d937620_6-k.htm
UNITED
STATES
SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C.
20549
FORM
6-K
REPORT
OF FOREIGN PRIVATE ISSUER PURSUANT TO RULE 13A-16 OR 15D-16 OF THE
SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For
the month of November 2008
Commission
File Number: 001-33068
ULTRAPETROL
(BAHAMAS) LIMITED
(Translation
of registrant’s name into English)
Ocean
Centre, Montagu Foreshore
East
Bay St.
Nassau,
Bahamas
P.O.
Box SS-19084
(Address
of principal executive office)
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant files or will file annual
reports
under
cover of Form 20-F or Form 40-F.
Form
20-F [X] Form 40-F [ ]
Indicate
by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in paper
as
permitted
by Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(1): ___
Note:
Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(1) only permits the submission in paper of a Form 6-K
if submitted solely to provide an attached annual report to security
holders.
Indicate
by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in paper as permitted
by Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)7: ___
Note:
Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(7) only permits the submission in paper of a Form 6-K
if submitted to furnish a report or other document that the registrant foreign
private issuer must furnish and make public under the laws of the jurisdiction
in which the registrant is incorporated, domiciled or legally organized (the
registrant’s “home country”), or under the rules of the home country exchange on
which the registrant’s securities are traded, as long as the report or other
document is not a press release, is not required to be and has not been
distributed to the registrant’s security holders, and, if discussing a material
event, has already been the subject of a Form 6-K submission or other Commission
filing on EDGAR.
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant by furnishing the information contained in
this Form is also thereby furnishing the information to the Commission pursuant
to Rule 12g3-2(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Yes [_] No
[X]
If
“Yes” is marked, indicate below the file number assigned to the registrant in
connection with Rule 12g3-2(b): 82-
INFORMATION
CONTAINED IN THIS FORM 6-K REPORT
Set
forth herein are a copy of the Company's report for the nine months ended
September 30, 2008, containing certain unaudited financial information and a
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations for the three month and nine month periods ended September 30,
2008.
ULTRAPETROL
(BAHAMAS) LIMITED
MANAGEMENT’S
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE
NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2008 AND 2007 (UNAUDITED)
The
following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the
unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements of Ultrapetrol (Bahamas)
Limited (the “Company”) and subsidiaries for the nine months ended September 30,
2008 and 2007 included elsewhere in this report.
Our
Company
We
are an industrial shipping company serving the marine transportation needs of
our clients in the markets on which we focus. We serve the shipping markets for
grain, vegetable oils, minerals, crude oil, petroleum, and refined petroleum
products, as well as the offshore oil platform supply market, and the leisure
passenger cruise market through our operations in the following four segments of
the marine transportation industry.
Our
River Business, with
currently 591 barges, is the largest owner and operator of river barges and
pushboats that transport dry bulk and liquid cargos through the Hidrovia Region
of South America, a large area with growing agricultural, forest and mineral
related exports. Our River Business fleet has an aggregate capacity of
approximately 1,025,000 dwt.
Our
Offshore Supply Business
owns and operates vessels that provide critical logistical and transportation
services for offshore petroleum exploration and production companies in the
North Sea and the coastal waters of Brazil. Our Offshore Supply Business fleet
currently consists of technologically advanced Platform Supply Vessels, or PSVs,
including five in operation, one under construction in Brazil to be delivered in
the first quarter of 2009, four under construction in India and two under
construction in China with deliveries commencing in 2009.
Our
Ocean Business operates
nine oceangoing vessels, including four Handysize / small product tankers, which
we employ in the South American coastal trade where we have preferential rights
and customer relationships, three versatile Suezmax / Oil-Bulk-Ore, or Suezmax
OBOs, one Capesize vessel and one semi-integrated tug / barge
unit. Our Ocean Business fleet has an aggregate capacity of
approximately 745,000 dwt.
Our
Passenger Business owns
and operates a passenger cruise vessel, the Blue Monarch, with 450 lower
berths, which we employed on 7-day and 14-day cruises in the Aegean Sea during
the 2008 European cruise season. This vessel is currently in lay-up after
completing its 2008 cruising season and is in the market for sale or
charter.
Our
business strategy is to continue to operate as a diversified marine
transportation company with an aim to maximize our growth and profitability
while limiting our exposure to the cyclical behavior of individual sectors of
the marine transportation industry.
Developments
in three months ended September 30, 2008
On
August 12, 2008, we entered into an Over the Counter Forward Freight Agreement
(“OTC FFA”) contract whereby a subsidiary of ours contracted with Bunge S.A. to
pay the average time charter rate for the 4 Capesize Time Charter Routes
(“C4TC”) for a total of 45 days (15 days per month from October to December 2008
both inclusive) in exchange for a fixed rate of $150,000 (one hundred and fifty
thousand U.S. Dollars) per day. This forward freight agreement (“FFA”) is an OTC
contract, has no margin requirements and bears a higher counterparty risk than a
cleared FFA. If the counterparty fails to meet its obligation under the FFA, the
Company could suffer losses on the contract, which could adversely affect the
Company’s financial condition and results of operations. Please see section
headed “Factors Affecting Our Operations–Forward Freight Agreements (FFAs)”
below for a discussion of counterparty risk in OTC FFAs.
On
August 13, 2008, we entered into an OTC FFA contract whereby a subsidiary of
ours contracted with Noble Chartering Inc. to pay the average time charter rate
for the C4TC for a total of 45 days (15 days per month from October to December
2008 both inclusive) in exchange for a fixed rate of $157,000 (one hundred and
fifty seven thousand U.S. Dollars) per day. This FFA is an OTC contract, has no
margin requirements and bears a higher counterparty risk than a cleared FFA. If
the counterparty fails to meet its obligation under the FFA, the Company could
suffer losses on the contract, which could adversely affect the Company’s
financial condition and results of operations.
On
August 14, 2008, we entered into an OTC FFA contract whereby a subsidiary of
ours contracted with Bunge S.A. to pay the average time charter rate for the
C4TC for a total of 365 days (every calendar day from January to December 2010
both inclusive) in exchange for a fixed rate of $83,000 (eighty three thousand
U.S. Dollars) per day. This FFA is an OTC contract, has no margin requirements
and bears a higher counterparty risk than a cleared FFA. If the counterparty
fails to meet its obligation under the FFA, the Company could suffer losses on
the contract, which could adversely affect the Company’s financial condition and
results of operations.
On
September 15, 2008, we signed and subsequently on September 30, 2008 drew down
two 12-year Senior Credit Loan facilities with IFC totaling $60.0 million,
secured by tugs and barges that we own, to partially finance our River Business
growth programs. The facilities include a grace period of four years and may be
expanded up to $75.0 million through a parallel loan.
On
September 19, 2008, we entered into an OTC FFA contract whereby a subsidiary of
ours contracted with Bunge S.A. to charge the average time charter rate for the
C4TC for a total of 18 days in October 2008 in exchange for paying a fixed rate
of $88,000 (eighty eight thousand U.S. Dollars) per day. This FFA is an OTC
contract, has no margin requirements and bears a higher counterparty risk than a
cleared FFA. If the counterparty fails to meet its obligation under the FFA, the
Company could suffer losses on the contract, which could adversely affect the
Company’s financial condition and results of operations.
On
September 24, 2008, we entered into an OTC FFA contract whereby a subsidiary of
ours contracted with Navios International Inc. to pay the average time charter
rate for the C4TC for a total of 45 days (15 days per month from January to
March 2009 both inclusive) in exchange for a fixed rate of $53,500 (fifty three
thousand five hundred U.S. Dollars) per day. This FFA is an OTC contract, has no
margin requirements and bears a higher counterparty risk than a cleared FFA. If
the counterparty fails to meet its obligation under the FFA, the Company could
suffer losses on the contract, which could adversely affect the Company’s
financial condition and results of operations.
Recent
Developments
On
October 2, 2008, we announced that our Board authorized an extension of the
share repurchase program to December 31, 2008 retaining the original cumulative
dollar limit of $50.0 million. The program does not require the Company to
purchase any specific number or amount of shares and may be suspended or
reinstated at any time at the Company’s discretion and without
notice.
On
November 3, 2008, we entered into a cleared FFA contract whereby a subsidiary of
ours contracted with BNP Paribas Commodity Futures Ltd. (as a clearing member of
LCH Clearnet) to charge the average time charter rate for the C4TC for a total
of 15 days per month in November and December 2008 in exchange for a fixed rate
of $9,000 (nine thousand U.S. Dollars) per day.
On
November 5, 2008, Princess
Marisol started its estimated 60-day dry dock and special survey in
China.
As
of November 12, 2008, under our share repurchase program we had repurchased in
2008 a total of 3,202,279 common shares for a total cost of $17.6 million at an
average all-in price of $5.49 per share. Included in these figures are purchases
in October 2008 of 2,531,108 shares for a total cost of $11.1 million at an
average all-in price of $4.39 per share.
The Company expects that lower levels of water in the High
Paraguay and reduced production at mines may negatively impact the volumes of
iron ore carried in the
fourth quarter.
Factors
Affecting Our Results of Operations
We
organize our business and evaluate performance by the following operating
segments: River Business, Offshore Supply Business, Ocean Business and Passenger
Business. The accounting policies of the reportable segments are the same as
those for the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements. We do not
have significant inter-segment transactions.
Revenues
In
our River Business, we contract for the carriage of cargoes, in substantially
all cases, under contracts of affreightment, or COAs. Most of these COAs
currently provide for monthly adjustments to the freight rate based on changes
in the price of marine diesel oil.
In
our Offshore Supply Business, we typically contract our vessels under time
charters in both Brazil and the North Sea.
In
our Ocean Business, we contract our vessels either on a time charter basis or on
a COA basis. Some of the differences between time charters and COAs are
summarized below.
Time
Charter
●
|
We
derive revenue from a daily rate paid for the use of the vessel,
and
|
●
|
The
charterer pays for all voyage expenses, including fuel costs and port
charges.
|
Contract of Affreightment
(COA)
●
|
We
derive revenue from a rate based on tonnage shipped expressed in dollars
per metric ton of cargo, which may be adjusted for increase in the price
of fuel in accordance with a pre-agreed formula.
|
●
|
We
pay for all voyage expenses, including fuel costs and port
charges.
|
Our
ships on time charters generate both lower revenues and lower expenses for us
than those under COAs. At comparable price levels, both time charters and COAs
result in approximately the same operating income, although the operating margin
as a percentage of revenues may differ significantly.
In
our Passenger Business, our Blue Monarch was employed on
7-day and 14-day cruises in the Aegean Sea. Under this arrangement we have no
guaranteed minimum income and we have to organize and pay for port expenses and
fuel in the itineraries we service. In this sense, the earnings of this vessel
are similar in nature to a COA.
Time
charter revenues accounted for 57% of the total revenues from our businesses for
the first nine months of 2008, while COA revenues accounted for 43%. With
respect to COA revenues in the first nine months of 2008, 77% were in respect of
repetitive voyages for our regular customers and 23% in respect of single
voyages for occasional customers.
In
our River Business, demand for our services is driven by agricultural, mining
and forestry activities in the Hidrovia Region. Droughts and other adverse
weather conditions, such as floods, could result in a decline in production of
the agricultural products we transport, which would likely result in a reduction
in demand for our services. Further, most of the operation in our River Business
occurs in the Parana and Paraguay Rivers, and any changes adversely affecting
either of these rivers, such as low water levels, could reduce or limit our
ability to effectively transport cargo.
In
our Ocean Business, we employed a significant part of our fleet on time charter
to different customers during the nine months ended September 30, 2008. During
the first nine months of 2008, the international dry bulk freight market was on
average higher than it was in the first nine months of 2007.
In
our Passenger Business, demand for our services is driven primarily by movements
of tourists during the European summer cruise season.
Expenses
Our
operating expenses generally include the cost of all vessel management, crewing,
spares and stores, insurance, lubricants, and repairs and maintenance.
Generally, the most significant of these expenses are repairs and maintenance,
wages paid to marine personnel, catering and marine insurance costs. However,
there are significant differences in the manner in which these expenses are
recognized in the different segments in which we operate.
In
addition to vessels’ operating expenses, our other primary sources of operating
expenses in 2008 included general and administrative expenses.
In
our River Business, our voyage expenses include port expenses, barge cleaning,
fleeting and fuel as well as charter hire paid to third parties for using small
port pushboats and other expenses that may be incurred in relation to port calls
incurred or cargos carried.
In
our Offshore Supply Business, voyage expenses include commissions paid by us to
third parties, which provide brokerage services.
In
our Passenger Business, operating expenses currently include all vessel
management, crewing, stores, insurance, lubricants, repairs and maintenance,
catering, housekeeping and entertainment staff costs. Voyage expenses include
port expenses, bunkers and the cost of food for the passengers.
Through
our River Business, we own a dry dock and a repair facility at Pueblo Esther,
Argentina, land suitable for the construction of two terminals and a shipyard
under construction in Argentina, and 50% joint venture participations in two
grain loading terminals in Paraguay. We also rent offices in Asuncion (Paraguay)
and Buenos Aires (Argentina) and a repair and shipbuilding facility in Ramallo
(Argentina).
Foreign
Currency Transactions
During
the nine months ended September 30, 2008, 90% of our revenues were denominated
and collected in U.S. Dollars, 9% of our revenues were denominated and collected
in British Pounds and 1% of our revenues were denominated and collected in
Brazilian Reals. Furthermore, 21% of our total revenues were denominated in U.S.
Dollars but collected in Argentine Pesos, Brazilian Reals and Paraguayan
Guaranies. Significant amounts of our expenses were denominated in U.S. dollars
and 42% of our total out-of-pocket operating expenses were paid in Argentine
Pesos, Brazilian Reals and Paraguayan Guaranies.
Our
operating results, which we report in U.S. Dollars, may be affected by
fluctuations in the exchange rate between the U.S. Dollar and other currencies.
For accounting purposes, we use U.S. Dollars as our functional currency.
Therefore, revenue and expense accounts are translated into U.S. Dollars at the
average exchange rate prevailing on the month of each transaction. We also have
exchange variances depending on the date that a revenue is actually received or
when an expense is actually paid.
We
have not historically significantly hedged our exposure to changes in foreign
currency exchange rates and, as a result, we could incur unanticipated losses
due to exchange rate variations. However, in September 2008, we entered into
several new forward currency agreements by which we sold forward between £0.5
and £1.0 million per month between October 2008 and April 2009 at a weighted
average rate of $1.84 per £ and £0.5 million per month between May and December
2009 at an average rate of $1.71 per £ to cover part of the exposure to exchange
rate variance that stems from the revenues of our PSVs in the North Sea, which
are denominated and collected in British Pounds.
Inflation
and Fuel Price Increases
We
do not believe that inflation has had a material impact on our operations,
although certain of our operating expenses (e.g., manning, repair, maintenance
and dry docking costs) are subject to fluctuations as a result of market
forces.
Inflationary
pressure on prices in the South American countries in which we operate may not
be fully compensated by equivalent adjustments in the rate of exchange between
the local currencies and the US Dollar. Also the US Dollar depreciation or
significant revaluation of the local currencies against it has had an
incremental effect on the portion of our operating expenses incurred in those
local currencies (See “Foreign Currency Transactions”).
In
2006 and thereafter, we negotiated and intend to continue to negotiate fuel
price adjustment (“fuel pass-through”) clauses in most of our River Business
COAs. However temporary misalignments may exist between the prices that we pay
for fuel and the adjustment that we obtain under our freight
contracts.
In
our Ocean Business, fuel price increases are not expected to have a material
effect on our immediate future operations, as the fleet is currently time
chartered to third parties, since under time charter contracts, it is the
charterer who pays for fuel. When our ocean vessels are employed under COAs,
freight rates for voyage charters are generally sensitive to the price of fuel
prevailing at the time of negotiating the voyage charter. However, a sharp rise
in bunker prices may have a temporary negative effect on results since freights
generally adjust only after prices have settled at a higher level.
In
the Offshore Supply Business the risk of variation of fuel prices under the
fleet’s current employment profile is borne by the charterers, since the vessels
generally are under time charters and the charterers are responsible for the
payment of the fuel cost.
In
our Passenger Business, our results of operations are exposed to changes in
bunker prices, offset somewhat by bunker fuel surcharges, which are charged to
passengers as a separate and supplementary cost when market conditions
allow.
Forward
Freight Agreements (FFAs)
We
enter into Forward Freight Agreements (FFAs) as economic hedges to reduce our
exposure to changes in the spot market rates earned by some of our vessels in
the normal course of our Ocean Business. By using FFAs, we aim at managing the
risk associated with fluctuating market conditions. FFAs generally cover periods
ranging from one month to one year and involve contracts to provide a fixed
number of theoretical days of voyages at fixed rates. FFAs can be executed
through LCH, a London clearing house, with which we started to trade during May
2007, but may also be agreed through other clearing houses or as “Over the
Counter” (OTC) contracts in which case each party accepts the signature of the
other party as sufficient guarantee of its obligations under the
contract.
OTC
FFAs are not cleared through a clearing house; they have no margin account
requirements and bear a higher counterparty risk than a cleared FFA. If the
counterparty in an OTC FFA fails to meet its obligation under the FFA, the
Company could suffer losses on the contract which could adversely affect the
Company’s financial condition and results of operations.
