e10vk
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND
EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, DC 20549
Form 10-K
|
|
|
þ
|
|
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
|
For fiscal year ended September
30,
2010
|
Commission File Number 1-14173
MarineMax, Inc.
(Exact Name of Registrant as
Specified in Its Charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
59-3496957
|
(State of
Incorporation)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification
No.)
|
18167
U.S. Highway 19 North
Suite 300
Clearwater, Florida 33764
(727) 531-1700
(Address,
including zip code, and telephone number,
including area code, of principal executive
offices)
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the
Exchange Act:
|
|
|
Title of Each Class
|
|
Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered
|
|
Common Stock, par value $.001 per share
Rights to Purchase Series A Junior Participating Preferred
Stock
|
|
New York Stock Exchange
|
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the
Exchange Act:
None
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known
seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities
Act. Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file
reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the
Securities
Act. Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed
all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding
12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant
was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past
90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted
electronically and posted on its corporate Website, if any,
every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of
Regulation S-T
(§ 229.405 of this chapter) during the preceding
12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant
was required to submit and post such
files). Yes o No o
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers
pursuant to Item 405 of
Regulation S-K
is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best
of registrants knowledge, in definitive proxy or
information statements incorporated by reference in
Part III of this
Form 10-K
or any amendment to this
Form 10-K. þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large
accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated
filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of
large accelerated filer, accelerated
filer and smaller reporting company in
Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated
filer o
|
|
Accelerated
filer þ
|
|
Non-accelerated
filer o
|
|
Smaller reporting
company o
|
|
|
(Do not check if a smaller
reporting company)
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company
(as defined in
Rule 12b-2
of the
Act). Yes o No þ
The aggregate market value of common stock held by nonaffiliates
of the registrant (18,250,797 shares) based on the closing
price of the registrants common stock as reported on the
New York Stock Exchange on March 31, 2010, which was the
last business day of the registrants most recently
completed second fiscal quarter, was $196,378,576. For purposes
of this computation, all officers, directors, and 10% beneficial
owners of the registrant are deemed to be affiliates. Such
determination should not be deemed to be an admission that such
officers, directors, or 10% beneficial owners are, in fact,
affiliates of the registrant.
As of November 30, 2010, there were outstanding
23,064,673 shares of the registrants common stock,
par value $.001 per share.
Documents
Incorporated by Reference
Portions of the registrants definitive proxy statement for
the 2011 Annual Meeting of Stockholders are incorporated by
reference into Part III of this report.
MARINEMAX,
INC.
ANNUAL REPORT ON
FORM 10-K
Fiscal Year Ended September 30, 2010
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PART I
Introduction
Our
Company
We are the largest recreational boat dealer in the United
States. Through 56 retail locations in Alabama, Arizona,
California, Colorado, Connecticut, Florida, Georgia, Kansas,
Maryland, Minnesota, Missouri, New Jersey, New York, North
Carolina, Ohio, Oklahoma, Rhode Island, Tennessee, and Texas, we
sell new and used recreational boats, including pleasure and
fishing boats, with a focus on premium brands in each segment.
We also sell related marine products, including engines,
trailers, parts, and accessories. In addition, we arrange
related boat financing, insurance, and extended service
contracts; provide repair and maintenance services; offer boat
and yacht brokerage services; and, where available, offer slip
and storage accommodations.
We are the nations largest retailer of Sea Ray, Boston
Whaler, Cabo, Hatteras, and Meridian recreational boats and
yachts, all of which are manufactured by Brunswick Corporation,
or Brunswick. Sales of new Brunswick boats accounted for
approximately 41% of our revenue in fiscal 2010. Brunswick is
the worlds largest manufacturer of marine products and
marine engines. We believe our sales represented approximately
7% of all Brunswick marine sales, including approximately 46% of
its Sea Ray boat sales, during our 2010 fiscal year. We are
parties to dealer agreements with Brunswick covering Sea Ray
products and are the exclusive dealer of Sea Ray boats in almost
all of our geographic markets. We also are the exclusive dealer
for Hatteras Yachts throughout the state of Florida (excluding
the Florida panhandle) and the states of New Jersey, New York,
and Texas; the exclusive dealer for Cabo Yachts throughout the
states of Florida, New Jersey, and New York; the exclusive
dealer for Boston Whaler in many of our markets, including our
locations in the states of New York, North Carolina, and
portions of the states of Florida, California, and Texas; and
the exclusive dealer for Meridian Yachts in most of our
geographic markets. In addition, we are the exclusive dealer for
Italy-based Azimut-Benetti Group for Azimut mega-yachts, yachts,
and other recreational boats for the Northeast United States
from Maryland to Maine and the state of Florida.
We commenced operations as a result of the March 1, 1998
acquisition of five previously independent recreational boat
dealers. Since that time, we have acquired 20 additional
previously independent recreational boat dealers, two boat
brokerage operations, and two full-service yacht repair
operations. We capitalize on the experience and success of the
acquired companies in order to establish a new national standard
of customer service and responsiveness in the highly fragmented
retail boating industry. As a result of our emphasis on premium
brand boats, our average selling price for a new boat in fiscal
2010 was approximately $145,000, an increase of approximately 9%
from fiscal 2009, compared with the industry average calendar
2009 selling price of approximately $37,000 based on industry
data published by the National Marine Manufacturers Association.
Our stores, which operated at least 12 months, averaged
approximately $8.8 million in annual sales in fiscal 2010.
We consider a store to be one or more retail locations that are
adjacent or operate as one entity. Our same-store sales
decreased 29% in fiscal 2009 and 17% in fiscal 2010.
We adopt the best practices developed by us and our acquired
companies as appropriate to enhance our ability to attract more
customers, foster an overall enjoyable boating experience, and
offer boat manufacturers stable and professional retail
distribution and a broad geographic presence. We believe that
our full range of services, no hassle sales approach, prime
retail locations, premium product offerings, extensive
facilities, strong management and team members, and emphasis on
customer service and satisfaction before and after a boat sale
are competitive advantages that enable us to be more responsive
to the needs of existing and prospective customers.
The U.S. recreational boating industry generated
approximately $30.8 billion in retail sales in calendar
2009, which is down from the peak of $39.5 billion in
calendar 2006. The retail sales include sales of new and used
boats; marine products, such as engines, trailers, equipment,
and accessories; and related expenditures, such as fuel,
insurance, docking, storage, and repairs. Retail sales of new
and used boats, engines, trailers, and accessories accounted for
approximately $22.4 billion of these sales in 2009 based on
industry data from the National Marine Manufacturers
Association. The highly fragmented retail boating industry
generally consists of small dealers that operate in a single
market and provide varying degrees of merchandising,
professional management, and customer
1
service. We believe that many small dealers are finding it
increasingly difficult to make the managerial and capital
commitments necessary to achieve higher customer service levels
and upgrade systems and facilities as required by boat
manufacturers and demanded by customers. We also believe that
many dealers lack an exit strategy for their owners. We believe
these factors contribute to our opportunity to gain competitive
advantage in current and future markets, through market
expansions and acquisitions.
Strategy
Our goal is to enhance our position as the nations leading
recreational boat dealer. Key elements of our operating and
growth strategy include the following:
|
|
|
|
|
emphasizing customer satisfaction and loyalty by creating an
overall enjoyable boating experience, beginning with a
hassle-free purchase process, customer training, superior
customer service, company-led events called Getaways!, and
premier facilities;
|
|
|
|
achieving efficiencies and synergies among our operations to
enhance internal growth and profitability;
|
|
|
|
promoting national brand name recognition and the MarineMax
connection;
|
|
|
|
offering additional products and services, including those
involving higher profit margins;
|
|
|
|
expanding our Internet marketing;
|
|
|
|
pursuing strategic acquisitions to capitalize upon the
consolidation opportunities in the highly fragmented
recreational boat dealer industry by acquiring additional
dealers and related operations and improving their performance
and profitability through the implementation of our operating
strategies;
|
|
|
|
opening additional retail facilities in our existing and new
territories;
|
|
|
|
emphasizing employee recruitment, training, and development;
|
|
|
|
emphasizing the best practices developed by us and
our acquired dealers as appropriate throughout our dealerships;
|
|
|
|
operating with a decentralized approach to the operational
management of our dealerships; and
|
|
|
|
utilizing information technology throughout operations, which
facilitates the interchange of information sharing and enhances
cross-selling opportunities throughout our company.
|
Development
of the Company; Expansion of Business
MarineMax was founded in January 1998. MarineMax itself,
however, conducted no operations until the acquisition of five
independent recreational boat dealers on March 1, 1998, and
we completed our initial public offering in June 1998. Since the
initial acquisitions in March 1998, we have acquired 20
additional recreational boat dealers, two boat brokerage
operations, and two full-service yacht repair operations.
Acquired dealers operate under the MarineMax name.
We continually attempt to enhance our business by providing a
full range of services, offering extensive and high-quality
product lines, maintaining prime retail locations, pursuing the
MarineMax Value Price hassle-free sales approach, and
emphasizing the highest level of customer service and customer
satisfaction.
We also evaluate opportunities to expand our operations by
acquiring recreational boat dealers to expand our geographic
scope, expanding our product lines, opening new retail locations
within our existing territories, and offering new products and
services for our customers.
2
Acquisitions of additional recreational boat dealers represent
an important strategy in our goal to enhance our position as the
nations leading retailer of recreational boats. The
following table sets forth information regarding the businesses
that we have acquired and their geographic regions.
|
|
|
|
|
Acquired Companies
|
|
Acquisition Date
|
|
Geographic Region
|
|
Bassett Boat Company of Florida
|
|
March 1998
|
|
Southeast Florida
|
Louis DelHomme Marine
|
|
March 1998
|
|
Dallas and Houston, Texas
|
Gulfwind USA, Inc.
|
|
March 1998
|
|
West Central Florida
|
Gulfwind South, Inc.
|
|
March 1998
|
|
Southwest Florida
|
Harrisons Boat Center, Inc. and Harrisons Marine
Centers of Arizona, Inc.(1)
|
|
March 1998
|
|
Northern California and Arizona
|
Stovall Marine, Inc.
|
|
April 1998
|
|
Georgia
|
Cochrans Marine, Inc. and C & N Marine
Corporation
|
|
July 1998
|
|
Minnesota
|
Sea Ray of North Carolina, Inc.
|
|
July 1998
|
|
North and South Carolina
|
Brevard Boat Company
|
|
September 1998
|
|
East Central Florida
|
Sea Ray of Las Vegas
|
|
September 1998
|
|
Nevada
|
Treasure Cove Marina, Inc.
|
|
September 1998
|
|
Northern Ohio
|
Woods & Oviatt, Inc.
|
|
October 1998
|
|
Southeast Florida
|
Boating World
|
|
February 1999
|
|
Dallas, Texas
|
Merit Marine, Inc.
|
|
March 1999
|
|
Southern New Jersey
|
Suburban Boatworks, Inc.
|
|
April 1999
|
|
Central New Jersey
|
Hansen Marine, Inc.
|
|
August 1999
|
|
Northeast Florida
|
Duce Marine, Inc.(2)
|
|
December 1999
|
|
Utah
|
Clarks Landing, Inc. (selected New Jersey locations and
operations)
|
|
April 2000
|
|
Northern New Jersey
|
Associated Marine Technologies, Inc.
|
|
January 2001
|
|
Southeast Florida
|
Gulfwind Marine Partners, Inc.
|
|
April 2002
|
|
West Florida
|
Seaside Marine, Inc.
|
|
July 2002
|
|
Southern California
|
Sundance Marine, Inc.
|
|
June 2003
|
|
Colorado
|
Killinger Marine Center, Inc. and Killinger Marine Center of
Alabama, Inc.
|
|
September 2003
|
|
Northwest Florida and Alabama
|
Emarine International, Inc. and Steven Myers, Inc.
|
|
October 2003
|
|
Southeast Florida
|
Imperial Marine
|
|
June 2004
|
|
Baltimore, Maryland
|
Port Jacksonville Marine
|
|
June 2004
|
|
Northeast Florida
|
Port Arrowhead Marina, Inc.
|
|
January 2006
|
|
Missouri, Oklahoma
|
Great American Marina(3)
|
|
February 2006
|
|
West Florida
|
Surfside 3 Marina, Inc.
|
|
March 2006
|
|
Connecticut, Maryland, New York and Rhode Island
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
We subsequently closed the Northern California operations of
Harrison Boat Center, Inc. |
|
(2) |
|
We subsequently closed the operations of Duce Marine, Inc. |
|
(3) |
|
Joint venture |
Apart from acquisitions, we have opened 28 new retail locations
in existing territories, excluding those opened on a temporary
basis for a specific purpose. We also monitor the performance of
our retail locations and close retail locations that do not meet
our expectations. Based on these factors and the recent
depressed economic conditions, we have closed 47 retail
locations since March 1998, excluding those opened on a
temporary basis for a specific purpose, including 26 in fiscal
2009.
As a part of our acquisition strategy, we frequently engage in
discussions with various recreational boat dealers regarding
their potential acquisition by us. In connection with these
discussions, we and each potential acquisition candidate
exchange confidential operational and financial information;
conduct due diligence inquiries; and consider the structure,
terms, and conditions of the potential acquisition. In certain
cases, the prospective acquisition candidate agrees not to
discuss a potential acquisition with any other party for a
specific period of time, grants us an option to purchase the
prospective dealer for a designated price during a specific time
period, and agrees to take
3
other actions designed to enhance the possibility of the
acquisition, such as preparing audited financial information and
converting its accounting system to the system specified by us.
Potential acquisition discussions frequently take place over a
long period of time and involve difficult business integration
and other issues, including in some cases, management succession
and related matters. As a result of these and other factors, a
number of potential acquisitions that from time to time appear
likely to occur do not result in binding legal agreements and
are not consummated.
In addition to acquiring recreational boat dealers and opening
new retail locations, we also add new product lines to expand
our operations. The following table sets forth various current
product lines that we have added to our existing locations
during the years indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
Product Line
|
|
Fiscal Year
|
|
Geographic Regions
|
|
Boston Whaler
|
|
1998
|
|
West Central Florida; Stuart, Florida; Dallas, Texas
|
Hatteras Yachts
|
|
1999
|
|
Florida (excluding the Florida panhandle)
|
Boston Whaler
|
|
2000
|
|
North Palm Beach, Florida
|
Meridian Yachts
|
|
2002
|
|
Florida, Georgia, North and South Carolina, New Jersey, Ohio,
Minnesota, Texas, and Delaware
|
Grady White
|
|
2002
|
|
Houston, Texas
|
Hatteras Yachts
|
|
2002
|
|
Texas
|
Boston Whaler
|
|
2004
|
|
North and South Carolina
|
Princecraft
|
|
2004
|
|
Minnesota
|
Boston Whaler
|
|
2005
|
|
Houston and Dallas, Texas
|
Meridian Yachts
|
|
2005
|
|
Chattanooga, Tennessee
|
Azimut
|
|
2006
|
|
Northeast United States from Maryland to Maine
|
Cabo
|
|
2006
|
|
West coast of Florida
|
Cabo
|
|
2007
|
|
East coast of Florida
|
Azimut
|
|
2008
|
|
Florida
|
Cabo
|
|
2008
|
|
New Jersey and New York
|
Hatteras Yachts
|
|
2008
|
|
New Jersey and New York
|
Meridian Yachts
|
|
2008
|
|
Arizona, and Colorado
|
Meridian Yachts
|
|
2009
|
|
Maryland and Delaware
|
Boston Whaler
|
|
2009
|
|
Southwest Florida
|
Harris FloteBote
|
|
2010
|
|
Arizona, Missouri, Minnesota, New Jersey, and Tennessee
|
Malibu
|
|
2010
|
|
Arizona
|
Axis
|
|
2010
|
|
Arizona
|
Nautique by Correct Craft
|
|
2010
|
|
Georgia and Minnesota
|
Bayliner
|
|
2010
|
|
New York
|
Meridian Yachts
|
|
2010
|
|
California
|
As we add a brand, we believe we are offering a migration path
for our existing customer base or filling a gap in our product
offerings. As a result, we do not believe that new product
offerings will compete with or cannibalize the business
generated from our other prominent brands. We also discontinue
offering product lines from time to time, primarily based upon
customer preferences.
During the nine-year period from the commencement of our
operations through our fiscal year ended September 30,
2007, our revenue increased from $291 million to
$1.2 billion. Our revenue and net income increased in seven
of those nine years over the prior year revenue and net income.
This period was marked by an increase in
4
retail locations from 41 on September 30, 1998 to 88 on
September 30, 2007, resulting from acquisitions and opening
new stores in existing territories.
Our growth was interrupted during the fiscal year ended
September 30, 2007, primarily as a result of factors
related to the deteriorating housing market and general economic
conditions. Substantially deteriorating economic and financial
conditions, reduced consumer confidence and spending, increases
in fuel prices, lower credit availability, financial market
declines, and asset value deterioration all contributed to
substantially lower financial performance in the fiscal years
ended September 30, 2008 and 2009 including significant
losses, and a pre-tax loss in the fiscal year ended
September 30, 2010.
We have taken a number of actions to address recent market and
economic conditions, including deferring our acquisition
program, slowing our new store openings, reducing our inventory
purchases, engaging in inventory reduction efforts, closing a
number of our retail locations, significantly reducing our
headcount, and modifying our debt structure and credit
agreement. We cannot predict the length or severity of the
current recessionary environment or the magnitude of the effects
it will have on our operating performance nor can we predict the
effectiveness of the measures we have taken to address this
environment.
Despite the foregoing actions, we are maintaining our core
values of customer service and satisfaction and plan to continue
to pursue strategies that will enable us to achieve long-term
growth. As noted in the earlier table, we have capitalized on
several brand expansion opportunities in the markets in which we
operate. We believe these expansions will strengthen our same
store sales growth when the industry recovers. We also believe
that we are well positioned for long-term success and growth
when economic conditions improve. Upon a return to more normal
economic conditions, we plan to resume expanding our business
through acquisitions in new geographical territories, and new
store openings in existing territories. In addition, we plan to
continue to expand other services, including conducting used
boat sales; offering yacht and boat brokerage services; offering
our customers the ability to finance new or used boats; offering
extended service contracts; arranging insurance coverage,
including boat property, credit-life, accident, disability, and
casualty coverage; selling related marine products, including
engines, trailers, parts, and accessories; providing maintenance
and repair services at our retail locations and at stand-alone
service facilities; and expanding our ability to provide slip
and storage accommodations. Our expansion plans will depend upon
the return of normal economic conditions.
We maintain our executive offices at 18167 U.S. Highway 19
North, Suite 300, Clearwater, Florida 33764, and our
telephone number is
(727) 531-1700.
We were incorporated in the state of Delaware in January 1998.
Unless the context otherwise requires, all references to
MarineMax mean MarineMax, Inc. prior to its
acquisition of five previously independent recreational boat
dealers in March 1998 (including their related real estate
companies) and all references to the Company,
our company, we, us, and
our mean, as a combined company, MarineMax, Inc. and
the 20 recreational boat dealers, two boat brokerage operations,
and two full-service yacht repair operations acquired to date
(the acquired dealers, and together with the
brokerage and repair operations, operating
subsidiaries, or the acquired companies).
Our website is located at www.MarineMax.com. Through our
website, we make available free of charge our annual report on
Form 10-K,
our quarterly reports on
Form 10-Q,
our current reports on
Form 8-K,
our proxy statements, and any amendments to those reports filed
or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934. These reports are available as
soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file
those reports with the Securities and Exchange Commission, or
SEC. We also post on our website the charters of our Audit,
Compensation, and Nominating/Corporate Governance Committees;
our Corporate Governance Guidelines, Code of Business Conduct
and Ethics, and Code of Ethics for the CEO and Senior Financial
Officers, and any amendments or waivers thereto; and any other
corporate governance materials contemplated by the SEC or the
regulations of the New York Stock Exchange, or NYSE. These
documents are also available in print to any stockholder
requesting a copy from our corporate secretary at our principal
executive offices. Because our common stock is listed on the
NYSE, our Chief Executive Officer is required to make an annual
certification to the NYSE stating that he is not aware of any
violation by us of the corporate governance listing standards of
the NYSE. Our Chief Executive Officer made his annual
certification to that effect to the NYSE on June 1, 2010.
5
General
We are the largest recreational boat dealer in the United
States. Through 56 retail locations in Alabama, Arizona,
California, Colorado, Connecticut, Florida, Georgia, Kansas,
Maryland, Minnesota, Missouri, New Jersey, New York, North
Carolina, Ohio, Oklahoma, Rhode Island, Tennessee, and Texas, we
sell new and used recreational boats, including pleasure boats
(such as sport boats, sport cruisers, sport yachts, and yachts),
and fishing boats, with a focus on premium brands in each
segment. We also sell related marine products, including
engines, trailers, parts, and accessories. In addition, we
arrange related boat and yacht financing, insurance, and
extended service contracts; provide repair and maintenance
services; offer boat and yacht brokerage services; and, where
available, slip and storage accommodations.
We are the nations largest retailer of Sea Ray, Boston
Whaler, Cabo, Hatteras, and Meridian recreational boats and
yachts, all of which are manufactured by Brunswick Corporation.
Sales of new Brunswick boats accounted for approximately 41% of
our revenue in fiscal 2010. Brunswick is the worlds
largest manufacturer of marine products and marine engines. We
believe our sales represented approximately 7% of all Brunswick
marine sales, including approximately 46% of its Sea Ray boat
sales, during our 2010 fiscal year. We are parties to dealer
agreements with Brunswick covering Sea Ray products and are the
exclusive dealer of Sea Ray boats in almost all of our
geographic markets. We also are the exclusive dealer for
Hatteras Yachts throughout the state of Florida (excluding the
Florida panhandle) and the states of New Jersey, New York, and
Texas; the exclusive dealer for Cabo Yachts throughout the
states of Florida, New Jersey, and New York; the exclusive
dealer for Boston Whaler in many of our markets, including our
locations in the states of New York, North Carolina, South
Carolina, and portions of the states of Florida, California, and
Texas; and the exclusive dealer for Meridian Yachts in most of
our geographic markets. In addition, we are the exclusive dealer
for Italy-based Azimut-Benetti Group for Azimut mega-yachts,
yachts, and other recreational boats for the Northeast United
States from Maryland to Maine and the state of Florida.
U.S.
Recreational Boating Industry
The total U.S. recreational boating industry generated
approximately $30.8 billion in retail sales in calendar
2009, which is down from the peak of $39.5 billion in
calendar 2006. The retail sales include retail sales of new and
used recreational boats; marine products, such as engines,
trailers, parts, and accessories; and related boating
expenditures, such as fuel, insurance, docking, storage, and
repairs. Retail sales of new and used boats, engines, trailers,
and accessories accounted for approximately $22.4 billion
of such sales in 2009. Annual retail recreational boating sales
were $17.9 billion in 1988, but declined to a low of
$10.3 billion in 1992 based on industry data published by
the National Marine Manufacturers Association. We believe this
decline was attributable to several factors, including a
recession, the Gulf War, and the imposition throughout 1991 and
1992 of a luxury tax on boats sold at prices in excess of
$100,000. The luxury tax was repealed in 1993, and retail
boating sales increased each year thereafter except for 1998,
2003, 2007, 2008, 2009, and 2010.
The recreational boat retail market remains highly fragmented
with little consolidation having occurred to date and consists
of numerous boat retailers, most of which are small companies
owned by individuals that operate in a single market and provide
varying degrees of merchandising, professional management, and
customer service. We believe that many boat retailers are
encountering increased pressure from boat manufacturers to
improve their levels of service and systems, increased
competition from larger national retailers in certain product
lines, and, in certain cases, business succession issues.
Strategy
Our goal is to enhance our position as the nations leading
recreational boat dealer. Key elements of our operating and
growth strategy include the following.
Emphasizing Customer Satisfaction and
Loyalty. We seek to achieve a high level of
customer satisfaction and establish long-term customer loyalty
by creating an overall enjoyable boating experience beginning
with a hassle-free purchase process. We further enhance and
simplify the purchase process by helping to arrange financing
and insurance at our retail locations with competitive terms and
streamlined turnaround. We offer the customer a thorough
in-water orientation of boat operations where available, as well
as ongoing boat safety, maintenance, and use seminars and
demonstrations for the customers entire family. We also
continue our customer service after the
6
sale by leading and sponsoring MarineMax Getaways! group boating
trips to various destinations, rendezvous gatherings, and
on-the-water
organized events to provide our customers with pre-arranged
opportunities to enjoy the pleasures of the boating lifestyle.
We also endeavor to provide superior maintenance and repair
services, often through mobile service at the customers
wet slip and with extended service department hours and
emergency service availability, that minimize the hassles of
boat maintenance.
Achieving Operating Efficiencies and
Synergies. We strive to increase the operating
efficiencies of and achieve certain synergies among our
dealerships in order to enhance internal growth and
profitability. We centralize various aspects of certain
administrative functions at the corporate level, such as
accounting, finance, insurance coverage, employee benefits,
marketing, strategic planning, legal support, purchasing and
distribution, and management information systems. Centralization
of these functions reduces duplicative expenses and permits the
dealerships to benefit from a level of scale and expertise that
would otherwise be unavailable to each dealership individually.
We also seek to realize cost savings from reduced inventory
carrying costs as a result of purchasing boat inventories on a
national level and directing boats to dealership locations that
can more readily sell such boats; lower financing costs through
our credit sources; and volume purchase discounts and rebates
for certain marine products, supplies, and advertising. The
ability of our retail locations to offer the complementary
services of our other retail locations, such as offering
customer excursion opportunities, providing maintenance and
repair services at the customers boat location, and giving
access to a larger inventory, increases the competitiveness of
each retail location. By centralizing these types of activities,
our store managers have more time to focus on the customer and
the development of their teams.
Promoting Brand Name Recognition and the MarineMax
Connection. We are promoting our brand name
recognition to take advantage of our status as the nations
only
coast-to-coast
marine retailer. This strategy also recognizes that many
existing and potential customers who reside in Northern markets
and vacation for substantial periods in Southern markets will
prefer to purchase and service their boats from the same
well-known company. We refer to this strategy as the
MarineMax Connection. As a result, our signage
emphasizes the MarineMax name at each of our locations, and we
conduct national advertising in various print and other media.
Offering Additional Products and Services, Including Those
Involving Higher Profit Margins. We plan to
continue to offer additional product lines and services
throughout our dealerships or, when appropriate, in selected
dealerships. We are offering throughout our dealerships product
lines that previously have been offered only at certain of our
locations. We also may obtain additional product lines through
the acquisition of distribution rights directly from
manufacturers and the acquisition of dealerships with
distribution rights. In either situation, such expansion is
typically done through agreements that appoint us as the
exclusive dealer for a designated geographic territory. We plan
to continue to grow our financing and insurance, parts and
accessories, service, and boat storage businesses to better
serve our customers and thereby increase revenue and improve
profitability of these higher margin businesses. We also are
implementing aggressive programs to increase substantially the
sale over the Internet of used boats, parts, accessories, and a
wide range of boating supplies and products.
Marketing over the Internet. Our web
initiatives span across multiple websites, including our core
site, www.MarineMax.com. The websites provide customers
with the ability to learn more about our company and our
products. Our website generates direct sales and provides our
stores with leads to potential customers for new and used boats,
brokerage services, finance and insurance products, and repair
and maintenance services. In addition, we utilize various feeder
websites and social networking websites to drive additional
traffic and leads for our various product and service offerings.
As mentioned above, we also maintain multiple online storefronts
for customers to purchase a wide variety of boating parts and
accessories.
Pursuing Strategic Acquisitions. We capitalize
upon the significant consolidation opportunities available in
the highly fragmented recreational boat dealer industry by
acquiring independent dealers and improving their performance
and profitability through the implementation of our operating
strategies. The primary acquisition focus is on
well-established, high-end recreational boat dealers in
geographic markets not currently served by us, particularly
geographic markets with strong boating demographics, such as
areas within the coastal states and the Great Lakes region. We
also may seek to acquire boat dealers that, while located in
attractive geographic markets, have not been able to realize
favorable market share or profitability and that can benefit
substantially from our systems and operating strategies. We may
expand our range of product lines, service offerings, and market
7
penetration by acquiring companies that distribute recreational
boat product lines or boating-related services different from
those we currently offer. As a result of our considerable
industry experience and relationships, we believe we are well
positioned to identify and evaluate acquisition candidates and
assess their growth prospects, the quality of their management
teams, their local reputation with customers, and the
suitability of their locations. We believe we are regarded as an
attractive acquirer by boat dealers because of (1) the
historical performance and the experience and reputation of our
management team within the industry; (2) our decentralized
operating strategy, which generally enables the managers of an
acquired dealer to continue their involvement in dealership
operations; (3) the ability of management and employees of
an acquired dealer to participate in our growth and expansion
through potential stock ownership and career advancement
opportunities; and (4) the ability to offer liquidity to
the owners of acquired dealers through the receipt of common
stock or cash. We have entered into an agreement regarding
acquisitions with the Sea Ray Division of Brunswick. Under the
agreement, acquisitions of Sea Ray dealers will be mutually
agreed upon by us and Sea Ray with reasonable efforts to be made
to include a balance of Sea Ray dealers that have been
successful and those that have not been. The agreement provides
that Sea Ray will not unreasonably withhold its consent to any
proposed acquisition of a Sea Ray dealer by us, subject to the
conditions set forth in the agreement, as further described in
Business Brunswick Agreement Relating to
Acquisitions.
Opening New Facilities. We intend to continue
to establish additional retail facilities in our existing and
new markets when markets conditions improve. We believe that the
demographics of our existing geographic territories support the
opening of additional facilities, and we have opened 28 new
retail facilities, excluding those opened on a temporary basis
for a specific purpose, since our formation in January 1998. We
also plan to reach new customers through various innovative
retail formats developed by us, such as mall stores and floating
retail facilities. We continually monitor the performance of our
retail locations and close retail locations that do not meet our
expectations or that were opened for a specific purpose that is
no longer relevant. Based on these factors since March 1998, we
have closed 47 retail locations, excluding those opened on a
temporary basis for a specific purpose, including 26 in fiscal
2009.
Emphasizing Employee Recruiting, Training, and
Development. We devote substantial efforts to
recruit employees that we believe to be exceptionally well
qualified for their position and to train our employees to
understand our core retail philosophies, which focus on making
the purchase of a boat and its subsequent use as hassle-free and
enjoyable as possible. Through our MarineMax University, or MMU,
we teach our retail philosophies to existing and new employees
at various locations and online, through MMU-online. MMU is a
modularized and instructor-led educational program that focuses
on our retailing philosophies and provides instruction on such
matters as the sales process, customer service, F&I,
accounting, leadership, and human resources.
Emphasizing Best Practices. We emphasize the
best practices developed by us and our acquired
dealers as appropriate throughout our locations. As an example,
we follow a no-haggle sales approach at each of our dealerships.
Under the MarineMax Value-Price approach, we sell our boats at
posted prices, generally representing a discount from the
manufacturers suggested retail price, thereby eliminating
the anxieties of price negotiations that occur in most boat
purchases. In addition, we adopt, where beneficial, the best
practices developed by us and our acquired dealers in terms of
location, design, layout, product purchases, maintenance and
repair services (including extended service hours and mobile or
dockside services), product mix, employee training, and customer
education and services.
Operating with Decentralized Management. We
maintain a generally decentralized approach to the operational
management of our dealerships. The decentralized management
approach takes advantage of the extensive experience of local
managers, enabling them to implement policies and make
decisions, including the appropriate product mix, based on the
needs of the local market. Local management authority also
fosters responsive customer service and promotes long-term
community and customer relationships. In addition, the
centralization of certain administrative functions at the
corporate level enhances the ability of local managers to focus
their efforts on
day-to-day
dealership operations and the customers.
