain................... 41,074 42,913 29,815
Depreciation recapture.... (11,428) (14,519) (4,354)
-------- -------- --------
Gain on property sales. $ 29,646 $ 28,394 $ 25,461
======== ======== ========
Gain on property sales, including the reduction for depreciation recapture,
is a component of our calculation of EBDDT. See "Management's Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" on page 34 of this
Form 10-K for more information regarding our sales activity.
Other Land Holdings
As of December 31, 2001, we owned approximately 356,000 acres of land in the
Southern California desert. The ownership of these desert properties is the
result of historical land grants to our railroad predecessors. Because of its
location, lack of contiguity among parcels, and other factors, much of this
land is not currently suitable for traditional development activities. We have
assessed the desert portfolio to explore the potential for agricultural,
mineral, water, telecommunications, energy, and waste management uses for this
property and concluded that the land, although valuable, does not fit within
our overall corporate strategy.
Since December 31, 1998, our portfolio of desert holdings has declined from
approximately 784,000 to 356,000 acres, primarily as a result of sales
activity. In 2000, we sold approximately 437,000 acres of desert holdings and
20,000 acres of severed mineral rights to the federal government, through an
agreement with The Wildlands Conservancy ("TWC"), for $45.1 million. In late
2001, we amended our agreement with TWC to provide for additional, future sales
of approximately 170,000 acres of desert land for approximately $13.6 million.
These sales are scheduled to close in 2002, subject to extension rights, and
would conclude our agreement with TWC.
See "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results
of Operations--Gain on Non-Strategic Asset Sales" of this Form 10-K for
information regarding the aggregate total of non-strategic asset sales.
We will continue to pursue additional sale, lease, or exchange opportunities
involving public and private buyers, as well as other arrangements to maximize
the value of this land. These large-sale transactions are often complicated
and, therefore, may take a significant amount of time to complete.
Sales
The following table summarizes our sales of other land holdings for the
periods presented:
Year Ended December 31,
------------------------
2001 2000 1999
------ ------- -------
(In thousands)
Sales........ $4,161 $50,759 $10,576
Cost of sales (252) (4,480) (3,773)
------ ------- -------
Gain...... $3,909 $46,279 $ 6,803
====== ======= =======
12
Commercial Group
The Commercial Group develops suburban commercial business parks on land we
have acquired or was a part of our historic portfolio. Our commercial
development activities include: (1) the acquisition and entitlement of
commercial land sites; (2) the construction of buildings, on land we own, for
sale to users; (3) the construction of pre-leased buildings and speculative
buildings to be added to our rental portfolio, some of which may be subject to
tenant purchase options; (4) the construction of buildings for sale to
investors; and (5) the sale of land to third parties for their own development.
In certain instances, we have generated development and management fees from
design-build services and construction management services.
In 2001, we commenced construction on 4.7 million square feet of new
commercial development and completed approximately 2.1 million square feet of
construction. Of the completed development, 1.5 million square feet was added
to our rental portfolio and the remainder was sold. As of December 31, 2001, we
had approximately 6.1 million square feet under construction by the Commercial
Group that is scheduled to be added to our rental portfolio upon completion,
although certain of these properties may be sold.
Sales
During 2001, we sold improved land capable of supporting 3.4 million square
feet of commercial development and four newly constructed buildings totaling
601,000 square feet.
The following table summarizes sales of our commercial development
properties in the periods presented:
Year Ended December 31,
----------------------------
2001 2000 1999
-------- -------- --------
(In thousands)
Sales........................................... $ 75,686 $ 68,951 $ 94,072
Cost of sales................................... (50,896) (52,415) (76,845)
-------- -------- --------
Gain on property sales....................... 24,790 16,536 17,227
Equity in earnings of development joint ventures 9 13 (23)
-------- -------- --------
Total gain on property sales................. $ 24,799 $ 16,549 $ 17,204
======== ======== ========
Of the total 2001 gain, approximately $12.0 million came from land sales to
developers and other users in our suburban business parks and approximately
$10.5 million came from build-to-sell or build-to-suit transactions with the
exercise of purchase options.
See "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results
of Operations--Liquidity and Capital Resources" of this Form 10-K for more
information regarding our sales activity.
Development Land Inventory
Our existing developable land can support an estimated 29.5 million square
feet of new development (approximately 28.2 million square feet of which is
entitled).
In 2001, we invested approximately $17.0 million in the acquisition of land
capable of supporting approximately 5.6 million square feet of commercial
development, including land capable of supporting 1.8 million square feet of
development that we subsequently sold in 2001.
13
The following table summarizes our commercial development land inventory
activity by location as of, or for, the year ended December 31, 2001:
Ground
Potential Leases Potential
Development Transfers and Development % of Book
Region/State/City 12/31/00 (1) Acquisitions Sales Development 12/31/01 Total Value
----------------- ----------- --------- ------------ ------ ----------- ----------- ----- --------
(In thousands)
Southern California
City of Industry............... 33 -- -- (33) -- -- $ --
Rancho Cucamonga............... 792 20 -- -- -- 812 6,645
Ontario........................ 2,274 10 -- (268) -- 2,016 2,590
Anaheim........................ 78 1 -- (35) -- 44 2,549
Northridge..................... 44 -- -- -- -- 44 199
Perris......................... -- -- 1,780 (1,780) -- -- --
Ontario (Kaiser)............... 6,000 3,000/(2)/ -- -- (1,437) 7,563 43,605
------ ----- ----- ------ ------ ------ ----- --------
Subtotal Southern California...... 9,221 3,031 1,780 (2,116) (1,437) 10,479 35.5% $ 55,588
------ ----- ----- ------ ------ ------ ----- --------
Northern California
Alameda........................ -- -- 1,300 -- -- 1,300 965
Richmond....................... 89 -- -- -- -- 89 1,202
Fremont........................ 7,155 -- -- (3,400) -- 3,755 35,828
Union City..................... 335 -- -- (335) -- -- --
Manteca........................ -- -- 1,150 -- (608) 542 2,811
------ ----- ----- ------ ------ ------ ----- --------
Subtotal Northern California...... 7,579 -- 2,450 (3,735) (608) 5,686 19.3% $ 40,806
------ ----- ----- ------ ------ ------ ----- --------
Total in California............... 16,800 3,031 4,230 (5,851) (2,045) 16,165 54.8% $ 96,394
------ ----- ----- ------ ------ ------ ----- --------
Illinois
Woodridge...................... 934 90 50 (98) -- 976 8,225
Glenview....................... 925 (112) -- (133) -- 680 2,516
Romeoville..................... 964 95 -- (90) (521) 448 103
Minooka........................ 1,400 124 1,220 -- (1,034) 1,710 2,151
Joliet......................... 431 -- -- (61) -- 370 85
------ ----- ----- ------ ------ ------ ----- --------
Subtotal Illinois................. 4,654 197 1,270 (382) (1,555) 4,184 14.2% $ 13,080
------ ----- ----- ------ ------ ------ ----- --------
Texas
Coppell........................ 1,718 (311) -- (287) -- 1,120 11,226
Garland........................ 983 -- -- -- -- 983 3,042
Grand Prairie.................. 814 -- -- -- -- 814 2,912
Houston........................ 1,969 -- -- -- -- 1,969 1,257
Plano.......................... 575 -- 67 -- (274) 368 583
------ ----- ----- ------ ------ ------ ----- --------
Subtotal Texas.................... 6,059 (311) 67 (287) (274) 5,254 17.8% $ 19,020
------ ----- ----- ------ ------ ------ ----- --------
Other
Denver, CO..................... 1,130 401 -- -- (606) 925 18,231
Westminster, CO................ 674 11 -- -- -- 685 19,363
Louisville, KY................. 602 (57) -- -- -- 545 1,678
Oklahoma City, OK.............. 576 (276) -- -- -- 300 46
Portland, OR................... 1,917 (10) -- (267) (181) 1,459 12,147
Tucson, AZ..................... -- -- 74 -- (74) --
------ ----- ----- ------ ------ ------ ----- --------
Total Outside of California....... 15,612 (45) 1,411 (936) (2,690) 13,352 45.2% $ 83,565
------ ----- ----- ------ ------ ------ ----- --------
Total............................. 32,412 2,986 5,641 (6,787) (4,735) 29,517 100.0% $179,959
====== ===== ===== ====== ====== ====== ===== ========
Entitled.......................... 31,085 28,190
Entitlements/approvals in progress 1,327 1,327
Other............................. 8,568
--------
Total............................. $188,527
========
--------
/(1)/ Includes revisions to estimates of potential development or transfers of
property between commercial development and other categories of property.
/(2)/ The original land use plan included land entitled for a truck stop. In
2001, the land use plan was revised to remove the truck stop, and the
revised entitlement allows for additional vertical development.
14
The following is a brief summary of some of the significant suburban
commercial development projects and development activities.
Pacific Commons, Fremont, California. This is one of our largest
development projects and also one of the largest planned business parks in
Silicon Valley. The project, which is adjacent to Interstate 880 sixteen miles
north of San Jose, consists of 870 acres, of which approximately 375 acres are
planned for development. In 2000, we finalized entitlements with the
certification of a Supplemental Environmental Impact Report for the 8.3
million-square-foot business park, reflecting species and wetlands mitigation
measures agreed to with various government agencies. Since inception, we have
developed, constructed, sold, or leased approximately 1,015,000 square feet of
R&D, light industrial, and warehouse properties at Pacific Commons and an
additional 106,000 square feet are currently under construction.
During 2001, we signed a 34-year ground lease with a subsidiary of Cisco
Systems for up to 3.4 million square feet of entitlements, located on
approximately 143 acres at Pacific Commons. The transaction includes a
development and construction management contract, purchase options, and Cisco's
agreement to fund $34 million of infrastructure costs. During 2001, we received
two installment payments from Cisco totaling $104.8 million that will be
recognized as income on a straight-line basis over the 34-year lease term. This
ground lease will contribute over $3.0 million in property operating income on
an annual basis.
Kaiser Commerce Center, Ontario, California. In 2000, one of our wholly
owned subsidiaries acquired this former steel mill site in Ontario, California,
located in the heart of one of the nation's most active distribution centers
near the intersection of Interstates 15 and 10. The property is served by both
Union Pacific and Burlington Northern Santa Fe railroads and is 6 miles from
the Ontario International Airport. Plans for the development include a 9
million-square-foot industrial park. During 2001, we started construction at
this site on 1.4 million square feet of build-to-suit warehouse/distribution
facility.
Fleet Industrial Supply Center, Alameda Annex, and Alameda Naval Air
Station, East Housing, Alameda, California. In 1998, we were selected by the
City of Alameda, California, as the master developer for the former 145-acre
U.S. Navy Fleet Industrial Supply Center, Alameda Annex, and the adjacent
70-acre portion of the former Alameda Naval Air Station. In June 2001, we were
granted entitlements to develop up to 1.3 million square feet of commercial
space and approximately 500 single family homes. The commercial portion of the
Alameda development is divided into six land purchase phases of approximately
14 acres each. Purchases are staged every two years, starting in 2002, but can
be delayed by market conditions like the ones we are currently experiencing.
Under the agreement, the City of Alameda must deliver the land with
environmental remediation and demolition of existing structures completed, and
the City of Alameda must build all backbone infrastructure.
Residential Group
The Residential Group develops large-scale suburban residential communities
and sells finished lots to homebuilders. Property is either acquired directly
or through a joint venture with a third party.
From 1996 through mid-2000, the Residential Group was actively involved in
the merchant housing (homebuilding) business. Because of competitive forces and
the high-volume, low-margin nature of the homebuilding industry, we determined
that the homebuilding business was not part of our corporate strategy. As a
result, we sold a majority of our merchant housing assets in July 2000. In
2001, we sold our residual interest in the ongoing activities of the joint
venture that bought the merchant housing assets.
15
Sales
The following table summarizes our Residential Group's sales of residential
development property, which include lots and housing units. The sales shown
below are for properties that we own and consolidated joint ventures for the
periods presented:
Year Ended December 31,
------------------------------
2001 2000 1999
-------- --------- ---------
(In thousands)
Sales........ $ 48,507 $ 292,822 $ 161,913
Cost of sales (30,202) (238,930) (121,107)
-------- --------- ---------
Gain...... $ 18,305 $ 53,892 $ 40,806
======== ========= =========
Unconsolidated Joint Venture Sales
We also participate in development joint venture projects in which we do not
own a controlling interest and for which we recognize income using the equity
method. For the year ending December 31, 2001, these development joint ventures
provided us with cash distributions of $38 million and $26 million, primarily
from our Residential Group joint venture interests. In addition, we also own
direct or indirect equity interests in operating joint ventures that provided
us with cash distributions of $5.7 million and earnings of $8.8 million for the
year ended December 31, 2001. The following table summarizes sales of our
residential development property in these unconsolidated joint venture projects:
Year Ended December 31,
------------------------------
2001 2000 1999
--------- --------- --------
(In thousands)
Sales......................................... $ 215,402 $ 316,523 $115,225
Cost of sales................................. (184,122) (260,975) (86,918)
--------- --------- --------
Gain....................................... 31,280 55,548 28,307
Venture partners' interest.................... (3,610) (27,781) (18,132)
--------- --------- --------
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated joint.
ventures................................. $ 27,670 $ 27,767 $ 10,175
========= ========= ========
16
Development Land Inventory
The following table summarizes our residential development land inventory
activity as of, or for, the year ending December 31, 2001:
Total Lots/ Ownership
Homes Controlled/ Transfers & Home Lot or Controlled
1/1/01 Acquired Adjustments Closings Closings 12/31/01 Interest
----------- ----------- ----------- -------- -------- -------- -------------
Community Development
Northern California
Alameda.......................... -- 492 -- -- -- 492 100%
Hercules......................... 701 -- -- -- (286) 415 100%
Reimal Site--Gilroy.............. 110 -- -- -- (110) -- 100%
Serrano--Sacramento.............. 2,235 -- -- -- (53) 2,182 67%
Parkway--Sacramento.............. -- 1,598 29 -- (190) 1,437 50%
Southern California
Talega--San Clemente............. 1,989 -- 264 -- (109) 2,144 30%
Westbluffs--Playa del Rey/ (1)/.. 114 -- -- -- -- 114 100%
----- ----- ---- ---- ---- -----
Subtotal Community
Development................... 5,149 2,090 293 -- (748) 6,784
----- ----- ---- ---- ---- -----
Merchant Housing
Southern California
BHC Residential/(2)/............. 524 (362) (162) -- -- 35%
Talega Village--San Clemente..... 276 -- 7 (100) -- 183 50%
Miraflores--La Quinta............ 3 -- -- (3) -- -- 100%
Oxnard-- El Pasco................ 52 -- -- (52) -- -- 50%
----- ----- ---- ---- ---- -----
Subtotal Merchant Housing...... 855 -- (355) (317) -- 183
----- ----- ---- ---- ---- -----
Total Residential
Properties................ 6,004 2,090 (62) (317) (748) 6,967
===== ===== ==== ==== ==== =====
Entitled............................ 5,890 6,853
Entitlements/approvals in
progress /(1)/..................... 114 114
--------
/(1)/ We have entitlements for this project; however, individuals are
challenging the entitlements under the California Environmental Quality
Act and the California Coastal Act.
/(2)/ In September 2001, Brookfield Southland Holdings bought the Residential
Group's interest in BHC Residential.
The following is a brief summary of our most significant residential
projects:
Talega, San Clemente, California. In 1997, we acquired an approximately
one-third interest in a joint venture project that owns a 3,470-acre, 4,000-lot
residential land development site in the Talega Valley in San Clemente,
California. This master-planned project includes a variety of attached and
detached homes; an 18-hole championship golf course; a seniors community; an
elementary/middle school; community parks; and an 82-acre, 1.5
million-square-foot mixed-use commercial area.
Serrano, El Dorado Hills, California. In 1998, we acquired a two-thirds
interest in a 3,500-acre, 4,000-lot masterplanned community in El Dorado Hills,
California, which is located 30 miles east of Sacramento, California. A
significant amount of infrastructure was in place and approximately 800 lots
were sold or developed prior to the acquisition of our interest in the project.
The project includes a variety of attached and detached homes; an 18-hole
executive golf course; a private 18-hole Championship Golf Course and Country
Club; elementary, intermediate, and high schools; and a retail commercial area.
Victoria By the Bay, Hercules, California. In 1997, Catellus participated
in a joint venture that acquired the Pacific Refinery at Hercules, California.
We entered into an agreement to provide entitlement services to the joint
venture; in return for an option to buy the property after defined
environmental remediation work was completed. The development has received
approval for up to 880 residential units, a school, commercial space, and
public parks. Significantly, in 2001, we received a "no further action" letter
from the Regional Water Quality Control Board ("RWQCB"), clearing the last
significant hurdle prior to the sale of the remaining lots of this project.
17
The Parkway, Folsom, California. In June 2001, we acquired a 50% interest
in the Parkway Venture, a 600-acre, master-planned community in Folsom,
California, which is located 20 miles east of Sacramento, California. The
development has received approvals for 1,600 lots that will include a variety
of single and multi-unit homes, a neighborhood retail commercial area, and
wetlands.
Fleet Industrial Supply Center, Alameda Annex, and Alameda Naval Air
Station, East Housing, Alameda, California. In 1998, we were selected by the
City of Alameda, California, as the master developer for the former 145-acre
U.S. Navy Fleet Industrial Supply Center, Alameda Annex ("FISC"), and the
adjacent 70-acre portion ("East Housing") of the former Alameda Naval Air
Station. In June of 2000, we were granted entitlements to develop up to
approximately 500 single-family homes and up to 1.3 million square feet of
office and research and development space on the site.
The residential development acreage will be purchased in phases commencing
in the summer of 2002. A minimum of 75 single-family lots must be purchased
annually. Under the agreement, the City of Alameda must deliver the land with
environmental remediation and demolition of existing structures completed, and
the City of Alameda must build all backbone infrastructure.
Demolition of the East Housing structures commenced in February 2002, and is
scheduled for completion in May 2002. Construction of the first phase of
backbone infrastructure improvements is planned to begin in April 2002. We
anticipate the start of construction of the homes and associated site
improvements in the third quarter of 2002.
18
Urban Group
The Urban Group develops large urban mixed-use projects. Its current
portfolio consists of three major mixed-use development sites that include
development for residential, office, biotech, retail, and hotel purposes.
As of December 31, 2001, we have 316,000 square feet of commercial
development under construction at Mission Bay in San Francisco, California,
including a 283,000-square-foot office building and a 78,000-square-foot
mixed-use building containing both 33,000 square feet of commercial space and
34 condominium units comprising 45,000 square feet.
Sales
During 2001, we sold two 1.4-acre, 220-unit condominium sites in San Diego,
California, for $26.5 million. At Mission Bay, we sold a 1.37-acre site for
$9.9 million and a 1.0-acre, 100-unit condominium site for $13.4 million.
The following table summarizes our sales of property in the periods
presented:
Year Ended December 31,
-----------------------
2001 2000 1999
-------- ---- ----
(In thousands)
Sales........ $ 49,793 $-- $--
Cost of Sales (37,337) -- --
-------- --- ---
Gain...... $ 12,456 $-- $--
======== === ===
Development Land Inventory
Our existing entitled developable land portfolio can support an estimated
13.1 million square feet of new development, more than 3,000 residential units,
and a 500-room hotel. The chart below summarizes our estimated development
potential of our current Urban Group development land inventory as of December
31, 2001:
Office Retail Residential Hotel
---------- --------- --------------- -------
(Net Sq. Ft.) (Lots or units) (Rooms)
Mission Bay (San Francisco, California) 4,537,000 549,000 3,273 500
Union Station (Los Angeles, California) 5,175,000 675,000 -- --
Santa Fe Depot (San Diego, California). 1,935,000 270,000 -- --
---------- --------- ----- ---
Total.................................. 11,647,000 1,494,000 3,273 500
========== ========= ===== ===
Following is a summary of our Urban Group projects:
Mission Bay, San Francisco, California. We own approximately 150 acres of
property in San Francisco adjacent to downtown, which is part of an
approximately 300-acre development project known as Mission Bay. The balance of
the project is primarily owned by the City and County of San Francisco ("the
City"), the Port of San Francisco, and the University of California San
Francisco ("UCSF").
In the years leading up to 1999, we obtained entitlement and redevelopment
plans for Mission Bay, and in 1999, we closed land transfers among the City,
the Port of San Francisco, the California State Lands Commission, UCSF, and
Catellus to result in the ownership described above in a developable
configuration. We also received regulatory approvals from the U.S. Army Corps
of Engineers and the California Regional Water Quality Control Board in 2000.
Additional permits and approvals are required for the development of individual
projects at Mission Bay, including, for office projects, allocation
("Proposition M Allocation") of square footage from a limited allowance of
office space permitted to be developed in the City at any given time.
19
Mission Bay North, the 65-acre portion of Mission Bay, north of Mission
Creek, is being developed adjacent to Pacific Bell Park (home of the San
Francisco Giants baseball team). AvalonBay Communities, Inc., began
construction on a 250-unit apartment building in October of 2000, and the San
Francisco Redevelopment Agency began construction of a 100-unit affordable
housing project in January of 2001. In December 2001, Catellus began
construction of a mixed-use project directly across from Pacific Bell Park,
which will include approximately 33,000 square feet of commercial space and 34
condominium units, scheduled for completion in the spring of 2003. In April
2001, Catellus sold a 1.0-acre site to Signature/Riding Group for construction
of a 100-unit condominium project. In September 2001, Third & King Investors,
LLC (a joint venture between Catellus Development Corporation and Federal
Street Operating, LLC) broke ground on a mixed-use project, which includes 595
apartments, 127,000 square feet of commercial space, and 945 parking stalls.
Mission Bay South, the 238-acre portion of Mission Bay, south of Mission
Creek, will be developed around UCSF's new 2.7 million-square-foot
biotech/research expansion campus. In accordance with agreements among
Catellus, the Regents of the University of California, and the City, UCSF is
locating its expansion campus on a portion of Mission Bay South. We have
donated approximately 18 acres and have agreed to donate approximately 11 acres
in the future for the campus, and the City has contributed or has agreed to
contribute an additional 13.3 acres. The UCSF campus will be constructed by
developers selected by UCSF. UCSF is nearing completion of its first building,
a 385,000-square-foot research facility, and in Fall, of 2001, broke ground on
its second building, a 170,000-square-foot biomedical research facility. In
March 2001, Catellus broke ground on a 283,000-square-foot office building
leased to the Gap, Inc., scheduled for completion in late 2002. In addition, in
March 2001, Catellus sold a 1.37-acre site to the Gladstone Institutes for
construction of a 180,000-square-foot research facility.
In 2001, $71 million of Community Facility District bonds were sold to
finance the initial phase of public infrastructure at Mission Bay. Upon
completion of the infrastructure improvements, the improvements will be
transferred to the City of San Francisco. (See Note 15 of the accompanying
notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in this Form 10-K).
