SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 8-K
CURRENT REPORT
PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
Date of Report (date of earliest event reported): October 24, 2002
THE AES CORPORATION
(exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
DELAWARE (State of Incorporation) |
0-19281 (Commission File No.) |
54-1163725 (IRS Employer ID No.) |
1001 North 19th Street, Suite 2000
Arlington, Virginia 22209
(Address of principal executive offices, including zip code)
Registrant's
telephone number, including area code:
(703) 522-1315
NOT APPLICABLE
(Former Name or Former Address, if changed since last report)
Eletropaulo Update
On October 23, 2002, the Investment arm of the Brazilian National Bank for Economic and Social Development (BNDESPAR) had agreed to defer until November 25, 2002 a $6 million interest payment due by an AES subsidiary related to the acquisition of preferred shares of Eletropaulo Metropolitana Electricidade de Sao Paulo S.A., the electric distribution company for Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Third Quarter Earnings Release
The AES Corporation (NYSE: AES) today reported earnings from recurring operations of $92 million, or 17 cents per share, for the third quarter ended September 30, 2002, down 39% from $151 million, or 28 cents per share, in the year earlier quarter. Earnings from recurring operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2002, were $410 million, or 76 cents per share, down 26% from $557 million, or $1.03 per share, for the nine months ended September 30, 2001. Revenues for the third quarter were $2.1 billion, up 16% percent from a year earlier.
After adjusting for non-cash charges and discontinued business operations, AES reported a GAAP loss for the third quarter of $(314) million, or (58) cents per share. For the nine months ended September 30, 2002, the GAAP loss was $(743) million, or $(1.38) per share. The GAAP loss for the third quarter of 2002 includes $(215) million, or (40) cents per share, from discontinued operations.
2
THE AES CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
FOR THE QUARTERS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2002 AND 2001
|
Quarter Ended 9/30/2002 |
Quarter Ended 9/30/2001 |
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
$ in millions, except per share amounts) |
||||||
REVENUES: | |||||||
Sales and services | $ | 2,138 | $ | 1,845 | |||
OPERATING COSTS AND EXPENSES: |
|||||||
Cost of sales and services | 1,548 | 1,362 | |||||
Selling, general and administrative expenses | 12 | 17 | |||||
Total operating costs and expenses | 1,560 | 1,379 | |||||
OPERATING INCOME |
578 |
466 |
|||||
OTHER INCOME AND (EXPENSE): |
|||||||
Interest expense, net | (473 | ) | (382 | ) | |||
Other expense, net | (210 | ) | (10 | ) | |||
Equity in earnings (loss) of affiliates (before income tax) | (20 | ) | (23 | ) | |||
Nonrecurring severance and transaction costs | | (37 | ) | ||||
INCOME (LOSS) BEFORE INCOME TAXES AND MINORITY INTEREST | (125 | ) | 14 | ||||
Income tax benefit |
(46 |
) |
(1 |
) |
|||
Minority interest expense | 20 | 9 | |||||
INCOME (LOSS) FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS |
(99 |
) |
6 |
||||
Loss from operations of discontinued components (net of income taxes of $3 and $2, respectively) |
(215 |
) |
(3 |
) |
|||
NET INCOME (LOSS) |
$ |
(314 |
) |
$ |
3 |
||
DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE: |
|||||||
Income (loss) from continuing operations | $ | (0.18 | ) | $ | 0.01 | ||
Discontinued operations | (0.40 | ) | | ||||
Total | $ | (0.58 | ) | $ | 0.01 | ||
Diluted weighted average shares outstanding (in millions) | 542 | 537 | |||||
3
THE AES CORPORATIONSupplemental Schedule
Reconciliation of GAAP Net income (loss) before discontinued operations to Net income excluding Brazil, Argentina and Venezuela foreign currency effects, effects of FAS No. 133 and nonrecurring items.
FOR THE QUARTERS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2002 AND 2001
|
Quarter ended 9/30/2002 |
Quarter ended 9/30/2001 |
||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Amount |
Amount per share |
Amount |
Amount per share |
||||||||
|
($ in millions, except per share amounts) |
|||||||||||
Net income (loss) before discontinued operations | $ | (99 | ) | $ | (0.18 | ) | $ | 6 | $ | 0.01 | ||
South America foreign currency transaction losses, net(1) | 182 | 0.33 | 82 | 0.15 | ||||||||
Mark to market losses from FAS No. 133(2) | 9 | 0.02 | 39 | 0.07 | ||||||||
Transaction and severance costs related to IPALCO transaction | | | 24 | 0.05 | ||||||||
Net income from recurring operations | $ | 92 | $ | 0.17 | $ | 151 | $ | 0.28 | ||||
Diluted weighted average shares outstanding (in millions) | 542 | 542 | ||||||||||
4
THE AES CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2002 AND 2001
|
Nine Months Ended 9/30/2002 |
Nine Months Ended 9/30/2001 |
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
($ in millions, except per share amounts) |
||||||
REVENUES: | |||||||
Sales and services | $ | 6,498 | $ | 5,806 | |||
OPERATING COSTS AND EXPENSES: |
|||||||
Cost of sales and services | 4,782 | 4,251 | |||||
Selling, general and administrative expenses | 68 | 73 | |||||
Total operating costs and expenses | 4,850 | 4,324 | |||||
OPERATING INCOME |
1,648 |
1,482 |
|||||
OTHER INCOME AND (EXPENSE): |
|||||||
Interest expense, net | (1,285 | ) | (1,025 | ) | |||
Other income (expense), net | (276 | ) | 21 | ||||
Equity in earnings of affiliates (before income tax) | 36 | 126 | |||||
Loss on sale or write-down of investments | (116 | ) | | ||||
Nonrecurring severance and transaction costs | | (131 | ) | ||||
INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAXES AND MINORITY INTEREST | 7 | 473 | |||||
Income tax provision |
42 |
141 |
|||||
Minority interest (income) expense | (11 | ) | 65 | ||||
INCOME (LOSS) FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS | (24 | ) | 267 | ||||
Loss from operations of discontinued components (net of income taxes of $15 and $18, respectively) |
(373 |
) |
(38 |
) |
|||
INCOME (LOSS) BEFORE CUMULATIVE EFFECT OF ACCOUNTING CHANGE | (397 | ) | 229 | ||||
Cumulative effect of accounting change (net of income taxes of $72) |
(346 |
) |
|
||||
NET INCOME (LOSS) | $ | (743 | ) | $ | 229 | ||
DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE: |
|||||||
Income (loss) from continuing operations | $ | (0.04 | ) | $ | 0.50 | ||
Discontinued operations | (0.69 | ) | (0.07 | ) | |||
Cumulative effect of accounting change | (0.65 | ) | | ||||
Total | $ | (1.38 | ) | $ | 0.43 | ||
Diluted weighted average shares outstanding (in millions) | 537 | 538 | |||||
5
THE AES CORPORATIONSupplemental Schedule
Reconciliation of GAAP Net income (loss) before discontinued operations and accounting change to Net income excluding Brazil, Argentina and Venezuela foreign currency effects, effects of FAS No. 133 and nonrecurring items.
FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2002 AND 2001
|
Nine Months ended 9/30/2002 |
Nine Months ended 9/30/2001 |
||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Amount |
Amount per share |
Amount |
Amount per share |
||||||||
|
($ in millions, except per share amounts) |
|||||||||||
Net income (loss) before discontinued operations and accounting change | $ | (24 | ) | $ | (0.04 | ) | $ | 267 | $ | 0.50 | ||
South America foreign currency transaction losses, net(1) | 321 | 0.59 | 176 | 0.32 | ||||||||
Mark to market (gains) losses from FAS No. 133(2) | (90 | ) | (0.16 | ) | 29 | 0.05 | ||||||
Loss on sale or write-down of investments(3) | 104 | 0.19 | | | ||||||||
Provision for regulatory decision in Brazil(4) | 99 | 0.18 | | | ||||||||
Transaction and severance costs related to IPALCO transaction | | | 85 | 0.16 | ||||||||
Net income from recurring operations | $ | 410 | $ | 0.76 | $ | 557 | $ | 1.03 | ||||
Diluted weighted average shares outstanding (in millions) | 544 | 543 | ||||||||||
6
Business Segment Results
AES's business segments, which include Contract Generation, Large Utilities, Competitive Supply and Growth Distribution generated combined income before income taxes (EBT) of $257 million for the third quarter of 2002 as compared to $359 million during the same period last year. On a geographic basis, EBT for the third quarter of 2002 was generated 71% from North America, 6% from South America, 6% from the Caribbean, 11% from Asia and 6% from Europe and Africa.
Contract Generation
|
3Q 2002 |
3Q 2001 |
Variance |
||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
($ in millions) |
||||||||||
Segment revenues | $ | 611 | $ | 590 | $ | 21 | |||||
% of total revenues | 29 | % | 32 | % | (3 | )% | |||||
Operating margin |
$ |
245 |
$ |
152 |
$ |
93 |
|||||
% of segment revenues | 40 | % | 26 | % | 14 | % | |||||
EBT |
$ |
142 |
$ |
75 |
$ |
67 |
|||||
% of total EBT | 55 | % | 21 | % | 34 | % |
Contract Generation consists of our power plants located around the world that have contractually limited their exposure to commodity price risks (primarily electricity prices) for a period of at least five years and for 75% or more of their expected output capacity.