Utilizing Technology Throughout Operations. We
believe that our management information system, which currently
is being utilized by each of our dealerships and was developed
over a number of years through cooperative efforts with a common
vendor, enhances our ability to integrate successfully the
operations of our dealerships and
8
future acquired dealers. The system facilitates the interchange
of information and enhances cross-selling opportunities
throughout our company. The system integrates each level of
operations on a company-wide basis, including purchasing,
inventory, receivables, financial reporting, budgeting, and
sales management. The system also provides sales representatives
with prospect and customer information that aids them in
tracking the status of their contacts with prospects,
automatically generates
follow-up
correspondence to such prospects, facilitates the availability
of boats company-wide, locates boats needed to satisfy
particular customer requests, and monitors the maintenance and
service needs of customers boats. Our representatives also
utilize the computer system to assist in arranging customer
financing and insurance packages. Our managers use a web-based
tool to access essentially all financial and operational data
from anywhere at any time.
Products
and Services
We offer new and used recreational boats and related marine
products, including engines, trailers, parts, and accessories.
While we sell a broad range of new and used boats, we focus on
premium brand products. In addition, we assist in arranging
related boat financing, insurance, and extended service
contracts; provide boat maintenance and repair services; provide
boat brokerage services; and offer slip and storage
accommodations.
New
Boat Sales
We primarily sell recreational boats, including pleasure boats
and fishing boats. The principal products we offer are
manufactured by Brunswick, the leading worldwide manufacturer of
recreational boats, including Sea Ray pleasure boats, Boston
Whaler fishing boats, Cabo Yachts, Hatteras Yachts, and Meridian
Yachts. In fiscal 2010, we derived approximately 41% of our
revenue from the sale of new boats manufactured by Brunswick. We
believe that we represented approximately 7% of all of
Brunswicks marine product sales during that period.
Certain of our dealerships also sell luxury yachts, fishing
boats, and pontoon boats provided by other manufacturers,
including Italy-based Azimut. During fiscal 2010, new boat sales
accounted for 54.4% of our revenue.
We offer recreational boats in most market segments, but have a
particular focus on premium quality pleasure boats and yachts as
reflected by our fiscal 2010 average new boat sales price of
approximately $145,000, an increase of approximately 9% from
fiscal 2009, compared with an estimated industry average
calendar 2009 selling price of approximately $37,000 based on
industry data published by the National Marine Manufacturers
Association. Given our locations in some of the more affluent,
offshore boating areas in the United States and emphasis on high
levels of customer service, we sell a relatively higher
percentage of large recreational boats, such as mega-yachts,
yachts, and sport cruisers. We believe that the product lines we
offer are among the highest quality within their respective
market segments, with well-established trade-name recognition
and reputations for quality, performance, and styling.
The following table is illustrative of the range and approximate
manufacturer suggested retail price range of new boats that we
currently offer, but is not all inclusive.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manufacturer Suggested
|
Product Line and Trade Name
|
|
Overall Length
|
|
Retail Price Range
|
|
Motor Yachts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hatteras Motor Yachts
|
|
|
54 to 100+
|
|
|
$3,000,000 to $10,000,000+
|
Azimut
|
|
|
38 to 116+
|
|
|
790,000 to 12,000,000+
|
Convertibles
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hatteras Convertibles
|
|
|
54 to 77+
|
|
|
2,300,000 to 7,000,000+
|
Cabo
|
|
|
32 to 52
|
|
|
475,000 to 2,000,000+
|
Pleasure Boats
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sea Ray
|
|
|
17 to 61
|
|
|
21,000 to 2,500,000
|
Meridian
|
|
|
34 to 59
|
|
|
300,000 to 1,600,000
|
Fishing Boats
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Boston Whaler
|
|
|
11 to 37
|
|
|
8,000 to 400,000
|
Grady White
|
|
|
18 to 36
|
|
|
40,000 to 500,000
|
Ski Boats
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Malibu
|
|
|
20 to 25
|
|
|
44,000 to 88,000
|
Axis
|
|
|
20 to 22
|
|
|
35,000 to 38,000
|
Nautique by Correct Craft
|
|
|
21 to 25
|
|
|
57,000 to 105,000
|
9
Motor Yachts. Hatteras Yachts and Azimut are
two of the worlds premier yacht builders. The motor yacht
product lines typically include
state-of-the-art
designs with live-aboard luxuries. Hatteras offers a flybridge
with extensive guest seating; covered aft deck, which may be
fully or partially enclosed, providing the boater with
additional living space; an elegant salon; and multiple
staterooms for accommodations. Azimut yachts are known for their
Americanized open layout with Italian design and powerful
performance. The luxurious interiors of Azimut yachts are
accented by windows and multiple accommodations that have been
designed for comfort.
Convertibles. Hatteras Yachts and Cabo Yachts
are two of the worlds premier convertible yacht builders
and offer
state-of-the-art
designs with live-aboard luxuries. Convertibles are primarily
fishing vessels, which are well equipped to meet the needs of
even the most serious tournament-class competitor. Hatteras
features interiors that offer luxurious salon/galley
arrangements, multiple staterooms with private heads, and a
cockpit that includes a bait and tackle center, fishbox, and
freezer. Cabo is known for spacious cockpits and accessibility
to essentials, such as bait chests, livewells, bait prep
centers, and tackle lockers. Cabo interiors offer elegance,
highlighted by teak woodwork, halogen lighting, and ample
storage areas.
Pleasure Boats. Sea Ray and Meridian pleasure
boats target both the luxury and the family recreational boating
markets and come in a variety of configurations to suit each
customers particular recreational boating style. Sea Ray
sport yachts and yachts serve the luxury segment of the
recreational boating market and include
top-of-the
line living accommodations with a salon, a fully equipped
galley, and multiple staterooms. Sea Ray sport yachts and yachts
are available in cabin, bridge cockpit, and cruiser models. Sea
Ray sport boat and sport cruiser models are designed for
performance and dependability to meet family recreational needs
and include many of the features and accommodations of Sea
Rays sport yacht and yacht models. Meridian sport yachts
and yachts are known for their solid performance and thoughtful
use of space with
360-degree
views and spacious salon, galley, and stateroom accommodations.
Meridian sport yachts and yachts are available in sedan,
motoryacht, and pilothouse models. All Sea Ray and Meridian
pleasure boats feature custom instrumentation that may include
an electronics package; various hull, deck, and cockpit designs
that can include a swim platform; bow pulpit and raised bridge;
and various amenities, such as swivel bucket helm seats, lounge
seats, sun pads, wet bars, built-in ice chests, and refreshment
centers. Most Sea Ray and Meridian pleasure boats feature
Mercury or MerCruiser engines.
Fishing Boats. The fishing boats we offer,
such as Boston Whaler and Grady White, range from entry level
models to advanced models designed for fishing and water sports
in lakes, bays, and off-shore waters, with cabins with limited
live-aboard capability. The fishing boats typically feature
livewells, in-deck fishboxes, rodholders, rigging stations,
cockpit coaming pads, and fresh and saltwater washdowns.
Ski Boats. The ski boats we offer, such as
Malibu, Axis, and Nautique by Correct Craft, range from entry
level models to advanced models, all of which are designed to
achieve an ultimate wake for increased skier and wakeboarder
performance and safety. With a variety of designs and options,
the ski boats we offer will appeal to the competitor and
recreational user alike.
Used
Boat Sales
We sell used versions of the new makes and models we offer and,
to a lesser extent, used boats of other makes and models
generally taken as trade-ins. During fiscal 2010, used boat
sales accounted for 24.0% of our revenue, and 73.1% of the used
boats we sold were Brunswick models.
Our used boat sales depend on our ability to source a supply of
high-quality used boats at attractive prices. We acquire
substantially all of our used boats through customer trade-ins.
We intend to continue to increase our used boat business as a
result of the availability of quality used boats generated from
our new boat sales efforts, the increasing number of used boats
that are well-maintained through our service initiatives,
including our Premium Certified Pre-Owned Program, our ability
to market used boats throughout our combined dealership network
to match used boat demand, and the experience of our yacht
brokerage operations. Additionally, substantially all of our
used boat inventory is posted on our website,
www.MarineMax.com, which expands the awareness and
availability of our products to a large audience of boating
enthusiasts.
To further enhance our used boat sales, we launched a Premium
Certified Pre-Owned Program, or PCPO, in fiscal 2008. Generally,
PCPO boats are less than four years old, have passed a 150-
point inspection, and carry a one
10
year warranty. Additionally, we offer the Sea Ray Legacy
warranty plan available for used Sea Ray boats less than six
years old. The Legacy plan applies to each qualifying used Sea
Ray boat, which has passed a 48-point inspection, and provides
protection against failure of most mechanical parts for up to
three years. We believe these programs enhance our sales of used
Sea Ray boats by motivating purchasers of used Sea Ray boats to
complete their purchases through our Sea Ray dealerships.
Marine
Engines, Related Marine Equipment, and Boating
Accessories
We offer marine engines and propellers, substantially all of
which are manufactured by Mercury Marine, a division of
Brunswick. We sell marine engines and propellers primarily to
retail customers as replacements for their existing engines or
propellers. Mercury Marine has introduced various new engine
models that reduce engine emissions to comply with current
Environmental Protection Agency requirements. See
Business Environmental and Other Regulatory
Issues. An industry leader for almost six decades, Mercury
Marine specializes in
state-of-the-art
marine propulsion systems and accessories. Many of our
dealerships have been recognized by Mercury Marine as
Premier Service Dealers. This designation is
generally awarded based on meeting certain standards and
qualifications.
We also sell related marine parts and accessories, including
oils, lubricants, steering and control systems, corrosion
control products, engine care, maintenance, and service products
(primarily Mercury Marines Quicksilver line);
high-performance accessories (such as propellers) and
instruments; and a complete line of boating accessories,
including life jackets, inflatables, and water sports equipment.
We also offer novelty items, such as shirts, caps, and license
plates bearing the manufacturers or dealers logo.
The sale of marine engines, related marine equipment, and
boating accessories accounted for 6.4% of our fiscal 2010
revenue.
Maintenance,
Repair, and Storage Services
Providing customers with professional, prompt maintenance and
repair services is critical to our sales efforts and contributes
to our success. We provide maintenance and repair services at
most of our retail locations, with extended service hours at
certain of our locations. In addition, in many of our markets,
we provide mobile maintenance and repair services at the
location of the customers boat. We believe that this
service commitment is a competitive advantage in the markets in
which we compete and is critical to our efforts to provide a
trouble-free boating experience. To further this commitment, in
certain of our markets, we have opened stand-alone maintenance
and repair facilities in locations that are more convenient for
our customers and that increase the availability of such
services. We also believe that our maintenance and repair
services contribute to strong customer relationships and that
our emphasis on preventative maintenance and quality service
increases the potential supply of well-maintained boats for our
used boat sales.
We perform both warranty and non-warranty repair services, with
the cost of warranty work reimbursed by the manufacturer in
accordance with the manufacturers warranty reimbursement
program. For warranty work, most manufacturers, including
Brunswick, reimburse a percentage of the dealers posted
service labor rates, with the percentage varying depending on
the dealers customer satisfaction index rating and
attendance at service training courses. We derive the majority
of our warranty revenue from Brunswick products, as Brunswick
products comprise the majority of products sold. Certain other
manufacturers reimburse warranty work at a fixed amount per
repair. Because boat manufacturers permit warranty work to be
performed only at authorized dealerships, we receive
substantially all of the warranted maintenance and repair work
required for the new boats we sell. The third-party extended
warranty contracts we offer also result in an ongoing demand for
our maintenance and repair services for the duration of the term
of the extended warranty contract.
Our maintenance and repair services are performed by
manufacturer-trained and certified service technicians. In
charging for our mechanics labor, many of our dealerships
use a variable rate structure designed to reflect the difficulty
and sophistication of different types of repairs. The percentage
markups on parts are similarly based on manufacturer suggested
prices and market conditions for different parts.
11
At many of our locations, we offer boat storage services,
including in-water slip storage and inside and outside land
storage. These storage services are offered at competitive
market rates and include in-season and winter storage.
Maintenance, repair, and storage services accounted for 9.8% of
our revenue during fiscal 2010. This includes warranty and
non-warranty services.
F&I
Products
At each of our retail locations, we offer our customers the
ability to finance new or used boat purchases and to purchase
extended service contracts and arrange insurance coverage,
including boat property, credit life, and accident, disability,
and casualty insurance coverage (collectively,
F&I).
We have relationships with various national marine product
lenders under which the lenders purchase retail installment
contracts evidencing retail sales of boats and other marine
products that are originated by us in accordance with existing
pre-sale agreements between us and the lenders. These
arrangements permit us to receive a portion of the finance
charges expected to be earned on the retail installment contract
based on a variety of factors, including the credit standing of
the buyer, the annual percentage rate of the contract charged to
the buyer, and the lenders then current minimum required
annual percentage rate charged to the buyer on the contract.
This participation is subject to repayment by us if the buyer
prepays the contract or defaults within a designated time
period, usually 90 to 180 days. To the extent required by
applicable state law, our dealerships are licensed to originate
and sell retail installment contracts financing the sale of
boats and other marine products.
We also offer third-party extended service contracts under
which, for a predetermined price, we provide all designated
services pursuant to the service contract guidelines during the
contract term at no additional charge to the customer above a
deductible. While we sell all new boats with the boat
manufacturers standard hull warranty of generally five
years and standard engine warranty of generally one year,
extended service contracts provide additional coverage beyond
the time frame or scope of the manufacturers warranty.
Purchasers of used boats generally are able to purchase an
extended service contract, even if the selected boat is no
longer covered by the manufacturers warranty. Generally,
we receive a fee for arranging an extended service contract.
Most required services under the contracts are provided by us
and paid for by the third-party contract holder.
We also are able to assist our customers with the opportunity to
purchase credit life insurance, accident and disability
insurance, and property and casualty insurance. Credit life
insurance policies provide for repayment of the boat financing
contract if the purchaser dies while the contract is
outstanding. Accident and disability insurance policies provide
for payment of the monthly contract obligation during any period
in which the buyer is disabled. Property and casualty insurance
covers loss or damage to the boat. We do not act as an insurance
broker or agent or issue insurance policies on behalf of
insurers. We do, however, provide marketing activities and other
related services to insurance companies and brokers for which we
receive marketing fees. One of our strategies is to generate
increased marketing fees by offering more competitive insurance
products.
During fiscal 2010, fee income generated from F&I products
accounted for 2.7% of our revenue. We believe that our
customers ability to obtain competitive financing quickly
and easily at our dealerships complements our ability to sell
new and used boats. We also believe our ability to provide
customer-tailored financing on a
same-day
basis gives us an advantage over many of our competitors,
particularly smaller competitors that lack the resources to
arrange boat financing at their dealerships or that do not
generate sufficient volume to attract the diversity of financing
sources that are available to us.
Brokerage
Services
Through employees or subcontractors that are licensed boat or
yacht brokers, we offer boat or yacht brokerage services at most
of our retail locations. For a commission, we offer for sale
brokered boats or yachts, listing them on the BUC
system, advising our other retail locations of their
availability through our integrated computer system, and posting
them on our web site, www.MarineMax.com. The BUC system,
which is similar to a real estate multiple listing service, is a
national boat or yacht listing service of approximately 900
brokers maintained by BUC International. Often sales are
co-brokered, with the commission split between the buying and
selling brokers. We
12
believe that our access to potential used boat customers and
methods of listing and advertising customers brokered
boats or yachts is more extensive than is typical among brokers.
In addition to generating revenue from brokerage commissions,
our brokerage services also enable us to offer a broad array of
used boats or yachts without increasing related inventory costs.
During fiscal 2010, brokerage services accounted for 2.7% of our
revenue.
Our brokerage customers generally receive the same high level of
customer service as our new and used boat customers. Our
waterfront retail locations enable in-water demonstrations of an
on-site
brokered boat. Our maintenance and repair services, including
mobile service, also are generally available to our brokerage
customers. The purchaser of a boat brokered through us also can
take advantage of MarineMax Getaways! weekend and day trips and
other rendezvous gatherings and in-water events, as well as boat
operation and safety seminars. We believe that the array of
services we offer are unique in the brokerage business.
Retail
Locations
We sell our recreational boats and other marine products and
offer our related boat services through 56 retail locations in
Alabama, Arizona, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Florida,
Georgia, Kansas, Maryland, Minnesota, Missouri, New Jersey, New
York, North Carolina, Ohio, Oklahoma, Rhode Island, Tennessee,
and Texas. Each retail location generally includes an indoor
showroom (including some of the industrys largest indoor
boat showrooms) and an outside area for displaying boat
inventories, a business office to assist customers in arranging
financing and insurance, and maintenance and repair facilities.
Many of our retail locations are waterfront properties on some
of the nations most popular boating locations, including
the San Diego Bay in California; Norwalk Harbor in
Connecticut; multiple locations on the Intracoastal Waterway,
the Atlantic Ocean, Biscayne Bay, Boca Ciega Bay, Naples Bay,
Tampa Bay, and the Caloosahatchee River in Florida; Lake Lanier
in Georgia; Chesapeake Bay in Maryland; Leech Lake and the
St. Croix River in Minnesota; Lake of the Ozarks, and Table
Rock Lake in Missouri; Barnegat Bay, the Hudson River, Lake
Hopatcong, Little Egg Harbor, and the Manasquan River in New
Jersey; Great Sound Bay, the Hudson River, and Huntington Harbor
in New York; the Intracoastal Waterway in North Carolina; Lake
Erie in Ohio; Grand Lake in Oklahoma; Tennessee River in
Tennessee; and Clear Lake, and Lake Lewisville in Texas. Our
waterfront retail locations, most of which include marina-type
facilities and docks at which we display our boats, are easily
accessible to the boating populace, serve as in-water showrooms,
and enable the sales force to give customers immediate in-water
demonstrations of various boat models. Most of our other
locations are in close proximity to water.
Operations
Dealership
Operations and Management
We have adopted a generally decentralized approach to the
operational management of our dealerships. While certain
administrative functions are centralized at the corporate level,
local management is primarily responsible for the
day-to-day
operations of the retail locations. Each retail location is
managed by a store manager, who oversees the
day-to-day
operations, personnel, and financial performance of the
individual store, subject to the direction of a regional
manager, who generally has responsibility for the retail
locations within a specified geographic region. Typically, each
retail location also has a staff consisting of an F&I
manager, a parts manager, and a service manager, sales
representatives, maintenance and repair technicians, and various
support personnel.
We attempt to attract and retain quality employees at our retail
locations by providing them with ongoing training to enhance
sales professionalism and product knowledge, career advancement
opportunities within a larger company, and favorable benefit
packages. We maintain a formal training program, called
MarineMax University or MMU, which provides training for
employees in all aspects of our operations. Training sessions
are held at our various regional locations covering a variety of
topics. MMU-online offers various modules over the Internet.
Highly trained, professional sales representatives are an
important factor to our successful sales efforts. These sales
representatives are trained at MMU to recognize the importance
of fostering an enjoyable sales process, to educate customers on
the operation and use of the boats, and to assist customers in
making technical and design decisions in boat purchases. The
overall focus of MMU is to teach our core retailing values,
which focus on customer service.
13
Sales representatives receive compensation primarily on a
commission basis. Each store manager is a salaried employee with
incentive bonuses based on the performance of the managed
dealership. Maintenance and repair service managers receive
compensation on a salary basis with bonuses based on the
performance of their departments. Our management information
system provides each store and department manager with daily
financial and operational information, enabling them to monitor
their performance on a daily, weekly, and monthly basis. We have
a uniform, fully integrated management information system
serving each of our dealerships.
Sales
and Marketing
Our sales philosophy focuses on selling the pleasures of the
boating lifestyle. We believe that the critical elements of our
sales philosophy include our appealing retail locations,
no-hassle sales approach, highly trained sales representatives,
high level of customer service, emphasis on educating the
customer and the customers family on boat usage, and
providing our customers with opportunities for boating. We
strive to provide superior customer service and support before,
during, and after the sale.
Each retail location offers the customer the opportunity to
evaluate a large variety of new and used boats in a comfortable
and convenient setting. Our full-service retail locations
facilitate a turn-key purchasing process that includes
attractive lender financing packages, extended service
agreements, and insurance. Many of our retail locations are
located on waterfronts and marinas, which attract boating
enthusiasts and enable customers to operate various boats prior
to making a purchase decision.
We sell our boats at posted MarineMax Value Prices that
generally represent a discount from the manufacturers
suggested retail price. Our sales approach focuses on customer
service by minimizing customer anxiety associated with price
negotiation.
As a part of our sales and marketing efforts, we also
participate in boat shows and
in-the-water
sales events at area boating locations, typically held in
January and February and toward the end of the boating season,
in each of our markets and in certain locations in close
proximity to our markets. These shows and events are normally
held at convention centers or marinas, with area dealers renting
space. Boat shows and other offsite promotions are an important
venue for generating sales orders. The boat shows also generate
a significant amount of interest in our products resulting in
boat sales after the show.
We emphasize customer education through
one-on-one
education by our sales representatives and, at some locations,
our delivery captains, before and after a sale, and through
in-house seminars for the entire family on boat safety, the use
and operation of boats, and product demonstrations. Typically,
one of our delivery captains or the sales representative
delivers the customers boat to an area boating location
and thoroughly instructs the customer about the operation of the
boat, including hands-on instructions for docking and trailering
the boat. To enhance our customer relationships after the sale,
we lead and sponsor MarineMax Getaways! group boating trips to
various destinations, rendezvous gatherings, and
on-the-water
organized events that promote the pleasures of the boating
lifestyle. Each company-sponsored event, planned and led by a
company employee, also provides a favorable medium for
acclimating new customers to boating, sharing exciting boating
destinations, creating friendships with other boaters, and
enabling us to promote actively new product offerings to boating
enthusiasts.
As a result of our relative size, we believe we have a
competitive advantage within the industry by being able to
conduct an organized and systematic advertising and marketing
effort. Part of our marketing effort includes an integrated
prospect management system that tracks the status of each sales
representatives contacts with a prospect, automatically
generates
follow-up
correspondence, facilitates company-wide availability of a
particular boat or other marine product desired by a customer,
and tracks the maintenance and service needs for the
customers boat.
Suppliers
and Inventory Management
We purchase substantially all of our new boat inventory directly
from manufacturers, which allocate new boats to dealerships
based on the amount of boats sold by the dealership. We also
exchange new boats with other dealers to accommodate customer
demand and to balance inventory.
We purchase new boats and other marine-related products from
Brunswick, which is the worlds largest manufacturer of
marine products, including Sea Ray, Boston Whaler, Cabo,
Hatteras, and Meridian. We also
14
purchase new boats and other marine related products from other
manufacturers, including Azimut-Benetti Group, Grady White, and
Tracker Marine. In fiscal 2010, sales of new Brunswick boats
accounted for approximately 41% of our revenue. No purchases of
new boats and other marine-related products from any other
manufacturer accounted for more than 10% of our revenue in
fiscal 2010. We believe our Sea Ray boat purchases represented
approximately 46% of Sea Rays new boat sales and
approximately 7% of all Brunswick marine product sales during
fiscal 2010.
We have entered into agreements with Brunswick covering Sea Ray
products. The dealer agreements with the Sea Ray division of
Brunswick do not restrict our right to sell any Sea Ray product
lines or competing products. The terms of each dealer agreement
appoints a designated geographical territory for the dealer,
which is exclusive to the dealer so long as the dealer is not in
breach of the material obligations and performance standards
under the agreement and Sea Rays then current material
policies and programs following notice and the expiration of any
applicable cure periods without cure.
Upon the completion of the Surfside-3 acquisition in March 2006,
we became the exclusive dealer for Azimut-Benetti Groups
Azimut product line in the Northeast United States. The Azimut
dealer agreement provides a geographic territory to promote the
product line and to network with the appropriate clientele
through various independent locations designated for Azimut
retail sales.
We typically deal with each of our manufacturers, other than the
Sea Ray division of Brunswick, under an annually renewable,
non-exclusive dealer agreement. Manufacturers generally
establish prices on an annual basis, but may change prices in
their sole discretion. Manufacturers typically discount the cost
of inventory and offer inventory financing assistance during the
manufacturers slow seasons, generally October through
March. To obtain lower cost of inventory, we strive to
capitalize on these manufacturer incentives to take product
delivery during the manufacturers slow seasons. This
permits us to gain pricing advantages and better product
availability during the selling season. Arrangements with
certain other manufacturers may restrict our right to offer some
product lines in certain markets.
We transfer individual boats among our retail locations to fill
customer orders that otherwise might take substantially longer
to fill from the manufacturer. This reduces delays in delivery,
helps us maximize inventory turnover, and assists in minimizing
potential overstock or
out-of-stock
situations. We actively monitor our inventory levels to maintain
levels appropriate to meet current anticipated market demands.
We are not bound by contractual agreements governing the amount
of inventory that we must purchase in any year from any
manufacturer, but the failure to purchase at agreed upon levels
may result in the loss of certain manufacturer incentives. We
participate in numerous
end-of-summer
manufacturer boat shows, which manufacturers sponsor to sell off
their remaining inventory at reduced costs before the
introduction of new model year products, typically beginning in
July.
Inventory
Financing
Marine manufacturers customarily provide interest assistance
programs to retailers. The interest assistance varies by
manufacturer and may include periods of free financing or
reduced interest rate programs. The interest assistance may be
paid directly to the retailer or the financial institution
depending on the arrangements the manufacturer has established.
We believe that our financing arrangements with manufacturers
are standard within the industry.
We account for consideration received from our vendors in
accordance with FASB Accounting Standards Codification
605-50,
Revenue Recognition, Customer Payments and
Incentives (ASC
605-50),
previously referred to as Emerging Issues Task Force Issue
No. 02-16,
Accounting by a Customer (Including a Reseller) for
Certain Consideration Received from a Vendor.
ASC 605-50
requires us to classify interest assistance received from
manufacturers as a reduction of inventory cost and related cost
of sales as opposed to netting the assistance against our
interest expense incurred with our lenders. Pursuant to
ASC 605-50,
amounts received by us under our co-op assistance programs from
our manufacturers are netted against related advertising
expenses.
We are party to an Inventory Financing Agreement with GE
Commercial Distribution Finance Company, or GECDF. The credit
facility provides a floor plan financing commitment of
$100 million and allows us to request a
15
$50 million increase to this commitment under an accordion
feature, subject to GECDF approval. The credit facility matures
on June 24, 2013 and is subject to extension for two
one-year periods, subject to GECDF approval.
The interest rate for amounts outstanding under the credit
facility is 378 basis points above the one-month London
Inter-Bank Offering Rate. There is an unused line fee of ten
basis points on the unused portion of the line.
The credit facility has certain financial covenants. The
covenants include provisions that our leverage ratio not exceed
2.75 to 1.0 and that our current ratio must be greater than 1.2
to 1.0. At September 30, 2010, we were in compliance with
all the covenants under the credit facility.
The initial advance under the credit facility was used to pay
off our prior credit facility. Subsequent advances will be
initiated by the acquisition of eligible new and used inventory
or will be re-advances against eligible new and used inventory
that has been partially paid-off. Advances on new inventory will
mature 1,081 days from the original invoice date. Advances
on used inventory will mature 361 days from the date we
acquire the used inventory. Each advance is subject to a
curtailment schedule, which requires that we pay down the
balance of each advance on a periodic basis starting after six
months. The curtailment schedule varies based on the type of
inventory and the value of the inventory.
The collateral for the credit facility is all of our personal
property with certain limited exceptions. None of our real
estate has been pledged for collateral for the credit facility.
At September 30, 2010, we owed an aggregate of
$93.8 million under our credit facility and were in
compliance with all of the credit facility covenants. Advances
under the facility accrued interest at a rate of 4.0% as of
September 30, 2010, and the credit facility provided us
with an additional net borrowing availability of approximately
$4.2 million. All indebtedness associated with our real
estate holdings were repaid during the fiscal year ended
September 30, 2009.
On October 7, 2010, we entered into an Inventory Financing
Agreement (the CGI Facility) with CGI Finance, Inc.
The CGI Facility provides a floor plan financing commitment of
$30 million and is designed to provide financing for our
Azimut inventory needs. The CGI Facility has a one-year term,
which is typical in the industry for similar floor plan
facilities; however, each advance under the CGI Facility can
remain outstanding for 18 months. The interest rate for
amounts outstanding under the CGI Facility is 350 basis
points above the one month London Inter-Bank Offering Rate.
Advances under the CGI Facility will be initiated by the
acquisition of eligible new and used inventory or will be
re-advances against eligible new and used inventory that has
been partially paid-off. Advances on new inventory will mature
550 days from the original invoice date. Advances on used
inventory will mature 366 days from the date we acquire the
used inventory. Each advance is subject to a curtailment
schedule, which requires that we pay down the balance of each
advance on a periodic basis starting after six months for used
inventory and one year for new inventory. The curtailment
schedule varies based on the type of inventory.
The collateral for the CGI Facility is our entire Azimut
inventory financed by the CGI Facility with certain limited
exceptions. None of our real estate has been pledged for
collateral for the CGI Facility. We must maintain compliance
with various covenants, including balance sheet related
covenants of current and leverage ratios, as defined in the CGI
Facility. The CGI Facility contemplates that other lenders may
be added by us to finance other inventory not financed under the
CGI Facility, if needed.
Management
Information System
We believe that our management information system, which
currently is being utilized by each of our dealerships and was
developed over a number of years through cooperative efforts
with a common vendor, enhances our ability to integrate
successfully the operations of our dealerships and future
acquisitions, facilitates the interchange of information, and
enhances cross-selling opportunities throughout our company. The
system integrates each level of operations on a company-wide
basis, including purchasing, inventory, receivables, financial
reporting, budgeting, and sales management. The system enables
us to monitor each dealerships operations in order to
identify quickly areas requiring additional focus and to manage
inventory. The system also provides sales representatives with
prospect and customer information that aids them in tracking the
status of their contacts with
16
prospects, automatically generates
follow-up
correspondence to such prospects, facilitates the availability
of a particular boat company-wide, locates boats needed to
satisfy a particular customer request, and monitors the
maintenance and service needs of customers boats. Company
representatives also utilize the system to assist in arranging
financing and insurance packages.
Brunswick
Agreement Relating to Acquisitions
We and the Sea Ray Division of Brunswick are parties to an
agreement extending through December 2015 that provides a
process for the acquisition of additional Sea Ray boat dealers
that desire to be acquired by us. Under the agreement,
acquisitions of Sea Ray dealers will be mutually agreed upon by
us and Sea Ray with reasonable efforts to be made to include a
balance of Sea Ray dealers that have been successful and those
that have not been. The agreement provides that Sea Ray will not
unreasonably withhold its consent to any proposed acquisition of
a Sea Ray dealer by us, subject to the conditions set forth in
the agreement. Among other things, the agreement provides for us
to provide Sea Ray with a business plan for each proposed
acquisition, including historical financial and five-year
projected financial information regarding the acquisition
candidate; marketing and advertising plans; service capabilities
and managerial and staff personnel; information regarding the
ability of the candidate to achieve performance standards within
designated periods; and information regarding the success of our
previous acquisitions of Sea Ray dealers. The agreement also
contemplates Sea Ray reaching a good faith determination whether
the acquisition would be in its best interest based on our
dedication and focus of resources on the Sea Ray brand and Sea
Rays consideration of any adverse effects that the
approval would have on the resulting territory configuration of
adjacent or other dealers and the absence of any violation of
applicable laws or rights granted by Sea Ray to others.
Dealer
Agreements with Brunswick
Brunswick, through its Sea Ray division, and we, through our
dealerships, are parties to Sales and Service Agreements
relating to Sea Ray products extending through December 2015.
Each of these dealer agreements appoints one of our dealerships
as a dealer for the retail sale, display, and servicing of
designated Sea Ray products, parts, and accessories currently or
in the future sold by Sea Ray. Each dealer agreement designates
a designated geographical territory for the dealer, which is
exclusive to the dealer as long as the dealer is not in breach
of the material obligations and performance standards under the
agreement and Sea Rays then current material policies and
programs following notice and the expiration of any applicable
cure periods without cure. Each dealer agreement also specifies
retail locations, which the dealer may not close, change, or add
to without the prior written consent of Sea Ray, provided that
Sea Ray may not unreasonably withhold its consent. Each dealer
agreement also restricts the dealer from selling, advertising
(other than in recognized and established marine publications),
soliciting for sale, or offering for resale any Sea Ray products
outside its territory without the prior written consent of Sea
Ray as long as similar restrictions also apply to all domestic
Sea Ray dealers selling comparable Sea Ray products. In
addition, each dealer agreement provides for the lowest product
prices charged by Sea Ray from time to time to other domestic
Sea Ray dealers, subject to the dealer meeting all the
requirements and conditions of Sea Rays applicable
programs and the right of Sea Ray in good faith to charge lesser
prices to other dealers to meet existing competitive
circumstances, for unusual and non-ordinary business
circumstances, or for limited duration promotional programs.