20
The following table summarizes our commercial development land activities at
Mission Bay. Because these activities require participation of a number of
private parties and public agencies, scheduled development activities are
subject to change:
Mission Bay Project
Schedule of Activity
Inception to December 31, 2001
Commercial Development (in square feet) Residential Units
--------------------------------------- ------------------------------------
Construction Future Project Construction Future Project
Project Commenced Planned Development Total Commenced Planned Development Total
------- --------- ------- ----------- --------- --------- ------- ----------- -------
Catellus owned 100%
Office building.......... 283,000 -- -- 283,000 -- -- -- --
Mixed-use................ 33,000 -- -- 33,000 -- -- -- --
Biotech.................. -- 85,000 -- 85,000 34 -- -- 34
Future development....... -- -- 5,001,000 5,001,000 -- -- 3,273 3,273
------- ------- --------- --------- --- --- ----- -----
316,000 85,000 5,001,000 5,402,000 34 -- 3,273 3,307
------- ------- --------- --------- --- --- ----- -----
Catellus' Joint Venture..... 127,000 -- -- 127,000 595 -- -- 595
------- ------- --------- --------- --- --- ----- -----
Development by others:
UCSF:
Biotech building......... 385,000 -- -- 385,000 -- -- -- --
Biotech building......... 170,000 -- -- 170,000 -- -- -- --
Campus center............ -- 156,000 -- 156,000 -- -- -- --
Future development....... -- -- 1,960,000 1,960,000 -- -- -- --
------- ------- --------- --------- --- --- ----- -----
Total UCSF:................. 555,000 156,000 1,960,000 2,671,000 -- -- -- --
Apartments.................. -- -- -- -- 250 303 -- 553
Condominiums................ -- -- -- -- -- 100 -- 100
Affordable housing.......... -- -- -- -- 100 140 -- 240
Biotech..................... -- 180,000 -- 180,000 -- -- -- --
Future development.......... -- -- -- -- -- -- (34) (34)
------- ------- --------- --------- --- --- ----- -----
Total Development by others: 555,000 336,000 1,960,000 2,851,000 350 543 (34) 859
------- ------- --------- --------- --- --- ----- -----
Total project............... 998,000 421,000 6,961,000 8,380,000 979 543 3,239 4,761
======= ======= ========= ========= === === ===== =====
Summary of our Urban Group projects-continued:
Union Station, Los Angeles, California. We own approximately 43 acres
surrounding and including the historic Los Angeles Union Station. Located in
downtown Los Angeles, Union Station is a transportation hub with commuter rail
lines (Metrolink) serving the surrounding five-county region, Amtrak rail
service, and Los Angeles' subway and surface light rail systems operated by the
Metropolitan Transportation Authority. In 1999, we completed a development plan
intended to maximize the potential of the site given current and projected
market conditions.
Santa Fe Depot, San Diego, California. We own approximately 12 acres near
the waterfront in downtown San Diego, California, including the Santa Fe Depot
train station. Amtrak, a commuter rail line (Coaster), and San Diego's
expanding trolley system serve the site daily. In accordance with a Development
Agreement executed with the City of San Diego, the site is currently entitled
for a mixture of office, hotel, retail, and housing development. During 1999 we
revised the plan to respond better to recovering markets in San Diego. In June
2001, we sold a 1.4-acre, 220-unit condominium site for approximately $13.4
million, and, in July 2001, we sold a second 1.4-acre, 220-unit condominium
site for $13.1 million. Also, we have completed preliminary design plans for a
580,000-square-foot office tower and a 410,000-square-foot office tower.
21
Other Items
Environmental Matters
For information about environmental matters, see "Management's Discussion
and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" in this Form
10-K.
Competition
The real estate industry is generally fragmented and characterized by
significant competition. Numerous developers, owners of industrial, office, and
retail properties, and managers compete with us in seeking properties for
acquisition, development, and management opportunities, tenants, and purchasers
for homes, and for non-strategic assets. There are competitors in each area in
which we operate that have greater capital resources than we. There can be no
assurance that the existence of such competition will not have a material
adverse effect on our business, operations, and cash flow.
Employees, Contractors, and Consultants
At December 31, 2001, we had 330 employees in our consolidated company. We
engage third parties to manage multi-tenant properties and properties in
locations that are not in close proximity to our regional or field offices. The
Company's employees are not represented by a collective bargaining agreement,
and management considers its relations with employees to be good. In addition,
we engage outside consultants such as architects and design firms in connection
with our pre-development activities. We also employ third-party contractors on
development projects for infrastructure and building construction, and retain
consultants to assist us in a variety of areas at the project and corporate
levels.
Working with organized labor is a critical component of many of our
projects. With the high volume of construction activity in many of our markets,
labor shortages and costs could significantly influence the success of
projects. In addition, organized labor often plays a key role in community
organizations and discretionary land use decisions concerning entitlements.
Stock Repurchase Program
From October 1999 through July 2001, our Board of Directors authorized five
separate stock repurchase programs; each had a limit of $50.0 million. Share
purchases under these programs were made on the open market. We purchased a
total of 13,047,097 shares of common stock at a total cost of $218.0 million
under these programs. The remaining $32.0 million authorization had expired or
was terminated.
In December 2001, we purchased 10,600,000 shares of common stock from the
California Public Employees' Retirement Systems ("CalPERS") for $183.1 million
in a privately negotiated transaction. An independent third party provided our
Board of Directors with a written opinion confirming that the terms and
conditions of this transaction were fair, from a financial point of view, to
our stockholders other than CalPERS'. Immediately prior to the transaction,
CalPERS' was the beneficial owner of 18.8 million shares, or approximately
19.3% of our issued and outstanding common stock. Upon completion of the
transaction, CalPERS' beneficial ownership was reduced to 8.2 million shares,
or approximately 9.5% of our issued and outstanding common stock.
Shareholder Rights Plan and Bylaw Amendments
In December 1999, our Board of Directors authorized the issuance of
2,000,000 shares of Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock in connection
with the adoption of a shareholder rights plan. This series of preferred stock
has a quarterly dividend of the greater of $1.00 or 100 times the dividend paid
on our common stock, and it has a voting right of 100 votes per share. No
shares of this series of preferred stock have been issued. Also in connection
with the shareholder rights plan adopted in December 1999, our Board of
Directors declared a dividend of one right to purchase 1/100th of a share of
Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock for each share of common stock.
This right becomes exercisable on the occurrence of certain events, and it also
may entitle the holder to purchase shares of common stock at one-half its
market price on the occurrence of certain events.
22
Item 2. Properties
Our real estate projects are generally described in Item 1 above, which
descriptions are incorporated in this Item by reference. Our principal
executive office is located in San Francisco, California, and we have regional
or field offices in eleven other locations in the United States. We believe
that our property and equipment are generally well maintained, in good
condition, and adequate for our present needs.
Item 3. Legal Proceedings
We, our subsidiaries, and other related companies are named defendants in
lawsuits arising from normal business activities, are named parties in certain
governmental proceedings (including environmental actions), and are the subject
of various environmental remediation orders of local governmental agencies
arising in the ordinary course of business. Although the outcome of these
lawsuits or other proceedings against us and the cost of compliance with any
governmental order cannot be predicted with certainty, management does not
expect any of these matters to have a material adverse effect on our business,
financial condition, or liquidity.
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
There were no matters submitted to a vote of security holders during the
quarter ended December 31, 2001.
23
PART II
Item 5. Market for Registrant's Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters
The Company's common stock commenced trading on December 5, 1990, and is
listed on the New York Stock Exchange, the Pacific Exchange, and the Chicago
Stock Exchange under the symbol "CDX". The following table sets forth for the
periods indicated the high and low sale prices of the Company's common stock as
reported by Bloomberg Financial Markets:
Common Stock
Price
-------------
High Low
------ ------
Year ended December 31, 2000
First Quarter............ $13.88 $11.50
Second Quarter........... $16.88 $12.63
Third Quarter............ $19.06 $16.31
Fourth Quarter........... $19.38 $16.81
Year ended December 31, 2001
First Quarter............ $18.17 $15.63
Second Quarter........... $18.35 $16.00
Third Quarter............ $18.80 $16.11
Fourth Quarter........... $18.50 $16.73
The Company has never declared or paid any cash dividends on its common
stock. The Company intends to retain any earnings to support operations and to
finance development projects and currently does not intend to pay cash
dividends on the common stock in the foreseeable future.
On March 7, 2002, there were approximately 22,281 holders of record of the
Company's common stock.
24
Item 6. Selected Financial Data
The following income statement and selected balance sheet data with respect
to each of the years in the five-year period ended December 31, 2001, have been
derived from our annual Consolidated Financial Statements. The operating data
have been derived from our underlying financial and management records and are
unaudited. This information should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated
Financial Statements and related Notes. See "Management's Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" in this Form 10-K
for a discussion of results of operations for 2001, 2000, and 1999.
Year Ended December 31,
----------------------------------------------------
2001 2000 1999 1998 1997
--------- --------- --------- --------- --------
(In thousands, except per share data)
Statement of Operations Data:
Rental properties
Rental revenue....................................................... $ 234,881 $ 206,762 $ 172,295 $ 149,319 $128,897
Property operating costs............................................. (62,663) (55,272) (46,754) (41,777) (37,653)
Equity in earnings of operating joint ventures, net.................. 8,833 9,809 10,668 9,368 7,436
--------- --------- --------- --------- --------
181,051 161,299 136,209 116,910 98,680
--------- --------- --------- --------- --------
Property sales and fee services
Sales revenue........................................................ 245,804 451,096 347,005 206,441 119,971
Cost of sales........................................................ (149,698) (337,755) (259,157) (154,903) (94,107)
--------- --------- --------- --------- --------
Gain on property sales.............................................. 96,106 113,341 87,848 51,538 25,864
Equity in earnings of development joint ventures, net................ 25,978 27,780 10,152 6,627 2,123
--------- --------- --------- --------- --------
Total gain on property sales........................................ 122,084 141,121 98,000 58,165 27,987
Management and development fees...................................... 6,000 15,460 14,968 16,792 15,895
Selling, general and administrative expenses......................... (26,570) (45,801) (31,727) (22,232) (19,528)
Other................................................................ 6,187 (9,351) (5,495) (662) (2,814)
--------- --------- --------- --------- --------
107,701 101,429 75,746 52,063 21,540
--------- --------- --------- --------- --------
Interest expense........................................................ (58,145) (50,964) (39,374) (37,384) (39,988)
Depreciation and amortization........................................... (52,458) (46,505) (39,214) (34,054) (31,245)
Corporate administrative costs.......................................... (19,256) (15,675) (14,760) (15,303) (9,463)
Gain on non-strategic asset sales....................................... 3,909 46,279 6,803 18,929 5,029
Other, net.............................................................. 5,660 940 (4,253) (184) 1,176
--------- --------- --------- --------- --------
Income before minority interests, income taxes, and extraordinary items. 168,462 196,803 121,157 100,977 45,729
Minority interests...................................................... (6,142) (10,701) (3,247) (674) (3,145)
--------- --------- --------- --------- --------
Income before income taxes and extraordinary items...................... 162,320 186,102 117,910 100,303 42,584
Income tax expense...................................................... (65,799) (75,095) (47,690) (40,400) (17,343)
--------- --------- --------- --------- --------
Income before extraordinary items....................................... 96,521 111,007 70,220 59,903 25,241
Extraordinary items..................................................... -- -- 26,652 (25,165) --
--------- --------- --------- --------- --------
Net income........................................................... 96,521 111,007 96,872 34,738 25,241
Preferred stock dividends............................................ -- -- -- -- (1,353)
--------- --------- --------- --------- --------
Net income applicable to common stockholders......................... $ 96,521 $ 111,007 $ 96,872 $ 34,738 $ 23,888
========= ========= ========= ========= ========
Net income per share of common stock--assuming dilution:
Before extraordinary items........................................... $ 0.94 $ 1.02 $ 0.64 $ 0.55 $ 0.24
Extraordinary items.................................................. -- -- 0.25 (0.23) --
--------- --------- --------- --------- --------
Net income per share after extraordinary items--assuming dilution.... $ 0.94 $ 1.02 $ 0.89 $ 0.32 $ 0.24
========= ========= ========= ========= ========
Average number of common shares outstanding--assuming dilution....... 102,685 109,017 109,146 109,420 100,768
========= ========= ========= ========= ========
25
Year Ended or as of December 31,
----------------------------------------------------------
2001 2000 1999 1998 1997
---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
(In thousands, except percentages and ratios)
Other Operating Data:
EBDDT/(1)/.............................. $ 183,141 $ 159,270 $ 128,628 $ 103,394 $ 62,771
EBITDA/(2)/............................. $ 280,522 $ 293,373 $ 207,643 $ 177,806 $ 117,163
Buildings owned (square feet)........... 30,900 28,756 24,743 19,657 16,874
Leased percentage....................... 94.4% 95.7% 93.6% 94.9% 97.7%
Annual fixed charges/(3)/............... $ 98,534 $ 75,220 $ 75,024 $ 65,432 $ 55,672
Debt to total market capitalization/(4)/ 45.1% 37.9% 38.9% 36.4% 21.0%
Capital investments/(5)/................ $ 445,624 $ 437,754 $ 540,024 $ 459,783 $ 257,984
Fixed charge coverage ratio/(6)/........ 2.85 3.90 2.77 2.72 2.10
December 31,
----------------------------------------------------------
2001 2000 1999 1998 1997
---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
(In thousands)
Balance Sheet Data:
Total properties, net................... $1,921,951 $1,705,538 $1,649,171 $1,402,496 $1,122,975
Total assets............................ $2,415,515 $2,274,416 $1,853,106 $1,623,719 $1,241,019
Mortgage and other debt................. $1,310,457 $1,134,563 $ 875,564 $ 873,207 $ 568,699
Total stockholders' equity.............. $ 435,257 $ 683,245 $ 590,972 $ 490,229 $ 451,899
Other Data:
Total market capitalization/(7)/........ $2,903,000 $2,991,000 $2,249,000 $2,402,000 $2,699,000
--------
/(1)/ We use a supplemental performance measure called Earnings Before
Depreciation and Deferred Taxes ("EBDDT"), along with net income, to
report our operating results. EBDDT is not a measure of operating results
or cash flows from operating activities as defined by generally accepted
accounting principles. Further, EBDDT is not necessarily indicative of
cash available to fund cash needs and should not be considered as an
alternative to cash flows as a measure of liquidity. We believe, however,
that EBDDT provides relevant information about our operations and is
useful, along with net income, for an understanding of our operating
results.
EBDDT is calculated by making various adjustments to net income.
Depreciation, amortization, and deferred income taxes are added back to
net income as they represent non-cash charges. Since depreciation expense
is added back to net income in arriving at EBDDT, the portion of gain on
property sales attributable to depreciation recapture is excluded from
EBDDT. In addition, gains on the sale of non-strategic assets and
extraordinary items, including their current tax effect, represent
unusual and/or non-recurring items, and are excluded from the EBDDT
calculation.
/(2)/ We use a supplemental measure, Earnings Before Interest, Taxes,
Depreciation and Amortization ("EBITDA"), along with net income and
EBDDT, to evaluate operating results. EBITDA is not a measure of
operating results or cash flows from operating activities as defined by
generally accepted accounting principles. Further, EBITDA is not
necessarily indicative of cash available to fund cash needs and should
not be considered as an alternative to cash flows as a measure of
liquidity. We believe that EBITDA provides relevant information about
operations and is useful, along with net income and EBDDT, for an
understanding of our operating results.
Interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization, capitalized interest in
cost of sales, extraordinary items, and preferred stock dividends are
added back to net income to calculate EBITDA.
/(3)/ Represents total interest incurred, less non-cash interest incurred
(amortization of deferred loan fees), principal amortization, and
preferred stock dividends.
/(4)/ Represents the ratio of total debt to equity market capitalization (based
on the number of common shares outstanding at the end of the period
indicated multiplied by the closing stock price for each respective
period) plus total debt.
/(5)/ Represents expenditures for commercial and residential development for
projects to be developed and sold or held for rental. See "Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations--Cash Flows From Investing Activities" in this Form 10-K.
/(6)/ Represents the ratio of EBITDA to fixed charges.
/(7)/ Represents the number of common shares outstanding multiplied by the
closing stock price at the end of the period indicated plus total debt.
26
Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations
Critical Accounting Policies
The preparation of our consolidated financial statements requires us to make
estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets,
liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets
and liabilities. On an on-going basis, we evaluate our estimates, including
those related to revenue recognition, impairment of real estate assets,
capitalization of costs, bad debts, environmental reserves, and income taxes.
We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions
that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of
which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets
and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual
results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or
conditions.
We believe the following critical accounting policies reflect our more
significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation of the consolidated
financial statements.
Revenue recognition
Our revenue is primarily derived from two sources, rental revenue from our
rental portfolio and property sales.
Rental revenue is recognized when due from tenants. Revenue from leases with
rent concessions or fixed escalations is recognized on a straight-line basis
over the initial term of the related lease. The financial terms of leases are
contractually defined. Rental revenue is not accrued when a tenant vacates the
premises and ceases to make rent payments or files for bankruptcy.
Revenue from sales of properties is recognized using the accrual method. If
a sale does not qualify for the accrual method of recognition, other deferral
methods will be used as appropriate including the percentage-of-completion
method. In certain cases, we retain the right to repurchase property from the
buyer at a specified price. Profit on these sales is not recognized until our
right to repurchase expires. In other instances, when we receive inadequate
cash down payment and take a promissory note for the balance of the sale price,
profit is deferred until such time as sufficient cash is received to meet
minimum down payment requirements. Also, in general, specific identification
and relative sales value methods are used to determine the cost of sales.
Management estimates of future costs to be incurred after the completion of
each sale are included in cost of sales. A change in circumstances that causes
these estimates of future costs to increase or decrease significantly would
affect the gain or loss recognized on future sales.
Impairment
We assess the impairment of real estate asset when events or changes in
circumstances indicate that the net book value may not be recoverable.
Indicators we consider important which could trigger an impairment review
include the following:
. a significant negative industry or economic trend;
. a significant underperformance relative to historical or projected future
operating results;
. a significant change in the manner in which an asset is used; and
. an accumulation of costs significantly in excess of the amount originally
expected to construct an asset.
Real estate is stated at the lower of cost or estimated fair value using the
methodology described as follows: (a) for operating properties and properties
held for investment, a write-down to estimated fair value is recognized when a
property's estimated undiscounted future cash flow, before interest charges, is
less than its net book value; and (b) for properties held for sale, a
write-down to estimated fair value is recorded when we determine that the net
book value exceeds the estimated selling prices less cost to sell. These
evaluations are made on a property-by-property basis. When we determine that
the net book value of an asset may not be recoverable based upon the estimated
undiscounted cash flow, we measure any impairment write-down based on a
projected discounted cash flow method using an estimated discount rate. Value
from comparable property sales will also be
27
considered. The evaluation of future cash flows, discount rates and fair value
of individual properties requires significant judgment and assumptions,
including estimates of market value, lease terms, development absorption,
development costs, lease up costs, and financings. Significant adverse changes
in circumstances affecting these judgments and assumptions in future periods
could cause a significant impairment adjustment to be recorded.
Capitalization of costs
We capitalize direct construction and development costs, including
predevelopment costs, interest, property taxes, insurance, and indirect project
costs, including a portion of our general and administrative costs that are
associated with the acquisition, development, or construction of a project.
Costs previously capitalized related to any abandoned development opportunities
are written off, if we determine such costs will not provide any future
benefits. Should development activity decrease, a portion of interest, property
taxes, insurance and certain general and administrative costs would no longer
be eligible for capitalization, and would be expensed as incurred.
Allowance for doubtful accounts
We make estimates with respect to the collectability of our receivables and
provide for doubtful accounts based on several factors, including our estimate
of collectability and the age of the outstanding balances. Our estimate of
collectability is based on our contacts with the debtors, collection agencies,
our knowledge of the debtors' credit and financial condition, debtors' payment
terms, and current economic trends. If a debtor becomes insolvent or files for
bankruptcy, we provide an allowance for the entire outstanding amount.
Significant judgments and estimates must be made and used in connection with
establishing allowances in any accounting period. Material differences may
result in the amount and timing of our allowances for any period if adverse
general economic conditions cause widespread financial difficulties among our
tenants.
Environmental reserve
We incur ongoing environmental remediation costs, including clean up costs,
consulting fees for environmental studies and investigations, monitoring costs,
and legal costs relating to clean up, litigation defense, and the pursuit of
responsible third parties. Costs incurred in connection with operating
properties and properties previously sold are expensed. Costs relating to
undeveloped land are capitalized as part of development costs. Costs incurred
for properties to be sold are deferred and charged to cost of sales when the
properties are sold.
We maintain a reserve for estimated costs of environmental remediation to be
incurred in connection with operating properties and properties previously
sold. The amounts for our properties to be developed or sold will be
capitalized as components of development costs when incurred, which is
anticipated to be over a period of twenty years, or will be deferred and
charged to cost of sales when the properties are sold. Our estimates were
developed based on reviews that took place over several years based upon
then-prevailing law and identified site conditions. Because of the breadth of
our portfolio, and past sales, we are unable to review each property
extensively on a regular basis. Such estimates are not precise and are always
subject to the availability of further information about the prevailing
conditions at the site, the future requirements of regulatory agencies, and the
availability and ability of other parties to pay some or all of such costs.
Should a previously undetected, substantial environmental hazard be found on
our properties, significant liquidity could be consumed by the resulting clean
up requirements and a material expense may be recorded.
Income taxes
As part of the process of preparing our consolidated financial statements,
significant management judgment is required to estimate our income taxes. Our
estimates are based on interpretation of tax laws. We estimate our actual
current tax due and assess temporary differences resulting from differing
treatment of items for tax and accounting purposes. The temporary differences
result in deferred tax assets and liabilities, which are included within our
consolidated balance sheet (see Note 4 Income taxes in Notes to Consolidated
Financial Statements). Adjustments may be required by a change in assessment of
our deferred tax assets and liabilities, changes due to
28
audit adjustments by Federal and State tax authorities, and changes in tax
laws. To the extent adjustments are required in any given period we would
include the adjustments within the tax provision in the statement of operations
and/or balance sheet. These adjustments could materially impact our financial
position and results of operation, liquidity, and EBDDT (as defined in this
Form 10-K), (see Risk Factors).
Financial Condition and Results of Operations
The following discussion and analysis of financial condition and EBDDT
(defined below) should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial
Statements and related Notes appearing elsewhere in this Form 10-K. This
discussion and analysis covers each of our five business segments: Asset
Management, Commercial, Residential, Urban, and Corporate. Asset Management is
now reported as a separate business segment; it was previously presented
predominately as a part of the Commercial segment. Prior year amounts have been
reclassified to conform with the current year presentation. This analysis of
EBDDT by segment is used in internal reporting to management and, we believe,
provides an effective means of understanding our business and corporate
structure.
Summary EBDDT and reconciliation to net income for the years ended December 31,
2001, 2000, and 1999
Year Ended December 31,
---------------------------- Difference Difference
2001 2000 1999 2001/2000 2000/1999
-------- -------- -------- ---------- ----------
(In thousands)
Pre-tax EBDDT
Asset Management.................. $133,956 $130,778 $113,558 $ 3,178 $ 17,220
Commercial........................ 18,685 8,425 10,993 10,260 (2,568)
Residential....................... 32,039 41,041 27,484 (9,002) 13,557
Urban............................. 12,921 (2,271) 793 15,192 (3,064)
Corporate......................... 1,840 (6,164) (6,861) 8,004 697
-------- -------- -------- -------- --------
Total pre-tax EBDDT.................. 199,441 171,809 145,967 27,632 25,842
Current tax....................... (16,300) (12,539) (17,339) (3,761) 4,800
-------- -------- -------- -------- --------
EBDDT................................ 183,141 159,270 128,628 23,871 30,642
Depreciation and amortization..... (52,458) (46,505) (39,214) (5,953) (7,291)
Deferred taxes.................... (49,499) (62,556) (30,351) 13,057 (32,205)
Gain on non-strategic asset sales. 3,909 46,279 6,803 (42,370) 39,476
Depreciation recapture............ 11,428 14,519 4,354 (3,091) 10,165
Extraordinary gain, net of tax.... -- -- 26,652 -- (26,652)
-------- -------- -------- -------- --------
Net income........................... $ 96,521 $111,007 $ 96,872 $(14,486) $ 14,135
======== ======== ======== ======== ========
The Company uses a supplemental performance measure, Earnings Before
Depreciation and Deferred Taxes ("EBDDT"), along with net income, to report
operating results. EBDDT is not a measure of operating results or cash flows
from operating activities as defined by generally accepted accounting
principles. Further, EBDDT is not necessarily indicative of cash available to
fund cash needs and should not be considered as an alternative to cash flows as
a measure of liquidity. The Company believes that EBDDT provides relevant
information about operations and is useful, along with net income, for an
understanding of the Company's operating results.
EBDDT is calculated by making various adjustments to net income.
Depreciation, amortization, and deferred income taxes are added back to net
income as they represent non-cash charges. Since depreciation expense is added
back to net income in arriving at EBDDT, the portion of gain on property sales
attributable to depreciation recapture is excluded from EBDDT. In addition,
gains on the sale of non-strategic assets and extraordinary items, including
their current tax effect, represent unusual and/or non-recurring items and are
excluded from the EBDDT calculation. A reconciliation from EBDDT to net income
is also provided.