For the third quarter of 2002, Contract Generation revenues were $611 million and represented 29% of total revenues for the quarter, an increase of $21 million over 2001. The most significant contributions continued to be from North and South America, which in aggregate comprised 61% of Contract Generation revenue for the quarter as compared to 63% for the third quarter of 2001. Revenues were enhanced with the addition of recently completed contract generation businesses totaling 1,537 mw (added subsequent to the third quarter of 2001), including Ironwood in Pennsylvania (705 mw natural gas) and Red Oak in New Jersey (832 mw natural gas). Revenues also improved at Warrior Run in Maryland, Shady Point in Oklahoma, Tiszai in Hungary, Ebute in Nigeria, Los Mina in the Dominican Republic and Ecogen in Australia. These improvements were offset by declines at Uruguaiana and Tiete in Brazil, the Gener plants in Chile, Southland and Mendota in California, Lal Pir and Pak Gen in Pakistan and Haripur in Bangladesh.
The operating margin (as a percentage of revenues) for our Contract Generation segment showed significant improvement over the third quarter of 2001 at 40% for the third quarter of 2002 as compared to 26% for the third quarter of 2001. Stronger margins and margin percentages arose during the quarter at most contract generation plants in South America, North America, Europe and Africa, with the most significant improvements at Tiete and Uruguaiana in Brazil (due to the discontinuance of electricity rationing in 2002), Warrior Run, Ironwood and Red Oak in the U.S., Kilroot in Northern Ireland, Tiszai in Hungary and Ebute in Nigeria. These improvements were partially offset by declines at Southland and Mendota in California, Lal Pir and Pak Gen in Pakistan and Haripur in Bangladesh.
As a result, Contract Generation delivered $142 million of EBT (or 55% of the total) for the third quarter of 2002, an increase of 89% over the third quarter of 2001 EBT of $75 million (21% of the total). All geographic regions showed increases in EBT within the contract generation segment except for the Caribbean and Asia.
7
Competitive Supply
|
3Q 2002 |
3Q 2001 |
Variance |
||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
($ in millions) |
||||||||||
Segment revenues | $ | 437 | $ | 513 | $ | (76 | ) | ||||
% of total revenues | 20 | % | 28 | % | (8 | )% | |||||
Operating margin |
$ |
98 |
$ |
126 |
$ |
(28 |
) |
||||
% of segment revenues | 22 | % | 25 | % | (3 | )% | |||||
EBT |
$ |
29 |
$ |
83 |
$ |
(54 |
) |
||||
% of total EBT | 11 | % | 23 | % | (12 | )% |
Competitive Supply consists primarily of our power plants selling electricity directly to wholesale customers in competitive markets and as a result the profitability of such plants are generally more sensitive to fluctuations in the market price of electricity, natural gas and coal, in particular. During the third quarter, AES completed the sale of NewEnergy, a competitive retail supply business for approximately $260 million. As a result of the sale, NewEnergy's results are included in the income statement for both 2001 and 2002 periods as a discontinued operation and are therefore excluded from the discussion below.
For the third quarter of 2002, revenues for this segment were $437 million and represented 20% of total revenues for the quarter. The most significant contributions continued to be from the competitive markets of the UK and the U.S. that in aggregate comprised 73% of Competitive Supply revenue for the quarter. Competitive market prices declined year over year in Argentina due to the devaluation of the Peso in January 2002 and prices were also lower in California and the UK compared to 2001 and as a result total revenue for the competitive supply segment decreased 15% from the third quarter of 2001. Certain plants showed offsetting revenue improvements including Tiszapalkonya in Hungary and Chivor in Colombia. Year on year increases associated with new businesses in 2002 included Parana in Argentina (845 mw gas) and Delano in California (50 mw gas).
The operating margin (as a percentage of revenues) for our Competitive Supply segment was 22% in the third quarter of 2002, a decrease from 25% in the third quarter of 2001. Improvements in margin and margin percentages were most significant at San Nicolas in Argentina due to export contracts that include a fixed capacity payment in U.S. Dollars, at Deepwater in Texas, Tiszapalkonya and Borsod in Hungary, and in the Caribbean region at Chivor in Colombia and at Panama. These improvements were offset by lower margins at Alicura in Argentina, the New York plants, Whitefield in New Hampshire, Barry and Drax in the UK, and most significantly by margin reductions at Placerita in California which operated minimally during the third quarter of 2002 due to lower prices in California. Overall, operating margin for competitive supply declined 22% to $98 million for the third quarter of 2002.
As a result of lower competitive prices, primarily in California and the UK, Competitive Supply generated $29 million of EBT (or 11% of the total) for the third quarter of 2002, a decrease from the 2001 third quarter EBT of $83 million.
8
Large Utilities
|
3Q 2002 |
3Q 2001 |
Variance |
||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
($ in millions) |
||||||||||
Segment revenues | $ | 781 | $ | 424 | $ | 357 | |||||
% of total revenues | 37 | % | 23 | % | 14 | % | |||||
Operating margin |
$ |
200 |
$ |
155 |
$ |
45 |
|||||
% of segment revenues | 26 | % | 37 | % | (11 | )% | |||||
EBT |
$ |
87 |
$ |
203 |
$ |
(116 |
) |
||||
% of total EBT | 34 | % | 56 | % | (22 | )% |
The Large Utilities segment is comprised of our four large integrated utilities that serve nearly 11 million customers in North America, the Caribbean and South America. Businesses include IPALCO in Indiana, EDC in Venezuela along with CEMIG (an equity affiliate) and Eletropaulo in Brazil. During the second quarter of 2002, AES announced the sale of CILCO, a large utility business serving Central Illinois, for an enterprise value of approximately $1.4 billion. As a result of the pending sale, CILCO's results are included in the income statement for both 2001 and 2002 periods as a discontinued operation and are therefore excluded from the discussion below.
For the third quarter of 2002, revenues for this segment were $781 million and represented 37% of total revenues for the quarter. The significant increase in revenues of 84% resulted primarily from consolidating the results of Eletropaulo (serving Sao Paulo, Brazil) beginning in February 2002 when AES acquired control of that business with a 68% voting interest (increased from 49% prior to that date when Eletropaulo was treated as an equity affiliate). Additional revenues from Eletropaulo of $416 million were aided by a slight increase in revenue at IPALCO and offset by a 31% decrease in revenues at EDC to $138 million primarily due to the devaluation of the Bolivar during 2002.
The operating margin was $200 million for the quarter, an increase of 29% over 2001 due to the consolidation of Eletropaulo and an improvement in the operating margin at IPALCO. These increases were offset by a decline in the operating margin at EDC. As a percentage of sales the operating margin for large utilities was 26%, down from 37% for the third quarter of 2001 because of reductions in margin at EDC resulting in part from the devaluation of the Bolivar as well as lower than average segment margins at Eletropaulo during the third quarter of 2002 because of slower than anticipated recovery of electricity demand from the effects of rationing in Brazil that ended in March 2002.
Large Utilities generated $87 million of EBT (or 34% of the total) for the third quarter of 2002, down from the third quarter EBT for 2001 of $203 million (or 56%). The reduction in third quarter 2002 results primarily from reduced contributions (after associated interest costs) from Eletropaulo and EDC because of the factors discussed above.
Growth Distribution
|
3Q 2002 |
3Q 2001 |
Variance |
|
|
|
|||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
($ in millions) |
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Segment revenues | $ | 308 | $ | 317 | $ | (9 | ) | ||||||||||
% of total revenues | 14 | % | 17 | % | (3 | )% | |||||||||||
Operating margin |
$ |
48 |
$ |
49 |
$ |
(1 |
) |
||||||||||
% of segment revenues | 16 | % | 15 | % | 1 | % | |||||||||||
EBT |
$ |
|
$ |
(2 |
) |
$ |
2 |
||||||||||
% of total EBT | | % | | % | | % |
9
Our Growth Distribution segment, serving over 5 million customers, consists of electricity distribution companies that are generally located in developing countries or regions where the demand for electricity is expected to grow at a rate higher than in more developed regions.
For the third quarter of 2002, revenues were $308 million and represented 14% of total revenues for the quarter. The Caribbean represents the most significant contributor representing 45% of growth distribution revenues, while South America represents 29% and Europe and Africa contributing the remaining 26% for the quarter.
Growth Distribution revenues increased at Ede Este in the Dominican Republic, Kievoblenergo and Rivnooblenergo in Ukraine as well as at Sonel in Cameroon. These increases were offset by significant reductions in Argentina because of the devaluation of the Argentine Peso, reductions at Sul because of the devaluation during the quarter of the Brazilian Real, reductions in revenues at our El Salvador distribution businesses and the change to reflect Cesco in India as an equity affiliate in the third quarter of 2001.