Although
LCH or other clearing houses require the posting of collateral, the use of a
clearing house reduces the Company’s exposure to counterparty credit risk. We
are exposed to market risk in relation to our positions in FFAs and could suffer
substantial losses from these activities in the event our expectations prove to
be incorrect. We enter into FFAs primarily with an objective of economically
hedging risk but we may occasionally enter into FFAs for trading purposes to
take advantage of short term fluctuations in freight rates. As of September 30,
2008, we were committed to FFAs with a fair value of $73.4 million recorded as
an asset. Of this amount, $3.1 million was held as cleared FFA contracts and
$70.3 million was held as OTC FFA contracts with a total of 4 different
counterparties. These contracts settle between October 2008 and December 2010.
As of September 30, 2008, our credit facility with BNP Paribas to fund part of
our margins with LCH, had a zero balance.
The
fair value of FFAs is the estimated amount that we would receive or pay in order
to terminate these FFA contracts as of September 30, 2008.
All
of our FFAs outstanding at September 30, 2008 qualified as cash flow hedges for
accounting purposes, with the change in fair value of the effective portions
being recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) as a gain
amounting to $73.4 million. All qualifying hedges are shown at fair value in our
balance sheet.
On
November 6 and 7 we received $9.5 million in total for the net settlement of all
our October 2008 OTC FFA positions. This amount will be included in the total
revenues of our Ocean Business for the fourth quarter of 2008.
At
November 10, 2008 the asset related to the fair market value of the FFAs has
been increased in $13.8 million from September 30, 2008 to $87.2 million.
However, this amount is likely to vary materially as a result of changes in
market conditions and / or for changes in the FFAs entered into by
us.
Although the counterparties to our FFAs have met their obligations
under their respective FFAs to date and we have received no indication that
any of them will
not continue to do so,
there can be no guarantee that they will continue to meet their obligations in
the future.
Seasonality
Each
of our businesses has seasonal aspects that affect their revenues on a per
quarter basis. The high season for our River Business is generally between the
months of March and September, as a result of the South American harvest and
higher river levels. However, growth in the soy pellet manufacturing, minerals
and forest industries may help offset some of this seasonality. The Offshore
Supply Business operates year-round, particularly off the coast of Brazil,
although weather conditions in the North Sea may reduce activity from December
to February. In the Ocean Business, demand for oil tankers tends to be stronger
during the winter months in the Northern hemisphere. Demand for dry bulk
transportation tends to be fairly stable throughout the year, with the
exceptions of the Chinese New Year in the first quarter and the European summer
holiday season in our third quarter, which generally show lower charter rates.
Under existing arrangements, our Passenger Business currently generates its
revenue during the European cruise season, typically between May and October of
each year.
Legal
Proceedings
Our
Brazilian subsidiary in the Offshore Supply Business UP Offshore Apoio Maritimo
Ltda. (“UP Apoio”) was involved in a customs dispute with the Brazilian Customs
Tax Authorities over the alleged infringement of customs regulations by the
UP Diamante in October
2007. The Customs Authority claimed that when the UP Diamante docked to the CSO
Deep Blue (a vessel not owned by us) to transfer certain equipment as part of
its employment instructions under its charter with Petróleo Brasilero S.A.
(¨Petrobras¨), the UP
Diamante allegedly did not comply with certain regulations applicable to
the docking of vessels when one of them is destined for a foreign country. As a
result, the Brazilian Customs Tax Authority commenced an administrative
proceeding of which UP Apoio was notified in November 24, 2007, and sought to
impose the maximum Customs penalty, which corresponded to the confiscation
(“perdimento”) of the
vessel UP Diamante in
favor of the Brazilian Federal Government.
On
December 21, 2007 UP Apoio filed an administrative defense stating that: (i) the
legal position taken by Customs Authority was not applicable to the UP Diamante since the “perdimento” was only
applicable to vessels coming from or going abroad, and not to vessels engaged in
cabotage voyages as was the UP
Diamante; (ii) UP
Diamante did not violate the Customs Regulation Code because (a) there
was no provision related to the transfer of equipment when one of the vessels is
going abroad but the other is not and (b) none of the vessels involved was
coming from or going abroad; (iii) confiscation could not be imposed on a vessel
owned by UP Apoio because at the time of the alleged infringement the UP Diamante was on hire and
under charter to Petrobras and consequently under the control and direction of
Petrobras and not of UP Apoio; (iv) the imposition of confiscation violated the
principles of proportionality, reasonability and non-confiscation; and (v)
confiscation was not applicable because under Brazilian Tax Code, when in case
of doubt, the applicable law should be interpreted in favor of the taxpayer, and
in this case the report issued by the Brazilian Customs Authorities recognized
the existence of doubt concerning the applicability of the corresponding section
of the Customs Regulation.
On
September 25, 2008 the Customs proceedings, in which Brazilian Customs Tax
Authorities were imposing a confiscation penalty ("perdimento") of the UP Diamante, were
successfully concluded when a final decision was issued
by
local Tax Authorities determining the cancellation of the tax assessment brought
up against UP Apoio. Therefore, the tax assessment was extinguished with no
liability to UP Apoio, and the UP Diamante was released from
any kind of legal or Customs restrictions.
On
September 21, 2005, the local customs authority of Ciudad del Este, Paraguay,
issued a finding that certain UABL entities owe taxes to that authority in the
amount of $2.2 million, together with a fine for non-payment of the taxes in the
same amount, in respect of certain operations of our River Business for the
prior three-year period. This matter was referred to the Central Customs
Authority of Paraguay (the “Paraguayan Customs Authority”). We believe that this
finding is erroneous and UABL has formally replied to the Paraguayan Customs
Authority contesting all of the allegations upon which the finding was based.
After review of the entire operations for the claimed period, the Paraguayan Tax
authorities, asserting their jurisdiction over the matter, confirmed that the
UABL entities did pay their taxes on the claimed period, but held a dissenting
view on a third issue (the tax base used by the UABL entities to calculate the
applicable withholding tax). Finally, the primary case was appealed by the UABL
entities before the Tax and Administrative Court, and when summoned, the
Paraguayan Tax Authorities filed an admission, upon which the Court on November
24, 2006, confirmed that the UABL entities were not liable for the first two
issues. Nevertheless, the third issue continued, and through a resolution, which
was provided to UABL on October 13, 2006, the Paraguayan Undersecretary for
Taxation has confirmed that, in his opinion, UABL was liable for a total of
approximately $0.7 million and has applied a fine of 100% of this amount. UABL
have entered a plea with the respective court contending the interpretation on
the third issue where we claim to be equally non liable. On October 19, 2007, we
presented a report by an expert, which is highly favorable for our position. All
court proceedings on the case are over, and it is expected that the Tax and
Administrative Court issues its finding by the end of 2008 or beginning of 2009.
We have been advised by UABL’s counsel in the case that there is only a remote
possibility that a judicial court would find UABL liable for any of these taxes
or fines.
On
November 3, 2006 and April 25, 2007, the Bolivian Tax Authority (“Departamento de Inteligencia Fiscal
de la Gerencia Nacional de Fiscalización”) issued a notice in the
Bolivian press advising that UABL International S.A. (a Panamanian subsidiary of
the Company) would owe taxes to that authority. On June 18, 2007, our legal
counsel in Bolivia submitted points of defense to the Bolivian tax authorities.
On August 27, 2007 the Bolivian tax authorities gave notice of a resolution
determining the taxes that UABL International S.A. would owe to them in the
amount of approximately $4.9 million (including interest and fines). On October
1, 2007, our legal counsel in Bolivia gave notice to the Bolivian tax
authorities of the lawsuit commenced by UABL International S.A. to refute the
resolution above mentioned. We have learned (but have not been legally notified)
that on October 20, 2007, the Bolivian Tax Authority replied to UABL’s lawsuit,
with the corresponding judge participating in the suit considering the legal
process as served and duly commenced. On June 26, 2008, a Bolivian court ordered
a preemptive embargo against all barges owned by UABL International S.A. that
may be registered in the International Bolivian Registry of Ships (“RIBB” for
its Spanish acronym). According to Company’s local counsel this preemptive
embargo under Bolivian law has no effect over the Company’s right to use its
assets nor does it have any implication over the final decision of the court,
the substance of the matter and in this case it is ineffective since UABL
International S.A. does not have any assets owned by it registered in the RIBB.
We have been advised by our local counsel that there is only a remote
possibility that UABL International S.A. would finally be found liable for any
of these taxes or fines and / or that these proceedings will have financial
material adverse impact on the financial position or results of the
Company.
Various
other legal proceedings involving us may arise from time to time in the ordinary
course of business. However, we are not presently involved in any other legal
proceedings that, if adversely determined, would have a material adverse effect
on us.
Three
months and nine months ended September 30, 2008 compared to three months and
nine months ended September 30, 2007.
The
following table sets forth certain unaudited historical income statement data
for the periods indicated above derived from our unaudited condensed
consolidated statements of income expressed in thousands of
dollars.
|
|
Third
Quarter
Ended
September 30,
|
|
|
Nine
Months Ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Percent
Change
|
|
Revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Attributable
to River Business
|
|
$ |
38,664 |
|
|
$ |
24,640 |
|
|
$ |
100,675 |
|
|
$ |
69,665 |
|
|
|
45 |
% |
Attributable
to Offshore Supply Business
|
|
|
13,019 |
|
|
|
11,359 |
|
|
|
33,180 |
|
|
|
30,153 |
|
|
|
10 |
% |
Attributable
to Ocean Business
|
|
|
32,965 |
|
|
|
13,407 |
|
|
|
98,288 |
|
|
|
39,237 |
|
|
|
150 |
% |
Attributable
to Passenger Business
|
|
|
6,656 |
|
|
|
13,684 |
|
|
|
9,540 |
|
|
|
24,887 |
|
|
|
-62 |
% |
Total
revenues
|
|
|
91,304 |
|
|
|
63,090 |
|
|
|
241,683 |
|
|
|
163,942 |
|
|
|
47 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Voyage
expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Attributable
to River Business
|
|
|
(21,378 |
) |
|
|
(11,496 |
) |
|
|
(52,861 |
) |
|
|
(29,767 |
) |
|
|
78 |
% |
Attributable
to Offshore Supply Business
|
|
|
(534 |
) |
|
|
(444 |
) |
|
|
(1,447 |
) |
|
|
(1,066 |
) |
|
|
36 |
% |
Attributable
to Ocean Business
|
|
|
(1,539 |
) |
|
|
(16 |
) |
|
|
(4,236 |
) |
|
|
(511 |
) |
|
|
729 |
% |
Attributable
to Passenger Business
|
|
|
(3,939 |
) |
|
|
(3,809 |
) |
|
|
(6,546 |
) |
|
|
(7,513 |
) |
|
|
-13 |
% |
Total
voyage expenses
|
|
|
(27,390 |
) |
|
|
(15,738 |
) |
|
|
(65,090 |
) |
|
|
(38,857 |
) |
|
|
68 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Running
costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Attributable
to River Business
|
|
|
(10,160 |
) |
|
|
(6,997 |
) |
|
|
(27,119 |
) |
|
|
(18,677 |
) |
|
|
45 |
% |
Attributable
to Offshore Supply Business
|
|
|
(4,412 |
) |
|
|
(3,770 |
) |
|
|
(12,776 |
) |
|
|
(9,578 |
) |
|
|
33 |
% |
Attributable
to Ocean Business
|
|
|
(9,865 |
) |
|
|
(4,326 |
) |
|
|
(26,744 |
) |
|
|
(11,720 |
) |
|
|
128 |
% |
Attributable
to Passenger Business
|
|
|
(3,265 |
) |
|
|
(5,439 |
) |
|
|
(7,376 |
) |
|
|
(13,604 |
) |
|
|
-46 |
% |
Total
running costs
|
|
|
(27,702 |
) |
|
|
(20,532 |
) |
|
|
(74,015 |
) |
|
|
(53,579 |
) |
|
|
38 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization
of dry dock & intangible assets
|
|
|
(1,036 |
) |
|
|
(1,939 |
) |
|
|
(3,402 |
) |
|
|
(6,039 |
) |
|
|
-44 |
% |
Depreciation
of vessels and equipment
|
|
|
(9,388 |
) |
|
|
(7,034 |
) |
|
|
(26,981 |
) |
|
|
(19,391 |
) |
|
|
39 |
% |
Administrative
and commercial expenses
|
|
|
(6,386 |
) |
|
|
(4,585 |
) |
|
|
(17,684 |
) |
|
|
(14,425 |
) |
|
|
23 |
% |
Other
operating income
|
|
|
1,342 |
|
|
|
513 |
|
|
|
3,765 |
|
|
|
578 |
|
|
|
551 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
profit
|
|
|
20,744 |
|
|
|
13,775 |
|
|
|
58,276 |
|
|
|
32,229 |
|
|
|
81 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial
expense
|
|
|
(8,171 |
) |
|
|
(4,997 |
) |
|
|
(19,027 |
) |
|
|
(14,639 |
) |
|
|
30 |
% |
Financial
income
|
|
|
188 |
|
|
|
1,056 |
|
|
|
835 |
|
|
|
2,296 |
|
|
|
-64 |
% |
Net
income (loss) on FFAs
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
(13,162 |
) |
|
|
5,862 |
|
|
|
(16,235 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Investment
in affiliates
|
|
|
(201 |
) |
|
|
161 |
|
|
|
(250 |
) |
|
|
454 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other,
net
|
|
|
(128 |
) |
|
|
(147 |
) |
|
|
(419 |
) |
|
|
(400 |
) |
|
|
5 |
% |
Total
other income (expenses)
|
|
|
(8,312 |
) |
|
|
(17,089 |
) |
|
|
(12,999 |
) |
|
|
(28,524 |
) |
|
|
-54 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income
(loss) before income taxes and minority interest
|
|
|
12,432 |
|
|
|
(3,314 |
) |
|
|
45,277 |
|
|
|
3,705 |
|
|
|
1122 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income
taxes
|
|
|
3,071 |
|
|
|
(1,246 |
) |
|
|
(296 |
) |
|
|
(5,032 |
) |
|
|
-94 |
% |
Minority
interest
|
|
|
(438 |
) |
|
|
(180 |
) |
|
|
(863 |
) |
|
|
(503 |
) |
|
|
72 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
income (loss)
|
|
$ |
15,065 |
|
|
$ |
(4,740 |
) |
|
$ |
44,118 |
|
|
$ |
(1,830 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Total
revenues from our River Business increased by $31.0 million or 45% from $69.7
million for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 to $100.7 million for the
same period in 2008. This increase is mainly attributable to an 11% increase in
volumes loaded and a 30% increase in freight rates, which is mainly related to
fuel pass-through.
Total
revenues from our Offshore
Supply Business increased from $11.4 million for the three months ended
September 30, 2007 to $13.0 million for the same period in 2008, an increase of
$1.6 million, or 14%. This increase is mainly attributable to higher average
rates obtained by our vessels UP Topazio, operating in the
North Sea as opposed to its operation in Brazil during the third quarter of
2007, and UP Esmeralda,
which obtained better rates on its operation in the North Sea than those
obtained during the same period of 2007.
Total
revenues from our Offshore Supply Business increased from $30.2 million for the
nine months ended September 30, 2007 to $33.2 million for the same period in
2008, an increase of $3.0 million, or 10%. This increase is mainly attributable
to a full nine months of operations of our UP Diamante, in 2008, as
compared to less than five months in the same period of 2007 coupled with higher
average rates obtained by our vessel UP Agua-Marinha in Brazil,
when compared to rates for the same period in 2007, and by higher average rates
obtained by our UP
Topazio operating in the North Sea in 2008 as opposed to its operation in
Brazil during 2007, partially offset by the lesser number of operational days of
our vessel UP Esmeralda
as a consequence of propulsion damage (while the loss of hire of this vessel is
covered by insurance, the amount of this insurance are accounted for under
“other operating income”) and lower average earnings of our UP Safira, which is operating
under a long term charter in the North Sea.
Total
revenues from our Ocean
Business increased from $13.4 million for the three months ended
September 30, 2007 to $33.0 million for the three months ended September 30,
2008, an increase of $19.6 million, or 146%. This increase is primarily
attributable to the higher time charter rates obtained by our three Suezmax OBO
vessels which operated under time charters linked to the Baltic Capesize Index 4
Time Charter Routes as compared to the three months ended September 30, 2007
when they were operating under fixed rate time charters at lower levels, and to
three full months of operation of our Capesize vessel Princess Marisol, which was
delivered to us in November 2007, coupled with an entire quarter of operations
of our product carrier Amadeo,
which started operations at the end of August 2007, and the operations of
our product carrier Austral delivered in April
2008, partially offset by the sale of our Aframax product tanker vessel, Princess Marina, in September
2007, which did not participate in our operations in 2008, and by the
settlements of the effective portion of the FFAs contracted for our Suezmax OBO
fleet which qualified as a cash flow hedge and corrected the revenues of the
Ocean Fleet accordingly.