29
Asset Management:
The Asset Management segment consists of the rental activities of our wholly
owned assets and income from operating joint ventures. Growth in this segment
is attributed primarily to the transfer of property developed by the Commercial
and Urban segments that we intend to hold and operate. Pre-tax EBDDT consists
of rental property operating income, gains from the sale of operating
properties, and gains from tenants exercising purchase options. The following
is a schedule of pre-tax EBDDT for the segment:
Year Ended December 31,
---------------------------- Difference Difference
2001 2000 1999 2001/2000 2000/1999
-------- -------- -------- ---------- ----------
(In thousands)
Rental properties
Rental revenue.................................. $234,881 $206,762 $172,295 $ 28,119 $34,467
Property operating costs........................ (62,663) (55,272) (46,754) (7,391) (8,518)
Equity in earnings of operating joint ventures,
net........................................... 8,833 9,809 10,668 (976) (859)
-------- -------- -------- -------- -------
181,051 161,299 136,209 19,752 25,090
-------- -------- -------- -------- -------
Property sales and fee services
Sales revenue................................... 71,818 89,323 91,020 (17,505) (1,697)
Cost of sales/(1)/.............................. (42,172) (60,929) (65,559) 18,757 4,630
-------- -------- -------- -------- -------
Total gain on property sales................ 29,646 28,394 25,461 1,252 2,933
Management and development fees................. 145 11,814 10,568 (11,669) 1,246
Selling, general and administrative expenses.... (1,235) (8,903) (7,493) 7,668 (1,410)
Other........................................... 5,518 2,353 2,737 3,165 (384)
-------- -------- -------- -------- -------
34,074 33,658 31,273 416 2,385
-------- -------- -------- -------- -------
Interest expense................................... (75,110) (57,832) (50,662) (17,278) (7,170)
Minority interests................................. (6,059) (6,347) (3,262) 288 (3,085)
-------- -------- -------- -------- -------
Pre-tax EBDDT............................... $133,956 $130,778 $113,558 $ 3,178 $17,220
======== ======== ======== ======== =======
Rental building occupancy
(In thousands of square feet, except percentages)
Owned.............................................. 30,900 28,756 24,743 2,144 4,013
Occupied........................................... 29,183 27,512 23,159 1,671 4,353
Occupancy percentage............................... 94.4% 95.7% 93.6% (1.36)% 2.2%
--------
/(1)/ For purposes of this segment disclosure, cost of sales for 2001, 2000,
and 1999 includes depreciation recapture of $11.4 million, $14.5 million,
and $4.4 million, respectively. Gain attributable to depreciation
recapture is included in net income, but not EBDDT.
30
Rental Revenue Less Property Operating Costs
Rental revenue less property operating costs has increased over the past few
years mainly because of additions of buildings, new ground leases, and rental
increases from renewals on Same Space (properties that were owned and operated
for the entire "current" year and the entire immediately preceding year are
referred to as "Same Space") partially offset by properties sold. We added a
net 2.1 million square feet in 2001, 4.0 million square feet in 2000, and 5.1
million square feet in 1999 to our rental portfolio. Rental revenue less
operating costs for 2001, 2000, and 1999, are summarized as follows:
Year Ended Year Ended
December 31, December 31,
----------------- Difference ----------------- Difference
2001 2000 2001/2000 2000 1999 2000/1999
-------- -------- ---------- -------- -------- ----------
(In thousands)
Rental revenue less
operating costs:
Same Space.................... $110,760 $110,007 $ 753 $ 93,279 $ 90,055 $ 3,224
Properties added to portfolio. 34,084 14,144 19,940 33,619 8,955 24,664
Properties sold from portfolio 1,784 6,599 (4,815) 2,780 6,537 (3,757)
Ground leases................. 25,590 20,740 4,850 21,812 19,994 1,818
-------- -------- ------- -------- -------- -------
$172,218 $151,490 $20,728 $151,490 $125,541 $25,949
======== ======== ======= ======== ======== =======
We do not expect substantial changes in rental income from our Same Space
rental portfolio. Rather, we expect growth in overall portfolio rental income
will result primarily from new properties we add to our rental portfolio over
time.
Rental revenue less operating costs increased $20.7 million in 2001
primarily attributable to $19.9 million from the additions of buildings and
$4.9 million and $0.8 million increases in revenue from ground leases and Same
Space, respectively, partially offset by $4.8 million from properties sold.
Rental revenue less operating costs increased $25.9 million in 2000
primarily attributable to $24.7 million from the additions of buildings and
$1.8 million and $3.2 million increases in revenue from ground leases and Same
Space, respectively, partially offset by $3.8 million from properties sold.
The increase in rental revenue less property operating costs in 2000 also
arose because the new buildings added to our portfolio in 2000 had higher
occupancy than those added in 1999. The occupancy, at December 31, 2000, for
the buildings added in 2000 was nearly 100%, as compared to 79%, at December
31, 1999, for the buildings added in 1999.
An increase in income from the Asset Management segment is expected in the
first quarter of 2002 because of an $8.7 million lease buyout from a major
tenant. Proceeds from the lease buyout will be used to fund our overall
operations. The re-leasing effort for the property is currently underway. As
part of the buyout, we have forgone approximately $4.0 million of annual rental
revenue from this tenant. The lease termination is not expected to result in an
impairment issue for this property.
Equity in Earnings of Operating Joint Ventures
Equity in earnings of operating joint ventures, net, decreased by $1.0
million and $0.9 million in 2001, and 2000, respectively, primarily because of
higher interest expense due to a refinancing at a joint venture in 2000 and
lower occupancies in hotels owned by two joint ventures in 2001 (see
Variability in Results section).
31
Property Sales
Gain on property sales was $29.6 million in 2001, $28.4 million in 2000, and
$25.5 million in 1999, summarized as follows:
Year Ended December 31,
---------------------------- Difference Difference
2001 2000 1999 2001/2000 2000/1999
-------- -------- -------- ---------- ----------
(In thousands)
Property sales
Building sales:
Sales proceeds....................... $ 37,898 $ 72,057 $ 36,937 $(34,159) $ 35,120
Cost of sales........................ (24,402) (50,262) (25,505) 25,860 (24,757)
-------- -------- -------- -------- --------
Gain............................. 13,496 21,795 11,432 (8,299) 10,363
-------- -------- -------- -------- --------
Ground Lease sales:
Sales proceeds....................... 23,861 10,850 330 13,011 10,520
Cost of sales........................ (11,194) (5,859) (72) (5,335) (5,787)
-------- -------- -------- -------- --------
Gain............................. 12,667 4,991 258 7,676 4,733
-------- -------- -------- -------- --------
Other sales:
Sales proceeds....................... 10,059 6,416 53,753 3,643 (47,337)
Cost of sales........................ (6,576) (4,808) (39,982) (1,768) 35,174
-------- -------- -------- -------- --------
Gain............................. 3,483 1,608 13,771 1,875 (12,163)
-------- -------- -------- -------- --------
Total gain on property sales..... $ 29,646 $ 28,394 $ 25,461 $ 1,252 $ 2,933
======== ======== ======== ======== ========
The 2001 property sales include the closings of 171.2 acres of ground leases
and 0.5 million square feet of existing operating properties.
The 2000 property sales include the closings of 9.0 acres of ground leases
and 1.2 million square feet of existing operating properties. The 1999 property
sales include the closings of 10.5 acres of ground leases and 0.4 million
square feet of existing operating properties (see Variability in Results
section).
"Other sales" in the table above included the sale of an apartment joint
venture in San Diego, California in 1999; there were no sales of operating
joint ventures in 2001 and 2000. The 2001, 2000, and 1999 "Other sales" also
include the sales of 937 acres, 1,026 acres, and 1,514 acres, respectively, of
ground leases that we had acquired in 1998 from a railroad customer with the
intention of selling them over the next several years.
Management Fees
In past years, a major source of management fee income was a contract to
manage and sell the non-railroad real estate assets of a major railroad
company. As anticipated, most of the railroad's inventory of managed assets was
sold in accordance with the customer's goals. We decided not to pursue renewal
of this contract when it expired on December 31, 2000, so management fees
decreased by $11.7 million in 2001. Management fees increased by $1.2 million
in 2000 primarily because of higher sales commissions from the sales of
railroad inventory of the railroad customer.
Selling, General, and Administrative Expenses
The decrease in 2001 in selling, general, and administrative expenses of
$7.7 million was due to the expiration of the contract to manage and sell the
non-railroad real estate assets of a major railroad company (see Management
Fees section above). The increase in 2000 of $1.4 million was primarily due to
increase in non-compensation administrative and office related expenses.
32
Other
"Other" increased by $3.2 million in 2001 primarily because of higher
interest income earned on a higher balance of short-term investments and gain
from a condemnation easement sale. "Other" decreased by $0.4 million in 2000
primarily because of higher expenses related to the expiration of the contract
to manage and sell the non-railroad real estate assets of a major railroad
company.
Interest
Interest expense was $75.1 million, $57.8 million, and $50.7 million in
2001, 2000, and 1999, respectively. Interest increased $17.3 million and $7.1
million in 2001, and 2000, respectively, primarily because of new mortgages
placed on completed buildings and newly acquired buildings added to our
portfolio.
We expect interest expense to continue to increase in 2002 as we anticipate
adding debt collateralized by the newly completed and retained buildings.
Minority Interests
In 1999, we formed a subsidiary real estate investment trust ("REIT") for
financing purposes and sold 10% of this subsidiary's stock to minority
investors. This subsidiary is consolidated for financial reporting purposes.
The increase in 2000 was because the subsidiary operated for a full year in
2000, but not in 1999.
Commercial:
The Commercial segment acquires and develops suburban commercial business
parks for our own account and the account of others. Pre-tax EBDDT consists
primarily of sales gains from development properties sold. The following is a
schedule of pre-tax EBDDT for the segment:
Year Ended December 31,
----------------------------
Difference Difference
2001 2000 1999 2001/2000 2000/1999
-------- -------- -------- ---------- ----------
(In thousands)
Property sales and fee services
Sales revenue.............................. $ 75,686 $ 68,951 $ 94,072 $ 6,735 $(25,121)
Cost of sales.............................. (50,896) (52,415) (76,845) 1,519 24,430
-------- -------- -------- ------- --------
Gain on property sales................. 24,790 16,536 17,227 8,254 (691)
Equity in earnings of development
joint ventures, net...................... 9 13 (23) (4) 36
-------- -------- -------- ------- --------
Total gain on property sales........ 24,799 16,549 17,204 8,250 (655)
Management and development fees............ 3,679 999 896 2,680 103
Selling, general and administrative
expenses................................. (9,607) (9,643) (6,192) 36 (3,451)
Other...................................... (179) 524 (915) (703) 1,439
-------- -------- -------- ------- --------
18,692 8,429 10,993 10,263 (2,564)
Interest expense.............................. (7) (4) -- (3) (4)
-------- -------- -------- ------- --------
Pre-tax EBDDT....................... $ 18,685 $ 8,425 $ 10,993 $10,260 $ (2,568)
======== ======== ======== ======= ========
33
Property Sales
Gain on property sales was $24.8 million in 2001, $16.5 million in 2000, and
$17.2 million in 1999, summarized as follows:
Year Ended December 31,
----------------------------
Difference Difference
2001 2000 1999 2001/2000 2000/1999
-------- -------- -------- ---------- ----------
(In thousands)
Building sales:
Sales proceeds....................... $ 40,697 $ 33,741 $ 59,806 $6,956 $(26,065)
Cost of sales........................ (29,846) (31,546) (52,788) 1,700 21,242
-------- -------- -------- ------ --------
Gain............................. 10,851 2,195 7,018 8,656 (4,823)
-------- -------- -------- ------ --------
Land sales:
Sales proceeds....................... 34,989 35,210 34,266 (221) 944
Cost of sales........................ (21,050) (20,869) (24,057) (181) 3,188
-------- -------- -------- ------ --------
Gain............................. 13,939 14,341 10,209 (402) 4,132
-------- -------- -------- ------ --------
Gain on property sales........... 24,790 16,536 17,227 8,254 (691)
Equity in earnings of development joint
ventures, net......................... 9 13 (23) (4) 36
-------- -------- -------- ------ --------
Total gain on property sales..... $ 24,799 $ 16,549 $ 17,204 $8,250 $ (655)
======== ======== ======== ====== ========
The 2001 commercial property sales include the closings of 0.6 million
square feet of new industrial buildings and 2,013.3 acres of improved land
capable of supporting 6.8 million square feet of commercial development (see
Variability in Results section).
The 2000 commercial property sales include the closings of 0.9 million
square feet of new industrial buildings, and 436.8 acres of improved land
capable of supporting 8.5 million square feet of commercial development. The
1999 commercial property sales include the closings of 1.3 million square feet
of new industrial buildings, and 161.2 acres of improved land capable of
supporting 3.3 million square feet of commercial development.
Management and Development Fees
Management and development fees increased by $2.7 million in 2001 primarily
because of the development and management fees related to a construction
management contract with a ground lease lessee.
Selling, General, and Administrative Expenses
Selling, general and administrative expenses in 2001 approximated those of
2000. In 2000, the selling, general, and administrative expenses increased $3.5
million, of which approximately $2.7 million was due to additional staffing
because of increased sales activity and higher costs to pursue new development
activities including expenses incurred on lost opportunities, and $0.8 million
was related to non-compensation administrative and office expenses.
Other
"Other" decreased by $0.7 million in 2001, but increased $1.4 million in
2000. The decrease in 2001 is primarily because of the expense of certain
predevelopment costs previously capitalized as these costs are not expected to
provide future benefits. The increase in 2000 is primarily because of interest
income from restricted cash generated by tax-deferred exchanges.
34
Interest
Although the development activities increased as of year-end 2001, the
interest incurred and capitalized during 2001 decreased as compared to 2000
because construction starts on several projects occurred in the latter part of
2001. The increase in interest incurred and capitalized in 2000 was due to
higher levels of development activity.
Following is a summary of interest incurred:
Year Ended December 31,
------------------------- Difference Difference
2001 2000 1999 2001/2000 2000/1999
------- ------- ------- ---------- ----------
(In thousands)
Total interest incurred $ 4,765 $ 5,534 $ 5,178 $(769) $ 356
Interest capitalized... (4,758) (5,530) (5,178) 772 (352)
------- ------- ------- ----- -----
Interest expensed...... $ 7 $ 4 $ -- $ 3 $ 4
======= ======= ======= ===== =====
Residential:
The Residential segment acquires and develops land primarily for
single-family residential property via direct investment or through joint
ventures. Through the third quarter of 2000, the Residential segment activities
also included home building; however, these assets were sold as discussed
below. Therefore, our residential sales activities in 2001 decreased as
compared to 2000. The following is a schedule of pre-tax EBDDT for the segment:
Year Ended December 31,
------------------------------ Difference Difference
2001 2000 1999 2001/2000 2000/1999
-------- --------- --------- ---------- ----------
(In thousands)
Property sales and fee services
Sales revenue........................ $ 48,507 $ 292,822 $ 161,913 $(244,315) $ 130,909
Cost of sales........................ (30,202) (238,930) (121,107) 208,728 (117,823)
-------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
Gain on property sales........... 18,305 53,892 40,806 (35,587) 13,086
Equity in earnings of development
joint ventures, net................ 27,670 27,767 10,175 (97) 17,592
-------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
Total gain on property
sales....................... 45,975 81,659 50,981 (35,684) 30,678
Management and development
fees............................... 1,394 1,498 892 (104) 606
Selling, general and
administrative expenses............ (11,379) (25,007) (17,217) 13,628 (7,790)
Other................................ (3,868) (12,209) (7,153) 8,341 (5,056)
-------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
32,122 45,941 27,503 (13,819) 18,438
Interest expense........................ -- (546) (34) 546 (512)
Minority interests...................... (83) (4,354) 15 4,271 (4,369)
-------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
Pre-tax EBDDT................. $ 32,039 $ 41,041 $ 27,484 $ (9,002) $ 13,557
======== ========= ========= ========= =========
Property Sales
The 2001 gain of $18.3 million came from residential property sales
generated from the closings of 55 homes and 396 lots. The 2001 gain decreased
by $35.6 million as compared to 2000 primarily because of the sale of our
home-building assets in 2000.
35
Included in gain on property sales for 2000 is $13.4 million from the sale
of our home-building assets to a limited liability company formed in 2000
managed by Brookfield Homes of California, Inc. ("BHC, LLC"), as well as $10.2
million, before deduction of approximately $4 million in minority interest,
from the closing of an 80-lot site in San Francisco, and $30.3 million
resulting primarily from the closings of 512 lots and 347 homes compared to the
closings of 328 homes and 121 lots in 1999. For results from BHC, LLC
operations, see Equity in earning of development joint ventures, net.
Equity in earnings of development joint ventures, net:
Year Ended December 31,
------------------------------ Difference Difference
2001 2000 1999 2001/2000 2000/1999
--------- --------- -------- ---------- ----------
(In thousands)
Sales proceeds-unconsolidated JVs.... $ 215,402 $ 316,523 $115,225 $(101,121) $ 201,298
Cost of sales........................ (184,122) (260,975) (86,918) 76,853 (174,057)
--------- --------- -------- --------- ---------
Gain.............................. 31,280 55,548 28,307 (24,268) 27,241
Joint Venture partners interest...... (3,610) (27,781) (18,132) 24,171 (9,649)
--------- --------- -------- --------- ---------
Equity in earnings of
development joint ventures, net. $ 27,670 $ 27,767 $ 10,175 $ (97) $ 17,592
========= ========= ======== ========= =========
Equity in earnings of development joint ventures, net, decreased $0.1
million in 2001. Of the $0.1 million decrease in 2001, $9.8 million and $1.3
million decreases were attributable to decreased sales volumes at Serrano in El
Dorado Hills, California, and Talega Associates in San Clemente, California,
respectively. These decreases were offset by the increased sales activities at
Parkway, Talega Village, and the sale of our interest in BHC, LLC of $3.5
million, $3.2 million, and $4.3 million, respectively.
Equity in earnings of development joint ventures, net, increased $17.6
million in 2000. Of the $17.6 million increase in 2000, $10.1 million was
attributable to BHC, LLC. The remaining increase is attributable to increased
sales activities at two of our investments, Serrano in El Dorado Hills,
California and Talega in San Clemente, California; our joint ventures sold
1,741 lots in 2000 as compared to 797 lots and 29 homes in 1999 (see
Variability in Results section).
Selling, General, and Administrative Expenses
Selling, general, and administrative expenses decreased $13.6 million in
2001, but increased $7.8 million in 2000. As expected, the decrease in 2001 was
primarily attributable to the decreased number of employees related to the sale
of our home-building assets to BHC, LLC, in 2000. The increase in 2000 was
primarily attributable to the expenses related to the sale of the home-building
assets to BHC, LLC during 2000.
Other
"Other" (expense) decreased $8.3 million in 2001, but increased $5.1 million
in 2000 primarily because of the $5.1 million loss in 2001 related to cost
overruns on a fixed-price contract for a development project compared to $11.8
million loss in 2000. The increase in 2001 was also due to an increase in
interest income of $1.1 million primarily attributable to higher short-term
investments and $0.5 million decrease in expenses incurred in lost
opportunities.
36
Interest
Following is a summary of interest incurred:
Year Ended December 31,
------------------------ Difference Difference
2001 2000 1999 2001/2000 2000/1999
----- ------- -------- ---------- ----------
(In thousands)
Total interest incurred $ 668 $ 6,529 $ 13,160 $(5,861) $(6,631)
Interest capitalized... (668) (5,983) (13,126) 5,315 7,143
----- ------- -------- ------- -------
Interest expensed...... $ -- $ 546 $ 34 $ (546) $ 512
===== ======= ======== ======= =======
Interest incurred and capitalized decreased in 2001 and 2000 primarily
because of the sale of the home-building assets, as part of the sale proceeds
were used to pay off certain existing debt (see Note 14).
Minority Interests
Minority interests decreased $4.3 million in 2001, but increased $4.4
million in 2000. This is primarily because of the sale of an 80-lot site in San
Francisco by a consolidated joint venture in 2000 (see Property Sales section).
Urban:
The Urban segment entitles and develops urban mixed-use sites in San
Francisco, Los Angeles, and San Diego. The principal active project of the
segment is Mission Bay in San Francisco. The following is a schedule of pre-tax
EBDDT for the segment:
Year Ended December 31,
------------------------- Difference Difference
2001 2000 1999 2001/2000 2000/1999
-------- ------- ------ ---------- ----------
(In thousands)
Property sales and fee services
Sales revenue........................ $ 49,793 $ -- $ -- $ 49,793 $ --
Cost of sales........................ (37,337) -- -- (37,337) --
-------- ------- ------ -------- -------
Total gain on property sales..... 12,456 -- -- 12,456 --
Management and development fees...... 782 1,149 2,612 (367) (1,463)
Selling, general and administrative
expenses........................... (4,349) (2,248) (825) (2,101) (1,423)
Other................................ 4,716 (19) (164) 4,735 145
-------- ------- ------ -------- -------
13,605 (1,118) 1,623 14,723 (2,741)
Interest expense........................ (684) (1,153) (830) 469 (323)
-------- ------- ------ -------- -------
Pre-tax EBDDT.................... $ 12,921 $(2,271) $ 793 $ 15,192 $(3,064)
======== ======= ====== ======== =======
Property sales
The gain in 2001 resulted from land sales of approximately 5.1 acres of land
at Mission Bay and San Diego (see Variability in Results section).
Management and Development Fees
Management and development fees decreased $0.4 million and $1.5 million in
2001 and 2000, respectively. The decreases were primarily because development
management activities related to the Dodger Stadium renovation were completed
in 2000. The 2001 decrease was partially offset by development fees for
development management activities commenced in September 2001 related to a new
ground lease and joint venture development.
37
Selling, General, and Administrative Expenses
The increases of $2.1 million and $1.4 million in 2001 and 2000,
respectively, were primarily attributable to changes in overall staffing to
accommodate increased activity associated with the projects of the Urban
segment.
Other
"Other" increased $4.7 million in 2001 primarily because of lease
termination payment related to an expected tenant at the Mission Bay project
and higher interest income from restricted cash generated by tax-deferred
exchanges.
Interest
Following is a summary of interest incurred:
Year Ended December 31,
----------------------- Difference Difference
2001 2000 1999 2001/2000 2000/1999
------- ------ ------ ---------- ----------
(In thousands)
Total interest incurred $ 3,258 $1,269 $1,377 $ 1,989 $(108)
Interest capitalized... (2,574) (116) (547) (2,458) 431
------- ------ ------ ------- -----
Interest expensed...... $ 684 $1,153 $ 830 $ (469) $ 323
======= ====== ====== ======= =====
Interest expense decreased $0.5 million in 2001 but increased $0.3 million
in 2000. The decrease in 2001 was attributable to the increased capitalized
interest as the result of higher development activities at our Mission Bay
project in San Francisco. The 2000 interest approximated that of 1999.
Corporate:
Corporate consists of administrative costs and interest contra-expense,
which represents the benefit of capitalized interest attributable to operating
segments that had qualifying assets, which required capitalization of more
interest than incurred by these segments.
Year Ended December 31,
---------------------------- Difference Difference
2001 2000 1999 2001/2000 2000/1999
-------- -------- -------- ---------- ----------
(In thousands)
Interest (contra-expense)..... $ 17,656 $ 8,571 $ 12,152 $ 9,085 $(3,581)
Cost of sales................. (2,220) -- -- (2,220) --
Corporate administrative costs (19,256) (15,675) (14,760) (3,581) (915)
Other......................... 5,660 940 (4,253) 4,720 5,193
-------- -------- -------- ------- -------
Pre-tax EBDDT.............. $ 1,840 $ (6,164) $ (6,861) $ 8,004 $ 697
======== ======== ======== ======= =======
Interest (contra-expenses)
Corporate interest consists primarily of interest contra-expense because the
Commercial, Residential, and Urban segments had qualifying assets which
required the capitalization of more interest than was directly incurred by
these segments. As a result, the Corporate segment capitalized interest during
the period and, as the qualifying assets are sold, the corresponding
capitalized interest is reflected as cost of sales under the Corporate segment.