The operating margin was $48 million or 16% of revenues as compared with $49 million and 15% of revenues for the third quarter of 2001. Margins improved at Sul in Brazil, Sonel in Cameroon, Telasi in Georgia, Kievoblenergo and Rivnooblenergo in the Ukraine and Ede Este in the Dominican Republic. Despite the reductions in revenue and operating margin arising from the devaluation of the Argentine Peso during 2002, the margin percentages in the Argentine distribution businesses improved slightly as compared to the third quarter of 2001.
As a result, Growth Distribution was break even for the third quarter of 2002, a slight increase from EBT of $(2) million in the third quarter of 2001.
10
THE AES CORPORATIONSupplemental Data
|
2001 |
2002 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1st Qtr |
2nd Qtr |
3rd Qtr |
4th Qtr |
Year |
1st Qtr |
2nd Qtr |
3rd Qtr |
|||||||||||||||||
GEOGRAPHIC% of Total | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
North America | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Revenues(5) | 26 | % | 26 | % | 32 | % | 24 | % | 27 | % | 22 | % | 22 | % | 27 | % | |||||||||
Income before Taxes(1) | 40 | % | 31 | % | 56 | % | 34 | % | 40 | % | 34 | % | 37 | % | 71 | % | |||||||||
Caribbean(2) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Revenues(5) | 26 | % | 25 | % | 24 | % | 20 | % | 24 | % | 18 | % | 17 | % | 17 | % | |||||||||
Income before Taxes(1) | 17 | % | 29 | % | 14 | % | 30 | % | 22 | % | 13 | % | 9 | % | 6 | % | |||||||||
South America | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Revenues(5) | 20 | % | 24 | % | 21 | % | 25 | % | 22 | % | 34 | % | 37 | % | 32 | % | |||||||||
Income before Taxes(1) | 34 | % | 36 | % | 21 | % | 24 | % | 29 | % | 26 | % | 26 | % | 6 | % | |||||||||
Europe/Africa | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Revenues(5) | 19 | % | 17 | % | 20 | % | 24 | % | 20 | % | 21 | % | 18 | % | 18 | % | |||||||||
Income before Taxes(1) | 5 | % | (2 | )% | 2 | % | 6 | % | 3 | % | 16 | % | 14 | % | 6 | % | |||||||||
Asia | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Revenues(5) | 9 | % | 8 | % | 3 | % | 7 | % | 7 | % | 5 | % | 6 | % | 6 | % | |||||||||
Income before Taxes(1) | 4 | % | 6 | % | 7 | % | 6 | % | 6 | % | 11 | % | 14 | % | 11 | % | |||||||||
SEGMENTS% of Total | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Contract Generation | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Revenues(5) | 33 | % | 33 | % | 32 | % | 32 | % | 32 | % | 29 | % | 28 | % | 29 | % | |||||||||
Operating Margin(3) | 39 | % | 37 | % | 32 | % | 49 | % | 40 | % | 39 | % | 43 | % | 41 | % | |||||||||
Income before Taxes(1) | 35 | % | 22 | % | 21 | % | 64 | % | 34 | % | 45 | % | 45 | % | 55 | % | |||||||||
Competitive Supply | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Revenues(5) | 27 | % | 23 | % | 28 | % | 24 | % | 26 | % | 21 | % | 19 | % | 20 | % | |||||||||
Operating Margin(3) | 28 | % | 19 | % | 26 | % | 16 | % | 22 | % | 15 | % | 16 | % | 17 | % | |||||||||
Income before Taxes(1) | 17 | % | 4 | % | 23 | % | | 12 | % | 10 | % | 13 | % | 11 | % | ||||||||||
Large Utilities | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Revenues(5) | 20 | % | 23 | % | 23 | % | 19 | % | 21 | % | 34 | % | 38 | % | 37 | % | |||||||||
Operating Margin(3) | 28 | % | 35 | % | 32 | % | 20 | % | 28 | % | 34 | % | 33 | % | 34 | % | |||||||||
Income before Taxes(1) | 48 | % | 71 | % | 56 | % | 12 | % | 49 | % | 34 | % | 37 | % | 34 | % | |||||||||
Growth Distribution Businesses | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Revenues(5) | 20 | % | 21 | % | 17 | % | 25 | % | 21 | % | 16 | % | 15 | % | 14 | % | |||||||||
Operating Margin(3) | 5 | % | 9 | % | 10 | % | 15 | % | 10 | % | 12 | % | 8 | % | 8 | % | |||||||||
Income before Taxes(1) | | 3 | % | | 24 | % | 5 | % | 11 | % | 5 | % | | ||||||||||||
FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS$ in millions, except Total Assets in billions | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Revenues(5) | $ | 2,084 | $ | 1,877 | $ | 1,845 | $ | 1,950 | $ | 7,756 | $ | 2,248 | $ | 2,272 | $ | 2,138 | |||||||||
Gross Margin Percentage | 29 | % | 25 | % | 26 | % | 33 | % | 28 | % | 31 | % | 26 | % | 28 | % | |||||||||
Income before Taxes(1) | $ | 479 | $ | 421 | $ | 359 | $ | 323 | $ | 1,582 | $ | 392 | $ | 345 | $ | 257 | |||||||||
Net Income Excluding Extraordinary and Other Items(4) | $ | 225 | $ | 181 | $ | 151 | $ | 128 | $ | 685 | $ | 176 | $ | 142 | $ | 92 | |||||||||
Total Assets (billions) | $ | 36 | $ | 36 | $ | 36 | $ | 37 | $ | 37 | $ | 40 | $ | 39 | $ | 37 | |||||||||
Deprec./Amort. | $ | 181 | $ | 186 | $ | 198 | $ | 196 | $ | 761 | $ | 200 | $ | 202 | $ | 198 |
11
THE AES CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET
SEPTEMBER 30, 2002 AND DECEMBER 31, 2001
|
September 30, 2002 |
December 31, 2001 |
||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
($ in millions) |
|||||||||
Assets: | ||||||||||
Current assets: | ||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents, including restricted cash of $371 and $357, respectively | $ | 1,346 | $ | 1,279 | ||||||
Short term investments | 305 | 215 | ||||||||
Accounts receivable, net of reserves of $352 and $240, respectively | 1,292 | 1,313 | ||||||||
Inventory | 503 | 562 | ||||||||
Receivable from affiliates | 10 | 10 | ||||||||
Deferred income taxes | 338 | 244 | ||||||||
Prepaid expenses and other assets | 948 | 602 | ||||||||
Current assets of discontinued operations | 300 | 467 | ||||||||
Total current assets | 5,042 | 4,692 | ||||||||
Property, Plant and Equipment: |
||||||||||
Land | 697 | 567 | ||||||||
Electric generation and distribution assets | 21,624 | 20,173 | ||||||||
Accumulated depreciation | (4,102 | ) | (3,177 | ) | ||||||
Construction in progress | 4,683 | 4,412 | ||||||||
Property, plant and equipment, net | 22,902 | 21,975 | ||||||||
Other assets: | ||||||||||
Deferred financing costs, net | 416 | 437 | ||||||||
Project development costs | 68 | 66 | ||||||||
Investment in and advances to affiliates | 1,092 | 3,100 | ||||||||
Debt service reserves and other deposits | 378 | 472 | ||||||||
Goodwill, net | 2,040 | 2,408 | ||||||||
Long-term assets of discontinued operations | 2,080 | 2,752 | ||||||||
Other assets | 2,548 | 910 | ||||||||
Total other assets | 8,622 | 10,145 | ||||||||
Total Assets | $ | 36,566 | $ | 36,812 | ||||||
Liabilities & Stockholders' Equity |
||||||||||
Current liabilities: | ||||||||||
Accounts payable | $ | 1,085 | $ | 736 | ||||||
Accrued interest | 443 | 281 | ||||||||
Accrued and other liabilities | 1,159 | 799 | ||||||||
Current liabilities of discontinued operations | 553 | 642 | ||||||||
Recourse debt-current portion | 1,544 | 488 | ||||||||
Non-recourse debt-current portion | 3,400 | 1,982 | ||||||||
Total current liabilities | 8,184 | 4,928 | ||||||||
Long-term liabilities |
||||||||||
Recourse debt | 4,180 | 4,913 | ||||||||
Non-recourse debt | 14,027 | 13,789 | ||||||||
Deferred income taxes | 1,650 | 1,695 | ||||||||
Long-term liabilities of discontinued operations | 1,252 | 1,413 | ||||||||
Other long-term liabilities | 2,978 | 2,027 | ||||||||
Total long-term liabilities | 24,087 | 23,837 | ||||||||
Minority interest, including discontinued operations of $41 and $124, respectively | 904 | 1,530 | ||||||||
Company obligated convertible mandatorily redeemable preferred securities of subsidiary trusts holding solely junior subordinated debentures of AES | 978 | 978 | ||||||||
Stockholders' equity: | ||||||||||
Common stock | 5 | 5 | ||||||||
Additional paid-in capital | 5,268 | 5,225 | ||||||||
Retained earnings | 2,067 | 2,809 | ||||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive loss | (4,927 | ) | (2,500 | ) | ||||||
Total stockholders' equity | 2,413 | 5,539 | ||||||||
Total Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity | $ | 36,566 | $ | 36,812 | ||||||
12
THE AES CORPORATION
CAPITAL RESOURCES AND OTHER BALANCE SHEET DATA
($ in billions)
|
September 30, 2002 |
December 31, 2001 |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Capitalization: | ||||||
Recourse debt | $ | 5.72 | $ | 5.40 | ||
Non-recourse debt | 17.43 | 15.77 | ||||
Total debt | 23.15 | 21.17 | ||||
Preferred Securities | 0.98 | 0.98 | ||||
Minority Interest | 0.90 | 1.53 | ||||
Stockholders' equity | 2.41 | 5.54 | ||||
Total capitalization | $ | 27.44 | $ | 29.22 | ||
Selected Balance Sheet Data by Geographic Region:
|
Property, Plant & Equipment |
Total Assets |