Total
revenues from our Ocean Business increased from $39.2 million for the nine
months ended September 30, 2007 to $98.3 million for the nine months ended
September 30, 2008, an increase of $59.1 million, or 151%. This increase is
primarily attributable to the higher time charter rates obtained by our three
Suezmax OBO vessels as compared to the first nine months of 2007 and to nine
full months of operation of our Capesize vessel Princess Marisol, which was
delivered to us in November 2007, coupled with nine full months of operation
during 2008 of our product carriers Alejandrina and Amadeo delivered in March and
August 2007, respectively, to nine full months of operations of our Miranda I, which had
undergone a conversion to double hull in the second quarter of 2007, and the
operations of our product carrier Austral delivered in April
2008, partially offset by the sale of our Aframax product tanker vessel, Princess Marina, in September
2007, and by the off hire due to refurbishments of our Alianza G3, and by
the settlements of the effective portion of the FFAs contracted for our Suezmax
OBO fleet which qualified as a cash flow hedge, which reduced the revenues of
the Suezmax OBOs accordingly.
Total
revenues from our Passenger
Business decreased $7.0 million or 51%, from $13.7 million in the three
months ended September 30, 2007 to $6.7 million in the same period of 2008. This
decrease is primarily attributable to the sale of our passenger vessel, New Flamenco, in October
2007, partially offset by higher revenues on the operation of our Blue Monarch during the three
months ended September 30, 2008.
Total
revenues from our Passenger Business decreased $15.4 million or 62%, from $24.9
million in the first nine months of 2007 to $9.5 million in the same period of
2008. This decrease is primarily attributable to the sale of
our
passenger
vessel, New Flamenco,
in October 2007 (which had enjoyed off-season employment as a floating hotel
during January and February 2007) partially offset by higher revenues on the
operation of our Blue
Monarch during the nine months ended September 30, 2008.
Voyage
expenses. In the three months ended September 30, 2008, voyage expenses
of our River Business
were $21.4 million, as compared to $11.5 million for the same period of 2007, an
increase of $9.9 million, or 86%. The increase is mainly attributable to higher
fuel expenditure (an increase of $8.1 million) primarily due to higher fuel
expenses, together with higher port expenses (which represents $1.6 million of
this increase).
In
the nine months ended September 30, 2008, voyage expenses of our River Business
were $52.9 million, as compared to $29.8 million for the same period of 2007, an
increase of $23.1 million, or 78%. The increase is mainly attributable to higher
fuel expenditure (an increase of $18.8 million) primarily due to higher fuel
expenses, together with higher port expenses (which represents $4.0 million of
this increase).
In
the three months ended September 30, 2008, voyage expenses of our Offshore Supply Business were
$0.5 million, as compared to $0.4 million for the same period of 2007, an
increase of $0.1 million or 25%. This increase is primarily attributable to the
increase in brokerage commissions of our UP Esmeralda due to higher
average rates obtained by this vessel in the third quarter of 2008, partially
offset by lower voyage expenses, which were incurred in the positioning of our
UP Topazio in the North
Sea in 2007.
In
the nine months ended September 30, 2008, voyage expenses of our Offshore Supply
Business were $1.4 million, as compared to $1.1 million for the same period of
2007, an increase of $0.3 million, or 27%. This increase is primarily
attributable to the delivery and commencement of operation of the UP Diamante in May 2007 and
to the increase in the brokerage commissions due to the higher average rates
obtained by our UP
Agua-Marinha and UP
Esmeralda, partially offset by lower voyage expenses incurred by our
UP Topazio in the third
quarter of 2008.
In
the three months ended September 30, 2008, voyage expenses of our Ocean Business were $1.5
million, as compared to nil for the same period of 2007, an increase of $1.5
million. This increase is mainly attributable to the brokerage commissions paid
by the operation of our Capesize vessel Princess Marisol delivered in
November 2007, the
bareboat charter hire paid for our product carrier Austral delivered in April
2008, and to higher brokerage commissions on the operations of our three Suezmax
OBO vessels related to their higher time charter earnings.
In
the nine months ended September 30, 2008, voyage expenses of our Ocean Business
were $4.2 million, as compared to $0.5 million for the same period of 2007, an
increase of $3.7 million, or 740%. This increase is mainly attributable to the
brokerage commissions paid by the operation of our Capesize vessel Princess Marisol, which only
commenced its activity with the Company in November 2007 was partially employed
under COA mode in the first quarter 2008 and consequently incurred bunker costs
during this period, the
bareboat charter hire paid for our product carrier Austral delivered in April
2008, higher brokerage commissions on the operations of our Suezmax OBO vessels
related to their higher time charter earnings, and husbandry expenses of our
Miranda I.
In
the three months ended September 30, 2008, voyage expenses of our Passenger Business were $3.9
million as compared to $3.8 million for the same period in 2007, an increase of
$0.1 million, or 3%. This increase is primarily attributable to increases in
fuel prices in the operation of our vessel Blue Monarch, almost entirely
offset by the sale of our passenger vessel, New Flamenco, in October
2007.
In
the nine months ended June 30, 2008, voyage expenses of our Passenger Business
were $6.5 million as compared to $7.5 million for the same period in 2007, a
decrease of $1.0 million, or 13%. This decrease is mainly attributable to the
sale of our passenger vessel, New Flamenco, in October
2007, partially offset by higher voyage expenses of our Blue Monarch primarily due to
increases in fuel prices.
Running
costs. For the three months ended September 30, 2008, running costs of
our River Business were
$10.2 million, as compared to $7.0 million for the same period in 2007, an
increase of $3.2 million, or 46%. This increase is mainly attributable to the
operation of a larger number of pushboats as well as the employment of a larger
number of barges than in the third quarter 2007, a larger quantity loaded,
coupled with an increase in our boat and barge costs such as crew, supplies and
repairs, also affected by the revaluation of some of the local currencies
against the U.S. Dollar when compared with the rates of exchange that prevailed
in the third quarter of 2007.
For
the nine months ended September 30, 2008, running costs of our River Business
were $27.1 million, as compared to $18.7 million for the same period in 2007, an
increase of $8.4 million, or 45%. This increase is mainly
attributable
to the operation of a bigger fleet, which now included for nine full months in
2008 the operation of the Otto
Candies convoy, as compared to less than seven months in the first nine
months of 2007, and the entry into service of 90 Mississippi barges and four
pushboats – acquired in the United States of America – between August 2007 and
June 2008, coupled with an increase in our boat and barge costs such as crew,
supplies and repairs also affected by the revaluation of some of the local
currencies against the U.S. Dollar when compared with the rates of exchange that
prevailed in the third quarter of 2007 and with an increase in the volumes
carried.
For
the three months ended September 30, 2008, running costs of our Offshore Supply Business were
$4.4 million, as compared to $3.8 million for the same period in 2007, an
increase of $0.6 million. This 16% increase is primarily attributable to a
general increase in our Brazilian PSV fleet running costs attributable to both
the appreciation of the Brazilian Real in relation to the US Dollar and
operating and crew costs increases in Brazil.
For
the nine months ended September 30, 2008, running costs of our Offshore Supply
Business were $12.8 million, as compared to $9.6 million for the same period in
2007, an increase of $3.2 million. This 33% increase is primarily attributable
to the commencement of operations of our UP Diamante in May 2007 and
an increase in our Brazilian operations expenses primarily attributable to both
the appreciation of the Brazilian Real and an operating cost increase in
Brazil.
For
the nine months ended September 30, 2008, running costs of our Ocean Business
were $26.7 million, as compared to $11.7 million for the same period in 2007, an
increase of $15.0 million, or 128%. This increase is mainly attributable to the
start of operations of our product carriers Alejandrina and Amadeo and our Capesize
vessel Princess Marisol
in March, August and November 2007, respectively, and of our product carrier
Austral in April 2008,
coupled with a general increase in running costs of our ocean vessels in
2008.
For
the three months ended September 30, 2008, running costs of our Passenger Business were $3.3
million, compared to $5.4 million for the same period in 2007, a decrease of
$2.1 million, or 39%. This decrease is mainly attributable to the sale of our
vessel, New Flamenco in
October 2007, partially offset by the higher cost of employment of certain Greek
nationals on board the Blue
Monarch.
For
the nine months ended September 30, 2008, running costs of our Passenger
Business were $7.4 million, compared to $13.6 million for the same period in
2007, a decrease of $6.2 million, or 46%. This decrease is mainly attributable
to the sale of our vessel, New
Flamenco, in October 2007, partially offset by increased running costs in
the operation of our Blue
Monarch mainly due to the higher cost of employment of certain Greek
nationals on board the Blue
Monarch.
Amortization of
dry docking and intangible assets. For the three months ended September
30, 2008, amortization of dry docking and special survey costs were $1.0 million
as compared to $1.9 million for the same period in 2007, a decrease of $0.9
million, 47%. This decrease is primarily attributable to the sales of our
Aframax product tanker vessel, Princess Marina, in September
2007, and of our passenger vessel, New Flamenco, in October
2007, and a reduced level of amortization of drydock of our Suezmax OBO vessels
and our dry barges.
For
the nine months ended September 30, 2008, amortization of dry docking and
special survey costs were $3.4 million as compared to $6.0 million for the same
period in 2007, a decrease of $2.6 million, or 43%. This decrease is primarily
attributable to the sale of our Aframax product tanker vessel, Princess Marina, in September
2007, and of our passenger vessel, New Flamenco, in October
2007, and a reduced level of amortization of drydock of our Suezmax OBO vessels
and our dry barges.
Depreciation of
vessels and equipment. Depreciation increased by $2.4 million, or 34%, to
$9.4 million for the three months ended September 30, 2008 as compared to $7.0
million for the same period in 2007. This increase is primarily attributable to
the entry into operation of our product carrier Amadeo in August 2007, and of
our Capesize vessel Princess
Marisol in November 2007, the additional depreciation associated with the
acquisitions of the Otto
Candies convoy, 90 Mississippi barges and four pushboats in the US, the
increased value of our Blue
Monarch, the depreciation associated with machinery added to our yard in
Ramallo and the additional depreciation associated with the
barge
enlargement program and the barges included in the bottom replacement program.
This increase is partially offset by the sale of our Aframax and passenger
vessel, Princess Marina
and New Flamenco, on
September and October 2007, respectively, and by the reduction in the
depreciation charge of our OBO vessels.
Depreciation
increased by $7.6 million, or 39%, to $27.0 million for the nine months ended
September 30, 2008 as compared to $11.7 million for the same period in 2007.
This increase is primarily attributable to the entry into operation of our
product carrier Amadeo
in August 2007, and of our Capesize vessel Princess Marisol in November
2007, the additional depreciation associated with the acquisitions of the Otto Candies convoy and 90
Mississippi barges and four pushboats in the US, the delivery by the yard and
entry into operation of the UP
Diamante in May 2007, the increased value of our Miranda I (which was
converted to double hull during the second quarter of 2007) and of our Blue Monarch, the
depreciation associated with machinery added to our yard in Ramallo and the
additional depreciation associated with the barge enlargement program and the
barges included in the bottom replacement program. This increase is partially
offset by the sale of our Aframax and passenger vessels, Princess Marina and New Flamenco, on September
and October 2007, respectively, and by the reduction in the depreciation charge
of our Suezmax OBO vessels.
Administrative
and commercial expenses. Administrative and commercial expenses were $6.4
million for the three months ended September 30, 2008 as compared to $4.6
million for the same period in 2007, an increase of $1.8 million, or 40%. This
increase of $1.8 million is mainly attributable to an increase in salaries and
related charges.
Administrative
and commercial expenses were $17.7 million for the nine months ended September
30, 2008 as compared to $14.4 million for the same period in 2007. This increase
of $3.3 million, or 23%, is mainly attributable to an increase in salaries and
related charges.
Other operating
income. For the three months ended September 30, 2008, other operating
income was $1.3 million as compared to $0.5 million for the same period in 2007,
an increase of $0.8 million, or 160%. This increase is primarily attributable to
the insurance proceeds received in connection with damage suffered by a heavy
fuel engine upon its arrival in Argentina.
For
the nine months ended September 30, 2008, other operating income was $3.8
million as compared to $0.6 million for the same period in 2007, an increase of
$3.2 million, or 533%. This increase is primarily attributable to income related
to the delay and loss of hire insurances of our UP Esmeralda, UP Topazio and Alejandrina during the first
half of 2008 and to the insurance proceeds received in connection with damage
suffered by a heavy fuel engine upon its arrival in Argentina.
Operating
profit. Operating profit for the three months ended September 30, 2008
was $20.7 million, as compared to $13.8 million for the same period in 2007, an
increase of $6.9 million, or 50%. This increase is mainly attributable to an
improved performance of our Ocean and Offshore Supply Businesses (an $11.0 and
$0.5 million increases respectively), partially offset by lower operating
profits in the River and Passenger Businesses (decreases of $0.5 and $4.0
million respectively from the three months ended September 30,
2007).
Operating
profit for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 was $58.3 million, as
compared to $32.3 million for the same period in 2007, an increase of $26.0
million, or 81%. This increase is mainly attributable to an improved performance
of our Ocean Business (a $36.9 million increase), partially offset by lower
results in the River, Offshore Supply and Passenger Businesses (decreases of
$4.1, $0.7 and $6.1 million respectively from first nine months in
2007).
Financial
expense. For the three months ended September 30, 2008, financial expense
was $8.2 million as compared to $5.0 million for the same period in 2007, an
increase of $3.2 million, or 64%. The increase is mainly attributable to an
increase in our total financial debt in comparison to the third quarter of
2007.
For
the nine months ended September 30, 2008, financial expense was $19.0 million as
compared to $14.6 million for the same period in 2007, an increase of $4.4
million, or 30%. This increase is primarily attributable to an increase in our
total financial debt in comparison to the first nine months of
2007.
Net income (loss)
on FFAs. For the three months ended September 30, 2008, net income on
FFAs was nil as compared to a loss of $13.2 million in the same period of 2007.
The $13.2 million loss for the three months ended September 30, 2007 was
attributable primarily to the mark-to-market at that date of the FFA positions
we had then outstanding that corresponded mainly to FFA positions until March
31, 2008 and to the settlements of FFA positions corresponding to the third
quarter of 2007, which did not qualify as a cash flow hedge for accounting
purposes.
The
net income on FFAs increased to a net gain of $5.9 million for the nine months
ended September 30, 2008 as compared to a loss of $16.2 million in the same
period of 2007, an increase of $22.1 million. The $16.2 million loss for the
nine months ended September 30, 2007 was primarily attributable to the
settlements of the FFA positions for the third quarter of 2007 and to the non
cash mark-to-market on September 30, 2007 of the FFA positions we had then
outstanding covering mainly the positions until March 31, 2008, neither of which
qualified as a cash flow hedge for accounting purposes. At the settlement dates
of these positions the mark to market liability was lower than that accounted
for at December 31, 2007 thus causing a net non-cash gain of $6.3 million in the
first quarter of 2008.
Minority
Interest. Minority Interest for the three months ended September 30, 2008
was $0.4 million, as compared to $0.2 million for the same period in 2007, an
increase of $0.2 million, or 100% mainly attributable to higher results of our
subsidiary in the Offshore Supply Business.
Minority
Interest for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 was $0.9 million, as
compared to $0.5 million for the same period in 2007, an increase of $0.4
million, or 80% mainly attributable to higher results of our subsidiary in the
Offshore Supply Business.
Income
tax. For the three months ended September 30, 2008 we had an income tax
positive impact of $3.1 million, compared with a charge of $1.2 million for the
same period in 2007. The $3.1 million gain in 2008 results mainly from a $5.1
million decrease in the deferred income tax charge from unrealized foreign
currency exchange gains on US Dollar-denominated debt of our Brazilian
subsidiary in our Offshore Supply Business, partially offset by taxes in our
River and Ocean Business
segments. .
The
charge for nine months ended September 30, 2008 was $0.3 million, compared with
$5.0 million for the same period in 2007. The lower charge in 2008 compared with
2007 principally reflects the decrease in the deferred income tax charge from
unrealized foreign currency exchange gains on US Dollar-denominated debt of our
Brazilian subsidiary in our Offshore Supply Business of $5.1 million for the
first nine months of 2008, partially offset by taxes in our River and Ocean
Business segments.
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
We
are a holding company and operate in a capital-intensive industry requiring
substantial ongoing investments in revenue-producing assets. Our subsidiaries
have historically funded their vessel acquisitions through a combination of bank
indebtedness, shareholder loans, cash flow from operations and equity
contributions.
The
ability of our subsidiaries to make distributions to us may be limited by, among
other things, restrictions under our credit facilities and applicable laws of
the jurisdictions of their incorporation or organization.
As
of September 30, 2008, we had aggregate indebtedness of $395.9 million,
consisting of $180.0 million aggregate principal amount of our First Preferred
Ship Mortgage Notes due 2014, or the Notes, consolidated indebtedness of our
subsidiary UP Offshore (Bahamas) Limited of $86.9 million under three senior
loan facilities with DVB, indebtedness of our subsidiary Ingatestone Holdings
Inc. of $6.9 million under a senior loan facility with DVB / Natixis,
indebtedness of our subsidiary Stanyan Shipping Inc. of $12.3 million under a
senior loan facility with Natixis, indebtedness of our subsidiary Hallandale
Commercial Corp. of $17.9 million under a senior loan facility with Nordea Bank,
indebtedness of our subsidiary Lowrie Shipping LLC of $21.9 million under a
senior loan facility with Banco BICE, indebtedness of the Company of $10.0
million under a revolving credit line with Banco BICE, indebtedness of our
subsidiaries UABL Barges (Panama) Inc., Marine Financial Investment Corp.,
Eastham Barges Inc. and UABL Paraguay S.A. of $60.0 million in the aggregate
under two senior loan facilities with International Finance Corporation, and
total accrued interest of $6.4 million.