To conform to current year segment reporting format, capitalized interest in
the amounts of $9.5 million for 2001, $7.0 million for 2000 and $5.5 million
for 1999, attributable to the Commercial segment's qualifying assets for the
years presented is reported under the Corporate segment. The increase of
interest contra-expense in 2001 is primarily because of increased assets in the
operating segments. The decrease of interest contra-expense in 2000 is
primarily because of the sale of our home-building assets.
38
Cost of Sales
As noted above, as the qualifying assets from other segments are sold, the
corresponding capitalized interest is reflected as cost of sale. Cost of sales
of $2.2 million in 2001 was attributable to the Residential segment.
Corporate Administrative Costs
Corporate administrative costs consist primarily of general and
administrative expenses. General and administrative expenses increased by $3.6
million and $0.9 million in 2001 and 2000, respectively, primarily because of
the increase in our overall activities.
Other
The increase in "other" in 2001 and 2000 is primarily attributable to higher
interest income from higher short-term investments.
Items Not Included in Pre-tax EBDDT by Segment
See a comparative presentation of reconciliation from Pre-tax EBDDT to net
income at page 29.
Depreciation and Amortization Expense
The increases in depreciation and amortization expense of $6.0 million and
$7.3 million in 2001 and 2000, respectively, were primarily attributable to the
new buildings added to the portfolio. In 2001 and 2000, we added 2.1 million
net square feet and 4.0 million net square feet of building space,
respectively, to our portfolio. The added buildings resulted in incremental
depreciation expense of $4.1 million and $7.1 million in 2001 and 2000,
respectively. The 2001 increase is also due to $1.5 million in amortization of
lease commissions and $0.3 million higher depreciation of computers and
furniture.
Gain on Non-Strategic Asset Sales
Gain on sales of non-strategic assets was $3.9 million, $46.3 million, and
$6.8 million for 2001, 2000, and 1999, respectively.
From 1995 through 2000, we sold $320 million of non-strategic assets with
the proceeds used to pay down a portion of existing debt, redeem preferred
stock, and fund new development. By the end of 2000, this program was virtually
completed. The decrease in 2001, but increase in 2000 is primarily because of a
significant sale of desert land that was ultimately transferred to the Federal
Government in 2000. Future gains will likely be limited to a few additional
transactions on remaining desert property.
39
Income Taxes
Income taxes decreased $9.3 million and increased $27.4 million in 2001 and
2000, respectively. These changes are the results of changes in pre-tax income
primarily attributed to rental income, gain from property sales, and gain on
non-strategic asset sales as discussed above.
Year Ended December 31,
---------------------------- Difference Difference
2001 2000 1999 2001/2000 2000/1999
-------- -------- -------- ---------- ----------
(In thousands)
Income before income taxes & extraordinary items $162,320 $186,102 $117,910 $(23,782) $68,192
======== ======== ======== ======== =======
Income taxes:
Current taxes................................ $ 16,300 $ 12,539 $ 17,339 $ 3,761 $(4,800)
Deferred taxes............................... 49,499 62,556 30,351 (13,057) 32,205
-------- -------- -------- -------- -------
Income tax expense........................... $ 65,799 $ 75,095 $ 47,690 $ (9,296) $27,405
======== ======== ======== ======== =======
Total tax:
Current tax rate............................. 10.0% 6.7% 14.7% 49.3% (54.4)%
Deferred tax rate............................ 30.5% 33.6% 25.7% (9.2)% 30.7 %
-------- -------- -------- -------- -------
Tax rate..................................... 40.5% 40.3% 40.4% .0% .0%
======== ======== ======== ======== =======
Current tax rates decreased from 1999 to 2000 and increased from 2000 to
2001 primarily due to increases and decreases, respectively, in the number of
tax-deferred property exchanges in the respective years. Gains from
tax-deferred exchange property sales are recognized for financial reporting
purposes but the associated tax liability is not incurred for tax purposes
until the replacement property is sold.
Accordingly, deferred taxes increased from 1999 to 2000 and decreased from
2000 to 2001 primarily due to increases and decreases, respectively, in the
number of tax-deferred property exchanges in the respective years.
The calculation of current taxes due involves the use of many estimates that
are not finalized and adjusted until our final tax returns are filed, usually
in September of the following year. Consequently, actual taxes paid in regard
to any given year will differ from the amounts shown above; however, the
differences have historically not been material, and are not expected to be
material in the future.
Depreciation Recapture
We exclude the portion of gain on property sales attributable to
depreciation recapture from EBDDT (see Note 13 of the accompanying Consolidated
Financial Statements). The decrease of $3.1 million in depreciation recapture
from 2000 to 2001 is because of lower sales volume of older properties in 2001
as compared to 2000. We sold seven older existing buildings in 2001 as compared
to eleven in 2000.
Extraordinary Income/Expense
In October of 1999, a partnership transferred its primary asset to a third
party. This transaction resulted in the recognition of a $26.7 million
extraordinary gain, net of tax expense of $17.8 million.
Variability in Results
Although our rental properties provide relatively stable operating results,
our earnings from period to period will be affected by the nature and timing of
acquisitions and sales of property. Many of our projects require a lengthy
process to complete the development cycle before they are sold. Also, sales of
assets are difficult to predict given fluctuating economic conditions and are
generally subject to lengthy negotiations and contingencies that need to be
resolved before closing. These factors may tend to "bunch" income in particular
periods rather than producing a more even pattern throughout the year or from
year to year. In addition, gross margins may vary significantly as the mix of
property varies. The cost basis of the properties sold varies because (i)
properties have been owned for varying periods of time; (ii) properties are
owned in various geographical locations; and (iii) development projects have
varying infrastructure costs and build-out periods.
40
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Off-balance sheet arrangements, contractual obligations and commitments
We have the following off-balance sheet arrangements, contractual
obligations and commitments, which are disclosed in various sections of the
Consolidated Financial Statements, Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements,
and elsewhere in this MD&A. They exist in the following areas:
. Unconsolidated real estate joint ventures--capital contribution
requirements
. Debt and debt service guarantees
. Surety bonds and standby letters of credit
. Executed contracts for construction and development activity
Unconsolidated real estate joint ventures--capital contribution requirements
We have investments in eleven unconsolidated real estate joint ventures.
Five of the joint ventures are involved in the operation of rental real estate
properties and the remaining six are involved in real estate development. We
use the equity method of accounting for all of our investments in
unconsolidated joint ventures.
We are required to make additional capital contributions to one of the
unconsolidated joint ventures should additional capital contributions be
necessary to fund cost overruns if actual construction costs exceed the
guaranteed maximum price in the construction contract. The maximum price is
approximately $252.5 million, of which $165 million is anticipated to be funded
from construction loan proceeds and $62.5 million from our partners. As of
December 31, 2001, no additional capital contribution is expected to be
necessary.
Debt and debt service guarantees
We have made certain debt service guarantees totaling $52.9 million. Of the
total guarantees, $42.3 million of debt service guarantees relates to three
unconsolidated residential development joint ventures, and an $8.6 million debt
service guarantee that relates to a development project in which we are the
construction manager. We also have a $2.0 million limited guarantee, relating
to another development project in which we are the developer, which expires on
July 1, 2002. These debt service guarantees are typical business arrangements
commonly required of developers in real estate development. Examples of events
that would require us to provide a cash payment pursuant to the guarantee
include a loan default, which would result from failure of the primary borrower
to service the debt when due, or non-compliance of the primary borrower with
financial covenants. Our guarantee exposure is generally limited to situations
in which the value of the collateral is not sufficient to satisfy the
outstanding indebtedness. At December 31, 2001, we have not been required to
satisfy any amounts pursuant to these debt and debt service guarantees.
Surety bonds and standby letters of credit
As of December 31, 2001, we have $177.2 million in surety bonds and $48.1
million in outstanding standby letters of credit, totaling $225.3 million, in
favor of local municipalities or financial institutions to guarantee the
construction of real property improvements or financial obligations. The $177.2
million in surety bonds are to guarantee the construction of public
improvements and infrastructure such as sewer, streets, traffic signals,
grading, and wildlife preservations in connection with our various development
projects. Surety bonds are commonly required by public agencies from developers
in real estate development. The surety bonds and standby letters of credit are
renewable and expire upon completion of the required improvements. Standby
letters of credit are a form of credit enhancement that is commonly required in
real estate development when bonds are issued to finance public improvements.
41
Executed contracts for construction and development activity
We have entered into construction and development contracts to vendors
totaling $273.3 million related to our various projects. A majority of these
commitments are typically funded by construction loans and originated in the
normal course of business.
The following table summarizes our outstanding contractual obligations as of
December 31, 2001 and the effect such obligations are expected to have on
liquidity and cash flow in future periods:
Payments Due by Period
------------------------------------------------
Less Than 1-3 After 5
Contractual Obligations Total 1 Year Years 4-5 Years Years
----------------------- ---------- --------- -------- --------- --------
(in thousands)
Mortgage and Other Debt...... $1,310,457 $176,723 $331,929 $197,993 $603,812
Operating Leases............. 9,263 2,573 6,239 226 225
Construction Contracts....... 273,264 253,509 19,755 -- --
---------- -------- -------- -------- --------
Total Contractual Obligations $1,592,984 $432,805 $357,923 $198,219 $604,037
========== ======== ======== ======== ========
The following table summarizes our outstanding commitments as of December
31, 2001 and the effect such commitments may have on liquidity and cash flow in
future periods:
Amount of Commitment Expiration
Per Period
Total -------------------------------
Amounts Less Than 1-3 4-5 After 5
Commitments Committed 1 Year Years Years Years
----------- --------- --------- ------- ----- -------
(in thousands)
Standby Letters of Credit and
Surety Bonds............... $225,325 $137,316 $87,999 $10 $ --
Debt Guarantees.............. 52,885 52,885 -- -- --
-------- -------- ------- --- ----
Total Commercial Commitments. $278,210 $190,201 $87,999 $10 $ --
======== ======== ======= === ====
Note: The above tables do not include certain obligations made in the ordinary
course of business (receivables, payables, etc).
Cash flows from operating activities
Cash provided by operating activities reflected in the statement of cash
flows for the years ended December 31, 2001, 2000, and 1999 was $355.6 million,
$336.2 million, and $183.9 million, respectively.
The increase of approximately $19.4 million in 2001 was primarily attributed
to a combined decrease of $72.4 million in uses offset by a combined decrease
of $53.0 million in sources. The combined decrease of $72.4 million in uses was
due to the $90.0 million decrease in capital expenditures for development
properties offset by the $13.0 million increase in other property acquisitions
and the $4.6 million lower minority interest. The combined decrease of $53.0
million in sources was primarily due to the $145.6 million decrease in cost of
development properties and non-strategic assets sold and the $14.5 million
decrease in net income offset by the $17.1 million increase in operating
distributions from joint ventures and the change of $103.6 million in assets
and liabilities which resulted from a $104.8 million prepayment of rent
associated with a 34-year ground lease.
The $152.3 million increase between 2000 and 1999 was primarily attributed
to a combined increase of $70.5 million in sources and a combined decrease of
$81.8 million in uses. The combined increase of $70.5 million in sources was
due to the $80.0 million increase in cost of development properties and
non-strategic assets sold, the $44.0 million extraordinary income in 1999, and
the $14.1 million increase in net income offset by the $20.1 million decrease
in operating distributions from joint ventures and the $43.9 million change in
assets and liabilities. The combined decrease of $81.8 million in uses was
primarily due to the $74.1 million decrease in capital expenditures for
development properties and the $7.5 million higher minority interest.
42
Cash flows from investing activities
Net cash used in investing activities reflected in the statement of cash
flows for the years ended December 31, 2001, 2000, and 1999 was $281.4 million,
$264.4 million, and $238.4 million, respectively.
The $17.0 million increase in 2001 consisted primarily of a combined
increase of $68.5 million in uses offset by a combined increase of $51.5
million in sources. The $68.5 million increase in uses was due to the $56.0
million increase in property acquisitions and capital expenditures for
investment properties and the $23.4 million increase from the reimbursable
construction costs incurred, offset by the $10.8 million decrease in
contributions to joint ventures and tenant improvements. The $51.5 million
increase in sources was due to the $63.8 million decrease in restricted cash
and investments as well as the $3.3 million increase in net proceeds from sale
of other assets offset by the $15.6 million decrease in distributions from
joint ventures.
The $26.0 million increase between 2000 and 1999 was primarily because of a
decrease of $19.2 million in sources and an increase of $6.8 million in uses.
The $19.2 million decrease in sources consisted of the $55.6 million increase
in restricted cash and investments offset by the $36.4 million increase in net
proceeds from sales of other assets and distributions from joint ventures. The
$6.8 million increase in uses was primarily due to the $27.3 million increase
in capital expenditures for investment properties offset by the decreases of
$16.6 million in property acquisitions and $4.4 million in contributions to
joint ventures.
Capital expenditures reflected in the statement of cash flows include the
following:
Year Ended December 31,
--------------------------
2001 2000 1999
-------- -------- --------
(In thousands)
Capital Expenditures from Operating Activities and
Non-Cash Acquisitions/(1)/
Capital expenditures for development properties............... $ 63,411 $121,032 $179,479
Development property acquisitions............................. -- 26,464 35,620
Capitalized interest and property tax......................... 1,849 7,738 14,266
-------- -------- --------
Capital expenditures in cash flows for operating activities... 65,260 155,234 229,365
Other acquisitions............................................ 13,000 -- 289
Seller-financed acquisitions.................................. 10,000 -- 26,707
-------- -------- --------
Total capital expenditures in operating activities..... 88,260 155,234 256,361
-------- -------- --------
Capital Expenditures from Investing Activities and Non-Cash
Acquisitions/(2)/
Construction and building improvements........................ 156,566 149,895 130,930
Predevelopment................................................ 1,387 26,637 19,406
Infrastructure and other...................................... 62,004 48,622 48,935
Capitalized interest and property tax......................... 27,536 14,426 13,040
-------- -------- --------
Capital expenditures for investment properties............. 247,493 239,580 212,311
Commercial property acquisitions.............................. 83,567 35,471 52,051
Reimbursable construction costs............................... 23,411 -- --
Tenant improvements........................................... 2,893 5,767 5,301
-------- -------- --------
Capital expenditures in investing activities.................. 357,364 280,818 269,663
Seller-financed acquisitions.................................. -- 1,702 14,000
-------- -------- --------
Total capital expenditures in investing activities..... 357,364 282,520 283,663
-------- -------- --------
Total capital expenditures............................. $445,624 $437,754 $540,024
======== ======== ========
--------
/(1) This category includes capital expenditures for properties we intend to
build to sell. /
/(2) This category includes capital expenditures for properties we intend to
hold for our own account. /
43
Capital expenditures for development properties--This item relates to the
development of residential and commercial for-sale development properties. The
decreases from 2000 to 2001 and 1999 to 2000 are primarily because of the sale
of home-building assets in July 2000 (see discussion of property sales in
Residential section).
Property acquisitions--In 2001, we invested approximately $106.6 million in
property and other acquisitions; $66.6 million for the acquisitions of two
commercial buildings, which added approximately 1.2 million square feet to our
income-producing portfolio; $17.0 million for the acquisition of commercial
land, which added about 5.6 million square feet of potential development; and
$23.0 million, including a $10.0 million seller-financed note, for the
acquisition of an ownership interest in Parkway Company, LLC in Folsom,
California.
In 2000, we invested approximately $63.6 million in property acquisitions,
including $1.7 million in seller-financed note from one of our commercial land
acquisitions; $26.5 million for the acquisitions of residential development
property in California, directly or through joint ventures; these acquisitions
would support up to 479 homes/lots; and $37.1 million for the acquisition of
commercial and mixed-used development land which added approximately 10.2
million square feet of potential development.
In 1999, we invested approximately $128.7 million in property acquisitions,
including $40.7 million in seller-financed notes. These acquisitions included
$67.5 million for commercial development land and completed buildings, and
$61.2 million for residential development properties, directly or through joint
ventures.
Capitalized interest and property taxes--This item represents interest and
property taxes capitalized as part of our development projects. The increase in
2001 resulted from an increase in our construction activity primarily from our
urban and commercial development projects as discussed under Construction and
building improvements. The decrease in 2000 was primarily because of the sale
of our home-building assets in July 2000.
Construction and building improvements--This item relates primarily to
development of new properties held for lease. This development activity is
summarized below:
Year Ended December 31,
----------------------
2001 2000
---------- ----------
(In square feet)
Commercial Development
Under construction, beginning of period........ 3,474,000 4,641,000
Construction starts............................ 4,735,000 4,863,000
Completed--retained in portfolio............... (1,465,000) (5,158,000)
Completed--design/build or sold................ (601,000) (872,000)
---------- ----------
Subtotal under construction, end of period..... 6,143,000 3,474,000
---------- ----------
Urban Development
Under construction, beginning of period........ -- --
Construction starts............................ 361,000 --
---------- ----------
Subtotal under construction, end of period/(1)/ 361,000 --
---------- ----------
Total under construction, end of period........ 6,504,000 3,474,000
========== ==========
--------
/(1) Includes approximately 45,000 square feet of residential units, which we
intend to sell; excludes approximately 280,000 square feet of commercial
space started but stopped during 2001. /
Predevelopment--This item relates to amounts incurred for our urban and
commercial development projects, primarily the Mission Bay project in San
Francisco, California, an acquisition in Ontario, California, and the Santa Fe
Depot project in San Diego, California. The decrease is primarily related to
Mission Bay whereas $12.4 million of predevelopment cost incurred is
reimbursable, which is discussed at Reimbursable construction costs below. The
decrease is also attributed to the increase in our development activities for
our Urban Development projects primarily at Mission Bay (see Construction and
building improvements for details).
44
Infrastructure and other--This item represents primarily infrastructure
costs incurred in connection with our urban and commercial projects.
Infrastructure costs relate primarily to the projects at Woodridge, Illinois;
Denver, Colorado; Ontario, California; Fremont, California; and Mission Bay,
San Francisco, California.
Reimbursable construction costs--Approximately $23.4 million of total
predevelopment and infrastructure cost incurred is reimbursable pursuant to
various Community Facility District Bonds issued in 2001 (see Note 15 of the
accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements for details).
Cash flows from financing activities
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities reflected in the
statement of cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2001, 2000, and 1999
was ($188.1 million), $229.3 million, and $37.0 million, respectively. The
$417.4 million decrease in 2001 is primarily attributable to $372.4 million
expended for the purchase of 21,649,797 shares of our common stock in 2001 as
compared to $28.7 million expended for the purchase of 1,997,300 shares in
2000. The 2001 decrease is also attributable to a net borrowing of $169.7
million in 2001 as compared to a net borrowing of $257.3 million in 2000. The
increase of $192.3 million in 2000 is primarily attributable to a net borrowing
of $257.3 million as compared to a net pay-down of $12.8 million in 1999 offset
by a net decrease in 2000 of $54.1 million in contributions from minority
partners primarily because of the formation of a subsidiary REIT in 1999 and
$28.7 million used to repurchase our common stock in 2000.
Capital commitments
As of December 31, 2001, we had outstanding standby letters of credit and
surety bonds in the amount of $225.3 million in favor of local municipalities
or financial institutions to guarantee performance on real property
improvements or financial obligations.
As of December 31, 2001, we had approximately $273.3 million in total
commitments for capital expenditures to vendors. These commitments are
primarily contracts to construct industrial development projects,
predevelopment costs, and re-leasing costs.
As a partner in certain joint ventures, we have made certain financing
guarantees totaling $42.3 million at December 31, 2001. In addition, we have
guaranteed debt service of $8.6 million and $2.0 million for various
residential projects (see Notes 5 & 15).
Cash balances, available borrowings, and capital resources
As of December 31, 2001, we had a total cash of $230.3 million, of which
$7.6 million is restricted cash. At year-end, in addition to the $230.3 million
cash, we had $132.2 million in borrowing capacity under our commercial
construction facilities and $3.0 million in additional borrowing capacity under
our term loans, both available upon satisfaction of certain conditions.
Our short- and long-term liquidity and capital resources requirements will
be provided primarily from four sources: (1) cash on hand, (2) ongoing income
from our rental portfolio, (3) proceeds from sales of developed properties,
land and non-strategic assets, and (4) additional debt. As noted above,
existing construction loan facilities are available for meeting short-term
liquidity requirements. Our ability to meet our mid- and long-term capital
requirements is dependent upon the ability to obtain additional financing for
new construction, completed buildings, acquisitions, and currently unencumbered
properties. There is no assurance that we can obtain this financing or obtain
this financing on favorable terms.
Stock Repurchase--From October 1999 through July 2001, our Board of
Directors authorized five separate stock repurchase programs; each had a limit
of $50 million. Share purchases under these programs were made on the open
market. We purchased a total of 13,047,097 shares at a total cost of $218.0
million under these programs. The remaining $32.0 million authorized had
expired or was terminated.
45
In December 2001, we purchased 10,600,000 shares of Common Stock from the
California Public Employees' Retirement System ("CalPERS") for $183.1 million
in a privately negotiated transaction. An independent third party provided our
Board of Directors with a written opinion confirming that the terms and
conditions of this transaction were fair, from a financial point of view, to
our stockholders other than CalPERS. Immediately prior to the transaction,
CalPERS was the beneficial owner of 18.8 million shares, or approximately 19.3%
of our issued and outstanding common stock. As a result of the transaction,
CalPERS' beneficial ownership was reduced to 8.2 million shares, or
approximately 9.5% of our issued and outstanding common stock.
Debt covenants--Four of our credit agreements, totaling $148 million,
contain financial covenants including a minimum debt services coverage ratio of
1.60 to 1, a maximum leverage ratio of 60%, and a minimum tangible net worth of
$370.6 million (subject to adjustment for stock buybacks), all terms are
defined in those credit agreements. As of or for period ending December 31,
2001 the actual numbers, as each is defined in those credit agreements, were
1.93; 53.9%; and $435.3 million, respectively. Our performance against these
covenants is measured on a quarterly basis, with debt service coverage being
measured on a rolling four-quarter basis. In the event we were to breach any of
these covenants and were unable to negotiate satisfactory waivers or
amendments, our lenders in theses credit facilities could declare outstanding
due and payable.
Bonds--In June 2001, $101 million of Community Facility District bonds were
sold to finance public infrastructure improvements at Mission Bay in San
Francisco and Pacific Commons in Fremont, California. These bonds have a series
of maturities up to thirty years. Bonds totaling $71 million were issued for
Mission Bay, of which $17 million have a floating rate of interest initially
set at 2.85% and currently at 1.5%, with the remaining $54 million at a fixed
rate of 6.02%. We have issued a letter of credit totaling $17 million in
support of the floating rate bond issued for Mission Bay. At Pacific Commons,
$30 million of bonds were issued and have a weighted average fixed interest
rate of 6.2%. At December 31, 2001, for Mission Bay, $2.4 million of the $17
million floating rate bonds and $10.9 million of the $54 million fixed rate
bonds were used to reimburse costs we incurred on behalf of the district. For
Pacific Commons, approximately $0.1 million of the bonds were used to reimburse
costs we incurred on the district's behalf as of December 31, 2001 (see Note 15
of the accompanying Consolidated Financial Statement for details).
Insurance--Changes in the insurance industry over the last year have caused
the availability of certain types of coverage to decrease and the cost of
available coverage to increase. In renewing our policies in the fourth quarter
of 2001, we were able to essentially obtain all of our historical levels and
types of insurance (although at a higher cost), except in regard to earthquake
coverage, where we were able to place approximately 65% of the previous $100
million coverage limit. We also expect availability to decrease and cost to
increase for surety bonds. Surety bonds are commonly used in the land
development process to guarantee the construction of infrastructure for public
entities.
Related party transactions
In 2001, we formed Third and King Investors, LLC, an unconsolidated joint
venture. The joint venture is building a large mixed-use project at Mission Bay
in San Francisco, California, consisting of approximately 595 apartments,
127,000 square feet of commercial space, and 945 parking stalls. As part of the
transaction, a subsidiary entered into a 99-year ground lease with the venture
and we recognized $1.8 million in rental income from this ground lease in 2001.