Non-recourse Debt |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
September 30, 2002 | |||||||
North America | 29 | % | 22 | % | 25 | % | |
Caribbean | 22 | % | 18 | % | 18 | % | |
South America | 18 | % | 25 | % | 32 | % | |
Europe/Africa | 23 | % | 20 | % | 18 | % | |
Asia | 8 | % | 7 | % | 7 | % | |
Discontinued operations | | 6 | % | | |||
Corporate | | 2 | % | | |||
December 31, 2001 |
|||||||
North America | 29 | % | 21 | % | 28 | % | |
Caribbean | 22 | % | 18 | % | 20 | % | |
South America | 20 | % | 27 | % | 28 | % | |
Europe/Africa | 23 | % | 18 | % | 19 | % | |
Asia | 6 | % | 6 | % | 5 | % | |
Discontinued operations | | 9 | % | | |||
Corporate | | 1 | % | |
Selected Balance Sheet Data by Line of Business:
|
Property, Plant & Equipment |
Total Assets |
Non-recourse Debt |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
September 30, 2002 | |||||||
Contract Generation | 37 | % | 35 | % | 38 | % | |
Competitive Supply | 33 | % | 25 | % | 23 | % | |
Large Utilities | 24 | % | 25 | % | 32 | % | |
Growth Distribution Businesses | 6 | % | 7 | % | 7 | % | |
Discontinued operations | | 6 | % | | |||
Corporate | | 2 | % | | |||
December 31, 2001 |
|||||||
Contract Generation | 37 | % | 33 | % | 40 | % | |
Competitive Supply | 34 | % | 25 | % | 25 | % | |
Large Utilities | 19 | % | 20 | % | 26 | % | |
Growth Distribution Businesses | 10 | % | 12 | % | 9 | % | |
Discontinued operations | | 9 | % | | |||
Corporate | | 1 | % | |
13
Item 9. Regulation FD Disclosure
On October 24, 2002, The AES Corporation issued its press release for the third quarter of 2002, which is presented below.
AES REPORTS THIRD QUARTER EARNINGS FROM RECURRING OPERATIONS OF $0.17 PER SHARE AND LAST TWELVE MONTH PARENT COMPANY OPERATING CASH FLOW OF $1.24 BILLION
Net Loss of $(0.58) Per Share for the Quarter After Discontinued Operations
ARLINGTON, VA, October 24, 2002The AES Corporation (NYSE: AES) today reported earnings from recurring operations of $92 million, or 17 cents per share, for the third quarter ended September 30, 2002, down 39% from $151 million, or 28 cents per share, in the year earlier quarter. Earnings from recurring operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2002, were $410 million, or 76 cents per share, down 26% from $557 million, or $1.03 per share, for the nine months ended September 30, 2001. Revenues for the third quarter were $2.1 billion, up 16% percent from a year earlier.
After adjusting for non-cash charges and discontinued business operations, AES reported a GAAP loss for the third quarter of $(314) million, or (58) cents per share. For the nine months ended September 30, 2002, the GAAP loss was $(743) million, or $(1.38) per share. The GAAP loss for the third quarter of 2002 includes $(215) million, or (40) cents per share, from discontinued operations.
Parent operating cash flow was $1.24 billion for the twelve months ended September 30, 2002 and $252 million for the third quarter of 2002. Parent company liquidity at September 30, 2002, stood at $395 million.
SUMMARY OF KEY FINANCIAL RESULTS
|
3Q 2002 |
3Q 2001 |
Change |
YTD 2002 |
YTD 2001 |
Change |
|||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pro Forma Net Income | |||||||||||||
Millions ($) | 92 | 151 | (59 | ) | 410 | 557 | (147 | ) | |||||
$/share | 0.17 | 0.28 | (0.11 | ) | 0.76 | 1.03 | (0.27 | ) | |||||
GAAP Income (Loss) from Continuing Operations | |||||||||||||
Millions ($) | (99 | ) | 6 | (105 | ) | (24 | ) | 267 | (291 | ) | |||
$/share | (0.18 | ) | 0.01 | (0.19 | ) | (0.04 | ) | 0.50 | (0.54 | ) | |||
Parent Operating Cash Flow | |||||||||||||
Millions ($) | 252 | 335 | (83 | ) | 846 | 782 | 64 |
"This has been a challenging time for AES and others in our industry. We are intensely focused on managing cash flow and liquidity as we work on solutions to near term challenges. At the same time, we remain committed to strengthening AES for the longer term through various initiatives to improve business performance," said President and Chief Executive Officer, Paul Hanrahan. "As a result of these efforts, we have begun to see improvements in the operating margins in many of our businesses, especially in the contract generation business line." Mr. Hanrahan continued, "We have also made good progress on asset sales. In September we completed the sale of AES NewEnergy ahead of schedule for approximately $260 million, and we expect to close the sale of Cilcorp by the end of the first quarter of 2003 and to realize approximately $500 million in cash."
Barry Sharp, Chief Financial Officer, added, "This quarter we have also launched an exchange offer for our 2002 and 2003 notes as well as a new multi-tranche $1.6 billion senior secured credit facility. This is an extremely important transaction for AES as it will help address our near term
14
liquidity issues, permitting the company to establish a more manageable debt maturity schedule over the next several years, as well as providing the flexibility to delever and strengthen the balance sheet."
Other Information
This information will be discussed on a conference call to be held today, Thursday October 24, 2002, at 9:00 am (Eastern Daylight Time). You may access the call via a live webcast which will be available online at http://www.aes.com under the Investor Relations section. This webcast will be available online until Friday, November 1, 2002. Also a telephonic replay of the call will be available from approximately 11:30 am on Thursday, October 24, until 6:00 pm on Friday, November 1 (Eastern Time). Please dial (800) 633 8284. The system will ask for a reservation number, please enter 20892490 followed by the pound key #. International callers should dial (402) 977 9140.
"Safe Harbor" Statement under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995: This news release may contain "forward-looking statements" regarding The AES Corporation's business. These statements are not historical facts, but statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Actual results could differ materially from those projected in these forward-looking statements. For a discussion of such risks and uncertainties, see "Risk Factors" in the Company's Annual Report or Form 10-K for the most recently ended fiscal year.
AES is a leading global power company comprised of contract generation, competitive supply, large utilities and growth distribution businesses.
The company's generating assets include interests in 176 facilities totaling over 60 gigawatts of capacity, in 33 countries. AES's electricity distribution network sells over 108,000 gigawatt hours per year to over 16 million end-use customers.
15
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
FOR THE QUARTERS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2002 AND 2001
|
Quarter Ended 9/30/2002 |
Quarter Ended 9/30/2001 |
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
($ in millions, except per share amounts) |
||||||
REVENUES: | |||||||
Sales and services | $ | 2,138 | $ | 1,845 | |||
OPERATING COSTS AND EXPENSES: |
|||||||
Cost of sales and services | 1,548 | 1,362 | |||||
Selling, general and administrative expenses | 12 | 17 | |||||
Total operating costs and expenses | 1,560 | 1,379 | |||||
OPERATING INCOME | 578 | 466 | |||||
OTHER INCOME AND (EXPENSE): |
|||||||
Interest expense, net | (473 | ) | (382 | ) | |||
Other expense, net | (210 | ) | (10 | ) | |||
Equity in earnings (loss) of affiliates (before income tax) | (20 | ) | (23 | ) | |||
Nonrecurring severance and transaction costs | | (37 | ) | ||||
INCOME (LOSS) BEFORE INCOME TAXES AND MINORITY INTEREST | (125 | ) | 14 | ||||
Income tax benefit |
(46 |
) |
(1 |
) |
|||
Minority interest expense | 20 | 9 | |||||
INCOME (LOSS) FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS | (99 | ) | 6 | ||||
Loss from operations of discontinued components (net of income taxes of $3 and $2, respectively) |
(215 |
) |
(3 |
) |
|||
NET INCOME (LOSS) | $ | (314 | ) | $ | 3 | ||
DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE: | |||||||
Income (loss) from continuing operations | $ | (0.18 | ) | $ | 0.01 | ||
Discontinued operations | (0.40 | ) | | ||||
Total | $ | (0.58 | ) | $ | 0.01 | ||
Diluted weighted average shares outstanding (in millions) | 542 | 537 | |||||
16
THE AES CORPORATIONSupplemental Schedule
Reconciliation of GAAP Net income (loss) before discontinued operations to Net income excluding Brazil, Argentina and Venezuela foreign currency effects, effects of FAS No. 133 and nonrecurring items.