At
September 30, 2008, we had cash and cash equivalents on hand of $106.7 million.
In addition, we had $4.9 million in current and non current restricted
cash.
Operating
Activities
In
the nine months ended September 30, 2008, we generated $40.3 million in cash
flow from operations compared to $42.7 million in the same period of 2007. Cash
flow from operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 includes
($12.6) million in net cash settlements on FFAs, which correspond to (i) the
replacement of certain
cleared
FFAs with OTC FFAs and which would have been spread evenly between the third and
fourth quarters of 2008 had the replacement not taken place, and to (ii) the
remaining cash settlements of the cleared and OTC FFAs which occurred during the
period. We had a net income of $44.1 million for the first nine months ended
September 30, 2008, as compared to a net loss of ($1.8) million in the same
period of 2007, an increase of $45.9 million. Included in the result for the
first nine months ended September 30, 2008 are $5.9 million in non-cash gains
due to the mark-to-market under our FFAs in the first quarter of 2008 and a
non-cash gain of $1.6 million due to the net effect during the period of the
provision for a deferred income tax charge from unrealized foreign currency
exchange rate gains on U.S. Dollar-denominated debt of our Brazilian subsidiary
in the Offshore Supply Business.
Net
cash provided by operating activities consists of our net income increased by
non-cash expenses, such as depreciation and amortization of deferred charges,
and adjusted by changes in working capital and expenditures for dry
docking.
Investing
Activities
During
the nine months ended September 30, 2008, we disbursed $16.0 million to enlarge
and refurbish barges and pushboats, $9.7 million in new engines and the
construction / modification of the pushboat that will receive them, $29.4
million as part of the purchase of 45 Mississippi barges and three pushboats,
$12.2 million related to the civil engineering and machinery of our new barge
building yard in our River Business; and $24.0 million to fund the advance on
the two PSVs that are being constructed in China, the installments on the PSVs
being built in India and the UP Rubi, under construction
in Brazil, in our Offshore Supply Business.
Financing
Activities
Net
cash provided by financing activities was $55.7 million during the nine months
ended September 30, 2008, compared to net cash provided by financing activities
of $142.4 million during the same period of 2007. The decrease in cash provided
by financing activities is mainly attributable to the $6.5 million used in
repurchasing shares as compared to none in the same period of 2007, $13.0
million used in principal repayments as compared to $5.1 million in the same
period of 2007, and $91.1 million less of net proceeds from offering of common
shares (no new public offerings in the nine months ended September 30, 2008),
partially offset by $25.3 million less in early repayments of financial debt in
the nine months ended September 30, 2008 and $9.7 million more of proceeds from
long-term financial debt.
Future
Capital Requirements
Our
near-term cash requirements are related primarily to funding operations and the
scheduled installments of our new vessels under construction, setting up our new
yard for building barges in Argentina, potentially acquiring second-hand
vessels, covering margin calls and settlements under our outstanding cleared
FFAs, increasing the size of some of our barges, purchasing new engines for our
line pushboats and drydocking as well as passing special surveys on our Ocean
vessels. We cannot assure that our actual cash requirements will not be greater
than we currently expect. If we cannot generate sufficient cash flow from
operations, we may obtain additional funding through capital market
transactions, bank debt and/or other financial instruments, although it is
possible some or all of these sources will not be available to us.
Supplemental
Information
The
following table reconciles our EBITDA to our net income (loss):
$(000) |
|
Nine
Months Ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
Income (loss)
|
|
|
$ |
44,118 |
|
|
$ |
(1,830 |
) |
Plus
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial
expense
|
|
|
|
19,027 |
|
|
|
14,639 |
|
Income
taxes
|
|
|
|
296 |
|
|
|
5,032 |
|
Depreciation
and amortization
|
|
|
|
30,383 |
|
|
|
25,430 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDA
(1)
|
|
|
$ |
93,824 |
|
|
$ |
43,271 |
|
The
following tables reconcile our EBITDA to our segment operating profit (loss) for
the nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, on a consolidated and a per
segment basis:
$(000) |
|
Nine
Months Ended September 30, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
River
|
|
|
Offshore
Supply
|
|
|
Ocean
|
|
|
Passenger
|
|
|
TOTAL
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment
operating profit (loss)
|
|
|
$ |
5,073 |
|
|
$ |
12,401 |
|
|
$ |
48,007 |
|
|
$ |
(7,205 |
) |
|
$ |
58,276 |
|
Depreciation
and amortization
|
|
|
|
9,544 |
|
|
|
3,628 |
|
|
|
14,584 |
|
|
|
2,627 |
|
|
|
30,383 |
|
Investment
in affiliates / Minority interest
|
|
|
|
(118 |
) |
|
|
(864 |
) |
|
|
(131 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(1,113 |
) |
Other,
net(2)
|
|
|
|
(451 |
) |
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(419 |
) |
Net
income on FFAs
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
5,862 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
5,862 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment
EBITDA
|
|
|
$ |
14,048 |
|
|
$ |
15,191 |
|
|
$ |
68,328 |
|
|
$ |
(4,578 |
) |
|
$ |
92,989 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Items
not included in segment EBITDA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial
income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
835 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated
EBITDA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
93,824 |
|
$(000) |
|
Nine
Months Ended September 30, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
River
|
|
|
Offshore
Supply
|
|
|
Ocean
|
|
|
Passenger
|
|
|
TOTAL
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment
operating profit (loss)
|
|
|
$ |
9,262 |
|
|
$ |
13,076 |
|
|
$ |
11,040 |
|
|
$ |
(1,149 |
) |
|
$ |
32,229 |
|
Depreciation
and amortization
|
|
|
|
7,134 |
|
|
|
3,175 |
|
|
|
10,968 |
|
|
|
4,153 |
|
|
|
25,430 |
|
Investment
in affiliates / Minority interest
|
|
|
|
(72 |
) |
|
|
(520 |
) |
|
|
543 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(49 |
) |
Other,
net(2)
|
|
|
|
(415 |
) |
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
(28 |
) |
|
|
(400 |
) |
Net
loss on FFAs
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(16,235 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(16,235 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment
EBITDA
|
|
|
$ |
15,909 |
|
|
$ |
15,748 |
|
|
$ |
6,342 |
|
|
$ |
2,976 |
|
|
$ |
40,975 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Items
not included in segment EBITDA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial
income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,296 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated
EBITDA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
43,271 |
|
(1)
EBITDA consists of net income (loss) prior to deductions for interest expense
and other financial gains and losses, income taxes, depreciation and
amortization of dry dock expense and financial gain (loss) on extinguishment of
debt. We believe that EBITDA is intended to exclude all items that affect
results relating to financing activities. The gains and losses associated with
extinguishment of debt are a direct financing item that affects our results, and
therefore should not be included in EBITDA. We do not intend for EBITDA to
represent cash flows from operations, as defined by GAAP (on the date of
calculation), and should not be considered as an alternative to net income
(loss) as an indicator of our operating performance or to cash flows from
operations as a measure of liquidity. This definition of EBITDA may not be
comparable to similarly titled measures disclosed by other companies. We have
provided EBITDA in this filing because we believe it provides useful information
to investors to measure our performance and evaluate our ability to incur and
service indebtedness.
(2)
Individually not significant.
ULTRAPETROL
(BAHAMAS) LIMITED AND SUBSIDIARIES
Condensed
Consolidated Financial Statements at September 30, 2008
ULTRAPETROL
(BAHAMAS) LIMITED AND SUBSIDIARIES
TABLE
OF CONTENTS TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
CONTENTS
|
|
PAGE
|
|
|
|
ŸFinancial
statements
|
|
|
|
|
|
–Condensed
consolidated balance sheets at September 30, 2008 (unaudited) and December
31, 2007
|
|
-
F-1 -
|
|
|
|
–Condensed
consolidated statements of operations for the nine-month periods ended
September 30, 2008 and 2007 (unaudited)
|
|
-
F-2 -
|
|
|
|
–Condensed
consolidated statements of changes in shareholders’ equity for the
nine-month periods ended September 30, 2008 and 2007
(unaudited)
|
|
-
F-3 -
|
|
|
|
–Condensed
consolidated statements of cash flows for the nine-month periods ended
September 30, 2008 and 2007 (unaudited)
|
|
-
F-4 -
|
|
|
|
–Notes
to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements
|
|
-
F-5 -
|
|
|
|
ULTRAPETROL
(BAHAMAS) LIMITED AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Stated
in thousands of U.S. dollars, except par value and share amounts)
|
|
At
September 30, 2008 (unaudited)
|
|
|
At
December 31, 2007
|
|
ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CURRENT
ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
|
$ |
106,721 |
|
|
$ |
64,262 |
|
Restricted
cash
|
|
|
2,075 |
|
|
|
- |
|
Accounts
receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $288 and
$248
in 2008 and 2007, respectively
|
|
|
31,529 |
|
|
|
15,680 |
|
Receivables
from related parties
|
|
|
2,917 |
|
|
|
2,804 |
|
Operating
supplies
|
|
|
6,530 |
|
|
|
4,961 |
|
Prepaid
expenses
|
|
|
7,694 |
|
|
|
3,198 |
|
Other
receivables
|
|
|
59,413 |
|
|
|
14,336 |
|
Total
current assets
|
|
|
216,879 |
|
|
|
105,241 |
|
NONCURRENT
ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
receivables
|
|
|
36,563 |
|
|
|
7,793 |
|
Receivables
from related parties
|
|
|
2,280 |
|
|
|
2,280 |
|
Restricted
cash
|
|
|
2,846 |
|
|
|
20,168 |
|
Vessels
and equipment, net
|
|
|
532,908 |
|
|
|
462,292 |
|
Dry
dock
|
|
|
4,032 |
|
|
|
4,428 |
|
Investment
in affiliates
|
|
|
2,007 |
|
|
|
2,257 |
|
Intangible
assets
|
|
|
2,372 |
|
|
|
2,961 |
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
5,015 |
|
|
|
5,015 |
|
Other
assets
|
|
|
7,599 |
|
|
|
6,877 |
|
Deferred
income tax assets
|
|
|
2,693 |
|
|
|
2,848 |
|
Total
noncurrent assets
|
|
|
598,315 |
|
|
|
516,919 |
|
Total
assets
|
|
$ |
815,194 |
|
|
$ |
622,160 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES,
MINORITY INTEREST AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CURRENT
LIABILITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts
payable
|
|
$ |
19,079 |
|
|
$ |
16,813 |
|
Payable
to related parties
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
718 |
|
Accrued
interest
|
|
|
6,400 |
|
|
|
2,579 |
|
Current
portion of long-term financial debt
|
|
|
29,358 |
|
|
|
17,795 |
|
Other
payables
|
|
|
2,562 |
|
|
|
2,568 |
|
Total
current liabilities
|
|
|
57,418 |
|
|
|
40,473 |
|
NONCURRENT
LIABILITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term
financial debt
|
|
|
366,521 |
|
|
|
314,140 |
|
Deferred
income tax liability
|
|
|
9,570 |
|
|
|
10,663 |
|
Total
noncurrent liabilities
|
|
|
376,091 |
|
|
|
324,803 |
|
Total
liabilities
|
|
|
433,509 |
|
|
|
365,276 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MINORITY
INTEREST
|
|
|
4,605 |
|
|
|
3,742 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SHAREHOLDERS’
EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common
stock, $.01 par value: 100,000,000 authorized shares;
32,771,859 and 33,443,030 shares issued and outstanding in 2008 and
2007
|
|
|
327 |
|
|
|
334 |
|
Additional
paid-in capital
|
|
|
267,981 |
|
|
|
266,647 |
|
Treasury
stock 671,171 shares
|
|
|
(6,459 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
Accumulated
earnings
|
|
|
53,790 |
|
|
|
9,672 |
|
Accumulated
other comprehensive income (loss)
|
|
|
61,441 |
|
|
|
(23,511 |
) |
Total
shareholders’ equity
|
|
|
377,080 |
|
|
|
253,142 |
|
Total
liabilities, minority interest and shareholders’ equity
|
|
$ |
815,194 |
|
|
$ |
622,160 |
|
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of
these
unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements
ULTRAPETROL
(BAHAMAS) LIMITED AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (UNAUDITED)
(Stated
in thousands of U.S. dollars, except share and per share data)
|
|
For
the nine-month periods ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
REVENUES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
from third parties
|
|
$ |
241,683 |
|
|
$ |
160,990 |
|
Revenues
from related parties
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
2,952 |
|
Total
revenues
|
|
|
241,683 |
|
|
|
163,942 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OPERATING
EXPENSES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Voyage
expenses
|
|
|
(65,090 |
) |
|
|
(38,857 |
) |
Running
costs
|
|
|
(74,015 |
) |
|
|
(53,579 |
) |
Amortization
of dry docking
|
|
|
(2,813 |
) |
|
|
(5,450 |
) |
Depreciation
of vessels and equipment
|
|
|
(26,981 |
) |
|
|
(19,391 |
) |
Amortization
of intangible assets
|
|
|
(589 |
) |
|
|
(589 |
) |
Administrative
and commercial expenses
|
|
|
(17,684 |
) |
|
|
(14,425 |
) |
Other
operating income
|
|
|
3,765 |
|
|
|
578 |
|
|
|
|
(183,407 |
) |
|
|
(131,713 |
) |
Operating
profit
|
|
|
58,276 |
|
|
|
32,229 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OTHER
INCOME (EXPENSES)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial
expense
|
|
|
(19,027 |
) |
|
|
(14,639 |
) |
Financial
income
|
|
|
835 |
|
|
|
2,296 |
|
Net
income (loss) on FFAs
|
|
|
5,862 |
|
|
|
(16,235 |
) |
Investment
in affiliates
|
|
|
(250 |
) |
|
|
454 |
|
Other,
net
|
|
|
(419 |
) |
|
|
(400 |
) |
Total
other expenses
|
|
|
(12,999 |
) |
|
|
(28,524 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income
before income taxes and minority interest
|
|
|
45,277 |
|
|
|
3,705 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income
taxes
|
|
|
(296 |
) |
|
|
(5,032 |
) |
Minority
interest
|
|
|
(863 |
) |
|
|
(503 |
) |
Net
income (loss)
|
|
$ |
44,118 |
|
|
$ |
(1,830 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
net income (loss) per share
|
|
$ |
1.35 |
|
|
$ |
(0.06 |
) |
Diluted
net income (loss) per share
|
|
$ |
1.34 |
|
|
$ |
(0.06 |
) |
Basic
weighted average number of shares
|
|
|
32,749,884 |
|
|
|
31,061,380 |
|
Diluted
weighted average number of shares
|
|
|
32,897,548 |
|
|
|
31,061,380 |
|
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of
these
unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements
ULTRAPETROL
(BAHAMAS) LIMITED AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
(UNAUDITED)
(Stated
in thousands of U.S. dollars, except share data)
Balance
|
|
Shares
amount
|
|
|
Common
stock
|
|
|
Additional
paid-in
capital
|
|
|
Treasury
stock
|
|
|
Accumulated
earnings
|
|
|
Accumulated
other comprehensive income (loss)
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December
31, 2006
|
|
|
28,346,952 |
|
|
$ |
283 |
|
|
$ |
173,826 |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
5,231 |
|
|
$ |
89 |
|
|
$ |
179,429 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance
of common stock
|
|
|
5,096,078 |
|
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
96,774 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
96,825 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Underwriting
fees and issuance expenses
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(5,731 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(5,731 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation
related to option and restricted stock granted
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
1,374 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
1,374 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive
income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
–Net
loss
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(1,830 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(1,830 |
) |
–Effect
of derivative financial
instruments
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(19,086 |
) |
|
|
(19,086 |
) |
Total
comprehensive loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(20,916 |
) |
September
30, 2007
|
|
|
33,443,030 |
|
|
$ |
334 |
|
|
$ |
266,243 |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
3,401 |
|
|
$ |
(18,997 |
) |
|
$ |
250,981 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December
31, 2007
|
|
|
33,443,030 |
|
|
$ |
334 |
|
|
$ |
266,647 |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
9,672 |
|
|
$ |
(23,511 |
) |
|
$ |
253,142 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation
related to options and
restricted stock granted
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
1,334 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
1,334 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repurchase
of common shares
|
|
|
(671,171 |
) |
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(6,459 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(6,466 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive
income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
–Net
income
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
44,118 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
44,118 |
|
–Effect
of derivative financial
instruments
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
84,952 |
|
|
|
84,952 |
|
Total
comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
129,070 |
|
September
30, 2008
|
|
|
32,771,859 |
|
|
$ |
327 |
|
|
$ |
267,981 |
|
|
$ |
(6,459 |
) |
|
$ |
53,790 |
|
|
$ |
61,441 |
|
|
|
377,080 |
|
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of
these
unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements
ULTRAPETROL
(BAHAMAS) LIMITED AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (UNAUDITED)
(Stated
in thousands of U.S. dollars)
|
|
For
the nine-month periods ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
CASH
FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
income (loss)
|
|
$ |
44,118 |
|
|
$ |
(1,830 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustments
to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by operating
activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation
of vessels and equipment
|
|
|
26,981 |
|
|
|
19,391 |
|
Amortization
of dry docking
|
|
|
2,813 |
|
|
|
5,450 |
|
Expenditure
for dry docking
|
|
|
(2,417 |
) |
|
|
(4,740 |
) |
Net
(income) loss on FFAs
|
|
|
(5,862 |
) |
|
|
16,235 |
|
Cash
settlements on FFAs, net
|
|
|
(12,562 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
Amortization
of intangible assets
|
|
|
589 |
|
|
|
589 |
|
Share-based
compensation
|
|
|
1,334 |
|
|
|
1,374 |
|
Note
issuance expenses amortization
|
|
|
1,100 |
|
|
|
750 |
|
Minority
interest in equity of subsidiaries
|
|
|
863 |
|
|
|
503 |
|
Net
loss (gain) from investment in affiliates
|
|
|
250 |
|
|
|
(454 |
) |
Allowance
for doubtful accounts
|
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
142 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes
in assets and liabilities net of effects from purchase of Otto Candies in
2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Decrease
(increase) in assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted
cash
|
|
|
(1,085 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
Accounts
receivable
|
|
|
(15,889 |
) |
|
|
1,219 |
|
Receivable
from related parties
|
|
|
(113 |
) |
|
|
(457 |
) |
Operating
supplies
|
|
|
(1,569 |
) |
|
|
(95 |
) |
Prepaid
expenses
|
|
|
(4,496 |
) |
|
|
(2,438 |
) |
Other
receivables
|
|
|
(409 |
) |
|
|
(1,293 |
) |
Other
|
|
|
2,391 |
|
|
|
466 |
|
Increase
(decrease) in liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts
payable
|
|
|
2,266 |
|
|
|
2,144 |
|
Payable
to related parties
|
|
|
(699 |
) |
|
|
(420 |
) |
Other
|
|
|
2,613 |
|
|
|
6,136 |
|
Net
cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
40,257 |
|
|
|
42,672 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH
FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase
of vessels and equipment ($21,712 and $16,277 in 2008 and
2007 for vessels in
construction)
|
|
|
(99,899 |
) |
|
|
(89,879 |
) |
Purchase
of Otto Candies, net of cash acquired
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(13,772 |
) |
Net
decrease (increase) in funding cash collateral of FFAs
|
|
|
51,851 |
|
|
|
(41,992 |
) |
Cash
settlements of FFAs
|
|
|
(5,408 |
) |
|
|
(935 |
) |
Net
cash (used in) investing activities
|
|
|
(53,456 |
) |
|
|
(146,578 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH
FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Scheduled
repayments of long-term financial debt
|
|
|
(12,954 |
) |
|
|
(5,104 |
) |
Early
repayments of long-term financial debt
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(25,300 |
) |
Proceeds
from long-term financial debt
|
|
|
91,900 |
|
|
|
82,244 |
|
Net
decrease in short-term financial debt
|
|
|
(15,000 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
Proceeds
from common shares public offering, net of issuance costs
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
91,094 |
|
Funds
used in repurchase common shares
|
|
|
(6,466 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
Other,
net
|
|
|
(1,822 |
) |
|
|
(532 |
) |
Net
cash provided by financing activities
|
|
|
55,658 |
|
|
|
142,402 |
|
Net
increase in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
42,459 |
|
|
|
38,496 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
and cash equivalents at the beginning of year
|
|
$ |
64,262 |
|
|
$ |
20,648 |
|
Cash
and cash equivalents at the end of period
|
|
$ |
106,721 |
|
|
$ |
59,144 |
|
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of
these
unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements
ULTRAPETROL
(BAHAMAS) LIMITED AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES
TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Stated in
thousands of U.S. dollars, except per share data and otherwise
indicated)
(Information
pertaining to the nine-month periods ended September 30, 2008 and 2007 is
unaudited)
1.