The joint venture is currently seeking a $165 million construction loan for the
project. We have also agreed with the venture to fund, on a pro-rata basis, the
balance of equity capital required and, in addition, to fund certain cost
overruns if actual construction costs exceed the guaranteed maximum price set
forth in the construction contract.
We also provide development and management services to several of our
unconsolidated joint venture investments. Fees earned were $1.2 million, $0.6
million and $1.1 million in 2001, 2000 and 1999, respectively.
46
As of December 31, 2001, we have a $13.2 million variable rate (8.42% at
December 31, 2001) note receivable maturing June 1, 2005 from one of our
unconsolidated joint venture investments. The note is collateralized by the
property owned by the venture. Interest earned was $0.9 million and $0.4
million in 2001 and 2000, respectively.
We have a $4.5 million note receivable from an unconsolidated joint venture
for project costs plus accrued interest at 9.0%. This note is collateralized by
property owned by the venture, and matures in October 2028. We also have
entered into various lease agreements with this unconsolidated joint venture.
We incurred rent expense of $0.1 million in each of the years 2001, 2000, and
1999; this lease will expire in November 2011. As lessor, we entered into a
ground lease, which will expire in August 2054. We recognized rental income of
$0.2 million in each of the last three years and have recorded a $1.4 million
receivable associated with this lease. The venture's current projection
reflects approximately $0.4 million available funds, per year, from its
operations to pay down our receivables.
Trading
Our executives from time to time in the future may enter into so-called
"Rule 10b5-1 Plans." Under an appropriate Rule 10b5-1 Plan, an executive may
instruct a third party, such as a brokerage firm, to engage in specified
securities transactions in the future based on a formula without further action
by the executive provided that the plan satisfies the legal requirements of
Rule 10b5-1 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
Environmental Matters
Many of our properties and our subsidiaries' properties are in urban and
industrial areas and may have been leased to or previously owned by commercial
and industrial companies that discharged hazardous materials. We and our
subsidiaries incur ongoing environmental remediation and disposal costs, legal
costs relating to clean up, defense of litigation, and the pursuit of
responsible third parties. Costs incurred by the consolidated group in
connection with operating properties and with properties previously sold are
expensed. Costs incurred for properties to be sold by us or our subsidiaries
are capitalized and will be charged to cost of sales when the properties are
sold (see Note 15 of the accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements for
further discussions).
In recent years, certain of our subsidiaries have acquired properties with
known environmental problems for cleanup and redevelopment, and we expect that
we may continue to form subsidiaries to acquire such properties (or that
existing subsidiaries will acquire such properties) when the potential benefits
of redevelopment warrant. When our subsidiaries acquire such properties, they
undertake due diligence to determine the nature of the environmental problems
and the likely cost of remediation, and they manage the risk with undertakings
from third parties, including the sellers and their affiliates, remediation
contractors, third party sureties, or insurers. The costs associated with
environmental remediation are included in the costs estimates for properties to
be developed.
Forward-Looking Information and Risk Factors
Except for historical matters, the matters discussed in this report are
forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. We have tried,
wherever practical, to identify these forward-looking statements by using words
like "anticipate", "believe", "estimate", "project", "expect", "plan",
"prospects", and similar expressions. Forward-looking statements include, but
are not limited to, statements about plans; opportunities; negotiations;
markets and economic conditions; development, construction, rental, and sales
activities; availability of financing; and property values.
We caution you not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking
statements, which reflect our current beliefs and are based on information
currently available to us. We do not undertake any obligation to revise these
forward-looking statements to reflect future events, changes in circumstances,
or changes in beliefs, except as may be required by law.
47
These forward-looking statements are subject to risks and uncertainties that
could cause our actual results, performance, or achievements to differ
materially from those expressed in or implied by these statements. In
particular, among the factors that could cause actual results, performance or
achievements to differ materially are:
. Changes in the real estate market or in general economic conditions in
the areas in which we own property, including of a worsening economic
slowdown or recession or continued economic weakness, especially in the
San Francisco Bay Area. Such changes may result in higher vacancy rates
for commercial property and lower prevailing rents, lower sales prices or
slower sales, lower absorption rates, more tenant defaults and
bankruptcies, and the like, with resulting impacts our liquidity and
profitability
. Product and geographical concentration
. Competition in the real estate industry
. Unavailability of financing to meet our capital needs, the variability of
interest rates, and our inability to use our collateral to secure loans
. Changes in insurance markets or unavailability of particular insurance
products (see Insurance Discussion at page 46)
. Exposure of our assets to damage from natural occurrences such as
earthquakes, and weather conditions that affect the progress of
construction
. Delay in receipt of or denial of government approvals and entitlements
for development projects, other political and discretionary government
decisions affecting the use of or access to land, or legal challenges to
the issuance of approvals or entitlements
. Changes in income taxes due because of audit adjustments required by
Federal and State income tax authorities, and changes in tax laws and
other circumstances that affect our ability to control the timing and
recognition of deferred tax liabilities
. Changes in the management team
. Liability for us or our subsidiaries for environmental remediation at
properties owned, managed, or formerly owned or managed by us, our
subsidiaries, or the predecessors of either, and changes in environmental
laws and regulations
. Failure to reach agreement with third parties on definitive terms or
failure to close transactions, and failure or inability of third parties
to perform their obligations under agreements, including tenants under
lease or other agreements with us
. Increases in the cost of land and building materials
. Limitations on or challenges to title to our properties
. Risks related to the performance, interests, and financial strength of
the co-owners of our joint venture projects
. Changes in policies and practices of organized labor groups who may work
on our projects
. Issues arising from shortages in electrical power to us or to our
customers, or higher prices for power, which could affect our ability to
rent or sell properties, the ability of tenants or buyers to pay for our
properties or for the use of our properties, or our ability to conduct
our business
. Other risks inherent in the real estate business
Item 7a. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
Our primary market risk exposure is interest rate risk. The majority of our
financial instruments are not considered market risk sensitive instruments, as
they are not subject to foreign exchange rate risk or commodity price risk. At
December 31, 2001, we did not have any outstanding interest-protection
contracts. We intend to continuously and actively monitor and manage interest
costs on our variable rate debt and may enter into interest rate-protection
contracts based on market fluctuations.
48
At December 31, 2001, approximately 68.38% of our debt bore interest at
fixed rates with a weighted average maturity of approximately 7.6 years and a
weighted average coupon rate of approximately 6.67%, which is below market.
Therefore, unless there were a drastic decrease in interest rates, the fair
value of our fixed-rate debt would not be adversely affected. The remainder of
our debt bears interest at variable rates with a weighted average maturity of
approximately 2.3 years and a weighted average coupon rate of approximately
4.45% at December 31, 2001. To the extent that we incur additional variable
rate indebtedness, our exposure to increases in interest rates would increase.
If coupon interest rates increased 100 basis points (1%), the annual effect on
our financial position and cash flow would be approximately $4.1 million, based
on the outstanding balance of our debt at December 31, 2001. We believe,
however, that increases in interest expense as a result of inflation will not
significantly affect our financial position, results of operations, or cash
flow.
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
The financial statements and schedules required under Regulation S-X
promulgated under the Securities Act of 1933 are identified in Item 14 and are
incorporated herein by reference.
Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and
Financial Disclosure
None.
49
PART III
Except for the information relating to the executive officers of the Company
set forth in Part I of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, the information
required by the following items in this Part III is hereby incorporated by
reference to the relevant sections contained in the Company's definitive Proxy
Statement ("2002 Proxy Statement") which will be filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission in connection with the 2002 Annual Meeting of Stockholders
to be held in 2002.
Item 10. Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant
Executive Officers of the Company
Our executive officers are listed below. There were no family relationships
between any executive officers and directors. All executive officers serve at
the pleasure of the Board of Directors, subject to compliance with various
employment agreements to which the Company and the officers are parties.
Executive Officers
Name Age Position
---- --- --------
Nelson C. Rising..... 60 Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
Timothy J. Beaudin... 43 Executive Vice President
C. William Hosler.... 38 Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Vanessa L. Washington 42 Senior Vice President and General Counsel
Paul A. Lockie....... 43 Vice President and Controller
Jaime L. Gertmenian.. 35 Vice President, Human Resources and Administration
Additional information concerning the business background of each executive
officer is set forth below.
MR. RISING has served as Chairman of our Board of Directors and Chief
Executive Officer since May 2000. From 1994 through May 2000, Mr. Rising served
as our President and Chief Executive Officer and as a Director. Mr. Rising is
also currently Chairman of the Board of Directors of the Federal Reserve Bank
of San Francisco, Chairman of The Real Estate Roundtable, a federal public
policy advocacy group for the real estate industry, and a member of the Board
of Governors of the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts
(NAREIT).
MR. BEAUDIN was elected as Executive Vice President in October 2001. Before
this election, Mr. Beaudin served as President of our Commercial Group, where
he was responsible for managing our commercial development activities, asset
management, property sales, and property tax group. From January 1996 to early
1999, Mr. Beaudin served as Senior Vice President, Property Operations.
MR. HOSLER joined us as Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer in
July 1999. From January 1998 to March 1999, Mr. Hosler served as the Chief
Financial Officer for Capital Company of America, LLC. From 1995 to 1998, Mr.
Hosler served as the Chief Financial Officer for Morgan Stanley & Co.--Morgan
Stanley Real Estate Funds.
MS. WASHINGTON has served us as Senior Vice President and General Counsel
since January 2002. Before joining the Company, Ms. Washington was associated
with California Federal Bank from 1992 to 2001, and served as Senior Vice
President, Corporate Secretary and Counsel from 1996 to 2001.
MR. LOCKIE has served as Vice President and Controller since he joined us in
February 1996.
MS. GERTMENIAN has been with us since October 1995 and currently serves as
Vice President of Human Resources and Administration.
50
The information in the section captioned "Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership
Reporting Compliance" in the 2002 Proxy Statement is incorporated herein by
reference.
Item 11. Executive Compensation
The information in the sections captioned "Directors--Directors'
Compensation", "Employment Agreements", and "Compensation Policy for Senior
Executive Officers" in the 2002 Proxy Statement is incorporated herein by
reference.
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management
The information in the sections captioned "Security Ownership of Directors
and Executive Officers" and "Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners"
in the 2002 Proxy Statement is incorporated herein by reference.
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions
The information in the section captioned "Certain Relationships and Related
Transactions" in the 2002 Proxy Statement is incorporated herein by reference.
51
PART IV
Item 14. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules, and Reports on Form 8-K
(a)(1) and (a)(2) Financial Statements and Financial Statement Schedules
See Index to Financial Statements and Financial Statement Schedules at F-1
herein.
All other Schedules are omitted because they are not applicable or the
required information is shown in the financial statements or notes thereto.
(a)(3) Exhibits
See Index to Exhibits on Pages E-1 and E-2.
(b) Reports on Form 8-K
Form 8-K filed December 13, 2001.
52
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, Catellus Development Corporation has duly caused this
report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
CATELLUS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
By /s/ NELSON C. RISING
----------------------------------
Nelson C. Rising
Chairman and Chief Executive
Officer
Dated: March 25, 2002
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this
report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of Catellus
Development Corporation and in the capacities and on the date indicated.
Signature Title Date
--------- ----- ----
/s/ NELSON C. RISING Chairman and Chief Executive
Officer March 25, 2002
------------------------------
Nelson C. Rising (Principal Executive
Officer)
/s/ C. WILLIAM HOSLER Senior Vice President and Chief Financial March 25, 2002
------------------------------
C. William Hosler
Officer (Principal Financial Officer)
/s/ PAUL A. LOCKIE Vice President and Controller March 25, 2002
------------------------------
Paul A. Lockie (Principal Accounting
Officer)
* Director March 25, 2002
------------------------------
Joseph F. Alibrandi
* Director March 25, 2002
------------------------------
Stephen F. Bollenbach
* Director March 25, 2002
------------------------------
Daryl J. Carter
* Director March 25, 2002
------------------------------
Richard D. Farman
* Director March 25, 2002
------------------------------
Christine Garvey
* Director March 25, 2002
------------------------------
William M. Kahane
* Director March 25, 2002
------------------------------
Leslie D. Michelson
53
Signature Title Date
--------- ----- ----
* Director March 25, 2002
------------------------------
Deanna W. Oppenheimer
* Director March 25, 2002
------------------------------
Thomas M. Steinberg
* Director March 25, 2002
------------------------------
Cora M. Tellez
*By: /s/ PAUL A. LOCKIE
-----------------------------
Paul A.
Lockie Attorney-in-Fact March
25, 2002
54
CATELLUS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Page
----
Financial Statements
Report of Independent Accountants dated February 1, 2002................................... F-2
Consolidated Balance Sheet at December 31, 2001 and 2000................................... F-3
Consolidated Statement of Operations for the years ended December 31, 2001, 2000, and 1999. F-4
Consolidated Statement of Stockholders' Equity for the years ended December 31, 2001, 2000,
and 1999................................................................................. F-5
Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2001, 2000, and 1999. F-6
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements................................................. F-7
Summarized Quarterly Results (Unaudited)................................................... F-30
Index to Exhibits
Exhibits................................................................................... E-1
Financial Statement Schedules
Report of Independent Accountants dated February 1, 2002................................... S-1
Schedule II--Valuation and Qualifying Accounts............................................. S-2
Schedule III--Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation..................................... S-3
Attachment A to Schedule III............................................................... S-4
F-1
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS
To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of
Catellus Development Corporation
In our opinion, the accompanying consolidated balance sheet and the related
consolidated statements of operations, of stockholders' equity, and of cash
flows present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of
Catellus Development Corporation and its subsidiaries at December 31, 2001 and
2000, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the
three years in the period ended December 31, 2001, in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. These
financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management; our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on
our audits. We conducted our audits of these statements in accordance with
auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America which
require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about
whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit
includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and
disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles
used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall
financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a
reasonable basis for our opinion.
PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP
San Francisco, California
February 1, 2002
F-2
CATELLUS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET
(In thousands)
December 31,
----------------------
2001 2000
---------- ----------
Assets
Properties................................................................... $2,276,508 $2,025,813
Less accumulated depreciation................................................ (354,557) (320,275)
---------- ----------
1,921,951 1,705,538
Other assets and deferred charges, net....................................... 167,305 121,033
Notes receivable, less allowance............................................. 73,335 36,119
Accounts receivable, less allowance.......................................... 22,663 29,690
Restricted cash and investments.............................................. 7,566 45,478
Cash and cash equivalents.................................................... 222,695 336,558
---------- ----------
Total.............................................................. $2,415,515 $2,274,416
========== ==========
Liabilities and stockholders' equity
Mortgage and other debt...................................................... $1,310,457 $1,134,563
Accounts payable and accrued expenses........................................ 145,688 96,274
Deferred credits and other liabilities....................................... 177,656 57,596
Deferred income taxes........................................................ 290,658 247,975
---------- ----------
Total liabilities..................................................... 1,924,459 1,536,408
---------- ----------
Commitments and contingencies (Note 15)
Minority interests........................................................... 55,799 54,763
---------- ----------
Stockholders' equity
Common stock, 110,209 and 108,088 shares issued, and 86,562 and 106,091
shares outstanding at December 31, 2001 and 2000, respectively.......... 1,102 1,081
Paid-in capital........................................................... 521,312 493,420
Treasury stock, at cost (23,647 and 1,997 shares at December 31, 2001 and
2000, respectively)..................................................... (401,082) (28,660)
Accumulated earnings...................................................... 313,925 217,404
---------- ----------
Total stockholders' equity............................................ 435,257 683,245
---------- ----------
Total.............................................................. $2,415,515 $2,274,416
========== ==========
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-3
CATELLUS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
(In thousands, except per share data)
Year Ended December 31,
-------------------------------
2001 2000 1999
--------- --------- ---------
Rental properties
Rental revenue....................................................................... $ 234,881 $ 206,762 $ 172,295
Property operating costs............................................................. (62,663) (55,272) (46,754)
Equity in earnings of operating joint ventures, net.................................. 8,833 9,809 10,668
--------- --------- ---------
181,051 161,299 136,209
--------- --------- ---------
Property sales and fee services
Sales revenue........................................................................ 245,804 451,096 347,005
Cost of sales........................................................................ (149,698) (337,755) (259,157)
--------- --------- ---------
Gain on property sales............................................................ 96,106 113,341 87,848
Equity in earnings of development joint ventures, net................................ 25,978 27,780 10,152
--------- --------- ---------
Total gain on property sales...................................................... 122,084 141,121 98,000
Management and development fees...................................................... 6,000 15,460 14,968
Selling, general and administrative expenses......................................... (26,570) (45,801) (31,727)
Other, net........................................................................... 6,187 (9,351) (5,495)
--------- --------- ---------
107,701 101,429 75,746
--------- --------- ---------
Interest expense......................................................................... (58,145) (50,964) (39,374)
Depreciation and amortization............................................................ (52,458) (46,505) (39,214)
Corporate administrative costs........................................................... (19,256) (15,675) (14,760)
Gain on non-strategic asset sales........................................................ 3,909 46,279 6,803
Other, net............................................................................... 5,660 940 (4,253)
--------- --------- ---------
Income before minority interests, income taxes and extraordinary item................ 168,462 196,803 121,157
Minority interests....................................................................... (6,142) (10,701) (3,247)
--------- --------- ---------
Income before income taxes and extraordinary item.................................... 162,320 186,102 117,910
--------- --------- ---------
Income tax expense
Current.............................................................................. (16,300) (12,539) (17,339)
Deferred............................................................................. (49,499) (62,556) (30,351)
--------- --------- ---------
(65,799) (75,095) (47,690)
--------- --------- ---------
Income before extraordinary item..................................................... 96,521 111,007 70,220
Extraordinary income related to a joint venture's asset transfer to a third party, net of
income tax expense...................................................................... -- -- 26,652
--------- --------- ---------
Net income........................................................................... $ 96,521 $ 111,007 $ 96,872
========= ========= =========
Net income per share before extraordinary item
Basic............................................................................. $ 0.97 $ 1.04 $ 0.66
========= ========= =========
Assuming dilution................................................................. $ 0.94 $ 1.02 $ 0.64
========= ========= =========
Net income per share--extraordinary item
Basic............................................................................. $ -- $ -- $ 0.25
========= ========= =========
Assuming dilution................................................................. $ -- $ -- $ 0.25
========= ========= =========
Net income per share after extraordinary item
Basic............................................................................. $ 0.97 $ 1.04 $ 0.91
========= ========= =========
Assuming dilution................................................................. $ 0.94 $ 1.02 $ 0.89
========= ========= =========
Average number of common shares outstanding--basic................................... 99,958 106,561 107,011
========= ========= =========
Average number of common shares outstanding--diluted................................. 102,685 109,017 109,146
========= ========= =========
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-4
CATELLUS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
(In thousands)
Common Stock Treasury Stock
-------------- ------------------ Paid-In Accumulated
Shares Amount Shares Amount Capital Earnings
------- ------ ------- --------- -------- -----------
Balance at December 31, 1998........... 106,808 $1,068 -- $ -- $479,636 $ 9,525
Exercise of stock options and other. 377 4 -- -- 3,867 --
Net income.......................... -- -- -- -- -- 96,872
------- ------ ------- --------- -------- --------
Balance at December 31, 1999........... 107,185 1,072 -- -- 483,503 106,397
Exercise of stock options and other. 903 9 -- -- 9,917 --
Treasury stock purchases............ -- -- (1,997) (28,660) -- --
Net income.......................... -- -- -- -- -- 111,007
------- ------ ------- --------- -------- --------
Balance at December 31, 2000........... 108,088 1,081 (1,997) (28,660) 493,420 217,404
Exercise of stock options and other. 2,121 21 -- -- 27,892 --
Treasury stock purchases............ -- -- (21,650) (372,422) -- --
Net income.......................... -- -- -- -- -- 96,521
------- ------ ------- --------- -------- --------
Balance at December 31, 2001........... 110,209 $1,102 (23,647) $(401,082) $521,312 $313,925
======= ====== ======= ========= ======== ========
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-5
CATELLUS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
(In thousands)
Year Ended December 31,
-------------------------------
2001 2000 1999
--------- --------- ---------
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income................................................................................ $ 96,521 $ 111,007 $ 96,872
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Extraordinary income related to a joint venture's asset transfer to a third party,
before income tax expense............................................................. -- -- (44,020)
Depreciation and amortization.......................................................... 52,458 46,505 39,214
Deferred income taxes.................................................................. 49,499 62,556 48,119
Amortization of deferred loan fees and other costs..................................... 5,775 6,400 4,575
Equity in earnings of joint ventures................................................... (34,811) (37,589) (20,820)
Gain on sales of other assets.......................................................... (25,433) (20,614) (10,270)
Minority interests in earnings of consolidated entities................................ 6,142 10,701 3,247
Operating distributions from joint ventures............................................ 43,786 26,714 46,811
Cost of development properties and non-strategic assets sold........................... 170,828 316,424 236,421
Capital expenditures for development properties........................................ (65,260) (155,234) (229,365)
Other property acquisitions............................................................ (13,000) -- (289)
Other, net............................................................................. (5,428) (1,570) (1,459)
Change in assets and liabilities:
Accounts and notes receivable.......................................................... (28,418) (12,319) (10,183)
Other assets and deferred charges...................................................... (32,378) (4,045) (11,901)
Accounts payable and accrued expenses.................................................. 15,306 (13,283) 18,718
Deferred credits and other liabilities................................................. 120,060 594 18,194
--------- --------- ---------
Net cash provided by operating activities.................................................... 355,647 336,247 183,864
--------- --------- ---------
Cash flows from investing activities:
Property acquisitions..................................................................... (83,567) (35,471) (52,051)
Capital expenditures for investment properties............................................ (247,493) (239,580) (212,311)
Tenant improvements....................................................................... (2,893) (5,767) (5,301)
Reimbursable construction costs........................................................... (23,411) -- --
Net proceeds from sale of other assets.................................................... 38,016 34,680 13,926
Distributions from joint ventures......................................................... -- 15,600 --
Contributions to joint ventures........................................................... -- (7,944) (12,370)
Decrease (increase) in restricted cash and investments.................................... 37,912 (25,913) 29,719
--------- --------- ---------
Net cash used in investing activities........................................................ (281,436) (264,395) (238,388)
--------- --------- ---------
Cash flows from financing activities:
Borrowings................................................................................ 398,501 540,007 295,628
Repayment of borrowings................................................................... (228,763) (282,710) (308,426)
(Distributions to) contributions from minority partners, net.............................. (5,106) (7,123) 46,947
Purchase of treasury stock................................................................ (372,422) (28,660) --
Proceeds from issuance of common stock.................................................... 19,716 7,782 2,810
--------- --------- ---------
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities.......................................... (188,074) 229,296 36,959
--------- --------- ---------
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents......................................... (113,863) 301,148 (17,565)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year............................................... 336,558 35,410 52,975
--------- --------- ---------
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year..................................................... $ 222,695 $ 336,558 $ 35,410
========= ========= =========
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information:
Cash paid during the year for:
Interest (net of amount capitalized)................................................... $ 52,378 $ 41,131 $ 34,400
Income taxes........................................................................... $ 8,110 $ 20,669 $ 13,154
Non-cash financing activities:
Seller-financed acquisitions........................................................... $ 10,000 $ 1,702 $ 40,707
Debt forgiveness-property reconveyance................................................. $ (3,844) $ -- $ --
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-6
CATELLUS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note 1. Description of Business
Catellus Development Corporation, together with its consolidated
subsidiaries (the "Company"), is a diversified real estate operating company
with a large portfolio of rental properties and developable land that manages
and develops real estate for its own account and that of others. Interests of
third parties in entities controlled and consolidated by the Company are
separately reflected as minority interests in the accompanying balance sheet.
The Company's rental properties and development portfolio of industrial,
residential, retail, office, and other projects (owned directly or through
joint ventures) are located mainly in major markets in California, Illinois,
Texas, Colorado, and Oregon.