FOR THE QUARTERS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2002 AND 2001
|
Quarter ended 9/30/2002 |
Quarter ended 9/30/2001 |
||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Amount |
Amount per share |
Amount |
Amount per share |
||||||||
|
($ in millions, except per share amounts) |
|||||||||||
Net income (loss) before discontinued operations | $ | (99 | ) | $ | (0.18 | ) | $ | 6 | $ | 0.01 | ||
South America foreign currency transaction losses, net(1) | 182 | 0.33 | 82 | 0.15 | ||||||||
Mark to market losses from FAS No. 133(2) | 9 | 0.02 | 39 | 0.07 | ||||||||
Transaction and severance costs related to IPALCO transaction | | | 24 | 0.05 | ||||||||
Net income from recurring operations | $ | 92 | $ | 0.17 | $ | 151 | $ | 0.28 | ||||
Diluted weighted average shares outstanding (in millions) | 542 | 542 | ||||||||||
17
THE AES CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2002 AND 2001
|
Nine Months Ended 9/30/2002 |
Nine Months Ended 9/30/2001 |
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
($ in millions, except per share amounts) |
||||||
REVENUES: | |||||||
Sales and services | $ | 6,498 | $ | 5,806 | |||
OPERATING COSTS AND EXPENSES: |
|||||||
Cost of sales and services | 4,782 | 4,251 | |||||
Selling, general and administrative expenses | 68 | 73 | |||||
Total operating costs and expenses | 4,850 | 4,324 | |||||
OPERATING INCOME | 1,648 | 1,482 | |||||
OTHER INCOME AND (EXPENSE): |
|||||||
Interest expense, net | (1,285 | ) | (1,025 | ) | |||
Other income (expense), net | (276 | ) | 21 | ||||
Equity in earnings of affiliates (before income tax) | 36 | 126 | |||||
Loss on sale or write-down of investments | (116 | ) | | ||||
Nonrecurring severance and transaction costs | | (131 | ) | ||||
INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAXES AND MINORITY INTEREST | 7 | 473 | |||||
Income tax provision |
42 |
141 |
|||||
Minority interest (income) expense | (11 | ) | 65 | ||||
INCOME (LOSS) FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS | (24 | ) | 267 | ||||
Loss from operations of discontinued components (net of income taxes of $15 and $18, respectively) |
(373 |
) |
(38 |
) |
|||
INCOME (LOSS) BEFORE CUMULATIVE EFFECT OF ACCOUNTING CHANGE | (397 | ) | 229 | ||||
Cumulative effect of accounting change (net of income taxes of $72) |
(346 |
) |
|
||||
NET INCOME (LOSS) | $ | (743 | ) | $ | 229 | ||
DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE: |
|||||||
Income (loss) from continuing operations | $ | (0.04 | ) | $ | 0.50 | ||
Discontinued operations | (0.69 | ) | (0.07 | ) | |||
Cumulative effect of accounting change | (0.65 | ) | | ||||
Total | $ | (1.38 | ) | $ | 0.43 | ||
Diluted weighted average shares outstanding (in millions) | 537 | 538 | |||||
18
THE AES CORPORATIONSupplemental Schedule
Reconciliation of GAAP Net income (loss) before discontinued operations and accounting change to Net income excluding Brazil, Argentina and Venezuela foreign currency effects, effects of FAS No. 133 and nonrecurring items.
FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2002 AND 2001
|
Nine Months ended 9/30/2002 |
Nine Months ended 9/30/2001 |
||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Amount |
Amount per share |
Amount |
Amount per share |
||||||||
|
($ in millions, except per share amounts) |
|||||||||||
Net income (loss) before discontinued operations and accounting change | $ | (24 | ) | $ | (0.04 | ) | $ | 267 | $ | 0.50 | ||
South America foreign currency transaction losses, net(1) | 321 | 0.59 | 176 | 0.32 | ||||||||
Mark to market (gains) losses from FAS No. 133(2) | (90 | ) | (0.16 | ) | 29 | 0.05 | ||||||
Loss on sale or write-down of investments(3) | 104 | 0.19 | | | ||||||||
Provision for regulatory decision in Brazil(4) | 99 | 0.18 | | | ||||||||
Transaction and severance costs related to IPALCO transaction | | | 85 | 0.16 | ||||||||
Net income from recurring operations | $ | 410 | $ | 0.76 | $ | 557 | $ | 1.03 | ||||
Diluted weighted average shares outstanding (in millions) | 544 | 543 | ||||||||||
19
AES's business segments, which include Contract Generation, Large Utilities, Competitive Supply and Growth Distribution generated combined income before income taxes (EBT) of $257 million for the third quarter of 2002 as compared to $359 million during the same period last year. On a geographic basis, EBT for the third quarter of 2002 was generated 71% from North America, 6% from South America, 6% from the Caribbean, 11% from Asia and 6% from Europe and Africa.
Contract Generation
|
3Q 2002 |
3Q 2001 |
Variance |
||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
($ in millions) |
||||||||||
Segment revenues | $ | 611 | $ | 590 | $ | 21 | |||||
% of total revenues | 29 | % | 32 | % | (3 | )% | |||||
Operating margin | $ | 245 | $ | 152 | $ | 93 | |||||
% of segment revenues | 40 | % | 26 | % | 14 | % | |||||
EBT | $ | 142 | $ | 75 | $ | 67 | |||||
% of total EBT | 55 | % | 21 | % | 34 | % |
Contract Generation consists of our power plants located around the world that have contractually limited their exposure to commodity price risks (primarily electricity prices) for a period of at least five years and for 75% or more of their expected output capacity.
For the third quarter of 2002, Contract Generation revenues were $611 million and represented 29% of total revenues for the quarter, an increase of $21 million over 2001. The most significant contributions continued to be from North and South America, which in aggregate comprised 61% of Contract Generation revenue for the quarter as compared to 63% for the third quarter of 2001. Revenues were enhanced with the addition of recently completed contract generation businesses totaling 1,537 mw (added subsequent to the third quarter of 2001), including Ironwood in Pennsylvania (705 mw natural gas) and Red Oak in New Jersey (832 mw natural gas). Revenues also improved at Warrior Run in Maryland, Shady Point in Oklahoma, Tiszai in Hungary, Ebute in Nigeria, Los Mina in the Dominican Republic and Ecogen in Australia. These improvements were offset by declines at Uruguaiana and Tiete in Brazil, the Gener plants in Chile, Southland and Mendota in California, Lal Pir and Pak Gen in Pakistan and Haripur in Bangladesh.
The operating margin (as a percentage of revenues) for our Contract Generation segment showed significant improvement over the third quarter of 2001 at 40% for the third quarter of 2002 as compared to 26% for the third quarter of 2001. Stronger margins and margin percentages arose during the quarter at most contract generation plants in South America, North America, Europe and Africa, with the most significant improvements at Tiete and Uruguaiana in Brazil (due to the discontinuance of electricity rationing in 2002), Warrior Run, Ironwood and Red Oak in the U.S., Kilroot in Northern Ireland, Tiszai in Hungary and Ebute in Nigeria. These improvements were partially offset by declines at Southland and Mendota in California, Lal Pir and Pak Gen in Pakistan and Haripur in Bangladesh.
As a result, Contract Generation delivered $142 million of EBT (or 55% of the total) for the third quarter of 2002, an increase of 89% over the third quarter of 2001 EBT of $75 million (21% of the total). All geographic regions showed increases in EBT within the contract generation segment except for the Caribbean and Asia.
20
Competitive Supply
|
3Q 2002 |
3Q 2001 |
Variance |
||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
($ in millions) |
||||||||||
Segment revenues | $ | 437 | $ | 513 | $ | (76 | ) | ||||
% of total revenues | 20 | % | 28 | % | (8 | )% | |||||
Operating margin | $ | 98 | $ | 126 | $ | (28 | ) | ||||
% of segment revenues | 22 | % | 25 | % | (3 | )% | |||||
EBT | $ | 29 | $ | 83 | $ | (54 | ) | ||||
% of total EBT | 11 | % | 23 | % | (12 | )% |
Competitive Supply consists primarily of our power plants selling electricity directly to wholesale customers in competitive markets and as a result the profitability of such plants are generally more sensitive to fluctuations in the market price of electricity, natural gas and coal, in particular. During the third quarter, AES completed the sale of NewEnergy, a competitive retail supply business for approximately $260 million. As a result of the sale, NewEnergy's results are included in the income statement for both 2001 and 2002 periods as a discontinued operation and are therefore excluded from the discussion below.