Among other things, each dealer agreement requires the dealer to
|
|
|
|
|
devote its best efforts to promote, display, advertise, and sell
Sea Ray products at each of its retail locations in accordance
with the agreement and applicable laws;
|
|
|
|
display and utilize at each of its retail locations signs,
graphics, and image elements with Sea Rays identification
that positively reflect the Sea Ray image and promote the retail
sale of Sea Ray products;
|
|
|
|
purchase and maintain at all times sufficient inventory of
current Sea Ray products to meet the reasonable demand of
customers at each of its locations and to meet Sea Rays
applicable minimum inventory requirements;
|
17
|
|
|
|
|
maintain at each retail location, or at another acceptable
location, a service department that is properly staffed and
equipped to service Sea Ray products promptly and professionally
and to maintain parts and supplies to service Sea Ray products
properly on a timely basis;
|
|
|
|
perform all necessary product rigging, installation, and
inspection services prior to delivery to purchasers in
accordance with Sea Rays standards and perform post-sale
services of all Sea Ray products sold by the dealer and brought
to the dealer for service;
|
|
|
|
provide or arrange for warranty and service work for Sea Ray
products regardless of the selling dealer or condition of sale;
|
|
|
|
exercise reasonable efforts to address circumstances in which
another dealer has made a sale to an original retail purchaser
who permanently resides within the dealers territory where
such sale is contrary to the selling dealers Sales and
Service Agreement;
|
|
|
|
provide appropriate instructions to purchasers on how to obtain
warranty and service work from the dealer;
|
|
|
|
furnish product purchasers with Sea Rays limited warranty
on new products and with information and training as to the safe
and proper operation and maintenance of the products;
|
|
|
|
assist Sea Ray in performing any product defect and recall
campaigns;
|
|
|
|
achieve sales performance in accordance with fair and reasonable
standards and sales levels established by Sea Ray in
consultation with the dealer based on factors such as
population, sales potential, market share percentage of Sea Ray
products sold in the territory compared with competitive
products sold in the territory, local economic conditions,
competition, past sales history, number of retail locations, and
other special circumstances that may affect the sale of Sea Ray
products or the dealer, in each case consistent with standards
established for all domestic Sea Ray dealers selling comparable
products;
|
|
|
|
provide designated financial information that are truthful and
accurate;
|
|
|
|
conduct its business in a manner that preserves and enhances the
reputation and goodwill of both Sea Ray and the dealer for
providing quality products and services;
|
|
|
|
maintain the financial ability to purchase and maintain on hand
and display Sea Rays current product models;
|
|
|
|
maintain customer service ratings in compliance with Sea
Rays criteria;
|
|
|
|
comply with those dealers obligations that may be imposed
or established by Sea Ray applicable to all domestic Sea Ray
dealers;
|
|
|
|
maintain a financial condition that is adequate to satisfy and
perform its obligations under the agreement;
|
|
|
|
achieve within designated time periods or maintain motor dealer
status (which is Sea Rays highest performance status) or
other applicable certification requirements as established from
time to time by Sea Ray applicable to all domestic Sea Ray
dealers;
|
|
|
|
notify Sea Ray of the addition or deletion of any retail
locations;
|
|
|
|
sell Sea Ray products only on the basis of Sea Rays
published applicable limited warranty and make no other warranty
or representations concerning the limited warranty, expressed or
implied, either verbally or in writing;
|
|
|
|
provide timely warranty service on all Sea Ray products
presented to the dealer by purchasers in accordance with Sea
Rays then current warranty program applicable to all
domestic Sea Ray dealers selling comparable Sea Ray
products; and
|
|
|
|
provide Sea Ray with access to the dealers books and
records and such other information as Sea Ray may reasonably
request to verify the accuracy of the warranty claims submitted
to Sea Ray by the dealer with regard to such warranty claims.
|
18
Sea Ray has agreed to indemnify each of our dealers against any
losses to third parties resulting from Sea Rays negligent
acts or omissions involving the design or manufacture of any of
its products or any breach by it of the agreement. Each of our
dealers has agreed to indemnify Sea Ray against any losses to
third parties resulting from the dealers negligent acts or
omissions involving the dealers application, use, or
repair of Sea Ray products, statements or representation not
specifically authorized by Sea Ray, the installation of any
after market components or any other modification or alteration
of Sea Ray products, and any breach by the dealer of the
agreement.
Each dealer agreement may be terminated
|
|
|
|
|
by Sea Ray, upon 60 days prior written notice, if the
dealer fails or refuses to place a minimum stocking order of the
next model years products in accordance with requirements
applicable to all Sea Ray dealers generally or fails to meet its
financial obligations as they become due to Sea Ray or to the
dealers lenders;
|
|
|
|
by Sea Ray or the dealer, upon 60 days written notice to
the other, in the event of a breach or default by the other with
any of the of the material obligations, performance standards,
covenants, representations, warranties, or duties imposed by the
agreement or the Sea Ray manual that has not been cured within
60 days of the notice of the claimed deficiency or within a
reasonable period when the cure cannot be completed within a
60-day
period, or at the end of the
60-day
period without the opportunity to cure when the cause
constitutes bad faith;
|
|
|
|
by Sea Ray or the dealer if the other makes a fraudulent
misrepresentation that is material to the agreement or the other
engages in an incurable act of bad faith;
|
|
|
|
by Sea Ray or the dealer in the event of the insolvency,
bankruptcy, or receivership of the other;
|
|
|
|
by Sea Ray in the event of the assignment of the agreement by
the dealer without the prior written consent of Sea Ray;
|
|
|
|
by Sea Ray upon at least 15 days prior written notice
in the event of the failure to pay any sums due and owing to Sea
Ray that are not disputed in good faith; and
|
|
|
|
upon the mutual consent of Sea Ray and the dealer.
|
Employees
As of September 30, 2010, we had 1,158 employees,
1,101 of whom were in store-level operations and 57 of whom were
in corporate administration and management. We are not a party
to any collective bargaining agreements. We consider our
relations with our employees to be excellent.
Trademarks
and Service Marks
We have registered trade names and trademarks with the
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office for various names,
including MarineMax, MarineMax Getaways,
MarineMax Care, Delivering the Dream,
MarineMax Delivering the Boating Dream,
Newcoast Financial Services, MarineMax Boating
Gear Center, and Women on Water. We have
registered the name MarineMax in the European
Community. We have trade name and trademark applications pending
in Canada for various names, including MarineMax,
Delivering the Dream, and The Water
Gene. There can be no assurance that any of these
applications will be granted.
Seasonality
and Weather Conditions
Our business, as well as the entire recreational boating
industry, is highly seasonal, with seasonality varying in
different geographic markets. Over the three-year period ended
September 30, 2010, the average revenue for the quarters
ended December 31, March 31, June 30, and
September 30 represented approximately 21%, 25%, 28%, and 26%,
respectively, of our average annual revenues. With the exception
of Florida, we generally realize significantly lower sales and
higher levels of inventories and related short-term borrowings,
in the quarterly periods ending December 31 and March 31.
The onset of the public boat and recreation shows in January
stimulates boat sales and typically allows us to reduce our
inventory levels and related short-term borrowings throughout
the remainder of the fiscal year.
19
Our business is also subject to weather patterns, which may
adversely affect our results of operations. For example, drought
conditions (or merely reduced rainfall levels) or excessive
rain, may close area boating locations or render boating
dangerous or inconvenient, thereby curtailing customer demand
for our products. In addition, unseasonably cool weather and
prolonged winter conditions may lead to a shorter selling season
in certain locations. Hurricanes and other storms could result
in disruptions of our operations or damage to our boat
inventories and facilities, as has been the case when Florida
and other markets were affected by hurricanes. Although our
geographic diversity is likely to reduce the overall impact to
us of adverse weather conditions in any one market area, these
conditions will continue to represent potential, material
adverse risks to us and our future financial performance.
Environmental
and Other Regulatory Issues
Our operations are subject to extensive regulation, supervision,
and licensing under various federal, state, and local statutes,
ordinances, and regulations. While we believe that we maintain
all requisite licenses and permits and are in compliance with
all applicable federal, state, and local regulations, there can
be no assurance that we will be able to maintain all requisite
licenses and permits. The failure to satisfy those and other
regulatory requirements could have a material adverse effect on
our business, financial condition, and results of operations.
The adoption of additional laws, rules, and regulations could
also have a material adverse effect on our business. Various
federal, state, and local regulatory agencies, including the
Occupational Safety and Health Administration, or OSHA, the
United States Environmental Protection Agency, or EPA, and
similar federal and local agencies, have jurisdiction over the
operation of our dealerships, repair facilities, and other
operations with respect to matters such as consumer protection,
workers safety, and laws regarding protection of the
environment, including air, water, and soil.
The EPA has various air emissions regulations for outboard
marine engines that impose more strict emissions standards for
two-cycle, gasoline outboard marine engines. The majority of the
outboard marine engines we sell are manufactured by Mercury
Marine. Mercury Marines product line of low-emission
engines, including the OptiMax, Verado, and other four-stroke
outboards, have achieved the EPAs mandated 2006 emission
levels. Any increased costs of producing engines resulting from
EPA standards, or the inability of our manufacturers to comply
with EPA requirements, could have a material adverse effect on
our business.
Certain of our facilities own and operate underground storage
tanks, or USTs, for the storage of various petroleum products.
The USTs are generally subject to federal, state, and local laws
and regulations that require testing and upgrading of USTs and
remediation of contaminated soils and groundwater resulting from
leaking USTs. In addition, if leakage from company-owned or
operated USTs migrates onto the property of others, we may be
subject to civil liability to third parties for remediation
costs or other damages. Based on historical experience, we
believe that our liabilities associated with UST testing,
upgrades, and remediation are unlikely to have a material
adverse effect on our financial condition or operating results.
As with boat dealerships generally, and parts and service
operations in particular, our business involves the use,
handling, storage, and contracting for recycling or disposal of
hazardous or toxic substances or wastes, including
environmentally sensitive materials, such as motor oil, waste
motor oil and filters, transmission fluid, antifreeze, freon,
waste paint and lacquer thinner, batteries, solvents,
lubricants, degreasing agents, gasoline, and diesel fuels.
Accordingly, we are subject to regulation by federal, state, and
local authorities establishing requirements for the use,
management, handling, and disposal of these materials and health
and environmental quality standards, and liability related
thereto, and providing penalties for violations of those
standards. We are also subject to laws, ordinances, and
regulations governing investigation and remediation of
contamination at facilities we operate to which we send
hazardous or toxic substances or wastes for treatment,
recycling, or disposal.
We do not believe we have any material environmental liabilities
or that compliance with environmental laws, ordinances, and
regulations will, individually or in the aggregate, have a
material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, or
results of operations. However, soil and groundwater
contamination has been known to exist at certain properties
owned or leased by us. We have also been required and may in the
future be required to remove aboveground and underground storage
tanks containing hazardous substances or wastes. As to certain
of our properties, specific releases of petroleum have been or
are in the process of being remedied in accordance with state
and federal guidelines. We are monitoring the soil and
groundwater as required by applicable state and federal
20
guidelines. In addition, the shareholders of the acquired
dealers have indemnified us for specific environmental issues
identified on environmental site assessments performed by us as
part of the acquisitions. We maintain insurance for pollutant
cleanup and removal. The coverage pays for the expenses to
extract pollutants from land or water at the insured property,
if the discharge, dispersal, seepage, migration, release, or
escape of the pollutants is caused by or results from a covered
cause of loss. We also have additional storage tank liability
insurance and Superfund coverage where applicable.
In addition, certain of our retail locations are located on
waterways that are subject to federal or state laws regulating
navigable waters (including oil pollution prevention), fish and
wildlife, and other matters.
Two of the properties we own were historically used as gasoline
service stations. Remedial action with respect to prior
historical site activities on these properties has been
completed in accordance with federal and state law. Also, one of
our properties is within the boundaries of a
Superfund site, although neither property has been
nor is expected to be identified as a contributor to the
contamination in the area. We, however, do not believe that
these environmental issues will result in any material
liabilities to us.
Additionally, certain states have required or are considering
requiring a license in order to operate a recreational boat.
While such licensing requirements are not expected to be unduly
restrictive, regulations may discourage potential first-time
buyers, thereby limiting future sales, which could adversely
affect our business, financial condition, and results of
operations.
Product
Liability
The products we sell or service may expose us to potential
liabilities for personal injury or property damage claims
relating to the use of those products. Historically, the
resolution of product liability claims has not materially
affected our business. Our manufacturers generally maintain
product liability insurance, and we maintain third-party product
liability insurance, which we believe to be adequate. However,
we may experience legal claims in excess of our insurance
coverage, and those claims may not be covered by insurance.
Furthermore, any significant claims against us could adversely
affect our business, financial condition, and results of
operations and result in negative publicity. Excessive insurance
claims also could result in increased insurance premiums.
Competition
We operate in a highly competitive environment. In addition to
facing competition generally from recreation businesses seeking
to attract consumers leisure time and discretionary
spending dollars, the recreational boat industry itself is
highly fragmented, resulting in intense competition for
customers, quality products, boat show space, and suitable
retail locations. We rely to a certain extent on boat shows to
generate sales. Our inability to participate in boat shows in
our existing or targeted markets could have a material adverse
effect on our business, financial condition, and results of
operations.
We compete primarily with single-location boat dealers and, with
respect to sales of marine equipment, parts, and accessories,
with national specialty marine stores, catalog retailers,
sporting goods stores, and mass merchants. Dealer competition
continues to increase based on the quality of available
products, the price and value of the products, and attention to
customer service. There is significant competition both within
markets we currently serve and in new markets that we may enter.
We compete in each of our markets with retailers of brands of
boats and engines we do not sell in that market. In addition,
several of our competitors, especially those selling boating
accessories, are large national or regional chains that have
substantial financial, marketing, and other resources. However,
we believe that our integrated corporate infrastructure and
marketing and sales capabilities, our cost structure, and our
nationwide presence enable us to compete effectively against
these companies. Private sales of used boats represent an
additional significant source of competition.
21
Executive
Officers
The following table sets forth information concerning each of
our executive officers:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Age
|
|
Position
|
|
William H. McGill Jr.
|
|
|
66
|
|
|
Chairman of the Board, President, Chief Executive Officer, and
Director
|
Michael H. McLamb
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Secretary,
and Director
|
Edward A. Russell
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer
|
Kurt M. Frahn
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
Vice President of Finance and Treasurer
|
Jack P. Ezzell
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
Vice President, Chief Accounting Officer, and Controller
|
Paulee C. Day
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
Vice President, General Counsel and Assistant Secretary
|
William H. McGill Jr. has served as the Chief Executive
Officer of MarineMax since January 23, 1998 and as the
Chairman of the Board and as a director of our company since
March 6, 1998. Mr. McGill served as the President of
our company from January 23, 1988 until September 8,
2000 and re-assumed the position on July 1, 2002.
Mr. McGill was the principal owner and president of
Gulfwind USA, Inc., one of our operating subsidiaries, from 1973
until its merger with us.
Michael H. McLamb has served as Executive Vice President
of our company since October 2002, as Chief Financial Officer
since January 23, 1998, as Secretary since April 5,
1998, and as a director since November 1, 2003.
Mr. McLamb served as Vice President and Treasurer of our
company from January 23, 1998 until October 22, 2002.
Mr. McLamb, a certified public accountant, was employed by
Arthur Andersen LLP from December 1987 to December 1997, serving
most recently as a senior manager.
Edward A. Russell has served as Executive Vice President
and Chief Operating Officer of our company since February 2010.
Mr. Russell served as Executive Vice President of
Operations and Sales of our company from February 2008 until
February 2010. Mr. Russell served as Vice President of
Operations of our company from March 2006 until February
2008, and as a Vice President of our company from
October 22, 2002 until March 2006. Mr. Russell served
as the Regional Manager of our Florida operations from
August 1, 2002 until October 22, 2002 and as the
District President for our Central and West Florida operations
from March 1998 until August 1, 2002. Mr. Russell was
an owner and General Sales Manager of Gulfwind USA Inc., one of
our operating subsidiaries, now called MarineMax of Central
Florida, from 1984 until its merger with our company in March
1998.
Kurt M. Frahn has served as Vice President of Finance and
Treasurer of our company since October 22, 2002.
Mr. Frahn served as Director of Taxes and Acquisitions of
our company from May 15, 1998 until October 22, 2002.
Mr. Frahn was employed by Arthur Andersen LLP from
September 3, 1991 until May 15, 1998, serving most
recently as a tax consulting manager.
Jack P. Ezzell has served as Vice President and Chief
Accounting Officer of our company since October 22, 2002
and as Corporate Controller of our company since June 1,
1999. Mr. Ezzell served as Assistant Controller from
January 13, 1998 until June 1, 1999. Mr. Ezzell,
a certified public accountant, was employed by Arthur Andersen
LLP from August 1996 until January 1998, serving most recently
as a senior auditor.
Paulee C. Day has served as Vice President of our company
since February 2009 and as General Counsel and Assistant
Secretary since January 2003. Ms. Day, an active member of
the Florida Bar, was employed by Maxxim Medical from May 1999 to
November 2002, serving as Vice President, General Counsel, and
Secretary. Prior to that time, Ms. Day was Corporate
Attorney at Eckerd Corporation from June 1997 through May 1999
and a corporate attorney at the law firm Trenam, Kemker, Scharf,
Barkin, Frye, ONeill and Mullis, P.A. from January 1995
through June 1997.
22
General
economic conditions and consumer spending patterns can
negatively impact our operating results, and the severe
recession that began in late 2007 has adversely affected the
boating industry and our company.
General economic conditions and consumer spending patterns can
negatively impact our operating results. Unfavorable local,
regional, national, or global economic developments or
uncertainties regarding future economic prospects could reduce
consumer spending in the markets we serve and adversely affect
our business. Economic conditions in areas in which we operate
dealerships, particularly Florida in which we generated 43%,
45%, and 54% of our revenue during fiscal 2008, 2009, and 2010
respectively, can have a major impact on our operations. Local
influences, such as corporate downsizing, military base
closings, and inclement weather, also could adversely affect our
operations in certain markets.
In an economic downturn, consumer discretionary spending levels
generally decline, at times resulting in disproportionately
large reductions in the sale of luxury goods. Consumer spending
on luxury goods also may decline as a result of lower consumer
confidence levels, even if prevailing economic conditions are
favorable. Although we have expanded our operations during
periods of stagnant or modestly declining industry trends, the
cyclical nature of the recreational boating industry or the lack
of industry growth could adversely affect our business,
financial condition, or results of operations in the future. Any
period of adverse economic conditions or low consumer confidence
has a negative effect on our business.
Lower consumer spending resulting from a downturn in the housing
market and other economic factors adversely affected our
business in fiscal 2007 and continued weakness in consumer
spending resulting from substantial weakness in the financial
markets and deteriorating economic conditions had a very
substantial negative effect on our business in fiscal 2008,
2009, and 2010. Our revenue decreased from $1.2 billion in
fiscal 2007, to $885.4 million in fiscal 2008, to
$588.6 million in fiscal 2009, and to $450.3 million
in fiscal 2010. Our earnings decreased from a net income of
$20.1 million in fiscal 2007 to a net loss of
$134.3 million in fiscal 2008 (including a
$122.1 million goodwill impairment charge), a net loss of
$76.8 million in fiscal 2009, and a net income of
$2.5 million in fiscal 2010 (including a $19.2 million
tax refund). These substantially deteriorating economic and
financial conditions have had a greater impact on many other
participants in the boating industry, with certain manufacturers
and dealers ceasing business operations or filing for
bankruptcy. While the reduction in boating industry participants
might have a long-term positive impact on our companys
competitive position, we are facing and expect to continue to
face short-term competitive pressure resulting from decreased
selling prices as a result of forced sales and other
liquidations of excess inventory.
These conditions caused us to defer our acquisition program,
delay new store openings, reduce our inventory purchases, engage
in inventory reduction efforts, close some of our retail
locations, reduce our headcount, and amend our credit facility.
While we believe the steps we have taken to date will enable us
to emerge from the current economic environment as a stronger
and more profitable company, we cannot predict the length or
severity of these unfavorable economic or financial conditions
or the extent to which they will adversely affect our operating
results nor can we predict the effectiveness of the measures we
have taken to address this environment or whether additional
measures will be necessary. A continuation of depressed economic
factors could have additional negative effects on our company,
including interfering with our supply of certain brands by
manufacturers, reduced marketing and other support by
manufacturers, decreased revenue, additional pressures on
margins, and our failure to satisfy covenants under our credit
agreement.
The
availability and costs of borrowed funds can adversely affect
our ability to obtain adequate boat inventory and the ability
and willingness of our customers to finance boat
purchases.
The availability and costs of borrowed funds can adversely
affect our ability to obtain and maintain adequate boat
inventory and the holding costs of that inventory as well as the
ability and willingness of our customers to finance boat
purchases. As of September 30, 2010, we had no long-term
debt. We rely on our credit facility to purchase and maintain
our inventory of boats. Our ability to borrow under our credit
facility depends on our ability to continue to satisfy our
covenants and other obligations under our credit facility. The
aging of our inventory limits our borrowing capacity as defined
provisions in our credit facility reduce the allowable advance
rate as our
23
inventory ages. Our access to funds under our credit facility
also depends upon the ability of our lender, GECDF, to meet its
funding commitments, particularly if it experiences shortages of
capital or experiences excessive volumes of borrowing requests
from others during a short period of time. A continuation of
depressed economic conditions, weak consumer spending, turmoil
in the credit markets, and lender difficulties could interfere
with our ability to maintain compliance with our debt covenants
and to utilize our credit facility to fund our operations.
Accordingly, it may be necessary for us to close additional
stores, further reduce our expense structure, or modify the
covenants with our lender. Any inability to utilize our credit
facility or the acceleration of amounts owed, resulting from a
covenant violation, insufficient collateral, or lender
difficulties, could require us to seek other sources of funding
to repay amounts outstanding under our credit facility or
replace or supplement our credit facility, which may not be
possible at all or under commercially reasonable terms.
Our credit facility provides a floor plan financing commitment
of $100 million and allows us to request a $50 million
increase to this commitment under an accordion feature, subject
to GECDF approval. The collateral for our credit facility is all
of our personal property with certain limited exceptions. None
of our real estate has been pledged as collateral under our
credit facility As of September 30, 2010, we were in
compliance with all of the credit facility covenants and our
additional available borrowings under our credit facility were
approximately $4.2 million.
Similarly, decreases in the availability of credit and increases
in the cost of credit adversely affect the ability of our
customers to purchase boats from us and thereby adversely
affects our ability to sell our products and impacts the
profitability of our finance and insurance activities. Tight
credit conditions during fiscal 2008, fiscal 2009, and fiscal
2010 adversely affected the ability of customers to finance boat
purchases, which had a negative affect on our operating results.
Our
strategies to enhance our performance may not be
successful.
We are increasing our efforts to grow our financing and
insurance, parts and accessory, service, and boat storage
businesses to better serve our customers and thereby increase
revenue and improve profitability to these higher margin
businesses. In addition, we are implementing aggressive programs
to substantially increase the sale over the Internet of used
boats, parts, accessories, and a wide range of boating supplies
and products. These efforts and programs are designed to
increase our revenue and reduce our dependence on the sale of
new boats. These business initiatives will require us to add
personnel, enter businesses in which we do not have extensive
experience, and encounter substantial competition. As a result,
our strategies to enhance our performance may not be successful
and we may increase our expenses.
Our
success depends to a significant extent on the well being, as
well as the continued popularity and reputation for quality of
the boating products, of our manufacturers, particularly
Brunswicks Sea Ray, Boston Whaler, Cabo, Hatteras, and
Meridian boat lines and Azimut-Benetti Groups Azimut
products.
Approximately 41% of our revenue in fiscal 2010 resulted from
sales of new boats manufactured by Brunswick, including
approximately 27% from Brunswicks Sea Ray division and
approximately 14% from Brunswicks other divisions. The
remainder of our fiscal 2010 revenue from new boat sales
resulted from sales of products from a limited number of other
manufacturers, none of which accounted for more than 10% of our
revenue.
We depend on our manufacturers to provide us with products that
compare favorably with competing products in terms of quality,
performance, safety, and advanced features, including the latest
advances in propulsion and navigation systems. Any adverse
change in the production efficiency, product development
efforts, technological advancement, marketplace acceptance,
marketing capabilities, and financial condition of our
manufacturers, particularly Brunswick given our reliance on Sea
Ray, Boston Whaler, Cabo, Hatteras, and Meridian, would have a
substantial adverse impact on our business. Any difficulties
encountered by any of our manufacturers, particularly Brunswick,
resulting from economic, financial, or other factors could
adversely affect the quality and amount of products that they
are able to supply to us and the services and support they
provide to us.
The interruption or discontinuance of the operations of
Brunswick or other manufacturers could cause us to experience
shortfalls, disruptions, or delays with respect to needed
inventory. Although we believe that adequate alternate sources
would be available that could replace any manufacturer other
than Brunswick as a product source,
24
those alternate sources may not be available at the time of any
interruption, and alternative products may not be available at
comparable quality and prices.
We maintain dealer agreements with Brunswick covering Sea Ray
products. Each dealer agreement has a multi-year term and
provides for the lowest product prices charged by the Sea Ray
division of Brunswick from time to time to other domestic Sea
Ray dealers. These terms are subject to
|
|
|
|
|
the dealer meeting all the requirements and conditions of Sea
Rays applicable programs; and
|
|
|
|
the right of Brunswick in good faith to charge lesser prices to
other dealers
|
|
|
|
|
|
to meet existing competitive circumstances;
|
|
|
|
for unusual and non-ordinary business circumstances; or
|
|
|
|
for limited duration promotional programs.
|
Each dealer agreement designates a specific geographical
territory for the dealer, which is exclusive to the dealer so
long as the dealer is not in breach of the material obligations
and performance standards under the agreement and Sea Rays
then current material policies and programs following notice and
the expiration of any applicable cure periods without cure.
We also maintain dealer agreements with Hatteras covering
Hatteras products. Each agreement allows Hatteras to revise
prices at any time, and such new prices will supersede previous
prices. Pursuant to the agreements, we must bear any losses we
incur as a result of such price changes and may not recover from
Hatteras for any losses. In addition, certain of our dealerships
may not represent manufacturers or product lines that compete
directly with Hatteras without its prior written consent.
Upon the completion of the Surfside-3 acquisition in March 2006,
we became the exclusive dealer for Azimut-Benetti Groups
Azimut product line for the Northeast United States. In
September 2008, our geographic territory was expanded to include
Florida. The Azimut dealer agreement provides a geographic
territory to promote the product line and to network with the
appropriate clientele through various independent locations
designated for Azimut retail sales.
As is typical in the industry, we generally deal with
manufacturers, other than the Sea Ray division of Brunswick,
under renewable annual dealer agreements. These agreements do
not contain any contractual provisions concerning product
pricing or required purchasing levels. Pricing is generally
established on a model year basis, but is subject to change in
the manufacturers sole discretion. Any change or
termination of these arrangements for any reason could adversely
affect product availability and cost and our financial
performance.
Boat
manufacturers exercise substantial control over our
business.
We depend on our dealer agreements. Through dealer agreements,
boat manufacturers, including Brunswick, exercise significant
control over their dealers, restrict them to specified
locations, and retain approval rights over changes in management
and ownership, among other things. The continuation of our
dealer agreements with most manufacturers, including Brunswick,
depends upon, among other things, our achieving stated goals for
customer satisfaction ratings and market share penetration in
the market served by the applicable dealership. Failure to meet
the customer satisfaction, market share goals, and other
conditions set forth in any dealer agreement could have various
consequences, including the following:
|
|
|
|
|
the termination of the dealer agreement;
|
|
|
|
the imposition of additional conditions in subsequent dealer
agreements;
|
|
|
|
limitations on boat inventory allocations;
|
|
|
|
reductions in reimbursement rates for warranty work performed by
the dealer;
|
|
|
|
loss of certain manufacturer to dealer incentives; or
|
|
|
|
denial of approval of future acquisitions.
|
25
Our dealer agreements with certain manufacturers, including
Brunswick, do not give us the exclusive right to sell those
manufacturers products within a given geographical area.
Accordingly, a manufacturer, including Brunswick, could
authorize another dealer to start a new dealership in proximity
to one or more of our locations, or an existing dealer could
move a dealership to a location that would be directly
competitive with us. These events could have a material adverse
effect on our competitive position and financial performance.
The
failure to receive rebates and other dealer incentives on
inventory purchases or retail sales could substantially reduce
our margins.
We rely on manufacturers programs that provide incentives
for dealers to purchase and sell particular boat makes and
models or for consumers to buy particular boat makes or models.
Any eliminations, reductions, limitations, or other changes
relating to rebate or incentive programs that have the effect of
reducing the benefits we receive, whether relating to the
ability of manufacturers to pay or our ability to qualify for
such incentive programs, could increase the effective cost of
our boat purchases, reduce our margins and competitive position,
and have a material adverse effect on our financial performance.
Fuel
prices and supply may affect our business.
All of the recreational boats we sell are powered by diesel or
gasoline engines. Consequently, an interruption in the supply,
or a significant increase in the price or tax on the sale of
fuel on a regional or national basis could have a material
adverse effect on our sales and operating results. Increases in
fuel prices (such as those that occurred during fiscal
2008) negatively impact boat sales. At various times in the
past, diesel or gasoline fuel has been difficult to obtain. The
supply of fuels may be interrupted, rationing may be imposed, or
the price of or tax on fuels may significantly increase in the
future, adversely impacting our business.
The
availability of boat insurance is critical to our
success.
The ability of our customers to secure reasonably affordable
boat insurance that is satisfactory to lenders that finance our
customers purchases is critical to our success.
Historically, affordable boat insurance has been available. With
the hurricanes that have impacted the state of Florida and other
markets over the past several years, insurance rates have
escalated and insurance coverage has become more difficult to
obtain. In addition, as a severe storm approaches land,
insurance providers cease underwriting until the storm has
passed. This loss of insurance prohibits lenders from lending.
As a result, sales of boats can be temporarily halted making our
revenue difficult to predict and potentially causing sales to be
cancelled. Any difficulty of customers to obtain affordable boat
insurance could impede boat sales and adversely affect our
business.
Other
recreational activities and poor industry perception can
adversely affect the levels of boat purchases.
Other recreational activities and poor industry perception can
adversely affect the levels of boat purchases. As a seller of
high-end consumer products, we must compete for discretionary
spending with a wide variety of other recreational activities
and consumer purchases. In addition, perceived hassles of boat
ownership and relatively poor customer service and customer
education throughout the retail boat industry represent
impediments to boat purchases. Our customer-centric strategy is
intended to overcome these perceptions.
Adverse
federal tax policies can have a negative effect on
us.
Changes in federal and state tax laws, such as an imposition of
luxury taxes on new boat purchases, increases in prevailing tax
rates, and weak stock market performance also influence
consumers decisions to purchase products we offer and
could have a negative effect on our sales. For example, during
1991 and 1992, the federal government imposed a luxury tax on
new recreational boats with sales prices in excess of $100,000,
which coincided with a sharp decline in boating industry sales
from a high of more than $17.9 billion in 1988 to a low of
$10.3 billion in 1992. Any increase in tax rates, including
those on capital gains and dividends, particularly those on
high-income taxpayers, could adversely affect our boat sales.
26
Our
success depends, in part, on our ability to continue to make
successful acquisitions and to integrate the operations of
acquired dealers and each dealer we acquire in the
future.