|
NATURE
OF OPERATIONS AND CORPORATE
ORGANIZATION
|
Nature
of operations
Ultrapetrol
(Bahamas) Limited (“Ultrapetrol Bahamas”, “Ultrapetrol”, “the Company”, “us” or
“we”) is a company organized and registered as a Bahamas Corporation since
December 1997.
We are
a shipping transportation company serving the marine transportation needs of our
clients in the markets on which we focus. We serve the shipping
markets for grain, forest products, minerals, crude oil, petroleum, and refined
petroleum products, as well as the offshore oil platform supply market, and the
leisure passenger cruise market through our operations in the following four
segments of the marine transportation industry. In our River Business we are an
owner and operator of river barges and pushboats in the Hidrovia region of South
America, a region of navigable waters on the Parana, Paraguay and Uruguay Rivers
and part of the River Plate, which flow through Brazil, Bolivia, Uruguay,
Paraguay and Argentina. In our Offshore Supply Business we own and operate
vessels that provide logistical and transportation services for offshore
petroleum exploration and production companies, in the North Sea and the coastal
waters of Brazil. In our Ocean Business, we are an owner and operator of
oceangoing vessels that transport petroleum products and dry cargo. In our
Passenger Business, we are an owner of a cruise vessel that transport passengers
primarily cruising the Aegean Sea.
2.
|
SIGNIFICANT
ACCOUNTING POLICIES
|
|
a)
|
Basis
of presentation and principles of
consolidation
|
The
unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in
accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America (“US GAAP”) for interim financial information. The
consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2007, has been derived from the
audited financial statement at that date. The unaudited condensed
consolidated financial statements do not include all of the information and
footnotes required by US GAAP for complete financial statements. All
adjustments which, in the opinion of the management of the Company, are
considered necessary for a fair presentation of the results of operations for
the periods shown are of a normal, recurring nature and have been reflected in
the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements. The
results of operations for the periods presented are not necessarily indicative
of the results expected for the full fiscal year or for any future
period.
The
unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of
the Company and its subsidiaries, both majority and wholly
owned. Significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been
eliminated in this consolidation. Investments in 50% or less owned affiliates,
in which the Company exercises significant influence, are accounted for by the
equity method.
ULTRAPETROL
(BAHAMAS) LIMITED AND SUBSIDIARIES
In
accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 128, Earnings
per share (“SFAS 128”) basic net income per share is computed by dividing the
net income by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during
the relevant periods net of shares held in treasury. Diluted net
income per share reflects the potential dilution that could occur if securities
or other contracts to issue common shares result in the issuance of such shares.
In determining dilutive shares for this purpose the Company assumes, through the
application of the treasury stock method, all restricted stock grants have
vested, all common shares have been issued pursuant to the exercise of all
outstanding stock options and all common shares have been issued pursuant to the
issuance of all outstanding warrants.
Antidilutive
instruments are excluded from net income per share calculations in all periods
for which they are antidilutive.
The
following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted net income
(loss) per share:
|
|
For
the nine-month periods
ended
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
income (loss)
|
|
$ |
44,118 |
|
|
$ |
(1,830 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
weighted average number of shares
|
|
|
32,749,884 |
|
|
|
31,061,380 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect
on dilutive shares:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options
and restricted stock
|
|
|
84,876 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Warrants
issued
|
|
|
62,788 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
Diluted
weighted average number of shares
|
|
|
32,897,548 |
|
|
|
31,061,380 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
net income (loss) per share
|
|
$ |
1.35 |
|
|
$ |
(0.06 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
net income gain (loss) per share
|
|
$ |
1.34 |
|
|
$ |
(0.06 |
) |
|
c)
|
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
|
Statement
of Financial Accounting Standards No. 130 Reporting Comprehensive Income (“SFAS
130”), establishes standard for reporting comprehensive income (loss), which is
defined as the change in equity arising from non-owner
sources. Comprehensive income (loss) is reflected in the consolidated
statement of shareholders’ equity.
The
components of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) in the unaudited
condensed consolidated balance sheets were as follows:
|
|
At
September
30,
2008
|
|
|
At
December
31,
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized
gain (losses) on forward freight agreements (FFAs)
|
|
|
61,265 |
|
|
|
(23,800 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized
gain on EURO hedge
|
|
|
176 |
|
|
|
182 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized
gain on forward fuel purchases
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
107 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized
gain (losses) on derivative financial instruments
|
|
|
61,441 |
|
|
|
(23,511 |
) |
ULTRAPETROL
(BAHAMAS) LIMITED AND SUBSIDIARIES
The
components of the change in the accumulated unrealized income (losses) on
derivative financial instruments were as follows:
|
|
For
the nine-months period
ended
September 30,
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Reclassification
adjustments for amounts included in net income (loss):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
--
Revenues
|
|
|
25,343 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
-- Voyage
expenses
|
|
|
(379 |
) |
|
|
98 |
|
|
--
Depreciation of vessels and equipment
|
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change
in unrealized impact on:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
--
FFAs
|
|
|
59,722 |
|
|
|
(19,178 |
) |
|
--
Forward fuel purchases
|
|
|
272 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
84,952 |
|
|
|
(19,086 |
) |
|
d)
|
Fair
value measurements
|
On
September 16, 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards N° 157, Fair Value Measurements
(“SFAS 157”). SFAS 157 provides a single definition of fair value, together with
a framework for measuring it, and requires additional disclosure about the use
of fair value to measure assets and liabilities. The Company adopted
SFAS 157 effective January 1, 2008, with no material impact on the Company’s
consolidated financial position or its results of operations.
The
fair value of an asset or liability, as defined by SFAS 157, is the price that
would be received to sell an asset or transfer a liability (an exit price) in
the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an
orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement
date. SFAS 157 establishes a fair value hierarchy which requires an
entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of
unobservable inputs when measuring fair value and defines three levels of inputs
that may be used to measure fair value. Level 1 inputs are quoted
prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. Level 2
inputs are observable inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that
are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly,
including quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets,
quoted prices in markets that are not active, inputs other than quoted prices
that are observable for the asset or liability, or inputs derived from
observable market data. Level 3 inputs are unobservable inputs that
are supported by little or no market activity and are significant to the fair
value of the assets or liabilities.
The
Company’s assets and liabilities as of September 30, 2008 that are measured at
fair value on a recurring basis are summarized below:
|
|
Level
2
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forward
freight agreements
|
|
|
73,379 |
|
|
e)
|
Change
in accounting estimate
|
Considering
the years of service, the condition and performance of its three Suezmax
Oil/Bulk/Ore (OBO) vessels, effective October 1, 2007 management’ reviewed and
extended their estimated useful lives from 24 to 27 years. The impact of this
change in estimate on the nine-month period ended September 30, 2008 increased
net income, basic net income per share and diluted net income per share in the
amount of $2,070, $0.06 and $0.06 per share, respectively.
ULTRAPETROL
(BAHAMAS) LIMITED AND SUBSIDIARIES
|
f)
|
Newly
issued accounting standards
|
In
March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161, “Disclosures about Derivative
Instruments and Hedging Activities, an amendment of SFAS No. 133” (“SFAS
161”). SFAS 161 requires qualitative disclosures about an entity’s
objectives and strategies for using derivatives and quantitative disclosures
about how derivative instruments and related hedged items affect an entity’s
financial position, financial performance and cash flows. SFAS 161 is
effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years,
beginning after November 15, 2008, with early application
allowed. SFAS 161 allows but does not require, comparative
disclosures for earlier periods at initial adoption.
In May
2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 162, The Hierarchy of Generally Accepted
Accounting Principles. SFAS No. 162 identifies the sources of
accounting principles and the framework for selecting the principles to be used
in the preparation of financial statements that are presented in conformity with
generally accepted accounting principles in the United States. SFAS
No. 162 will be effective 60 days following the SEC’s approval of the Public
Company Accounting Oversight Board amendments to AU Section 411, The Meaning of
Present Fairly in Conformity with Generally Accepted Accounting
Principles. The Company does not expect the adoption of SFAS No. 162
will result in a change in current practice and as such will have no impact on
its consolidated financial position or its results of operations.
3.
|
VESSELS
AND EQUIPMENT, NET
|
The
capitalized cost of the vessels and equipment, and the related accumulated
depreciation at September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007 were as
follows:
|
|
At
September 30,
2008
|
|
|
At
December 31,
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ocean-going
vessels
|
|
$ |
236,217 |
|
|
$ |
228,090 |
|
River
barges and pushboats
|
|
|
229,035 |
|
|
|
172,041 |
|
PSVs
|
|
|
113,891 |
|
|
|
113,862 |
|
Construction
of PSVs in progress
|
|
|
22,847 |
|
|
|
19,609 |
|
Advance
for PSVs construction
|
|
|
39,938 |
|
|
|
18,226 |
|
Passenger
vessels
|
|
|
15,650 |
|
|
|
14,344 |
|
Furniture
and equipment
|
|
|
7,010 |
|
|
|
6,784 |
|
Building,
land and operating base
|
|
|
11,868 |
|
|
|
11,327 |
|
Yard
construction in progress
|
|
|
18,025 |
|
|
|
5,770 |
|
Advances
to vendors
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
6,941 |
|
Total
original book value
|
|
|
694,481 |
|
|
|
596,994 |
|
Accumulated
depreciation
|
|
|
(161,573 |
) |
|
|
(134,702 |
) |
Net
book value
|
|
$ |
532,908 |
|
|
$ |
462,292 |
|
As of
September 30, 2008, the net book value of the assets pledged as a guarantee of
our long term financial debt described in note 4 was $354,000.
ULTRAPETROL
(BAHAMAS) LIMITED AND SUBSIDIARIES
On
September 26, 2007 and February 5 and 21, 2008, we entered into purchase
agreements to acquire 30 Mississippi barges and a 7,200 HP push-boat, the M/V
Harry Waddington, for an aggregate consideration of $8,094.
The
Company has also incurred $5,530 in additional direct costs relating to this
acquisition and on April 1, 2008 these equipments were positioned in the
Hidrovia Region.
On
March 27 and 28, 2008, we entered into purchase agreements to acquire 27
Mississippi barges and two push boats, (M/V Joey C and M/V Bob Blocker) for an
aggregate consideration of $10,415.
The
Company has also incurred $6,163 in additional direct costs relating to this
acquisition.
The 27
Mississippi barges and two push boats were positioned in the Hidrovia Region in
May 2008.
|
-
|
Offshore Supply
Business
|
On
December 21, 2007, UP Offshore (Bahamas) Ltd. signed two contracts with a
shipyard in China to construct two PSVs, with deliveries in 2009 and 2010. The
price for each new PSV to be constructed in China is $26,400, to be paid in five
installments of 20% of the contract price each, prior to delivery. As of
September 30, 2008, UP Offshore (Bahamas) Ltd. had paid the first installment of
$10,520, which is recorded under Advance for PSVs construction.
On
February 21 and June 13, 2007, UP Offshore (Bahamas) Ltd. signed shipbuilding
contracts with a shipyard in India for construction of four PSVs with a combined
cost of $88,052, with delivery in June and October 2009 and March and July 2010.
The purchase price will be paid in five installments of 20% of the purchase
price each, prior to delivery.
As of
September 30, 2008, UP Offshore (Bahamas) Ltd. had paid installments of its PSVs
under construction in India totalling $26,415, which is recorded under Advance
for PSVs construction account.
As of
September 30, 2008, the Company had remaining commitments of $107,678 on
non-cancelable contracts for the construction of seven PSVs (four in India, two
in China and one in Brazil) scheduled for delivery between March 2009 and July
2010.
On June
30, 2008, the Company entered into a Memorandum of Agreement (“MOA”),
subsequently modified by two addendums signed on July 24 and August 6, 2008,
whereby it agreed to sell the passenger vessel, Blue Monarch. Under the terms of
the agreement, the buyers were supposed to deposit the purchase price prior to
August 25, 2008 in a joint escrow account, while the delivery of the vessel
would have taken place at the end of the 2008 cruising season in the Aegean.
This transaction was not materialized because the buyer failed to make the
deposit accordingly.