Note 2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Principles of consolidation--The accompanying consolidated financial
statements include the accounts of the Company, its wholly owned subsidiaries,
and investees which are controlled by the Company. All other investees are
accounted for using the equity method.
Revenue recognition--Rental revenue, in general, is recognized when due from
tenants; however, revenue from leases with rent concessions or fixed
escalations is recognized on a straight-line basis over the initial term of the
lease. Direct costs of negotiating and consummating a lease are deferred and
amortized on a straight-line basis over the initial term of the related lease.
The Company recognizes revenue from the sale of properties using the accrual
method. Sales not qualifying for full recognition at the time of sale are
accounted for under other appropriate deferral methods, including the
percentage-of-completion method. In certain cases, the Company retains the
right to repurchase property from the buyer at a specified price. Profit on
these sales is not recognized until the Company's right to repurchase expires.
In other cases, when the Company receives inadequate cash down payment and
takes a note for the balance, profit is deferred until such time as sufficient
cash is received to meet minimum down payment requirements. In general,
specific identification and relative sales value methods are used to determine
the cost of sales. Estimated future costs to be incurred by the Company after
completion of each sale are included in cost of sales.
Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash and investments--The Company
considers all highly liquid investments with maturity of three months or less
at time of purchase to be cash equivalents. Of the restricted cash and
investments totaling $7.6 million and $45.5 million at December 31, 2001 and
2000, respectively, $0.4 million and $38.1 million, respectively, represent
proceeds from property sales being held in separate cash accounts at a trust
company in order to preserve the Company's options of reinvesting the proceeds
on a tax-deferred basis. In addition, restricted investments of $7.2 million
and $7.1 million at December 31, 2001 and 2000, respectively, represent
certificates of deposit used to guarantee lease performance and $0.3 million at
December 31, 2000 represents a retained deposit for future lease-up costs.
Interest rate protection contracts ("Treasury-lock contracts")--The Company
may enter into interest rate protection agreements from time to time to lock
its interest rate when negotiating fixed rate financing agreements. Amounts
paid or received would be capitalized and amortized as a component of interest
expense using the effective interest method over the term of the associated
debt agreement.
Financial instruments--The historical cost basis of the Company's notes
receivable is representative of fair value based on a comparison to year-end
interest rates for receivables of comparable risks and maturities.
F-7
CATELLUS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(Continued)
Variable rate debt has carrying values which approximate estimated fair value
while fixed rate mortgage loans have an estimated aggregate fair value of
$831.0 million and remaining principal of $842.3 million based on a comparison
to year-end interest rates for debt with similar terms and remaining maturities.
Property and deferred costs--Real estate is stated at the lower of cost or
estimated fair value using the methodology described as follows: (a) for
operating properties and properties held for investment, a write-down to
estimated fair value is recognized when a property's estimated undiscounted
future cash flow, before interest charges, is less than its net book value; (b)
for properties held for sale, a write-down to estimated fair value is recorded
when the Company determines that the net book value exceeds the estimated
selling price, less cost to sell. This evaluation is made by management on a
property-by-property basis. The evaluation of future cash flows and fair value
of individual properties requires significant judgment; it is reasonably
possible that a change in estimate could occur as economic conditions change.
The Company capitalizes direct construction and development costs. Costs
associated with financing or leasing projects are also capitalized and
amortized over the period benefited by those expenditures.
Depreciation is computed using the straight-line method. Buildings and
improvements are depreciated using lives of between 20 and 40 years. Tenant
improvements are depreciated over the primary terms of the leases (generally
3-15 years), while furniture and equipment are depreciated using lives ranging
between 3 and 10 years.
Maintenance and repair costs are charged to expense as incurred, while
significant improvements, replacements, and major renovations are capitalized.
Notes receivable--Notes receivable are carried at the principal balance,
less estimated uncollectible amounts totaling $1.8 million and $3.8 million at
December 31, 2001 and 2000, respectively. Interest is recognized as earned;
however, the Company discontinues accruing interest when collection is
considered doubtful. Notes are generally collateralized by real property or a
financing agreement.
Allowance for uncollectible accounts--Accounts receivable are net of an
allowance for uncollectible accounts totaling $1.4 million and $1.7 million at
December 31, 2001 and 2000, respectively.
Environmental costs--The Company incurs ongoing environmental remediation
costs, including clean up costs, consulting fees for environmental studies and
investigations, monitoring costs, and legal costs relating to clean up,
litigation defense, and the pursuit of responsible third parties. Costs
incurred in connection with operating properties and properties previously sold
are expensed. Costs relating to undeveloped land are capitalized as part of
development costs. Costs incurred for properties to be sold are deferred and
charged to cost of sales when the properties are sold.
The Company maintains a reserve for estimated costs of environmental
remediation to be incurred in connection with operating properties and
properties previously sold. For developable land, remediation costs will be
capitalized, as incurred, as part of the project costs.
Income taxes--Income taxes are recorded based on the future tax effects of
the difference between the tax and financial reporting bases of the Company's
assets and liabilities. In estimating future tax consequences, potential future
events are considered except for potential changes in income tax law or in
rates.
Income per share--Income per share of common stock applicable to common
stockholders is computed by dividing net income, before extraordinary items, by
the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the
period (see table below for effect of dilutive securities).
F-8
CATELLUS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(Continued)
Year Ended December 31,
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2001 2000 1999
------------------------- -------------------------- -------------------------
Per Share Per Share Per Share
Income Shares Amount Income Shares Amount Income Shares Amount
------- ------- --------- -------- ------- --------- ------- ------- ---------
(In thousands, except per share data)
Income before extraordinary
items......................... $96,521 99,958 $0.97 $111,007 106,561 $1.04 $70,220 107,011 $0.66
===== ===== =====
Effect of dilutive securities--
stock options................. -- 2,727 -- 2,456 -- 2,135
------- ------- -------- ------- ------- -------
Income applicable to
common stockholders plus
assumed conversion of
options....................... $96,521 102,685 $0.94 $111,007 109,017 $1.02 $70,220 109,146 $0.64
======= ======= ===== ======== ======= ===== ======= ======= =====
Use of estimates--The preparation of financial statements in conformity with
generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates
and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the
disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities, and the reported amounts of
revenue and expenses. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Reclassifications--Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to
conform with the current year financial statement presentation.
Minority interests--In 1999 the Company formed a subsidiary REIT and sold
10% of this subsidiary's stock to minority investors. There are also minority
investors in the Company's consolidated residential joint ventures.
New accounting standards--Effective January 1, 2001, the Company adopted
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 133, "Accounting for Derivative
Instruments and Hedging Activities" ("SFAS No. 133"). SFAS No. 133 requires
that all derivative financial instruments be recognized as either assets or
liabilities on the balance sheet and carried at fair value. Changes in the fair
value of derivative instruments are recognized periodically in earnings or
stockholders' equity, depending on the intended use of the instrument.
Valuation changes for derivatives designated as fair value hedges are
recognized in earnings in the period of change, along with the change in value
of the underlying hedged item. Gains or losses on derivatives designated as
cash flow hedges are initially reported as a component of other comprehensive
income and later reclassified into earnings in the period affected by the
underlying hedged exposure. Changes in value of derivatives that are not
designated as hedging instruments and the amount of any hedging instruments
deemed to be ineffective are recorded in earnings in the period of change. The
adoption of SFAS No. 133 had no material impact on the financial position,
results of operations, or cash flows of the Company. At December 31, 2001 and
2000, the Company had no derivative investments or ongoing hedging activities.
In June 2001, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141, "Business Combinations" and SFAS
No. 142, "Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets". As a result of SFAS No. 141,
all acquisitions completed after June 30, 2001 are accounted for using the
purchase method of accounting. SFAS No. 142 requires that goodwill resulting
from acquisitions completed after June 30, 2001 not be amortized. The adoption
of these new standards has not significantly affected the financial position,
results of operations, or cash flows of the Company.
In August 2001, the FASB issued SFAS No. 144, "Accounting for the Impairment
or Disposal of Long Lived Assets" which addresses financial accounting and
reporting for the impairment and disposal of long-lived assets. The Company
will be required to adopt SFAS No. 144 no later than January 1, 2003.
Management does not believe the adoption of this standard will significantly
affect the financial position, results of operations, or cash flows of the
Company.
F-9
CATELLUS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(Continued)
Note 3. Mortgage and Other Debt
Mortgage and other debt consisted of the following:
December 31,
---------------------
2001 2000
---------- ----------
(In thousands)
Fixed rate mortgage loans, interest at 6.01% to 9.75%, due at various dates through
April 12, 2016/(a)/............................................................... $ 842,296 $ 648,752
Floating rate mortgage loans, interest variable (3.88% to 4.40% at December 31,
2001), due at various dates through August 1, 2006/(b)/........................... 272,288 309,837
Construction loans, interest variable (3.90% to 5.87% at December 31, 2001), due at
various dates through June 12, 2004/(c)/.......................................... 98,321 88,241
Land acquisition and development loans, interest at 5.33% to 7.0%, due at various
dates through October 15, 2025/(d)/............................................... 58,498 46,031
Assessment district bonds, interest at 4.0% to 10.30%, due at various dates through
September 1, 2025/(e)/............................................................ 34,456 26,116
Capital leases, interest variable (4.75% at December 31, 2001), due at various dates
through December, 31, 2004/(f)/................................................... 3,981 15,336
Other loans, interest at 6.70% to 7.0%, due at various dates through September 15,
2006.............................................................................. 617 250
---------- ----------
$1,310,457 $1,134,563
========== ==========
--------
/(a)/ The fixed rate mortgage loans consist of the following: a $358.0 million
loan bearing interest at 6.01% (6.65% effective rate considering
financing costs), with a 30 year amortization schedule and a maturity in
November 2008; a $145.7 million loan bearing interest at 6.65% (6.83%
effective rate considering financing costs), maturing in September 2006;
$73.7 million of loans bearing interest at 7.29% (7.43% effective rate
considering financing costs), maturing on various dates from January 2008
through May 2010; a $20.3 million loan bearing interest at 9.75%,
maturing October 2002; $19.3 million of loans bearing interest at 7.23%,
maturing on various dates from February 2003 through December 2005; and
$13.4 million of loans bearing interest at 7.63% to 9.50%, maturing on
various dates from October 2002 through March 2009.
In addition, during 2001, the Company closed two fixed rate mortgage
loans for a total of $213 million. The first was for $200 million, bears
interest at 7.25% (7.28% effective rate considering financing costs),
with a 30-year amortization schedule and a maturity of 15 years. Of the
loan proceeds, $145.5 million was used to pay off existing variable rate
construction debt and related interest at closing. At December 31, 2001,
$199.0 million was outstanding. The second was for $13.0 million, bears
interest at 9.34% (9.75% effective rate considering financing costs), and
is amortized over 15 years with a maturity of 5 years. At December 31,
2001, $12.9 million was outstanding.
These fixed rate mortgage loans are collateralized by certain of the
Company's operating properties and by an assignment of rents generated by
the underlying properties. A majority of these loans have penalties if
paid prior to maturity.
/(b)/ In 2001, the Company closed a $28.0 million floating rate mortgage loan
(LIBOR plus 2.25%) that has a 25-year amortization schedule and a
maturity of 5 years. Under certain conditions, this loan has a yield
maintenance premium if paid prior to maturity.
Floating rate mortgage loans are collateralized by operating properties
and by an assignment of rents generated by the underlying properties.
/(c)/ The Company closed sixteen variable rate, collateralized construction
loans during 2001. As of December 31, 2001, thirteen of these variable
rate (LIBOR plus 1.8% to LIBOR plus 2.5%) loans, with a combined balance
of $93.2 million, were outstanding with a total remaining capacity of
$132.2 million, maturing on various dates from September 2002 through
June 2004.
F-10
CATELLUS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(Continued)
The Company's construction loans are used to finance development projects
and are collateralized by the related land and improvements and may be
guaranteed by the Company. As construction is completed, these loans may
be refinanced with fixed or variable rate mortgages.
/(d)/ In 2001, the Company closed a $10.0 million variable rate (LIBOR plus
2.75%) collateralized promissory note maturing in December 2002. After
repayments, $7.3 million was outstanding at December 31, 2001. The note
is collateralized by a deed of trust and assignment of leases and rents.
In addition, the Company issued a $10.0 million uncollateralized
promissory note in connection with the acquisition of a 50% interest in a
residential development partnership. The note matures on June 1, 2003,
and bears interest at 6% for the first year, if paid on or before the
first anniversary date, and 8% for the second year, if paid on or before
the second anniversary date.
/(e)/ The assessment district bonds are issued through local municipalities to
fund the construction of public infrastructure and improvements, which
benefit the Company's properties. These bonds are collateralized by
certain of the Company's properties (see Note 15).
/(f)/ Capital leases represent the estimated present value of the minimum lease
payments.
Four of the Company's credit agreements, totaling $148 million, contain
financial covenants including a minimum debt service coverage ratio of 1.60 to
1, a maximum leverage ratio of 60%, and a minimum tangible net worth of $370.6
million (subject to adjustment for stock buybacks), all terms are defined in
those credit agreements. As of or for the period ending December 31, 2001 the
actual numbers, as each is defined in those credit agreements, were 1.93;
53.9%; and $435.3 million, respectively. The Company's performance against
these covenants is measured on a quarterly basis, with debt service coverage
being measured on a rolling four-quarter basis. In the event the Company was to
breach any of these covenants and was unable to negotiate satisfactory waivers
or amendments, the lenders in these credit facilities could declare the amounts
outstanding due and payable.
The maturities of mortgage and other debt outstanding as of December 31,
2001, are summarized as follows (in thousands):
2002....................................................... $ 176,723
2003....................................................... 105,972
2004....................................................... 49,811
2005....................................................... 176,146
2006....................................................... 182,003
Thereafter................................................. 619,802
----------
$1,310,457
==========
Interest costs relating to mortgage and other debt are summarized as follows:
Year Ended December 31,
----------------------------
2001 2000 1999
-------- -------- --------
(In thousands)
Total interest incurred...... $ 83,623 $ 69,620 $ 63,764
Interest capitalized......... (25,478) (18,656) (24,390)
-------- -------- --------
Interest expensed............ $ 58,145 $ 50,964 $ 39,374
======== ======== ========
F-11
CATELLUS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(Continued)
Note 4. Income Taxes
The income tax expense reflected in the consolidated statement of operations
differs from the amounts computed by applying the federal statutory rate of 35%
to income before income taxes and extraordinary items as follows:
Year Ended December 31,
-----------------------
2001 2000 1999
------- ------- -------
(In thousands)
Federal income tax expense at statutory rate. $56,812 $65,136 $41,269
Increase in taxes resulting from:
State income taxes, net of federal impact. 8,719 9,860 6,251
Other..................................... 268 99 170
------- ------- -------
$65,799 $75,095 $47,690
======= ======= =======
Deferred income taxes are provided for the temporary differences between the
financial reporting basis and the tax basis of the Company's assets and
liabilities and for operating loss and tax credit carryforwards. Significant
components of the Company's net deferred tax liability are as follows:
December 31,
-----------------
2001 2000
-------- --------
(In thousands)
Deferred tax liabilities:
Involuntary conversions (condemnations) of property $ 85,715 $ 85,650
Capitalized interest, taxes, and overhead.......... 95,154 93,211
Like-kind property exchanges....................... 107,323 92,674
Investments in partnerships........................ 61,307 49,029
Income of subsidiary REIT.......................... 40,708 23,726
Capital lease...................................... 12,148 14,966
Other.............................................. 16,137 11,720
-------- --------
418,492 370,976
-------- --------
Deferred tax assets:
Operating loss and tax credit carryforwards........ -- 3,071
Intercompany transactions (prior to spin-off)...... 15,001 15,253
Capitalized rent................................... 24,048 23,901
Adjustment to carrying value of property........... 41,261 41,425
Construction contract receivable................... 10,556 8,832
Depreciation and amortization...................... 21,372 17,309
Capital lease payable.............................. 1,592 6,134
Environmental reserve.............................. 3,529 4,097
Other.............................................. 10,475 2,979
-------- --------
127,834 123,001
-------- --------
Net deferred tax liability......................... $290,658 $247,975
======== ========
All of the Company's net operating loss carryforwards have been used. The
Company used its remaining alternative minimum tax credit in 2001.
The permanent income tax benefit of $7.2 million and $2.1 million for the
years ended December 31, 2001 and 2000, respectively, associated with the
exercise of stock options is credited directly to paid-in capital on the
accompanying statement of stockholders' equity.
F-12
CATELLUS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(Continued)
Note 5. Joint Venture Investments
The Company has investments in a variety of unconsolidated real estate joint
ventures that are involved in both operating properties and development of
various other projects.
The Company's unconsolidated joint ventures include the following at
December 31, 2001:
Ownership Ownership
Operating Properties Percentage Development Projects Percentage
-------------------- ---------- -------------------- ----------
Hotel Residential
International Rivercenter /(a)/........ 25% Talega Associates, LLC /(f)/..... 30%
New Orleans Rivercenter /(b)/.......... 39% Talega Village, LLC /(g)/........ 50%
New Orleans International Hotel /(c)/.. 16% Serrano Associates, LLC /(h)/.... 67%
Pacific Market Investment Company /(d)/ 50% Parkway Company, LLC /(i)/....... 50%
Office Urban
Torrance Investment Company /(e)/...... 67% Third & King Investors, LLC /(j)/ 29%
Commercial
Traer Creek LLC /(k)/............ 10%
--------
/(a)/ International Rivercenter owns the 1,600-room New Orleans Hilton Hotel on
and adjacent to the Lower Poydras Wharf in New Orleans, Louisiana.
/(b)/ New Orleans Rivercenter owns a 75% undivided interest in an 8.5-acre
parcel of land, which primarily provides parking for the New Orleans
Hilton Hotel.
/(c)/ New Orleans International Hotel owns a 22.5% interest in New Orleans
Rivercenter.
/(d)/ Pacific Market Investment Company owns and operates a 337-room Embassy
Suites Hotel in San Diego, California.
/(e)/ Torrance Investment Company owns two office buildings totaling 202,000
square feet on 14 acres of land in Torrance, California.
/(f)/ Talega Associates, LLC acquired and developed a master-planned community
located partially in the City of San Clemente, and partially in an
incorporated area of Orange County. At December 31, 2001, it had an
inventory of 2,144 available lots.
/(g)/ Talega Village, LLC develops age-restricted residential units in Orange
County, California. At December 31, 2001, it had an inventory of 183
available homes.
/(h)/ Serrano Associates, LLC acquired and is developing a 3,500-acre
master-planned community near Sacramento, California. At December 31,
2001, it had an inventory of 2,182 available lots.
/(i)/ Parkway Company, LLC develops a master-planned residential community
located in Folsom, California. At December 31, 2001, it had an inventory
of 1,437 available lots.
/(j)/ Third & King Investors, LLC is in the construction phase of a mixed-use
project at Mission Bay in San Francisco, California.
/(k)/ Traer Creek LLC owns land for development in Avon, Colorado.
In 2001, the Company sold its retained interest in BHC Residential, LLC, and
realized a pre-tax gain of $14.2 million (see Note 14), which has been included
in "equity in earnings of development joint ventures, net" on the consolidated
statement of operations.
During 2000, the Company acquired the remaining interest that it did not
previously own in a residential joint venture, Hercules, LLC. Consequently, the
$27.1 million of the Company's investment in this joint venture was
consolidated as of December 31, 2000.
F-13
CATELLUS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(Continued)
During 1999, the Company acquired the remaining 50% interest that it did not
previously own in its apartment joint venture, JMB/Santa Fe Bayfront Venture,
which subsequently sold the apartment building that was its sole asset, and the
Company realized a pre-tax gain of $10.3 million in 1999.
In October of 1999, the partnership owning the Pacific Design Center
transferred its primary asset to a third party. This transaction resulted in
the Company recognizing in 1999 a $26.7 million extraordinary gain, net of tax
expense of $17.8 million, resulting from a negative investment/capital account
due to prior cash distributions by the partnership.
The Company guarantees a portion of the debt and interest of certain of its
joint ventures. At December 31, 2001, these guarantees totaled $42.3 million.
In some cases, other parties have jointly and severally guaranteed these
obligations and are collateralized by the related properties.
The combined balance sheets and statements of operations of these
unconsolidated joint ventures, along with the Company's proportionate share,
are summarized as follows:
Combined Proportionate Share
------------------ ------------------
December 31, December 31,
------------------ ------------------
2001 2000 2001 2000
-------- -------- -------- --------
(In thousands)
Assets:
Operating properties:
Property.......................................... $139,620 $126,363 $ 45,432 $ 41,915
Other............................................. 19,118 20,416 6,032 6,301
Development projects:
Property.......................................... 350,877 367,475 137,786 122,218
Other............................................. 40,244 36,714 11,390 13,413
-------- -------- -------- --------
Total.......................................... $549,859 $550,968 $200,640 $183,847
======== ======== ======== ========
Liabilities and venturers' equity:
Operating properties:
Notes Payable..................................... $192,134 $194,384 $ 59,466 $ 60,197
Other............................................. 17,408 13,601 5,024 4,111
Development projects:.................................
Notes Payable..................................... 101,345 157,152 36,803 61,378
Other............................................. 96,714 82,138 35,617 27,997
-------- -------- -------- --------
Total liabilities.............................. 407,601 447,275 136,910 153,683
-------- -------- -------- --------
Venturers' equity/(deficit):
Operating properties.............................. (50,804) (61,206) (13,026) (16,092)
Development projects.............................. 193,062 164,899 76,756 46,256
-------- -------- -------- --------
142,258 103,693 63,730 30,164
-------- -------- -------- --------
Total liabilities and venturers' equity........ $549,859 $550,968 $200,640 $183,847
======== ======== ======== ========
The Company's proportionate share of venturers' equity is an aggregate
amount for all ventures. Because the Company's ownership percentage differs
from venture to venture, because there are varying distribution agreements, and
because certain ventures have accumulated equity while others have accumulated
deficits, the Company's percentage of venturers' equity is not reflective of
the Company's ownership percentage of the
F-14
CATELLUS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(Continued)
ventures. The Company does not recognize its share of losses generated by joint
ventures in excess of its investment unless it is legally committed or intends
to fund deficits in the future.
During 2000, one of the hotel joint ventures refinanced its property and
subsequently distributed $15.6 million to the Company. This was recorded as a
reduction in the Company's proportionate share of the venturers' equity.
The Company has contributed appreciated property to certain of its joint
venture investments. Although the properties are recorded by the venture at
fair value on the date of contribution, the related gains have been deferred in
the Company's financial statements and will be recognized when the properties
are sold by the joint ventures.