Since March 1, 1998, we have acquired 20 recreational boat
dealers, two boat brokerage operations, and two full-service
yacht repair facilities. Each acquired dealer operated
independently prior to its acquisition by us. Our success
depends, in part, on our ability to continue to make successful
acquisitions and to integrate the operations of acquired
dealers, including centralizing certain functions to achieve
cost savings and pursuing programs and processes that promote
cooperation and the sharing of opportunities and resources among
our dealerships. We may not be able to oversee the combined
entity efficiently or to implement effectively our growth and
operating strategies. To the extent that we successfully pursue
our acquisition strategy, our resulting growth will place
significant additional demands on our management and
infrastructure. Our failure to pursue successfully our
acquisition strategies or operate effectively the combined
entity could have a material adverse effect on our rate of
growth and operating performance.
Unforeseen
expenses, difficulties, and delays frequently encountered in
connection with rapid expansion through acquisitions could
inhibit our growth and negatively impact our
profitability.
Our growth strategy of acquiring additional recreational boat
dealers involves significant risks. This strategy entails
reviewing and potentially reorganizing acquired business
operations, corporate infrastructure and systems, and financial
controls. Unforeseen expenses, difficulties, and delays
frequently encountered in connection with rapid expansion
through acquisitions could inhibit our growth and negatively
impact our profitability. We may be unable to identify suitable
acquisition candidates or to complete the acquisitions of
candidates that we identify. Increased competition for
acquisition candidates or increased asking prices by acquisition
candidates may increase purchase prices for acquisitions to
levels beyond our financial capability or to levels that would
not result in the returns required by our acquisition criteria.
Acquisitions also may become more difficult in the future as we
acquire more of the most attractive dealers. In addition, we may
encounter difficulties in integrating the operations of acquired
dealers with our own operations or managing acquired dealers
profitably without substantial costs, delays, or other
operational or financial problems.
We may issue common or preferred stock and incur substantial
indebtedness in making future acquisitions. The size, timing,
and integration of any future acquisitions may cause substantial
fluctuations in operating results from quarter to quarter.
Consequently, operating results for any quarter may not be
indicative of the results that may be achieved for any
subsequent quarter or for a full fiscal year. These fluctuations
could adversely affect the market price of our common stock.
Our ability to continue to grow through the acquisition of
additional dealers will depend upon various factors, including
the following:
|
|
|
|
|
the availability of suitable acquisition candidates at
attractive purchase prices;
|
|
|
|
the ability to compete effectively for available acquisition
opportunities;
|
|
|
|
the availability of borrowed funds or common stock with a
sufficient market price to complete the acquisitions;
|
|
|
|
the ability to obtain any requisite manufacturer or governmental
approvals;
|
|
|
|
the ability to obtain approval of our lender under our current
credit agreement; and
|
|
|
|
the absence of one or more manufacturers attempting to impose
unsatisfactory restrictions on us in connection with their
approval of acquisitions.
|
As a part of our acquisition strategy, we frequently engage in
discussions with various recreational boat dealers regarding
their potential acquisition by us. In connection with these
discussions, we and each potential acquisition candidate
exchange confidential operational and financial information,
conduct due diligence inquiries, and consider the structure,
terms, and conditions of the potential acquisition. In certain
cases, the prospective acquisition candidate agrees not to
discuss a potential acquisition with any other party for a
specific period of time, grants us an option to purchase the
prospective dealer for a designated price during a specific
time, and agrees
27
to take other actions designed to enhance the possibility of the
acquisition, such as preparing audited financial information and
converting its accounting system to the system specified by us.
Potential acquisition discussions frequently take place over a
long period of time and involve difficult business integration
and other issues, including in some cases, management succession
and related matters. As a result of these and other factors, a
number of potential acquisitions that from time to time appear
likely to occur do not result in binding legal agreements and
are not consummated.
We may
be required to obtain the consent of Brunswick and various other
manufacturers prior to the acquisition of other
dealers.
In determining whether to approve acquisitions, manufacturers
may consider many factors, including our financial condition and
ownership structure. Manufacturers also may impose conditions on
granting their approvals for acquisitions, including a
limitation on the number of their dealers that we may acquire.
Our ability to meet manufacturers requirements for
approving future acquisitions will have a direct bearing on our
ability to complete acquisitions and effect our growth strategy.
There can be no assurance that a manufacturer will not terminate
its dealer agreement, refuse to renew its dealer agreement,
refuse to approve future acquisitions, or take other action that
could have a material adverse effect on our acquisition program.
We and the Sea Ray Division of Brunswick have an agreement
extending through June 2015 that provides a process for the
acquisition of additional Sea Ray boat dealers that desire to be
acquired by us. Under the agreement, acquisitions of Sea Ray
dealers will be mutually agreed upon by us and Sea Ray with
reasonable efforts to be made to include a balance of Sea Ray
dealers that have been successful and those that have not been.
The agreement provides that Sea Ray will not unreasonably
withhold its consent to any proposed acquisition of a Sea Ray
dealer by us, subject to the conditions set forth in the
agreement. Among other things, the agreement requires us to
provide Sea Ray with a business plan for each proposed
acquisition, including historical financial and five-year
projected financial information regarding the acquisition
candidate; marketing and advertising plans; service capabilities
and managerial and staff personnel; information regarding the
ability of the candidate to achieve performance standards within
designated periods; and information regarding the success of our
previous acquisitions of Sea Ray dealers. The agreement also
contemplates Sea Ray reaching a good faith determination whether
the acquisition would be in its best interest based on our
dedication and focus of resources on the Sea Ray brand and Sea
Rays consideration of any adverse effects that the
approval would have on the resulting territory configuration and
adjacent or other dealers sales and the absence of any violation
of applicable laws or rights granted by Sea Ray to others.
Our growth strategy also entails expanding our product lines and
geographic scope by obtaining additional distribution rights
from our existing and new manufacturers. We may not be able to
secure additional distribution rights or obtain suitable
alternative sources of supply if we are unable to obtain such
distribution rights. The inability to expand our product lines
and geographic scope by obtaining additional distribution rights
could have a material adverse effect on the growth and
profitability of our business.
Our
growth strategy may require us to secure significant additional
capital, the amount of which will depend upon the size, timing,
and structure of future acquisitions and our working capital and
general corporate needs.
If we finance future acquisitions in whole or in part through
the issuance of common stock or securities convertible into or
exercisable for common stock, existing stockholders will
experience dilution in the voting power of their common stock
and earnings per share could be negatively impacted. The extent
to which we will be able and willing to use our common stock for
acquisitions will depend on the market value of our common stock
and the willingness of potential sellers to accept our common
stock as full or partial consideration. Our inability to use our
common stock as consideration, to generate cash from operations,
or to obtain additional funding through debt or equity
financings in order to pursue our acquisition program could
materially limit our growth.
Any borrowings made to finance future acquisitions or for
operations could make us more vulnerable to a downturn in our
operating results, a downturn in economic conditions, or
increases in interest rates on borrowings that are subject to
interest rate fluctuations. If our cash flow from operations is
insufficient to meet our debt service requirements, we could be
required to sell additional equity securities, refinance our
obligations, or dispose of assets
28
in order to meet our debt service requirements. In addition, our
credit arrangement contains financial covenants and other
restrictions with which we must comply, including limitations on
the incurrence of additional indebtedness. Adequate financing
may not be available if and when we need it or may not be
available on terms acceptable to us. The failure to obtain
sufficient financing on favorable terms and conditions could
have a material adverse effect on our growth prospects and our
business, financial condition, and results of operations.
Our
internal growth and operating strategies of opening new
locations and offering new products involve risk.
In addition to pursuing growth by acquiring boat dealers, we
intend to continue to pursue a strategy of growth through
opening new retail locations and offering new products in our
existing and new territories. Accomplishing these goals for
expansion will depend upon a number of factors, including the
following:
|
|
|
|
|
our ability to identify new markets in which we can obtain
distribution rights to sell our existing or additional product
lines;
|
|
|
|
our ability to lease or construct suitable facilities at a
reasonable cost in existing or new markets;
|
|
|
|
our ability to hire, train, and retain qualified personnel;
|
|
|
|
the timely integration of new retail locations into existing
operations;
|
|
|
|
our ability to achieve adequate market penetration at favorable
operating margins without the acquisition of existing
dealers; and
|
|
|
|
our financial resources.
|
Our dealer agreements with Brunswick require Brunswicks
consent to open, close, or change retail locations that sell Sea
Ray products, and other dealer agreements generally contain
similar provisions. We may not be able to open and operate new
retail locations or introduce new product lines on a timely or
profitable basis. Moreover, the costs associated with opening
new retail locations or introducing new product lines may
adversely affect our profitability.
As a result of these growth strategies, we expect to expend
significant time and effort in opening and acquiring new retail
locations and introducing new products. Our systems, procedures,
controls, and financial resources may not be adequate to support
expanding operations. The inability to manage our growth
effectively could have a material adverse effect on our
business, financial condition, and results of operations.
Our planned growth also will impose significant added
responsibilities on members of senior management and require us
to identify, recruit, and integrate additional senior level
managers. We may not be able to identify, hire, or train
suitable additions to management.
Our
business, as well as the entire recreational boating industry,
is highly seasonal, with seasonality varying in different
geographic markets. In addition, weather and environmental
conditions may adversely impact our business.
During the three-year period ended September 30, 2010, the
average revenue for the quarterly periods ended
December 31, March 31, June 30, and September 30
represented 21%, 25%, 28%, and 26%, respectively, of our average
annual revenue. With the exception of Florida, we generally
realize significantly lower sales and higher levels of
inventories and related short-term borrowings in the quarterly
periods ending December 31 and March 31. The onset of the
public boat and recreation shows in January stimulates boat
sales and allows us to reduce our inventory levels and related
short-term borrowings throughout the remainder of the fiscal
year. Our business could become substantially more seasonal as
we acquire dealers that operate in colder regions of the United
States.
Weather and environmental conditions may adversely impact our
operating results. For example, drought conditions, reduced
rainfall levels, excessive rain and environmental conditions,
such as the BP oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico, may force
boating areas to close or render boating dangerous or
inconvenient, thereby curtailing customer demand for our
products. While we traditionally maintain a full range of
insurance coverage for any such events, there can be no
assurance that such insurance coverage is adequate to cover
losses that we sustain as a result
29
of such disasters. In addition, unseasonably cool weather and
prolonged winter conditions may lead to shorter selling seasons
in certain locations. Many of our dealerships sell boats to
customers for use on reservoirs, thereby subjecting our business
to the continued viability of these reservoirs for boating use.
Although our geographic diversity and any future geographic
expansion will reduce the overall impact on us of adverse
weather and environmental conditions in any one market area,
weather and environmental conditions will continue to represent
potential material adverse risks to us and our future operating
performance. As a result of the foregoing and other factors, our
operating results in some future quarters could be below the
expectations of stock market analysts and investors.
In addition, hurricanes and other storms could result in the
disruption of our operations or damage to our boat inventories
and facilities as has been the case when Florida and other
markets has been affected by hurricanes. While we traditionally
maintain property and casualty insurance coverage for damage
caused by hurricanes and other storms, there can be no assurance
that such insurance coverage is adequate to cover losses that we
may sustain as a result of hurricanes and other storms.
We
face intense competition.
We operate in a highly competitive environment. In addition to
facing competition generally from non-boating recreation
businesses seeking to attract discretionary spending dollars,
the recreational boat industry itself is highly fragmented and
involves intense competition for customers, product distribution
rights, and suitable retail locations, particularly on or near
waterways. Competition increases during periods of stagnant
industry growth. During the recent recession, we have also faced
competition from banks liquidating repossessed boats.
We compete primarily with single-location boat dealers and, with
respect to sales of marine parts, accessories, and equipment,
with national specialty marine parts and accessories stores,
catalog retailers, sporting goods stores, and mass merchants.
Competition among boat dealers is based on the quality of
available products, the price and value of the products, and
attention to customer service. There is significant competition
both within markets we currently serve and in new markets that
we may enter. We compete in each of our markets with retailers
of brands of boats and engines we do not sell in that market. In
addition, several of our competitors, especially those selling
marine equipment and accessories, are large national or regional
chains that have substantial financial, marketing, and other
resources. Private sales of used boats represent an additional
source of competition.
Due to various matters, including environmental concerns,
permitting and zoning requirements, and competition for
waterfront real estate, some markets in the United States have
experienced an increased waiting list for marina and storage
availability. In general, the markets in which we currently
operate are not experiencing any unusual difficulties. However,
marine retail activity could be adversely effected in markets
that do not have sufficient marine and storage availability to
satisfy demand.
We
depend on income from financing, insurance, and extended service
contracts.
A portion of our income results from referral fees derived from
the placement or marketing of various finance and insurance, or
F&I, products, consisting of customer financing, insurance
products, and extended service contracts, the most significant
component of which is the participation and other fees resulting
from our sale of customer financing contracts. During fiscal
2010, F&I products accounted for 2.7% of our revenue.
The availability of financing for our boat purchasers and the
level of participation and other fees we receive in connection
with such financing depend on the particular agreement between
us and the lender and the current rate environment. Lenders may
impose terms in their boat financing arrangements with us that
may be unfavorable to us or our customers, resulting in reduced
demand for our customer financing programs and lower
participation and other fees. Customer financing became more
difficult to secure during fiscal 2008, which continued in
fiscal 2009 and fiscal 2010.
The reduction of profit margins on sales of F&I products or
the lack of demand for or the unavailability of these products
could have a material adverse effect on our operating margins.
30
We
depend on key personnel.
Our success depends, in large part, upon the continuing efforts
and abilities of our executive officers. Although we have
employment agreements with certain of our executive officers, we
cannot assure that these or other executive personnel will
remain with us. Expanding our operations may require us to add
additional executive personnel in the future. As a result of our
decentralized operating strategy, we also rely on the management
teams of our dealerships. In addition, we likely will depend on
the senior management of any significant businesses we acquire
in the future. The loss of the services of one or more of these
key employees before we are able to attract and retain qualified
replacement personnel could adversely affect our business.
The
products we sell or service may expose us to potential liability
for personal injury or property damage claims relating to the
use of those products.
Manufacturers of the products we sell generally maintain product
liability insurance. We also maintain third-party product
liability insurance that we believe to be adequate. We may
experience claims that are not covered by or that are in excess
of our insurance coverage. The institution of any significant
claims against us could subject us to damages, result in higher
insurance costs, and harm our business reputation with potential
customers.
Environmental
and other regulatory issues may impact our
operations.
Our operations are subject to extensive regulation, supervision,
and licensing under various federal, state, and local statutes,
ordinances, and regulations. The failure to satisfy those and
other regulatory requirements could have a material adverse
effect on our business, financial condition, and results of
operations.
Various federal, state, and local regulatory agencies, including
the Occupational Safety and Health Administration, or OSHA, the
United States Environmental Protection Agency, or EPA, and
similar federal and local agencies, have jurisdiction over the
operation of our dealerships, repair facilities, and other
operations, with respect to matters such as consumer protection,
workers safety, and laws regarding protection of the
environment, including air, water, and soil. The EPA promulgated
emissions regulations for outboard marine engines that impose
stricter emissions standards for two-cycle, gasoline outboard
marine engines. The majority of the outboard marine engines we
sell are manufactured by Mercury Marine. Mercury Marines
product line of low-emission engines, including the OptiMax,
Verado, and other four-stroke outboards, have achieved the
EPAs mandated 2006 emission levels. Any increased costs of
producing engines resulting from EPA standards or the inability
of our manufacturers to comply with EPA requirements, could have
a material adverse effect on our business.
Certain of our facilities own and operate underground storage
tanks, or USTs, for the storage of various petroleum products.
USTs are generally subject to federal, state, and local laws and
regulations that require testing and upgrading of USTs and
remediation of contaminated soils and groundwater resulting from
leaking USTs. In addition, we may be subject to civil liability
to third parties for remediation costs or other damages if
leakage from our owned or operated USTs migrates onto the
property of others.
Our business involves the use, handling, storage, and
contracting for recycling or disposal of hazardous or toxic
substances or wastes, including environmentally sensitive
materials, such as motor oil, waste motor oil and filters,
transmission fluid, antifreeze, freon, waste paint and lacquer
thinner, batteries, solvents, lubricants, degreasing agents,
gasoline, and diesel fuels. Accordingly, we are subject to
regulation by federal, state, and local authorities establishing
investigation and health and environmental quality standards,
and liability related thereto, and providing penalties for
violations of those standards.
We also are subject to laws, ordinances, and regulations
governing investigation and remediation of contamination at
facilities we operate or to which we send hazardous or toxic
substances or wastes for treatment, recycling, or disposal. In
particular, the Comprehensive Environmental Response,
Compensation and Liability Act, or CERCLA or
Superfund, imposes joint, strict, and several
liability on
|
|
|
|
|
owners or operators of facilities at, from, or to which a
release of hazardous substances has occurred;
|
|
|
|
parties that generated hazardous substances that were released
at such facilities; and
|
|
|
|
parties that transported or arranged for the transportation of
hazardous substances to such facilities.
|
31
A majority of states have adopted Superfund statutes comparable
to and, in some cases, more stringent than CERCLA. If we were to
be found to be a responsible party under CERCLA or a similar
state statute, we could be held liable for all investigative and
remedial costs associated with addressing such contamination. In
addition, claims alleging personal injury or property damage may
be brought against us as a result of alleged exposure to
hazardous substances resulting from our operations. In addition,
certain of our retail locations are located on waterways that
are subject to federal or state laws regulating navigable waters
(including oil pollution prevention), fish and wildlife, and
other matters.
Soil and groundwater contamination has been known to exist at
certain properties owned or leased by us. We have also been
required and may in the future be required to remove aboveground
and underground storage tanks containing hazardous substances or
wastes. As to certain of our properties, specific releases of
petroleum have been or are in the process of being remediated in
accordance with state and federal guidelines. We are monitoring
the soil and groundwater as required by applicable state and
federal guidelines. We also may have additional storage tank
liability insurance and Superfund coverage where applicable.
Environmental laws and regulations are complex and subject to
frequent change. Compliance with amended, new, or more stringent
laws or regulations, more strict interpretations of existing
laws, or the future discovery of environmental conditions may
require additional expenditures by us, and such expenditures may
be material.
Two of the properties we own were historically used as gasoline
service stations. Remedial action with respect to prior
historical site activities on these properties has been
completed in accordance with federal and state law. Also, one of
our properties is within the boundaries of a Superfund site,
although neither property has been identified as a contributor
to the contamination in the area.
Additionally, certain states have required or are considering
requiring a license in order to operate a recreational boat.
These regulations could discourage potential buyers, thereby
limiting future sales and adversely affecting our business,
financial condition, and results of operations.
The
market price of our common stock could be subject to wide
fluctuations as a result of many factors.
Factors that could affect the trading price of our common stock
include the following:
|
|
|
|
|
variations in our operating results;
|
|
|
|
the thin trading volume and relatively small public float of our
common stock;
|
|
|
|
our ability to continue to secure adequate levels of financing;
|
|
|
|
variations in same-store sales;
|
|
|
|
general economic, political, and market conditions;
|
|
|
|
changes in earnings estimates published by analysts;
|
|
|
|
the level and success of our acquisition program and new store
openings;
|
|
|
|
the success of dealership integration;
|
|
|
|
relationships with manufacturers;
|
|
|
|
seasonality and weather conditions;
|
|
|
|
governmental policies and regulations;
|
|
|
|
the performance of the recreational boat industry in
general; and
|
|
|
|
factors relating to suppliers and competitors.
|
In addition, market demand for small-capitalization stocks, and
price and volume fluctuations in the stock market unrelated to
our performance could result in significant fluctuations in the
market price of our common stock.
32
The performance of our common stock could adversely affect our
ability to raise equity in the public markets and adversely
affect our acquisition program.
The
issuance of additional capital stock in the future, including
shares that we may issue pursuant to stock-based grants,
including stock option grants, and future acquisitions, may
result in dilution in the net tangible book value per share of
our common stock.
Our board of directors has the legal power and authority to
determine the terms of an offering of shares of our capital
stock, or securities convertible into or exchangeable for these
shares, to the extent of our shares of authorized and unissued
capital stock. The issuance of additional common stock in the
future, including shares that we may issue pursuant to
stock-based grants, including stock option grants, and future
acquisitions, may result in dilution in the net tangible book
value per share of our common stock. The issuance of additional
capital stock in the future, including shares that we may issue
pursuant to stock-based grants, including stock option grants,
and future acquisitions, may result in dilution in the net
tangible book value per share of our common stock.
A
substantial number of shares are eligible for future
sale.
As of September 30, 2010, there were outstanding
22,148,038 shares of our common stock. Substantially all of
these shares are freely tradable without restriction or further
registration under the securities laws, unless held by an
affiliate of our company, as that term is defined in
Rule 144 under the securities laws. Shares held by
affiliates of our company, which generally include our
directors, officers, and certain principal stockholders, are
subject to the resale limitations of Rule 144 described
below. Outstanding shares of common stock issued in connection
with the acquisition of any acquired dealers are available for
resale beginning six months after the respective dates of the
acquisitions, subject to compliance with the provisions of
Rule 144 under the securities laws.
As of September 30, 2010, we had issued options to purchase
approximately 3,523,097 shares of common stock and 830,317
restricted stock awards under our incentive stock plan, and we
issued 348,319 shares of common stock under our employee
stock purchase plan. We have filed a registration statement
under the securities laws to register the common stock to be
issued under these plans. As a result, shares issued under these
plans will be freely tradable without restriction unless
acquired by affiliates of our company, who will be subject to
the volume and other limitations of Rule 144.
We may issue additional shares of common stock or preferred
stock under the securities laws as part of any acquisition we
may complete in the future. If issued pursuant to an effective
registration statement, these shares generally will be freely
tradable after their issuance by persons not affiliated with us
or the acquired companies.
We do
not pay cash dividends.
We have never paid cash dividends on our common stock.
Our
stockholders rights plan may adversely affect existing
stockholders.
Our Stockholders Rights Plan may have the effect of
deterring, delaying, or preventing a change in control that
might otherwise be in the best interests of our stockholders.
Under the Rights Plan, we issued a dividend of one Preferred
Share Purchase Right for each share of our common stock held by
stockholders of record as of the close of business on
September 7, 2001.
In general, subject to certain limited exceptions, the stock
purchase rights become exercisable when a person or group
acquires 15% or more of our common stock or a tender offer or
exchange offer for 15% or more of our common stock is announced
or commenced. After any such event, our other stockholders may
purchase additional shares of our common stock at 50% of the
then-current market price. The rights will cause substantial
dilution to a person or group that attempts to acquire us on
terms not approved by our board of directors. The rights may be
redeemed by us at $0.01 per stock purchase right at any time
before any person or group acquires 15% or more of our
outstanding common stock. The rights should not interfere with
any merger or other business combination approved by our board
of directors. The rights expire on August 28, 2011.
33
Certain
provisions of our restated certificate of incorporation and
bylaws and Delaware law may make a change in the control of our
company more difficult to complete, even if a change in control
were in the stockholders interest or might result in a
premium over the market price for the shares held by the
stockholders.
Our certificate of incorporation and bylaws divide our board of
directors into three classes of directors elected for staggered
three-year terms. The certificate of incorporation also provides
that the board of directors may authorize the issuance of one or
more series of preferred stock from time to time and may
determine the rights, preferences, privileges, and restrictions
and fix the number of shares of any such series of preferred
stock, without any vote or action by our stockholders. The board
of directors may authorize the issuance of preferred stock with
voting or conversion rights that could adversely affect the
voting power or other rights of the holders of common stock. The
certificate of incorporation also allows our board of directors
to fix the number of directors and to fill vacancies on the
board of directors.
We also are subject to the anti-takeover provisions of
Section 203 of the Delaware General Corporation Law, which
prohibits us from engaging in a business combination
with an interested stockholder for a period of three
years after the date of the transaction in which the person
became an interested stockholder, unless the
business combination is approved in a prescribed manner.
Certain of our dealer agreements could also make it difficult
for a third party to attempt to acquire a significant ownership
position in our company. In addition, the stockholders
agreement and governance agreement will have the effect of
increasing the control of our directors, executive officers, and
persons associated with them.
Our
sales of Azimut-Benetti Group products may be adversely affected
by fluctuations in currency exchange rates between the U.S.
dollar and the euro.
Products purchased from Italy-based Azimut-Benetti Group are
subject to fluctuations in the euro to U.S. dollar exchange
rate, which ultimately may impact the retail price at which we
can sell such products. As a result, fluctuations in the value
of the euro compared with the U.S. dollar may impact the
price points at which we can sell profitably Azimut-Benetti
Group products, and such price points may not be competitive
with other product lines in the United States. Accordingly, such
fluctuations in exchange rates ultimately may impact the amount
of revenue, cost of goods sold, cash flows, and earnings we
recognize for the Azimut-Benetti Group product lines. The impact
of these currency fluctuations could increase, particularly if
our revenue from the Azimut-Benetti Group products increase as a
percentage of our total revenue. We also could incur losses from
hedging transactions designed to reduce our risk to fluctuation
in exchange rates. We cannot predict the effects of exchange
rate fluctuations or currency rate hedges on our operating
results. Therefore, in certain cases, we may, from time to time,
enter into foreign currency cash flow hedges to reduce the
variability of cash flows associated with firm commitments to
purchase boats and yachts from Azimut-Benetti Group. We cannot
assure that our strategies will adequately protect our operating
results from the effects of exchange rate fluctuations.
|
|
Item 1B.
|
Unresolved
Staff Comments
|
Not applicable.
We lease our corporate offices in Clearwater, Florida. We also
lease 29 of our retail locations under leases, many of which
contain multi-year renewal options and some of which grant us a
first right of refusal to purchase the property at fair value.
In most cases, we pay a fixed rent at negotiated rates. In
substantially all of the leased locations, we are responsible
for taxes, utilities, insurance, and routine repairs and
maintenance. We own the property associated with 26 other retail
locations we operate and one joint venture as noted below.
Additionally, we own two retail locations that are currently
closed and one retail location that is closed and available for
sale.
34
The following table reflects the status, approximate size, and
facilities of the various retail locations we operate as of the
date of this report.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Square
|
|
|
|
Operated
|
|
|
Location
|
|
Location Type
|
|
Footage(1)
|
|
Facilities at Property
|
|
Since(2)
|
|
Waterfront
|
|
Alabama
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gulf Shores
|
|
Company owned
|
|
|
4,000
|
|
|
Retail and service
|
|
|
1998
|
|
|
|
Arizona
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tempe
|
|
Company owned
|
|
|
34,000
|
|
|
Retail and service
|
|
|
1992
|
|
|
|
California
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
San Diego (Shelter Island)
|
|
Third-party lease
|
|
|
930
|
|
|
Retail and service; 20 wet slips
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
San Diego Bay
|
Colorado
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grand Junction
|
|
Third-party lease
|
|
|
9,300
|
|
|
Retail, service, and storage
|
|
|
1986
|
|
|
|
Connecticut
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Norwalk
|
|
Third-party lease
|
|
|
7,000
|
|
|
Retail and service
|
|
|
1994
|
|
|
Norwalk Harbor
|
Florida
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cape Haze
|
|
Company owned
|
|
|
18,000
|
|
|
Retail, 8 wet slips
|
|
|
1972
|
|
|
Intracoastal Waterway
|
Clearwater
|
|
Company owned
|
|
|
42,000
|
|
|
Retail and service; 20 wet slips
|
|
|
1973
|
|
|
Tampa Bay
|
Cocoa
|
|
Company owned
|
|
|
15,000
|
|
|
Retail and service
|
|
|
1968
|
|
|
|
Coconut Grove
|
|
Third-party lease
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
Retail only; 24 wet slips
|
|
|
2002
|
|
|
Biscayne Bay
|
Dania
|
|
Company owned
|
|
|
32,000
|
|
|
Repair and service; 16 wet slips
|
|
|
1991
|
|
|
Port Everglades
|
Destin
|
|
Third-party lease
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
Retail only
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
Fort Myers
|
|
Third-party lease
|
|
|
8,000
|
|
|
Retail and service; 18 wet slips
|
|
|
1983
|
|
|
Caloosahatchee River
|
Jacksonville
|
|
Company owned
|
|
|
15,000
|
|
|
Retail and service
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
Jacksonville
|
|
Third-party lease
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
Retail only; 7 wet slips
|
|
|
1995
|
|
|
St Johns River
|
Key Largo
|
|
Third-party lease
|
|
|
8,900
|
|
|
Retail and service; 6 wet slips
|
|
|
2002
|
|
|
Card Sound
|
Miami
|
|
Company owned
|
|
|
7,200
|
|
|
Retail and service; 15 wet slips
|
|
|
1980
|
|
|
Little River
|
Miami
|
|
Company owned
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
|
Service only; 11 wet slips
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Little River
|
Naples
|
|
Company owned
|
|
|
19,600
|
|
|
Retail and service; 14 wet slips
|
|
|
1997
|
|
|
Naples Bay
|
Pensacola
|
|
Third-party lease
|
|
|
24,300
|
|
|
Retail and service
|
|
|
1974
|
|
|
|
Pompano Beach
|
|
Company owned
|
|
|
23,000
|
|
|
Retail and service; 16 wet slips
|
|
|
1990
|
|
|
Intracoastal Waterway
|
Pompano Beach
|
|
Company owned
|
|
|
5,400
|
|
|
Retail and service; 24 wet slips
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Intracoastal Waterway
|
Sarasota
|
|
Third-party lease
|
|
|
26,500
|
|
|
Retail, service, and storage; 15 wet slips
|
|
|
1972
|
|
|
Sarasota Bay
|
St. Petersburg(3)
|
|
Joint venture
|
|
|
15,000
|
|
|
Yacht service, 20 wet slips
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Boca Ciega Bay
|
Stuart
|
|
Company owned
|
|
|
29,100
|
|
|
Retail and service; 66 wet slips
|
|
|
2002
|
|
|
Intracoastal Waterway
|
Tampa
|
|
Company owned
|
|
|
13,100
|
|
|
Retail and service
|
|
|
1995
|
|
|
|
Venice
|
|
Company owned
|
|
|
62,000
|
|
|
Retail, service, and storage; 90 wet slips
|
|
|
1972
|
|
|
Intracoastal Waterway
|
Georgia
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Buford (Atlanta)
|
|
Company owned
|
|
|
13,500
|
|
|
Retail and service
|
|
|
2001
|
|
|
|
Cumming (Atlanta)
|
|
Third-party lease
|
|
|
13,000
|
|
|
Retail and service; 50 wet slips
|
|
|
1981
|
|
|
Lake Lanier
|
Maryland
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Baltimore
|
|
Third-party lease
|
|
|
7,600
|
|
|
Retail and service; 17 wet slips
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Baltimore Inner Harbor
|
Joppa
|
|
Company owned
|
|
|
28,400
|
|
|
Retail, service, and storage; 294 wet slips
|
|
|
1966
|
|
|
Gunpowder River
|
White Marsh
|
|
Company owned
|
|
|
19,800
|
|
|
Retail and service
|
|
|
1958
|
|
|
|
Minnesota
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bayport
|
|
Third-party lease
|
|
|
450
|
|
|
Retail only; 10 wet slips
|
|
|
1996
|
|
|
St Croix River
|
Rogers
|
|
Company owned
|
|
|
70,000
|
|
|
Retail, service, and storage
|
|
|
1991
|
|
|
|
Walker
|
|
Company owned
|
|
|
76,400
|
|
|
Retail, service, and storage
|
|
|
1989
|
|
|
|
Walker
|
|
Company owned
|
|
|
6,800
|
|
|
Retail and service; 93 wet slips
|
|
|
1977
|
|
|
Leech Lake
|
35
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Square
|
|
|
|
Operated
|
|
|
Location
|
|
Location Type
|
|
Footage(1)
|
|
Facilities at Property
|
|
Since(2)
|
|
Waterfront
|
|
Missouri
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lake Ozark
|
|
Company owned
|
|
|
60,300
|
|
|
Retail and service; 300 wet slips
|
|
|
1987
|
|
|
Lake of the Ozarks
|
Kimberling City
|
|
Third-party lease
|
|
|
500
|
|
|
Retail only; 7 wet slips
|
|
|
2000
|
|
|
Table Rock Lake
|
New Jersey
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Brant Beach
|
|
Third-party lease
|
|
|
3,800
|
|
|
Retail and service; 36 wet slips
|
|
|
1965
|
|
|
Barnegat Bay
|
Brick
|
|
Company owned
|
|
|
20,000
|
|
|
Retail and service; 225 wet slips
|
|
|
1977
|
|
|
Manasquan River
|
Lake Hopatcong
|
|
Third-party lease
|
|
|
4,600
|
|
|
Retail and service; 80 wet slips
|
|
|
1998
|
|
|
Lake Hopatcong
|
Ship Bottom
|
|
Third-party lease
|
|
|
19,300
|
|
|
Retail and service
|
|
|
1972
|
|
|
|
Somers Point
|
|
Third-party lease
|
|
|
31,000
|
|
|
Retail, service and storage; 33 wet slips
|
|
|
1987
|
|
|
Little Egg Harbor Bay
|
New York
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copiague
|
|
Third-party lease
|
|
|
15,000
|
|
|
Retail only
|
|
|
1993
|
|
|
|
Huntington
|
|
Third-party lease
|
|
|
1,200
|
|
|
Retail and service
|
|
|
1995
|
|
|
Huntington Harbor and Long Island Sound
|
Lindenhurst (Delivery Center)
|
|
Third-party lease
|
|
|
54,000
|
|
|
Retail, service, and dry storage
|
|
|
1968
|
|
|
Neguntatogue Creek to Great South Bay
|
Lindenhurst (Marina)
|
|
Third-party lease
|
|
|
14,600
|
|
|
Marina and service; 370 wet slips
|
|
|
1968
|
|
|
Neguntatogue Creek to Great South Bay
|
Manhattan
|
|
Third-party lease
|
|
|
1,200
|
|
|
Retail only; 75 wet slips
|
|
|
1996
|
|
|
Hudson River
|
New Rochelle
|
|
Third-party lease
|
|
|
4,650
|
|
|
Retail and service
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Long Island Sound
|
North Carolina
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Southport
|
|
Third-party lease
|
|
|
1,600
|
|
|
Retail only
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Cape Fear River
|
Wrightsville Beach
|
|
Third-party lease
|
|
|
34,500
|
|
|
Retail, service, and storage
|
|
|
1996
|
|
|
Intracoastal Waterway
|
Ohio
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Port Clinton
|
|
Company owned
|
|
|
80,000
|
|
|
Retail, service and storage; 8 wet slips
|
|
|
1997
|
|
|
Lake Erie
|
Oklahoma
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Afton
|
|
Third-party lease
|
|
|
3,500
|
|
|
Retail and service; 23 wet slips
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
Grand Lake
|
Rhode Island
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wakefield
|
|
Third-party lease
|
|
|
1,800
|
|
|
Retail only; 3 wet slips
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Narragansett Bay
|
Tennessee
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chattanooga
|
|
Third-party lease
|
|
|
3,000
|
|
|
Retail only; 12 wet slips
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Tennessee River
|
Texas
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lewisville (Dallas)
|
|
Company owned
|
|
|
22,000
|
|
|
Retail and service
|
|
|
2002
|
|
|
|
Seabrook
|
|
Company owned
|
|
|
32,000
|
|
|
Retail and service; 30 wet slips
|
|
|
2002
|
|
|
Clear Lake
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Square footage is approximate and does not include outside sales
space or dock or marina facilities. |
|
(2) |
|
Operated since date is the date the facility was opened by us or
opened prior to its acquisition by us. |
|
(3) |
|
Joint venture entered into with Brunswick to acquire marina and
service facility. |
36
|
|
Item 3.