ULTRAPETROL
(BAHAMAS) LIMITED AND SUBSIDIARIES
4.
|
LONG-TERM
FINANCIAL DEBT
|
Balances
of long-term financial debt at September 30, 2008 and December 31,
2007:
|
Financial
institution /
|
|
|
Nominal
value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
Due-year
|
|
Current
|
|
|
Noncurrent
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Interest
rate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ultrapetrol
(Bahamas) Ltd.
|
Private
Investors (Notes)
|
2014
|
|
|
- |
|
|
$ |
180,000 |
|
|
$ |
180,000 |
|
|
|
9.000%
|
|
UP
Offshore Apoio
|
DVB
AG
|
Through
2016
|
|
|
1,178 |
|
|
|
9,775 |
|
|
|
10,953 |
|
|
Libor
+ 1.200%
|
|
UP
Offshore (Bahamas) Ltd.
|
DVB
AG
|
Through
2016
|
|
|
5,022 |
|
|
|
48,175 |
|
|
|
53,197 |
|
|
Libor
+ 1.200%
|
|
UP
Offshore (Bahamas) Ltd.
|
DVB
AG
|
Through
2017
|
|
|
3,000 |
|
|
|
19,750 |
|
|
|
22,750 |
|
|
Libor
+ 1.500%
|
|
Stanyan
Shipping Inc.
|
Natixis
|
Through
2017
|
|
|
908 |
|
|
|
11,346 |
|
|
|
12,254 |
|
|
|
6.380%
|
|
Lowrie
Shipping LLC
|
BICE
|
Through
2012
|
|
|
6,250 |
|
|
|
15,625 |
|
|
|
21,875 |
|
|
Libor
+ 2.950%
|
|
Ultrapetrol
(Bahamas) Ltd.
|
BICE
|
2008
|
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
Libor
+ 1.625%
|
|
Hallandale
Commercial Corp.
|
Nordea
|
Through
2014
|
|
|
3,000 |
|
|
|
14,950 |
|
|
|
17,950 |
|
|
Libor
+ 1.250%
|
|
Ingatestone
Holdings Inc.
|
DVB
AG and Natixis
|
Through
2019
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
6,900 |
|
|
|
6,900 |
|
|
Libor
+ 1.500%
|
|
UABL
Paraguay S.A.
|
IFC
|
Through
2018
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
25,000 |
|
|
|
25,000 |
|
|
Libor
+ 3.000%
|
|
UABL
Barges and others
|
IFC
|
Through
2018
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
35,000 |
|
|
|
35,000 |
|
|
Libor
+ 3.000%
|
|
At
September 30, 2008
|
|
|
|
$ |
29,358 |
|
|
$ |
366,521 |
|
|
$ |
395,879 |
|
|
|
|
|
At
December 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
$ |
17,795 |
|
|
$ |
314,140 |
|
|
$ |
331,935 |
|
|
|
|
|
Loan
with DVB Bank AG (DVB AG) and Natixis
On June
24, 2008 Ingatestone Holdings Inc., as Borrower, and Ultrapetrol (Bahamas)
Limited, UP Offshore (Bahamas) Ltd., Bayshore Shipping Inc., Gracebay Shipping
Inc., Springwater Shipping Inc. and Woodrow Shipping Inc. (all of these our
subsidiaries in the Offshore Supply Business), as joint and several Guarantors,
entered into a senior secured term loan facility of up to $93,600 with DVB AG
and Natixis, as co-lender, to finance the construction and delivery of our PSVs
being constructed at Bharati Shipyard Ltd. in India.
This
loan is divided into two tranches:
|
-
|
Tranche
A, amounting to $60,000, to be made available for each ship in the amount
of up to $15,000 in multiple advances for the payment of installments of
the contract price due under the applicable shipbuilding contract. This
tranche accrues interest at LIBO rate plus a margin of 1.5% and shall be
repaid by (i) 40 quarterly installments of $250 per ship and (ii) a
balloon repayment of $5,000 together with the last installment. The first
quarterly repayment shall commence on the date falling three months after
the delivery date of such ship.
|
During
the pre-delivery period, advances of Tranche A in respect of each ship shall not
exceed $3,450 per advance and in the aggregate for each ship the lesser of (i)
60% of the relevant construction cost and (ii) $13,800.
|
-
|
Tranche
B, amounting to $33,600, to be made available for each ship in the amount
of up to $8,400 in a single advance on the delivery date of such ship.
This tranche accrues interest at LIBO rate plus a margin of 1.75% per
annum and shall be repaid by 20 quarterly installments of $420 per ship.
The first quarterly repayment shall commence on the date falling three
months after the delivery date of such
ship.
|
The
loan contains customary covenants which are similar to the stipulated covenants
in previous loans entered with DVB AG. The agreements governing the
facility also contain customary events of default. If an event of default occurs
and is continuing, DVB AG and Natixis may require the entire amount of the loans
be immediately repaid in full.
On June
27, 2008, we drew down $6,900 as first advance of the Tranche A applicable to
our two first PSVs under construction.
ULTRAPETROL
(BAHAMAS) LIMITED AND SUBSIDIARIES
Four-year
term $25,000 secured loan agreement with Banco BICE
On
January 25, 2008, Lowrie Shipping LLC (our wholly owned subsidiary in the Ocean
Business and the owner of the Princess Marisol), as
Borrower, Ultrapetrol (Bahamas) Limited and Angus Shipping LLC, as Guarantors,
and Tuebrook Holdings Inc., as Pledgor entered into a four-year term, $25,000
secured loan agreement with Banco BICE for the purpose of repaying the $25,000
we have borrowed from Banco BICE under the revolving credit
facility.
On
January 29, 2008 we drew down $25,000 under the secured loan
agreement.
The
loan shall be repaid by 16 consecutive quarterly installment of $1,562 each
beginning in April 2008. The loan accrues interest at LIBOR plus
2.95% per annum.
The
loan is secured by a mortgage on the Princess Marisol and is
jointly and severally irrevocable and unconditionally guaranteed by Ultrapetrol
(Bahamas) Limited and Angus Shipping LLC. The loan also contains
customary covenants that limit, among other things, the Borrower’s and the
Guarantors’ ability to incur additional indebtedness, grant liens over their
assets, sell assets, pay dividends, repay indebtedness, merge or consolidate,
change lines of business and amend the terms of subordinated
debt. The loan contains various restrictive covenants including
interest coverage, financial debt to shareholders’ equity and financial debt to
EBITDA ratios, as well as customary events of default.
Revolving
non-secured credit facility with Banco BICE
On
October 12, 2007, we entered into a three-year, $10,000, revolving non-secured
credit facility with Banco BICE. Our obligations under this credit
facility are guaranteed by three of our subsidiaries. This loan bears
interest at LIBOR plus 1.625% per annum.
As of
September 30, 2008, we drew down $10,000 available under this revolving
non-secured credit facility which due on January 13, 2009.
Loan
with International Finance Corporation (“IFC”)
|
a)
|
Loan
facility up to $25,000
|
On
September 15, 2008 UABL Paraguay S.A., as Borrower, and IFC entered into a loan
agreement to partially finance: (i) the replacement of existing pushboat engines
and conversion of pushboats to install such engines, (ii) the enlargement and
re-bottoming of existing barges, (iii) the construction and acquisition of
additional pushboats and barges and (iv) supplies and related equipment for the
foregoing.
The
loan shall be repaid by 17 consecutive sixth-monthly installment of $1,087 for
the first 9 payments and 1,902 for the last 8 payments, beginning in June
2012. The loan accrues interest at LIBOR plus 3% for the first
payment due on December 2008. The next interest installments will be
calculated considering LIBOR plus a percentage ranging between 1.875% to 3.250%
obtained from the Guarantor Prospective Debt Service Coverage ratio as indicated
in the agreement.
The
loan is secured by a mortgage on part of our River Business
fleet. The loan contains various restrictive covenants, among others,
that limit the Borrower’s ability to declare or pay any dividend, incur capital
expenditures, leases, enter into any derivative transaction, except hedging
arrangements for fuel.
On
September 30, 2008 we drew down $25,000 under the loan
agreement.
ULTRAPETROL
(BAHAMAS) LIMITED AND SUBSIDIARIES
|
b)
|
Loan
facility up to $35,000
|
On
September 15, 2008 UABL Barges (Panama) Inc., UABL Towing Services S.A., Marine
Financial Investment Corp. and Eastham Barges Inc. (all our subsidiaries in the
River Business), as Borrowers, and IFC entered into a loan agreement to
partially finance: (i) the replacement of existing pushboat engines and
conversion of pushboats to install such engines, (ii) the enlargement and
re-bottoming of existing barges, (iii) the construction and acquisition of
additional pushboats and barges and (iv) supplies and related equipment for the
foregoing.
The
loan shall be repaid by 16 consecutive sixth-monthly installment of $1,522 for
the first 9 payments and 2,663 for the last 8 payments, beginning in June
2012. The loan accrues interest at LIBOR plus 3% for the first
payment due on December 2008. The next interest installments will be
calculated considering LIBOR plus a percentage ranging between 1.875% to 3.250%
obtained from the Guarantor Prospective Debt Service Coverage ratio as indicated
in the agreement.
The
loan is secured by a mortgage on part of our River Business
fleet. The loan contains various restrictive covenants, among others,
that limit the each Borrower’s ability to declare or pay any dividend, incur
capital expenditures, leases, enter into any derivative transaction, except
hedging arrangements for fuel.
On
September 30, 2008 we drew down $35,000 under the loan agreement.
5.
|
COMMITMENTS
AND CONTINGENCIES
|
The
Company is subject to legal proceedings, claims and contingencies arising in the
ordinary course of business. When such amounts can be estimated and the
contingency is probable, management accrues the corresponding
liability. While the ultimate outcome of lawsuits or other
proceedings against the Company cannot be predicted with certainty, management
does not believe the costs of such actions will have a material effect on the
Company´s consolidated financial position or results of operations.
|
a)
|
Paraguayan
Customs Dispute
|
On
September 21, 2005 the local Customs Authority of Ciudad del Este, Paraguay
issued a finding that certain UABL entities owe taxes to that authority in the
amount of $2,200, together with a fine for non-payment of the taxes in the same
amount, in respect of certain operations of our River Business for the prior
three-year period. This matter was referred to the Central Customs Authority of
Paraguay. We believe that this finding is erroneous and UABL has formally
replied to the Paraguayan Customs Authority contesting all of the allegations
upon which the finding was based.
After
review of the entire case the Paraguayan Central Tax Authorities who have
jurisdiction over the matter have confirmed the Company has no liability in
respect of two of the three matters at issue, while they held a dissenting view
on the third issue. Through a Resolution which was notified to UABL
on October 13, 2006 the Paraguayan Undersecretary for Taxation has confirmed
that, in his opinion, the Company is liable for a total of $731 and has applied
a fine of 100% of this amount. On November 24, 2006, the court confirmed that
UABL is not liable for the first two issues. The Company has entered
a plea with the respective court contending the interpretation on the third
issue where the Company claims to be equally non-liable.
ULTRAPETROL
(BAHAMAS) LIMITED AND SUBSIDIARIES
We have
been advised by UABL’s counsel in the case that they believe that there is only
a remote possibility that a court would find UABL liable for any of these taxes
or fines.
On
November 3, 2006 and April 25, 2007, the Bolivian Tax Authority (Departamento de
Inteligencia Fiscal de la Gerencia Nacional de Fiscalización) issued a notice
informing that UABL International S.A. (a Panamanian subsidiary of the Company
in the River Business) would owe taxes to that authority in the amount of $4,928
(including interest and fines). On June 18, 2007 our legal counsel in
Bolivia submitted points of defense to the Bolivian tax
authorities.
On
August 27, 2007 the Bolivian tax authorities gave notice of a resolution
determining the taxes that UABL International S.A. would owe to them in the
amount of approximately $4.9 million (including interest and fines). On October
1, 2007, our legal counsel in Bolivia gave notice to the Bolivian tax
authorities of the lawsuit commenced by UABL International S.A. to refute the
resolution above mentioned.
We have
learned (but have not been legally notified) that on October 20, 2007, the
Bolivian Tax Authority replied to UABL's lawsuit, with the corresponding judge
participating in the suit stopping the process. On June 26, 2008, a Bolivian
court ordered a preemptive embargo against all barges owned by UABL
International S.A. that may be registered in the International Bolivian Registry
of Ships ("RIBB" for its Spanish acronym).
According
to Company's local counsel this preemptive embargo under Bolivian law has no
effect over the Company's right to use its assets nor does it have any
implication over the final decision of the court, the substance of the matter
and in this case it is ineffective since UABL International S.A. does not have
any assets owned by it registered in the RIBB.
We have
been advised by our local counsel that there is only a remote possibility that
UABL International S.A. would finally be found liable for any of these taxes or
fines and / or that these proceedings will have financial material adverse
impact on the financial position or results of the Company.
|
c)
|
Brazilian
customs dispute
|
Our
Brazilian subsidiary UP Offshore Apoio Maritimo Ltda. (“UP Apoio”) was involved
in a customs dispute with the Brazilian Customs Tax Authorities over the alleged
infringement of customs regulations by our PSV UP Diamante in October
2007. The Customs Authority claimed that when the UP Diamante docked
alongside the CSO Deep Blue (a vessel not owned by us) to transfer certain
equipment as part of its employment instructions under its charter with Petróleo
Brasileiro S.A. (“Petrobras”), the UP Diamante allegedly did not comply with
certain regulations applicable to the docking of vessels when one of them is
destined for a foreign country. As a result, the Brazilian Customs
Tax Authority commenced an administrative proceeding of which UP Apoio was
notified in November 24, 2007, and sought to impose the maximum customs penalty,
which corresponded to the confiscation (“perdimento”) of the vessel UP Diamante
in favor of the Brazilian Federal Government.
ULTRAPETROL
(BAHAMAS) LIMITED AND SUBSIDIARIES
On
December 21, 2007 UP Apoio filed an administrative defense stating that: (i) the
legal position taken by Customs Authority was not applicable to the UP Diamante
since the “perdimento” was only applicable to vessels coming from or going to
abroad, and not to vessels engaged in cabotage voyages as was the UP Diamante;
(ii) UP Diamante did not violate the Customs Regulation Code because (a) there
was no provision related to the transfer of equipment when one of the vessels is
going abroad but the other is not and (b) none of the vessels involved was
coming from or going abroad; (iii) confiscation could not be imposed on a vessel
owned by UP Apoio because at the time of the alleged infringement the UP
Diamante was on hire and under charter to Petrobras and consequently under the
control of Petrobras and not of UP Apoio; (iv) the imposition of confiscation
violated the principles of proportionality, reasonability and non-confiscation;
and (v) confiscation was not applicable because under Brazilian Tax Code, when
in case of doubt, the applicable law should be interpreted in favor of the
taxpayer, and in this case the report issued by the Brazilian Customs
Authorities recognizes the existence of doubt concerning the applicability of
the corresponding section of the Customs Regulation.
On
September 25, 2008 the Customs proceedings, in which Brazilian Customs Tax
Authorities were imposing a confiscation penalty ("perdimento") of the UP
Diamante, were successfully concluded when a final decision was issued by local
Tax Authorities determining the cancellation of the tax assessment brought up
against UP Apoio. Therefore, the tax assessment was extinguished with no
liability to UP Apoio, and the UP Diamante is released of any kind of legal or
Customs restrictions.
6.
|
FORWARD
FREIGHT AGREEMENTS (“FFAs”)
|
FFAs
with LCH Clearnet (“LCH”)
During
the second quarter of 2007 the Company entered into Forward Freight Agreements
(“FFAs”) with an objective to utilize them as either: (i) a hedging
instruments that reduce its exposure to changes in the spot market rates earned
by certain of its vessels in the normal course of its Ocean Business, the
Suezmax OBO fleet or (ii) before March 2008 for trading purposes to
take advantage of short term fluctuations in the market. These FFAs involve a
contract to provide a fixed number of theoretical days of voyages at fixed
rates. These contracts are net settled each month with the Company receiving a
fixed rate per day and paying the average rate of the 4 Capesize Time Charter
Routes (“C4TC Index”). We have contracted our Suezmax OBO fleet in
2008 under time charters that are based on the C4TC Index. The FFAs
are hedging the fluctuation in the revenues of the Suezmax OBO fleet which are
based on the C4TC Index.
We
entered into FFAs contracted with BNP Paribas Commodity Futures Limited ("BNP
Paribas") as a clearing member of LCH Clearnet ("LCH"), a London clearing
house.
At
September 30, 2008 the outstanding FFAs with LCH Clearnet entered by the Company
were as follows:
Days
|
|
|
Fixed
rate
received
($/Day)
|
|
Floating
rate paid
|
|
Nominal
amount
(in
thousands)
|
|
|
Fair
value
Asset
(Liability)
(in
thousands)
|
|
Settlement
date
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45 |
(1) |
|
|
77,250 |
|
C4TC
|
|
$ |
3,476 |
|
|
$ |
1,537 |
|
October
to December 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
180 |
(1) |
|
|
51,000 |
|
C4TC
|
|
|
9,180 |
|
|
|
1,576 |
|
January
to December 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
12,656 |
|
|
$ |
3,113 |
|
|
(1) Corresponds
to 15 days per each month.
ULTRAPETROL
(BAHAMAS) LIMITED AND SUBSIDIARIES
At
September 30, 2008 the fair market value of all FFAs with LCH Clearnet resulted
in an asset to the Company of $3,113 recorded in other non-current
receivables. The cash collateral amounts to $2,169 and was recorded
in the non-current restricted cash on the unaudited condensed consolidated
balance sheet.
FFAs
representing positions from October 2008 to December 2009 have been designated
as cash flow hedges for accounting purposes with the change in fair value being
recorded in other comprehensive income (loss) as an unrealized income amounting
to $3,113 at September 30, 2008. Any gain or loss will be realized in
future earnings contemporaneously with the related revenue generated for our
Suezmax fleet in the Ocean Business.
In
connection with the outstanding FFAs, at September 30, 2008, we had transferred
$2,169 to cover the margin requirements for these transactions. We have a credit
facility for a total amount of $9,000 with BNP Paribas to cover initial and
variation margin requirements. We will pay interest at LIBOR plus 0.75% per
annum if amounts are withdrawn under this facility. At September 30,
2008, the outstanding balance of the credit facility was nil.
Although
the use of a clearing house reduces the Company’s exposure to counterparty
credit risk, the Company is exposed to credit loss in the event of
non-performance by the counterparty to the FFAs; however, the Company does not
currently expect non-performance by the counterparty.
These
FFAs are valued using actively quoted prices and quotes obtained from reputable
unaffiliated independent sources.
During
the nine-month period ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, the Company recorded an
aggregate net realized income of $5,862 and during the nine-month period ended
September 30, 2007, the Company recorded an aggregate net unrealized loss of
$14,315 and an aggregate net realized loss of $1,920 for FFAs that were not
designated as cash flow hedges for accounting purposes and for the ineffective
portion of FFAs designated as cash flow hedges for accounting purposes, which is
reflected on the Company´s unaudited condensed consolidated statement of
operations as Other income (expenses) – Net income (loss) on FFAs. During the
nine-month period ended September 30, 2008, we paid cash settlements in an
amount of $5,408 for our January to March 2008 FFAs positions and paid a net
cash settlements of $13,089 for April to September 2008 FFAs
positions.