Combined Proportionate Share
-------------------------- -------------------------
Year Ended December 31,
----------------------------------------------------
2001 2000 1999 2001 2000 1999
-------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------
(In thousands)
Revenue:
Operating properties....... $135,849 $139,692 $136,199 $ 41,006 $ 41,777 $40,502
Development projects....... 220,154 320,988 117,839 109,842 144,381 53,611
-------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------
356,003 460,680 254,038 150,848 186,158 94,113
-------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------
Expenses:
Operating properties....... 106,184 104,642 98,929 32,173 31,968 29,834
Development projects....... 191,370 276,200 91,139 83,864 116,601 43,459
-------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------
297,554 380,842 190,068 116,037 148,569 73,293
-------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------
Net earnings before income tax $ 58,449 $ 79,838 $ 63,970 $ 34,811 $ 37,589 $20,820
======== ======== ======== ======== ======== =======
F-15
CATELLUS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(Continued)
Note 6. Property
Book value by property type consists of the following:
December 31,
----------------------
2001 2000
---------- ----------
(In thousands)
Rental properties:
Industrial buildings..................... $ 943,340 $ 874,168
Office buildings......................... 297,707 205,179
Retail buildings......................... 96,263 94,085
Ground leases............................ 142,913 92,803
Investment in operating joint ventures... (13,026) (16,092)
---------- ----------
1,467,197 1,250,143
---------- ----------
Developable properties:
Commercial............................... 188,527 174,329
Residential (See Note 14)................ 49,614 64,479
Urban.................................... 258,504 366,136
Investment in development joint ventures. 76,756 46,256
---------- ----------
573,401 651,200
---------- ----------
Work-in-process:
Commercial............................... 118,668 50,098
Commercial--capital lease................ 40,560 37,415
Residential (See Note 14)................ 2,494 4,883
Urban.................................... 40,318 --
---------- ----------
202,040 92,396
---------- ----------
Furniture, fixtures and equipment........... 28,818 26,599
Other....................................... 5,052 5,475
---------- ----------
Gross book value............................ 2,276,508 2,025,813
Accumulated depreciation.................... (354,557) (320,275)
---------- ----------
Net book value.............................. $1,921,951 $1,705,538
========== ==========
F-16
CATELLUS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(Continued)
Note 7. Other Financial Statement Captions
Other Assets and Deferred Charges, Net
The Company's other assets and deferred charges consisted of the following:
December 31,
-----------------
2001 2000
-------- --------
(In thousands)
Deferred lease commissions, net....... $ 34,200 $ 33,096
Deferred financing fees, net.......... 26,584 29,647
Reimbursable construction costs....... 25,052 --
Straight-line rent.................... 21,612 17,452
Deferred cost of sales................ 19,627 9,908
Tax increment financing assets........ 15,555 --
Cash surrender value of life insurance 9,012 7,525
Prepaid expenses...................... 7,567 10,606
Other................................. 8,096 12,799
-------- --------
$167,305 $121,033
======== ========
Amortization of lease commissions was $6.5 million, $4.9 million, and $3.9
million for the years ended December 31, 2001, 2000, and 1999, respectively.
Amortization of deferred finance fees was $5.8 million, $6.4 million, and $4.6
million for the years ended December 31, 2001, 2000, and 1999, respectively.
In 2001, the Company entered into a tax increment financing agreement with a
municipality and shares a portion of the increased property tax to be generated
by one of its residential development projects. The estimated value to the
Company of the incremental tax revenue at December 31, 2001 was $15.6 million
and this amount is anticipated to be collected, with interest, over the next 37
years.
The aggregate total of employee loans at December 31, 2001 and 2000 were
$2.0 million and $1.9 million, respectively. In 2001, the Company issued an
unsecured $0.1 million interest free promissory note to an employee. Principal
repayment is in two annual installments of $62,500 commencing March 31, 2002.
In December 2000, the Company issued an unsecured $1.0 million promissory note
to an employee pursuant to an employment agreement. Interest is fixed at 5.87%
and is due annually commencing February 28, 2002. Principal repayment is in
three annual installments of $333,000 commencing on the first anniversary of
the employee's termination date, as defined, subject to acceleration provisions
in case of certain events. The principal amount of employee loans is included
in "Other" above.
Accounts Payable and Accrued Expenses
The Company's accounts payable and accrued expenses consisted of the
following:
December 31,
----------------
2001 2000
-------- -------
(In thousands)
Accrued construction costs................. $ 76,562 $33,183
Salaries, bonuses and deferred compensation 33,542 27,985
Property taxes............................. 15,425 14,331
Interest................................... 10,454 10,303
Other...................................... 9,705 10,472
-------- -------
$145,688 $96,274
======== =======
F-17
CATELLUS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(Continued)
Deferred Credits and Other Liabilities
The Company's deferred credits and other liabilities consisted of the
following:
December 31,
----------------
2001 2000
-------- -------
(In thousands)
Rent deposits.................. $111,105 $ 4,660
Deferred profits............... 38,774 17,670
Environmental and legal reserve 11,216 10,377
Security deposits.............. 7,253 11,457
Sales deposits................. 1,530 4,212
Other.......................... 7,778 9,220
-------- -------
$177,656 $57,596
======== =======
At December 31, 2001, rent deposits includes $102.5 million of prepaid
ground lease rent from a major tenant and is being amortized over the lease
term of 34 years. The environmental and legal reserves are more fully described
in Note 15. Deferred profits represent cash or notes received by the Company in
connection with property sales transactions, which do not meet the criteria for
profit recognition.
Note 8. Leases
The Company, as lessor, has entered into noncancelable operating leases
expiring at various dates through 2052. Rental revenue under these leases
totaled $230.2 million in 2001, $202.8 million in 2000, and $168.4 million in
1999. Included in this revenue are rentals contingent on lessees' operations of
$2.0 million in 2001, $3.4 million in 2000, and $2.0 million in 1999. Future
minimum rental revenue under existing noncancelable operating leases as of
December 31, 2001, is summarized as follows (in thousands):
2002...... $ 185,594
2003...... 160,596
2004...... 141,101
2005...... 112,314
2006...... 85,897
Thereafter 803,844
----------
$1,489,346
==========
The book value of the Company's properties under operating leases or held
for rent is summarized as follows:
December 31,
----------------------
2001 2000
---------- ----------
(In thousands)
Buildings.................... $1,337,310 $1,173,432
Ground leases................ 142,913 92,803
---------- ----------
1,480,223 1,266,235
Less accumulated depreciation (325,130) (287,039)
---------- ----------
$1,155,093 $ 979,196
========== ==========
F-18
CATELLUS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(Continued)
The Company, as lessee, has entered into noncancelable operating leases
expiring at various dates through 2023. Rental expense under these leases
totaled $3.0 million in 2001, $3.1 million in 2000, and $3.3 million in 1999.
Future minimum lease payments as of December 31, 2001, are summarized as
follows (in thousands):
2002...... $2,573
2003...... 2,421
2004...... 2,118
2005...... 1,700
2006...... 211
Thereafter 240
------
$9,263
======
Note 9. Other, net
Property sales and fee services--other income (expense) is summarized as
follows:
Year Ended December 31,
--------------------------
2001 2000 1999
------- -------- -------
(In thousands)
Interest income.......................... $10,395 $ 6,551 $ 6,910
Lease termination fee.................... 3,398 -- --
Proceeds from condemnation sale.......... 1,347 -- --
Land holding costs....................... (89) (286) (2,933)
Abandoned project costs.................. (3,977) (1,720) (2,608)
Reserve for uncollectible note receivable -- (2,000) --
Loss on fee development contract......... (5,108) (11,797) (6,720)
All other, net........................... 221 (99) (144)
------- -------- -------
$ 6,187 $ (9,351) $(5,495)
======= ======== =======
Other, net--other income (expense) is summarized as follows:
Year Ended December 31,
-------------------------
2001 2000 1999
------- ------- -------
(In thousands)
Interest income $13,213 $ 4,652 $ 527
Consulting fees (6,470) (3,500) (4,393)
All other, net. (1,083) (212) (387)
------- ------- -------
$ 5,660 $ 940 $(4,253)
======= ======= =======
Note 10. Non-Strategic Asset Sales
The Company's sales of non-strategic assets are summarized as follows:
Year Ended December 31,
-----------------------
2001 2000 1999
------ ------- -------
(In thousands)
Sales........ $4,161 $50,759 $10,576
Cost of sales 252 4,480 3,773
------ ------- -------
Gain...... $3,909 $46,279 $ 6,803
====== ======= =======
In 2000, the Company sold 405,000 acres of desert holdings for $45.1 million
resulting in a pre-tax gain of $42.4 million.
F-19
CATELLUS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(Continued)
Note 11. Employee Benefit and Stock Option Plans
The Company has a profit sharing and savings plan for all employees. Funding
consists of employee contributions along with matching and discretionary profit
sharing contributions by the Company. Total expense for the Company under this
plan was $1.2 million, $1.2 million, and $1.1 million in 2001, 2000, and 1999,
respectively.
The Company has various plans through which employees may purchase common
stock of the Company.
The Company has five stock option plans under which certain committees of
the Board of Directors may grant options to purchase up to 14,500,000 shares of
common stock (1991 Stock Option Plan, Amended and Restated Executive Stock
Option Plan, 1995 Stock Option Plan, Amended and Restated 1996 Performance
Award Plan, and 2000 Performance Award Plan). The exercise price of options
granted under these plans is generally the closing price of the common stock on
the date of grant. Options typically become exercisable in four annual
installments commencing on the first anniversary of the date of grant and
expires ten years from the date of grant. However, there are other vesting
schedules and expiration periods for options granted under the plans.
The Company also has various plans through which non-employee directors may
purchase or receive common stock of the Company.
Under the Amended and Restated Executive Stock Option Plan and the Amended
and Restated 1996 Performance Award Plan, each non-employee director was
automatically granted an option to purchase 5,000 shares of common stock upon
initial election to the Board of Directors, and annually thereafter during his
or her term of service. The exercise prices of the options are at fair market
value, as defined, on the date of grant. Options granted under the Amended and
Restated Executive Stock Option Plan were exercisable in installments on a
cumulative basis at a rate of 20% each year. Under the Amended and Restated
1996 Performance Award Plan, options granted through 1998 were exercisable
based upon stock price performance benchmarks, while options granted in 1999
and after became exercisable in four annual installments. After May 22, 1996,
no further options were granted to non-employee directors under the Amended and
Restated Executive Stock Option Plan.
Under the 2000 Performance Award Plan, in lieu of the automatic grants
provided for in the Amended and Restated 1996 Performance Award Plan, each
non-employee director is automatically granted an option, immediately following
each annual meeting of stockholders, to purchase 5,000 shares of common stock.
Any new non-employee member of the Board will receive an option to purchase a
portion of 5,000 shares that corresponds to the number of months until the next
annual meeting. The exercise price of each automatic stock option is the
closing stock price on the date of grant. Each automatic stock option has a
ten-year term and becomes exercisable in four equal installments on each of the
first four anniversaries of the date of grant.
In addition, the Amended and Restated 1996 Performance Award Plan had
provided, and the 2000 Performance Award Plan currently provides, that each
non-employee director may elect irrevocably to defer any retainers or fees and
receive director stock units instead. If a director makes such an election, his
or her director stock units will be distributed to him or her in the form of
common stock in a single lump sum or in up to five substantially equal
installments, beginning on either January 1 of the year immediately following
the director's termination of service, or January 1 of another year selected by
the director provided that such year is not less than three years after the
year in which the compensation being deferred is earned. On the distribution
date, the director will receive a number of shares of common stock calculated
by dividing the deferred compensation by 90% of the fair market value of the
common stock on the date of credit.
F-20
CATELLUS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(Continued)
The Company has elected to follow Accounting Principles Board Opinion No.
25, "Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees" (APB 25), and related
Interpretations in accounting for its employee stock options because, as
discussed below, the alternative fair value accounting provided for under
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123, "Accounting for
Stock-Based Compensation" (Statement 123) requires use of option valuation
models that were developed for use in valuing publicly traded stock options.
Under APB 25, because the exercise price of the Company's employee stock
options equals the market price of the underlying stock on the date of grant,
no compensation expense is recognized.
Pro forma information regarding net income and income per share is required
by Statement 123 and has been determined as if the Company had accounted for
its employee stock options under the fair value method. The weighted-average
fair value of options granted during 2001, 2000, and 1999 was $5.42, $5.31, and
$5.35, respectively. The fair value of options granted was estimated at the
date of grant using a Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following
weighted-average assumptions for 2001, 2000, and 1999, respectively: risk-free
interest rates of 4.42%, 6.39%, and 5.52%; zero percent dividend yields;
volatility factors of the expected market price of the Company's common stock
of 24.0%, 28.5%, and 30.0%; and a weighted-average expected life of the options
of five years.
The Black-Scholes option valuation model was developed for use in estimating
the fair value of traded options, which have no vesting restrictions and are
fully transferable. In addition, option valuation models require the input of
highly subjective assumptions, including the expected stock price volatility.
Because the Company's employee stock options have characteristics significantly
different from those of traded options, and because changes in the subjective
input assumptions can materially affect the fair value estimate, in
management's opinion, the existing models do not necessarily provide a reliable
measure of the fair value of its employee stock options.
For purposes of pro forma disclosures, the estimated fair value of the
options is amortized to expense over the options' vesting period. The Company's
pro forma information is as follows:
Year Ended December 31,
--------------------------------
2001 2000 1999
------- -------- -------
(In thousands, except income per
share information)
Pro forma net income applicable to common stockholders $88,855 $104,537 $92,333
======= ======== =======
Pro forma income per share--basic..................... $ 0.89 $ 0.98 $ 0.86
======= ======== =======
Pro forma income per share--assuming dilution......... $ 0.87 $ 0.96 $ 0.85
======= ======== =======
F-21
CATELLUS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(Continued)
A summary of the Company's stock option activity, and related information is
as follows:
Year Ended December 31,
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
2001 2000 1999
------------------------ ------------------------ ------------------------
Weighted-Average Weighted-Average Weighted-Average
Options Exercise Price Options Exercise Price Options Exercise Price
------- ---------------- ------- ---------------- ------- ----------------
(In thousands, except exercise price information)
Outstanding--beginning of
year.................... 10,259 $12.22 7,333 $10.83 7,383 $10.49
Granted................... 1,119 $17.65 4,172 $14.05 827 $14.50
Exercised................. (2,104) $ 9.24 (903) $ 8.61 (373) $ 7.38
Expired................... (33) $18.83 (147) $11.74 (25) $16.19
Forfeited................. (374) $13.50 (196) $15.85 (479) $14.75
------ ------ -----
Outstanding--end of year.. 8,867 $13.50 10,259 $12.22 7,333 $10.83
====== ====== =====
Exercisable at end of year 4,663 $11.85 5,158 $10.03 4,369 $ 8.56
====== ====== =====
Exercise prices for options outstanding as of December 31, 2001, ranged from
$5.58 to $21.38. The weighted-average remaining contractual life of those
options is 6.6 years.
Note 12. Capital Stock
The Company has authorized the issuance of 150 million shares of $.01 par
value common stock. The Company has reserved 14,500,000 shares of common stock
pursuant to various compensation programs.
From October 1999 through July 2001, the Company's Board of Directors
authorized a total of $250 million in repurchases of the Company's Common
Stock. Through December 31, 2001, the Company purchased 13,047,097 shares at a
cost of $218.0 million under these programs. The remaining $32.0 million
authorized has expired or was terminated. All purchases were made on the open
market.
In December 2001, the Company purchased 10,600,000 shares of its Common
Stock from the California Public Employees' Retirement System ('CalPERS') for
$183.1 million or $17.2755 per share, representing a negotiated 1% discount to
the closing price of the Company's common stock on December 12, 2001. An
independent third party, American Appraisal Associates, Inc., provided the
Company's Board of Directors with a written opinion confirming that the terms
and conditions of this transaction were fair, from a financial point of view,
to the Company's stockholders other than CalPERS. Immediately prior to the
transaction, CalPERS was the beneficial owner of 18,782,276 shares, or
approximately 19.3%, of the Company's issued and outstanding common stock. As a
result of the transaction, CalPERS' beneficial ownership was reduced to
8,182,276 shares, or approximately 9.45%, of the Company's issued and
outstanding common stock.
The Company's repurchases are reflected as treasury stock at cost and are
presented as a reduction to consolidated stockholders' equity.
In December 1999, the Company authorized the issuance of 2,000,000 shares of
Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock in connection with the adoption
of a shareholder rights plan. This series of preferred stock has a quarterly
dividend of the greater of $1.00 or 100 times the dividend paid on our common
stock, and it has a voting right of 100 votes per share. Also in connection
with the shareholder rights plan adopted in December 1999, the Company's Board
of Directors declared a dividend of one right to purchase 1/100th of a share of
Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock for each share of common stock.
This right becomes exercisable on the occurrence of certain events, and it also
may entitle the holder to purchase shares of common stock at one-half its
market price on the occurrence of certain events. No shares of this series of
preferred stock have been issued.
F-22
CATELLUS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(Continued)
Note 13. Segment Reporting
The Company has determined that its reportable segments are those that are
based on the Company's method of internal reporting, which disaggregates its
business by type. The Company has five reportable segments: Asset Management,
Commercial, Residential, Urban, and Corporate. Asset Management is now reported
as a separate business segment; it was previously presented predominately as
part of the Commercial segment. Prior year amounts have been reclassified to
conform with the current year presentation. The Asset Management segment leases
and manages the Company-owned commercial buildings and land leases. The
Commercial segment develops real estate for the Company's own account or for
third parties, and acquires and sells developable land and commercial
buildings. The Residential segment is involved in community development,
project management, and, historically, home-building activities (see additional
discussion regarding the sale of the home-building assets in Note 14, Sale of
Home-Building Assets). The Urban segment entitles and develops major mixed-use
development sites, which includes development for residential, office, retail,
and entertainment purposes. The Corporate segment consists of administrative
and other services.
The accounting policies of the segments are the same as those described in
the summary of significant accounting policies (See Note 2). Inter-segment
gains and losses are not recognized. Debt and interest-bearing assets are
allocated to segments based upon the grouping of the underlying assets. All
other assets and liabilities are specifically identified. Each segment has a
separate operating management structure.
The Company uses a supplemental performance measure, Earnings Before
Depreciation and Deferred Taxes ("EBDDT"), along with net income, to report
operating results. EBDDT is not a measure of operating results or cash flows
from operating activities as defined by generally accepted accounting
principles. Further, EBDDT is not necessarily indicative of cash available to
fund cash needs and should not be considered as an alternative to cash flows as
a measure of liquidity. The Company believes that EBDDT provides relevant
information about operations and is useful, along with net income, for an
understanding of the Company's operating results.
EBDDT is calculated by making various adjustments to net income.
Depreciation, amortization, and deferred income taxes are added back to net
income as they represent non-cash charges. Since depreciation expense is added
back to net income in arriving at EBDDT, the portion of gain on property sales
attributable to depreciation recapture is excluded from EBDDT. In addition,
gains on the sale of non-strategic assets and extraordinary items, including
their current tax effect, represent unusual and/or non-recurring items and are
excluded from the EBDDT calculation. A reconciliation from EBDDT to net income
is also provided.
F-23
CATELLUS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(Continued)
Financial data by reportable segment is as follows:
Asset
Management Commercial Residential Urban Corporate Total
---------- ---------- ----------- -------- --------- ----------
(In thousands)
2001
Rental properties:
Rental revenue....................... $ 234,881 $ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- $ 234,881
Property operating costs............. (62,663) -- -- -- -- (62,663)
Equity in earnings of operating joint
ventures, net...................... 8,833 -- -- -- -- 8,833
---------- -------- -------- -------- -------- ----------
181,051 -- -- -- -- 181,051
---------- -------- -------- -------- -------- ----------
Property sales and fee services:
Sales revenue........................ 71,818 75,686 48,507 49,793 -- 245,804
Cost of sales........................ (30,744) (50,896) (30,202) (37,337) (519) (149,698)
---------- -------- -------- -------- -------- ----------
Gain on property sales............ 41,074 24,790 18,305 12,456 (519) 96,106
Equity in earnings of development
joint ventures, net................ -- 9 27,670 -- (1,701) 25,978
---------- -------- -------- -------- -------- ----------
Total gain on property sales...... 41,074 24,799 45,975 12,456 (2,220) 122,084
Management and development
fees............................... 145 3,679 1,394 782 -- 6,000
Selling, general and administrative
expenses........................... (1,235) (9,607) (11,379) (4,349) -- (26,570)
Other, net........................... 5,518 (179) (3,868) 4,716 -- 6,187
---------- -------- -------- -------- -------- ----------
45,502 18,692 32,122 13,605 (2,220) 107,701
---------- -------- -------- -------- -------- ----------
Interest expense..................... (75,110) (7) -- (684) 17,656 (58,145)
Corporate administrative costs....... -- -- -- -- (19,256) (19,256)
Minority interests................... (6,059) -- (83) -- -- (6,142)
Other, net........................... -- -- -- -- 5,660 5,660
Depreciation recapture............... (11,428) -- -- -- -- (11,428)
---------- -------- -------- -------- -------- ----------
Pre-tax EBDDT..................... $ 133,956 $ 18,685 $ 32,039 $ 12,921 $ 1,840 199,441
========== ======== ======== ======== ========
Current taxes........................ (16,300)
----------
EBDDT................................ 183,141
Depreciation and amortization........ (52,458)
Deferred taxes....................... (49,499)
Non-strategic asset sales............ 3,909
Depreciation recapture............... 11,428
----------
Net Income........................ $ 96,521
==========
Investments in equity method
subsidiaries....................... $ (13,026) $ -- $ 74,721 $ 2,035 $ -- $ 63,730
========== ======== ======== ======== ======== ==========
Segment assets....................... $1,243,108 $371,105 $216,920 $321,601 $262,781 $2,415,515
========== ======== ======== ======== ======== ==========
Capital expenditures for segment
assets............................. $ 72,075 $234,124 $ 58,640 $ 61,317 $ 9,468 $ 435,624
========== ======== ======== ======== ======== ==========
F-24
CATELLUS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(Continued)
Asset
Management Commercial Residential Urban Corporate Total
---------- ---------- ----------- -------- --------- ----------
(In thousands)
2000
Rental properties:
Rental revenue....................... $ 206,762 $ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- $ 206,762
Property operating costs............. (55,272) -- -- -- -- (55,272)
Equity in earnings of operating joint
ventures, net...................... 9,809 -- -- -- -- 9,809
---------- -------- --------- -------- -------- ----------
161,299 -- -- -- -- 161,299
---------- -------- --------- -------- -------- ----------
Property sales and fee services:
Sales revenue........................ 89,323 68,951 292,822 -- -- 451,096
Cost of sales........................ (46,410) (52,415) (238,930) -- -- (337,755)
---------- -------- --------- -------- -------- ----------
Gain on property sales............ 42,913 16,536 53,892 -- -- 113,341
Equity in earnings of development
joint ventures, net................ -- 13 27,767 -- -- 27,780
---------- -------- --------- -------- -------- ----------
Total gain on property sales...... 42,913 16,549 81,659 -- -- 141,121
Management and development fees...... 11,814 999 1,498 1,149 -- 15,460
Selling, general and administrative
expenses........................... (8,903) (9,643) (25,007) (2,248) -- (45,801)
Other, net........................... 2,353 524 (12,209) (19) -- (9,351)
---------- -------- --------- -------- -------- ----------
48,177 8,429 45,941 (1,118) -- 101,429
---------- -------- --------- -------- -------- ----------
Interest expense..................... (57,832) (4) (546) (1,153) 8,571 (50,964)
Corporate administrative costs....... -- -- -- -- (15,675) (15,675)
Minority interests................... (6,347) -- (4,354) -- -- (10,701)
Other, net........................... -- -- -- -- 940 940
Depreciation recapture............... (14,519) -- -- -- -- (14,519)
---------- -------- --------- -------- -------- ----------
Pre-tax EBDDT..................... $ 130,778 $ 8,425 $ 41,041 $ (2,271) $ (6,164) 171,809
========== ======== ========= ======== ========
Current taxes........................ (12,539)
----------
EBDDT................................ 159,270
Depreciation and amortization........ (46,505)
Deferred taxes....................... (62,556)
Non-strategic asset sales............ 46,279
Depreciation recapture............... 14,519
----------
Net Income........................ $ 111,007
==========
Investments in equity method
subsidiaries....................... $ (16,092) $ 11 $ 46,245 $ -- $ -- $ 30,164
========== ======== ========= ======== ======== ==========
Segment assets....................... $1,072,283 $325,513 $ 152,551 $355,202 $368,867 $2,274,416
========== ======== ========= ======== ======== ==========
Capital expenditures for segment
assets............................. $ 31,646 $245,647 $ 115,428 $ 41,264 $ 2,067 $ 436,052
========== ======== ========= ======== ======== ==========
F-25
CATELLUS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(Continued)
Asset
Management Commercial Residential Urban Corporate Total
---------- ---------- ----------- -------- --------- ----------
(In thousands)
1999
Rental properties:
Rental revenue....................... $172,295 $ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- $ 172,295
Property operating costs............. (46,754) -- -- -- -- (46,754)
Equity in earnings of operating joint
ventures, net...................... 10,668 -- -- -- -- 10,668
-------- -------- --------- -------- -------- ----------
136,209 -- -- -- -- 136,209
-------- -------- --------- -------- -------- ----------
Property sales and fee services:
Sales revenue........................ 91,020 94,072 161,913 -- -- 347,005
Cost of sales........................ (61,205) (76,845) (121,107) -- -- (259,157)
-------- -------- --------- -------- -------- ----------
Gain on property sales............ 29,815 17,227 40,806 -- -- 87,848
Equity in earnings of development
joint ventures, net................ -- (23) 10,175 -- -- 10,152
-------- -------- --------- -------- -------- ----------
Total gain on property sales...... 29,815 17,204 50,981 -- -- 98,000
Management and development fees...... 10,568 896 892 2,612 -- 14,968
Selling, general and administrative
expenses........................... (7,493) (6,192) (17,217) (825) -- (31,727)
Other, net........................... 2,737 (915) (7,153) (164) -- (5,495)
-------- -------- --------- -------- -------- ----------
35,627 10,993 27,503 1,623 -- 75,746
-------- -------- --------- -------- -------- ----------
Interest expense..................... (50,662) -- (34) (830) 12,152 (39,374)
Corporate administrative costs....... -- -- -- -- (14,760) (14,760)
Minority interests................... (3,262) -- 15 -- -- (3,247)
Other, net........................... -- -- -- -- (4,253) (4,253)
Depreciation recapture............... (4,354) -- -- -- -- (4,354)
-------- -------- --------- -------- -------- ----------
Pre-tax EBDDT..................... $113,558 $ 10,993 $ 27,484 $ 793 $ (6,861) 145,967
======== ======== ========= ======== ========
Current taxes........................ (17,339)
----------
EBDDT................................ 128,628
Depreciation and amortization........ (39,214)
Deferred taxes....................... (30,351)
Non-strategic asset sales............ 6,803
Depreciation recapture............... 4,354
Extraordinary gain, net of tax....... 26,652
----------
Net Income........................ $ 96,872
==========
Investments in equity method
subsidiaries....................... $ (2,916) $ 434 $ 47,491 $ -- $ -- $ 45,009
======== ======== ========= ======== ======== ==========
Segment assets....................... $918,662 $304,883 $ 272,981 $314,796 $ 41,784 $1,853,106
======== ======== ========= ======== ======== ==========
Capital expenditures for segment
assets............................. $ 56,687 $210,601 $ 202,167 $ 27,493 $ 2,369 $ 499,317
======== ======== ========= ======== ======== ==========
F-26
CATELLUS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(Continued)
Note 14. Sale of Home-Building Assets
In July 2000, the Company's residential subsidiary sold a majority of its
home-building assets, with a book value of $125.8 million, to a newly formed
limited liability company ("LLC") managed by Brookfield Homes of California,
Inc., for $139 million in cash and a retained interest in the new company
valued at $22.5 million. Approximately $77 million of the initial cash proceeds
were used for debt repayment, closing costs, and other expenses related to the
sale of the home building operations. The remaining proceeds were added to the
Company's working capital. Under the agreement, the Company's residential
subsidiary was entitled to a preferred return on the retained interest and 35%
of additional profits from LLC operations. The deferred gain related to the
retained interest and the 35% share of profits from LLC's operations were
recorded as part of "Equity in earnings of development joint ventures, net" as
home/lots are sold by LLC.