|
Legal
Proceedings
|
We are party to various legal actions arising in the ordinary
course of business. While it is not feasible to determine the
actual outcome of these actions as of September 30, 2010,
we do not believe that these matters will have a material
adverse effect on our consolidated financial condition, results
of operations, or cash flows.
|
|
Item 4.
|
Removed
and Reserved
|
PART II
|
|
Item 5.
|
Market
for the Registrants Common Equity, Related Stockholder
Matters, and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
|
Our common stock has been traded on the New York Stock Exchange
under the symbol HZO since our initial public offering on
June 3, 1998 at $12.50 per share. The following table sets
forth high and low sale prices of the common stock for each
calendar quarter indicated as reported on the New York Stock
Exchange.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High
|
|
Low
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First quarter
|
|
$
|
16.18
|
|
|
$
|
10.38
|
|
Second quarter
|
|
$
|
13.82
|
|
|
$
|
6.99
|
|
Third quarter
|
|
$
|
9.66
|
|
|
$
|
4.92
|
|
Fourth quarter
|
|
$
|
7.45
|
|
|
$
|
1.25
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First quarter
|
|
$
|
3.61
|
|
|
$
|
1.19
|
|
Second quarter
|
|
$
|
6.15
|
|
|
$
|
1.84
|
|
Third quarter
|
|
$
|
8.52
|
|
|
$
|
3.01
|
|
Fourth quarter
|
|
$
|
9.46
|
|
|
$
|
6.44
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First quarter
|
|
$
|
11.99
|
|
|
$
|
8.63
|
|
Second quarter
|
|
$
|
12.79
|
|
|
$
|
6.91
|
|
Third quarter
|
|
$
|
8.51
|
|
|
$
|
6.17
|
|
Fourth quarter (through November 30, 2010)
|
|
$
|
8.27
|
|
|
$
|
6.85
|
|
On November 30, 2010, the closing sale price of our common
stock was $7.63 per share. On November 30, 2010, there were
approximately 100 record holders and approximately 5,000
beneficial owners of our common stock.
Dividends
We have never declared or paid cash dividends on our common
stock. We currently plan to retain any earnings to finance the
growth of our business rather than to pay cash dividends.
Payments of any cash dividends in the future will depend on our
financial condition, results of operations, and capital
requirements as well as other factors deemed relevant by our
board of directors.
37
Performance
Graph
The following line graph compares cumulative total stockholder
returns for the five years ended September 30, 2010 for
(i) our common stock, (ii) the Russell 2000 Index, and
(iii) the Nasdaq Retail Trade Index. The graph assumes an
investment of $100 on September 30, 2005. The calculations
of cumulative stockholder return on the Russell 2000 Index and
the Nasdaq Retail Trade Index include reinvestment of dividends.
The calculation of cumulative stockholder return on our common
stock does not include reinvestment of dividends because we did
not pay any dividends during the measurement period. The
historical performance shown is not necessarily indicative of
future performance.
COMPARISON
OF 5 YEAR CUMULATIVE TOTAL RETURN*
Among
MarineMax, Inc., the Russell 2000 Index
and the NASDAQ Retail Trade Index
|
|
|
* |
|
$100 invested on 9/30/05 in stock or index, including
reinvestment of dividends. Fiscal year ending September 30. |
The performance graph above shall not be deemed
filed for purposes of Section 18 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or Exchange Act, or
otherwise subject to the liability of that section. The
performance graph above will not be deemed incorporated by
reference into any filing of our company under the Exchange Act
or the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.
38
|
|
Item 6.
|
Selected
Financial Data
|
The following table contains certain financial and operating
data and is qualified by the more detailed consolidated
financial statements and notes thereto included elsewhere in
this report. The balance sheet and statement of operations data
were derived from the consolidated financial statements and
notes thereto that have been audited by Ernst & Young
LLP, an independent registered certified public accounting firm.
The financial data shown below should be read in conjunction
with the consolidated financial statements and the related notes
thereto and Managements Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations included
elsewhere in this report.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
(Amounts in thousands except share, per share, and retail
location data)
|
|
|
Statement of Operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
$
|
1,213,541
|
|
|
$
|
1,255,985
|
|
|
$
|
885,407
|
|
|
$
|
588,585
|
|
|
$
|
450,340
|
|
Cost of sales
|
|
|
906,781
|
|
|
|
956,251
|
|
|
|
679,164
|
|
|
|
499,925
|
|
|
|
339,533
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
306,760
|
|
|
|
299,734
|
|
|
|
206,243
|
|
|
|
88,660
|
|
|
|
110,807
|
|
Selling, general, and administrative expenses
|
|
|
222,806
|
|
|
|
245,224
|
|
|
|
217,426
|
|
|
|
159,998
|
|
|
|
123,972
|
|
Goodwill and intangible asset impairment charge
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
122,091
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from operations
|
|
|
83,954
|
|
|
|
54,510
|
|
|
|
(133,274
|
)
|
|
|
(71,338
|
)
|
|
|
(13,165
|
)
|
Interest expense, net
|
|
|
18,616
|
|
|
|
26,955
|
|
|
|
20,164
|
|
|
|
14,064
|
|
|
|
3,926
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income tax provision (benefit)
|
|
|
65,338
|
|
|
|
27,555
|
|
|
|
(153,438
|
)
|
|
|
(85,402
|
)
|
|
|
(17,091
|
)
|
Income tax provision (benefit)
|
|
|
25,956
|
|
|
|
7,486
|
|
|
|
(19,161
|
)
|
|
|
(8,630
|
)
|
|
|
(19,588
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
39,382
|
|
|
$
|
20,069
|
|
|
$
|
(134,277
|
)
|
|
$
|
(76,772
|
)
|
|
$
|
2,497
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
2.08
|
|
|
$
|
1.04
|
|
|
$
|
(7.30
|
)
|
|
$
|
(4.11
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of shares:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
18,928,735
|
|
|
|
19,289,231
|
|
|
|
18,391,488
|
|
|
|
18,685,423
|
|
|
|
22,597,953
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Data (as of year-end):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of retail locations(1)
|
|
|
87
|
|
|
|
88
|
|
|
|
80
|
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
|
56
|
|
Sales per store(2)(4)
|
|
$
|
17,064
|
|
|
$
|
15,246
|
|
|
$
|
12,492
|
|
|
$
|
11,285
|
|
|
$
|
8,779
|
|
Same-store sales growth(3)(4)
|
|
|
7
|
%
|
|
|
(1
|
)%
|
|
|
(28
|
)%
|
|
|
(29
|
)%
|
|
|
(17
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
2006
|
|
2007
|
|
2008
|
|
2009
|
|
2010
|
|
Balance Sheet Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Working capital
|
|
$
|
153,465
|
|
|
$
|
170,389
|
|
|
$
|
134,458
|
|
|
$
|
97,179
|
|
|
$
|
104,519
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
801,563
|
|
|
|
825,878
|
|
|
|
661,323
|
|
|
|
393,644
|
|
|
|
336,760
|
|
Long-term debt (including current portion)(5)
|
|
|
37,186
|
|
|
|
30,833
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
349,887
|
|
|
|
373,559
|
|
|
|
248,583
|
|
|
|
197,756
|
|
|
|
202,030
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes only those retail locations open at period end. |
|
(2) |
|
Includes only those stores open for the entire preceding
12-month
period. |
39
|
|
|
(3) |
|
New and acquired stores are included in the comparable base at
the end of the stores thirteenth month of operations. |
|
(4) |
|
A store is one or more retail locations that are adjacent or
operate as one entity. Sales per store and same-store sales
growth is intended only as supplemental information and is not a
substitute for revenue or net income presented in accordance
with generally accepted accounting principles. |
|
(5) |
|
Amount excludes our short-term borrowings for working capital
and inventory financing. |
|
|
Item 7.
|
Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations
|
The following should be read in conjunction with Part I,
including the matters set forth in the Risk Factors
section of this report, and our Consolidated Financial
Statements and notes thereto included elsewhere in this report.
Overview
We are the largest recreational boat retailer in the United
States with fiscal 2010 revenue in excess of $450 million.
Through our current 56 retail locations in 19 states, we
sell new and used recreational boats and related marine
products, including engines, trailers, parts, and accessories.
We also arrange related boat financing, insurance, and extended
warranty contracts; provide boat repair and maintenance
services; and offer yacht and boat brokerage services, and,
where available, offer slip and storage accommodations.
MarineMax was incorporated in January 1998. We commenced
operations with the acquisition of five independent recreational
boat dealers on March 1, 1998. Since the initial
acquisitions in March 1998, we have acquired 20 recreational
boat dealers, two boat brokerage operations, and two
full-service yacht repair facilities. As a part of our
acquisition strategy, we frequently engage in discussions with
various recreational boat dealers regarding their potential
acquisition by us. Potential acquisition discussions frequently
take place over a long period of time and involve difficult
business integration and other issues, including, in some cases,
management succession and related matters. As a result of these
and other factors, a number of potential acquisitions that from
time to time appear likely to occur do not result in binding
legal agreements and are not consummated. We did not complete
any significant acquisitions during the fiscal years ended
September 30, 2008, 2009, and 2010.
General economic conditions and consumer spending patterns can
negatively impact our operating results. Unfavorable local,
regional, national, or global economic developments or
uncertainties regarding future economic prospects could reduce
consumer spending in the markets we serve and adversely affect
our business. Economic conditions in areas in which we operate
dealerships, particularly Florida in which we generated 43%,
45%, and 54% of our revenue during fiscal 2008, 2009, and 2010,
respectively, can have a major impact on our operations. Local
influences, such as corporate downsizing, military base
closings, inclement weather, and environmental conditions, such
as the BP oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico, also could adversely
affect our operations in certain markets.
In an economic downturn, consumer discretionary spending levels
generally decline, at times resulting in disproportionately
large reductions in the sale of luxury goods. Consumer spending
on luxury goods also may decline as a result of lower consumer
confidence levels, even if prevailing economic conditions are
favorable. Although we have expanded our operations during
periods of stagnant or modestly declining industry trends, the
cyclical nature of the recreational boating industry or the lack
of industry growth could adversely affect our business,
financial condition, or results of operations in the future. Any
period of adverse economic conditions or low consumer confidence
has a negative effect on our business.
Lower consumer spending resulting from a downturn in the housing
market and other economic factors adversely affected our
business in fiscal 2007, and continued weakness in consumer
spending resulting from substantial weakness in the financial
markets and deteriorating economic conditions had a very
substantial negative effect on our business in fiscal 2008,
2009, and 2010. These conditions caused us to defer our
acquisition program, delay new store openings, reduce our
inventory purchases, engage in inventory reduction efforts,
close a significant portion of our retail locations, reduce our
headcount, and amend and replace our credit facility. We cannot
predict the length or severity of these unfavorable economic or
financial conditions or the extent to which they will continue
to adversely affect our operating results nor can we predict the
effectiveness of the measures we have taken to address this
environment or whether additional measures will be necessary.
40
Although economic conditions have adversely affected our
operating results, we have capitalized on our core strengths to
substantially outperform the industry, resulting in market share
gains. Our ability to produce such market share supports the
alignment of our retailing strategies with the desires of
consumers. We believe the steps we have taken to address weak
market conditions may yield an increase in future revenue. As
general economic trends improve, we expect our core strengths
and retailing strategies will position us to capitalize on
growth opportunities as they occur and will allow us to emerge
from this challenging economic environment with greater earnings
potential.
Application
of Critical Accounting Policies
We have identified the policies below as critical to our
business operations and the understanding of our results of
operations. The impact and risks related to these policies on
our business operations is discussed throughout
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations when such policies affect our reported
and expected financial results.
In the ordinary course of business, we make a number of
estimates and assumptions relating to the reporting of results
of operations and financial condition in the preparation of our
financial statements in conformity with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States. We base our estimates
on historical experience and on various other assumptions that
we believe are reasonable under the circumstances. The results
form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of
assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other
sources. Actual results could differ significantly from those
estimates under different assumptions and conditions. We believe
that the following discussion addresses our most critical
accounting policies, which are those that are most important to
the portrayal of our financial condition and results of
operations and require our most difficult, subjective, and
complex judgments, often as a result of the need to make
estimates about the effect of matters that are inherently
uncertain.
Revenue
Recognition
We recognize revenue from boat, motor, and trailer sales, and
parts and service operations at the time the boat, motor,
trailer, or part is delivered to or accepted by the customer or
service is completed. We recognize deferred revenue from service
operations and slip and storage services on a straight-line
basis over the term of the contact or when service is completed.
We recognize commissions earned from a brokerage sale at the
time the related brokerage transaction closes. We recognize
commissions earned by us for placing notes with financial
institutions in connection with customer boat financing when we
recognize the related boat sales. We also recognize marketing
fees earned on credit life, accident and disability, and hull
insurance products sold by third-party insurance companies at
the later of customer acceptance of the insurance product as
evidenced by contract execution or when the related boat sale is
recognized. We also recognize commissions earned on extended
warranty service contracts sold on behalf of third-party
insurance companies at the later of customer acceptance of the
service contract terms as evidenced by contract execution or
recognition of the related boat sale.
Certain finance and extended warranty commissions and marketing
fees on insurance products may be charged back if a customer
terminates or defaults on the underlying contract within a
specified period of time. Based upon our experience of
repayments and defaults, we maintain a chargeback allowance that
was not material to our financial statements taken as a whole as
of September 30, 2009 or 2010. Should results differ
materially from our historical experiences, we would need to
modify our estimate of future chargebacks, which could have a
material adverse effect on our operating margins.
Vendor
Consideration Received
We account for consideration received from our vendors in
accordance with FASB Accounting Standards Codification
605-50,
Revenue Recognition, Customer Payments and
Incentives (ASC
605-50),
previously referred to as Emerging Issues Task Force Issue
No. 02-16,
Accounting by a Customer (Including a Reseller) for
Certain Consideration Received from a Vendor.
ASC 605-50
requires us to classify interest assistance received from
manufacturers as a reduction of inventory cost and related cost
of sales as opposed to netting the assistance
41
against our interest expense incurred with our lenders. Pursuant
to
ASC 605-50,
amounts received by us under our co-op assistance programs from
our manufacturers are netted against related advertising
expenses.
Inventories
Inventory costs consist of the amount paid to acquire the
inventory, net of vendor consideration and purchase discounts,
the cost of equipment added, reconditioning costs, and
transportation costs relating to acquiring inventory for sale.
We state new boat, motor, and trailer inventories at the lower
of cost, determined on a specific-identification basis, or
market. We state used boat, motor, and trailer inventories,
including trade-ins, at the lower of cost, determined on a
specific-identification basis, or market. We state parts and
accessories at the lower of cost, determined on an average cost
basis, or market. We utilize our historical experience, the
aging of the inventories, and our consideration of current
market trends as the basis for determining lower of cost or
market valuation allowance. As of September 30, 2009 and
2010, our lower of cost or market valuation allowance was
$17.7 million and $7.3 million, respectively. If
events occur and market conditions change, causing the fair
value to fall below carrying value, the lower of cost or market
valuation allowance could increase.
Valuation
of Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
We account for goodwill and identifiable intangible assets in
accordance with FASB Accounting Standards Codification 350,
Intangibles Goodwill and Other
(ASC 350), previously referred to as Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 142, Goodwill and
Other Intangible Assets. Under this standard, we assess
the impairment of goodwill and identifiable intangible assets at
least annually and whenever events or changes in circumstances
indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable. The
first step in the assessment is the estimation of fair value. If
step one indicates that impairment potentially exists, we
perform the second step to measure the amount of impairment, if
any. Goodwill and identifiable intangible asset impairment
exists when the estimated fair value is less than its carrying
value.
During the three months ended June 30, 2008, we experienced
a significant decline in market valuation driven primarily by
weakness in the marine retail industry and an overall soft
economy, which hindered our financial performance. Accordingly,
we completed a step one analysis (as noted above) and estimated
the fair value of the reporting unit as prescribed by
ASC 350, which indicated potential impairment. As a result,
we completed a fair value analysis of indefinite lived
intangible assets and a step two goodwill impairment analysis,
as required by ASC 350. We determined that indefinite lived
intangible assets and goodwill were impaired and recorded a
non-cash charge of $121.1 million based on our assessment.
We were not required to make any current or future cash
expenditures as a result of this impairment charge.
Impairment
of Long-Lived Assets
FASB Accounting Standards Codification
360-10-40,
Property, Plant, and Equipment, Impairment or Disposal of
Long-Lived Assets (ASC
360-10-40),
previously referred to as Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards No. 144, Accounting for Impairment or
Disposal of Long-Lived Assets, requires that long-lived
assets, such as property and equipment and purchased intangibles
subject to amortization, be reviewed for impairment whenever
events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying
amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Recoverability of the
asset is measured by comparison of its carrying amount to
undiscounted future net cash flows the asset is expected to
generate. If such assets are considered to be impaired, the
impairment to be recognized is measured as the amount by which
the carrying amount of the asset exceeds its fair market value.
Estimates of expected future cash flows represent our best
estimate based on currently available information and reasonable
and supportable assumptions. Any impairment recognized in
accordance with
ASC 360-10-40
is permanent and may not be restored. As of September 30,
2010, we had not recognized any impairment of long-lived assets
in connection with
ASC 360-10-40
based on our reviews.
During the three months ended June 30, 2008, we experienced
a significant decline in market valuation driven primarily by
weakness in the marine retail industry and an overall soft
economy, which adversely affected our financial performance. As
a result of this weakness, we realized a goodwill and intangible
asset impairment charge, see Note 6 Other
Long-Term Assets of Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements. Based on these events, we
42
reviewed the valuation of our investment in Gulfport in
accordance with ASC 323 and recoverability of the assets
contained within the joint venture. ASC 323 requires the
recognition of a loss in value of an investment, which is other
than a temporary decline. We reviewed our investment and assets
contained within the Gulfport joint venture, which consists of
land, buildings, equipment, and goodwill. As a result, we
determined that our investment in the joint venture was impaired
and recorded a non-cash charge of $1.0 million based on our
assessment. We were not required to make any current or future
cash expenditures as a result of this impairment charge.
Stock-Based
Compensation
We account for our share-based compensation plans following the
provisions of FASB Accounting Standards Codification 718,
Compensation Stock Compensation
(ASC 718), previously referred to as Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 123R, Share-Based
Payment. In accordance with ASC 718, we use the
Black-Scholes valuation model for valuing all stock-based
compensation and shares granted under our Employee Stock
Purchase Plan. We measure compensation for restricted stock
awards and restricted stock units at fair value on the grant
date based on the number of shares expected to vest and the
quoted market price of our common stock. We recognize
compensation cost for all awards in earnings, net of estimated
forfeitures, on a straight-line basis over the requisite service
period for each separately vesting portion of the award.
Income
Taxes
We account for income taxes in accordance with FASB Accounting
Standards Codification 740, Income Taxes (ASC
740), previously referred to as Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards No. 109, Accounting for Income
Taxes, and Financial Accounting Standard Board
Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in
Income Taxes. Under ASC 740, we recognize deferred
tax assets and liabilities for the future tax consequences
attributable to temporary differences between the financial
statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities
and their respective tax basis. We measure deferred tax assets
and liabilities using enacted tax rates expected to apply to
taxable income in the years in which we expect those temporary
differences to be recovered or settled. We record valuation
allowances to reduce our deferred tax assets to the amount
expected to be realized by considering all available positive
and negative evidence.
Pursuant to ASC 740, we must consider all positive and
negative evidence regarding the realization of deferred tax
assets, including past operating results and future sources of
taxable income. Under the provisions of
ASC 740-10,
we determined that our net deferred tax asset needed to be fully
reserved given recent earnings and industry trends.
The Worker, Homeownership, and Business Assistance Act of 2009
(the Act) was signed into law in November 2009. The
Act allowed us to carryback the 2009 net operating loss,
which had a valuation allowance recorded against the entire
amount and which we were not able to carryback under the prior
tax law. The additional carryback generated a tax refund of
$19.2 million. The tax refund was recorded as income tax
benefit during our quarter ended December 31, 2009, the
period the Act was enacted. We filed a carryback claim with the
Internal Revenue Service, and we received a $19.2 million
refund in the quarter ended March 31, 2010.
For a more comprehensive list of our accounting policies,
including those which involve varying degrees of judgment, see
Note 2 Significant Accounting
Policies of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
43
Results
of Operations
The following table sets forth certain financial data as a
percentage of revenue for the periods indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
(Amounts in thousands)
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
$
|
885,407
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
588,585
|
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
$
|
450,340
|
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
Cost of sales
|
|
|
679,164
|
|
|
|
76.7
|
%
|
|
|
499,925
|
|
|
|
84.9
|
%
|
|
|
339,533
|
|
|
|
75.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
206,243
|
|
|
|
23.3
|
%
|
|
|
88,660
|
|
|
|
15.1
|
%
|
|
|
110,807
|
|
|
|
24.6
|
%
|
Selling, general, and administrative expenses
|
|
|
217,426
|
|
|
|
24.6
|
%
|
|
|
159,998
|
|
|
|
27.2
|
%
|
|
|
123,972
|
|
|
|
27.5
|
%
|
Goodwill and intangible asset impairment charge
|
|
|
122,091
|
|
|
|
13.8
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from operations
|
|
|
(133,274
|
)
|
|
|
(15.1
|
)%
|
|
|
(71,338
|
)
|
|
|
(12.1
|
)%
|
|
|
(13,165
|
)
|
|
|
(2.9
|
)%
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
20,164
|
|
|
|
2.3
|
%
|
|
|
14,064
|
|
|
|
2.4
|
%
|
|
|
3,926
|
|
|
|
0.9
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss before income tax benefit
|
|
|
(153,438
|
)
|
|
|
(17.3
|
)%
|
|
|
(85,402
|
)
|
|
|
(14.5
|
)%
|
|
|
(17,091
|
)
|
|
|
(3.8
|
)%
|
Income tax benefit
|
|
|
19,161
|
|
|
|
2.2
|
%
|
|
|
8,630
|
|
|
|
1.5
|
%
|
|
|
19,588
|
|
|
|
4.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
(134,277
|
)
|
|
|
(15.2
|
)%
|
|
$
|
(76,772
|
)
|
|
|
(13.0
|
)%
|
|
$
|
2,497
|
|
|
|
0.6
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal
Year Ended September 30, 2010 Compared with Fiscal Year
Ended September 30, 2009
Revenue. Revenue decreased
$138.3 million, or 23.5%, to $450.3 million for the
fiscal year ended September 30, 2010 from
$588.6 million for the fiscal year ended September 30,
2009. Of this decrease, $89.0 million was attributable to a
decline in comparable-store sales and $49.3 million was
attributable to stores opened or closed that were not eligible
for inclusion in the comparable-store base for the
12 months ended September 30, 2010. The decline in our
comparable-store sales was due to the ongoing economic pressure
on our industry caused by the widely reported recession, a
difficult retail financing environment, and the impact of the BP
oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico on customers purchasing
decisions, all of which have adversely impacted our retail sales.
Gross Profit. Gross profit increased
$22.1 million, or 25.0%, to $110.8 million for the
fiscal year ended September 30, 2010 from
$88.7 million for the fiscal year ended September 30,
2009. Gross profit as a percentage of revenue increased to 24.6%
for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2010 from 15.1% for
the fiscal year ended September 30, 2009. The increase in
gross profit as a percentage of revenue was a result of the
actions we have taken to dramatically reduce inventory levels
and improve its aging. This has resulted in a reduction in the
amount of discounting required on new and used boat sales. Gross
profit has also been positively impacted by a product mix shift
from boat sales to our higher margin brokerage services, finance
and insurance products, and service, parts and accessories
products.
Selling, General, and Administrative
Expenses. Selling, general, and administrative
expenses decreased $36.0 million, or 22.5%, to
$124.0 million for the fiscal year ended September 30,
2010 from $160.0 million for the fiscal year ended
September 30, 2009. The overall decrease in selling,
general, and administrative expenses resulted from the strategic
store reductions that we enacted throughout our 2009 fiscal
year. Additionally, through reductions in workforce, we reduced
personnel costs, commissions, and manager bonuses along with
reductions in marketing, travel, and entertainment expenses. The
fiscal year ended September 30, 2010 included the reversal
of approximately $3.9 million of stock compensation
expense, resulting from the performance criteria of certain
restricted stock units no longer being probable. The fiscal year
ended September 30, 2009 included approximately
$6.2 million in store closing costs. Additionally, the
fiscal year ended September 30, 2010 included approximately
$1.2 million in store closing costs and $1.0 million
of debt extinguishment costs related to our previous credit
facility. Excluding these items would result in an increase of
selling, general, and administrative expenses as a percentage of
revenue of approximately 1.8% from 26.1% for the fiscal year
ended September 30, 2009 to 27.9% for the fiscal year ended
September 30, 2010. This increase in selling, general, and
administrative expenses (with such adjustments) as a percentage
of revenue, was primarily attributable to the reported
same-store sales decline, which resulted in a reduction in our
ability to leverage our expense structure.
44
Interest Expense. Interest expense decreased
$10.2 million, or 72.1%, to $3.9 million for the
fiscal year ended September 30, 2010 from
$14.1 million for the fiscal year ended September 30,
2009. The decrease was primarily a result of decreased
borrowings under our credit facility. Interest expense as a
percentage of revenue decreased to 0.9% for the fiscal year
ended September 30, 2010 from 2.4% for the fiscal year
ended September 30, 2009 because of the reductions in
average borrowings on our credit facility.
Income Tax Benefit. Our income tax benefit for
the fiscal year ended September 30, 2010 was
$19.6 million compared with $8.6 million for the
fiscal year ended September 30, 2009. The increase in our
tax benefit was primarily due to the enactment of the Worker,
Homeownership, and Business Assistance Act of 2009 (the
Act), which was signed into law in November 2009.
The Act allowed us to carryback our 2009 net operating
loss, which had a valuation allowance recorded against the
entire amount and which we were not able to carryback under the
prior tax law. The additional carryback generated a tax refund
of $19.2 million. The tax refund was recorded as income tax
benefit during the quarter ended December 31, 2009, the
period the Act was enacted. We filed a carryback claim with the
Internal Revenue Service, and we received a $19.2 million
refund in the quarter ended March 31, 2010.
Fiscal
Year Ended September 30, 2009 Compared with Fiscal Year
Ended September 30, 2008
Revenue. Revenue decreased
$296.8 million, or 33.5%, to $588.6 million for the
fiscal year ended September 30, 2009 from
$885.4 million for the fiscal year ended September 30,
2008. Of this decrease, $234.4 million was attributable to
a decline in comparable-store sales and $62.5 million was
attributable to 26 stores closed in fiscal 2009 that were not
eligible for inclusion in the comparable-store base for the
12 months ended September 30, 2009. The decline in our
comparable-store sales was due to the widely reported weak
economic conditions and tighter retail lending environment,
which have adversely impacted our retail sales.
Gross Profit. Gross profit decreased
$117.5 million, or 57.0%, to $88.7 million for the
fiscal year ended September 30, 2009 from
$206.2 million for the fiscal year ended September 30,
2008. Gross profit as a percentage of revenue decreased to 15.1%
for fiscal 2009 from 23.3% for fiscal 2008. The decrease in
gross profit dollars reflected the combination of the
significant reduction in revenue because of the soft economic
environment and the decreases in gross profit percentage. The
decrease in gross profit as a percentage of revenue was due to
margin pressure arising from the difficult retail environment
and the aggressive pricing strategy that we deployed to drive a
significant reduction to our inventory levels. Additionally,
during fiscal 2009, we incurred losses and increased reserves
for expected losses associated with market declines in brands we
no longer carry by approximately $12.6 million. Lastly, we
strategically decided to forego certain manufacturer purchase
incentives and ordered substantially less boats in fiscal 2009
than in fiscal 2008.
Selling, General, and Administrative
Expenses. Selling, general, and administrative
expenses decreased $57.4 million, or 26.4%, to
$160.0 million for the fiscal year ended September 30,
2009 from $217.4 million for the fiscal year ended
September 30, 2008. Selling, general, and administrative
expenses as a percentage of revenue increased to 27.2% for the
year ended September 30, 2009 from 24.6% for the year ended
September 30, 2008. The fiscal year ended
September 30, 2009 included $6.2 million in charges
associated with store closures. The fiscal year ended
September 30, 2008 included $3.0 million in charges
associated with store closures, partially offset by
$1.0 million in gains recorded as an expense offset related
to proceeds from business interruption insurance claims and the
favorable settlement of certain interest rate swaps. Excluding
these items would result in a comparable selling, general, and
administrative expense reduction of $65.1 million, or
29.8%, and selling, general, and administrative expenses as a
percent of revenue increased to 26.0% for the year ended
September 30, 2009 from 24.7% for the year ended
September 30, 2008. This increase in selling, general, and
administrative expenses as a percentage of revenue was primarily
attributable to the reported same-store sales decline, which
resulted in a reduction in our ability to leverage our expense
structure. The reduction in the dollar level of selling,
general, and administrative expenses was due to the significant
reductions we have made in personnel, retail locations, and most
other expense categories.