For the third quarter of 2002, revenues for this segment were $437 million and represented 20% of total revenues for the quarter. The most significant contributions continued to be from the competitive markets of the UK and the U.S. that in aggregate comprised 73% of Competitive Supply revenue for the quarter. Competitive market prices declined year over year in Argentina due to the devaluation of the Peso in January 2002 and prices were also lower in California and the UK compared to 2001 and as a result total revenue for the competitive supply segment decreased 15% from the third quarter of 2001. Certain plants showed offsetting revenue improvements including Tiszapalkonya in Hungary and Chivor in Colombia. Year on year increases associated with new businesses in 2002 included Parana in Argentina (845 mw gas) and Delano in California (50 mw gas).
The operating margin (as a percentage of revenues) for our Competitive Supply segment was 22% in the third quarter of 2002, a decrease from 25% in the third quarter of 2001. Improvements in margin and margin percentages were most significant at San Nicolas in Argentina due to export contracts that include a fixed capacity payment in U.S. Dollars, at Deepwater in Texas, Tiszapalkonya and Borsod in Hungary, and in the Caribbean region at Chivor in Colombia and at Panama. These improvements were offset by lower margins at Alicura in Argentina, the New York plants, Whitefield in New Hampshire, Barry and Drax in the UK, and most significantly by margin reductions at Placerita in California which operated minimally during the third quarter of 2002 due to lower prices in California. Overall, operating margin for competitive supply declined 22% to $98 million for the third quarter of 2002.
As a result of lower competitive prices, primarily in California and the UK, Competitive Supply generated $29 million of EBT (or 11% of the total) for the third quarter of 2002, a decrease from the 2001 third quarter EBT of $83 million.
21
Large Utilities
|
3Q 2002 |
3Q 2001 |
Variance |
||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
($ in millions) |
||||||||||
Segment revenues | $ | 781 | $ | 424 | $ | 357 | |||||
% of total revenues | 37 | % | 23 | % | 14 | % | |||||
Operating margin | $ | 200 | $ | 155 | $ | 45 | |||||
% of segment revenues | 26 | % | 37 | % | (11 | )% | |||||
EBT | $ | 87 | $ | 203 | $ | (116 | ) | ||||
% of total EBT | 34 | % | 56 | % | (22 | )% |
The Large Utilities segment is comprised of our four large integrated utilities that serve nearly 11 million customers in North America, the Caribbean and South America. Businesses include IPALCO in Indiana, EDC in Venezuela along with CEMIG (an equity affiliate) and Eletropaulo in Brazil. During the second quarter of 2002, AES announced the sale of CILCO, a large utility business serving Central Illinois, for an enterprise value of approximately $1.4 billion. As a result of the pending sale, CILCO's results are included in the income statement for both 2001 and 2002 periods as a discontinued operation and are therefore excluded from the discussion below.
For the third quarter of 2002, revenues for this segment were $781 million and represented 37% of total revenues for the quarter. The significant increase in revenues of 84% resulted primarily from consolidating the results of Eletropaulo (serving Sao Paulo, Brazil) beginning in February 2002 when AES acquired control of that business with a 68% voting interest (increased from 49% prior to that date when Eletropaulo was treated as an equity affiliate). Additional revenues from Eletropaulo of $416 million were aided by a slight increase in revenue at IPALCO and offset by a 31% decrease in revenues at EDC to $138 million primarily due to the devaluation of the Bolivar during 2002.
The operating margin was $200 million for the quarter, an increase of 29% over 2001 due to the consolidation of Eletropaulo and an improvement in the operating margin at IPALCO. These increases were offset by a decline in the operating margin at EDC. As a percentage of sales the operating margin for large utilities was 26%, down from 37% for the third quarter of 2001 because of reductions in margin at EDC resulting in part from the devaluation of the Bolivar as well as lower than average segment margins at Eletropaulo during the third quarter of 2002 because of slower than anticipated recovery of electricity demand from the effects of rationing in Brazil that ended in March 2002.
Large Utilities generated $87 million of EBT (or 34% of the total) for the third quarter of 2002, down from the third quarter EBT for 2001 of $203 million (or 56%). The reduction in third quarter 2002 results primarily from reduced contributions (after associated interest costs) from Eletropaulo and EDC because of the factors discussed above.
Growth Distribution
|
3Q 2002 |
3Q 2001 |
Variance |
||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
($ in millions) |
||||||||||
Segment revenues | $ | 308 | $ | 317 | $ | (9 | ) | ||||
% of total revenues | 14 | % | 17 | % | (3 | )% | |||||
Operating margin | $ | 48 | $ | 49 | $ | (1 | ) | ||||
% of segment revenues | 16 | % | 15 | % | 1 | % | |||||
EBT | $ | | $ | (2 | ) | $ | 2 | ||||
% of total EBT | | % | | % | | % |
22
Our Growth Distribution segment, serving over 5 million customers, consists of electricity distribution companies that are generally located in developing countries or regions where the demand for electricity is expected to grow at a rate higher than in more developed regions.
For the third quarter of 2002, revenues were $308 million and represented 14% of total revenues for the quarter. The Caribbean represents the most significant contributor representing 45% of growth distribution revenues, while South America represents 29% and Europe and Africa contributing the remaining 26% for the quarter.
Growth Distribution revenues increased at Ede Este in the Dominican Republic, Kievoblenergo and Rivnooblenergo in Ukraine as well as at Sonel in Cameroon. These increases were offset by significant reductions in Argentina because of the devaluation of the Argentine Peso, reductions at Sul because of the devaluation during the quarter of the Brazilian Real, reductions in revenues at our El Salvador distribution businesses and the change to reflect Cesco in India as an equity affiliate in the third quarter of 2001.
The operating margin was $48 million or 16% of revenues as compared with $49 million and 15% of revenues for the third quarter of 2001. Margins improved at Sul in Brazil, Sonel in Cameroon, Telasi in Georgia, Kievoblenergo and Rivnooblenergo in the Ukraine and Ede Este in the Dominican Republic. Despite the reductions in revenue and operating margin arising from the devaluation of the Argentine Peso during 2002, the margin percentages in the Argentine distribution businesses improved slightly as compared to the third quarter of 2001.
As a result, Growth Distribution was break even for the third quarter of 2002, a slight increase from EBT of $(2) million in the third quarter of 2001.
23
THE AES CORPORATIONSupplemental Data
|
2001 |
2002 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1st Qtr |
2nd Qtr |
3rd Qtr |
4th Qtr |
Year |
1st Qtr |
2nd Qtr |
3rd Qtr |
|||||||||||||||||
GEOGRAPHIC% of Total | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
North America | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Revenues(5) | 26 | % | 26 | % | 32 | % | 24 | % | 27 | % | 22 | % | 22 | % | 27 | % | |||||||||
Income before Taxes(1) | 40 | % | 31 | % | 56 | % | 34 | % | 40 | % | 34 | % | 37 | % | 71 | % | |||||||||
Caribbean(2) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Revenues(5) | 26 | % | 25 | % | 24 | % | 20 | % | 24 | % | 18 | % | 17 | % | 17 | % | |||||||||
Income before Taxes(1) | 17 | % | 29 | % | 14 | % | 30 | % | 22 | % | 13 | % | 9 | % | 6 | % | |||||||||
South America | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Revenues(5) | 20 | % | 24 | % | 21 | % | 25 | % | 22 | % | 34 | % | 37 | % | 32 | % | |||||||||
Income before Taxes(1) | 34 | % | 36 | % | 21 | % | 24 | % | 29 | % | 26 | % | 26 | % | 6 | % | |||||||||
Europe/Africa | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Revenues(5) | 19 | % | 17 | % | 20 | % | 24 | % | 20 | % | 21 | % | 18 | % | 18 | % | |||||||||
Income before Taxes(1) | 5 | % | (2 | )% | 2 | % | 6 | % | 3 | % | 16 | % | 14 | % | 6 | % | |||||||||
Asia | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Revenues(5) | 9 | % | 8 | % | 3 | % | 7 | % | 7 | % | 5 | % | 6 | % | 6 | % | |||||||||