In 2000, the Company recorded a $13.4 million gain on property sales related
to this transaction and recognized $8.3 million of the $22.5 million retained
interest, $0.8 million of the Company's 35% share of the profits of the LLC,
and a $1.0 million preferred return from the Company's investment in the LLC.
In 2001, the Company sold its retained interest in the LLC for $8.2 million
and recognized the remaining deferred gain of $14.2 million, which has been
included as part of "equity in earnings of development joint ventures, net".
Note 15. Commitments and Contingencies
As of December 31, 2001, the Company has outstanding standby letters of
credit and surety bonds in the amount of $225.3 million in favor of local
municipalities or financial institutions to guarantee performance on real
property improvements or financial obligations.
The Company, as a partner in certain joint ventures, has made certain
financing guarantees of $42.3 million (Note 5). In addition, the Company has
guaranteed debt service of $8.6 million and $2.0 million for various
residential projects.
The Company is a party to a number of legal actions arising in the ordinary
course of business. The Company cannot predict with certainty the final outcome
of these proceedings. Considering current insurance coverages and the
substantial legal defenses available, however, management believes that none of
these actions, when finally resolved, will have a material adverse effect on
the consolidated financial position, results of operations, or cash flows of
the Company. Where appropriate, the Company has established reserves for
potential liabilities related to legal actions or threatened legal actions.
These reserves are necessarily based on estimates and probabilities of the
occurrence of events and therefore are subject to revision from time to time.
Some of the legal actions to which the Company is party seek to restrain
actions related to the development process or challenge title to or possession
of the Company's properties. Typically, such actions, if successful, would not
result in significant financial liability for the Company but might instead
prevent the completion of the development process originally planned.
Inherent in the operations of the real estate business is the possibility
that environmental liability may arise from the current or past ownership, or
current or past operation, of real properties. The Company may be required in
the future to take action to correct or reduce the environmental effects of
prior disposal or release of hazardous substances by third parties, the
Company, or its corporate predecessors. Future environmental costs are
difficult to estimate because of such factors as the unknown magnitude of
possible contamination, the unknown timing and extent of the corrective actions
that may be required, the determination of the Company's potential liability in
proportion to that of other potentially responsible parties, and the extent to
which such costs are recoverable from insurance. Also, the Company does not
generally have access to properties sold in the past.
F-27
CATELLUS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(Continued)
At December 31, 2001, management estimates that future costs for remediation
of environmental contamination on operating properties and properties
previously sold approximate $9.6 million, and has provided a reserve for that
amount. It is anticipated that such costs will be incurred over the next
several years. Management also estimates that similar costs relating to the
Company's properties to be developed or sold may range from $24.3 million to
$43.5 million. These amounts will be capitalized as components of development
costs when incurred, which is anticipated to be over a period of twenty years,
or will be deferred and charged to cost of sales when the properties are sold.
Environmental costs capitalized during 2001 totaled $3.0 million. The Company's
estimates were developed based on reviews that took place over several years
based upon then-prevailing law and identified site conditions. Because of the
breadth of its portfolio, and past sales, the Company is unable to review each
property extensively on a regular basis. Such estimates are not precise and are
always subject to the availability of further information about the prevailing
conditions at the site, the future requirements of regulatory agencies, and the
availability and ability of other parties to pay some or all of such costs.
In 2001, $101 million of Community Facility District ("CFD") bonds were sold
to finance public infrastructure improvements at Mission Bay in San Francisco
and Pacific Commons in Fremont. Bonds totaling $71 million were issued for
Mission Bay, of which $17 million have a floating rate of interest initially
set at 2.85% (1.5% at December 31, 2001) with the remaining $54 million at a
fixed rate of 6.02%. The Company has issued a letter of credit totaling $17
million in support of the floating rate bond issued for Mission Bay. At Pacific
Commons, $30 million of bonds were issued and have a weighted average fixed
interest rate of 6.20%. These bonds have a series of maturities up to thirty
years. At December 31, 2001, for Mission Bay $2.4 million of the $17 million
floating rate bonds and $10.9 million of the $54 million fixed rate bonds were
used to reimburse costs the Company incurred on behalf of the district; for
Pacific Commons, approximately $0.1 million of cost was reimbursed. At December
31, 2001, the Company has incurred, but has not been reimbursed, costs of $25.1
million for Mission Bay and $12.7 million for Pacific Commons.
Upon completion of the infrastructure improvements at Mission Bay, for which
the $71 million CFD bonds were issued, the improvements will be transferred to
the City of San Francisco. Therefore, the expected reimbursement of the
infrastructure costs from the bonds is reflected in Other Assets.
The Company will retain the infrastructure improvements at Pacific Commons,
for which the $30 million CFD bonds were issued, until the land is sold.
Therefore, as construction of the improvements proceeds, the costs incurred are
capitalized and the liability of the CFD bonds has been recorded.
At Mission Bay, the landowners must satisfy any shortfall in annual debt
service obligations for the CFD bonds, if incremental tax revenues generated by
the projects are insufficient. At Pacific Commons, developed and designated
developed property is taxed first, and any shortfall in annual debt service is
paid by a tax on vacant land.
Note 16. Related Party Transactions
At December 31, 2001, the Company has a $13.2 million variable rate (8.42%
at December 31, 2001) note receivable maturing June 1, 2005 from one of its
unconsolidated joint venture investments. The note is collateralized by the
property owned by the venture. Interest earned was $0.9 million and $0.4
million in 2001 and 2000, respectively.
The Company provides development and management services to various
unconsolidated joint venture investments. Fees earned were $1.2 million, $0.6
million, and $1.1 million in 2001, 2000, and 1999, respectively. Deferred fees
of $1.0 million at December 31, 2001 will be earned as completed projects are
sold.
F-28
CATELLUS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(Continued)
In 2001, the Company entered into a 99-year ground lease with one of its
unconsolidated joint venture investments. $3.1 million of rent payments were
received, of which $1.8 million was recognized as rental income during 2001,
and $1.3 million will be recognized, together with annual rents, over the life
of the lease. The Company also received $0.4 million of interest from this
venture on a prior loan. There were no outstanding loans at December 31, 2001.
The Company has a $4.5 million collateralized 9.0% note receivable from an
unconsolidated joint venture for project costs plus accrued interest. The note
is collateralized by property owned by the venture, and matures in October
2028. The Company has entered into various lease agreements with this
unconsolidated joint venture. As lessee, rent expense was $0.1 million in each
of the years 2001, 2000, and 1999; this lease will expire in November 2011. As
lessor, the Company entered into a ground lease, which will expire in August
2054. The Company earned rental income of $0.2 million in each of the last
three years and has recorded a $1.4 million receivable associated with this
lease.
F-29
CATELLUS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
Summarized Quarterly Results (Unaudited)
The Company's income and cash flow are determined to a large extent by
property sales. Sales and net income have fluctuated significantly from quarter
to quarter, as evidenced by the following summary of unaudited quarterly
consolidated results of operations. Property sales fluctuate from quarter to
quarter, reflecting general market conditions and the Company's intent to sell
property when it can obtain attractive prices. Cost of sales may also vary
widely because (i) properties have been owned for varying periods of time; (ii)
properties are owned in various geographical locations; and (iii) development
projects have varying infrastructure costs and build-out periods.
Year Ended December 31,
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2001 2000
-------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------
First Second Third Fourth First Second Third Fourth
-------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- --------- --------
(In thousands, except per share data)
Rental properties:
Rental revenue................. $ 55,811 $ 57,098 $ 59,116 $ 62,856 $ 49,918 $ 50,738 $ 52,523 $ 53,583
Property operating costs....... (14,120) (14,088) (17,390) (17,065) (12,658) (13,731) (14,251) (14,632)
-------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- --------- --------
Property sales and fee services:
Sales revenue.................. 57,896 67,966 64,324 55,618 76,021 106,978 213,190 54,907
Cost of sales.................. (35,051) (41,824) (36,609) (36,214) (56,138) (64,244) (172,512) (44,861)
Equity in earnings of
development joint ventures,
net........................... 7,795 332 13,489 4,362 1,131 1,715 9,238 15,696
Management and development
fees.......................... 1,180 1,374 1,266 2,180 3,269 3,324 2,749 6,118
Selling, general and
administrative expenses....... (9,583) (5,997) (6,373) (4,617) (9,923) (9,409) (14,249) (12,220)
Interest expense................... (14,693) (15,017) (13,895) (14,540) (9,819) (10,753) (12,957) (17,435)
Gain on non-strategic asset sales.. 1,747 1,389 765 8 27,667 (198) 18,662 148
Corporate administrative costs..... (5,545) (5,062) (4,685) (3,964) (4,260) (3,460) (3,656) (4,299)
Depreciation and amortization...... (12,934) (12,932) (12,877) (13,715) (10,870) (11,379) (11,661) (12,595)
Net income $ 26,208 $ 22,171 $ 28,646 $ 19,496 $ 34,738 $ 26,067 $ 35,604 $ 14,598
======== ======== ======== ======== ======== ======== ========= ========
Net income per common share--
basic............................. $ 0.25 $ 0.22 $ 0.29 $ 0.20 $ 0.32 $ 0.24 $ 0.34 $ 0.14
======== ======== ======== ======== ======== ======== ========= ========
Net income per common share--
assuming dilution................. $ 0.24 $ 0.21 $ 0.28 $ 0.20 $ 0.32 $ 0.24 $ 0.33 $ 0.13
======== ======== ======== ======== ======== ======== ========= ========
EBDDT/(1)/ $ 46,768 $ 46,618 $ 46,329 $ 43,426 $ 34,399 $ 41,669 $ 45,652 $ 37,550
======== ======== ======== ======== ======== ======== ========= ========
--------
/(1)/ Refer to Note 13 for a definition of EBDDT.
F-30
EXHIBIT INDEX
Exhibit
Number
------
3.1A Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Registrant effective December 4, 1990, is incorporated
by reference to the exhibits to the Registration Statement on Form 10 (Commission File
No. 0-18694) as filed with the Commission on July 18, 1990.
3.1B Amendment to Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Registrant effective July 13, 1993, is
incorporated by reference to the exhibits to the Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2000.
3.2 Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Registrant are incorporated by reference to the exhibits to the
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2000.
4.1 Form of Certificate of Designations of Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock is incorporated
by reference to the exhibits to the Form 8-K as filed with the Commission on December 28, 1999.
4.3 Loan Agreement by and between Catellus Finance 1, L.L.C. and Prudential Mortgage Capital
Company, Inc. dated as of October 28, 1998, is incorporated by reference to the exhibits to the
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1998.
10.1 Restated Tax Allocation and Indemnity Agreement dated December 29, 1989, among the Registrant
and certain of its subsidiaries and Santa Fe Pacific Corporation is incorporated by reference to the
exhibits to the Registration Statement on Form 10 (Commission File No. 0-18694) as filed with the
Commission on July 18, 1990.
10.2 State Tax Allocation and Indemnity Agreement dated December 29, 1989, among the Registrant and
certain of its subsidiaries and Santa Fe Pacific Corporation is incorporated by reference to the
exhibits to the Registration Statement on Form 10 (Commission File No. 0-18694) as filed with the
Commission on July 18, 1990.
10.3A Registration Rights Agreement dated as of December 29, 1989, among the Registrant, BAREIA,
O&Y and Itel is incorporated by reference to the exhibits to the Registration Statement on Form 10
(Commission File No. 0-18694) as filed with the Commission on July 18, 1990.
10.3B First Amendment to Registration Rights Agreement among the Registrant, BAREIA, O&Y and Itel is
incorporated by reference to the exhibits to Amendment No. 2 to Form S-3 as filed with the
Commission on February 4, 1993.
10.3C Letter Agreement dated November 14, 1995, between the Registrant and California Public
Employees' Retirement System ("CalPERS") is incorporated by reference to the exhibits to the
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1995.
10.3D Purchase and Sale Agreement dated December 12, 2001 between the Registrant and CalPERS is
incorporated by reference to the exhibits to the Form 8-K as filed with the Commission on
December 13, 2001.
10.4 Amendment to Registrant's Amended and Restated 1991 Stock Option Plan, dated as of
September 26, 2001, is incorporated by reference to the exhibits to the Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended September 30, 2001. The Amended and Restated 1991 Stock Option Plan, as previously
amended and restated, is incorporated by reference to the exhibits to the Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 1997.
10.5 Amendment to Registrant's Amended and Restated 1995 Stock Option Plan, dated as of
September 26, 2001, is incorporated by reference to the exhibits to the Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended September 30, 2001. The Amended and Restated 1995 Stock Option Plan, as previously
amended and restated, is incorporated by reference to the exhibits to the Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 1997.
1
Exhibit
Number
------
10.6 Amendment to Registrant's Amended and Restated Executive Stock Option Plan, dated as of
September 26, 2001, is incorporated by reference to the exhibits to the Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended September 30, 2001. The Amended and Restated Executive Stock Option Plan, as previously
amended and restated, is incorporated by reference to the exhibits to the Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 1997.
10.7 Amendment to Registrant's Amended and Restated 1996 Performance Award Plan, dated as of
September 26, 2001, is incorporated by reference to the exhibits to the Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended September 30, 2001. The Amended and Restated 1996 Performance Award Plan, as previously
amended and restated, is incorporated by reference to the exhibits to the Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended March 31, 1999.
10.8 Amendment to Registrant's 2000 Performance Award Plan, dated as of September 26, 2001, is
incorporated by reference to the exhibits to the Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2001.
The 2000 Performance Award Plan is incorporated by reference to the exhibits to the Registrant's
proxy statement filed with the Commission on Schedule 14A on March 31, 2000 for the Annual
Meeting of Stockholders held on May 2, 2000.
10.9 Registrant's Deferred Compensation Plan is incorporated by reference to the exhibits to the
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1997.
10.10 Third Amended and Restated Employment Agreement dated as of December 24, 2001, between the
Registrant and Nelson C. Rising is attached.
10.11 Memorandum of Understanding regarding Employment dated February 7, 2001, between the
Registrant and Timothy J. Beaudin is incorporated by reference to the exhibits to the Form 10-Q for
the quarter ended September 30, 2001.
10.12 Memorandum of Understanding regarding Employment dated February 7, 2001, between the
Registrant and C. William Hosler is incorporated by reference to the exhibits to the Form 10-K for
the year ended December 31, 2000.
10.13 Rights Agreement dated as of December 16, 1999, between the Registrant and American Stock
Transfer and Trust Company is incorporated by reference to the exhibits to the Form 8-K as filed
with the Commission on December 28, 1999.
21 Schedule of Subsidiaries and Joint Ventures of the Registrant is attached.
23 Consent of Independent Accountants is attached.
24 Power of Attorney to sign this Form 10-K executed by Joseph F. Alibrandi and a schedule of
substantially identical powers of attorney executed by other non-employee members of the Board of
Directors are attached.
The Registrant has omitted instruments with respect to long-term debt where
the total amount of the securities authorized thereunder does not exceed 10
percent of the assets of the Registrant and its subsidiaries on a consolidated
basis. The Registrant agrees to furnish a copy of such instruments to the
Commission upon request.
2
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS ON
FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
To the Board of Directors of Catellus Development Corporation
Our audits of the consolidated financial statements referred to in our
report dated February 1, 2002, appearing on page F-2 of this Form 10-K of
Catellus Development Corporation, also included an audit of the financial
statement schedules listed in Item 14(a)(2) of this Form 10-K. In our opinion,
these Financial Statement Schedules present fairly, in all material respects,
the information set forth therein when read in conjunction with the related
consolidated financial statements.
PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP
San Francisco, California
February 1, 2002
S-1
CATELLUS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
SCHEDULE II--VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS
Three Years Ended December 31, 2001
(In thousands)
Additions
-------------------
Balance at Charged to Charged
Beginning Costs and to Other Balance at
of Year Expenses Accounts Deductions End of Year
---------- ---------- -------- ---------- -----------
Year ended December 31, 1999
Allowance for doubtful accounts receivable. $ 1,267 $ 404 -- $ (417)/(1)/ $ 1,254
Allowance for doubtful notes receivable.... 1,860 -- -- -- 1,860
Reserve for abandoned projects............. 307 -- -- (307)/(2)/ --
Reserve for environmental and legal costs.. 12,849 -- -- (2,347)/(3)/ 10,502
Year ended December 31, 2000
Allowance for doubtful accounts receivable. 1,254 853 -- (404)/(1)/ 1,703
Allowance for doubtful notes receivable.... 1,860 2,000 -- (40)/(1)/ 3,820
Reserve for environmental and legal costs.. 10,502 -- -- (125)/(3)/ 10,377
Year ended December 31, 2001
Allowance for doubtful accounts receivable. 1,703 444 -- (716)/(1)/ 1,431
Allowance for doubtful notes receivable.... 3,820 -- -- (2,000)/(4)/ 1,820
Reserve for environmental and legal costs.. 10,377 1,102 -- (263)/(3)/ 11,216
--------
Notes:
/(1) Balances written off as uncollectible. /
/(2) Costs of unsuccessful projects written off. /
/(3) Environmental and legal costs incurred. /
/(4) Recovery of note receivable previously written off. /
S-2
CATELLUS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
SCHEDULE III--REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION
December 31, 2001
(Dollars in thousands)
Cost Capitalized
Subsequent to Gross Amount at Which Carried
Initial Cost to Catellus Acquisition at Close of Period/(1)(2)(3)/
------------------------ --------------------- --------------------------------
Buildings & Carrying Buildings &
Description Encumbrances Land Improvements Improvements Costs Land Improvements Total
----------- ------------ -------- ------------ ------------ -------- -------- ------------ ----------
Rental properties........... $1,116,105 $178,395 $120,307 $1,051,794 $129,727 $178,395 $1,301,828 $1,480,223
---------- -------- -------- ---------- -------- -------- ---------- ----------
Developable properties
Mission Bay,
San Francisco, CA....... 45,578 69,861 3,952 99,775 50,399 69,861 154,126 223,987
Other properties
less than 5% of total... 139,529 137,807 10,397 237,132 89,362 137,807 336,891 474,698
---------- -------- -------- ---------- -------- -------- ---------- ----------
Total developable
properties................. 185,107 207,668 14,349 336,907 139,761 207,668 491,017 698,685
---------- -------- -------- ---------- -------- -------- ---------- ----------
Other....................... 558 3,086 -- 1,895 71 3,086 1,966 5,052
---------- -------- -------- ---------- -------- -------- ---------- ----------
Total....................... $1,301,770 $389,149 $134,656 $1,390,596 $269,559 $389,149 $1,794,811 $2,183,960
========== ======== ======== ========== ======== ======== ========== ==========
Life on
Which
Depreciation
Date of in Latest
Completion Income
Accumulated of Date Statement is
Description Depreciation Construction Acquired Computed
----------- ------------ ------------ -------- ------------
Rental properties........... $325,130 N/A Various (4)
--------
Developable properties
Mission Bay,
San Francisco, CA....... 4,644 N/A Various (4)
Other properties
less than 5% of total... 5,244 N/A Various (4)
--------
Total developable
properties................. 9,888
--------
Other....................... 723 N/A Various (4)
--------
Total....................... $335,741
========
--------
/(1) The aggregate cost for Federal income tax purpose is approximately
$1,610,422. /
/(2) See Attachment A to Schedule III for reconciliation of beginning of period
total to total at close of period. /
/(3) Excludes investments in joint ventures and furniture and equipment. /
/(4) Reference is made to Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for
information related to depreciation. /
S-3
CATELLUS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
ATTACHMENT A TO SCHEDULE III
RECONCILIATION OF COST OF REAL ESTATE AT BEGINNING OF PERIOD
WITH TOTAL AT END OF PERIOD
(In thousands)
Year Ended December 31,
--------------------------------
2001 2000 1999
---------- ---------- ----------
Balance at January 1....................................... $1,969,050 $1,873,254 $1,630,797
---------- ---------- ----------
Additions during period:
Acquisitions.......................................... 83,567 63,637 103,113
Improvements.......................................... 321,788 368,185 389,356
Reclassification from other accounts.................. 6,075 22,107 505
---------- ---------- ----------
Total additions.................................. 411,430 453,929 492,974
---------- ---------- ----------
Deductions during period:
Cost of real estate sold.............................. 195,541 356,077 248,578
Other
Reclassification to personal property and other
accounts.......................................... 979 2,056 1,939
---------- ---------- ----------
Total deductions................................. 196,520 358,133 250,517
---------- ---------- ----------
Balance at December 31..................................... $2,183,960 $1,969,050 $1,873,254
========== ========== ==========
RECONCILIATION OF REAL ESTATE ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION
AT BEGINNING OF PERIOD WITH TOTAL AT END OF PERIOD
(In thousands)
Year Ended December 31,
---------------------------
2001 2000 1999
-------- -------- --------
Balance at January 1............ $303,866 $279,946 $252,332
-------- -------- --------
Additions during period:
Charged to expense......... 43,522 39,266 32,890
-------- -------- --------
Deductions during period:
Cost of real estate sold... 11,923 14,685 4,773
Other...................... (276) 661 503
-------- -------- --------
Total deductions......... 11,647 15,346 5,276
-------- -------- --------
Balance at December 31.......... $335,741 $303,866 $279,946
======== ======== ========
S-4