Terminated
FFAs with LCH
On May
16 and 19, 2008, the Company terminated FFAs positions contracted with LCH from
June 2008 to December 2008 as follows:
Days
|
|
|
Fixed
rate paid
($/day)
|
|
|
Fixed
rate received
($/day)
|
|
|
Total
settlement
(in
thousands)
|
|
|
Unrealized
loss
in
other comprehensive income (loss) as
of
September 30, 2008
|
|
Period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
194,500 |
|
|
|
80,000 |
|
|
$ |
1,718 |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
June
2008
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
194,500 |
|
|
|
79,500 |
|
|
|
1,725 |
|
|
|
- |
|
June
2008
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
193,500 |
|
|
|
77,250 |
|
|
|
3,487 |
|
|
|
- |
|
June
2008
|
|
90 |
(1) |
|
|
170,000 |
|
|
|
80,000 |
|
|
|
8,100 |
|
|
|
(4,050 |
) |
July
to December 2008
|
|
90 |
(1) |
|
|
166,000 |
|
|
|
79,500 |
|
|
|
7,785 |
|
|
|
(3,893 |
) |
July
to December 2008
|
|
94 |
(2) |
|
|
166,000 |
|
|
|
77,250 |
|
|
|
8,342 |
|
|
|
(4,171 |
) |
July
to December 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
31,157 |
|
|
$ |
(12,114 |
) |
|
|
(1)
|
Corresponds
to 15 days per month.
|
|
(2)
|
Corresponds
to 15 days in November, and 16 days in each of October and
December.
|
ULTRAPETROL
(BAHAMAS) LIMITED AND SUBSIDIARIES
During
the nine-month period ended September 30, 2008 the Company paid cash settlements
totaled $31,157. $12,114 out of this amount correspond of cash
settlements for contracts maturing from October 2008 to December 2008. This
amount has been recorded in other comprehensive income (loss) at September 30,
2008 and shall be reclassified into revenues during the last quarter of 2008,
when the revenues of the Suezmax fleet occurs.
FFAs
on OTC
During
2008 the Company entered into FFAs with an objective to utilize them as hedging
instruments that reduce its exposure to changes in the spot market rates earned
by certain of its vessels in the normal course of its Ocean Business, the
Capesize OBOs fleet. These FFAs involve a contract to provide a fixed
number of theoretical days of voyages at fixed rates. These contracts
are net settled each month with the Company receiving a fixed rate per day and
paying the average rate of the C4TC Index. The FFAs are hedging the
fluctuation in the revenues of the Capesize OBO fleet which are based on
the C4TC Index.
At
September 30, 2008 the outstanding FFAs entered by the Company were as
follows:
Days
|
|
|
Fixed
rate received ($/Day)
|
|
Floating
rate
paid
|
|
Nominal
amount
(in
thousands)
|
|
|
Fair
value
Asset
(Liability)
(in
thousands)
|
|
Settlement
date
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
182.5 |
(1) |
|
|
90,000 |
|
C4TC
|
|
$ |
16,425 |
|
|
$ |
8,327 |
|
January
to December 2009
|
|
182.5 |
(1) |
|
|
90,500 |
|
C4TC
|
|
|
16,516 |
|
|
|
8,650 |
|
January
to December 2009
|
|
182.5 |
(1) |
|
|
95,000 |
|
C4TC
|
|
|
17,338 |
|
|
|
9,457 |
|
January
to December 2009
|
|
365 |
(3) |
|
|
83,000 |
|
C4TC
|
|
|
30,295 |
|
|
|
17,696 |
|
January
to December 2010
|
|
45 |
(1) |
|
|
53,500 |
|
C4TC
|
|
|
2,408 |
|
|
|
419 |
|
January
to March 2009
|
|
45 |
(2) |
|
|
168,000 |
|
C4TC
|
|
|
7,560 |
|
|
|
5,568 |
|
October
to December 2008
|
|
92 |
(3) |
|
|
165,000 |
|
C4TC
|
|
|
15,180 |
|
|
|
11,110 |
|
October
to December 2008
|
|
45 |
(2) |
|
|
150,000 |
|
C4TC
|
|
|
6,750 |
|
|
|
4,793 |
|
October
to December 2008
|
|
45 |
(2) |
|
|
157,000 |
|
C4TC
|
|
|
7,065 |
|
|
|
5,077 |
|
October
to December 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
119,537 |
|
|
$ |
71,097 |
|
|
|
(1)
|
Corresponds
to 50% days of every calendar
month.
|
|
(2)
|
Corresponds
to 15 days per month.
|
|
(3)
|
Corresponds
to each calendar month.
|
At
September 30, 2008 the fair market value of all FFAs resulted in receivables of
$46,751 recorded in the current other receivables and receivables of $24,346
recorded in the non-current other receivables on the unaudited condensed
consolidated balance sheet.
These
FFAs have been designated as cash flow hedges for accounting purposes with the
change in fair value being recorded in other comprehensive income (loss) as an
unrealized income amounting to $71,097 at September 30, 2008. Any
gain or loss will be realized in future earnings contemporaneously with the
related revenue generated for our Capesize OBOs fleet in the Ocean
Business.
These
FFAs are valued using actively quoted prices and quotes obtained from reputable
independent sources.
During
the nine-month period ended September 30, 2008 the Company received net cash
settlements for its 2008 FFAs positions totaled $6,340.
These
FFAs are Over the Counter Contracts (OTC) and as such they are not agreed
through a clearing house, they have no margin account requirements and bears a
higher counterparty risk than a cleared FFA, however the Company does not
currently expect non-performance by the counterparties. Our
counterparties are mostly subsidiaries of major international grain
houses.
ULTRAPETROL
(BAHAMAS) LIMITED AND SUBSIDIARIES
During
the third quarter 2008, the Company entered into a OTC FFA to receiving the
average rate of the C4TC Index for a total of 18 days in October 2008 in
exchange for paying fixed rate of $88,000. At September 30, 2008, the
fair market value of this transaction resulted in a liability of
$831.
The
Company operates through its subsidiaries, which are subject to several tax
jurisdictions, as follows:
The
earnings from shipping operations were derived from sources outside the Bahamas
and such earnings were not subject to Bahamian taxes.
The
earnings from shipping operations were derived from sources outside Panama and
such earnings were not subject to Panamanian taxes.
Our
subsidiaries in Paraguay are subject to Paraguayan corporate income
taxes.
Our
subsidiaries in Argentina are subject to Argentine corporate income
taxes.
In
Argentina, the tax on minimum presumed income (“TOMPI”), supplements income tax
since it applies a minimum tax on the potential income from certain income
generating-assets at a 1% tax rate. The companies’ tax obligation in
any given year will be the higher of these two tax amounts. However,
if in any given tax year TOMPI exceeds income tax, such excess may be computed
as payment on account of any excess of income tax over TOMPI that may arise in
any of the ten following years.
Our
subsidiaries in Brazil are subject to Brazilian corporate income
taxes.
UP
Offshore Apoio Maritimo Ltda., has foreign currency exchange gains recognized
for tax purposes only in the period the debt (including intercompany
transactions) is extinguished. A deferred income tax liability is
recognized in the period the foreign currency exchange rate changes equal to the
future taxable income at the applicable tax rate.
Our
subsidiary in the Ocean Business, Corporación de Navegación Mundial S.A.
(Cor.Na.Mu.S.A.) is subject to Chilean corporate income taxes.
ULTRAPETROL
(BAHAMAS) LIMITED AND SUBSIDIARIES
Under
the US Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, or the Code, 50% of the gross
shipping income of our vessel owning or chartering subsidiaries attributable to
transportation that begins or ends, but that does not both begin and end, in the
U.S. are characterized as U.S. source shipping income. Such income is
subject to 4% U.S. federal income tax without allowance for deduction, unless
our subsidiaries qualify for exemption from tax under Section 883 of the Code
and the Treasury Regulations promulgated thereunder.
For the
nine-month periods ended September 30, 2008 and 2007 our subsidiaries did not
derive any U.S. source shipping income. Therefore our subsidiaries
are not subject to any U.S. federal income taxes, except our ship management
services provided by Ravenscroft.
Our
subsidiary in the Offshore Supply Business, UP Offshore (UK) Limited, is not
subject to corporate income tax in the United Kingdom, rather, it qualifies
under UK tonnage tax rules and pays a flat rate based on the net tonnage of
qualifying PSVs.
8.
|
RELATED
PARTY TRANSACTIONS
|
At
September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, the balances of receivables from
related parties, were as follows:
|
|
At
September 30, 2008
|
|
|
At
December 31, 2007
|
|
Current:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Receivable
from related parties
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
−Puertos del Sur S.A. and
O.T.S.
|
|
$ |
2,766 |
|
|
$ |
2,582 |
|
−Maritima Sipsa
S.A.
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
156 |
|
−Other
|
|
|
151 |
|
|
|
66 |
|
|
|
$ |
2,917 |
|
|
$ |
2,804 |
|
Noncurrent:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Receivable
from related parties - Puertos del Sur S.A.
|
|
$ |
2,280 |
|
|
$ |
2,280 |
|
At
September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007 the balance of payable to related
parties, were as follows:
|
|
At
September 30, 2008
|
|
|
At
December 31, 2007
|
|
Payable
to related parties --
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maritima
Sipsa S.A.
|
|
$ |
19 |
|
|
$ |
718 |
|
ULTRAPETROL
(BAHAMAS) LIMITED AND SUBSIDIARIES
Revenues
from related parties
For the
nine-month periods ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, the revenues derived from
related parties were as follows:
|
|
For
the nine-month periods
ended
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maritima
Sipsa S.A. (1)
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
2,764 |
|
Maritima
Sipsa S.A.
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
188 |
|
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
2,952 |
|
|
(1)
|
Sale
and repurchase of vessel Princess
Marina
|
In
2003, the Company entered into certain transactions to sell, and repurchase, to
and from Marítima Sipsa S.A., a 49% owned company, the vessel Princess
Marina. The transaction was recognized in the Company’s’
statements of income as a lease. On September 28, 2007 Marítima Sipsa
S.A. delivered the vessel Princess Marina to us and we sold her to a third party
in October 2007.
Common
shares and shareholders
On
September 21, 2006, Inversiones Los Avellanos S.A., Hazels (Bahamas) Investments
Inc. and Solimar Holdings Ltd. (collectively the “Original Shareholders”) signed
a second amended and restated shareholders agreement. The shares held
directly by our Original Shareholders expressly entitle to seven votes per share
and all other holders of our common stock entitle to one vote per
share. The special voting rights of the Original Shareholders are not
transferable.
On
March 17, 2008 Ultrapetrol’s Board of Directors has approved a share repurchase
program, effective March 17, 2008, for up to a total of $50,000 of the Company’s
common stock through September 30, 2008. The expiration date and/or
amount of the share repurchase program will be extended or amended at the
discretion of the Board of Directors. Share repurchases will be made
from time to time for cash in open market transactions at prevailing market
prices or in privately negotiated transactions.
At
September 30, 2008, the Company repurchased a total of 671,171 common shares, at
a total cost of $6,466.
At
September 30, 2008, the issued and outstanding common shares are 32,771,859 par
value $.01 per share.
At
September 30, 2008 our shareholders Solimar Holdings Ltd., Inversiones Los
Avellanos S.A. and Hazels (Bahamas) Investments Inc. (a wholly owned subsidiary
of Inversiones Los Avellanos S.A.) hold 2,977,690, 4,735,517 and 150,878 shares,
respectively, which represent 9.09%, 14.45% and 0.46%,
respectively. The joint voting power for these shares represents
approximately 68.5% of the total voting power.
10.
|
BUSINESS
AND GEOGRAPHIC SEGMENT INFORMATION
|
The
Company organizes its business and evaluates performance by its operating
segments, River, Offshore Supply, Ocean and Passenger Business. The
accounting policies of the reportable segments are the same as those for the
unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements. The Company does not have
significant intersegment transactions. These segments and their
respective operations are as follows:
ULTRAPETROL
(BAHAMAS) LIMITED AND SUBSIDIARIES
River
Business: In our River Business, we own and operate several dry and
tanker barges, and push boats. In addition, we use one barge from our
ocean fleet, the Alianza G2, as a transfer station. The dry barges
transport basically agricultural and forestry products, iron ore and other
cargoes, while the tanker barges carry petroleum products, vegetable oils and
other liquids.
We
operate our pushboats and barges on the navigable waters of Parana, Paraguay and
Uruguay Rivers and part of the River Plate in South America, also known as the
Hidrovia region.
Offshore
Supply Business: We operate our Offshore Supply Business, using PSVs
owned by UP Offshore (Bahamas), three are employed in the North Sea and two in
the Brazilian market. PSVs are designed to transport supplies such as
containerized equipment, drill casing, pipes and heavy loads on deck, along with
fuel, water, drilling fluids and bulk cement in under deck tanks and a variety
of other supplies to drilling rigs and platforms.
Ocean
Business: In our Ocean Business, we operate nine oceangoing vessels
and semi-integrated oceangoing tug barge units (eight of these owned and one
leased) under the trade name Ultrapetrol. Our Suezmax, Capesize and
Handysize/small product tankers vessels transport dry and liquid bulk goods on
major trade routes around the globe. Major products carried include liquid cargo
such as petroleum and petroleum derivatives, as well as dry cargo such as iron
ore, coal and other bulk cargoes.
Passenger
Business: We owned and operated two vessels during 2007, which were
purchased in 2005. In November 2007, we sold our largest passenger vessel New
Flamenco. The business is concentrated in the Mediterranean and Aegean
Sea.
Ultrapetrol’s
vessels operate on a worldwide basis and are not restricted to specific
locations. Accordingly, it is not possible to allocate the assets of
these operations to specific countries. In addition, the Company does
not manage its operating profit on a geographic basis.
|
|
For
the nine-month periods
ended
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
Revenues
(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
−South
America
|
|
$ |
119,950 |
|
|
$ |
85,535 |
|
−Europe
|
|
|
119,857 |
|
|
|
74,021 |
|
−Asia
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
3,388 |
|
−Other
|
|
|
1,876 |
|
|
|
998 |
|
|
|
$ |
241,683 |
|
|
$ |
163,942 |
|
(1)
Classified by country of domicile of charterers.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue
by segment consists only of services provided to external customers, as reported
in the unaudited condensed consolidated statement of
income. Resources are allocated based on segment profit or loss from
operation, before interest and taxes.
Identifiable
assets represent those assets used in the operations of each
segment.
ULTRAPETROL
(BAHAMAS) LIMITED AND SUBSIDIARIES
The
following schedule presents segment information about the Company’s operations
for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2008:
|
|
River
Business
|
|
|
Offshore
Supply
Business
|
|
|
Ocean
Business
|
|
|
Passenger
Business
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$ |
100,675 |
|
|
$ |
33,180 |
|
|
$ |
98,288 |
|
|
$ |
9,540 |
|
|
$ |
241,683 |
|
Running
and voyage expenses
|
|
|
79,980 |
|
|
|
14,223 |
|
|
|
30,980 |
|
|
|
13,922 |
|
|
|
139,105 |
|
Depreciation
and amortization
|
|
|
9,544 |
|
|
|
3,628 |
|
|
|
14,584 |
|
|
|
2,627 |
|
|
|
30,383 |
|
Segment
operating profit (loss)
|
|
|
5,073 |
|
|
|
12,401 |
|
|
|
48,007 |
|
|
|
(7,205 |
) |
|
|
58,276 |
|
Segment
assets
|
|
|
249,050 |
|
|
|
184,705 |
|
|
|
244,147 |
|
|
|
13,506 |
|
|
|
691,408 |
|
Investment
in affiliates
|
|
|
1,679 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
328 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
2,007 |
|
Income
(loss) from investment in
affiliates
|
|
|
(118 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(132 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(250 |
) |
Additions
to long-lived assets
|
|
$ |
70,620 |
|
|
$ |
25,090 |
|
|
$ |
2,882 |
|
|
$ |
1,307 |
|
|
$ |
99,899 |
|
Reconciliation
of total assets of the segments to amount included in the unaudited condensed
consolidated balance sheet as follow:
|
|
At
September 30, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
assets for reportable segments
|
|
$ |
691,408 |
|
Other
assets
|
|
|
17,065 |
|
Corporate
cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
106,721 |
|
Consolidated
total assets
|
|
$ |
815,194 |
|
The
following schedule presents segment information about the Company’s operations
for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2007:
|
|
River
Business
|
|
|
Offshore
Supply
Business
|
|
|
Ocean
Business
|
|
|
Passenger
Business
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$ |
69,665 |
|
|
$ |
30,153 |
|
|
$ |
39,237 |
|
|
$ |
24,887 |
|
|
$ |
163,942 |
|
Running
and voyage expenses
|
|
|
48,444 |
|
|
|
10,644 |
|
|
|
12,231 |
|
|
|
21,117 |
|
|
|
92,436 |
|
Depreciation
and amortization
|
|
|
7,134 |
|
|
|
3,175 |
|
|
|
10,968 |
|
|
|
4,153 |
|
|
|
25,430 |
|
Segment
operating profit (loss)
|
|
|
9,262 |
|
|
|
13,076 |
|
|
|
11,040 |
|
|
|
(1,149 |
) |
|
|
32,229 |
|
Segment
assets
|
|
|
169,123 |
|
|
|
148,578 |
|
|
|
132,221 |
|
|
|
39,158 |
|
|
|
489,080 |
|
Investments
in affiliates
|
|
|
1,864 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
875 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
2,739 |
|
Income
(loss) from investment in
affiliates
|
|
|
(72 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
526 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
454 |
|
Additions
to long-lived assets
|
|
$ |
(1)
|
38,075
|
|
|
$ |
16,277 |
|
|
$ |
32,721 |
|
|
$ |
2,806 |
|
|
$ |
89,879 |
|
(1) Does
not include the 12 river barges and 1 pushboat acquired in the Otto Candies
acquisition valued at $13,679.