Goodwill and intangible asset
impairment. During the fiscal year ended
September 30, 2008, we were required to write-off our
goodwill and indefinite lived intangible assets as a result of
the decline in our market valuation and the continuation of the
difficult retail environment, as prescribed by ASC 350.
45
Interest Expense. Interest expense decreased
$6.1 million, or 30.3%, to $14.1 million for the
fiscal year ended September 30, 2009 from
$20.2 million for the fiscal year ended September 30,
2008. Interest expense as a percentage of revenue increased to
2.4% for fiscal 2009 from 2.3% for fiscal 2008. The decrease in
interest expense was primarily a result of the decline in
average borrowings throughout fiscal 2009.
Income Tax Benefit. Our income tax benefit
decreased $10.5 million to a benefit of $8.6 million
for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2009 from an income
tax benefit of $19.2 million for the fiscal year ended
September 30, 2008, primarily as a result of limitations on
the carryback of our pretax loss and recording a valuation
allowance on the carryforward pretax loss. The effective tax
rate for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2008 differed
from previous periods primarily as a result of the recording of
a non-cash valuation allowance that offsets the majority of
income tax benefit that would have arisen from the goodwill and
intangible asset impairment charge.
Quarterly
Data and Seasonality
Our business, as well as the entire recreational boating
industry, is highly seasonal, with seasonality varying in
different geographic markets. With the exception of Florida, we
generally realize significantly lower sales and higher levels of
inventories, and related short-term borrowings, in the quarterly
periods ending December 31 and March 31. The onset of the
public boat and recreation shows in January stimulates boat
sales and typically allows us to reduce our inventory levels and
related short-term borrowings throughout the remainder of the
fiscal year. Our business could become substantially more
seasonal if we acquire dealers that operate in colder regions of
the United States or close retail locations in warm climates.
Our business is also subject to weather patterns, which may
adversely affect our results of operations. For example, drought
conditions (or merely reduced rainfall levels) or excessive
rain, may close area boating locations or render boating
dangerous or inconvenient, thereby curtailing customer demand
for our products. In addition, unseasonably cool weather and
prolonged winter conditions may lead to a shorter selling season
in certain locations. Hurricanes and other storms could result
in disruptions of our operations or damage to our boat
inventories and facilities, as has been the case when Florida
and other markets were affected by hurricanes. Although our
geographic diversity is likely to reduce the overall impact to
us of adverse weather conditions in any one market area, these
conditions will continue to represent potential, material
adverse risks to us and our future financial performance.
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
Our cash needs are primarily for working capital to support
operations, including new and used boat and related parts
inventories, off-season liquidity, and growth through
acquisitions and new store openings. We regularly monitor the
aging of our inventories and current market trends to evaluate
our current and future inventory needs. We also use this
evaluation in conjunction with our review of our current and
expected operating performance and expected business levels to
determine the adequacy of our financing needs. These cash needs
have historically been financed with cash generated from
operations and borrowings under our credit facility. Our ability
to utilize our credit facility to fund operations depends upon
the collateral levels and compliance with the covenants of the
credit facility. Turmoil in the credit markets and weakness in
the retail markets may interfere with our ability to remain in
compliance with the covenants of the credit facility and
therefore utilize the credit facility to fund operations. At
September 30, 2010, we were in compliance with all of the
credit facility covenants. We currently depend upon dividends
and other payments from our dealerships and our credit facility
to fund our current operations and meet our cash needs.
Currently, no agreements exist that restrict this flow of funds
from our dealerships.
For the fiscal years ended September 30, 2009 and 2010,
cash provided by operating activities approximated
$209.1 million and $40.2 million, respectively. For
the fiscal year ended September 30, 2008, cash used in
operating activities was approximately $8.8 million. For
the fiscal year ended September 30, 2008, cash used in
operating activities was due primarily to our net loss, a
decrease in accounts payable because of reductions in purchases
from our manufacturers, and a decrease in customer deposits due
to a reduction in pending sales. These amounts were primarily
offset by noncash charges, including the impairment of goodwill,
stock-based compensation, and depreciation and amortization
expense. The cash used in operating activities was further
offset by reductions
46
in inventories and accounts receivables due to the reduction in
sales trends. For the fiscal year ended September 30, 2009,
cash provided by operating activities was due primarily to the
significant reduction of inventories. For the fiscal year ended
September 30, 2010, cash provided by operating activities
was primarily related to a decrease in inventories due to our
reduction in purchasing and our comparable-store sales, a
decrease in accounts receivable from our manufacturers, and a
decrease in income tax receivable, partially offset by a
decrease in our accounts payable.
For the fiscal years ended September 30, 2008, 2009, and
2010, cash used in investing activities was approximately
$7.9 million, $1.9 million, and $2.0 million,
respectively. For the fiscal year ended September 30, 2008,
cash used in investing activities was primarily used to purchase
property and equipment associated with opening new retail
facilities or improving and relocating existing retail
facilities. For the fiscal year ended September 30, 2009,
cash used in investing activities was primarily used to purchase
property and equipment associated with improving and relocating
existing retail facilities. For the fiscal year ended
September 30, 2010, cash used in investing activities was
primarily used to purchase property and equipment associated
with improving existing retail facilities.
For the fiscal years ended September 30, 2009 and 2010,
cash used in financing activities was approximately
$212.0 million and $47.2 million, respectively. For
the fiscal year ended September 30, 2008, cash provided by
financing activities was approximately $16.5 million. For
the fiscal year ended September 30, 2008, cash provided by
financing activities was primarily attributable to a net
increase in short-term borrowings, partially offset by
repayments of long-term debt. For the fiscal year ended
September 30, 2009, cash used by financing activities was
primarily attributable to the repayments of short-term
borrowings, partially offset by proceeds from our common stock
sale. For the fiscal year ended September 30, 2010, cash
used by financing activities was primarily attributable to net
payments on our short-term borrowings as a result of decreased
inventory levels.
In June 2010, we entered into an Inventory Financing Agreement
(the Credit Facility) with GE Commercial
Distribution Finance Company (GECDF). The Credit
Facility provides a floor plan financing commitment of
$100 million and allows us to request a $50 million
increase to this commitment under an accordion feature, subject
to GECDF approval. The Credit Facility matures in June 2013 and
is subject to extension for two one-year periods, subject to
GECDF approval.
The Credit Facility has certain financial covenants as specified
in the agreement. The covenants include provisions that our
leverage ratio not exceed 2.75 to 1.0 and that our current ratio
must be greater than 1.2 to 1.0. At September 30, 2010, we
were in compliance with all of the covenants under the Credit
Facility. The interest rate for amounts outstanding under the
Credit Facility is 378 basis points above the one-month
London Inter-Bank Offering Rate. There is an unused line fee of
ten basis points on the unused portion of the Credit Facility.
Advances under the Credit Facility will be initiated by the
acquisition of eligible new and used inventory or will be
re-advances against eligible new and used inventory that have
been partially paid-off. Advances on new inventory will mature
1,081 days from the original invoice date. Advances on used
inventory will mature 361 days from the date we acquire the
used inventory. Each advance is subject to a curtailment
schedule, which requires that we pay down the balance of each
advance on a periodic basis starting after six months. The
curtailment schedule varies based on the type and value of the
inventory. The collateral for the Credit Facility is all of our
personal property with certain limited exceptions. None of our
real estate has been pledged for collateral for the Credit
Facility.
On October 7, 2010, we entered into an Inventory Financing
Agreement (the CGI Facility) with CGI Finance, Inc.
The CGI Facility provides a floor plan financing commitment of
$30 million and is designed to provide financing for our
Azimut inventory needs. The CGI Facility has a one-year term,
which is typical in the industry for similar floor plan
facilities; however, each advance under the CGI Facility can
remain outstanding for 18 months. The interest rate for
amounts outstanding under the CGI Facility is 350 basis
points above the one month London Inter-Bank Offering Rate.
Advances under the CGI Facility will be initiated by the
acquisition of eligible new and used inventory or will be
re-advances against eligible new and used inventory that has
been partially paid-off. Advances on new inventory will mature
550 days from the original invoice date. Advances on used
inventory will mature 366 days from the date
47
we acquire the used inventory. Each advance is subject to a
curtailment schedule, which requires that we pay down the
balance of each advance on a periodic basis starting after six
months for used inventory and one year for new inventory. The
curtailment schedule varies based on the type of inventory.
The collateral for the CGI Facility is our entire Azimut
inventory financed by the CGI Facility with certain limited
exceptions. None of our real estate has been pledged for
collateral for the CGI Facility. We must maintain compliance
with various covenants, including balance sheet related
covenants of current and leverage ratios, as defined in the CGI
Facility. The CGI Facility contemplates that other lenders may
be added by us to finance other inventory not financed under the
CGI Facility, if needed.
The Credit Facility and CGI Facility replace our prior
$180 million credit facility that provided for a line of
credit with asset-based borrowing availability. The prior credit
facility had certain financial covenants as specified in the
agreement. The interest rate for amounts outstanding under the
prior credit facility was 490 basis points above the
one-month LIBOR. During the quarter ended June 30, 2010, we
accelerated the amortization of the prior credit facility loan
costs of approximately $1.0 million.
As of September 30, 2009 and 2010, our indebtedness
associated with financing our inventory and working capital
needs totaled approximately $142.0 million and
$93.8 million, respectively, and we were in compliance with
all of the credit facility covenants. At September 30, 2009
and 2010, the interest rate on the outstanding short-term
borrowings was 5.2% and 4.0%. At September 30, 2010, our
additional available borrowings under our Credit Facility were
approximately $4.2 million.
Except as specified in this Managements Discussion
and Analysis of Financial Condition, and Results of
Operations and in our consolidated financial statements,
we have no material commitments for capital for the next
12 months. We believe that our existing capital resources
will be sufficient to finance our operations for at least the
next 12 months, except for possible significant
acquisitions.
Contractual
Commitments and Commercial Commitments
The following table sets forth a summary of our material
contractual obligations and commercial commitments as of
September 30, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ending
|
|
Short-Term
|
|
|
Other Long-Term
|
|
|
Operating
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
Borrowings(1)
|
|
|
Liabilities(2)
|
|
|
Leases(3)
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(Amounts in thousands)
|
|
|
2011
|
|
$
|
93,844
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
6,469
|
|
|
$
|
100,313
|
|
2012
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,748
|
|
|
|
5,141
|
|
|
|
8,889
|
|
2013
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,755
|
|
|
|
3,755
|
|
2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,582
|
|
|
|
2,582
|
|
2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,402
|
|
|
|
2,402
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,727
|
|
|
|
3,727
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
93,844
|
|
|
$
|
3,748
|
|
|
$
|
24,076
|
|
|
$
|
121,668
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Estimates of future interest payments for short-term borrowings
have been excluded in the tabular presentation. Amounts due are
contingent upon the outstanding balances and the variable
interest rates. As of September 30, 2010, the interest rate
on our short-term borrowings was 4.0%. |
|
(2) |
|
The amounts included in other long-term liabilities consist
primarily of our estimated liability for claims on certain
workers compensation insurance policies. While we estimate
the amount to be paid in excess of 12 months, the ultimate
timing of the payments is subject to certain variability.
Accordingly, we have classified all amounts as due in the
following year for the purposes of this table. |
|
(3) |
|
Amounts for operating lease commitments do not include certain
operating expenses such as maintenance, insurance, and real
estate taxes. These amounts are not a material component of
operating expenses. |
48
Off-Balance
Sheet Arrangements
We do not have any transactions, arrangements, or other
relationships with unconsolidated entities that are reasonably
likely to affect our financial condition, liquidity, or capital
resources. We have no special purpose or limited purpose
entities that provide off-balance sheet financing, liquidity, or
market or credit risk support; we do not engage in leasing,
hedging, or research and development services; and we do not
have other relationships that expose us to liability that is not
reflected in the financial statements.
|
|
Item 7A.
|
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
|
At September 30, 2010, all of our short-term debt bore
interest at a variable rate, tied to LIBOR as a reference rate.
Changes in the underlying LIBOR interest rate or the spread
charged under our performance pricing grid on our short-term
debt could affect our earnings. For example, a hypothetical
100 basis point increase in the interest rate on our
short-term debt would result in an increase of approximately
$900,000 in annual pre-tax interest expense. This estimated
increase is based upon the outstanding balance of our short-term
debt as of September 30, 2010 and assumes no mitigating
changes by us to reduce the outstanding balances, no additional
interest assistance that could be received from vendors due to
the interest rate increase, and no changes in the base LIBOR
rate.
Products purchased from Italian-based manufacturers are subject
to fluctuations in the euro to U.S. dollar exchange rate,
which ultimately may impact the retail price at which we can
sell such products. Accordingly, fluctuations in the value of
the euro as compared with the U.S. dollar may impact the
price points at which we can profitably sell Italian products,
and such price points may not be competitive with other product
lines in the United States. Accordingly, such fluctuations in
exchange rates ultimately may impact the amount of revenue, cost
of goods sold, cash flows, and earnings we recognize for Italian
product lines. We cannot predict the effects of exchange rate
fluctuations on our operating results. In certain cases, we may
enter into foreign currency cash flow hedges to reduce the
variability of cash flows associated with forecasted purchases
of boats and yachts from Italian-based manufacturers. We are not
currently engaged in foreign currency exchange hedging
transactions to manage our foreign currency exposure. If and
when we do engage in foreign currency exchange hedging
transactions, we cannot assure that our strategies will
adequately protect our operating results from the effects of
exchange rate fluctuations.
|
|
Item 8.
|
Financial
Statements and Supplementary Data
|
Reference is made to the financial statements, the notes
thereto, and the report thereon, commencing on
page F-1
of this report, which financial statement, notes, and report are
incorporated herein by reference.
|
|
Item 9.
|
Changes
in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and
Financial Disclosure
|
Not applicable.
|
|
Item 9A.
|
Controls
and Procedures
|
Evaluation
of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
We maintain disclosure controls and procedures that are designed
to ensure that material information required to be disclosed by
us in Securities Exchange Act reports is recorded, processed,
summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the
Securities and Exchange Commissions rules and forms, and
that such information is accumulated and communicated to our
management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions
regarding required disclosure.
Our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have
evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of our
disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Rules 13a-15(e)
and
15d-15(e)
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) as of the end of
the period covered by this report. Based on such evaluation,
such officers have concluded that, as of the end of the period
covered by this report, our disclosure controls and procedures
were effective.
49
Changes
in Internal Controls
During the quarter ended September 30, 2010, there were no
changes in our internal controls over financial reporting that
materially affected, or were reasonably likely to materially
affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
Limitations
on the Effectiveness of Controls
Our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer, does not expect that our disclosure controls
and internal controls will prevent all errors and all fraud. A
control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can
provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the
objectives of the control system are met. Further, the design of
a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource
constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered
relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in
all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide
absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of
fraud, if any, within the company have been detected. These
inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in
decision-making can be faulty, and that breakdowns can occur
because of simple error or mistake. Additionally, controls can
be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by
collusion of two or more people, or by management override of
the control. The design of any system of controls also is based
in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future
events, and there can be no assurance that any design will
succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future
conditions; over time, a control may become inadequate because
of changes in conditions, or the degree of compliance with the
policies or procedures may deteriorate. Because of the inherent
limitations in a cost-effective control system, misstatements
due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected.
CEO and
CFO Certifications
Exhibits 31.1 and 31.2 are the Certifications of the Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, respectively. The
Certifications are required in accordance with Section 302
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (the Section 302
Certifications). This Item of this report, which you are
currently reading is the information concerning the Evaluation
referred to in the Section 302 Certifications and this
information should be read in conjunction with the
Section 302 Certifications for a more complete
understanding of the topics presented.
Managements
Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining
adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term
is defined in
Rule 13a-15(f)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Under the supervision
and with the participation of the Companys management,
including its principal executive officer and principal
financial officer, the Company conducted an evaluation of the
effectiveness of the Companys internal control over
financial reporting as of September 30, 2010 as required by
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
Rule 13a-15(c).
In making this assessment, the Company used the criteria set
forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the
Treadway Commission (COSO) in Internal
Control Integrated Framework. Based on its
evaluation, management concluded that its internal control over
financial reporting was effective as of September 30, 2010.
Our internal control over financial reporting as of
September 30, 2010 has been audited by Ernst and Young LLP,
an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in
their report which appears below.
50
Report of
Independent Registered Certified Public Accounting
Firm
The Board of Directors and Stockholders
of MarineMax, Inc.
We have audited MarineMax, Inc.s internal control over
financial reporting as of September 30, 2010, based on
criteria established in Internal Control Integrated
Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of
the Treadway Commission (the COSO criteria).
MarineMax, Inc.s management is responsible for maintaining
effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its
assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over
financial reporting included in the accompanying
managements report on internal control over financial
reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the
Companys internal control over financial reporting based
on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control
over financial reporting was maintained in all material
respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of
internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk
that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the
design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on
the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we
considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our
audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
A companys internal control over financial reporting is a
process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the
reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of
financial statements for external purposes in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles. A companys
internal control over financial reporting includes those
policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance
of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly
reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the
company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions
are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial
statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company
are being made only in accordance with authorizations of
management and directors of the company; and (3) provide
reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of
unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the
companys assets that could have a material effect on the
financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over
financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements.
Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future
periods are subject to the risk that controls may become
inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree
of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
In our opinion, MarineMax, Inc. maintained, in all material
respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as
of September 30, 2010, based on the COSO criteria.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the
consolidated balance sheets of MarineMax, Inc. as of
September 30, 2010 and 2009, and the related consolidated
statements of operations, comprehensive income,
stockholders equity and cash flows for each of the three
years in the period ended September 30, 2010 of MarineMax,
Inc. and our report dated December 2, 2010 expressed an
unqualified opinion thereon.
Certified Public Accountants
Tampa, Florida
December 2, 2010
51
PART III
|
|
Item 10.
|
Directors,
Executive Officers, and Corporate Governance
|
The information required by this Item relating to our directors
is incorporated herein by reference to the definitive Proxy
Statement (particularly under the caption Corporate
Governance) to be filed pursuant to Regulation 14A of
the Exchange Act for our 2011 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.
The information required by this Item relating to our executive
officers is included in Business Executive
Officers.
We have adopted a code of ethics that applies to our principal
executive officer, principal financial officer, and other senior
accounting personnel. The Code of Ethics for the CEO and
Senior Financial Officers is located on our website at
www.MarineMax.com in the Investor Relations section under
Corporate Governance.
We intend to satisfy the disclosure requirement under
Item 5.05(c) of
Form 8-K
regarding any amendment to, or waiver from, a provision of this
code of ethics by posting such information on our website, at
the address and location specified above.
|
|
Item 11.
|
Executive
Compensation
|
The information required by this Item is incorporated herein by
reference to the definitive Proxy Statement (particularly under
the caption Executive Compensation) to be filed
pursuant to Regulation 14A of the Exchange Act for our 2011
Annual Meeting of Stockholders.
|
|
Item 12.
|
Security
Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and
Related Stockholder Matters
|
The information required by this Item is incorporated herein by
reference to the definitive Proxy Statement (particularly under
the caption Security Ownership of Principal Stockholders,
Directors, and Officers) to be filed pursuant to
Regulation 14A of the Exchange Act for our 2011 Annual
Meeting of Stockholders.
|
|
Item 13.
|
Certain
Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director
Independence
|
The information required by this Item is incorporated herein by
reference to the definitive Proxy Statement (particularly under
the caption Certain Relationships and Related
Transactions) to be filed pursuant to Regulation 14A
of the Exchange Act for our 2011 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.
|
|
Item 14.
|
Principal
Accountant Fees and Services
|
The information required by this Item is incorporated herein by
reference to the definitive Proxy Statement (particularly under
the caption ratification of Appointment of Independent
Auditor) to be filled pursuant to Regulation 14A of
the Exchange Act for our 2011 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.
PART IV
|
|
Item 15.
|
Exhibits
and Financial Statement Schedules
|
|
|
(a)
|
Financial
Statements and Financial Statement Schedules
|
(1) Financial Statements are listed in the Index to
Consolidated Financial Statements on
page F-1
of this report.
(2) No financial statement schedules are included because
such schedules are not applicable, are not required, or because
required information is included in the consolidated financial
statements or notes thereto.
52
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
Number
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
3
|
.1
|
|
Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Registrant,
including all amendments to date(1)
|
|
3
|
.1(a)
|
|
Certificate of Amendment of Restricted Certificate of
Incorporation of the Registrant(2)
|
|
3
|
.2
|
|
Second Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Registrant(3)
|
|
3
|
.3
|
|
Certificate of Designation of Series A Junior Participating
Preferred Stock(1)
|
|
4
|
.1
|
|
Specimen of Common Stock Certificate(1)
|
|
4
|
.2
|
|
Rights Agreement, dated August 28, 2001 between Registrant
and American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, as
Rights Agent(4)
|
|
10
|
.3(h)
|
|
Employment Agreement between Registrant and William H. McGill
Jr.(5)
|
|
10
|
.3(i)
|
|
Employment Agreement between Registrant and Michael H. McLamb(5)
|
|
10
|
.3(j)
|
|
Employment Agreement between Registrant and Edward A. Russell(5)
|
|
10
|
.3(l)
|
|
Asset Purchase Agreement dated as of March 30, 2006 among
MarineMax of New York, Inc.; Surfside-3 Marina, Inc.; Matthew
Barbara, Paul Barbara, Diane Keeney, and Angela Chianese; and
certain affiliates of Surfside-3 Marina, Inc.(6)
|
|
10
|
.4
|
|
1998 Incentive Stock Plan, as amended through February 27,
2001(7)
|
|
10
|
.5
|
|
1998 Employee Stock Purchase Plan(8)
|
|
10
|
.18
|
|
Hatteras Sales and Service Agreement, effective August 1,
2006 among the Registrant, MarineMax Motor Yachts, LLC, and
Hatteras Yachts Division of Brunswick Corporation(7)
|
|
10
|
.20
|
|
Agreement Relating to Acquisitions between Registrant and
Brunswick Corporation, dated December 7, 2005(10)
|
|
10
|
.20(a)
|
|
Sea Ray Sales and Service Agreement(10)
|
|
10
|
.21
|
|
Second Amended and Restated Credit and Security Agreement dated
June 19, 2006 among the Registrant and its subsidiaries, as
Borrowers, and Bank of America, N.A., KeyBank, N.A., General
Electric Commercial Distribution Finance Corporation, Wachovia
Bank, N.A., Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., National City Bank, N.A.,
U.S. Bank, N.A., and Branch Banking and Trust company, as
Lenders(11)
|
|
10
|
.21(a)
|
|
First Amendment to Second Amended and Restated Credit and
Security Agreement executed on June 5, 2007 effective as of
May 31, 2007 among the Registrant and its subsidiaries, as
Borrowers, and Bank of America, N.A., KeyBank, N.A., General
Electric Commercial Distribution Finance Corporation, Branch
Banking and Trust Company, as Lenders(12)
|
|
10
|
.21(b)
|
|
Third Amendment to Second Amended and Restated Credit and
Security Agreement executed on March 7, 2008, among
MarineMax, Inc. and its subsidiaries, as Borrowers, and Bank of
America, N.A., Keybank, N.A., General Electric Commercial
Distribution Finance Corporation, Wachovia Bank, N.A., Wells
Fargo Bank, N.A., U.S. Bank, N.A., Branch Banking and
Trust Company, and Bank of the West, as Lenders.(13)
|
|
10
|
.21(c)
|
|
Fourth Amendment to Second Amended and Restated Credit and
Security Agreement executed on December 15, 2008, by and
among MarineMax, Inc. and its subsidiaries, as Borrowers, and
Bank of America, N.A., Keybank, N.A., GE Commercial Distribution
Finance Corporation, Wachovia Bank, N.A., Wells Fargo Bank,
N.A., U.S. Bank, N.A., Branch Banking &
Trust Company, and Bank of the West, as Lenders.(14)
|
|
10
|
.21(d)
|
|
Fifth Amendment to Second Amended and Restated Credit and
Security Agreement executed on June 5, 2009, by and among
MarineMax, Inc. and its subsidiaries, as Borrowers, and Bank of
America, N.A., Keybank, N.A., GE Commercial Distribution Finance
Corporation, Wachovia Bank, N.A., Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., U.S.
Bank, N.A., Branch Banking & Trust Company, and
Bank of the West, as Lenders.(15)
|
|
10
|
.21(e)
|
|
Sixth Amendment to Second Amended and Restated Credit and
Security Agreement executed on September 10, 2009, by and
among MarineMax, Inc. and its subsidiaries, as Borrowers, and
Bank of America, N.A., Keybank, N.A., GE Commercial Distribution
Finance Corporation, Wachovia Bank, N.A., Wells Fargo Bank,
N.A., U.S. Bank, N.A., Branch Banking &
Trust Company, and Bank of the West, as Lenders.(16)
|
53
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
Number
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
10
|
.21(f)
|
|
Inventory Financing Agreement executed on June 24, 2010,
among MarineMax, Inc. and its subsidiaries, as Borrowers, and GE
Commercial Distribution Finance Corporation, as Lender.(17)
|
|
10
|
.21(g)
|
|
Program Terms Letter executed on June 24, 2010, among
MarineMax, Inc. and its subsidiaries, as Borrowers, and GE
Commercial Distribution Finance Corporation, as Lender.(17)
|
|
10
|
.22
|
|
MarineMax, Inc. 2007 Incentive Compensation Plan(18)
|
|
10
|
.23
|
|
Form Stock Option Agreement for 2007 Incentive Compensation
Plan(18)
|
|
10
|
.24
|
|
Form Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement for 2007
Incentive Compensation Plan(18)
|
|
10
|
.25
|
|
Director Fee Share Purchase Program(19)
|
|
10
|
.26
|
|
Floor Plan Loan Agreement executed on October 7, 2010, by
and among MarineMax, Inc. and its subsidiaries, as Borrowers,
and CGI Finance, Inc., as Lender.
|
|
10
|
.27
|
|
Floor Plan Credit Loan Note executed on October 7, 2010, by
MarineMax, Inc. and its subsidiaries, as Borrowers, payable to
CGI Finance, Inc., as Lender.
|
|
10
|
.28
|
|
Pledge and Security Agreement executed on October 7, 2010,
by and among MarineMax, Inc. and its subsidiaries, as Borrowers,
and CGI Finance, Inc., as Lender.
|
|
21
|
|
|
List of Subsidiaries
|
|
23
|
.1
|
|
Consent of Ernst & Young LLP
|
|
31
|
.1
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to
Rule 13a-14(a)
and
Rule 15d-14(a),
promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended.
|
|
31
|
.2
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to
Rule 13a-14(a)
and
Rule 15d-14(a),
promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended.
|
|
32
|
.1
|
|
Certification pursuant to U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
|
32
|
.2
|
|
Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Certain information in this exhibit has been omitted and filed
separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Confidential treatment has been requested with respect to the
omitted portions. |
|
(1) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Registration Statement on
Form 10-K
for the year ended September 30, 2001, as filed on
December 20, 2001. |
|
(2) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Registrants
Form 8-K
as filed February 19, 2010. |
|
(3) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Registrants
Form 8-K
as filed on November 26, 2008. |
|
(4) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Registrants
Form 8-K
as filed on September 5, 2001. |
|
(5) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Registrants
Form 8-K
as filed on June 13, 2006. |
|
(6) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Registrants
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended March 31, 2006, as filed on
May 10, 2006. |
|
(7) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Registrants
Form 10-Q
for the quarterly period ended December 31, 2001, as filed
on February 14, 2002. |
|
(8) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Registration Statement on
Form S-1
(Registration
333-47873)
as filed on March 12, 1998. |
|
(9) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Registrants
Form 10-Q/A
for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2007, as filed on
September 23, 2008. |
|
(10) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Registrants
Form 8-K
as filed on December 9, 2005. |
|
(11) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Registrants
Form 10-Q
for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2006, as filed on
August 4, 2006. |
|
(12) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Registrants
Form 8-K
as filed on June 11, 2007. |
|
(13) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Registrants
form 8-K
as filed on March 12, 2008. |
54
|
|
|
(14) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Registrants
Form 10-Q
for the quarterly period ended December 31, 2008, as filed
on February 9, 2009. |
|
(15) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Registrants
Form 10-Q
for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2009, as filed on
August 6, 2009. |
|
(16) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Registrants
Form 10-K
for the year ended September 30, 2009, as filed on
December 14, 2009. |
|
(17) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Registrants
Form 10-Q
for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2010, as filed on
August 9, 2010. |
|
(18) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Registrants
Form 8-K
as filed on March 6, 2007. |
|
(19) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Registrants
Form S-8
(File
No. 333-141657)
as filed March 29, 2007. |
|
|
(c)
|
Financial
Statements Schedules
|
(1) See Item 15(a) above.
55
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned,
thereunto duly authorized.
MARINEMAX, INC.
/s/ William
H. McGill Jr.
William H. McGill Jr.
Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
Date: December 2, 2010
In accordance with the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the
capacities and on the date indicated have signed this report
below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Signature
|
|
Capacity
|
|
Date
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ William
H. McGill Jr.
William
H. McGill Jr.
|
|
Chairman of the Board, President, and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
|
|
December 2, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Michael
H. McLamb
Michael
H. McLamb
|
|
Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Secretary,
and Director
(Principal Accounting and
Financial Officer)
|
|
December 2, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Hilliard
M. Eure III
Hilliard
M. Eure III
|
|
Director
|
|
December 2, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ John
B. Furman
John
B. Furman
|
|
Director
|
|
December 2, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Robert
S. Kant
Robert
S. Kant
|
|
Director
|
|
December 2, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Russell
J. Knittel
Russell
J. Knittel
|
|
Director
|
|
December 2, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Joseph
A. Watters
Joseph
A. Watters
|
|
Director
|
|
December 2, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Dean
S. Woodman
Dean
S. Woodman
|
|
Director
|
|
December 2, 2010
|
56
MARINEMAX,
INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
INDEX TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page
|
|
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-2
|
|
|
|
|
F-3
|
|
|
|
|
F-4
|
|
|
|
|
F-5
|
|
|
|
|
F-6
|
|
|
|
|
F-7
|
|
|
|
|
F-8
|
|
F-1
Report of
Independent Registered Certified Public Accounting
Firm
The Board of Directors and Stockholders
of MarineMax, Inc.
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of
MarineMax, Inc. and subsidiaries as of September 30, 2010
and 2009, and the related consolidated statements of operations,
comprehensive income, stockholders equity and cash flows
for each of the three years in the period ended
September 30, 2010. These financial statements are the
responsibility of the Companys management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial
statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are
free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a
test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in
the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the
accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial
statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a
reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above
present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated
financial position of MarineMax, Inc. and subsidiaries at
September 30, 2010 and 2009, and the consolidated results
of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three
years in the period ended September 30, 2010, in conformity
with U.S generally accepted accounting principles.
As discussed in Note 2 to the financial statements, in 2008
the Company changed its method for accounting for income tax
uncertainties.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States),
MarineMax, Inc.s internal control over financial reporting
as of September 30, 2010, based on criteria established in
Internal Control Integrated Framework issued by the
Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission
and our report dated December 2, 2010 expressed an
unqualified opinion thereon.