Income before Taxes(1) | 4 | % | 6 | % | 7 | % | 6 | % | 6 | % | 11 | % | 14 | % | 11 | % | |||||||||
SEGMENTS% of Total | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Contract Generation | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Revenues(5) | 33 | % | 33 | % | 32 | % | 32 | % | 32 | % | 29 | % | 28 | % | 29 | % | |||||||||
Operating Margin(3) | 39 | % | 37 | % | 32 | % | 49 | % | 40 | % | 39 | % | 43 | % | 41 | % | |||||||||
Income before Taxes(1) | 35 | % | 22 | % | 21 | % | 64 | % | 34 | % | 45 | % | 45 | % | 55 | % | |||||||||
Competitive Supply | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Revenues(5) | 27 | % | 23 | % | 28 | % | 24 | % | 26 | % | 21 | % | 19 | % | 20 | % | |||||||||
Operating Margin(3) | 28 | % | 19 | % | 26 | % | 16 | % | 22 | % | 15 | % | 16 | % | 17 | % | |||||||||
Income before Taxes(1) | 17 | % | 4 | % | 23 | % | | 12 | % | 10 | % | 13 | % | 11 | % | ||||||||||
Large Utilities | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Revenues(5) | 20 | % | 23 | % | 23 | % | 19 | % | 21 | % | 34 | % | 38 | % | 37 | % | |||||||||
Operating Margin(3) | 28 | % | 35 | % | 32 | % | 20 | % | 28 | % | 34 | % | 33 | % | 34 | % | |||||||||
Income before Taxes(1) | 48 | % | 71 | % | 56 | % | 12 | % | 49 | % | 34 | % | 37 | % | 34 | % | |||||||||
Growth Distribution Businesses | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Revenues(5) | 20 | % | 21 | % | 17 | % | 25 | % | 21 | % | 16 | % | 15 | % | 14 | % | |||||||||
Operating Margin(3) | 5 | % | 9 | % | 10 | % | 15 | % | 10 | % | 12 | % | 8 | % | 8 | % | |||||||||
Income before Taxes(1) | | 3 | % | | 24 | % | 5 | % | 11 | % | 5 | % | | ||||||||||||
FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS$ in millions, except Total Assets in billions | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Revenues(5) | $ | 2,084 | $ | 1,877 | $ | 1,845 | $ | 1,950 | $ | 7,756 | $ | 2,248 | $ | 2,272 | $ | 2,138 | |||||||||
Gross Margin Percentage | 29 | % | 25 | % | 26 | % | 33 | % | 28 | % | 31 | % | 26 | % | 28 | % | |||||||||
Income before Taxes(1) | $ | 479 | $ | 421 | $ | 359 | $ | 323 | $ | 1,582 | $ | 392 | $ | 345 | $ | 257 | |||||||||
Net Income Excluding | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Extraordinary and Other Items(4) | $ | 225 | $ | 181 | $ | 151 | $ | 128 | $ | 685 | $ | 176 | $ | 142 | $ | 92 | |||||||||
Total Assets (billions) | $ | 36 | $ | 36 | $ | 36 | $ | 37 | $ | 37 | $ | 40 | $ | 39 | $ | 37 | |||||||||
Deprec./Amort. | $ | 181 | $ | 186 | $ | 198 | $ | 196 | $ | 761 | $ | 200 | $ | 202 | $ | 198 |
24
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET
SEPTEMBER 30, 2002 AND DECEMBER 31, 2001
|
September 30, 2002 |
December 31, 2001 |
||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
($ in millions) |
|||||||||
Assets: | ||||||||||
Current assets: | ||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents, including restricted cash of $371 and $357, respectively | $ | 1,346 | $ | 1,279 | ||||||
Short term investments | 305 | 215 | ||||||||
Accounts receivable, net of reserves of $352 and $240, respectively | 1,292 | 1,313 | ||||||||
Inventory | 503 | 562 | ||||||||
Receivable from affiliates | 10 | 10 | ||||||||
Deferred income taxes | 338 | 244 | ||||||||
Prepaid expenses and other assets | 948 | 602 | ||||||||
Current assets of discontinued operations | 300 | 467 | ||||||||
Total current assets | 5,042 | 4,692 | ||||||||
Property, Plant and Equipment: |
||||||||||
Land | 697 | 567 | ||||||||
Electric generation and distribution assets | 21,624 | 20,173 | ||||||||
Accumulated depreciation | (4,102 | ) | (3,177 | ) | ||||||
Construction in progress | 4,683 | 4,412 | ||||||||
Property, plant and equipment, net | 22,902 | 21,975 | ||||||||
Other assets: |
||||||||||
Deferred financing costs, net | 416 | 437 | ||||||||
Project development costs | 68 | 66 | ||||||||
Investment in and advances to affiliates | 1,092 | 3,100 | ||||||||
Debt service reserves and other deposits | 378 | 472 | ||||||||
Goodwill, net | 2,040 | 2,408 | ||||||||
Long-term assets of discontinued operations | 2,080 | 2,752 | ||||||||
Other assets | 2,548 | 910 | ||||||||
Total other assets | 8,622 | 10,145 | ||||||||
Total Assets | $ | 36,566 | $ | 36,812 | ||||||
Liabilities & Stockholders' Equity | ||||||||||
Current liabilities: | ||||||||||
Accounts payable | $ | 1,085 | $ | 736 | ||||||
Accrued interest | 443 | 281 | ||||||||
Accrued and other liabilities | 1,159 | 799 | ||||||||
Current liabilities of discontinued operations | 553 | 642 | ||||||||
Recourse debt-current portion | 1,544 | 488 | ||||||||
Non-recourse debt-current portion | 3,400 | 1,982 | ||||||||
Total current liabilities | 8,184 | 4,928 | ||||||||
Long-term liabilities |
||||||||||
Recourse debt | 4,180 | 4,913 | ||||||||
Non-recourse debt | 14,027 | 13,789 | ||||||||
Deferred income taxes | 1,650 | 1,695 | ||||||||
Long-term liabilities of discontinued operations | 1,252 | 1,413 | ||||||||
Other long-term liabilities | 2,978 | 2,027 | ||||||||
Total long-term liabilities | 24,087 | 23,837 | ||||||||
Minority interest, including discontinued operations of $41 and $124, respectively | 904 | 1,530 | ||||||||
Company obligated convertible mandatorily redeemable preferred securities of subsidiary trusts holding solely junior subordinated debentures of AES | 978 | 978 | ||||||||
Stockholders' equity: |
||||||||||
Common stock | 5 | 5 | ||||||||
Additional paid-in capital | 5,268 | 5,225 | ||||||||
Retained earnings | 2,067 | 2,809 | ||||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive loss | (4,927 | ) | (2,500 | ) | ||||||
Total stockholders' equity | 2,413 | 5,539 | ||||||||
Total Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity | $ | 36,566 | $ | 36,812 | ||||||
25
THE AES CORPORATION
CAPITAL RESOURCES AND OTHER BALANCE SHEET DATA
($ in billions)
|
September 30, 2002 |
December 31, 2001 |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Capitalization: | ||||||
Recourse debt | $ | 5.72 | $ | 5.40 | ||
Non-recourse debt | 17.43 | 15.77 | ||||
Total debt | 23.15 | 21.17 | ||||
Preferred Securities | 0.98 | 0.98 | ||||
Minority Interest | 0.90 | 1.53 | ||||
Stockholders' equity | 2.41 | 5.54 | ||||
Total capitalization | $ | 27.44 | $ | 29.22 | ||
Selected Balance Sheet Data by Geographic Region:
|
Property, Plant & Equipment |
Total Assets |
Non-recourse Debt |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
September 30, 2002 | |||||||
North America | 29 | % | 22 | % | 25 | % | |
Caribbean | 22 | % | 18 | % | 18 | % | |
South America | 18 | % | 25 | % | 32 | % | |
Europe/Africa | 23 | % | 20 | % | 18 | % | |
Asia | 8 | % | 7 | % | 7 | % | |
Discontinued operations | | 6 | % | | |||
Corporate | | 2 | % | | |||
December 31, 2001 |
|||||||
North America | 29 | % | 21 | % | 28 | % | |
Caribbean | 22 | % | 18 | % | 20 | % | |
South America | 20 | % | 27 | % | 28 | % | |
Europe/Africa | 23 | % | 18 | % | 19 | % | |
Asia | 6 | % | 6 | % | 5 | % | |
Discontinued operations | | 9 | % | | |||
Corporate | | 1 | % | |
Selected Balance Sheet Data by Line of Business:
|
Property, Plant & Equipment |
Total Assets |
Non-recourse Debt |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
September 30, 2002 | |||||||
Contract Generation | 37 | % | 35 | % | 38 | % | |
Competitive Supply | 33 | % | 25 | % | 23 | % | |
Large Utilities | 24 | % | 25 | % | 32 | % | |
Growth Distribution Businesses | 6 | % | 7 | % | 7 | % | |
Discontinued operations | | 6 | % | | |||
Corporate | | 2 | % | | |||
December 31, 2001 |
|||||||
Contract Generation | 37 | % | 33 | % | 40 | % | |
Competitive Supply | 34 | % | 25 | % | 25 | % | |
Large Utilities | 19 | % | 20 | % | 26 | % | |
Growth Distribution Businesses | 10 | % | 12 | % | 9 | % | |
Discontinued operations | | 9 | % | | |||
Corporate | | 1 | % | |
26
The AES Corporation
Historical Parent Operating Cash Flow and Interest Coverage Information
Parent Operating Cash Flow reflects cash payments to the holding company (the "Parent Company") from its subsidiary operating businesses (consisting of dividends, consulting and management fees, tax sharing payments and interest income), less Parent operating expenses. Parent Operating Cash Flow is measured after payment of principal and interest on non-recourse debt as well as maintenance capital expenditures at those businesses. As a result, it represents the cash flow that is available to service the Parent Company's liquidity needs, including debt service.
For more detailed information regarding Parent Operating Cash Flow, see the notes below.