Reconciliation
of total assets of the segments to amount included in the unaudited condensed
consolidated balance sheet as follow:
|
|
At
September 30, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
assets for reportable segments
|
|
$ |
489,080 |
|
Other
assets
|
|
|
12,755 |
|
Corporate
cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
59,144 |
|
Consolidated
total assets
|
|
$ |
560,979 |
|
ULTRAPETROL
(BAHAMAS) LIMITED AND SUBSIDIARIES
11.
|
SUPPLEMENTAL
GUARANTOR INFORMATION
|
On
November 24, 2004, the Company issued $180,000 9% First Preferred Ship Mortgage
Notes due 2014.
The
2014 Senior Notes are fully and unconditionally guaranteed on a joint and
several senior basis by the majority of the Company’s subsidiaries directly
involved in our Ocean and River Business.
The
Indenture provides that the 2014 Senior Notes and each of the guarantees granted
by the Company’s subsidiaries, other than the mortgage, are governed by, and
construed in accordance with, the laws of the state of New York. Each
of the mortgaged vessels is registered under either the Panamanian flag, or
another jurisdiction with similar procedures. All of the subsidiary guarantors
are located outside of the United States.
Supplemental
condensed combining financial information for the guarantor subsidiaries for the
2014 Senior Notes is presented below. This information is prepared in
accordance with the Company’s accounting policies. This supplemental
financial disclosure should be read in conjunction with the unaudited condensed
consolidated financial statements.
SUPPLEMENTAL
CONDENSED COMBINING BALANCE SHEET
AT
SEPTEMBER 30, 2008 (UNAUDITED)
(stated
in thousands of U.S. dollars)
|
|
Parent
|
|
|
Combined
subsidiary guarantors
|
|
|
Combined
subsidiary
non guarantors
|
|
|
Consolidating
adjustments
|
|
|
Total
consolidated amounts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Receivables
from related parties
|
|
$ |
212,100 |
|
|
$ |
46,046 |
|
|
$ |
28,884 |
|
|
$ |
(284,113 |
) |
|
$ |
2,917 |
|
Other
current assets
|
|
|
71,390 |
|
|
|
84,941 |
|
|
|
57,631 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
213,962 |
|
Total
current assets
|
|
|
283,490 |
|
|
|
130,987 |
|
|
|
86,515 |
|
|
|
(284,113 |
) |
|
|
216,879 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noncurrent
assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vessels
and equipment, net
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
165,412 |
|
|
|
368,630 |
|
|
|
(1,134 |
) |
|
|
532,908 |
|
Investment
in affiliates
|
|
|
274,583 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
2,007 |
|
|
|
(274,583 |
) |
|
|
2,007 |
|
Other
noncurrent assets
|
|
|
5,960 |
|
|
|
34,258 |
|
|
|
23,182 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
63,400 |
|
Total
noncurrent assets
|
|
|
280,543 |
|
|
|
199,670 |
|
|
|
393,819 |
|
|
|
(275,717 |
) |
|
|
598,315 |
|
Total
assets
|
|
$ |
564,033 |
|
|
$ |
330,657 |
|
|
$ |
480,334 |
|
|
$ |
(559,830 |
) |
|
$ |
815,194 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payable
to related parties
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
150,282 |
|
|
$ |
133,850 |
|
|
$ |
(284,113 |
) |
|
$ |
19 |
|
Current
portion of long-term financial debt
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
29,358 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
29,358 |
|
Other
current liabilities
|
|
|
6,953 |
|
|
|
7,051 |
|
|
|
14,037 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
28,041 |
|
Total
current liabilities
|
|
|
6,953 |
|
|
|
157,333 |
|
|
|
177,245 |
|
|
|
(284,113 |
) |
|
|
57,418 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noncurrent
liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term
financial debt
|
|
$ |
180,000 |
|
|
$ |
25,000 |
|
|
$ |
161,521 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
366,521 |
|
Other
noncurrent liabilities
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
565 |
|
|
|
9,005 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
9,570 |
|
Total
noncurrent liabilities
|
|
|
180,000 |
|
|
|
25,565 |
|
|
|
170,526 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
376,091 |
|
Total
liabilities
|
|
|
186,953 |
|
|
|
182,898 |
|
|
|
347,771 |
|
|
|
(284,113 |
) |
|
|
433,509 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minority
interest
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
4,605 |
|
|
|
4,605 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders’
equity
|
|
|
377,080 |
|
|
|
147,759 |
|
|
|
132,563 |
|
|
|
(280,322 |
) |
|
|
377,080 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
liabilities, minority interest and shareholders’ equity
|
|
$ |
564,033 |
|
|
$ |
330,657 |
|
|
$ |
480,334 |
|
|
$ |
(559,830 |
) |
|
$ |
815,194 |
|
SUPPLEMENTAL
CONDENSED COMBINING BALANCE SHEET
AT
DECEMBER 31, 2007
(stated
in thousands of U.S. dollars)
|
|
Parent
|
|
|
Combined
subsidiary guarantors
|
|
|
Combined
subsidiary non guarantors
|
|
|
Consolidating
adjustments
|
|
|
Total
consolidated amounts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Receivables
from related parties
|
|
$ |
290,349 |
|
|
$ |
116,818 |
|
|
$ |
14,166 |
|
|
$ |
(418,529 |
) |
|
$ |
2,804 |
|
Other
current assets
|
|
|
30,714 |
|
|
|
24,251 |
|
|
|
47,472 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
102,437 |
|
Total
current assets
|
|
|
321,063 |
|
|
|
141,069 |
|
|
|
61,638 |
|
|
|
(418,529 |
) |
|
|
105,241 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noncurrent
assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vessels
and equipment, net
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
139,938 |
|
|
|
323,532 |
|
|
|
(1,178 |
) |
|
|
462,292 |
|
Investment
in affiliates
|
|
|
134,061 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
2,257 |
|
|
|
(134,061 |
) |
|
|
2,257 |
|
Other
noncurrent assets
|
|
|
6,638 |
|
|
|
25,402 |
|
|
|
20,330 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
52,370 |
|
Total
noncurrent assets
|
|
|
140,699 |
|
|
|
165,340 |
|
|
|
346,119 |
|
|
|
(135,239 |
) |
|
|
516,919 |
|
Total
assets
|
|
$ |
461,762 |
|
|
$ |
306,409 |
|
|
$ |
407,757 |
|
|
$ |
(553,768 |
) |
|
$ |
622,160 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payable
to related parties
|
|
$ |
1,097 |
|
|
$ |
270,215 |
|
|
$ |
147,935 |
|
|
$ |
(418,529 |
) |
|
$ |
718 |
|
Current
portion of long-term financial debt
|
|
|
4,688 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
13,107 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
17,795 |
|
Other
current liabilities
|
|
|
2,522 |
|
|
|
8,264 |
|
|
|
11,174 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
21,960 |
|
Total
current liabilities
|
|
|
8,307 |
|
|
|
278,479 |
|
|
|
172,216 |
|
|
|
(418,529 |
) |
|
|
40,473 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noncurrent
liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term
financial debt
|
|
|
200,313 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
113,827 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
314,140 |
|
Other
noncurrent liabilities
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
562 |
|
|
|
10,101 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
10,663 |
|
Total
noncurrent liabilities
|
|
|
200,313 |
|
|
|
562 |
|
|
|
123,928 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
324,803 |
|
Total
liabilities
|
|
|
208,620 |
|
|
|
279,041 |
|
|
|
296,144 |
|
|
|
(418,529 |
) |
|
|
365,276 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minority
interest
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
3,742 |
|
|
|
3,742 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders’
equity
|
|
|
253,142 |
|
|
|
27,368 |
|
|
|
111,613 |
|
|
|
(138,981 |
) |
|
|
253,142 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
liabilities, minority interest and shareholders’ equity
|
|
$ |
461,762 |
|
|
$ |
306,409 |
|
|
$ |
407,757 |
|
|
$ |
(553,768 |
) |
|
$ |
622,160 |
|
SUPPLEMENTAL
CONDENSED COMBINING STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
FOR
THE NINE MONTH PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2008 (UNAUDITED)
(stated in
thousands of U.S. dollars)
|
|
Parent
|
|
|
Combined
subsidiary guarantors
|
|
|
Combined
subsidiary
non guarantors
|
|
|
Consolidating
adjustments
|
|
|
Total
consolidated amounts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
138,144 |
|
|
$ |
105,233 |
|
|
$ |
(1,694 |
) |
|
$ |
241,683 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
expenses
|
|
|
(7,654 |
) |
|
|
(89,504 |
) |
|
|
(87,899 |
) |
|
|
1,650 |
|
|
|
(183,407 |
) |
Operating
profit (loss)
|
|
|
(7,654 |
) |
|
|
48,640 |
|
|
|
17,334 |
|
|
|
(44 |
) |
|
|
58,276 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment
in affiliates
|
|
|
55,482 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(250 |
) |
|
|
(55,482 |
) |
|
|
(250 |
) |
Other
income (expenses)
|
|
|
(3,710 |
) |
|
|
(8,979 |
) |
|
|
(60 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(12,749 |
) |
Income
before income taxes and minority interest
|
|
|
44,118 |
|
|
|
39,661 |
|
|
|
17,024 |
|
|
|
(55,526 |
) |
|
|
45,277 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income
taxes
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(287 |
) |
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(296 |
) |
Minority
interest
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(863 |
) |
|
|
(863 |
) |
Net
income
|
|
$ |
44,118 |
|
|
$ |
39,374 |
|
|
$ |
17,015 |
|
|
$ |
(56,389 |
) |
|
$ |
44,118 |
|
SUPPLEMENTAL
CONDENSED COMBINING STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
FOR
THE NINE MONTH PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2007 (UNAUDITED)
(stated in
thousands of U.S. dollars)
|
|
Parent
|
|
|
Combined
subsidiary guarantors
|
|
|
Combined
subsidiary
non guarantors
|
|
|
Consolidating
adjustments
|
|
|
Total
consolidated amounts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
63,546 |
|
|
$ |
104,711 |
|
|
$ |
(4,315 |
) |
|
$ |
163,942 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
expenses
|
|
|
(5,582 |
) |
|
|
(49,095 |
) |
|
|
(81,307 |
) |
|
|
4,271 |
|
|
|
(131,713 |
) |
Operating
profit (loss)
|
|
|
(5,582 |
) |
|
|
14,451 |
|
|
|
23,404 |
|
|
|
(44 |
) |
|
|
32,229 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment
in affiliates
|
|
|
2,687 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
454 |
|
|
|
(2,687 |
) |
|
|
454 |
|
Other
income (expenses)
|
|
|
1,065 |
|
|
|
(28,498 |
) |
|
|
(1,545 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(28,978 |
) |
Income
(loss) before income taxes and minority interest
|
|
|
(1,830 |
) |
|
|
(14,047 |
) |
|
|
22,313 |
|
|
|
(2,731 |
) |
|
|
3,705 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income
taxes
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
366 |
|
|
|
(5,398 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(5,032 |
) |
Minority
interest
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(503 |
) |
|
|
(503 |
) |
Net
income (loss)
|
|
$ |
(1,830 |
) |
|
$ |
(13,681 |
) |
|
$ |
16,915 |
|
|
$ |
(3,234 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,830 |
) |
SUPPLEMENTAL
CONDENSED COMBINING STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOW
FOR
THE NINE MONTH PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2008 (UNAUDITED)
(stated in
thousands of U.S. dollars)
|
|
Parent
|
|
|
Combined
subsidiary guarantors
|
|
|
Combined
subsidiary
non guarantors
|
|
|
Consolidating
adjustments
|
|
|
Total
consolidated amounts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
income
|
|
$ |
44,118 |
|
|
$ |
39,374 |
|
|
$ |
17,015 |
|
|
$ |
(56,389 |
) |
|
$ |
44,118 |
|
Adjustments
to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating
activities
|
|
|
(49,464 |
) |
|
|
(7,289 |
) |
|
|
(3,497 |
) |
|
|
56,389 |
|
|
|
(3,861 |
) |
Net
cash (used in) provided by operating activities
|
|
|
(5,346 |
) |
|
|
32,085 |
|
|
|
13,518 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
40,257 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intercompany
sources
|
|
|
5,829 |
|
|
|
(72,420 |
) |
|
|
1,097 |
|
|
|
65,494 |
|
|
|
- |
|
Non-subsidiary
sources
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
19,916 |
|
|
|
(73,372 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(53,456 |
) |
Net
cash (used in) provided by investing activities
|
|
|
5,829 |
|
|
|
(52,504 |
) |
|
|
(72,275 |
) |
|
|
65,494 |
|
|
|
(53,456 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intercompany
sources
|
|
|
71,323 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(5,829 |
) |
|
|
(65,494 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
Non-subsidiary
sources
|
|
|
(31,763 |
) |
|
|
25,000 |
|
|
|
62,421 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
55,658 |
|
Net
cash (used in) provided by financing activities
|
|
|
39,560 |
|
|
|
25,000 |
|
|
|
56,592 |
|
|
|
(65,494 |
) |
|
|
55,658 |
|
Net
(decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$ |
40,043 |
|
|
$ |
4,581 |
|
|
$ |
(2,165 |
) |
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
42,459 |
|
SUPPLEMENTAL
CONDENSED COMBINING STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOW
FOR
THE NINE MONTH PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2007 (UNAUDITED)
(stated
in thousands of U.S. dollars)
|
|
Parent
|
|
|
Combined
subsidiary guarantors
|
|
|
Combined
subsidiary
non guarantors
|
|
|
Consolidating
adjustments
|
|
|
Total
consolidated amounts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
income (loss)
|
|
$ |
(1,830 |
) |
|
$ |
(13,681 |
) |
|
$ |
16,915 |
|
|
$ |
(3,234 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,830 |
) |
Adjustments
to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash (used in) provided by operating
activities
|
|
|
1,271 |
|
|
|
(2,030 |
) |
|
|
42,027 |
|
|
|
3,234 |
|
|
|
44,502 |
|
Net
cash (used in) provided by operating activities
|
|
|
(559 |
) |
|
|
(15,711 |
) |
|
|
58,942 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
42,672 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intercompany
sources
|
|
|
(62,559 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
62,559 |
|
|
|
- |
|
Non-subsidiary
sources
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(61,887 |
) |
|
|
(84,691 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(146,578 |
) |
Net
cash (used in) provided by investing activities
|
|
|
(62,559 |
) |
|
|
(61,887 |
) |
|
|
(84,691 |
) |
|
|
62,559 |
|
|
|
(146,578 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intercompany
sources
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
75,290 |
|
|
|
(12,731 |
) |
|
|
(62,559 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
Non-subsidiary
sources
|
|
|
91,006 |
|
|
|
7,322 |
|
|
|
44,074 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
142,402 |
|
Net
cash provided by (used in) financing activities
|
|
|
91,006 |
|
|
|
82,612 |
|
|
|
31,343 |
|
|
|
(62,559 |
) |
|
|
142,402 |
|
Net
increase in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$ |
27,888 |
|
|
$ |
5,014 |
|
|
$ |
5,594 |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
38,496 |
|
Share
repurchase program
On
October 2, 2008, the Board of Directors of Ultrapetrol approved the extension of
the share repurchase program to December 31, 2008 retaining the original
cumulative dollar limit of $50,000.
Since
October 1, 2008 to November 12, 2008, the Company repurchased 2,531,108 common
shares at a total cost of $11,104.
Since
approval of the share repurchase program on March 17, 2008, Ultrapetrol has
repurchased 3,202,279 common shares, or 9.58% of total shares outstanding at a
total cost of $17,570.
As of
November 12, 2008 Ultrapetrol had 30,240,751 common shares
outstanding.
Cleared
FFAs for November and December 2008
On
November 3, 2008, the Company entered into a cleared FFA contract whereby a
subsidiary of Ultrapetrol Bahamas contracted with BNP Paribas Commodity Futures
Ltd. (as a clearing member of LCH Clearnet) to receiving the average rate of the
C4TC Index for a total of 15 days per month in November and December 2008 in
exchange for paying fixed rate of $9,000 per day.
SIGNATURES
Pursuant
to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has
duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto
duly authorized.
ULTRAPETROL
(BAHAMAS) LIMITED
(registrant)
Dated: November
12, 2008
|
By:
|
/s/
Felipe Menendez R.
|
|
|
Felipe
Menendez R.
|
|
|
Chief
Executive Officer
|
SK 02351 0010
937620