Certified Public Accountants
Tampa, Florida
December 2, 2010
F-2
MARINEMAX,
INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
(Amounts in thousands except share and per share data)
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
CURRENT ASSETS:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
25,508
|
|
|
$
|
16,539
|
|
Accounts receivable, net
|
|
|
35,497
|
|
|
|
22,774
|
|
Income tax receivable
|
|
|
9,983
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventories, net
|
|
|
205,934
|
|
|
|
188,724
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
|
|
12,314
|
|
|
|
7,464
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
289,236
|
|
|
|
235,501
|
|
Property and equipment, net
|
|
|
102,316
|
|
|
|
99,705
|
|
Other long-term assets
|
|
|
2,092
|
|
|
|
1,554
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
393,644
|
|
|
$
|
336,760
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
|
CURRENT LIABILITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
$
|
15,847
|
|
|
$
|
7,002
|
|
Customer deposits
|
|
|
4,882
|
|
|
|
5,412
|
|
Accrued expenses
|
|
|
29,328
|
|
|
|
24,724
|
|
Short-term borrowings
|
|
|
142,000
|
|
|
|
93,844
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
192,057
|
|
|
|
130,982
|
|
Other long-term liabilities
|
|
|
3,831
|
|
|
|
3,748
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
195,888
|
|
|
|
134,730
|
|
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, $.001 par value, 1,000,000 shares
authorized, none issued or outstanding at September 30,
2009 and 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $.001 par value; 24,000,000 and
40,000,000 shares authorized, 22,496,659 and
22,938,938 shares issued and 21,705,759 and
22,148,038 shares outstanding at September 30, 2009
and 2010, respectively
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
204,772
|
|
|
|
206,549
|
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
8,772
|
|
|
|
11,269
|
|
Treasury stock, at cost, 790,900 shares held at
September 30, 2009 and 2010
|
|
|
(15,810
|
)
|
|
|
(15,810
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
197,756
|
|
|
|
202,030
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity
|
|
$
|
393,644
|
|
|
$
|
336,760
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-3
MARINEMAX,
INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Year Ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
(Amounts in thousands except share
|
|
|
|
and per share data)
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
$
|
885,407
|
|
|
$
|
588,585
|
|
|
$
|
450,340
|
|
Cost of sales
|
|
|
679,164
|
|
|
|
499,925
|
|
|
|
339,533
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
206,243
|
|
|
|
88,660
|
|
|
|
110,807
|
|
Selling, general, and administrative expenses
|
|
|
217,426
|
|
|
|
159,998
|
|
|
|
123,972
|
|
Goodwill and intangible asset impairment charge
|
|
|
122,091
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from operations
|
|
|
(133,274
|
)
|
|
|
(71,338
|
)
|
|
|
(13,165
|
)
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
20,164
|
|
|
|
14,064
|
|
|
|
3,926
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss before income tax benefit
|
|
|
(153,438
|
)
|
|
|
(85,402
|
)
|
|
|
(17,091
|
)
|
Income tax benefit
|
|
|
19,161
|
|
|
|
8,630
|
|
|
|
19,588
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
(134,277
|
)
|
|
$
|
(76,772
|
)
|
|
$
|
2,497
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic net income (loss) per common share
|
|
$
|
(7.30
|
)
|
|
$
|
(4.11
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted net income (loss) per common share
|
|
$
|
(7.30
|
)
|
|
$
|
(4.11
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of common shares used in computing net
income (loss) per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
18,391,488
|
|
|
|
18,685,423
|
|
|
|
21,998,743
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
18,391,488
|
|
|
|
18,685,423
|
|
|
|
22,597,953
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-4
MARINEMAX,
INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Year Ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
(Amounts in thousands)
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
(134,277
|
)
|
|
$
|
(76,772
|
)
|
|
$
|
2,497
|
|
Other comprehensive income (loss):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in fair market value of derivative instruments, net of
tax benefit of $228 for the year ended September 30, 2008
|
|
|
(365
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reclassification adjustment for gains included in net loss, net
of tax of $211 for the year ended September 30, 2008
|
|
|
337
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income (loss)
|
|
$
|
(134,305
|
)
|
|
$
|
(76,772
|
)
|
|
$
|
2,497
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-5
MARINEMAX,
INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
|
Paid-in
|
|
|
Retained
|
|
|
Comprehensive
|
|
|
Treasury
|
|
|
Stockholders
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Capital
|
|
|
Earnings
|
|
|
Income
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
|
(Amounts in thousands except share data)
|
|
|
BALANCE, September 30, 2007
|
|
|
18,379,864
|
|
|
$
|
19
|
|
|
$
|
167,912
|
|
|
$
|
220,375
|
|
|
$
|
28
|
|
|
$
|
(14,775
|
)
|
|
$
|
373,559
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(134,277
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(134,277
|
)
|
Purchase of treasury stock
|
|
|
(71,300
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,035
|
)
|
|
|
(1,035
|
)
|
Shares issued pursuant to employee stock purchase plan
|
|
|
105,390
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,207
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,207
|
|
Shares issued upon exercise of stock options
|
|
|
102,352
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,024
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,024
|
|
Stock-based compensation
|
|
|
8,181
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,464
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,464
|
|
Tax benefits of options exercised
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
223
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
223
|
|
Cumulative effect of adoption of FIN 48
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(554
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(554
|
)
|
Conversion of restricted stock awards to restricted stock units
|
|
|
(100,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in fair market value of derivative instruments, net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(28
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(28
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BALANCE, September 30, 2008
|
|
|
18,424,487
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
178,830
|
|
|
|
85,544
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15,810
|
)
|
|
|
248,583
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(76,772
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(76,772
|
)
|
Shares issued pursuant to employee stock purchase plan
|
|
|
198,298
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
630
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
630
|
|
Shares issued upon vesting of equity awards
|
|
|
45,407
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
74
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
74
|
|
Shares issued upon exercise of stock options
|
|
|
20,554
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
62
|
|
Issuance of common stock
|
|
|
2,990,000
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
19,611
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,614
|
|
Stock-based compensation
|
|
|
27,013
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,565
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,565
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BALANCE, September 30, 2009
|
|
|
21,705,759
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
204,772
|
|
|
|
8,772
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15,810
|
)
|
|
|
197,756
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,497
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,497
|
|
Shares issued pursuant to employee stock purchase plan
|
|
|
172,371
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
483
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
483
|
|
Shares issued upon vesting of equity awards
|
|
|
61,624
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(177
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(177
|
)
|
Shares issued upon exercise of stock options
|
|
|
185,834
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
923
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
923
|
|
Stock-based compensation
|
|
|
22,450
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
529
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
529
|
|
Tax benefits of options exercised
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BALANCE, September 30, 2010
|
|
|
22,148,038
|
|
|
$
|
22
|
|
|
$
|
206,549
|
|
|
$
|
11,269
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(15,810
|
)
|
|
$
|
202,030
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-6
MARINEMAX,
INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Year Ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
(Amounts in thousands)
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
(134,277
|
)
|
|
$
|
(76,772
|
)
|
|
$
|
2,497
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided
by (used in) operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill and intangible asset impairment
|
|
|
122,091
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
11,090
|
|
|
|
10,969
|
|
|
|
7,357
|
|
Deferred income tax provision (benefit)
|
|
|
(6,303
|
)
|
|
|
1,513
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss (gain) on sale of property and equipment
|
|
|
259
|
|
|
|
(64
|
)
|
|
|
357
|
|
Stock-based compensation expense, net
|
|
|
8,464
|
|
|
|
5,565
|
|
|
|
529
|
|
Loss on extinguishment and modification of debt and short-term
borrowings
|
|
|
160
|
|
|
|
492
|
|
|
|
1,023
|
|
Tax benefits from options exercised
|
|
|
223
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
Excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation
|
|
|
(169
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(19
|
)
|
(Increase) decrease in
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable, net
|
|
|
28,402
|
|
|
|
(6,566
|
)
|
|
|
12,723
|
|
Income tax receivable
|
|
|
(6,744
|
)
|
|
|
(3,239
|
)
|
|
|
9,983
|
|
Inventories, net
|
|
|
9,410
|
|
|
|
262,695
|
|
|
|
17,210
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other assets
|
|
|
2,633
|
|
|
|
1,362
|
|
|
|
1,539
|
|
(Decrease) increase in
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
(16,749
|
)
|
|
|
11,366
|
|
|
|
(8,845
|
)
|
Customer deposits
|
|
|
(26,915
|
)
|
|
|
(1,623
|
)
|
|
|
530
|
|
Accrued expenses
|
|
|
(361
|
)
|
|
|
3,405
|
|
|
|
(4,687
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities
|
|
|
(8,786
|
)
|
|
|
209,103
|
|
|
|
40,216
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of property and equipment
|
|
|
(7,969
|
)
|
|
|
(2,101
|
)
|
|
|
(4,159
|
)
|
Proceeds from sale of property and equipment
|
|
|
112
|
|
|
|
240
|
|
|
|
2,166
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(7,857
|
)
|
|
|
(1,861
|
)
|
|
|
(1,993
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repayments of long-term debt
|
|
|
(30,833
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (repayments) borrowings on short-term borrowings
|
|
|
46,000
|
|
|
|
(230,000
|
)
|
|
|
(48,156
|
)
|
Purchases of treasury stock
|
|
|
(1,035
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation
|
|
|
169
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
Debt modification costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,378
|
)
|
|
|
(284
|
)
|
Net proceeds from issuance of common stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,614
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net proceeds from issuance of common stock under incentive
compensation and employee purchase plans
|
|
|
2,231
|
|
|
|
766
|
|
|
|
1,229
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
|
|
|
16,532
|
|
|
|
(211,998
|
)
|
|
|
(47,192
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET DECREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS:
|
|
|
(111
|
)
|
|
|
(4,756
|
)
|
|
|
(8,969
|
)
|
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, beginning of period
|
|
|
30,375
|
|
|
|
30,264
|
|
|
|
25,508
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, end of period
|
|
$
|
30,264
|
|
|
$
|
25,508
|
|
|
$
|
16,539
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental Disclosures of Cash Flow Information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
20,630
|
|
|
|
14,493
|
|
|
|
4,469
|
|
Income taxes
|
|
|
2,617
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-7
MARINEMAX,
INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
|
1.
|
COMPANY
BACKGROUND AND BASIS OF PRESENTATION:
|
We are the largest recreational boat retailer in the United
States. We engage primarily in the retail sale, brokerage, and
service of new and used boats, motors, trailers, marine parts,
and accessories and offer slip and storage accommodations in
certain locations. In addition, we arrange related boat
financing, insurance, and extended service contracts. As of
September 30, 2010, we operated through 56 retail locations
in 19 states, consisting of Alabama, Arizona, California,
Colorado, Connecticut, Florida, Georgia, Kansas, Maryland,
Minnesota, Missouri, New Jersey, New York, North Carolina, Ohio,
Oklahoma, Rhode Island, Tennessee, and Texas.
We are the nations largest retailer of Sea Ray, Boston
Whaler, Meridian, Cabo, and Hatteras recreational boats and
yachts, all of which are manufactured by Brunswick Corporation
(Brunswick). Sales of new Brunswick boats accounted
for approximately 41% of our revenue in fiscal 2010. Brunswick
is the worlds largest manufacturer of marine products and
marine engines. We believe we represented in excess of 7% of all
Brunswick marine sales, including approximately 46% of its Sea
Ray boat sales, during our 2010 fiscal year.
We have dealership agreements with Sea Ray, Boston Whaler, Cabo,
Hatteras, Meridian, and Mercury Marine, all subsidiaries or
divisions of Brunswick. We also have dealer agreements with
Azimut Yachts. These agreements allow us to purchase, stock,
sell, and service these manufacturers boats and products.
These agreements also allow us to use these manufacturers
names, trade symbols, and intellectual properties in our
operations.
We are a party to a multi-year dealer agreement with Brunswick
covering Sea Ray products that appoints us as the exclusive
dealer of Sea Ray boats in our geographic markets. We are a
party to a multi-year dealer agreement with Hatteras Yachts that
gives us the exclusive right to sell Hatteras Yachts throughout
the states of Florida (excluding the Florida panhandle), New
Jersey, New York, and Texas. We are also the exclusive dealer
for Cabo Yachts throughout the states of Florida, New Jersey,
and New York through a multi-year dealer agreement. We are also
the exclusive dealer for Italy-based Azimut-Benetti Groups
product line, Azimut Yachts, for the Northeast United States
from Maryland to Maine and for the state of Florida through a
multi-year dealer agreement. We believe non-Brunswick brands
offer a migration for our existing customer base or fill a void
in our product offerings, and accordingly, do not compete with
the business generated from our other prominent brands.
As is typical in the industry, we deal with manufacturers, other
than Sea Ray, Boston Whaler, Hatteras, Cabo, and Azimut Yachts,
under renewable annual dealer agreements, each of which gives us
the right to sell various makes and models of boats within a
given geographic region. Any change or termination of these
agreements, or the agreements discussed above, for any reason,
or changes in competitive, regulatory, or marketing practices,
including rebate or incentive programs, could adversely affect
our results of operations. Although there are a limited number
of manufacturers of the type of boats and products that we sell,
we believe that adequate alternative sources would be available
to replace any manufacturer other than Sea Ray as a product
source. These alternative sources may not be available at the
time of any interruption, and alternative products may not be
available at comparable terms, which could affect operating
results adversely.
General economic conditions and consumer spending patterns can
negatively impact our operating results. Unfavorable local,
regional, national, or global economic developments or
uncertainties regarding future economic prospects could reduce
consumer spending in the markets we serve and adversely affect
our business. Economic conditions in areas in which we operate
dealerships, particularly Florida in which we generated 43%,
45%, and 54% of our revenue during fiscal 2008, 2009, and 2010,
respectively, can have a major impact on our operations. Local
influences, such as corporate downsizing and military base
closings, also could adversely affect our operations in certain
markets.
In an economic downturn, consumer discretionary spending levels
generally decline, at times resulting in disproportionately
large reductions in the sale of luxury goods. Consumer spending
on luxury goods also may decline as a result of lower consumer
confidence levels, even if prevailing economic conditions are
favorable. Although we have expanded our operations during
periods of stagnant or modestly declining industry trends, the
cyclical nature of the recreational boating industry or the lack
of industry growth may adversely affect our business,
F-8
MARINEMAX,
INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
financial condition, and results of operations. Any period of
adverse economic conditions or low consumer confidence has a
negative effect on our business.
Lower consumer spending resulting from a downturn in the housing
market and other economic factors adversely affected our
business in fiscal 2007 and continued weakness in consumer
spending resulting from substantial weakness in the financial
markets and deteriorating economic conditions had a very
substantial negative effect on our business in fiscal 2008,
2009, and 2010. These conditions caused us to defer our
acquisition program, delay new store openings, reduce our
inventory purchases, engage in inventory reduction efforts,
close some of our retail locations, reduce our headcount, and
amend and replace our credit facility. We cannot predict the
length or severity of these unfavorable economic or financial
conditions or the extent to which they will continue to
adversely affect our operating results nor can we predict the
effectiveness of the measures we have taken to address this
environment or whether additional measures will be necessary.
In order to provide comparability between periods presented,
certain amounts have been reclassified from the previously
reported consolidated financial statements to conform to the
consolidated financial statement presentation of the current
period. The consolidated financial statements include our
accounts and the accounts of our subsidiaries, all of which are
wholly owned. All significant intercompany transactions and
accounts have been eliminated.
|
|
2.
|
SIGNIFICANT
ACCOUNTING POLICIES:
|
Cash and
Cash Equivalents
We consider all highly liquid investments with an original
maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents.
Vendor
Consideration Received
We account for consideration received from our vendors in
accordance with FASB Accounting Standards Codification
605-50,
Revenue Recognition, Customer Payments and
Incentives (ASC
605-50),
previously referred to as Emerging Issues Task Force Issue
No. 02-16,
Accounting by a Customer (Including a Reseller) for
Certain Consideration Received from a Vendor.
ASC 605-50
requires us to classify interest assistance received from
manufacturers as a reduction of inventory cost and related cost
of sales as opposed to netting the assistance against our
interest expense incurred with our lenders. Pursuant to
ASC 605-50,
amounts received by us under our co-op assistance programs from
our manufacturers are netted against related advertising
expenses.
Inventories
Inventory costs consist of the amount paid to acquire the
inventory, net of vendor consideration and purchase discounts,
the cost of equipment added, reconditioning costs, and
transportation costs relating to acquiring inventory for sale.
We state new boat, motor, and trailer inventories at the lower
of cost, determined on a specific-identification basis, or
market. We state used boat, motor, and trailer inventories,
including trade-ins, at the lower of cost, determined on a
specific-identification basis, or market. We state parts and
accessories at the lower of cost, determined on an average cost
basis, or market. We utilize our historical experience, the
aging of the inventories, and our consideration of current
market trends as the basis for determining lower of cost or
market valuation allowance. As of September 30, 2009 and
2010, our lower of cost or market valuation allowance was
$17.7 million and $7.3 million, respectively. If
events occur and market conditions change, causing the fair
value to fall below carrying value, the lower of cost or market
valuation allowance could increase.
Property
and Equipment
We record property and equipment at cost, net of accumulated
depreciation, and depreciate property and equipment over their
estimated useful lives using the straight-line method. We
capitalize and amortize leasehold
F-9
MARINEMAX,
INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
improvements over the lesser of the life of the lease or the
estimated useful life of the asset. Useful lives for purposes of
computing depreciation are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Years
|
|
Buildings and improvements
|
|
5-40
|
Machinery and equipment
|
|
3-10
|
Furniture and fixtures
|
|
5-10
|
Vehicles
|
|
3-5
|
We remove the cost of property and equipment sold or retired and
the related accumulated depreciation from the accounts at the
time of disposition and include any resulting gain or loss in
the consolidated statements of operations. We charge
maintenance, repairs, and minor replacements to operations as
incurred, and we capitalize and amortize major replacements and
improvements over their useful lives.
Valuation
of Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
We account for goodwill and identifiable intangible assets in
accordance with FASB Accounting Standards Codification 350,
Intangibles Goodwill and Other
(ASC 350), previously referred to as Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 142, Goodwill and
Other Intangible Assets. Under this standard, we assess
the impairment of goodwill and identifiable intangible assets at
least annually and whenever events or changes in circumstances
indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable. The
first step in the assessment is the estimation of fair value. If
step one indicates that impairment potentially exists, we
perform the second step to measure the amount of impairment, if
any. Goodwill and identifiable intangible asset impairment
exists when the estimated fair value is less than its carrying
value.
During the three months ended June 30, 2008, we experienced
a significant decline in market valuation driven primarily by
weakness in the marine retail industry and an overall soft
economy, which hindered our financial performance. Accordingly,
we completed a step one analysis (as noted above) and estimated
the fair value of the reporting unit as prescribed by
ASC 350, which indicated potential impairment. As a result,
we completed a fair value analysis of indefinite lived
intangible assets and a step two goodwill impairment analysis,
as required by ASC 350. We determined that indefinite lived
intangible assets and goodwill were impaired and recorded a
non-cash charge of $121.1 million based on our assessment.
We were not required to make any current or future cash
expenditures as a result of this impairment charge.
Impairment
of Long-Lived Assets
FASB Accounting Standards Codification
360-10-40,
Property, Plant, and Equipment, Impairment or Disposal of
Long-Lived Assets (ASC
360-10-40),
previously referred to as Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards No. 144, Accounting for Impairment or
Disposal of Long-Lived Assets, requires that long-lived
assets, such as property and equipment and purchased intangibles
subject to amortization, be reviewed for impairment whenever
events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying
amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Recoverability of the
asset is measured by comparison of its carrying amount to
undiscounted future net cash flows the asset is expected to
generate. If such assets are considered to be impaired, the
impairment to be recognized is measured as the amount by which
the carrying amount of the asset exceeds its fair market value.
Estimates of expected future cash flows represent our best
estimate based on currently available information and reasonable
and supportable assumptions. Any impairment recognized in
accordance with
ASC 360-10-40
is permanent and may not be restored. As of September 30,
2010, we had not recognized any impairment of long-lived assets
in connection with
ASC 360-10-40
based on our reviews.
F-10
MARINEMAX,
INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Customer
Deposits
Customer deposits primarily include amounts received from
customers toward the purchase of boats. We recognize these
deposits as revenue upon delivery or acceptance of the related
boats to customers.
Insurance
We retain varying levels of risk relating to the insurance
policies we maintain, most significantly workers
compensation insurance and employee medical benefits. We are
responsible for the claims and losses incurred under these
programs, limited by per occurrence deductibles and paid claims
or losses up to pre-determined maximum exposure limits. Our
third-party insurance carriers pay any losses above the
pre-determined exposure limits. We estimate our liability for
incurred but not reported losses using our historical loss
experience, our judgment, and industry information.
Derivative
Instruments
We account for derivative instruments in accordance with FASB
Accounting Standards Codification 815, Derivatives and
Hedging (ASC 815), previously referred to as
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 133,
Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Certain Hedging
Activities, Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
No. 138, Accounting for Certain Derivative
Instruments and Certain Hedging Activity, an Amendment of
SFAS 133 and Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards No. 149, Amendment of Statement 133 on
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities. Under these
standards, all derivative instruments are recorded on the
balance sheet at their respective fair values.
We utilize certain derivative instruments, from time to time,
including interest rate swaps and forward contracts, to manage
variability in cash flows associated with interest rates and
forecasted purchases of boats and yachts from certain of our
foreign suppliers in euros. At September 30, 2009 and 2010,
no such instruments were outstanding.
Revenue
Recognition
We recognize revenue from boat, motor, and trailer sales, and
parts and service operations at the time the boat, motor,
trailer, or part is delivered to or accepted by the customer or
service is completed. We recognize deferred revenue from service
operations and slip and storage services on a straight-line
basis over the term of the contact or when service is completed.
We recognize commissions earned from a brokerage sale at the
time the related brokerage transaction closes. We recognize
commissions earned by us for placing notes with financial
institutions in connection with customer boat financing when we
recognize the related boat sales. We recognize marketing fees
earned on credit life, accident and disability, and hull
insurance products sold by third-party insurance companies at
the later of customer acceptance of the insurance product as
evidenced by contract execution or when the related boat sale is
recognized. Pursuant to negotiated agreements with financial and
insurance institutions, we are charged back for a portion of
these fees should the customer terminate or default on the
related finance or insurance contract before it is outstanding
for a stipulated minimal period of time. We base the chargeback
allowance, which was not material to the consolidated financial
statements taken as a whole as of September 30, 2009 or
2010, on our experience with repayments or defaults on the
related finance or insurance contracts.
We also recognize commissions earned on extended warranty
service contracts sold on behalf of third-party insurance
companies at the later of customer acceptance of the service
contract terms as evidenced by contract execution or recognition
of the related boat sale. We are charged back for a portion of
these commissions should the customer terminate or default on
the service contract prior to its scheduled maturity. We
determine the chargeback allowance, which was not material to
the consolidated financial statements taken as a whole as of
September 30, 2009 or 2010, based upon our experience with
repayments or defaults on the service contracts.
F-11
MARINEMAX,
INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The following table sets forth percentages of our revenue
generated by certain products and services, for each of last
three years.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
2009
|
|
2010
|
|
New boat sales
|
|
|
63.5
|
%
|
|
|
60.7
|
%
|
|
|
54.4
|
%
|
Used boat sales
|
|
|
20.5
|
%
|
|
|
22.5
|
%
|
|
|
24.0
|
%
|
Maintenance and repair services
|
|
|
6.6
|
%
|
|
|
7.9
|
%
|
|
|
9.8
|
%
|
Finance and insurance products
|
|
|
3.6
|
%
|
|
|
2.7
|
%
|
|
|
2.7
|
%
|
Parts and accessories
|
|
|
4.4
|
%
|
|
|
5.0
|
%
|
|
|
6.4
|
%
|
Brokerage services
|
|
|
1.4
|
%
|
|
|
1.2
|
%
|
|
|
2.7
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Revenue
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-Based
Compensation
We account for our share-based compensation plans following the
provisions of FASB Accounting Standards Codification 718,
Compensation Stock Compensation
(ASC 718), previously referred to as Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 123R, Share-Based
Payment. In accordance with ASC 718, we use the
Black-Scholes valuation model for valuing all stock-based
compensation and shares granted under our Employee Stock
Purchase Plan. We measure compensation for restricted stock
awards and restricted stock units at fair value on the grant
date based on the number of shares expected to vest and the
quoted market price of our common stock. We recognize
compensation cost for all awards in earnings, net of estimated
forfeitures, on a straight-line basis over the requisite service
period for each separately vesting portion of the award.
Advertising
and Promotional Costs
We expense advertising and promotional costs as incurred and
include them in selling, general, and administrative expenses in
the accompanying consolidated statements of operations. Pursuant
to ASC
605-50, we
net amounts received by us under our co-op assistance programs
from our manufacturers against the related advertising expenses.
Total advertising and promotional expenses approximated
$19.3 million, $9.4 million, and $8.5 million,
net of related co-op assistance of approximately $700,000,
$526,000, and $334,000, for the fiscal years ended
September 30, 2008, 2009, and 2010, respectively.
Income
Taxes
We account for income taxes in accordance with FASB Accounting
Standards Codification 740, Income Taxes (ASC
740), previously referred to as Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards No. 109, Accounting for Income
Taxes, and Financial Accounting Standard Board
Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in
Income Taxes (FIN 48). In 2008 we adopted
the provisions of FIN 48. Under ASC 740, we recognize
deferred tax assets and liabilities for the future tax
consequences attributable to temporary differences between the
financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and
liabilities and their respective tax basis. We measure deferred
tax assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates expected to
apply to taxable income in the years in which we expect those
temporary differences to be recovered or settled. We record
valuation allowances to reduce our deferred tax assets to the
amount expected to be realized by considering all available
positive and negative evidence.
Pursuant to ASC 740, we must consider all positive and
negative evidence regarding the realization of deferred tax
assets, including past operating results and future sources of
taxable income. Under the provisions of
ASC 740-10,
we determined that our net deferred tax asset needed to be fully
reserved given recent earnings and industry trends.
The Worker, Homeownership, and Business Assistance Act of 2009
(the Act) was signed into law in November 2009. The
Act allowed us to carryback the 2009 net operating loss,
which had a valuation allowance
F-12
MARINEMAX,
INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
recorded against the entire amount and which we were not able to
carryback under the prior tax law. The additional carryback
generated a tax refund of $19.2 million. The tax refund was
recorded as income tax benefit during our quarter ended
December 31, 2009, the period the Act was enacted. We filed
a carryback claim with the Internal Revenue Service, and we
received a $19.2 million refund in the quarter ended
March 31, 2010.
New
Accounting Pronouncements
In June 2009 the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued
FASB Accounting Standards Codification 810,
Consolidation (ASC 810), previously
referred to as Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
No. 167, Amendments to FASB Interpretation
No. 46(R) (SFAS 167). SFAS 167,
addresses the effects of eliminating the qualifying
special-purpose entity (QSPE) concept from Statement
of Financial Accounting Standards No. 140, Accounting
for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and
Extinguishments of Liabilities and addresses certain key
provisions of FIN 46(R), including transparency of
enterprises involvement with variable interest entities
(VIEs). ASC 810 is effective for fiscal years
beginning after November 15, 2009 and interim periods
within those fiscal years. We do not expect the adoption of this
standard to have a material impact on our consolidated financial
statements.
Concentrations
of Credit Risk
Financial instruments, which potentially subject us to
concentrations of credit risk, consist principally of cash and
cash equivalents and accounts receivable. Concentrations of
credit risk with respect to our cash and cash equivalents are
limited primarily to amounts held with financial institutions.
Concentrations of credit risk arising from our receivables are
limited primarily to amounts due from manufacturers and
financial institutions.
Fair
Value of Financial Instruments
The carrying amount of our financial instruments approximates
fair value due either to length to maturity or existence of
interest rates that approximate prevailing market rates unless
otherwise disclosed in these consolidated financial statements.
Use of
Estimates and Assumptions
The preparation of consolidated financial statements in
conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States requires us to make estimates and assumptions that
affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and
disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of
the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts
of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods.
Significant estimates made by us in the accompanying
consolidated financial statements relate to valuation
allowances, valuation of long-lived assets, and valuation of
accruals. Actual results could differ materially from those
estimates.
Trade receivables consist primarily of receivables from
financial institutions, which provide funding for customer boat
financing and amounts due from financial institutions earned
from arranging financing with our customers. We normally collect
these receivables within 30 days of the sale. Trade
receivables also include amounts due from customers on the sale
of boats, parts, service, and storage. Amounts due from
manufacturers represent receivables for various manufacturer
programs and parts and service work performed pursuant to the
manufacturers warranties.
The allowance for uncollectible receivables, which was not
material to the consolidated financial statements as of
September 30, 2009 or 2010, was based on our consideration
of customer payment practices, past transaction history with
customers, and economic conditions. When an account becomes
uncollectable, we expense it as a bad debt and we credit
payments subsequently received to the bad debt expense account.
We review the allowance for
F-13
MARINEMAX,
INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
uncollectible receivables when an event or other change in
circumstances results in a change in the estimate of the
ultimate collectability of a specific account.
Accounts receivable, net consisted of the following at
September 30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
(Amounts in thousands)
|
|
|
Trade receivables
|
|
$
|
11,598
|
|
|
$
|
10,415
|
|
Amounts due from manufacturers
|
|
|
23,501
|
|
|
|
12,021
|
|
Other receivables
|
|
|
398
|
|
|
|
338
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
35,497
|
|
|
$
|
22,774
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventories, net consisted of the following at September 30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
(Amounts in thousands)
|
|
|
New boats, motors, and trailers
|
|
$
|
160,303
|
|
|
$
|
166,282
|
|
Used boats, motors, and trailers
|
|
|
39,113
|
|
|
|
16,737
|
|
Parts, accessories, and other
|
|
|
6,518
|
|
|
|
5,705
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
205,934
|
|
|
$
|
188,724
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.
|
PROPERTY
AND EQUIPMENT:
|
Property and equipment consisted of the following at
September 30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
(Amounts in thousands)
|
|
|
Land
|
|
$
|
40,410
|
|
|
$
|
41,847
|
|
Buildings and improvements
|
|
|
76,411
|
|
|
|
77,498
|
|
Machinery and equipment
|
|
|
28,002
|
|
|
|
26,536
|
|
Furniture and fixtures
|
|
|
4,982
|
|
|
|
4,680
|
|
Vehicles
|
|
|
5,717
|
|
|
|
5,165
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
155,522
|
|
|
|
155,726
|
|
Less Accumulated depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
(53,206
|
)
|
|
|
(56,021
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
102,316
|
|
|
$
|
99,705
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization expense on property and equipment
totaled approximately $10.9 million, $10.4 million,
and $6.6 million for the fiscal years ended
September 30, 2008, 2009, and 2010, respectively.
During fiscal 2009, we closed certain owned retail locations in
an effort to better match our fixed costs with the decline in
retail business caused by the soft economic conditions.
Accordingly, we entered into plans to market and sell certain
locations we have exited. We assessed our plans to sell certain
locations with the criteria identified in FASB Accounting
Standards Codification 360, Property, Plant, and
Equipment (ASC 360), previously referred to as
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 144,
Accounting for Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived
Assets, and determined the locations should be classified
as available for sale. As of September 30, 2009 and 2010,
we have reclassified $4.8 million and $2.5 million,
respectively, from property and equipment to prepaid expenses
and other current assets within the consolidated balance sheets.
F-14
MARINEMAX,
INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
6.
|
OTHER
LONG-TERM ASSETS:
|
During February 2006, we became party to a joint venture with
Brunswick that acquired certain real estate and assets of Great
American Marina for an aggregate purchase price of approximately
$11.0 million, of which we contributed approximately
$4.0 million and Brunswick contributed approximately
$7.0 million. The terms of the agreement specify that we
operate and maintain the service business and that Brunswick
operate and maintain the marina business. Simultaneously with
the closing, the acquired entity became Gulfport Marina, LLC
(Gulfport). We account for our investment in
Gulfport in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board
Accounting Standards Codification 323,
Investment Equity Method and Joint
Venture (ASC 323), previously referred to as
Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 18, The
Equity Method of Accounting for Investments in Common
Stock. Accordingly, we adjust the carrying amount of our
investment in Gulfport to recognize our share of earnings or
losses, based on the service business we operate.