Parent Only Data
(Last Four Quarters):
|
12 Months Ended |
|||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1998 |
1999 |
2000 |
2001 |
September 30, 2002 |
September 30, 2001 |
||||||||||||||
|
(actual $ in millions) |
|||||||||||||||||||
Parent Operating Cash Flow(1) | $ | 360 | $ | 403 | $ | 871 | $ | 1,163 | $ | 1,236 | $ | 1,160 | ||||||||
Parent Interest Charges(2) | $ | 118 | $ | 164 | $ | 216 | $ | 391 | $ | 471 | $ | 338 | ||||||||
Interest Coverage Ratio(3) | 3.05x | 2.46x | 4.03x | 2.97x | 2.62x | 3.43x | ||||||||||||||
Parent Operating Cash Flow(1) | 360 | 403 | 871 | 1,163 | 1,236 | 1,160 | ||||||||||||||
less: Development Costs and Corporate Taxes | (74 | ) | (48 | ) | 103 | ) | (112 | ) | (56 | ) | (115 | ) | ||||||||
less: Total Interest Costs (including SELLs & Trust Preferred) | (150 | ) | (198 | ) | 415 | ) | (563 | ) | (545 | ) | (433 | ) | ||||||||
Parent Free Cash Flow(4) | $ | 136 | $ | 157 | $ | 353 | $ | 488 | $ | 635 | $ | 612 | ||||||||
Parent Operating Cash Flow by Region: | ||||||||||||||||||||
North America | 48 | % | 60 | % | 39 | % | 54 | % | 65 | % | 43 | % | ||||||||
Caribbean | 6 | % | 7 | % | 29 | % | 17 | % | 9 | % | 22 | % | ||||||||
Asia | 1 | % | 6 | % | 4 | % | 8 | % | 12 | % | 6 | % | ||||||||
South America | 25 | % | 8 | % | 17 | % | 12 | % | 4 | % | 20 | % | ||||||||
Europe | 20 | % | 19 | % | 11 | % | 9 | % | 10 | % | 9 | % | ||||||||
Parent Operating Cash Flow by Line of Business |
||||||||||||||||||||
Contract Generation | 67 | % | 67 | % | 44 | % | 39 | % | 59 | % | 36 | % | ||||||||
Large Utilities | 14 | % | 3 | % | 39 | % | 31 | % | 23 | % | 39 | % | ||||||||
Competitive Supply | 13 | % | 24 | % | 12 | % | 28 | % | 15 | % | 22 | % | ||||||||
Growth Distribution Businesses | 6 | % | 6 | % | 5 | % | 2 | % | 3 | % | 3 | % |
(Quarterly):
|
Q4 2001 |
Q1 2002 |
Q2 2002 |
Q3 2002 |
Q3 2001 |
||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
(actual $ in millions |
||||||||||||||||
Parent Operating Cash Flow(1) | $ | 390 | $ | 331 | $ | 263 | $ | 252 | $ | 335 | |||||||
Parent Interest Charges(2) | $ | 120 | $ | 116 | $ | 105 | $ | 130 | $ | 112 | |||||||
Interest Coverage Ratio(3) | 3.25x | 2.85x | 2.50x | 1.94x | 2.99x | ||||||||||||
Parent Operating Cash Flow(1) | 390 | 331 | 263 | 252 | 335 | ||||||||||||
less: Development Costs and Corporate Taxes | (24 | ) | (14 | ) | (11 | ) | (7 | ) | (25 | ) | |||||||
less: Total Interest Costs (including SELLs & Trust Preferred) | (115 | ) | (136 | ) | (140 | ) | (154 | ) | (112 | ) | |||||||
Parent Free Cash Flow(4) | $ | 251 | $ | 181 | $ | 112 | $ | 91 | $ | 198 | |||||||
27
(Last Four Quarters):
|
December 31, 2001 |
March 31, 2002 |
June 30, 2002 |
September 30, 2002 |
September 30, 2001 |
||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
(actual $ in millions) |
||||||||||||||
Parent Operating Cash Flow(1) | $ | 1,163 | $ | 1,314 | $ | 1,319 | $ | 1,236 | $ | 1,160 | |||||
Parent Interest Charges(2) | $ | 391 | $ | 428 | $ | 453 | $ | 471 | $ | 338 | |||||
Interest Coverage Ratio(3) | 2.97x | 3.07x | 2.91x | 2.62x | 3.43x |
Note 1:
Parent Operating Cash Flow does not include the following cash payments made to the Parent Company by its subsidiaries and affiliates:
28
The AES Corporation
Forecasted Parent Operating Cash Flow and Liquidity 2002-2003
In the tables below, historical (actual) information is denoted with an "A" next to the year and forecasted information is denoted with an "F" next to the year.
Parent Only Data
|
Q1 2002 A |
Q2 2002 A |
Q3 2002 A |
Q4 2002 F |
YE 2002 F |
|||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
($ in millions) |
|||||||||||||||
Parent Operating Cash Flow(1) | $ | 331 | $ | 263 | $ | 252 | $ | 224 | $ | 1,070 | ||||||
Parent Interest Charges(2) | $ | 116 | $ | 105 | $ | 130 | $ | 107 | $ | 458 | ||||||
Interest Coverage Ratio(3) | 2.85x | 2.50x | 1.94x | 2.09x | 2.34x | |||||||||||
Parent Operating Cash Flow by Region: | ||||||||||||||||
North America | 58 | % | 46 | % | 66 | % | 65 | % | 59 | % | ||||||
Caribbean | 4 | % | 20 | % | 2 | % | 3 | % | 7 | % | ||||||
Asia | 13 | % | 13 | % | 22 | % | 21 | % | 17 | % | ||||||
Europe | 10 | % | 15 | % | 8 | % | 8 | % | 10 | % | ||||||
South America | 15 | % | 6 | % | 2 | % | 3 | % | 7 | % | ||||||
Parent Operating Cash Flow by Line of Business | ||||||||||||||||
Contract Generation | 54 | % | 61 | % | 54 | % | 73 | % | 60 | % | ||||||
Large Utilities | 31 | % | 34 | % | 30 | % | 15 | % | 28 | % | ||||||
Competitive Supply | 14 | % | 4 | % | 15 | % | 9 | % | 11 | % | ||||||
Growth Distribution | 1 | % | 1 | % | 1 | % | 3 | % | 1 | % |
29
Parent Sources & Uses
|
Q1 2002 A |
Q2 2002 A |
Q3 2002 A |
Q4 2002 F |
YE 2002 F |
||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
($ in millions) |
||||||||||||||||
Sources | |||||||||||||||||
Distributions from Subsidiaries | $ | 340 | $ | 269 | $ | 268 | $ | 246 | $ | 1,123 | |||||||
less: Corporate Overhead | (9 | ) | (6 | ) | (16 | ) | (22 | ) | (53 | ) | |||||||
Parent Operating Cash Flow(1) | 331 | 263 | 252 | 224 | 1,070 | ||||||||||||
less: Development Costs and Corporate Taxes | (14 | ) | (11 | ) | (7 | ) | (12 | ) | (44 | ) | |||||||
less: Total Interest Costs (including SELLs & Trust Preferred) | (136 | ) | (140 | ) | (154 | ) | (134 | ) | (564 | ) | |||||||
Parent Free Cash Flow(4) | 181 | 112 | 91 | 78 | 462 | ||||||||||||
Agreed Asset Sales | | | 251 | | 251 | ||||||||||||
Additional Asset Sales | | | | | | ||||||||||||
Project Financing Proceeds | | 239 | | | 239 | ||||||||||||
Bank Loan Renewals (net of transaction costs)(5) | | | | 1,570 | 1,570 | ||||||||||||
Bond Exchange(5) | | | | 263 | 263 | ||||||||||||
Beginning Liquidity | 565 | 285 | 359 | 395 | 565 | ||||||||||||
Total Sources | $ | 746 | $ | 636 | $ | 701 | $ | 2,306 | $ | 3,350 | |||||||
Uses | |||||||||||||||||
Bank Loan Repayments | 63 | $ | 63 | $ | 225 | $ | | $ | 351 | ||||||||
Bank Loan Renewals | | | | 1,620 | 1,620 | ||||||||||||
Bond Exchange(5) | | | | 263 | 263 | ||||||||||||
Bond Repayments(5) | | | | 188 | 188 | ||||||||||||
Committed Investments | 398 | 214 | 81 | 77 | 770 | ||||||||||||
Ending Liquidity | 285 | 359 | 395 | 158 | 158 | ||||||||||||
Total Uses | $ | 746 | $ | 636 | $ | 701 | $ | 2,306 | $ | 3,350 | |||||||
Note 2:
30
Certain statements regarding AES's ("the Company's") business operations may constitute "forward looking statements" as defined by the Securities and Exchange Commission. Such statements are not historical facts, but are predictions about the future which inherently involve risks and uncertainties, which could cause our actual results to differ from those contained in the forward looking statement. We urge investors to read our descriptions and discussions of these risks that are contained under the section "Risk Factors" in the Company's Annual Report/Form 10K for the year ended December 31, 2001.
31
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.
THE AES CORPORATION | ||||
DATE: October 24, 2002 |
by: |
/s/ William R. Luraschi Senior Vice President and General Counsel |
32