During the three months ended June 30, 2008, we experienced
a significant decline in market valuation driven primarily by
weakness in the marine retail industry and an overall soft
economy, which adversely affected our financial performance. As
a result of this weakness, we realized a goodwill and intangible
asset impairment charge. Based on these events, we reviewed the
valuation of our investment in Gulfport in accordance with
ASC 323 and recoverability of the assets contained within
the joint venture. ASC 323 requires the recognition of a
loss in value of an investment, which is other than a temporary
decline. We reviewed our investment and assets contained within
the Gulfport joint venture, which consists of land, buildings,
equipment, and goodwill. As a result, we determined that our
investment in the joint venture was impaired and recorded a
non-cash charge of $1.0 million based on our assessment. We
were not required to make any current or future cash
expenditures as a result of this impairment charge.
|
|
7.
|
DERIVATIVE
INSTRUMENTS AND HEDGING ACTIVITY:
|
During fiscal 2008, we entered into six interest rate swap
agreements with a total notional amount of approximately
$23.2 million, which were designated as cash flow hedges
that effectively converted a portion of the floating rate debt
to fixed rates ranging from 4.36% to 4.87%. During fiscal 2008,
we prepaid the outstanding balances of our long-term debt. With
this prepayment, the swaps were terminated and the pretax fair
market value of the swaps of approximately $550,000 was
reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income and
recognized as income in the statements of operations.
During fiscal 2009 and 2010, we have not entered into any
interest rate swaps or currency hedging activity.
|
|
8.
|
SHORT-TERM
BORROWINGS:
|
In June 2010, we entered into an Inventory Financing Agreement
(the Credit Facility) with GE Commercial
Distribution Finance Company (GECDF). The Credit
Facility provides a floor plan financing commitment of
$100 million and allows us to request a $50 million
increase to this commitment under an accordion feature, subject
to GECDF approval. The Credit Facility matures in June 2013 and
is subject to extension for two one-year periods, subject to
GECDF approval.
The Credit Facility has certain financial covenants as specified
in the agreement. The covenants include provisions that our
leverage ratio not exceed 2.75 to 1.0 and that our current ratio
must be greater than 1.2 to 1.0. At September 30, 2010, we
were in compliance with all the covenants under the Credit
Facility. The interest rate for amounts outstanding under the
Credit Facility is 378 basis points above the one-month
London Inter-Bank Offering Rate. There is an unused line fee of
ten basis points on the unused portion of the Credit Facility.
Advances under the Credit Facility will be initiated by the
acquisition of eligible new and used inventory or will be
re-advances against eligible new and used inventory that have
been partially paid-off. Advances on new inventory will mature
1,081 days from the original invoice date. Advances on used
inventory will mature 361 days from the date we acquire the
used inventory. Each advance is subject to a curtailment
schedule, which requires that
F-15
MARINEMAX,
INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
we pay down the balance of each advance on a periodic basis
starting after six months. The curtailment schedule varies based
on the type and value of the inventory. The collateral for the
Credit Facility is all of our personal property with certain
limited exceptions. None of our real estate has been pledged for
collateral for the Credit Facility.
The Credit Facility replaces our prior $180 million credit
facility that provided for a line of credit with asset-based
borrowing availability. The prior credit facility had certain
financial covenants as specified in the agreement. The interest
rate for amounts outstanding under the prior credit facility was
490 basis points above the one-month LIBOR. During the
quarter ended June 30, 2010, we accelerated the
amortization of the prior credit facility loan costs of
approximately $1.0 million.
As of September 30, 2009 and 2010, our indebtedness
associated with financing our inventory and working capital
needs totaled approximately $142.0 million and
$93.8 million, respectively and were in compliance with all
of the credit facility covenants. At September 30, 2009 and
2010, the interest rate on the outstanding short-term borrowings
was 5.2% and 4.0%. At September 30, 2010, our additional
available borrowings under our Credit Facility were
approximately $4.2 million.
As is common in our industry, we receive interest assistance
directly from boat manufacturers, including Brunswick. The
interest assistance programs vary by manufacturer but generally
include periods of free financing or reduced interest rate
programs. The interest assistance may be paid directly to us or
our lender depending on the arrangements the manufacturer has
established. We classify interest assistance received from
manufacturers as a reduction of inventory cost and related cost
of sales as opposed to netting the assistance against our
interest expense incurred with our lender.
The availability and costs of borrowed funds can adversely
affect our ability to obtain adequate boat inventory and the
holding costs of that inventory as well as the ability and
willingness of our customers to finance boat purchases. As of
September 30, 2010, we had no long-term debt. However, we
rely on our Credit Facility to purchase our inventory of boats.
The aging of our inventory limits our borrowing capacity as
defined curtailments reduce the allowable advance rate as our
inventory ages. Our access to funds under our Credit Facility
also depends upon the ability of GECDF to meet its funding
commitments, particularly if it experiences shortages of capital
or experiences excessive volumes of borrowing requests from
others during a short period of time. A continuation of
depressed economic conditions, weak consumer spending, turmoil
in the credit markets, and lender difficulties could interfere
with our ability to utilize our Credit Facility to fund our
operations. Any inability to utilize our Credit Facility could
require us to seek other sources of funding to repay amounts
outstanding under the credit agreement or replace or supplement
our credit agreement, which may not be possible at all or under
commercially reasonable terms.
Similarly, decreases in the availability of credit and increases
in the cost of credit adversely affect the ability of our
customers to purchase boats from us and thereby adversely affect
our ability to sell our products and impact the profitability of
our finance and insurance activities. Tight credit conditions,
during fiscal 2009 and continuing in fiscal 2010, adversely
affected the ability of customers to finance boat purchases,
which had a negative affect on our operating results.
F-16
MARINEMAX,
INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The components of our provision for income taxes consisted of
the following for the fiscal years ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
(Amounts in thousands)
|
|
|
Current provision (benefit):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal
|
|
$
|
(12,776
|
)
|
|
$
|
(10,004
|
)
|
|
$
|
(19,244
|
)
|
State
|
|
|
(82
|
)
|
|
|
(139
|
)
|
|
|
(344
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current provision (benefit)
|
|
|
(12,858
|
)
|
|
|
(10,143
|
)
|
|
|
(19,588
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred provision (benefit):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal
|
|
|
(5,726
|
)
|
|
|
1,380
|
|
|
|
|
|
State
|
|
|
(577
|
)
|
|
|
133
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred provision (benefit)
|
|
|
(6,303
|
)
|
|
|
1,513
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total income tax provision (benefit)
|
|
$
|
(19,161
|
)
|
|
$
|
(8,630
|
)
|
|
$
|
(19,588
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Below is a reconciliation of the statutory federal income tax
rate to our effective tax rate for the fiscal years ended
September 30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
2009
|
|
2010
|
|
Federal tax provision
|
|
|
(35.0
|
)%
|
|
|
(35.0
|
)%
|
|
|
(35.0
|
)%
|
State taxes, net of federal effect
|
|
|
(4.4
|
)%
|
|
|
(4.0
|
)%
|
|
|
(8.8
|
)%
|
Stock based compensation
|
|
|
0.3
|
%
|
|
|
0.4
|
%
|
|
|
0.5
|
%
|
Valuation allowance
|
|
|
25.5
|
%
|
|
|
29.5
|
%
|
|
|
(71.0
|
)%
|
Other
|
|
|
1.1
|
%
|
|
|
(1.0
|
)%
|
|
|
(0.3
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effective tax rate
|
|
|
(12.5
|
)%
|
|
|
(10.1
|
)%
|
|
|
(114.6
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income taxes reflect the impact of temporary
differences between the amount of assets and liabilities
recognized for financial reporting purposes and such amounts
recognized for income tax purposes. The tax effects of these
temporary differences representing the components of deferred
tax assets (liabilities) at September 30 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
(Amounts in thousands)
|
|
|
Current deferred tax assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventories
|
|
$
|
5,169
|
|
|
$
|
2,690
|
|
Accrued expenses
|
|
|
4,093
|
|
|
|
3,496
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current deferred tax assets
|
|
|
9,262
|
|
|
|
6,186
|
|
Valuation Allowance
|
|
|
(9,262
|
)
|
|
|
(6,186
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net current deferred tax assets
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term deferred tax assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
$
|
21,393
|
|
|
$
|
19,142
|
|
Stock based compensation
|
|
|
6,010
|
|
|
|
4,712
|
|
FIN 48 deferred tax asset
|
|
|
588
|
|
|
|
547
|
|
Tax loss carryforwards
|
|
|
23,495
|
|
|
|
17,139
|
|
Other
|
|
|
111
|
|
|
|
106
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term deferred tax assets
|
|
|
51,597
|
|
|
|
41,646
|
|
Valuation allowance
|
|
|
(51,597
|
)
|
|
|
(41,646
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net long-term deferred tax assets
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-17
MARINEMAX,
INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Pursuant to ASC 740, we must consider all positive and
negative evidence regarding the realization of deferred tax
assets, including past operating results and future sources of
taxable income. Under the provisions of ASC 740, we
determined that the entire net deferred tax asset
(DTA) needed to be reserved given recent earnings
and industry trends. The total valuation allowance at
September 30, 2009 and 2010 was $60.9 million and
$47.8 million, respectively. The change in valuation
allowance primarily consisted of the reversal of the DTA for the
2009 federal Net Operating Loss (NOL), due to the
change in law allowing for a
5-year
carryback, offset by the additional DTA for this years NOL
carryforward. The reduction in the valuation allowance related
to the 2009 federal NOL DTA and the addition to the valuation
allowance due to the current year federal NOL DTA was
$19.1 million and $9.9 million respectively. The tax
loss carryfowards consists of $7.2 million of state NOLs,
which expire at various intervals, and a $9.9 million
federal NOL generated this fiscal year which will expire in
twenty-years.
We have adopted the provisions of FIN 48, now under
ASC 740. Under ASC 740, the impact of an uncertain tax
position taken or expected to be taken on an income tax return
must be recognized in the financial statements at the largest
amount that is more-likely-than-not to be sustained upon audit
by the relevant taxing authority. An uncertain income tax
position will not be recognized in the financial statements
unless it is more likely than not of being sustained. As of
September 30, 2009 and 2010, we had approximately
$1.9 million and $1.7 million, respectively, of gross
unrecognized tax benefits, of which approximately
$1.3 million and $1.2 million, respectively, if
recognized, would impact the effective tax rate before
considering a change in valuation allowance.
The reconciliation of the total amount recorded for unrecognized
tax benefits at the beginning and end of the fiscal years ended
September 30, 2009 and 2010 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
(Amounts in thousands)
|
|
|
Unrecognized tax benefits at the beginning of the year
|
|
$
|
2,064
|
|
|
$
|
1,894
|
|
Increases in tax positions for prior years
|
|
|
69
|
|
|
|
60
|
|
Decreases in tax positions for prior years
|
|
|
(62
|
)
|
|
|
(57
|
)
|
Lapse of statute of limitations
|
|
|
(177
|
)
|
|
|
(159
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrecognized tax benefits at September 30,
|
|
$
|
1,894
|
|
|
$
|
1,738
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consistent with our prior practices, we recognize interest and
penalties related to uncertain tax positions as a component of
income tax expense. As of September 30, 2010, interest and
penalties represented approximately $663,000 of the gross
unrecognized tax benefits. There have been no significant
changes to the balance of interest and penalties subsequent to
adoption.
We are subject to tax by both federal and state taxing
authorities. Until the respective statutes of limitations
expire, we are subject to income tax audits in the jurisdictions
in which we operate. We are no longer subject to
U.S. federal tax examinations for fiscal years prior to
2008, and we are not subject to audits prior to the 2007 fiscal
year for the majority of the state jurisdictions.
It is reasonably possible that a change to the total amount of
unrecognized tax benefits could occur in the next 12 months
based on examinations by tax authorities, the expiration of
statutes of limitations, or potential settlements of outstanding
positions. It is not possible to estimate a range of the
possible changes at this time. However, we do not expect the
change to be significant to the overall balance of unrecognized
tax benefits.
|
|
10.
|
STOCKHOLDERS
EQUITY:
|
In November 2005, our Board of Directors approved a share
repurchase plan allowing our company to repurchase up to
1,000,000 shares of our common stock. Under the plan, we
may buy back common stock from time to time in the open market
or in privately negotiated blocks, dependent upon various
factors, including price and availability of the shares, and
general market conditions. Through September 30, 2010, we
had purchased an
F-18
MARINEMAX,
INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
aggregate of 790,900 shares of common stock under the plan
for an aggregate purchase price of approximately
$15.8 million.
In September 2009, we completed a public offering of
2,990,000 shares of common stock at a price to the public
of $7.00 per share for total gross proceeds of approximately
$20.9 million. The net proceeds of the offering were used
to reduce our short-term borrowings and general corporate
purposes.
|
|
11.
|
STOCK-BASED
COMPENSATION:
|
In accordance with ASC 718, we use the Black-Scholes
valuation model for valuing all stock-based compensation and
shares granted under the Employee Stock Purchase Plan. We
measure compensation for restricted stock awards and restricted
stock units at fair value on the grant date based on the number
of shares expected to vest and the quoted market price of our
common stock. We recognize compensation cost for all awards in
earnings, net of estimated forfeitures, on a straight-line basis
over the requisite service period for each separately vesting
portion of the award.
Cash received from option exercises under all share-based
compensation arrangements for the fiscal years ended
September 30, 2008, 2009, and 2010 was approximately
$2.2 million, $766,000, and $1.2 million,
respectively. Tax benefits realized for tax deductions from
option exercises for the fiscal years ended September 30,
2008 and 2010 was approximately $223,000 and $19,000,
respectively. There were no tax benefits realized for tax
deductions from option exercises for the fiscal year ended
September 30, 2009. We currently expect to satisfy
share-based awards with registered shares available to be issued.
|
|
12.
|
THE
INCENTIVE STOCK PLANS:
|
During February 2007, our stockholders approved a proposal to
approve our 2007 Incentive Compensation Plan (2007
Plan), which replaced our 1998 Incentive Stock Plan
(1998 Plan). Our 2007 Plan provides for the grant of
stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock,
stock units, bonus stock, dividend equivalents, other stock
related awards, and performance awards (collectively,
awards), that may be settled in cash, stock, or
other property. Our 2007 Plan is designed to attract, motivate,
retain, and reward our executives, employees, officers,
directors, and independent contractors by providing such persons
with annual and long-term performance incentives to expend their
maximum efforts in the creation of stockholder value. The total
number of shares of our common stock that may be subject to
awards under the 2007 Plan is equal to 1,000,000 shares,
plus (i) any shares available for issuance and not subject
to an award under the 1998 Plan, (ii) the number of shares
with respect to which awards granted under the 2007 Plan and the
1998 Plan terminate without the issuance of the shares or when
the shares are forfeited or repurchased; (iii) with respect
to awards granted under the 2007 Plan and the 1998 Plan, the
number of shares that are not issued as a result of the award
being settled for cash or otherwise not issued in connection
with the exercise or payment of the award; and (iv) the
number of shares that are surrendered or withheld in payment of
the exercise price of any award or any tax withholding
requirements in connection with any award granted under the 2007
Plan and the 1998 Plan. The 2007 Plan terminates in February
2017, and awards may be granted at any time during the life of
the 2007 Plan. The date on which awards vest are determined by
the Board of Directors or the Plan Administrator. The exercise
prices of options are determined by the Board of Directors or
the Plan Administrator and are at least equal to the fair market
value of shares of common stock on the date of grant. The term
of options under the 2007 Plan may not exceed ten years. The
options granted have varying vesting periods. To date, we have
not settled or been under any obligation to settle any awards in
cash.
F-19
MARINEMAX,
INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The following table summarizes option activity from
September 30, 2009 through September 30, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Remaining
|
|
|
|
Available
|
|
|
Options
|
|
|
Intrinsic
|
|
|
Exercise
|
|
|
Contractual
|
|
|
|
for Grant
|
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Price
|
|
|
Life
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at September 30, 2009
|
|
|
1,007,875
|
|
|
|
1,995,194
|
|
|
$
|
5,173
|
|
|
$
|
10.37
|
|
|
|
7.0
|
|
Options granted
|
|
|
(432,300
|
)
|
|
|
432,300
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
7.93
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options cancelled/forfeited/expired
|
|
|
139,779
|
|
|
|
(139,779
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
11.36
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted stock awards issued
|
|
|
(119,100
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted stock awards forfeited
|
|
|
17,835
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options exercised
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(185,834
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
4.97
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at September 30, 2010
|
|
|
614,089
|
|
|
|
2,101,881
|
|
|
$
|
3,713
|
|
|
$
|
10.27
|
|
|
|
6.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable at September 30, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,193,322
|
|
|
$
|
1,770
|
|
|
$
|
12.34
|
|
|
|
5.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The weighted-average grant date fair value of options granted
during the fiscal years ended September 30, 2008, 2009, and
2010 was $6.12, $1.75, and $5.41, respectively. The total
intrinsic value of options exercised during the fiscal years
ended September 30, 2008, 2009, and 2010 was approximately
$541,000, $54,000, and $969,000, respectively.
As of September 30, 2009 and 2010, there was approximately
$1.2 million and $1.1 million, respectively, of
unrecognized compensation costs related to non-vested options
that are expected to be recognized over a weighted average
period of 2.1 years and 2.1 years, respectively. The
total fair value of options vested during the fiscal years ended
September 30, 2008, 2009, and 2010 was approximately
$2.1 million, $1.2 million, and $2.4 million,
respectively.
We continued using the Black-Scholes model to estimate the fair
value of options granted during fiscal 2010. The expected term
of options granted is derived from the output of the option
pricing model and represents the period of time that options
granted are expected to be outstanding. Volatility is based on
the historical volatility of our common stock. The risk-free
rate for periods within the contractual term of the options is
based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the
time of grant.
The following are the weighted-average assumptions used for the
fiscal years ended September 30:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
2009
|
|
2010
|
|
Dividend yield
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
Risk-free interest rate
|
|
|
3.4
|
%
|
|
|
2.2
|
%
|
|
|
2.3
|
%
|
Volatility
|
|
|
44.2
|
%
|
|
|
63.4
|
%
|
|
|
85.8
|
%
|
Expected life
|
|
|
7.5 years
|
|
|
|
6.0 years
|
|
|
|
5.0 years
|
|
|
|
13.
|
EMPLOYEE
STOCK PURCHASE PLAN:
|
During February 2008, our stockholders approved our 2008
Employee Stock Purchase Plan (Stock Purchase Plan).
The Stock Purchase Plan provides for up to 500,000 shares
of common stock to be available for purchase by our regular
employees who have completed at least one year of continuous
service. In addition there were 52,837 shares of common
stock available under our 1998 Employee Stock Purchase Plan
which have been made available for issuance under our Stock
Purchase Plan. The Stock Purchase Plan provides for
implementation of up to 10 annual offerings beginning on the
first day of October starting in 2008, with each offering
terminating on September 30 of the following year. Each annual
offering may be divided into two six-month offerings. For each
offering, the purchase price per share will be the lower of
(i) 85% of the closing price of the common stock on the
first day of the offering or (ii) 85% of the closing price
of the common stock on the last day of the offering. The
F-20
MARINEMAX,
INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
purchase price is paid through periodic payroll deductions not
to exceed 10% of the participants earnings during each
offering period. However, no participant may purchase more than
$25,000 worth of common stock annually.
We continued using the Black-Scholes model to estimate the fair
value of options granted to purchase shares issued pursuant to
the Stock Purchase Plan. The expected term of options granted is
derived from the output of the option pricing model and
represents the period of time that options granted are expected
to be outstanding. Volatility is based on the historical
volatility of our common stock. The risk-free rate for periods
within the contractual term of the options is based on the
U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant.
The following are the weighted-average assumptions used for the
fiscal years ended September 30:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
2009
|
|
2010
|
|
Dividend yield
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
Risk-free interest rate
|
|
|
2.3
|
%
|
|
|
0.5
|
%
|
|
|
0.2
|
%
|
Volatility
|
|
|
75.6
|
%
|
|
|
160.4
|
%
|
|
|
65.4
|
%
|
Expected life
|
|
|
six months
|
|
|
|
six months
|
|
|
|
six months
|
|
As of September 30, 2010, we had issued 348,319 shares
of common stock under our Stock Purchase Plan.
|
|
14.
|
RESTRICTED
STOCK AWARDS:
|
During fiscal 2008, 2009, and 2010, we granted non-vested
(restricted) stock awards or restricted stock units
(collectively, restricted stock awards) to certain
key employees pursuant to the 1998 Plan or the 2007 Plan. The
restricted stock awards have varying vesting periods, but
generally become fully vested at either the end of year four or
the end of year five, depending on the specific award. Certain
awards granted in fiscal 2008 require certain levels of
performance by us after the grant before they are earned. Such
performance metrics must be achieved by September 2011, or the
awards will be forfeited. The stock underlying the vested
restricted stock units will be delivered upon vesting. Certain
awards granted in fiscal 2010 require a minimum level of
performance of our stock price compared to an index before they
are earned. Such performance metrics must be achieved by
September 2012, or the awards will be forfeited. The stock
underlying the vested restricted stock units will be delivered
upon vesting. During fiscal 2010, we reversed approximately
$3.9 million of stock compensation expense, resulting from
the performance criteria of certain awards no longer being
probable.
We accounted for the restricted stock awards granted during
fiscal 2008, 2009, and 2010 using the measurement and
recognition provisions of ASC 718. Accordingly, the fair
value of the restricted stock awards is measured on the grant
date and recognized in earnings over the requisite service
period for each separately vesting portion of the award.
The following table summarizes restricted stock award activity
from September 30, 2009 through September 30, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
Grant Date
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
Non-vested balance at September 30, 2009
|
|
|
520,070
|
|
|
$
|
22.65
|
|
Changes during the period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Awards granted
|
|
|
119,100
|
|
|
$
|
7.00
|
|
Awards vested
|
|
|
(187,166
|
)
|
|
$
|
23.48
|
|
Awards forfeited
|
|
|
(17,835
|
)
|
|
$
|
15.11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-vested balance at September 30, 2010
|
|
|
434,169
|
|
|
$
|
18.31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-21
MARINEMAX,
INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
As of September 30, 2010, we had approximately
$1.0 million of total unrecognized compensation cost
related to non-vested restricted stock awards. We expect to
recognize that cost over a weighted-average period of
1.8 years.
|
|
15.
|
NET
INCOME/LOSS PER SHARE:
|
The following is a reconciliation of the shares used in the
denominator for calculating basic and diluted net income/loss
per share for the fiscal years ended September 30:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
2009
|
|
2010
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding used in calculating
basic income (loss) per share
|
|
|
18,391,488
|
|
|
|
18,685,423
|
|
|
|
21,998,743
|
|
Effect of dilutive options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
599,210
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common and common equivalent shares used in
calculating diluted income (loss) per share
|
|
|
18,391,488
|
|
|
|
18,685,423
|
|
|
|
22,597,953
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options to purchase approximately 1,700,000, 764,000 and
979,000 shares of common stock were outstanding at
September 30, 2008, 2009, and 2010, respectively, but were
not included in the computation of income (loss) per share
because the options exercise prices were greater than the
average market price of our common stock, and therefore, their
effect would be anti-dilutive. Accordingly, there is no dilutive
effect of shares used in the denominator for calculating basic
and diluted loss per share.
|
|
16.
|
COMMITMENTS
AND CONTINGENCIES:
|
Lease
Commitments
We lease certain land, buildings, machinery, equipment, and
vehicles related to our dealerships under non-cancelable
third-party operating leases. Certain of our leases include
options for renewal periods and provisions for escalation.
Rental expenses, including
month-to-month
rentals, were approximately $13.9 million,
$9.2 million, and $6.7 million for the fiscal years
ended September 30, 2008, 2009, and 2010, respectively.
The rental payments to related parties, under both cancelable
and non-cancelable operating leases during fiscal 2008, 2009,
and 2010, represent rental payments for buildings to an entity
partially owned by a former officer of our company. We believe
the terms of the transaction are consistent with those that we
would obtain from third parties.
Future minimum lease payments under non-cancelable operating
leases at September 30, 2010, were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Amounts in thousands)
|
|
|
2011
|
|
$
|
6,469
|
|
2012
|
|
|
5,141
|
|
2013
|
|
|
3,755
|
|
2014
|
|
|
2,582
|
|
2015
|
|
|
2,402
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
3,727
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
24,076
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
Commitments and Contingencies
We are party to various legal actions arising in the ordinary
course of business. The ultimate liability, if any, associated
with these matters was not believed to be material at
September 30, 2010. While it is not feasible to
F-22
MARINEMAX,
INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
determine the actual outcome of these actions as of
September 30, 2010, we do not believe that these matters
will have a material adverse effect on our consolidated
financial condition, results of operations, or cash flows.
During fiscal 2008, 2009, and 2010, we incurred costs associated
with store closings of approximately $3.0 million,
$6.2 million, and $1.2 million, respectively. These
costs primarily related to the future minimum operating lease
payments of the closed locations. The store closings were a key
component in our effort to better match our fixed costs with the
decline in retail business caused by the soft economic
conditions. The store closing costs have been included in
selling, general, and administrative expenses in the
consolidated statements of operations during fiscal 2008, 2009,
and 2010.
In connection with our workers compensation insurance policies,
the Company maintains a letter of credit in the amount of
$2.5 million with our policy holder. The letter of credit
is collateralized by a certificate of deposit held by the bank
that issued the letter of credit. The certificate of deposit is
classified as cash and cash equivalents in the accompanying
consolidated balance sheets as of September 30, 2010.
We are subject to federal and state environmental regulations,
including rules relating to air and water pollution and the
storage and disposal of gasoline, oil, other chemicals and
waste. We believe that we are in compliance with such
regulations.
|
|
17.
|
EMPLOYEE
401(k) PROFIT SHARING PLANS:
|
Employees are eligible to participate in our 401(k) Profit
Sharing Plan (the Plan) following their
90-day
introductory period starting either April 1 or October 1,
provided that they are 21 years of age. Under the Plan, we
match 25% of participants contributions, up to a maximum
of 5% of each participants compensation. We contributed,
under the Plan, or pursuant to previous similar plans,
approximately $1.5 million, $167,000, and $150,000 for the
fiscal years ended September 30, 2008, 2009, and 2010,
respectively.
|
|
18.
|
PREFERRED
SHARE PURCHASE RIGHTS:
|
During September 2001, we adopted a Stockholders Rights
Plan (the Rights Plan) that may have the effect of
deterring, delaying, or preventing a change in control that
might otherwise be in the best interests of our stockholders.
Under the Rights Plan, a dividend of one Preferred Share
Purchase Right was issued for each share of common stock held by
the stockholders of record as of the close of business on
September 7, 2001. Each right entitles stockholders to
purchase, at an exercise price of $50 per share, one-thousandth
of a share of a newly created Series A Junior Participating
Preferred Stock.
In general, subject to certain limited exceptions, the stock
purchase rights become exercisable when a person or group
acquires 15% or more of our common stock or a tender offer or
exchange offer for 15% or more of our common stock is announced
or commenced. After any such event, other stockholders may
purchase additional shares of our common stock at 50% of the
then-current market price. The rights will cause substantial
dilution to a person or group that attempts to acquire us on
terms not approved by our Board of Directors. The rights should
not interfere with any merger or other business combination
approved by the Board of Directors. The rights may be redeemed
by us at $0.01 per stock purchase right at any time before any
person or group acquires 15% or more of the outstanding common
stock. The rights expire on August 28, 2011.
The Rights Plan adoption and Rights Distribution is a
non-taxable event with no impact on our financial results.
On October 7, 2010, we entered into an Inventory Financing
Agreement (the CGI Facility) with CGI Finance, Inc.
The CGI Facility provides a floor plan financing commitment of
$30 million and is designed to provide financing for our
Azimut inventory needs. The CGI Facility has a one-year term,
which is typical in the
F-23
MARINEMAX,
INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
industry for similar floor plan facilities; however, each
advance under the CGI Facility can remain outstanding for
18 months. The interest rate for amounts outstanding under
the CGI Facility is 350 basis points above the one month
London Inter-Bank Offering Rate.
Advances under the CGI Facility will be initiated by the
acquisition of eligible new and used inventory or will be
re-advances against eligible new and used inventory that has
been partially paid-off. Advances on new inventory will mature
550 days from the original invoice date. Advances on used
inventory will mature 366 days from the date we acquire the
used inventory. Each advance is subject to a curtailment
schedule, which requires that we pay down the balance of each
advance on a periodic basis starting after six months for used
inventory and one year for new inventory. The curtailment
schedule varies based on the type of inventory.
The collateral for the CGI Facility is our entire Azimut
inventory financed by the CGI Facility with certain limited
exceptions. None of our real estate has been pledged for
collateral for the CGI Facility. We must maintain compliance
with various covenants, including balance sheet related
covenants of current and leverage ratios, as defined in the CGI
Facility. The CGI Facility contemplates that other lenders may
be added by us to finance other inventory not financed under the
CGI Facility, if needed.
|
|
20.
|
QUARTERLY
FINANCIAL DATA (UNAUDITED):
|
The following table sets forth certain unaudited quarterly
financial data for each of our last eight quarters. The
information has been derived from unaudited financial statements
that we believe reflect all adjustments, consisting only of
normal recurring adjustments, necessary for the fair
presentation of such quarterly financial information.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
(Amounts in thousands except share and per share data)
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
$
|
100,224
|
|
|
$
|
129,608
|
|
|
$
|
151,514
|
|
|
$
|
207,239
|
|
|
$
|
100,449
|
|
|
$
|
110,116
|
|
|
$
|
115,383
|
|
|
$
|
124,392
|
|
Cost of sales
|
|
|
76,521
|
|
|
|
109,894
|
|
|
|
118,898
|
|
|
|
194,612
|
|
|
|
78,478
|
|
|
|
85,910
|
|
|
|
80,829
|
|
|
|
94,316
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
23,703
|
|
|
|
19,714
|
|
|
|
32,616
|
|
|
|
12,627
|
|
|
|
21,971
|
|
|
|
24,206
|
|
|
|
34,554
|
|
|
|
30,076
|
|
Selling, general, and administrative expenses
|
|
|
38,862
|
|
|
|
36,360
|
|
|
|
38,975
|
|
|
|
45,801
|
|
|
|
29,629
|
|
|
|
29,631
|
|
|
|
33,340
|
|
|
|
31,372
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from operations
|
|
|
(15,159
|
)
|
|
|
(16,646
|
)
|
|
|
(6,359
|
)
|
|
|
(33,174
|
)
|
|
|
(7,658
|
)
|
|
|
(5,425
|
)
|
|
|
1,214
|
|
|
|
(1,296
|
)
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
4,062
|
|
|
|
3,774
|
|
|
|
3,380
|
|
|
|
2,848
|
|
|
|
1,462
|
|
|
|
1,059
|
|
|
|
702
|
|
|
|
703
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income tax benefit
|
|
|
(19,221
|
)
|
|
|
(20,420
|
)
|
|
|
(9,739
|
)
|
|
|
(36,022
|
)
|
|
|
(9,120
|
)
|
|
|
(6,484
|
)
|
|
|
512
|
|
|
|
(1,999
|
)
|
Income tax benefit
|
|
|
(4,881
|
)
|
|
|
(151
|
)
|
|
|
(559
|
)
|
|
|
(3,039
|
)
|
|
|
(19,273
|
)
|
|
|
(146
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(169
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
(14,340
|
)
|
|
$
|
(20,269
|
)
|
|
$
|
(9,180
|
)
|
|
$
|
(32,983
|
)
|
|
$
|
10,153
|
|
|
$
|
(6,338
|
)
|
|
$
|
512
|
|
|
$
|
(1,830
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
(0.78
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1.09
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.49
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1.72
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.45
|
|
|
$
|
(0.29
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.02
|
|
|
$
|
(0.08
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
number of shares:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
18,500,794
|
|
|
|
18,512,104
|
|
|
|
18,575,332
|
|
|
|
19,148,498
|
|
|
|
22,344,687
|
|
|
|
21,982,631
|
|
|
|
22,793,218
|
|
|
|
22,139,158
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-24